RichardF on IRC suggested "semaptic" > take the "semantic" word associated with wikidata and add moar maps which seem to have gained a few support votes there. Does it have any negative meanings in any languages?
On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 6:15 PM, Jo <winfi...@gmail.com> wrote: > SparklyMapData or SparklyDataMap > > 2017-09-17 23:46 GMT+02:00 Yuri Astrakhan <yuriastrak...@gmail.com>: > >> One thing we should consider is the domain name. I doubt we can afford >> woq.com :) >> >> These names were proposed >> woq 2 >> wdoqs >> woqs >> q936 >> >> And these proposed names have OSM in them, so likely are not good >> according to Legal >> wosm 2 >> wikosm >> wdosm >> wikidosm >> >> (P.S. Sorry for double - hit send too fast before fixing the first list) >> >> On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Yuri Astrakhan <yuriastrak...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> One thing we should consider is the domain name. I doubt we can afford >>> woq.com :) >>> >>> These names were proposed >>> woq 2 >>> wdoqs >>> wdosm >>> woqs >>> q936 >>> >>> And these proposed names have OSM in them, so likely are not good >>> according to Legal >>> wosm 2 >>> wikosm >>> wikidosm >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 5:10 PM, Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch> wrote: >>> >>>> I believe there is a slight misunderstanding, while remixing >>>> OpenStreetMap/OSM/etc in various ways may result in cutesy copycat domain >>>> names they simply do not jibe well with reality. >>>> >>>> Not only does every single one of them weaken the standing of the marks >>>> themselves and make is increasingly difficult to take action against >>>> misuse, they are further uncontrollable liabilities for the whole >>>> community. I gave the example of OpenWeatherMap, but there are others that >>>> would be really painful if they ended up in the hands of your fav giant >>>> tech corp. >>>> >>>> That said, I'm not sure why you believe the policy has broken >>>> something, with the exception of a few local chapters, to my knowledge, the >>>> OSMF has never granted a licence to anybody to use the marks in a domain >>>> name. As outlined in the FAQ we will be operating a grandfathering scheme >>>> to legalize such use after the fact so actually making such use legit for >>>> the first time. >>>> >>>> And yes: WoQ would be a wonderful name for Yuris service and shows that >>>> it is completely possible to break out of the old schema of simply copying >>>> OSM. >>>> >>>> Simon >>>> >>>> Am 17.09.2017 um 15:57 schrieb Yves: >>>> >>>> So, no OpenSparqlMap, then? :( >>>> Sad, this policy definitely broke something. >>>> Yves >>>> >>>> Le 17 septembre 2017 12:58:12 GMT+02:00, Blake Girardot >>>> <bgirar...@gmail.com> <bgirar...@gmail.com> a écrit : >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> How does this relate to the new draft trademark policy? >>>>> >>>>> I can't tell from the draft policy, but I believe that OSM at least is >>>>> a protected mark, not sure about osm. >>>>> >>>>> But I do think Simone Poole asked the community to stop naming things >>>>> with osm trademarks in them or variations on openstreetmap phrase. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers >>>>> blake >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 5:11 PM, Yuri Astrakhan <yuriastrak...@gmail.com> >>>>> <yuriastrak...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> The new service is getting more and more usage, but it lacks the most >>>>>> important thing - a good name. So far my two choices are: >>>>>> >>>>>> * wikosm >>>>>> * wikidosm >>>>>> >>>>>> Suggestions? Votes? The service combines Wikidata and OpenStreetMap >>>>>> databases, and uses SPARQL (query language) to search it, so might be >>>>>> good >>>>>> to reflect that in the name. >>>>>> >>>>>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wikidata%2BOSM_SPARQL_query_service >>>>>> >>>>>> P.S. I know this is the hardest problem after off-by-one and caching... >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>> >>>>>> talk mailing list >>>>>> talk@openstreetmap.org >>>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> talk mailing >>>> listtalk@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> talk mailing list >>>> talk@openstreetmap.org >>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> talk mailing list >> talk@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >> >> >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
