Re: [Talk-GB] UK style rendering port ...

2015-07-27 Thread John Aldridge
I hope this can be done, too, if it makes it easier to be much more 
responsive about making the renderer respect best UK tagging practice.


One of the reasons, IMO, that its difficult to prevent people tagging 
for the renderer, is that there currently seems to be little attempt, 
when a tagging scheme is devised, to consider whether and how the 
results of such tagging should be made visible on the map, and then to 
get any necessary renderer changes implemented.


--
Cheers,
John

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Survey: A UK/GB OpenStreetMap group?

2015-07-27 Thread Rob Nickerson
All,

Last chance to fill in the UK/GB OSM group survey if you have not already
done so. I aim to release the results soon along with suggestions on how we
should proceed. This second stage will allow for more comment than the
initial survey (with the survey results acting to support any commentary).

Best,
Rob

On 11 July 2015 at 21:19, Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com wrote:

 Dear UK/GB OpenStreetMappers,

 From time to time we talk about the potential of setting up a UK/GB
 OpenStreetMap group (name yet to be decided) but we never quite know what
 it should look like.

 Survey time!! Please fill in the following 2 minute survey:

 http://goo.gl/forms/Z797QhC27c

 Your responses to page 1 will be shared when we close the survey (in a few
 weeks). If you respond to the optional page 2 questions (your details),
 your responses will be used for the purpose of administrating the group
 only (they will only be seen by myself and any designated administrator
 should a UK/GB group be set up).

 So stop reading and go to the survey:

 http://goo.gl/forms/Z797QhC27c

 Best regards and happy mapping,
 Rob


___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] UK style rendering port ...

2015-07-27 Thread SK53
Completely agree with Richard,

New rendering styles are a chance to start afresh with the technologies 
perspectives from 10 (or 11) years worth of experience. This does not just
mean vector tiles (although my feeling is these are still 'bleeding-edge'),
but also potentially more use of LUA and/or more complex database-side
post-processing: this is particularly true when considering rendering a
smaller area such as Britain  Ireland., where the constraints of database
update are less overwhelming.

There are plenty of trivial things which can be done now with a new render
which are harder for existing styles: such as making use of the hstore
column.

A much tougher thing to try would be to find a way to include more of the
mapping community in establishing what is wanted: not just vociferous
voices on the mailing list  github, nor the bias inherent in a
'do-ocracy'.

Jerry

On 27 July 2015 at 08:43, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:

 Lester Caine wrote:
  The other area that I am looking to roll back

 First, I wouldn't think in terms of rolling back at all.

 Cartography for a UK tileset could and should be designed from scratch. If
 you really want to start with an existing tileset then use OSM Bright, not
 osm-carto, but I'm not convinced that's necessary. We're much more likely
 to
 get a coherent, UK-friendly style by thinking about it from first
 principles
 than by adapting osm-carto with its eight-year heritage (and all the
 attendant compromises).

 Second, let's not start with raster rendering. Let's build this as a vector
 tileset from the start, with in-browser/on-device rendering.

 Vectors have lighter infrastructure needs, and enable clickable POIs and
 on-the-fly restyling. The UK is small enough that we could just run it
 through tilemaker (https://github.com/systemed/tilemaker) without the need
 for a complex stack. The two disadvantages are that the very oldest
 browsers
 will struggle, and that (for now) minutely updates don't happen unless you
 build that complex stack - but that's fine, we still have osm-carto for
 instant feedback.

 Let's build tomorrow's map, not yesterday's; and who knows, maybe osm-carto
 might want to borrow from some of our advances in months to come!

 Richard





 --
 View this message in context:
 http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/UK-style-rendering-port-tp5850972p5850975.html
 Sent from the Great Britain mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

 ___
 Talk-GB mailing list
 Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


[Talk-GB] UK style rendering port ...

2015-07-27 Thread Lester Caine
With the discussion on a more self contained 'UK' group I'd like to
highlight one area that is becoming perhaps more urgent for some of us,
the idea of a UK style tile set.

With the current push to make the default mapping more 'google like',
retaining the UK colour coding for roads is something I feel many of us
wish to retain, but there is no need to force that on the rest of the
world. While I've not actually looked, and it's not easy to find them, I
have seen links to other 'local' styles and this is exactly what OSM is
about.

Some aspects of the proposed changes do make sense, but I feel that
comparisons with google are a little unfair since google still does not
nearly as much low level detail anyway. A single style is never going to
be ideal, and so I'm actually thinking that two or three base tile sets
actually makes a lot more sense. Keeping the UK road colours is the
obvious starting point,

The other area that I am looking to roll back is some of the agresive
changes to town centres. I'm still getting complaints about where names
now appear on shops, or rather on adjacent shops and tidying this up
probably applies world wide, but the much more abstract layout of
buildings in many UK towns does not lend itself to a style that assumes
a more geometric layout.

Finally landmarks such as some of the viaducts and other now 'retasked'
structures which are perhaps more prevalent in the UK are an area where
a more local treatment may be more appropriate?

That the world map is going to evolve on a more generic basis is a given
so I feel now is the time to be looking at a more local alternative. At
one time I did have my own tile server and OSRM routing service running
but it needs more resources than I can put up on my own to be more
generally available. I have space on a site with a large pipe, but I
would prefer to see perhaps a more distributed model where several sites
mirror the same tile set and hopefully historic overlays ... another
area that needs a little more locally based support.

-- 
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk
Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] UK style rendering port ...

2015-07-27 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Lester Caine wrote:
 The other area that I am looking to roll back

First, I wouldn't think in terms of rolling back at all.

Cartography for a UK tileset could and should be designed from scratch. If
you really want to start with an existing tileset then use OSM Bright, not
osm-carto, but I'm not convinced that's necessary. We're much more likely to
get a coherent, UK-friendly style by thinking about it from first principles
than by adapting osm-carto with its eight-year heritage (and all the
attendant compromises).

Second, let's not start with raster rendering. Let's build this as a vector
tileset from the start, with in-browser/on-device rendering.

Vectors have lighter infrastructure needs, and enable clickable POIs and
on-the-fly restyling. The UK is small enough that we could just run it
through tilemaker (https://github.com/systemed/tilemaker) without the need
for a complex stack. The two disadvantages are that the very oldest browsers
will struggle, and that (for now) minutely updates don't happen unless you
build that complex stack - but that's fine, we still have osm-carto for
instant feedback.

Let's build tomorrow's map, not yesterday's; and who knows, maybe osm-carto
might want to borrow from some of our advances in months to come!

Richard





--
View this message in context: 
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/UK-style-rendering-port-tp5850972p5850975.html
Sent from the Great Britain mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] UK style rendering port ...

2015-07-27 Thread Marc Gemis
The French style: http://tile.openstreetmap.fr/  (mainly icons as far as I
know)
The German style: http://openstreetmap.de/karte.html (different rendering
technology, different road styles, though they want to convert the renderer
(style specification) to the same as osm.org)

As far as I understood some people from France and Germany are working on a
vector tile server. Can't find the link to mail in the French mailing list
though.

regards

On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:

 With the discussion on a more self contained 'UK' group I'd like to
 highlight one area that is becoming perhaps more urgent for some of us,
 the idea of a UK style tile set.

 With the current push to make the default mapping more 'google like',
 retaining the UK colour coding for roads is something I feel many of us
 wish to retain, but there is no need to force that on the rest of the
 world. While I've not actually looked, and it's not easy to find them, I
 have seen links to other 'local' styles and this is exactly what OSM is
 about.

 Some aspects of the proposed changes do make sense, but I feel that
 comparisons with google are a little unfair since google still does not
 nearly as much low level detail anyway. A single style is never going to
 be ideal, and so I'm actually thinking that two or three base tile sets
 actually makes a lot more sense. Keeping the UK road colours is the
 obvious starting point,

 The other area that I am looking to roll back is some of the agresive
 changes to town centres. I'm still getting complaints about where names
 now appear on shops, or rather on adjacent shops and tidying this up
 probably applies world wide, but the much more abstract layout of
 buildings in many UK towns does not lend itself to a style that assumes
 a more geometric layout.

 Finally landmarks such as some of the viaducts and other now 'retasked'
 structures which are perhaps more prevalent in the UK are an area where
 a more local treatment may be more appropriate?

 That the world map is going to evolve on a more generic basis is a given
 so I feel now is the time to be looking at a more local alternative. At
 one time I did have my own tile server and OSRM routing service running
 but it needs more resources than I can put up on my own to be more
 generally available. I have space on a site with a large pipe, but I
 would prefer to see perhaps a more distributed model where several sites
 mirror the same tile set and hopefully historic overlays ... another
 area that needs a little more locally based support.

 --
 Lester Caine - G8HFL
 -
 Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
 L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
 EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
 Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk
 Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk

 ___
 Talk-GB mailing list
 Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] UK style rendering port ...

2015-07-27 Thread Matthijs Melissen
On 27 July 2015 at 09:06, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
 With the discussion on a more self contained 'UK' group I'd like to
 highlight one area that is becoming perhaps more urgent for some of us,
 the idea of a UK style tile set.

I also think it's a good idea for the UK to create there own rendering
server, just like German/France/the Netherlands have their own
rendering servers. I agree this is getting even more urgent now the
default rendering is becoming less UK-centric.

If you would like any technical help with this, please let me know and
I'll try to assist where I can.

One thing I'd like to warn for is not to underestimate the time it
takes to create a rendering, or even to make changes to an existing
rendering.

I hope this project will be a success, and indeed I look forward to
the moment the default style can start borrowing idea from the UK
style! In the past - in the past we have already been borrowing ideas
from the French rendering.

-- Matthijs

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] UK style rendering port ...

2015-07-27 Thread Lester Caine
On 27/07/15 08:43, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
 Lester Caine wrote:
  The other area that I am looking to roll back
 First, I wouldn't think in terms of rolling back at all.
 
 Cartography for a UK tileset could and should be designed from scratch. If
 you really want to start with an existing tileset then use OSM Bright, not
 osm-carto, but I'm not convinced that's necessary. We're much more likely to
 get a coherent, UK-friendly style by thinking about it from first principles
 than by adapting osm-carto with its eight-year heritage (and all the
 attendant compromises).
 
 Second, let's not start with raster rendering. Let's build this as a vector
 tileset from the start, with in-browser/on-device rendering.
 
 Vectors have lighter infrastructure needs, and enable clickable POIs and
 on-the-fly restyling. The UK is small enough that we could just run it
 through tilemaker (https://github.com/systemed/tilemaker) without the need
 for a complex stack. The two disadvantages are that the very oldest browsers
 will struggle, and that (for now) minutely updates don't happen unless you
 build that complex stack - but that's fine, we still have osm-carto for
 instant feedback.
 
 Let's build tomorrow's map, not yesterday's; and who knows, maybe osm-carto
 might want to borrow from some of our advances in months to come!

Richard ... that is exactly the sort of help I was looking for. I've
spent the last couple of years trying to keep clients websites working
given all of the crap going on in browsers and the other infrastructure,
so I've been reliant on things like OSM 'just working'. I NEED to get
OSMAND set up properly for UK use ... it's current routing rules just do
not work around here ... and that shows what can be done.

But I still see a place for a traditional tile set which I use for
location maps on the websites, and it's this changing that is causing
the current 'complaints' where we had local detail added which no longer
renders nicely.

My only problem is conflicts with bloody 'boost' and lua has been fun as
well ... everybody seems to feel the whole infrastructure needs changing
  while I'm still on a PHP/C++ base :(

-- 
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk
Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb