Re: [time-nuts] 60 Hz frequency and phase measurement

2019-07-04 Thread Hal Murray
Interesting.  Thanks.

I plotted your data next to mine.
http://users.megapathdsl.net/~hmurray/time-nuts/60Hz/60Hz-2019-June.png
There are actually 2 lines there.  At this scale, they are on top of eachother.

My samples are roughly every 10 seconds.  So there should be a 6 to 1 ratio.


If you zoom in, you can see some quirks.

This is June 10th.
http://users.megapathdsl.net/~hmurray/time-nuts/60Hz/60Hz-2019-June-10.png
This is zoomed in enough so that you can see the offset which is arbitary.

Zooming in farther.
http://users.megapathdsl.net/~hmurray/time-nuts/60Hz/60Hz-2019-June-10a.png
Looks like I picked up at extra cycle.  I see that occasionally - ballpark of 
once a day.


This is June 25th.
http://users.megapathdsl.net/~hmurray/time-nuts/60Hz/60Hz-2019-June-25.png

Here is one area that caught my attention.
http://users.megapathdsl.net/~hmurray/time-nuts/60Hz/60Hz-2019-June-25a.png
It looks like the cycle count on one sample is off by one.

I see that occasionally.  I assume it's a missing lock in the Linux PPS kernel 
API that I'm using to read the data.  I get pairs of time-stamp and count.   A 
pulse comes through between when it has grabbed the time stamp and when it 
grabbed the count.  The following sample looks good so it's not a extra or 
missing cycle.


-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 60 Hz frequency and phase measurement

2019-07-04 Thread Thomas D. Erb
We have used line frequency counting for time keeping in the past  it works 
very well in the USA - EXCEPT in locations with lots of dimmers - theaters in 
particular chop the AC waveform creating lots of noise and can make the 
internal timer run fast.  I think at one location we had 5 volts of noise on 
the mains. TXO chips just always work - so we use them now, or GPS.

I had a recent tour of a power station - the operators had no idea the output 
was synchronized to a time standard - they just synchronize with the local grid.

For a history of line frequency time keeping, Wikipedia has a good entry.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telechron

Though Tesla I believe demonstrated this at the Chicago World's fair.

I have a master in my small museum.
https://electricclock.omeka.net/items/show/12





Thomas D. Erb
p:508-359-4396
f:508-359-4482
a:97 West Street, Medfield, MA 02052 USA
e: t...@electrictime.com
w:www.electrictime.com
Tower & Street Clocks Since 1928

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 60 Hz frequency and phase measurement

2019-07-04 Thread Jeremy Nichols
It gets time from GPS and frequency from the power line at my house. I
suspect a certain amount of frequency wobble due to inductive loads
somewhere upstream of my home.


On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 8:01 PM jimlux  wrote:

> On 7/3/19 3:20 PM, Jeremy Nichols wrote:
> > The station at Santa Rosa, California (#853 in the Western
> Interconnection)
> > is mine. Have had their receiver for several years. Only downside is
> that i
> > can't record the data directly from the supplied receiver.
> >
> > Jeremy
> >
> >
>
> but what can you tell us about the receiver - I assume it's line
> connected.  How does it get time hacks? GPS? Maybe it takes a feed from
> the de-rigueur  Hydrogen maser, Cs fountain, or cryogenic sapphire
> oscillator that time-nuts just happen to have around?
>
>
> --
Jeremy Nichols
Sent from my iPad 6.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 60 Hz frequency and phase measurement

2019-07-03 Thread jimlux

On 7/3/19 3:20 PM, Jeremy Nichols wrote:

The station at Santa Rosa, California (#853 in the Western Interconnection)
is mine. Have had their receiver for several years. Only downside is that i
can't record the data directly from the supplied receiver.

Jeremy




but what can you tell us about the receiver - I assume it's line 
connected.  How does it get time hacks? GPS? Maybe it takes a feed from 
the de-rigueur  Hydrogen maser, Cs fountain, or cryogenic sapphire 
oscillator that time-nuts just happen to have around?


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 60 Hz frequency and phase measurement

2019-07-03 Thread Jeremy Nichols
The station at Santa Rosa, California (#853 in the Western Interconnection)
is mine. Have had their receiver for several years. Only downside is that i
can't record the data directly from the supplied receiver.

Jeremy


On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 12:01 PM Paul Theodoropoulos via time-nuts <
time-nuts@lists.febo.com> wrote:

> This stuff is fascinating to a time-nut-level:Novice such as myself.
> While falling down the rabbit-hole searching on all the various bits of
> the info below, I ran across this - not sure if you're aware of it, or
> if it's old news, but it seems at least peripherally interesting:
>
> http://fnetpublic.utk.edu
>
>
> On 7/3/19 08:56, Tom Van Baak wrote:
> > Bob,
> >
> > Several of us do long-term measurement of mains frequency. We tend to
> > time-stamp cycles and then compute period or frequency, rather than
> > measuring frequency or period directly. Traditional counters in gated
> > frequency or time interval mode have dead time and this will skew
> > results.
> >
> > In my case I just run a 5 VAC wall-wart through a 10k resistor
> > directly to the input pin of a PIC. No scaling, no filtering, no opto,
> > no ZCD, no nothing. If I measure every cycle I get 155 million samples
> > per month. If I extract one cycle each second (decimate by 60) it's
> > only 2.5 million samples a month. Many months there is not a single
> > glitch in the data in spite of all the FUD about power line noise.
> > Once in a while a month contains an extra or missing sample but the
> > beauty of timestamp data is that this can be detected and repaired as
> > part of data processing with no loss of phase.
> >
> > Here's a page where Kevin (in New Mexico) and I (in Seattle) both used
> > picPET's to measure mains for a few days and then we compared the
> > results. Although thousands of miles apart, we're both on the same
> > grid so the agreement was astonishing. It was milliseconds in time and
> > ADEV down to e-8 over a day:
> >
> > http://leapsecond.com/pages/mains-cv/
> >
> > See also: http://leapsecond.com/pic/mains-adev-mdev-gnuplot-g4.png
> >
> > /tvb
> >
> >
> > On 7/2/2019 10:09 PM, Bob Albert via time-nuts wrote:
> >>   I have tried to measure the power line frequency with spotty
> >> success.  My best results came from a period measurement, as many
> >> periods as the counter can accumulate.  Due to noise, one is never
> >> sure at quite what point the source is measured.  Perhaps a brick
> >> wall filter would clean it up for a more reliable measurement.
> >> Of course, at 60 Hz the period is 16-2/3 milliseconds.  So the
> >> counter should properly show a 1 followed by a row of 6s, with the
> >> last digit bouncing between 6 and 7 most of the time.
> >> If there is a filter used, it will not only remove noise but also
> >> short term variations.  But generatlly speaking you don't want to
> >> measure those, unless you are trying to evaluate a rotary generator.
> >> Getting this reading can be a challenge.
> >>  On Tuesday, July 2, 2019, 10:01:03 PM PDT, jimlux
> >>  wrote:
> >> On 7/2/19 4:09 PM, Dana Whitlow wrote:
> >>> I've always noted that casual attempts to pick up 60 Hz with small
> >>> antennas
> >>> etc see more harmonics and other trash than actual line frequency.
> >>> But if
> >>> you're in an office environment, why not plug something in? It's
> >>> quite easy
> >>> to build a simple passive diode clipper/filter that will plug into a
> >>> wall
> >>> outlet and
> >>> which will provide a sort of soft (but clean) squarewave at a
> >>> voltage level
> >>> convenient for lab instruments and with good protection against big
> >>> spikes
> >>> and
> >>> other trash riding on the line.
> >>
> >> Safety approvals are one obstacle (of course one could use a AC wall
> >> wart).
> >>
> >> Actually, it's because someone asked me about a science experiment where
> >> you'd place them in a neighborhood outdoors.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ___
> >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
> >> To unsubscribe, go to
> >> http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
> >> and follow the instructions there.
> >>___
> >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
> >> To unsubscribe, go to
> >> http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
> >> and follow the instructions there.
> >
> >
> > ___
> > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
> > To unsubscribe, go to
> > http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
> > and follow the instructions there.
>
> --
> Paul Theodoropoulos
> www.anastrophe.com
>
> ___
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
> and follow the instructions there.
>
___
time-nut

Re: [time-nuts] 60 Hz frequency and phase measurement

2019-07-03 Thread Paul Theodoropoulos via time-nuts
This stuff is fascinating to a time-nut-level:Novice such as myself. 
While falling down the rabbit-hole searching on all the various bits of 
the info below, I ran across this - not sure if you're aware of it, or 
if it's old news, but it seems at least peripherally interesting:


http://fnetpublic.utk.edu


On 7/3/19 08:56, Tom Van Baak wrote:

Bob,

Several of us do long-term measurement of mains frequency. We tend to 
time-stamp cycles and then compute period or frequency, rather than 
measuring frequency or period directly. Traditional counters in gated 
frequency or time interval mode have dead time and this will skew 
results.


In my case I just run a 5 VAC wall-wart through a 10k resistor 
directly to the input pin of a PIC. No scaling, no filtering, no opto, 
no ZCD, no nothing. If I measure every cycle I get 155 million samples 
per month. If I extract one cycle each second (decimate by 60) it's 
only 2.5 million samples a month. Many months there is not a single 
glitch in the data in spite of all the FUD about power line noise. 
Once in a while a month contains an extra or missing sample but the 
beauty of timestamp data is that this can be detected and repaired as 
part of data processing with no loss of phase.


Here's a page where Kevin (in New Mexico) and I (in Seattle) both used 
picPET's to measure mains for a few days and then we compared the 
results. Although thousands of miles apart, we're both on the same 
grid so the agreement was astonishing. It was milliseconds in time and 
ADEV down to e-8 over a day:


http://leapsecond.com/pages/mains-cv/

See also: http://leapsecond.com/pic/mains-adev-mdev-gnuplot-g4.png

/tvb


On 7/2/2019 10:09 PM, Bob Albert via time-nuts wrote:
  I have tried to measure the power line frequency with spotty 
success.  My best results came from a period measurement, as many 
periods as the counter can accumulate.  Due to noise, one is never 
sure at quite what point the source is measured.  Perhaps a brick 
wall filter would clean it up for a more reliable measurement.
Of course, at 60 Hz the period is 16-2/3 milliseconds.  So the 
counter should properly show a 1 followed by a row of 6s, with the 
last digit bouncing between 6 and 7 most of the time.
If there is a filter used, it will not only remove noise but also 
short term variations.  But generatlly speaking you don't want to 
measure those, unless you are trying to evaluate a rotary generator.

Getting this reading can be a challenge.
 On Tuesday, July 2, 2019, 10:01:03 PM PDT, jimlux 
 wrote:

    On 7/2/19 4:09 PM, Dana Whitlow wrote:
I've always noted that casual attempts to pick up 60 Hz with small 
antennas
etc see more harmonics and other trash than actual line frequency.  
But if
you're in an office environment, why not plug something in? It's 
quite easy
to build a simple passive diode clipper/filter that will plug into a 
wall

outlet and
which will provide a sort of soft (but clean) squarewave at a 
voltage level
convenient for lab instruments and with good protection against big 
spikes

and
other trash riding on the line.


Safety approvals are one obstacle (of course one could use a AC wall 
wart).


Actually, it's because someone asked me about a science experiment where
you'd place them in a neighborhood outdoors.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com

and follow the instructions there.
   ___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com

and follow the instructions there.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com

and follow the instructions there.


--
Paul Theodoropoulos
www.anastrophe.com

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 60 Hz frequency and phase measurement

2019-07-03 Thread Bob Albert via time-nuts
 Wow Tom that is great work!  I won't pretend to understand what you did and 
how you did it or, even, what the various graphs represent.  But one thing I 
get out of it is the amazing correlation of measurements made across such a 
distance.  And the equally amazing accuracy, stability, and precision of the 
mains frequency.
It inspires me to push aside my current project and see how consistent my own 
results can be.  I would revert to my original method of period measurement, 
perhaps modified by the addition of a simple filter.  Now that my counter is 
solidly on the money due to the rubidium oscillator, I can trust the readings 
for as many digits as I can count.
My little motor driven electric clock has never needed resetting other than the 
switch to and from daylight time.  But of course that's a rather gross 
measurement.
I wonder what method the power companies use to control frequency and who 
decides what is the correct signal.  Presumably there is an ivory tower 
somewhere with a cloistered team of bearded scientists who hold magnifying 
glasses to oscilloscope screens to decide when to throw another lump of coal 
into the furnace.
Bob
On Wednesday, July 3, 2019, 09:01:16 AM PDT, Tom Van Baak 
 wrote:  
 
 Bob,

Several of us do long-term measurement of mains frequency. We tend to 
time-stamp cycles and then compute period or frequency, rather than 
measuring frequency or period directly. Traditional counters in gated 
frequency or time interval mode have dead time and this will skew results.

