Re: [Talk-GB] Highways Leading to Farms and single residential properties in rural areas

2013-03-12 Thread wool...@hotmail.com
I tend to use the combination of service/driveway, for roads that lead to 
residential buildings or farm houses, even when they have other farm buildings 
around them.   Tracks i tend to use for roads that go just to barns, farm out 
buildings, or to fields.  

Jason (Unieagle)

Connected by Motorola

Dudley Ibbett dudleyibb...@hotmail.com wrote:


Hi

This may be a matter of style but it seems that both Highway=Service and 
Highway=Track are used for the access highways to farms and also residential 
properties in rural areas.  I must admit I was using High=Track based on 
whether it was paved (tarmac) or not.  i.e. tarmac would suggest 
Highway=Service but looking closer at the wiki it appears that Highway=Service 
isn't dependent on this.  It would also appear that there has been an import 
(source tag) that has tagged Highway=Service in some areas for Farm access.

Is there a correct answer for this or is it a matter of mapping style?  I am 
leaning towards using Highway=Service for these and keeping Highway=Track for 
tracks that link from fields to farms or roads to fields (i.e. not from 
roads to farmyards or residential properties).  It would seem to suggest this 
in the wiki on Track.  The wiki would also suggest the use of Service=Driveway 
when using Highway=Service.

Has anyone come to a conclusion on this?

Many Thanks

Dudley







 
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Highways Leading to Farms and single residential properties in rural areas

2013-03-12 Thread Kevin Peat
Dudley,

On 11 Mar 2013 21:27, Dudley Ibbett dudleyibb...@hotmail.com wrote:

 Is there a correct answer for this or is it a matter of mapping style?  I
am leaning towards using Highway=Service for these and keeping
Highway=Track for tracks that link from fields to farms or roads to
fields (i.e. not from roads to farmyards or residential properties...

Modern farms are more like industrial estates with access designed for 40t
trucks and massive farm machinery so in those cases I favour
highway=service for the main farm access road even if it has a central
divide like a track might have.

Highway=track is better for typical bridleways, green lanes, etc that only
a tractor or 4x4 could use.

Kevin
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Highways Leading to Farms and single residential properties in rural areas

2013-03-12 Thread Lester Caine

Kevin Peat wrote:

On 11 Mar 2013 21:27, Dudley Ibbett dudleyibb...@hotmail.com
mailto:dudleyibb...@hotmail.com wrote:
 
  Is there a correct answer for this or is it a matter of mapping style?  I am
leaning towards using Highway=Service for these and keeping Highway=Track for
tracks that link from fields to farms or roads to fields (i.e. not from roads
to farmyards or residential properties...
 
Modern farms are more like industrial estates with access designed for 40t
trucks and massive farm machinery so in those cases I favour highway=service for
the main farm access road even if it has a central divide like a track might 
have.

Highway=track is better for typical bridleways, green lanes, etc that only a
tractor or 4x4 could use.


I tend to follow the same rule. As soon as there is a diversity of premises on 
the way then it tends to get 'service'. A single residence would not normally 
have it's drive shown, but where it may have public access to walk down, 'track' 
seems less formal?


--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk
Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Highways Leading to Farms and single residential properties in rural areas

2013-03-12 Thread Nick Whitelegg

This may be a matter of style but it seems that both Highway=Service and 
Highway=Track are used for the access highways to farms and also residential 
properties in rural areas.  I must admit I was using High=Track based on 
whether it was paved (tarmac) or not.  i.e. tarmac would suggest 
Highway=Service but looking closer at the wiki it appears that Highway=Service 
isn't dependent on this.  It would also appear that there has been an import 
(source tag) that has tagged Highway=Service in some areas for Farm access.

I would generally always use highway=surface for these, plus surface=unpaved if 
necessary.

The exception is where it appears to be a public road rather than private 
drive. Diagnostic features for this would include Give Way markers on the 
road, the T no through road sign, or a road name.
In these cases I would use highway=unclassified.

Ncik
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Highways Leading to Farms and single residential properties in rural areas

2013-03-12 Thread Nick Whitelegg

Oops - highway=service, not surface...

