Re: [OSM-talk-be] landuse mapping

[Lionel Giard]

I would also be interested, virtually or even real meeting. ;-)

Lionel


2017-11-08 17:10 GMT+01:00 joost schouppe :

> Hi,
>
> We would have loved to have a landuse-mapping debate during Foss4G, it
> didn't really happen though. There were two very cool presentations about
> landuse mapping though, by Julien Minet and Julien Radoux.
>
> You can see Julien's presentation here [1]. It does a nice job of
> summarizing the state of the landuse map, and shows some of the current
> mapping dilemmas.
>
> Julien Radoux explained how OSM is useful - and sometimes fails - for his
> project to map the landcover in Wallonia for the Lifewatch project [2].
> This data is available for download and could possibly be interesting for
> us - not for a simple import, but at least as food for a mapping challenge
> to map Wallonia landuse in detail.
>
> The agenda of the meeting would be:
> - work on a Belgian proposal to deal with current dilemmas, so "Belgian
> mapping standards". These would hopefully be followed internationally, but
> we have to start somewhere. This would build especially on the thoughts of
> Marc and Julien on the subject and would ideally result in a Belgian
> mapping standards on the wiki.
> - define usecases for the dataset Julien Radoux is providing, and make
> sure that everything is OK to make that happen
> - what you bring to the table
>
> To move forward, I would like to propose having a (virtual) meeting about
> the subject. Who would be interested in participating? We could have a real
> meeting (probably in Brussels or Namur) with some people participating
> online.
>
> 1: https://cdn.rawgit.com/nobohan/OSMLanduseAnalyzer/
> 9a8b0290/presentation/2017_10_26_FOSS4G.be_OSMLanduse/index.html#/
> 2: http://www.lifewatch.be/en/lifewatch-wb-ecotope-database
>
> --
> Joost Schouppe
>
> ___
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
>
___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

Re: [OSM-talk-be] landuse mapping

[Jo]

I also found Julien Radoux' talk very interesting. We should definitely
seize this opportunity to improve our data. Unfortunately I missed Julien
Minet's talk.

I'm interested in participating online in such a meeting.

Jo

2017-11-08 17:10 GMT+01:00 joost schouppe :

> Hi,
>
> We would have loved to have a landuse-mapping debate during Foss4G, it
> didn't really happen though. There were two very cool presentations about
> landuse mapping though, by Julien Minet and Julien Radoux.
>
> You can see Julien's presentation here [1]. It does a nice job of
> summarizing the state of the landuse map, and shows some of the current
> mapping dilemmas.
>
> Julien Radoux explained how OSM is useful - and sometimes fails - for his
> project to map the landcover in Wallonia for the Lifewatch project [2].
> This data is available for download and could possibly be interesting for
> us - not for a simple import, but at least as food for a mapping challenge
> to map Wallonia landuse in detail.
>
> The agenda of the meeting would be:
> - work on a Belgian proposal to deal with current dilemmas, so "Belgian
> mapping standards". These would hopefully be followed internationally, but
> we have to start somewhere. This would build especially on the thoughts of
> Marc and Julien on the subject and would ideally result in a Belgian
> mapping standards on the wiki.
> - define usecases for the dataset Julien Radoux is providing, and make
> sure that everything is OK to make that happen
> - what you bring to the table
>
> To move forward, I would like to propose having a (virtual) meeting about
> the subject. Who would be interested in participating? We could have a real
> meeting (probably in Brussels or Namur) with some people participating
> online.
>
> 1: https://cdn.rawgit.com/nobohan/OSMLanduseAnalyzer/
> 9a8b0290/presentation/2017_10_26_FOSS4G.be_OSMLanduse/index.html#/
> 2: http://www.lifewatch.be/en/lifewatch-wb-ecotope-database
>
> --
> Joost Schouppe
>
> ___
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
>
___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

[OSM-talk-be] landuse mapping

[joost schouppe]

Hi,

We would have loved to have a landuse-mapping debate during Foss4G, it
didn't really happen though. There were two very cool presentations about
landuse mapping though, by Julien Minet and Julien Radoux.

You can see Julien's presentation here [1]. It does a nice job of
summarizing the state of the landuse map, and shows some of the current
mapping dilemmas.

Julien Radoux explained how OSM is useful - and sometimes fails - for his
project to map the landcover in Wallonia for the Lifewatch project [2].
This data is available for download and could possibly be interesting for
us - not for a simple import, but at least as food for a mapping challenge
to map Wallonia landuse in detail.

The agenda of the meeting would be:
- work on a Belgian proposal to deal with current dilemmas, so "Belgian
mapping standards". These would hopefully be followed internationally, but
we have to start somewhere. This would build especially on the thoughts of
Marc and Julien on the subject and would ideally result in a Belgian
mapping standards on the wiki.
- define usecases for the dataset Julien Radoux is providing, and make sure
that everything is OK to make that happen
- what you bring to the table

To move forward, I would like to propose having a (virtual) meeting about
the subject. Who would be interested in participating? We could have a real
meeting (probably in Brussels or Namur) with some people participating
online.

1:
https://cdn.rawgit.com/nobohan/OSMLanduseAnalyzer/9a8b0290/presentation/2017_10_26_FOSS4G.be_OSMLanduse/index.html#/
2: http://www.lifewatch.be/en/lifewatch-wb-ecotope-database

-- 
Joost Schouppe
___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Landuse mapping: farmland vs meadow/grass

[Marc Gemis]

Thanks,

so far I never put barrier and landuse on the same object.
I have put barrier on the way and created a multi-polygon relation
with that way for the landuse. I've read about this approach from some
long time mappers.

m

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 10:00 PM, Julien Minet  wrote:
> The way I did there (see the changeset:
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45664904#map=14/49.7397/5.5428 ) is
> to tag barrier=fence the ways delineating the meadow (so the polygon is
> tagged as landuse=meadow + meadow =agricultural + barrier=fence).
>
> To me in your picture, the ditch also delineates the meadow so I would put
> it as a part of the polygon of the meadow (I mean, not drawing new nodes for
> the ditch). In some cases where there is a large hedge (> 1m), I would map
> it separately from the meadow limit.
>
> Julien
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Marc Gemis  wrote:
>>
>> I have some additional questions regarding landuse=meadow mapping.
>> You can see it as a continuation of my longer post a few weeks ago in
>> Dutch on landuse/landcover.
>>
>> Where does the landuse=meadow ends ?
>> Typical situation: [1]
>> Is the ditch part of the meadow ?
>> What if there is a fence next to the ditch (away from the street) ?
>>
>> What about ditches/streams between two meadows, are the part of the
>> landuse=meadow ?
>> What if there are some bushes and or trees around the ditch/stream ?
>>
>> I know it is easier to map all of it with 1 landuse and include the
>> ditches into the landuse. But what would be the ideal mapping ?
>>
>> Can a landuse=meadow include a landcover=bushes ?
>>
>> m
>>
>>
>>
>> [1]
>> https://xian.smugmug.com/OSM/OSM-2016/2016-12-30-Kasterlee-Hoge-Mouw/i-rwdQp8z/A
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Julien Minet  wrote:
