Re: [OSM-talk-be] samenvoegen van stukken weg
Turn restrictions not for Mr. Everybody ? Did you try the iD UI for that ? Simpler than that is almost possible (besides interpretation from spoken natural language). I've been thinking a bit about your proposal during my walk this afternoon. I don't see how it helps when you have to turn a single way into a dual carriageway or vice versa. Another problem that I see is that those segments have to stay coupled to a street. Which makes it harder on the server to verify. As far as I see it now, the implementation of the OSM API for edits on the server is pretty straightforward and can handle large loads. The more things that have to be verified, the higher the load for a simple edit. But with your new explanation, it seems that you make it even more complex, since you create a segment / patch for each new combination of tags. So when one wants to add an attribute to a street, one does not have to split the street but X number of segments that might already exist ? With as only benefit that there is only 1 object that represents a street. Which is right now a number of OSM-ways that accidentally have the same name ? I think the current approach of splitting a street is much easier then. We just need an API to retrieve all OSM-ways that form a street. Some might say associatedStreet, others say Street (cfr. discussion on cycleways), or maybe some upcoming Overpass feature might solve it (cfr a request from the maker of [1]) AFAIK there are no restrictions implied by a service road. Some navigation systems put a penalty on service roads, as they are typically not for through traffic. regards m [1] http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/cgi-bin/render.pl -- shows all lane direction information for a street On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 1:47 PM, André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com wrote: On 2015-01-03 08:27, Marc Gemis wrote : I once read your proposal on the wiki. The main drawback that I see is that one will get an awful lot of layers (or whatever you want to call them). For each property you add to a street a need to create a new layer. After verifying of course that there isn't already a layer with that property. In that case you have to split the layer at the right place. No. There is not a layer for each property but for each segment of the road that has a different sets of properties. Take a bridge as an example. With the present scheme, the road is split in three parts. With my scheme, it has only two parts: the road and the patch for the bridge. And the patch for the bridge very clearly contains all the tags that relate to the bridge only, for example a special speed limit and a name. Presently, if two paths arriving at a main road are 50 m apart like this and a walk uses the paths | *---*- | then the road must be split as shown and the red part becomes part of the walk. With patches, the road remains intact and the patch is in the walk that is self contained. I try to imaging how a UI to edit that would look like. Or software that uses that data. I wonder whether it would much easier to work with such a structure. hard to tell. You are probably to much ahead of your time with this proposal. The UI would make very clear what the bridge is and the user would have a very clear view of what its particular tags are instead of being mixed with the tags of the road. For the walk, the user dealing with the main street would have very little concern with it. The users would not have to compare the tags of different splits and wonder to what they relate. It's pure simplicity. I have now devised a much more simpler way to do patches than what I explained before. But, as you almost say, I would lose my time explaining that. Unfortunately, this means that OSM will remain very complicated, mapping restricted to gurus and subject to many mistakes. For example, tagging a simple turn restriction is NOT for Mr Everybody and when I make a simple GPS trip nearby, it goes through a track through the meadows instead of the main road. That's probably because the definition of a service road is fuzzy and does not say if it's an access restrictions or not. The mapper and GPS writer probably had different points of view about that. And that happens in several places. Cheers André. regards m PS, it is indeed pretty confusing that something with one 'l' in one language has two in the other, and has another meaning in the second language with one l. On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 2:34 AM, André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com wrote: On 2015-01-02 19:01, Marc Gemis wrote : 2015-01-02 17:11 GMT+01:00 André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com: J'ai un jour écrit un article décrivant une méthode pour ne plus devoir découper les chemins mais ça n'a intéressé personne. I've read somewhere that navigation software will split all ways at a crossing in order to be able to calculate all possible routes. So the merging
[OSM-talk-be] Voor liefhebbers van POIs / for the POI-lovers
De Nederlander Marc Zoutendijk is volop bezig met de ontwikkeling van een website voor het bekijken en editeren van POIs. zie [1]. Je kan de ontwikkeling en de vragen volgen op het NL-forum [2]. Hij heeft er ook een diary entry over geschreven [3] (in het Engels) The Dutchmen Marc Zoutendijk is currently developing a website for viewing and editing POIs. see [1]. There is a discussion thread [2] on the Dutch forum. There is an English diary entry about the tool [3] mvg, regards m [1] http://mijndev.openstreetmap.nl/~marczoutendijk/taglocator/index.html [2] http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=475397 [3] http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/marczoutendijk/diary/28316 ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Re: [OSM-talk-be] samenvoegen van stukken weg
On 2015-01-03 17:39, Marc Gemis wrote : I've been thinking a bit about your proposal during my walk this afternoon. I don't see how it helps when you have to turn a single way into a dual carriageway or vice versa. Another problem that I see is that those segments have to stay coupled to a street. Which makes it harder on the server to verify. As far as I see it now, the implementation of the OSM API for edits on the server is pretty straightforward and can handle large loads. The more things that have to be verified, the higher the load for a simple edit. ? But with your new explanation, it seems that you make it even more complex, since you create a segment / patch for each new combination of tags. So when one wants to add an attribute to a street, one does not have to split the street but X number of segments that might already exist ? It seems that you did not understand. No patch is created for each new combination of tags. They are created only over the segment of the road that has tags different from the rest and they contain only the tags that are different. Creating a new patch does not splits existing patches, they overlap like they overlap the main road. Example: cobble stones patch --- road -- 50 km/h patch 50 km/h has been added without splitting anything and a part of the road is both cobble stones and 50 km/h, a new combination that does not split anything. Both patches are separate, well isolated concepts that do not interfere with each other and that can be changed or removed without (almost) any concern for the rest without changing anything else. Now, I'm sorry that I have to close this discussion because I'm losing my time. With as only benefit that there is only 1 object that represents a street. Which is right now a number of OSM-ways that accidentally have the same name ? I think the current approach of splitting a street is much easier then. We just need an API to retrieve all OSM-ways that form a street. Some might say "associatedStreet", others say "Street" (cfr. discussion on cycleways), or maybe some upcoming Overpass feature might solve it (cfr a request from the maker of [1]) AFAIK there are no restrictions implied by a service road. Some navigation systems put a penalty on service roads, as they are typically not for through traffic. regards m [1] http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/cgi-bin/render.pl -- shows all lane direction information for a street On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 1:47 PM, André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com wrote: On 2015-01-03 08:27, Marc Gemis wrote : I once read your proposal on the wiki. The main drawback that I see is that one will get an awful lot of "layers" (or whatever you want to call them). For each property you add to a street a need to create a new layer. After verifying of course that there isn't already a layer with that property. In that case you have to split the layer at the right place. No. There is not a "layer" for each property but for each segment of the road that has a different sets of properties. Take a bridge as an example. With the present scheme, the road is split in three parts. With my scheme, it has only two parts: the road and the patch for the bridge. And the patch for the bridge very clearly contains all the tags that relate to the bridge only, for example a special speed limit and a name. Presently, if two paths arriving at a main road are 50 m apart like this and a walk uses the paths | | then the road must be split as shown and the red part becomes part of the walk. With patches, the road remains intact and the patch is in
[OSM-talk] MEP - pipelines
in accordance to the mechanical edit policy, I'd like to open the discussion on this list: a recently approved proposal introduced new tags for pipelines and marker [1] and changed an established tag: type=* was changed to substance=* the main reason for this change was a (possible) conflict with type=* as used in relations. also, type=* was considered to be too generic to describe the medium flowing within pipelines. this requires a mechanical update of existing data: nodes: containing pipeline=marker nodes: containing pipeline=substation type=* -- substance=* ways: for man_made=pipeline ways: containing pipeline=substation type=* -- substance=* As of now, I'm only aware of the ITO pipeline map (rendering), that is affected by this change. this affects data worldwide. I assume that this update will have to be executed several times in the near future, as mappers may continue to use type=* until they are aware of the new pipeline tagging scheme. cu ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] MEP - pipelines
Hi, Am Samstag, den 03.01.2015, 17:50 +0100 schrieb Rainer Fügenstein: in accordance to the mechanical edit policy, I'd like to open the discussion on this list: a recently approved proposal introduced new tags for pipelines and marker [1] and changed an established tag: type=* was changed to substance=* the main reason for this change was a (possible) conflict with type=* as used in relations. also, type=* was considered to be too generic to describe the medium flowing within pipelines. Some mappers used pipeline:type for the substance. http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/pipeline:type#values It is/was a recommendation to use xx:type instead of the confusing type tag (especially on relations). http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:type Can you have a look at that pipeline:type tag, too? Regards Werner (werner2101) ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] MEP - pipelines
CH No, just because a handful of wiki 'votes' does not mandate a mechanical CH edit. OK, then we'll have split data. CH What about the maps I produce for my client? You're not likely to know what about changing the rendering rules after the mechanical edit? the purpose of this discussion is to let users like you know about the change. CH about it as it is a private project. If you make a mechanical edit that CH breaks my render, should I send the bill for the changes to you no. you're using open data here without any guarantees. CH What? your amazing wiki page might be ignored by some mappers? How dare CH they?! [censored] CH If you must have a mechanical edit (which I don't see as vital), why not CH add substance=* tag alongside the type=* tag? redundancy? ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[OSM-talk] osmapi 0.5.0 for python supports changeset discussion
Hi there, the python wrapper for the OSM API now finally supports changeset discussions, the new feature introduced in November: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/osmapi In the course of this update, I also added the new calls to the API wiki page: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/API_v0.6. Cheers Stefan ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] MEP - pipelines
I don't see any objection to do as Rainer suggested. Maybe someone can give us examples of conflict with any other data ? All the best *François Lacombe* fl dot infosreseaux At gmail dot com www.infos-reseaux.com @InfosReseaux http://www.twitter.com/InfosReseaux 2015-01-03 17:50 GMT+01:00 Rainer Fügenstein r...@oudeis.org: in accordance to the mechanical edit policy, I'd like to open the discussion on this list: a recently approved proposal introduced new tags for pipelines and marker [1] and changed an established tag: type=* was changed to substance=* the main reason for this change was a (possible) conflict with type=* as used in relations. also, type=* was considered to be too generic to describe the medium flowing within pipelines. this requires a mechanical update of existing data: nodes: containing pipeline=marker nodes: containing pipeline=substation type=* -- substance=* ways: for man_made=pipeline ways: containing pipeline=substation type=* -- substance=* As of now, I'm only aware of the ITO pipeline map (rendering), that is affected by this change. this affects data worldwide. I assume that this update will have to be executed several times in the near future, as mappers may continue to use type=* until they are aware of the new pipeline tagging scheme. cu ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] MEP - pipelines
On 03/01/15 16:50, Rainer Fügenstein wrote: in accordance to the mechanical edit policy, I'd like to open the discussion on this list: a recently approved proposal introduced new tags for pipelines and marker [1] and changed an established tag: type=* was changed to substance=* The values may need changing, e.g. type=sewer become substance=sewage the main reason for this change was a (possible) conflict with type=* as used in relations. also, type=* was considered to be too generic to describe the medium flowing within pipelines. this requires a mechanical update of existing data: No, just because a handful of wiki 'votes' does not mandate a mechanical edit. nodes: containing pipeline=marker nodes: containing pipeline=substation type=* -- substance=* ways: for man_made=pipeline ways: containing pipeline=substation type=* -- substance=* As of now, I'm only aware of the ITO pipeline map (rendering), that is affected by this change. What about the maps I produce for my client? You're not likely to know about it as it is a private project. If you make a mechanical edit that breaks my render, should I send the bill for the changes to you rather than ask my client to pay? (This is not hypothetical I really do have a render using pipelines. I'm also using pipeline data to calculate approximations of distribution and aggregation). this affects data worldwide. I assume that this update will have to be executed several times in the near future, as mappers may continue to use type=* until they are aware of the new pipeline tagging scheme. What? your amazing wiki page might be ignored by some mappers? How dare they?! If you must have a mechanical edit (which I don't see as vital), why not add substance=* tag alongside the type=* tag? That way existing renders and other uses will not be broken. Mech edits that are presumably intended to improve the quality of OSM data can badly damage confidence in the data by breaking existing use. -- Cheers, Chris user: chillly ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] MEP - pipelines
2015-01-03 18:22 GMT+01:00 Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net: The values may need changing, e.g. type=sewer become substance=sewage +1 indeed What about the maps I produce for my client? You're not likely to know about it as it is a private project. If you make a mechanical edit that breaks my render, should I send the bill for the changes to you rather than ask my client to pay? (This is not hypothetical I really do have a render using pipelines. I'm also using pipeline data to calculate approximations of distribution and aggregation). The map your produce for private projects should be based on a static export of OSM. It will prevent any kind of vandalism to have impact on your valuable services. As data producer, may I ask you how can I refine any tagging scheme if so called private projects have priority on information improvement and general interest ? Rainer, I doesn't avoid you contacting supp...@itoworld.com (and maybe any other pipeline user) to inform them. If you must have a mechanical edit (which I don't see as vital), why not add substance=* tag alongside the type=* tag? That way existing renders and other uses will not be broken. Mech edits that are presumably intended to improve the quality of OSM data can badly damage confidence in the data by breaking existing use. Why not. It will maintain type=* on features which shouldn't be described with it and I think it's bad. If we do so, the wiki must be assumed as a reference. Because, when substance=* and type=* will be on every feature, who will be able to make the distinguish between them both ? All the best *François Lacombe* fl dot infosreseaux At gmail dot com www.infos-reseaux.com @InfosReseaux http://www.twitter.com/InfosReseaux ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] 176k Wikidata tags to add to OSM
Hi Edward, any updates on your project? As said before, I would love to see some test imports. Am 24.11.2014 um 12:28 schrieb Edward Betts: It has been suggested that I shouldn't be using Wikipedia at all, instead I should be looking at the 'instance of' property in Wikidata. Using English Wikipedia introduces an English-language bias, there are items in Wikidata without an associated article in English Wikipedia. The reason for using Wikipedia Categories is because use of the 'instance of' property is very patchy. The majority of the items in my result list don't include the 'instance of' property. A related piece of work will be to populate this field in Wikidata, but for now I'm focused on linking OSM and Wikidata. Did you already start on this side? There are already 25k things with a Wikidata tag in OSM. When I compare this list with my generated list I find 2,000 cases where a given Wikidata ID is assigned to a different OSM object from the one picked by my system. In addition there are 26 OSM objects with a wikidata tag pointing at a different Wikidata item. By now there are arround 26k things. Give it a boost to 30k ;-), in a well defined area. So people can evaluate. Many of these mismatches are villages, towns and municipalities in Germany. One possible way to solve this is if I exclude settlements in Germany from my list. It looks like Germany doesn't need an automated import of Wikidata tags. Why are they mismatching? Maybe we can fix it. Happy new year Morray ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] MEP - pipelines
On 03/01/15 17:46, François Lacombe wrote: 2015-01-03 18:22 GMT+01:00 Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net mailto:o...@raggedred.net: What about the maps I produce for my client? You're not likely to know about it as it is a private project. If you make a mechanical edit that breaks my render, should I send the bill for the changes to you rather than ask my client to pay? (This is not hypothetical I really do have a render using pipelines. I'm also using pipeline data to calculate approximations of distribution and aggregation). The map your produce for private projects should be based on a static export of OSM. It will prevent any kind of vandalism to have impact on your valuable services. Thanks for telling me how to run my process. Given that the data used in the project are being edited and are evolving and includes data other than the pipeline data that are being edited, a static snapshot won't cut it. I include some mechanical edits as vandalism, other than that, vandalism has not caused me any problems at all. As data producer, may I ask you how can I refine any tagging scheme if so called private projects have priority on information improvement and general interest ? If you must adjust tagging schemes that are in use, then you must devise a way to migrate to the new scheme in stages that doesn't break the existing processes that people use the data for. The proposer of the change is, IMO, fully responsible for this and if there is not a proper migration plan then the change should be quickly rejected. Simply replacing a tag with another tag via mechanical edit at an arbitrary point in time just isn't good enough to me. -- Cheers, Chris user: chillly ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] MEP - pipelines
2015-01-03 21:18 GMT+01:00 Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net: I include some mechanical edits as vandalism, other than that, vandalism has not caused me any problems at all. I was too. And I don't understand why a static snapshot can't help you regarding changes that don't suit your needs. If you must adjust tagging schemes that are in use, then you must devise a way to migrate to the new scheme in stages that doesn't break the existing processes that people use the data for. The proposer of the change is, IMO, fully responsible for this and if there is not a proper migration plan then the change should be quickly rejected. Simply replacing a tag with another tag via mechanical edit at an arbitrary point in time just isn't good enough to me. I'm sorry, but I'm not very fond of bureaucracy. My unpaid contribution is entirely done in free time (like many MANY people here) and we won't spend it on personal interests considerations. As Rainer rightly said, you're using free data without any guarantee. My point isn't to not be user-friendly, but if I setup a smooth migration process for YOU, it won't necessarily suit your neighbour's processes. Why each data consumer can't adapt themselves and make an effort ? Mechanical edits aren't bad if they are prepared and users informed about it. Then a precise date can be discussed and everyone start using tags at the same tags without letting the old ones in the DB for years. Rainer, others and myself should be focused on consistency, versatility of tags, doing things (like tag migration) once. That's why OSM need a serious workflow refinement regarding tagging reference. This new one should include mechanical edits and communication about them toward data consumers. *François Lacombe* fl dot infosreseaux At gmail dot com www.infos-reseaux.com @InfosReseaux http://www.twitter.com/InfosReseaux ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-it] Inversione ad U ad incrocio
Ho guardato la situazione su StreetView. Penso che l'inversione a U come la descrivi tu, vista l'assenza di cartelli, sia legale, anche se non consigliata. Ho anche guardato il senso opposto dove c'è segnaletica che mi sembra è ignorata (https://maps.google.com/maps?output=classicdg=oo). C'è la segnaletica solo diritto ma la varie foto Streetview fanno vedere una macchina e due moto girare a sinistra. Ma l'inversione a U è vietata chiaramente. 2015-01-03 15:03 GMT+01:00 emmexx emm...@tiscalinet.it: Cercando di sistemare le turn restrictions di un incrocio mi sono imbattuto in un problema legato al routing. http://osrm.at/ax1 In teoria le inversioni ad U sono vietate agli incroci, senza bisogno di ulteriore segnaletica verticale. Nel caso in questione e' presente uno spartitraffico, dove si trova un semaforo, ma non ci sono altri cartelli. Probabilmente e' un errore del Comune perche' in quell'incrocio c'e' anche una via a sx contromano e quindi dovrebbe esserci un divieto di svolta. Vabbe'... Volevo capire se, anche in mancanza di segnaletica, e' il caso di inserire una o piu' turn restrictions in casi come questo. grazie maxx ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Vendita legna
Il 3 gennaio 2015 11:52, Carlo Stemberger carlo.stember...@gmail.com ha scritto: Chi produce legna da ardere è un'impresa agricola: secondo me si dovrebbe mappare questa attività sostanzialmente come chi produce mele o pomodori. I roditori potrebbero trovarlo interessante. Guardando cosa fanno gli altri mappers, in ordine di utilizzo troviamo: [999* fuel=wood] 102 shop=wood 9 shop=firewood 1 shop=woods 1 shop=fire_wood 1 fuel:wood=yes * insieme a amenity=bbq, leiusure, tourism, shelter, ecc... nessuno che venda legna. Guardando all'utilizzo (bruciare) direi che senza dubbio sto cercando un combustibile (fuel), poi che sia liquido, solido o gassoso, dipende dal tipo di caldaia che possiedo. E se il negozio di combustibili vendesse non solo legna, ma anche carbone, gasolio e bombole di gpl/metano? 359 shop=gas 7 shop=lpg 4 shop=coal Non è un distributore sulla strada (amenity) ma solo un negozio di combustibili (shop). Propongo shop=fuel, fuel:wood=yes, fuel:coal=yes, fuel:diesel=yes, fuel:lpg=yes, fuel:cng=yes coerentemente con lo schema adottato per qualsiasi altro combustibile. Da taginfo ci sono 32 shop=fuel. Mauro. ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
[Talk-it] Posizionamento Tracce GPS
Ragazzi Ciao, Mi chiamo Angelo e sono iscritto da più di un anno alla list. Vi seguo, ma poi effettivamente non ho dato molto contributo. Comunque mi è capitato di lavorare con le mappe OSM per la mia tesi universitaria. Voglio, appunto, condividere con voi il mio lavoro che purtroppo ho lasciato perdere per vari motivi (di lavoro, anche). Innanzitutto trovate il codice e il testo della tesi che spiega tutto al seguente link https://github.com/chemickypes/searchgpspath In pratica, il lavoro consiste nel posizionare le tracce GPX sulla mappa in modo tale da poter estrarre tutte le informazioni necessarie. Più in dettaglio: 1. La mappa (osm) viene partizionata in un diagramma di voronoi (in particolare questa parte è stato il mio vero lavoro) 2. per mezzo di un algoritmo di point location, posizioniamo i punti della traccia a quelli reali della mappa (questo è stato in particolare il lavoro del mio collega) Nella tesi comunque è scritto tutto. Per qualsiasi cosa sono a disposizione. Spero che serva a qualcuno. Vi auguro buona giornata. -- Angelo ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
[Talk-it] Numeri Civici Open Data Regione Sardegna ....
Ciao a tutti, un po di tempo ricordo che è apparsa la news che la Regione Sardegna rendeva disponibili sul suo geoPortale i Numeri Civici georiferiti al seguente indirizzo http://www.sardegnageoportale.it/index.php?xsl=1598s=140641v=2c=8831t=1 Ho provato a scaricarli e a dargli un'occhiata ma devo ammettere, anche leggendomi i metadati, che non riesco a capire come visualizzare le info associate che mi diano visione dei classici dati associati ad un civico e quindi tipo_via toponimo civico. Sicuramente sono in qualche altro strato da scaricare e mettere in join ma non ho capito quali e come :-( Qualcuno riesce a darmi una mano con qualche spiegazione più terra-terra? Grazie mille sin da ora! Cesare Gerbino http://cesaregerbino.wordpress.com/ http://www.facebook.com/cesare.gerbino http://www.facebook.com/pages/Cesare-Gerbino-GIS-Blog/246234455498174?ref=hl https://twitter.com/CesareGerbino http://www.linkedin.com/pub/cesare-gerbino/56/494/77b ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Problema rendering chiese
Magari vengono renderizzate solo le tiles che hanno 'subito' cambiamenti. È solo un'ipotesi. Saluti Il 03/Gen/2015 09:16 Federico Cortese cortese...@gmail.com ha scritto: 2015-01-03 8:39 GMT+01:00 Luca Delucchi lucadel...@gmail.com: 2015-01-02 22:48 GMT+01:00 sabas88 saba...@gmail.com: Ciao, mi sa che l'hanno rilasciato subito... https://c.tile.openstreetmap.org/17/68787/47453.png non sto capendo come mai genova la vedo col nuovo stile, mentre trento con quello vecchio, ed ho anche provato a far ricaricare le tiles... Anche in provincia di Lecce avevo notato lo stesso problema ieri, alcuni tiles vengono renderizzati col nuovo stile altri restano col vecchio, anche ricaricando ripetutamente. Il discorso vale anche per gli stessi tiles a diversi livelli di zoom. Credevo fosse una cosa temporanea invece permane ancora stamattina. Ciao Federico ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
[Talk-it] Inversione ad U ad incrocio
Cercando di sistemare le turn restrictions di un incrocio mi sono imbattuto in un problema legato al routing. http://osrm.at/ax1 In teoria le inversioni ad U sono vietate agli incroci, senza bisogno di ulteriore segnaletica verticale. Nel caso in questione e' presente uno spartitraffico, dove si trova un semaforo, ma non ci sono altri cartelli. Probabilmente e' un errore del Comune perche' in quell'incrocio c'e' anche una via a sx contromano e quindi dovrebbe esserci un divieto di svolta. Vabbe'... Volevo capire se, anche in mancanza di segnaletica, e' il caso di inserire una o piu' turn restrictions in casi come questo. grazie maxx ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Inversione ad U ad incrocio
Non l'avrei fatto, ma non sapevo che l'inversione a U è generalmente vietato a incroci in Italia. Ci sono paesi dove non è vietato. 2015-01-03 18:06 GMT+01:00 emmexx emm...@tiscalinet.it: Il 01/03/2015 03:59 PM, Volker Schmidt scrisse: Penso che l'inversione a U come la descrivi tu, vista l'assenza di cartelli, sia legale, anche se non consigliata. Il codice della strada dice che l'inversione a U agli incroci e' vietata, non c'e' bisogno di specifici cartelli. Oltre al fatto che in quel punto e' come fare inversione in autostrada ;-) ciao maxx ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Inversione ad U ad incrocio
Il 01/03/2015 03:59 PM, Volker Schmidt scrisse: Penso che l'inversione a U come la descrivi tu, vista l'assenza di cartelli, sia legale, anche se non consigliata. Il codice della strada dice che l'inversione a U agli incroci e' vietata, non c'e' bisogno di specifici cartelli. Oltre al fatto che in quel punto e' come fare inversione in autostrada ;-) ciao maxx ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Vendita legna
From: Volker Schmidt [mailto:vosc...@gmail.com] Sent: sabato 3 gennaio 2015 11:21 To: openstreetmap list - italiano Subject: Re: [Talk-it] Vendita legna Forse. ci sono 9 shop=firewood e un shop=fire_wood in Taginfo Ci sono anche 60 trade=wood. Anche 40 trade=timber_yard, ma questo penso sia pensato per legname da costruzione. Ciao, Alberto ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Vendita legna
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Il 03/01/2015 11:37, Volker Schmidt ha scritto: Nemmeno questo, secondo me. Man_made indica una costruzione, ma tu vuoi descrivere una attività commerciale. No, credo che per la vendita shop=firewood vada bene, è solo il caso eventuale di produzione propria di legna che non mi riesce, pensavo di inquadrare la cosa tipo una segheria artigianale, ma non mi quadra nemmeno questa. È un lavoro specifico, per cui credo bisognerà inventare un tag/key apposito. Mi fà strano vedere che non esiste, visto che praticamente è presente in tutto il nord e centro europa. - -- Simone Girardelli _|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_ |_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_| -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUp8d/AAoJEMTPIIVov0ZtJuIH/iP7sXvxcFvZEWEKAVeLQHJp WsZYqVoc5e1/TPuDddPaUErShIrbnr2pt/hAN2elpNzcd7q8QFD0EYuQv5080RVw 95CYLHe/bReIXmY44rFc7lKxKvq3PPbMdjhoP98SuF+fauvrABCJw/ZhIXM4Omi8 ZIJSIWpIeXb5Ee47qWWoHTOlpyoLwPZSflz5zT8wvnDFacJPwHBPNKRmLPl46zhp 1kMxWqQXIOn9KC3+k2g79YKpNhUqELqK9vMI39o29J2uizXT5uzarfsBHCutCJEn 3IHFdKtDJmTkcI59zgwY0x39TBLLWe5QzfwywGB7T84khBnXz/UAOR98fLu06Rg= =EuDY -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Vendita legna
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Il 03/01/2015 10:43, Gianluca Boero ha scritto: Ciao a tutti. Dovrei taggare un'attività commerciale che vende legna da ardere in prevalenza. Ho trovato sul wiki il tag shop:energy che ha come traduzione negozio che vende forniture di energia. Non mi sembra molto appropriato per il legname ma non so dove collocarlo. Avete idee in proposito? Ciao... Gianluca forse: shop=firewood e se le produce anche: man_made=firewood - -- Simone Girardelli _|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_ |_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_| -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUp7xeAAoJEMTPIIVov0Zt2UAH/iwUTTOjL45SsNEjdM7J5COD zp6go04D5SwPl4YYhmWKQHl5M5UuWmqTttbgPSl51xcPfW+1n5zpPmyBKO+nuRy+ NF37lgDSy5yb6co5qnkfuB1He4iooaq5X+E1SGkk5/9Y0S5rrZkTktJloNExE3sq YH2smgXFa0hJ6a06ayWrtgXEOtKRGL8qKUgxE0pYBAN2LJRL2DMq7dmtF3qvLd8A BzO1uTeckohHdC/FylSvDeKEXFReim24ls45Qx1ED04G3QJ1f8Bm67Xj5cg64SrB HC5ImuHlpGJfeMS82+mM/98LiXY69rpFhniIIKXFf+F6Kp6XT9nks52EJxkGQS4= =OIzn -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Vendita legna
Nemmeno questo, secondo me. Man_made indica una costruzione, ma tu vuoi descrivere una attività commerciale. On 3 January 2015 at 11:23, girarsi_liste liste.gira...@gmail.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Il 03/01/2015 11:21, Volker Schmidt ha scritto: Non va bene. A tag for identifying man made (artificial) structures and buildings added to the landscape. MmH! Forse: man_made=storage_firewood - -- Simone Girardelli _|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_ |_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_| -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUp8M8AAoJEMTPIIVov0Zt1pgIAM94k/m4VyUT+p7+tSBcakwK F4nWdH/cjusjGXM8CHFmDQDEzguYguJMMiA/RVgSTBF8+FdHhJ3eFtkcvnQ8lcpU 1wfaREByKv4K7hC32/4hZJ3Xs2ltaW/1slDDJuIYzZX1JtwiY0ERr5NOMtBk1Ug7 HM6ch2EHe6YK9daweoNNO2ArGs9tTTvlHr+GGZXHAwJwNer6jLfI0efrVXSUvP7O SVqjsQshqrzcCMQMbL4sx1mB238gcSneshHupTUj7K2z62HVKv93LLQqB9EqafWS /uvNNTPXJwWMp4APR1Rapau1eLHAK0vcph/aFPsA2gw5YojBMhHpEMPaJeRfGws= =FLBM -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Problema rendering chiese
2015-01-03 8:39 GMT+01:00 Luca Delucchi lucadel...@gmail.com: 2015-01-02 22:48 GMT+01:00 sabas88 saba...@gmail.com: Ciao, mi sa che l'hanno rilasciato subito... https://c.tile.openstreetmap.org/17/68787/47453.png non sto capendo come mai genova la vedo col nuovo stile, mentre trento con quello vecchio, ed ho anche provato a far ricaricare le tiles... Anche in provincia di Lecce avevo notato lo stesso problema ieri, alcuni tiles vengono renderizzati col nuovo stile altri restano col vecchio, anche ricaricando ripetutamente. Il discorso vale anche per gli stessi tiles a diversi livelli di zoom. Credevo fosse una cosa temporanea invece permane ancora stamattina. Ciao Federico ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Vendita legna
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Il 03/01/2015 11:21, Volker Schmidt ha scritto: Non va bene. A tag for identifying man made (artificial) structures and buildings added to the landscape. MmH! Forse: man_made=storage_firewood - -- Simone Girardelli _|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_ |_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_| -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUp8M8AAoJEMTPIIVov0Zt1pgIAM94k/m4VyUT+p7+tSBcakwK F4nWdH/cjusjGXM8CHFmDQDEzguYguJMMiA/RVgSTBF8+FdHhJ3eFtkcvnQ8lcpU 1wfaREByKv4K7hC32/4hZJ3Xs2ltaW/1slDDJuIYzZX1JtwiY0ERr5NOMtBk1Ug7 HM6ch2EHe6YK9daweoNNO2ArGs9tTTvlHr+GGZXHAwJwNer6jLfI0efrVXSUvP7O SVqjsQshqrzcCMQMbL4sx1mB238gcSneshHupTUj7K2z62HVKv93LLQqB9EqafWS /uvNNTPXJwWMp4APR1Rapau1eLHAK0vcph/aFPsA2gw5YojBMhHpEMPaJeRfGws= =FLBM -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
[Talk-it] Vendita legna
Ciao a tutti. Dovrei taggare un'attività commerciale che vende legna da ardere in prevalenza. Ho trovato sul wiki il tag shop:energy che ha come traduzione negozio che vende forniture di energia. Non mi sembra molto appropriato per il legname ma non so dove collocarlo. Avete idee in proposito? Ciao... Gianluca ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Vendita legna
forse: shop=firewood Forse. ci sono 9 shop=firewood e un shop=fire_wood in Taginfo e se le produce anche: man_made=firewood Non va bene. A tag for identifying man made (artificial) structures and buildings added to the landscape. ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Vendita legna
Chi produce legna da ardere è un'impresa agricola: secondo me si dovrebbe mappare questa attività sostanzialmente come chi produce mele o pomodori. Ciao! Carlo ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Problema rendering chiese
2015-01-03 12:22 GMT+01:00 Fabrizio Tambussa ftambu...@gmail.com: Magari vengono renderizzate solo le tiles che hanno 'subito' cambiamenti. È solo un'ipotesi. Saluti Se avete nella cache vecchie tiles potrebbe essere che vengono visualizzate quelle. Provate a chiedere al browser di aggiornare la pagina e i suoi contrnuti. Io, nelle zone di Milano che ho controllato, vedo vecchio stile gli zoom da 10 a 12, poi nuovo stile da 13 a 16 poi vecchio sitle dallo zoom 17 allo zoom 19. AnyFile ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] [SOD] Numeri Civici Open Data Regione Sardegna ....
On 3 Jan 2015 18:19, cesare gerbino cesaregerb...@gmail.com wrote: Ciao a tutti, un po di tempo ricordo che è apparsa la news che la Regione Sardegna rendeva disponibili sul suo geoPortale i Numeri Civici georiferiti al seguente indirizzo http://www.sardegnageoportale.it/index.php?xsl=1598s=140641v=2c=8831t=1 Ho provato a scaricarli e a dargli un'occhiata ma devo ammettere, anche leggendomi i metadati, che non riesco a capire come visualizzare le info associate che mi diano visione dei classici dati associati ad un civico e quindi tipo_via toponimo civico. Sicuramente sono in qualche altro strato da scaricare e mettere in join ma non ho capito quali e come :-( Qualcuno riesce a darmi una mano con qualche spiegazione più terra-terra? Qui c'è la documentazione di Leonardo per l'import, magari ti è utile http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sardegna/Import/Address_import_for_Sardinia Grazie mille sin da ora! Cesare Gerbino Ciao, Stefano http://cesaregerbino.wordpress.com/ http://www.facebook.com/cesare.gerbino http://www.facebook.com/pages/Cesare-Gerbino-GIS-Blog/246234455498174?ref=hl https://twitter.com/CesareGerbino http://www.linkedin.com/pub/cesare-gerbino/56/494/77b -- Hai ricevuto questo messaggio perché sei iscritto al gruppo Spaghetti Open Data di Google Gruppi. Per annullare l'iscrizione a questo gruppo e non ricevere più le sue email, invia un'email a spaghettiopendata+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. Visita questo gruppo all'indirizzo http://groups.google.com/group/spaghettiopendata. Per altre opzioni visita https://groups.google.com/d/optout. ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] [SOD] Numeri Civici Open Data Regione Sardegna ....
Che paese ti interessa (se é disponibile nei civici)? Il 03/gen/2015 19:22 sabas88 saba...@gmail.com ha scritto: On 3 Jan 2015 18:19, cesare gerbino cesaregerb...@gmail.com wrote: Ciao a tutti, un po di tempo ricordo che è apparsa la news che la Regione Sardegna rendeva disponibili sul suo geoPortale i Numeri Civici georiferiti al seguente indirizzo http://www.sardegnageoportale.it/index.php?xsl=1598s=140641v=2c=8831t=1 Ho provato a scaricarli e a dargli un'occhiata ma devo ammettere, anche leggendomi i metadati, che non riesco a capire come visualizzare le info associate che mi diano visione dei classici dati associati ad un civico e quindi tipo_via toponimo civico. Sicuramente sono in qualche altro strato da scaricare e mettere in join ma non ho capito quali e come :-( Qualcuno riesce a darmi una mano con qualche spiegazione più terra-terra? Qui c'è la documentazione di Leonardo per l'import, magari ti è utile http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sardegna/Import/Address_import_for_Sardinia Grazie mille sin da ora! Cesare Gerbino Ciao, Stefano http://cesaregerbino.wordpress.com/ http://www.facebook.com/cesare.gerbino http://www.facebook.com/pages/Cesare-Gerbino-GIS-Blog/246234455498174?ref=hl https://twitter.com/CesareGerbino http://www.linkedin.com/pub/cesare-gerbino/56/494/77b -- Hai ricevuto questo messaggio perché sei iscritto al gruppo Spaghetti Open Data di Google Gruppi. Per annullare l'iscrizione a questo gruppo e non ricevere più le sue email, invia un'email a spaghettiopendata+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. Visita questo gruppo all'indirizzo http://groups.google.com/group/spaghettiopendata. Per altre opzioni visita https://groups.google.com/d/optout. ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] [SOD] Numeri Civici Open Data Regione Sardegna ....
Grazie delle risposte sollecite. Stefano : mi era sfuggita la documentazione per l'import e quindi gli darò un'occhiata. Leonardo: in realtà mi servirebbero tutti i comuni disponibili, li ho scaricati dal sito adesso dovrei solo recuperare le info di cui nella mia mail di help ... Grazie e buona serata Cesare Gerbino http://cesaregerbino.wordpress.com/ http://www.facebook.com/cesare.gerbino http://www.facebook.com/pages/Cesare-Gerbino-GIS-Blog/246234455498174?ref=hl https://twitter.com/CesareGerbino http://www.linkedin.com/pub/cesare-gerbino/56/494/77b Il giorno 3 gennaio 2015 19:25, Leonardo Frassetto kinetocor...@gmail.com ha scritto: Che paese ti interessa (se é disponibile nei civici)? Il 03/gen/2015 19:22 sabas88 saba...@gmail.com ha scritto: On 3 Jan 2015 18:19, cesare gerbino cesaregerb...@gmail.com wrote: Ciao a tutti, un po di tempo ricordo che è apparsa la news che la Regione Sardegna rendeva disponibili sul suo geoPortale i Numeri Civici georiferiti al seguente indirizzo http://www.sardegnageoportale.it/index.php?xsl=1598s=140641v=2c=8831t=1 Ho provato a scaricarli e a dargli un'occhiata ma devo ammettere, anche leggendomi i metadati, che non riesco a capire come visualizzare le info associate che mi diano visione dei classici dati associati ad un civico e quindi tipo_via toponimo civico. Sicuramente sono in qualche altro strato da scaricare e mettere in join ma non ho capito quali e come :-( Qualcuno riesce a darmi una mano con qualche spiegazione più terra-terra? Qui c'è la documentazione di Leonardo per l'import, magari ti è utile http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sardegna/Import/Address_import_for_Sardinia Grazie mille sin da ora! Cesare Gerbino Ciao, Stefano http://cesaregerbino.wordpress.com/ http://www.facebook.com/cesare.gerbino http://www.facebook.com/pages/Cesare-Gerbino-GIS-Blog/246234455498174?ref=hl https://twitter.com/CesareGerbino http://www.linkedin.com/pub/cesare-gerbino/56/494/77b -- Hai ricevuto questo messaggio perché sei iscritto al gruppo Spaghetti Open Data di Google Gruppi. Per annullare l'iscrizione a questo gruppo e non ricevere più le sue email, invia un'email a spaghettiopendata+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. Visita questo gruppo all'indirizzo http://groups.google.com/group/spaghettiopendata. Per altre opzioni visita https://groups.google.com/d/optout. ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
[Talk-it] Rampa di scale cilindrica con ascensore
Purtroppo non ho fotografato l'oggetto nel suo insieme, solo a pezzi. Si tratta di un cilindro di cemento armato che contiene una scala, ovviamente a spirale, e al centro un ascensore. Serve per permettere ai pedoni, ed alle bici, c'e' anche la canalina, di salire ad una piazza pedonale/ponte ciclopedonale. (per i milanesi si tratta della zona Portello). Le foto qui: http://www.emmexx.it/varie/osm/rampa/DSC05246.JPG http://www.emmexx.it/varie/osm/rampa/DSC05247.JPG http://www.emmexx.it/varie/osm/rampa/DSC05259.JPG http://www.emmexx.it/varie/osm/rampa/DSC05266.JPG grazie maxx ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] mappe città europee
Credo che cercare di comprendere il lavoro di un creativo ci voglia troppo tempo, non basta uno sguardo. Cmq a meno di spiegazioni specifiche anche a me sembra una cagata pazzesca l'impiego di alcuni Pantone e stampe in misura tipografica. Poi viste dal vivo magari sono proprio belli. Berti Il giorno 2 gen 2015 15:54, alle ore 15:54, Simone Saviolo simone.savi...@gmail.com ha scritto: Il giorno 29 dicembre 2014 11:36, Simone Cortesi sim...@cortesi.com ha scritto: su segnalazione vi inoltro il sito: http://www.paologianfrancesco.com/graphic/urban-shape mappe grafiche progettate dall'architetto Paolo Gianfrancesco. Le mappe si basano su dati di Open Street Map. La serie copre tutte le capitali europee. La scelta del colore è basata sulla tavolozza dei colori Pantone in dissolvenza dal più alto valore di popolazione al più basso. Solo io non vedo il valore artistico di questo progetto? Mi sembra che non ci sia alcuna data reduction, nessun vero punto di vista e nessuna interpretazione. Ok, ha scelto una tavolozza di colori, e allora? Trovo molto più interessanti le mappe Watercolor di Stamen. Ciao, Simone ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Vendita legna
Considerando che nel mio caso non si vende solo legna ma anche pellets che non sono proprio legna ma un derivato. Il 03/01/2015 17:35, Mauro Costantini ha scritto: Il 3 gennaio 2015 11:52, Carlo Stemberger carlo.stember...@gmail.com ha scritto: Chi produce legna da ardere è un'impresa agricola: secondo me si dovrebbe mappare questa attività sostanzialmente come chi produce mele o pomodori. I roditori potrebbero trovarlo interessante. Guardando cosa fanno gli altri mappers, in ordine di utilizzo troviamo: [999* fuel=wood] 102 shop=wood 9 shop=firewood 1 shop=woods 1 shop=fire_wood 1 fuel:wood=yes * insieme a amenity=bbq, leiusure, tourism, shelter, ecc... nessuno che venda legna. Guardando all'utilizzo (bruciare) direi che senza dubbio sto cercando un combustibile (fuel), poi che sia liquido, solido o gassoso, dipende dal tipo di caldaia che possiedo. E se il negozio di combustibili vendesse non solo legna, ma anche carbone, gasolio e bombole di gpl/metano? 359 shop=gas 7 shop=lpg 4 shop=coal Non è un distributore sulla strada (amenity) ma solo un negozio di combustibili (shop). Propongo shop=fuel, fuel:wood=yes, fuel:coal=yes, fuel:diesel=yes, fuel:lpg=yes, fuel:cng=yes coerentemente con lo schema adottato per qualsiasi altro combustibile. Da taginfo ci sono 32 shop=fuel. Mauro. ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
[Talk-it-trentino] Segnalazione di una relazione da sistemare nel confine Veneto - Trentino.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ho appena mappato sul confine Veneto, dalla parte Trentina con ortofoto 2012, zona Castello Tesino - Lamon. Nella frazione dello stesso, dopo aver mappato, ho avviato il validatore con josm, che mi ha restituito un'errore di una relazione dedicata ad un sentiero dell'orso, che non ho mappato, ma essendo presente nell'area selezionata, ovviamente me lo ha segnalato. la relazione è questa: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3644957 È Presente solo un tag name, ma niente più, ed io non conosco questo sentiero o area della zona, per cui rimetto a chi conosce la zona il darci un'occhio, visto che ci sono anche alcuni errori di strade da sistemare che passano in mezzo a case, ma quelle le posso sistemare anche io domani. Mi premeva segnalare questo agli amici veneti, visto che qualcuno sicuramente è di quella zona, o vi ha percorso quel sentiero. - -- Simone Girardelli _|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_ |_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_| -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUqGNmAAoJEMTPIIVov0Zt8CIH/2GtBmW2qSLm30zzQnYnTCB0 HvwMJowDksXv0hQdKcN8t0BcFnz5A7zyVVQDorvU1pikIDY7SQTsnf7U0UfRMwWB pIh7mjNMUV1jJiFvoCmq3cvRndL0A5hm44n67TpzK7gKKn8p/hJ81g0au1AlqkmZ /blEJblW1hhHKHAPOypjkXjTFWZJiJSuczkYrbYpm7sSW0BROFhE55+hVrescmIR ZvGkJ+7BeUEKpsD7Qt5ngnhNJacKx+LqIN7QZlk5pdxFCu173Sxu/VNOMqKZq5AM IK8yxK2jZZDiC0eANxC4DVH9zGATcUDNDgg9M0KdR9zByhKf1Dtx04LnLlVTrzs= =wQ0I -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Talk-it-trentino mailing list Talk-it-trentino@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it-trentino
Re: [Talk-pe] Reunión de comunidad OSM Perú
El 02/01/15 a las 02:13, Marco Antonio escribió: Bien, para ser exactos es aquí? (usar el botón compartir (derecha) y seleccionar añadir marcador): http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=-11.99705mlon=-77.07945#map=17/-11.99705/-77.07949 Una sorpresa de Alfonso por el blog: Para aquellos interesados en participar y que no se encuentren en Lima podríamos coordinar y ayudarlos en lo referente al hospedaje o alguna otra cosa que esté a nuestro alcance. Ese tipo de inconvenientes no debería inmovilizarnos. http://osmpe.ourproject.org/2015/01/01/reunion-comunidad-osmpe/#comment-227 :) Saludos! ___ Talk-pe mailing list Talk-pe@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Re: [Talk-ro] Talk-ro Digest, Vol 69, Issue 1
Eu nu am masina, poate sa ma ia cineva din drum ? 2015-01-02 18:16 GMT+02:00 talk-ro-requ...@openstreetmap.org: Send Talk-ro mailing list submissions to talk-ro@openstreetmap.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to talk-ro-requ...@openstreetmap.org You can reach the person managing the list at talk-ro-ow...@openstreetmap.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of Talk-ro digest... Today's Topics: 1. Re: O zi de osm in data de 4 ianuarie 2015 ? (Jean-Baptiste Holcroft) 2. Re: O zi de osm in data de 4 ianuarie 2015 ? (Rădulescu Răzvan) -- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2015 17:06:29 +0200 From: Jean-Baptiste Holcroft jb.holcr...@gmail.com To: OSM Romania talk-ro@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-ro] O zi de osm in data de 4 ianuarie 2015 ? Message-ID: CAPE+OKzt9ihiCePBX9ESUyPNz+tCOO-x4= jcmh336s4ptbp...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Începem ziua la orele 10: la stație Branesti (Brănești Sat) Pentru fiecare excursie de o zi, amintiți-vă să utilizați telefonul și aplicarea mapillary pentru a îmbunătăți acoperirea Bucureștiului: https://www.mapillary.com Nu ezitați să trimiteți în mod repetat imagini din același loc, instrumentul îmbunătățeste toate datele de calitate in mod regulat. La orele 10:10: distributia persoanelor pe autoturism, idealul ar fi un conducător auto și un co-pilot; pentru a face foto si a lua notițe: * Identificarea obiectivelor: nume de străzi, stații de transport public, clădiri publice, suprafețe de drum. Orice altceva este un bonus. Zone de distribuție (pe care o vom face pentru fiecare mașină, cum am spud mai sus), folosind harta :Http://fieldpapers.org/atlas.php?id=tdx4xdfq La orele 10:20: * Mapping * ~ prânz: mergem la Have a cigare, ma voi ocupa sa fac rezervarea pentru noi toti. Masa de prânz. În jurul orelor 13 sau 14: * Prezentarea de instrument și obiectivehttp:// osmose.openstreetmap.fr/ro/map/ * Corectarea greșelilor, este o buna ocazie de a acorda atenție acestei zone. * * de exemplu, o corecție a unei clădiri daca cartierul este bine poziționat în raport cu sateliți * *sa corectam erorihttp:// osmose.openstreetmap.fr/ro/errors/?country=romaniaitem=categorii * Introducerea datelor colectate la Branesti (atentie la datele deja adaugate) * Corectarea erorilor osmose 16h: Rezumatul progreselor înregistrate în timpul zilei, prezentarea informațiilor despre OSM România și în lume și în cazul în care cineva dorește să prezinte lucrarea sa (Florin?). * Discuții, bere sau cartografie Vrei sa faci ceva înainte de eveniment? * Descoperiți osmose:http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/ro/map/ Le 24 déc. 2014 18:07, Jean-Baptiste Holcroft jb.holcr...@gmail.com a écrit : Foarte bine :) Poți transmite acest mesaj pe pagina de facebook ? -- Jean-Baptiste Holcroft 2014-12-24 12:15 GMT+02:00 Alex Morega a...@grep.ro: Eu vin. -- Alex On 24 Dec 2014, at 01:42, Gabriel Sebastian Moise gabrielsebastianmo...@gmail.com wrote: Ar fi chiar interesant si productiv Sa vedem cine ar mai putea veni ! În data de 24 decembrie 2014, 01:24, Jean-Baptiste Holcroft [via GIS] [hidden email] a scris: Salut, Sunt in Bucuresti pentru sarbatorile de iarna si voi pleaca in Franta pe 6 ianuarie. As dori sa va propun o zi de osm in data de 4 ianuarie in apropiere de Bucuresti, cine este disponibil ? Ideea mea este : 1) sa mergem intr-un loc pentru a profita de aer si de a descoperi si a cartografia un orasel pe langa Bucuresti ca de exemplu : http://layers.openstreetmap.fr/?zoom=13lat=44.46059lon=26.33133layers=0B000TF Sau 2) sa merge intr-un bar cu wifi (si videoproiector ?) pentru a corecta un pic de la 89985 osmose Romania errors : http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/ro/errors/?country=romaniaitem= Astept cu nerabdare raspunsul vostru. Intre timp va urez la toti sarbatori fericite si La multi ani pentru anul 2015! Numai bine, JIBEC / Jean-Baptiste PS : don't fool yourself, this message has been totaly rewritten by my fiancée ... My romanian is improving, but is still bad ... -- Jean-Baptiste Holcroft ___ Talk-ro mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/O-zi-de-osm-in-data-de-4-ianuarie-2015-tp5828113.html To start a new topic under Romania, email [hidden email] To unsubscribe from Romania, click here. NAML --
Re: [Talk-ro] O zi de osm in data de 4 ianuarie 2015 ?
no problems, you'll come when you can, we'll probably stay for a few hours -- Jean-Baptiste Holcroft 2015-01-03 19:07 GMT+02:00 Gabriel Sebastian Moise gabrielsebastianmo...@gmail.com: Eu cred ca abia la ora 16.00 ajung in Bucuresti. Nu pot sa plec de dimineata din Campina ( PH )... Pregatisem si masina cu autocolantele de cartografiere OpenStreetMap ! Poate va gasesc la Have a Cigar in jurul orei 16.00 În data de 3 ianuarie 2015, 18:33, Jean-Baptiste Holcroft [via GIS] [hidden email] http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=5828892i=0 a scris: Finally i have a car :) Le 3 janv. 2015 16:43, Jean-Baptiste Holcroft [hidden email] http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=5828883i=0 a écrit : Poate cineva sa ma ia si pe mine de la arena nationala? Le 2 janv. 2015 18:16, Rădulescu Răzvan [hidden email] http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=5828883i=1 a écrit : Si Keypad mapper pentru cules numere in modul cel mai rapid cu putinta... On 02.01.2015 17:06, Jean-Baptiste Holcroft wrote: Începem ziua la orele 10: la stație Branesti (Brănești Sat) Pentru fiecare excursie de o zi, amintiți-vă să utilizați telefonul și aplicarea mapillary pentru a îmbunătăți acoperirea Bucureștiului: https://www.mapillary.com Nu ezitați să trimiteți în mod repetat imagini din același loc, instrumentul îmbunătățeste toate datele de calitate in mod regulat. La orele 10:10: distributia persoanelor pe autoturism, idealul ar fi un conducător auto și un co-pilot; pentru a face foto si a lua notițe: * Identificarea obiectivelor: nume de străzi, stații de transport public, clădiri publice, suprafețe de drum. Orice altceva este un bonus. Zone de distribuție (pe care o vom face pentru fiecare mașină, cum am spud mai sus), folosind harta : Http://fieldpapers.org/atlas.php?id=tdx4xdfq La orele 10:20: * Mapping * ~ prânz: mergem la Have a cigare, ma voi ocupa sa fac rezervarea pentru noi toti. Masa de prânz. În jurul orelor 13 sau 14: * Prezentarea de instrument și obiectivehttp:// osmose.openstreetmap.fr/ro/map/ * Corectarea greșelilor, este o buna ocazie de a acorda atenție acestei zone. * * de exemplu, o corecție a unei clădiri daca cartierul este bine poziționat în raport cu sateliți * *sa corectam erorihttp:// osmose.openstreetmap.fr/ro/errors/?country=romaniaitem=categorii * Introducerea datelor colectate la Branesti (atentie la datele deja adaugate) * Corectarea erorilor osmose 16h: Rezumatul progreselor înregistrate în timpul zilei, prezentarea informațiilor despre OSM România și în lume și în cazul în care cineva dorește să prezinte lucrarea sa (Florin?). * Discuții, bere sau cartografie Vrei sa faci ceva înainte de eveniment? * Descoperiți osmose:http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/ro/map/ Le 24 déc. 2014 18:07, Jean-Baptiste Holcroft [hidden email] http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=5828883i=2 a écrit : Foarte bine :) Poți transmite acest mesaj pe pagina de facebook ? -- Jean-Baptiste Holcroft 2014-12-24 12:15 GMT+02:00 Alex Morega [hidden email] http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=5828883i=3: Eu vin. -- Alex On 24 Dec 2014, at 01:42, Gabriel Sebastian Moise [hidden email] http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=5828883i=4 wrote: Ar fi chiar interesant si productiv Sa vedem cine ar mai putea veni ! În data de 24 decembrie 2014, 01:24, Jean-Baptiste Holcroft [via GIS] [hidden email] a scris: Salut, Sunt in Bucuresti pentru sarbatorile de iarna si voi pleaca in Franta pe 6 ianuarie. As dori sa va propun o zi de osm in data de 4 ianuarie in apropiere de Bucuresti, cine este disponibil ? Ideea mea este : 1) sa mergem intr-un loc pentru a profita de aer si de a descoperi si a cartografia un orasel pe langa Bucuresti ca de exemplu : http://layers.openstreetmap.fr/?zoom=13lat=44.46059lon=26.33133layers=0B000TF Sau 2) sa merge intr-un bar cu wifi (si videoproiector ?) pentru a corecta un pic de la 89985 osmose Romania errors : http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/ro/errors/?country=romaniaitem= Astept cu nerabdare raspunsul vostru. Intre timp va urez la toti sarbatori fericite si La multi ani pentru anul 2015! Numai bine, JIBEC / Jean-Baptiste PS : don't fool yourself, this message has been totaly rewritten by my fiancée ... My romanian is improving, but is still bad ... -- Jean-Baptiste Holcroft ___ Talk-ro mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/O-zi-de-osm-in-data-de-4-ianuarie-2015-tp5828113.html To start a new topic under Romania, email [hidden email] To unsubscribe from Romania, click here. NAML -- Toate cele bune ! Gabriel Sebastian Moise Administrator Local - Departament Tehnic
Re: [Talk-ro] O zi de osm in data de 4 ianuarie 2015 ?
Finally i have a car :) Le 3 janv. 2015 16:43, Jean-Baptiste Holcroft jb.holcr...@gmail.com a écrit : Poate cineva sa ma ia si pe mine de la arena nationala? Le 2 janv. 2015 18:16, Rădulescu Răzvan radulescu.raz...@gmail.com a écrit : Si Keypad mapper pentru cules numere in modul cel mai rapid cu putinta... On 02.01.2015 17:06, Jean-Baptiste Holcroft wrote: Începem ziua la orele 10: la stație Branesti (Brănești Sat) Pentru fiecare excursie de o zi, amintiți-vă să utilizați telefonul și aplicarea mapillary pentru a îmbunătăți acoperirea Bucureștiului: https://www.mapillary.com Nu ezitați să trimiteți în mod repetat imagini din același loc, instrumentul îmbunătățeste toate datele de calitate in mod regulat. La orele 10:10: distributia persoanelor pe autoturism, idealul ar fi un conducător auto și un co-pilot; pentru a face foto si a lua notițe: * Identificarea obiectivelor: nume de străzi, stații de transport public, clădiri publice, suprafețe de drum. Orice altceva este un bonus. Zone de distribuție (pe care o vom face pentru fiecare mașină, cum am spud mai sus), folosind harta : Http://fieldpapers.org/atlas.php?id=tdx4xdfq La orele 10:20: * Mapping * ~ prânz: mergem la Have a cigare, ma voi ocupa sa fac rezervarea pentru noi toti. Masa de prânz. În jurul orelor 13 sau 14: * Prezentarea de instrument și obiectivehttp:// osmose.openstreetmap.fr/ro/map/ * Corectarea greșelilor, este o buna ocazie de a acorda atenție acestei zone. * * de exemplu, o corecție a unei clădiri daca cartierul este bine poziționat în raport cu sateliți * *sa corectam erorihttp:// osmose.openstreetmap.fr/ro/errors/?country=romaniaitem=categorii * Introducerea datelor colectate la Branesti (atentie la datele deja adaugate) * Corectarea erorilor osmose 16h: Rezumatul progreselor înregistrate în timpul zilei, prezentarea informațiilor despre OSM România și în lume și în cazul în care cineva dorește să prezinte lucrarea sa (Florin?). * Discuții, bere sau cartografie Vrei sa faci ceva înainte de eveniment? * Descoperiți osmose:http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/ro/map/ Le 24 déc. 2014 18:07, Jean-Baptiste Holcroft jb.holcr...@gmail.com a écrit : Foarte bine :) Poți transmite acest mesaj pe pagina de facebook ? -- Jean-Baptiste Holcroft 2014-12-24 12:15 GMT+02:00 Alex Morega a...@grep.ro: Eu vin. -- Alex On 24 Dec 2014, at 01:42, Gabriel Sebastian Moise gabrielsebastianmo...@gmail.com wrote: Ar fi chiar interesant si productiv Sa vedem cine ar mai putea veni ! În data de 24 decembrie 2014, 01:24, Jean-Baptiste Holcroft [via GIS] [hidden email] a scris: Salut, Sunt in Bucuresti pentru sarbatorile de iarna si voi pleaca in Franta pe 6 ianuarie. As dori sa va propun o zi de osm in data de 4 ianuarie in apropiere de Bucuresti, cine este disponibil ? Ideea mea este : 1) sa mergem intr-un loc pentru a profita de aer si de a descoperi si a cartografia un orasel pe langa Bucuresti ca de exemplu : http://layers.openstreetmap.fr/?zoom=13lat=44.46059lon=26.33133layers=0B000TF Sau 2) sa merge intr-un bar cu wifi (si videoproiector ?) pentru a corecta un pic de la 89985 osmose Romania errors : http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/ro/errors/?country=romaniaitem= Astept cu nerabdare raspunsul vostru. Intre timp va urez la toti sarbatori fericite si La multi ani pentru anul 2015! Numai bine, JIBEC / Jean-Baptiste PS : don't fool yourself, this message has been totaly rewritten by my fiancée ... My romanian is improving, but is still bad ... -- Jean-Baptiste Holcroft ___ Talk-ro mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/O-zi-de-osm-in-data-de-4-ianuarie-2015-tp5828113.html To start a new topic under Romania, email [hidden email] To unsubscribe from Romania, click here. NAML -- Toate cele bune ! Gabriel Sebastian Moise Administrator Local - Departament Tehnic -- NextGen Communications S.R.L. - Campina Mobil NextGen : 076 111 65 59 Mobil Personal : 0726 311 957 Adresa Postala: Strada Grivitei, Nr.63, Campina, Romania ! -- View this message in context: Re: O zi de osm in data de 4 ianuarie 2015 ? Sent from the Romania mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Talk-ro mailing list Talk-ro@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro ___ Talk-ro mailing list Talk-ro@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro ___ Talk-ro
Re: [Talk-ro] O zi de osm in data de 4 ianuarie 2015 ?
I can't reach in the morning because, me and my friends we reserved some tickets for a movie in Baneasa Shopping City, and my friend that helps me collecting the field data while i'm driving has something to do in the morning And I have to wait for him to finish I'll arrive as soon as I can ! Keep Facebook open, so I can talk to you ! -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/O-zi-de-osm-in-data-de-4-ianuarie-2015-tp5828113p5828923.html Sent from the Romania mailing list archive at Nabble.com.___ Talk-ro mailing list Talk-ro@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
Re: [Talk-cz] RÚIAN tracer
Ahoj, On 3.1.2015 08:37, Marián Kyral wrote: Dne 3.1.2015 v 00:23 Michal Pustějovský napsal(a): Zdravím, měl bych malou prosbu na RÚIAN tracer. Šlo by naprogramovat, aby při nahrazování existujících domů u klíče building=* přepisoval stávající hodnotu tou z RÚIAN POUZE pro building=yes? Spousta domů už totiž má upřesňující značky typu building=supermarket, building=train_station apod. Při použití traceru hodnoty změní na obecnější civic příp. transportation. Podobná situace je i u building:levels, kdy ruian není vždy přesný. Takže bych radši nechávál stávající hodnoty. Stačil by například i zaškrtávací box v nastaveních. Dost by to zrychlilo a zpřesnilo práci. Ahoj, takhle to původně bylo, ale při úpravách se to ztratilo. Implementoval jsem oba požadavky. Asi nejlepší by bylo, kdyby se zobrazilo okno s rozdíly. Tak jak to je třeba dělá příkaz replace geometry. Ale podle mne by to spíše zdržovalo a časem by to mohlo začít vadit. Takže pokud bych to dělal, tak bych to asi udělal konfigurovatelné. Zobrazil bych okno s rozdíly jen tehdy, pokud je potřeba rozhodnout neznámý neošetřený konflikt. Když pak na talk-cz vychytáme seznam známých konfliktů (civic = church atd.), dialog bude otravovat minimálně. Zároveň ale upozorní na nesrovnalosti, třeba zrovna u building:levels. Už to mám napůl rozpracované, zatím to vypadá nadějně... Martin ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
[Talk-cz] Vypadek MTB map
Ahojte, bohuzel mame nejake problemy se serverem, na kterem bezi MTB mapa, za coz se omlouvam. Pokusime se to opravit co nejdriv, ale konkretni termin je nejasny. Dam vedet. Martin Tesar ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
[Talk-cz] Hromadná úprava tagu
Ahoj všem, nejsem zrovna zběhlý v hromadných úpravách proto se chci zeptat na příkladu: je možné ve vybrané oblasti v JOSM hromadně upravit nějaký tag, myšleno vyhledat kde je a nahradit ho (Např. změnil se tag ze sub_station na substation). Je toto nějak možno alespoň trochu zautomatizovat? Díky za radu Pavel ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
Re: [Talk-cz] Hromadná úprava tagu
V JOSM existuje plugin mirrored_download. Umožňuje stahovat filtrovaná data z Overpass API. Příklad požadavku právě na power=sub_station: ( way[power=sub_station]; ; ); (._; rel(bw); ); (._; rel(bw); ); out meta; Snad pomůže. Michal -- Původní zpráva -- Od: rattsn...@gmail.com Komu: talk-cz@openstreetmap.org Datum: 3. 1. 2015 22:13:37 Předmět: [Talk-cz] Hromadná úprava tagu Ahoj všem, nejsem zrovna zběhlý v hromadných úpravách proto se chci zeptat na příkladu: je možné ve vybrané oblasti v JOSM hromadně upravit nějaký tag, myšleno vyhledat kde je a nahradit ho (Např. změnil se tag ze sub_station na substation). Je toto nějak možno alespoň trochu zautomatizovat? Díky za radu Pavel ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz;___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
Re: [Talk-cz] Hromadná úprava tagu
Ahoj, pro změny na malém území stačí v JOSM vybrat víc objektů současně. Pak můžeš editovat jejich tagy hromadně přímo v okně pro úpravu tagů. Při změně tagu ti nabídne i přehled zastoupených hodnot ve výběru. Když se to zkombinuje s funkcí Hledat (Ctrl-F) [1] a pro přehlednost s filtry [2], dají se tím rychle dělat psí kusy na stažené oblasti. Akorát si vždycky dej dobrý pozor co máš vybráno. Proto je lepší vybrat objekty přes funkci Hledat a co nejpřesněji specifikovat jejich vlastnosti, než vybírat ručně myší nebo Shiftem. Dá se to i kombinovat, hledání umí hledat jen uvnitř současného výběru atd. [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Search_function [2] https://www.mapbox.com/blog/2012-08-15-using-filters-josm/ Martin On 3.1.2015 22:12, rattsn...@gmail.com wrote: Ahoj všem, nejsem zrovna zběhlý v hromadných úpravách proto se chci zeptat na příkladu: je možné ve vybrané oblasti v JOSM hromadně upravit nějaký tag, myšleno vyhledat kde je a nahradit ho (Např. změnil se tag ze sub_station na substation). Je toto nějak možno alespoň trochu zautomatizovat? Díky za radu Pavel ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
Re: [Talk-cz] Hromadná úprava tagu
Dne 3.1.2015 v 23:10 Martin Švec - OSM napsal(a): Ahoj, pro změny na malém území stačí v JOSM vybrat víc objektů současně. Pak můžeš editovat jejich tagy hromadně přímo v okně pro úpravu tagů. Při změně tagu ti nabídne i přehled zastoupených hodnot ve výběru. Když se to zkombinuje s funkcí Hledat (Ctrl-F) [1] a pro přehlednost s filtry [2], dají se tím rychle dělat psí kusy na stažené oblasti. Akorát si vždycky dej dobrý pozor co máš vybráno. Proto je lepší vybrat objekty přes funkci Hledat a co nejpřesněji specifikovat jejich vlastnosti, než vybírat ručně myší nebo Shiftem. Dá se to i kombinovat, hledání umí hledat jen uvnitř současného výběru atd. [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Search_function [2] https://www.mapbox.com/blog/2012-08-15-using-filters-josm/ Martin On 3.1.2015 22:12, rattsn...@gmail.com wrote: Ahoj všem, nejsem zrovna zběhlý v hromadných úpravách proto se chci zeptat na příkladu: je možné ve vybrané oblasti v JOSM hromadně upravit nějaký tag, myšleno vyhledat kde je a nahradit ho (Např. změnil se tag ze sub_station na substation). Je toto nějak možno alespoň trochu zautomatizovat? Díky za radu Pavel ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz Super díky oběma, chci se trochu posunout a zase se něco nového přiučit a změna tagu sub_station na substation mi přišla vhodna pro tento účel.. Pavel ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
Re: [Talk-cz] Hromadná úprava tagu
Dne 3.1.2015 v 23:10 Martin Švec - OSM napsal(a): Ahoj, pro změny na malém území stačí v JOSM vybrat víc objektů současně. Pak můžeš editovat jejich tagy hromadně přímo v okně pro úpravu tagů. Při změně tagu ti nabídne i přehled zastoupených hodnot ve výběru. Když se to zkombinuje s funkcí Hledat (Ctrl-F) [1] a pro přehlednost s filtry [2], dají se tím rychle dělat psí kusy na stažené oblasti. Akorát si vždycky dej dobrý pozor co máš vybráno. Proto je lepší vybrat objekty přes funkci Hledat a co nejpřesněji specifikovat jejich vlastnosti, než vybírat ručně myší nebo Shiftem. Dá se to i kombinovat, hledání umí hledat jen uvnitř současného výběru atd. [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Search_function [2] https://www.mapbox.com/blog/2012-08-15-using-filters-josm/ Martin On 3.1.2015 22:12, rattsn...@gmail.com wrote: Ahoj všem, nejsem zrovna zběhlý v hromadných úpravách proto se chci zeptat na příkladu: je možné ve vybrané oblasti v JOSM hromadně upravit nějaký tag, myšleno vyhledat kde je a nahradit ho (Např. změnil se tag ze sub_station na substation). Je toto nějak možno alespoň trochu zautomatizovat? Díky za radu Pavel ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz Ještě jeden malý dotaz ohledně objektů a ruian pluginu: je stále dobrá praxe nechat budově tagy např. building industrial a zvlášť na nod dát power=substation místo obojího na budovu...Jen abych nedělal bordel v mapě. Dost nachazím tag power=substation na celémobjektu, což mi i s ohledem na mapy a vyhledávání v nich (např. osmand) přijde jako méně vhodné. Díky ještě za tuto malou radu. Pavel ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
Re: [Talk-cz] Hromadná úprava tagu
To záleží na situaci, může to být oboje. Nemohl bys nám ten objekt ukázat např. na ortofoto? -- Původní zpráva -- Od: rattsn...@gmail.com Komu: talk-cz@openstreetmap.org Datum: 3. 1. 2015 23:19:47 Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] Hromadná úprava tagu Dne 3.1.2015 v 23:10 Martin Švec - OSM napsal(a): Ahoj, pro změny na malém území stačí v JOSM vybrat víc objektů současně. Pak můžeš editovat jejich tagy hromadně přímo v okně pro úpravu tagů. Při změně tagu ti nabídne i přehled zastoupených hodnot ve výběru. Když se to zkombinuje s funkcí Hledat (Ctrl-F) [1] a pro přehlednost s filtry [2], dají se tím rychle dělat psí kusy na stažené oblasti. Akorát si vždycky dej dobrý pozor co máš vybráno. Proto je lepší vybrat objekty přes funkci Hledat a co nejpřesněji specifikovat jejich vlastnosti, než vybírat ručně myší nebo Shiftem. Dá se to i kombinovat, hledání umí hledat jen uvnitř současného výběru atd. [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Search_function [2] https://www.mapbox.com/blog/2012-08-15-using-filters-josm/ Martin On 3.1.2015 22:12, rattsn...@gmail.com wrote: Ahoj všem, nejsem zrovna zběhlý v hromadných úpravách proto se chci zeptat na příkladu: je možné ve vybrané oblasti v JOSM hromadně upravit nějaký tag, myšleno vyhledat kde je a nahradit ho (Např. změnil se tag ze sub_station na substation). Je toto nějak možno alespoň trochu zautomatizovat? Díky za radu Pavel ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz Ještě jeden malý dotaz ohledně objektů a ruian pluginu: je stále dobrá praxe nechat budově tagy např. building industrial a zvlášť na nod dát power=substation místo obojího na budovu...Jen abych nedělal bordel v mapě. Dost nachazím tag power=substation na celémobjektu, což mi i s ohledem na mapy a vyhledávání v nich (např. osmand) přijde jako méně vhodné. Díky ještě za tuto malou radu. Pavel ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz;___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
Re: [OSM-talk-fr] [BANO] noms non trouvés sur cadastre
Pour donner un exemple concret de ce que je dis : A Cahors, dans le quartier suivant : http://layers.openstreetmap.fr/?zoom=17lat=44.46144lon=1.45202layers=BFT Je n'ai trouvé la Rue François Villon et l'Impasse Pablo Picasso sur aucun plan cadastraL Par contre, l'extraction BANO trouve bien ces noms à partir des adresses des parcelles, et si on demande ces adresses au cadastre.gouv.fr, il les trouve. Pour l'instant, je n'ai pas osé saisir ces noms dans OSM, mais je pense que je devrais, la source est sûre. Art. Le 2 janvier 2015 17:54, Nicolas Dumoulin nicolas_openstreetmap@dumoulin63.net a écrit : Le vendredi 2 janvier 2015 15:27:27 Jérôme Amagat a écrit : Bonjour, Sur la Couche Bano, en rouge, ce sont des données qui viennent du cadastre donc pas besoin de vérifier a nouveau sur le cadastre dans le cas où c'est facile de déduire quelle portion de route porte ce nom. Il me semble que sur certains cas, l'orthographe n'est pas la même. -- Nicolas Dumoulin http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:NicolasDumoulin ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
Re: [OSM-talk-fr] [BANO] noms non trouvés sur cadastre
Le 3 janv. 2015 10:00, David Crochet david.croc...@free.fr a écrit : Bonjour Le 03/01/2015 09:49, Art Penteur a écrit : Pour l'instant, je n'ai pas osé saisir ces noms dans OSM, mais je pense que je devrais, la source est sûre. Mais que dit le terrain ? Je ne me ferais pas tous ces nœuds au cerveau si je ne faisais pas de la cartographie en fauteuil, dans cette zone. C'est pour cela que je progresse par petits ajouts : je laisse le temps aux cartographieurs du coin de réagir, corriger, compléter. Ça a marché dans d'autres endroits, mais à Cahors, aucun local n'a encore complété ces deux rues. Art. ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
Re: [OSM-talk-fr] [BANO] noms non trouvés sur cadastre
D'après streetview : https://www.google.fr/maps/@44.4619726,1.4488646,3a,75y,61.9h,80.04t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!1sNCWcTZ8m0WlBynhkitgR6w!2e0?hl=fr C'est bien l'Impasse Pablo PICASSO Cyrille Le 3 janvier 2015 10:00, David Crochet david.croc...@free.fr a écrit : Bonjour Le 03/01/2015 09:49, Art Penteur a écrit : Pour l'instant, je n'ai pas osé saisir ces noms dans OSM, mais je pense que je devrais, la source est sûre. Mais que dit le terrain ? si le terrain dit autre choses ou rien, il faut l'indiquer sur l'outil de retour d'info FANTOIR (http://cadastre.openstreetmap.fr/fantoir/) Cordialement -- David Crochet ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
Re: [OSM-talk-fr] conseil achat smartphone Android bon GPS?
Merci pour les infos. J'ai déjà un Etrex20 que je prends en backup, mais l'écran est trop petit par rapport à un smartphone, et il ne semble pas possible de le connecter à un smartphone pour servir de GPS extérieur. Je vais donc acheter un nouveau smartphone, mais GPS + Glonass cette fois. -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Smartphone-Android-avec-GPS-rapide-tp5777133p5828855.html Sent from the France mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
[OSM-talk-fr] cadastre - telechargement commune pour josm
bonjour, a disposition la liste des emprises des communes du cadastre http://osm2020.free.fr/dwcadastre/index.html c'est pour josm et remote activé le fichier est vide, il suffit d'aller dans le menu Fichier = Mettre a jour les données cela telecharge par petit carré toutes les données de la commune Si ca peut servir a quelqu'un d'autre que moi ... ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
Re: [OSM-talk-fr] [BANO] noms non trouvés sur cadastre
Le samedi 3 janvier 2015 11:01:53 Art Penteur a écrit : Je ne me ferais pas tous ces nœuds au cerveau si je ne faisais pas de la cartographie en fauteuil, dans cette zone. C'est pour cela que je progresse par petits ajouts : je laisse le temps aux cartographieurs du coin de réagir, corriger, compléter. Ça a marché dans d'autres endroits, mais à Cahors, aucun local n'a encore complété ces deux rues. De mon point de vue, il vaut mieux mettre le nom si sans ambiguïté sur la couche BANO et laisser un relevé de terrain le corriger si besoin. Je voulais donc tâter l'ambiance (même si le débat a déjà plus ou moins eu lieu) avant de passer à l'acte :-) Merci pour vos avis -- Nicolas Dumoulin http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:NicolasDumoulin ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
Re: [OSM-talk-fr] [BANO] noms non trouvés sur cadastre
Le 03/01/2015 19:17, Nicolas Dumoulin a écrit : Le samedi 3 janvier 2015 11:01:53 Art Penteur a écrit : Je ne me ferais pas tous ces nœuds au cerveau si je ne faisais pas de la cartographie en fauteuil, dans cette zone. C'est pour cela que je progresse par petits ajouts : je laisse le temps aux cartographieurs du coin de réagir, corriger, compléter. Ça a marché dans d'autres endroits, mais à Cahors, aucun local n'a encore complété ces deux rues. De mon point de vue, il vaut mieux mettre le nom si sans ambiguïté sur la couche BANO et laisser un relevé de terrain le corriger si besoin. Je voulais donc tâter l'ambiance (même si le débat a déjà plus ou moins eu lieu) avant de passer à l'acte :-) Des cas comme ceux indiqués ne semblent pas présenter d'ambiguité. La source est plutôt fiable, cohérente, donc utilisable seule, non ? Ce n'est pas parce que le plan cadastral ne contient pas les noms de ces voies qu'il y a un problème. Quand je dégomme du rouge, je n'affiche pas le cadastre en fond... Quand j'ai un doute sur un nom (orthographe par exemple), je cherche des adresses avec mon moteur de recherche web préféré (qui n'est pas Google) et en général ça confirme. -- Christian Quest - OpenStreetMap France ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Communes nouvelles - fusion de communes
Le vendredi 02 janvier 2015 à 12:13 +0100, Christian Quest a écrit : Et une petite carte overpass-turbo pour l'occasion: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/6MO je connaissais pas ce type de requete c'est plutot pratique ! -- Christian Quest - OpenStreetMap France ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
[Talk-us] Next DC Great Streets mapping party
Happy 2015, mappers! We're returning to Minnesota Ave for the first mapping party of the year. I've reserved space at the Benning Rd Library from 1pm - 4pm on 24 January. We'll be mapping local small businesses and neighborhood institutions, as well as refining our photo survey techniques using Mapillary[1] to create an up-to-date, open source street view. As always, no experience necessary. Parents, bring your kids. Everybody, bring your friends, your laptop, and dress for the weather. Hope to see you there! [1] http://mapillary.com/ -- SEJ -- twitter: @geomantic -- skype: sejohnson8 There are two types of people in the world. Those that can extrapolate from incomplete data. ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-it] Vendita legna
Se non è un'impresa agricola che vende anche legna da ardere (prodotta in azienda), ma è solo un distributore di legna da ardere, pellet, e simili (magari carbonella, accendifuoco, ecc.), allora opterei anch'io per shop=fuel, fuel:wood=yes, fuel:pellet=yes, ecc. Ciao! Carlo ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
[Talk-cl] Nombre carreteras
Hola, en mi reciente viaje a Pucón fui almacenando algunos marcadores de kilómetros sobre la Ruta 5 (211 en 700 kilómetros). Podría decir que en promedio cada 5 kilómetros. Según la wiki el nodo debe ser del tipo highway=milestone [1], además de distance=150 sin unidad (Se supone que es kilómetros a menos que diga otra cosa, por ejemplo mi para millas) Lo que no encuentro es como nombrar la carretera a la que hace referencia, tengo de la 5 Sur y de la S-199 Que une Freire con Curarrehue, pasando por Villarrica y Pucón (Tengo hasta Pucón). Por ahora mi opción es colocar un tag name=Ruta 5 Sur Bueno el tema es que no tenemos la Ruta 5 Sur, sino que por ejemplo tenemos la Autopista del Maipo [2]. Creo que el nombre debe ser Ruta 5 Sur y el operador Ruta del Maipo Cuando termine la concesión la Ruta se seguirá llamando Ruta 5 Sur. Atento a los comentarios Saludos Álvaro Monares G. [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmilestone [2] http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/-34.3930/-70.8625 ___ Talk-cl mailing list Talk-cl@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cl
