Thebat take over all topmost windows

[Tong Narak]

Saturday, January 26, 2002 3:03:16 PM

Hello tbbeta,

When loading thebat, take over all topmost windows.
I would like status bar instead of big connection windows.
And request propertional font in message compose edit view.
Why you hate propertional font ? I don't understand
because many users request it for a whole year.
Is it very hard to add propertional font list in dephi ?

Best regards,
Tong Narak

Attachments: 

--
ºÒ§¤ÃÑ駤¹àÃÒ¡ç·ÓÍÐäÃÊÔ鹤Դ
The Bat! 1.54 Beta/30
Windows NT 5 0 2195 Service Pack 2


--
_
Archives   : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wish List  : http://wish.thebat.dutaint.com
BugTraq: https://bt.ritlabs.com/

The Bat! - bug report

[SyP]

Hello The Bat! developers,

  I'm using The Bat! Version 1.54 Beta/31

  The bug description:

TB cannot decode BASE64-encoded attachments, when the lines are overly
long - I don't know if the RFCs require a maximum line length in this
matter, but let me point out that after exporting the message in
question, and importing to MS Outlook Express 6, I could see the
(JPG) attachments in OE.

  Steps to reproduce the bug:

Please see an example at http://www.detim.hu/~syp/TheBat/0001.eml

BugTracker link: https://bt.ritlabs.com/view_bug_advanced_page.php?f_id=369


Regards,
  SyP


-- 
_
Archives   : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wish List  : http://wish.thebat.dutaint.com
BugTraq: https://bt.ritlabs.com/

Re: OT: CC: to beta page

[Marck D Pearlstone]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi SyP,

On 25 January 2002 at 21:52:56 +0100 (which was 20:52 where I live)
SyP wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

> I don't like it: if I send a bugreport to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and CC:
> tbbeta, my message never shows up :( If I send to tbbeta directly, it
> appears instantly.

Because of people still using folder templates (despite all warnings)
we added a filter to stop messages the didn't have the list address in
the To: field. They come to a moderator for approval before posting.

The solution is to add TBBETA to the To instead of the CC or to make
the bugs@ address the CC.

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator
___
\ BrainStorm - thought power  - www: http://www.brainstormsw.com  /
 \ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com /
·
TB! v1.54 Beta/31-14F4B4B2 on Windows NT 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
·
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32)

iD8DBQE8UeOPOeQkq5KdzaARAiX/AJwNl99lIkKvSKBRHmaXo5JAsfUAygCeJ00H
wQV74aW/RX3R6NF6kBjDxnc=
=37VR
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



-- 
_
Archives   : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wish List  : http://wish.thebat.dutaint.com
BugTraq: https://bt.ritlabs.com/

OT: CC: to beta page

[SyP]

Hello Syafril and all,
 
I don't like it: if I send a bugreport to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and CC:
tbbeta, my message never shows up :( If I send to tbbeta directly, it
appears instantly.
-- 
Cheers, SyP

A picture is worth a thousand words. It just takes up more bandwidth.


-- 
_
Archives   : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wish List  : http://wish.thebat.dutaint.com
BugTraq: https://bt.ritlabs.com/

long lines in BASE64-encoded attachments - The Bat! - bug report

[SyP]

Hello The Bat! developers,

  I'm using The Bat! Version 1.54 Beta/31

  The bug description:

TB cannot decode BASE64-encoded attachments, when the lines are overly
long - I don't know if the RFCs require a maximum line length in this
matter, but let me point out that after exporting the message in
question, and importing to MS Outlook Express 6, I could see the
(JPG) attachments in OE.

  Steps to reproduce the bug:

Please see an example at http://www.detim.hu/~syp/TheBat/0001.eml

BugTracker link: https://bt.ritlabs.com/view_bug_advanced_page.php?f_id=369


Regards,
  SyP


-- 
_
Archives   : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wish List  : http://wish.thebat.dutaint.com
BugTraq: https://bt.ritlabs.com/

Re: BAV plug-ins

[Terry L Fritts]

Lars

On Friday, January 25, 2002 1:19 PM you wrote:
L> The only problem I see is in the communication between TB! and the AV
L> program. How to tell TB! that a virus was found? Via a return code?

We use a program for our IMAIL mail server that does this very thing.
It is called Declude by Scott Perry at Computerized Horizons.
Basically we use it with both f-prot and Network Associates or
McaFfee. Normally f-prot catches everything. It is very rare that a
virus makes it to McAffee.

Imail has a hook that allows this to work.  The hook is set so that a
message is presented to the program pointed to by the hook instead of
the Queue.  Then Declude grabs the message, parses it, and presents
the file to whatever command line scanner you've configured.  Declude
waits on the response from the scanner and places the message back in
the queue if no virus is found.  If a virus is found then the message
is quarantined.  Emails can be generated to various sources then
depending upon configuration.

In my declude configuration for f-prot for instance I have a line like
this:
SCANFILE C:\F-Prot\F-Prot.exe /TYPE /SILENT /NOMEM
  /ARCHIVE /NOFLOPPY /NOBOOT /DUMB /REPORT=report.txt
VIRUSCODE 3
VIRUSCODE 6
REPORT Infection

The first and 2nd line above tells the declude program which scan
engine to call and what cmd line switches to use. The viruscode lines
tell declude the code response to expect from the scanner on finding a
virus. The REPORT line tells declude what string to look for in
report.txt to identify the virus name.

People are using this product with various cmd line scanners with
great success.

It might not hurt for TB! programmers to contact Scott Perry since
this would be a similar application as I see it.
 

Terry Fritts
the Bat! 1.54 Beta/31
Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195


-- 
_
Archives   : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wish List  : http://wish.thebat.dutaint.com
BugTraq: https://bt.ritlabs.com/

Re: BAV plug-ins

[Alastair Scott]

On 25 January 2002 at 09:11 Den wrote:

> Hello.


> GMM> I have tested many AVP releases with the bat. For me it only worked with
> GMM> AVP 3.5.1.3 Platinum (although it may works with Gold or Std)

> What file is necessary for connection AVP to The BAT! ?

We may find out eventually ;)

>From what I understand the author(s) of each virus checker will have
to write an plugin to TB! via an interface which is not currently
freely available.

Awkward question: even when it does become available, do the authors
and users of TB! collectively have enough clout to get the plugins
written? (I shall be on the email to F-Prot, but one swallow does not
make a summer :)

I can see the point of the plugin (the virus is caught even before the
window containing the attachment icon is drawn, thus not giving the
user a chance to click on it and ignore all the warnings) but am
worried about the mechanics of implementing it to any extent.

Alastair


-- 
Alastair Scott (London, United Kingdom)
Using Windows XP and The Bat! 1.54 Beta/31


-- 
_
Archives   : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wish List  : http://wish.thebat.dutaint.com
BugTraq: https://bt.ritlabs.com/

Re: BAV plug-ins

[Lars Geiger]

Hi Terry,
On Friday, January 25, 2002 at 13:09:49 [GMT -0600], you wrote:

TLF> Seems to me though that you'd have to parse the message and look in
TLF> the mime-segments for anything and everything that could carry a
TLF> virus, then present the parsed segment(s) as file(s) to the command
TLF> line scanner, then you'd have to know what the scanner(s) would do,
TLF> await a response(s), and then take appropriate action(s).

The MUA has to parse the mail anyway to extract all the parts of the
message, don't you think? :-)

The only problem I see is in the communication between TB! and the AV
program. How to tell TB! that a virus was found? Via a return code?

-- 
Regards,
Lars

The Bat! 1.54 Beta/31 on Windows NT 5.1 Build 2600 
 
|Lars Geiger  |  |


-- 
_
Archives   : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wish List  : http://wish.thebat.dutaint.com
BugTraq: https://bt.ritlabs.com/

Re: BAV plug-ins

[Lars Geiger]

Hi Sergey,
On Friday, January 25, 2002 at 19:45:18 [GMT +], you wrote:

SU> This is *exactly* what I mean. Many AV checkers have command-line
SU> interface (CMI), why not use it? CMI is described in AV manuals and
SU> can be easy imlemented by most of users themselves.

I agree with you on that one. RIT could provide a standard plugin for
use with scanners without separate plugin via a command line. (Stefan?)
;-)

But I'm not sure if I would drop the transparent scanning of NAV 2002 of
incoming and outgoing messages for this one. :-)

-- 
Regards,
Lars

The Bat! 1.54 Beta/31 on Windows NT 5.1 Build 2600 
 
|Lars Geiger  |  |


-- 
_
Archives   : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wish List  : http://wish.thebat.dutaint.com
BugTraq: https://bt.ritlabs.com/