Re: 5.1.6.2

2012-06-15 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Maxim,

Thursday, May 10, 2012, 9:11:04 PM, you wrote:

MM Message  Dispatcher  didn't  work  properly  in 5.1.6.1 MSI, could you
MM please  try  those  files.  If  you had installed 5.1.6 before, please
MM uninstall The Bat! prior to installing 5.1.6.2

MM http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/thebat_pro_5-1-6-2.msi

Up and running. The Search function seems to be very slow (well,
slower than the 4.x versions).

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/

Message reply created with The Bat! 5.1.6.2
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3



 Current beta is 5.1.6.4 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: 5.1.6.2

2012-06-15 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Thomas,

Saturday, June 16, 2012, 11:54:38 AM, you wrote:

MM Message  Dispatcher  didn't  work  properly  in 5.1.6.1 MSI, could you
MM please  try  those  files.  If  you had installed 5.1.6 before, please
MM uninstall The Bat! prior to installing 5.1.6.2

MM http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/thebat_pro_5-1-6-2.msi

TF Up and running. The Search function seems to be very slow (well,
TF slower than the 4.x versions).

Please ignore: Fixed in 5.1.6.4.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/

Message reply created with The Bat! 5.1.6.4
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3



 Current beta is 5.1.6.4 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: [SOT] Gmail and own domain name (Re: 5.1.6.2 AV Windows)

2012-06-04 Thread MAU
Hello Francis,
 
 You must use Google Apps.
 http://www.google.com/enterprise/apps/business/

I think I never said Thank You. Sorry. 

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v5.1.6.2 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 3
My photos at: http://www.Rancho-K.com
My photoblog: http://mau.aminus3.com



 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: [SOT] Gmail and own domain name (Re: 5.1.6.2 AV Windows)

2012-06-04 Thread Eddie
Title: Re: [SOT] Gmail and own domain name (Re: 5.1.6.2 AV Windows)


Dear MAU,

--- MAU / Monday Mon 04. Jun 2012, 01:06 PM
[SOT] Gmail and own domain name (Re: 5.1.6.2 AV Windows)


 You must use Google Apps.
 http://www.google.com/enterprise/apps/business/

 I think I never said Thank You. Sorry.

I thought Online Collaboration tools (Word, Excel, etc.) at Google are free?


--
 best regards | Using The Bat! 5.1.6
   Eddie| on Windows 7 6.1
   | Build 7601 Service Pack 1



 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: 5.1.6.2 AV Windows

2012-05-31 Thread Francis Dhumes
Hi Roelof,

Le mercredi 30 mai 2012 à 23:53:50, vous écriviez :
 Check your ex_log.txt and thebat_Exceptions.log, both in your mail
 directory.
 Maybe they can tell you something and you could send them (off list)
 to Maxim (only the recent part)

Ok, I'll do that.

Funny:  I use GMail with my own domain name, and I receive my mails in
this list.
-- 
Regards,,
 Francise-mail : fran...@dhumes.fr



 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: 5.1.6.2 AV Windows

2012-05-31 Thread MAU
Hello Francis,
 
 I use GMail with my own domain name

How do you do that? I have my own domain but never thought about 
something like that.

TIA.

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v5.1.6.2 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 3
My photos at: http://www.Rancho-K.com
My photoblog: http://mau.aminus3.com



 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


[SOT] Gmail and own domain name (Re: 5.1.6.2 AV Windows)

2012-05-31 Thread Francis Dhumes
Hi Miguel,

Thursday, May 31, 2012 at 10:15:11, MAU wrote :
 How do you do that? I have my own domain but never thought about
 something like that.

You must use Google Apps.
http://www.google.com/enterprise/apps/business/
(just  sign  in, and use the free services (only 10 email addresses,
and  only  7  GB  mailbox  size).  You  must  have access to you DNS
records.
I  found  very  easily  many  tutorials  in french, I recommend you to
search  for  use  gmail  with  my  domain in spanish. (sorry for the
Google it answer !)

(And welcome the push mail if you have an Android phone).

Slighty off-topic, but it may interest other subscribers.
-- 
Regards,
 Francis  mailto:fran...@dhumes.fr
 French translator of TB! and ASS
  Message handmade on TB! 5.1.6.2 on Windows 7 7601
 AntispamSniper for TB! 3.3.1.1



 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


5.1.6.2 AV Windows

2012-05-30 Thread Francis Dhumes
Hello ,

very often I get the message
---
The Bat!
---
Access violation at address 00A288EC in module 'thebat.exe'. Read of address 
0100.
---
OK   
---

Many, many windows with this message appears, ans the only way to work
is to kill the process.
This happens without any action.

I  work  now with IMAP, on GMail servers (my own domain name). I don't
know if this could help.
-- 
Regards,
 Francismailto:fran...@dhumes.fr
 French translator of TB! and ASS
 Message handmade on TB! v.5.1.6.2 on Windows 7 7601 Service Pack 1
 AntispamSniper for TB! 3.3.0.3



 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: 5.1.6.2 AV Windows

2012-05-30 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Francis,

On Wed, 30 May 2012 22:51:06 +0200GMT (30-5-2012, 22:51 , where I
live), you wrote:

FD I  work  now with IMAP, on GMail servers (my own domain name). I don't
FD know if this could help.

Check your ex_log.txt and thebat_Exceptions.log, both in your mail
directory.
Maybe they can tell you something and you could send them (off list)
to Maxim (only the recent part)

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

A moderator has no friends or enemies, except other moderators.
http://www.voormijalleen.nl/
The Bat! 5.1.6.2
Windows 7 6.1 Build 7601 Service Pack 1
5 pop3 accounts, 2 imap accounts
OTFE disabled
i7-2600 3.4GHz
4 GB RAM



 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: 5.1.6.2 VF bug still there

2012-05-27 Thread MAU
Hello Raymund,
 
 That may be a different issue because Mailticker is not really a VF
 although it may seem so. Mailticker existed long before VFs were 
 'invented' and implemented.

 As  far  as  I know the mail ticker was changed internally to be a VF.

It could be so, I don't know. As I have said several times recently, I 
didn't follow v5 development and implementation closely.

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v5.1.6.2 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 3
My photos at: http://www.Rancho-K.com
My photoblog: http://mau.aminus3.com



 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: 5.1.6.2 VF bug still there

2012-05-24 Thread Carsten Guthardt-Schulz
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 4:29 PM, MAU miguel.ur...@gmail.com wrote:

 Forget it. Do you understand what 'pointless' means?

Apparently for you it means to stop a discussion with for me it
works. I don't care if it doesn't work for you, or if the solution
that would work for you wouldn't change anything for me, because I
don't have a problem. Great.


 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: 5.1.6.2 VF bug still there

2012-05-24 Thread MAU
Hello Carsten,
 
 Forget it. Do you understand what 'pointless' means?

 Apparently for you it means to stop a discussion with for me it
 works.

No, the discussion is pointless not 'because it works for me' but
because you don't understand what I am trying to say (or I can't explain
it more clearly), and because, no matter how much we discuss, you are
going to keep thinking there is a bug m(*) and I am convinced there is
not and it is WAD.
 
So, why continue the discussion?

(*) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_bug

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v5.1.6.2 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 3
My photos at: http://www.Rancho-K.com
My photoblog: http://mau.aminus3.com



 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: 5.1.6.2 VF bug still there

2012-05-24 Thread MAU
Hello Mark,
 
 Maybe we are not talking about the same thing, but I have a Virtual
 Folder for today's messages [I know, this might sound strange to some
 :-)] and when I delete messages in there, they are still shown,
 except, from then on, Trash is being mentioned as the folder they
 are in.

That's probably because your VF is also 'looking' at Trash folder. Go to 
your VF Properties and remove Trash and deleted messages should/will not 
show then


-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v5.1.6.2 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 3
My photos at: http://www.Rancho-K.com
My photoblog: http://mau.aminus3.com



 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: 5.1.6.2 VF bug still there

2012-05-24 Thread MAU
Hello Rick,
 
 Sorry to interject, but it seems to be working as DESIGNED. If you
 don't want read messages to show, then they DON'T. There WERE some
 refresh issues with VFs which I believe were fixed.

That's probably the reason some think there is a bug now. I mean, VFs 
are dumb and they do what they are told to do. For example, if you were 
a VF and I told you: When I tell you to refresh, look in this list of 
folders for messages that are Unread and display them here. What would 
you do? ;-)


-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v5.1.6.2 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 3
My photos at: http://www.Rancho-K.com
My photoblog: http://mau.aminus3.com



 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: 5.1.6.2 VF bug still there

2012-05-24 Thread MAU
Hello Raymund,
 
 The VF for the mailticker is the best example. No one would expect
 that a mail that you have open in an message window is closed because
 of some background activity.

That may be a different issue because Mailticker is not really a VF 
although it may seem so. Mailticker existed long before VFs were 
'invented' and implemented.

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v5.1.6.2 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 3
My photos at: http://www.Rancho-K.com
My photoblog: http://mau.aminus3.com



 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: 5.1.6.2 VF problem still there

2012-05-24 Thread Carsten Guthardt-Schulz
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:21 AM, MAU miguel.ur...@gmail.com wrote:

 No, the discussion is pointless not 'because it works for me' but
 because you don't understand what I am trying to say (or I can't explain
 it more clearly), and because, no matter how much we discuss, you are
 going to keep thinking there is a bug m(*) and I am convinced there is
 not and it is WAD.

 So, why continue the discussion?

Because what you say is just a question of definition. Even if this
does not qualify as a bug, it may still be a FAIL.

We don't even know if this behaviour was intendet (which I cannot
imagine, since it is of disadvantage to the user). If it was not
intended then this should be fixed. If it was intended and does not
make sense, then it should be fixed as well.

I changed the subject. Pleased? ;-)


 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: 5.1.6.2 VF bug still there

2012-05-22 Thread MAU
Hello RS,
 
DC unless  there  is  some  reason  why  marking  it  read right away
DC interferes with what one wants to do with the message

 In  example you read or just scan a message but you don't have time to
 deal  with  it at the moment . In that way it stays in example in your
 main (cumulative) folder and waits for it's turn.

 Solution  would be creating additional VF and tag messages somehow but
 for instance in my TB! all VF values are reset to zero and in that way
 if  I  use  that  solution  I  will not know that there is any message
 pending to be handled...

I think it is a bit pointless to continue with this discussion, no one
is going to convince the other if there is a bug or not. Anyway, I will
tell you how I do things myself which, of course, to me, it seems a bit
more logic.

I hardly use any Incoming filters, just a few to sort messages for lists 
like this one and a couple of news letters. I mainly rely on Read and 
Reply filters.

This way, most of my incoming email just stays in the Inbox, where I 
will go to see if I have any new and 'unread' messages. I normally use 
Smart Space to browse/read a message and when I get to the end the 
message is marked as read and I'm automatically taken to the next. 
That's what Smart Space does.

Now, when I have one message selected in the Inbox Message List and 
displayed in the Preview pane, I may do several things with it if I just 
don't delete it:

1.- Just finish reading it and file it in appropriate folder

When message is marked as read by Smart Space, Read filters trigger and
one of them (most based on sender being in an AB Group) will move the
message to appropriate folder.

2.- Reply to it and then file it

As soon as I 'Send now' or 'Put in the outbox' the reply, Replied 
filters are triggered and one of them, with similar logic as Read ones 
(i.e. AB Groups) will move both the message being replied and the reply 
to appropriate folder.

3.- Keep it for later reply or further action

Before Smart Space marks it as read I flag it. Then, when marked as
read, a Read filter will move the message to my 'Action - Reply' folder,
which is the folder I will look at for pending actions/replies. When I
do reply/act on any of them, again Read and Replied filters will file
them appropriately.

Under 'Action - Reply' I have a VF which looks into it and with Advanced 
filter settings:
   Age is greater than 10 days
   AND Massage (attributes) is not replied 

And that is all. Have a good day.

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v5.1.6.2 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 3
My photos at: http://www.Rancho-K.com
My photoblog: http://mau.aminus3.com



 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: 5.1.6.2 VF bug still there

2012-05-22 Thread Carsten Guthardt-Schulz
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 9:07 AM, MAU miguel.ur...@gmail.com wrote:

 I think it is a bit pointless to continue with this discussion, no one
 is going to convince the other if there is a bug or not. Anyway, I will
 tell you how I do things myself which, of course, to me, it seems a bit
 more logic.

Well, there is one thing I find pretty convincing: The old VF
behaviour (not removing the currently selected message) would not
destroy your process, while the current behaviour destroys ours.

So what's the argument against keeping the currently selected message
in the VF list until the user selects another? I haven't seen one. So
why don't we agree on that this should be fixed?


BRgds,
Carsten


 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: 5.1.6.2 VF bug still there

2012-05-22 Thread MAU
Hello Carsten,
 
 So what's the argument against keeping the currently selected message
 in the VF list until the user selects another? I haven't seen one. So
 why don't we agree on that this should be fixed?

Forget it. Do you understand what 'pointless' means?

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v5.1.6.2 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 3
My photos at: http://www.Rancho-K.com
My photoblog: http://mau.aminus3.com



 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: 5.1.6.2 VF bug still there

2012-05-22 Thread Rick
 Hello Carsten,
  
 So what's the argument against keeping the currently selected message
 in the VF list until the user selects another? I haven't seen one. So
 why don't we agree on that this should be fixed?

 Forget it. Do you understand what 'pointless' means?

Sorry to interject, but it seems to be working as DESIGNED. If you don't want 
read messages to show, then they DON'T. There WERE some refresh issues with VFs 
which I believe were fixed.

VFs don't show deleted emails. Perhaps that should be a feature request?

-- 
Rick
People are like stained glass windows:  They sparkle and shine when the sun is 
out,
But when the darkness sets in, their true beauty is revealed only if there is a 
light shining from within.

v5.1.6.2 on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600
Service Pack 3
Using all POP accounts
I download all images

 



 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: 5.1.6.2 VF bug still there

2012-05-22 Thread Mark Partous
Hello Rick,

Tuesday, May 22, 2012, 5:00:56 PM, you wrote:

R VFs don't show deleted emails. Perhaps that should be a feature request?

Maybe  we  are  not  talking  about  the  same thing, but I have a Virtual 
Folder for today's messages
[I   know,   this   might  sound strange to some :-)] and when I delete 
messages in there, they are still shown, except,
from then on, Trash is being mentioned as the folder they are in.

-- 
Best Wishes,
Mark 
   
using 
The Bat! Version 5.1.6.2



 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: 5.1.6.2 VF bug still there

2012-05-22 Thread Dwight Corrin
On Tuesday, May 22, 2012, 3:11:24 PM, Mark Partous wrote:
 
 when I delete messages in there, they are still shown, except,
 from then on, Trash is being mentioned as the folder they are in.
 
empty the trash, and they will most likely no longer be in the virtual 
folder 
  
-- 
 Dwight A. Corrin 
 316.303.9385  phone ahead to fax 
 dcorrin at fastmail.fm 
 photo galleries at http://dcorrin.smugmug.com 
 photo blog at http://dcorrin.aminus3.com 
   http://photos.vfxy.com/photoblogs/5882 
 Using IMAP with The Bat! 5.1.6.2 on Windows Vista version 6,0 (Service Pack 2)



 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: 5.1.6.2 VF bug still there

2012-05-22 Thread Mark Partous
Hello Dwight,

Tuesday, May 22, 2012, 10:13:04 PM, you wrote:

DC empty the trash, and they will most likely no longer be in the virtual 
DC folder 

:-)  I would consider that to be a purged message.

-- 
Best Wishes,
Mark 
   
using 
The Bat! Version 5.1.6.2



 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: 5.1.6.2 VF bug still there

2012-05-21 Thread Carsten Guthardt-Schulz
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 4:28 PM, MAU miguel.ur...@gmail.com wrote:


 Wouldn't it make much more sense to mark a message as read (*) when you
 have actually finished reading it and after deciding if you want to flag
 it, delete it, park it, tag it, reply or forward it, assign it to a
 color group or perhaps just leaving it as unread?

 (*) Using Smart Space, Ctrl+M (or any key combination you want to
 customise) or from RMB menu if you are using the mouse.


I disagree. Almost every email client/interface on this planet, from
Hotmail to the iPhone, marks an email as read when you open it for reading.
And this for good reason: Usually people read an email after they open it,
which is generally the purpose of opening an email. Having to manually mark
them as read, especially when using the mouse, is an unnecessary task.

Also, what is the disadvantage of keeping the email currently being looked
at in the VF's message list? I bet my ass that Ritlabs didn't implement the
current behaviour on purpose. They just made the VFs refresh more often
(which is generally good) and don't care about this side effect that
actually destroys a useful process for users. That process being to have a
VF that shows all your unread mail from various accounts/folders. Not such
an unusual way to handle new mail one would think.

BRgds,
Carsten

 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: 5.1.6.2 VF bug still there

2012-05-21 Thread Dwight Corrin
On Monday, May 21, 2012, 11:04:09 AM, Carsten Guthardt-Schulz wrote:
 
 I disagree. Almost every email client/interface on this planet,
 from Hotmail to the iPhone, marks an email as read when you open it
 for reading. And this for good reason: Usually people read an email
 after they open it, which is generally the purpose of opening an
 email. Having to manually mark them as read, especially when using
 the mouse, is an unnecessary task. 

unless there is some reason why marking it read right away interferes 
with what one wants to do with the message 
  
-- 
 Dwight A. Corrin 
 316.303.9385  phone ahead to fax 
 dcorrin at fastmail.fm 
 photo galleries at http://dcorrin.smugmug.com 
 photo blog at http://dcorrin.aminus3.com 
   http://photos.vfxy.com/photoblogs/5882 
 Using IMAP with The Bat! 5.1.6.2 on Windows Vista version 6,0 (Service Pack 2)



 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: 5.1.6.2 VF bug still there

2012-05-21 Thread RS (FEDARA)
Hi Dwight,

CGS I  disagree. Almost every email client/interface on this planet,
CGS from Hotmail to the iPhone, marks an email as read when you open
CGS it for reading. And this for good reason: Usually people read an
CGS email  after  they  open  it,  which is generally the purpose of
CGS opening  an  email.  Having  to  manually  mark  them  as  read,
CGS especially when using the mouse, is an unnecessary task.

DC unless  there  is  some  reason  why  marking  it  read right away
DC interferes with what one wants to do with the message

In  example you read or just scan a message but you don't have time to
deal  with  it at the moment . In that way it stays in example in your
main (cumulative) folder and waits for it's turn.

Solution  would be creating additional VF and tag messages somehow but
for instance in my TB! all VF values are reset to zero and in that way
if  I  use  that  solution  I  will not know that there is any message
pending to be handled...

-- 
Best Regards,
RS (FEDARA)

The Bat! 5.1.2
Windows 7 x64 Professional (7601 Service Pack 1)
POP3 accounts (x5)

Tuesday, May 22, 2012 (01:45 ; GMT+8)





 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: 5.1.6.2 VF bug still there

2012-05-21 Thread Carsten Guthardt-Schulz
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 6:29 PM, Raymund Tump raymund.t...@gmx.de wrote:

 Which leads to a slightly different scenario but as annoying.

 1. Mail is shown on mail ticker.
 2. I open the mail as I'm interested in it
 3. A filter is triggered for this mail and the mail is sorted out to a
 different folder therefore removing it from the mail ticker.
 4. As the message is no longer in the VF, TB closes my message window.

 This is clearly not expected.

Sounds to me like it's the exact same bug. The message that is
currently open suddenly doesn''t fulfill the VF criteria anymore and
therefore gets closed/removed from the list, even though the user is
still working with it. Ritlabs, please fix this. There was a bug in
BT, but it was pretty much ignored (as usual).

BRgds,
Carsten


 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: 5.1.6.2 VF bug still there

2012-05-21 Thread Carsten Guthardt-Schulz
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 7:51 PM, RS (FEDARA) r...@fedara.com wrote:
 DC unless  there  is  some  reason  why  marking  it  read right away
 DC interferes with what one wants to do with the message

 In  example you read or just scan a message but you don't have time to
 deal  with  it at the moment . In that way it stays in example in your
 main (cumulative) folder and waits for it's turn.

This is exactly why my virtual folders are configured to show all
unread and flagged mail. If I have read an email and still want to
work with it later (e.g. write a long answer) I will simply flag it,
so it stays in the virtual folder. This, by the way, is one thing that
isn't possible anymore in v5, because often the email will disappear
from the list once read and I can't set the flag anymore.

Of course you could also misuse the read/unread status to mark emails
that still need to be worked on, instead of flagging them or using
colours or whatever. However, this is not what the read/unread status
is designed for, because then it's just limited to be used as another
kind of flag, not making use of the special ability of read/unread,
which is to be set from read to unread state automatically after
displaying a message. BTW, that's why it's called read/unread and
not done / still needs work :-)


 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: 5.1.6.2 VF bug still there

2012-05-20 Thread Carsten Guthardt-Schulz
 I don't consider this to be a bug. If the message you are viewing, or
any other message in the same folder, is already marked as read when the
VF refreshes, I would say it is normal and to be expected that the
message(s) disappear from the VF. As you say, your VF is configured to
show *unread* messages.

Well, it makes absolutely no sense to remove the message from the VF while
it is still selected. Having the message selected in the message list (and
open in the preview pane) means it is a message currently being looked at,
so refreshing its state in the VF only makes sense once you have FINISHED
working with this message (i.e. selected another one).

The result of the message being removed from the list while you are still
working with it is dramatic:
- you can't flag it, as it's not in the list anymore
- you can't delete it
- you can't mark it as unread
- you can't park it
- ...

If you want to do any of these thing, you'll have to search for the folder
the message is located in. If your VF draws on many folders this may be a
long search.

It's not such an usual way to have a VF show unread messages, but with the
current bug it's absolutely useless. And the worst part is that it worked
right in v4!

 BRgds,
Carsten

 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: 5.1.6.2 VF bug still there

2012-05-20 Thread Carsten Guthardt-Schulz
Probably the best (and easiest) way to handle this would be that a VF,
while open, does not remove any messages automatically, and only adds the
new ones. Removing only takes place once you either refresh manually or
leave the VF. That's how v4 handled it and it definitely made sense.

On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Carsten Guthardt-Schulz 
gutha...@gmail.com wrote:

 Well, it makes absolutely no sense to remove the message from the VF while
 it is still selected. Having the message selected in the message list (and
 open in the preview pane) means it is a message currently being looked at,
 so refreshing its state in the VF only makes sense once you have FINISHED
 working with this message (i.e. selected another one).

 The result of the message being removed from the list while you are still
 working with it is dramatic:
 - you can't flag it, as it's not in the list anymore
 - you can't delete it
 - you can't mark it as unread
 - you can't park it
 - ...

 If you want to do any of these thing, you'll have to search for the folder
 the message is located in. If your VF draws on many folders this may be a
 long search.

 It's not such an usual way to have a VF show unread messages, but with the
 current bug it's absolutely useless. And the worst part is that it worked
 right in v4!

  BRgds,
 Carsten


 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: 5.1.6.2 VF bug still there

2012-05-20 Thread Paul Van Noord
5/20/2012  8:41 AM

Hi Carsten,

On 5/20/2012 Carsten Guthardt-Schulz wrote:

CGS Probably the best (and easiest) way to handle this would be that
CGS a VF, while open, does not remove any messages automatically, and
CGS only adds the new ones. Removing only takes place once you either
CGS refresh manually or leave the VF. That's how v4 handled it and it 
definitely made sense.

Agreed... see below...

- --
Paul

The Bat! v.4.2.44.2 on Windows 7 Pro 64 bit 6.1.7601
No IMAP  No OTFE



 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: 5.1.6.2 VF bug still there

2012-05-20 Thread MAU
Hello Carsten,
 
 Well, it makes absolutely no sense to remove the message from the VF while
 it is still selected. Having the message selected in the message list (and
 open in the preview pane) means it is a message currently being looked at,
 so refreshing its state in the VF only makes sense once you have FINISHED
 working with this message (i.e. selected another one).

What really doesn't make sense to me is what you wrote in your first 
post:

,- [  ]
| ... which then of course become read when you click on them.
`-

Wouldn't it make much more sense to mark a message as read (*) when you
have actually finished reading it and after deciding if you want to flag
it, delete it, park it, tag it, reply or forward it, assign it to a
color group or perhaps just leaving it as unread?

(*) Using Smart Space, Ctrl+M (or any key combination you want to 
customise) or from RMB menu if you are using the mouse.

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v5.1.6.2 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 3
My photos at: http://www.Rancho-K.com
My photoblog: http://mau.aminus3.com



 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: 5.1.6.2 VF bug still there

2012-05-20 Thread RS (FEDARA)
Hi Paul,

CGS Probably the best (and easiest) way to handle this would be that
CGS a VF, while open, does not remove any messages automatically, and
CGS only adds the new ones. Removing only takes place once you either
CGS refresh  manually  or leave the VF. That's how v4 handled it and
CGS it definitely made sense.

P Agreed... see below...

Agreed as well.

One  more thing is that if new messages in the folder are selected for
reading   they  are marked automatically as Read - that is logical and
if  there  is  no  other  action  from  a  user  side filter should be
triggered when user moves to next message. But if user decided to keep
message as UnRead with CTRL+U filter is still triggered after you move
to next message and UnRead message is filtered out.

IMO,  if  user  decides  to  keep  message UnRead filter should not be
triggered. Just an observation.

-- 
Best Regards,
RS (FEDARA)

The Bat! 5.1.2
Windows 7 x64 Professional (7601 Service Pack 1)
POP3 accounts (x5)

Monday, May 21, 2012 (00:14 ; GMT+8)





 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: 5.1.6.2 VF bug still there

2012-05-20 Thread MAU
Hello RS,
 
 One  more thing is that if new messages in the folder are selected for
 reading   they  are marked automatically as Read -

Not if Account/Properties/Options/Mark message as read... is not selected 
(ticked).

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v5.1.6.2 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 3
My photos at: http://www.Rancho-K.com
My photoblog: http://mau.aminus3.com



 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: 5.1.6.2 VF bug still there

2012-05-20 Thread RS (FEDARA)
Hi MAU,

RS One   more  thing  is  that  if  new  messages  in the folder are
RS selected for reading   they  are marked automatically as Read -

MAU Not  if Account/Properties/Options/Mark message as read... is not
MAU selected (ticked).

You might be right about that ; however, I get about 50-100 messages a
day and most of them are to be marked as Read while opened. Just a few
of them are to still stay as UnRead for further processing.

So,  in  my  case  using that option as checked is helpful so I do not
have to manually mark 100 messages a day :)

What  I  meant here was only that if user decides to keep a message as
UnRead  filter shall not be triggered (user marking it as UnRead after
check-up  may  rather be willing to leave it for further processing in
the  folder  where  it  is  at  the moment than have it moved). If I'm
mistaken  I  do not see much sense in an option to mark the message as
UrRead if it's to be moved out somewhere and anyway I need to look for
it in the depth of the folders :)

-- 
Best Regards,
RS (FEDARA)

The Bat! 5.1.2
Windows 7 x64 Professional (7601 Service Pack 1)
POP3 accounts (x5)

Monday, May 21, 2012 (01:24 ; GMT+8)





 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: 5.1.6.2 VF bug still there

2012-05-20 Thread MAU
Hello RS,
 
MAU Not  if Account/Properties/Options/Mark message as read... is not
MAU selected (ticked).

 You might be right about that ; however, I get about 50-100 messages a
 day and most of them are to be marked as Read while opened. Just a few
 of them are to still stay as UnRead for further processing.

 So,  in  my  case  using that option as checked is helpful so I do not
 have to manually mark 100 messages a day :)

It is certainly your option to do so. As I have said on this list
before, and just recently in this thread, I mark messages as read when I
have actually finished reading them and/or decided what I want to do
with them.

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v5.1.6.2 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 3
My photos at: http://www.Rancho-K.com
My photoblog: http://mau.aminus3.com



 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


5.1.6.2 VF bug still there

2012-05-19 Thread Carsten Guthardt-Schulz
The bug that the message I am currently reading in a VF disappears as soon
as the virtual folder gets refreshed is still there. This happens if a VF
is configured to show unread emails, which then of course become read when
you click on them. Then you better hurry if you want to flag the message,
because as soon as a new unread message comes in (causing the VF to
refresh) your message will disappear from the VF.

Bug exists and was reported since v5.0.

 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: 5.1.6.2 VF bug still there

2012-05-19 Thread MAU
Hello Carsten,
 
 The bug that the message I am currently reading in a VF disappears as
 soon as the virtual folder gets refreshed is still there. This happens
 if a VF is configured to show unread emails, which then of course
 become read when you click on them. Then you better hurry if you want
 to flag the message, because as soon as a new unread message comes in
 (causing the VF to refresh) your message will disappear from the VF.

I don't consider this to be a bug. If the message you are viewing, or 
any other message in the same folder, is already marked as read when the 
VF refreshes, I would say it is normal and to be expected that the 
message(s) disappear from the VF. As you say, your VF is configured to 
show *unread* messages.

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v5.1.6.2 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 3
My photos at: http://www.Rancho-K.com
My photoblog: http://mau.aminus3.com



 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: 5.1.6.2

2012-05-11 Thread Mark Partous
Hello Maxim,

Thursday, May 10, 2012, 4:11:04 PM, you wrote:

MM Message  Dispatcher  didn't  work  properly  in 5.1.6.1 MSI, could you
MM please  try  those  files.  If  you had installed 5.1.6 before, please
MM uninstall The Bat! prior to installing 5.1.6.2

MM http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/thebat_rus_5-1-6-2.msi
MM http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/thebat_pro_5-1-6-2.msi
MM http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/thebat_home_5-1-6-2.msi
MM http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/intpack_5-1-6-2.msi

Installed,  but  will  try  to  go back later today, to see wether the fact 
that pictures in html-messages are no longer
downloaded, or, at least, not shown, is due to 5-1-6-2 or not.

-- 
Best Wishes,
Mark 
   
using 
The Bat! Version 5.1.6.2 





 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: 5.1.6.2

2012-05-11 Thread Mark Partous
Hello Mark,

Friday, May 11, 2012, 1:28:52 PM, you wrote:

MP Installed,  but  will  try  to  go back later today, to see wether the fact 
that pictures in html-messages are no longer
MP downloaded, or, at least, not shown, is due to 5-1-6-2 or not.

