Re: Can't see embedded pictures - usually

2021-09-02 Thread MAU
Hello Thomas,


> … others will have to be downloaded from the net.

And they may even come from different servers, the reason for "rules" in 
download manager.

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial (Madrid)- Spain)
Using The Bat! Version 9.4.4 (64-bit)
Current version is 9.1.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Can't see embedded pictures - usually

2021-09-02 Thread MAU
Hello Avram,


> Thanks, Thomas and Miguel for taking the time to offer suggestions.
> I think this is going to be one of those things that will have to be
> fixed.   I have already looked at the Image download manager.   And,
> even though I have selected the option "download external
> medial...automatically for all sources,"  I still see some images -
> I believe it is always an image within an image, where there are
> still the gray placeholders that I have described.

If you think/believe there is a bug, I suggest you open a report in 
https://bt.ritlabs.com and perhaps include a sample email.

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial (Madrid)- Spain)
Using The Bat! Version 9.4.4 (64-bit)
Current version is 9.1.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Can't see embedded pictures - usually

2021-09-01 Thread Avram Sacks
Hi, Miguel and Thomas
 

Wednesday, September 1, 2021, 4:37:28 PM, Miguel wrote:

> Hello Avram,


>> Thanks.  This helps about 60% of the time, but.   while in some cases 
>> the image will open up automatically, now, in  other cases, only PART of the 
>> image will open up - or some, but not all of the images will appear, with 
>> the remaining ones replaced by the gray square surrounded by a lattice of 
>> white and grey squares. 
>>  
>> Any idea as to what is going on now?

> Image download manager is now used for downloading images from external 
> resources  

> That is the reason, the Image download manager. You should get familiar with 
> it. Take a look at:
> Options/Preferences/HTML viewer/Download external media

And Thomas wrote:
 
Some images will be sent with the message, others will have to be downloaded 
from the net. Did you check the options? 
 
  
Thanks, Thomas and Miguel for taking the time to offer suggestions.   I think 
this is going to be one of those things that will have to be fixed.   I have 
already looked at the Image download manager.   And, even though I have 
selected the option "download external medial...automatically for all sources," 
 I still see some images - I believe it is always an image within an image, 
where there are still the gray placeholders that I have described.
 
All the best, 
 
-- 
Avi

Avram Sacks, using The Bat! Pro ver. 9.4.4 on Win 7 Pro
Current version is 9.1.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Can't see embedded pictures - usually

2021-09-01 Thread Thomas Fernandez ML
Hello Avram,


On Wed, 1 Sep 2021 12:59:26 -0500 GMT (02-Sep-21, 0:59 +0700 GMT),
Avram Sacks wrote:

>> In the header area on the right-hand side, you have a picture depicting a 
>> picture  and a green down-arrow. If you click on that, the pictures for 
>> this email will be downloaded.
>>  
>> You will also find a small black down-arrow next to it. Click on that, and 
>> you will be offered choices how to automate downloading of pictures.
>  
> Thanks.  This helps about 60% of the time, but.   while in some cases the 
> image will open up automatically, now, in  other cases, only PART of the 
> image will open up - or some, but not all of the images will appear, with the 
> remaining ones replaced by the gray square surrounded by a lattice of white 
> and grey squares. 
>  
> Any idea as to what is going on now?

Please do not CC to my direct email.
 
Some images will be sent with the message, others will have to be downloaded 
from the net. Did you check the options?

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Message reply created with The Bat! Version 9.4.4 (64-bit)
under Windows 10.0 Build 19043 
Current version is 9.1.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Can't see embedded pictures - usually

2021-09-01 Thread MAU
Hello Avram,


> Thanks.  This helps about 60% of the time, but.   while in some
> cases the image will open up automatically, now, in  other cases,
> only PART of the image will open up - or some, but not all of the
> images will appear, with the remaining ones replaced by the gray
> square surrounded by a lattice of white and grey squares. 
>  
> Any idea as to what is going on now?

On 27 July, in  in TBBeta, Stefan 
Tanurkov announced the release of beta 9.4.2.9 and among the short list of 
changes:
 
[+] Image download manager is now used for downloading images from external 
resources  
That is the reason, the Image download manager. You should get familiar with 
it. Take a look at:
Options/Preferences/HTML viewer/Download external media
 
-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial (Madrid)- Spain)
Using The Bat! Version 9.4.4 (64-bit)
Current version is 9.1.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Can't see embedded pictures - usually

2021-09-01 Thread Avram Sacks
Hi Thomas,


Tuesday, August 31, 2021, 7:55:46 PM, you wrote:

> In the header area on the right-hand side, you have a picture depicting a 
> picture  and a green down-arrow. If you click on that, the pictures for 
> this email will be downloaded.
>  
> You will also find a small black down-arrow next to it. Click on that, and 
> you will be offered choices how to automate downloading of pictures.
 
 
 
Thanks.  This helps about 60% of the time, but.   while in some cases the 
image will open up automatically, now, in  other cases, only PART of the image 
will open up - or some, but not all of the images will appear, with the 
remaining ones replaced by the gray square surrounded by a lattice of white and 
grey squares. 
 
Any idea as to what is going on now?
   
-- 
Avi

Avram Sacks, using The Bat! Pro ver. 9.4.4 on Win 7 Pro
Current version is 9.1.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Can't see embedded pictures - usually

2021-09-01 Thread Thomas Fernandez ML
Hello MAU,


On Wed, 1 Sep 2021 10:45:40 +0200 GMT (01-Sep-21, 15:45 +0700 GMT),
MAU wrote:

>> In the header area on the right-hand side, you have a picture depicting a 
>> picture  and a green down-arrow.

> But depends on the setting "Options/Preferences/Viewer/Editor/HTML 
> Viewer/Download external media/Always show the download button", doesn't it?

Errr, yes. Gee, the button should be there by default, I believe.

-- 


Cheers,
Thomas.

Message reply created with The Bat! Version 9.4.4 (64-bit)
under Windows 10.0 Build 19043 
Current version is 9.1.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Can't see embedded pictures - usually

2021-09-01 Thread MAU
Hello Thomas,


> In the header area on the right-hand side, you have a picture
> depicting a picture  and a green down-arrow.

But depends on the setting "Options/Preferences/Viewer/Editor/HTML 
Viewer/Download external media/Always show the download button", doesn't it? 

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial (Madrid)- Spain)
Using The Bat! Version 9.4.4 (64-bit)
Current version is 9.1.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Can't see embedded pictures - usually

2021-08-31 Thread Thomas Fernandez ML
Hello Lore and Achdut,


On Tue, 31 Aug 2021 15:23:32 -0700 GMT (01-Sep-21, 5:23 +0700 GMT),
Lore Galore wrote:

>> Another "feature" of the upgraded version of The Bat is that I do not get to 
>> see 90% of the embedded pictures.   Instead, I see a gray square, surrounded 
>> by a number of gray and white squares in a blurry latticework.    How do I 
>> change settings in order to see these pictures?

> I'm looking forward to the answer to that, as I had upgraded and asked what 
> to do about it and got no answer.  I couldn't stand the way it failed to 
> display as it should, so I went back to v 9.4.1.

In the header area on the right-hand side, you have a picture depicting a 
picture  and a green down-arrow. If you click on that, the pictures for this 
email will be downloaded.
 
You will also find a small black down-arrow next to it. Click on that, and you 
will be offered choices how to automate downloading of pictures.

-- 


Cheers,
Thomas.

Message reply created with The Bat! Version 9.4.4 (64-bit)
under Windows 10.0 Build 19043 
Current version is 9.1.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Can't see embedded pictures - usually

2021-08-31 Thread Lore Galore
Hello Achdut18,


Tuesday, August 31, 2021, 2:34:38 PM, you wrote:

> Another "feature" of the upgraded version of The Bat is that I do not get to 
> see 90% of the embedded pictures.   Instead, I see a gray square, surrounded 
> by a number of gray and white squares in a blurry latticework.    How do I 
> change settings in order to see these pictures?



> --
> Avi

> Avram Sacks, using The Bat! Pro ver. 9.4.4 on Win 7 Pro

I'm looking forward to the answer to that, as I had upgraded and asked what to 
do about it and got no answer.  I couldn't stand the way it failed to display 
as it should, so I went back to v 9.4.1.
-- 
Lore Galore
The Bat! E-Mail Client by Ritlabs v9.3.3
Current version is 9.1.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Can't see embedded pictures - usually

2021-08-31 Thread Achdut18
Another "feature" of the upgraded version of The Bat is that I do not get to 
see 90% of the embedded pictures.   Instead, I see a gray square, surrounded by 
a number of gray and white squares in a blurry latticework.    How do I change 
settings in order to see these pictures?



--
Avi

Avram Sacks, using The Bat! Pro ver. 9.4.4 on Win 7 Pro
Current version is 9.1.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Non-viewable pictures

2012-10-04 Thread Jack S. LaRosa
Greetings All,

A friend sent me an email which was supposed to contain a bunch of pictures,
none of which showed up when viewing the email in the VIEW→WINDOW SPLIT
MODE→FULL-WIDTH PREVIEW PANE. The left column in this view mode shows the icons
for the pictures which were a few GIFs but most were just labeled ATTx~1KB
where x was a number from 1 to 15. The KB size was different for each picture,
varying from less than 1KB to more than 31KB. The only icons which had
extensions were the GIFs (.gif). Clicking on a tab at the bottom of the window
would reveal each picture individually. However, when I clicked on REPLY and the
reply window opened, all the pictures were suddenly viewable in the reply
window.

Anyone have any ideas as to why this would work this way?

-- 
TIA,
Jack LaRosa
:usflag: Central Alabama

Using The Bat! ver: 5.2.
Running Windows XP Pro ver 5 build 2600 Service Pack 3














Current version is 4.2.42 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Non-viewable pictures

2012-10-04 Thread Rick
 Greetings All,

 A friend sent me an email which was supposed to contain a bunch of pictures,
 none of which showed up when viewing the email in the VIEW→WINDOW SPLIT
 MODE→FULL-WIDTH PREVIEW PANE. The left column in this view mode shows the 
 icons
 for the pictures which were a few GIFs but most were just labeled 
 ATTx~1KB
 where x was a number from 1 to 15. The KB size was different for each picture,
 varying from less than 1KB to more than 31KB. The only icons which had
 extensions were the GIFs (.gif). Clicking on a tab at the bottom of the window
 would reveal each picture individually. However, when I clicked on REPLY and 
 the
 reply window opened, all the pictures were suddenly viewable in the reply
 window.

 Anyone have any ideas as to why this would work this way?

Not specifically, but I often get graphics with the extension stripped
but  the  Bat  can  read  them  correctly.  That is a problem with the
sender's system settings or email provider, not with the Bat. Actually
the Bat does an excellent job of interpreting these.

If  all  else fails, detach and add the ending JPG of GIF and see what
you get.

-- 
Rick
Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today. - James Dean

v5.3.2 on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600
Service Pack 3

 



Current version is 4.2.42 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Non-viewable pictures

2012-10-04 Thread Jack S. LaRosa
Hello Rick,

On Thursday, October 04, 2012 you wrote:

 Greetings All,

 A friend sent me an email which was supposed to contain a bunch of pictures,
 none of which showed up when viewing the email in the VIEW→WINDOW SPLIT
 MODE→FULL-WIDTH PREVIEW PANE. The left column in this view mode shows the 
 icons
 for the pictures which were a few GIFs but most were just labeled 
 ATTx~1KB
 where x was a number from 1 to 15. The KB size was different for each 
 picture,
 varying from less than 1KB to more than 31KB. The only icons which had
 extensions were the GIFs (.gif). Clicking on a tab at the bottom of the 
 window
 would reveal each picture individually. However, when I clicked on REPLY and 
 the
 reply window opened, all the pictures were suddenly viewable in the reply
 window.

 Anyone have any ideas as to why this would work this way?

R Not specifically, but I often get graphics with the extension stripped
R but  the  Bat  can  read  them  correctly.  That is a problem with the
R sender's system settings or email provider, not with the Bat. Actually
R the Bat does an excellent job of interpreting these.

R If  all  else fails, detach and add the ending JPG of GIF and see what
R you get.


You were right Rick. Saving one of these to my desktop and renaming it so that
it had a .jpg extension made it viewable in Zoner Picture Studio (my viewer of
choice). Without the extension caused Windows to question what program it should
use to open the file.

But, why should TB! be unable to display them *except* in the reply window?

Curiouser and curiouser.

-- 
Best Regards, 
Jack LaRosa
:usflag: Central Alabama

Using The Bat! ver: 5.2.
Running Windows XP Pro ver 5 build 2600 Service Pack 3



Current version is 4.2.42 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Pictures in html?

2011-06-14 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Bill,

On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:36:14 -0700 GMT (14/Jun/11, 6:36 AM +0700 GMT),
Bill McQuillan wrote:

BM In case # 3, there is a security problem. The act of fetching the images
BM from the external site can reveal too much information about you. Thus, TB
BM has been reluctant to automatically fetch such images. Previously the only
BM way to see those images was to display the message in the browser. Now TB
BM will fetch the images if you give it permission. The Image Download Manager
BM may be accessed by clicking the Yellow Question Mark at the right of the
BM message header (To, From, Subject).

BM Unfortunately, at this point I can give you little more help since the
BM Download manager seems to have a lot of capabilities, but they are not very
BM obvious and I can find ABSOLUTELY NO DOCUMENTATION about it.

BM So, does anybody on this list have a pointer to any documention about the
BM Image Download Manager?

There is no documentation.

This is how the Download Manager (the globe with the question mark)
works:

Whenever a message (I believe this only applies to HTML messages) adds
a picture by URL only, the Download Manager shows up automatically.
This is your case #3. If the images are sent with the messages, the
pictures are shown by default, but if they are not, there is a
security issue.

How to make the pictures show: Click on the globe with the questin
mark. You will get a context menu with the option to show download
manager Choose that option, and a window pops up.

In this window (the Download Manager) you can block or allow URLs. I
have allowed all the pictures for my newsletters, and blocked all that
contain constandcontact or icontact or adclient etc in the URL.
Also, URLs with weird long alphanumerical names won't get allowed, as
these are likely trackers.

That's it. I think it's not very difficult to grasp, play with it and
you'll see.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/

Message reply created with The Bat! 4.2.44
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3





Current version is 4.2.42 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Pictures in html?

2011-06-14 Thread Susanne
 

Hi,

Monday, June 13, 2011, 4:36:14 PM,bill.mcquil...@pobox.com wrote:

  The Image Download Manager
 may be accessed by clicking the Yellow Question Mark at the right of the
 message header (To, From, Subject).

Thanks!
I played with the download manager, and can now see my newsletters in their 
full glory! :)

-- 

Best regards,
 Susannemailto:sisk...@gmail.com

Using The Bat! 4.2.6
OS: Windows 7 6.1 Build 7600 



Current version is 4.2.42 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Pictures in html?

2011-06-14 Thread Susanne
 

Hi,

Tuesday, June 14, 2011, 10:08:31 AM,thomas.gm...@gmx.net wrote:

 That's it. 

Thanks! 
It works as described. 


-- 

Best regards,
 Susannemailto:sisk...@gmail.com

Using The Bat! 4.2.6
OS: Windows 7 6.1 Build 7600 



Current version is 4.2.42 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Pictures in html?

2011-06-14 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Susanne,

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:39:04 -0700 GMT (15/Jun/11, 4:39 AM +0700 GMT),
Susanne wrote:

 That's it. 

S Thanks! 
S It works as described. 

Glad to have helped.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/

Message reply created with The Bat! 4.2.44
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3





Current version is 4.2.42 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Pictures in html?

2011-06-13 Thread Susanne
Hi,

is there a way to make them visible in TB?

  

-- 

Best regards,
 Susannemailto:sisk...@gmail.com

Using The Bat! 4.2.6
OS: Windows 7 6.1 Build 7600 



Current version is 4.2.42 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Pictures in html?

2011-06-13 Thread Steven P Vallière

Susanne,

Monday, June 13, 2011, 12:13:50 PM, you wrote:

S is there a way to make them visible in TB?

I'm assuming you mean pictures embedded within your message...

FWIW, I've found that embedding images in email is rather
inconsistent, especially between Thunderbird and TheBat!
(my two main email clients.)  Those two often refuse to
correctly display messages sent by the other one, though
both programs can send the same messages to a GMail user
who can see them both fine using Google's web mail interface.

Basically, until there's a standard for how to handle HTML
mail, especially with embedded images, we users will just
be forced to suffer differing interpretations of the RFCs
that cover those things.  After all, RFC /does/ stand for
(R)equest (F)or (C)omments.  If there is an actual STD
document for this, then it must allow too much interpretation
and have too many optional things to enforce interoperability.

Sorry for the rant, I've been complaining about this issue
to RIT Labs for a couple years and have always been told that
TB is right and the others are wrong.  Not in so many
words, but that's the essence of all the replies I've ever
received on the subject.

-- 
Steven Vallière | tb 4.2.44.2 | mailto:the...@e-visions.com
--
If you didn't write it down, then it didn't happen.
   -Larry Zana



Current version is 4.2.42 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Pictures in html?

2011-06-13 Thread Susanne
 

Hi,

Monday, June 13, 2011, 12:00:47 PM,the...@e-visions.com wrote:

 I'm assuming you mean pictures embedded within your message...

Yes. All I get are placeholders, and embedded pictures are *never* visible in 
TB for me.
Was hoping I was just missing a setting somewhere.

-- 

Best regards,
 Susannemailto:sisk...@gmail.com

Using The Bat! 4.2.6
OS: Windows 7 6.1 Build 7600 



Current version is 4.2.42 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Pictures in html?

2011-06-13 Thread Bill McQuillan

On Mon, 2011-06-13, Susanne wrote:

 Monday, June 13, 2011, 12:00:47 PM,the...@e-visions.com wrote:

 I'm assuming you mean pictures embedded within your message...

 Yes. All I get are placeholders, and embedded pictures are *never* visible in 
 TB for me.
 Was hoping I was just missing a setting somewhere.

Images can be associated with a message in several ways:

  1 - A message may have attachments of images or other documents,

  2 - An HTML message can have place holders that refer to images that
  are included with the message,

  3 - An HTML message may have place holders that refer to images at some
  External Web site.

In case # 1, the attachments should be available using tabs at the bottom
of the message window and/or icons in a sidebar.

In case # 2, TB should display the images correctly in line.

In case # 3, there is a security problem. The act of fetching the images
from the external site can reveal too much information about you. Thus, TB
has been reluctant to automatically fetch such images. Previously the only
way to see those images was to display the message in the browser. Now TB
will fetch the images if you give it permission. The Image Download Manager
may be accessed by clicking the Yellow Question Mark at the right of the
message header (To, From, Subject).

Unfortunately, at this point I can give you little more help since the
Download manager seems to have a lot of capabilities, but they are not very
obvious and I can find ABSOLUTELY NO DOCUMENTATION about it.

So, does anybody on this list have a pointer to any documention about the
Image Download Manager?

-- 
Bill McQuillan bill.mcquil...@pobox.com
Using The Bat! 5.0.12 on Windows 7 6.1 build 7601-Service Pack 1



Current version is 4.2.42 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: FORWARDING not forwarding attached pictures only .HTML

2007-02-01 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello alists,

On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 22:37:05 -0800 GMT (01/02/2007, 13:37 +0700 GMT),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

awc It was not selected. I selected it, but still NOTHING attaches to
awc the forwarded message. I've been using TB for 5 years now and
awc have never seen this behavior.

awc hummm

Hm. I've never seen it either.

I don't know what's happening to you. Which TB version are you using?

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Wenn ich Sie jetzt um Sex bitten wuerde - waere Ihre Antwort die
gleiche, die Sie auf diese Frage geben?
http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/

Message reply created with The Bat! 3.95.6
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2






Current version is 3.95.08 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


FORWARDING not forwarding attached pictures only .HTML

2007-01-31 Thread alists
Hello  group...

I'm sure it is some setting, but when I forward a message that
has attachments (HTML  GIF's) on the
christmas edition, only the HTML is attached in the forwarded
message.. I can't for the life of me find any setting that would
do that. Any ideas? thanks!

-- 

Best regards,
Laura mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Current version is 3.95.08 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: FORWARDING not forwarding attached pictures only .HTML

2007-01-31 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello alists,

On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 09:34:58 -0800 GMT (01/02/2007, 00:34 +0700 GMT),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

awc I'm sure it is some setting, but when I forward a message that
awc has attachments (HTML  GIF's) on the
awc christmas edition, only the HTML is attached in the forwarded
awc message.. I can't for the life of me find any setting that would
awc do that. Any ideas? thanks!

I cannot confirm that. Do you forward as MIME or not?

Account / Properties / Templates / Forward

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

A chicken crossing the road is poultry in motion.
http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/

Message reply created with The Bat! 3.95.6
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2






Current version is 3.95.08 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: FORWARDING not forwarding attached pictures only .HTML

2007-01-31 Thread alists
Hello Thomas,


TF awc I'm sure it is some setting, but when I forward a message that
TF awc has attachments (HTML  GIF's) on the
TF awc christmas edition, only the HTML is attached in the forwarded
TF awc message.. I can't for the life of me find any setting that would
TF awc do that. Any ideas? thanks!

TF I cannot confirm that. Do you forward as MIME or not?

It was not selected. I selected it, but still NOTHING attaches to
the forwarded message. I've been using TB for 5 years now and
have never seen this behavior.

hummm

Laura




-- 

Best regards,
 alistsmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Current version is 3.95.08 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[5]: ideal size for AB pictures

2005-11-03 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello Ben,

Wednesday, November 2, 2005, 11:04:45 AM, you wrote:
 Thats disappointing I was hoping for a I run the damn thing I can
 do what I like kinda responce, followed by getting your hunch men
 to throw me roughly onto the street. I dont know you just can't get
 the proper experts these days...

grin I don't ever use the AB photo thing anymore. I played with it
when it first came out, but not in a long time.



-- 
  TBUDL/BETA/DEV/TECH Lists Moderator / PGP 0x6C0AB16B
 __       Geocaching:http://gps.PCWize.com
(  )  ( ___)(_  _)( ___)  TBUDP Wiki Site:  http://www.PCWize.com/thebat/tbudp
 )(__  )__)  _)(_  )__)   Roguemoticons  Smileys:http://PCWize.com/thebat
()()()(__)PHP Tutorials and snippets:http://www.DevTek.org

Solid, liquid and gas.  The three states of a burrito.




Current version is 3.62.09 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[4]: ideal size for AB pictures

2005-11-02 Thread Ben Allen
Howdy Leif,

Thursday, October 27, 2005, 3:29:57 PM, Leif wrotened:

 So how come yours isn't?

Leif Sorry, should have been a bit clearer. If the image is larger than
Leif 120x144 it'll resize down.

Thats  disappointing I was hoping for a I run the damn thing I can do
what  I  like  kinda  responce, followed by getting your hunch men to
throw  me  roughly onto the street. I dont know you just can't get the
proper experts these days...





-- 
Have Fun,
 
Stan the Almighty!

[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
crashing The Bat! v3.61.14 Echo (Beta)
falling out of mid air with Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600
Service Pack 2 
Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.70GHz 598 MHz 1.00GB RAM
I was sitting in the lunchroom with a coworker, and he noticed a
funny pattern on one of his socks.  He told me that his socks were
the same color, but the pattern of one was not right.  He just
couldn't figure out what was wrong.  I let him ponder the situation
for five minutes and then I informed him that he was wearing one sock
inside out.  He is our director of quality.



Current version is 3.62.09 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: ideal size for AB pictures

2005-10-27 Thread Ludovic LE MOAL
Hi,

On Tuesday, October 25, 2005 at 11:20:35 PM, Leif Gregory wrote:

 I can't find this information (and I'm too lazy to try  try again
 until I find it) - whats the best picture size for the AB entry
 photos?

 120x144, the same size as most roguemoticons surprisingly! grin

I think the size is not important. The proportion (an height which
is equal to 1,2 the length) is more important imho.
-- 
Ludovic LE MOAL
The Bat! 3.60.07 on Windows 98 4.10



Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: ideal size for AB pictures

2005-10-27 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello Ludovic,

Thursday, October 27, 2005, 6:03:14 AM, you wrote:
 I think the size is not important. The proportion (an height which
 is equal to 1,2 the length) is more important imho.

Correct, but TB will resize to 120x144 when you stick it in the AB.


-- 
  TBUDL/BETA/DEV/TECH Lists Moderator / PGP 0x6C0AB16B
 __       Geocaching:http://gps.PCWize.com
(  )  ( ___)(_  _)( ___)  TBUDP Wiki Site:  http://www.PCWize.com/thebat/tbudp
 )(__  )__)  _)(_  )__)   Roguemoticons  Smileys:http://PCWize.com/thebat
()()()(__)PHP Tutorials and snippets:http://www.DevTek.org

For people who like peace and quiet:  a phoneless cord.




Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: ideal size for AB pictures

2005-10-27 Thread Ben Allen
Howdy Leif,

Tuesday, October 25, 2005, 10:20:35 PM, Leif wrotened:

Leif Tuesday, October 25, 2005, 2:56:55 PM, you wrote:
 I can't find this information (and I'm too lazy to try  try again
 until I find it) - whats the best picture size for the AB entry
 photos?

Leif 120x144, the same size as most roguemoticons surprisingly! grin

So how come yours isn't?



-- 
Have Fun,
 
Stan the Almighty!

[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
crashing The Bat! v3.61.14 Echo (Beta)
falling out of mid air with Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600
Service Pack 2 
Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.70GHz 598 MHz 1.00GB RAM
I can resist everything except temptation.



Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[3]: ideal size for AB pictures

2005-10-27 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello Ben,

Thursday, October 27, 2005, 8:35:38 AM, you wrote:
 So how come yours isn't?

Sorry, should have been a bit clearer. If the image is larger than
120x144 it'll resize down.



-- 
  TBUDL/BETA/DEV/TECH Lists Moderator / PGP 0x6C0AB16B
 __       Geocaching:http://gps.PCWize.com
(  )  ( ___)(_  _)( ___)  TBUDP Wiki Site:  http://www.PCWize.com/thebat/tbudp
 )(__  )__)  _)(_  )__)   Roguemoticons  Smileys:http://PCWize.com/thebat
()()()(__)PHP Tutorials and snippets:http://www.DevTek.org

Sir, Deck Fourteen reports that the toilet's blocked.




Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


ideal size for AB pictures

2005-10-25 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello everyone,

I can't find this information (and I'm too lazy to try  try again until I
find it) - whats the best picture size for the AB entry photos?

-- 
Best regards,
 Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)

I am compelled to fear that science will be used to promote the power
of dominant groups rather than to make men happy. (Bertrand Russel)




Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: ideal size for AB pictures

2005-10-25 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello Alexander,

Tuesday, October 25, 2005, 2:56:55 PM, you wrote:
 I can't find this information (and I'm too lazy to try  try again
 until I find it) - whats the best picture size for the AB entry
 photos?

120x144, the same size as most roguemoticons surprisingly! grin

-- 
  TBUDL/BETA/DEV/TECH Lists Moderator / PGP 0x6C0AB16B
 __       Geocaching:http://gps.PCWize.com
(  )  ( ___)(_  _)( ___)  TBUDP Wiki Site:  http://www.PCWize.com/thebat/tbudp
 )(__  )__)  _)(_  )__)   Roguemoticons  Smileys:http://PCWize.com/thebat
()()()(__)PHP Tutorials and snippets:http://www.DevTek.org

Synonym (n): Word used in place of a word you can't spell.




Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: HTML + pictures

2005-05-26 Thread Vili
 How can I display/insert a picture automatically? I'm not talking about
 the attachment macro but really showing it. I can doe this manually by
 starting a new message and selecting type HTML. From the toolbar that
 then appears I can use the insert function.
ASK You can not use HTML in templates, only plain text. To really show a
ASK picture you would need an HTML template.

It  is  true.  Maybe  a little trick will solve Tony's immediate need,
partly:  create  a  new HTML mail, that includes the pic, also. Make a
new folder and store it there. Anytime you need this kind of mail just
copy  a  copy  :))  of that mail into your outbox and start editing...

Yes,  you  cannot  apply  macros,  but  at  least you have a HTML type
template...

-- 
Vili





Current version is 3.5.0.17 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


HTML + pictures

2005-05-25 Thread Tony
Hallo,

I'm able to define a diffrent template for each person in my address
book.
How can I display/insert a picture automatically?
I'm not talking about the attachment macro but really showing it.
I can doe this manually by starting a new message and selecting type
HTML. From the toolbar that then appears I can use the insert
function.

Any help on automating this?

-- 
Best regards,
Tony

Always try to stop talking before people stop listening.



Current version is 3.5.0.16 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: HTML + pictures

2005-05-25 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Tony  everyone else,

on 25-Mai-2005 at 18:16 you (Tony) wrote:

 How can I display/insert a picture automatically? I'm not talking about
 the attachment macro but really showing it. I can doe this manually by
 starting a new message and selecting type HTML. From the toolbar that
 then appears I can use the insert function.

You can not use HTML in templates, only plain text. To really show a
picture you would need an HTML template.

-- 
Best regards,
 Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)

When Newton saw the apple fall, he found a mode of proving that the
Earth turned round In a most natural whirl, called gravitation, And
thus is the sole mortal who could grapple, Since Adam, with the fall
of an apple. -- Lord Byron



Current version is 3.5.0.16 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Problem opening Pictures

2004-09-20 Thread Wolffe
On Saturday, September 18, 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] stated:

L Hello tbudl List,
L I was having problems with sending pictures in TB, so I went
L to Applications and clicked on Install The Bat as the Simple MAPI
L request handler. Then when I attached a picture and then tried to
L open it, to check it before sending, I got the message, %1 is not
L a valid Win32 application. How can I get it back like it was
L before I started messing with it? 

Try going to Options-Preferences-General and checking/unchecking
the 5th box Use external viewer to open attached images

-- 
Cheers Yall
\\'

 Running TB! version 3.0.0.15 (beta) under Windows XP 5.1



Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Problem opening Pictures

2004-09-18 Thread Lloyd Hite
Hello tbudl List,
I was having problems with sending pictures in TB, so I went to Applications and 
clicked on Install The Bat as the Simple MAPI request handler. Then when I attached a 
picture and then tried to open it, to check it before sending, I got the message, %1 
is not a valid Win32 application. How can I get it back like it was before I started 
messing with it? 

  

-- 
Regards,
 Lloyd 
 : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Problem opening Pictures

2004-09-18 Thread Chris

Lloyd Hite @ 2004-Sep-18 4:09:59 PM
Problem opening Pictures mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 I was having problems with sending pictures in TB, so I went to
 Applications and clicked on Install The Bat as the Simple MAPI
 request handler. Then when I attached a picture and then tried to
 open it, to check it before sending, I got the message, %1 is not a
 valid Win32 application. How can I get it back like it was before I
 started messing with it? 

In whatever program was the MAPI handler before (usually Outlook or
Outlook Express), set it as the default MAPI handler. Then, reset The
Bat! as the mailto: handler.

If you cannot figure out how to reset an application as the MAPI
handler, re-install it.

-- 
Chris
Quoting when replying to this message is good for your karma.

Using The Bat! v3.0 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2

In an office: WOULD THE PERSON WHO TOOK THE STEP LADDER YESTERDAY
PLEASE BRING IT BACK OR FURTHER STEPS WILL BE TAKEN


pgp4tRB3PO2j9.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

html and graphics/pictures showing

2003-07-08 Thread Aaron M Farbo
Hi,

 I have a problem viewing graphics/pictures in html email that I
recieve using TB.  I will download all my messages, some being html and
some not, but for some reason the graphics and pictures that go with the
html messages show up as x's where the pictures are supposed to be.  I
cannot find an option in TB to turn off the high security or how to make
it so that I can view these graphics/pictures.  Any help would be greatly 
appreciated. 

Thank you.  




Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: html and graphics/pictures showing

2003-07-08 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello Aaron,

Tuesday, July 8, 2003, 10:42:06 AM, you wrote:
AMF I have a problem viewing graphics/pictures in html email that I
AMF recieve using TB. I will download all my messages, some being
AMF html and some not, but for some reason the graphics and pictures
AMF that go with the html messages show up as x's where the pictures
AMF are supposed to be. I cannot find an option in TB to turn off the
AMF high security or how to make it so that I can view these
AMF graphics/pictures. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

The answer to your question is in the FAQ:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/Messages.html


-- 
Leif (TB list moderator and fellow end user).

Using The Bat! 1.63 Beta/10 under Windows 2000 5.0
Build 2195 Service Pack 3 on a Pentium 4 2GHz with 512MB



Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: html and graphics/pictures showing

2003-07-08 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Aaron,

On Tue, 08 Jul 2003 11:42:06 EST GMT (08/07/03, 23:42 +0700 GMT),
Aaron M Farbo wrote:

  I have a problem viewing graphics/pictures in html email that I
 recieve using TB.  I will download all my messages, some being html and
 some not, but for some reason the graphics and pictures that go with the
 html messages show up as x's where the pictures are supposed to be.  I
 cannot find an option in TB to turn off the high security or how to make
 it so that I can view these graphics/pictures.  Any help would be greatly
 appreciated. 

Easy: the pictures that you don't see have not been sent with the
message. The HTML code contains a command that they be downloaded from
the web. TB doesn't do that, for security reasons.

If you still want to see the HTML mail in its full glory, double click
on the attachment icon. Your browser will open, and it will download
all those picutures.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.

A day without sunshine is like, night.

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.63 Beta/5
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build  A 
using a Pentium P4 1.7 GHz, 128MB RAM



Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Pictures

2002-12-21 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Thomas!

On Saturday, December 21, 2002 at 12:44:53 AM you wrote:

 Well, I never used OL/OE, but I also had some business associates who
 sent me their vCards with every message. Quite an annoying habit. Once
 I have their details in my AB, I don't need them to attach their vCard
 again and again.

1. Nothing to do with what I wrote.

2. What you describe is a shortcoming in MS's software, you only have
the option to include vCard with every message or none at all. Another
point where TB shows its supremacy.




-- 
Dierk Haasis

The Bat 1.62 Christmas Edition on Windows XP 5.1 2600Service Pack 1

The graveyards are full of people who rushed in bravely but unwisely.
(Terry Pratchett)



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: how to do this - pictures, address book, file extract

2002-12-21 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo speedguy,

On Sat, 21 Dec 2002 02:21:24 +0200GMT (21-12-02, 1:21 +0100GMT, where
I live), you wrote:

s -is it possible to create a rule so that all incoming messages are
s added to address book

Yes, for the the first part of your message

s and its attachment file goes as entry for picture in the address book

And no for the second part of your question.

s -if picture for particular address exists in AB, can some rule be
s created which show preview of picture for incoming emails from this
s address

 Shift-Ctrl-O enables the address book auto-view, doesn't care whether
 a picture exist or not.

s -there is a possible way to create filter that can extract
s attachements and save in some directory but it doesn't allow us to
s select the file name. is there anyway, where i can specify that file
s name should of format say first_name or email_address or something..

You can't in TB. You'd need some third party tool for that.

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Pictures

2002-12-20 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Thomas!

On Friday, December 20, 2002 at 4:37:25 AM you wrote:

 If I do that, will you allow me one line for the X-Face?

Let's be perfectly honest, the best way to get rid of unnecessary
overhead would be to ban e-mail, actually computers. The Internet is
there to solve problems one would not have without them.

Take the TB lists, perfectly self-referential and therefore useless to
everyone not using TB.

That is why I hate arguments on specifics, in this case bandwidth.
It does not hold for me, my line is wide enough to download even the
notoriously big security patches from MS in a little more than 2
minutes - and this line doesn't cost me extra for time or traffic.

I still don't want X-Face or something similar. I also don't want
people to always be exposed to my face - or whatever I chose to put
in. I like the idea of the Rogues Gallery but even that is not used
honestly. In my experience there'll always be clowns using Bart
faces, *LotR* characters, *Star Wars* images. I don't want to see
that.



-- 
Dierk Haasis

The Bat 1.62 Christmas Edition on Windows XP 5.1 2600Service Pack 1

Only the strong survive.



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Pictures

2002-12-20 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hi Miguel,

On Fri, 20 Dec 2002 01:57:14 +0100
Miguel A. Urech [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 If more ml software uses them and more MUAs implement it's
 interpretation it can be a help to list members.

 Yeap, specially these two ;-)
 
 ,- [  ]
 | List-Subscribe:
 | http://stromgrade.its-toasted.org/mailman/listinfo/tbudl,
 | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=subscribe
 `-

In conjunction with a public accessible archive that offers to download
messages in MBOX format: yes :-)
-- 
Pit


Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Pictures

2002-12-20 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hi Thomas,

On Fri, 20 Dec 2002 10:37:25 +0700
Thomas Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 And a minimum of 7 by the list server.

 I see only 5 lines added to the body by the server :-)
 
 *ahhh* You refer to 7 lines in header ... :-)
 Yes, could But I think _these_ lines are quite useful.

 You think so. Others don't. I think X-Face (1 line) is useful. You
 don't. My offer to you: I exchange 7 List-Header lines for one X-face
 line. Interested? ;-)

No. Not interested :-)
The one category of header lines offer technical information and help,
the other only fun. Recognizing a person on a ML is usually done by
it's name, so X-Face is a pure toy.
One might find it funny, but it's use is far behind the one of
List-headers. :-)

 You can have the footer, too.

We already to have.
Me personally don't need the list footers :-)

 Nobody reads that anyway. 

Sadly the truth :-/

 How about the sig? I see no value in it, you can see my name in the
 From address.

Yes, I can.
But as you might have noticed: some signature don't contain only the
name, but maybe also a nickname (as mine sometimes do) and different
contact information or PGP-Key-IDs. These information are usually not in
From: header :) (or any other)

 Some people even use cookies!

Yes ... of course ... it's christmas time!!! :-

 These should be outlawed. 

No. they're _too_ delicious :-)))

 Oh, and then, let's do away with the greeting. It is not useful.

??? You seem not to understand the meaning of an attribution line?!?
Didn't we had this discussion on any of the TB!-lists recently? :-)

 I am looking at a way to reduce the number of Received headers. Surely
 they are useful (most people check every mail about its routing), but
 maybe I should use my own SMTP server after all, connect directly to
 the recipient's server and thus reduce the number of header lines.

I do have. But you still don't have any influence on number of
Received lines in incoming mails :-)
But yes, I've written a program for myself to strip header lines out of
a mail. :-) It's primary use is to strip SpamAssassin headers when
submitting mails to SpamCop. As it takes the headers to strip as command
line arguments (multiple are allowed) it would be easy stip Received
headers on incoming mails too :-)

 If I do that, will you allow me one line for the X-Face?

I didn't forbid it, so I don't need to allow it now or later, no
matter what changed in circumstances. I just expressed my opinion it's
superfluous :-)


 If more ml software uses them and more MUAs implement it's
 interpretation it can be a help to list members. Especially those
 telling the same over and over again (Send an empty message to ...
 to unsubscribe., Use the followin link to crawl through the
 archive ..., etc, etc.)

 I absolutely agree. Those threads arising from people asking these
 things, which you know already so aren't interested in downloading,
 should be deleted on server side.

Seems you want to misunderstand or misinterpret. That's sad.
I did not say these messages should be deleted, neither server side nor
client side, just because of it's content.
I said having references for FAQs can be helpful.
I don't like the idea of typing the same answer over and over again.
I don't like creating a QT for every FAQ. So pointing the questioner to
the correct location of the answer is a possible solution.
If these pointer / reference is in message headers (inserted by list
server software) I (and others) can refer there, the answer will be
short an precise and everybody _can_ be happy.
Those with 1000+ mails per day because the number ain't increasing more
than needed with only redundant information, the others because they got
a short and exact answer to their question, instead of a 20+ mails
thread with 19 possible ... answers.

 After all, TB uses the ML headers correctly, so they are useful, and
 any questions superfluous.

??? Lets switch off the computer. It's superfluous. Somebody once said:
Computers are there to solve problems we wouldn't have without them.
[source unknown] 

I have seen a figure of a cow, applicable at the roof of a car.
It increases the factor of recognition if I drive through the city,
albeit it increases the consumption of fuel significant ... Superfluous
or necessary?

P.S.: I smell a fish ... let's hide on TBOT before it hits :-)
-- 
Pit


Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Pictures

2002-12-20 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hi Dierk,

On Fri, 20 Dec 2002 11:16:00 +0100
Dierk Haasis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 That is why I hate arguments on specifics, in this case bandwidth.

Just to clear things a little bit: I was not nitpicking on waste of
bandwidth because of too much headerline or superfluous information
in mails.

I just wanted to express _this_ special header line is IMO superfluous
AND I wanted to show quickly the ratio of header vs. body. No
implicit meaning of let's concentrate on reducing header lines before
we continue with anything else ... just a quick note ... there's an
interesting fact: there can be more meta information than information.
-- 
Pit


Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Pictures

2002-12-20 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Peter!

On Friday, December 20, 2002 at 11:48:04 AM you wrote:

 Just to clear things a little bit: I was not nitpicking on waste of
 bandwidth because of too much headerline or superfluous information
 in mails.

No problem with your arguments, actually we just took the same
approach with partly even identical wording in answering Thomas' -
hopefully tongue-in-cheek - post. As you have read by now.



-- 
Dierk Haasis

The Bat 1.62 Christmas Edition on Windows XP 5.1 2600Service Pack 1

Statistics are like bikinis: What they reveal is suggestive, but what
they conceal is vital.



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Pictures

2002-12-20 Thread Simon Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

'Lo Dierk,

On Fri, 20 Dec 2002 11:16:00 +0100 your time, you said:

DH That  is why I hate arguments on specifics, in this case bandwidth.

That was brave g

I  don't  like X-Face either - I have an X-Face of 269 bytes after trying it
out.  Apart  from anything else, the quality is rubbish. It seems to me that
X-Face  is  better  suited  to Instant Messengers and 'Avatar-centric' email
clients...

However,  I  wouldn't  complain  at all if there was a better way for photos
used for The Bat! AB to be exchanged via TB!/TB! users though.

Let's  say a check box under your personal photo *in your personal VCard* to
allow  sending  of  your photo, and then to add your personal photo to a new
message  in  TB!  as  an  attachment  you'd  choose a menu entry maybe under
Utilities menu such as 'Insert VCard Photo' or something, when you wanted to
send  your  visog  to  someone  in particular for their TB! AB. Yes, I would
quite like that.

- --
Slán,

 Simon @ theycallmesimon.co.uk

**
PGP Key: http://pgp.theycallmesimon.co.uk/

Faffing about with TB! v1.62 on W2K SP3

#1988. Warm Qed Sir Lousy ¶

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: Privacy is freedom. Protect your freedom with PGP!
Comment: KeyID: 0x5C7E8966
Comment: Fingerprint: 851C F927 0296 FF1C 70A2  474F CB6E 6FFE 5C7E 8966

iQA/AwUBPgL6F8tub/5cfolmEQJi3ACeNwwZvST1T0AX2LHB5NM3+ox4HCUAn29p
2eyGhTj/hH/a9TvyK6A+AZRC
=s8OX
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Re: Pictures

2002-12-20 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Peter,

On Fri, 20 Dec 2002 11:43:59 +0100 GMT (20/12/02, 17:43 +0700 GMT),
Peter Palmreuther wrote:

 ??? Lets switch off the computer. It's superfluous. Somebody once said:
 Computers are there to solve problems we wouldn't have without them.
 [source unknown] 

That's the truth. Yeah, man.

 P.S.: I smell a fish ... let's hide on TBOT before it hits :-)

(I just had to post this last comment g).

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.

All generalizations are false.

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.62 Christmas Edition
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build  A 
using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Pictures

2002-12-20 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Simon!

On Friday, December 20, 2002 at 12:08:07 PM you wrote:

 Let's  say a check box under your personal photo *in your personal VCard* to
 allow  sending  of  your photo,

*That* is a good idea.
Two years ago I couldn't include a portrait into my vCard because the
vCard consistently crashed OL/OE - and most of my contacts use that.
As some of them are business associates it is not a good idea to send
them messages crashing their PCs.

Hence, what I suggest is to give Add vCard a submenu: - with photo
- without photo
- just photo



-- 
Dierk Haasis

The Bat 1.62 Christmas Edition on Windows XP 5.1 2600Service Pack 1

Marriage is a wonderful institution, but who wants to live in an
institution?



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Pictures

2002-12-20 Thread Gerard

ON Friday, December 20, 2002, 7:00:17 PM, you wrote:
DH Hence, what I suggest is to give Add vCard a submenu: - with photo
DH - without photo
DH - just photo

And for the appearance challenged   - Photo of a randomly selected
movie star :-)

Yes yes I know.

-- 
Best regards,
 Gerard 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Sudden success at golf is like the sudden acquisition of wealth. It is
apt to unsettle and deteriorate the character. And, as it comes almost
miraculously, so only a miracle can effect a cure. ==P.G Wodehouse - THE
MAGIC PLUS FOURS ==

Using The Bat! v1.62 Christmas Edition on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Pictures

2002-12-20 Thread Simon Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

'Lo Dierk,

On Fri, 20 Dec 2002 19:00:17 +0100 your time, you said:

DH Hence,  what  I suggest is to give Add vCard a submenu: - with photo -
DH without photo - just photo

Yes, indeed, and I agree that such a submenu would also be a great addition.
And  of  course utilising the vCard photo obviously means not adding useless
xtra  features  like X-Face, but rather building on a useful feature already
present in TB! :)

- --
Slán,

 Simon @ theycallmesimon.co.uk

**
PGP Key: http://pgp.theycallmesimon.co.uk/

Faffing about with TB! v1.62 on W2K SP3

#2809. Ray Qed I Low Mrs Us ¶

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: Privacy is freedom. Protect your freedom with PGP!
Comment: KeyID: 0x5C7E8966
Comment: Fingerprint: 851C F927 0296 FF1C 70A2  474F CB6E 6FFE 5C7E 8966

iQA/AwUBPgOdkstub/5cfolmEQKMoQCgg7byMj1ME+aAl9Jp2Us0bzKtLQoAn2mK
owTiUt0YbA+3hHpYVf8qn3M7
=wsoC
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Re: Pictures

2002-12-20 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Dierk,

On Fri, 20 Dec 2002 19:00:17 +0100 GMT (21/12/02, 01:00 +0700 GMT),
Dierk Haasis wrote:

 Let's  say a check box under your personal photo *in your personal VCard* to
 allow  sending  of  your photo,

 *That* is a good idea.
 Two years ago I couldn't include a portrait into my vCard because the
 vCard consistently crashed OL/OE - and most of my contacts use that.
 As some of them are business associates it is not a good idea to send
 them messages crashing their PCs.

Well, I never used OL/OE, but I also had some business associates who
sent me their vCards with every message. Quite an annoying habit. Once
I have their details in my AB, I don't need them to attach their vCard
again and again.

A small little X-Face, though... (scnr)

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.

Hypnotophobie: Angst vor dem Bettenmachen.

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.62 Christmas Edition
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build  A 
using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



how to do this - pictures, address book, file extract

2002-12-20 Thread speedguy

well, again some excellent questions from a TB newbie :)

-is it possible to create a rule so that all incoming messages are
added to address book and its attachment file goes as entry for
picture in the address book

-if picture for particular address exists in AB, can some rule be
created which show preview of picture for incoming emails from this
address

-there is a possible way to create filter that can extract
attachements and save in some directory but it doesn't allow us to
select the file name. is there anyway, where i can specify that file
name should of format say first_name or email_address or something..

-thanks in advance ;)



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re[2]: Pictures

2002-12-20 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Simon!

On Friday, December 20, 2002, at 2:45:31 PM you wrote:

S 'Lo Dierk,

DH Hence,  what  I suggest is to give Add vCard a submenu: - with photo -
DH without photo - just photo

S Yes, indeed, and I agree that such a submenu would also be a great addition.
S And  of  course utilising the vCard photo obviously means not adding useless
S xtra  features  like X-Face, but rather building on a useful feature already
S present in TB! :)

This is excellent reasoning, and I would like to see these ideas
implemented. How soon can you set about getting the request to the
programmers? This is something I would use, if it were in my copy of
The Bat!

-- 

Best regards,
Mary

The Bat 1.61 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 1



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Pictures

2002-12-19 Thread Heiko Kuschel
Hallo thebat,

still configuring this new program... ;-)

I found out that I can add a picture of every person in the address
book. Thats fine. :-))
In my old mail program, YAM, this picture was shown with every mail
from that sender, in the right part of the header lines (theres always
some space there anyway...)
It seems that with TB, I have to press Shift-Ctrl-O to get the
picture. Or is there a way to show it as default, like in YAM?

If not, I´ll have to find out how to request a new feature... ;-)

BTW How do you get that English apostrophe (in it´s etc) on a German PC keyboard?!? 
It was
on Alt-ä on my Amiga...



-- 
Schöne Grüße
Heiko



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Pictures

2002-12-19 Thread Thomas Martin
Hello  Heiko,

On  Thursday, 19. December 2002  at 14:27:30 [GMT +0100] you wrote:

 still configuring this new program... ;-)

we are all learning each day new stuff... also about TB!

 In my old mail program, YAM, this picture was shown with every mail
 from that sender, in the right part of the header lines (theres
 always some space there anyway...) It seems that with TB, I have to
 press Shift-Ctrl-O to get the picture. Or is there a way to show it
 as default, like in YAM?

No, there isn't, and hopefully won't be. Just my opinion. Will only
cost resources.

 BTW How do you get that English apostrophe (in it´s etc) on a German PC 
keyboard?!? It was
 on Alt-ä on my Amiga...

ALT + 3 + 9

-- 
Ciao
Thomas

Mailer:  The Bat!1.62 Christmas Edition | Windows XP
PGP: 6.58 ckt Build 8 - Key 0xBB9237A9
ICQ: 121117424 (hardly ever online)
HP:  http://www.thebat.int.tc/

Checked by AVG anti-virus system.
Version: 6.0.431 / Virus Database: 241 - Release Date: 12/17/2002



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Pictures

2002-12-19 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Heiko!

On Thursday, December 19, 2002 at 2:27:30 PM you wrote:

 It seems that with TB, I have to press Shift-Ctrl-O to get the
 picture. Or is there a way to show it as default, like in YAM?

The picture is a bitmap only stored in the AB/vCard.

 If not, I´ll have to find out how to request a new feature... ;-)

Sad to say it is already suggested. At least through the list.



-- 
Dierk Haasis

The Bat 1.62 Christmas Edition on Windows XP 5.1 2600Service Pack 1

There *is* love at first sight.



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Pictures

2002-12-19 Thread Markus Gloede
Hi,

Thomas Martin wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :

 BTW How do you get that English apostrophe (in it´s etc) on a
 German PC keyboard?!? It was on Alt-ä on my Amiga...

 ALT + 3 + 9

SHIFT-# also does it. Many people wrongly use ` or ´ (accents). The
typographical correct 'curly' apostrophe as it may be used in word
processing is not in the regular character set used in common email,
the ' is the character to be used here.

Regards,

Markus
-- 
Using The Bat! 1.62 Beta/17 under Windows NT 4.0 Build
1381 Service Pack 6 



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Pictures

2002-12-19 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hi Heiko,

On Thu, 19 Dec 2002 14:27:30 +0100
Heiko Kuschel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 BTW How do you get that English apostrophe (in it´s etc) on a German
 PC keyboard?!? It was on Alt-ä on my Amiga...

The _English_ apostroph is ' (Shift+# on German keyboard), the
accent you were typing is a bad replacement.
The most important reason _NOT_ to use it is: it's not defined in Latin9
(ISO-8859-15) anymore, as it was (and is) in Latin1 (ISO-8859-1).
Therefore your mail reads with some accented 'Z's instead of the
intended apostroph.
-- 
Pit


Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Pictures

2002-12-19 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Thomas,

On Thu, 19 Dec 2002 10:50:02 -0300 GMT (19/12/02, 20:50 +0700 GMT),
Thomas Martin wrote:

 In my old mail program, YAM, this picture was shown with every mail
 from that sender, in the right part of the header lines (theres
 always some space there anyway...) It seems that with TB, I have to
 press Shift-Ctrl-O to get the picture. Or is there a way to show it
 as default, like in YAM?

 No, there isn't, and hopefully won't be. Just my opinion. Will only
 cost resources.

It would only be a handful of lines of code to include this option. I
wouldn't call that bloat.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.

Was ist das fuer eine Zeitform: Ich haette kein Kind werden sollen?
Preservativ defekt.

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.62 Christmas Edition
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build  A 
using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Pictures

2002-12-19 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Thomas!

On Thursday, December 19, 2002 at 4:44:18 PM you wrote:

 It would only be a handful of lines of code to include this option. I
 wouldn't call that bloat.

A few line here, a few lines there ... Bloat is part of a continuum,
like heap. How much can be considered right, and when is it too
much?

Also, one man's useful feature is another woman's bloat.

I don't want X-Image (or whatever that is called).




-- 
Dierk Haasis

The Bat 1.62 Christmas Edition on Windows XP 5.1 2600Service Pack 1

You can't please everyone, so you've got to please yourself. (Ricky
Nelson)



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re[2]: Pictures

2002-12-19 Thread Kevin
Hello Dierk,

Thursday, December 19, 2002, 4:41:33 PM, you wrote:

 I don't want X-Image (or whatever that is called).

If you are referring to X-Face, then that makes two of us. I really
can't see the point of it.

-- 
Kevin 

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com


Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Pictures

2002-12-19 Thread Heiko Kuschel
Hallo Peter Palmreuther,

am Donnerstag, 19. Dezember 2002 schriebst Du:

 Hi Heiko,

 On Thu, 19 Dec 2002 14:27:30 +0100
 Heiko Kuschel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 BTW How do you get that English apostrophe (in it´s etc) on a German
 PC keyboard?!? It was on Alt-ä on my Amiga...

 The _English_ apostroph is ' (Shift+# on German keyboard), the
 accent you were typing is a bad replacement.

Thanks to all who replied; yes I found it there. I know that the other
one was wrong, but couldn't locate the right one on my keyboard
although it is printed there. :)



-- 
Schöne Grüße
Heiko Kuschel



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Pictures

2002-12-19 Thread Heiko Kuschel
Hallo Thomas Fernandez,

am Donnerstag, 19. Dezember 2002 schriebst Du:

 Hello Thomas,

 press Shift-Ctrl-O to get the picture. Or is there a way to show it
 as default, like in YAM?

 No, there isn't, and hopefully won't be. Just my opinion. Will only
 cost resources.

 It would only be a handful of lines of code to include this option. I
 wouldn't call that bloat.

And if you mean online resources: The picture would be stored on your
HD, no need to transfer it all the time.
A 10 year old Amiga was able to do that without problems, so it
should't be a problem for modern PCs at all.



-- 
Schöne Grüße
Heiko Kuschel



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Pictures

2002-12-19 Thread Heiko Kuschel
Hallo Kevin,

am Donnerstag, 19. Dezember 2002 schriebst Du:

 Hello Dierk,

 Thursday, December 19, 2002, 4:41:33 PM, you wrote:

 I don't want X-Image (or whatever that is called).

 If you are referring to X-Face, then that makes two of us. I really
 can't see the point of it.

I couldn't see a point of it until I used it. It makes Emails much
more personal if you have a picture of the sender displayed. Really.
For those who can't imagine how this looks like I put a screenshot of
such a header under
http://www.kuschelchaos.de/YAM-Bild.gif



-- 
Schöne Grüße
Heiko Kuschel



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Pictures

2002-12-19 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Heiko!

On Thursday, December 19, 2002 at 8:11:51 PM you wrote:

 I couldn't see a point of it until I used it. It makes Emails much
 more personal if you have a picture of the sender displayed.

I don't want that.

And I don't intend to get this into a pseudo-logical/rational debate.
So don't ask why. I just don't want it.



-- 
Dierk Haasis

The Bat 1.62 Christmas Edition on Windows XP 5.1 2600Service Pack 1

Silence is the virtue of fools. (Francis Bacon)



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re[2]: Pictures

2002-12-19 Thread myob
Hello Heiko,

Thursday, December 19, 2002, 7:11:51 PM, you wrote:

 If you are referring to X-Face, then that makes two of us. I really
 can't see the point of it.

HK I couldn't see a point of it until I used it. It makes Emails much
HK more personal if you have a picture of the sender displayed. Really.

Agreed. I've found it one of the plus points in Ameol, and would
like it as an option in TB! too.


Using The Bat! v1.62 Christmas Edition on Windows 2000
5.0 Build 2195
Service Pack 3

-- 
Best regards,
 myobmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Pictures

2002-12-19 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Dierk,

On Thu, 19 Dec 2002 20:46:49 +0100 GMT (20/12/02, 02:46 +0700 GMT),
Dierk Haasis wrote:

 I don't want that.

I do. It isn't compulsory to use, and if someone does, the overhead is
minimal.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.

Travel is very educational. I can now say Kaopectate in seven
different languages.

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.62 Christmas Edition
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build  A 
using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Pictures

2002-12-19 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Thomas!

On Thursday, December 19, 2002 at 8:57:48 PM you wrote:

 I do. It isn't compulsory to use, and if someone does, the overhead is
 minimal.

How can it not be compulsory. If someone sends it, I see it ...



-- 
Dierk Haasis

The Bat 1.62 Christmas Edition on Windows XP 5.1 2600Service Pack 1

The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always
so certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts.
(Bertrand Russell)



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Pictures

2002-12-19 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello myob!

On Thursday, December 19, 2002 at 8:51:25 PM you wrote:

 Agreed. I've found it one of the plus points in Ameol, and would
 like it as an option in TB! too.

Seems to be a real killer feature.

Let's go wells and bhistles everyone!



-- 
Dierk Haasis

The Bat 1.62 Christmas Edition on Windows XP 5.1 2600Service Pack 1

Life is like a sewer: What you get out of it, depends on what you put
into it! (Tom Lehrer)



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Pictures

2002-12-19 Thread Heiko Kuschel
Hallo Dierk Haasis,

am Donnerstag, 19. Dezember 2002 schriebst Du:

 Hello Thomas!

 On Thursday, December 19, 2002 at 8:57:48 PM you wrote:

 I do. It isn't compulsory to use, and if someone does, the overhead is
 minimal.

 How can it not be compulsory. If someone sends it, I see it ...

No. Totally different system. If *you* store a picture in your
addressbook, it will be shown automatically if you get a mail from
that sender.






-- 
Schöne Grüße
Heiko Kuschel



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Pictures

2002-12-19 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello Heiko,

On Thursday, December 19, 2002 at 9:25:32 PM you [HK] wrote (at least
in part):

[X-Face Header]
 I do. It isn't compulsory to use, and if someone does, the overhead is
 minimal.

 How can it not be compulsory. If someone sends it, I see it ...

HK No. Totally different system. If *you* store a picture in your
HK addressbook, it will be shown automatically if you get a mail from
HK that sender.

Not with X-Face, a superfluous method to bloat the already not so
small header part [1] of an e-mail with superfluous information, which is
discussed in this branch.

[1] The message I'm responding to had 54 lines of header information,
containing 2950 bytes and 30 lines of body carrying 665 byte (of
which a _minimum_ of 5 lines could have been avoided by the author).
-- 
Regards
Peter Palmreuther
(The Bat! v1.62 Beta/17 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1)

I am the neurosis (sp?) that requires a $500-an-hour shrink!



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Pictures

2002-12-19 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hello Peter,

 [1] The message I'm responding to had 54 lines of header information,
 containing 2950 bytes and 30 lines of body carrying 665 byte (of
 which a _minimum_ of 5 lines could have been avoided by the author).

And a minimum of 7 by the list server.

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.61



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Pictures

2002-12-19 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello Miguel,

On Thursday, December 19, 2002 at 10:11:42 PM you [MAU] wrote (at
least in part):

 [1] The message I'm responding to had 54 lines of header information,
 containing 2950 bytes and 30 lines of body carrying 665 byte (of
 which a _minimum_ of 5 lines could have been avoided by the author).

MAU And a minimum of 7 by the list server.

I see only 5 lines added to the body by the server :-)

*ahhh* You refer to 7 lines in header ... :-)
Yes, could But I think _these_ lines are quite useful.
If more ml software uses them and more MUAs implement it's
interpretation it can be a help to list members. Especially those
telling the same over and over again (Send an empty message to ... to
unsubscribe., Use the followin link to crawl through the archive ...,
etc, etc.)
-- 
Regards
Peter Palmreuther
(The Bat! v1.62 Beta/17 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1)

Better dead than mellow.



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Pictures

2002-12-19 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hello Peter,

 If more ml software uses them and more MUAs implement it's
 interpretation it can be a help to list members.

Yeap, specially these two ;-)

,- [  ]
| List-Subscribe: http://stromgrade.its-toasted.org/mailman/listinfo/tbudl,
| mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=subscribe
`-
-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.61



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Pictures

2002-12-19 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Peter,

On Fri, 20 Dec 2002 01:02:36 +0100 GMT (20/12/02, 07:02 +0700 GMT),
Peter Palmreuther wrote:

MAU And a minimum of 7 by the list server.

 I see only 5 lines added to the body by the server :-)

 *ahhh* You refer to 7 lines in header ... :-)
 Yes, could But I think _these_ lines are quite useful.

You think so. Others don't. I think X-Face (1 line) is useful. You
don't. My offer to you: I exchange 7 List-Header lines for one X-face
line. Interested? ;-)

You can have the footer, too. Nobody reads that anyway. How about the
sig? I see no value in it, you can see my name in the From address.
Some people even use cookies! These should be outlawed. It's a shame
TB supports them, especially those longer than one line. Oh, and then,
let's do away with the greeting. It is not useful. My attritubtion
line could be shortened too, surely.

I am looking at a way to reduce the number of Received headers. Surely
they are useful (most people check every mail about its routing), but
maybe I should use my own SMTP server after all, connect directly to
the recipient's server and thus reduce the number of header lines. If
I do that, will you allow me one line for the X-Face?

 If more ml software uses them and more MUAs implement it's
 interpretation it can be a help to list members. Especially those
 telling the same over and over again (Send an empty message to ...
 to unsubscribe., Use the followin link to crawl through the
 archive ..., etc, etc.)

I absolutely agree. Those threads arising from people asking these
things, which you know already so aren't interested in downloading,
should be deleted on server side. After all, TB uses the ML headers
correctly, so they are useful, and any questions superfluous.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.

Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible. -- Lord Kelvin,
president, Royal Society, 1895.

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.62 Christmas Edition
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build  A 
using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re[2]: Logo pictures of TB!

2001-02-20 Thread Lija

Hi Jason,

On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, at 22:40:16 [GMT -0800, your local time]
(20.2.2001. at 07:40 was my local time), you wrote:

JJT You can find it at http://jason.is.dreaming.org/newbat.jpg
JJT The file will be there for a few days. I will delete it from the
JJT server after a while.

Yes, I found it... that's my bat :)
Thanks!

-- 
Best regards, Lija
Using The Bat! v1.49 on Windows 95 4.0 Build  B

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re[2]: Logo pictures of TB!

2001-02-20 Thread Lija

Hi Wolfgang,

On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, at 08:58:55 [GMT +0100, your local time]
(20.2.2001. at 08:58 was my local time), you wrote:

L I started to collect TB logo pictures. The reason: maybe I'll make some site and
L put them there. :)
WK You should be aware that this might be a copyright infringement.

Yes, I know, but I just want them for my own entertainment... nothing more.

-- 
Best regards, Lija
Using The Bat! v1.49 on Windows 95 4.0 Build  B

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Logo pictures of TB!

2001-02-19 Thread Lija

Hello TBUDL subscribers,

I need one favour or possible link.

I started to collect TB logo pictures. The reason: maybe I'll make some site and
put them there. :)

AFAIK from 1.47HE, there are 3, slightly different pictures. I deleted my 1.47HE
instalation and don't have that logo (all startup logos are in 271x288x16M when
you crop and paste it into the paint-editing programme).

So, if there is one, could you provide me with some link on the net to find
these, or if there is still some 1.47HE user, please send that logo to me
privately (JPEG should be about 30KB).

TIA.

-- 
Best regards, Lija
Using The Bat! v1.49 on Windows 95 4.0 Build  B

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Logo pictures of TB!

2001-02-19 Thread Jason J Thompson

Hello Lija,

Monday, 19 February, 2001, 19:51:41, you wrote:

L So, if there is one, could you provide me with some link on the net to find
L these, or if there is still some 1.47HE user, please send that logo to me
L privately (JPEG should be about 30KB).

I knew I saved all my old mails for a reason. :-)

I found it attached to an email I sent a friend when 1.47HE was
released showing off the new logo. TB! had kept the attachment. How
lucky!

You can find it at http://jason.is.dreaming.org/newbat.jpg
The file will be there for a few days. I will delete it from the
server after a while.

-- 
Best regards,
 Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Logo pictures of TB!

2001-02-19 Thread Wolfgang Kynast

Hi Lija,

L I started to collect TB logo pictures. The reason: maybe I'll make some site and
L put them there. :)

You should be aware that this might be a copyright infringement.

-- 
Regards,
Wolfgang

Co-moderator TBUDL / TBBETA discussion lists
writing without the moderator's hat on ;-)

Using The Bat! 1.49 under Windows 95 4.0 Build   B
in Stadtallendorf, Germany,
on a 166Mhz Cyrix, 128MB SDRAM, half SCSI system ;-)

http://www.wolfgang-kynast.de/

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Where are the pictures in my html mail

2000-08-23 Thread Aaron Gravvat

Hello TBUDL,

  When I open html mail, instead of pictures, I get a box with an
  exclamation point in it. Where are the pictures?

-- 
Best regards,
 Aaron  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: Where are the pictures in my html mail

2000-08-23 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Aaron,

On 23 August 2000 at 09:09:29 GMT -0700 (which was 17:09 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Where are the pictures in my html mail":

AG   When  I open html mail, instead of pictures, I get a box with an
AG   exclamation point in it. Where are the pictures?

TB (Quite correctly) will only show in-line pictures included with the
mail.  Any  pictures  that  are  external  to  the mail and need to be
retrieved  with  an HTTP GET command are outside the scope of an email
client  and  require  a web browser to work correctly. TB is not a web
browser and shows a place marker where such images exist.

By  viewing the message on the first tab (instead of the HTML) you can
double-click  on the html attachment and view it in your favourite web
browser, which *can* retrieve the images.

- --
Cheers,
.\\arck
Marck D. Pearlstone | Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA  
 PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com  
 PGP Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=GET%20MARCKKEY 
 Someday we'll look back on all this and plow into a parked car.

*---
| Using The Bat! 1.46 Beta/3 S/N 14F4B4B2
| under Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998
*---

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i
Comment: PGP Signed so you know it's really me

iQA/AwUBOaQJKDnkJKuSnc2gEQK3CACZAa9b6u4ubF6wYANdjjfKQeS/3LIAn1tt
JYfZVTAIngg6Lxw/uWQCgn2O
=LrIU
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: sending a webpage complete with pictures

2000-08-13 Thread David Powell


Saturday, August 12, 2000, 11:47:23 PM, you wrote:

JA Hello Ming-Li,


JA On  Saturday, August 12, 2000  at  15:12:34 GMT -0700 (which was 3:12 PM
JA where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:

 Hi David,

 Save a web page from Internet Explorer using .mht format.  (You
 must have Outlook Express 5 installed to do this, but you needn't
 use it.

 Really? What does OE5 has anything to do with it? IE describes .mht
 format as "Web Archive" file, which doesn't seem to suggest it's
 related to OE5. Well, never mind, it's not that important.

JA  I'm using IE 5.5, and I don't have the .mht file type available to
JA  me.  Perhaps OE5 installs the appropriate drivers?  I would be very
JA  interested in getting this ability without having to install OE5.
JA  Does the offline Browser pack have anything to do with this?

No it's not that, it does say somewhere that you need OE5.  I tried
renaming the Outlook Express directory to see if it disabled the
option, but it didn't, so I'm not sure if it's a specific .dll you
need or what.

 The .mht files is indeed quite handy when having to save the whole
 page in one file. I use it all the time. But the downside is not all
 browsers recognize it.

JA  Ah, that is a big downside, especially for future reference.  Does
JA  anyone know if there any other methods that are more universal?

I only know that they work with IE5, but they should open in any HTML
complient mail reader, if you import them, eg rename them to .eml or
.msg and double click.

 Then from the bat, create an email to the recipient as normal, and
 attach the file using Quoted-Printable from the utilities menu.  It
 works very well.

JA  This just sends an .mht file to the recipient right?  TB doesn't
JA  process it any differently than say an .exe file does it?

Yes it is treated differently. It displays it inline, like an HTML
email. It is very neat. Well, what happens is you see the .mht as an
attachment, but when you open it, it opens in The Bat, like a Mime
forwarded email does.