>> > OK, thanks. I think I'll follow your way: landuse=meadow +
>> > meadow=agricultural (+ meadow=pasture in case of grazing).
>> >
>> > Julien
>> >
>> > On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 7:46 AM, Marc Gemis 
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I would use landuse=meadow, which I believe is the standard way to map
>> >> it.
>> >>
>> >> Furthermore there are the tags:
>> >>
>> >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dmeadow>
>> >> If it is known, indicate the process that protects the meadow status.
>> >>
>> >> If the meadow is retained by environmental factors, add
>> >> meadow=perpetual.
>> >> If the meadow is retained by cutting or using grazing, add
>> >> meadow=agricultural.
>> >> 
>> >>
>> >> taginfo also show a large number of meadow=pasture [1], which is
>> >> mentioned on the Riding page [2]. So for grazing I add meadow=pasture.
>> >> In case it is  cut by humans you could use agricultural. Or use
>> >> agricultural for both. I use pasture, as that was the one I found
>> >> first on the wiki.
>> >>
>> >> Recently there was a discussion on landuse=grass / crop=grass for the
>> >> production of "grass" (not hay) on the tagging mailing list. It was
>> >> not meant for hay but for patches of ground with grass that could be
>> >> used to lay in gardens.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> regards
>> >>
>> >> m
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> [1] http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/meadow#values
>> >> [2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Riding
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 7:03 PM, Julien Minet 
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > I'm starting mapping landuse in the South of Belgium and I don't know
>> >> > the
>> >> > proper way to tag meadows/pastures, being grazed or hay meadows. In
>> >> > Ardenne,
>> >> > a large part of meadows are permanents: there are there for decades,
>> >> > especially for grazed meadows that can hardly be ploughed (because
>> >> > non-drained, presence of trees, etc.)
>> >> >
>> >> > On the other side, even old pastures can sometimes be ploughed and
>> >> > sowed
>> >> > with a cereal.
>> >> >
>> >> > So how to tag meadows in Belgium:
>> >> >
>> >> > landuse=farmland + crop=grass
>> >> > landuse=meadow
>> >> > landuse= grass?
>> >> >
>> >> > From this post in the osm forum
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > (https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/366/should-pastures-be-marked-as-farm-or-grass),
>> >> > the first option seems the best, but I've seen a lot of
>> >> > landuse=meadow
>> >> > in
>> >> > Belgium
>> >> >
>> >> > Also, any tag for differentiate hay meadow and  grazed pasture?
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Julien
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > ___
>> >> > Talk-be mailing list
>> >> > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
>> >> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> ___
>> >> Talk-be mailing list
>> >> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
>> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ___
>> > Talk-be mailing list
>> > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
>> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>> >

