RE: Filenames of JSP generated servlets
But it's the same JVM... J2SDK 1.4.2_01 from Sun. It's odd, as you say. BTW, we found another difference between WinXP with MSIE 6 and Win2k with MSIE 5.5. The handle whitespace differently. A wrongly formatted JScript include file with all the code in one line caused the WinXP installation to generate HTML from JSP with most of the code squashed into the first line. No such problem on Win2k. Could these two things, generated servlet filenames and whitespace handling, be connected? We don't have *big* problems with these effects, but the reason, why I am still hoping for a good explanation is: 1. We are unsure, if these phenomena are caused by a *real* malfunction behind the scenes, maybe in JVM or WinXP itself. 2. Searching for files is easier when you know what the file is named like. ;-) Thanks again for any useful thought. Regards Peter -Original Message- From: Tim Funk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 6:44 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Filenames of JSP generated servlets Odd. The same version of tomcat shouldn't do that. It could be that $ is not a valid character according to one of the JVMs. (guess) -Tim Baer Peter Christoph Alexander wrote: Hi Tim, you wrote: snip The behavior was changed (in the Jsp compiler) and is not configurable. /snip So it is normal, that when we use *the same* - Tomcat 4.0.6 LE - JSP compiler - J2SDK 1.4.2_01 - everything else, but OS the filenames on WinXP are different than on Win2k? Why? Regards Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Filenames of JSP generated servlets
The behavior was changed (in the Jsp compiler) and is not configurable. -Tim Baer Peter Christoph Alexander wrote: Hello, forgive me if I ask something obvious, but browsing the Tomcat docs and the mailing list archive I haven't found the relevant piece of information, yet. We have three installations of Tomcat 4.06 LE (yes, it's old, and we are already planning to replace it, once version 5 is mature for production environments). Two of them are on Windows XP, one is Windows 2000. Although we thought the installations were identical we found a difference. The filenames of servlets generated out of JSP pages differ. For example, if the JSP filename is login.jsp, on the *Win2k* system we find the generated servlet as *login$jsp.java*, while the WinXP Tomcats generate something like *_0002fjsp0002flogin_jsp.java*. Is this configurable? What is this difference caused by? Thanks for your kind support in advance, regards Peter Bär - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Filenames of JSP generated servlets
Baer, Are you sure you have the same version of the JDK and Tomcat on both machines? Is this configurable? I'm pretty sure it's not configurable. Are you concerned about what the filenames actually are? What is this difference caused by? It's probably caused by the way the VM gets unique filenames from the OS. The native implementation uses OS calls (which in turn uses filesystem calls) to get unique filenames. Perhaps the mechanism in windows XP is more complicated (and hopefully more likely to be unique :) than on windows 2k. -chris - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Filenames of JSP generated servlets
Hi Tim, you wrote: snip The behavior was changed (in the Jsp compiler) and is not configurable. /snip So it is normal, that when we use *the same* - Tomcat 4.0.6 LE - JSP compiler - J2SDK 1.4.2_01 - everything else, but OS the filenames on WinXP are different than on Win2k? Why? Regards Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Filenames of JSP generated servlets
Odd. The same version of tomcat shouldn't do that. It could be that $ is not a valid character according to one of the JVMs. (guess) -Tim Baer Peter Christoph Alexander wrote: Hi Tim, you wrote: snip The behavior was changed (in the Jsp compiler) and is not configurable. /snip So it is normal, that when we use *the same* - Tomcat 4.0.6 LE - JSP compiler - J2SDK 1.4.2_01 - everything else, but OS the filenames on WinXP are different than on Win2k? Why? Regards Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Filenames of JSP generated servlets
Hi, Christopher, you wrote: snip Are you sure you have the same version of the JDK and Tomcat on both machines? /snip Yes, I'm sure. All installations of Tomcat and the JDK were freshly done a second time, before I posted the phenomenon on this list. Your explanation, why the filenames *can* be different, sounds logical, yet I am not sure if this is really it... Thanks and regards, Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Filenames of JSP generated servlets
It's just a matter of which versions of the jasper jars you have. I ran into that same issue before. You may just want to upgrade to the latest versions of jasper-compiler.jar and jasper-runtime.jar The latest versions produce java files such as login_jsp.java instead of login$jsp.java. As for that *_0002fjsp0002f stuff, I don't know where that is coming from. I pre-compile all my jsps and I do not get resulting files that are named that way. -Original Message- From: Baer Peter Christoph Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 12:52 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Filenames of JSP generated servlets Hi, Christopher, you wrote: snip Are you sure you have the same version of the JDK and Tomcat on both machines? /snip Yes, I'm sure. All installations of Tomcat and the JDK were freshly done a second time, before I posted the phenomenon on this list. Your explanation, why the filenames *can* be different, sounds logical, yet I am not sure if this is really it... Thanks and regards, Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
