Re: TB & K9

2005-01-27 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Melissa Reese & everyone else,

on 27-Jan-2005 at 04:13 you (Melissa Reese) wrote:

> I have no idea if this should make any difference, but are you by
> chance using the "Junk mail" folder that TB! creates for use with the
> BayesIt plug-in?

I use that folder with K9 (no Bayes* plugin installed) and its working just
fine here. :-)

-- 
Best regards,
 Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)

Medicine is a collection of uncertain prescriptions that will kill the
poor,and succeed sometimes with the rich, and the results of which,
collectively taken, are more fatal than useful to mankind. -- Napoleon
Bonaparte



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: TB & K9

2005-01-27 Thread Roman Katzer
Hello Mike,

On Wednesday, January 26, 2005, 17:14:59, Mike Rourke wrote:
> Decided to try K9 with TB see wow it worked. I have K9 set up to add
> X-text-classification SPAM to the header. I then set up a filter to
> move mail with this header to the junk folder, no problem, so I
> thought.

Makes perfect sense.

>  TB is toggling parking to on for random messages

Only in that folder?

> The parking column dutifully disappeared when set to default then
> reappeared when going back to junk.

TB3 has changed column settings to whatever it thought appropriate on my
computer aswell, but I don't think it has anything to do with K9, which I
also use. K9 only proxies the incoming messages. TB is responsible for its
own behavior.
Again, TB has changes column settings randomly aswell, even changed column
_presets_ (yes!).
And for those who think I should file a bug report, the bugs I've entered
into the system so far haven't gotten any attention, so why bother?

> The other thing is threading. I have never had threading
> turned on for the junk folder. Well, it's threaded by subject now,
> even though the view mode specifically says threaded by none. Has
> anybody else seen any of these behaviors before?

Theading, another quirk. My TBUDL folder is set to threading by reference,
which works reasonably well since most users on the list use TB. However,
last week all of a sudden I found it set to threading by subject. I may
have accidentally hit a shortcut key at some time, but who knows.

That said, are you making extensive use of shortcuts in Windows and/or TB?


Regards,
Roman


-- 
On one issue at least, men and women agree; they both distrust women.  --
H.L. Mencken




Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: TB & K9

2005-01-26 Thread Melissa Reese
Hi Mike,

On Wednesday, January 26, 2005, at 8:59:54 PM PST, you wrote:

> It makes sense. I have deleted the folder several times, recreated
> it it with varying names to no avail...

I'm still using TB! v2.12, and I see that you're using v3.  I don't
know if there's some peculiar about the particular build of v3 you're
using either.

By the way, the SPAM folder I created is a "common folder".  Is this
the way you created your Junk folder as well?

I'm really just grasping at straws here, because I can't seem to
reproduce the problem.  Sorry I couldn't be more helpful.

Good luck sorting it out!

-- 
Melissa

PGP public keys:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]&Body=Please%20send%20keys

TB! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1



pgpQl8NM5cWsZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: TB & K9

2005-01-26 Thread msr_mailing_lists

Hi Melissa,


MR> When I set up my K9, I just created a fresh "SPAM" folder for K9
MR> designated spam, and I've never seen any of the behavior you've
MR> described.

MR> Again, I don't know if my speculations about folders makes any sense
MR> here.

It makes sense. I have deleted the folder several times, recreated it
it with varying names to no avail...

-- 

Mike
  
  
:flag-us-tx: :flag-thailand:   

Windows XP Professional Service Pack 2
The Bat! 3.0.2.10; 



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: TB & K9

2005-01-26 Thread Melissa Reese
Hi Mike,

On Wednesday, January 26, 2005, at 2:14:59 PM PST, you wrote:

> Has anybody else seen any of these behaviors before?

I have no idea if this should make any difference, but are you by
chance using the "Junk mail" folder that TB! creates for use with the
BayesIt plug-in?

When I set up my K9, I just created a fresh "SPAM" folder for K9
designated spam, and I've never seen any of the behavior you've
described.

Again, I don't know if my speculations about folders makes any sense
here.

-- 
Melissa

PGP public keys:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]&Body=Please%20send%20keys

TB! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1



pgpZpWkQzcncO.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

TB & K9

2005-01-26 Thread Mike Rourke

K9 Users or anyone who can explain this...

Decided to try K9 with TB see wow it worked. I have K9 set up to add
X-text-classification SPAM to the header. I then set up a filter to
move mail with this header to the junk folder, no problem, so I
thought. TB is toggling parking to on for random messages, probably
about 30% of the total junk mail traffic. I rechecked my filter, it's
OK. I looked for a common thread in the e-mail that were parked and
those that were not parked, I can't find anything.

Two other odd things have happened since using K9. I have a specific
view mode for my junk folder. It does not include the parking column.
I went back and checked the view mode, parking is not selected. I
changed the view mode for the junk folder to my default (which doesn't
include parking either) then back to junk. The parking column
dutifully disappeared when set to default then reappeared when going
back to junk.

The other thing is threading. I have never had threading
turned on for the junk folder. Well, it's threaded by subject now,
even though the view mode specifically says threaded by none. Has
anybody else seen any of these behaviors before?

  

-- 
v/r,
 Mike



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html