The problem was already in 5.1.6.1 (but see BTW, later in this message), the 
problem did/does not exist in the 5.1.0.4 beta...

The pictures I am talking about are not the ones contained within the message, 
but those that are referenced to and must
be downloaded.

In 5.1.6.1 and 5.1.6.2 the problem occurs as well with TB!-viewer as with the 
system-viewer.

Am I the only one experiencing this?

BTW:   after   I   uninstalled  5.1.6.2  and  reinstalled  the  5.1.6.1  msi  
and launched TB! by letting it start after
installation  had  finished,  I  got  an  error  message  (since  I could not 
capture it's content with Ctrl+C, I took a
screenshot).  Strangely enough The About-screen said it still was the 
5.1.6.2-version. I am sure I did use the 5.1.6.1
msi. When I uninstalled it again, it said it was 5.1.6.1 (as expected).



-- 
Best Wishes,
Mark 
   
using 
The Bat! Version 5.1.0.4 
int_1.jpg
 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: 5.1.6.2

2012-05-11 Thread Mark Partous
Hello Raymund,

Friday, May 11, 2012, 5:55:52 PM, you wrote:

RT TB obviously wasn't deinstalled properly as the Installer still finds
RT a hint for thebat.exe in the registry. As there is a custom action
RT that should run during installation relying on the newly installed
RT thebat.exe it fails.

RT Check  if  TB!  is  not running in the background and check if you can
RT find thebat.exe somewhere.

I repeated what I had done before with (almost) the same result (without any 
error warning though).
I then deleted the 5.1.6.2 exe-file and chose repair. This time the 5.1.6.1 
exe file was installed.

I do not have the problem with the pictures not being downloaded for html-mails 
in 5.1.6.1 now.

I'll give 5.1.6.2 another try after this to make sure it's not a local problem.


-- 
Best Wishes,
Mark 
   
using 
The Bat! Version 5.1.6.1 
MyMacros 1.11a

zOmbie's Macros Version 0.7 
Windows XP Professional/5.1 build 2600 Service Pack 3 (0 days 7:51:27) on Dual 
Intel Pentium III




 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: 5.1.6.2

2012-05-11 Thread Mark Partous
Hello Mark,

Friday, May 11, 2012, 6:16:10 PM, you wrote:

MP I do not have the problem with the pictures not being downloaded for 
html-mails in 5.1.6.1 now.

MP I'll give 5.1.6.2 another try after this to make sure it's not a local 
problem.

By simply substituting the 5.1.6.1 .exe file with the 5.1.6.2 .exe one, it 
still works.
Now I'll try the .msi uninstall and install method again


-- 
Best Wishes,
Mark 
   
using 
The Bat! Version 5.1.6.2 





 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: 5.1.6.2

2012-05-11 Thread Mark Partous

Hello,

Citing myself once more:

MP By simply substituting the 5.1.6.1 .exe file with the 5.1.6.2 .exe one, it 
still works.
MP Now I'll try the .msi uninstall and install method again

Still works. Slower than 5.1.0.4 (no idea why), but it works.

-- 
Best wishes,
Mark  


__
Message made with The Bat, 5.1.6.2
started replying on vrijdag 11 mei 2012 at 19:43:01





 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


5.1.6.2

2012-05-10 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello ,

Message  Dispatcher  didn't  work  properly  in 5.1.6.1 MSI, could you
please  try  those  files.  If  you had installed 5.1.6 before, please
uninstall The Bat! prior to installing 5.1.6.2

http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/thebat_rus_5-1-6-2.msi
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/thebat_pro_5-1-6-2.msi
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/thebat_home_5-1-6-2.msi
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/intpack_5-1-6-2.msi


-- 
Best regards,
 Maxim  mailto:m...@ritlabs.com



 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: 5.1.6.2

2012-05-10 Thread Cees Schouten
Hallo Maxim,

Thursday, May 10, 2012, 4:11:04 PM, you wrote:

 Message  Dispatcher  didn't  work  properly  in 5.1.6.1 MSI, could you
 please  try  those  files.  If  you had installed 5.1.6 before, please
 uninstall The Bat! prior to installing 5.1.6.2

 http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/thebat_pro_5-1-6-2.msi

Well alright... up and running!

-- 
met vriendelijke groet,
 Cees Schouten
__
TheBat! v5.1.6.2 Professional Edition Registered to
Cees Schouten
S/N 3F8062AA
Single-computer licence on Windows 7 Ultimate X64 6.1.7601



 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html