Re: [TV orNotTV] LiLo On Dave

2013-04-11 Thread Joe Coughlin
I think she's contractually obligated to promote her film. Also, if
what has been said is true, she's moved to New York primarily. That's
why her rehab is being done in New York State and not California.

On 4/11/13, PGage  wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:04 PM, Dave Sikula  wrote:
>
>> I'll take your points, but, to me, it just felt exploitative and
>> unpleasant. She has enough problems that she doesn't need to be flying
>> cross-country to do a talk show.
>
>
> Well, I agree with that last sentence. If she were my daughter I would
> certainly be encouraging her to take a break from the media spotlight and
> commit herself 100% to getting well. I don't think there is much question
> about that. I doubt that Dave would have bashed her if she took that
> approach. But since she is not taking that approach, is making ridiculously
> bad films and tv shows and then going around the country promoting them, I
> think he would have bashed her had she only gone on outlets that would let
> her ignore her issues, or had not made fun of her. Given that she stepped
> up and did his show and took it, I think she came off looking about as good
> as she possibly could.
>
> --
> --
> TV or Not TV  The Smartest (TV) People!
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "TV or Not TV" group.
> To post to this group, send email to tvornottv@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> tvornottv-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "TVorNotTV" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to tvornottv+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>


-- 
+++
Joe Coughlin
http://www.twitter.com/inturnaround

-- 
-- 
TV or Not TV  The Smartest (TV) People!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "TV or Not TV" group.
To post to this group, send email to tvornottv@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
tvornottv-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TVorNotTV" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tvornottv+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: [TV orNotTV] LiLo On Dave

2013-04-10 Thread PGage
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:04 PM, Dave Sikula  wrote:

> I'll take your points, but, to me, it just felt exploitative and
> unpleasant. She has enough problems that she doesn't need to be flying
> cross-country to do a talk show.


Well, I agree with that last sentence. If she were my daughter I would
certainly be encouraging her to take a break from the media spotlight and
commit herself 100% to getting well. I don't think there is much question
about that. I doubt that Dave would have bashed her if she took that
approach. But since she is not taking that approach, is making ridiculously
bad films and tv shows and then going around the country promoting them, I
think he would have bashed her had she only gone on outlets that would let
her ignore her issues, or had not made fun of her. Given that she stepped
up and did his show and took it, I think she came off looking about as good
as she possibly could.

-- 
-- 
TV or Not TV  The Smartest (TV) People!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "TV or Not TV" group.
To post to this group, send email to tvornottv@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
tvornottv-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TVorNotTV" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tvornottv+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: [TV orNotTV] LiLo On Dave

2013-04-10 Thread Kevin M.
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:04 PM, Dave Sikula  wrote:
> I'll take your points, but, to me, it just felt exploitative and unpleasant.
> She has enough problems that she doesn't need to be flying cross-country to
> do a talk show.

Well, nobody NEEDS to do a talk show. I think your comment about
exploitation is fair, but I think Lohan benefited from the appearance
regardless.

-- 
Kevin M. (RPCV)

-- 
-- 
TV or Not TV  The Smartest (TV) People!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "TV or Not TV" group.
To post to this group, send email to tvornottv@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
tvornottv-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TVorNotTV" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tvornottv+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: [TV orNotTV] LiLo On Dave

2013-04-10 Thread Dave Sikula
I'll take your points, but, to me, it just felt exploitative and 
unpleasant. She has enough problems that she doesn't need to be flying 
cross-country to do a talk show.

--Dave Sikula

On Wednesday, April 10, 2013 9:16:28 PM UTC-7, PGage wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Dave Sikula 
> > wrote:
>
>> If I may be the voice of negativity, I'd like to say I thought the whole 
>> thing was a train wreck.
>>
>> I'll stipulate both that CBS and WWP are in business to draw viewers and 
>> make money and that Lohan has no obligation to air her problems publicly.
>>
>> That said, what was the point of this booking, other than to let America 
>> gawp at the junkie? Lohan was a moderately-talented teen actor who has 
>> fallen victim to myriad demons. If she was unprepared to talk about her 
>> problems (and let me repeat there was no necessity to do so), what did she 
>> think she was there for? To promote that pile-of-steaming-crap movie? If 
>> Dave wanted to help her, he was out of his depth, as more-skilled 
>> professionals than he have failed, numerous times.
>>
>> I truly feel sorry for Lohan, and think she'd be best served by getting 
>> out of show business and trying to put her life together. The panel last 
>> night did nothing in that direction. I basically ignored it and thought 
>> twenty minutes of dead air would have been more enlightening.
>
>
> Well, lets define our terms a little bit here. I don't think anyone is 
> really suggesting that Dave can, or was even trying, to help her in some 
> mental health sense. They joked about him sounding like Dr. Phil, but it 
> was, after all, just a joke. What I mean by him helping her, and I think 
> that is what others have meant to, is in renewing her public image or 
> persona. He could have ridiculed her and blown her out of the water - and 
> if she had acted a bit differently than she did, I might have felt like she 
> deserved it. Instead he helped her address the issue more than she seemed 
> to want to, engage in some moments that approached honesty, and 
> then acknowledged for having the guts to show up knowing that she has been 
> the butt of many of his jokes, knowing that he would probably be persistant 
> in bringing up her difficulties, and hanging in there with him. And he gave 
> her what amounted to fatherly advice (which she basically asked him for) - 
> that the best revenge she could get against the people who really wish her 
> ill is to get better and live well. She is an actress (I don't know how 
> good she is), so maybe her tears were fake, but I thought it was 
> understated enough that if Dave had not drawn attention to it many would 
> not have noticed, so that made me think they were genuine.
>
> Anyone who thinks a person can solve their substance abuse or mental 
> health problems by talking to someone for 30 minutes on a television 
> program has no idea what is involved in dealing with such issues, so I 
> think that is not even on the table here. But before last night's show I 
> would have put Lohan somewhere at the Khardasian/Paris Hilton end of the 
> scale, and now I would move her up several notches.
>  

-- 
-- 
TV or Not TV  The Smartest (TV) People!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "TV or Not TV" group.
To post to this group, send email to tvornottv@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
tvornottv-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TVorNotTV" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tvornottv+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: [TV orNotTV] LiLo On Dave

2013-04-10 Thread PGage
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Dave Sikula  wrote:

> If I may be the voice of negativity, I'd like to say I thought the whole
> thing was a train wreck.
>
> I'll stipulate both that CBS and WWP are in business to draw viewers and
> make money and that Lohan has no obligation to air her problems publicly.
>
> That said, what was the point of this booking, other than to let America
> gawp at the junkie? Lohan was a moderately-talented teen actor who has
> fallen victim to myriad demons. If she was unprepared to talk about her
> problems (and let me repeat there was no necessity to do so), what did she
> think she was there for? To promote that pile-of-steaming-crap movie? If
> Dave wanted to help her, he was out of his depth, as more-skilled
> professionals than he have failed, numerous times.
>
> I truly feel sorry for Lohan, and think she'd be best served by getting
> out of show business and trying to put her life together. The panel last
> night did nothing in that direction. I basically ignored it and thought
> twenty minutes of dead air would have been more enlightening.


Well, lets define our terms a little bit here. I don't think anyone is
really suggesting that Dave can, or was even trying, to help her in some
mental health sense. They joked about him sounding like Dr. Phil, but it
was, after all, just a joke. What I mean by him helping her, and I think
that is what others have meant to, is in renewing her public image or
persona. He could have ridiculed her and blown her out of the water - and
if she had acted a bit differently than she did, I might have felt like she
deserved it. Instead he helped her address the issue more than she seemed
to want to, engage in some moments that approached honesty, and
then acknowledged for having the guts to show up knowing that she has been
the butt of many of his jokes, knowing that he would probably be persistant
in bringing up her difficulties, and hanging in there with him. And he gave
her what amounted to fatherly advice (which she basically asked him for) -
that the best revenge she could get against the people who really wish her
ill is to get better and live well. She is an actress (I don't know how
good she is), so maybe her tears were fake, but I thought it was
understated enough that if Dave had not drawn attention to it many would
not have noticed, so that made me think they were genuine.

Anyone who thinks a person can solve their substance abuse or mental health
problems by talking to someone for 30 minutes on a television program has
no idea what is involved in dealing with such issues, so I think that is
not even on the table here. But before last night's show I would have put
Lohan somewhere at the Khardasian/Paris Hilton end of the scale, and now I
would move her up several notches.

-- 
-- 
TV or Not TV  The Smartest (TV) People!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "TV or Not TV" group.
To post to this group, send email to tvornottv@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
tvornottv-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TVorNotTV" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tvornottv+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: [TV orNotTV] LiLo On Dave

2013-04-10 Thread Kevin M.
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Dave Sikula  wrote:
> If I may be the voice of negativity, I'd like to say I thought the whole 
> thing was a train wreck.

Hey, I'm the only voice of negativity around here, mugsy.

To me, the interview achieved what it needed to for Lohan. It allowed
her to appear more human. My guess is that it achieved some ratings
for Letterman, which was all CBS is interested in. So, yeah, I agree
the booking was because America wanted to see the ape-woman emerge
from the jungle, but it turned out her negative hype was -- at least
in this instance -- merely hype. Once there, I think Letterman could
have said/done anything as others suggested, but he opted not to be
mean and not to ignore the elephant(s) in the room. I have been
critical of Dave phoning it in more often than not, but I do think he
was conscious during this interview. He wasn't Oprah (thank God) or Dr
Phil (thank merciful God), but he wasn't supposed to be either. He was
a guy who had two segments with a girl who is on a road, so he tossed
in some funny and tossed in some weighty, and basically just sat back
and let her say what she wanted to say. I mean, imagine if Lindsay WAS
as far gone as, say Michelle Shocked, or even Charlie Sheen at the
height of his insanity. She could have hung herself on that stage, but
she didn't. It might not be one for Dave's career retrospective, but
it was head-and-shoulders above the waste of time and oxygen that
occurred when he interviewed the Kardashian girls a few weeks back (I
don't think rehab would treat them... you can't cure stupid).
-- 
Kevin M. (RPCV)

-- 
-- 
TV or Not TV  The Smartest (TV) People!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "TV or Not TV" group.
To post to this group, send email to tvornottv@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
tvornottv-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TVorNotTV" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tvornottv+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: [TV orNotTV] LiLo On Dave

2013-04-10 Thread Joe Hass
It was interesting that Gawker originally teased the interview by using the 
term "awkward", then went back against itself and said it wasn't. I didn't 
think it was at all awkward. I think it was more honest than most interviews, 
and it made for riveting television. At the end of the day that's all that 
matters.

I consider Ms Lohan one of those people that I know but I really shouldn't. I 
read the article in the Times recently about the struggles to get some film 
with James Deen shot, and it didn't make Lohan look good at all. And yet, by 
the end of the 14 minutes, I found myself intrigued by her, at least from a 
human perspective. I empathize with her tonight. That's a pretty neat trick.

As you noted, Dave had the ability to blow her out of the water. Something made 
him counter that. I think that's why people who are Dave fans are Dave fans.

On Apr 10, 2013, at 6:31 PM, PGage  wrote:

> I had no idea she was going to be on, and just watched it like I usually do. 
> I agree it was a great interview. I read blogs today that teased their story  
> about this with something like "Dave makes Lohan cry". I did not read the 
> body of those articles - I assume when the reader clicks through they are 
> informed that he made her cry by being sensitive and supportive, not 
> mean-spirited.
> 
> It was not clear to me how genuine she was being when she resists talking 
> about the rehab by saying "we did not go over this at the pre-interview". It 
> is possible they did go over it, and impossible that she really thought they 
> were only going to talk about her epic performance on Scream 5 and whatever 
> the Charlie Sheen TV show is called. I thought Dave was very fair to her, and 
> let her know what anyone who has watched his show for a while already knows, 
> which is that any celeb who has embarrassing issues and is willing to have 
> something approaching a real conversation about them with him will end up 
> looking good, and getting a big thumb's up and approving sign-off from him. 
> Any such celeb who comes on and tries to weasel their way through the 
> interview is going to get hammered. She eventually took the relatively high 
> road, and Dave showered her with his best wishes and respect, and that is 
> what made her cry.
> 
> I don't really know her that well - I saw Mean Girls, and her SNL 
> appearances, and I guess the Praire Home Companion. I don't particularly like 
> or dislike her, but I like her better than I did after last night. 

-- 
-- 
TV or Not TV  The Smartest (TV) People!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "TV or Not TV" group.
To post to this group, send email to tvornottv@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
tvornottv-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TVorNotTV" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tvornottv+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: [TV orNotTV] LiLo On Dave

2013-04-10 Thread PGage
I had no idea she was going to be on, and just watched it like I usually
do. I agree it was a great interview. I read blogs today that teased their
story  about this with something like "Dave makes Lohan cry". I did not
read the body of those articles - I assume when the reader clicks through
they are informed that he made her cry by being sensitive and supportive,
not mean-spirited.

It was not clear to me how genuine she was being when she resists talking
about the rehab by saying "we did not go over this at the pre-interview".
It is possible they did go over it, and impossible that she really thought
they were only going to talk about her epic performance on Scream 5 and
whatever the Charlie Sheen TV show is called. I thought Dave was very fair
to her, and let her know what anyone who has watched his show for a while
already knows, which is that any celeb who has embarrassing issues and is
willing to have something approaching a real conversation about them with
him will end up looking good, and getting a big thumb's up and approving
sign-off from him. Any such celeb who comes on and tries to weasel their
way through the interview is going to get hammered. She eventually took the
relatively high road, and Dave showered her with his best wishes and
respect, and that is what made her cry.

I don't really know her that well - I saw Mean Girls, and her
SNL appearances, and I guess the Praire Home Companion. I don't
particularly like or dislike her, but I like her better than I did after
last night.


On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Joe Hass  wrote:

> The one thing that really rubbed me the wrong way about being at the
> taping of The Late Show is the rather adamant insistance that you laugh at
> everything. Seriously: they have an Alec Baldwin video at the start that
> basically says the audience should laugh at anything they think might be
> funny. I understand why they do that, but the problem with laying that at
> the start is that you wind up getting these moments where Dave's trying to
> be serious, and the audience keeps making nervous chuckles because they've
> been trained to believe that they should laugh at anything that even looks
> like it might be funny. That kept happening during Dave's interview of
> Lindsey last night, and I kept wanting to reach through time and tell the
> folks in the audience to shut the hell up.
>
> Interestingly, the only reason I knew Lindsey Lohan was going to be on
> Letterman was a promo during the NCAA Basketball Championship Game on
> Monday night, and the only reason I was watching that was because I was
> hosting trivia at a bar and had to work around the game. For some reason, I
> remembered that this afternoon and went to look for the video.
>
> It was a surprisingly powerful interview. Letterman knew he could've gone
> in a certain direction (and had the ammo right there at the desk). The file
> photo of Lohan on the old show as "Things Found On The D Train" was great.
> I think he liked the fact that Lohan refused to go into detail on the rehab
> issue despite him going back to that well a couple times, and he decided to
> change tacks, which caught Lohan off-guard. The more honest he became, the
> more she seemed to drop her guard. When he complemented her about showing
> up despite being how much he'd serve up on her, the audience's sustained
> applause went on for a good 15 seconds until Dave (quite irritated), told
> the audience, "Alright, alright! That's enough!"
>
> These were two flawed people, and Letterman decided he was going to go
> ahead and peel back a little more than he normally would (the reference to
> psychiatry, which was followed by Dave grinning into the camera, was rather
> amusing). Which made the whole thing just a little more special. It
> reminded me of when Teri Garr was on the show, and he came over to help
> her, and you just saw a different Dave: the one that made most of us fall
> for him.
>
> The one question I have: I wonder how the decision to not have her come
> out with a price tag on her dress went down, since Dave lit up like a kid
> on Christmas when she told him. Did the staff really run out of time and
> weren't able to get to Letterman in time, or did they decide not to? I
> remember reading about Penn & Teller's appearances on Late Night a few
> years back and how Letterman told Robert Morton that he didn't want to know
> what they were going to do, only that they had his permission to do
> anything.
>
> Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gEF53jCmL3c
>
> --
> --
> TV or Not TV  The Smartest (TV) People!
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "TV or Not TV" group.
> To post to this group, send email to tvornottv@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> tvornottv-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to 

Re: [TV orNotTV] LiLo On Dave

2013-04-10 Thread Kevin M.
When Lindsey Lohan is free of -- let's call it baggage -- she is warm
and human and adorable.

Last night on Letterman, she was warm and human and adorable. I hope
rehab doesn't change that.

-- 
Kevin M. (RPCV)

-- 
-- 
TV or Not TV  The Smartest (TV) People!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "TV or Not TV" group.
To post to this group, send email to tvornottv@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
tvornottv-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TVorNotTV" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tvornottv+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.