PGP/GnuPG

[Peter Meyns]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi all,

the GnuPG implementation of The Bat! still doesn't allow
secondary
user IDs.

So I tried to sign my previous message
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
with GPGshell, and it returned MS type funky wrapping. So I
refrained
from signing it. But I'll do it with this one, so you can see.
TB! is
set to wrap at 70 chars, and I don't find any respective option
(to
turn off) in GPGshell.

Any ideas?

- -- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5 Return RC1 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
Dell Latitude C600 P3 at 1012 MHz, 512 MB RAM

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.42
Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: http://www.gswot.org
Comment: My key: https://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0xE10774CE

iD8DBQFCdnwdAzZSBuEHdM4RAssTAJ42akbV/cfS1+tfdkrlG/zCTbYVlgCdEO3R
P+UUXFwvafMmsCcGNp36tsc=
=OuFR
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




 Current beta is 3.5 Return RC/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

PGP/GnuPG

[Peter Meyns]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi all,

this is the same message manually re-wrapped and signed with PGP
built-in support.

the GnuPG implementation of The Bat! still doesn't allow secondary
user IDs.

So I tried to sign my previous message
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] with GPGshell, and
it returned MS type funky wrapping. So I refrained from signing it.
But I'll do it with this one, so you can see. TB! is set to wrap at 70
chars, and I don't find any respective option (to turn off) in
GPGshell.

Any ideas?

- --
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5 Return RC1 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
Dell Latitude C600 P3 at 1012 MHz, 512 MB RAM

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPsdk version 1.7.1 (C) 1997-1999 Network Associates, Inc. and its 
affiliated companies.
Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: http://www.gswot.org

iQA/AwUBQnZvpAM2UgbhB3TOEQIpNwCg3vbe7kzFF7WCRTJ/4KmXQ18DgVcAoINp
GeakgLLlN/6AmXv8tqxXKAgV
=CLHc
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



 Current beta is 3.5 Return RC/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: PGP/GnuPG

[Peter Meyns]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Nick,

on Mon, 2 May 2005 17:20:54 -0700GMT, you wrote:

NA> Peter, if you right click GPGTray and go to Launch/GPGShell Prefs/GPGTray,
NA> you will find the word wrap setting there... set it to zero.

Thank you Nick. I must have suffered partial blindness that I didn't
see it... ;-)

- -- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5 Return RC1 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
Dell Latitude C600 P3 at 1012 MHz, 512 MB RAM

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.42
Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: http://www.gswot.org
Comment: My key: https://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0xE10774CE

iD8DBQFCdxgjAzZSBuEHdM4RAlFcAJ0fPq1AoO4CC+EVtLRP83lArjO4jQCfUsK7
0QdlohfWOcur3V3ECp1AJ1E=
=Nqoc
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




 Current beta is 3.5 Return RC/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

PGP/MIME with GnuPG (was: The Bat! 3.5 Return RC4 is now available)

[Peter Meyns]

Hi 9Val,

on Fri, 6 May 2005 11:38:54 +0300GMT, you wrote:

9> The Bat! 3.5 Return RC4 is now available from:
9> http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/

9> It fixes freezes on receiving message on POP3

After some time of beta abstinence, 3.5 RC3 was my first serious try,
and I thought, OMG, not this one again... ;-)

So thanks a lot! Now I can go and check the other issues, like GnuPG
implementation.

Too bad, it still doesn't work for this account, although the address
is a sub-ID of my key. I can clearsign though via GPGshell. But only
inline, no MIME... hmm

I'll try it this time with PGP 6.5.8ckt plugin enabled. :-)

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5 Return RC4 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
Dell Latitude C600 P3 at 1012 MHz, 512 MB RAM



pgp8TFCmbrosP.pgp
Description: PGP signature

 Current beta is 3.5 Return RC/4 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: PGP/MIME with GnuPG

[Peter Meyns]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160

Hi all,

on Fri, 6 May 2005 20:35:10 +0200GMT, I wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[see subject]

PM> Too bad, it still doesn't work for this account, although the address
PM> is a sub-ID of my key. I can clearsign though via GPGshell. But only
PM> inline, no MIME... hmm

PM> I'll try it this time with PGP 6.5.8ckt plugin enabled. :-)

gpg: Signature made 05/06/05 19:35:11 using DSA key ID E10774CE
gpg: Good signature from "Peter Meyns"

This works perfectly. Why doesn't it work with GnuPG?
See http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4171

- -- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5 Return RC4 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
Dell Latitude C600 P3 at 1012 MHz, 512 MB RAM
'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.42
Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: http://www.gswot.org
Comment: My key: https://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0xE10774CE

iD8DBQFCe718AzZSBuEHdM4RA744AKDUTjskccQAF3IwvC7Wiq5TPaxS/wCgopaz
NNwxHj0S2etjCTvkxg9T1Eo=
=A+Bm
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




 Current beta is 3.5 Return RC/4 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

On-the-fly-encryption

[Peter Meyns]

Hi all,

which install file do I need for On-the-fly encryption? I have OTFE
implemented here on my PC with v3.0.2.10 (which I also don't find on
Ritlabs' site, although it is running very smoothly...?) I'd like to
implement it on my laptop too, but I forgot, how I did it here on the
PC...

3.1.33.msi doesn't seem to offer it... hmm

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.0.2.10 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM




 Current beta is 3.5 Return RC/4 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: On-the-fly-encryption

[Peter Meyns]

Hi Marek,

on Sat, 7 May 2005 14:17:31 +0200GMT, you wrote:

>> which install file do I need for On-the-fly encryption?

>> 3.1.33.msi doesn't seem to offer it... hmm

MM> OTFE is not included in 3.0.1.33, it appeared in this beta cycle.

Yes, I remember that. I have OTFE installed on my PC, but I don't
remember, nor do i find the install file that I might use for my
notebook.

MM> If You install it for the first time, select On-The-Fly encryption in
MM> first dialog, which will appear.

Well, yes, but install from which file? I installed from 3.1.33.msi,
but as you stated, there is no such option.

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.0.2.10 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM




 Current beta is 3.5 Return RC/4 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

To the admins of bugtracker

[Peter Meyns]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160

Hi maintainers of BT,

I submitted a bug report about BT,
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4590.

Could someone please delete the attached PNG, because it is
unnecessarily large, and I'd like to provide a better one.

- -- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5 Return RC4 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM
'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.32
Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: http://www.gswot.org
Comment: My key: https://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0xE10774CE

iD8DBQFCfM6VAzZSBuEHdM4RA7ZnAKC4M/MBttlSJ1DzUtoRL3Ys9TMlFgCg1lCd
bHfVcr+88PXZQyK9LPuVBt0=
=gKcu
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




 Current beta is 3.5 Return RC/4 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: On-the-fly-encryption

[Peter Meyns]

Hi MAU,

on Sat, 7 May 2005 15:57:11 +0200GMT, you wrote:

MM>>> If You install it for the first time, select On-The-Fly encryption in
MM>>> first dialog, which will appear.
>> 
>> Well, yes, but install from which file? I installed from 3.1.33.msi,
>> but as you stated, there is no such option.

M> I have found this in case it helps:

Yes, indeed, it does.

M> |   *DO NOT* run the new
M> |   installation prior to overwriting the executable with the new beta.

This was the part I had forgotten.

Thank you and all who replied :)

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5 Return RC4 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM




 Current beta is 3.5 Return RC/4 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: The Bat! 3.5 Return RC7 is now available

[Peter Meyns]

Hi Thomas,

on Thu, 12 May 2005 01:11:04 +0700GMT, you wrote:

TF> On Wed, 11 May 2005 20:46:10 +0300 GMT (12/05/2005, 00:46 +0700 GMT),
TF> George M. Menegakis wrote:

GMM>> If this are release candidates I am the new pope

TF> Your holiness, we are in the middle of a beta series.

That's how I perceive it too. But why are they called Release
Candidates?

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5 Return RC7 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM




 Current beta is 3.5 Return RC/7 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: The Bat! 3.5 Return RC7 is now available

[Peter Meyns]

Hi Mary,

on Wed, 11 May 2005 13:32:24 -0500GMT, you wrote:

GMM If this are release candidates I am the new pope
TF>>> Your holiness, we are in the middle of a beta series.
>> That's how I perceive it too. But why are they called Release
>> Candidates?

MB> They're "Beta Release Candidates"?  ;)

lol

MB> If the Customize functionalities can only be straightened out, we may
MB> actually have one of the best Bats offered to date (notwithstanding
MB> the fact that v. 3.0.2.10 is presently my favorite.)

I haven't yet tried to customize anything, and so far, I'm quite
content. Some old bugs remain, but that will be another post. I'm also
glad to have 3.0.2.10 to revert to, if it should be necessary. :grin:

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5 Return RC7 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM
'



 Current beta is 3.5 Return RC/7 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

GnuPG support still unsufficient

[Peter Meyns]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160

Hi all,

on Thu, 24 Feb 2005 23:36:33 +0100GMT, I wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :

PM> ... The problem is, that The Bat! doesn't recognize other UIDs
PM> than the first. ... It is probably related to BT entry
PM> http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4171

This old bug still exists in current versions. So I'll use GPGshell
again instead of TB!'s implementation. :-(

- -- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5 Return RC7 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM
'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.32
Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: http://www.gswot.org
Comment: My key: https://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0xE10774CE

iD8DBQFCgmVsAzZSBuEHdM4RA3v1AKDqLvghQMm4vC9HvBq2YgH7oPfZFgCgy/dZ
Ukdhrs04ednGba2/YA/4MfA=
=k//U
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




 Current beta is 3.5 Return RC/7 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

[Peter Meyns]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160

Hi Marck,

on Wed, 11 May 2005 22:45:42 +0100GMT, you wrote:

PM>>> ... The problem is, that The Bat! doesn't recognize other UIDs
PM>>> than the first. ... It is probably related to BT entry
PM>>> http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4171

PM>> This old bug still exists in current versions. So I'll use GPGshell
PM>> again instead of TB!'s implementation. :-(

MDP> I only found this to be the case when using GnuPG's "OpenPGP"
MDP> compatibility setting. I can use all UIDs when setting compatibility
MDP> to "None".

It is set to "none" here. Still, this is the answer, when I try to
sign from within TB!:

gpg: key 9E19BFC2: secret key without public key - skipped
gpg: no default secret key: secret key not available
gpg: [stdin]: clearsign failed: secret key not available

- -- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5 Return RC8 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM
'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.32
Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: http://www.gswot.org
Comment: My key: https://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0xE10774CE

iD8DBQFCgu80AzZSBuEHdM4RA8SxAKCS7ckx8iPJakgZVSV+yoUXcDDlgACg155V
rDzaSkePh83g/8eYSA+g4Oc=
=OgPt
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




 Current beta is 3.5 Return RC/8 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

[Peter Meyns]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Kevin,

on Thu, 12 May 2005 02:30:49 -0400GMT, you wrote:

PM>> It is set to "none" here. Still, this is the answer, when I try to
PM>> sign from within TB!:

KC> Try setting it for "pgp8".

I also tried OpenPGP. No difference. Same error, no matter what I
select.

- -- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5 Return RC8 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
Dell Latitude C600 P3 at 1012 MHz, 512 MB RAM
'

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.42
Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: http://www.gswot.org
Comment: My key: https://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0xE10774CE

iD8DBQFCg37wAzZSBuEHdM4RAkKGAKDNVJYGUL8yREhQttgxHV6OKlzMBACg4PyF
Q7jvDB6Ai97tmIWZ3IlMwxI=
=+IKY
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




 Current beta is 3.5 Return RC/8 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

[Peter Meyns]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Henk,

on Fri, 13 May 2005 08:45:57 +0200GMT, you wrote:

HMdB> How does the signing go with RC9? I did some tests with different
HMdB> UID's and I as far as I can see now, I don't have anymore problems. I
HMdB> tested with signing without using GPGshell and experienced no more
HMdB> problems neither with clearsigning nor with pgp/mime from the
HMdB> editormenu and from a template.

Again the same error. No way to use PGP/MIME with this address. I can
only sign using GPGshell.

- -- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5 Return RC9 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM
'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.32
Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: http://www.gswot.org
Comment: My key: https://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0xE10774CE

iD8DBQFChMrFAzZSBuEHdM4RAiRNAKDU64pIUbG7zOuVDqOPXHCs2hSCjQCgwK9u
B6O4S2Dr2EXIikVrwU8rmmc=
=eF5j
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




 Current beta is 3.5 Return RC/9 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Export command in filter actions broken since RC8

[Peter Meyns]

Hi all,

I used to submit my spam to SpamCop via a manual filter, which exports
the spam mail from a Common Folder to a text file in UNIX-mailbox
format, overwriting the existing one, and then creates a message to
SpamCop with the mail retrieved from the text file with the %PUT
macro.

This doesn't work any more in RC 8 and 9. Neither is the existing file
overwritten nor a new one created. So the new messages always have the
old contents. Just went back to RC 7 to make sure.

It seems that the filter action "export message to" is broken. Does
anyone else use something similar and can confirm?

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5 Return RC7 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
Dell Latitude C600 P3 at 1012 MHz, 512 MB RAM




 Current beta is 3.5 Return RC/9 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: Export command in filter actions broken since RC8

[Peter Meyns]

Hi MAU,

on Fri, 13 May 2005 18:51:56 +0200GMT, you wrote:

>> It seems that the filter action "export message to" is broken. Does
>> anyone else use something similar and can confirm?

M> Yes I do. I had not noticed that but I have now revised what I sent to
M> Spamcop along today and it is certainly the same message always.

M> So, fully confirm.

Thank you and Marck. So there is a new BT issue:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4636

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5 Return RC7 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
Dell Latitude C600 P3 at 1012 MHz, 512 MB RAM




 Current beta is 3.5 Return RC/9 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

[Peter Meyns]

Hi Roelof,

on Fri, 13 May 2005 18:55:07 +0200GMT, you wrote:

PM>> Again the same error. No way to use PGP/MIME with this address.

RO> Works fine for me

I see it and I believe it. But still I don't understand why it doesn't
work here. Not even on this rather freshly set up notebook... hmm

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5 Return RC7 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
Dell Latitude C600 P3 at 1012 MHz, 512 MB RAM




 Current beta is 3.5 Return RC/9 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

[Peter Meyns]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Henk,

on Fri, 13 May 2005 22:36:22 +0200GMT, you wrote:

HMdB>>> How does the signing go with RC9?
HMdB> ...

>> Again the same error. No way to use PGP/MIME with this address. I can
>> only sign using GPGshell.

HMdB> Strange, you know I have a freeform UID and this message is signed
HMdB> pgp/mime.

gpg: Signature made 05/13/05 22:36:22 using DSA key ID 8C32408B
gpg: WARNING: signature digest conflict in message
gpg: Can't check signature: general error

Nor can I sign using TB!...

- -- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM
'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.32
Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: http://www.gswot.org
Comment: My key: https://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0xE10774CE

iD8DBQFChY0tAzZSBuEHdM4RAhhIAKCYqKIIJ6bnXBusfaYVboILRHtE8wCfdifa
h/skepCkQKp7y6/fnWqPwws=
=22Bp
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




 Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: AV in search: always reproducible!

[Peter Meyns]

Hi Max,

on Sat, 14 May 2005 15:27:15 +0400GMT, you wrote:

MS>   When pressing F7 to invoke search dialog, I ALWAYS get an AV in the
MS>   release (!!!) version. This means I have a release, and can't even
MS>   search for a message?

No AV here.  brings up the message finder as it should.

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5 on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM



 Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

[Peter Meyns]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Martin,

on Sat, 14 May 2005 09:12:27 +0200GMT, you wrote:

HMdB> How does the signing go with RC9?
HMdB>>> ...

 Again the same error. No way to use PGP/MIME with this address. I can
 only sign using GPGshell.

HMdB>>> Strange, you know I have a freeform UID and this message is signed
HMdB>>> pgp/mime.

>> gpg: Signature made 05/13/05 22:36:22 using DSA key ID 8C32408B
>> gpg: WARNING: signature digest conflict in message
>> gpg: Can't check signature: general error

MS> Have the same message from GnuPG 1.4.1 when checking the message
MS> from Henk.

It is a known bug. See https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4329

- -- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5 on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM
'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.32
Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: http://www.gswot.org
Comment: My key: https://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0xE10774CE

iD8DBQFChhnTAzZSBuEHdM4RAgN1AJsFt58Cbxke904U6/K+tKRvjTUZ4QCfRupJ
HSj3+uyF0lNClPFidX4mElQ=
=oVVS
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




 Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

No more shortcut for maintenance in folder menu

[Peter Meyns]

Hi all,

I used to start the folder maintenance with a PowerPro script using
the keyboard shortcuts provided by The Bat!, so that the keystrokes

  {alt}fa
  pdc
  {enter}

started to remove dupes and purge and compress all folders. This
doesn't work any more, because there isn't a shortcut for Maintenance
in 3.5 final. Is this intentional or has it only been lost? I'd love
to have it back.

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5 on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM




 Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Window indices of The Bat! changed and not (yet?) translated

[Peter Meyns]

Hi all,

in previous TB! versions I could use the PowerPro command
win.childtextbyindex("The Bat!",3) to distinguish the English from the
German interface. English returned "Account specials" while in German
the page returned "Konto-Sondereinstellungen". In version 3.5 final
the return is "For folder Popup" in both languages. It is also the
same for indices other than 3.

Was it necessary to change these and is this supposed to stay this
way, or is it just the translation lagging behind?

I'd really like to have this distinction. Several of my PPro scripts
rely on it, because the keyboard shortcuts are different in the two
languages.

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5 on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM



 Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: No more shortcut for maintenance in folder menu

[Peter Meyns]

Hi Marcus,

on  Mon, 16 May 2005 16:28:32 +0200GMT (16.05.2005, 16:28 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:

>>   {alt}fa
>>   pdc
>>   {enter}

>> started to remove dupes and purge and compress all folders. This
>> doesn't work any more, because there isn't a shortcut for Maintenance
>> in 3.5 final. Is this intentional or has it only been lost? I'd love
>> to have it back.

MO> It is lost customisation. There were no default shortcut in the older
MO> versions either, you must have, just like me, assigned that shortcut
MO> manually.

Really? I don't remember... hmm

MO> Reassign and you will be fine (as long as focus is not on a
MO> VF, but that should be fixed soon, if I understood my offline
MO> conversation with 9Val correctly).

But where would I do that now? Menu View -- Toolbars -- Customise
let's me assign a shortcut, but that's a global one. I only need it in
the folder menu.

Besides, after assigning one and pressing OK, the View -- Toolbars
menu is shown empty. I used yesterday's backup of the TB! directory to
have the items shown again. It is probably only one file to be deleted
or changed, but I don't know yet which one.

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5 on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM




 Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: No more shortcut for maintenance in folder menu

[Peter Meyns]

Hi Dwight,

on  Mon, 16 May 2005 10:50:20 -0500GMT (16.05.2005, 17:50 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:

MO>>> It is lost customisation. There were no default shortcut in the
MO>>> older versions either, you must have, just like me, assigned that
MO>>> shortcut manually.

>> Really? I don't remember... hmm

DAC> Windows pull down menus normally have a letter underlined for each
DAC> item, and hitting that letter gets one there the same as mouse point
DAC> and click. TB used to do this, but in the new version many of those
DAC> are gone.

Exactly. That's what I meant. :-)

DAC> alt-f i, for instance, used to re-filter. now it doesn't

It is marked with the f underlined, but then, there is "New Common
_F_older" before in the menu, so this is chosen...

DAC> just as alt-f a used to get one to maintenance.

That's the one I'm missing for my task.

DAC> This is not customization wiping out created shortcuts, but
DAC> rather departure from windows conventions.

I hope it is an unforeseen bug that will be fixed soon. Can't be too
hard, can it?

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5 on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM




 Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: No more shortcut for maintenance in folder menu

[Peter Meyns]

Hi Marcus,

on  Mon, 16 May 2005 17:53:03 +0200GMT (16.05.2005, 17:53 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:

>> alt-f i, for instance, used to re-filter...

MO> Don't rub salt into my wounds, I know I misinterpreted him ;-)

You did, but that's no reason at all to feel wounded. :))

-- 
Cheers
Peter

Fer sall chiep: bran nu spel chekker - nevur usd!




 Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

VF and mailticker: again this message from Dec 31, 1899

[Peter Meyns]

Hi all,

I have a virtual folder that shows messages from or replied to myself.
Whenever there is a new message and I select the folder, the
mailticker appears with one message dated Dec 31, 1899, size -1b. It
goes away when I leave the VF and go back again. I saw this in
previous versions, so it's not too surprising or annoying for me, but
certainly it isn't right. And it may be confusing to new users... ;-)

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5 on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM
<>
 Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: New Folders

[Peter Meyns]

Hi Gleason,

on  Tue, 24 May 2005 09:27:43 -0700GMT (24.05.2005, 18:27 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:

GP> Under the Folder menu, the New, and New Virtual Folder entries do not
GP> respond when clicked on.

Not confirmed. Here they open the dialog for a new folder.

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5 on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM




 Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

3.0.5.14 Still no key access to folder maintenance

[Peter Meyns]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Maxim,

I got never ending AVs upon opening this message that was stored as a
draft. I chose ++ at last. 3.0.5.14 should not be
presented as a release version.

I also saw that there is still no shortcut assigned to menu folder --
maintenance. Please put in the "A" again. The German translation has
an underlined character, and I want it in English too. See
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

- -- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5.0.14 on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM
'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.32
Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: http://www.gswot.org
Comment: My key: https://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0xE10774CE

iD4DBQFCk3M/AzZSBuEHdM4RAv0QAJdgRQBsHYa6CSWnT08ww4pUy8KoAKDwxhWh
pL9MRW3MrFV6q2lEm10+qQ==
=O3Cj
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




 Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: 3.5.19: *Unknown* toolbars

[Peter Meyns]

Hi Cees,

on Fri, 27 May 2005 17:10:03 +0200GMT, you wrote:

C> Mail's In (~50Kb)
C> Morticia Addams from The Addam's Family

C> would LOVE to have that one
C> but don't get access

I tried to send it privately. I got this reply from my provider:

,- [ error ]
| This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
| 
| A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of
| its recipients. The following addresses failed:
| 
|   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| 
| SMTP error from remote server in greeting:
| host mail.shhh.nl[212.129.178.217]:
| 501 Domain must resolve
| 
| 
| --- The header of the original message is following. ---
| ...
`-

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5.19 on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
Dell Latitude C600 P3 at 1012 MHz, 512 MB RAM




 Current beta is 3.5.20 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: 3.5.20

[Peter Meyns]

Hi NetVicious,

on  Fri, 27 May 2005 20:04:23 +0200GMT (27.05.2005, 20:04 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:

>> 3.5.20 should fix AVs of previous betas, please try it:

N> Wow! A RIT programmer with a not registered TB! :-D

Of course! He is evaluating! lol

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5.20 on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM




 Current beta is 3.5.20 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: 3.5.20

[Peter Meyns]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Nick,

on  Fri, 27 May 2005 11:24:27 -0700GMT (27.05.2005, 20:24 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:

NA> On Friday, May 27, 2005, at 11:21:57 AM, Maxim wrote:

>> .5.20 should fix AVs of previous betas, please try it:

>> www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb3520.rar

NA> I receive a "Page cannot be loaded" error when trying the above. Does anyone
NA> have a different URL that would allow me to download the latest Beta?

The same here now. I could download it this afternoon. If you want me
to send you the file, tell me. :-)

- -- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5.20 on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM
'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.32
Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: http://www.gswot.org
Comment: My key: https://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0xE10774CE

iD8DBQFCl22DAzZSBuEHdM4RArbZAJ9XrLFd1vYpWraL1HFK6UOVaQZW1QCeIzJx
xeM+SoawcwelgNh+8yPsuE4=
=Sl0X
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




 Current beta is 3.5.20 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: OT: Do you happen to know...

[Peter Meyns]

Hi MAU,

on  Sun, 29 May 2005 17:49:13 +0200GMT (29.05.2005, 17:49 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:

M> How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?

M> ;-)

A woodchuck would chuck as much wood as he could chuck, if the
woodchuck could chuck wood. lol

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5.21 on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM



 Current beta is 3.5.21 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: X-Rogue?

[Peter Meyns]

Hi Tony,

on Mon, 6 Jun 2005 12:08:26 +0100GMT, you wrote:

>> Just noticed that. Have you got a special template for the list as
>> there is no Rogue header in your message at all

TB>  Yes I have, a new and a reply template and both have...

TB>  %SetHeader("X-Rogue",":tbc:")%-

TB>  In them.

Have you defined the X-Rogue header in Preferences -- Message headers
in your new installation?

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5.25 on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
Dell Latitude C600 P3 at 1012 MHz, 512 MB RAM




 Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: X-Rogue?

[Peter Meyns]

Hi Tony,


on Mon, 6 Jun 2005 14:02:13 +0100GMT, you wrote:

TB>   A reminder of what Peter Meyns on TBBETA typed on:
TB>   06 June 2005 at 14:55:59 GMT +0200

>> Have you defined the X-Rogue header in Preferences -- Message headers
>> in your new installation?

TB>  Yes but I'm not sure it's right. I even restored my old installation to
TB>  check everything and it should be OK.

TB>  What are the exact setting I should have in there?

Mine are: Display as: X-Rogue:
  RFC-Name: X-Rogue
  Allow editing

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5.25 on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
Dell Latitude C600 P3 at 1012 MHz, 512 MB RAM




 Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: Folder maintenance bug

[Peter Meyns]

Hi Claude,

on Tue, 7 Jun 2005 21:13:54 +0200GMT, you wrote:

CR>   When I perform a folder maintenance I receive the following :

CR> The Bat!
CR> TProgressBar property out of range.
CR> OK

CR> four times !!!

Not here. I did my usual folder maintenance (kill dupes, purge,
compress) and no error at all.

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5.26 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
Dell Latitude C600 P3 at 1012 MHz, 512 MB RAM




 Current beta is 3.5.26 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Keyboard shortcuts in folder menu

[Peter Meyns]

Hi all,

I'm on a small vacation, so I finally found time to file a bug report
about a tiny issue, that bothers me since the beginning of the 3.x
series:

The keyboard shortcut for Maintenance in the Folder menu is lost. We
had a short discussion about it in May starting with
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] but the shortcut is
*still* missing. So please add your support to
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4759

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5.26 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
Dell Latitude C600 P3 at 1012 MHz, 512 MB RAM



 Current beta is 3.5.26 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: Keyboard shortcuts in folder menu

[Peter Meyns]

Hi Natasha,

on Wed, 15 Jun 2005 12:59:16 +1200GMT, you wrote:

PM>>> The keyboard shortcut for Maintenance in the Folder menu is lost.

M>> Why don't you assign your preferred shortcut using Customise?

NVP> I notice at https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4759 you mention you 
want to
NVP> start your maintenance via PowerPro. Why not use TB's internal scheduler?

I don't want my folder maintenance done at a certain time, but with
one click of a button, automatically selecting "Kill dupes", "Purge"
and "Compress" and starting. Miguel's suggestion helped me achieve it.

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5.26 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
Dell Latitude C600 P3 at 1012 MHz, 512 MB RAM




 Current beta is 3.5.26 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: Keyboard shortcuts in folder menu

[Peter Meyns]

Hi MAU,

on Tue, 14 Jun 2005 18:32:56 +0200GMT, you wrote:

>> The keyboard shortcut for Maintenance in the Folder menu is lost. We
>> had a short discussion about it in May starting with
>> mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] but the shortcut is
>> *still* missing.

M> Why don't you assign your preferred shortcut using Customise?

Ok. It's not quite the same, but it works. Thanks for the idea. :-).

BTW, after I assigned a shortcut, the View -- Toolbars menu shrunk to
no contents. It returned after a restart of TB!. Known issue?

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5.26 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
Dell Latitude C600 P3 at 1012 MHz, 512 MB RAM



 Current beta is 3.5.26 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: Keyboard shortcuts in folder menu

[Peter Meyns]

Hi MAU,

on Wed, 15 Jun 2005 12:25:42 +0200GMT, you wrote:

M> A beer, you owe me a beer ;-)

Right, and it's not the first one. :)

I'll be back home next week, and I'm about to check out the conditions
to send a case of German beer to a friend in Minnesota. I shall ask
for Spain too... ;o)

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5.26 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
Dell Latitude C600 P3 at 1012 MHz, 512 MB RAM




 Current beta is 3.5.26 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: Keyboard shortcuts in folder menu

[Peter Meyns]

Hi Mary,

on Wed, 15 Jun 2005 07:14:19 -0500GMT, you wrote:

>> BTW, after I assigned a shortcut, the View -- Toolbars menu shrunk to
>> no contents. It returned after a restart of TB!. Known issue?

MB> Known issue...

MB> One work-around, if you don't want to re-start The Bat!, is a
MB> right-click anywhere on the tool bar. That context menu displays the
MB> same thing as the missing drop-down menu.

Oh, thanks a lot. This is sufficient not to care about the bug... ;-)

--
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5.26 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
Dell Latitude C600 P3 at 1012 MHz, 512 MB RAM



 Current beta is 3.5.26 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: Little problem sending mail to two different addresses

[Peter Meyns]

Hi Mary,

on  Thu, 16 Jun 2005 16:23:53 -0500GMT (16.06.2005, 23:23 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:

>>> The way I see it here, both times the message was sent to both lists

>> and for many both copies were filtered to the same list twice each
>> time

MB> Confirmed here. I am among the many. :(

Good thing, my Folder Maintenance button is working again. It kills
dupes too. :))

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5.27 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM




 Current beta is 3.5.27 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: 3.5.28

[Peter Meyns]

Hi Dimitry,

on  Fri, 17 Jun 2005 19:22:24 +0200GMT (17.06.2005, 19:22 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:

DA> On 2005-06-17 at 18:31:20 Maxim Masiutin wrote:

>> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb3528.rar

DA> Before I waste my time on this, did anybody already check if the
DA> maintenance centre bug (the out of bounds list index when purging) has
DA> already been fixed?

It doesn't seem so, just tried it. But clicking OK will remove the
window, so it's non-fatal. :-)

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5.28 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM




 Current beta is 3.5.28 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

PGP issue in 3.5.28

[Peter Meyns]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi all,

when I try to decrypt an inline encrypted message by clicking the
Decrypt button, a "Save as" dialogue opens instead of the passphrase
prompt. Worked ok in .26.

- -- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5.26 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM
'

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.32
Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: http://www.gswot.org
Comment: My key: https://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0xE10774CE

iD8DBQFCtEJ2AzZSBuEHdM4RAt2QAJ4i8lid7pu90Ump/qHF1Fwa7p4HAACgv3Sk
raAGyfOLfFkKHp+jy5Sr0y8=
=N5Rl
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




 Current beta is 3.5.28 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: PGP issue in 3.5.28

[Peter Meyns]

Hi rtelle,

on  Sat, 18 Jun 2005 19:20:19 +0200GMT (18.06.2005, 19:20 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:

PM>> when I try to decrypt an inline encrypted message by clicking the
PM>> Decrypt button, a "Save as" dialogue opens instead of the
PM>> passphrase prompt. Worked ok in .26.

rln> I think that it happens because the encrypted message includes a
rln> public keyring ; when the "save as" windows opens, save with something
rln> like donald.asc then try to import this key. Usually you should get a
rln> correct public key.
rln> Am I correct ? ;-)

No, I don't think so. There was just the encrypted message with no key
attached, and the sender's key has been in my public keyring for long.
Besides, decrypting depends on *my* key, not the sender's.

The "Decrypt" button just doesn't decrypt, but opens the "save to
file" dialog instead.

When I click the button with version .26 it opens the passphrase
prompt as expected.

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5.28 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM




 Current beta is 3.5.28 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: PGP issue in 3.5.28

[Peter Meyns]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Kevin,

on  Sat, 18 Jun 2005 15:06:05 -0400GMT (18.06.2005, 21:06 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:

PM>> when I try to decrypt an inline encrypted message by clicking the
PM>> Decrypt button, a "Save as" dialogue opens instead of the
PM>> passphrase prompt. Worked ok in .26.

KC> I just ran a test and did not experience this. Is the message double
KC> encrypted? Try pressing F9 and cut the PGP portion to the clipboard
KC> and see what GPGShell shows.

No problems with GPGshell to decrypt. And there's no problem verifying
sigs with TB!'s button (yours verified good). It's just decrypting
that doesn't work here from the button.

- -- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5.28 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.32
Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: http://www.gswot.org
Comment: My key: https://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0xE10774CE

iD8DBQFCtHMuAzZSBuEHdM4RAk5FAKCmenqXtgIVkD1aAH788mU21eOLzgCfX8T8
i6pnwPQ3mR2aKTiZCpcAQZs=
=SoUr
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




 Current beta is 3.5.28 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: PGP issue in 3.5.28

[Peter Meyns]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160

Hendrik Oesterlin schrieb:

>>when I try to decrypt an inline encrypted message by clicking the
>>Decrypt button, a "Save as" dialogue opens instead of the passphrase
>>prompt. Worked ok in .26.
>
>
>It works just fine here with TB!3.5.28 and PGP8.1 (both with inline
>and MIME encrypted messsages)

I found, that it only occurs with inline encrypted mails created with
KMail. Mails created
with The Bat! or Thunderbird open the passphrase prompt as expected. So
it doesn't
seem to be a serious issue.

- --
Cheers
Peter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: http://www.gswot.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCtUtIAzZSBuEHdM4RAwToAJ41dwkMiUUPqCgldzEcF+Iq/9ZsXgCfcQRG
7rPLvPQE5tr4WI8SsODzVD8=
=D38d
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




 Current beta is 3.5.29 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Solved (was: PGP issue in 3.5.28)

[Peter Meyns]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Peter Meyns schrieb:

> 
> when I try to decrypt an inline encrypted message by clicking the
> Decrypt button, a "Save as" dialogue opens instead of the passphrase
> prompt. Worked ok in .26.
> 

The problem was caused by contradictory HASH statements in KMail
(SHA1) and my gpg.conf (RIPEMD 160).

I also sorted out my wrapping in T'bird, or so I hope... ;-)

- --
Cheers
Peter

Thunderbird Version 1.0.2 (20050602), Kanotix 2005-3
Dell Latitude C600 at 1002 MHz, 512 MB RAM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: http://www.gswot.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCtWfUAzZSBuEHdM4RAkpoAKC5Ymb0DkGvRN1dd7qyHQfsf9bplACg6zWn
fibOWoKvHFwjCn+SmjA4ggk=
=ZecO
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



 Current beta is 3.5.29 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: 3.5.30

[Peter Meyns]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Maxim,

on  Sun, 19 Jun 2005 18:54:01 +0300GMT (19.06.2005, 17:54 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:

MM> Even if you were using betas .26-.29 and it did start
MM> normally, you should upgrade to .30.

I did, and it still runs fine! :))

But I still can't sign the msg from within The Bat!... hmm

- -- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5.30 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.32
Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: http://www.gswot.org
Comment: My key: https://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0xE10774CE

iD8DBQFCtadtAzZSBuEHdM4RAuw6AKCQHVItlJaaP5FZL5Kkpun3NAtyvgCeJmUI
oX0nZfV2thkjffnTKsj2n0o=
=A9Rz
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




 Current beta is 3.5.30 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

GPG, using other than primary UID (was: 3.5.30)

[Peter Meyns]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Martin,

on  Sun, 19 Jun 2005 19:18:19 +0200GMT (19.06.2005, 19:18 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:

>> But I still can't sign the msg from within The Bat!... hmm

MS> With GnuPG 1.4.1 ?

Right. No other than the primary UID of my key is accepted by The
Bat!. For all others I have to use GPGshell.

- -- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5.30 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.32
Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: http://www.gswot.org
Comment: My key: https://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0xE10774CE

iD8DBQFCtasEAzZSBuEHdM4RAkveAJoCI6TcZkfThkdMLI+EEzOY+imgHgCghon/
3Csc+XS2CeNKCTCYkOZqx4g=
=GWQk
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




 Current beta is 3.5.30 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: GPG, using other than primary UID

[Peter Meyns]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Martin Schoch schrieb:

>>Right. No other than the primary UID of my key is accepted by The
>>Bat!. For all others I have to use GPGshell.
> 
> 
> I added a second UID to this key I am using here...
> 
> When using the second UID to send a message the passphrase window
> pops up and asks for the primary UID passphrase - so the right key
> is found. And if you check later on the signature the primary UID is
> shown with all others as AKA...

As it is done here on T'bird on Linux. I have a suspicion, that an
obsolete list key I once created, but think to have deleted, is still
around in one way or another... I'll have to take a *deep* look. :-)

- --
Cheers
Peter

Thunderbird Version 1.0.2 (20050602), Kanotix 2005-3
Dell Latitude C600 at 1002 MHz, 512 MB RAM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: http://www.gswot.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCtcECAzZSBuEHdM4RAvmrAJ4obGpOcj4YWwSO7coMT1mBgFRKNQCaAuMD
pl9WzPsTlQjNL3863tdf0LA=
=r45w
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



 Current beta is 3.5.30 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

AV in Network and Administration

[Peter Meyns]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160

Hi all,

I didn't find the time yet to follow all the discussion about the
latest version here or on BT, and I'm not sure if I will, so there is
a good chance that I may have missed this bug being mentioned.

I installed The Bat! freshly on my notebook from the
thebat_pro_3-5-30.msi and restored my backup. Then I updated to
3.5.0.31.

It runs well so far, but one thing annoys me:

in Options -- Network and Administration I cannot change anything (see
attachment). Clicking ok on the AV window leaves the cursor as the
hourglass, but I can click Cancel anyway, and TB! moves on fine.

I hope I'll get to keeping up with the current development. :-)

BTW, GnuPG support hasn't improved. I still can't sign this message
from within The Bat!, but that's worth another thread...

- -- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5.0.31 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
Dell Latitude C600 P3 at 1002 MHz, 512 MB RAM
'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.42
Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: http://www.gswot.org
Comment: My key: https://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0xE10774CE

iD8DBQFCwElCAzZSBuEHdM4RA5FxAJ9M/RmbLX788qLLrtdCOsENGV0zjgCgyiog
uHy16oV/VWbv2/ZzP5UJ0No=
=B70G
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


net_and_admin.png
Description: PNG image

 Current beta is 3.5.31 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: It worries me...

[Peter Meyns]

Hi Liz,

on  Sat, 30 Jul 2005 07:11:26 +0100GMT (30.07.2005, 08:11 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:

L> ...

What happened to your calendar? SCNR :-)

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5.33 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM

Excess on occasion is exhilarating.
It prevents moderation from acquiring the deadening
effect of a habit.
W. Somerset Maugham



 Current beta is 3.5.33 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: It worries me...

[Peter Meyns]

Hi Cees,

on  Thu, 30 Jun 2005 17:57:31 +0200GMT (30.06.2005, 17:57 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:

PM>> What happened to your calendar? SCNR :-)

C>  is that a TV-station??

It looks like one, indeed! LOL

Sorry, could not resist (http://www.acronymfinder.com/)

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5.33 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM

'There are two major products that come out of Berkeley;
LSD and BSD Unix. We don't believe this to be a coincidence.'



 Current beta is 3.5.33 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: It worries me...

[Peter Meyns]

Hi Liz,

on  Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:28:16 +0100GMT (30.07.2005, 18:28 +0200GMT here),
   ^^ 
you wrote:

L> In the message
L>  which was 
L> apparently written on Thursday, June 30, 2005, 4:52:46 PM. I believe you 
wrote:

PM>> on  Sat, 30 Jul 2005 07:11:26 +0100GMT (30.07.2005, 08:11 +0200GMT here),
PM>> you wrote:

PM>> What happened to your calendar? SCNR :-)

L> I dont understand the question and what is SCNR?

For the latter see my reply to Cees.

For the first: your messages appear here as dated on July 30 instead
of June. So somehow your system setting must have been moved a month
ahead. Nothing of serious importance. I just stumbled over it... :-)

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5.33 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM

Sex is like air.  It's not important unless you aren't getting any.




 Current beta is 3.5.33 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: also....

[Peter Meyns]

Hi Gary,

on  Thu, 30 Jun 2005 12:28:49 -0500GMT (30.06.2005, 19:28 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:

G>   I see a new thing here... after deleting several emails in my inbox, I had
G> a -1 listed in unread message count... was it anticipating the next new
G> email arriving?  :)

As Charlene said, it occurs from time to time - mine are always dated
from Dec 30, 1899. It happens here usually when I select the next
unread from a Virtual Folder.

hmm

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5.35 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM




 Current beta is 3.5.35 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: Persistant bugs.

[Peter Meyns]

Hi Alexander,

on  Fri, 1 Jul 2005 18:40:45 +0200GMT (01.07.2005, 18:40 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:

>> Cntrl-m does not mark all messages read.

ASK> ALL messages? It never did that here.

+M marks all messages of a folder as read when the focus is on
the folder pane. Still works as it used to.

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5.36 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM




 Current beta is 3.5.36 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Keyboard shortcuts (was: Persistant bugs.)

[Peter Meyns]

Hi Alexander,

on  Fri, 1 Jul 2005 19:22:18 +0200GMT (01.07.2005, 19:22 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:

>> +M marks all messages of a folder as read when the focus is on the
>> folder pane. Still works as it used to.

ASK> OK. I have the focus on the message list usually.

Me too. But + quickly reverses it, when I assume that
there is nothing left that I want to read. :-)

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5.36 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM

Sex is never the answer. Sex is the question. And the answer is YES!



 Current beta is 3.5.36 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: AV in Network and Administration

[Peter Meyns]

Hi all,

on Mon, 27 Jun 2005 20:45:55 +0200GMT, I wrote:

PM> in Options -- Network and Administration I cannot change anything (see
PM> attachment). Clicking ok on the AV window leaves the cursor as the
PM> hourglass, but I can click Cancel anyway, and TB! moves on fine.

It happens on my main machine too. Would anyone mind to try to change
dial-up to local area or vice versa? It always produces an AV here on
both machines with different addresses.

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5.36 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM




 Current beta is 3.5.36 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: AV in Network and Administration

[Peter Meyns]

Hi Mary,

on  Sun, 3 Jul 2005 09:14:45 -0500GMT (03.07.2005, 16:14 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:

PM>>> in Options -- Network and Administration I cannot change anything (see
PM>>> attachment). Clicking ok on the AV window leaves the cursor as the
PM>>> hourglass, but I can click Cancel anyway, and TB! moves on fine.

>> It happens on my main machine too. Would anyone mind to try to change
>> dial-up to local area or vice versa? It always produces an AV here on
>> both machines with different addresses.

MB> To change from LAN to Dial-up is grayed-out for me.

Not here, because the options exist.

MB> However, I changed from TCP/IP setting to non-TCP/IP and back again,
MB> with no access violation notification occurring.

Thank you for testing Mary. :-)

MB> I'm on broadband, with the configuration so set in Windows XP. Maybe
MB> that's why the dial-up option is grayed-out for me?

This may be the case. I'm on dial-up via DSL, or, in case I need it,
via 56k modem.

This doesn't represent an acute problem, because I can establish the
connection first, and after that use The Bat! as usual. Still, I'd
like to be able to change the settings, particularly for the notebook.

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5.36 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM




 Current beta is 3.5.36 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: AV in Network and Administration

[Peter Meyns]

Hi all,

on  Mon, 27 Jun 2005 20:45:55 +0200GMT I wrote:

PM> in Options -- Network and Administration I cannot change anything (see
PM> attachment). Clicking ok on the AV window leaves the cursor as the
PM> hourglass, but I can click Cancel anyway, and TB! moves on fine.

One confirmation was given in unthreaded
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], and it
appears as it only happens on Win2K.

Any other Win2K users here to give it a try?

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5.36 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM




 Current beta is 3.5.36 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

3.51 going off-topic

[Peter Meyns]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160

Hi all,

I usually don't have much time to read through this and a couple of
other lists, so I try to get to read the important messages (i.e.,
bugs, solutions) at least.

But of lately there are so many OT postings in between them. Although
parts of the thread about upside down question marks made me chuckle
too, I'd prefer not to have those in here. Why not use TBOT? :-)

I don't want to spoil any fun, but please, keep TBBeta to beta issues.

- -- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.51 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.45
Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: http://www.gswot.org
Comment: My key: https://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0xE10774CE

iD8DBQFCzCA1AzZSBuEHdM4RA/CpAKCG6HzbzXb7vzIOLe4hiSOHO2icxwCfRToh
HAn2SeXzorSimK9Tg1FpOa4=
=5wGX
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




 Current beta is 3.51 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: Mail dispatcher: Source viewer does not work

[Peter Meyns]

Hi Stuart,

on  Fri, 8 Jul 2005 08:02:49 -0500GMT (08.07.2005, 15:02 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:

SC> Also noted that there is no indication that Mail Dispatcher is working
SC> when  first  started. It initially shows 0/107 messages and stays that
SC> way  until  all  the messages appear. It used to count as the messages
SC> were downloaded. Confirmations?

Not here. When the Mail Dispatcher retrieves the headers, the count
starts and goes on as usual.

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.51 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM




 Current beta is 3.51 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: problems with encrypting

[Peter Meyns]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160

Hello Henk,

on Wed, 13 Jul 2005 19:47:37 +0200GMT (13.07.2005, 19:47 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:

> Never had that but lately I am having problems with encrypting messages.
> I am getting error messages that the ASCII armor has been garbled
> somewhere on the transport.
> Trying to avoid this I even fell back from GnuPG 1.4.2rc2 to 1.4.1 and
> from GPGshell 3.45 to 3.44.
> But even with these older versions I get:
> gpg: Problem reading source (766 bytes remaining)
> gpg: handle plaintext failed: file read error
> gpg: WARNING: encrypted message has been manipulated!

> Could this be something with the Bat!???

I don't know. Does it happen with every attempt to encrypt?

I'll send you the same message privately and encrypted, maybe we can
find out. :-)

- -- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.51 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM
'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.45
Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: http://www.gswot.org
Comment: My key: https://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0xE10774CE

iD8DBQFC1V5KAzZSBuEHdM4RA55HAKCLFU/g6A88nrph7yuGhIUAlYPSmACfVYo7
p6VtoW/cNXb5qj41aoxIsNY=
=DAM/
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




 Current beta is 3.51 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: MicroEd dropping random characters

[Peter Meyns]

Hi Mary,

on  Thu, 14 Jul 2005 09:48:33 -0500GMT (14.07.2005, 16:48 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:

MB> Where can I choose the character set to be used?

MB> Would I be better off to choose us-ascii? If so, how to choose that?

It is displayed in the message editor bottom right. Rightclick and see
all installed charsets to make your selection.

MB> It's evident that I used the Default set, whatever that is, since I
MB> touched none of these settings either prior to or after installing v.
MB> 3.51.0.0.

us-ascii is perfectly right for you as the default, because that's
what you normally use. If, in replies, you quote other characters, The
Bat! should adjust the setting. I didn't test this recently though...
;-)

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.51 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM




 Current beta is 3.51 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: MicroEd dropping random characters

[Peter Meyns]

Hi Mary,

on  Thu, 14 Jul 2005 11:30:18 -0500GMT (14.07.2005, 18:30 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:

MB> BTW, are you seeing this unwanted "missing characters" behavior in the
MB> MicroEd/Outbox interactions?

MB> Or in your Viewer, as described by Hendrik Oesterlin in
MB> mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  ?

I can't say I'm sorry, but, no, not yet. I'll watch for it! :-)

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.51 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM




 Current beta is 3.51 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: MicroEd dropping random characters

[Peter Meyns]

Hi Mary,

on  Thu, 14 Jul 2005 11:48:07 -0500GMT (14.07.2005, 18:48 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:

MB> It's really hazardous behavior, for those of us who are experiencing
MB> it.

As to what I read, it obviously is.

MB> Worse than dropping Smiley ascii characters when reading in RTV
MB> and then replying while using MicroEd.

This is my own setting, but as yet I haven't seen this happening here.
hmm

But then, I don't pay very much attention to the smileys. I find them
neat, and sometimes even useful to express an emotion, albeit my
"vocabulary" is limited to only a few, e.g., :beer: :batbeer: :grin:

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.51 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM



 Current beta is 3.51 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: 3.51.4 - Strange display behaviour in Sorting Office

[Peter Meyns]

Hi Ian,

on  Mon, 18 Jul 2005 18:10:18 +1000GMT (18.07.2005, 10:10 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:

IAW> I have noticed some strange behaviour when entering conditions that
IAW> exceed the available space in the Sorting Office. When you add a
IAW> condition it appears at the bottom, but try and change anything and it
IAW> goes through a weird redisplay with the condition being edited off the
IAW> bottom with a gap above it.

I see the same here. However, when I close and re-open the Sorting
Office, the gap is gone and the new condition is in its place. It is
confusing, but it doesn't seem to affect the function...

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.51.4 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM




 Current beta is 3.51.4 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: 3.51.4 - Strange display behaviour in Sorting Office

[Peter Meyns]

Hi Thomas,

on  Mon, 18 Jul 2005 23:35:12 +0700GMT (18.07.2005, 18:35 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:

TF> On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 18:02:32 +0200 GMT (18/07/2005, 23:02 +0700 GMT),
TF> Peter Meyns wrote:

IAW>>> I have noticed some strange behaviour when entering conditions that
IAW>>> exceed the available space in the Sorting Office. When you add a
IAW>>> condition it appears at the bottom, but try and change anything and it
IAW>>> goes through a weird redisplay with the condition being edited off the
IAW>>> bottom with a gap above it.

PM>> I see the same here. However, when I close and re-open the Sorting
PM>> Office, the gap is gone and the new condition is in its place. It is
PM>> confusing, but it doesn't seem to affect the function...

TF> Confirmed, but the problem is that the "weird display" can take
TF> minutes (literally) when there are more than 50 or 100 conditions. TB
TF> hangs in the meantime.

This is happening here when I add an item to my /Ignore/ filter, which
is quite large, because I'm reading some news groups via MyGate.
Although this reminds me of doing some cleaning up there, it is a
hassle to have The Bat! blocked for the time it takes.

TF> I reported this with 3.0.1.33, but that's so long ago that the mid is
TF> not even in my message base any more.

If I had the time, I'd search in my archive. But not today. Anyway, do
you remember the subject?

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.51.4 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM




 Current beta is 3.51.4 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: 3.51.4 - Strange display behaviour in Sorting Office

[Peter Meyns]

Hi Thomas,

on  Tue, 19 Jul 2005 09:14:43 +0700GMT (19.07.2005, 04:14 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:

TF> On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 20:48:21 +0200 GMT (19/07/2005, 01:48 +0700 GMT),
TF> Peter Meyns wrote:

TF>>> I reported this with 3.0.1.33, but that's so long ago that the mid is
TF>>> not even in my message base any more.

PM>> If I had the time, I'd search in my archive. But not today. Anyway, do
PM>> you remember the subject?

TF> I believe I put the letters NFS in the subject at the time. My own
TF> archives go back only 180 days, so it must be oldeer than that.

Right. It is from October 2004, first on TBUDL,
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], later forwarded to TBBeta,
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Miguel made the good proposition
to use an address book group instead of adding more and more addresses
to the filter with the OR condition. I just re-built my ignore filter
this way. It is indeed more elegant. :-)

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.51.4 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM




 Current beta is 3.51.4 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: 3.51.4 - Strange display behaviour in Sorting Office

[Peter Meyns]

Hi Thomas,

on  Tue, 19 Jul 2005 23:42:10 +0700GMT (19.07.2005, 18:42 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:

PM>> mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], later forwarded to TBBeta,
PM>> mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

TF> Thanks for digging that out. I should have sent a bugreport to BT.

This can and should still be done. I'm going to fire up my notebook,
which still has the old ignore filter with about 80 OR conditions, and
see, if I can produce a good screen shot.

PM>> Miguel made the good proposition to use an address book group
PM>> instead of adding more and more addresses to the filter with the
PM>> OR condition. I just re-built my ignore filter this way. It is
PM>> indeed more elegant. :-)

TF> May be elegant, but it's a workaround that doesn't fix the problem
TF> in the NFS.

Fully ACK.

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.51.4 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM




 Current beta is 3.51.4 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: 3.51.4 - Strange display behaviour in Sorting Office

[Peter Meyns]

Hi Thomas,

on Tue, 19 Jul 2005 23:42:10 +0700GMT, you wrote:

TF> Thanks for digging that out. I should have sent a bugreport to BT.

Done. https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4937

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.51.4 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
Dell Latitude C600 P3 at 1002 MHz, 512 MB RAM




 Current beta is 3.51.4 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: Failure to quote in MIcroEd in pgp-decrypted message

[Peter Meyns]

Hi Mary,

on  Wed, 20 Jul 2005 13:54:46 -0500GMT (20.07.2005, 20:54 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:

MB> Beginning with 3.51.5 and still present in 3.51.6:

MB> 1) Open and decrypt a pgp-encrypted message.
MB> 2) Choose Reply by any method
MB> 3) Reply template from Address Book entry is implemented, but original
MB>message from the View Folder, decrypted view, is not quoted.

MB> However, selected text will be quoted using the Reply arrow button.

MB> So, a work-around is to Select All and quote using the F4 shortcut key
MB> or a Shift-plus-Reply-arrow button.

MB> Same conditions exist with Reply to All.

MB> Any confirmations?

Confirmed fully. Plus, smilies are not quoted, even when the rest is.
Can't say for 3.51.6, because I can't start it (OTFE).

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.51.5 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM




 Current beta is 3.51.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: Folder-specific deletion is not working

[Peter Meyns]

Hi Wayne,

on  Wed, 20 Jul 2005 19:46:51 -0400GMT (21.07.2005, 01:46 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:

WH> For some reason, I can no longer delete messages per folder using the
WH> folder-specific settings and Maintenance mode. I have it set to delete
WH> messages older than 180 days and have Use Folder-Secific deletion
WH> settings set on the Deletion tab. What am I missing?

Dunno. What does folder-specific deletion state? I just tried and it
seems to work as it should.

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.51.5 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM




 Current beta is 3.51.7 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: Failure to quote in MIcroEd in pgp-decrypted message

[Peter Meyns]

Hi Mary,

on  Thu, 21 Jul 2005 10:24:59 -0500GMT (21.07.2005, 17:24 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:

>> Confirmed fully. Plus, smilies are not quoted, even when the rest
>> is. Can't say for 3.51.6, because I can't start it (OTFE).

MB> Thank you so very much for the confirmation! I'm off to report the
MB> issue on BT now.

MB> Sorry about the starting problem with OTFE. :(

No more problem with 3.51.7. But the quoting from decrypted messages
still doesn't work.

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.51.7 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM



 Current beta is 3.51.7 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

tbuser.def

[Peter Meyns]

Hi all,

I read about the file tbuser.def for several times, but I don't seem
to have it here. The closest I get to it is tbmain.def (root
definition file).

For installation I had to run the .msi files with admin privileges,
but I'm using TB! as an unprivileged user, and it works fine.

Do I *need* this file for special purposes? What should it contain?

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.51.7 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM



 Current beta is 3.51.7 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: tbuser.def

[Peter Meyns]

Hi Marek,

on  Thu, 21 Jul 2005 18:00:57 +0200GMT (21.07.2005, 18:00 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:

MM> it will appear, when You change theme or change toolbars/menus of any
MM> part of program.

No, it didn't. Some time ago I changed my toolbars. I deleted a few,
and added two for Spam and Not Spam. They still show up, but no
tbuser.def here. hmm

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.51.7 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM



 Current beta is 3.51.7 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: tbuser.def

[Peter Meyns]

Hi Mary,

on  Thu, 21 Jul 2005 12:39:27 -0500GMT (21.07.2005, 19:39 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:

MM>>> it will appear, when You change theme or change toolbars/menus of any
MM>>> part of program.

>> No, it didn't. Some time ago I changed my toolbars. I deleted a few,
>> and added two for Spam and Not Spam. They still show up, but no
>> tbuser.def here. hmm

MB> Nothing in The Bat!/MAIL subfolder?

Yes, there it is. I never looked there, as the mail folder is on
another drive. Thank you Mary, for clearing this up! :))

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.51.7 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM



 Current beta is 3.51.7 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: The Bat! 3.51.8 is now available

[Peter Meyns]

Hi 9Val,

on  Thu, 21 Jul 2005 22:51:10 +0300GMT (21.07.2005, 21:51 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:

9> [-] (#0004964) Quoting from a PGP-decrypted message omits the message,
9>supplying  only  the  greeting  and  sig from the Reply
9>template

Indeed! Confirm fixed. :))

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.51.8 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM



 Current beta is 3.51.7 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: testing other digest algo

[Peter Meyns]

Henk M. de Bruijn schrieb:
> This message has been signed pgp/mime. In this case I have used digest
> algo RIPEMD160.
> 
> Till now it has not been possible to verify this message with the Bat!
> when this digest algo had been used.

Verifies good with Thunderbird/Enigmail, but The Bat! states a
signature digest conflict.

-- 
Cheers
Peter

Thunderbird Version 1.0.2 (20050602), Kanotix 2005-3
Dell Latitude C600, P III at 1002 MHz, 512 MB RAM
'


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

 Current beta is 3.51.8 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: Old Smiley Quoting Bug [Re: The Bat! 3.51.9 is now available]

[Peter Meyns]

Hi Mary,

on  Fri, 22 Jul 2005 11:32:14 -0500GMT (22.07.2005, 18:32 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:

>> Replying quoted text (F4) results in quoted smileys except the very last one!

MB> Confirmed, but I don't think you were experiencing the bug which has
MB> been fixed in 3.51.9. I think not quoting the very last one is an
MB> instance of an old bug which has been too elusive so far to track
MB> down.

MB> This bug has been around at least since v. 3.0.

MB> It happens randomly...

MB> In some replies to messages, this omission of a Smiley leads to
MB> misunderstandings that range from minor to serious.

MB> I *do* so wish that we could hunt this bug down! :(

Well, the latest version *does* quote your last smilie. :-)

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.51.9 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM



 Current beta is 3.51.9 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: Filters

[Peter Meyns]

Hi David,

on  Sun, 24 Jul 2005 19:32:54 +0100GMT (24.07.2005, 20:32 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:

DE> Have I got this wrong, or did it change.

DE> A message can get caught by a number of filters.

DE> Filter 1 catches spam and moves it to a spam folder.
DE> Filter 2 catches list and moves it to a list folder.

DE> Which one should take preference if the message get caught by both ?

The one that is topmost, if "Continue with other filters" is not
checked.

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.51.9 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM



 Current beta is 3.51.9 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: some S/MIME bugs

[Peter Meyns]

Hi Maxim,

on  Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:02:03 +0300GMT (25.07.2005, 11:02 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:

MM> Monday, July 25, 2005, 11:33:37, you wrote:

>>>https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4985
>>>https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4986
>>>https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4987

>>>Can somebody confirm?
MM> Can't confirm without samples.

For https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4986 import my cert, change
to another window, change back to my message, click import on the cert
again.

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.51.10 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

 Current beta is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: Beta notification

[Peter Meyns]

Hi 9Val,

on  Fri, 29 Jul 2005 18:45:40 +0300GMT (29.07.2005, 17:45 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:

9>   Sorry  for  auto-generated messages, there is no new betas yet. Just
9>   haven't exited from debug in time :(

No problem. I haven't received it either yet. LOL

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.51.10 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM



 Current beta is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: some S/MIME bugs

[Peter Meyns]

Hi all readers,

on  Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:49:42 +0200GMT I wrote:

PM> For https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4986 import my cert, change
PM> to another window, change back to my message, click import on the cert
PM> again.

Strange. Trying it with my own cert now doesn't pose a problem. But I
had the crash with another cert. hmm

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.51.10 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM



 Current beta is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: and unable to connect

[Peter Meyns]

Hi Peter,

on  Sun, 31 Jul 2005 17:01:47 +0200GMT (31.07.2005, 17:01 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:

PH>   Sometimes, not always, when I press , TB connects and receives 
mail
PH>   from 3/4 of the accounts. One to five accounts are sitting in the CC and
PH>   after a minute or so TB tells me that it is unable to connect. When I
PH>   navigate to one of these accounts and press , it connects 
*immediately*
PH>   and receives the mail! Even a second  is successful in most of the
PH>   cases.

This happens here on a dial-up connection, when TB! has to establish
the internet connection upon + herself. I get around this by
connecting first manually, and then check for all...

I admit, this is not wanted behavior... :-(

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.51.10 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM



 Current beta is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: and unable to connect

[Peter Meyns]

Hi Peter,

on  Sun, 31 Jul 2005 17:01:47 +0200GMT (31.07.2005, 17:01 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:

PH>   Sometimes, not always, when I press , TB connects and receives 
mail
PH>   from 3/4 of the accounts. One to five accounts are sitting in the CC and
PH>   after a minute or so TB tells me that it is unable to connect.

After observing this issue a bit closer, I suspect the reason here to
be K9, which is started automatically with The Bat!, but I'm not at
all sure. Do you use K9 or any other proxies?

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.51.10 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM



 Current beta is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: unable to reach server annoyance

[Peter Meyns]

Hi Gleason,

on  Mon, 1 Aug 2005 10:09:18 -0700GMT (01.08.2005, 19:09 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:

GP> When TB can't reach the email server for whatever reason, it starts
GP> throwing up hundreds of little change password screens.  One would be
GP> sufficient while it waits for me to respond.

I never had that here. I only see the message in the status window
"Could not connect to server" and hear the system's default failure
sound, chord.wav.

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.51.10 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM



 Current beta is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: unable to reach server annoyance

[Peter Meyns]

Hi Mary,

on  Mon, 1 Aug 2005 12:45:29 -0500GMT (01.08.2005, 19:45 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:

MB> Are you running IMAP, Peter? I'm not. Maybe Gleason's TB! behavior
MB> problem is IMAP related.

No IMAP here, so maybe... hmm

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.51.10 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM



 Current beta is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: New OTFE reports in BT

[Peter Meyns]

Hi Vladimir,

on  Sat, 6 Aug 2005 20:57:15 +0400GMT (06.08.2005, 18:57 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:

ViP> Good day, TBBETA.

ViP> Can anybody with OTFE add a supporting note to
ViP> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5006
ViP> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5007
ViP> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5008

What are they about? I'm on a time-limited dial-up connection, so a
hint to the topic would be useful. I do use OTFE. Thank you. :-)

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.51.10 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM



 Current beta is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

PGP/MIME, digest conflict

[Peter Meyns]

I still get the infamous "signature digest conflict in message" error
in The Bat! 3.51.10 when I try to verify a PGP/MIME signed message
from, let's say, Thunderbird.

I think it relates to https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4329

-- 
Cheers
Peter

Thunderbird Version 1.0.2 (20050602), Kanotix 2005-3
Dell Latitude C600, P III at 1002 MHz, 512 MB RAM

Public key available at http://www.meynsweb.com/public-key.txt
'


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

 Current beta is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: PGP/MIME, digest conflict

[Peter Meyns]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160

Hi Vladimir,

on  Thu, 11 Aug 2005 20:58:04 +0400GMT (11.08.2005, 18:58 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:

ViP>   This is a PGP encrypted message.
ViP>   Click the security button to decrypt/verify it

This is my return:

gpg: Signature made 08/11/05 18:58:04 using RSA key ID 66D309C9
gpg: BAD signature from "\xc2\xeb\xe0\xe4\xe8\xec\xe8\xf0 'insider' 
\xcf\xf0\xee\xf5\xee\xf0\xee\xe2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"

Please, don't send encrypted messages to the list. Nobody can read
them... :-(

- -- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.51.10 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.45
Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: http://www.gswot.org
Comment: My key: https://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0xE10774CE

iD8DBQFC+4ZUAzZSBuEHdM4RA//oAJ9oGz23J4x1ghvaU147ru/AgXAPfgCfTS5d
cRnt21oa5drhyNLtowRYhDI=
=8l20
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




 Current beta is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: PGP/MIME, digest conflict

[Peter Meyns]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160

Hi Vladimir,

on  Thu, 11 Aug 2005 20:49:15 +0400GMT (11.08.2005, 18:49 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:

PM>> I still get the infamous "signature digest conflict in message" error
PM>> in The Bat! 3.51.10 when I try to verify a PGP/MIME signed message
PM>> from, let's say, Thunderbird.

ViP> Did you received it with my signed message? Because I did.

Yes, I did too:

gpg: Signature made 08/11/05 18:49:14 using RSA key ID 66D309C9
gpg: WARNING: signature digest conflict in message
gpg: Can't check signature: general error

PM>> I think it relates to https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4329

Did my PGP/MIME signed message verify with you?

This one won't be MIME signed, but inline using GPGshell, because The
Bat! doesn't accept secondary user IDs for her own GPG implementation.
See https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4171

- -- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.51.10 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.45
Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: http://www.gswot.org
Comment: My key: https://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0xE10774CE

iD8DBQFC+4WUAzZSBuEHdM4RAw2OAKCc4i17QzaTOq4skhxKc3ceytjMjQCgsDqm
bomISuXZovsXsQyepTkkhR0=
=1OeD
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




 Current beta is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: PGP/MIME, digest conflict

[Peter Meyns]

Vladimir 'insider' Prohorov schrieb:

> PM> gpg: Signature made 08/11/05 18:58:04 using RSA key ID 66D309C9
> PM> gpg: BAD signature from "\xc2\xeb\xe0\xe4\xe8\xec\xe8\xf0
> PM> 'insider' \xcf\xf0\xee\xf5\xee\xf0\xee\xe2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
> 
> PM> Please, don't send encrypted messages to the list. Nobody can read
> PM> them... :-(
> 
> I missed a little...

hmm this one shows good so far with Enigmail:

OpenPGP Security Info

UNTRUSTED Good signature from Vladimir 'insider' Prohorov (Alive and
kickin') <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Key ID: 0x66D309C9 / Signed on: 08/11/2005 07:17 PM
Key fingerprint: F7E9 3CA6 878C 1D3A 8E16 10F6 65D3 0796

-- 
Cheers
Peter

Thunderbird Version 1.0.2 (20050602), Kanotix 2005-3
Dell Latitude C600, P III at 1002 MHz, 512 MB RAM
'


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

 Current beta is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: PGP/MIME, digest conflict

[Peter Meyns]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160

Hi Vladimir,

on  Thu, 11 Aug 2005 21:17:32 +0400GMT (11.08.2005, 19:17 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:

ViP> I missed a little...

The Bat! returns:

gpg: Signature made 08/11/05 19:17:31 using RSA key ID 66D309C9
gpg: WARNING: signature digest conflict in message
gpg: Can't check signature: general error

*sigh*

- -- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.51.10 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.45
Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: http://www.gswot.org
Comment: My key: https://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0xE10774CE

iD8DBQFC+5CQAzZSBuEHdM4RA0dzAJ0SQULvIGpCRthn+8MWPNuSWAd/0QCdGflj
6POvtTLNcRhArd6mxWi5MWU=
=1xSt
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




 Current beta is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: PGP/MIME, digest conflict

[Peter Meyns]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160

Hi Vladimir,

on  Thu, 11 Aug 2005 21:45:04 +0400GMT (11.08.2005, 19:45 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:

ViP> I  can  say  where  dog  is buried. There is necessary to remove extra
ViP> CR/LF's before signature part when using GPG. I manually did that and
>> gpg: Signature made 11.08.2005 20:45:06 using DSA key ID E10774CE
>> gpg: Good signature from "Peter Meyns"

Why doesn't The Bat! do this herself? hmm

- -- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.51.10 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.45
Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: http://www.gswot.org
Comment: My key: https://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0xE10774CE

iD8DBQFC+5RVAzZSBuEHdM4RA97MAKCIiyXoWfE+ZchH1n1NFg9S0SCBCQCgocfa
H5e6OkDh/PUwgkvgNw3xDks=
=J9WS
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




 Current beta is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: Extracting files from the TB MSI package

[Peter Meyns]

Hi Claude,

on  Fri, 12 Aug 2005 21:33:56 +0200GMT (12.08.2005, 21:33 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:

CR> I would like to know if we want to extract a single file, in case of
CR> corruption, how it can be done knowing that final tb version are only
CR> available via MSI distribution packages ?
CR> IS there any switch we can use to achieve this operation ?

If I understand you right, you want to extract single files from the
MSI file. This is not possible from TB! or Windows alone. I achieve
it, if need be, with Total Commander (http://www.ghisler.com) combined
with the MSI plugin, available on the same site via Addons.

HTH...

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.51.10 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM



 Current beta is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: Headers "Follow-up" line partially obscured

[Peter Meyns]

Hi Mary,

on  Wed, 17 Aug 2005 13:04:44 -0500GMT (17.08.2005, 20:04 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:

MB> I don't have that vertical scroll bar. hmm

Neither have I. That's because I, and probably you too, unchecked the
"Show scrollable" or so option when adding new header fields in
Options » Preferences.

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.60.01 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM



 Current beta is 3.60.01 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Header name alignment

[Peter Meyns]

Hi all,

the header names are now aligned left in the preview pane. It looks
indeed more professional, but it leaves a little twinge. I always
loved these little "flaws" that make The Bat! so singular, like having
the header names aligned right. ;-)

I see the need to adjust to common formats, and I don't object to it.
It is just also a bit sad...

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.60.01 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM



 Current beta is 3.60.01 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: 3.60.02 and BayesIt

[Peter Meyns]

Hi Feli,

on Sat, 20 Aug 2005 09:31:22 +0200GMT, you wrote:

FW> I cannot run this new version with BayesIt 0.0.8.1 enabled. As soon as I
FW> activate the plugin, TB stops without any notice. The splash screen
FW> comes up, I can see for a moment the BayesIt logo and then - nothing. TB
FW> closes without any message or warning. When I enable the plugin in the
FW> user preferences TB closes when BayesIt starts.

FW> I had to return to v3.60.01 :-(

Cannot confirm here.

However, BayesIt still does a lousy job. It hardly ever finds any spam
after a couple of months. I use K9 on my main machine, which seems a
lot more efficient.

-- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.60.02 Forerunner (Beta) :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
Dell Latitude C600 P3 at 1002 MHz, 512 MB RAM



 Current beta is 3.60.02 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/