Re: [Ubnt_users] Ubiquiti LBE-5AC

[James Craig via Ubnt_users]

Rick,

If you SSH into the unit, could you share the output of:

cat /etc/board.info | grep fcc

What firmware are you using?

Both LBE-5AC-23 and LBE-5AC-GEN2 (updated version) have certification for
UNII-1/2/3, but the non-GEN2 versions would require an unlock code to
enable the Revised UNII Grant.



On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 10:08 AM Roy  wrote:

>
>
> We use LiteBeam AC Gen 2 and LBE-5AC-23 successfully out to 3 miles.
> YMMV.  For .5 miles and less, we are starting to use Mikrotik 60Ghz
>
> Roy
>
>
>
> On 7/29/2019 5:44 AM, Phil Curnutt wrote:
>
> The original model needs the unlock code for the UNII, the newer, Gen2,
> comes activated.  They work fine for short shots 3/4 of mile or less:
> anything longer move to the PowerBeams.  The LBE's work much better then
> the NBE's that have a funky antenna pattern.
>
> Phil
>
> On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 10:16 PM Roy  wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> I just checked a LBE-5AC-23 and it has the "revised U-NII question.  Its
>> activated and I think all those channels are selectable.  Software is
>> version 8.5.12
>>
>> Roy
>>
>> On 7/28/2019 8:56 PM, RickG wrote:
>>
>> I dont get that option on these.
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 1:17 PM Mimbres Communications 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Any chance you forgot to activate the revised U-NII rules?
>>> [image: lbe-unii-rules.PNG]
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 10:28 AM RickG  wrote:
>>>
 Anyone here know what's the deal with the LBE-5AC units? I've got
 several that will not select the UNII bands. I've tried upgrading the
 firmware. -RickG

 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> -RickG
>>
>>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] AC rocket dish jumpers

[James Craig via Ubnt_users]

Hi Jerry,

Were these missing from the package?  If so, could send me photos of the
antenna box (looking for S/N) offline?



On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 12:09 PM Jerry Head II 
wrote:

> We have been shorted the jumpers on our last 4 AC Rocket Dishes, I am
> having trouble sourcing them and have run out of scavenged ones.
> Is anyone else having this problem?
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Warning UBNT did it again

[James Craig via Ubnt_users]

Hi Guys,

The -300 and the -400 are interchangeable between the PBEM5-300/400,
PBE5AC-300/400 and PBE5AC-GEN2 (400).  Same for the -ISO variants.



On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 1:54 PM, Jon Langeler 
wrote:

> 620 are not the same. The focal point changes. You can interoperable all
> the horns as far as I know but performances obviously changes.
>
> Jon Langeler
> Michwave Technologies, Inc.
>
>
> On Aug 7, 2018, at 1:29 PM, Kees H.  wrote:
>
> They are the same length.  The 300 bracket moves them further back to make
> them look shorter.  But when replacing the PBM5 with the PB5 AC Gen2 you
> can just use the existing bracket.
> I suspect that the 620 are also the same length, but can not confirm that.
>
> *From:* Phil Curnutt
> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 07, 2018 10:14 AM
> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Warning UBNT did it again
>
> 400’s are longer then 300, but are other wise interchangeable.
>
> Phil
>
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 11:09 AM Mike Hammett 
> wrote:
>
>> Please create e-mails from scratch instead of replying to existing
>> threads and changing the content.
>>
>>
>>
>> -
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Midwest Internet Exchange 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> The Brothers WISP 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> *From: *"Kees H." 
>> *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" 
>> *Sent: *Tuesday, August 7, 2018 10:29:26 AM
>> *Subject: *[Ubnt_users] Warning UBNT did it again
>>
>>
>> This morning I got a call from my distributor that the PB 2 AC-400 that I
>> had on order for a long time, finally came in.
>>
>> Not wanting to get burned again (as with the PB5 ACs), I asked how many
>> to a
>> case.  He came back with 2 radios per case.  So I cancelled the order.
>>
>> UBNT when will you learn that wisps are your market and not the
>> occasional
>> end user.
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
> --
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Well this is new

[James Craig via Ubnt_users]

Hi Forbes,

Are you seeing this on AC APs only?

What TDD Framing option are you using on the AC APs?

Please try to grab the Support Info file from one of these CPEs (and AP)
and send to me offlist (ja...@ubnt.com)

The 6.1.8 beta branch has some stability improvements that could help here,
but that wouldn't explain AC stations seeing the same symptoms.

On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 1:50 PM, Forbes Mercy 
wrote:

> So trying to take the 100+ heat into consideration we are having a lot
> of issues with customers associated to the tower but they won't ping and
> I can't get in to their radios.  They can get into AirOS and even select
> and change AP's but still they come up again showing their correct IP on
> the AP yet again no ping, no access, no Internet for them.  Some or AC
> radios, some older, doesn't seem to discriminate.  Floor is about -90
> and the last one was -74, not bad enough to be lost in the noise.
>
> Typical power cycle, etc. offers no solution.  This has happened 5 times
> (most using 6.16) in the past few days, a disturbing trend that we will
> now have to do a truck roll on.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Forbes Mercy
> Washington Broadband, Inc.
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Airrouter

[James Craig via Ubnt_users]

Hey Clay,

We've actually been hearing a lot of positive feedback RE: airCube
coverage. If you have a unit that appears to be underperforming, please let
me know.

A  web interface for configuration was also added a few versions ago, so
you can config via mobile app, HTTPS or UNMS.



On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 9:15 AM, Clay Stewart 
wrote:

> Since AirRouters are gone, and the new cubes are too poor in coverage and
> you need an APP on cell phone to program them, for those who have been
> using them, what are you going to for replacements that are as good as the
> HP model AirRouter, and has that price point?
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] False DFS going to bad channel on AC Gen 2 problem

[James Craig via Ubnt_users]

Hey Alex,

Make sure that the antenna gain is set on the Wireless tab matches the
connected antenna.  Other than that, if you are still seeing false hits,
please forward the Support Info file from the AP to me and I'd be happy to
take a closer look.

Thanks,
James



On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 10:31 AM, Kees H.  wrote:

> remove that frequency from the control frequency list.
>
>
> *From:* alex phillips
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 06, 2018 7:07 AM
> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
> *Subject:* [Ubnt_users] False DFS going to bad channel on AC Gen 2 problem
>
> We are nowhere near any radar and I have an AP that keeps changing
> channels to a neighboring AP causing me some issue because of DFS.
>
> Anyone have any thoughts on what I can do to stop this?
>
> *Alex Phillips*
> CEO and General Manager
> RBNS.net
> HighSpeedLink.net
> *540-908-3993 <(540)%20908-3993>*
> Member WISPA.org
> #Rev18
>
> --
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] 8.5.0 problem

[James Craig via Ubnt_users]

What freq was the AP (and channel width) set to, Forbes?

Please keep in mind that the XM units operate under a different DFS grant
VS XW and AC radios.

On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 12:50 PM, Rory Conaway 
wrote:

> 6.13 or 6.14.  Might be a legacy upgrade thing.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
> On Behalf Of Roy
> Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2018 10:48 AM
> To: Ubiquiti Users Group 
> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 8.5.0 problem
>
>
>
> Actually they can.  It depends on what OS you used when you activated
> DFS.  I have a number of M5s running in that range
>
>
> On 1/25/2018 8:58 AM, Rory Conaway wrote:
> > The M radios don't support 5585-5655GHz.  AC radios do.
> >
> > Rory
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
> On Behalf Of Forbes Mercy
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2018 9:29 PM
> > To: Ubiquiti Users Group
> > Subject: [Ubnt_users] 8.5.0 problem
> >
> > Did I miss a memo, I upgraded a Prism 5AC Gen2 to firmware 8.50 and the
> > 6 radios with 6.14XM Loco and Nanobridges dropped offline and no longer
> worked on any UNII frequency.  I had to move the radio down to a clogged
> non-UNII spectrum channel?
> >
> > Forbes Mercy
> > Washington Broadband, Inc.
> > ___
> > Ubnt_users mailing list
> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> > ___
> > Ubnt_users mailing list
> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] cannot find interference source

[James Craig via Ubnt_users]

One option to help narrow things down would be to enable the PingWatchdog
(+ Generate .sup file) and set it to ping an internal IP you have control
over.  If you starting seeing the same thing, you can take down the target
IP long enough for it to trigger the PWD.

If you have a current .sup file handy, please feel free to forward to me
offline and I'll take a look for any hints (Please include the AP .sup as
well)

On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Mimbres Communications 
wrote:

> Have you done an extended (like hours) airView run?
>
> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Aaron McKillip <
> aaron.mckil...@hamiltontel.com> wrote:
>
>> Dual Band router?
>>
>> Aaron McKillip
>> Hamilton Telecommunications
>> 402-694-6655 <(402)%20694-6655>
>>
>> On Dec 6, 2017, at 11:58 AM, Jan Van Kort 
>> wrote:
>>
>> It's just the one customer.  Neighbors to each side are just fine.
>> Neighbors are about 1/4 mile away on same hillside in quasi-rural area.
>> There are no other WISPs in area, no airFiber that I've found.  AirView
>> shows nothing worth getting excited about when problem isn't happening,
>> when problem is happening Airview is not accessible as unit is not
>> responding.  Rarely has problem occurred while I'm on the premises and goes
>> away before I can zero in on it.   I'm suspecting large pumps, old
>> transformers, bad neutral?  How to prove and stop wasting time and money on
>> one customer?  Pulling hair time!
>>
>> On 2017-12-06 09:17 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>>
>> Spectrum Analyzer and AirView both show real noise.
>>
>> You said you changed bands at the customer site, are there other
>> customers on those APs that are having issues or is it this one guy?
>>
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Phil Curnutt  wrote:
>>
>>> I have on two occasions tried to cross the path of an AirFiber5 and had
>>> the signal completely blocked.  Like Rory said they don't show up on Site
>>> Surveys or noise figures, but are very apparent in AirView.
>>>
>>> Phil
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Rory Conaway 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Could still be noise.  Canopy and AFx equipment won't show up in the
 noise figures.

 Rory

 -Original Message-
 From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
 On Behalf Of Jan-OOLLC
 Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2017 11:07 PM
 To: Ubiquiti Users Group 
 Subject: [Ubnt_users] cannot find interference source

 Have a client that is difficult to login to at times, service for them
 seems to quit.  Has good signal strength.  Have changed the radio to
 different models and frequencies and connected to different towers. It's
 like some kind of barrier at random times is erected between house and
 tower.  Site survey and spectrum analyzer never show anything remotely
 definitive as to possible cause or source of trouble.  Could problem be
 noisy electrical transformers or well pumps and what low-cost equipment
 would I need to find it?

 --

 J

 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing 
>> listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This email and any attachments are confidential and
>> may be protected by legal privilege. If you have received this email in
>> error, please immediately notify the sender by return email and delete all
>> copies of this email.
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This email and any attachments are confidential and
>> may be protected by legal privilege. If you have received this email in
>> error, please immediately notify the sender by return email and delete all
>> copies of this email.
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042 
> <(575)%20342-0042>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
__

Re: [Ubnt_users] PRISM Station Universal Mount

[James Craig via Ubnt_users]

Hi Eric,

The sku is *IS-MB* and it should be available now.

On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 9:01 PM, James Craig  wrote:

> Hi Eric,
>
> Yes, we'll have this as an accessory that can be used with the ISOStation
> as well.  Will check on ETA.
>
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 5:36 PM, Eric Williams SDWISP 
> wrote:
>
>> I reserved my first PRISM Station AP and have a really nice new Universal
>> Mount, that will clip on the back of the AP to give it a down tilt, and
>> an adjustment screw.
>>
>> I have the first  Stations {no mount include} and I’m looking to pick up
>> two more Station Universal Mounts to use with  the first two radios, non
>> PRISM radios, that I have that did not include the very nice station
>> Universal Mount.
>>
>> Anyone know if they will become available to purchase separately?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Eric Williams W7EMW
>>
>> *The Man with a Wireless Plan*
>>
>>
>>
>> 619-698-3904 <(619)%20698-3904> Office
>>
>> Admin Hours Monday - Friday 9AM to 5PM
>>
>> *Closed all US, Bank, School and Mexican Holidays due to Social
>> Obligations.*
>>
>>
>>
>> 9740 Campo Road #211Spring Valley Ca 91977
>>
>>
>>
>> *SDWISP.  A Private Community Wireless network. Built by the neighbors
>> for the neighbors*
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] PRISM Station Universal Mount

[James Craig via Ubnt_users]

Hi Eric,

Yes, we'll have this as an accessory that can be used with the ISOStation
as well.  Will check on ETA.

On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 5:36 PM, Eric Williams SDWISP 
wrote:

> I reserved my first PRISM Station AP and have a really nice new Universal
> Mount, that will clip on the back of the AP to give it a down tilt, and
> an adjustment screw.
>
> I have the first  Stations {no mount include} and I’m looking to pick up
> two more Station Universal Mounts to use with  the first two radios, non
> PRISM radios, that I have that did not include the very nice station
> Universal Mount.
>
> Anyone know if they will become available to purchase separately?
>
>
>
>
>
> Eric Williams W7EMW
>
> *The Man with a Wireless Plan*
>
>
>
> 619-698-3904 <(619)%20698-3904> Office
>
> Admin Hours Monday - Friday 9AM to 5PM
>
> *Closed all US, Bank, School and Mexican Holidays due to Social
> Obligations.*
>
>
>
> 9740 Campo Road #211Spring Valley Ca 91977
>
>
>
> *SDWISP.  A Private Community Wireless network. Built by the neighbors for
> the neighbors*
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] aircontrol won't find 6.0.4 devices

[James Craig via Ubnt_users]

Hi David,

I would like to have a look if you have any MM sectors that are seeing a
larger discrepancy between UDP and TCP performance.  Sending you an email.


>No matter what I tried with UBNT I could not get my legacy devices to pull
more than 40mbps TCP on a sector with more than 35 devices connected. sure
its udp test showed 85mbps+ but the TCP was barely half that. With the
cambium tests the TCP is usually within 5% of it.

Thanks,
James



On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 6:33 PM, David Jones  wrote:

