Re: [OSM-talk] Name challenge - what to call the new OSM+Wikidata service?

[Florian Schäfer]

Hi,
my suggestion would be WOQ (pronounced like "Wok"), which would be short
for "Wikidata-OSM-Queryservice". Or WOQs, if you don't want to only use
one letter for "query" and "service".
The soundalike word "Wok" could also in my opinion be a good metaphor,
you can put Wikidata and OSM data "into a Wok" and "cook" something new
out of it. Maybe the logo could then be a Wok containing map elements
like highways, rivers, forests and so on and also something representing
Wikidata (like the colourful barcode).

Cheers,
Florian

Am 16.09.2017 um 23:11 schrieb Yuri Astrakhan:
> The new service is getting more and more usage, but it lacks the most
> important thing - a good name.  So far my two choices are:
>
> * wikosm
> * wikidosm
>
> Suggestions?  Votes?  The service combines Wikidata and OpenStreetMap
> databases, and uses SPARQL (query language) to search it, so might be
> good to reflect that in the name.
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wikidata%2BOSM_SPARQL_query_service
>
> P.S.  I know this is the hardest problem after off-by-one and caching...



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Name challenge - what to call the new OSM+Wikidata service?

[Blake Girardot]

Hi,

How does this relate to the new draft trademark policy?

I can't tell from the draft policy, but I believe that OSM at least is
a protected mark, not sure about osm.

But I do think Simone Poole asked the community to stop naming things
with osm trademarks in them or variations on openstreetmap phrase.

Cheers
blake

On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 5:11 PM, Yuri Astrakhan  wrote:
> The new service is getting more and more usage, but it lacks the most
> important thing - a good name.  So far my two choices are:
>
> * wikosm
> * wikidosm
>
> Suggestions?  Votes?  The service combines Wikidata and OpenStreetMap
> databases, and uses SPARQL (query language) to search it, so might be good
> to reflect that in the name.
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wikidata%2BOSM_SPARQL_query_service
>
> P.S.  I know this is the hardest problem after off-by-one and caching...
>
> ___
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>



-- 

Blake Girardot
OSM Wiki - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Bgirardot
HOTOSM Member - https://hotosm.org/users/blake_girardot
skype: jblakegirardot
Live OSM Mapper-Support channel - https://hotosm-slack.herokuapp.com/

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Name challenge - what to call the new OSM+Wikidata service?

[Yves]

So, no OpenSparqlMap, then? :(
Sad, this policy definitely broke something. 
Yves 

Le 17 septembre 2017 12:58:12 GMT+02:00, Blake Girardot  a 
écrit :
>Hi,
>
>How does this relate to the new draft trademark policy?
>
>I can't tell from the draft policy, but I believe that OSM at least is
>a protected mark, not sure about osm.
>
>But I do think Simone Poole asked the community to stop naming things
>with osm trademarks in them or variations on openstreetmap phrase.
>
>Cheers
>blake
>
>On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 5:11 PM, Yuri Astrakhan
> wrote:
>> The new service is getting more and more usage, but it lacks the most
>> important thing - a good name.  So far my two choices are:
>>
>> * wikosm
>> * wikidosm
>>
>> Suggestions?  Votes?  The service combines Wikidata and OpenStreetMap
>> databases, and uses SPARQL (query language) to search it, so might be
>good
>> to reflect that in the name.
>>
>>
>https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wikidata%2BOSM_SPARQL_query_service
>>
>> P.S.  I know this is the hardest problem after off-by-one and
>caching...
>>
>> ___
>> talk mailing list
>> talk@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>>
>
>
>
>-- 
>
>Blake Girardot
>OSM Wiki - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Bgirardot
>HOTOSM Member - https://hotosm.org/users/blake_girardot
>skype: jblakegirardot
>Live OSM Mapper-Support channel - https://hotosm-slack.herokuapp.com/
>
>___
>talk mailing list
>talk@openstreetmap.org
>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Name challenge - what to call the new OSM+Wikidata service?

[Bryan Housel]

I’d call it Q936  :)
Bryan



2017-09-16 23:11 GMT+02:00 Yuri Astrakhan mailto:yuriastrak...@gmail.com>>:
The new service is getting more and more usage, but it lacks the most important 
thing - a good name.  So far my two choices are:

* wikosm
* wikidosm

Suggestions?  Votes?  The service combines Wikidata and OpenStreetMap 
databases, and uses SPARQL (query language) to search it, so might be good to 
reflect that in the name.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wikidata%2BOSM_SPARQL_query_service 


P.S.  I know this is the hardest problem after off-by-one and caching...

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org 
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk 



___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Name challenge - what to call the new OSM+Wikidata service?

[Blake Girardot HOT/OSM]

On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Yves  wrote:
> So, no OpenSparqlMap, then? :(
> Sad, this policy definitely broke something.
> Yves
>

I agree 100%

Respectfully,
blake


> Le 17 septembre 2017 12:58:12 GMT+02:00, Blake Girardot
>  a écrit :
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> How does this relate to the new draft trademark policy?
>>
>> I can't tell from the draft policy, but I believe that OSM at least is
>> a protected mark, not sure about osm.
>>
>> But I do think Simone Poole asked the community to stop naming things
>> with osm trademarks in them or variations on openstreetmap phrase.
>>
>> Cheers
>> blake
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 5:11 PM, Yuri Astrakhan 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>  The new service is getting more and more usage, but it lacks the most
>>>  important thing - a good name.  So far my two choices are:
>>>
>>>  * wikosm
>>>  * wikidosm
>>>
>>>  Suggestions?  Votes?  The service combines Wikidata and OpenStreetMap
>>>  databases, and uses SPARQL (query language) to search it, so might be
>>> good
>>>  to reflect that in the name.
>>>
>>>  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wikidata%2BOSM_SPARQL_query_service
>>>
>>>  P.S.  I know this is the hardest problem after off-by-one and caching...
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>  talk mailing list
>>>  talk@openstreetmap.org
>>>  https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> ___
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>



-- 

Blake Girardot
Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

[OSM-talk] Transferring OSMTracker for Android development to the OpenStreetMap organization

[Nicolas Guillaumin]

Hi,

I'm the author of the OSMTracker for Android application:
https://github.com/nguillaumin/osmtracker-android
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=me.guillaumin.android.osmtracker

As people have probably noticed, development has more or less halted 
since a few years because I lack the time and motivation to continue 
working on the app. A factor has been that I moved to places where the 
OSM map is complete, so I'm not even using the app. myself anymore :)


Pull requests and bug reports are regularly coming though, so I'd like 
to transfer the code to the OpenStreetMap GitHub organization so that 
someone can take over and continue maintaining & improving it. Ideally:

- Transfer the GitHub project to the OSM organization
- Transfer the Transifex project too, for translations
- Remove the app. from the Google Play Store under my name, so that it 
can be re-published by OpenStreetMap / the new maintainer(s)


I'm not sure this mailing list is the best place to discuss this, but 
there are so many communication channels these days that I wasn't sure 
where to post. Let me know if there's a better place, and if anyone is 
interested to take over?


Thanks,

Nico


___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] talk Digest, Vol 157, Issue 18

[Kathleen Lu]

>From a trademark perspective, osm is the same as OSM.
But I really like WOQ(s), it's clever and easy to say.
- Kathleen

On Sun, Sep 17, 2017, 5:13 AM  wrote:

> Send talk mailing list submissions to
> talk@openstreetmap.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> talk-requ...@openstreetmap.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> talk-ow...@openstreetmap.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of talk digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>1. Re: Name challenge - what to call the new OSM+Wikidata
>   service? (Florian Schäfer)
>2. Re: Name challenge - what to call the new OSM+Wikidata
>   service? (Blake Girardot)
>
>
> --
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2017 11:45:35 +0200
> From: Florian Schäfer 
> To: talk@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Name challenge - what to call the new
> OSM+Wikidata service?
> Message-ID: 
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi,
> my suggestion would be WOQ (pronounced like "Wok"), which would be short
> for "Wikidata-OSM-Queryservice". Or WOQs, if you don't want to only use
> one letter for "query" and "service".
> The soundalike word "Wok" could also in my opinion be a good metaphor,
> you can put Wikidata and OSM data "into a Wok" and "cook" something new
> out of it. Maybe the logo could then be a Wok containing map elements
> like highways, rivers, forests and so on and also something representing
> Wikidata (like the colourful barcode).
>
> Cheers,
> Florian
>
> Am 16.09.2017 um 23:11 schrieb Yuri Astrakhan:
> > The new service is getting more and more usage, but it lacks the most
> > important thing - a good name.  So far my two choices are:
> >
> > * wikosm
> > * wikidosm
> >
> > Suggestions?  Votes?  The service combines Wikidata and OpenStreetMap
> > databases, and uses SPARQL (query language) to search it, so might be
> > good to reflect that in the name.
> >
> > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wikidata%2BOSM_SPARQL_query_service
> >
> > P.S.  I know this is the hardest problem after off-by-one and caching...
>
> -- next part --
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: signature.asc
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 898 bytes
> Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
> URL: <
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20170917/8bdb43fe/attachment-0001.sig
> >
>
> --
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2017 06:58:12 -0400
> From: Blake Girardot 
> To: Yuri Astrakhan 
> Cc: OpenStreetMap talk mailing list 
> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Name challenge - what to call the new
> OSM+Wikidataservice?
> Message-ID:
> <
> cabmb++rechxi+s0vxnjmvy71pqsxx1gaopbmzqfscu92fmc...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> Hi,
>
> How does this relate to the new draft trademark policy?
>
> I can't tell from the draft policy, but I believe that OSM at least is
> a protected mark, not sure about osm.
>
> But I do think Simone Poole asked the community to stop naming things
> with osm trademarks in them or variations on openstreetmap phrase.
>
> Cheers
> blake
>
> On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 5:11 PM, Yuri Astrakhan 
> wrote:
> > The new service is getting more and more usage, but it lacks the most
> > important thing - a good name.  So far my two choices are:
> >
> > * wikosm
> > * wikidosm
> >
> > Suggestions?  Votes?  The service combines Wikidata and OpenStreetMap
> > databases, and uses SPARQL (query language) to search it, so might be
> good
> > to reflect that in the name.
> >
> > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wikidata%2BOSM_SPARQL_query_service
> >
> > P.S.  I know this is the hardest problem after off-by-one and caching...
> >
> > ___
> > talk mailing list
> > talk@openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
> >
>
>
>
> --
> 
> Blake Girardot
> OSM Wiki - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Bgirardot
> HOTOSM Member - https://hotosm.org/users/blake_girardot
> skype: jblakegirardot
> Live OSM Mapper-Support channel - https://hotosm-slack.herokuapp.com/
>
>
>
> --
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> ___
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
> --
>
> End of talk Digest, Vol 157, Issue 18
> *
>
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Transferring OSMTracker for Android development to the OpenStreetMap organization

[Simon Poole]

Hi Nicolas

I suspect that the dev mailing list would have been better, but that
isn't the key issue, finding a) somebody to look after the project and
b) when that is done, migrating the users in a reasonable way to a new
version/release, are the bigger questions. I haven't really even started
thinking about the consequences of publishing apps as OSM /OSMF but it
is naturally not impossible.

Simon

Am 17.09.2017 um 21:32 schrieb Nicolas Guillaumin:
> Hi,
>
> I'm the author of the OSMTracker for Android application:
> https://github.com/nguillaumin/osmtracker-android
> https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=me.guillaumin.android.osmtracker
>
>
> As people have probably noticed, development has more or less halted
> since a few years because I lack the time and motivation to continue
> working on the app. A factor has been that I moved to places where the
> OSM map is complete, so I'm not even using the app. myself anymore :)
>
> Pull requests and bug reports are regularly coming though, so I'd like
> to transfer the code to the OpenStreetMap GitHub organization so that
> someone can take over and continue maintaining & improving it. Ideally:
> - Transfer the GitHub project to the OSM organization
> - Transfer the Transifex project too, for translations
> - Remove the app. from the Google Play Store under my name, so that it
> can be re-published by OpenStreetMap / the new maintainer(s)
>
> I'm not sure this mailing list is the best place to discuss this, but
> there are so many communication channels these days that I wasn't sure
> where to post. Let me know if there's a better place, and if anyone is
> interested to take over?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Nico
>
>
> ___
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Name challenge - what to call the new OSM+Wikidata service?

[Simon Poole]

I believe there is a slight misunderstanding, while remixing
OpenStreetMap/OSM/etc in various ways may result in cutesy copycat
domain names they simply do not jibe well with reality.

Not only does every single one of them weaken the standing of the marks
themselves and make is increasingly difficult to take action against
misuse, they are further uncontrollable liabilities for the whole
community. I gave the example of OpenWeatherMap, but there are others
that would be really painful if they ended up in the hands of your fav
giant tech corp.

That said, I'm not sure why you believe the policy has broken something,
with the exception of a few local chapters, to my knowledge, the OSMF
has never granted a licence to anybody to use the marks in a domain
name. As outlined in the FAQ we will be operating a grandfathering
scheme to legalize such use after the fact so actually making such use
legit for the first time.

And yes: WoQ would be a wonderful name for Yuris service and shows that
it is completely possible to break out of the old schema of simply
copying OSM.

Simon


Am 17.09.2017 um 15:57 schrieb Yves:
> So, no OpenSparqlMap, then? :(
> Sad, this policy definitely broke something.
> Yves
>
> Le 17 septembre 2017 12:58:12 GMT+02:00, Blake Girardot
>  a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> How does this relate to the new draft trademark policy?
>
> I can't tell from the draft policy, but I believe that OSM at least is
> a protected mark, not sure about osm.
>
> But I do think Simone Poole asked the community to stop naming things
> with osm trademarks in them or variations on openstreetmap phrase.
>
> Cheers
> blake
>
> On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 5:11 PM, Yuri Astrakhan  
> wrote:
>
> The new service is getting more and more usage, but it lacks
> the most important thing - a good name. So far my two choices
> are: * wikosm * wikidosm Suggestions? Votes? The service
> combines Wikidata and OpenStreetMap databases, and uses SPARQL
> (query language) to search it, so might be good to reflect
> that in the name.
> 
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wikidata%2BOSM_SPARQL_query_service
> P.S. I know this is the hardest problem after off-by-one and
> caching...
> 
> 
> talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

[OSM-talk] Trademark policy

[Yves]

Sorry for breaking the thread.
I understand the reasoning and the need for this policy, Simon, but can't help 
seeing the disappearance of such naive (somebody said infamous? ) names a bit 
sad. 
But it's time to grow up, I guess. 
Cheers, 
Yves 

Le 17 septembre 2017 23:10:40 GMT+02:00, Simon Poole  a écrit :
>I believe there is a slight misunderstanding, while remixing
>OpenStreetMap/OSM/etc in various ways may result in cutesy copycat
>domain names they simply do not jibe well with reality.
>
>Not only does every single one of them weaken the standing of the marks
>themselves and make is increasingly difficult to take action against
>misuse, they are further uncontrollable liabilities for the whole
>community. I gave the example of OpenWeatherMap, but there are others
>that would be really painful if they ended up in the hands of your fav
>giant tech corp.
>
>That said, I'm not sure why you believe the policy has broken
>something,
>with the exception of a few local chapters, to my knowledge, the OSMF
>has never granted a licence to anybody to use the marks in a domain
>name. As outlined in the FAQ we will be operating a grandfathering
>scheme to legalize such use after the fact so actually making such use
>legit for the first time.
>
>And yes: WoQ would be a wonderful name for Yuris service and shows that
>it is completely possible to break out of the old schema of simply
>copying OSM.
>
>Simon
>
>
>Am 17.09.2017 um 15:57 schrieb Yves:
>> So, no OpenSparqlMap, then? :(
>> Sad, this policy definitely broke something.
>> Yves
>>
>> Le 17 septembre 2017 12:58:12 GMT+02:00, Blake Girardot
>>  a écrit :
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> How does this relate to the new draft trademark policy?
>>
>> I can't tell from the draft policy, but I believe that OSM at
>least is
>> a protected mark, not sure about osm.
>>
>> But I do think Simone Poole asked the community to stop naming
>things
>> with osm trademarks in them or variations on openstreetmap
>phrase.
>>
>> Cheers
>> blake
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 5:11 PM, Yuri Astrakhan
> wrote:
>>
>> The new service is getting more and more usage, but it lacks
>> the most important thing - a good name. So far my two choices
>> are: * wikosm * wikidosm Suggestions? Votes? The service
>> combines Wikidata and OpenStreetMap databases, and uses
>SPARQL
>> (query language) to search it, so might be good to reflect
>> that in the name.
>>
>https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wikidata%2BOSM_SPARQL_query_service
>> P.S. I know this is the hardest problem after off-by-one and
>> caching...
>>
>
>> talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ___

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Name challenge - what to call the new OSM+Wikidata service?

[Yuri Astrakhan]

One thing we should consider is the domain name.  I doubt we can afford
woq.com :)

These names were proposed
woq   2
wdoqs
wdosm
woqs
q936

And these proposed names have OSM in them, so likely are not good according
to Legal
wosm  2
wikosm
wikidosm


On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 5:10 PM, Simon Poole  wrote:

> I believe there is a slight misunderstanding, while remixing
> OpenStreetMap/OSM/etc in various ways may result in cutesy copycat domain
> names they simply do not jibe well with reality.
>
> Not only does every single one of them weaken the standing of the marks
> themselves and make is increasingly difficult to take action against
> misuse, they are further uncontrollable liabilities for the whole
> community. I gave the example of OpenWeatherMap, but there are others that
> would be really painful if they ended up in the hands of your fav giant
> tech corp.
>
> That said, I'm not sure why you believe the policy has broken something,
> with the exception of a few local chapters, to my knowledge, the OSMF has
> never granted a licence to anybody to use the marks in a domain name. As
> outlined in the FAQ we will be operating a grandfathering scheme to
> legalize such use after the fact so actually making such use legit for the
> first time.
>
> And yes: WoQ would be a wonderful name for Yuris service and shows that it
> is completely possible to break out of the old schema of simply copying OSM.
>
> Simon
>
> Am 17.09.2017 um 15:57 schrieb Yves:
>
> So, no OpenSparqlMap, then? :(
> Sad, this policy definitely broke something.
> Yves
>
> Le 17 septembre 2017 12:58:12 GMT+02:00, Blake Girardot
>   a écrit :
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> How does this relate to the new draft trademark policy?
>>
>> I can't tell from the draft policy, but I believe that OSM at least is
>> a protected mark, not sure about osm.
>>
>> But I do think Simone Poole asked the community to stop naming things
>> with osm trademarks in them or variations on openstreetmap phrase.
>>
>> Cheers
>> blake
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 5:11 PM, Yuri Astrakhan  
>>  wrote:
>>>
>>>  The new service is getting more and more usage, but it lacks the most
>>>  important thing - a good name.  So far my two choices are:
>>>
>>>  * wikosm
>>>  * wikidosm
>>>
>>>  Suggestions?  Votes?  The service combines Wikidata and OpenStreetMap
>>>  databases, and uses SPARQL (query language) to search it, so might be good
>>>  to reflect that in the name.
>>>
>>>  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wikidata%2BOSM_SPARQL_query_service
>>>
>>>  P.S.  I know this is the hardest problem after off-by-one and caching...
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>  talk mailing list
>>>  talk@openstreetmap.org
>>>  https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> ___
> talk mailing 
> listtalk@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
>
> ___
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Name challenge - what to call the new OSM+Wikidata service?

[Yuri Astrakhan]

One thing we should consider is the domain name.  I doubt we can afford
woq.com :)

These names were proposed
woq   2
wdoqs
woqs
q936

And these proposed names have OSM in them, so likely are not good according
to Legal
wosm  2
wikosm
wdosm
wikidosm

(P.S. Sorry for double - hit send too fast before fixing the first list)

On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Yuri Astrakhan 
wrote:

> One thing we should consider is the domain name.  I doubt we can afford
> woq.com :)
>
> These names were proposed
> woq   2
> wdoqs
> wdosm
> woqs
> q936
>
> And these proposed names have OSM in them, so likely are not good
> according to Legal
> wosm  2
> wikosm
> wikidosm
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 5:10 PM, Simon Poole  wrote:
>
>> I believe there is a slight misunderstanding, while remixing
>> OpenStreetMap/OSM/etc in various ways may result in cutesy copycat domain
>> names they simply do not jibe well with reality.
>>
>> Not only does every single one of them weaken the standing of the marks
>> themselves and make is increasingly difficult to take action against
>> misuse, they are further uncontrollable liabilities for the whole
>> community. I gave the example of OpenWeatherMap, but there are others that
>> would be really painful if they ended up in the hands of your fav giant
>> tech corp.
>>
>> That said, I'm not sure why you believe the policy has broken something,
>> with the exception of a few local chapters, to my knowledge, the OSMF has
>> never granted a licence to anybody to use the marks in a domain name. As
>> outlined in the FAQ we will be operating a grandfathering scheme to
>> legalize such use after the fact so actually making such use legit for the
>> first time.
>>
>> And yes: WoQ would be a wonderful name for Yuris service and shows that
>> it is completely possible to break out of the old schema of simply copying
>> OSM.
>>
>> Simon
>>
>> Am 17.09.2017 um 15:57 schrieb Yves:
>>
>> So, no OpenSparqlMap, then? :(
>> Sad, this policy definitely broke something.
>> Yves
>>
>> Le 17 septembre 2017 12:58:12 GMT+02:00, Blake Girardot
>>   a écrit :
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> How does this relate to the new draft trademark policy?
>>>
>>> I can't tell from the draft policy, but I believe that OSM at least is
>>> a protected mark, not sure about osm.
>>>
>>> But I do think Simone Poole asked the community to stop naming things
>>> with osm trademarks in them or variations on openstreetmap phrase.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> blake
>>>
>>> On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 5:11 PM, Yuri Astrakhan  
>>>  wrote:

  The new service is getting more and more usage, but it lacks the most
  important thing - a good name.  So far my two choices are:

  * wikosm
  * wikidosm

  Suggestions?  Votes?  The service combines Wikidata and OpenStreetMap
  databases, and uses SPARQL (query language) to search it, so might be good
  to reflect that in the name.

  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wikidata%2BOSM_SPARQL_query_service

  P.S.  I know this is the hardest problem after off-by-one and caching...

 --

  talk mailing list
  talk@openstreetmap.org
  https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ___
>> talk mailing 
>> listtalk@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> talk mailing list
>> talk@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>>
>>
>
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Name challenge - what to call the new OSM+Wikidata service?

[Jo]

SparklyMapData or SparklyDataMap

2017-09-17 23:46 GMT+02:00 Yuri Astrakhan :

> One thing we should consider is the domain name.  I doubt we can afford
> woq.com :)
>
> These names were proposed
> woq   2
> wdoqs
> woqs
> q936
>
> And these proposed names have OSM in them, so likely are not good
> according to Legal
> wosm  2
> wikosm
> wdosm
> wikidosm
>
> (P.S. Sorry for double - hit send too fast before fixing the first list)
>
> On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Yuri Astrakhan 
> wrote:
>
>> One thing we should consider is the domain name.  I doubt we can afford
>> woq.com :)
>>
>> These names were proposed
>> woq   2
>> wdoqs
>> wdosm
>> woqs
>> q936
>>
>> And these proposed names have OSM in them, so likely are not good
>> according to Legal
>> wosm  2
>> wikosm
>> wikidosm
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 5:10 PM, Simon Poole  wrote:
>>
>>> I believe there is a slight misunderstanding, while remixing
>>> OpenStreetMap/OSM/etc in various ways may result in cutesy copycat domain
>>> names they simply do not jibe well with reality.
>>>
>>> Not only does every single one of them weaken the standing of the marks
>>> themselves and make is increasingly difficult to take action against
>>> misuse, they are further uncontrollable liabilities for the whole
>>> community. I gave the example of OpenWeatherMap, but there are others that
>>> would be really painful if they ended up in the hands of your fav giant
>>> tech corp.
>>>
>>> That said, I'm not sure why you believe the policy has broken something,
>>> with the exception of a few local chapters, to my knowledge, the OSMF has
>>> never granted a licence to anybody to use the marks in a domain name. As
>>> outlined in the FAQ we will be operating a grandfathering scheme to
>>> legalize such use after the fact so actually making such use legit for the
>>> first time.
>>>
>>> And yes: WoQ would be a wonderful name for Yuris service and shows that
>>> it is completely possible to break out of the old schema of simply copying
>>> OSM.
>>>
>>> Simon
>>>
>>> Am 17.09.2017 um 15:57 schrieb Yves:
>>>
>>> So, no OpenSparqlMap, then? :(
>>> Sad, this policy definitely broke something.
>>> Yves
>>>
>>> Le 17 septembre 2017 12:58:12 GMT+02:00, Blake Girardot
>>>   a écrit :

 Hi,

 How does this relate to the new draft trademark policy?

 I can't tell from the draft policy, but I believe that OSM at least is
 a protected mark, not sure about osm.

 But I do think Simone Poole asked the community to stop naming things
 with osm trademarks in them or variations on openstreetmap phrase.

 Cheers
 blake

 On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 5:11 PM, Yuri Astrakhan  
  wrote:
>
>  The new service is getting more and more usage, but it lacks the most
>  important thing - a good name.  So far my two choices are:
>
>  * wikosm
>  * wikidosm
>
>  Suggestions?  Votes?  The service combines Wikidata and OpenStreetMap
>  databases, and uses SPARQL (query language) to search it, so might be 
> good
>  to reflect that in the name.
>
>  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wikidata%2BOSM_SPARQL_query_service
>
>  P.S.  I know this is the hardest problem after off-by-one and caching...
>
> --
>
>  talk mailing list
>  talk@openstreetmap.org
>  https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk




>>>
>>> ___
>>> talk mailing 
>>> listtalk@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> talk mailing list
>>> talk@openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> ___
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Name challenge - what to call the new OSM+Wikidata service?

[Yuri Astrakhan]

RichardF on IRC suggested "semaptic"
>  take the "semantic" word associated with wikidata and add moar maps
which seem to have gained a few support votes there.   Does it have any
negative meanings in any languages?

On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 6:15 PM, Jo  wrote:

> SparklyMapData or SparklyDataMap
>
> 2017-09-17 23:46 GMT+02:00 Yuri Astrakhan :
>
>> One thing we should consider is the domain name.  I doubt we can afford
>> woq.com :)
>>
>> These names were proposed
>> woq   2
>> wdoqs
>> woqs
>> q936
>>
>> And these proposed names have OSM in them, so likely are not good
>> according to Legal
>> wosm  2
>> wikosm
>> wdosm
>> wikidosm
>>
>> (P.S. Sorry for double - hit send too fast before fixing the first list)
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Yuri Astrakhan 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> One thing we should consider is the domain name.  I doubt we can afford
>>> woq.com :)
>>>
>>> These names were proposed
>>> woq   2
>>> wdoqs
>>> wdosm
>>> woqs
>>> q936
>>>
>>> And these proposed names have OSM in them, so likely are not good
>>> according to Legal
>>> wosm  2
>>> wikosm
>>> wikidosm
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 5:10 PM, Simon Poole  wrote:
>>>
 I believe there is a slight misunderstanding, while remixing
 OpenStreetMap/OSM/etc in various ways may result in cutesy copycat domain
 names they simply do not jibe well with reality.

 Not only does every single one of them weaken the standing of the marks
 themselves and make is increasingly difficult to take action against
 misuse, they are further uncontrollable liabilities for the whole
 community. I gave the example of OpenWeatherMap, but there are others that
 would be really painful if they ended up in the hands of your fav giant
 tech corp.

 That said, I'm not sure why you believe the policy has broken
 something, with the exception of a few local chapters, to my knowledge, the
 OSMF has never granted a licence to anybody to use the marks in a domain
 name. As outlined in the FAQ we will be operating a grandfathering scheme
 to legalize such use after the fact so actually making such use legit for
 the first time.

 And yes: WoQ would be a wonderful name for Yuris service and shows that
 it is completely possible to break out of the old schema of simply copying
 OSM.

 Simon

 Am 17.09.2017 um 15:57 schrieb Yves:

 So, no OpenSparqlMap, then? :(
 Sad, this policy definitely broke something.
 Yves

 Le 17 septembre 2017 12:58:12 GMT+02:00, Blake Girardot
   a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> How does this relate to the new draft trademark policy?
>
> I can't tell from the draft policy, but I believe that OSM at least is
> a protected mark, not sure about osm.
>
> But I do think Simone Poole asked the community to stop naming things
> with osm trademarks in them or variations on openstreetmap phrase.
>
> Cheers
> blake
>
> On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 5:11 PM, Yuri Astrakhan  
>  wrote:
>>
>>  The new service is getting more and more usage, but it lacks the most
>>  important thing - a good name.  So far my two choices are:
>>
>>  * wikosm
>>  * wikidosm
>>
>>  Suggestions?  Votes?  The service combines Wikidata and OpenStreetMap
>>  databases, and uses SPARQL (query language) to search it, so might be 
>> good
>>  to reflect that in the name.
>>
>>  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wikidata%2BOSM_SPARQL_query_service
>>
>>  P.S.  I know this is the hardest problem after off-by-one and caching...
>>
>> --
>>
>>  talk mailing list
>>  talk@openstreetmap.org
>>  https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
>
>

 ___
 talk mailing 
 listtalk@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk



 ___
 talk mailing list
 talk@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


>>>
>>
>> ___
>> talk mailing list
>> talk@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>>
>>
>
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Name challenge - what to call the new OSM+Wikidata service?

[Pierre Béland]

Then WiseOM ! No OSM license and neither hotosm Blake ;)
 
Pierre 


  De : Yuri Astrakhan 
 À : winfi...@gmail.com 
Cc : OpenStreetMap talk mailing list 
 Envoyé le : Dimanche 17 Septembre 2017 19h20
 Objet : Re: [OSM-talk] Name challenge - what to call the new OSM+Wikidata 
service?
   
RichardF on IRC suggested "semaptic" >  take the "semantic" word associated 
with wikidata and add moar mapswhich seem to have gained a few support votes 
there.   Does it have any negative meanings in any languages?
On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 6:15 PM, Jo  wrote:

SparklyMapData or SparklyDataMap

2017-09-17 23:46 GMT+02:00 Yuri Astrakhan :

One thing we should consider is the domain name.  I doubt we can afford woq.com 
:)
These names were proposedwoq   2wdoqs 
woqs
q936
And these proposed names have OSM in them, so likely are not good according to 
Legalwosm  2wikosmwdosm wikidosm
(P.S. Sorry for double - hit send too fast before fixing the first list)
On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Yuri Astrakhan  wrote:

One thing we should consider is the domain name.  I doubt we can afford woq.com 
:)
These names were proposedwoq   2wdoqs 
wdosm woqsq936
And these proposed names have OSM in them, so likely are not good according to 
Legalwosm  2wikosmwikidosm

On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 5:10 PM, Simon Poole  wrote:

  I believe there is a slight misunderstanding, while remixing 
OpenStreetMap/OSM/etc in various ways may result in cutesy copycat domain names 
they simply do not jibe well with reality. Not only does every single one of 
them weaken the standing of the marks themselves and make is increasingly 
difficult to take action against misuse, they are further uncontrollable 
liabilities for the whole community. I gave the example of OpenWeatherMap, but 
there are others that would be really painful if they ended up in the hands of 
your fav giant tech corp. That said, I'm not sure why you believe the policy 
has broken something, with the exception of a few local chapters, to my 
knowledge, the OSMF has never granted a licence to anybody to use the marks in 
a domain name. As outlined in the FAQ we will be operating a grandfathering 
scheme to legalize such use after the fact so actually making such use legit 
for the first time. And yes: WoQ would be a wonderful name for Yuris service 
and shows that it is completely possible to break out of the old schema of 
simply copying OSM. Simon
  
 Am 17.09.2017 um 15:57 schrieb Yves:
  
So, no OpenSparqlMap, then? :(
 Sad, this policy definitely broke something. 
 Yves 
 
 Le 17 septembre 2017 12:58:12 GMT+02:00, Blake Girardot  
a écrit : 
 Hi,

How does this relate to the new draft trademark policy?

I can't tell from the draft policy, but I believe that OSM at least is
a protected mark, not sure about osm.

But I do think Simone Poole asked the community to stop naming things
with osm trademarks in them or variations on openstreetmap phrase.

Cheers
blake

On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 5:11 PM, Yuri Astrakhan  wrote:

 The new service is getting more and more usage, but it lacks the most 
important thing - a good name. So far my two choices are: * wikosm * wikidosm 
Suggestions? Votes? The service combines Wikidata and OpenStreetMap databases, 
and uses SPARQL (query language) to search it, so might be good to reflect that 
in the name. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org /wiki/Wikidata%2BOSM_SPARQL_qu 
ery_service P.S. I know this is the hardest problem after off-by-one and 
caching... talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org 
https://lists.openstreetmap.or g/listinfo/talk
 
  
  
 __ _
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.or g/listinfo/talk
 
 
 
__ _
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.or g/listinfo/talk






__ _
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.or g/listinfo/talk





___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


   ___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Name challenge - what to call the new OSM+Wikidata service?

[Blake Girardot HOT/OSM]

Mappy McDataFace is a serious suggestion, please include it in any
official lists of proposals.

Cheers
Blake

On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 5:46 PM, Yuri Astrakhan  wrote:
> One thing we should consider is the domain name.  I doubt we can afford
> woq.com :)
>
> These names were proposed
> woq   2
> wdoqs
> woqs
> q936
>
> And these proposed names have OSM in them, so likely are not good according
> to Legal
> wosm  2
> wikosm
> wdosm
> wikidosm
>
> (P.S. Sorry for double - hit send too fast before fixing the first list)
>
> On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Yuri Astrakhan 
> wrote:
>>
>> One thing we should consider is the domain name.  I doubt we can afford
>> woq.com :)
>>
>> These names were proposed
>> woq   2
>> wdoqs
>> wdosm
>> woqs
>> q936
>>
>> And these proposed names have OSM in them, so likely are not good
>> according to Legal
>> wosm  2
>> wikosm
>> wikidosm
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 5:10 PM, Simon Poole  wrote:
>>>
>>> I believe there is a slight misunderstanding, while remixing
>>> OpenStreetMap/OSM/etc in various ways may result in cutesy copycat domain
>>> names they simply do not jibe well with reality.
>>>
>>> Not only does every single one of them weaken the standing of the marks
>>> themselves and make is increasingly difficult to take action against misuse,
>>> they are further uncontrollable liabilities for the whole community. I gave
>>> the example of OpenWeatherMap, but there are others that would be really
>>> painful if they ended up in the hands of your fav giant tech corp.
>>>
>>> That said, I'm not sure why you believe the policy has broken something,
>>> with the exception of a few local chapters, to my knowledge, the OSMF has
>>> never granted a licence to anybody to use the marks in a domain name. As
>>> outlined in the FAQ we will be operating a grandfathering scheme to legalize
>>> such use after the fact so actually making such use legit for the first
>>> time.
>>>
>>> And yes: WoQ would be a wonderful name for Yuris service and shows that
>>> it is completely possible to break out of the old schema of simply copying
>>> OSM.
>>>
>>> Simon
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 17.09.2017 um 15:57 schrieb Yves:
>>>
>>> So, no OpenSparqlMap, then? :(
>>> Sad, this policy definitely broke something.
>>> Yves
>>>
>>> Le 17 septembre 2017 12:58:12 GMT+02:00, Blake Girardot
>>>  a écrit :

 Hi,

 How does this relate to the new draft trademark policy?

 I can't tell from the draft policy, but I believe that OSM at least is
 a protected mark, not sure about osm.

 But I do think Simone Poole asked the community to stop naming things
 with osm trademarks in them or variations on openstreetmap phrase.

 Cheers
 blake

 On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 5:11 PM, Yuri Astrakhan
  wrote:
>
>  The new service is getting more and more usage, but it lacks the most
>  important thing - a good name.  So far my two choices are:
>
>  * wikosm
>  * wikidosm
>
>  Suggestions?  Votes?  The service combines Wikidata and OpenStreetMap
>  databases, and uses SPARQL (query language) to search it, so might be
> good
>  to reflect that in the name.
>
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wikidata%2BOSM_SPARQL_query_service
>
>  P.S.  I know this is the hardest problem after off-by-one and
> caching...
>
> 
>  talk mailing list
>  talk@openstreetmap.org
>  https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> talk mailing list
>>> talk@openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> talk mailing list
>>> talk@openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>>>
>>
>
>
> ___
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>



-- 

Blake Girardot
Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Name challenge - what to call the new OSM+Wikidata service?

[James]

Mappy McDataFace+1

On Sep 17, 2017 8:05 PM, "Blake Girardot HOT/OSM" 
wrote:

Mappy McDataFace is a serious suggestion, please include it in any
official lists of proposals.

Cheers
Blake

On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 5:46 PM, Yuri Astrakhan 
wrote:
> One thing we should consider is the domain name.  I doubt we can afford
> woq.com :)
>
> These names were proposed
> woq   2
> wdoqs
> woqs
> q936
>
> And these proposed names have OSM in them, so likely are not good
according
> to Legal
> wosm  2
> wikosm
> wdosm
> wikidosm
>
> (P.S. Sorry for double - hit send too fast before fixing the first list)
>
> On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Yuri Astrakhan 
> wrote:
>>
>> One thing we should consider is the domain name.  I doubt we can afford
>> woq.com :)
>>
>> These names were proposed
>> woq   2
>> wdoqs
>> wdosm
>> woqs
>> q936
>>
>> And these proposed names have OSM in them, so likely are not good
>> according to Legal
>> wosm  2
>> wikosm
>> wikidosm
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 5:10 PM, Simon Poole  wrote:
>>>
>>> I believe there is a slight misunderstanding, while remixing
>>> OpenStreetMap/OSM/etc in various ways may result in cutesy copycat
domain
>>> names they simply do not jibe well with reality.
>>>
>>> Not only does every single one of them weaken the standing of the marks
>>> themselves and make is increasingly difficult to take action against
misuse,
>>> they are further uncontrollable liabilities for the whole community. I
gave
>>> the example of OpenWeatherMap, but there are others that would be really
>>> painful if they ended up in the hands of your fav giant tech corp.
>>>
>>> That said, I'm not sure why you believe the policy has broken something,
>>> with the exception of a few local chapters, to my knowledge, the OSMF
has
>>> never granted a licence to anybody to use the marks in a domain name. As
>>> outlined in the FAQ we will be operating a grandfathering scheme to
legalize
>>> such use after the fact so actually making such use legit for the first
>>> time.
>>>
>>> And yes: WoQ would be a wonderful name for Yuris service and shows that
>>> it is completely possible to break out of the old schema of simply
copying
>>> OSM.
>>>
>>> Simon
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 17.09.2017 um 15:57 schrieb Yves:
>>>
>>> So, no OpenSparqlMap, then? :(
>>> Sad, this policy definitely broke something.
>>> Yves
>>>
>>> Le 17 septembre 2017 12:58:12 GMT+02:00, Blake Girardot
>>>  a écrit :

 Hi,

 How does this relate to the new draft trademark policy?

 I can't tell from the draft policy, but I believe that OSM at least is
 a protected mark, not sure about osm.

 But I do think Simone Poole asked the community to stop naming things
 with osm trademarks in them or variations on openstreetmap phrase.

 Cheers
 blake

 On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 5:11 PM, Yuri Astrakhan
  wrote:
>
>  The new service is getting more and more usage, but it lacks the most
>  important thing - a good name.  So far my two choices are:
>
>  * wikosm
>  * wikidosm
>
>  Suggestions?  Votes?  The service combines Wikidata and OpenStreetMap
>  databases, and uses SPARQL (query language) to search it, so might be
> good
>  to reflect that in the name.
>
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wikidata%2BOSM_
SPARQL_query_service
>
>  P.S.  I know this is the hardest problem after off-by-one and
> caching...
>
> 
>  talk mailing list
>  talk@openstreetmap.org
>  https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> talk mailing list
>>> talk@openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> talk mailing list
>>> talk@openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>>>
>>
>
>
> ___
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>



--

Blake Girardot
Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

[OSM-talk] JOSM now supports OSM+Wikidata service

[Yuri Astrakhan]

The "not yet fully named" service is now accessible directly from JOSM -
just like OT.  Simply install or update Wikipedia plugin, and it will show
up in the download data screen (expert mode).

Documentation:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wikidata%2BOSM_SPARQL_query_service#Using_from_JOSM
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk