Re: [OSM-talk] more OSM coming soon

2009-06-19 Thread Andy Allan
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 10:56 PM, Ivo van den
Maagdenberg wrote:

> What the reason is that I would get the 404.png is not fully clear to me.

Glad that it's working for you. For an explanation of the above, it's
not actually the tileserver that ever returns the 404.png. It's the
javascript that controls this, and if the javascript can't get a tile
for some reason, it swaps in the 404.png. So because your browser was
blocking those tile requests, the javascript showed you the more osm
soon picture.

Cheers,
Andy

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] more OSM coming soon

2009-06-18 Thread Apollinaris Schoell
ff has some shortcuts or gestures. clicking lot and fast and you won't  
recognize the change in settings ...

On 18 Jun 2009, at 14:56 , Ivo van den Maagdenberg wrote:

>
> 2009/6/18 Apollinaris Schoell 
> had the same troubles in firefox at some point. some tiles loaded  
> some didn't.
> other browser worked so it was clearly not server problem
>
> Check the Content -> Load images automatically settings, this solved  
> my troubles
>
> Very hard to spot, but for some reason the c.tile.openstreetmap.org  
> had made it in exactly the browsers config area you mention, to not  
> load automatically. I removed it and everything properly loads. 12/12.
>
> What the reason is that I would get the 404.png is not fully clear  
> to me. Anyways, case closed.
>
> Thanks!
> Ivom


___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] more OSM coming soon

2009-06-18 Thread Ivo van den Maagdenberg
2009/6/18 Apollinaris Schoell 

> had the same troubles in firefox at some point. some tiles loaded some
> didn't. other browser worked so it was clearly not server problem
>
> Check the Content -> Load images automatically settings, this solved my
> troubles
>
> Very hard to spot, but for some reason the c.tile.openstreetmap.org had
made it in exactly the browsers config area you mention, to not load
automatically. I removed it and everything properly loads. 12/12.

What the reason is that I would get the 404.png is not fully clear to me.
Anyways, case closed.

Thanks!
Ivom
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] more OSM coming soon

2009-06-18 Thread Apollinaris Schoell
had the same troubles in firefox at some point. some tiles loaded some
didn't. other browser worked so it was clearly not server problem

Check the Content -> Load images automatically settings, this solved my
troubles

On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Ivo van den Maagdenberg <
ivo.vdmaagdenb...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> 2009/5/13 Jon Burgess 
>
> On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 22:12 +0100, Thomas Wood wrote:
>> > 2009/5/13 Ivo van den Maagdenberg :
>> > > Hi Folks,
>> > >
>> > > This is some sort of quality of service question. Half of all the
>> tiles on
>> > > http://www.openstreetmap.org render as 'more OSM coming soon'. I want
>> to
>> > > know if I am doing something wrong (Ubuntu 8.10 + firefox 3.0 +
>> reasonable
>> > > hardware)
>> >
>> > The tiles display this in the case of network troubles where the
>> > server isn't reachable, they're also displayed if the tile hasn't yet
>> > been rendered (and is present on the server's disk) and when it's not
>> > possible to render on the fly. Otherwise, the tile is added to the
>> > render queue and should be available at some point shortly in the
>> > future.
>> >
>> > > Showing OSM to a friend that has not seen 'the Map' does not give a
>> good
>> > > impression this way. A solution is to implement some sort of double
>> > > buffering where the old tiles are kept for display until the new one
>> has
>> > > properly rendered? Well, that's maybe impossible, but it would improve
>> the
>> > > responsiveness of the http://www.openstreetmap.org at the moment.
>> >
>> > I believe this is already the case.
>>
>> There is a cache of tiles which is used when the rendering can not keep
>> up. The weekly planet import is running at the moment and I have
>> temporarily turned of the re-rendering of tiles so you will only seeing
>> tiles from the cache right now.
>>
>> I'm in the middle of making some updates to the server to migrate the
>> cached tiles and rendering database to an external disk array which will
>> speed things up quite a bit. All the old tiles should still be
>> available, but the live rendering probably won't restart until some time
>> tomorrow.
>>
>
> Strange thing, after a month things seem not to have improved much on the
> frontpage for openstreetmap, with respect to the number of tiles being
> rendered at a fairly reasonable place and zoom-level like:
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.91&lon=-0.23&zoom=7&layers=B000FTF
>
> In my browser it currently shows 4 out of 12 renderd tiles "... more OSM
> coming soon". As mentioned before, I would like to raise some concern to
> have at least rendered tiles available at all times. Especially now, it
> seems things are broken to a noticable extent.
>
> Is there something to do about this? Maybe not flush previous rendered
> tiles until they are actually rerenderd on an another disklocation and when
> the new tile is ready, copy it over the old tile to keep the update fairly
> unnoticable. Then again, I am just guessing how the rendering takes place,
> so this approach might be totally unpractical.
>
> Looking trough the openlayer code reference by the map page, the tiles seem
> to come from
>
> var noname = new OpenLayers.Layer.OSM("NoName", [
>   "http://a.tile.cloudmade.com/"; + nonamekey + "/3/256/",
>   "http://b.tile.cloudmade.com/"; + nonamekey + "/3/256/",
>
>   "http://c.tile.cloudmade.com/"; + nonamekey + "/3/256/"
>
>
> Maybe there is a known bottleneck in infrastructure that makes the tiles fail 
> to be rendered?
>
> Bye, Ivom
>
>
> ___
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] more OSM coming soon

2009-06-18 Thread Jon Burgess
On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 20:26 +0200, Ivo van den Maagdenberg wrote:
> 
> 
> 2009/6/18 Ivo van den Maagdenberg 
> 
> 
> var noname = new OpenLayers.Layer.OSM("NoName", [
>   "http://a.tile.cloudmade.com/"; + nonamekey + "/3/256/",
>   "http://b.tile.cloudmade.com/"; + nonamekey + "/3/256/",
> 
> 
>   "http://c.tile.cloudmade.com/"; + nonamekey + "/3/256/"
> 
> 
> Closer inspection and attention :/ reveals that the main tiles come
> from 
> http://a.tile.openstreetmap.org/ and
> http://b.tile.openstreetmap.org/ 
> 

Ah... if you consistently see 1 in every 3 tiles as missing then chances
are that you may have fallen into a common trap. Try opening each of the
following links:

http://a.tile.openstreetmap.org/0/0/0.png
http://b.tile.openstreetmap.org/0/0/0.png
http://c.tile.openstreetmap.org/0/0/0.png

If you get an error or a blank image on one of those then chances are
that at some point you have asked your browser to 'block images from
this server'. It is quite easy to select this option by mistake.

Jon



___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] more OSM coming soon

2009-06-18 Thread Ivo van den Maagdenberg
2009/6/18 Ivo van den Maagdenberg 

>
>
> var noname = new OpenLayers.Layer.OSM("NoName", [
>   "http://a.tile.cloudmade.com/"; + nonamekey + "/3/256/",
>   "http://b.tile.cloudmade.com/"; + nonamekey + "/3/256/",
>
>   "http://c.tile.cloudmade.com/"; + nonamekey + "/3/256/"
>
>
> Closer inspection and attention :/ reveals that the main tiles come from
http://a.tile.openstreetmap.org/ and  http://b.tile.openstreetmap.org/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] more OSM coming soon

2009-06-18 Thread Ivo van den Maagdenberg
2009/5/13 Jon Burgess 

> On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 22:12 +0100, Thomas Wood wrote:
> > 2009/5/13 Ivo van den Maagdenberg :
> > > Hi Folks,
> > >
> > > This is some sort of quality of service question. Half of all the tiles
> on
> > > http://www.openstreetmap.org render as 'more OSM coming soon'. I want
> to
> > > know if I am doing something wrong (Ubuntu 8.10 + firefox 3.0 +
> reasonable
> > > hardware)
> >
> > The tiles display this in the case of network troubles where the
> > server isn't reachable, they're also displayed if the tile hasn't yet
> > been rendered (and is present on the server's disk) and when it's not
> > possible to render on the fly. Otherwise, the tile is added to the
> > render queue and should be available at some point shortly in the
> > future.
> >
> > > Showing OSM to a friend that has not seen 'the Map' does not give a
> good
> > > impression this way. A solution is to implement some sort of double
> > > buffering where the old tiles are kept for display until the new one
> has
> > > properly rendered? Well, that's maybe impossible, but it would improve
> the
> > > responsiveness of the http://www.openstreetmap.org at the moment.
> >
> > I believe this is already the case.
>
> There is a cache of tiles which is used when the rendering can not keep
> up. The weekly planet import is running at the moment and I have
> temporarily turned of the re-rendering of tiles so you will only seeing
> tiles from the cache right now.
>
> I'm in the middle of making some updates to the server to migrate the
> cached tiles and rendering database to an external disk array which will
> speed things up quite a bit. All the old tiles should still be
> available, but the live rendering probably won't restart until some time
> tomorrow.
>

Strange thing, after a month things seem not to have improved much on the
frontpage for openstreetmap, with respect to the number of tiles being
rendered at a fairly reasonable place and zoom-level like:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.91&lon=-0.23&zoom=7&layers=B000FTF

In my browser it currently shows 4 out of 12 renderd tiles "... more OSM
coming soon". As mentioned before, I would like to raise some concern to
have at least rendered tiles available at all times. Especially now, it
seems things are broken to a noticable extent.

Is there something to do about this? Maybe not flush previous rendered tiles
until they are actually rerenderd on an another disklocation and when the
new tile is ready, copy it over the old tile to keep the update fairly
unnoticable. Then again, I am just guessing how the rendering takes place,
so this approach might be totally unpractical.

Looking trough the openlayer code reference by the map page, the tiles seem
to come from

var noname = new OpenLayers.Layer.OSM("NoName", [
  "http://a.tile.cloudmade.com/"; + nonamekey + "/3/256/",
  "http://b.tile.cloudmade.com/"; + nonamekey + "/3/256/",
  "http://c.tile.cloudmade.com/"; + nonamekey + "/3/256/"


Maybe there is a known bottleneck in infrastructure that makes the
tiles fail to be rendered?

Bye, Ivom
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] more OSM coming soon

2009-05-13 Thread Jon Burgess
On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 22:12 +0100, Thomas Wood wrote:
> 2009/5/13 Ivo van den Maagdenberg :
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > This is some sort of quality of service question. Half of all the tiles on
> > http://www.openstreetmap.org render as 'more OSM coming soon'. I want to
> > know if I am doing something wrong (Ubuntu 8.10 + firefox 3.0 + reasonable
> > hardware)
> 
> The tiles display this in the case of network troubles where the
> server isn't reachable, they're also displayed if the tile hasn't yet
> been rendered (and is present on the server's disk) and when it's not
> possible to render on the fly. Otherwise, the tile is added to the
> render queue and should be available at some point shortly in the
> future.
> 
> > Showing OSM to a friend that has not seen 'the Map' does not give a good
> > impression this way. A solution is to implement some sort of double
> > buffering where the old tiles are kept for display until the new one has
> > properly rendered? Well, that's maybe impossible, but it would improve the
> > responsiveness of the http://www.openstreetmap.org at the moment.
> 
> I believe this is already the case.

There is a cache of tiles which is used when the rendering can not keep
up. The weekly planet import is running at the moment and I have
temporarily turned of the re-rendering of tiles so you will only seeing
tiles from the cache right now.

I'm in the middle of making some updates to the server to migrate the
cached tiles and rendering database to an external disk array which will
speed things up quite a bit. All the old tiles should still be
available, but the live rendering probably won't restart until some time
tomorrow.

If you really must see an image which has not been rendered, the export
tab should still produce an image for you.

Jon


> > I am not 100% sure if this list is the most appropriate place to post and
> > apolgise for hogging the wrong list with my concerns.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Ivom
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > talk mailing list
> > talk@openstreetmap.org
> > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 


___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] more OSM coming soon

2009-05-13 Thread Thomas Wood
2009/5/13 Ivo van den Maagdenberg :
> Hi Folks,
>
> This is some sort of quality of service question. Half of all the tiles on
> http://www.openstreetmap.org render as 'more OSM coming soon'. I want to
> know if I am doing something wrong (Ubuntu 8.10 + firefox 3.0 + reasonable
> hardware)

The tiles display this in the case of network troubles where the
server isn't reachable, they're also displayed if the tile hasn't yet
been rendered (and is present on the server's disk) and when it's not
possible to render on the fly. Otherwise, the tile is added to the
render queue and should be available at some point shortly in the
future.

> Showing OSM to a friend that has not seen 'the Map' does not give a good
> impression this way. A solution is to implement some sort of double
> buffering where the old tiles are kept for display until the new one has
> properly rendered? Well, that's maybe impossible, but it would improve the
> responsiveness of the http://www.openstreetmap.org at the moment.

I believe this is already the case.

> I am not 100% sure if this list is the most appropriate place to post and
> apolgise for hogging the wrong list with my concerns.
>
> Kind regards,
> Ivom
>
>
>
> ___
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>



-- 
Regards,
Thomas Wood
(Edgemaster)

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


[OSM-talk] more OSM coming soon

2009-05-13 Thread Ivo van den Maagdenberg
Hi Folks,

This is some sort of quality of service question. Half of all the tiles on
http://www.openstreetmap.org render as 'more OSM coming soon'. I want to
know if I am doing something wrong (Ubuntu 8.10 + firefox 3.0 + reasonable
hardware)

Showing OSM to a friend that has not seen 'the Map' does not give a good
impression this way. A solution is to implement some sort of double
buffering where the old tiles are kept for display until the new one has
properly rendered? Well, that's maybe impossible, but it would improve the
responsiveness of the http://www.openstreetmap.org at the moment.

I am not 100% sure if this list is the most appropriate place to post and
apolgise for hogging the wrong list with my concerns.

Kind regards,
Ivom
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] more OSM coming soon

2009-03-26 Thread Jon Burgess
On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 14:43 +, Andy Allan wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Shaun McDonald
>  wrote:
> > This is the weekly re-import of the data, when the render daemon is
> > stopped for the duration.
> 
> I'm not entirely sure that it is, especially since I'd have expected
> it to restart yesterday morning (or maybe this morning - again, not
> sure when Jon does things). But looking at the munin graphs [1] I can
> see that the eth0 load is high, the CPU has been flat out earlier
> today, and the load average is spiking pretty high too.

There was a spike in the number of Apache threads and render daemon
crashed when it used up all 1024 available file descriptors. I have
known about this for a while, the render daemon has hit this a couple of
times over the past year.

I have restarted the process with the ulimit on the descriptors raised
to 4096. Longer term I think I either need rethink how we handle >1k
Apache connections or make the process increase the descriptors itself.

Jon



___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] more OSM coming soon

2009-03-26 Thread Andy Allan
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Shaun McDonald
 wrote:
> This is the weekly re-import of the data, when the render daemon is
> stopped for the duration.

I'm not entirely sure that it is, especially since I'd have expected
it to restart yesterday morning (or maybe this morning - again, not
sure when Jon does things). But looking at the munin graphs [1] I can
see that the eth0 load is high, the CPU has been flat out earlier
today, and the load average is spiking pretty high too. Mod_tile has a
load average cutout where it stops trying to render tiles in the few
seconds it normally gives renderd to respond (hence the usual few
seconds before the "coming soon" logo appears. When that threshold is
exceeded, mod_tile responds immediately with a 404 (and the osm.org
Javascript shows the "coming soon" logo straight away). I don't know
what the threshold is on tile.openstreetmap.org

So a fair amount of speculations - the server is busy, but not that
much more busy than it normally gets during the week, and I think it's
triggering the mod_tile overload protection.

Cheers,
Andy

[1] http://munin.openstreetmap.org/openstreetmap/tile.openstreetmap.html

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] more OSM coming soon

2009-03-26 Thread Chris Hill

Thanks, though I can't say I've noticed it before.

 cheers, Chris



- Original Message 
> From: Shaun McDonald 
> To: Chris Hill 
> Cc: Talk OSM 
> Sent: Thursday, 26 March, 2009 12:00:04
> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] more OSM coming soon
> 
> This is the weekly re-import of the data, when the render daemon is stopped 
> for 
> the duration.
> 
> Shaun
> 
> On 26 Mar 2009, at 11:45, Chris Hill wrote:
> 
> > 
> > I've been getting a lot of tiles with the 'more OSM coming soon' message on 
> Mapnik, both yesterday and today at various zoom levels.  The tiles appear 
> quickly rather than after a long delay as occasionally happens.  Is anyone 
> else 
> seeing this?  Does it need attention?
> > 
> > cheers, Chris
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ___
> > talk mailing list
> > talk@openstreetmap.org
> > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk



  

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] more OSM coming soon

2009-03-26 Thread Shaun McDonald
This is the weekly re-import of the data, when the render daemon is  
stopped for the duration.

Shaun

On 26 Mar 2009, at 11:45, Chris Hill wrote:

>
> I've been getting a lot of tiles with the 'more OSM coming soon'  
> message on Mapnik, both yesterday and today at various zoom levels.   
> The tiles appear quickly rather than after a long delay as  
> occasionally happens.  Is anyone else seeing this?  Does it need  
> attention?
>
> cheers, Chris
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


[OSM-talk] more OSM coming soon

2009-03-26 Thread Chris Hill

I've been getting a lot of tiles with the 'more OSM coming soon' message on 
Mapnik, both yesterday and today at various zoom levels.  The tiles appear 
quickly rather than after a long delay as occasionally happens.  Is anyone else 
seeing this?  Does it need attention?

 cheers, Chris



  

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk