Re: SPEC / mod_specweb99.c
MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote: Hi, Does anybody know if the mod_specweb99.c been 'blessed' by the SPEC committee ?..I mean, have they acknowledged that the module acts in a SPEC compliant manner? No, they have not blessed it. I had a doubt regarding executing CGI scripts in SPECweb99 - somebody here told me that the SPEC mandates the web server to fork a child process to execute a CGI script - is that so ?. Yes, that is so. You need to configure a SPEC CGI independently from mod_specweb99. Fortunately this is only a tiny fraction of the workload. In spite of the low frequency of CGI requests, I've seen multiple zombie CGI processes hanging around quite often. Bill S. had a fix for apr/unix/pools.c::free_proc_chain not too long ago that might help with the zombies. Switching to a compiled CGI as Dave suggested wouldn't hurt either. Greg
Re: Digest Auth Benchmark?
--On Wednesday, February 19, 2003 1:52 AM -0800 Paul Querna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is anyone interested in writing digest authentication abilities into flood? Sounds like we have a volunteer. =) I don't believe it would be terribly hard to add digest support. We already save the cookies on a session basis. We'd have to do the same for digest. -- justin
Re: SPEC / mod_specweb99.c
> I had a doubt regarding executing CGI scripts in SPECweb99 - somebody here > told me that the SPEC mandates the web server to fork a child process to > execute a CGI script - is that so ?. Speaking of cgi scripts - be sure to use the C based one for this, the perl based reference is quite a bit more cpu intensive. The cgi component really adds up in the cpu time, but then again, I think that was part of the point. The assumption was that a busy site would do certain things in the fastest way possible (ie mod_specweb) but that some things would continue to be done the hard way (basic cgi). If anyone does not have a copy of the C program you can get it from me or from the specweb archives (part of the submittals). Dave
Digest Auth Benchmark?
is there any benchmarking tool that does Digest Authentication? As far as I can see ab, flood and all others that I can find on google, just do basic auth. Is anyone interested in writing digest authentication abilities into flood? -chip
about flood program with ssl
Hello. I'm just new in flood. I wanna test my openssl page, but i can't know even it can , or can't . examples in flood say only about sucess or failure about ssl page. is there a way?=20 would you mind if i ask you to show some sources to me? And , In flood program, plz teach me where is good documents are placed. just few documents in apache website are only document? thanks for reading. _ 전세계인이 함께하는 웹 메일 서비스인 MSN Hotmail을 만나 보세요. http://loginnet.passport.com/login.srf?id=2&svc=mail&cbid=24325&msppjph=1&lc=1042
Re: comeback
--On Friday, February 14, 2003 11:11 AM +0100 Jacek Prucia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: on flood development, but I might do something useful anyway. I've already talked to Justin about few flood related issues and he insisted on making them public, so here's it is... I'll just state that this list is the home for flood development. =) We need a 'real' release. That is, one that follows httpd release guidelines as close as possible. This produces a few problems, in particular: Yup. 1. KEYS file In order to sign release tarballs, RM needs a valid PGP/GPG key in public KEYS file. I suggested separate KEYS file, but since Justin pointed out that there's no problem importing given key to httpd KEYS file (even if that person is not directly related to httpd development) -- it might not be the best idea after all. Yup, when you are ready to do the release, just add your key to the KEYS file in httpd-dist. If you need access to the repository (you probably don't have it already), drop me a line and I will ensure you are added to httpd-dist. (Or, just submit a patch to this list with your public key and one of us can commit it.) We can also setup a way to verify your key as well. I'm not aware of anyone else who lives near you, but we may be able to find someone on the same continent. (If possible, we could arrange a phone call or something - making international calls is a bit troublesome for me, but I imagine we can work something out.) 2. tarball signing We have to sing releases. As Sander said -- even if flood uses no special privileges and won't open socket listening for incoming connection, we have to sign tarballs, to assure everybody, that even httpd subproject releases are secure and high quality. I'm +1 on this. Totally. =) It's about time to get my and Phi-Long's patches out the door, so after we have things sorted out -- let's do a 1.1 release. After that we have to define showstoppers for 1.2 and start to work on that. My key task for 1.2 is documentation. Merge with httpd-docs subprojects right now seems tricky to me, but we can have our own xsl for the time beeing. And that is just what I'm gonna work on right now. Yup. If there's anything I can do to help, let me know. But, I'll stand back and let you work your magic. If you need help or guidance, let me know and I'll give pointers. It's unlikely that I'll have a lot of time, but I should be able to test a release candidate and provide feedback. Good luck! -- justin
Re: problem while using flood
--On Monday, February 17, 2003 11:20 AM +0530 MAASK Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Note that I had to moderate your post through. Please make sure that you are subscribed to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list. I checked out http-test/flood, apr, and apr-util from the apache cvs to test my apache server (1.3.20) running on linux. I got errors while running buildconf in all 3, flood, apr and apr-util directories. The error was 'cannot find libtoolize' or "libtool not found". Where can I get libtool? You need to install libtool. You can get it from: http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/libtool.html You may also need autoconf as well: http://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf/ Also in the http.conf, I have set the ScoreBoard file to logs/apache_runtime_status but it hasnt been created. What else do I have to do for it? I executed the show_compile_settings() function in the code and it shows HAVE_SHMGET ON and USE_SHMGET_SCOREBOARD ON. Do I have to change anything else to see the scoreboard file?? I believe shmget() does not actually create the scoreboard file in a manner in which other processes can read them. Good luck! -- justin
problem while using flood
Hi, I checked out http-test/flood, apr, and apr-util from the apache cvs to test my apache server (1.3.20) running on linux. I got errors while running buildconf in all 3, flood, apr and apr-util directories. The error was 'cannot find libtoolize' or "libtool not found". Where can I get libtool? Also in the http.conf, I have set the ScoreBoard file to logs/apache_runtime_status but it hasnt been created. What else do I have to do for it? I executed the show_compile_settings() function in the code and it shows HAVE_SHMGET ON and USE_SHMGET_SCOREBOARD ON. Do I have to change anything else to see the scoreboard file?? Thansk in advance, Asmita (MAASK group) _ The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
Re: SPEC / mod_specweb99.c
> Does anybody know if the mod_specweb99.c been 'blessed' by the SPEC > committee ?..I mean, have they acknowledged that the module acts in a SPEC > compliant manner? As far as I am aware, the module has not been used for benchmarks submitted to the SPEC organization. That is the moment any code would get 'blessed': SPEC validates the results and the way they were obtained and the benchmarkee submits the API source code as part of this process. > I had a doubt regarding executing CGI scripts in SPECweb99 - somebody here > told me that the SPEC mandates the web server to fork a child process to > execute a CGI script - is that so ?. This is the case for Dynamic CGI GET requests. You set a special URL for this in your rc file. All other dynamic requests can be processed by in-process code and most if not all submittors have written code for this. S. -- Covalent Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering groupVoice: (415) 856 4214 303 Second Street #375 South Fax: (415) 856 4210 San Francisco CA 94107 PGP Fingerprint: 7A8D B189 E871 80CB 9521 9320 C11E 7B47 964F 31D9
SPEC / mod_specweb99.c
Hi, Does anybody know if the mod_specweb99.c been 'blessed' by the SPEC committee ?..I mean, have they acknowledged that the module acts in a SPEC compliant manner? I had a doubt regarding executing CGI scripts in SPECweb99 - somebody here told me that the SPEC mandates the web server to fork a child process to execute a CGI script - is that so ?. -Madhu
