Re: [Trisquel-users] Fonts Font rendering

2013-04-04 Thread dparker1324
I have tried installing trisquel on the desktop and I must say it is working  
good. It is true that font rendering has a very great impact on the system  
performance and it wholly depends on it. Trisquel definitely solves the  
issue.microsoft-chat.com


Re: [Trisquel-users] Fonts Font rendering

2013-03-15 Thread mampir

In 6.0 the fonts settings are a bit different.  Now I do:


cd /etc/fonts/conf.d 
sudo rm --verbose 01-trisquel.conf 
sudo rm --verbose 59-droid-serif-fonts.conf 
sudo rm --verbose 60-droid-sans-mono-fonts.conf 
sudo rm --verbose 10-hinting-slight.conf 
sudo ln --verbose --symbolic ../conf.avail/10-hinting-full.conf 
sudo ln --berbose --symbolic ../conf.avail/10-sub-pixel-rgb.conf

gsettings set org.gnome.settings-daemon.plugins.xsettings antialiasing 'rgba'
gsettings set org.gnome.settings-daemon.plugins.xsettings rgba-order 'rgb'
gsettings set org.gnome.settings-daemon.plugins.xsettings hinting 'full'

gsettings set org.gnome.desktop.interface font-name 'Sans 9'
gsettings set org.gnome.desktop.interface document-font-name 'Serif 9'
gsettings set org.gnome.desktop.interface monospace-font-name 'Monospace 9'



Re: [Trisquel-users] Fonts Font rendering

2013-03-04 Thread mampir
The problem is with your setup, probably due to setting something that  
interferers with the options I proposed.  On my system the fonts are  
perfectly anti-aliased and crisp.


Re: [Trisquel-users] Fonts Font rendering

2013-03-03 Thread onpon4
Mint is spyware free... as long as you don't use Google Chrome, or Adobe  
Flash, or Skype, or possibly other nonfree programs.


Of course, note that Mint is not an Ubuntu clone, either. Actually, if it's  
just the look of Ubuntu you really want (and not also the package manager),  
you might have an easier time using something like Parabola GNU/Linux as a  
base, then installing all the fonts and stuff from Ubuntu there.


Another thing worth trying in Trisquel: see if you're able to get it looking  
more like Ubuntu if you use Unity.


Re: [Trisquel-users] Fonts Font rendering

2013-03-01 Thread John Smith
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 9:39 PM, mikko.viinam...@students.turkuamk.fiwrote:

 I'm just asking for DejaVu Sans Mono size 11 to be rendered consistently
 on all Ubuntu-based distributions!

 Not exactly a Trisquel's goal.

But that's what Trisquel is: a free Ubuntu-based distribution.
The goal is to make it free, not just on purpose different from Ubuntu.
Otherwise, just remove Ubuntu-based from description and go with that.
The point was the DejaVu Sans Mono which is the default monospaced(i.e.
programmer's) font
in Ubuntu (and preserved so in Linux Mint) was screwed with on Trisquel for
no good reason.
You know how I got enthusiastic about Trisquel: I browsed the list of free
distros
and selected the one labeled Ubuntu-based. And it doesn't qualify for me as
Ubuntu-like
if it can't render the default font properly.
 I doubt any other distro's either...
As I've mentioned a few times, Linux Mint does the proper job.


Re: [Trisquel-users] Fonts Font rendering

2013-02-28 Thread icarolongo

I changed for GNOME 3 default configuration.


Re: [Trisquel-users] Fonts Font rendering

2013-02-28 Thread tegskywalker
For those that are unaware, icarolongo is using Gnome Tweak Tool:  
http://packages.trisquel.info/toutatis/gnome-tweak-tool


Re: [Trisquel-users] Fonts Font rendering

2013-02-28 Thread icarolongo

Or Advanced Settings in System Settings by default on Trisquel.


Re: [Trisquel-users] Fonts Font rendering

2013-02-27 Thread John Smith
Thanks for the suggestions, but it did not work.
I tried all possible combinations with no result.
Finally just installed Mint 14 instead.
The font there looks exactly the same.
I have only one pair of eyes and it's more valuable to me
than a completely free GNU/Linux distribution.
But was that really so much to ask to not screw up the fonts?
I mean Mint did it right.
And I'm not asking for Microsoft fonts,
not even Ubuntu fonts,
I'm just asking for DejaVu Sans Mono size 11
to be rendered consistently on all Ubuntu-based distributions!


Re: [Trisquel-users] Fonts Font rendering

2013-02-27 Thread tegskywalker
Anytime I install Trisquel from scratch, I increase the font size and do RGB  
instead of greyscale. It looks better and I have no idea why these aren't set  
like this by default.


I also switched from Droid Sans to Roboto:  
http://packages.ubuntu.com/raring/fonts-roboto


Re: [Trisquel-users] Fonts Font rendering

2013-02-27 Thread mikko . viinamaki
I'm just asking for DejaVu Sans Mono size 11 to be rendered consistently on  
all Ubuntu-based distributions!


Not exactly a Trisquel's goal. I doubt any other distro's either...


Re: [Trisquel-users] Fonts Font rendering

2013-02-25 Thread ohwoeowho

Can I ask you if you managed to replicate ubuntu fonts exatly?
Because I've copied the font settings from gnome-tweak-tool on Ubuntu to  
gnome-tweak-tool on Trisquel and still it does not look the same.
It's important for me that it looks exactly the same: I've been using the  
exact same font setup for 3 years and now anything but this setup is  
extremely distracting.
I attach the screenshot. As you can see, the fonts are identical, and they're  
both antialiased, but they're different.


Re: [Trisquel-users] Fonts Font rendering

2013-02-25 Thread onpon4
I assume you're talking about the menus, in which case the font size is too  
small. Maybe the text scaling factor?


If you're actually talking about the body, it looks to me like the difference  
in that is a (cyan-colored) shadow effect of some sort that is toward the top  
in the one on the left, but toward the right in the one on the right. I guess  
maybe a different anti-aliasing method, but this is a bit outside of my  
knowledge-base.


Re: [Trisquel-users] Fonts Font rendering

2013-02-25 Thread nospamhere
I always put the following into .Xresources and my fonts look perfect no  
matter in Trisquel, Debian or whatever. Supposedly, these settings are what  
Ubuntu uses:


!{{{XFT
Xft*dpi:   96
Xft*antialias: true
Xft*hinting:   true
Xft*hintstyle: hintslight
Xft*rgba:  rgb
Xft.lcdfilter: lcddefault
!}}}



Re: [Trisquel-users] Fonts Font rendering

2013-02-25 Thread mampir

What I do on new installations is:

cd /etc/fonts/conf.d 
sudo rm --verbose 01-trisquel.conf 
sudo rm --verbose 59-ttf-droid-serif-fonts.conf 
sudo rm --verbose 10-hinting-slight.conf 
sudo ln --symbolic ../conf.avail/10-hinting-full.conf 
sudo ln --symbolic ../conf.avail/10-sub-pixel-rgb.conf
cd $HOME

gsettings set org.gnome.settings-daemon.plugins.xsettings antialiasing 'rgba'
gsettings set org.gnome.settings-daemon.plugins.xsettings rgba-order 'rgb'
gsettings set org.gnome.settings-daemon.plugins.xsettings hinting 'full'

gsettings set org.gnome.desktop.interface font-name 'Sans 9'
gsettings set org.gnome.desktop.interface document-font-name 'Serif 9'
gsettings set org.gnome.desktop.interface monospace-font-name 'Monospace 9'

Some of the lines might be wrapped.

The first block removes fonts set as default by Trisquel. This in turn sets  
the default fonts to DejaVu, which are much more readable. It also sets the  
system fonts to full hinting and sub-pixeled, which makes them crisp and even  
more readable.


The other two blocks must be set for each user.

The first of the two set full hinting and sub-pixeled, again. I remember that  
some programs, such as Abrowser, do not use these settings and others do, so  
that's why it's needed to set them in both places.


The last block sets desktop fonts to the default generic ones. The generic  
ones are equal to DejaVu, because of the first block.


Re: [Trisquel-users] Fonts Font rendering

2012-12-24 Thread e . k . orlov
Surely, Trisquel would benefit from at least an increase of the fonts' size  
and antialiasing being set to RGBA. With Ubuntu fonts it would be even  
better. But it's my perception.


Fonts issue is quite personal. May be some people like what is by default.


Re: [Trisquel-users] Fonts Font rendering

2012-12-24 Thread jbar

Font rendering has a great impact on system performance.

A high font rendering is a bad option for a low spec pc. That's why distros  
like debian have a poor rendering by default.


Trisquel tries to achieve a balance point between a good look and feel and  
system performance.


Re: [Trisquel-users] Fonts Font rendering

2012-12-24 Thread sampie

I have two questions:

1) Are there measurements about font rendering impact on system performance?  
Is it for sure that trisquel has better performance than ubuntu?


2) Is trisquel targeting for different hardware specs than ubuntu?



Re: [Trisquel-users] Fonts Font rendering

2012-12-23 Thread mikko . viinamaki
However, the fonts  font rendering seems to be not that good, especially  
when I compare to font  font rendering on ubuntu desktop.


Since Trisquel is Ubuntu without the proprietary parts, the fonts  rendering  
of the fonts is likely identical. :)


Re: [Trisquel-users] Fonts Font rendering

2012-12-23 Thread sampie

I did a bit of tweaking:

- Installed ttf-ubuntu-font-family package
- Used gnome-tweak-tool to 1) set fonts to ubuntu fonts, 2) set antialiasing  
to rgba

- Used dconf-editor to set nautilus desktop to use ubuntu mono font

Now the fonts on my trisquel desktop look very clean and nice. Thanks for  
help!


I do not understand why trisquel has changed the out-of-the-box fonts, as  
trisquel seems to be ubuntu derivative. As I see it, the font changes are not  
improving the look.


Re: [Trisquel-users] Fonts Font rendering

2012-12-22 Thread Michał Masłowski
Maybe you need to install better fonts,
http://packages.trisquel.info/search?keywords=ttf- lists some.

There are various hinting-related options of fontconfig that change how
the fonts look, your DE probably has settings for it (or look in
/etc/fonts).

Maybe you have some screenshots to compare it?


pgp4EEHcZp8uW.pgp
Description: PGP signature