Re: [Tex-music] New PMX beta, version 2.87
Dear Don,
Here is an example that i can get right by in line tex:
===
22 2 4 2 4 0 0
1 1 20 .0
bt
./
w200
a82 d b c //
rb4 rb8 [jl c14 b ] /
c84 d [u-10 d ]j rb //
f84 a zf c1+ za b zg a zf g zes /
by changing in the tex code this 2 lines :
\ibbu4{'b}{-1}\zq a\nbbl2\qb4c\zq{`g}\qb4{'b}\en% remove \nbbl2
\pnotes{1.41}\tbl1\qb1{'C}\nextvoice\nbbl2\qb2{''C}\tbu2\qb2B&\sk% replace
\nbbl2 by \nbbu2
by:
\ibbu4{'b}{-1}\zq a\qb4c\zq{`g}\qb4{'b}\en%
\pnotes{1.41}\tbl1\qb1{'C}\nextvoice\nbbu2\qb2{''C}\tbu2\qb2B&\sk%
Andre
From: Don Simons
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 4:46 PM
To: 'Werner Icking Music Archive'
Subject: [Tex-music] New PMX beta, version 2.87
I’ve just generated a new PMX beta version 2.87 that should be able to handle
most cases of staff-jumping beams that change multiplicity at the staff jump.
Thanks go to Andre for pointing out the issue. Please see psb.pdf and psb.pmx
for more details.
--Don Simons
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
Re: [Tex-music] New PMX beta
Dirk wrote >... > > The following PMX file produces the attached output. I can't play it on my > recorder. > > --- > 1 -1 1 4 4 0 6 0.0 0 1 1 20 0 > > 0 > ./ > w60m > c44x3 d r e44x3 f r c2 / > --- Thanks for the report! Maybe you need a sopranininino recorder :-) Meanwhile, I believe the typesetting issue has already been resolved in my working version. But I'm in the middle of a raft of fixes for other xtuplet+rest matters, so it may be a little while before I release a new version. --Don --- TeX-music@tug.org mailing list If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
Re: [Tex-music] New PMX beta
2017-12-08 2:57 GMT+02:00 Don Simons : > There’s a new beta distribution of PMX version 2.82 on WIMA, at > > http://icking-music-archive.org/software/pmx/pmx282PRE.zip > > The only new feature here is allowing xtuplets to end with a rest. It had > been sitting around waiting for an excuse to go public, and that excuse came > out of the blue when Christian specifically asked about that very feature. The following PMX file produces the attached output. I can't play it on my recorder. --- 1 -1 1 4 4 0 6 0.0 0 1 1 20 0 0 ./ w60m c44x3 d r e44x3 f r c2 / --- xxx.pdf Description: Adobe PDF document xxx.tex Description: TeX document --- TeX-music@tug.org mailing list If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
Re: [Tex-music] New PMX beta
Thanks Andre for the bug report. Since I can’t play ping pong over the weekend due to a strained muscle, this will give me something to while away the hours :). From: TeX-Music [mailto:tex-music-boun...@tug.org] On Behalf Of Andre Van Ryckeghem Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2017 11:17 PM To: tex-music@tug.org Subject: Re: [Tex-music] New PMX beta Thanks Don, i am very happy with this feature Here i have an example that sometimes fails to run, ie when removing the ‘nf’ 1 1 4 4 4 4 0 0 1 1 20 0 t ./ w160 f45a-x3nf za+ zd- r r r r r / == Andre From: Don Simons Sent: Friday, December 8, 2017 1:57 AM To: tex-music@tug.org <mailto:tex-music@tug.org> Subject: [Tex-music] New PMX beta There’s a new beta distribution of PMX version 2.82 on WIMA, at http://icking-music-archive.org/software/pmx/pmx282PRE.zip The only new feature here is allowing xtuplets to end with a rest. It had been sitting around waiting for an excuse to go public, and that excuse came out of the blue when Christian specifically asked about that very feature. --Don _ --- TeX-music@tug.org <mailto:TeX-music@tug.org> mailing list If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music --- TeX-music@tug.org mailing list If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
Re: [Tex-music] New PMX beta
Thanks Don, i am very happy with this feature Here i have an example that sometimes fails to run, ie when removing the ‘nf’ 1 1 4 4 4 4 0 0 1 1 20 0 t ./ w160 f45a-x3nf za+ zd- r r r r r / == Andre From: Don Simons Sent: Friday, December 8, 2017 1:57 AM To: tex-music@tug.org Subject: [Tex-music] New PMX beta There’s a new beta distribution of PMX version 2.82 on WIMA, at http://icking-music-archive.org/software/pmx/pmx282PRE.zip The only new feature here is allowing xtuplets to end with a rest. It had been sitting around waiting for an excuse to go public, and that excuse came out of the blue when Christian specifically asked about that very feature. --Don --- TeX-music@tug.org mailing list If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music --- TeX-music@tug.org mailing list If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
Re: [Tex-music] New PMX beta 2.622: All sorts of transposition, with MIDI too
Anything is possible, but some things are trickier than others. At the
moment, my thinking is (1) I'll add in some fairly explicit error messages
for this situation; (2) this will only affect a tiny fraction of the already
small number of people using PMX, and (3) anyone whom it does affect will
have been recompiling an old PMX source, an act only performed by people
familiar with the whole PMX process, and therefore people who can easily
make the necessary adjustment to the source file once the error message
tells them what the problem is.
By the way, after learning about this, I checked the AS command, for
changing sizes of different staves. It also requires a sequence of
specifiers which up to now were advertised to be per staff. For consistency
the MIDI changes, they should instead also be per instrument. I had never
checked this with any multi-staff instruments and no one has ever
complained. But having checked it now, I found out that it doesn't really
work as advertised; it does read in nv characters, but if there are
multi-staff instruments, it applies the specifier for the lowest staff to
all the staves of the instrument. So I'm planning to make this one also per
instrument, with a similar explicit error message if too many chaqracters
are input.
--Don
>-Original Message-
>From: TeX-Music [mailto:tex-music-boun...@tug.org] On Behalf Of Bob Tennent
>Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2013 11:11 AM
>To: Werner Icking Music Archive
>Subject: Re: [Tex-music] New PMX beta 2.622: All sorts of transposition,
with MIDI
>too
>
> >|Now that you mention this, the same issue applies to MIDI
> >|velocities, balances, and transpositions. My excuse is that
> >|as I worked out the transposition issues, I wanted to do it
> >|consistently by instruments rather than staves. Other than going
> >|back to the old way (which I don't really want to do), all I can
> >|think of is to put more information in the PMX-generated error
> >|message, and add some warnings to the documentation. Any other
> >|suggestions?
>
>Would it be possible to interpret the old notation as before and
>introduce new notation for the new way?
>
>Bob
>
> >|>But I see that when there is an instrument written on two
> >|>staves, like piano, in the previous versions of PMX you need to
> >|>insert two midi instruments, e.g. "It92ipipi", whilst in pmx2622
> >|>you have to insert just one midi instrument ("It92ipi"). This
> >|>produces incompatibility with pmx files created for the old
> >|>versions. Is there a way to avoid this problem?
>---
>TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
>If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
>http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
Re: [Tex-music] New PMX beta 2.622: All sorts of transposition, with MIDI too
>|Now that you mention this, the same issue applies to MIDI
>|velocities, balances, and transpositions. My excuse is that
>|as I worked out the transposition issues, I wanted to do it
>|consistently by instruments rather than staves. Other than going
>|back to the old way (which I don't really want to do), all I can
>|think of is to put more information in the PMX-generated error
>|message, and add some warnings to the documentation. Any other
>|suggestions?
Would it be possible to interpret the old notation as before and
introduce new notation for the new way?
Bob
>|>But I see that when there is an instrument written on two
>|>staves, like piano, in the previous versions of PMX you need to
>|>insert two midi instruments, e.g. "It92ipipi", whilst in pmx2622
>|>you have to insert just one midi instrument ("It92ipi"). This
>|>produces incompatibility with pmx files created for the old
>|>versions. Is there a way to avoid this problem?
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
Re: [Tex-music] New PMX beta 2.622: All sorts of transposition, with MIDI too
Good catch, Luigi! Now that you mention this, the same issue applies to MIDI
velocities, balances, and transpositions. My excuse is that as I worked out
the transposition issues, I wanted to do it consistently by instruments
rather than staves. Other than going back to the old way (which I don't
really want to do), all I can think of is to put more information in the
PMX-generated error message, and add some warnings to the documentation. Any
other suggestions?
--Don
>-Original Message-
>From: TeX-Music [mailto:tex-music-boun...@tug.org] On Behalf Of Luigi
Cataldi
>Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2013 2:39 AM
>To: tex-music@tug.org
>Subject: Re: [Tex-music] New PMX beta 2.622: All sorts of transposition,
with MIDI
>too
>
>On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 23:02:27 -0700
>Don Simons wrote:
>
>> I've just uploaded a new PMX beta to
>>
>> http://icking-music-archive.org/software/pmx/pmx2622.zip
>>
>> I would VERY much appreciate people experimenting with the kinds of
>> situations explained in the tutorial, and any other
transposition/key-change
>> situations you can think of, and report back on the mailing list with bug
>> reports, questions, errors in the tutorial, or suggestions.
>>
>
>My replay comes late, sorry.
>
>I'm very glad for the new version!
>But I see that when there is an instrument written on two staves, like
piano, in the
>previous versions of PMX you need to insert two midi instruments, e.g.
"It92ipipi",
>whilst in pmx2622 you have to insert just one midi instrument ("It92ipi").
This
>produces incompatibility with pmx files created for the old versions. Is
there a way to
>avoid this problem?
>
>Luigi
>
>--
>Luigi Cataldi
>---
>TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
>If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
>http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
Re: [Tex-music] New PMX beta 2.622: All sorts of transposition, with MIDI too
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 23:02:27 -0700
Don Simons wrote:
> I've just uploaded a new PMX beta to
>
> http://icking-music-archive.org/software/pmx/pmx2622.zip
>
> I would VERY much appreciate people experimenting with the kinds of
> situations explained in the tutorial, and any other transposition/key-change
> situations you can think of, and report back on the mailing list with bug
> reports, questions, errors in the tutorial, or suggestions.
>
My replay comes late, sorry.
I'm very glad for the new version!
But I see that when there is an instrument written on two staves, like piano,
in the previous versions of PMX you need to insert two midi instruments, e.g.
"It92ipipi", whilst in pmx2622 you have to insert just one midi instrument
("It92ipi"). This produces incompatibility with pmx files created for the old
versions. Is there a way to avoid this problem?
Luigi
--
Luigi Cataldi
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
Re: [Tex-music] New PMX beta
I just replaced yesterday's .zip with another with the same name correcting a missing carriage return in pmx2621.for. The file date for the corrected zip file is 1/30/2013. --Don Simons >-Original Message- >From: TeX-Music [mailto:tex-music-boun...@tug.org] On Behalf Of Don Simons >Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 6:14 PM >To: 'Werner Icking Music Archive' >Subject: [Tex-music] New PMX beta > >I've just uploaded a new PMX Beta, Version 2.621, to > >http://icking-music-archive.org/software/pmx/pmx2621.zip . > >It fixes a bug pointed out by Dirk Baack (Thanks, Dirk!) in positioning of >rests in xtuplets when the keyboard rests option "AK" is in effect. At the >same time, I've fine-tuned the positioning of the number and bracket in >unbeamed xtuplets containing rests. As before, the default positioning of >the number and bracket can be overridden with options on the first note >command in the xtuplet. > >I believe that Bob Tennent will soon update the software page to include a >link to the new beta. > >--Don Simons > > > > >--- >TeX-music@tug.org mailing list >If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to >http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music --- TeX-music@tug.org mailing list If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
Re: [Tex-music] New PMX beta 2.616 to fix long hairpin problem
Thanks so much Don. Sebastian Canagaratna On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 12:22 AM, Don Simons wrote: > I've just uploaded the new beta to > > http://icking-music-archive.org/software/pmx/pmx2616.zip > > It allows you to have hairpins that span over input block boundaries. The > corrects the issue recently raised by Sebastian Canagaratna and Dirk > Laurie, and will make life easier for M-Tx users since M-Tx puts every bar > into a separate input block. > > --Don Simons > > > > > > --- > TeX-music@tug.org mailing list > If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to > http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music > --- TeX-music@tug.org mailing list If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
Re: [TeX-Music] New PMX Beta 2.519
I've tested the new version with a lot of scores: the program worked properly in all cases exept for this little piece of G.M. Bononcini: http://icking-music-archive.org/scores/g.m.bononcini/4vcnt.zip In the second PMX pass I have the following error message: Figures not allowed in >1 voice above first I can't locate the mistake in my source pmx file. This score was typeset with an experimental and not still alive pmx preprocessor, PMXPP. Nevertheless the resulting pmx file works well with PMX 2.5.4. Luigi Don Simons wrote: Well, here's the latest bugfix of the day. Thanks to Luigi for finding the bug. Unlike the last round, this time I could see exactly where I screwed up and how it caused Luigi's bug. I've removed both 2.517 and 2.518 from the S/W archive. Sorry for all the recent careless programming. I'm crossing my fingers that this one will be reasonably stable. Here's the new link: http://icking-music-archive.org/software/pmx/pmx2519.zip --Don Simons ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music
Re: [TeX-Music] New PMX Beta 2.518
I've found an error both in pmx2517 and pmx2518. When I compile the following sample the duration of the half note (Vl I, bar 1 and 2; Va bar 3) is wrong. Luigi --- % F. J. Haydn, Quartetto Op.76, n. 2, bb. 1--4 4 4 4 4 0 6 0 -1 1 1 16 .07 Vc Va Vl II Vl I batt ./ Ab It92ivcvavlvl w170m % Batt 1-2 h Allegro d8-- Df o. d o. d o. d o. r d o. d o. d o. | r d o. d o. d o. r e o. e o. e o. / f8- Df o. f o. f o. f o. r f o. f o. f o. | r g o. g o. g o. r g o. g o. g o. / r8 a Df o. a o. a o. r a o. a o. a o. | r b o. b o. b o. r cs o. c o. c o. / a2+ Df d- | e a- / % Batt 3-4 f8 s e f cs s d4 a | b2 s a4 s o. r Rb / a2 t a4 t .cs- | d8 s e f d s e4 o. r / d8 s cs d e s e s d c s a1+ s g s | f s g f e s d8 o. d o. cs4 r / d8 s cs d e s g s f e s a | d4- zd+ cn1 s b a gs s a4 o. r / Andre Van Ryckeghem wrote: I have tested the new version on a large file (the extract came from it) and got no errors Thank you very much Don, Andre - Original Message - From: "Don Simons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Werner Icking Music Archive'" Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2008 7:55 AM Subject: [TeX-Music] New PMX Beta 2.518 This new version fixes some errors and bugs I introduced in 2.517 . It will compile Andre's file (thanks for sending it!). Hopefully the FORTRAN source will compile on Hermann's setup. After finding the coding errors I'm not surprised it would have compiled in some systems but not others. What I am surprised about is that it never crashed for me (like it did for Andre). I've done three whole 2-line Pasquini sonatas already--about 12 pages--but I guess the troubles only started when there are at least 3 voices. Here's a link: http://icking-music-archive.org/software/pmx/pmx2518.zip --Don Simons ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music
Re: [TeX-Music] New PMX Beta 2.518
I have tested the new version on a large file (the extract came from it) and got no errors Thank you very much Don, Andre - Original Message - From: "Don Simons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Werner Icking Music Archive'" Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2008 7:55 AM Subject: [TeX-Music] New PMX Beta 2.518 This new version fixes some errors and bugs I introduced in 2.517 . It will compile Andre's file (thanks for sending it!). Hopefully the FORTRAN source will compile on Hermann's setup. After finding the coding errors I'm not surprised it would have compiled in some systems but not others. What I am surprised about is that it never crashed for me (like it did for Andre). I've done three whole 2-line Pasquini sonatas already--about 12 pages--but I guess the troubles only started when there are at least 3 voices. Here's a link: http://icking-music-archive.org/software/pmx/pmx2518.zip --Don Simons ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music
Re: [TeX-Music] New PMX Beta 2.517
Am Sonntag, 7. Dezember 2008 schrieb Christian Mondrup: > Luigi Cataldi wrote: > > I've compiled pmx2.517 with f2c version 20050501-1 (same as Christian) > > and gcc versio 4.1.1-15 on Linux Debian Etch. f2c prints some warnings > > (see at the end of this e-mail) but works. I've compiled perfectly > > Hermann's test.mtx. I'm very glad to you, Don, for this improvement! > > > > Luigi > > > > > > f2c pmxab.f -Nx400 -Nn802 > > pmxab.f: > > MAIN pmxab: > > Warning on line 688 of pmxab.f: inconsistent calling sequences for > > getarg, arg 3: here integer variable, previously ftnlen. > > Warning on line 688 of pmxab.f: inconsistent calling sequences for > > getarg: here 4, previously 3 args and string lengths. > > Did you remember to replace the comments at the getarg calls in line > 681-682 and 694-695? Christian thank you for this hint! I forgot to make these changes. I just compiled Don's pmx-2518 and now my test-mtx runs without any error. Don, thank you for your improvements of PMX. Hermann ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music
Re: [TeX-Music] New PMX Beta 2.517
Christian Mondrup wrote: Luigi Cataldi wrote: I've compiled pmx2.517 with f2c version 20050501-1 (same as Christian) and gcc versio 4.1.1-15 on Linux Debian Etch. f2c prints some warnings (see at the end of this e-mail) but works. I've compiled perfectly Hermann's test.mtx. I'm very glad to you, Don, for this improvement! Luigi f2c pmxab.f -Nx400 -Nn802 pmxab.f: MAIN pmxab: Warning on line 688 of pmxab.f: inconsistent calling sequences for getarg, arg 3: here integer variable, previously ftnlen. Warning on line 688 of pmxab.f: inconsistent calling sequences for getarg: here 4, previously 3 args and string lengths. Did you remember to replace the comments at the getarg calls in line 681-682 and 694-695? Sorry, I realize that I have forgotten line 694-695. I've compiled pmx 2.518 now. All works well but the following warnings still remains: ... dograce: Warning on line 5081 of pmxab.f: local variable lshft never used dopsslur: Warning on line 5663 of pmxab.f: local variable tmove never used Warning on line 5663 of pmxab.f: local variable sfound never used Warning on line 5663 of pmxab.f: local variable tfound never used ... Luigi ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music
Re: [TeX-Music] New PMX Beta 2.517
Luigi Cataldi wrote: I've compiled pmx2.517 with f2c version 20050501-1 (same as Christian) and gcc versio 4.1.1-15 on Linux Debian Etch. f2c prints some warnings (see at the end of this e-mail) but works. I've compiled perfectly Hermann's test.mtx. I'm very glad to you, Don, for this improvement! Luigi f2c pmxab.f -Nx400 -Nn802 pmxab.f: MAIN pmxab: Warning on line 688 of pmxab.f: inconsistent calling sequences for getarg, arg 3: here integer variable, previously ftnlen. Warning on line 688 of pmxab.f: inconsistent calling sequences for getarg: here 4, previously 3 args and string lengths. Did you remember to replace the comments at the getarg calls in line 681-682 and 694-695? -- Christian Mondrup, Archive Editor WIMA: Werner Icking Music Archive http://icking-music-archive.org/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music
Re: [TeX-Music] New PMX Beta 2.517
Robin, there still seems to be a bug of some sort in the new version that wasn't there in 2.515 (See Andre's recent posting). I'll try to find it today. --Don Simons >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >On Behalf Of Robin Fairbairns >Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2008 10:12 AM >To: Werner Icking Music Archive >Subject: Re: [TeX-Music] New PMX Beta 2.517 > >Luigi Cataldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I've compiled pmx2.517 with f2c version 20050501-1 (same as Christian) >> and gcc versio 4.1.1-15 on Linux Debian Etch. f2c prints some warnings >> (see at the end of this e-mail) but works. I've compiled perfectly >> Hermann's test.mtx. I'm very glad to you, Don, for this improvement! > >oh, good. > >i had delayed updating the ctan catalogue for pmx (it still says 2.516) >because the error report came in... > >will get that done for tonight's web update. > >robin >___ >[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list >http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex- >music ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music
Re: [TeX-Music] New PMX Beta 2.517
Luigi Cataldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've compiled pmx2.517 with f2c version 20050501-1 (same as Christian) > and gcc versio 4.1.1-15 on Linux Debian Etch. f2c prints some warnings > (see at the end of this e-mail) but works. I've compiled perfectly > Hermann's test.mtx. I'm very glad to you, Don, for this improvement! oh, good. i had delayed updating the ctan catalogue for pmx (it still says 2.516) because the error report came in... will get that done for tonight's web update. robin ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music
Re: [TeX-Music] New PMX Beta 2.517
I've compiled pmx2.517 with f2c version 20050501-1 (same as Christian) and gcc versio 4.1.1-15 on Linux Debian Etch. f2c prints some warnings (see at the end of this e-mail) but works. I've compiled perfectly Hermann's test.mtx. I'm very glad to you, Don, for this improvement! Luigi f2c pmxab.f -Nx400 -Nn802 pmxab.f: MAIN pmxab: Warning on line 688 of pmxab.f: inconsistent calling sequences for getarg, arg 3: here integer variable, previously ftnlen. Warning on line 688 of pmxab.f: inconsistent calling sequences for getarg: here 4, previously 3 args and string lengths. accsym: addask: addblank: addfb: addmidi: addstr: adjusteskz: askfig: backfill: beamend: beamid: beamn1: beamstrt: BLOCK DATA: catspace: chax: checkdyn: chkarp: chkimidi: chklit: chkpm4ac: clefsym: crdacc: crdaccs: doacc: docrd: dodyn: dograce: Warning on line 5062 of pmxab.f: local variable lshft never used dopsslur: Warning on line 5644 of pmxab.f: local variable tmove never used Warning on line 5644 of pmxab.f: local variable sfound never used Warning on line 5644 of pmxab.f: local variable tfound never used doslur: dotmov: dotrill: endslur: errmsg: eskb4: f1eon: feon: findbeam: findeonk: fnote: g1etchar: g1etnote: g1etset: g1etx: getbuf: getchar: getdyn: getfig: getgrace: getmidi: getnote: getorn: getpmxmod: getset: getsquez: getx: i1fnodur: iashft: ifnodur: ifnolev: igetbits: igetvarlen: isdotted: isetvarlen: istring: lenstr: levrn: lfmt1: linebreakties: littex: llen: log2: logbeam: m1rec1: make1bar: make2bar: makeabar: midievent: moveln: mrec1: ncmid: ncmidf: newvoice: notefq: notex: ntindex: ntrbbb: numclef: outbar: pmxa: pmxb: poestats: precrd: printl: putarp: putast: putcb: putfig: putorn: putshft: puttitle: putxtn: read10: readin: readmeter: readnum: setbits: setbm2: setmac: setmeter: setupb: sortpoe: spsslur: sslur: stop1: topfile: udfq: udqq: ulfq: upcaseq: wgmeter: writemidi: writflot: wsclef: ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music
Re: [TeX-Music] New PMX Beta 2.517
Thanks to Hermann and Christian for the reports. The file test.mtx went through with no errors for me in Windows XP (and Hermann, it looks very nice!). I'm at home and my only Linux systems (Redhat 6.0) are at the office so I can't check what happens with that. --Don Simons >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >On Behalf Of Hermann Hinsch >Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 5:34 AM >To: Werner Icking Music Archive >Subject: Re: [TeX-Music] New PMX Beta 2.517 > >Am Freitag, 5. Dezember 2008 schrieb Christian Mondrup: >> Hermann Hinsch wrote: >> > Hi Don, >> > >> > I tested your new version of pmx with my mtx-score which has >> > figures in the 3. staff. Unfortunately I got a memory access error >> > by pmx. I then tried the original score with inline TeX as used >> > before which was compiled without any error with the older version >> > of pmx, but now I get the same memory access error. >> > >> > I think it would be best if you test my score yourself, Therefore >> > you may find enclosed my score. >> >> I've compiled pmx 2517 with f2c as well as g77 (as described in >> http://icking-music-archive.org/software/musixtex/musixtex-for-unix.ht >> ml) >> and tested both pmx >> binaries on the result of prepmx-ing your M-Tx file. I can't reproduce >> the memory access error you're reporting with any of the 2 binaries. >> The postscript outcome looks good:-) >> >> My environment is Ubuntu 8.04 linux. For prepmx-ing I've been using my >> most recent M-Tx patch release 0.60d >> >> HOWEVER - now that I inspect your M-Tx file it looks like you didn't >> upload the version with PMX figured bass code for the lute part. >> Please consider providing this file for test as well >> >> Greetings > >I use SuSE 11.0 and compiled pmx2517 by f2c -Nx400 -Nn802 pmx2517.f and >gcc -lf2c -lm -o pmxab pmx2517.c and copied the new pmx.tex to >/usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/musixtex. prepmx-ing by M-Tx patch release >0.60d. > >I enclose the score with the PMX figured bass code for the lute part >although the described error is the same in both score versions. > >Hermann ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music
Re: [TeX-Music] New PMX Beta 2.517
Christian Mondrup wrote: Hermann Hinsch wrote: Hermann Hinsch wrote: Am Freitag, 5. Dezember 2008 schrieb Christian Mondrup: [snip] There must be something technically specific with your SuSE environment which conflicts with the pmx binary. Could it be the version(s) of f2c and gcc? I think too that I have a local problem because compiling other scores results in the same error. The version of f2c is 0.11-1171.1. What is yours? I've installed the Ubuntu f2c package distribution, version 20050501-1. On the Redhat station I'm using an RPM distribution labeled 19991109-2 I'm using gcc version 4.2.4 -- Christian Mondrup, Archive Editor WIMA: Werner Icking Music Archive http://icking-music-archive.org/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music
Re: [TeX-Music] New PMX Beta 2.517
Hermann Hinsch wrote: Hermann Hinsch wrote: Am Freitag, 5. Dezember 2008 schrieb Christian Mondrup: [snip] There must be something technically specific with your SuSE environment which conflicts with the pmx binary. Could it be the version(s) of f2c and gcc? I think too that I have a local problem because compiling other scores results in the same error. The version of f2c is 0.11-1171.1. What is yours? I've installed the Ubuntu f2c package distribution, version 20050501-1. I'm using gcc version 4.2.4 -- Christian Mondrup, Archive Editor WIMA: Werner Icking Music Archive http://icking-music-archive.org/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music
Re: [TeX-Music] New PMX Beta 2.517
Am Freitag, 5. Dezember 2008 schrieb Christian Mondrup: > Hermann Hinsch wrote: > > Am Freitag, 5. Dezember 2008 schrieb Christian Mondrup: > >> Hermann Hinsch wrote: > >>> Hi Don, > >>> > >>> I tested your new version of pmx with my mtx-score which has figures > >>> in the 3. staff. Unfortunately I got a memory access error by pmx. I > >>> then tried the original score with inline TeX as used before which > >>> was compiled without any error with the older version of pmx, but now > >>> I get the same memory access error. > >>> > >>> I think it would be best if you test my score yourself, Therefore you > >>> may find enclosed my score. > >> > >> I've compiled pmx 2517 with f2c as well as g77 (as described in > >> http://icking-music-archive.org/software/musixtex/musixtex-for-unix.html > >>) and tested both pmx > >> binaries on the result of prepmx-ing your M-Tx file. I can't reproduce > >> the memory access error you're reporting with any of the 2 binaries. The > >> postscript outcome looks good:-) > >> > >> My environment is Ubuntu 8.04 linux. For prepmx-ing I've been using my > >> most recent M-Tx patch release 0.60d > >> > >> HOWEVER - now that I inspect your M-Tx file it looks like you didn't > >> upload the version with PMX figured bass code for the lute part. Please > >> consider providing this file for test as well > >> > >> Greetings > > > > I use SuSE 11.0 and compiled pmx2517 by f2c -Nx400 -Nn802 pmx2517.f and > > gcc -lf2c -lm -o pmxab pmx2517.c and copied the new pmx.tex > > to /usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/musixtex. prepmx-ing by M-Tx patch > > release 0.60d. > > > > I enclose the score with the PMX figured bass code for the lute part > > although the described error is the same in both score versions. > > This file processes with no problems on my Ubuntu pc, and the postscript > outcome is perfect. > > For further test I've compiled pmx 2517 on a Redhat 7.5 station and a > Mac OSX laptop. On both computers pmx 2517 processes the test file with > no errors. > > There must be something technically specific with your SuSE environment > which conflicts with the pmx binary. Could it be the version(s) of f2c > and gcc? I think too that I have a local problem because compiling other scores results in the same error. The version of f2c is 0.11-1171.1. What is yours? Hermann > > Greetings ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music
Re: [TeX-Music] New PMX Beta 2.517
Hermann Hinsch wrote: Am Freitag, 5. Dezember 2008 schrieb Christian Mondrup: Hermann Hinsch wrote: Hi Don, I tested your new version of pmx with my mtx-score which has figures in the 3. staff. Unfortunately I got a memory access error by pmx. I then tried the original score with inline TeX as used before which was compiled without any error with the older version of pmx, but now I get the same memory access error. I think it would be best if you test my score yourself, Therefore you may find enclosed my score. I've compiled pmx 2517 with f2c as well as g77 (as described in http://icking-music-archive.org/software/musixtex/musixtex-for-unix.html) and tested both pmx binaries on the result of prepmx-ing your M-Tx file. I can't reproduce the memory access error you're reporting with any of the 2 binaries. The postscript outcome looks good:-) My environment is Ubuntu 8.04 linux. For prepmx-ing I've been using my most recent M-Tx patch release 0.60d HOWEVER - now that I inspect your M-Tx file it looks like you didn't upload the version with PMX figured bass code for the lute part. Please consider providing this file for test as well Greetings I use SuSE 11.0 and compiled pmx2517 by f2c -Nx400 -Nn802 pmx2517.f and gcc -lf2c -lm -o pmxab pmx2517.c and copied the new pmx.tex to /usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/musixtex. prepmx-ing by M-Tx patch release 0.60d. I enclose the score with the PMX figured bass code for the lute part although the described error is the same in both score versions. This file processes with no problems on my Ubuntu pc, and the postscript outcome is perfect. For further test I've compiled pmx 2517 on a Redhat 7.5 station and a Mac OSX laptop. On both computers pmx 2517 processes the test file with no errors. There must be something technically specific with your SuSE environment which conflicts with the pmx binary. Could it be the version(s) of f2c and gcc? Greetings -- Christian Mondrup, Archive Editor WIMA: Werner Icking Music Archive http://icking-music-archive.org/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music
Re: [TeX-Music] New PMX Beta 2.517
Am Freitag, 5. Dezember 2008 schrieb Christian Mondrup:
> Hermann Hinsch wrote:
> > Hi Don,
> >
> > I tested your new version of pmx with my mtx-score which has figures
> > in the 3. staff. Unfortunately I got a memory access error by pmx. I
> > then tried the original score with inline TeX as used before which
> > was compiled without any error with the older version of pmx, but now
> > I get the same memory access error.
> >
> > I think it would be best if you test my score yourself, Therefore you
> > may find enclosed my score.
>
> I've compiled pmx 2517 with f2c as well as g77 (as described in
> http://icking-music-archive.org/software/musixtex/musixtex-for-unix.html)
> and tested both pmx
> binaries on the result of prepmx-ing your M-Tx file. I can't reproduce
> the memory access error you're reporting with any of the 2 binaries. The
> postscript outcome looks good:-)
>
> My environment is Ubuntu 8.04 linux. For prepmx-ing I've been using my
> most recent M-Tx patch release 0.60d
>
> HOWEVER - now that I inspect your M-Tx file it looks like you didn't
> upload the version with PMX figured bass code for the lute part. Please
> consider providing this file for test as well
>
> Greetings
I use SuSE 11.0 and compiled pmx2517 by f2c -Nx400 -Nn802 pmx2517.f and
gcc -lf2c -lm -o pmxab pmx2517.c and copied the new pmx.tex
to /usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/musixtex. prepmx-ing by M-Tx patch release
0.60d.
I enclose the score with the PMX figured bass code for the lute part although
the described error is the same in both score versions.
Hermann
Style: Trio Canto Bass
Trio: Voices V1 V2 La; Clefs G G F; Choral
Canto: Voices Ca; Vocal; Clefs G
Bass: Voices B; Clefs F
Meter: m4/2/0/6
Flats: 1
Pages: 11
Systems: 21
Name: {g${^2}$} {g${^2}$} {} {c${^1}$}
% Bars/line: 3
Size: 16
%% \pageinsert
%% \vskip4cm
%% \centerline{\BIgtype Anonymus}
%% \vskip3mm
%% \centerline{ \medtype\bf (Komponisten- oder Besitzervermerk: F.F. =
Francesco Foggia?)}
%% \vskip10mm
%% \centerline{\BIgtype "O quam suavis est Domine spiritus tuus"}
%% \vskip2mm
%% \vskip3mm
%% \centerline{\Bigtype a voce sola, 2 Violini e Leuto}
%% \vskip6mm
%% \centerline{\medtype\bf aus}
%% \vskip1cm
%% \centerline{\Bigtype Ms. 10.B.126, Pio Sodalizio dei Piceni, Roma}
%% \vskip2mm
% % \centerline{\Bigtype A una, due, tr\`{e}, \`{e} Quattro voci con
Instromenti}
%% \vskip2mm
% % \centerline{\Bigtype Opera settima $...$}
%% \vskip15mm
%% \vskip15mm
%% \vskip10mm
%% \vskip20mm
% % \centerline{\medtype Milano 1660}
%% \vskip50mm
%% \centerline{\medtype herausgegeben von Gunther Morche, Heidelberg, Juli 2008}
%% \centerline{\medtype gesetzt von Hermann Hinsch mit M-Tx}
%% \vskip20mm
%% \centerline{\normtype Das Kopieren ist nur f\"ur den nicht kommerziellen
Gebrauch erlaubt. }
%% \endinsert
%% \def\writebarno{\ifnum\barno>1\lrlap{\tenrm\it\the\barno\barnoadd}\fi}
%% \def\raisebarno{5mm}
% % \raggedbottom
%% \parskip 8\Interligne plus 7\Interligne minus 7\Interligne
%% \input musixlit
% Bar 1-5
%% \\let\interstaffsav\interstaff\def\interstaff#1{}\interstaffsav{15}\
%% h250m
%% w180m
%% P
%% \zchar{133}{Violino}\
%% \zchar{103}{Violino}\
%% \zchar{73}{Leuto}\
%% \zchar{44}{Canto}\
V1: d05 e2f g su | g s g g fs | g d ef f | cd c4 d2 d | edf f4 g2 g | g25d f4s
g0
V2: b04n c2 d | ef b ad g4 | g2 b c d | a4 b2 a4 b2 b s | b s a g c s | c45 s b
a2 g0
La: g03 e2f bn | c g d0+ 4 x143 | g2- g+ ef d | f0 4 x143 b2- b | cd d4 e2f c
| d0 g-
Ca: r9 | r | r | r | r | r
L:
B: g03 e2f bn | c g d0+ 4 x123 | g2- g+ ef d | f0 b- | c2d d4 e2f c | d03 4
x123 g-
% Bar 6-9
%% L2
V1: r9 | r | r4 d25 [ d8 d ] c4d c8 b2
V2: r9 | r | r4 b24 [ b8 b ] b4d a8 b2
La: r9 | r | b23 g4 [ d8 ef ] f2 4 x143 43 b-
Ca: r4 d25 b8 a b4 b8 fs (~ g4d [ a1 b ] | c4d )~ c8 a4 d2 c8 da (~ da c4d )~
| b2 r r0
L: O quam su-a-vis est Do-mi-ne spi-ri-tus tu-us
B: g03 g4 d # e2f s | e s d # g4 ef f2 4 x143 | b- g4 [ d8+ 6 ef ] f2 4 x143
b-
% Bar 10-12
%% L3P2
V1: XS8 r0 r2 r4 c45 | r8 [ c85 c f ] e2f r0 | r9
V2: XS8 r0 r2 r4 a44 | r8 [ a84 a a ] g2 r0 | r9
La: XS8 r0 r2 r4 f43 | r8 [ f83 f f ] c2 r0 | r9
Ca: r4 d45 r8 d X1 d X2 d X1 (~ c4 [ d1 c d e ] )~ c2 | XS4 r2 r4 e45f r8 e e
X2 e X1.5 d4d c8 | d4 (~ [ g8- X-0.5 a ] [ bn X-0.5 c X-0.5 d X-0.5 e ] f4 )~
e8f d e c ( e4
L: o, o quam su-a-vis o, o quam su-a-vis est spi-ri-tus tu-us, o
B: b02 f2+ f | f c - c g4+ af | g2 g f c -
% Bar 13-15
%% L4
V1: r2b \pause\ rb r4 [ e85f e ] [ e f ] d4 | c2 r r8 [ d c b ] [ a a ] a4 | g2
r r0
V2: r2b \pause\ rb r4 [ c85 c ] [ c d ] b4n | c2 r r8 [ b a g ] g4d f8s | g2 r
r0
La: r2b \pause\ rb r4 [ c84 b ] [ af f ] g4 | c2- r r8 [ g+ c- ef ] c4 d | g2-
r r0
Ca: e45 ) f8 X2 g X1 (~ [ e f1 e ] d8d )~ d1 c2 r | r8 c b X2 a X1.8 (~ [ b c1
b ] a8 )~ b g2 r | r4 g8 X2 a X1 (~ [ b c1 b ] a8d )~ a1 g0
L: quam su-a-vis est o quam su-a-vis est quam su-a-vis est
B: f23 g 4 x183 c4- [ c8+ b ] [ af f ] g4 | c2- g4 d+ 4 x183 g- [ c8 ef ] c4 d
| g2- g4 d+ 4 x183 g0-
% Bar 16-18
%% L5P3
V1:
Re: [TeX-Music] New PMX Beta 2.517
Hermann Hinsch wrote: Hi Don, I tested your new version of pmx with my mtx-score which has figures in the 3. staff. Unfortunately I got a memory access error by pmx. I then tried the original score with inline TeX as used before which was compiled without any error with the older version of pmx, but now I get the same memory access error. I think it would be best if you test my score yourself, Therefore you may find enclosed my score. I've compiled pmx 2517 with f2c as well as g77 (as described in http://icking-music-archive.org/software/musixtex/musixtex-for-unix.html) and tested both pmx binaries on the result of prepmx-ing your M-Tx file. I can't reproduce the memory access error you're reporting with any of the 2 binaries. The postscript outcome looks good:-) My environment is Ubuntu 8.04 linux. For prepmx-ing I've been using my most recent M-Tx patch release 0.60d HOWEVER - now that I inspect your M-Tx file it looks like you didn't upload the version with PMX figured bass code for the lute part. Please consider providing this file for test as well Greetings -- Christian Mondrup, Archive Editor WIMA: Werner Icking Music Archive http://icking-music-archive.org/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music
Re: [TeX-Music] New PMX Beta 2.517
Am Freitag, 5. Dezember 2008 schrieb Don Simons:
> I've revised PMX to allow a 2nd set of figures in any voice, not just voice
> #2 as was the case in 2.516. Here's the link:
>
> http://www.icking-music-archive.org/software/pmx/pmx2517.zip
>
> I would still very much appreciate it if some users would test this version
> against old scores with figures to be sure I haven't messed anything up. I
> have not received any feedback yet from the last release.
>
> --Don Simons
>
>
Hi Don,
I tested your new version of pmx with my mtx-score which has figures in the
3. staff. Unfortunately I got a memory access error by pmx. I then tried the
original score with inline TeX as used before which was compiled without any
error with the older version of pmx, but now I get the same memory access
error.
I think it would be best if you test my score yourself, Therefore you may find
enclosed my score.
Hermann
>
>
> ___
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
> http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-mus
>ic
Style: Trio Canto Bass
Trio: Voices V1 V2 La; Clefs G G F; Choral
Canto: Voices Ca; Vocal; Clefs G
Bass: Voices B; Clefs F
Meter: m4/2/0/6
Flats: 1
Pages: 11
Systems: 21
Name: {g${^2}$} {g${^2}$} {} {c${^1}$}
% Bars/line: 3
Size: 16
%% \pageinsert
%% \vskip4cm
%% \centerline{\BIgtype Anonymus}
%% \vskip3mm
%% \centerline{ \medtype\bf (Komponisten- oder Besitzervermerk: F.F. =
Francesco Foggia?)}
%% \vskip10mm
%% \centerline{\BIgtype "O quam suavis est Domine spiritus tuus"}
%% \vskip2mm
%% \vskip3mm
%% \centerline{\Bigtype a voce sola, 2 Violini e Leuto}
%% \vskip6mm
%% \centerline{\medtype\bf aus}
%% \vskip1cm
%% \centerline{\Bigtype Ms. 10.B.126, Pio Sodalizio dei Piceni, Roma}
%% \vskip2mm
% % \centerline{\Bigtype A una, due, tr\`{e}, \`{e} Quattro voci con
Instromenti}
%% \vskip2mm
% % \centerline{\Bigtype Opera settima $...$}
%% \vskip15mm
%% \vskip15mm
%% \vskip10mm
%% \vskip20mm
% % \centerline{\medtype Milano 1660}
%% \vskip50mm
%% \centerline{\medtype herausgegeben von Gunther Morche, Heidelberg, Juli 2008}
%% \centerline{\medtype gesetzt von Hermann Hinsch mit M-Tx}
%% \vskip20mm
%% \centerline{\normtype Das Kopieren ist nur f\"ur den nicht kommerziellen
Gebrauch erlaubt. }
%% \endinsert
%% \def\writebarno{\ifnum\barno>1\lrlap{\tenrm\it\the\barno\barnoadd}\fi}
%% \def\raisebarno{5mm}
% % \raggedbottom
%% \parskip 8\Interligne plus 7\Interligne minus 7\Interligne
%% \input musixlit
% Bar 1-5
%% \\let\interstaffsav\interstaff\def\interstaff#1{}\interstaffsav{15}\
%% h250m
%% w180m
%% P
%% \zchar{133}{Violino}\
%% \zchar{103}{Violino}\
%% \zchar{73}{Leuto}\
%% \zchar{44}{Canto}\
V1: d05 e2f g su | g s g g fs | g d ef f | cd c4 d2 d | edf f4 g2 g | g25d f4s
g0
V2: b04n c2 d | ef b ad g4 | g2 b c d | a4 b2 a4 b2 b s | b s a g c s | c45 s b
a2 g0
La: g03 e2f bn | c g \Figu0{4 \quad3}\ d0+ | g2- g+ ef d | \Figu0{4 \quad3}\
f0 b2- b | cd d4 e2f c | d0 g-
Ca: r9 | r | r | r | r | r
L:
B: g03 e2f bn | c g d0+ 4 x123 | g2- g+ ef d | f0 b- | c2d d4 e2f c | d03 4
x123 g-
% Bar 6-9
%% L2
V1: r9 | r | r4 d25 [ d8 d ] c4d c8 b2
V2: r9 | r | r4 b24 [ b8 b ] b4d a8 b2
La: r9 | r | b23 g4 [ d8 ef ] \Figu0{4 \quad3}\ f2 b-
Ca: r4 d25 b8 a b4 b8 fs (~ g4d [ a1 b ] | c4d )~ c8 a4 d2 c8 da (~ da c4d )~
| b2 r r0
L: O quam su-a-vis est Do-mi-ne spi-ri-tus tu-us
B: g03 g4 d # e2f s | e s d # g4 ef f2 4 x143 | b- g4 [ d8+ 6 ef ] f2 4 x143
b-
% Bar 10-12
%% L3P2
V1: XS8 r0 r2 r4 c45 | r8 [ c85 c f ] e2f r0 | r9
V2: XS8 r0 r2 r4 a44 | r8 [ a84 a a ] g2 r0 | r9
La: XS8 r0 r2 r4 f43 | r8 [ f83 f f ] c2 r0 | r9
Ca: r4 d45 r8 d X1 d X2 d X1 (~ c4 [ d1 c d e ] )~ c2 | XS4 r2 r4 e45f r8 e e
X2 e X1.5 d4d c8 | d4 (~ [ g8- X-0.5 a ] [ bn X-0.5 c X-0.5 d X-0.5 e ] f4 )~
e8f d e c ( e4
L: o, o quam su-a-vis o, o quam su-a-vis est spi-ri-tus tu-us, o
B: b02 f2+ f | f c - c g4+ af | g2 g f c -
% Bar 13-15
%% L4
V1: r2b \pause\ rb r4 [ e85f e ] [ e f ] d4 | c2 r r8 [ d c b ] [ a a ] a4 | g2
r r0
V2: r2b \pause\ rb r4 [ c85 c ] [ c d ] b4n | c2 r r8 [ b a g ] g4d f8s | g2 r
r0
La: r2b \pause\ rb r4 [ c84 b ] [ af f ] g4 | c2- r r8 [ g+ c- ef ] c4 d | g2-
r r0
Ca: e45 ) f8 X2 g X1 (~ [ e f1 e ] d8d )~ d1 c2 r | r8 c b X2 a X1.8 (~ [ b c1
b ] a8 )~ b g2 r | r4 g8 X2 a X1 (~ [ b c1 b ] a8d )~ a1 g0
L: quam su-a-vis est o quam su-a-vis est quam su-a-vis est
B: f23 g 4 x183 c4- [ c8+ b ] [ af f ] g4 | c2- g4 d+ 4 x183 g- [ c8 ef ] c4 d
| g2- g4 d+ 4 x183 g0-
% Bar 16-18
%% L5P3
V1: r9 | r | r
V2: r9 | r | r
La: r9 | r | r
Ca: r4 b24n b8 b c4 c8 b a4 a8 a | d d1 d d8 c b4 b r edf d8 d d | c4d c8 c4 fd
e8f e d d4d d8
L: qui ut dul-ce-di-nem tu-am in fi-li-os de-mon-stra-res pa-ne su-a-vis-si-mo,
pa-ne su-a-vis-si-
B: g22 # g+ e 6 f | f 6 g g 6- g 6 | a0 a2 6 b
% Bar 19-21
%% L6
V1: r2b \pause\ rb r2 r4 f45 | [ g8 f ] [ ef d ] c4d b8 b2 r | r9
V2: r2b \pause\ rb r2 r4 d45 | [ g8- a b c ] b4d a8 b2 r | r9
La: r2b \pause\ rb r2 b22
Re: [TeX-Music] New PMX Beta
Hermann Hinsch wrote >As far as I can see from pmx.tex you inserted new lines 219 to 222, 250, >and >260-261. There were also dozens of changes in the FORTRAN. >Would it be possible to expand this to the 3rd staff? Anything is possible; some things take more work than others. I'll think about it. At first glance, to allow a maximum of two lines of figures would be less new work than to allow an arbitrary number of lines of figures. FYI what makes this tricky is that for every system and for each staff within that system with figures, there is a baseline vertical offset to align the tops of the figures for that staff and system only. If two staves in the system have figures, there are two independent offsets for that system. But those offsets cannot be calculated until all of the system breaks are set. That doesn't happen until very near the end of all the analysis---so near the end in fact that I decided to include the entire list of vertical offsets explicitly in a macro near the top of the generated musixtex file. Since TeX does not support subscripts, I defined a second variable in TeX to represent the second offset, and two new pairs of macros to use the two different offsets. If figures' vertical positioning were like ornaments or dynamics, it could be done locally on the fly and would be much easier. --Don Simons ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music
Re: [TeX-Music] New PMX Beta
