Re: PGP bug revisited
Hello Peter! On Friday, October 15, 2004 at 8:34:02 AM you wrote: > I think you got confused by Zygmunt writing "internal", but I guess he > intended to say "build-in", as this would be correct. That may be. Since I was writing about an installation of CKT ... > You *need* to have PGP or GnuPG installed, if you want more than > PGP-2.6.3(or around there). It's just some versions ago one needed > extra DLLs to get external PGP supported, but for many moons right > know TB! has this DLL's functionality compiled in. The problem is that the internal support for PGP or equal to 5.x lacks some features - not big ones, admittedly. For instance, with CKT builds you can choose Conventional Encryption or Secure Viewer from the Enter Passphrase dialogue. This isn't possible with the internal support. Hendrik sent me an older version of Imad's DLL, which works fine for now. Since the special charcaters trouble didn't show up with this yet or with the internal support, it is the last DLL he wrote for build09b3 (or 2, it's the same) which introduced it. TB does not have a PGP connected bug. -- Dierk Haasis :Dierk: Copy 'n' Concept The Bat 3.0.2.1 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2 Chat info for ICQ, AIM, MSN, Yahoo, Jabber upon request A popular government without popular information or the means of acquiring it, is but a prologue to a farce or a tragedy or perhaps both. (James Madison) Current beta is 3.0.2.1 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: PGP bug revisited
"Peter Palmreuther" wrotes on 15/10/2004 at 17:34:02 +1100 subject "PGP bug revisited" : > @Hendrik: could you try to rename the DDL's you're writing about and > test if PGP integration still works? It really should :-) Yes, as I use actually PGP-8.1 use the "PGP 5,6,7,8 (build-in support)". I can certainly delete this dll's as I have no more PGP-6.5 installed. In any case, the Options for dll-Support are grayed out. Formerly, as I was using PGP-6.5.8 from www.pgpi.??? I was using the dll.Support, because with the "PGP 5,6,7,8 (build-in support)" there was some problems with password caching. -- Sincerely Hendrik Oesterlin - email [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jabber-IM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ 215599852 - MSN [EMAIL PROTECTED] - YIM moimeme666fr - AIM moimeme666fr TheBat! 3.0.1.33 and BayesIt! 0.7.3 on Windows 2000 Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: PGP bug revisited
Hello Dierk, On Friday, October 15, 2004 at 7:54:52 AM Dierk [DH] wrote: >> I don't use any batpgp65.dll, only The Bat! internal support for all PGP >> versions and all characters are properly decoded after encryption. DH> I'll try it; can't remember exactly why I chose Imad's plug-in, DH> perhaps because originally the internal support didn't use all of DH> PGP's features (or an installed PGP at all). I think you got confused by Zygmunt writing "internal", but I guess he intended to say "build-in", as this would be correct. You *need* to have PGP or GnuPG installed, if you want more than PGP-2.6.3(or around there). It's just some versions ago one needed extra DLLs to get external PGP supported, but for many moons right know TB! has this DLL's functionality compiled in. You nevertheless need the PGP program(s), but you can choose "PGP 5,6,7,8 (build-in support)" without having to install any additional DLL for The Bat!. @Hendrik: could you try to rename the DDL's you're writing about and test if PGP integration still works? It really should :-) -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2) Those who do not understand Unix are condemned to reinvent it, poorly. Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: PGP bug revisited
Hello Zygmunt! On Thursday, October 14, 2004 at 11:46:08 PM you wrote: > I don't use any batpgp65.dll, only The Bat! internal support for all PGP > versions and all characters are properly decoded after encryption. I'll try it; can't remember exactly why I chose Imad's plug-in, perhaps because originally the internal support didn't use all of PGP's features (or an installed PGP at all). -- Dierk Haasis :Dierk: Copy 'n' Concept The Bat 3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2 Chat info for ICQ, AIM, MSN, Yahoo, Jabber upon request Life is what happens while you are busy making other plans. (John Lennon) Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: PGP bug revisited
On Thursday, October 14, 2004, at 08:03:11 [UTC+1100] (Thursday, October 14, 2004 23:03 my local time) Hendrik Oesterlin wrote: >> Quick rehash: CKT builds are usable with TB via plug-in; > there are different versions of this batpgp65.dll file. The one I used > without any problem of this kind has this checksum: 83B94A66 I don't use any batpgp65.dll, only The Bat! internal support for all PGP versions and all characters are properly decoded after encryption. It doesn't matter if I use PGP/MIME or not. -- Best regards, Zygmunt Wereszczynski (Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 with BayesIt! 0.7.3) Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: PGP bug revisited
On 14-Oct-2004 12:34:54, Dierk wrote: >Hm, may the setting in Account properties how to handle 8-bit >characters be related? Mine is Quoted Printable ... I would definitely change that option Dierk to "Without Changes". ~Nick Andriash~ Creston, B.C. Canada Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: PGP bug revisited
"Dierk Haasis" wrotes on 15/10/2004 at 04:54:31 +1100 subject "PGP bug revisited" : > Quick rehash: CKT builds are usable with TB via plug-in; there are different versions of this batpgp65.dll file. The one I used without any problem of this kind has this checksum: 83B94A66 There is an other newer one with 0C4F3E96 checksum, but it had make some problems on my machine (do not remember what...) witch checksum one do you use? I use PGP-8.1 with internal support now. Feel free to send some test mails do me, if you want so. My key is available on servers. -- Sincerely Hendrik Oesterlin - email [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jabber-IM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ 215599852 - MSN [EMAIL PROTECTED] - YIM moimeme666fr - AIM moimeme666fr TheBat! 3.0.1.33 and BayesIt! 0.7.3 on Windows 2000 Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: PGP bug revisited
Thursday, October 14, 2004, 8:09:45 PM, you wrote: > Hello Zygmunt, >> Hmmm... I use last build of Imad's PGP (6.5.8CKT9b2) and all 8-bit >> characters are correctly decoded. > also here with the 'normal' PGP6.5.8 Version, with and without MIME. -- Best regards, Chris Wilson The Bat 2.12 RC/4 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build Number 2195 Service Pack 4 Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: PGP bug revisited
Salutation TBBETA, The ancient mystics foretold that on 14 October 2004, at 20:51:36 +0200 (which was 19:51 where I live) Zygmunt Wereszczynski wrote >> Anybody remember the problem where CKT versions of PGP didn't >> correctly decode special characters, like German umlauts becoming >> Hex-code? > Hmmm... I use last build of Imad's PGP (6.5.8CKT9b2) and all 8-bit > characters are correctly decoded. I had lots of problems with that one so have reverted to build 8. -- Ti2GO,___ David |David Elliott| Software Engineer | _| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP Key ID 0x650F4534 | | Whenever Possible, Put People On Hold | | Using The Bat ! 3.0.1.33 pro| | but crippled by Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2 | pgpoBcLUB55Hf.pgp Description: PGP signature Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: PGP bug revisited
On Thursday, October 14, 2004, at 21:34:54 [UTC+0200] (Thursday, October 14, 2004 21:34 my local time) Dierk Haasis wrote: >> Interesting, I am using exactly the same version and even the blank in >> signature delimiters gets converted to "=20", it was I think. > Hm, may the setting in Account properties how to handle 8-bit > characters be related? Mine is Quoted Printable ... The same as mine. -- Best regards, Zygmunt Wereszczynski (Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 with BayesIt! 0.7.3) Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: PGP bug revisited
Hello Dierk! On Thursday, October 14, 2004 at 9:23:37 PM you wrote: > Interesting, I am using exactly the same version and even the blank in > signature delimiters gets converted to "=20", it was I think. Hm, may the setting in Account properties how to handle 8-bit characters be related? Mine is Quoted Printable ... -- Dierk Haasis :Dierk: Copy 'n' Concept The Bat 3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2 Chat info for ICQ, AIM, MSN, Yahoo, Jabber upon request Wherever Germany extends her sway, she ruins culture. (Friedrich Nietzsche) Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: PGP bug revisited
Hello Zygmunt! On Thursday, October 14, 2004 at 8:51:36 PM you wrote: > Hmmm... I use last build of Imad's PGP (6.5.8CKT9b2) and all 8-bit > characters are correctly decoded. Interesting, I am using exactly the same version and even the blank in signature delimiters gets converted to "=20", it was I think. -- Dierk Haasis :Dierk: Copy 'n' Concept The Bat 3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2 Chat info for ICQ, AIM, MSN, Yahoo, Jabber upon request Don't let a little dispute injure a friendship. Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: PGP bug revisited
Hello Zygmunt, > Hmmm... I use last build of Imad's PGP (6.5.8CKT9b2) and all 8-bit > characters are correctly decoded. also here with the 'normal' PGP6.5.8 Version, with and without MIME. -- best regards Miroslav BAT-MAIL.DE.VU - http://bat-mail.de.vu News-Ticker: http://thebat.orgavision.de/bat-mail.xml Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: PGP bug revisited
Hello TBBETA, The ancient mystics foretold that on 14 October 2004, at 19:54:31 +0200 (which was 18:54 where I live) Dierk Haasis emanated these words of wisdom > Anybody remember the problem where CKT versions of PGP didn't > correctly decode special characters, like German umlauts becoming > Hex-code? Err no. > Quick rehash: CKT builds are usable with TB via plug-in; there has > been one way back by RL, which was later superseded by one > programmed between RL and Imad Faiad (who apparently has retired). > For years everything worked fine until some day we were presented > with messages that upon decrypting showed Hex-code instead of > special characters. > For use with TB I went to GPG with GPGShell, both of which I updated > today. Unfortunately GPG showed me a message of "no trust" because > "not signed" for keys that have been signed and trusted [awkward > grammar intended] by me. > So I reverted to PGP 6.5.8CKT and still found the special character > bug. Which version ? Can you send me an PM encrypted to test. > Is there a chance this bug will be hunted down? And either solved or > validly identified as a problem of PGP CKT? -- TTFN, ___ David |David Elliott| Software Engineer | _| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP Key ID 0x650F4534 | | My hard drive has a furball, my cat has bad sectors.| | Using The Bat ! 3.0.1.33 pro| | but crippled by Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2 | pgpcj1fNcWeK3.pgp Description: PGP signature Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: PGP bug revisited
On Thursday, October 14, 2004, at 19:54:31 [UTC+0200] (Thursday, October 14, 2004 19:54 my local time) Dierk Haasis wrote: > Anybody remember the problem where CKT versions of PGP didn't > correctly decode special characters, like German umlauts becoming > Hex-code? Hmmm... I use last build of Imad's PGP (6.5.8CKT9b2) and all 8-bit characters are correctly decoded. -- Best regards, Zygmunt Wereszczynski (Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 with BayesIt! 0.7.3) pgpzAUxgrAEnR.pgp Description: PGP signature Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