-Nick Whitelegg/FT/Solent wrote: -
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
From: Nick Whitelegg/FT/Solent
Date: 12/03/2013 11:46AM
Subject: Re: Re: [Talk-GB] Highways Leading to Farms and single residential 
properties in rural areas


This may be a matter of style but it seems that both Highway=Service and 
Highway=Track are used for the access highways to farms and also residential 
properties in rural areas.  I must admit I was using High=Track based on 
whether it was paved (tarmac) or not.  i.e. tarmac would suggest 
Highway=Service but looking closer at the wiki it appears that Highway=Service 
isn't dependent on this.  It would also appear that there has been an import 
(source tag) that has tagged Highway=Service in some areas for Farm access.

I would generally always use highway=surface for these, plus surface=unpaved if 
necessary.

The exception is where it appears to be a public road rather than private 
drive. Diagnostic features for this would include Give Way markers on the 
road, the T no through road sign, or a road name.
In these cases I would use highway=unclassified.

Nick


___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Highways Leading to Farms and single residential properties in rural areas

2013-03-12 Thread Dudley Ibbett

Many thanks for the comments.

I will now stick to Highway=Service for direct access from roads to Farmyards.  
I will also use this for residential properties set back from the road as there 
are quite a few old farms/farm buildings being converted into residential use.

I will also try and remember to use Access=Private when there is no public 
right of way designation.  I doubt that there will every be rendering for UK 
public rights of way on the main OSM map but it does render Highways that are 
tagged as private differently and it is helpful to know when a path goes 
through a Farmyard etc if the Highway connecting the Farmyard is a public right 
of way or not.

Regards

Dudley

 From: nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk
 To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
 Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:47:18 +
 Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Highways Leading to Farms and single residential 
 properties in rural areas
 
 
 Oops - highway=service, not surface...
 
 -Nick Whitelegg/FT/Solent wrote: -
 To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
 From: Nick Whitelegg/FT/Solent
 Date: 12/03/2013 11:46AM
 Subject: Re: Re: [Talk-GB] Highways Leading to Farms and single residential 
 properties in rural areas
 
 
 This may be a matter of style but it seems that both Highway=Service and 
 Highway=Track are used for the access highways to farms and also residential 
 properties in rural areas.  I must admit I was using High=Track based on 
 whether it was paved (tarmac) or not.  i.e. tarmac would suggest 
 Highway=Service but looking closer at the wiki it appears that 
 Highway=Service isn't dependent on this.  It would also appear that there 
 has been an import 
 (source tag) that has tagged Highway=Service in some areas for Farm access.
 
 I would generally always use highway=surface for these, plus surface=unpaved 
 if necessary.
 
 The exception is where it appears to be a public road rather than private 
 drive. Diagnostic features for this would include Give Way markers on the 
 road, the T no through road sign, or a road name.
 In these cases I would use highway=unclassified.
 
 Nick
 
 
 ___
 Talk-GB mailing list
 Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
  ___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Gaps in Barriers

2013-03-12 Thread Dudley Ibbett

Hi

I could also do with some comments on the use of barrier=entrance or 
entrance=yes when there is a gap in a barrier (i.e hedge or wall) i.e. no gate 
or stile.  I appreciate you could just draw two ways with a gap but sometimes 
the gap is quite small and a node would seem more suitable.  The former 
(barrier=entrance) seems more sensible in the context and is described in the 
context of a barrier but the latter is more widely used.  The wiki however very 
much describes (entrance=yes) in relation to an urban context i.e. entrances to 
buildings etc. 

I am wondering whether there is a need to distinguish between these types of 
entrance or whether to stick to the more widely used entrance=yes?

Many Thanks

Dudley


  ___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Postcode data

2013-03-12 Thread Brian Prangle
Aidan

I've had a look at your list and would say it's way under - you only have 3
B27 codes and I've completed addressing this whole postcode area - I've not
got every one complete but I'm sure there's far more than the 3 you're
showing, including the one for my own house which is missing! Similarly for
B72 which I know is also complete with every address mapped

Regards

Brian
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Postcode data

2013-03-12 Thread Rob Nickerson
Brian,

The list was of invalid postcodes. Hopefully everything you entered was a
valid postcode (it seems that way given that only 3 invalid B27 postcodes
appear in the list).

Rob



On 12 March 2013 22:37, Brian Prangle bpran...@gmail.com wrote:

 Aidan

 I've had a look at your list and would say it's way under - you only have
 3 B27 codes and I've completed addressing this whole postcode area - I've
 not got every one complete but I'm sure there's far more than the 3 you're
 showing, including the one for my own house which is missing! Similarly for
 B72 which I know is also complete with every address mapped

 Regards

 Brian



___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb