Defragmentation of message bases

2002-02-23 Thread Alastair Scott

I noted that the TB! message bases become _horrendously_ fragmented*
(hardly a surprise, as they're continuously written to) and have
worked out a way of fixing this easily without having to defragment
the entire hard disk (NT4, Win2K or WinXP only).

The drill is:

1. Download contig.exe (which allows you to defragment single files)
from

http://www.sysinternals.com/ntw2k/freeware/contig.shtml

2. Unpack it and, from a DOS prompt _with TB! closed_, type:

contig -s -q C:\Program Files\The Bat!\MAIL\*.*

This will grind away and come back to the DOS prompt sooner or later.
In my case it produces a considerable speed improvement, particularly
in backing up and compressing folders.

Alastair

* some files had over 400 fragments ...

-- 
Alastair Scott (London, United Kingdom)
Using Windows XP and The Bat! 1.54 Beta/42


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Defragmentation of message bases

2002-02-23 Thread Jason

Hello Alastair,

Saturday, February 23, 2002, 11:12:16 PM, you wrote:

AS  without having to defragment
AS the entire hard disk (NT4, Win2K or WinXP only).

so, is there any similar solution for WinME??

-- 
Best regards,
 Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Defragmentation of message bases

2002-02-23 Thread Alastair Scott

On 23 February 2002 at 15:38 Jason wrote:

 Hello Alastair,

 Saturday, February 23, 2002, 11:12:16 PM, you wrote:

 AS  without having to defragment
 AS the entire hard disk (NT4, Win2K or WinXP only).

 so, is there any similar solution for WinME??

Unfortunately not, because contig uses Windows system calls that
aren't in 95, 98 or ME. (Unless someone, somewhere, has written a
similar application for these flavours of Windows; unlikely and I
can't find anything).

Alastair

PS I note that, on defragmenting, opening TB!, receiving _one_ email
message, compressing, exiting TB! and defragmenting again, 5 out of
199 files in the MAIL directory and below are found to be fragmented
on my (XP) system. That's a lot :(


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Defragmentation of message bases

2002-02-23 Thread Alain de Gevigney

Hello Alastair,

 On  Sat, 23 Feb 2002 at 15:12:16 [GMT +] (which was 16:12 where I live) you wrote:

AS I noted that the TB! message bases become _horrendously_ fragmented*

AS contig -s -q C:\Program Files\The Bat!\MAIL\*.*
I do the same but through a batch file without the Quite argument to
redirect the result in a log file
I only defrag messages.* files and run the batch every day with mstask

AS In my case it produces a considerable speed improvement, particularly
AS in backing up and compressing folders.

here too, a base like TBUDL can be fragmented in more than 50 parts in a
single day (even in NTFS) !



-- 
Regards, Alain
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 The Bat! 1.54 Beta/42
 Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Defragmentation of message bases - Maybe OT

2002-02-23 Thread Raj

Alastair,

On Sat, 23 Feb 2002, at 15:12:16 [GMT +] (which was 8:42 PM where I live) you
wrote:

AS This will grind away and come back to the DOS prompt sooner or later.
AS In my case it produces a considerable speed improvement, particularly
AS in backing up and compressing folders.

In  my  case  (I  have not done a de-frag of the disk for over 2 months) and the
de-frag using contig was over in a jiffy. And gave the following report

Summary:
 Number of files processed   : 327
 Number of files defragmented: 65
 Average fragmentation before: 1.56575 frags/file
 Average fragmentation after : 1 frags/file

Can you throw light on the report on the level fragmentation the TB had ??

-- 
Warm regards,
Raj

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Performance Appraisal Terms And Their Real Meanings

 Loyal - Can't get a job anywhere else

Replied on Sunday, February 24, 2002 using TB Ver 1.54 Beta/39 on Windows 2000


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com