Just to clear the confusion up, there is no need to use
Quoted-Printable, The Bat recognises that a .mht file doesn't need any
encoding. But strangely, from my earlier experiments with attaching
HTML files. For a .html file it is better to use quoted-printable. It
seems to display better in other email programs, and sends a much
smaller email (eg 27K vs. 36K)




-- 
Dave - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: sending a webpage complete with pictures

2000-08-13 Thread Ming-Li

Hi David,

 Just to clear the confusion up, there is no need to use
 Quoted-Printable, The Bat recognises that a .mht file doesn't need
 any encoding. But strangely, from my earlier experiments with
 attaching HTML files. For a .html file it is better to use
 quoted-printable. It seems to display better in other email
 programs, and sends a much smaller email (eg 27K vs. 36K)

Whether it would display better in other email programs is beyond my
knowledge. As to the smaller size, it incidental, I'm afraid. Try a
page with lots of 8-bit characters (characters with accent marks, or
East Asian languages, etc.), and Base64 encoding would result in a
smaller file than QP.

Base64 (the default of TB and many other email clients) encodes
everything with 65 ASCII characters--a 6-bit operation. IOW, it
encodes 3 8-bit characters with 4 ASCII ones, resulting in a
consistent 33% increase in file size--regardless of the format or
content of the original file.

In comparison, QP encodes only characters with their high bit as "1"
(ASCII code 127-255). Most standard readable ASCII characters
(except the "=" sign, which carry special meaning in QP) are
represented literally without change. But when it does need to
encode something, it uses 3 bytes to represent one byte, a 200%
inflation.

Because the .mht format has already encoded binary data (graphics,
e.g.) with Base64 encoding, those have been converted into ASCII
characters. In consequence, it won't be encoded again with QP, while
with Base64 it will be encoded (and inflated) again. So, with web
pages consisting of English text (or of other languages without many
accented, umlaut or others that use the 8th bit), you're right, QP
is more efficient in terms of file size.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.46 Beta/3 | Win2k SP1



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: sending a webpage complete with pictures

2000-08-12 Thread Ming-Li

Hi David,

 Save a web page from Internet Explorer using .mht format.  (You
 must have Outlook Express 5 installed to do this, but you needn't
 use it.

Really? What does OE5 has anything to do with it? IE describes .mht
format as "Web Archive" file, which doesn't seem to suggest it's
related to OE5. Well, never mind, it's not that important.

The .mht files is indeed quite handy when having to save the whole
page in one file. I use it all the time. But the downside is not all
browsers recognize it.

 Then from the bat, create an email to the recipient as normal, and
 attach the file using Quoted-Printable from the utilities menu.  It
 works very well.

Just curious, does it have to be QP? Other encoding methods seem to
work fine here. Is there any reason to specify QP for the
attachment? I'm asking for QP isn't the default, and you can't even
make it the default.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.46 Beta/3 | Win2k SP1



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: sending a webpage complete with pictures

2000-08-12 Thread Januk Aggarwal

Hello Ming-Li,


On  Saturday, August 12, 2000  at  15:12:34 GMT -0700 (which was 3:12 PM
where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:

 Hi David,

 Save a web page from Internet Explorer using .mht format.  (You
 must have Outlook Express 5 installed to do this, but you needn't
 use it.

 Really? What does OE5 has anything to do with it? IE describes .mht
 format as "Web Archive" file, which doesn't seem to suggest it's
 related to OE5. Well, never mind, it's not that important.

 I'm using IE 5.5, and I don't have the .mht file type available to
 me.  Perhaps OE5 installs the appropriate drivers?  I would be very
 interested in getting this ability without having to install OE5.
 Does the offline Browser pack have anything to do with this?

 The .mht files is indeed quite handy when having to save the whole
 page in one file. I use it all the time. But the downside is not all
 browsers recognize it.

 Ah, that is a big downside, especially for future reference.  Does
 anyone know if there any other methods that are more universal?

 Then from the bat, create an email to the recipient as normal, and
 attach the file using Quoted-Printable from the utilities menu.  It
 works very well.

 This just sends an .mht file to the recipient right?  TB doesn't
 process it any differently than say an .exe file does it?

 

-- 
Thanks for writing,
 Januk Aggarwal
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Using The Bat! 1.46 Beta/3
 under Windows 98 4.10 Build   A 

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: sending a webpage complete with pictures

2000-08-12 Thread Ming-Li

Hi Januk,

  I'm using IE 5.5, and I don't have the .mht file type available
  to me.  Perhaps OE5 installs the appropriate drivers?

Hmm, it surely does look like so. MS just has to exploit every
opportunity to tie their products together. I don't use OE either,
but it's bundled with Win2k, so it's in my system.

 The .mht files is indeed quite handy when having to save the
 whole page in one file. I use it all the time. But the downside
 is not all browsers recognize it.

  Ah, that is a big downside, especially for future reference.

Indeed. Opera can't read it right. Netscape does, though.

 Does  anyone know if there any other methods that are more
 universal?

I would like to know about that, too.

 Then from the bat, create an email to the recipient as normal, and
 attach the file using Quoted-Printable from the utilities menu.  It
 works very well.

  This just sends an .mht file to the recipient right?  TB doesn't
  process it any differently than say an .exe file does it?

That's what I thought. And I tried to mail one to myself with the
default Base64 encoding, and it was fine.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.46 Beta/3 | Win2k SP1



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: sending a webpage complete with pictures

2000-08-12 Thread Januk Aggarwal

Hello Ming-Li,


On  Saturday, August 12, 2000  at  17:07:51 GMT -0700 (which was 5:07 PM
where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:

 Then from the bat, create an email to the recipient as normal, and
 attach the file using Quoted-Printable from the utilities menu.  It
 works very well.

  This just sends an .mht file to the recipient right?  TB doesn't
  process it any differently than say an .exe file does it?

 That's what I thought. And I tried to mail one to myself with the
 default Base64 encoding, and it was fine.

 Err, just to clear my confusion, you do mean that the attachment came
 through as an .mht file, right?  If not, could you please send me a
 .mht file offlist so I can see what you mean?

 Thanks.

-- 
Thanks for writing,
 Januk Aggarwal
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Using The Bat! 1.46 Beta/3
 under Windows 98 4.10 Build   A 

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re[2]: sending a webpage complete with pictures

2000-08-12 Thread Alex P. Madarasz, Jr.

On Saturday, August 12, 2000, 8:07:51 PM, Ming-Li wrote:
 Hi Januk,

  I'm using IE 5.5, and I don't have the .mht file type available
  to me.  Perhaps OE5 installs the appropriate drivers?

 Hmm, it surely does look like so. MS just has to exploit every
 opportunity to tie their products together. I don't use OE either,
 but it's bundled with Win2k, so it's in my system.

 The .mht files is indeed quite handy when having to save the
 whole page in one file. I use it all the time. But the downside
 is not all browsers recognize it.

  Ah, that is a big downside, especially for future reference.

 Indeed. Opera can't read it right. Netscape does, though.

 Does  anyone know if there any other methods that are more
 universal?

 I would like to know about that, too.

Opening up a .mht file in an editor shows it's no great miracle of
invention - it's a multipart MIME-encoded text file, e.g. (from a VCDJ
article I just grabbed for reference):

 From: Saved by Microsoft Internet Explorer 5
 Subject: Listing 1
 Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2000 20:17:36 -0400
 MIME-Version: 1.0
 Content-Type: multipart/related;
   boundary="=_NextPart_000_0079_01C0049A.5B310DB0";
   type="text/html"
 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700
 
 This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
 
 --=_NextPart_000_0079_01C0049A.5B310DB0
 Content-Type: text/html;
   charset="Windows-1252"
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 Content-Location: 
http://www.devx.com/upload/free/features/vcdj/2000/07jul00/bn2_0007/listing1.asp
 
 !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"
 HTMLHEADTITLEListing 1/TITLE
 ...

 --=_NextPart_000_0079_01C0049A.5B310DB0
 Content-Type: image/gif
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: http://ads.devx.com/adgifs/Unify1_8.1.00.gif
 ...

 --=_NextPart_000_0079_01C0049A.5B310DB0
 Content-Type: image/gif
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: http://www.devx.com/images/general/devxrule.gif
 
 R0lGODlh5QACALP/AP///97n76Wt1u/v9+fn997e79bW787O57W13q2t1qWlzqWl1pyczs7G58a9
 3gAAACwA5QACAAAEWpCQUow5pzmHUEqLwoxkaZ5oqq5s675wzC50/d1fp3fc5muNYBBDPFiO
 FoqyMCEEJISBVBqgWDCOxu4Tknm/4LB4fBKZQzTcbcfT9XyOTKNIRCaXhapz8IxKIwA7
 
 --=_NextPart_000_0079_01C0049A.5B310DB0--

So any decent MIME-aware Internet app like Opera _should_ be able to open
it, parse it, and dump it into a browser window.

-- 
 Alex P. Madarasz, Jr.   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: sending a webpage complete with pictures

2000-08-12 Thread Ming-Li

Hi Januk,

 That's what I thought. And I tried to mail one to myself with the
 default Base64 encoding, and it was fine.

  Err, just to clear my confusion, you do mean that the attachment came
  through as an .mht file, right?  If not, could you please send me a
  .mht file offlist so I can see what you mean?

Yes, it came in as a .mht file.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.46 Beta/3 | Win2k SP1



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: sending a webpage complete with pictures

2000-08-12 Thread Ming-Li

Hi Alex,

 Opening up a .mht file in an editor shows it's no great miracle of
 invention - it's a multipart MIME-encoded text file, e.g. (from a
 VCDJ article I just grabbed for reference):

[example snipped]

Right. It's pretty similar to what you get when someone email the
page to you from within IE.

 So any decent MIME-aware Internet app like Opera _should_ be able
 to open it, parse it, and dump it into a browser window.

Maybe, but it doesn't in reality. :(

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.46 Beta/3 | Win2k SP1

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org