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Landuse mapping: farmland vs meadow/grass

[Julien Minet]

The way I did there (see the changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45664904#map=14/49.7397/5.5428
) is to tag barrier=fence the ways delineating the meadow (so the polygon
is tagged as landuse=meadow + meadow =agricultural + barrier=fence).

To me in your picture, the ditch also delineates the meadow so I would put
it as a part of the polygon of the meadow (I mean, not drawing new nodes
for the ditch). In some cases where there is a large hedge (> 1m), I would
map it separately from the meadow limit.

Julien



On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Marc Gemis  wrote:

> I have some additional questions regarding landuse=meadow mapping.
> You can see it as a continuation of my longer post a few weeks ago in
> Dutch on landuse/landcover.
>
> Where does the landuse=meadow ends ?
> Typical situation: [1]
> Is the ditch part of the meadow ?
> What if there is a fence next to the ditch (away from the street) ?
>
> What about ditches/streams between two meadows, are the part of the
> landuse=meadow ?
> What if there are some bushes and or trees around the ditch/stream ?
>
> I know it is easier to map all of it with 1 landuse and include the
> ditches into the landuse. But what would be the ideal mapping ?
>
> Can a landuse=meadow include a landcover=bushes ?
>
> m
>
>
>
> [1] https://xian.smugmug.com/OSM/OSM-2016/2016-12-30-Kasterlee-
> Hoge-Mouw/i-rwdQp8z/A
>
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Julien Minet  wrote:
> > OK, thanks. I think I'll follow your way: landuse=meadow +
> > meadow=agricultural (+ meadow=pasture in case of grazing).
> >
> > Julien
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 7:46 AM, Marc Gemis 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I would use landuse=meadow, which I believe is the standard way to map
> it.
> >>
> >> Furthermore there are the tags:
> >>
> >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dmeadow>
> >> If it is known, indicate the process that protects the meadow status.
> >>
> >> If the meadow is retained by environmental factors, add
> meadow=perpetual.
> >> If the meadow is retained by cutting or using grazing, add
> >> meadow=agricultural.
> >> 
> >>
> >> taginfo also show a large number of meadow=pasture [1], which is
> >> mentioned on the Riding page [2]. So for grazing I add meadow=pasture.
> >> In case it is  cut by humans you could use agricultural. Or use
> >> agricultural for both. I use pasture, as that was the one I found
> >> first on the wiki.
> >>
> >> Recently there was a discussion on landuse=grass / crop=grass for the
> >> production of "grass" (not hay) on the tagging mailing list. It was
> >> not meant for hay but for patches of ground with grass that could be
> >> used to lay in gardens.
> >>
> >>
> >> regards
> >>
> >> m
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> [1] http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/meadow#values
> >> [2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Riding
> >>
> >> On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 7:03 PM, Julien Minet 
> wrote:
> >> > I'm starting mapping landuse in the South of Belgium and I don't know
> >> > the
> >> > proper way to tag meadows/pastures, being grazed or hay meadows. In
> >> > Ardenne,
> >> > a large part of meadows are permanents: there are there for decades,
> >> > especially for grazed meadows that can hardly be ploughed (because
> >> > non-drained, presence of trees, etc.)
> >> >
> >> > On the other side, even old pastures can sometimes be ploughed and
> sowed
> >> > with a cereal.
> >> >
> >> > So how to tag meadows in Belgium:
> >> >
> >> > landuse=farmland + crop=grass
> >> > landuse=meadow
> >> > landuse= grass?
> >> >
> >> > From this post in the osm forum
> >> >
> >> > (https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/366/should-
> pastures-be-marked-as-farm-or-grass),
> >> > the first option seems the best, but I've seen a lot of landuse=meadow
> >> > in
> >> > Belgium
> >> >
> >> > Also, any tag for differentiate hay meadow and  grazed pasture?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Julien
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > ___
> >> > Talk-be mailing list
> >> > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
> >> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
> >> >
> >>
> >> ___
> >> Talk-be mailing list
> >> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Talk-be mailing list
> > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
> >
>
> ___
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Landuse mapping: farmland vs meadow/grass

[Marc Gemis]

I have some additional questions regarding landuse=meadow mapping.
You can see it as a continuation of my longer post a few weeks ago in
Dutch on landuse/landcover.

Where does the landuse=meadow ends ?
Typical situation: [1]
Is the ditch part of the meadow ?
What if there is a fence next to the ditch (away from the street) ?

What about ditches/streams between two meadows, are the part of the
landuse=meadow ?
What if there are some bushes and or trees around the ditch/stream ?

I know it is easier to map all of it with 1 landuse and include the
ditches into the landuse. But what would be the ideal mapping ?

Can a landuse=meadow include a landcover=bushes ?

m



[1] 
https://xian.smugmug.com/OSM/OSM-2016/2016-12-30-Kasterlee-Hoge-Mouw/i-rwdQp8z/A

On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Julien Minet  wrote:
> OK, thanks. I think I'll follow your way: landuse=meadow +
> meadow=agricultural (+ meadow=pasture in case of grazing).
>
> Julien
>
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 7:46 AM, Marc Gemis  wrote:
>>
>> I would use landuse=meadow, which I believe is the standard way to map it.
>>
>> Furthermore there are the tags:
>>
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dmeadow>
>> If it is known, indicate the process that protects the meadow status.
>>
>> If the meadow is retained by environmental factors, add meadow=perpetual.
>> If the meadow is retained by cutting or using grazing, add
>> meadow=agricultural.
>> 
>>
>> taginfo also show a large number of meadow=pasture [1], which is
>> mentioned on the Riding page [2]. So for grazing I add meadow=pasture.
>> In case it is  cut by humans you could use agricultural. Or use
>> agricultural for both. I use pasture, as that was the one I found
>> first on the wiki.
>>
>> Recently there was a discussion on landuse=grass / crop=grass for the
>> production of "grass" (not hay) on the tagging mailing list. It was
>> not meant for hay but for patches of ground with grass that could be
>> used to lay in gardens.
>>
>>
>> regards
>>
>> m
>>
>>
>>
>> [1] http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/meadow#values
>> [2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Riding
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 7:03 PM, Julien Minet  wrote:
>> > I'm starting mapping landuse in the South of Belgium and I don't know
>> > the
>> > proper way to tag meadows/pastures, being grazed or hay meadows. In
>> > Ardenne,
>> > a large part of meadows are permanents: there are there for decades,
>> > especially for grazed meadows that can hardly be ploughed (because
>> > non-drained, presence of trees, etc.)
>> >
>> > On the other side, even old pastures can sometimes be ploughed and sowed
>> > with a cereal.
>> >
>> > So how to tag meadows in Belgium:
>> >
>> > landuse=farmland + crop=grass
>> > landuse=meadow
>> > landuse= grass?
>> >
>> > From this post in the osm forum
>> >
>> > (https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/366/should-pastures-be-marked-as-farm-or-grass),
>> > the first option seems the best, but I've seen a lot of landuse=meadow
>> > in
>> > Belgium
>> >
>> > Also, any tag for differentiate hay meadow and  grazed pasture?
>> >
>> >
>> > Julien
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ___
>> > Talk-be mailing list
>> > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
>> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>> >
>>
>> ___
>> Talk-be mailing list
>> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
>
>
> ___
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>

___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Landuse mapping: farmland vs meadow/grass

[Marc Gemis]

I would use landuse=meadow, which I believe is the standard way to map it.

Furthermore there are the tags:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dmeadow>
If it is known, indicate the process that protects the meadow status.

If the meadow is retained by environmental factors, add meadow=perpetual.
If the meadow is retained by cutting or using grazing, add meadow=agricultural.


taginfo also show a large number of meadow=pasture [1], which is
mentioned on the Riding page [2]. So for grazing I add meadow=pasture.
In case it is  cut by humans you could use agricultural. Or use
agricultural for both. I use pasture, as that was the one I found
first on the wiki.

Recently there was a discussion on landuse=grass / crop=grass for the
production of "grass" (not hay) on the tagging mailing list. It was
not meant for hay but for patches of ground with grass that could be
used to lay in gardens.


regards

m



[1] http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/meadow#values
[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Riding

On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 7:03 PM, Julien Minet  wrote:
> I'm starting mapping landuse in the South of Belgium and I don't know the
> proper way to tag meadows/pastures, being grazed or hay meadows. In Ardenne,
> a large part of meadows are permanents: there are there for decades,
> especially for grazed meadows that can hardly be ploughed (because
> non-drained, presence of trees, etc.)
>
> On the other side, even old pastures can sometimes be ploughed and sowed
> with a cereal.
>
> So how to tag meadows in Belgium:
>
> landuse=farmland + crop=grass
> landuse=meadow
> landuse= grass?
>
> From this post in the osm forum
> (https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/366/should-pastures-be-marked-as-farm-or-grass),
> the first option seems the best, but I've seen a lot of landuse=meadow in
> Belgium
>
> Also, any tag for differentiate hay meadow and  grazed pasture?
>
>
> Julien
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>

___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

[OSM-talk-be] Landuse mapping: farmland vs meadow/grass

[Julien Minet]

I'm starting mapping landuse in the South of Belgium and I don't know the
proper way to tag meadows/pastures, being grazed or hay meadows. In
Ardenne, a large part of meadows are permanents: there are there for
decades, especially for grazed meadows that can hardly be ploughed (because
non-drained, presence of trees, etc.)

On the other side, even old pastures can sometimes be ploughed and sowed
with a cereal.

So how to tag meadows in Belgium:

   - landuse=farmland + crop=grass
   - landuse=meadow
   - landuse= grass?

>From this post in the osm forum (
https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/366/should-pastures-be-marked-as-farm-or-grass),
the first option seems the best, but I've seen a lot of landuse=meadow in
Belgium

Also, any tag for differentiate hay meadow and  grazed pasture?

Julien
___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Landuse mapping

[Marc Gemis]

Ruben, bedankt, ik zal wetland gebruiken en de bestaande mapping aanpassen
Thanks Ruben, I'll use wetland and adapt the existing tags.

2016-05-21 14:57 GMT+02:00 Ruben Maes :
> --- English below -
>
> Thursday 19 May 2016 21:14:58, Marc Gemis:
>> Recentelijk ben ik hier en daar wat landuse beginnen corrigeren of wat
>> extra detail beginnen toevoegen. Ik vind het niet zo eenvoudig om
>> alles mooi te classificeren.
>> Hoe zouden jullie bv
>>
>> https://photos.smugmug.com/OSM/OSM-2016/2016-03-27-Stotert-Olmen/i-rXpM5hd/0/O/DSC_7398.jpg
>>
>> en
>>
>> https://photos.smugmug.com/OSM/OSM-2016/2016-03-27-Stotert-Olmen/i-8nCSVqP/0/O/DSC_7396.jpg
>>
>> taggen ?
>
> Ik dacht meteen aan natural=wetland, en gepaste subtags.
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dwetland
>
>> Jammer dat er hier niet rechtstreeks foto's kunnen worden gezet. Ik
>> wel nog wel wat plekjes waar ik de landuse zou willen van aanpassen en
>> waar ik hulp bij nodig heb. Hebben jullie suggesties om gemakkelijker
>> over foto's te discussieren ? Het forum is jammer genoeg vrij doods.
>
> -- English ---
> Thursday 19 May 2016 21:14:58, Marc Gemis:
>> Recently, I started mapping landuse. In the beginning some small
>> changes or extra detail, but now I want to make more involving
>> changes. But that is pretty hard. Can you help to map
>>
>> https://photos.smugmug.com/OSM/OSM-2016/2016-03-27-Stotert-Olmen/i-rXpM5hd/0/O/DSC_7398.jpg
>>
>> and
>>
>> https://photos.smugmug.com/OSM/OSM-2016/2016-03-27-Stotert-Olmen/i-8nCSVqP/0/O/DSC_7396.jpg
>
> I immediately thought of natural=wetland, and fitting subtags.
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dwetland
>
>> I know this is not the best media to discuss photo's, but nobody is
>> reading the forum. Other suggestions to handle this ?
>>
>> met vriendelijke groeten/regards
>
> --
> This message is OpenPGP signed.
> ___
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>

___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Landuse mapping

[Ruben Maes]

--- English below -

Thursday 19 May 2016 21:14:58, Marc Gemis:
> Recentelijk ben ik hier en daar wat landuse beginnen corrigeren of wat
> extra detail beginnen toevoegen. Ik vind het niet zo eenvoudig om
> alles mooi te classificeren.
> Hoe zouden jullie bv
> 
> https://photos.smugmug.com/OSM/OSM-2016/2016-03-27-Stotert-Olmen/i-rXpM5hd/0/O/DSC_7398.jpg
> 
> en
> 
> https://photos.smugmug.com/OSM/OSM-2016/2016-03-27-Stotert-Olmen/i-8nCSVqP/0/O/DSC_7396.jpg
> 
> taggen ?

Ik dacht meteen aan natural=wetland, en gepaste subtags.

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dwetland

> Jammer dat er hier niet rechtstreeks foto's kunnen worden gezet. Ik
> wel nog wel wat plekjes waar ik de landuse zou willen van aanpassen en
> waar ik hulp bij nodig heb. Hebben jullie suggesties om gemakkelijker
> over foto's te discussieren ? Het forum is jammer genoeg vrij doods.

-- English ---
Thursday 19 May 2016 21:14:58, Marc Gemis:
> Recently, I started mapping landuse. In the beginning some small
> changes or extra detail, but now I want to make more involving
> changes. But that is pretty hard. Can you help to map
> 
> https://photos.smugmug.com/OSM/OSM-2016/2016-03-27-Stotert-Olmen/i-rXpM5hd/0/O/DSC_7398.jpg
> 
> and
> 
> https://photos.smugmug.com/OSM/OSM-2016/2016-03-27-Stotert-Olmen/i-8nCSVqP/0/O/DSC_7396.jpg

I immediately thought of natural=wetland, and fitting subtags.

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dwetland

> I know this is not the best media to discuss photo's, but nobody is
> reading the forum. Other suggestions to handle this ?
> 
> met vriendelijke groeten/regards

-- 
This message is OpenPGP signed.

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

[OSM-talk-be] Landuse mapping

[Marc Gemis]

Hallo,

--- English below -

Recentelijk ben ik hier en daar wat landuse beginnen corrigeren of wat
extra detail beginnen toevoegen. Ik vind het niet zo eenvoudig om
alles mooi te classificeren.
Hoe zouden jullie bv

https://photos.smugmug.com/OSM/OSM-2016/2016-03-27-Stotert-Olmen/i-rXpM5hd/0/O/DSC_7398.jpg

en

https://photos.smugmug.com/OSM/OSM-2016/2016-03-27-Stotert-Olmen/i-8nCSVqP/0/O/DSC_7396.jpg

taggen ?

Jammer dat er hier niet rechtstreeks foto's kunnen worden gezet. Ik
wel nog wel wat plekjes waar ik de landuse zou willen van aanpassen en
waar ik hulp bij nodig heb. Hebben jullie suggesties om gemakkelijker
over foto's te discussieren ? Het forum is jammer genoeg vrij doods.


-- English ---

Recently, I started mapping landuse. In the beginning some small
changes or extra detail, but now I want to make more involving
changes. But that is pretty hard. Can you help to map

https://photos.smugmug.com/OSM/OSM-2016/2016-03-27-Stotert-Olmen/i-rXpM5hd/0/O/DSC_7398.jpg

and

https://photos.smugmug.com/OSM/OSM-2016/2016-03-27-Stotert-Olmen/i-8nCSVqP/0/O/DSC_7396.jpg

I know this is not the best media to discuss photo's, but nobody is
reading the forum. Other suggestions to handle this ?

met vriendelijke groeten/regards

___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

Re: [OSM-talk] Field/Landuse Mapping

[Mark Williams]

Sfan00 wrote:
 Hi,
 
 You may have noticed some of my recent 
 contributions in respect of
 fields nr Bourne End and Bovingdon in 
 Hertfordshire, UK.
 
 Can I make a polite request that 
 alongside the many other ongoing
 pojects, that an effort be
 made to mark land-use based on available 
 sources? (i.e npe, USGS, Yahoo!
 and others)
 
 After landuse is comprhensively mapped, 
 the next logical
 step alongside other mapping might be 
 tracing buildings :)
 
Very pretty.

It'll render better if you fix all the typos, eg natrual, amentiy, Name,
 etc - I did a few for you but there's over 30 in quite a small area.
Josm Validator's good at spotting these.

Mark



___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk

[OSM-talk] Field/Landuse Mapping

[Sfan00]

Hi,

You may have noticed some of my recent 
contributions in respect of
fields nr Bourne End and Bovingdon in 
Hertfordshire, UK.

Can I make a polite request that 
alongside the many other ongoing
pojects, that an effort be
made to mark land-use based on available 
sources? (i.e npe, USGS, Yahoo!
and others)

After landuse is comprhensively mapped, 
the next logical
step alongside other mapping might be 
tracing buildings :)

Thanks


___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk