Re: [topbraid-users] Export RDF to custom XML

[Holger Knublauch]

Hi Jack,

you can execute the script up the RDF2XML step and export the resulting 
graph to a file to see what is actually part of that graph. I also 
suspect the SXML triples are not present. I assume you have a file with 
the sxml:element and sxml:attribute triples. Could you try to add this 
file to the script so that it directly becomes another import to the 
RDF2XML step, i.e. use ImportRDFFromWorkspace for the sxml file and then 
draw an edge from that file to the RDF2XML?


Holger



On 2021-07-02 9:06 am, Jack Hodges wrote:
I am doing something similar to Oleksandr and I know that this is a 
very old thread but such is life. I 'am' doing round tripping but here 
is my SM workflow:


XML source --> XML-2-RDF module --> RDF-2-RDF using SPIN Map --> 
Insert to KG --> DO Stuff with resuting KG --> RDF-2-RDF Reversal 
using SPIN Map --> RDF-2-XML module --> Export to remote.


Because (I think) the sxml tags are in the first conversion but not to 
my ontology, they are not there when I want to export the XML and the 
result is empty. I tried to watch Holger's really old movie but it no 
longer seems to exist. My next stop is the SM help page but any help 
would be appreciated.


Jack

On Thursday, March 9, 2017 at 7:08:03 AM UTC-8 icod...@gmail.com wrote:

Hi Holger,

thank you very much for help!

Best regards,
Oleksandr Mandryk


On Thursday, March 9, 2017 at 1:11:38 AM UTC+1, Holger Knublauch
wrote:

Hi Oleksandr,

we have discovered that the sml:RDFXML mode of sml:ReturnRDF
indeed produces the same output as sml:RDFXMLAbbrev. Something
must have changed in the underlying Jena writer's contract and
this may have gone undetected for quite a while because most
users have switched to Turtle or JSON-LD. I have just updated
our code to use a different RDF/XML writer, and this fix will
go into 5.3. The beta of 5.3 is planned for the end of this
month, so if you urgently require a fix then I am afraid there
is not much I can do right now.

The alternative would be to produce the RDF triples using SWP
- that would give you fine tuned control over the exact output
but is of course also quite a bit of work to get right. I have
attached an example that produces

http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#

"xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
">
http://aldi.de ">
Test



using SWP. Call it using
http://localhost:8083/tbl/swp?_viewClass=rdfXMLInSWP:Example


Another option would be to create the exact RDF/XML with some
3rd party tool such as a Jena command line tool.

Apologies for the inconvenience!

Holger


On 7/03/2017 20:48, Oleksandr Mandryk wrote:

Hi Holger,
thank you very much for your advice!

I've created new SPARQLMotion script with such
modules: spl:Argument -> sml:ApplyConstruct -> sml:ReturnRDF,
where in  sml:ApplyConstruct I put this constructQuery:
|
CONSTRUCT {
?a ?b ?c .
}
WHERE {
    BIND (smf:buildURI("{?1}",?projectGraph)AS ?graphName).
    GRAPH ?graphName {
?a ?b ?c .
}.
}
|

and sml:RDFXMLAbbrev in sml:ReturnRDF

but it produces the same output with sml:RDFXML.

Also I tried to change arg:serialization
in teamwork:ExportEntireProjectPlugin for ExportToRDF, but it
also produces the same output as with sml:RDFXML.

I'm working on EVN Version 5.2.0.v20160909-1520B.

Thank you.

Best regards,
Oleksandr Mandryk

On Tuesday, March 7, 2017 at 4:49:27 AM UTC+1, Holger
Knublauch wrote:

Try to use sml:serialization=sml:RDFXMLAbbrev at
sml:ReturnRDF.


In general, the main alternatives for producing arbitrary
XML are Semantic XML (via sml:ConvertRDFToXML) or SWP.
SWP can produce any XML, assuming you turn each XML
element into a subclass of ui:Element and each XML
attribute into corresponding argument properties at these
elements.

Holger


On 7/03/2017 13:26, Oleksandr Mandryk wrote:

Hi Hogler,

as far as I remember the nested resources was the main
issue. I haven't tried approach that you suggested but
as I can see
here
http://www.topquadrant.com/sparqlmotion/lib.html#sml:ReturnRDF

there is no such property in sml:ReturnRDF.

Could you please explain where I can specify 

Re: [topbraid-users] Export RDF to custom XML

[Jack Hodges]

I am doing something similar to Oleksandr and I know that this is a very 
old thread but such is life. I 'am' doing round tripping but here is my SM 
workflow:

XML source --> XML-2-RDF module --> RDF-2-RDF using SPIN Map --> Insert to 
KG --> DO Stuff with resuting KG --> RDF-2-RDF Reversal using SPIN Map --> 
RDF-2-XML module --> Export to remote.

Because (I think) the sxml tags are in the first conversion but not to my 
ontology, they are not there when I want to export the XML and the result 
is empty. I tried to watch Holger's really old movie but it no longer seems 
to exist. My next stop is the SM help page but any help would be 
appreciated.

Jack

On Thursday, March 9, 2017 at 7:08:03 AM UTC-8 icod...@gmail.com wrote:

> Hi Holger,
>
> thank you very much for help!
>
> Best regards,
> Oleksandr Mandryk
>
>
> On Thursday, March 9, 2017 at 1:11:38 AM UTC+1, Holger Knublauch wrote:
>>
>> Hi Oleksandr,
>>
>> we have discovered that the sml:RDFXML mode of sml:ReturnRDF indeed 
>> produces the same output as sml:RDFXMLAbbrev. Something must have changed 
>> in the underlying Jena writer's contract and this may have gone undetected 
>> for quite a while because most users have switched to Turtle or JSON-LD. I 
>> have just updated our code to use a different RDF/XML writer, and this fix 
>> will go into 5.3. The beta of 5.3 is planned for the end of this month, so 
>> if you urgently require a fix then I am afraid there is not much I can do 
>> right now.
>>
>> The alternative would be to produce the RDF triples using SWP - that 
>> would give you fine tuned control over the exact output but is of course 
>> also quite a bit of work to get right. I have attached an example that 
>> produces
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#; 
>> xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#;>
>> http://aldi.de;>
>> Test
>> 
>> 
>>
>> using SWP. Call it using 
>> http://localhost:8083/tbl/swp?_viewClass=rdfXMLInSWP:Example
>>
>> Another option would be to create the exact RDF/XML with some 3rd party 
>> tool such as a Jena command line tool.
>>
>> Apologies for the inconvenience!
>>
>> Holger
>>
>>
>> On 7/03/2017 20:48, Oleksandr Mandryk wrote:
>>
>> Hi Holger, 
>> thank you very much for your advice!
>>
>> I've created new SPARQLMotion script with such modules: spl:Argument 
>> -> sml:ApplyConstruct -> sml:ReturnRDF, where in  sml:ApplyConstruct I put 
>> this constructQuery:
>> CONSTRUCT {
>> ?a ?b ?c .
>> }
>> WHERE {
>> BIND (smf:buildURI("{?1}", ?projectGraph) AS ?graphName) .
>> GRAPH ?graphName {
>> ?a ?b ?c .
>> } .
>> }
>>
>> and sml:RDFXMLAbbrev in sml:ReturnRDF 
>>
>> but it produces the same output with sml:RDFXML.
>>
>> Also I tried to change arg:serialization 
>> in teamwork:ExportEntireProjectPlugin for ExportToRDF, but it also produces 
>> the same output as with sml:RDFXML.
>>
>> I'm working on EVN Version 5.2.0.v20160909-1520B.
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Oleksandr Mandryk
>>
>> On Tuesday, March 7, 2017 at 4:49:27 AM UTC+1, Holger Knublauch wrote: 
>>>
>>> Try to use sml:serialization=sml:RDFXMLAbbrev at sml:ReturnRDF.
>>>
>>  
>>
>>>
>>> In general, the main alternatives for producing arbitrary XML are 
>>> Semantic XML (via sml:ConvertRDFToXML) or SWP. SWP can produce any XML, 
>>> assuming you turn each XML element into a subclass of ui:Element and each 
>>> XML attribute into corresponding argument properties at these elements.
>>>
>>> Holger
>>>
>>>
>>> On 7/03/2017 13:26, Oleksandr Mandryk wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Hogler,
>>>
>>> as far as I remember the nested resources was the main issue. I haven't 
>>> tried approach that you suggested but as I can see
>>> here http://www.topquadrant.com/sparqlmotion/lib.html#sml:ReturnRDF 
>>> there is no such property in sml:ReturnRDF.
>>>
>>> Could you please explain where I can specify sml:RDFXML / 
>>> sml:RDFXMLAbbrev?
>>>
>>> BTW: Do we have any alternatives (just in case) to this approach? I mean 
>>> if I would like to build totally different XML from taxonomy RDF what would 
>>> be the most appropriate way to do it?
>>>
>>> Thank you very much!
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Oleksandr Mandryk
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, March 7, 2017 at 4:07:44 AM UTC+1, Holger Knublauch wrote: 

 Whether resources are nested or remain top-level is a configuration 
 option in the RDF/XML writer. In sml:ReturnRDF, try using sml:RDFXML 
 versus 
 sml:RDFXMLAbbrev (the abbrev option will produce nested objects). Have you 
 tried this or would there be other differences from your planned output?

 Holger 

 On 7/03/2017 12:56, Oleksandr Mandryk wrote:

 Hi Hogler, 
 thank you for reply!

 Actually RDF/XML is pretty different from what I need. The biggest 
 issue with RDF/XML for me is hierarchical structure of relations between 
 nodes, 
 for example if PARENT_NODE is parent of CHILD_NODE in RDF/XML it will 
 look like this:

 
  
  ... 

Re: [topbraid-users] Export RDF to custom XML

[Oleksandr Mandryk]

Hi Holger,

thank you very much for help!

Best regards,
Oleksandr Mandryk

On Thursday, March 9, 2017 at 1:11:38 AM UTC+1, Holger Knublauch wrote:
>
> Hi Oleksandr,
>
> we have discovered that the sml:RDFXML mode of sml:ReturnRDF indeed 
> produces the same output as sml:RDFXMLAbbrev. Something must have changed 
> in the underlying Jena writer's contract and this may have gone undetected 
> for quite a while because most users have switched to Turtle or JSON-LD. I 
> have just updated our code to use a different RDF/XML writer, and this fix 
> will go into 5.3. The beta of 5.3 is planned for the end of this month, so 
> if you urgently require a fix then I am afraid there is not much I can do 
> right now.
>
> The alternative would be to produce the RDF triples using SWP - that would 
> give you fine tuned control over the exact output but is of course also 
> quite a bit of work to get right. I have attached an example that produces
>
> http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#; 
> xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#;>
> http://aldi.de;>
> Test
> 
> 
>
> using SWP. Call it using 
> http://localhost:8083/tbl/swp?_viewClass=rdfXMLInSWP:Example
>
> Another option would be to create the exact RDF/XML with some 3rd party 
> tool such as a Jena command line tool.
>
> Apologies for the inconvenience!
>
> Holger
>
>
> On 7/03/2017 20:48, Oleksandr Mandryk wrote:
>
> Hi Holger, 
> thank you very much for your advice!
>
> I've created new SPARQLMotion script with such modules: spl:Argument 
> -> sml:ApplyConstruct -> sml:ReturnRDF, where in  sml:ApplyConstruct I put 
> this constructQuery:
> CONSTRUCT {
> ?a ?b ?c .
> }
> WHERE {
> BIND (smf:buildURI("{?1}", ?projectGraph) AS ?graphName) .
> GRAPH ?graphName {
> ?a ?b ?c .
> } .
> }
>
> and sml:RDFXMLAbbrev in sml:ReturnRDF 
>
> but it produces the same output with sml:RDFXML.
>
> Also I tried to change arg:serialization 
> in teamwork:ExportEntireProjectPlugin for ExportToRDF, but it also produces 
> the same output as with sml:RDFXML.
>
> I'm working on EVN Version 5.2.0.v20160909-1520B.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Best regards,
> Oleksandr Mandryk
>
> On Tuesday, March 7, 2017 at 4:49:27 AM UTC+1, Holger Knublauch wrote: 
>>
>> Try to use sml:serialization=sml:RDFXMLAbbrev at sml:ReturnRDF.
>>
>  
>
>>
>> In general, the main alternatives for producing arbitrary XML are 
>> Semantic XML (via sml:ConvertRDFToXML) or SWP. SWP can produce any XML, 
>> assuming you turn each XML element into a subclass of ui:Element and each 
>> XML attribute into corresponding argument properties at these elements.
>>
>> Holger
>>
>>
>> On 7/03/2017 13:26, Oleksandr Mandryk wrote:
>>
>> Hi Hogler,
>>
>> as far as I remember the nested resources was the main issue. I haven't 
>> tried approach that you suggested but as I can see
>> here http://www.topquadrant.com/sparqlmotion/lib.html#sml:ReturnRDF 
>> there is no such property in sml:ReturnRDF.
>>
>> Could you please explain where I can specify sml:RDFXML / 
>> sml:RDFXMLAbbrev?
>>
>> BTW: Do we have any alternatives (just in case) to this approach? I mean 
>> if I would like to build totally different XML from taxonomy RDF what would 
>> be the most appropriate way to do it?
>>
>> Thank you very much!
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Oleksandr Mandryk
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, March 7, 2017 at 4:07:44 AM UTC+1, Holger Knublauch wrote: 
>>>
>>> Whether resources are nested or remain top-level is a configuration 
>>> option in the RDF/XML writer. In sml:ReturnRDF, try using sml:RDFXML versus 
>>> sml:RDFXMLAbbrev (the abbrev option will produce nested objects). Have you 
>>> tried this or would there be other differences from your planned output?
>>>
>>> Holger 
>>>
>>> On 7/03/2017 12:56, Oleksandr Mandryk wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Hogler, 
>>> thank you for reply!
>>>
>>> Actually RDF/XML is pretty different from what I need. The biggest issue 
>>> with RDF/XML for me is hierarchical structure of relations between nodes, 
>>> for example if PARENT_NODE is parent of CHILD_NODE in RDF/XML it will 
>>> look like this:
>>>
>>> 
>>>  
>>>  ... properties
>>>  
>>>  
>>>  
>>>  ...
>>>  
>>>  
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>
>>> but I need something like this:
>>>
>>> 
>>>  ... properties
>>>
>>>
>>>  
>>> 
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>>>  ... properties
>>>  
>>> 
>>>
>>> so each node should be separate XML element.
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Oleksandr Mandryk
>>>
>>> On Monday, March 6, 2017 at 11:13:00 PM UTC+1, Holger Knublauch wrote: 



 On 7/03/2017 0:40, Oleksandr Mandryk wrote:

 Hi,

 I'm trying to create a SPARQLMotion script that will export specified 
 taxonomy to the custom XML output.

 Currently my script is based no these modules:

 *spl:Argument* -> *sml:ImportRDFFromWorkspace* -> *sml:ConvertRDFToXML* 
 -> *sml:ReturnXML*


 But when I run this script I get only the first (root) node of the 
 specified projectGraph:

 >>> 

Re: [topbraid-users] Export RDF to custom XML

[Holger Knublauch]

Hi Oleksandr,

we have discovered that the sml:RDFXML mode of sml:ReturnRDF indeed 
produces the same output as sml:RDFXMLAbbrev. Something must have 
changed in the underlying Jena writer's contract and this may have gone 
undetected for quite a while because most users have switched to Turtle 
or JSON-LD. I have just updated our code to use a different RDF/XML 
writer, and this fix will go into 5.3. The beta of 5.3 is planned for 
the end of this month, so if you urgently require a fix then I am afraid 
there is not much I can do right now.


The alternative would be to produce the RDF triples using SWP - that 
would give you fine tuned control over the exact output but is of course 
also quite a bit of work to get right. I have attached an example that 
produces

Re: [topbraid-users] Export RDF to custom XML

[Oleksandr Mandryk]

Hi Holger,

ok, thank you. I will wait for your answer.

Best regards,
Oleksandr Mandryk

On Wednesday, March 8, 2017 at 4:14:01 AM UTC+1, Holger Knublauch wrote:
>
> Hi Oleksandr,
>
> I can confirm there is a problem and we are investigating why the output 
> is the same. I will keep you posted.
>
> Holger
>
>
>
> On 7/03/2017 20:48, Oleksandr Mandryk wrote:
>
> Hi Holger, 
> thank you very much for your advice!
>
> I've created new SPARQLMotion script with such modules: spl:Argument 
> -> sml:ApplyConstruct -> sml:ReturnRDF, where in  sml:ApplyConstruct I put 
> this constructQuery:
> CONSTRUCT {
> ?a ?b ?c .
> }
> WHERE {
> BIND (smf:buildURI("{?1}", ?projectGraph) AS ?graphName) .
> GRAPH ?graphName {
> ?a ?b ?c .
> } .
> }
>
> and sml:RDFXMLAbbrev in sml:ReturnRDF 
>
> but it produces the same output with sml:RDFXML.
>
> Also I tried to change arg:serialization 
> in teamwork:ExportEntireProjectPlugin for ExportToRDF, but it also produces 
> the same output as with sml:RDFXML.
>
> I'm working on EVN Version 5.2.0.v20160909-1520B.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Best regards,
> Oleksandr Mandryk
>
> On Tuesday, March 7, 2017 at 4:49:27 AM UTC+1, Holger Knublauch wrote: 
>>
>> Try to use sml:serialization=sml:RDFXMLAbbrev at sml:ReturnRDF.
>>
>  
>
>>
>> In general, the main alternatives for producing arbitrary XML are 
>> Semantic XML (via sml:ConvertRDFToXML) or SWP. SWP can produce any XML, 
>> assuming you turn each XML element into a subclass of ui:Element and each 
>> XML attribute into corresponding argument properties at these elements.
>>
>> Holger
>>
>>
>> On 7/03/2017 13:26, Oleksandr Mandryk wrote:
>>
>> Hi Hogler,
>>
>> as far as I remember the nested resources was the main issue. I haven't 
>> tried approach that you suggested but as I can see
>> here http://www.topquadrant.com/sparqlmotion/lib.html#sml:ReturnRDF 
>> there is no such property in sml:ReturnRDF.
>>
>> Could you please explain where I can specify sml:RDFXML / 
>> sml:RDFXMLAbbrev?
>>
>> BTW: Do we have any alternatives (just in case) to this approach? I mean 
>> if I would like to build totally different XML from taxonomy RDF what would 
>> be the most appropriate way to do it?
>>
>> Thank you very much!
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Oleksandr Mandryk
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, March 7, 2017 at 4:07:44 AM UTC+1, Holger Knublauch wrote: 
>>>
>>> Whether resources are nested or remain top-level is a configuration 
>>> option in the RDF/XML writer. In sml:ReturnRDF, try using sml:RDFXML versus 
>>> sml:RDFXMLAbbrev (the abbrev option will produce nested objects). Have you 
>>> tried this or would there be other differences from your planned output?
>>>
>>> Holger 
>>>
>>> On 7/03/2017 12:56, Oleksandr Mandryk wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Hogler, 
>>> thank you for reply!
>>>
>>> Actually RDF/XML is pretty different from what I need. The biggest issue 
>>> with RDF/XML for me is hierarchical structure of relations between nodes, 
>>> for example if PARENT_NODE is parent of CHILD_NODE in RDF/XML it will 
>>> look like this:
>>>
>>> 
>>>  
>>>  ... properties
>>>  
>>>  
>>>  
>>>  ...
>>>  
>>>  
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>
>>> but I need something like this:
>>>
>>> 
>>>  ... properties
>>>
>>>
>>>  
>>> 
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>>>  ... properties
>>>  
>>> 
>>>
>>> so each node should be separate XML element.
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Oleksandr Mandryk
>>>
>>> On Monday, March 6, 2017 at 11:13:00 PM UTC+1, Holger Knublauch wrote: 



 On 7/03/2017 0:40, Oleksandr Mandryk wrote:

 Hi,

 I'm trying to create a SPARQLMotion script that will export specified 
 taxonomy to the custom XML output.

 Currently my script is based no these modules:

 *spl:Argument* -> *sml:ImportRDFFromWorkspace* -> *sml:ConvertRDFToXML* 
 -> *sml:ReturnXML*


 But when I run this script I get only the first (root) node of the 
 specified projectGraph:

 >>> "http://www.topbraid.org/2007/05/composite.owl; 
  xmlns:skos=
 "http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core; 
  skos:prefLabel=Root Test Node"/>

 So I have a few questions:

 1) Is my approach correct? I mean spl:Argument -> 
 sml:ImportRDFFromWorkspace -> sml:ConvertRDFToXML -> sml:ReturnXML

 2) Why I'm receiving only first node as result but not all?

 3) How to specify a custom template for the XML, for example I need 
 something like this:
 >>> xmlns:ui="http://uispin.org/ui#; 
 xmlns:let="http://uispin.org/let#; 
  ... >

 >>> "http://test.com/Concept_7c932ea3-2b5b-11b2-8037-eac2f42a0c5a; 
 >
   http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string; 
 >NodeLabel
   http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#Concept; 
 

Re: [topbraid-users] Export RDF to custom XML

[Holger Knublauch]

Hi Oleksandr,

I can confirm there is a problem and we are investigating why the output 
is the same. I will keep you posted.


Holger



On 7/03/2017 20:48, Oleksandr Mandryk wrote:

Hi Holger,
thank you very much for your advice!

I've created new SPARQLMotion script with such modules: spl:Argument 
-> sml:ApplyConstruct -> sml:ReturnRDF, where in  sml:ApplyConstruct I 
put this constructQuery:

|
CONSTRUCT {
?a ?b ?c .
}
WHERE {
BIND (smf:buildURI("{?1}",?projectGraph)AS ?graphName).
GRAPH ?graphName {
?a ?b ?c .
}.
}
|

and sml:RDFXMLAbbrev in sml:ReturnRDF

but it produces the same output with sml:RDFXML.

Also I tried to change arg:serialization 
in teamwork:ExportEntireProjectPlugin for ExportToRDF, but it also 
produces the same output as with sml:RDFXML.


I'm working on EVN Version 5.2.0.v20160909-1520B.

Thank you.

Best regards,
Oleksandr Mandryk

On Tuesday, March 7, 2017 at 4:49:27 AM UTC+1, Holger Knublauch wrote:

Try to use sml:serialization=sml:RDFXMLAbbrev at sml:ReturnRDF.


In general, the main alternatives for producing arbitrary XML are
Semantic XML (via sml:ConvertRDFToXML) or SWP. SWP can produce any
XML, assuming you turn each XML element into a subclass of
ui:Element and each XML attribute into corresponding argument
properties at these elements.

Holger


On 7/03/2017 13:26, Oleksandr Mandryk wrote:

Hi Hogler,

as far as I remember the nested resources was the main issue. I
haven't tried approach that you suggested but as I can see
here
http://www.topquadrant.com/sparqlmotion/lib.html#sml:ReturnRDF

there is no such property in sml:ReturnRDF.

Could you please explain where I can specify sml:RDFXML /
sml:RDFXMLAbbrev?

BTW: Do we have any alternatives (just in case) to this approach?
I mean if I would like to build totally different XML from
taxonomy RDF what would be the most appropriate way to do it?

Thank you very much!

Best regards,
Oleksandr Mandryk


On Tuesday, March 7, 2017 at 4:07:44 AM UTC+1, Holger Knublauch
wrote:

Whether resources are nested or remain top-level is a
configuration option in the RDF/XML writer. In sml:ReturnRDF,
try using sml:RDFXML versus sml:RDFXMLAbbrev (the abbrev
option will produce nested objects). Have you tried this or
would there be other differences from your planned output?

Holger

On 7/03/2017 12:56, Oleksandr Mandryk wrote:

Hi Hogler,
thank you for reply!

Actually RDF/XML is pretty different from what I need. The
biggest issue with RDF/XML for me is hierarchical structure
of relations between nodes,
for example if PARENT_NODE is parent of CHILD_NODE in
RDF/XML it will look like this:

|


 ... properties



 ...





|


but I need something like this:

|

 ... properties

Re: [topbraid-users] Export RDF to custom XML

[Oleksandr Mandryk]

Hi Holger,
thank you very much for your advice!

I've created new SPARQLMotion script with such modules: spl:Argument 
-> sml:ApplyConstruct -> sml:ReturnRDF, where in  sml:ApplyConstruct I put 
this constructQuery:
CONSTRUCT {
?a ?b ?c .
}
WHERE {
BIND (smf:buildURI("{?1}", ?projectGraph) AS ?graphName) .
GRAPH ?graphName {
?a ?b ?c .
} .
}

and sml:RDFXMLAbbrev in sml:ReturnRDF 

but it produces the same output with sml:RDFXML.

Also I tried to change arg:serialization 
in teamwork:ExportEntireProjectPlugin for ExportToRDF, but it also produces 
the same output as with sml:RDFXML.

I'm working on EVN Version 5.2.0.v20160909-1520B.

Thank you.

Best regards,
Oleksandr Mandryk

On Tuesday, March 7, 2017 at 4:49:27 AM UTC+1, Holger Knublauch wrote:
>
> Try to use sml:serialization=sml:RDFXMLAbbrev at sml:ReturnRDF.
>
 

>
> In general, the main alternatives for producing arbitrary XML are Semantic 
> XML (via sml:ConvertRDFToXML) or SWP. SWP can produce any XML, assuming you 
> turn each XML element into a subclass of ui:Element and each XML attribute 
> into corresponding argument properties at these elements.
>
> Holger
>
>
> On 7/03/2017 13:26, Oleksandr Mandryk wrote:
>
> Hi Hogler,
>
> as far as I remember the nested resources was the main issue. I haven't 
> tried approach that you suggested but as I can see
> here http://www.topquadrant.com/sparqlmotion/lib.html#sml:ReturnRDF there 
> is no such property in sml:ReturnRDF.
>
> Could you please explain where I can specify sml:RDFXML / sml:RDFXMLAbbrev?
>
> BTW: Do we have any alternatives (just in case) to this approach? I mean 
> if I would like to build totally different XML from taxonomy RDF what would 
> be the most appropriate way to do it?
>
> Thank you very much!
>
> Best regards,
> Oleksandr Mandryk
>
>
> On Tuesday, March 7, 2017 at 4:07:44 AM UTC+1, Holger Knublauch wrote: 
>>
>> Whether resources are nested or remain top-level is a configuration 
>> option in the RDF/XML writer. In sml:ReturnRDF, try using sml:RDFXML versus 
>> sml:RDFXMLAbbrev (the abbrev option will produce nested objects). Have you 
>> tried this or would there be other differences from your planned output?
>>
>> Holger 
>>
>> On 7/03/2017 12:56, Oleksandr Mandryk wrote:
>>
>> Hi Hogler, 
>> thank you for reply!
>>
>> Actually RDF/XML is pretty different from what I need. The biggest issue 
>> with RDF/XML for me is hierarchical structure of relations between nodes, 
>> for example if PARENT_NODE is parent of CHILD_NODE in RDF/XML it will 
>> look like this:
>>
>> 
>>  
>>  ... properties
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  ...
>>  
>>  
>>
>>
>> 
>>
>>
>> but I need something like this:
>>
>> 
>>  ... properties
>>
>>
>>  
>> 
>>
>>
>> 
>>  ... properties
>>  
>> 
>>
>> so each node should be separate XML element.
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Oleksandr Mandryk
>>
>> On Monday, March 6, 2017 at 11:13:00 PM UTC+1, Holger Knublauch wrote: 
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 7/03/2017 0:40, Oleksandr Mandryk wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm trying to create a SPARQLMotion script that will export specified 
>>> taxonomy to the custom XML output.
>>>
>>> Currently my script is based no these modules:
>>>
>>> *spl:Argument* -> *sml:ImportRDFFromWorkspace* -> *sml:ConvertRDFToXML* 
>>> -> *sml:ReturnXML*
>>>
>>>
>>> But when I run this script I get only the first (root) node of the 
>>> specified projectGraph:
>>>
>>> >> "http://www.topbraid.org/2007/05/composite.owl; 
>>>  xmlns:skos=
>>> "http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core; 
>>>  skos:prefLabel=Root Test Node"/>
>>>
>>> So I have a few questions:
>>>
>>> 1) Is my approach correct? I mean spl:Argument -> 
>>> sml:ImportRDFFromWorkspace -> sml:ConvertRDFToXML -> sml:ReturnXML
>>>
>>> 2) Why I'm receiving only first node as result but not all?
>>>
>>> 3) How to specify a custom template for the XML, for example I need 
>>> something like this:
>>> >> xmlns:ui="http://uispin.org/ui#; 
>>> xmlns:let="http://uispin.org/let#; 
>>>  ... >
>>>
>>> >> "http://test.com/Concept_7c932ea3-2b5b-11b2-8037-eac2f42a0c5a; 
>>> >
>>>   http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string; 
>>> >NodeLabel
>>>   http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#Concept; 
>>> />
>>>
>>>   >> "http://test.com/#Concept_7c932e90-2b5b-11b2-8037-eac2f42a0c5a; 
>>> />
>>>
>>>   >> "http://test.com/#Concept_7c932ea8-2b5b-11b2-8037-eac2f42a0c5a; 
>>> />
>>>   >> "http://test.com/#Concept_7c932ea5-2b5b-11b2-8037-eac2f42a0c5a; 
>>> />
>>>
>>>
>>>   ... other properties
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> This 

Re: [topbraid-users] Export RDF to custom XML

[Holger Knublauch]

Try to use sml:serialization=sml:RDFXMLAbbrev at sml:ReturnRDF.

In general, the main alternatives for producing arbitrary XML are 
Semantic XML (via sml:ConvertRDFToXML) or SWP. SWP can produce any XML, 
assuming you turn each XML element into a subclass of ui:Element and 
each XML attribute into corresponding argument properties at these elements.


Holger


On 7/03/2017 13:26, Oleksandr Mandryk wrote:

Hi Hogler,

as far as I remember the nested resources was the main issue. I 
haven't tried approach that you suggested but as I can see
here http://www.topquadrant.com/sparqlmotion/lib.html#sml:ReturnRDF 
there is no such property in sml:ReturnRDF.


Could you please explain where I can specify sml:RDFXML / 
sml:RDFXMLAbbrev?


BTW: Do we have any alternatives (just in case) to this approach? I 
mean if I would like to build totally different XML from taxonomy RDF 
what would be the most appropriate way to do it?


Thank you very much!

Best regards,
Oleksandr Mandryk


On Tuesday, March 7, 2017 at 4:07:44 AM UTC+1, Holger Knublauch wrote:

Whether resources are nested or remain top-level is a
configuration option in the RDF/XML writer. In sml:ReturnRDF, try
using sml:RDFXML versus sml:RDFXMLAbbrev (the abbrev option will
produce nested objects). Have you tried this or would there be
other differences from your planned output?

Holger

On 7/03/2017 12:56, Oleksandr Mandryk wrote:

Hi Hogler,
thank you for reply!

Actually RDF/XML is pretty different from what I need. The
biggest issue with RDF/XML for me is hierarchical structure of
relations between nodes,
for example if PARENT_NODE is parent of CHILD_NODE in RDF/XML it
will look like this:

|


 ... properties



 ...





|


but I need something like this:

|

 ... properties

Re: [topbraid-users] Export RDF to custom XML

[Oleksandr Mandryk]

Hi Hogler,

as far as I remember the nested resources was the main issue. I haven't 
tried approach that you suggested but as I can see
here http://www.topquadrant.com/sparqlmotion/lib.html#sml:ReturnRDF there 
is no such property in sml:ReturnRDF.

Could you please explain where I can specify sml:RDFXML / sml:RDFXMLAbbrev?

BTW: Do we have any alternatives (just in case) to this approach? I mean if 
I would like to build totally different XML from taxonomy RDF what would be 
the most appropriate way to do it?

Thank you very much!

Best regards,
Oleksandr Mandryk


On Tuesday, March 7, 2017 at 4:07:44 AM UTC+1, Holger Knublauch wrote:
>
> Whether resources are nested or remain top-level is a configuration option 
> in the RDF/XML writer. In sml:ReturnRDF, try using sml:RDFXML versus 
> sml:RDFXMLAbbrev (the abbrev option will produce nested objects). Have you 
> tried this or would there be other differences from your planned output?
>
> Holger 
>
> On 7/03/2017 12:56, Oleksandr Mandryk wrote:
>
> Hi Hogler, 
> thank you for reply!
>
> Actually RDF/XML is pretty different from what I need. The biggest issue 
> with RDF/XML for me is hierarchical structure of relations between nodes, 
> for example if PARENT_NODE is parent of CHILD_NODE in RDF/XML it will look 
> like this:
>
> 
>  
>  ... properties
>  
>  
>  
>  ...
>  
>  
>
>
> 
>
>
> but I need something like this:
>
> 
>  ... properties
>
>
>  
> 
>
>
> 
>  ... properties
>  
> 
>
> so each node should be separate XML element.
> Thanks.
>
> Best regards,
> Oleksandr Mandryk
>
> On Monday, March 6, 2017 at 11:13:00 PM UTC+1, Holger Knublauch wrote: 
>>
>>
>>
>> On 7/03/2017 0:40, Oleksandr Mandryk wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm trying to create a SPARQLMotion script that will export specified 
>> taxonomy to the custom XML output.
>>
>> Currently my script is based no these modules:
>>
>> *spl:Argument* -> *sml:ImportRDFFromWorkspace* -> *sml:ConvertRDFToXML* 
>> -> *sml:ReturnXML*
>>
>>
>> But when I run this script I get only the first (root) node of the 
>> specified projectGraph:
>>
>> > "http://www.topbraid.org/2007/05/composite.owl; 
>>  xmlns:skos=
>> "http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core; 
>>  skos:prefLabel=Root Test Node"/>
>>
>> So I have a few questions:
>>
>> 1) Is my approach correct? I mean spl:Argument -> 
>> sml:ImportRDFFromWorkspace -> sml:ConvertRDFToXML -> sml:ReturnXML
>>
>> 2) Why I'm receiving only first node as result but not all?
>>
>> 3) How to specify a custom template for the XML, for example I need 
>> something like this:
>> > xmlns:ui="http://uispin.org/ui#; 
>> xmlns:let="http://uispin.org/let#; 
>>  ... >
>>
>> > "http://test.com/Concept_7c932ea3-2b5b-11b2-8037-eac2f42a0c5a; 
>> >
>>   http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string; 
>> >NodeLabel
>>   http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#Concept; 
>> />
>>
>>   > "http://test.com/#Concept_7c932e90-2b5b-11b2-8037-eac2f42a0c5a; 
>> />
>>
>>   > "http://test.com/#Concept_7c932ea8-2b5b-11b2-8037-eac2f42a0c5a; 
>> />
>>   > "http://test.com/#Concept_7c932ea5-2b5b-11b2-8037-eac2f42a0c5a; 
>> />
>>
>>
>>   ... other properties
>>
>> 
>>
>> ...
>>
>> 
>>
>>
>>
>> This output looks very much like RDF/XML. How does it differ, and could 
>> you simply use sml:ReturnRDF?
>>
>> Holger
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you very much!
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Oleksandr Mandryk
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group 
>> "TopBraid Suite Users", the topics of which include the TopBraid Suite 
>> family of products and its base technologies such as SPARQLMotion, SPARQL 
>> Web Pages and SPIN.
>> To post to this group, send email to topbrai...@googlegroups.com
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to topbraid-user...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>>
>> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group 
> "TopBraid Suite Users", the topics of which include the TopBraid Suite 
> family of products and its base technologies such as SPARQLMotion, SPARQL 
> Web Pages and SPIN.
> To post to this group, send email to topbrai...@googlegroups.com 
> 
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to 

Re: [topbraid-users] Export RDF to custom XML

[Holger Knublauch]

Whether resources are nested or remain top-level is a configuration 
option in the RDF/XML writer. In sml:ReturnRDF, try using sml:RDFXML 
versus sml:RDFXMLAbbrev (the abbrev option will produce nested objects). 
Have you tried this or would there be other differences from your 
planned output?