In my case I just run a 5 VAC wall-wart through a 10k resistor directly 
to the input pin of a PIC. No scaling, no filtering, no opto, no ZCD, no 
nothing. If I measure every cycle I get 155 million samples per month. 
If I extract one cycle each second (decimate by 60) it's only 2.5 
million samples a month. Many months there is not a single glitch in the 
data in spite of all the FUD about power line noise. Once in a while a 
month contains an extra or missing sample but the beauty of timestamp 
data is that this can be detected and repaired as part of data 
processing with no loss of phase.

Here's a page where Kevin (in New Mexico) and I (in Seattle) both used 
picPET's to measure mains for a few days and then we compared the 
results. Although thousands of miles apart, we're both on the same grid 
so the agreement was astonishing. It was milliseconds in time and ADEV 
down to e-8 over a day:

http://leapsecond.com/pages/mains-cv/

See also: http://leapsecond.com/pic/mains-adev-mdev-gnuplot-g4.png

/tvb


On 7/2/2019 10:09 PM, Bob Albert via time-nuts wrote:
>  I have tried to measure the power line frequency with spotty success.  My 
>best results came from a period measurement, as many periods as the counter 
>can accumulate.  Due to noise, one is never sure at quite what point the 
>source is measured.  Perhaps a brick wall filter would clean it up for a more 
>reliable measurement.
> Of course, at 60 Hz the period is 16-2/3 milliseconds.  So the counter should 
> properly show a 1 followed by a row of 6s, with the last digit bouncing 
> between 6 and 7 most of the time.
> If there is a filter used, it will not only remove noise but also short term 
> variations.  But generatlly speaking you don't want to measure those, unless 
> you are trying to evaluate a rotary generator.
> Getting this reading can be a challenge.
>      On Tuesday, July 2, 2019, 10:01:03 PM PDT, jimlux  
>wrote:
>  
>  On 7/2/19 4:09 PM, Dana Whitlow wrote:
>> I've always noted that casual attempts to pick up 60 Hz with small antennas
>> etc see more harmonics and other trash than actual line frequency.  But if
>> you're in an office environment, why not plug something in?  It's quite easy
>> to build a simple passive diode clipper/filter that will plug into a wall
>> outlet and
>> which will provide a sort of soft (but clean) squarewave at a voltage level
>> convenient for lab instruments and with good protection against big spikes
>> and
>> other trash riding on the line.
>
> Safety approvals are one obstacle (of course one could use a AC wall wart).
>
> Actually, it's because someone asked me about a science experiment where
> you'd place them in a neighborhood outdoors.
>
>
>
> ___
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to 
> http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
> and follow the instructions there.
>    
> ___
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to 
> http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
> and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.
  
___
time-nuts mail

Re: [time-nuts] 60 Hz frequency and phase measurement

2019-07-03 Thread jimlux

On 7/3/19 8:56 AM, Tom Van Baak wrote:

Bob,

Several of us do long-term measurement of mains frequency. We tend to 
time-stamp cycles and then compute period or frequency, rather than 
measuring frequency or period directly. Traditional counters in gated 
frequency or time interval mode have dead time and this will skew results.


In my case I just run a 5 VAC wall-wart through a 10k resistor directly 
to the input pin of a PIC. No scaling, no filtering, no opto, no ZCD, no 
nothing. If I measure every cycle I get 155 million samples per month. 
If I extract one cycle each second (decimate by 60) it's only 2.5 
million samples a month. Many months there is not a single glitch in the 
data in spite of all the FUD about power line noise. Once in a while a 
month contains an extra or missing sample but the beauty of timestamp 
data is that this can be detected and repaired as part of data 
processing with no loss of phase.


Here's a page where Kevin (in New Mexico) and I (in Seattle) both used 
picPET's to measure mains for a few days and then we compared the 
results. Although thousands of miles apart, we're both on the same grid 
so the agreement was astonishing. It was milliseconds in time and ADEV 
down to e-8 over a day:


http://leapsecond.com/pages/mains-cv/

See also: http://leapsecond.com/pic/mains-adev-mdev-gnuplot-g4.png

/tvb



yes indeed

http://fnetpublic.utk.edu/anglecontour.html shows a pretty constant 
phase shift of tens of degrees.


(except Texas, because, after all, they're Texas)



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 60 Hz frequency and phase measurement

2019-07-03 Thread jimlux

On 7/2/19 11:47 PM, Hal Murray wrote:


jim...@earthlink.net said:

Actually, it's because someone asked me about a science experiment where
you'd place them in a neighborhood outdoors.


Sounds like another science experiment: build an antenna to pick up 60 Hz.

You could start with the typical ferrite, coil, and cap.  Just adjust the cap 
to your new target frequency.  Simple to try.


I ran through some quick calculations on that - unlike for AM band, you 
need a fairly good sized capacitor. I think it's doable. A typical 
loopstick for AM is around 0.5 to 1 mH, so you'd need about 7000 
microfarads to resonate it at 60Hz. So, a LOT more turns on that inductor.




And then you have to start worrying about phase shift - it's going to be 
a fairly high Q resonant circuit, with the phase varying most rapidly 
around resonance.


So a resonant antenna probably isn't the way to go..

The whole goal is to look for phase shifts after all.

That's why I was thinking about magnetic field sensors..

The little electronic compass sensors sample at 100-300 Hz and have 
sensitivities comparable to the Earth's field (i.e. something like 2 
Gauss, 200 microTesla, full scale).


I don't know that they're sensitive enough - I recall that typical line 
frequency fields are in the "single digit milliGauss" range. If I 
convert that the E field, I get "single digit Volts/meter" - which is 
consistent with my tens of mV holding the scope probe in my hand.


Well... since it's a holiday weekend, it's time to break out the Beagles 
and Teensys and do some experiments. It's just that I don't like E field 
sensors (if for no other reason than High Z amplifiers get destroyed by 
ESD)..










___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 60 Hz frequency and phase measurement

2019-07-03 Thread Tom Van Baak

Bob,

Several of us do long-term measurement of mains frequency. We tend to 
time-stamp cycles and then compute period or frequency, rather than 
measuring frequency or period directly. Traditional counters in gated 
frequency or time interval mode have dead time and this will skew results.


In my case I just run a 5 VAC wall-wart through a 10k resistor directly 
to the input pin of a PIC. No scaling, no filtering, no opto, no ZCD, no 
nothing. If I measure every cycle I get 155 million samples per month. 
If I extract one cycle each second (decimate by 60) it's only 2.5 
million samples a month. Many months there is not a single glitch in the 
data in spite of all the FUD about power line noise. Once in a while a 
month contains an extra or missing sample but the beauty of timestamp 
data is that this can be detected and repaired as part of data 
processing with no loss of phase.


Here's a page where Kevin (in New Mexico) and I (in Seattle) both used 
picPET's to measure mains for a few days and then we compared the 
results. Although thousands of miles apart, we're both on the same grid 
so the agreement was astonishing. It was milliseconds in time and ADEV 
down to e-8 over a day:


http://leapsecond.com/pages/mains-cv/

See also: http://leapsecond.com/pic/mains-adev-mdev-gnuplot-g4.png

/tvb


On 7/2/2019 10:09 PM, Bob Albert via time-nuts wrote:

  I have tried to measure the power line frequency with spotty success.  My 
best results came from a period measurement, as many periods as the counter can 
accumulate.  Due to noise, one is never sure at quite what point the source is 
measured.  Perhaps a brick wall filter would clean it up for a more reliable 
measurement.
Of course, at 60 Hz the period is 16-2/3 milliseconds.  So the counter should 
properly show a 1 followed by a row of 6s, with the last digit bouncing between 
6 and 7 most of the time.
If there is a filter used, it will not only remove noise but also short term 
variations.  But generatlly speaking you don't want to measure those, unless 
you are trying to evaluate a rotary generator.
Getting this reading can be a challenge.
 On Tuesday, July 2, 2019, 10:01:03 PM PDT, jimlux  
wrote:
  
  On 7/2/19 4:09 PM, Dana Whitlow wrote:

I've always noted that casual attempts to pick up 60 Hz with small antennas
etc see more harmonics and other trash than actual line frequency.  But if
you're in an office environment, why not plug something in?  It's quite easy
to build a simple passive diode clipper/filter that will plug into a wall
outlet and
which will provide a sort of soft (but clean) squarewave at a voltage level
convenient for lab instruments and with good protection against big spikes
and
other trash riding on the line.


Safety approvals are one obstacle (of course one could use a AC wall wart).

Actually, it's because someone asked me about a science experiment where
you'd place them in a neighborhood outdoors.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.
   
___

time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 60 Hz frequency and phase measurement

2019-07-03 Thread Tim Shoppa
Jim, almost any mains powered lighting has a substantial 120Hz component in
light intensity. It's quite reasonable to trigger off this at nighttime if
the light is on and only that single light is in field of view of a
phototransistor (no car headlights allowed to come into view!)

It's still far far easier to plug in an AC wall wart.

Tim N3QE

On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 1:01 AM jimlux  wrote:

> On 7/2/19 4:09 PM, Dana Whitlow wrote:
> > I've always noted that casual attempts to pick up 60 Hz with small
> antennas
> > etc see more harmonics and other trash than actual line frequency.  But
> if
> > you're in an office environment, why not plug something in?  It's quite
> easy
> > to build a simple passive diode clipper/filter that will plug into a wall
> > outlet and
> > which will provide a sort of soft (but clean) squarewave at a voltage
> level
> > convenient for lab instruments and with good protection against big
> spikes
> > and
> > other trash riding on the line.
>
>
> Safety approvals are one obstacle (of course one could use a AC wall wart).
>
> Actually, it's because someone asked me about a science experiment where
> you'd place them in a neighborhood outdoors.
>
>
>
> ___
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
> and follow the instructions there.
>
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 60 Hz frequency and phase measurement

2019-07-03 Thread jimlux

On 7/2/19 10:09 PM, Bob Albert via time-nuts wrote:

  I have tried to measure the power line frequency with spotty success.  My 
best results came from a period measurement, as many periods as the counter can 
accumulate.  Due to noise, one is never sure at quite what point the source is 
measured.  Perhaps a brick wall filter would clean it up for a more reliable 
measurement.
Of course, at 60 Hz the period is 16-2/3 milliseconds.  So the counter should 
properly show a 1 followed by a row of 6s, with the last digit bouncing between 
6 and 7 most of the time.
If there is a filter used, it will not only remove noise but also short term 
variations.  But generatlly speaking you don't want to measure those, unless 
you are trying to evaluate a rotary generator.
Getting this reading can be a challenge.



The idea would be to look at the phase variations over time across a 
neighborhood and see if you can see effects from people turning on and 
off loads (air conditioners and sags causing light flicker  brought up 
the discussion).


It's a whole lot easier for someone to ask "can I put this little 
recording box here" than "can I plug something into your wall socket"


The idea is that you get cheap GPS receivers as the time hack and record 
*something* at a suitable rate after some low pass filtering, and then 
post process.   1kHz sample rate for a day is 86 Megasamples, so it's 
not an enormous dataset that needs to be recorded.


Maybe it's just time [sic] for an experiment - stick a wire on an ADC on 
a Beagle or Arduino and make some recordings.










 On Tuesday, July 2, 2019, 10:01:03 PM PDT, jimlux  
wrote:
  
  On 7/2/19 4:09 PM, Dana Whitlow wrote:

I've always noted that casual attempts to pick up 60 Hz with small antennas
etc see more harmonics and other trash than actual line frequency.  But if
you're in an office environment, why not plug something in?  It's quite easy
to build a simple passive diode clipper/filter that will plug into a wall
outlet and
which will provide a sort of soft (but clean) squarewave at a voltage level
convenient for lab instruments and with good protection against big spikes
and
other trash riding on the line.



Safety approvals are one obstacle (of course one could use a AC wall wart).

Actually, it's because someone asked me about a science experiment where
you'd place them in a neighborhood outdoors.




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 60 Hz frequency and phase measurement

2019-07-03 Thread Hal Murray


jim...@earthlink.net said:
> Actually, it's because someone asked me about a science experiment where
> you'd place them in a neighborhood outdoors. 

Sounds like another science experiment: build an antenna to pick up 60 Hz.

You could start with the typical ferrite, coil, and cap.  Just adjust the cap 
to your new target frequency.  Simple to try.


-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 60 Hz frequency and phase measurement

2019-07-03 Thread Adrian Godwin
I'd normally use an optocoupler.

But it doesn't need to be an 8-pin dip with the mains and low-voltage pins
0.3" apart - it can be a neon lamp and a photodiode, or a photodiode near a
mains-fed lamp. Even an incandescent has a very strong modulation of the
light. You just need to avoid leds that have smoothed DC, and flourescents
with HF ballasts.


On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 7:00 AM Bob Albert via time-nuts <
time-nuts@lists.febo.com> wrote:

>  I have tried to measure the power line frequency with spotty success.  My
> best results came from a period measurement, as many periods as the counter
> can accumulate.  Due to noise, one is never sure at quite what point the
> source is measured.  Perhaps a brick wall filter would clean it up for a
> more reliable measurement.
> Of course, at 60 Hz the period is 16-2/3 milliseconds.  So the counter
> should properly show a 1 followed by a row of 6s, with the last digit
> bouncing between 6 and 7 most of the time.
> If there is a filter used, it will not only remove noise but also short
> term variations.  But generatlly speaking you don't want to measure those,
> unless you are trying to evaluate a rotary generator.
> Getting this reading can be a challenge.
> On Tuesday, July 2, 2019, 10:01:03 PM PDT, jimlux <
> jim...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>  On 7/2/19 4:09 PM, Dana Whitlow wrote:
> > I've always noted that casual attempts to pick up 60 Hz with small
> antennas
> > etc see more harmonics and other trash than actual line frequency.  But
> if
> > you're in an office environment, why not plug something in?  It's quite
> easy
> > to build a simple passive diode clipper/filter that will plug into a wall
> > outlet and
> > which will provide a sort of soft (but clean) squarewave at a voltage
> level
> > convenient for lab instruments and with good protection against big
> spikes
> > and
> > other trash riding on the line.
>
>
> Safety approvals are one obstacle (of course one could use a AC wall wart).
>
> Actually, it's because someone asked me about a science experiment where
> you'd place them in a neighborhood outdoors.
>
>
>
> ___
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
> and follow the instructions there.
>
> ___
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
> and follow the instructions there.
>
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 60 Hz frequency and phase measurement

2019-07-02 Thread Bob Albert via time-nuts
 I have tried to measure the power line frequency with spotty success.  My best 
results came from a period measurement, as many periods as the counter can 
accumulate.  Due to noise, one is never sure at quite what point the source is 
measured.  Perhaps a brick wall filter would clean it up for a more reliable 
measurement.
Of course, at 60 Hz the period is 16-2/3 milliseconds.  So the counter should 
properly show a 1 followed by a row of 6s, with the last digit bouncing between 
6 and 7 most of the time.
If there is a filter used, it will not only remove noise but also short term 
variations.  But generatlly speaking you don't want to measure those, unless 
you are trying to evaluate a rotary generator.
Getting this reading can be a challenge.
On Tuesday, July 2, 2019, 10:01:03 PM PDT, jimlux  
wrote:  
 
 On 7/2/19 4:09 PM, Dana Whitlow wrote:
> I've always noted that casual attempts to pick up 60 Hz with small antennas
> etc see more harmonics and other trash than actual line frequency.  But if
> you're in an office environment, why not plug something in?  It's quite easy
> to build a simple passive diode clipper/filter that will plug into a wall
> outlet and
> which will provide a sort of soft (but clean) squarewave at a voltage level
> convenient for lab instruments and with good protection against big spikes
> and
> other trash riding on the line.


Safety approvals are one obstacle (of course one could use a AC wall wart).

Actually, it's because someone asked me about a science experiment where 
you'd place them in a neighborhood outdoors.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.
  
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 60 Hz frequency and phase measurement

2019-07-02 Thread jimlux

On 7/2/19 4:09 PM, Dana Whitlow wrote:

I've always noted that casual attempts to pick up 60 Hz with small antennas
etc see more harmonics and other trash than actual line frequency.  But if
you're in an office environment, why not plug something in?  It's quite easy
to build a simple passive diode clipper/filter that will plug into a wall
outlet and
which will provide a sort of soft (but clean) squarewave at a voltage level
convenient for lab instruments and with good protection against big spikes
and
other trash riding on the line.



Safety approvals are one obstacle (of course one could use a AC wall wart).

Actually, it's because someone asked me about a science experiment where 
you'd place them in a neighborhood outdoors.




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 60 Hz frequency and phase measurement

2019-07-02 Thread Jeremy Nichols
I built a 6 Volt filament transformer into a small metal box and connected
the secondary to a couple of 5-way banana jacks. In addition to the 6 Volt
output, I put a 100KΩ pot across the terminals with the wiper connected to
a third jack. That way, I can have any voltage from 0 to 6 VAC, avoiding
possible damage to sensitive front ends.

Jeremy


On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 8:00 PM Gerhard Hoffmann  wrote:

>
> Am 03.07.19 um 01:25 schrieb Tim Shoppa:
> > Jim, most of us are satisfied to use a 6.3VAC filament transformer to
> step down from 120VAC and isolate from the power line.
>
> Exactly. I used an old 6 or 9V AC wall wart and a resistive 1:3 divider
> last year when the European grid frequency was low because of some
> trouble in the distant south-east. That gave a really stable reading.
>
> <
>
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/137684711@N07/38870750440/in/dateposted-public/
>>
>
>
> regards, Gerhard
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
> and follow the instructions there.
>
-- 
Jeremy Nichols
Sent from my iPad 6.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 60 Hz frequency and phase measurement

2019-07-02 Thread Gerhard Hoffmann


Am 03.07.19 um 01:25 schrieb Tim Shoppa:

Jim, most of us are satisfied to use a 6.3VAC filament transformer to step down 
from 120VAC and isolate from the power line.


Exactly. I used an old 6 or 9V AC wall wart and a resistive 1:3 divider 
last year when the European grid frequency was low because of some 
trouble in the distant south-east. That gave a really stable reading.


< 
https://www.flickr.com/photos/137684711@N07/38870750440/in/dateposted-public/ 
  >



regards, Gerhard





___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 60 Hz frequency and phase measurement

2019-07-02 Thread Tim Shoppa
Jim, most of us are satisfied to use a 6.3VAC filament transformer to step down 
from 120VAC and isolate from the power line.

Tim N3QE

> On Jul 2, 2019, at 5:56 PM, jimlux  wrote:
> 
> There's some designs on the list (using a PICPET, for instance) to measure 
> the local line frequency and phase..
> 
> but the schemes we've discussed require connecting to the power line in some 
> way.
> 
> What about a non-contact sensing approach?  Something you could put in a box 
> and it would pick up the electric or magnetic field as the input?
> 
> Just how strong is the field anyway?  I've always been trying to cancel or 
> shield it or reduce it in some way, so I've never actually measured it in a 
> calibrated way.  A 10cm antenna on a 1Meg scope probe looks like about 40 mV 
> peak to peak (for the 60 Hz component) along with lots of other high 
> frequency stuff (40 kHz and a few hundred kHz in my office) from switching 
> power supplies.
> 
> I realize that in a office/industrial area you'll probably pick up all three 
> phases in some way.
> 
> What about using a small loop? or a magnetoresistive sensor (like the 
> compasses in phones)?
> 
> Has anyone tried any of these?
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to 
> http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
> and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 60 Hz frequency and phase measurement

2019-07-02 Thread Dana Whitlow
I've always noted that casual attempts to pick up 60 Hz with small antennas
etc see more harmonics and other trash than actual line frequency.  But if
you're in an office environment, why not plug something in?  It's quite easy
to build a simple passive diode clipper/filter that will plug into a wall
outlet and
which will provide a sort of soft (but clean) squarewave at a voltage level
convenient for lab instruments and with good protection against big spikes
and
other trash riding on the line.

If you're willing to do this and need help with a design, contact me
off-list at
k8yumdoo...@gmail.com.

Dana

On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 6:00 PM jimlux  wrote:

> There's some designs on the list (using a PICPET, for instance) to
> measure the local line frequency and phase..
>
> but the schemes we've discussed require connecting to the power line in
> some way.
>
> What about a non-contact sensing approach?  Something you could put in a
> box and it would pick up the electric or magnetic field as the input?
>
> Just how strong is the field anyway?  I've always been trying to cancel
> or shield it or reduce it in some way, so I've never actually measured
> it in a calibrated way.  A 10cm antenna on a 1Meg scope probe looks like
> about 40 mV peak to peak (for the 60 Hz component) along with lots of
> other high frequency stuff (40 kHz and a few hundred kHz in my office)
> from switching power supplies.
>
> I realize that in a office/industrial area you'll probably pick up all
> three phases in some way.
>
> What about using a small loop? or a magnetoresistive sensor (like the
> compasses in phones)?
>
> Has anyone tried any of these?
>
>
>
> ___
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
> and follow the instructions there.
>
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.