Re: What does this mean in my account log?
Karla on Wednesday, January 22, 2014, 2:58:19 PM, you (tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com) wrote: I changed that and will be closely monitoring the mail account.Malwarebytes free software has solved any invader-related issues I've had from time to time over the years, and I download it upon getting a new computer so that I am prepared. I highly recommend it, and hope it is that simple to solve your issue. I downloaded the free version and performed a quick scan. A whole bunch of items were detected Most of them have to do with the registry. Some are in files I recognize, e.g., set up file from software the I have installed, and I do not want to delete those. So, in your opinion, can I safely remove the items associated with the registry? (I really do not understand how to mess with the registry.) Thanks. -- Leonard S. Berkowitz Using The Bat! v5.2.2 on Windows 7 6.1 Build 7601 Service Pack 1 Current version is 6.1.8 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What does this mean in my account log?
I downloaded the free version and performed a quick scan. A whole bunch of items were detected Most of them have to do with the registry. Some are in files I recognize, e.g., set up file from software the I have installed, and I do not want to delete those. Most of the setup file REGISTRY entries can be deleted as they are just leftovers from the install process. As for files, it likes to suggest uninstall files as being potentially dangerous. If you know what the FILE is you can exclude it. If you really want to get your registry cleaned out and compacted (and speed up your machine, get Macecrafts Jv16 Powertools. You can get the lite version for free and the pro ... well they are going open source soon and when they do grab it. If you want to follow up with this, shoot me an email off list -- Rick Work like you don't need the money. Love like you've never been hurt. Dance like nobody's watching. Leroy Satchel Paige, 1906 - 1982. v6.2.4.1 (BETA) on Windows 6.2 Build 9200 Using all POP accounts I download all images Current version is 6.1.8 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What does this mean in my account log?
Friday, January 24, 2014, 5:34:31 AM, you wrote: Karla on Wednesday, January 22, 2014, 2:58:19 PM, you (tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com) wrote: I changed that and will be closely monitoring the mail account.Malwarebytes free software has solved any invader-related issues I've had from time to time over the years, and I download it upon getting a new computer so that I am prepared. I highly recommend it, and hope it is that simple to solve your issue. I downloaded the free version and performed a quick scan. A whole bunch of items were detected Most of them have to do with the registry. Some are in files I recognize, e.g., set up file from software the I have installed, and I do not want to delete those. So, in your opinion, can I safely remove the items associated with the registry? (I really do not understand how to mess with the registry.) Thanks Hello Leonard, My understanding of the registry is limited also, but when using Malwarebytes, I've allowed detected items to be removed. Have never seen installer software as a detection, and I have many software installations. Removal of detected threats has always solved whatever problem I had. Karla -- Best regards, Cafe Noir mailto:cafe.n...@mail.ru Secure Email Natural Health http://pobox.com/~potentia http://www.63y.in Using The Bat! v5.8.8 on Windows 6.2 Build 9200 Current version is 6.1.8 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What does this mean in my account log?
On Friday, January 24, 2014, 12:23:43 PM, you (tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com) wrote: Most of the setup file REGISTRY entries can be deleted as they are just leftovers from the install process. As for files, it likes to suggest uninstall files as being potentially dangerous. If you know what the FILE is you can exclude it. If you really want to get your registry cleaned out and compacted (and speed up your machine, get Macecrafts Jv16 Powertools. You can get the lite version for free and the pro ... well they are going open source soon and when they do grab it. If you want to follow up with this, shoot me an email off list Thank you. I will have to bone up on Jv16 Powertools. Leonard -- Leonard S. Berkowitz Using The Bat! v5.2.2 on Windows 7 6.1 Build 7601 Service Pack 1 Current version is 6.1.8 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What does this mean in my account log?
Karla, on Wednesday, January 22, 2014, 2:58:19 PM, you (tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com) wrote: My default mode for finding any such issues is to run a Malwarebytes scan on the computer. One of the things I've noticed in The Bat! is that accessing AOL mail gives a message of an invalid certificate, but I've always ignored the message. However, for the first time yesterday, I received a clearly virus-laden (via a link) email which claimed to be sent from my AOL account to two other unrelated email addresses that I own and one other email address of a correspondent of mine. I visited AOL mail online and found that the email had been sent from my account, so I changed my password at AOL and scanned both of my computers. I had no invaders, so I think it is either a hacking of my AOL account or something related to Facebook, since I used the AOL address there. I changed that and will be closely monitoring the mail account.Malwarebytes free software has solved any invader-related issues I've had from time to time over the years, and I download it upon getting a new computer so that I am prepared. I highly recommend it, and hope it is that simple to solve your issue. Thanks for the tip. I have not used AOL for more than 15 years. However, I will download and install Malwarebytes as you recommend. Leonard -- Leonard S. Berkowitz Using The Bat! v5.2.2 on Windows 7 6.1 Build 7601 Service Pack 1 Current version is 6.1.8 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What does this mean in my account log?
On Tuesday, January 21, 2014, 6:22:06 PM, you (tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com) wrote: Gmail doesn't use self-signed certificates. You have an MITM attack going on there, as Jernej already said. I have no way to tell if it is malicious, or something friendly installed on your computer or network. What can I do about it? -- Leonard S. Berkowitz Using The Bat! v5.2.2 on Windows 7 6.1 Build 7601 Service Pack 1 Current version is 6.1.8 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What does this mean in my account log?
Hi, What can I do about it? What would you do if someone raided your living room while you were upstairs sleeping? Treat it the same way. -- Mit freundlichem Gruß Alto Speckhardt mailto:a...@treadstone79.de Current version is 6.1.8 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What does this mean in my account log?
On Wednesday, January 22, 2014, 7:42:48 AM, you (tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com) wrote: What would you do if someone raided your living room while you were upstairs sleeping? Treat it the same way. If someone raided my living room, I would call the police, then get a boom and clean up the mess. What police do I summon for man-in-the-middle? Where do I find the mess in this instance. Thanks, -- Leonard S. Berkowitz Using The Bat! v5.2.2 on Windows 7 6.1 Build 7601 Service Pack 1 Current version is 6.1.8 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What does this mean in my account log?
Wednesday, January 22, 2014, 11:15:54 AM, you wrote: On Wednesday, January 22, 2014, 7:42:48 AM, you (tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com) wrote: What would you do if someone raided your living room while you were upstairs sleeping? Treat it the same way. If someone raided my living room, I would call the police, then get a boom and clean up the mess. What police do I summon for man-in-the-middle? Where do I find the mess in this instance. Thanks, Hello Leonard, My default mode for finding any such issues is to run a Malwarebytes scan on the computer. One of the things I've noticed in The Bat! is that accessing AOL mail gives a message of an invalid certificate, but I've always ignored the message. However, for the first time yesterday, I received a clearly virus-laden (via a link) email which claimed to be sent from my AOL account to two other unrelated email addresses that I own and one other email address of a correspondent of mine. I visited AOL mail online and found that the email had been sent from my account, so I changed my password at AOL and scanned both of my computers. I had no invaders, so I think it is either a hacking of my AOL account or something related to Facebook, since I used the AOL address there. I changed that and will be closely monitoring the mail account.Malwarebytes free software has solved any invader-related issues I've had from time to time over the years, and I download it upon getting a new computer so that I am prepared. I highly recommend it, and hope it is that simple to solve your issue. Karla -- Best regards, Cafe Noir mailto:cafe.n...@mail.ru Secure Email Natural Health http://pobox.com/~potentia http://www.63y.in Using The Bat! v5.8.8 on Windows 6.2 Build 9200 Current version is 6.1.8 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What does this mean in my account log?
Hi On Tuesday 21 January 2014 at 6:46:25 AM, in mid:1852040294.20140121014...@gmail.com, Leonard S. Berkowitz wrote: Here is the entires set for one connect interval: 1/20/2014, 22:32:00: FETCH - receiving mail messages 1/20/2014, 22:32:00: FETCH - Connecting to POP3 server pop.gmail.com on port 995 1/20/2014, 22:32:00: FETCH - Initiating TLS handshake 1/20/2014, 22:32:00: FETCH - Certificate S/N: 011E8403, algorithm: RSA (512 bits), issued from 10/5/2012 10:19:13 PM to 9/30/2032 10:19:13 PM, for 1 host(s): pop.gmail.com. 1/20/2014, 22:32:00: FETCH - Owner: EN, pop.gmail.com. 1/20/2014, 22:32:00: FETCH - This certificate is self-issued. 1/20/2014, 22:32:00: FETCH - TLS handshake complete 1/20/2014, 22:32:00: FETCH - connected to POP3 server 1/20/2014, 22:32:01: FETCH - authenticated (plain) 1/20/2014, 22:32:01: FETCH - 0 messages in the mailbox, 0 new 1/20/2014, 22:32:01: FETCH - connection finished - 0 messages received Does this tell you anything? It tells me the certificate you already mentioned is self-signed. Gmail doesn't use self-signed certificates. You have an MITM attack going on there, as Jernej already said. I have no way to tell if it is malicious, or something friendly installed on your computer or network. -- Best regards MFPAmailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net Take my advice - I don't use it anyway. Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current version is 6.1.8 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What does this mean in my account log?
Hi On Sunday 19 January 2014 at 9:09:12 AM, in mid:474345013.20140119040...@gmail.com, Leonard S. Berkowitz wrote: I do not have Avast, rather Avira. Would your comment still apply? Thanks. It was just a suggestion, that the apparent MITM attack might be nothing to worry about. Some anti-virus programs do it like Avast with an MITM attack, others have a plug-in for the email app and scan the messages on access after they are received. I don't know what way Avira does it, if at all. After the line about FETCH - Certificate S/N: 011E8403, algorithm: RSA (512 bits), issued from 10/5/2012 10:19:13 PM to 9/30/2032 10:19:13 PM, for 1 host(s): pop.gmail.com. do you see a line about owner or root? -- Best regards MFPAmailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net A closed door is an invitation to knock Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current version is 6.1.8 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What does this mean in my account log?
