Re: [Ubnt_users] Aiming AirFiber 5u 13mi link

2018-04-17 Thread Darin Steffl 
You're not going to have good luck at 13 miles. Those are only 25db gain
antennas which are far too small for 13 miles. You really should be using
af5xhd with minimum 2 foot dishes but preferably 3 foot dishes.



On Tue, Apr 17, 2018, 2:14 PM Tyler Fulginiti 
wrote:

> Hello,
>
>
>
> We have read through tons of documents based on how to aim and align these
> radios , we have set the frequencies outside of the DFS range and are using
> HDD at 10MHz channel. We have verified the LOS a couple different ways
> (WISPtools RF Planner, Google maps etc.)
>
>
>
> Outside of configuration settings being incorrect the only thing we think
> it could be is setting of  the elevation correctly on these devices have
> been hard to find a good cheaper way to do that.
>
>
>
> Are there any tips to getting this shot to work ?
>
>
> Tyler Fulginiti
> Network Administrator
> Cell- 301-643-1176
> www.PeakeNetBroadband.com 
> 300 Charles St, La Plata MD 20646
> ​
>   
> 
> 
> 
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF11 10x

2018-03-26 Thread Darin Steffl 
We also had problems with jirous 2 foot dishes not having very good signal
no matter how hard we aimed a 3.8 mile link. No problems with 4 foot jirous
or ubnt 35db dishes. I have not tried 3 foot for jirous yet though.

On Mon, Mar 26, 2018, 1:59 PM Mathew Howard <mat...@litewire.net> wrote:

> While we're on that subject, what dishes are most people using with these?
> On the link we have up, we have Jirous, and I was considering using those
> for our next couple of links as well... mainly because they're physically a
> fair amount smaller than the ubnt dishes (and I'm assuming quite a bit less
> wind load), but also because it would seem easier to adapt other radios to
> them later, if we need more capacity. Any thoughts on that?
>
> --
> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on
> behalf of Adair Winter [ada...@amarillowireless.net]
> *Sent:* Monday, March 26, 2018 2:55 PM
> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] AF11 10x
>
> We noticed the Jirous 2' antenna is not that good and will be further off
> than the UBNT dishes.
>
> the Jirous 3' and 4' dishes seem to be much better.
>
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 2:47 PM, Mathew Howard <mat...@litewire.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Ah yeah, that makes sense... I forget about the duplexer. Not that it
>> really changes anything anyway with these, it'll just throw the signal
>> calculations off a bit. For licensing purposes, I figure you're generally
>> better off erring on the side of higher output power. The AF11 link we have
>> up has always been off by about 5db, and I haven't been able to get it any
>> better after trying to tune it several times, but I think we may have some
>> trees poking a bit into the fresnel zone somewhere in the middle...
>> --
>> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on
>> behalf of Adair Winter [ada...@amarillowireless.net]
>> *Sent:* Monday, March 26, 2018 2:45 PM
>> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] AF11 10x
>>
>> It's actually not excessive.
>> If you read the manual it says the duplexer is = to 1db loss and you're
>> going to have at least that in the jumpers as well.
>> I however always set the cable loss to zero and do the math for my max
>> EIRP or 18dbm. It's just easier when looking at it to know that there isn't
>> 2 being subtracted somewhere.
>> Even with the losses, we usually are within 1-2db of target and sometimes
>> beat it.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 2:41 PM, Mathew Howard <mat...@litewire.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Does UBNT say to use 2db cable loss? that seems a little excessive to
>>> me...
>>>
>>> But yeah, I'd say alignment is either a bit off or you have some
>>> obstructions... you should have better signal than that, at that distance.
>>>
>>> 
>>> From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on
>>> behalf of Matt Hoppes [mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net]
>>> Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 12:55 PM
>>> To: Ubiquiti Users Group; Adair Winter
>>> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] AF11 10x
>>>
>>> Why is that?  They are 35dB antennas.
>>>
>>> 17 + 35 - 2 = 50, which is right where we are.
>>>
>>> On 3/26/18 1:17 PM, Adair Winter wrote:
>>> > And it looks like you either have antenna gain set wrong or need to
>>> work
>>> > on the alignment, Matt.
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018, 12:01 PM Mathew Howard <mat...@litewire.net
>>> > <mailto:mat...@litewire.net>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Yeah, but you have a much stronger link - you're at -48 with 17dbm
>>> > Tx Power.
>>> >
>>> > 
>>> > From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
>>> > <mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org> [
>>> ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
>>> > <mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org>] on behalf of Matt Hoppes
>>> > [mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net
>>> > <mailto:mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net>]
>>> > Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 11:26 AM
>>> > To: Ubiquiti Users Group; Darin Steffl
>>> > Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] AF11 10x
>>> >
>>> > I'm not sure what has been discussed here, but we have 10x going
>>> on this
>>> > link (see picture)
>>> >
>>

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF11 10x

2018-03-26 Thread Darin Steffl 
Matt, leave your gain at 35 dB and set cable loss to 1db. After that, aim
to what the ideal signal shown in the gui. You're at least 6db away from a
perfect link still so I'd look into that if I were you. We have links at 6
to 7 miles with better signal than you have at 2.6 miles. Using same dishes
and 18db power.

Aka please aim better and verify perfect Los.

On Mon, Mar 26, 2018, 1:46 PM Adair Winter <ada...@amarillowireless.net>
wrote:

> It's actually not excessive.
> If you read the manual it says the duplexer is = to 1db loss and you're
> going to have at least that in the jumpers as well.
> I however always set the cable loss to zero and do the math for my max
> EIRP or 18dbm. It's just easier when looking at it to know that there isn't
> 2 being subtracted somewhere.
> Even with the losses, we usually are within 1-2db of target and sometimes
> beat it.
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 2:41 PM, Mathew Howard <mat...@litewire.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Does UBNT say to use 2db cable loss? that seems a little excessive to
>> me...
>>
>> But yeah, I'd say alignment is either a bit off or you have some
>> obstructions... you should have better signal than that, at that distance.
>>
>> 
>> From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on
>> behalf of Matt Hoppes [mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net]
>> Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 12:55 PM
>> To: Ubiquiti Users Group; Adair Winter
>> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] AF11 10x
>>
>> Why is that?  They are 35dB antennas.
>>
>> 17 + 35 - 2 = 50, which is right where we are.
>>
>> On 3/26/18 1:17 PM, Adair Winter wrote:
>> > And it looks like you either have antenna gain set wrong or need to work
>> > on the alignment, Matt.
>> >
>> > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018, 12:01 PM Mathew Howard <mat...@litewire.net
>> > <mailto:mat...@litewire.net>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Yeah, but you have a much stronger link - you're at -48 with 17dbm
>> > Tx Power.
>> >
>> > 
>> > From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
>> > <mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org> [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
>> > <mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org>] on behalf of Matt Hoppes
>> > [mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net
>> > <mailto:mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net>]
>> > Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 11:26 AM
>> > To: Ubiquiti Users Group; Darin Steffl
>> > Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] AF11 10x
>> >
>> > I'm not sure what has been discussed here, but we have 10x going on
>> this
>> > link (see picture)
>> >
>> > On 3/26/18 11:48 AM, Darin Steffl wrote:
>> >  > Alex,
>> >  >
>> >  > Frequency coordinators are supposed to find you spectrum but at
>> > the end
>> >  > of the day, it's up to your company to engineer/design the link
>> > to meet
>> >  > your required signal and bandwidth needs. The manual for the
>> AF11fx
>> >  > clearly spells out the required signal levels and power levels
>> > needed to
>> >  > achieve 6x, 8x, 10x modulation schemes. 18db is MAX power that
>> can be
>> >  > used to achieve 10x for example and then whatever the required
>> signal
>> >  > level is listed but I don't have it memorized.
>> >  >
>> >  > Sorry to put you on the spot and I don't mean any disrespect but
>> you
>> >  > guys kind of messed up. Don't rely on frequency coordinators to
>> > design
>> >  > your links. Only use them to find you spectrum.
>> >  >
>> >  > A 17 mile link in 11ghz should definitely have minimum 3 foot
>> > antennas
>> >  > on each end but I would plan on using 4 foot antennas to be safe
>> > if the
>> >  > link is important to you and you want max bandwidth.
>> >  >
>> >  > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 11:38 AM, alex phillips
>> > <highspeedl...@gmail.com <mailto:highspeedl...@gmail.com>
>> >  > <mailto:highspeedl...@gmail.com
>> > <mailto:highspeedl...@gmail.com>>> wrote:
>> >  >
>> >  > Yes, this is what I Am concluding as well.  I have spoken
>> with my
>> >  > freq coordinator about making changes to their software that
>> >

Re: [Ubnt_users] Looking for a network consultant at WISPA

2018-03-07 Thread Darin Steffl 
James,

I don't suggest using UCRM for billing or anything. Use a legitimate, solid
platform like Azotel, Sonar, Powercode, VISP, etc. and your life will be
easier.

Never trust your billing platform to someone you can't call and talk to on
the phone. Recipe for disaster otherwise.

On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 10:26 PM, Mike Whelan <
mike.whe...@airlinkinternet.net> wrote:

> Dennis Burgess @ Link Techs is the best. We use regularly.
>
>
>
>
> Please excuse the short response, this email was sent via a mobile device.
>
>  Original message 
> From: RickG <rgunder...@gmail.com>
> Date: 3/6/18 10:21 PM (GMT-06:00)
> To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org>
> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Looking for a network consultant at WISPA
>
> +1
>
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 9:26 AM, alex phillips <highspeedl...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I suggest you reach out to Dennis Burges at LinkTechs.  They will have a
>> booth in the show hall
>>
>> *Alex Phillips*
>> CEO and General Manager
>> RBNS.net
>> HighSpeedLink.net
>> *540-908-3993 <(540)%20908-3993>*
>> Member WISPA.org
>> #Rev18
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 9:21 AM, James Wilson <ja...@ridgecomms.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> We're a small WISP that has outgrown our network design competency so
>>> we're looking for some design and configuration help.
>>>
>>> We're switching to Ubiquiti routers and are planning on using UNMS and
>>> UCRM.
>>>
>>> I'd like to meet up with someone here at WISPA.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> -James
>>>
>>> RidgeComms
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> -RickG
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 
Darin Steffl
Minnesota WiFi
www.mnwifi.com
507-634-WiFi
<http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi> Like us on Facebook
<http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] MTU

2018-02-19 Thread Darin Steffl 
CCR is fine. One of ours pushes 2 gbps at night and averages 5% CPU
utilization so we have plenty of headroom.

On Feb 19, 2018 6:11 PM, "J Portman"  wrote:

> Our CCR1072 pulls 2g out of 10g and doesn't break a sweat.
> YMMV,
> JP
> *On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 19:03:26 -0500, Jon Langeler wrote*
> > [UTF-8?]I’d consider x86 over CCR if your at those numbers
> >
> > Jon Langeler
> > Michwave Technologies, Inc.
> >
> > On Feb 19, 2018, at 6:05 PM, RickG  wrote:
> >
> >
>
>
> >
> > Travis, I appreciate the input and cant speak for Steve but I've been
> running a CCR for years. Currently it's a CCR1036 being fed with a 2gig
> fiber circuit with peak traffic of 700-800 megs. LOL, I'm starting to think
> it's the CCR!
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 5:35 PM, Travis Allen  > wrote:
> >
>>
>>
>> >
>> > Guys,
>> > We have had a very similar problem recently with non Cloud Core
>> mikrotik routers.  Nothing seemed wrong, but the router capacity to process
>> packets was maxed out even though the CPU showed only around 70-80% max.
>> After replacing the router with a CCR, everything was much better.   I
>> recommend upgrading the router to a CCR and see what happens.
>> >
>> > Travis Allen, President
>> > Total Highspeed Internet Solutions
>> > totalhighspeed.com
>> > 417-851-1107 x 501 <(417)%20851-1107>
>> >
>> >
>> --
>>
>> > *From: *"RickG" 
>> > *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" 
>> > *Sent: *Monday, February 19, 2018 4:22:28 PM
>> > *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] MTU
>> >
>> > I've got the same issue. I cant identify exactly when it started, just
>> crept up over time.
>> >
>> > On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 11:38 AM, Steve Barnes 
>> wrote:
>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> >
>>> > I am trying to get every last drop out of our internet.  Most towers
>>> have a MikroTik Routing, Netonix doing POE and Switching, Fed by AF5x, and
>>> Rockets or Prism for [UTF-8?]AP’s.  Sometimes seeing some slow downs I
>>> cant account for.  Wondering if MTU or Flow control needs adjusted.
>>> >
>>> > The MTU settings are as follows:
>>> > MikroTik MTU: 1500  L2 MTU: 1598  Flow Disabled
>>> > Netonix MTU: 1528 Both
>>> > AF5x Up to 9600 AutoFlow Disabled
>>> > Rocket MTU: 1500   Flow
>>> Disabled
>>> > Prism MTU: 1500  Flow
>>> Disabled
>>> >
>>> > In your experience should any of these be adjusted?
>>> >
>>> > *Steve Barnes*
>>> > Wireless Operations Manager
>>> > *New Lisbon Broadband*
>>> > *NLBC.COM *
>>> > *PCSWIN.COM *
>>> > 765-584-2288 <(765)%20584-2288> ext:1101
>>> >
>>> > ___
>>> > Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>> >
>>> >
>>
>>
>> >
>>
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > -RickG
>> > ___
>> > Ubnt_users mailing list
>> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>> >
>> > ___
>> > Ubnt_users mailing list
>> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>> >
>> >
>
>
> >
>
> >
> > --
> >
> > -RickG
>
>
> > ___
> > Ubnt_users mailing list
> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> >
>
>
>
>
> Joe Portman
> Alamo Broadband Inc.
> www.alamobroadband.com
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] MTU

2018-02-19 Thread Darin Steffl 
I'll plug that Preseem is working really well for us to help find issues
exactly like you're talking about. It is more than monitoring and equipment
stats like AirControl. It actually gives you visibility into the customer
experience. I'd recommend doing their free 30-day trial. I promise you'll
want to keep it like we decided to.

On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 1:55 PM, Steve Barnes <st...@pcswin.com> wrote:

> Yeah everything is on AIRcontrol.  Just can figure it out.
>
>
>
> At peak times I can run TCP Btest from PC through CPE to Router on Local
> tower2 and get 45-50 Meg.  (10Mhz channel)
>
>
>
> Btest from Router Tower2 to Router tower1 and get 200Meg.  (AF5x link 250M
> capacity Only 50-100M used).
>
>
> Tower 1 Connected to GB fiber and can get 700Meg to Dist router at Core
> due to traffic.
>
>
>
> But from PC through all to Dist router I can only get 8 Mbps at night.
> During the morning when traffic is low I can get 45Mbps.  So has to be
> buffer, retry, MTU, cpu, etc. but I cant pin point it.  Ping times stay
> pretty stable. AMQ and AMC really good on this AP, 90%+.
>
>
>
> Giving some serious thought to Preseem.
>
>
>
> *Steve Barnes*
>
> Wireless Operations Manager
>
> *New Lisbon Broadband*
>
> *NLBC.COM <http://NLBC.COM>*
>
> *PCSWIN.COM <http://PCSWIN.COM>*
>
> 765-584-2288 ext:1101 <(765)%20584-2288>
>
>
>
> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
> *On Behalf Of *Chris J. Ruschmann
> *Sent:* Monday, February 19, 2018 1:34 PM
> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] MTU
>
>
>
> Are you running air control or anything else that can aggregate the
> performance of your site in some nice easy to read graphs?
>
>
>
> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
> <ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org>] *On Behalf Of *Steve Barnes
> *Sent:* Monday, February 19, 2018 7:38 AM
> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org>
> *Subject:* [Ubnt_users] MTU
>
>
>
> I am trying to get every last drop out of our internet.  Most towers have
> a MikroTik Routing, Netonix doing POE and Switching, Fed by AF5x, and
> Rockets or Prism for AP’s.  Sometimes seeing some slow downs I cant account
> for.  Wondering if MTU or Flow control needs adjusted.
>
>
>
> The MTU settings are as follows:
>
> MikroTik MTU: 1500  L2 MTU: 1598 Flow Disabled
>
> Netonix MTU: 1528   Both
>
> AF5x Up to 9600 Auto  Flow Disabled
>
> Rocket MTU: 1500 Flow Disabled
>
> Prism MTU: 1500   Flow Disabled
>
>
>
> In your experience should any of these be adjusted?
>
>
>
> *Steve Barnes*
>
> Wireless Operations Manager
>
> *New Lisbon Broadband*
>
> *NLBC.COM <http://NLBC.COM>*
>
> *PCSWIN.COM <http://PCSWIN.COM>*
>
> 765-584-2288 ext:1101 <(765)%20584-2288>
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 
Darin Steffl
Minnesota WiFi
www.mnwifi.com
507-634-WiFi
<http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi> Like us on Facebook
<http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] 60 Gigs ???

2017-12-12 Thread Darin Steffl 
What does one depend on then Mike? Recommend something better instead of
just saying it's terrible.

On Dec 12, 2017 7:52 AM, "Mike Hammett"  wrote:

> Please stop depending on ITU rain zones for your uptime and distance
> calculations. That model is terribly broken.
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Midwest Internet Exchange 
> 
> 
> 
> The Brothers WISP 
> 
> 
> --
> *From: *"Brough Turner" 
> *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" 
> *Sent: *Tuesday, December 12, 2017 7:49:02 AM
> *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] 60 Gigs ???
>
> Ignitenet now has a path calculation tool.  You have to register for their
> "cloud" service to access it, but you can use the free registration and
> forget everything else.
> The tool is here:
>https://cloud.ignitenet.com/cloud/3384/tools/linqpath
>
> A sample screen capture using this tool for their 2.5Gbps radios in ITU
> rain zone K (Boston, MA) is attached.
>
>
> ​
>
> Thanks,
> Brough
>
> Brough Turner
> netBlazr Inc. – Free your Broadband!
> Mobile:  617-285-0433 <(617)%20285-0433>   Skype:  brough
> netBlazr Inc.  | Google+
>  | Twitter
>  | LinkedIn
>  | Facebook
>  | Blog
>  | Personal website
> 
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 6:22 PM, Mike Hammett 
> wrote:
>
>> You'll have to do the math yourself on these.
>>
>> https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp/posts/956205354504917
>>
>> https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp/posts/1152763711515746
>>
>>
>>
>> -
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Midwest Internet Exchange 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> The Brothers WISP 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> *From: *"Mitch" 
>> *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" , "Chris J.
>> Ruschmann" 
>> *Sent: *Monday, December 11, 2017 5:12:01 PM
>> *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] 60 Gigs ???
>>
>> What are the max distances for back haul and PtMP?
>>
>> Mitch
>>
>> On 12/11/2017 5:07 PM, Chris J. Ruschmann wrote:
>>
>> We deploy them as fast as we can find a place to use them. They work
>> great and I am still surprised there isn’t an Air Fiber 60Ghz yet.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
>> ] *On Behalf Of *Eric Williams SDWISP
>> *Sent:* Monday, December 4, 2017 1:19 PM
>> *To:* ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> *Subject:* [Ubnt_users] 60 Gigs ???
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Anyone know of Ubiquiti getting in to the 60 Gig space ?  This Ignite
>> Net ML-60-LW-DO-USlooks nice ? any one played with Ignite Net and or short
>> rang 60 Gigs ?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Eric Williams W7EMW
>>
>> *The Man with a Wireless Plan…I know luckey me !*
>>
>>
>>
>> 619-698-3904 <(619)%20698-3904> Office
>>
>>
>>
>> Admin Hours Monday - Friday 9AM to 5PM
>>
>> *Closed all US, Bank, School and Mexican Holidays due to Social
>> Obligations.*
>>
>>
>>
>> 9740 Campo Road #211Spring Valley Ca 91977
>>
>>
>>
>> *SDWISP.  A Private Community Wireless network. Built by the neighbors
>> for the neighbors*
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing 
>> listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
>

Re: [Ubnt_users] replacing rocket w/sector antenna AP

2017-01-30 Thread Darin Steffl 
Don't ever use lock to ap Mac. Seen too many wisps roll trucks when they
replace the ap. Every ssid should be different for every sector.

Also for the client connecting to a weaker signal. That would be fixed as
well if you connected to a specific ssid.
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 6:21 PM Jan-OOLLC <j.vank...@oregononline.net>
wrote:

> Update, trying to balance the Rx dbm's at the AP first, by decreasing
> transmit power at the CPE.  Noticed that one of the trouble CPEs was
> connecting to another tower with same name SSID even the the signal was 10
> dbm weaker.  So I figured if all the CPEs were configured to lock to the AP
> mac, they would transfer over to a new name for SSID.  Ended up doing a lot
> of driving for orphans.  Not one of them accepted the new name, all were
> set to "lock to AP" mac.  I'm pretty sure with older firmware this used to
> work, is this a bug?
>
> Have tried airControl2 in the past, could not figure out how to add new
> CPEs after initial install.  Dude is much easier to use.
>
> Jan
>
> On 01/30/2017 12:03 PM, Nick Bright wrote:
>
> On 1/28/2017 11:43 AM, Chris Soiles wrote:
>
> I have replaced APs and just named them the same with same security and
> they just connect
>
> I.E.: had rocket with Omni named SSID: radio WPA2: 1234
>
> Added a new section, installed 4 APs at New top, named all APs SSID: radio
> same WPA2
>
> Turned off Omni AP
>
> As each CPE connected to new AP
> Login to CPE change SSID to New name for the radio
>
> Once all CPEs gone, change name of AP to New name, they all reconnect
>
> That's what I do too. If things are working well, you could also use
> airControl2 to do it by batch, but you need to ensure that all the CPE have
> reliable connections and are responding properly first, or they'll get
> orphaned.
>
> --
> ---
> -  Nick Bright-
> -  Vice President of Technology   -
> -  Valnet -=- We Connect You -=-  -
> -  Tel 888-332-1616 x 315 / Fax 620-331-0789  -
> -  Web http://www.valnet.net/ -
> ---
> - Are your files safe?-
> - Valnet Vault - Secure Cloud Backup  -
> - More information & 30 day free trial at -
> - http://www.valnet.net/services/valnet-vault -
> ---
>
> This email message and any attachments are intended solely for the use of the 
> addressees hereof. This message and any attachments may contain information 
> that is confidential, privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable 
> law. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are 
> prohibited from reading, disclosing, reproducing, distributing, disseminating 
> or otherwise using this transmission. If you have received this message in 
> error, please promptly notify the sender by reply E-mail and immediately 
> delete this message from your system.
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing 
> listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
-- 
Darin Steffl
Minnesota WiFi
www.mnwifi.com
507-634-WiFi
<http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi> Like us on Facebook
<http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] 2.4 throughput. gotta love being a wisp

2017-01-05 Thread Darin Steffl 
d that it was too bad, and that nothing
>>> will be done. xx is a conman, relying on shady business tactics
>>> to further his greed."
>>>
>>> btw - i can't recall any downtime within the last year and, well, i just
>>> love human beings.
>>>
>>> i am wondering - - am i asking too much out of these access points?
>>>
>>> usage graphed -
>>>
>>> access point 1 -
>>>
>>>
>>> access point #2
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> btw - i should add the kid who filed the complaint lives in his parents
>>> barn (yes, i said barn) and has
>>> his own connection separate from his parents.
>>>
>>> question - am i asking too much of these access points?
>>>
>>> yes - i'm waiting on the rocket 2ac prism - - and these are our two
>>> busiest 2.4 rockets - - but
>>> i am also getting complaints on other parts of our network.
>>>
>>> ok - thanks in advance.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> -RickG KyWiFi
>
> --
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 
Darin Steffl
Minnesota WiFi
www.mnwifi.com
507-634-WiFi
<http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi> Like us on Facebook
<http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] R5AC-PRISM-US

2016-09-27 Thread Darin Steffl 
Shawn,

Are you using sectors or the horns? If sectors, which model?

Thanks

On Tuesday, September 27, 2016, Shawn C. Peppers <
videodirectwispal...@gmail.com> wrote:

> We run 6 x 60 on multiple towers without issue.
>
> Shawn C. Peppers
> Video Direct Satellite & Entertainment
> 866-680-8433 Toll Free
> 480-287-9960 Fax
> http://www.video-direct.tv
>
> On Sep 27, 2016, at 9:46 PM, Tasos Alexiou <ta...@rfelements.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ta...@rfelements.com');>> wrote:
>
> Darin,
>
> I dont know anyone who has tried 12 but that would be cool. I think GPS is
> for sure needed :) I do think 6x 60deg might be possible w/o gps with an
> ABC ABC channel set up.
>
> On Sep 27, 2016 9:08 PM, "Darin Steffl" <darin.ste...@mnwifi.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','darin.ste...@mnwifi.com');>> wrote:
>
> Adair,
>
> That's exactly what it would look like on a pole lol!
>
> In some of your denser areas I think it would be cool to try doing 12
> prism sectors if they get GPS sync working. Lots of capacity that way
>
>
> On Tuesday, September 27, 2016, Adair Winter <ada...@amarillowireless.net
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ada...@amarillowireless.net');>> wrote:
>
>> You said that and all I could think of was
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Darin Steffl <darin.ste...@mnwifi.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> So the 30s would be a great replacement for some of our 90 degree
>>> sectors as long as we're putting 3 of them in place per sector? Gain is
>>> similar or better even at long distance like 8 miles or so?
>>>
>>> Has anyone done a 12 horn 30 degree setup yet for full 360 coverage on a
>>> tower? If the front to back and side lobes are great, this would seem to be
>>> achievable.
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, September 27, 2016, Tasos Alexiou <ta...@rfelements.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Lol... No worries. The 30s rock and our 50 or 60 have great
>>>> performance. The 90s are great little sectors but range can be limited. I
>>>> hope you report back your results when you try the 60 or 30.
>>>>
>>>> On Sep 27, 2016 8:06 PM, "Chris Ruschmann" <ch...@scsalaska.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Well shit, I guess if I just would have went on your site I would have
>>>>> saw that J
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I guess I have the 60’s as well, not 65’s as you don’t make them, I
>>>>> haven’t deployed any yet though, only the 90’s.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks though, I’ll give them a shot.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-bounces@wis
>>>>> pa.org] *On Behalf Of *Tasos Alexiou
>>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 27, 2016 4:47 PM
>>>>> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org>
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] R5AC-PRISM-US
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Chris,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> We have a 18db 30deg version that is performing better than 20 or 21db
>>>>> traditional sectors as Garth mentioned. You should give one of them a 
>>>>> try..
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Tasos Alexiou
>>>>> Managing Partner
>>>>> RFelements North America LLC
>>>>>
>>>>> Skype: tasosrfe
>>>>> eMail: ta...@rfelements.com
>>>>> Web: www.rfelements.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Facebook: www.facebook.com/rfelements
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/tasosalexiou
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
>>>>> intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any
>>>>> views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not
>>>>> necessarily represent those of RF elements s.r.o. If you are not the
>>>>> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
>>>>> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the 
>>>>> sender
>>>>> if you believe you have received t