Holger

On 7/03/2017 12:56, Oleksandr Mandryk wrote:

Hi Hogler,
thank you for reply!

Actually RDF/XML is pretty different from what I need. The biggest 
issue with RDF/XML for me is hierarchical structure of relations 
between nodes,
for example if PARENT_NODE is parent of CHILD_NODE in RDF/XML it will 
look like this:


|


 ... properties



 ...





|


but I need something like this:

|

 ... properties

Re: [topbraid-users] Export RDF to custom XML

[Oleksandr Mandryk]

Hi Hogler,
thank you for reply!

Actually RDF/XML is pretty different from what I need. The biggest issue 
with RDF/XML for me is hierarchical structure of relations between nodes, 
for example if PARENT_NODE is parent of CHILD_NODE in RDF/XML it will look 
like this:


 
 ... properties
 
 
 
 ...
 
 





but I need something like this:


 ... properties


 




 ... properties
 


so each node should be separate XML element.
Thanks.

Best regards,
Oleksandr Mandryk

On Monday, March 6, 2017 at 11:13:00 PM UTC+1, Holger Knublauch wrote:
>
>
>
> On 7/03/2017 0:40, Oleksandr Mandryk wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to create a SPARQLMotion script that will export specified 
> taxonomy to the custom XML output.
>
> Currently my script is based no these modules:
>
> *spl:Argument* -> *sml:ImportRDFFromWorkspace* -> *sml:ConvertRDFToXML* 
> -> *sml:ReturnXML*
>
>
> But when I run this script I get only the first (root) node of the 
> specified projectGraph:
>
>  "http://www.topbraid.org/2007/05/composite.owl; 
>  xmlns:skos=
> "http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core; 
>  skos:prefLabel=Root Test Node"/>
>
> So I have a few questions:
>
> 1) Is my approach correct? I mean spl:Argument -> 
> sml:ImportRDFFromWorkspace -> sml:ConvertRDFToXML -> sml:ReturnXML
>
> 2) Why I'm receiving only first node as result but not all?
>
> 3) How to specify a custom template for the XML, for example I need 
> something like this:
>
>  xmlns:ui="http://uispin.org/ui#; 
> xmlns:let="http://uispin.org/let#; 
>  ... >
>
>  "http://test.com/Concept_7c932ea3-2b5b-11b2-8037-eac2f42a0c5a; 
> >
>   http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string; 
> >NodeLabel
>   http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#Concept; 
> />
>
>"http://test.com/#Concept_7c932e90-2b5b-11b2-8037-eac2f42a0c5a; 
> />
>
>"http://test.com/#Concept_7c932ea8-2b5b-11b2-8037-eac2f42a0c5a; 
> />
>"http://test.com/#Concept_7c932ea5-2b5b-11b2-8037-eac2f42a0c5a; 
> />
>
>
>   ... other properties
>
> 
>
> ...
>
> 
>
>
>
> This output looks very much like RDF/XML. How does it differ, and could 
> you simply use sml:ReturnRDF?
>
> Holger
>
>
>
> Thank you very much!
>
> Best regards,
> Oleksandr Mandryk
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group 
> "TopBraid Suite Users", the topics of which include the TopBraid Suite 
> family of products and its base technologies such as SPARQLMotion, SPARQL 
> Web Pages and SPIN.
> To post to this group, send email to topbrai...@googlegroups.com 
> 
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to topbraid-user...@googlegroups.com .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group 
"TopBraid Suite Users", the topics of which include the TopBraid Suite family 
of products and its base technologies such as SPARQLMotion, SPARQL Web Pages 
and SPIN.
To post to this group, send email to topbraid-users@googlegroups.com
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [topbraid-users] Export RDF to custom XML

[Oleksandr Mandryk]

Hi Pat,
thank you for reply!

Actually I'm not using sml:ConvertXMLToRDF, I just need to get RDF from 
taxonomy and compose custom XML based on this RDF.
Do you know better way how to do it?

Thank you.

Best regards,
Oleksandr Mandryk

On Monday, March 6, 2017 at 10:47:02 PM UTC+1, Pat Doyle wrote:
>
> Oleksandr,
>
> It seems you're using sml:ConvertRDFToXML - are you using 
> sml:ConvertXMLToRDF at any point earlier to initially convert some XML data 
> to RDF?
>
> The reason I ask is because sml:ConvertRDFToXML is not meant to be called 
> against arbitrary RDF data - you'd typically use it in order to round-trip 
> some XML data from XML to RDF for processing then back to XML.  
>
> More information about this module can be found in the SPARQLMotion 
> Functions Library in the TBCME Help under *TopBraid Composer *--> *Reference 
> *--> *SPARQLMotion Module Library Reference*.
>
> Let me know if this helps,
> Pat
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Oleksandr Mandryk <icod...@gmail.com >
> Date: Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 9:40 AM
> Subject: [topbraid-users] Export RDF to custom XML
> To: TopBraid Suite Users <topbrai...@googlegroups.com >
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to create a SPARQLMotion script that will export specified 
> taxonomy to the custom XML output.
>
> Currently my script is based no these modules:
>
> *spl:Argument* -> *sml:ImportRDFFromWorkspace* -> *sml:ConvertRDFToXML* 
> -> *sml:ReturnXML*
>
>
> But when I run this script I get only the first (root) node of the 
> specified projectGraph:
>
> http://www.topbraid.org/2007/05/composite.owl; xmlns:skos="
> http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core; skos:prefLabel=Root Test Node"/>
>
> So I have a few questions:
>
> 1) Is my approach correct? I mean spl:Argument -> 
> sml:ImportRDFFromWorkspace -> sml:ConvertRDFToXML -> sml:ReturnXML
>
> 2) Why I'm receiving only first node as result but not all?
>
> 3) How to specify a custom template for the XML, for example I need 
> something like this:
>
>
>  xmlns:ui="http://uispin.org/ui#;
> xmlns:let="http://uispin.org/let#;
>  ... >
>
> http://test.com/Concept_7c932ea3-2b5b-11b2-8037-eac2f42a0c5a;>
>   http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string;>
> NodeLabel
>   http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#Concept"/>
>
>   http://test.com/#Concept_7c932e90-2b5b-11b2-8037-eac2f42a0c5a"/>
>
>   http://test.com/#Concept_7c932ea8-2b5b-11b2-8037-eac2f42a0c5a"/>
>   http://test.com/#Concept_7c932ea5-2b5b-11b2-8037-eac2f42a0c5a"/>
>
>
>   ... other properties
>
> 
>
> ...
>
> 
>
>
> Thank you very much!
>
> Best regards,
> Oleksandr Mandryk
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group 
> "TopBraid Suite Users", the topics of which include the TopBraid Suite 
> family of products and its base technologies such as SPARQLMotion, SPARQL 
> Web Pages and SPIN.
> To post to this group, send email to topbrai...@googlegroups.com 
> 
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to topbraid-user...@googlegroups.com .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group 
"TopBraid Suite Users", the topics of which include the TopBraid Suite family 
of products and its base technologies such as SPARQLMotion, SPARQL Web Pages 
and SPIN.
To post to this group, send email to topbraid-users@googlegroups.com
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [topbraid-users] Export RDF to custom XML

[Holger Knublauch]

On 7/03/2017 0:40, Oleksandr Mandryk wrote:

Hi,

I'm trying to create a SPARQLMotion script that will export specified 
taxonomy to the custom XML output.


Currently my script is based no these modules:
*
*
*spl:Argument* -> *sml:ImportRDFFromWorkspace* -> 
*sml:ConvertRDFToXML* -> *sml:ReturnXML*



But when I run this script I get only the first (root) node of the 
specified projectGraph:


|

Re: [topbraid-users] Export RDF to custom XML

[Pat Doyle]

Oleksandr,

It seems you're using sml:ConvertRDFToXML - are you using
sml:ConvertXMLToRDF at any point earlier to initially convert some XML data
to RDF?

The reason I ask is because sml:ConvertRDFToXML is not meant to be called
against arbitrary RDF data - you'd typically use it in order to round-trip
some XML data from XML to RDF for processing then back to XML.

More information about this module can be found in the SPARQLMotion
Functions Library in the TBCME Help under *TopBraid Composer *--> *Reference
*--> *SPARQLMotion Module Library Reference*.

Let me know if this helps,
Pat


-- Forwarded message --
From: Oleksandr Mandryk <icoder...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 9:40 AM
Subject: [topbraid-users] Export RDF to custom XML
To: TopBraid Suite Users <topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>


Hi,

I'm trying to create a SPARQLMotion script that will export specified
taxonomy to the custom XML output.

Currently my script is based no these modules:

*spl:Argument* -> *sml:ImportRDFFromWorkspace* -> *sml:ConvertRDFToXML* ->
*sml:ReturnXML*


But when I run this script I get only the first (root) node of the
specified projectGraph:

http://www.topbraid.org/2007/05/composite.owl
" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core; skos:prefLabel=Root Test
Node"/>

So I have a few questions:

1) Is my approach correct? I mean spl:Argument ->
sml:ImportRDFFromWorkspace -> sml:ConvertRDFToXML -> sml:ReturnXML

2) Why I'm receiving only first node as result but not all?

3) How to specify a custom template for the XML, for example I need
something like this:


http://uispin.org/ui#;
xmlns:let="http://uispin.org/let#;
 ... >

http://test.com/Concept_7c932ea3-2b5b-11b2-
8037-eac2f42a0c5a">
  http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string;>Nod
eLabel
  http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#Concept"/>

  http://test.com/#Concept_7c932e90-2b5b-11b2-
8037-eac2f42a0c5a"/>

  http://test.com/#Concept_7c932ea8-2b5b-11b2-
8037-eac2f42a0c5a"/>
  http://test.com/#Concept_7c932ea5-2b5b-11b2-
8037-eac2f42a0c5a"/>


  ... other properties



...




Thank you very much!

Best regards,
Oleksandr Mandryk

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group
"TopBraid Suite Users", the topics of which include the TopBraid Suite
family of products and its base technologies such as SPARQLMotion, SPARQL
Web Pages and SPIN.
To post to this group, send email to topbraid-users@googlegroups.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group 
"TopBraid Suite Users", the topics of which include the TopBraid Suite family 
of products and its base technologies such as SPARQLMotion, SPARQL Web Pages 
and SPIN.
To post to this group, send email to topbraid-users@googlegroups.com
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[topbraid-users] Export RDF to custom XML

[Oleksandr Mandryk]

Hi,

I'm trying to create a SPARQLMotion script that will export specified 
taxonomy to the custom XML output.

Currently my script is based no these modules:

*spl:Argument* -> *sml:ImportRDFFromWorkspace* -> *sml:ConvertRDFToXML* -> 
*sml:ReturnXML*


But when I run this script I get only the first (root) node of the 
specified projectGraph:

http://www.topbraid.org/2007/05/composite.owl; xmlns:skos=
"http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core; skos:prefLabel=Root Test Node"/>

So I have a few questions:

1) Is my approach correct? I mean spl:Argument -> 
sml:ImportRDFFromWorkspace -> sml:ConvertRDFToXML -> sml:ReturnXML

2) Why I'm receiving only first node as result but not all?

3) How to specify a custom template for the XML, for example I need 
something like this:


http://uispin.org/ui#;
xmlns:let="http://uispin.org/let#;
 ... >

http://test.com/Concept_7c932ea3-2b5b-11b2-8037-eac2f42a0c5a;>
  http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string;>
NodeLabel
  http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#Concept"/>

  http://test.com/#Concept_7c932e90-2b5b-11b2-8037-eac2f42a0c5a"/>

  http://test.com/#Concept_7c932ea8-2b5b-11b2-8037-eac2f42a0c5a"/>
  http://test.com/#Concept_7c932ea5-2b5b-11b2-8037-eac2f42a0c5a"/>


  ... other properties



...




Thank you very much!

Best regards,
Oleksandr Mandryk

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group 
"TopBraid Suite Users", the topics of which include the TopBraid Suite family 
of products and its base technologies such as SPARQLMotion, SPARQL Web Pages 
and SPIN.
To post to this group, send email to topbraid-users@googlegroups.com
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.