Hermann Hinsch wrote: Am Montag, 24. November 2008 schrieb Don Simons: I've just uploaded PMX 2.516 to http://www.icking-music-archive.org/software/pmx/pmx2516.zip . The only change is that I've allowed figures (for figured bass) in the 2nd staff from the bottom, in addition to and independent of those in the bottom staff. This has necessitated a few changes in pmx.tex. I'd especially appreciate some testing from folks with existing scores that include figures, to be sure I haven't messed anything up. Unfortunately I have a score with figures in the 3rd staff of a score which I included by using inline-TeX as Diana and you suggested in a former mail. As far as I can see from pmx.tex you inserted new lines 219 to 222, 250, and 260-261. Would it be possible to expand this to the 3rd staff? or better, any other additional staff -- Christian Mondrup, Archive Editor WIMA: Werner Icking Music Archive http://icking-music-archive.org/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music
Re: [TeX-Music] New PMX Beta
Am Montag, 24. November 2008 schrieb Don Simons: > I've just uploaded PMX 2.516 to > > http://www.icking-music-archive.org/software/pmx/pmx2516.zip . > > The only change is that I've allowed figures (for figured bass) in the 2nd > staff from the bottom, in addition to and independent of those in the > bottom staff. This has necessitated a few changes in pmx.tex. > > I'd especially appreciate some testing from folks with existing scores that > include figures, to be sure I haven't messed anything up. Unfortunately I have a score with figures in the 3rd staff of a score which I included by using inline-TeX as Diana and you suggested in a former mail. As far as I can see from pmx.tex you inserted new lines 219 to 222, 250, and 260-261. Would it be possible to expand this to the 3rd staff? Hermann > > I did this because I've started typesetting the Bernardo Pasquini sonatas > for two harpsichords. > > --Don Simons > > ___ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-mus >ic ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music
Re: [TeX-Music] New PMX Beta, Version 2.515
Two housekeeping issues: 1. There was a formatting problem in the source file pmx2515.for included in my original upload of pmx2515.zip (Thanks to Christian for pointing it out). I corrected it and silently replaced the file the next day. If you were a first-day adopter, you may want to download the fixed-up version. The original windows binary was OK and hasn't been changed. 2. I just activated links on the software page to bugfix version 0.60c of M-Tx . I deleted the links to the two prior bugfix versions but the files are still there and accessible by browsing the S/W directory. --Don Simons > -Original Message- > From: Don Simons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2007 3:54 PM > To: 'Werner Icking Music Archive' > Subject: New PMX Beta, Version 2.515 > > I've just uploaded a new PMX beta to > > http://icking-music-archive.org/software/pmx/pmx2515.zip > > It contains two bug fixes I'll tell you about, and a few others I won't > bore you with. > > 1. I corrected an error in automatic forced beams. Before the fix, if > the beam did not start an integral number of beam durations from the > start of the bar, incorrect results would occur. Note that neither the > "rules" nor the syntax have not changed. As stated in pmx250.pdf, "... > if the option : (colon) is included in the starting command [ for a > forced beam, then henceforth beams of the same duration will be forced > in that voice, until stopped. They will be stopped at either the next > regular forced beam, or the end of the input block for that voice, > whichever comes first." An important restriction that is not explicitly > stated at that point in pmx250.pdf but is explained elsewhere and does > affect this option, is that no forced beam of any sort can go across a > barline. Thus if your automatic forced beam pattern would cause a beam > to cross a barline, and if you do not terminate it (with a normal > forced beam) in the same bar, you'll get an error. > > 2. Fermatas over centered whole-bar rests are now properly centered > over the rest. > > As usual, I'd appreciate folks trying to break these fixes and report > back. > > Happy holidays to everyone! > > --Don Simons > ___ TeX-music mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.daimi.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
Re: [TeX-music] New PMX beta (2.508)
Dear Don! You wrote, 2005-10-08: > I've just uploaded a new beta version of PMX to > > http://icking-music-archive.org/software/pmx/pmx2508.zip > > Recent list traffic has shamed me into enabling grace notes within xtuplets. > I hope I haven't screwed anything up. I'd appreciate reports of any > problems. I noticed that you improved PMX due to my particular question about grace notes in xtuplets. That is really kind. :) SASS Bálint ___ TeX-music mailing list TeX-music@icking-music-archive.org http://icking-music-archive.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
Re: [TeX-music] New PMX beta (2.508)
On Sat, 8 Oct 2005, Don Simons wrote: I've just uploaded a new beta version of PMX to http://icking-music-archive.org/software/pmx/pmx2508.zip Recent list traffic has shamed me into enabling grace notes within xtuplets. I hope I haven't screwed anything up. I'd appreciate reports of any problems. --Don Simons For people who are as slow as I am (sometimes) : (1) rename "pmx2508.exe" (which you find in "pmx2508.zip") to "pmxab.exe" (2) replace your old "pmxab.exe" in your "TeX" configuration, (3) refresh the database if called for in your setup, (4) use the standard PMX notation for grace notes (cf. the PMX manual, or my PMX tutorial, Sec. B 4.8, p.34). Note that the grace notes do not count in the time measure(s) of the xtuplet! (5) Enjoy! (and cudos to Don ...) ccn. -- . Prof.Dr. Cornelius C. Noack Phones: Inst. f. Theor. Physik FB 1 office : +49 (421) 218-2427 Universit"at Bremen secretary: -2422 Otto-Hahn-Allee Fax : -4869 D - 28334 Bremen home : +49 (421) 34 22 36 Fax: 346 7872 E-mail: noack at itp.uni-bremen.de or ccnoack at mailaps.org WWW-page: www.itp.uni-bremen.de/~noack . ___ TeX-music mailing list TeX-music@icking-music-archive.org http://icking-music-archive.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