On Monday, January 20, 2014, 6:38:27 PM, you (tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com) wrote: After the line about FETCH - Certificate S/N: 011E8403, algorithm: RSA (512 bits), issued from 10/5/2012 10:19:13 PM to 9/30/2032 10:19:13 PM, for 1 host(s): pop.gmail.com. do you see a line about owner or root? Here is the entires set for one connect interval: 1/20/2014, 22:32:00: FETCH - receiving mail messages 1/20/2014, 22:32:00: FETCH - Connecting to POP3 server pop.gmail.com on port 995 1/20/2014, 22:32:00: FETCH - Initiating TLS handshake 1/20/2014, 22:32:00: FETCH - Certificate S/N: 011E8403, algorithm: RSA (512 bits), issued from 10/5/2012 10:19:13 PM to 9/30/2032 10:19:13 PM, for 1 host(s): pop.gmail.com. 1/20/2014, 22:32:00: FETCH - Owner: EN, pop.gmail.com. 1/20/2014, 22:32:00: FETCH - This certificate is self-issued. 1/20/2014, 22:32:00: FETCH - TLS handshake complete 1/20/2014, 22:32:00: FETCH - connected to POP3 server 1/20/2014, 22:32:01: FETCH - authenticated (plain) 1/20/2014, 22:32:01: FETCH - 0 messages in the mailbox, 0 new 1/20/2014, 22:32:01: FETCH - connection finished - 0 messages received Does this tell you anything? -- Leonard S. Berkowitz Using The Bat! v5.2.2 on Windows 7 6.1 Build 7601 Service Pack 1 Current version is 6.1.8 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What does this mean in my account log?
On Saturday, January 18, 2014, 5:25:47 AM, you (tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com) wrote: You said it. This line is just one of the 'TLS handshake' lines logged when connecting to gmail servers. That is why it occurs every 3 minutes in your case. Thanks. -- Leonard S. Berkowitz Using The Bat! v5.2.2 on Windows 7 6.1 Build 7601 Service Pack 1 Current version is 6.1.8 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What does this mean in my account log?
On Saturday, January 18, 2014, 11:49:22 AM, you (tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com) wrote: However, the certificate it's announcing doesn't look right - 512bit RSA is insecure (even 1024bit RSA has been phased out), and nobody issues end-entity certificates that are valid for more than 5 years, so you should check why you're seeing that certificate (it almost certainly means that somebody is doing a man-in-the-middle attack with it, thus being able to read all messages you download). How do I go about doing that? -- Leonard S. Berkowitz Using The Bat! v5.2.2 on Windows 7 6.1 Build 7601 Service Pack 1 Current version is 6.1.8 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What does this mean in my account log?
On Saturday, January 18, 2014, 12:39:53 PM, you (tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com) wrote: Maybe it is something to do with your anti-virus, like the Avast! root certificate with no dates or serial number mentioned in my TLS handshake? (Avast! does a man-in-the-middle attack so that it can scan my email for nasties.) I do not have Avast, rather Avira. Would your comment still apply? Thanks. -- Leonard S. Berkowitz Using The Bat! v5.2.2 on Windows 7 6.1 Build 7601 Service Pack 1 Current version is 6.1.8 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What does this mean in my account log?
Hello Leonard, FETCH - Certificate S/N: 011E8403, algorithm: RSA (512 bits), issued from 10/5/2012 10:19:13 PM to 9/30/2032 10:19:13 PM, for 1 host(s): pop.gmail.com. It occurs repeatedly, every three minutes -- the frequency configured for checking mail. You said it. This line is just one of the 'TLS handshake' lines logged when connecting to gmail servers. That is why it occurs every 3 minutes in your case. Here is a sample of the TLS handshake lines in my case: 18/01/2014, 11:16:52: FETCH - receiving mail messages 18/01/2014, 11:16:52: FETCH - Connecting to POP3 server pop.gmail.com on port 995 18/01/2014, 11:16:53: FETCH - Initiating TLS handshake 18/01/2014, 11:16:53: FETCH - Certificate S/N: 0A7AA2766A688E80,algorithm: RSA (2. 18/01/2014, 11:16:53: FETCH - Issuer: US, Google Inc, Google Internet Authority G2. 18/01/2014, 11:16:53: FETCH - Root: US, GeoTrust Inc., GeoTrust Global CA 18/01/2014, 11:16:53: FETCH - TLS handshake complete And should I be concerned about it? No, not at all. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v6.2.4 My photos at: http://www.Rancho-K.com My photoblog: http://mau.aminus3.com Current version is 6.1.8 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What does this mean in my account log?
On Friday, January 17, 2014, 23:10:24, Leonard S. Berkowitz wrote: FETCH - Certificate S/N: 011E8403, algorithm: RSA (512 bits), issued from 10/5/2012 10:19:13 PM to 9/30/2032 10:19:13 PM, for 1 host(s): pop.gmail.com. It occurs repeatedly, every three minutes -- the frequency configured for checking mail. And should I be concerned about it? The line is part of the normal TLS handshake, and usually wouldn't matter. However, the certificate it's announcing doesn't look right - 512bit RSA is insecure (even 1024bit RSA has been phased out), and nobody issues end-entity certificates that are valid for more than 5 years, so you should check why you're seeing that certificate (it almost certainly means that somebody is doing a man-in-the-middle attack with it, thus being able to read all messages you download). -- Jernej Simončič http://eternallybored.org/ The idea is to die young as late as possible. -- Montagu's Maxim Current version is 6.1.8 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What does this mean in my account log?
Hi On Saturday 18 January 2014 at 4:49:22 PM, in mid:26180520.20140118174...@eternallybored.org, Jernej Simoncic wrote: On Friday, January 17, 2014, 23:10:24, Leonard S. Berkowitz wrote: FETCH - Certificate S/N: 011E8403, algorithm: RSA (512 bits), issued from 10/5/2012 10:19:13 PM to 9/30/2032 10:19:13 PM, for 1 host(s): pop.gmail.com. However, the certificate it's announcing doesn't look right - 512bit RSA is insecure (even 1024bit RSA has been phased out), and nobody issues end-entity certificates that are valid for more than 5 years, so you should check why you're seeing that certificate (it almost certainly means that somebody is doing a man-in-the-middle attack with it, thus being able to read all messages you download). My Gmail account log shows:- FETCH - Initiating TLS handshake FETCH - Certificate S/N: 0A7AA2766A688E80, algorithm: RSA (2048 bits), issued from 10/09/2013 07:57:39 to 10/09/2014 07:57:39, for 1 host(s): pop.gmail.com. FETCH - Owner: US, California, Mountain View, Google Inc, pop.gmail.com. FETCH - Root: generated by avast! antivirus for SSL scanning, avast! Mail Scanner, avast! Mail Scanner Root FETCH - TLS handshake complete Maybe it is something to do with your anti-virus, like the Avast! root certificate with no dates or serial number mentioned in my TLS handshake? (Avast! does a man-in-the-middle attack so that it can scan my email for nasties.) -- Best regards MFPAmailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net A closed mouth gathers no foot Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current version is 6.1.8 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
What does this mean in my account log?
FETCH - Certificate S/N: 011E8403, algorithm: RSA (512 bits), issued from 10/5/2012 10:19:13 PM to 9/30/2032 10:19:13 PM, for 1 host(s): pop.gmail.com. It occurs repeatedly, every three minutes -- the frequency configured for checking mail. And should I be concerned about it? Thanks. -- Leonard S. Berkowitz Using The Bat! v5.2.2 on Windows 7 6.1 Build 7601 Service Pack 1 Current version is 6.1.8 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Folder Template not doing what I want
Hi On Thursday 1 November 2012 at 11:03:00 PM, in mid:459720137.20121101190...@grunwalds.com, Rick wrote: %To=%OFROMNAME %OFROMADDR BINGO that does it. In order to make only the original from work in this case is to add a line ABOVE your suggestion %To- To clear the field THANK YOU SO MUCH!! Glad I could help. -- Best regards MFPAmailto:expires2...@rocketmail.com When you're through changing, you're through Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current version is 5.2.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Folder Template not doing what I want
Glad I could help. I could NOT see what I was doing wrong!! Duh Thanks again :) -- Rick Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind. - Dr. Seuss v5.3.2.8 (BETA) on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 Using all POP accounts I download all images Current version is 5.2.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Folder Template not doing what I want
Hi On Wednesday 31 October 2012 at 5:03:29 PM, in mid:1807044102.20121031130...@grunwalds.com, Rick wrote: I have been beating my head on this. Every reply goes back to masterc...@yahoogroups.com as the group is set up that way and the owner won't change it even though replying back to that group is against the rules I want to reply to the original sender - in this case From: marylynnbehrens mlbehr...@msn.com I can't get it to work. TO: %FROMNAME %FROMADDR For that line, did you try something like:- %To=%OFROMNAME %OFROMADDR (not sure if you need the quotes) Look at TB!'s help file:- TO=address(es) Changes the TO header to the value given by the parameter. If left empty it will remove all addresses already in the header. OFROMNAME Note: Replies and Forwards only. Inserts the original message's full name of the sender FROM: %OFROMNAME %OFROMADDR I can't work out what you were trying to do with that line. -- Best regards MFPAmailto:expires2...@rocketmail.com Maybe YOU have nothing to hide; that still leaves plenty you want to hide from! Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current version is 5.2.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Folder Template not doing what I want
%To=%OFROMNAME %OFROMADDR You pointed me in the right direction! It is still picking up the group name. I will play with this a bit more and post back -- Rick When you're caffeinated, all is right with the world v5.3.2.8 (BETA) on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 Using all POP accounts I download all images Current version is 5.2.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Folder Template not doing what I want
%To=%OFROMNAME %OFROMADDR BINGO that does it. In order to make only the original from work in this case is to add a line ABOVE your suggestion %To- To clear the field THANK YOU SO MUCH!! -- Rick Blessed are the cracked, for they will let in the light. v5.3.2.8 (BETA) on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 Using all POP accounts I download all images Current version is 5.2.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Folder Template not doing what I want
I have been beating my head on this. Every reply goes back to masterc...@yahoogroups.com as the group is set up that way and the owner won't change it even though replying back to that group is against the rules I want to reply to the original sender - in this case From: marylynnbehrens mlbehr...@msn.com I can't get it to work. WHat am I doing wrong (I tried MANY other macros before posting this) Thanks in advance MY TEMPLATE %CURSOR __ Rick %SINGLERE TO: %FROMNAME %FROMADDR FROM: %OFROMNAME %OFROMADDR %ACCOUNT=Rick Micfo %SetEditor=3%- %FROM=Rick rg...@grunwalds.com%- %COOKIE=C:\Documents andSettings\Rick\ApplicationData\The Bat!\cookies\quotes.txt %QUOTES HEADERS X-Received: from [98.137.34.155] by tg1.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Oct 2012 02:42:23 - To: masterc...@yahoogroups.com Message-ID: k62bqe+b...@egroups.com User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82 X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster X-Originating-IP: 68.102.135.113 X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0:0:0 X-Yahoo-Post-IP: 68.102.135.113 From: marylynnbehrens mlbehr...@msn.com X-Yahoo-Profile: marylynnbehrens Sender: masterc...@yahoogroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list masterc...@yahoogroups.com; contact mastercook-ow...@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list masterc...@yahoogroups.com List-Id: MasterCook.yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: mailto:mastercook-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 02:42:22 - Subject: [MasterCook] The Prospect's Spinach Salad Reply-To: masterc...@yahoogroups.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: groups-email-tradt-m Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -- Rick Most men can handle adversity but if you want to see the real character of a man, give him power. --Abraham Lincoln v5.3.2.8 (BETA) on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current version is 5.2.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Not sure what to do with this
Greetings Batties, I have received several of these HTML messages with the following line as the entire message: Invalid HTML ! Please forward this message to developers. Thanks. I assumed it was an Apple problem simply because Apple was the sender. It wasn't until I searched for this string on-line that I learned it's apparently being generated by TB!. If I understand what's happening, Apple is sending me HTML messages which TB! is having trouble displaying in HTML. The actual text of the message (from Apple) can be displayed by clicking on the TEXT tab at the bottom of that message. So, if my assumptions are correct, to whom should I forward these? The line doesn't contain any links. -- TIA, Jack LaRosa Using The Bat! ver: 4.2.44.2. Running Windows XP Pro ver 5 build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.2.42 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html Current version is 4.2.42 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Not sure what to do with this
Hello Jack, Monday, February 27, 2012, 8:49:12 PM, you wrote: JSL Invalid HTML ! Please forward this message to developers. JSL Thanks. [...] JSL So, if my assumptions are correct, to whom should I forward JSL these? The line doesn't contain any links. Your assumptions are correct, and I don't know who at Ritlabs is now in charge of HTML development. If in doubt, send to max [at] ritlabs.com -- Cheers, Thomas. Current version is 4.2.42 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Not sure what to do with this
Hello Thomas, On Monday, February 27, 2012 you wrote: TF Hello Jack, TF Monday, February 27, 2012, 8:49:12 PM, you wrote: JSL Invalid HTML ! Please forward this message to developers. JSL Thanks. TF [...] JSL So, if my assumptions are correct, to whom should I forward JSL these? The line doesn't contain any links. TF Your assumptions are correct, and I don't know who at Ritlabs is now TF in charge of HTML development. If in doubt, send to max [at] ritlabs.com Thank you Thomas, I'll do as you suggest. -- Jack LaRosa Using The Bat! ver: 4.2.44.2. Running Windows XP Pro ver 5 build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.2.42 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Message base damaged - what can I do?
Hi, I have a problem with my sent message base. It must have been corrupt, so I ran maintenance over it. The bat reported the message base damaged and put about 3.000 mails in a part0001.bin file. Is there any way to access those lost mails and to reimport them into the message base? Thanks Andreas -- Rechtsanwalt Andreas Schwartmann Gleueler Str. 249 D-50935 Köln Tel: +49 (221) 3559205 | Fax: +49 (221) 3559206 Skype: schwartmann50733 www.rechtsanwalt-schwartmann.de Current version is 4.2.23 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Message base damaged - what can I do?
Hello Andreas, On Mon, 1 Feb 2010 14:59:06 +0100 GMT (01/Feb/10, 20:59 PM +0700 GMT), Andreas Schwartmann wrote: AS I have a problem with my sent message base. AS It must have been corrupt, so I ran maintenance over it. AS The bat reported the message base damaged and put about 3.000 mails in a AS part0001.bin file. AS Is there any way to access those lost mails and to reimport them into the AS message base? If you use OTFE, you are out of luck. If you use plain, just go to Tools / Import, and point to that file. All good messages will be imported. -- Cheers, Thomas. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 4.2.23 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.2.23 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Can you configure what TB! sends as HELO/EHLO string?
Hi I've recently noticed the following header in some test mail I sent to myself using TB! v4.0.38 sending through my ISP's SMTP server:- X-Lookup-Warning: EHLO lookup on [10.0.0.1] does not match xx.xxx.xxx.xxx I enabled protocol logging and looked at the SMTP logs and, yes, TB! is sending EHLO [10.0.0.1] I am behind a router and 10.0.0.1 is the IP address assigned to my PC by the router. The xx.xxx.xxx.xxx of the X-Lookup-Warning header matches the public IP address. Is there any way to make TB! send a HELO/EHLO string that won't generate the warning header? -- Best regards, MFPA Don't ask me, I'm making this up as I go! Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current version is 4.2.9.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Can you configure what TB! sends as HELO/EHLO string?
Hi On Tuesday 4 August 2009 at 8:55:33 PM, in mid:1593177333.20090804205...@my_localhost, I wrote: I enabled protocol logging and looked at the SMTP logs and, yes, TB! is sending EHLO [10.0.0.1] For comparison, I have now enabled protocol logging on another account that sends mail through my own SMTP server app on the same computer as my TB! installation. That account is sending EHLO localhost. I guess in that instance, localhost or [127.0.0.1] or the computer name would be correct... -- Best regards, MFPA Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals. Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current version is 4.2.9.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
What are these chracters?
Fellow list members, I've notice for a long time (probably ever since I started using TB!) that every time I forward a message, I get this: ===8==Original message text=== Body of quoted text ===8===End of original message text=== What are the 8 characters which always appear where you see them? If it means anything, my editor is always set to Plain Text(MicroEd). They aren't in the reply templates and they appear no matter to whom the reply is sent. -- TIA, Jack LaRosa mailto:jlar...@charter.net Sticking with with The Bat! ver: 3.99.3 for now. Operating? with Windows XP Pro ver 5 build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.1.11 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What are these chracters?
[Reply to: »Jack S. LaRosa« · 2009-04-08 · 19:33 h (CET)] Moin, Jack! ===8==Original message text=== Body of quoted text ===8===End of original message text=== What are the 8 characters which always appear where you see them? These characters emblematize scissors. It's a kind of cut mark. Cheers! VA - -- Direct eMail without [The Bat!] in subject line will end in Nirvana! mailto:va%20%3...@ahrendt.net%3e?subject=[the%20bat%21]%20 Using The Bat! 4.1.11.11 [Pro] on Windows XP [Pro] Service Pack 3. »You live and learn. At any rate, you live.« Douglas Adams (* March 11, 1952; † May 11, 2001) Current version is 4.1.11 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What are these chracters?
On Wednesday, April 8, 2009, 19:33:01, Jack S. LaRosa wrote: What are the 8 characters which always appear where you see them? Scissors :) They aren't in the reply templates and they appear no matter to whom the reply is sent. They're in the forward template. -- Jernej Simončič http://eternallybored.org/ Them what gets, has. -- Wakefield's Refutation of the Iron Law of Distribution Current version is 4.1.11 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What are these chracters?
Hello Jack, Wednesday, April 8, 2009, 7:33:01 PM, you wrote: JSL I've notice for a long time (probably ever since I started using TB!) JSL that every time I forward a message, I get this: JSL ===8==Original message text=== JSL Body of quoted text JSL ===8===End of original message text=== JSL What are the 8 characters which always appear where you see them? JSL If it means anything, my editor is always set to Plain Text(MicroEd). JSL They aren't in the reply templates and they appear no matter to whom JSL the reply is sent. It's an eight 8 and a representing scissors! :-) -- Best Wishes, Mark using The Bat! 4.1.11.11 97 days remaining in 2009. Actually it's 267 days) + less than 24 hours. Yours truly residing on earth for 18775 days now. Current version is 4.1.11 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What are these chracters?
Hello Mark, MP Hello Jack, MP Wednesday, April 8, 2009, 7:33:01 PM, you wrote: JSL I've notice for a long time (probably ever since I started using TB!) JSL that every time I forward a message, I get this: JSL ===8==Original message text=== JSL Body of quoted text JSL ===8===End of original message text=== JSL What are the 8 characters which always appear where you see them? JSL If it means anything, my editor is always set to Plain Text(MicroEd). JSL They aren't in the reply templates and they appear no matter to whom JSL the reply is sent. MP It's an eight 8 and a representing scissors! Scissors Gads! Well, it was lost on me. Thanks to all who replied. -- Jack LaRosa mailto:jlar...@charter.net Sticking with with The Bat! ver: 3.99.3 for now. Operating? with Windows XP Pro ver 5 build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.1.11 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What are these chracters?
Mittwoch, 8. April 2009 at 19:33, Jack S. LaRosa wrote: What are the 8 characters which always appear where you see them? Thats the ASCII View of a scissors ;-) -- With kind Regards Jens Franik mailto:je...@gmx.de Picture of me? X-Rogue http://www.de2all.de/Kr_bat.jpg The Bat! 4.1.11.11 mit AntiSpamSniper 3.2.0.1 und Gaijin XMP Makro Plugin 11.91.0 Windows XP 5.1 build 2600 Service Pack 2 AMD Athlon Dual Core 4850e 2,50 GHz, 4 GB RAM 8 POP3 Accounts - 1 IMAP - 120 Folders Current version is 4.1.11 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
What can be wrong?
Hi, what can here be wrong? I have for Polish templates the following: %qinclude=day,%qinclude=DD %qinclude=month %- %qinclude=YYo %- %OTime%IF:%ABTOGENDER=2:napisa?a?:%IF:'%ABTOGENDER'='1':%- 'napisa?e?':'pa?stwo napisa?y' w wiadomo?ci %- %qinclude=MsgID mi?dzy innymi: day %IF:%ODOW=Montag:poniedzia?ek%- %IF:%ODOW=Dienstag:wtorek%- %IF:%ODOW=Mittwoch:?roda%- %IF:%ODOW=Donnerstag:czwartek%- %IF:%ODOW=Freitag:pi?tek%- %IF:%ODOW=Samstag:sobota%- %IF:%ODOW=Sonntag:niedziela%- DD %SETPATTREGEXP=.*,([0-9]*)%REGEXPMATCH=%ODate %- month %IF:'%SETPATTREGEXP=...(..)%REGEXPMATCH=%ODATESHORT'=01:stycze?%- %IF:'%SETPATTREGEXP=...(..)%REGEXPMATCH=%ODATESHORT'=02:luty%- %IF:'%SETPATTREGEXP=...(..)%REGEXPMATCH=%ODATESHORT'=03:marzec%- %IF:'%SETPATTREGEXP=...(..)%REGEXPMATCH=%ODATESHORT'=04:kwiecie?%- %IF:'%SETPATTREGEXP=...(..)%REGEXPMATCH=%ODATESHORT'=05:maj%- %IF:'%SETPATTREGEXP=...(..)%REGEXPMATCH=%DATESHORT'=06:czerwiec%- %IF:'%SETPATTREGEXP=...(..)%REGEXPMATCH=%DATESHORT'=07:lipiec%- %IF:'%SETPATTREGEXP=...(..)%REGEXPMATCH=%ODATESHORT'=08:sierpie?%- %IF:'%SETPATTREGEXP=...(..)%REGEXPMATCH=%ODATESHORT'=09:wrzesie?%- %IF:'%SETPATTREGEXP=...(..)%REGEXPMATCH=%ODATESHORT'=10:pa?dziernik%- %IF:'%SETPATTREGEXP=...(..)%REGEXPMATCH=%ODATESHORT'=11:listopad%- %IF:'%SETPATTREGEXP=...(..)%REGEXPMATCH=%ODATESHORT'=12:grudzie?%- YY %SETPATTREGEXP=.*,[0-9]*.*\s.*\s([0-9]*)%REGEXPMATCH=%ODATE %- I get the following: wtorek, =01:stycze? =02:luty=03:marzec - =04:kwiecie? =05:maj=06:czerwiec =07:lipiec - =08:sierpie? =09:wrzesie? =10:pa?dzier nik=11:listopad =12:grudzie? 2008 o 20:37napisa?e? w wiadomo?ci mid:82545c4a898b4d499dcb1ea6705e0...@home4e45b6480a mi?dzy innymi: -- Best regards, Roland I use TheBat! v4.1.7 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3! Current version is 4.1.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What can be wrong?
Hallo Roland, On Thu, 25 Dec 2008 15:21:59 +0100GMT (25-12-2008, 15:21 +0100, where I live), you wrote: RB what can here be wrong? I have for Polish templates the following: You're mismatching the ' and pairs in the month QT -- Groetjes, Roelof Women, like rabbits, will hop into bed at night. http://www.voormijalleen.nl/ The Bat! 4.1.7 Windows Vista 6.0 Build 6001 Service Pack 1 3 pop3 accounts OTFE enabled Quad Core 2.4GHz 4 GB RAM pgprWb5cSUfr2.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 4.1.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: smtp auth: what am I missing?
Hello, all. On 5/8/07, Luc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good afternoon Roelof, It was foretold that on 8/5/2007 @ 16:59:22 GMT+0200 (which was 11:59:22 where I live) Roelof Otten would write: snipped a bit RO My smtp setting for gmail are: Mine are: SMTP Server: smtp.gmail.com Grr... tired of futzing with this. I recreated the imap account with the exact same settings, and outgoing email works on the newly created account. Not sure what's going on... Now, to copy over my template settings Thanks for the suggestions and help, -- WL Current version is 3.99 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: smtp auth: what am I missing?
Hallo WL, On Mon, 7 May 2007 19:28:54 -0500GMT (8-5-2007, 2:28 +0200, where I live), you wrote: W In the account properties, I have the smtp server using TLS. W The port is set to 465. In the authentication button, I W have Perform SMTP Authentication checked, with the specific W settings selected. Try 'use same settings as mail retrieval' W [18:49:11] C: MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] W [18:49:11] S: 530 authentication required - for help go to W http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/sbc/dsl/mail/pop/pop-11.html Did you follow that link? W -- W WL Your cutsign is missing the trailing space. -- Groetjes, Roelof If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you! http://www.voormijalleen.nl/ The Bat! 3.99.3 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 2 pop3 accounts OTFE enabled P4 3GHz 2 GB RAM pgp09XVVN7G2D.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.99 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: smtp auth: what am I missing?
On 5/8/07, Roelof Otten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hallo WL, On Mon, 7 May 2007 19:28:54 -0500GMT (8-5-2007, 2:28 +0200, where I live), you wrote: W In the account properties, I have the smtp server using TLS. W The port is set to 465. In the authentication button, I W have Perform SMTP Authentication checked, with the specific W settings selected. Try 'use same settings as mail retrieval' In this case, the credentials have to be different. The ISP blocks outgoing smtp traffic unless it goes through the ISP's SMTP server. Regardless of what username and password is used, the log indicates the smtp authentication is not happening. I expected to see something like C: AUTH LOGIN before the MAIL FROM: line, or even C: MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] AUTH=blahblah but I don't see anything like that. W [18:49:11] C: MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] W [18:49:11] S: 530 authentication required - for help go to W http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/sbc/dsl/mail/pop/pop-11.html Did you follow that link? Yes. It says to enable smtp authentication. Hopefully, the cut sign will be intact -- WL Current version is 3.99 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: smtp auth: what am I missing?
Hallo WL, On Tue, 8 May 2007 06:54:20 -0500GMT (8-5-2007, 13:54 +0200, where I live), you wrote: W In this case, the credentials have to be different. The ISP W blocks outgoing smtp traffic unless it goes through the ISP's W SMTP server. Often they're only blocking port 25. I see that you're using gmail and they're using a different port. You could try to reach them. BTW Can you send mail via your regular mail account at your ISP? -- Groetjes, Roelof Where there's smoke, there's toast. http://www.voormijalleen.nl/ The Bat! 3.99.3 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 2 pop3 accounts OTFE enabled P4 3GHz 2 GB RAM pgpkBvlErbqd2.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.99 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: smtp auth: what am I missing?
On 5/8/07, Roelof Otten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 8 May 2007 06:54:20 -0500GMT (8-5-2007, 13:54 +0200, where I live), you wrote: W In this case, the credentials have to be different. The ISP W blocks outgoing smtp traffic unless it goes through the ISP's W SMTP server. Often they're only blocking port 25. I see that you're using gmail and they're using a different port. You could try to reach them. Same problem: gmail says I need to be authorized first. Here's the log using gmail's smtp server. [07:43:34] C: Connected to smtp.gmail.com, port 465 [07:43:34] S: 220 mx.google.com ESMTP f24sm14853661pyh [07:43:36] C: EHLO WL [07:43:36] S: 250-mx.google.com at your service, [65.42.208.133] [07:43:36] S: 250-SIZE 28311552 [07:43:36] S: 250-8BITMIME [07:43:36] S: 250-AUTH LOGIN PLAIN [07:43:36] S: 250 ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES [07:43:36] C: MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIZE=305 [07:43:36] S: 530 5.5.1 Authentication Required f24sm14853661pyh [07:43:36] C: RSET [07:43:36] S: 250 2.1.0 Flushed f24sm14853661pyh [07:43:36] C: QUIT Again, no AUTH. BTW Can you send mail via your regular mail account at your ISP? Oddly enough, I can. Here's the smtp log from that: [07:49:56] C: Connected to smtp.att.yahoo.com, port 465 [07:49:56] S: 220 smtp113.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com ESMTP [07:49:58] C: EHLO WL [07:49:58] S: 250-smtp113.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com [07:49:58] S: 250-AUTH LOGIN PLAIN XYMCOOKIE [07:49:58] S: 250-PIPELINING [07:49:58] S: 250 8BITMIME [07:49:58] C: AUTH PLAIN [07:49:58] S: 334 ok, go on [07:49:59] S: 235 ok, go ahead (#2.0.0) yay, auth... I went through and double checked the settings but I still can't send email out. The only difference that may matter is the non-sending account is really IMAP, and the second account is POP. Having said that, I'm not sure how why or how it would make a difference... -- WL Current version is 3.99 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: smtp auth: what am I missing?
Sorry, just a random sig test... On 5/8/07, Roelof Otten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snippaged] Sig yes? It's weird... I thought it worked before... and emails sent to myself seem to have the trailing space... -- WL Current version is 3.99 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: smtp auth: what am I missing?
Hallo WL, On Tue, 8 May 2007 08:10:32 -0500GMT (8-5-2007, 15:10 +0200, where I live), you wrote: Often they're only blocking port 25. I see that you're using gmail and they're using a different port. You could try to reach them. W Same problem: gmail says I need to be authorized first. Here's W the log using gmail's smtp server. W [07:43:34] C: Connected to smtp.gmail.com, port 465 W [07:43:34] S: 220 mx.google.com ESMTP f24sm14853661pyh W [07:43:36] C: EHLO WL W [07:43:36] S: 250-mx.google.com at your service, [65.42.208.133] W [07:43:36] S: 250-SIZE 28311552 W [07:43:36] S: 250-8BITMIME W [07:43:36] S: 250-AUTH LOGIN PLAIN W [07:43:36] S: 250 ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES W [07:43:36] C: MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIZE=305 W [07:43:36] S: 530 5.5.1 Authentication Required f24sm14853661pyh Yes, that's definitely different from my gmail account (for testing purposes only) That shows: [16:17:40] C: Connected to smtp.gmail.com, port 465 [16:17:40] S: 220 mx.google.com ESMTP z40sm791870ugc [16:17:40] C: EHLO BASILISK [16:17:40] S: 250-mx.google.com at your service, [217.122.181.180] [16:17:40] S: 250-SIZE 28311552 [16:17:40] S: 250-8BITMIME [16:17:40] S: 250-AUTH LOGIN PLAIN [16:17:40] S: 250 ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES [16:17:40] C: AUTH PLAIN [16:17:40] S: 334 [16:17:40] C: Some gobbledygook [16:17:41] S: 235 2.7.0 Accepted [16:17:41] C: MAIL FROM:myaddress SIZE=475 [16:17:41] S: 250 2.1.0 OK [16:17:41] C: RCPT TO:myaddress [16:17:41] S: 250 2.1.5 OK [16:17:41] C: DATA [16:17:41] S: 354 Go ahead My smtp setting for gmail are: SMTP Server: smtp.gmail.com Connection: Secure to dedicated port (TLS) Port: 465 Authentication:'Perform SMTP Authentication' and 'Same user/password as for Mail Retrieval' selected and nothing else. -- Groetjes, Roelof If the water is clean, you see the bottom, if dirty, you see yourself. http://www.voormijalleen.nl/ The Bat! 3.99.3 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 2 pop3 accounts OTFE enabled P4 3GHz 2 GB RAM pgpCCjkxrswwO.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.99 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: smtp auth: what am I missing?
Good afternoon Roelof, It was foretold that on 8/5/2007 @ 16:59:22 GMT+0200 (which was 11:59:22 where I live) Roelof Otten would write: snipped a bit RO My smtp setting for gmail are: RO SMTP Server: smtp.gmail.com RO Connection: Secure to dedicated port (TLS) RO Port: 465 RO Authentication:'Perform SMTP Authentication' and 'Same user/password RO as for Mail Retrieval' selected and nothing else. Mine are: SMTP Server: smtp.gmail.com Connection: Secure to regular port (STARTTLS) Port: 587 Authentication:'Perform SMTP Authentication' and 'use specific settings' Might seem strange but initially i had problems sending mail and fiddled with the settings... after 3 days, out of the blue, gmail decided to go along with it and works fine now. Seems gmail needs some time to think about it HTH -- Best regards, Luc http://www.dzinelabs.com --- Powered by The Bat! version 3.99.3 with Windows XP (build 2600), version 5.1 Service Pack 2 and using the best browser: Opera. A balanced diet is a cookie in each hand. Current version is 3.99 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
smtp auth: what am I missing?
Hello, all. With TB! 3.99.3, I seem to be unable to use smtp authentication. I'm getting a ``must first authenticate message'' from the server. I must be missing something... In the account properties, I have the smtp server using TLS. The port is set to 465. In the authentication button, I have Perform SMTP Authentication checked, with the specific settings selected. I've tried tests with and without the ``Require secure authentication'' selected but the results seem the same. The protocol logs say: [18:49:11] C: Connected to smtp.att.yahoo.com, port 465 [18:49:11] S: 220 smtp104.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com ESMTP [18:49:11] C: EHLO X [18:49:11] S: 250-smtp104.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com [18:49:11] S: 250-AUTH LOGIN PLAIN XYMCOOKIE [18:49:11] S: 250-PIPELINING [18:49:11] S: 250 8BITMIME [18:49:11] C: MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [18:49:11] S: 530 authentication required - for help go to http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/sbc/dsl/mail/pop/pop-11.html [18:49:11] C: RSET [18:49:11] C: QUIT It doesn't even seem to be performing the AUTH step. Suggestions? -- WL Current version is 3.99 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: filter incoming mails according to what time they were created
Hello Tom, Monday, March 26, 2007, 1:55:38 PM, among other things, I wrote: R I will set up some similar filters here and see what happens and report R back. I initially set up three filters in the following order: 1. Time of creation 00.00 to 07.59 2. Time of creation 08.00 to 15.59 3. Time of creation 16.00 to 23.59 and then used them to filter 850 messages that I copied from my 'Trash' folder, with the result that three messages with creation times like 00.00 and 8.00 did not get filtered anywhere! I did not do any further analysis of this test. I then changed the filter times as follows: 1. Time of creation 00.00 to 08.00 2. Time of creation 08.00 to 16.00 3. Time of creation 16.00 to 00.00 and repeated the filtering of the 850 messages with the following results: a) The filters work on creation times converted to my local time zone. b) One message was mis-sorted. It had a creation time of 08.00 but was repeatedly sorted by the No.3 filter. I cannot see anything unusual about the header of this message, but it is always ignored by filters 1 and 2 and found by no.3! c) A message with a creation time of 00.00 was sorted by No.3 filter whereas a message with a creation time of 00.01 was sorted by filter No.1. Thus it seems that these filters do not really overlap. Conclusion: I can confirm that some messages can get mis-sorted, but for reasons still unknown! I hope this will at least reassure you that the problem is not just local to you. :-| -- Best regards, Roger :flag-southafrica: The Bat! v3.98.6 :beta: with AntispamSniper 1.8.0.8 , on Windows XP, version 5 1, build 2600 and Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.98.04 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html Current version is 3.98.04 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: filter incoming mails according to what time they were created
Monday, March 26, 2007, 12:09:43 AM, you wrote: Hello Tom, Sunday, March 25, 2007, 8:02:19 AM, among other things, you wrote: T Saturday, March 24, 2007, 7:52:05 PM, you wrote: Saturday, March 24, 2007, 7:47:50 PM, you wrote: for statistical purposes I would like to filter incoming mails of a specific account by the time they were created. My intention is to have one filter for all emails I receive that were created between 08.00AM and 05.00 pm. Similar filters for 5.00pm to midnight and midnight to 08.00AM. SNIP T Instead of trying to do this with virtual folders, I have now set up T common folders and use filters sequentially on the incoming account to T provide me with the info. T However, I don't like that I need to create copies - the beauty of a T virtual folder is that you don't create copies just links. T Also, the output is still not correct as some emails show up under T both officehour filter and evening filter. I checked and rechecked the T filter and they seem fine (time of creation) and I again wonder if T this has something to do with the info in source and this time T sometimes shown as 21.35 -7.00 ? Are you quite sure the filters don't overlap? For example, one ending at 08.00 and another starting at 08.00. Just a thought :-) While I have indeed the filters overlapping on these, this would only matter if the emails arrived on the hour. The problem affects other emails - one email was created at 2.18 pm and it appears both in officehours and evening. -- Tom using TheBat! 3.98.4 on XP Current version is 3.98.04 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: filter incoming mails according to what time they were created
Hello Tom, Monday, March 26, 2007, 1:55:38 PM, among other things, you wrote: Are you quite sure the filters don't overlap? For example, one ending at 08.00 and another starting at 08.00. Just a thought :-) T While I have indeed the filters overlapping on these, this would only T matter if the emails arrived on the hour. Yes, I realised that, but it can happen, and you didn't indicate whether the mis sorts were random times. T The problem affects other T emails - one email was created at 2.18 pm and it appears both in T officehours and evening. As you suggested, it might have something to do with the differing time zones, but I really don't see why that should affect the filters. I will set up some similar filters here and see what happens and report back. -- Best regards, Roger :flag-southafrica: The Bat! v3.98.6 :beta: with AntispamSniper 1.8.0.8 , on Windows XP, version 5 1, build 2600 and Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.98.04 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: filter incoming mails according to what time they were created
Hello Tom, Sunday, March 25, 2007, 8:02:19 AM, among other things, you wrote: T Saturday, March 24, 2007, 7:52:05 PM, you wrote: Saturday, March 24, 2007, 7:47:50 PM, you wrote: for statistical purposes I would like to filter incoming mails of a specific account by the time they were created. My intention is to have one filter for all emails I receive that were created between 08.00AM and 05.00 pm. Similar filters for 5.00pm to midnight and midnight to 08.00AM. SNIP T Instead of trying to do this with virtual folders, I have now set up T common folders and use filters sequentially on the incoming account to T provide me with the info. T However, I don't like that I need to create copies - the beauty of a T virtual folder is that you don't create copies just links. T Also, the output is still not correct as some emails show up under T both officehour filter and evening filter. I checked and rechecked the T filter and they seem fine (time of creation) and I again wonder if T this has something to do with the info in source and this time T sometimes shown as 21.35 -7.00 ? Are you quite sure the filters don't overlap? For example, one ending at 08.00 and another starting at 08.00. Just a thought :-) -- Best regards, Roger :flag-southafrica: The Bat! v3.98.6 :beta: with AntispamSniper 1.8.0.8 , on Windows XP, version 5 1, build 2600 and Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.98.04 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: filter incoming mails according to what time they were created
Tom @ 2007-3-24 1:04:43 AM filter incoming mails according to what time they were created mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] for statistical purposes I would like to filter incoming mails of a specific account by the time they were created. My intention is to have one filter for all emails I receive that were created between 08.00AM and 05.00 pm. Similar filters for 5.00pm to midnight and midnight to 08.00AM. SNIP I don't think I could do this with the easy conditions offered under filters? Have you looked at the Time Of filter? -- Chris Using The Bat! v3.98.4 on Windows Vista 6.0 Build 6000. Accessing a POP3 mailbox. Notice in a dry cleaner's window: ANYONE LEAVING THEIR GARMENTS HERE FOR MORE THAN 30 DAYS WILL BE DISPOSED OF pgpgTAo4qVQ7M.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.98.04 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: filter incoming mails according to what time they were created
Saturday, March 24, 2007, 7:47:50 PM, you wrote: for statistical purposes I would like to filter incoming mails of a specific account by the time they were created. My intention is to have one filter for all emails I receive that were created between 08.00AM and 05.00 pm. Similar filters for 5.00pm to midnight and midnight to 08.00AM. SNIP I don't think I could do this with the easy conditions offered under filters? Have you looked at the Time Of filter? I did not see that before but I am filtering to a virtual folder and I would like to set the new filter to work on the virtual folder. Filter in virtual folders only provides for date or time interval not time of? -- Tom using TheBat! 3.98.4 on XP Current version is 3.98.04 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: filter incoming mails according to what time they were created
Saturday, March 24, 2007, 7:52:05 PM, you wrote: Saturday, March 24, 2007, 7:47:50 PM, you wrote: for statistical purposes I would like to filter incoming mails of a specific account by the time they were created. My intention is to have one filter for all emails I receive that were created between 08.00AM and 05.00 pm. Similar filters for 5.00pm to midnight and midnight to 08.00AM. SNIP Instead of trying to do this with virtual folders, I have now set up common folders and use filters sequentially on the incoming account to provide me with the info. However, I don't like that I need to create copies - the beauty of a virtual folder is that you don't create copies just links. Also, the output is still not correct as some emails show up under both officehour filter and evening filter. I checked and rechecked the filter and they seem fine (time of creation) and I again wonder if this has something to do with the info in source and this time sometimes shown as 21.35 -7.00 ? -- Tom using TheBat! 3.98.4 on XP Current version is 3.98.04 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
filter incoming mails according to what time they were created
Hello Everyone, for statistical purposes I would like to filter incoming mails of a specific account by the time they were created. My intention is to have one filter for all emails I receive that were created between 08.00AM and 05.00 pm. Similar filters for 5.00pm to midnight and midnight to 08.00AM. I looked a the source code of incoming email and tried to find the information required. I am not sure which line has the right information and get confused by the fact that there may be an adjustment to my time zone or GMT. In most emails it appears that the line Date underneath subject shows the right time and if the adjustment (+11.00) is identical to my own, than the time is correct. In other cases it appears as -7.00 and looking at other data, the correct time would be deducting 7 hours from the time shown. Could someone please explain this to me and provide some guidance as to how I best write a filter? I suppose some regEx can do this but that's beyond me. I don't think I could do this with the easy conditions offered under filters? -- Best regards, Tom using TheBat! 3.98.4 on XP Current version is 3.98.04 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Unable to sign with pkcs#11 or what am I doing wrong ?
Hello, just got an identity card with a chip and I try this to sign an email. But this does not work. (only intend is to sign not encrytion) What I did : menu options - s/mime : enable Microsoft CryptoApi Cryptographic Service Provider : Belgium Identity Card CSP signing hash algorithm : SHA-1 enabled : Keep associations between e-mail address and .. in the account : sign when completed and enable S/mime in the account in the edit personal certificates I see the certificates then when I send a message from this account The Bat says : Cannot find a certificate to sign message from email address Do I something wrong here ? Any help is appriciated. -- Best regards, Patrick Using The Bat! v3.95.3 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.95.08 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
what is a postmaster in the address book?
Hi guys, I sent out a message and mistakenly pushed the wrong button - so it ended up being sent to a sublist of my address book. However, I noticed that one of the sublist address entry was supposed to be an empty one, such as xyz, but it seems to me that it's automatically filled and became xyzpostmaster. Even worse, some people who are not in that sublist reported back that they received the rogue message... Does anyone know what exactly does postmaster do in this case? -- Regards, Anthony Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What is alternative forward?
Hallo Costas, On Sun, 3 Sep 2006 23:31:14 +0300GMT (3-9-2006, 22:31 , where I live), you wrote: CP Would anybody please explain what alternative forward is? There are two ways to forward a message. You can forward the old message as a part of the message body of the new message and you can forward it as an attachment. You can make that choice in Account - Properties - Templates - Forward - Forward as attachment Whatever way you select there is the default way to forward any message. When you select 'alternative forward' it selects the non default way. -- Groetjes, Roelof WinErr 004: Erroneous error - nothing is wrong http://www.voormijalleen.nl/ The Bat! 3.81.18 RC2 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 1 pop3 account, server on LAN OTFE enabled P4 3GHz 2 GB RAM pgpRHZVqT68Wu.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What is alternative forward?
Hello Roelof, Monday, September 4, 2006, 12:49:44 AM, you wrote (possibly edited): On Sun, 3 Sep 2006 23:31:14 +0300GMT (3-9-2006, 22:31 , where I live), you wrote: CP Would anybody please explain what alternative forward is? There are two ways to forward a message. You can forward the old message as a part of the message body of the new message and you can forward it as an attachment. Thank you for the clarification. -- Best regards, Costas Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: What is Inbox - Known for?
Hello Chris, Tuesday, August 29, 2006, 7:38:25 PM, you wrote: Andrew Diederich @ 2006-8-29 8:30:02 PM What is Inbox - Known for? mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I have a folder called Inbox - Known in one of my two accounts, but nothing is in it. I can't figure out what _should_ be in it, either. It does look like a system generated folder. What's it for? It is for messages from contacts in your address book. There is also a pre-built filter in the Sorting Office that will move messages from these people into the Known folder. The filter is called Known. You may need to enable it. Mystery solved, thanks! Outside of mail lists most of the mail I get is from known people, so I don't think I'll wind up using it. If Inbox - Known was just a reference to the email, and not a move or copy, I'd probably use it, though. -- Andrew Diederich Using Voyager v3.80.04 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What is Inbox - Known for?
Hi Andrew, on Wed, 30 Aug 2006 13:08:58 -0600GMT (30.08.2006, 21:08 +0200GMT here), you wrote: AAD Mystery solved, thanks! Outside of mail lists most of the mail I get AD is from known people, so I don't think I'll wind up using it. If AD Inbox - Known was just a reference to the email, and not a move or AD copy, I'd probably use it, though. I'm sure you can make a Virtual Folder do that. AD Using Voyager v3.80.04 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 AD Service Pack 2 There is a new version of Voyager, based on The Bat! 3.81.14 Beta. If interested, get it at http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/voyager_beta14.rar -- Cheers Peter The Bat! v3.81.17 RC1 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195 plenty of POP accounts, no IMAP, OTFE enabled Dell Latitude C600 P3 at 1002 MHz, 512 MB RAM Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What is Inbox - Known for?
Hello Peter, On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] PM There is a new version of Voyager, based on The Bat! 3.81.14 Beta. You had me all excited there for a minute until I realised that it's not exactly new and it's the one I have already installed :-( -- Regards, Richard | The Bat! 3.81.17 RC1. POP3 account AntispamSniper plug-in | Windows XP (build 2600), version 5. 1 Service Pack 2 | F-Prot AV, Outpost Firewall Pro, Spysweeper, Adaware, SpyBot Holiday in France: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/lazyhomes/holiday.html Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
What is Inbox - Known for?
Hello Batfolk, I have a folder called Inbox - Known in one of my two accounts, but nothing is in it. I can't figure out what _should_ be in it, either. It does look like a system generated folder. What's it for? Thanks for the help. -- Andrew Diederich Using Voyager v3.80.04 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What is Inbox - Known for?
Andrew Diederich @ 2006-8-29 8:30:02 PM What is Inbox - Known for? mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I have a folder called Inbox - Known in one of my two accounts, but nothing is in it. I can't figure out what _should_ be in it, either. It does look like a system generated folder. What's it for? It is for messages from contacts in your address book. There is also a pre-built filter in the Sorting Office that will move messages from these people into the Known folder. The filter is called Known. You may need to enable it. -- Chris Using The Bat! v3.80.06 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2. Accessing a POP3 mailbox. A .44 magnum beats four aces. pgpEDewsBE80o.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What is a part0001.bin file?
Hallo subscriber2list, On Mon, 15 May 2006 09:29:02 -0400GMT (15-5-2006, 15:29 +0200, where I live), you wrote: S Soo, I took a look at this respective inbox's folder and saw both S the .tbb and .tbi files, but also noted a part0001.bin file. I S suspect the part0001.bin file may be the missing messages, That's right. S but am somewhat befuddled as to why TB!'s maintenance activity S didn't incorporate these messages back into the overall flow/thread S of messages. Don't know that either. The best way restore the messages from the .bin is to do this: Move the .bin to somewhere else. Rename it to messages.tbb Now from TB's menu Tools - Import messages - TB msgbase v2 - browse to your renamed .bin -- Groetjes, Roelof WinErr: 019 User error - Not our fault. Is Not! Is Not! The Bat! 3.80.03 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 1 pop3 account, server on LAN OTFE enabled P4 3GHz 2 GB RAM pgpfLZJhHRPhF.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What is a part0001.bin file?
subscriber2list @ 5/15/2006 11:05:57 AM What is a part0001.bin file? mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I followed the... suggested procedure, but unfortunately, it didn't work for me as I got the following message when I attempted to import the messages 0 message(s) converted. Oh, well Try opening the file in a text editor, like WordPad. Perhaps the data is there, but not in a useable form. -- Chris Quoting when replying to this message is good for you and me. Using The Bat! v3.80.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2. Accessing a POP3 mailbox. Spotted in a safari park: ELEPHANTS PLEASE STAY IN YOUR CAR pgpFBf3DGrMr5.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
What was that 'close all folders' shortcut?
Recently someone pointed out that a shortcut existed to close all folers in the folder tree, and also opened all folders. I can't find it and can't remember it. -- Marten Gallagher Annery Kiln Web Design www.annerykiln.co.uk Using The Bat! 3.71.03 with POPFile 0.22.4 on Windows XP 5.1 tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What was that 'close all folders' shortcut?
Hello Marten, On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 11:46:32 +GMT Marten Gallagher wrote: MG Recently someone pointed out that a shortcut existed to close all folers in MG the folder tree, and also opened all folders. Ctrl + * (on the numeric keypad) -- Regards, Feli The Bat! 3.72.04 (Beta) on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2 BayesIt! 0.8.4 Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: What was that 'close all folders' shortcut?
shortcut to close all folders Ctrl + * (on the numeric keypad) Thanks - acutally CTRL + 8 does it for me as well as * on num pad. -- Marten Gallagher Annery Kiln Web Design www.annerykiln.co.uk Using The Bat! 3.71.03 with POPFile 0.22.4 on Windows XP 5.1 Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What happened to my F4 functionality?
Hello Leonard, On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] LSB What is a cut mark? You have to put dash dash then space and that way the signature is recognised and can be ignored when quoting. You could take away one of the Leonard's too :-) -- Regards, Richard | The Bat! 3.63.15 (Beta) with SpamPal POP3 account and no Plug-ins | Windows XP (build 2600), version 5. 1 Service Pack 2 | F-Prot AV, Outpost Firewall Pro 3.0, Spysweeper, Adaware, SpyBot Holiday in France: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/lazyhomes/holiday.html Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What happened to my F4 functionality?
Leonard S. Berkowitz @ 12/19/2005 8:49:57 PM What happened to my F4 functionality? mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You must be on to something because in this reply to you, it worked. Or it was the new version of The Bat! What is a cut mark? Leonard -- Leonard S. Berkowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] That little dash-fash is a cut mark. It tells The Bat! to cut off everything below when replying. However, for it to work, it must be on its own line and match the following pattern exactly: dashdashspace If you use quick templates, take a look at the ISSIGNATURE macro. -- Chris Quoting when replying to this message is good for you and me. Using The Bat! v3.62.14 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2. Accessing a POP3 mailbox. Bug? That's not a bug, that's a feature. pgpjrlRhZyAkt.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
What happened to my F4 functionality?
I upgraded today to 3.60.07 from 2.12. For a long time, if I highlighted part of a message to which I wanted to reply, only the hightlighted part would be quoted when I hit the F4 key instead of a reply icon. Now, the whole message is quoted. Is there some way of setting this to behave as it did previously? Thank you. Leonard S. Berkowitz -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] TheBat version 3.60.07 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What happened to my F4 functionality?
Leonard S. Berkowitz @ 12/19/2005 5:08:47 PM What happened to my F4 functionality? mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I upgraded today to 3.60.07 from 2.12. For a long time, if I highlighted part of a message to which I wanted to reply, only the hightlighted part would be quoted when I hit the F4 key instead of a reply icon. Now, the whole message is quoted. Is there some way of setting this to behave as it did previously? It works for me in 3.62.14. What is your reply filter? Perhaps you're using the wrong macro... Also, your cut mark is missing the space. -- Chris Quoting when replying to this message is good for you and me. Using The Bat! v3.62.14 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2. Accessing a POP3 mailbox. How can you tell when sour cream goes bad? pgpEo1z0YnC3K.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What happened to my F4 functionality?
Tuesday, December 20, 2005, Leonard S. Berkowitz wrote: For a long time, if I highlighted part of a message to which I wanted to reply, only the hightlighted part would be quoted when I hit the F4 key instead of a reply icon. Now, the whole message is quoted. Is there some way of setting this to behave as it did previously? Do you have any %QUOTES macros in your reply templates? -- Urban Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so. (Douglas Adams) Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What happened to my F4 functionality?
Hello Leonard! On Monday, December 19, 2005, 5:08 PM, you wrote: upgraded today to 3.60.07 from 2.12. For a long time, if I highlighted part of a message to which I wanted to reply, only the hightlighted part would be quoted when I hit the F4 key instead of a reply icon. Now, the whole message is quoted. Is there some way of setting this to behave as it did previously? It's a bug. I was involved on the TBBETA list in its fix. https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5149 Try v. 3.62.14 from RitLabs download page, http://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/thebat/download.php -- Best regards, Mary The Bat! 3.63.15 (Beta) on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: What happened to my F4 functionality?
On Monday, December 19, 2005, at 7:23:12 PM, Chris wrote: C It works for me in 3.62.14. What is your reply filter? Perhaps you're C using the wrong macro... C Also, your cut mark is missing the space. You must be on to something because in this reply to you, it worked. What is a cut mark? Leonard -- Leonard S. Berkowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: What happened to my F4 functionality?
On Monday, December 19, 2005, at 7:31:17 PM, Urban wrote: U Do you have any %QUOTES macros in your reply templates? Yes. -- Leonard Leonard S. Berkowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: What happened to my F4 functionality?
On Monday, December 19, 2005, at 8:26:46 PM, Mary Bull wrote: MB Try v. 3.62.14 from RitLabs download page, MB http://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/thebat/download.php Thanks, but I have paid for the Home edition and this seems to be the Pro edition Leonard -- Leonard S. Berkowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: What happened to my F4 functionality?
On Monday, December 19, 2005, at 8:26:46 PM, Mary Bull wrote: MB Try v. 3.62.14 from RitLabs download page, MB http://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/thebat/download.php OK. I downloaded 3.62.14 Home edition and the problem is apparently solved. Thanks, Mary. Leonard -- Leonard S. Berkowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What is winmail.dat file attachment? EOM
Hi, I have my data back and the utility for getting any information from WINMAIL.DAT files is a utility called WMPARSER. You can do a search on Google for it. Some of the links it turns up don't go anywhere, so you might have to try. -- Regards, Ian A. White, CPEng | /| / WAI Engineering | /_| / Sydney 2000 |/ |/ Australia :Australia_Flag: Ph:0418 203 229 (Int'l: +61 418 203 229) Fax: (02) 9622 0450 (Int'l: +61 2 9622 0450) Home Page: www.wai.com.au mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] callto://waiwhite on Skype e-mail address not to be provided to any other party except with written permission of Ian A. White, CPEng. ** Where work is requested without a formal written quotation, all work is carried out on the basis that the WAI Engineering Terms Conditions (available at www.wai.com.au) have been read and accepted unconditionally. All work supplied in accordance with WAI Engineering Terms Conditions available at www.wai.com.au ** ** If you have received this message and/or attachments and are either not the person(s) and/or organisation(s) indicated above or the information is not intended for you, please reply by e-mail to WAI Engineering, and destroy the original and all copies of this message and any attachments. This message contains privileged and confidential information, and is intended for the person(s) and/or organisation(s) indicated. If you are not the intended recipient(s), any dissemination, copying, or use of any information contained in this communication, in any form, is strictly prohibited. ** Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What is the role of all those directories that are getting created .. in the Voyager ..??
Hallo Narayana, On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 22:44:08 +0530GMT (18-11-2005, 18:14 +0100, where I live), you wrote: N Can someone tell me as to what is the role of all those directories N getting created with *.EBB *.EBI files inside them. I have only 4 N e-mail id's configured. N Yet I seem to have a looot of directories with all these files with N funny names as directories. Not really a beta issue. But they're your folders. You mention four id's, so I guess you mean you've got four accounts configured. Per default every account has at least six folders (inbox, inbox known, outbox, sent mail, trash and junk) so four accounts gives you 24 folders, each with their own directory with a messages.ebb/.ebi pair (.tbb and .tbi for a non encrypted message base) Part of TB's encryption system is that they've got odd names, where a plain message base has names corresponding with the actual name as shown by TB. -- Groetjes, Roelof The ultimate Virus, a self-installing copy of Bob. The Bat! 3.62.14 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 1 pop3 account, server on LAN OTFE enabled P4 3GHz 2 GB RAM pgpe98fOF7jQG.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What is the role of all those directories that are getting created .. in the Voyager ..??
Hello Roelof Otten, on Fri, 18 Nov 2005 19:04:35 +0100 (2005-11-18 19:04:35 in .nl) in the message with reference mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] you [RO] wrote (at least in part): RO Not really a beta issue. RO But they're your folders. You mention four id's, so I guess you mean RO you've got four accounts configured. Per default every account has at RO least six folders (inbox, inbox known, outbox, sent mail, trash and RO junk) so four accounts gives you 24 folders, each with their own RO directory with a messages.ebb/.ebi pair (.tbb and .tbi for a non RO encrypted message base) Voyager doesn't offer you a choice between un-encrypted or encrypted msg bases, in my experience as a TB-Home user and a Voyager UNREGISTERED user. -- Kind regards, Peter Ouwehand - - - Using A program which insists to be : The Bat! V3.62.13 (Beta) (Home) An anti-spam filter which insists to be : Bayes Filter Plugin v2.0.3 An OS which insists to be : Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 Multiple POP3, one gmail.com, one fastmail.fm IMAP Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What is winmail.dat file attachment? EOM
Wednesday, November 16, 2005, rich gregory wrote: The fentun product seems Netscape-centric. Any other ideas how one could see inside a winmail.dat file? This should work, I think http://www.mail-archive.com/tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com/msg34347.html Else, there a few links at http://dev.kanngard.net/Permalinks/ID_20050429165927.html and an online conversion at http://tud.at/php/tnef/ -- Urban Moses led the Hebrew slaves to the Red Sea, where they made unleavened bread which is bread made without any ingredients. Moses went up on Mount Cyanide to get the ten commandments. He died before he ever reached Canada. Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What is winmail.dat file attachment? EOM
Admin, On Wednesday, November 16, 2005, 7:53:10 AM, you (Admin at AK) wrote: AaA see subject Actually I had a program that would parse the WINMAIL.DAT file after it was saved to disk. Unfortunately it is on the hard disk that is with a data recovery service and my backups were corrupted. When I get the disk back (hopefully with the data) I will let you know what it is. -- Regards, Ian A. White, CPEng | /| / WAI Engineering | /_| / Sydney 2000 |/ |/ Australia :Australia_Flag: Ph:0418 203 229 (Int'l: +61 418 203 229) Fax: (02) 9622 0450 (Int'l: +61 2 9622 0450) Home Page: www.wai.com.au mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] callto://waiwhite on Skype Using The Bat! 3.62.12 Professional on a 1.4 GHz Centrino with 1 GB RAM and 60 GB HDD, Windows XP Pro with Service Pack 2, and MailWasher Pro Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What is winmail.dat file attachment? EOM
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 at 17:12:08 -0500, Rich wrote: The fentun product seems Netscape-centric. Any other ideas how one could see inside a winmail.dat file? (Windows w/ IE browser) I don't use it with a browser at all. As I recall you can: * use a command line with a single argument (the winmail.dat file) * drag a winmail.dat file to the fentun.exe file in windows explorer and drop it * put a shortcut to fentun.exe in your C:\Documents and Settings\username\SendTo directory and then right click on the winmail.dat file and send to fentun I use the third of these options. There is another application, WMDecode, at www.biblet.com. You could try that if you don't like Fentun. -- Robin Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
What is winmail.dat file attachment? EOM
see subject -- Marten Gallagher Annery Kiln Web Design www.annerykiln.co.uk Using The Bat! 3.62.14 with POPFile 0.22.1 on Windows XP 5.1 Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What is winmail.dat file attachment? EOM
see subject Oh dear I should have done what I tell everyone who asks me questions... google it Answered - FTWNTK: Data file added by Outlook when sending in RTF format (i.e: not plain text) to 'maintain the look and feel of the original message as sent'. -- Marten Gallagher Annery Kiln Web Design www.annerykiln.co.uk Using The Bat! 3.62.14 with POPFile 0.22.1 on Windows XP 5.1 Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What is winmail.dat file attachment? EOM
Admin at AK @ 11/15/2005 2:53:10 PM What is winmail.dat file attachment? EOM mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [What is winmail.dat file attachment?] It is probably from someone using Outlook who is writing you in rich-text format. To extract it, try using this free (as in freedom) utility: http://tnef.sourceforge.net/ -- Chris Quoting when replying to this message is good for you and me. Using The Bat! v3.62.14 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2. Accessing a POP3 mailbox. I'd love to go out with you, but it's my parakeet's bowling night. pgpJl8AMTJu5j.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: What is winmail.dat file attachment? EOM
Admin at AK @ 11/15/2005 2:53:10 PM What is winmail.dat file attachment? EOM mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [What is winmail.dat file attachment?] It is probably from someone using Outlook who is writing you in rich-text format. To extract it, try using this free (as in freedom) utility: http://tnef.sourceforge.net/ Thanks but that seems to be a Unix thingy - now I know what a win mail.dat file is I'll just delete it. Now if there was a way for TB to do that automatically - cool. BTW your message came through with a part.txt attachment - it was the TB current version data. -- Marten Gallagher Annery Kiln Web Design www.annerykiln.co.uk Using The Bat! 3.62.14 with POPFile 0.22.1 on Windows XP 5.1 Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What is winmail.dat file attachment? EOM
Dear Marten, @15-Nov-2005, 21:22 Marten Gallagher [MG] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Chris: MG BTW your message came through with a part.txt attachment - it was MG the TB current version data. Chris's message was (as is mine) signed with a PGP/MIME signature. The difference between a normal plain text clear signed message and a PGP/MIME signed is that this MIME signing adds an attachment to the message. This attachment contains the signature data. Now - this is where clever-server-mode kicks in. When there is a MIME attachment, any footer to be added by the list server has to go as an attachment following any other attachments already present. Thus - you see a part.txt containing the list footer. Does that help? -- Cheers -- //.arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator and fellow end user TB! v3.62.14 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2 ' pgp7RJtzJhh6W.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What is winmail.dat file attachment? EOM
On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 at 21:22:04 +, Marten wrote: It is probably from someone using Outlook who is writing you in rich-text format. To extract it, try using this free (as in freedom) utility: http://tnef.sourceforge.net/ Thanks but that seems to be a Unix thingy - now I know what a win mail.dat file is I'll just delete it. Now if there was a way for TB to do that automatically - cool. Sometimes the winmail.dat file contains attachments that you actually need. Try Fentun at http://www.fentun.com/ for a windows decoder. -- Robin Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
What Triggers 'Read' Filter
Hi I know this may be a really dumb question! But what actually triggers the 'Read' filter? Is it the action of actually reading the mail OR is it the fact that a mail has been read? I ask because I would like a filter that moves mails that have been read and are of a certain age to a specified folder. I want to archive certain messages when they reach a specific age and I have read them. I tried the 'Alternative deletion method for purging folders' but it doesn't seem to work the way I want as my archive folder ends up with messages I don't want to keep. Or maybe I just can't see the obvious. -- Best regards Barry barryh'at'kentra'dot'co'dot'uk Using TheBat! version 3.60.07 and BayesIt! 0.8.4 Release Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What Triggers 'Read' Filter
Hallo BJH, On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 09:59:48 +0100GMT (20-10-2005, 10:59 +0200, where I live), you wrote: B But what actually triggers the 'Read' filter? The changing from 'unread' status to 'read'. B I want to archive certain messages when they reach a specific age and I B have read them. You could create a filter that checks whether the message has been read and is older than your specific age and then moves the message to another folder. And then you create a recurring re-filter action in the scheduler and assign that filter to it. -- Groetjes, Roelof Windows: If I wanted a MAC, I woulda BOUGHT one! The Bat! 3.61.13 Echo (Beta) Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 1 pop3 account, server on LAN OTFE enabled P4 3GHz 2 GB RAM pgp9ZcfXOUiID.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What Triggers 'Read' Filter
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 12:23:13 +0200, Roelof Otten wrote: You could create a filter that checks whether the message has been read and is older than your specific age and then moves the message to another folder. Where do I place the filter, Incoming, Outgoing, Read, Replied or Selective Download? And then you create a recurring re-filter action in the scheduler and assign that filter to it. That's the bit I was missing! -- Best regards Barry barryh'at'kentra'dot'co'dot'uk Using TheBat! version 3.60.07 and BayesIt! 0.8.4 Release Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What Triggers 'Read' Filter
Hallo BJH, On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 12:16:41 +0100GMT (20-10-2005, 13:16 +0200, where I live), you wrote: You could create a filter that checks whether the message has been read and is older than your specific age and then moves the message to another folder. B Where do I place the filter, Incoming, Outgoing, Read, Replied or B Selective Download? I'd place it between the incoming filters. Together with the required 'read' status that will mean that it won't be triggered by accident. And then you create a recurring re-filter action in the scheduler and assign that filter to it. B That's the bit I was missing! For this you need to set the folder (in the schedule) you want to run the filter on. The last time I tried it, it worked only for the first selected folder. So when you want to process multiple folders, I'd suggest that you use multiple schedules. -- Groetjes, Roelof WYSIWYG: see Optical illusion The Bat! 3.61.13 Echo (Beta) Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 1 pop3 account, server on LAN OTFE enabled P4 3GHz 2 GB RAM pgp5eXkRCkt0N.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
What about The Bat! Mobile Edition ?
Hi all and Ritlabs folks, As The Bat! 3.5.0.30 has been released recently. I wonder how many time we have to wait before seeing the release of the long awaited and promised TBME ? Greetings, -- Claude Renaud Skype : Name : renaud_claude Number : 0870445179 Using The Bat! v3.5.30 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Themes dont vary a whole lot from what I see
Hello TBUDL, I finally got around to taking a look at all the different themes for TB. The majority of the ones I see dont offer all that much change. All the changes are very slight. I guess Im used to themes for other programs where everything is altered sometimes drastically. -- Darrin Emailed using The Bat! V 3.5.25 smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Themes dont vary a whole lot from what I see
D I finally got around to taking a look at all the different themes for D TB. The majority of the ones I see dont offer all that much change. D All the changes are very slight. I guess Im used to themes for other D programs where everything is altered sometimes drastically. That is called Skins. Here you add only some extra to the default color scheme of your Windows settings. -- Vili Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
