[Texascavers] Governor Perry Recognized Pollinator Week - June 22-28, 2008

2008-06-26 Thread Mike Quinn
Greetings,

Governor Perry Recognized Pollinator Week

Read details of how Betty Jensen spearheaded this recognition:
http://heartwoodtmn.org/node/1039

Official Pollinator Week Proclamation (pdf 938 KB)
http://heartwoodtmn.org/files/Pollinator%20Week.pdf

Betty Jensen, Treasurer
Texas Master Naturalist
Heartwood Chapter
The Woodlands, TX 
http://heartwoodtmn.org/ 

Thanks, Mike

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Mike Quinn
Invertebrate Biologist
Wildlife Diversity Program
Texas Parks  Wildlife

* New Address  Phone *

M: 4200 Smith School Road, Austin, TX 78744
P: 512-389-8759 or 8758 (FAX)
C: 512-577-0250
E: mailto:mike.qu...@tpwd.state.tx.us

  Texas Entomology
http://TexasEnto.net
 

-
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com



[Texascavers] Mexico's Cave of Crystals - Nat. Geo's 5th most viewed news pix of 2007

2007-12-26 Thread Mike Quinn
Giant Crystal Cave Comes to Light 

Crisscrossed with gems up to 36 feet (11 meters) long, Mexico's Cave of 
Crystals looks like nothing so much as Superman's Fortress of Solitude.

That otherworldly appeal-which helped make the cave gallery our fifth most 
viewed of 2007-is a big reason we still get the occasional email accusing us of 
propagating a hoax. 

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/12/photogalleries/topten-pictures/photo6.html
or: http://tinyurl.com/36wb27

--

Giant Crystal Cave's Mystery Solved

It's the Sistine Chapel of crystals, says Juan Manuel García- Ruiz. 

The geologist announced this week that he and a team of researchers have 
unlocked the mystery of just how the minerals in Mexico's Cueva de los 
Cristales (Cave of Crystals) achieved their monumental forms. 

Buried a thousand feet (300 meters) below Naica mountain in the Chihuahuan 
Desert, the cave was discovered by two miners excavating a new tunnel for the 
Industrias Peñoles company in 2000. 

The cave contains some of the largest natural crystals ever found: translucent 
gypsum beams measuring up to 36 feet (11 meters) long and weighing up to 55 
tons. 

It's a natural marvel, said García-Ruiz, of the University of Granada in 
Spain. 

To learn how the crystals grew to such gigantic sizes, García-Ruiz studied tiny 
pockets of fluid trapped inside. 

The crystals, he said, thrived because they were submerged in mineral-rich 
water with a very narrow, stable temperature range-around 136 degrees 
Fahrenheit (58 degrees Celsius). 

At this temperature the mineral anhydrite, which was abundant in the water, 
dissolved into gypsum, a soft mineral that can take the form of the crystals in 
the Naica cave. 

snips

There is no limit to the size a crystal can reach, García-Ruiz said. 

But, he said, for the Cave of Crystals to have grown such gigantic crystals, it 
must have been kept just below the anhydrite-gypsum transition temperature for 
many hundreds of thousands of years. 

s

The caves containing larger crystals will be located in deeper levels with 
temperatures closer to, but no higher than, 58 degrees Celsius, he said. 

He has recommended to the mining company that the caves should be preserved. 

The only reason humans can get into the caves today, however, is because the 
mining company's pumping operations keep them clear of water. If the pumping is 
stopped, the caves will again be submerged and the crystals will start growing 
again, García-Ruiz said. 

So what happens if-or when-the mine is closed? 

That's an interesting question, García-Ruiz said. 

Should we continue to pump water to keep the cave available so future 
generations may admire the crystals? Or should we stop pumping and return the 
scenario to the natural origin, allowing the crystals to regrow? 



full text:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/04/070406-giant-crystals.html
or: http://tinyurl.com/39brt5

photo gallery:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/04/photogalleries/giant-crystals-cave/index.html
or: http://tinyurl.com/2hzehg

-
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com



[Texascavers] RE: butterfly in the twilight zone of a cave...

2007-11-26 Thread Mike Quinn
David,

Two spread-winged skippers known as flats are frequently found within
culverts and sometimes in caves... 

They range from south Texas to Costs Rica.

Stallings' Flat (Celaenorrhinus stallingsi)

Fritzgaertner's Flat (Celaenorrhinus fritzgaertneri)
http://www.naba.org/chapters/nabast/fritzgaertneri.html

Mike Quinn, TPWD, Austin

-Original Message-
From: David Locklear [mailto:dlocklea...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2007 10:52 PM
To: Texas Cavers
Subject: [Texascavers] OT - the monarch butterfly and Mexico

The monarch butterfly is in the news again.

I think protecting the butterfly is in the best interest
of cavers and caving.

For example, I am almost certain that the migration path
includes a pitstop for a day or 2 at Grutas de Carrizal
in Nuevo Leon just east of the town of Candela.

Maybe a caver could document that or some other
karst area where they stop along the way to rest.

I believe that the area around the Nacimiento de
Rio Sabinas and high above there near the
famous cave of Joya de Salas is most certainly
another place.

And high above the town of Gomez Farias there
are probably areas where they are known to stop.

Do bats eat them?  If so, that could be another
opportunity for a caver to do some investigating.

I have never seen a butterfly in the twilight zone
of a cave.  Are they a speleo-phobic species?

David Locklear

-
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com



[Texascavers] OT: History Channel to air peak oil episode tonight - Nov 13

2007-11-13 Thread Mike Quinn
Note the conflicting listed air times...

--- FYI ---

History Channel

Mega Disasters : Oil Apocalypse

Airs on Tuesday November 13 11:00 PM

The oil that our world runs on won't last forever. The gap between
supply and demand is ever increasing. Will alternative energy save us
or is it already too late? What would happen to the world as we know it
when our oil dependent industries come to a grinding halt? A
worldwide depression is a certainty but a power struggle for the basic
necessities of life would be complete chaos.

http://tinyurl.com/2m2krx

--

On Tuesday night, November 13th, (at 9 p.m. EST/PST - 8 p.m. C), the
History Channel will present Mega disasters: Oil Apocalypse, a
documentary that Los Angeles-based filmmaker Martin Kent is calling a
wake up call, about the world's energy crisis. We can no longer
count on getting all the gasoline we need - and there's no plan B.

Energy experts appearing on camera in Oil Apocalypse include authors
Richard Heinberg, Matthew Simmons, David Goodstein, Kenneth Deffeyes,
Michael Economides and Christine Woodside; Oppenheimer energy analyst
Fadel Gheit, PFC Energy chairman J. Robinson West, RAND Corp.'s James
Bartis and Congressman Roscoe Bartlett.

-
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com



RE: [Texascavers] OT - recycling economics

2007-10-28 Thread Mike Quinn
Dr. David Goodstein, a physics professor at the California Institute of 
Technology and author of the best seller: Out of Gas: The End of the Age of 
Oil estimates that it would take 10,000 new nuclear power plants to replace 
the energy created by oil but even then the world's uranium would be gone in 
one or two decades.



RE: [Texascavers] OT - recycling economics

2007-10-28 Thread Mike Quinn
When was the last nuclear power plant built? When will the next singular plant 
produce power? When will we have 10,000 nuclear power plants of *any* kind?
 
Given that some say the world is already past peak oil, I personally don't see 
how we're going to make it to 10,000 nukes... 
 
see PO article in last Monday's The Guardian:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/oil/story/0,,2196435,00.html
 
Graphic Showing Oil Producing Countries Past Peak Oil...
http://www.indybay.org/uploads/2007/10/25/oil-producing-countries-past-peak-oct-2007.png
or: http://tinyurl.com/33ambo
 
If we are past PO, then the likely ensuing hoarding will accentuate the 
problem...
 
Mike Quinn, Austin

-Original Message- 
From: Lyndon Tiu [mailto:l...@alumni.sfu.ca] 
Sent: Sun 10/28/2007 8:22 AM 
To: Texas Cavers 
Cc: 
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] OT - recycling economics



Mike Quinn wrote:
 Dr. David Goodstein, a physics professor at the California Institute 
of Technology and author of the best seller: Out of Gas: The End of the Age of 
Oil estimates that it would take 10,000 new nuclear power plants to replace 
the energy created by oil but even then the world's uranium would be gone in 
one or two decades.


That's assuming we are using 10,000 fission nuclear power plants.
Uranium is a non-renewable resource. The supply of uranium will follow a
depletion curve similar to that of oil.

Fusion nuclear (as opposed to fission) holds more promise as it uses
heavy water/regular water/hydrogen which is more abundant, but if I
understand it correctly, current fusion nuclear technology is only good
for WMD's and not for power generation.

There is international work underway to develop fusion nuclear tech for
power generation. If I remember it correctly, a reactor is being built
in France for this. Try googling it.

--
Lyndon Tiu



RE: [Texascavers] OT - recycling economics

2007-10-28 Thread Mike Quinn
If you mean corn, the energy input/output ration is quite small (if positive at 
all)... 
 
Plus, using a high percentage of our arable land to use for filling our SUV's 
vs. feeding people is perhaps not the best way forward.
 
As for help from the gov, FEMA, Uncle Sam, etc., I suggest developing self 
reliant contingency plans.
 
Conservation will make more energy available quicker than any other route, but 
we can't all move closer to our jobs and shifting to more economical vehicles 
will take a decade or more. An increase in telecomuting would be great.
 
Mike

-Original Message- 
From: John P. Brooks [mailto:jpbrook...@sbcglobal.net] 
Sent: Sun 10/28/2007 10:15 AM 
To: Mike Quinn; Lyndon Tiu; Texas Cavers 
Cc: 
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] OT - recycling economics



President Shrub thinks we will just switch to bio-fuels..that will
surely save the world


On 10/28/07 8:53 AM, Mike Quinn mike.qu...@tpwd.state.tx.us wrote:

 When was the last nuclear power plant built? When will the next 
singular plant
 produce power? When will we have 10,000 nuclear power plants of *any* 
kind?

 Given that some say the world is already past peak oil, I personally 
don't see
 how we're going to make it to 10,000 nukes...

 see PO article in last Monday's The Guardian:
 http://www.guardian.co.uk/oil/story/0,,2196435,00.html

 Graphic Showing Oil Producing Countries Past Peak Oil...
 
http://www.indybay.org/uploads/2007/10/25/oil-producing-countries-past-peak-oc
 t-2007.png
 or: http://tinyurl.com/33ambo

 If we are past PO, then the likely ensuing hoarding will accentuate 
the
 problem...

 Mike Quinn, Austin

 -Original Message-
 From: Lyndon Tiu [mailto:l...@alumni.sfu.ca]
 Sent: Sun 10/28/2007 8:22 AM
 To: Texas Cavers
 Cc:
 Subject: Re: [Texascavers] OT - recycling economics



 Mike Quinn wrote:
 Dr. David Goodstein, a physics professor at the California Institute 
of
 Technology and author of the best seller: Out of Gas: The End of 
the Age of
 Oil estimates that it would take 10,000 new nuclear power plants to 
replace
 the energy created by oil but even then the world's uranium would be 
gone in
 one or two decades.


 That's assuming we are using 10,000 fission nuclear power plants.
 Uranium is a non-renewable resource. The supply of uranium will 
follow a
 depletion curve similar to that of oil.

 Fusion nuclear (as opposed to fission) holds more promise as it 
uses
 heavy water/regular water/hydrogen which is more abundant, but if I
 understand it correctly, current fusion nuclear technology is only 
good
 for WMD's and not for power generation.

 There is international work underway to develop fusion nuclear tech 
for
 power generation. If I remember it correctly, a reactor is being built
 in France for this. Try googling it.

 --
 Lyndon Tiu






RE: [Texascavers] OT - recycling economics

2007-10-28 Thread Mike Quinn
The world's enery availability is rapidly peaking... Mexico, our number two 
supplier, is running out:
 
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109sid=aQP1F89dAOs8refer=home# 
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109sid=aQP1F89dAOs8refer=home# 
or: http://tinyurl.com/2a9e59

-Original Message- 
From: Lyndon Tiu [mailto:l...@alumni.sfu.ca] 
Sent: Sun 10/28/2007 5:10 PM 
To: Texas Cavers 
Cc: 
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] OT - recycling economics



... energy is cheap and still widely available.

--
Lyndon Tiu



RE: [Texascavers] Sept National Geographic

2007-08-24 Thread Mike Quinn
Here's the primary link to the caver article featuring Jean Krejca:

http://www7.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/0709/new-troglobites/new-troglobi
tes.html 
or: http://tinyurl.com/2b7cf7

Mike Quinn, Austin

-Original Message-
From: Robert Albach [mailto:ralb...@austin.rr.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2007 10:34 PM
To: texascavers@texascavers.com
Subject: [Texascavers] Sept National Geographic

We just got the September National Geographic with story on the 
troglodytes / troglophiles found in Sequoia National Park.

While I've no doubt this contributes greatly to science for me its the 
wide eyed look of my kids when I tell them that the lady who did this 
lives right here in Austin (and I think spoke at one of the few grotto 
meetings I managed to break their bed time curfew for).

My 10 year old daughter wants it autographed!

-Robert Albach




-
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com




-
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com



[Texascavers] OT: PEMEX announcement...

2007-08-02 Thread Mike Quinn
All,
 
PEMEX announced last Friday that they will probably be out of oil in
seven years--out of oil, not just beginning to decline. This came out on
Friday afternoon which, of course, is when you issue a press release for
a story you want to bury 
 
Mike 
 
==
 
Mexican Company Predicts End of Oil

Mexico, Jul 27 (Prensa Latina) Petroleos Mexicanos (PEMEX) announced
that oil reserves may run out in seven years. 

Supplies of this economically exploitable resource are running out,
informed a report sent by the state owned company to the United States
stock market.

Until December 31, 2005 the report says proven reserves were about 8.978
billion barrels, while yearly production was 1.322 billion tons. If this
rhythm continues oil will run out in the time stipulated..

El Universal newspaper reports that experts of the PFC Energy Advisory
company based in Washington pointed out that investments for PEMEX
exploration is also running out of time. 

Even if heavy investments were made now, new oil fields would take from
six to eight years to be ready and, consequently, Mexico may have to
import oil to satisfy the internal market, it warned.

The newspaper quotes Carlos Ramirez, PEMEX spokesman as saying that if
necessary investments were made, this would provide another 2.9 more
years to what is foreseen with the proven developed reserves.

The director of the state owned company, Jesus Reyes, insisted that
these are difficult moments due to a reduction of production in
Cantarell, the main oil field in the country. 

http://www.plenglish.com/article.asp?ID=%7BF1F8B8FE-DA99-4717-8FBD-2B3C4
F90FBA3%7D%29language=EN
http://www.plenglish.com/article.asp?ID=%7BF1F8B8FE-DA99-4717-8FBD-2B3C
4F90FBA3%7D%29language=EN 

or: http://tinyurl.com/254xde


[Texascavers] OT: PEMEX announcement...

2007-08-02 Thread Mike Quinn
All, 
 
Prensa Latina comes out of Cuba
 
Looking around I don't see any similar quite so dire articles, in fact
here's one that's pretty much the opposite:
 
http://www.petroleumworld.com/story07070513.htm
 
How's that go? 'We report, you decide'...
 
Mike
 
==
 
Mexican Company Predicts End of Oil

Mexico, Jul 27 (Prensa Latina) 


RE: [Texascavers] misnaned bugs (UNCLASSIFIED)

2007-06-25 Thread Mike Quinn
Mas escarabajo Tejas info aqui:
 
http://texasento.net/beetles.htm
 
Mike

  _  

From: Pekins, Charles E CIV DPW ENV (PKI)
[mailto:charles.pek...@us.army.mil] 
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2007 8:01 AM
To: Texas cavers list
Subject: RE: [Texascavers] misnaned bugs (UNCLASSIFIED)



Classification: UNCLASSIFIED 

Caveats: NONE

They are native scarab beetles, the genus is Cotinus. The brown scarab
beetles are in the genus Phyllophaga. Have you ever dug in the soil and
found large, fat, C-shaped, grubs? They are the larvae of scarabs.
 
As far as taxonomy is concerned, beetles are the most diverse group of
creatures on the earth (over 500,000 known species and growing). But I
bet the microbes outnumber them...just aren't a whole lot of people
studying them to classify them.

  _  

From: Scott [mailto:back2scool...@hotmail.com] 
Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2007 12:24 PM
To: Texas cavers list
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] misnaned bugs


I think the green shinny ones are Japaneese Beetles arent they?

- Original Message - 
From: Wayne Hutchinson mailto:m4w8...@yahoo.com  
To: Texas cavers list mailto:texascavers@texascavers.com  
Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2007 10:35 AM
Subject: [Texascavers] misnaned bugs

The brown beetles we call Junebugs here are correctly called May
Beetles.
June bugs are green shiny and about twice the size.




[Texascavers] WFU study finds that moths mimic sounds to survive

2007-05-31 Thread Mike Quinn
Wake Forest University  

WFU study finds that moths mimic sounds to survive

May 29, 2007

In a night sky filled with hungry bats, good-tasting moths increase
their chances of survival by mimicking the sounds of their bad-tasting
cousins, according to a new Wake Forest University study.

To be published in the May 29 issue of the Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences, the study is the first to definitively show how an
animal species uses acoustic mimicry as a defensive strategy.

The research was conducted by Jesse Barber, a doctoral student in
biology at Wake Forest.  William E. Conner, professor of biology at Wake
Forest, co-authored the study.

In response to the sonar that bats use to locate prey, the tiger moths
make ultrasonic clicks of their own.  They broadcast the clicks from a
paired set of structures called tymbals.  Many species of tiger moth
use the tymbals to make specific sounds that warn the bat of their bad
taste.  Other species make sounds that closely mimic those
high-frequency sounds.

We found that the bats do not eat the good-tasting moths that make the
similar sounds, said Barber, who has worked on this research for four
years.

In the study, other types of moths that were similar in size to the
sound-emitting moths, but did not make sounds, were gobbled up by the
bats.

The researcher trained free-flying bats to hunt moths in view of two
high-speed infrared video cameras to record predator-prey interactions
that occur in fractions of a second.  He also recorded the sounds
emitted from each moth, as well as the sounds made by the bats. 

All the bats quickly learned to avoid the noxious moths first offered to
them, associating the warning sounds with bad taste.  They then avoided
a second sound-producing species even though it was not chemically
protected. This is similar to the way birds avoid butterflies that look
like the bad-tasting Monarch. 

The two species of bats used were big brown bats and red bats. Barber
raised the bats in the lab so behavior learned in the wild would not
influence the results of the experiment.  

Barber said anecdotal observations have suggested that animals such as
snakes, owls and bees use acoustic mimicry.  This study takes the next
step and provides the definitive experimental evidence for how mimicking
sounds helps an animal survive.
 
http://www.wfu.edu/news/release/2007.05.29.a.php
 

-
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com



[Texascavers] High Cost of Nitrogen Calls For ... use of poultry litter

2007-04-23 Thread Mike Quinn
 
Can a return to guano mining be far behind??? Mike

PS: Predictions are for $4/gal gas this summer...

 
 
http://agnews.tamu.edu/index.htm  

April 16, 2007

High Cost of Nitrogen Calls For New Farming Strategies

Writer: Robert Burns, 903-834-6191,rd-bu...@tamu.edu 
Contacts: Dr. Jason Cleere, , (979) 845-6931,jjcle...@ag.tamu.edu 
Dr. Ray Smith, 903-834-6191,g-sm...@tamu.edu 
Dr. Lloyd Nelson, 903-834-6191,lr-nel...@tamu.edu 
Dr. Gerald Evers, 903-834-6191,g-ev...@tamu.edu 
Dr. Vincent Haby, 903-834-6191,v-h...@tamu.edu 
Dr. Monte Rouquette, 903-834-6191,m-rouque...@tamu.edu 
Dr. David D. Baltensperger, 979-845-3041,dbaltensper...@tamu.edu 

OVERTON - Farmers can expect nitrogen fertilizer costs to be more than
50 cents per pound of nitrogen this year, said Texas Agricultural
Experiment Station and Texas Cooperative Extension experts. 

What's driving the fertilizer costs higher? Several things, said Dr.
David D. Baltensperger, head of the Texas AM University department of
soil and crop sciences. 

There are a lot of factors that always go into fertilizer prices,
Baltensperger said. Since the majority of our nitrogen fertilizer at
least comes from petroleum products, the price of petroleum drives
nitrogen fertilizer prices rather directly. 

Baltensperger said that with fossil fuel prices remaining high relative
to what was seen two or three years ago, it's reasonable to expect
higher nitrogen prices this year. Another factor is the price of corn,
and the record number of acres being planted to supply grain for new
ethanol plants. 

Corn acreage ... is one of our big nitrogen users, he said. And
consequently we'd expect to be paying the highest prices we've ever paid
for nitrogen on a national basis this coming spring. 

Not all types of nitrogen fertilizer will be in the 50-cent-plus range,
Baltensperger said, but the ones most commonly used by East Texas
livestock operations will. 

Anhydrous (ammonia) will probably still be the cheapest source where it
is practical to use, but in many cases we have to use ammonium sulfate
or ammonia nitrate, he said. Probably all of the last three are going
to be in the 50-cent-plus category coming this year per pound of
nitrogen. 

With nitrogen costing this much, how can producers maintain production
without going in the red? In East Texas, the most critical economic
crops are improved summer forages, which require high rates of nitrogen
for good production. Experts from Extension and the Experiment Station -
one beef specialist, four forage researchers and a soils scientist -
gave suggestions on how to lower input costs and maintain profitable
production levels. 

We talk about in the future, coming up, how we are experiencing high
fertilizer prices now and what challenges it's going to have for the
cow/calf producer, said Dr. Jason Cleere, Extension beef specialist.
... I think that one thing we have to evaluate ... is the stocking rate
on these pastures. We may not be able to be where we have been in the
past. We may have to adjust those stocking rates ... and think more on a
basis of per unit of land rather than producing as many calves as we can
produce. 

Dr. Ray Smith, Experiment Station legume breeder and developer of Apache
arrowleaf clover, said winter legumes, because they fix nitrogen from
the air, can be part of the answer. The legumes require careful
management, however. 

One thing we can do to deal with the really high cost of nitrogen in
the future is we can add clover and other forage legumes into our
pasture systems, Smith said. We do this generally by planting in the
fall and summer, but we need to make plans now in the spring and summer
to both soil test and to add lime into these systems so that we are
ready for fall planning. 

Properly managed, clovers can add from 80 to 100 pounds of nitrogen per
acre to the soils, he said. 

Dr. Lloyd Nelson, Experiment Station small grains breeder, has been
bullish about using over-seeding of annual ryegrass and other small
grains to offset the cost of buying hay and supplemental feeds in the
past. With current nitrogen prices, he's more reserved, he said. 

Whenever we do this (over-seed), we are going to have to put on quite a
bit of nitrogen to make them very productive. I think cattlemen are
going to have to look at that very closely and manage these small grains
and ryegrass so they can get the most forage out of them without putting
on too much nitrogen. It's going to be too expensive. 

Dr. Vincent Haby, soil scientist with the Experiment Station, says the
easiest, cheapest cost saving management strategy is one that is often
overlooked. 

In fertilizing any forage grass, regardless of the prices of
fertilizer, a soil test is always advisable to have, he said.
Fertilize based on that soil test. Also there are some crops that do
not require nitrogen.  

One of these crops that do not require nitrogen is alfalfa. It was once

CaveTex: Cricket watchers say caves may need expanded buffer

2007-03-26 Thread Mike Quinn
From San Antonio's newspaper... Mike Quinn, Austin



Cricket watchers say caves may need expanded buffer 
Web Posted: 09/11/2005 12:00 AM CDT


Jerry Needham
Express-News Staff Writer

After staying cooped up in a dark cave all day, crickets are willing to
travel far and wide for a good meal. 

Cave crickets that share living quarters north of San Antonio with more
than a dozen other creatures that have landed on the nation's endangered
species list - spiders, beetles, psuedoscorpions and daddy long-legs -
go twice as far as thought looking for food, according to a new study. 

And that, the scientist who tracked them says, could require that even
more land be set aside to protect those endangered species. 

A team of researchers led by Steven Taylor, an entomologist at the
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, found that the little
brown-and-white hoppers travel up to 350 feet from the cave entrance in
their nightly search for food. 

Previous research had indicated that most crickets stay within 164 feet
of their cave openings to feed on fruit, dead animals, insects or animal
droppings. 

The crickets - often found by the thousands in Central Texas caves - are
important sources of food for their roommates. Their droppings, eggs and
dead bodies provide nutrients for the other creatures. 

Just how did the scientists keep up with crickets in the dark? They
caught more than 2,000 of them as they came out of a cave at Fort Hood,
marked them with water-based fluorescent paint and let them go. Over the
course of 17 nights, they located the marked crickets using portable
black lights. 

Although half of the marked crickets were found within 130 feet of the
cave entrance and 90 percent within 236 feet, a few hungry critters were
found up to 350 feet away, the researchers reported. That's quite a
journey for a creature hardly more than an inch long. 

Our findings suggest that a relatively large area may be needed to
protect the crickets' foraging area and to shield them from fire ants,
Taylor said. Based on the foraging range we saw, we believe that cave
resource managers may wish to create buffers around the footprint of a
cave - not just the entrance. 

His findings on Ceuthophilus secretus were published this week in the
journal American Midland Naturalist. 

But Bob Pine, supervisor of the Austin office of the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, said the findings probably wouldn't change how the
agency goes about protecting Central Texas caves that contain endangered
species. 

He said that besides the crickets' eating habits, the wildlife service
takes into account a number of factors in determining the area that
needs to be left undisturbed around a cave opening. 

Those include the vegetation, the surface and underground drainage
patterns and the underground footprint of the cave. 

Vegetation is more of a determiner for the area of the buffer than the
crickets' foraging, Pine said, noting that the buffer around protected
caves in Bexar County is 40 acres. 

The vegetated surface area is what provides the nutrients that go into
the cave, said Sybil Vosler, a biologist with the federal wildlife
service. Bare earth or concrete is not going to provide any nutrients.


Pine said knowledge of the crickets' needs would help in drafting future
agreements written to protect cave habitats. 

Some of the things that might be influenced by these findings are fire
ant control and pesticide usage around caves, he said. 

---

original text
http://tinyurl.com/7qcl4 

Use following to bypass login:

come...@yahoo.com
123456 

http://bugmenot.com/

To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to mailto:majord...@cavetex.net
with the following message--unsubscribe cavetex.  For help and
information go to www.cavetex.net.
List administrator:  mailto:jswh...@cavetex.net