Re: [U2] Logged user list
Assuming this is UniVerse on UNIX, you have the PORT.STATUS command in the UV account, and you have ipcs -m | grep aceb at the operating system level. If it's Windows-based UniVerse you still have PORT.STATUS. The equivalent of ipcs is shrdump, but you don't have an equivalent for grep. So you need your own mechanism for parsing out the aceb entries. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] [UV] Conversion code for week number
There isn't one, and for a very good reason - you have to nail the business rules, and these won't be the same everywhere. For example, on what dat does your week start? It's Sunday for you (I assume, since you're in Australia), but it's Monday in the USA. Some businesses run Thursday through Wednesday as their week. The other business rule is the definition of week number 1 in the year. Assuming that you want to implement the ISO 8601 standard format Wnn, in which every week has seven days, you must decide some kind of rule for week number 1 - for example the first week that has four dates in the calendar year. Using such a rule January 1st is often in week #53 of the preceding year. Of course, if you don't require seven days in every week, and week number 1 starts on January 1st, then you can go with something like Int(Oconv(TheDate, "DJ") / 7) --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [UV] Conversion code for week number {unclassified}
Thanks for that Mike. I'd forgotten about pickwiki. I found this function which should do the trick: http://www.pickwiki.com/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?IsoWeekNum Thanks, Adrian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of HENDERSON MIKE, MR Sent: Wednesday, 11 July 2007 12:14 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] Conversion code for week number {unclassified} Adrian, This has been discussed before on the list. IIRC, there is no built-in U2 support (i.e. conversion code) for this, at least partly because it's one of those nasty 'depends what you mean' questions. For example, * is the first week in the year week # 0 or 1? * when does the first week start - the first day in the year, the first Sunday in the year, the first Monday, ... ? There is I believe an ISO standard, but that may not be what you want. There may be something in Pickwiki Regards Mike DISCLAIMER: Disclaimer. This e-mail is private and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please advise us by return e-mail immediately, and delete the e-mail and any attachments without using or disclosing the contents in any way. The views expressed in this e-mail are those of the author, and do not represent those of this company unless this is clearly indicated. You should scan this e-mail and any attachments for viruses. This company accepts no liability for any direct or indirect damage or loss resulting from the use of any attachments to this e-mail. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] UniObjects .NET - Security Best Practices, Connection Pooling in UD
Although you don't need the IBM connection pooling license or tools, if you use an in-house or third-party mechanism...you still have to pay IBM a fee equivalent to the maximum concurrent connections your pooling mechansim allows. This requirement/guideline is explained in "IBM U2 Direct End User Handbook (9 May 2007)" (not sure if this document is downloadable from ibm.com). Much like the iPhantom restrictions, IBM is trying to limit "license revenue loss". The less revenue they get, the less they have to invest in the U2 product lines in terms of R&D, Support and personnel. Regards, David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Boydell, Stuart Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 11:00 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] UniObjects .NET - Security Best Practices, Connection Pooling in UD Robert, You can use any version of UniObjects /U2 using Windows Enterprise Services pooling service. This will already be installed and ready to use on any Windows 2000 server and later. You don't necessarily need to upgrade or pay for the U2 version. http://www.google.com/search?q=enterprise+services+pooling --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [UV] Conversion code for week number {unclassified}
Adrian, This has been discussed before on the list. IIRC, there is no built-in U2 support (i.e. conversion code) for this, at least partly because it's one of those nasty 'depends what you mean' questions. For example, * is the first week in the year week # 0 or 1? * when does the first week start - the first day in the year, the first Sunday in the year, the first Monday, ... ? There is I believe an ISO standard, but that may not be what you want. There may be something in Pickwiki Regards Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Womack, Adrian Sent: Wednesday, 11 July 2007 3:07 p.m. To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] [UV] Conversion code for week number Does anyone know of a conversion code that returns the week number of the year? The information contained in this Internet Email message is intended for the addressee only and may contain privileged information, but not necessarily the official views or opinions of the New Zealand Defence Force. If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy or distribute this message or the information in it. If you have received this message in error, please Email or telephone the sender immediately. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] [UV] Conversion code for week number
Does anyone know of a conversion code that returns the week number of the year? DISCLAIMER: Disclaimer. This e-mail is private and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please advise us by return e-mail immediately, and delete the e-mail and any attachments without using or disclosing the contents in any way. The views expressed in this e-mail are those of the author, and do not represent those of this company unless this is clearly indicated. You should scan this e-mail and any attachments for viruses. This company accepts no liability for any direct or indirect damage or loss resulting from the use of any attachments to this e-mail. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] Universe and virtual machines
I run unidata , universe AND jBASE all on the same virtual machine on my laptop and they all run fine, now I am not doing any serious development on this virtual machine but its fun to try and get jbase code (which is what I mostly work in) to compile and run on unidata and universe as well as I just wanted to see if I could get all three to work on the same machine (my laptop is running media center and the virtual machine is centos (free version of RH advanced server 4.0) yes I have a pathetic personal live .. dougc Don Kibbey wrote: I've used vmware for development work and as a means of converting data from one system to another. Works very well if you run it on a machine with dual core's, adequate memory and more than one hard drive. Works best if you can put the vm's files onto their own hard drive. -- When you are SURE that everything in your program is correct AND your program STILL DOES NOT work, one thing you can be sure of is that something you are sure of is wrong - unknown --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] Issue with installing UniVerse on Linux
Thanks for all the responses guys. I will change the cpio command as suggested and see how it goes from there. I assume I just change any line that has the cpio command with a 'c' option i just remove? If that does not work I will post the uv.load script as suggested by Mark. Thanks On 7/11/07, John Jenkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Fore reference: > > The "cpio" difference is in the "c" option on an extract. By my > recollection: RedHat announced (aeons ago) that they were changing "c" to > mean "not create" whereas previously it had meant "create". I think this > was > to do with POSIX changes but I am not sure. > > Then - after a gap - they made the change with no new announcement > (because > it had been announced a long time ago). > > My recollection may be hazy after this time - but it was definitely the > meaning of "c" on cpio that was reversed. The resolution was to modify the > installation script from: > > cpio -icvdumB > > to > > cpio -ivdumB > > The may be no more than modifying the case statement in uv.load to cater > for > the response passed back from uname - make it the same as the RedHat Linux > case statement which does I believe cater for this. > > Worth noting: On some systems the response from "uname" is wholly > customisable - it can play merry hell with the installation script > sometimes > as it tries to work out what on earth we are installing on and defaults to > "case 1". > > Regards > > JayJay > --- > u2-users mailing list > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] Universe and virtual machines
I've used vmware for development work and as a means of converting data from one system to another. Works very well if you run it on a machine with dual core's, adequate memory and more than one hard drive. Works best if you can put the vm's files onto their own hard drive. -- Don Kibbey --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] UniObjects .NET - Security Best Practices, Connection Pooling in UD
Robert, You can use any version of UniObjects /U2 using Windows Enterprise Services pooling service. This will already be installed and ready to use on any Windows 2000 server and later. You don't necessarily need to upgrade or pay for the U2 version. http://www.google.com/search?q=enterprise+services+pooling >I guess it's not possible to use connection pooling until UniData 7.1. >We are still on UniData 6.1. Is there some other method I could use to >limit the number of licenses the web application can grab? ** This email message and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of addressed recipient(s). If you have received this communication in error, please reply to this e-mail to notify the sender of its incorrect delivery and then delete it and your reply. It is your responsibility to check this email and any attachments for viruses and defects before opening or sending them on. Spotless collects information about you to provide and market our services. For information about use, disclosure and access, see our privacy policy at http://www.spotless.com.au Please consider our environment before printing this email. ** --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] JMS and Unidata
Has anyone had any experience integrating from Unibasic to JMS? We were thinking of using the XML tools to map the database then use a Database Trigger to send a XML message to a JMS server... -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/JMS-and-Unidata-tf4059332.html#a11532415 Sent from the U2 - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] Issue with installing UniVerse on Linux
On Red Hat I found I needed ivdum rather than icvBdum HTH Francis - Original Message - From: "John Jenkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 5:55 AM Subject: RE: [U2] Issue with installing UniVerse on Linux > Fore reference: > > The "cpio" difference is in the "c" option on an extract. By my > recollection: RedHat announced (aeons ago) that they were changing "c" to > mean "not create" whereas previously it had meant "create". I think this was > to do with POSIX changes but I am not sure. > > Then - after a gap - they made the change with no new announcement (because > it had been announced a long time ago). > > My recollection may be hazy after this time - but it was definitely the > meaning of "c" on cpio that was reversed. The resolution was to modify the > installation script from: > > cpio -icvdumB > > to > > cpio -ivdumB > > The may be no more than modifying the case statement in uv.load to cater for > the response passed back from uname - make it the same as the RedHat Linux > case statement which does I believe cater for this. > > Worth noting: On some systems the response from "uname" is wholly > customisable - it can play merry hell with the installation script sometimes > as it tries to work out what on earth we are installing on and defaults to > "case 1". > > Regards > > JayJay > --- > u2-users mailing list > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Logged user list
Try SYSTEM(1302) - each attribute holds details about one user (no, username, pid, type) eg: USERS = SYSTEM(1302) CRT USERS<1> CRT USERS<2> -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of chuchi Sent: Tuesday, 10 July 2007 5:34 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] Logged user list Hi all, I have some problems getting the users currently logged into the system. If I launch a LISTU command, in some operating systems I cannot see the user names, only the ids. There are any way to get the user name list in TCL, basic or any operating system commnad? Regards, Chuchi DISCLAIMER: Disclaimer. This e-mail is private and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please advise us by return e-mail immediately, and delete the e-mail and any attachments without using or disclosing the contents in any way. The views expressed in this e-mail are those of the author, and do not represent those of this company unless this is clearly indicated. You should scan this e-mail and any attachments for viruses. This company accepts no liability for any direct or indirect damage or loss resulting from the use of any attachments to this e-mail. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] UniData config
Hmmm I wasn't sure whether 11.23 was available on PA-RISC... Something to try (I'd be interested if this was the case): If SHMMAX is > 2Gb try turning it down below the limit and lket us know the result Otherwise is there anything of note in a "udtdiag"? (sms output springs to mind). Regards JayJay -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Butera Sent: 10 July 2007 21:43 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] UniData config > I am assuming that you have loaded an Itanium release? (compare the HPUX > availability for Itanium and PA-RISC on the U2TechConnect Product > Availability Matrix (PAM)): > > Itanium 7.1.1/2/4/8/11 > PA-RISC 7.1.0/7/8/10 No, this is PA-RISC, unidata 7.1.8 Jeff Butera, Ph.D. Administrative Systems Hampshire College [EMAIL PROTECTED] 413-559-5556 "Daddy - did you lose your mind?" Catherine Butera --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] UniObjects .NET - Security Best Practices, Connection Pooling in UD
This can be a lengthy topic... Following the MVC design pattern, when building any web app it's best to funnel all data access through a single Data Access Layer (DAL). This is in preference to having MV-related code in every page and class throughout a web application. This makes maintenance easier, allows you to switch the back-end for some or all functions, and allows for changing connectivity tools - all without changing the entire front-end. This also allows you to get one person to do the front-end access and someone else to do data access. Someone who grew up on a green screen may not be adept at creating an attractive or fully functional UI. It also follows that someone can change the front-end, even to something completely different like a web service, without any changes to the DAL. One of the best security methods is to not give people access to source. Put your DAL into a DLL and take the source off of your deployment system. If someone hacks in there they will be much less likely to find vulnerabilities in your DAL code. And because .NET code can be de-compiled, obfuscate your assemblies. Security is handled at different layers including transport and application. Transport security means using HTTPS from client to server, and maybe SSH or tunneling for web server to DBMS. Application security involves authentication and authorization. In other words, only allow people in with an ID and password, and then ensure that only people who fit a given role are authorized to access specific functions. This prevents someone with a generic ID from maliciously or accidentally executing things they shouldn't. Do not allow users to enter data which then gets executed blindly by queries. I think this is one of the biggest faults in MV applications when a new UI is added. This is known in the RDBMS world as SQL injection but we are just as subject to queries being tweaked if your code does not carefully screen data entry. I don't use UO.NET so I can't comment on its pooling details. I do sell, support, and develop with mv.NET which has its own pooling mechanisms, and that allows fine-tuning of license limits. mv.NET is a superset of UO.NET, and even uses UO.NET underneath as a basic transport tool. I've also found that UO.NET requires full permissions to do almost anything, and no one seems to be able to tell us what the absolute minimal permissions are which are required to run it. That's not very security-friendly... For assistance with any of the above, feel free to contact me. Tony Gravagno Nebula Research and Development Worldwide distributor for mv.NET TG@ removethisNebula-RnD.com Robert Kubarych wrote: > Does anyone have any security best practices for building web > applications using UniObjects for .NET? > > I've placed the connection string in web.config and encrypted it, as > well as created a separate remote account with a stripped down VOC. > The only data files that can be accessed from this separate remote > are the two that the application needs to access (via pointers the > main remote account). I also tried to dial down the asp.net trust > level runs with, but it seems that uniobjects for .net needs to run > with full trust. > > I guess it's not possible to use connection pooling until UniData 7.1. > We are still on UniData 6.1. Is there some other method I could use > to limit the number of licenses the web application can grab? --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Issue with installing UniVerse on Linux
Fore reference: The "cpio" difference is in the "c" option on an extract. By my recollection: RedHat announced (aeons ago) that they were changing "c" to mean "not create" whereas previously it had meant "create". I think this was to do with POSIX changes but I am not sure. Then - after a gap - they made the change with no new announcement (because it had been announced a long time ago). My recollection may be hazy after this time - but it was definitely the meaning of "c" on cpio that was reversed. The resolution was to modify the installation script from: cpio -icvdumB to cpio -ivdumB The may be no more than modifying the case statement in uv.load to cater for the response passed back from uname - make it the same as the RedHat Linux case statement which does I believe cater for this. Worth noting: On some systems the response from "uname" is wholly customisable - it can play merry hell with the installation script sometimes as it tries to work out what on earth we are installing on and defaults to "case 1". Regards JayJay --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] UniObjects .NET - Security Best Practices, Connection Pooling in UD
You could use a service on another server inside your firewall that does all of the universe access. Then your web app would only be able to communicate with that service. Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Kubarych Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 2:54 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] UniObjects .NET - Security Best Practices, Connection Pooling in UD Does anyone have any security best practices for building web applications using UniObjects for .NET? I've placed the connection string in web.config and encrypted it, as well as created a separate remote account with a stripped down VOC. The only data files that can be accessed from this separate remote are the two that the application needs to access (via pointers the main remote account). I also tried to dial down the asp.net trust level runs with, but it seems that uniobjects for .net needs to run with full trust. I guess it's not possible to use connection pooling until UniData 7.1. We are still on UniData 6.1. Is there some other method I could use to limit the number of licenses the web application can grab? Thanks in advance for any pointers. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] UniData config
I am assuming that you have loaded an Itanium release? (compare the HPUX availability for Itanium and PA-RISC on the U2TechConnect Product Availability Matrix (PAM)): Itanium 7.1.1/2/4/8/11 PA-RISC 7.1.0/7/8/10 No, this is PA-RISC, unidata 7.1.8 Jeff Butera, Ph.D. Administrative Systems Hampshire College [EMAIL PROTECTED] 413-559-5556 "Daddy - did you lose your mind?" Catherine Butera --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] UniData config
Not one I immediately recognise. I am assuming that you have loaded an Itanium release? (compare the HPUX availability for Itanium and PA-RISC on the U2TechConnect Product Availability Matrix (PAM)): Itanium 7.1.1/2/4/8/11 PA-RISC 7.1.0/7/8/10 Regards JayJay -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Butera Sent: 09 July 2007 15:49 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] Unidata config I'm having trouble with unidata 7.1 (hpux 11.23) accepting some of my configuration. When I enter MAX_FLENGTH 1073741824 SBCS_SHM_SIZE 16777216 and attempt to save, I get the following MAX_FLENGTH is not reasonable. Recommended to be >= 32KB and <= 2GB-16KB and SBCS_SGM_SIZE is set to 0. Last I checked, 1,073,741,824 was <= 2GB-16KB. These values work fine on similar Solaris server. Anyone have insight why it thinks this is unreasonable? Jeff Butera, Ph.D. Administrative Systems Hampshire College [EMAIL PROTECTED] 413-559-5556 "Daddy - did you lose your mind?" Catherine Butera --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Disappearing Indexes on UniVerse
Every problem I have seen here was caused by running index operations while a file was in use. Golden rules: 1. Make sure no-one is using the file 2. REALLY make sure no-one is using the file 3. REALLY, REALLY make sure (you get the idea). fuser -u This is your friend here - check each file component - data (and the parts if it is dynamic) and index. Block access (permissions if necessary) and then re-check and do your index deletion / creation / rebuild as necessary. If you still have a problem after that (sometimes Herculean I know) effort I'd be very surprised (it does happen tho). Regards JayJay --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] UniObjects .NET - Security Best Practices, Connection Pooling in UD
Does anyone have any security best practices for building web applications using UniObjects for .NET? I've placed the connection string in web.config and encrypted it, as well as created a separate remote account with a stripped down VOC. The only data files that can be accessed from this separate remote are the two that the application needs to access (via pointers the main remote account). I also tried to dial down the asp.net trust level runs with, but it seems that uniobjects for .net needs to run with full trust. I guess it's not possible to use connection pooling until UniData 7.1. We are still on UniData 6.1. Is there some other method I could use to limit the number of licenses the web application can grab? Thanks in advance for any pointers. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] [UD] XML/DB Tool v1.2
Sure could use some help with this tool. I'm trying to create a map between an existing file and an XML schema without success - can't even get the existing file name to appear in the right-hand side (TABLES). Thanks. Tom --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Uniobjects Issue
Thanks for all the responses. It turns out it was the UD_Database config. The account I was working in was not defined. Once I fixed it, it worked famously. Thanks for the help! Steve> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org> Subject: RE: [U2] Uniobjects Issue> Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 16:45:30 +1000> > Hi Steve> > If I remember rightly, there may be an issue of opening files not in the> account, ie remote files from other accounts. Check to see if this file you> are looking at is a remote file. > > Another issue could be as simple as the logon you are using does not have> access rights to the file you are using.> > Regards > > David Jordan> ---> u2-users mailing list> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Issue with installing UniVerse on Linux
One other point. Have IBM fixed the problem they had with default options on cpio? I know when I installed PE on SuSE ages ago, the SuSE and RH defaults were different and I had to edit the install script. It was one of those toggle issues - where RH was on by default and the switch toggled it off, and SuSE was vice versa or the whole lot was vice versa :-) If IBM haven't explicitly said Ubuntu is supported, this might be the problem - certainly sounds like it, but I would have thought it would have sorted itself out by now ... Cheers, Wol -Original Message- From: Doug Chanco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10 July 2007 15:30 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Issue with installing UniVerse on Linux My guess is that you did not download a complete tar file (maybe something happened during the download) are you using download director to download or manually downloading it? Also make sure that tmp has enough free space (this would be the first thing I would check) that may be why cpio stops (full file system) Dougc _ Doug Chanco Engineer Developer Senior, TLOTLD Activant Solutions Inc.(tm) Austin, Texas 78746 T: 800-678-5426 F: 512-278-5915 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web site: www.activant.com _ > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Trevor McNamara > Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 7:21 PM > To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > Subject: [U2] Issue with installing UniVerse on Linux > > Hi, > > I'm having some issues with installing UniVerse on an Ubuntu machine. > > I have everything in the /tmp/uv directory, so the listing is like this:- > > CONNPL > CVTB > DEVELOP > DOC > FILESIZE > GCI > IC > JDBC > MAIN > NETWORK > NLS > OBJ > PORTING > QA > STARTUPUCI > UOJ > UVODBC > uv.load > > When I run ./uv.load it runs, i select option 1 (Install as root), then it > prompts for the settings, which i change option 4 and 5 to /tmp/uv > So looks like this:- > _ > UniVerse Installation Options > > The current settings of the available options are: > >UniVerse installer: root >UniVerse administrator: root uid=0 gid=0 > > 1) UniVerse home directory: /usr/ibm/uv > (currently: Not Installed.) > 2) UniVerse-UniData shared directory: /usr/ibm/unishared > (currently: Not Installed.) > 3) Compile terminfo definitions: true > 4) Rewind tape name /tmp/uv > 5) No-rewind tape name/tmp/uv > 6) Long File NamesOFF > _ > > When i press enter to begin installing it comes up with the following:- > _ > User uvsql will inherit ownership of the SQL catalog. > Downloading from /tmp/uv to /usr/ibm/uv > > Now loading uniVerse from the install media... > > cpio: premature end of file > Unable to read installation media. > Contact your IBM support representative. > _ > > > I have created the uvsql and uvadm users. > I have also tried burning it all to cd and running it from there, which > produced the same results? > > Anyone got any ideas? > > Thanks > Trev > --- > u2-users mailing list > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] Issue with installing UniVerse on Linux
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 10:20:43AM +1000, Trevor McNamara wrote: > > I'm having some issues with installing UniVerse on an Ubuntu machine. > > cpio: premature end of file > Unable to read installation media. > Contact your IBM support representative. Debian, and by extension Ubuntu, uses a different cpio syntax. I will have to see if I wrote down the change you have to make, but it involves editing the install script and changing the cpio lines. If you can, post what it shows on the cpio line and I'll try to remember the change. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Issue with installing UniVerse on Linux
My guess is that you did not download a complete tar file (maybe something happened during the download) are you using download director to download or manually downloading it? Also make sure that tmp has enough free space (this would be the first thing I would check) that may be why cpio stops (full file system) Dougc _ Doug Chanco Engineer Developer Senior, TLOTLD Activant Solutions Inc.(tm) Austin, Texas 78746 T: 800-678-5426 F: 512-278-5915 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web site: www.activant.com _ > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Trevor McNamara > Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 7:21 PM > To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > Subject: [U2] Issue with installing UniVerse on Linux > > Hi, > > I'm having some issues with installing UniVerse on an Ubuntu machine. > > I have everything in the /tmp/uv directory, so the listing is like this:- > > CONNPL > CVTB > DEVELOP > DOC > FILESIZE > GCI > IC > JDBC > MAIN > NETWORK > NLS > OBJ > PORTING > QA > STARTUPUCI > UOJ > UVODBC > uv.load > > When I run ./uv.load it runs, i select option 1 (Install as root), then it > prompts for the settings, which i change option 4 and 5 to /tmp/uv > So looks like this:- > _ > UniVerse Installation Options > > The current settings of the available options are: > >UniVerse installer: root >UniVerse administrator: root uid=0 gid=0 > > 1) UniVerse home directory: /usr/ibm/uv > (currently: Not Installed.) > 2) UniVerse-UniData shared directory: /usr/ibm/unishared > (currently: Not Installed.) > 3) Compile terminfo definitions: true > 4) Rewind tape name /tmp/uv > 5) No-rewind tape name/tmp/uv > 6) Long File NamesOFF > _ > > When i press enter to begin installing it comes up with the following:- > _ > User uvsql will inherit ownership of the SQL catalog. > Downloading from /tmp/uv to /usr/ibm/uv > > Now loading uniVerse from the install media... > > cpio: premature end of file > Unable to read installation media. > Contact your IBM support representative. > _ > > > I have created the uvsql and uvadm users. > I have also tried burning it all to cd and running it from there, which > produced the same results? > > Anyone got any ideas? > > Thanks > Trev > --- > u2-users mailing list > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Universe and virtual machines
Subversion. Does this use GIT as a back-end now? The old-style version control systems pretty much only worked with one person being able to check out a file at a time. Sounds like Eugene wants a distributed version control, and there's a choice. But - AND CHECK IT OUT, I'M NOT SURE - I think most of them use git as the back-end so you might well find that one person can use subversion, another DARCS, another Cogito, and they're all happy accessing the same GIT backing store. I haven't got round to installing git on gentoo yet - that's a project for as soon as I can find the time ... :-) Cheers, Wol -Original Message- From: Brian Leach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10 July 2007 11:35 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] Universe and virtual machines Eugene I do all my development work on Microsoft Virtual PC (in fact going back to when it was owned by Connectix). It is solid. If you're using this for local copies, remember to also have some form of source control system in place. I'd recommend SubVersion with TortoiseSVN windows explorer integration: very simple. You can read about this in the next issue of Spectrum. Regards Brian REPOSTED FOR NON-MEMBER ADDRESS: "Eugene Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Bounce notice: Eugene, Your recent post to our lists bounced because either you are not a member or because you are not signed up using the e-mail address which you used to post. To subscribe or resubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/. You aren't subscribed to U2-Community under this name.] Hello, I would like to be able to create virtual machines on a Windows server and run Universe and Redback on the virtual machine. Is anyone doing this now. Currently we are stepping each others toes as we are wanting to work on the same program at the same time. My idea is to create virtual machines so that we can work on the copies of the same program and interface to redback. Since each virtual machine would be running universe as well as redback we should be able to get more work done since this is our major bottleneck. I am interested in hearing of any experiences with this method. Thanks Eugene --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Universe and virtual machines
Eugene I do all my development work on Microsoft Virtual PC (in fact going back to when it was owned by Connectix). It is solid. If you're using this for local copies, remember to also have some form of source control system in place. I'd recommend SubVersion with TortoiseSVN windows explorer integration: very simple. You can read about this in the next issue of Spectrum. Regards Brian REPOSTED FOR NON-MEMBER ADDRESS: "Eugene Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Bounce notice: Eugene, Your recent post to our lists bounced because either you are not a member or because you are not signed up using the e-mail address which you used to post. To subscribe or resubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/. You aren't subscribed to U2-Community under this name.] Hello, I would like to be able to create virtual machines on a Windows server and run Universe and Redback on the virtual machine. Is anyone doing this now. Currently we are stepping each others toes as we are wanting to work on the same program at the same time. My idea is to create virtual machines so that we can work on the copies of the same program and interface to redback. Since each virtual machine would be running universe as well as redback we should be able to get more work done since this is our major bottleneck. I am interested in hearing of any experiences with this method. Thanks Eugene --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] Logged user list
Hi all, I have some problems getting the users currently logged into the system. If I launch a LISTU command, in some operating systems I cannot see the user names, only the ids. There are any way to get the user name list in TCL, basic or any operating system commnad? Regards, Chuchi Pulse para ir al sitio web JesC:s Barbero RodrC-guez Departamento de AnC!lisis y ProgramaciC3n - Desarrollo tecnolC3gico Zoco Gran Santander, 1B* Planta b 39011 PeC1acastillo b Santander b ESPACA Tel.: +34 902 233 323 b Fax: +34 902 234 280 AVISO LEGAL: Este mensaje contiene informaciC3n destinada exclusivamente al usuario de destino, pudiendo contener informaciC3n confidencial o protegida legalmente. Si, por un error de envC-o o transmisiC3n, ha recibido este mensaje y usted no es el destinatario del mismo, por favor, notifique de este hecho al remitente y no use, informe, distribuya, imprima, copie o difunda este mensaje bajo ningC:n medio . Cualquier opiniC3n en C)l contenida, es exclusiva de su autor y no representa necesariamente la opiniC3n de Quiter Servicios InformC!ticos, S.L. LEGAL WARNING: This e-mail and any attachment, contain information intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information or legally protected data. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender and do not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this e-mail under any circumstances. The views and opinions expressed are the authorE=s own and do not necessarily reflect those of Quiter Servicios InformC!ticos, S.L. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] UV install - internal vs. external
REPOSTED FOR NON-MEMBER ADDRESS: "Arie van Dam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Bounce notice: Eugene, Your recent post to our lists bounced because either you are not a member or because you are not signed up using the e-mail address which you used to post. To subscribe or resubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/. You aren't subscribed to U2-Community under this name.] Brian, There are at least three more: /.uvhome , /.unishared and the spool directory /etc/spool/uv, although you may place that anywhere via the configuration in uv. Cheers, Arie --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Running UniData on SAN
REPOSTED FOR NON-MEMBER ADDRESS: "Brad Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Bounce notice: Eugene, Your recent post to our lists bounced because either you are not a member or because you are not signed up using the e-mail address which you used to post. To subscribe or resubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/. You aren't subscribed to U2-Community under this name.] What I was told is that IBM (one person) changed their mind - their main concern was not allocating enough of a SAN to the DB application and sharing with lots of other applications and complaining about I/O speed. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Uniobjects Issue
Hi Steve If I remember rightly, there may be an issue of opening files not in the account, ie remote files from other accounts. Check to see if this file you are looking at is a remote file. Another issue could be as simple as the logon you are using does not have access rights to the file you are using. Regards David Jordan --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/