Re: [U2] Quick poll - how many use 3-tier or N-tier Architecture
There is a new weapon that you can throw at this argument, that is cost and deliverables. Boards and CEOs and professional CIOs are frustrated at the cost and delays, where deliverables are not being met. Forget the technical arguments and focus on the financial ones. CEOs and boards do not know if Oracle or SAP is any good, they are taking the approach of there is security in numbers. The old I cannot get sacked for buying IBM. However risk mitigation is a growing issue in every organisation. Reducing the cost and shortening deliverable time tables mitigate risk. This is where U2 shines. I talk to management about the KISS principal, I play on their fears of technology by promoting robust technology instead of flashy technology. Focus on the business arguments and risk mitigation, then U2 has the legs on Oracle and SAP. Regards David Jordan -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Symeon Breen Sent: Saturday, 10 April 2010 6:12 AM To: 'U2 Users List' Subject: Re: [U2] Quick poll - how many use 3-tier or N-tier Architecture Absolutely Brian, i agree wholeheartedly - However try having that conversation with a computer science guro... but then again they don't live in the real world. ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] CPU Spikes to 100%
I have 2 sites running on vmware virtualisation for Windows 2003 and a HyperV with Windows 2008 66 bit and have had no problems. I did have an issue of a .Net application with an old release of UniObjects .Net that caused the CPU to spike 100%. I recompiled the app with the new version and this problem went away. I do have a problem with the Telnet sessions freezing after a time of no activity on the VMware sites, but this has not caused a CPU issue. David Jordan ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] CPU Spikes to 100%
I hit a similar problem with the .Net Uniobjects. A .Net application was using an old version. I recompiled the application with the new version and the problem went away. This occurred when a uniobject call took more than 6 minutes to respond. Regards David Jordan ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] visual source safe plugin with basic developer toolkit
Has anyone tried the Microsoft visual source safe plugin for eclipse with the basic developer toolkit. I was trying to see if I could use a common source control mechanism for the .Net and unibasic code. http://sourceforge.net/projects/vssplugin/ Regards David Jordan ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] Uniobject.Net Plus ASP.Net web service performance (was Re: Error connecting to Universe using Web Service Developer Tool)
I had a problem like this due to the Uniobject.Net client was an old version, I updated it to the latest version and this improved the process. David Jordan ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] U2U - Sydney
I will be Regards David Jordan www.dacono.com.au -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Dan McGrath Sent: Monday, 16 November 2009 2:30 PM To: U2 Users List Subject: [U2] U2U - Sydney Are there any people from here going to U2U in Sydney tomorrow? Cheers, Dan ### The information transmitted in this message and attachments (if any) is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed. The message may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. The intended recipient of this e-mail may only use, reproduce, disclose or distribute the information contained in this e-mail and any attached files with the permission of IMB. ### ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: [U2] Leaving U2 World to the Dark Side (SQL)
Brian raises a good point about concurrency and record locking. I am often surprised at how little understanding some developers have of record locking in the RDBMS environment. With RDBMS really having to work in the optimistic mode as pessimistic locking is usually inefficient in RDBMS. Hence applications need to handle conflict resolution, where someone else has made a change between read and update. David Jordan --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] UniData LIMITs
Hi Bill I can't see users selecting 300 users, there must be another criteria that they choose to get those clients, can't that be used instead. Otherwise: I would set up another file SELECTEDCLIENTS with key @UserNo*Clientno with f1 = 1 which holds the clientnos the user wants. The core subroutine builds that file. Then instead of using clientno = . in your selects use a TRANS(SELECTEDCLIENTS,@userno:*:f2,1,'x') = 1 If it is not on SELECTEDCLIENTS it will return and only those items on SELECTEDCLIENTS will be selected. It is just an idea, and processing may be faster. Regards David Jordan Managing Consultant Dacono Holdings Pty Ltd --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] UV, Linux, and Active Directory
Hi Norm I believe it is the latest release of UniVerse that will run on 2008 Regards David Jordan --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] mv.net versus Web DE
You can download a free version of Visual Studio Basic called express. It is a slimmed down version, but should do most of what U2 developers would use. http://www.microsoft.com/express/download/default.aspx Regards David Jordan --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Do we need to put a value in UniObject SubKeys
Jak I don't use this property either, I was curious why others were adding this into their code and whether I am missing something. Regards David Jordan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Kent Sent: Friday, 10 December 2004 8:10 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [U2] Do we need to put a value in UniObject SubKeys --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Universe on NT
I ran into a similar problem on a demo laptop. In services, I set for UniVerse Services under logon Allow Services to Interact with Desktop This seemed to solve the problem Regards David Jordan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eremenko, Sergey Sent: Saturday, 25 September 2004 2:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] Universe on NT Any kind of OFM. It seems that UV 10.x doesn't like combination of MS 2000/2003 server + Open File Manager In our cause it was OFM from Legato. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Vezertzis Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 8:58 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] Universe on NT What kind of 'Open File Manager'? Kevin D. Vezertzis Project Manager Cypress Business Solutions, LLC. 678.494.9353 ext. 1403 Fax 678.494.9354 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit us at www.cypressesolutions.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eremenko, Sergey Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 11:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] Universe on NT Do you have any Open File Manager software running on that 2003 server? If yes, try to disable it. In our cause it helped... Sergey Eremenko. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Vezertzis Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 6:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [U2] Universe on NT We are having problems with the stability of Universe on Server 2003. Several times a day, we are unable to get into Universe. When this happens, we are able to 'remote desktop' into the server and Universe is up and running (can run uv shell). However, telnet and UniAdmin are both refusing connections. We are only able to resolve this by rebooting the entire server.the Universe control panel will not restart. Any ideas? Thanks, Kevin Kevin D. Vezertzis Project Manager Cypress Business Solutions, LLC. 678.494.9353 ext. 1403 Fax 678.494.9354 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit us at www.cypressesolutions.com [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of Kevin Vezertzis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).vcf] --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of Kevin Vezertzis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).vcf] --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Editors (was: Comparison Unidata and Universe)
I occasionaly need to edit a type 1 file of around 30-50 megabytes. The problem is most editors want to load the file into memory before working on it. Does anyone know an editor that would handle big files like this David Jordan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken Wallis Sent: Friday, 24 September 2004 9:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] Editors (was: Comparison Unidata and Universe) Scott, vim is free software too. You can make a donation to charity, but you don't have to pay a license fee. As I understand it, vim originated as an improved version of vi on UNIX and has since been ported to Windows. Its a wonderful product, widely used, robust, fast. If you like vi, you'll like vim. vim has every feature that vi has, plus many others. As I said the two that spring to mind as immediately useful are that it has unlimited undo - every time you press 'u' or click the undo button it backs out a previous change, where in vi, the first 'u' undoes, and then the next 'u' undoes the undo...; and that it remembers your previous searches and ':' commands - you can scroll through them with the cursor. I understand that you may be 'free-time challenged', but I'd say that vim is seriously worth checking out. (www.vim.org) Cheers, Ken -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Scott Richardson Sent: Friday, 24 September 2004 8:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [U2] Editors (was: Comparison Unidata and Universe) Hey Ken, First I heard of vim right here and now. (Who says these forums aren't useful?). Learn something new everyday! Merely mentioned that winvi32 was available, and seems to work wonderfully, bringing this Unix Editor into the Windows realm. And it appears to be a freebie - shareware - whatever. Guess in my copious free time, I will check out www.vim.org, (but I get the sense it may be kind of cult-ish ;^) --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] UniDebugger won't let me in.
When creating the connect have you ticked the correct box for UniVerse or UniData database. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alfke, Colin Sent: Thursday, 16 September 2004 3:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] UniDebugger won't let me in. You can change your view to host mode and login with the telnet client UniDebugger users - some sort of stripped Dynamic Connect. You may have a connection script setup that is incorrect. Or is this when you are trying to read your source code? If you are on HP-UX then you will need to use either ftp or UniObjects to grab your code from the server. Your user may not be setup to ftp into the server. good luck Colin Alfke Calgary, AB -Original Message- From: Shawn Waldie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I can log in using wintegrate, and I can even telnet in, but an error message is returned stating invalid username or password when I try to access my source code using unidebugger. Any suggestions on where to look first? TIA --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Alas .NET
.Net is a frame work, similar to the UniVerse Virtial Machine for UniBasic. If I have a VB .Net application then I need the .Net Framework to run underneath it. If I am using ASP.Net then it is only required on the web server, not the web browser client. As far as I am aware the .Net framework is available for Win NT 4 and I think it is available for Windows 98, but Microsoft is aiming everybody to be running on the NT platform of some sort and no longer deal with the issues of the DOS related Win 95 Win 98. You can download the frameworks from the Microsoft site. If Uniobjects .Net is a .Net assembley, then it should run anywhere that the .Net frame work runs as well as probably on the Linux version as well. Regards David Jordan --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] RE:
Consider the options. There are the UniObjects components that run as activex classes, java or .Net. With these you can call Unibasic subroutines or do direct reads and writes to the UniData database. You can also call unibasic subroutine through ODBC OLEDB. If you are looking for a sockets solution, look at redback as this includes a scheduler to handle multiple requests down a socket which you would have to manualy build otherwise. There is also the Websphere Message Que interface. I think there is an example program for sockets on the Pikwiki web page and also in the archieves of this list. Regards David Jordan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 15 September 2004 11:30 AM To: u2-users Subject: I need to write a client server application with the server doing things in Unibasic. I have IBM's Unidata UniBasic Extentions manual, which has a chapter on the Unibasic Socket API. It gives the bare basics, but it leaves a lot to be desired, and I have even found errors. I'm interested if anyone has written a server using this API, and, if so, what were your experiences? Will it work OK running Unidata on WIN, and does it act the same on WIN and in unix? Anything to avoid? And is there any better documentation available Thanks in advance. --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] u2bc - lack of software delivery.
I believe they are finalising some changes within the 2 division to improve things, and we will soon be able to electronically download software as well. Regards David Jordan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dianne Ackerman Sent: Thursday, 9 September 2004 1:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [U2] u2bc - lack of software delivery. I order the CD; I'm sure that's the problem. -Dianne Mike Pflugfelder wrote: We've been pretty successful here at Keystone. We order a Gold Master and we usually get an e-mail within 1 week with the instructions on where to download the software from... Are you requesting CD media, or online delivery? -Original Message- From: Dianne Ackerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 9:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [U2] u2bc - lack of software delivery. Don't get me started The last time I ordered a gold master, it took 7 weeks and constant emails/phone calls. -Dianne uniVerse mailing list wrote: Does anyone else get a headache everytime they try and order gold masters from u2bc? We've been waiting over a month for version 5.3.4 of SB+ that supposedly fixes problems we have but we can't get hold of SB+ it! Andy --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Using RedBack.RedPages OLE DB provider in .NET
Hi Tony To make an RBO class a Web service in .Net is fairly easy. All is required is to add the webservice syntex to the class header. If you create a new webclass object from the .Net environment, you will see the syntax required. If you are trying to use the web service for MS infopath look at xml searilization and you will need to physically describe the the methods and properties in the class. I have not used Redback fro a while or under .Net but I cannot see why you should not receive the rows. Can you show a sample of code. Regards David Jordan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Evans Sent: Thursday, 26 August 2004 4:45 AM To: U2 Users Discussion List Subject: [U2] Using RedBack.RedPages OLE DB provider in .NET Hi all, Has anyone had any luck using the RedBack.RedPages OLE DB provider in a .NET project? I've followed IBM's whitepaper to a T, and tried many other things on my own, but I cannot get the provider to return any rows when I create and execute an RBO. Only the column information is returned. No error messages are surfacing, either. In fact, the server logs indicate that the RedBack Gateway received the .Create and .Execute requests and returned the information appropriately. We're using RedBack 4.1.3.2. On another note, does anyone know of any RedBack tools to create WSDL (Web Service Definition Language) files for RBO classes, for the purpose of accessing them via RedBack's SOAP interface? Or does anyone have any example WSDL files that they've created to access an RBO class? Any help would be greatly appreciated! -Tony Tony Evans Web Developer Richmont --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] UniObjects on Server 2003
With Windows 2003 as part of the new security direction of Microsoft, everything is switched off or closed, and you need to switch on the items you want. Check that the unirpc port you use for uniobjects does not have the port closed. Check the port number used for RPC in the Unidata Administration menu and check that it is not closed in the firewall or IRC, etc. I have not had any problems with Universe Objects on Windows 2003. Regards David Jordan Managing Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dacono Holdings Pty Ltd Business Technology Consulting PO Box 909 Lane Cove NSW 2066 Australia Ph 61 2 9418 8329 Fax 61 2 9427 2371 www.dacono.com.au -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darren Tauer Sent: Thursday, 5 August 2004 1:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [U2] UniObjects on Server 2003 Using .net we have an asp application connecting to a Unidata 6.08 database. The following code works fine on 2000, but not on Windows 2003 server. It errors out with a library not registered error. Do we need a different version of uniobjects in order to run this on Windows 2003 server or is there a different way to create the objects on 2003? I tried several different approaches and got different errors ranging from library not registered to invalid cast exception. Is there a different com object for 2003 or a different object library we should be using? Dim UDSession As New UNIOBJECTSLib.UnioaifCtrl UDSession.UserName = dsiroot UDSession.Password = x UDSession.accountpath = /info/TCF UDSession.HOSTNAME = beaker UDSession.connect() Anyone else have this experience with moving to Windows 2003 server? Thanks, Darren Tauer TCF Leasing, Inc. --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] combining licenses [ot]
Device licensing works with Wintegrate the free version of directconnect that comes with U2. One other 3rd party client had set that up, other than those, most 3rd party clients do not have access to it. With Workgroup you can have up to 5 connections of combinations of telnet, uniobjects, odbc, etc connect at the same time from the same PC and still count that as 1 user. For enterprise it is up to 10 connections, but at around 3 times the price. For a workgroup license of 24 users, you can have 120 simultaneous connections, but only from 24 physical devices. Regards David Jordan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ross Ferris Sent: Friday, 30 July 2004 12:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] combining licenses [ot] Does anyone know if the device licencing (aka enterprise licence I think) will work with any telnet client (eg: we use AccuTerm), or if it is tied to wIntegrate If I understand the licencing model correctly, does this also mean/imply that with the workgroup sized sites, each of the max 24 users in a workgroup operates with device licencing is that correct ? Ross Ferris Stamina Software Visage an Evolution in Software Development -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Dallaire Sent: Friday, 30 July 2004 12:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] combining licenses Yes, but isn't there a higher cost involved if you want Enterprise? I guess the point is, do you want to pay for device licensing or get it free? Just a thougth. Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Jordan Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 9:40 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] combining licenses Device licensing is also in Enterprise licensing and this goes over 25 users. Workgroup is a low cost version for small site restricted to Windows, SCO, Linux on the Intel platform. David Jordan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Dallaire Sent: Thursday, 29 July 2004 10:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] combining licenses You should be able to get IBM to do this for you. However, keep in mind if you combine the licenses to one 40 user license you will lose device licensing. If I remember correctly the cutoff point for Work Group is 25 users. Mike Dallaire Mortgage Builder Software Inc. (248) 208-3223 ext. 103 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.mortgagebuilder.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 5:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [U2] combining licenses Hi All We have one machine that is licensed for 25 universe users and a second machine licensed for 15 users. Is there a way to combine to two licenses on one machine for 40 users? Thanks in Advances --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.730 / Virus Database: 485 - Release Date: 28/07/2004 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.730 / Virus Database: 485 - Release Date: 28/07/2004 --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Copying data between two Universe servers
I assume you will have 2 locations where people are entering data to a server at each location and you want the data to be duplicated on both servers. If this is the case you could look at a number of options. A. You could use publish and subscribe, but this will require all the data to be updated at one server. B. You can use triggers on files to pick up writes which runs a process to copy the data to the other server. (You have to consider data integrity if you are updating the same record on 2 machines at the same time only one version may be saved) - To ensure data integrity I would look at using Message queue (IBM MQ) in ver 10.1 (this will ensure if the communication line or a server went down, then the message queue will hold the updates until the systems are backup and then update.) You could write a UniObject interface and take advantage of Microsoft Message Queue -Another option is to use ODBC inbuilt into UniVerse. You connect to the remote database and do sql writes to it or update through a remote procedure call. Hope this gives you some ideas to explore Regards David Jordan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 28 July 2004 8:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [U2] Copying data between two Universe servers I am looking for the best way to copy data between two Windows 2000 servers running Universe 10.0.10 over a VPN. I was looking at putting the data in a type 1 file and using a ftp copy command running on the scheduler. I don't want all the data being entered on one server I don't know if there is a better way using q-pointers and copying or any other method I haven't thought of yet. Many thanks --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Universe Phantom Problem
I would say that the file B is still being read by the C program or has not been released. Check if the file is locked before you try to write using a READL or READU. If you don't use the locked clause it will wait until the C program releases File B. Also consider looking at new features of UniVerse such as Sockets or MQ (Message Que) to do the same process. These have a lot of sophisticated features to handle this environment. Regards David Jordan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of prem jaisinghani Sent: Friday, 23 July 2004 5:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [U2] Universe Phantom Problem Hi, I am facing following problem regarding Phantoms in universe: We have a phantom which keeps on polling a type 19 file, say File1 for data and transfers it to another type 19 file, say File B. File B in turn is being read by a 'c' program. The first phantom gets killed sometimes and pretty randomly. The error code thrown is 40019, but I could not get any the information about this error. Please find below a sample error message: FATAL - Unable to write 7545698440*13346*25966.940943 on FileB If someone has experienced such problem and/or has a workaround, please let me know. Thanks and Regards, Prem --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] CallHTTP
The type of error message is typical from a variable growing beyond the memory size. If it is not the program, is their a log file or como file or something in the backgroud that could be getting large. Otherwise it might be a limitation in the C routine that is parsing the HTTP. I would get on to IBM support. Regards David Jordan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Cipollina Sent: Thursday, 22 July 2004 11:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] CallHTTP It's not. The error doesn't occur until I try to submit my http request. And it happens the first time through. I am sending multiple transactions as an XML string. I can send 3 in a single string, but when I get to 4 it causes this to happen. Nick --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [UV] UniObjects across the internet
Hi Thanks for the information. It is a current application, where a number of users would require to access the database across the internet. Although there is new development in progress, this is needed for a short term solution. I have written a process to swap the UniObjects layer with Wintegrate for a uniobjects application and use the telnet interface. This could probably take advantage of secured telnet across the internet. I was looking at other ways of securing UniObjects communication over the internet without too much change to the application Regards David Jordan --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] [UV] UniObjects across the internet
I am looking at a scenario of having a VB client with UniObjects access a UniVerse database over the internet. I want to make it as simple as possible for the user, ie to be able to do this by just launching the VB client on client with internet access. Has anyone done this and what security steps did you take and what issues did you have. Regards David Jordan --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] UV Read failure
You may have already checked this, but is someone using CONTRACT as a normal variable, like in common and thereby overwriting the file variable. I always add .FV to any file variable names to prevent issues like this. Regards David Jordan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sara Burns Sent: Friday, 2 July 2004 2:11 PM To: U2 List ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Subject: [U2] UV Read failure SNIP 0079 TRAN*y 15 0080 Program PTREVBRB: Line 15, Read operation failure. [EFAULT] Bad address 0081 [201] 'CONTRACT' IS NOT A FILE NAME CONTRACT was being used a few seconds before. SNIP I wish it were that simple but here is the Opens section * 0013 OPEN 'X.REF' TO XREF ELSE STOP 201,'X.REF' 0014 OPEN 'TOFL' TO TOFL ELSE STOP 201,'TOFL' 0015 OPEN 'CONTRACT' TO CONTRACT ELSE STOP 201,'CONTRACT' The program would appear to definitely be trying to open CONTRACT. This program is a subroutine being called multiple times through a loop, and would have opened CONTRACT in the previous iteration. Having just written that I think - why are we doing this - but that is another matter, over which we may have less control. Could it be that AIX is not releasing the files fast enough and we are running out of MFILES or something like that? This might have been running very fast at 3 am. We do at times when the machine is lightly loaded, see errors where the Capture file has not been created. All thoughts appreciated Regards, Sara Burns Sara Burns (SEB) Development Team Leader Public Trust Phone: +64 (04) 474-3841 (DDI) Mobile: 027 457 5974 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Information contained in this communication is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient the information should not be used, disclosed, copied or commercialised. The information is not necessarily the views nor the official communication of Public Trust. No guarantee or representation is made that the communication is free of errors, virus or interference. --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [wIntegrate]
In Wintegrate under the preference menu, you can set the toolbars off and this will hide the menu. Exit and save changes and that is how it should reload. In scripting look at unloading toolbars Regards David Jordan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barry Brevik Sent: Wednesday, 30 June 2004 6:54 AM To: U2-users (E-mail) Subject: [U2] [wIntegrate] I am using wIntegrate scripting on a Kiosk application. One of the things I'm doing is removing things like 'File' and 'Edit' from the main menu like this: If IsMenu(MainMenu) then If IsOnMenu(MainMenu,'run') then Menu Detach mainmenu,'run' Endif Endif For some reason, the 'Help' menu refuses to unload this way. What I'd really like to do is remove the main menu entirely, but I can't seem to figure out how to do this. Any tips for me? --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Performancing of File Universe
What is the size of the records, what OS are you running on? David Jordan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cisar Riba Cervera Sent: Friday, 25 June 2004 9:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] Performancing of File Universe Hello, I creating the Index and the time for the SELECT, is down to 5 seconds, but I think that is very time. This is posible that the can is problem abouth memory bolcks or the server have chip memory (512 Mb RAM). Thanks. Cisar. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.707 / Virus Database: 463 - Release Date: 15/06/2004 --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Performancing of File Universe
Is that 300 character or 300k. The size of the record can effect the number of reads from the disk. Ie if the record exceed the bucket size read from the disk then you need to to do another read. There are parameters in setting the file size to handle record size, but I assume you are talking 300 characters and this should not be an issue. By upgrading from Windows NT4 to Win2003 you could expect a doubling of the performance. With release 10.1 Select lists take advantage of hyperthreading, so having a CPU that process hyperthreading can improve performance. Areas that could also effect performance, other applications on the server especially if it is single CPU, fragmented disks, lack of Disk space on the drive with the swap area. This sounds more an issue outside of UniVerse and a result of the environment Regards David Jordan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cisar Riba Cervera Sent: Friday, 25 June 2004 11:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] Performancing of File Universe Hello, The size of record is about 300, and the OS is Windows NT. Cisar. Thanks. -Mensaje original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] nombre de djordan Enviado el: viernes, 25 de junio de 2004 13:47 Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: RE: [U2] Performancing of File Universe What is the size of the records, what OS are you running on? David Jordan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cisar Riba Cervera Sent: Friday, 25 June 2004 9:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] Performancing of File Universe Hello, I creating the Index and the time for the SELECT, is down to 5 seconds, but I think that is very time. This is posible that the can is problem abouth memory bolcks or the server have chip memory (512 Mb RAM). Thanks. Cisar. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.707 / Virus Database: 463 - Release Date: 15/06/2004 --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.707 / Virus Database: 463 - Release Date: 15/06/2004 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.707 / Virus Database: 463 - Release Date: 15/06/2004 --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] U2 XML
Mike The xml interface in U2 can process xml data in a variable through a Basic program. This would allow you to do it on the fly. Was there other issues related to this. Any comments would be valuable feedback to IBM engineers, if you could post it on the U2canXML forum on the www.u2ug.org site. Regards David Jordan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Rajkowski Sent: Wednesday, 16 June 2004 12:17 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] U2 XML Like Mark, we are using UOJ to send and receive the XML to UniVerse. We ended up developing our own routines, to get a better response. We have the need for near real time access, in our J2EE environment, and utilize XML in the web app as well as the means to communicate to the UniVerse Back end. Interesting enough, we are using DB2 for our Cache Database, and a common XML schema for both databases. Updates are sent to Universe, and then the change is replicated back to the DB2 Cache. ( Over simplification, but the point is that we needed a way to process the XML quickly, and saving it to disk before processing was to resource intensive ) Mike --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] UniVerse Data in SQL Tables
Hi Trevor With UniVerse the ODBC, OLEDB UniObjects come free with the database. If you have an older version of UniVerse and did not get these with the product then get hold of your supplier and they should be able to organise if free of charge. Writing a front end for universe can be done in Minutes and cheaper than can be done frontending SQL Server. I have set up Web Services and Clients for UniVerse in .Net very quickly and cheaply. You can take advantage of current UV Basic Subroutines and the business logic already done in UniVerse and pass them to the client where all you have to do the GUI interface. There is a variety of ways achieving this according to whether you want to take the SQL approach or the direct interface. UniObjects runs a lot quicker than the SQL approach. You can contact me direct if you wish some further advice of approach. Regards David Jordan Managing Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dacono Holdings Pty Ltd Business Technology Consulting PO Box 909 Lane Cove NSW 2066 Australia Ph 61 2 9418 8329 Fax 61 2 9427 2371 www.dacono.com.au -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Trevor McNamara Sent: Thursday, 10 June 2004 1:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] UniVerse Data in SQL Tables It is for an asset register frontend. Will need it to read data from the database aswell as write back. I know its expensive to write a frontend to UniVerse as you need o purchase third party software like Pick .NET DP. So i thought i could be able to get the data to the SQL server and then use the SQL for the backend to the frontend (which will be written in VB .NET) I have done an SQL frontend before and i would assume its easier than a UniVerse frontend. Thanks Hi Trevor There are a variety of ways to do this. The question is what do you want to do exactly with the replicated Database, defines the best approach or even away to avoid the replication. Regards --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Debugging code with #INCLUDES
I use $INCLUDE file record This use to go through the include section in the debug mode. (possible #INCLUDE doesn't) Can he change to the $INCLUDE format and try it Regards David Jordan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Pflugfelder Sent: Saturday, 5 June 2004 5:06 AM To: u2-users Subject: [U2] Debugging code with #INCLUDES I've got a customer that is having some problems debugging his Basic code. He started using the #INCLUDE statement to include code from other files. He's running the code with the TRAP option so that he gets dropped to the debugger on non-fatal errors. When the program encounters an error that comes from the #INCLUDEd file, he's left in the debugger, on the line where #INCLUDE is. When he tries to step to the next line, it seems to run the rest of the code in the #INCLUDE, then puts him at the next line in the main program. Does anyone know how to tell exactly what line in the #INCLUDE is causing the problem? Are there any $OPTIONS that could be set to change this behavior? Thanks! Mike Pflugfelder Keystone Information Systems 856.722.0700 x238 --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] RE: [UV] 10.0.19 - Bug with FMT?
Are you running in PICK flavour or Information Flavour or Ideal David Jordan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 31 May 2004 6:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [U2] RE: [UV] 10.0.19 - Bug with FMT? The following statement on 10.0 would insert text marks (@TM) into the string every 10 characters: A = FMT(ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ,10L) This one would truncate and give only the first 10 characters. A = FMT(ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ,L#10) Under 10.0.19 the first statement is doing exactly the same as the second (ie. truncating). Surely this is incorrect. As a test I tried this: A = FMTS(ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ,10L) (Note: FMTS not FMT - for multi-valued FMT) and it correctly inserted the text marks every 10 characters. Does anyone know if this is a known bug, or if there is a compile time switch that I am unaware of? Thanks, AdrianW Disclaimer. This e-mail is private and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please advise us by return e-mail immediately, and delete the e-mail and any attachments without using or disclosing the contents in any way. The views expressed in this e-mail are those of the author, and do not represent those of this company unless this is clearly indicated. You should scan this e-mail and any attachments for viruses. This company accepts no liability for any direct or indirect damage or loss resulting from the use of any attachments to this e-mail. --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.u2ug.org/listinfo/u2-users --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.u2ug.org/listinfo/u2-users
RE: [U2] UV objects dying
Hi Kate What specifically are you doing in the execute command. Executing a Select List, running a program ? Regards David Jordan Managign Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dacono Holdings Pty Ltd Business Technology Consulting PO Box 909 Lane Cove NSW 2066 Australia Ph 61 2 9418 8329 Fax 61 2 9427 2371 www.dacono.com.au --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.u2ug.org/listinfo/u2-users