Re: [Ubnt_users] R5AC-PRISM-US

2016-09-27 Thread Darin Steffl 
 <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>>
>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
>> --
>>
>> *From: *"Chris Ruschmann" <ch...@scsalaska.net
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ch...@scsalaska.net');>>
>> *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" <ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ubnt_users@wispa.org');>>
>> *Sent: *Tuesday, September 27, 2016 5:36:27 PM
>> *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] R5AC-PRISM-US
>>
>> We have been using both the 65’s and the 90’s. Like I said, they work
>> really well in our less than a mile areas, better than any sector would in
>> fact.
>>
>>
>>
>> While I can connect devices over a mile, the signals on the receive side
>> of the sector don’t meet our minimum qualifications for a connection. I
>> think its a gain issue on the horn. 10 Dbi just isn’t enough for long range
>> PTMP at our return signal requirements.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org');> [mailto:
>> ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org');>] *On
>> Behalf Of *Tasos Alexiou
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 27, 2016 9:50 AM
>> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ubnt_users@wispa.org');>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] R5AC-PRISM-US
>>
>>
>>
>> Chris,
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks for that feedback. I have a few questions.  What horns are you
>> using and what CPE's are connected?
>>
>>
>>
>> Customers are able to connect some devices over 10miles.  For example
>> using Airgrids or PBE400's on 30deg Horns. We had someone with a 30deg Horn
>> and RocketM5 connect to a NSM5LOCO at almost 3 miles.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Tasos Alexiou
>> Managing Partner
>> RFelements North America LLC
>>
>> Skype: tasosrfe
>> eMail: ta...@rfelements.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ta...@rfelements.com');>
>> Web: www.rfelements.com
>>
>> Facebook: www.facebook.com/rfelements
>>
>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/tasosalexiou
>>
>>
>> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
>> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
>> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
>> represent those of RF elements s.r.o. If you are not the intended recipient
>> of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents,
>> nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you
>> have received this email in error.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Chris Ruschmann <ch...@scsalaska.net
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ch...@scsalaska.net');>> wrote:
>>
>> I use the feed horns as well, they work great up close, but as you get
>> farther out, more than a mile, they start to have issues I've found.
>>
>> How far are you connecting you're your devices at?
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org');> [mailto:
>> ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org');>]
>> On Behalf Of G. Nicholas
>> Sent: Monday, September 26, 2016 7:29 PM
>> To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ubnt_users@wispa.org');>>
>> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] R5AC-PRISM-US
>>
>> Evan,
>>
>> Yes you have the correct pairing,  we just converted a tower site from 4
>> Prism's on the UB Titanium sectors to the RF Elements 30deg horns.
>> Greatly reduced the noise floor by going to the 30deg which gave us higher
>> SNR and more 8x rates.  doing an ABC channel config until UB actually gets
>> the GPS sync on the Prisms working.   Total capacity on the tower now is
>> over 2 GBps.
>>
>>
>> Garth
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: Evan Galvin
>> Sent: 9/26/2016 7:42:35 PM
>> To: ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ubnt_users@wispa.org');>
>> Subject: [Ubnt_users] R5AC-PRISM-US
>>
>> > Hey guys, just wanted to confirm that the R5AC-PRISM-US has a metal
>> > shielded housing on it.
>> >
>> > Do you think it would pair up good with this combo:
>> >
>> > https://www.streakwave.com/Itemdesc.aspb
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Ubnt_users@wispa.org');>
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Ubnt_users@wispa.org');>
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Ubnt_users@wispa.org');>
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Ubnt_users@wispa.org');>
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>

-- 
Darin Steffl
Minnesota WiFi
www.mnwifi.com
507-634-WiFi
<http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi> Like us on Facebook
<http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] NTP

2016-07-11 Thread Darin Steffl 
What software do you use for NTP server?

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Jesse DuPont <
jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net> wrote:

> Yes, 0.ubnt.pool.ntp.org is working. NTP just syncs things to GMT time.
> Local time, adjusted for timezone AND daylight savings, is always a local
> process. I have many devices that don't do well with keeping up on daylight
> savings time. Subsequently, they're correct during winter and an hour off
> in summer.
>
> *Jesse DuPont*
>
> Network Architect
> email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
> Celerity Networks LLC
>
> Celerity Broadband LLC
> Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
>
> Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband
> On 7/11/16 11:28 AM, Steve Barnes wrote:
>
> Is 0.ubnt.pool.ntp.org set right and working.  I have lots of stuff pointed 
> to that and its off an hour at least. Time zone set correctly but still off 
> an hour.
>
>
> Steve Barnes
> Wireless Operations ManagerPCSWIN.COMNLBC.COM
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing 
> listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 
Darin Steffl
Minnesota WiFi
www.mnwifi.com
507-634-WiFi
<http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi> Like us on Facebook
<http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] 5.6.5 APs loosing at STAs until reboot?

2016-06-23 Thread Darin Steffl 
We see that happen until the AP is rebooted but only if running a dfs
channel. Any other time it never happens.

Sent from my smartphone. Please excuse any typos.
On Jun 23, 2016 11:03 AM,  wrote:

> Having that problem too...
>
> On Jun 23, 2016, at 08:59, Adair Winter 
> wrote:
>
> We keep having problems with the station showing their connected but no
> data is moving
> On Jun 23, 2016 10:57 AM,  wrote:
>
>> Anyone else seeing XW APs running 5.6.5 loose all of their connected STAs
>> and then when you reboot the AP, they come back?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mike
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs

2014-12-09 Thread Darin Steffl 
When are the 3 new devices shipping or available at our distributors? None
of the new product numbers have shown up yet.

On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Mathew Howard mat...@litewire.net wrote:

  Yes, the spectrum analyzer is quite nice... even if the only Rocket I
 have that it works on is sitting on my desk. :p

 So is the only difference with this new Rocket AirPrism, or are there
 other  changes as well?
  --
 *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on
 behalf of Ben Moore [ben.mo...@ubnt.com]
 *Sent:* Tuesday, December 09, 2014 1:27 PM

 *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
 *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs

   ;-)  I think you guys will really like the new SW tools being added
 (especially the persistent spectrum analyzer...lots that can be done with
 that).  Will send out some details shortly on PTMP networks in the wild ;)

 On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Mathew Howard mat...@litewire.net
 wrote:

  ha... I just Rocket and PowerBeam and assumed they were the same ones.
 I guess I should actually read stuff. This is what happens when you don't
 make new stuff look different :p
  --
 *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on
 behalf of Mike Hammett [wispaubntus...@ics-il.net]
 *Sent:* Tuesday, December 09, 2014 1:22 PM
 *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
 *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs

Oh, so the non-Lite Rocket. Sorry.

 The e-mail didn't really make it clear that there were new things, just
 the same platform hype we had 14 months ago. I didn't read it all, just
 skimmed it because it didn't look any different.

 Ohhh, so the PtMP works now with the new software?



 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com

  https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL
 https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb
 https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions
 https://twitter.com/ICSIL

  --
  *From: *Ben Moore ben.mo...@ubnt.com
 *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
 *Sent: *Tuesday, December 9, 2014 1:20:19 PM
 *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs

 The 3 new products announced today:

  R5AC-PTP - Rocket w/AirPrism, PTP only
 NBE-5AC-19 - 19dB NanoBeam
 PBE-5AC-620 - 620mm PowerBeam

  Also, all of the software updates:

  http://www.ubnt.com/broadband/software/

  Some highlights:

  - Dedicated spectrum analysis (persistent)
 - CINR (Carrier to Interference and Noise Ratio - accurate assessment of
 channel conditions
 - New diagnostic tools (Ethernet Cabling test, RF Diagnostics, etc...)
 - PTMP enabled on R5AC-LITE

  The R5AC-PTMP (AirPrism AP) will be announced shortly.

  Thanks,
 Ben

 On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Mathew Howard mat...@litewire.net
 wrote:

   We have a couple of links up... I haven't really seen any problems
 with them.

 I think the NanoBeam AC might be new... at least I hadn't seen it
 before, but otherwise, no, nothing new.

  --
 *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on
 behalf of Mike Hammett [wispaubntus...@ics-il.net]
 *Sent:* Tuesday, December 09, 2014 1:07 PM
 *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
 *Subject:* [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs

For those of you that have them...  are they working well?

 Was there anything new in their announcement today? It didn't seem like
 it.



 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com

  https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL
 https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb
 https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions
 https://twitter.com/ICSIL



 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users



 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users


 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users



 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users




-- 
Darin Steffl
Minnesota WiFi
www.mnwifi.com
507-634-WiFi
http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi Like us on Facebook
http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users