> We tried an AC with MM sync And the performance is worse than just mixed
> mode. It may have to do with the clients that have poor signal. With an
> elevated XM I can pull 70mbps at a -73 signal with 60 other people
> connected to the AP on a 40mhz channel. with a - 64 signal I can pull
> 94mbps maxing out the 100mbps port. an XW on the same sector can pull about
> 127mbps tcp throughput.
> No matter what I tried with UBNT I could not get my legacy devices to pull
> more than 40mbps TCP on a sector with more than 35 devices connected. sure
> its udp test showed 85mbps+ but the TCP was barely half that. With the
> cambium tests the TCP is usually within 5% of it.
>
> We have also had problems with random UDP packets going missing and it
> causes problems with VOIP and gamers. its not the connection quality
> because we can use a VPN and magically the udp didn't disappear. adding the
> latency and overhead improved the VOIP and UDP based games.
>
> Going Forward we may have places that pure AC may work well but for any of
> the old M equipment nothing beats an ePMP2000 with elevated firmware.
>
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 1:38 PM, J Portman  wrote:
>
>> Just as a data point, we upgraded one of our towers to run sync in mixed
>> mode a few weeks ago and it has performed flawlessly.
>>
>> We are getting ready to roll sync out to the entire network (60+ APS). I
>> will report on our progress.
>>
>> YMMV,
>> JP
>>
>>
>> *On Fri, 17 Nov 2017 19:56:17 +, Rory Conaway wrote*
>> > Understood.  With the [UTF-8?]Prism’s handling multi-mode, have you
>> considered that option?
>> >
>> > Rory
>> >
>> > *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-bounces@wis
>> pa.org] *On Behalf Of *David Jones
>> > *Sent:* Friday, November 17, 2017 12:21 PM
>> > *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group 
>> > *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] aircontrol won't find 6.0.4 devices
>> >
>> >
>> > Well for us it is because we are elevating our units. I also hate the
>> locked firmware at and after 6.0.6
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Rory Conaway 
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> >
>> > Why are you still running 6.0.4?
>> >
>> > Rory
>> >
>> >
>> > *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-bounces@wis
>> pa.org] *On Behalf Of *Troy Gibson, Byhalia.net,LLC
>> > *Sent:* Friday, November 17, 2017 5:31 AM
>> >
>> > *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group 
>> > *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] aircontrol won't find 6.0.4 devices
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Beta 6 or 7 still does not find 6.0.4.  I have had to go through my
>> system to find missing CPE's or APs that were on 6.0.4  Downgraded to
>> 5.6.15 for them to be found as I was unsure of the higher 6.0 firmware at
>> the time.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Troy Gibson
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >  Original message 
>> >
>> > From: RickG 
>> >
>> > Date: 11/17/17 4:51 AM (GMT-05:00)
>> >
>> > To: Ubiquiti Users Group 
>> >
>> > Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] aircontrol won't find 6.0.4 devices
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > The beta works better.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Phil Curnutt 
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> >
>> > AirControl2 2.0.3 is found on Ubnt.com, Support>Downloads>AirMax>Utilities.
>> Your have choices of Linux or Windows10 Servers and Clients and Mac
>> Clients.  I found our 900 radios on 5.6.9, but not the one on 6.0.4, but I
>> was able to add the device manually using v 2.0.2.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Phil
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Jan Van Kort <
>> j.vank...@oregon

Re: [Ubnt_users] GPS sync with M radios

[James Craig via Ubnt_users]

Hi Guys,

We have seen a few reports of high CPU/Mem usage when UNMS is enabled on
8.4/6.1.  We're planning to release a hotfix this week.  If you are seeing
high mem/CPU after upgrading and are using UNMS, please
temporarily disable/unmanage.

Mixed mode GPS Sync/Fixed frame currently supports XW clients(6.1+)
connected to AC APs (8.4+).  XM Station support (Mixed-Mode FF/GPS) is
planned for this month.


On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Josh Luthman 
wrote:

> When you say it doesn't work with XM, does it work with XM clients nor
> APs?  Or will it work with APs but not clients?
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Mike Hammett 
> wrote:
>
>> Note that it only works with XW clients. XM still has to wait.
>>
>>
>>
>> -
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Midwest Internet Exchange 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> The Brothers WISP 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> *From: *"Kevin Sullivan" 
>> *To: *"ubnt users" 
>> *Sent: *Friday, September 29, 2017 5:31:18 PM
>> *Subject: *[Ubnt_users] GPS sync with M radios
>>
>> Anyone tried the new release yet? I'm curious to see how it performs but
>> am a bit too shell shocked from other ubnt firmware releases to try it out.
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] aircontrol won't find 6.0.4 devices

[James Craig via Ubnt_users]

Hi Guys,

This is most likely due to this change in discovery in 6.0.4.  We're adding
CGN address space in 6.0.7, so moving forward, you will only be able to
discover from RFC1918 and RFC6598 address. IP range scanning should still
work.

- Fix: Limit discovery response to queries from private subnets or
multicast/broadcast


On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Troy Gibson, Byhalia.net,LLC <
t...@byhalia.net> wrote:

> I'm on AC2.1 beta 7 and it won't find any 6.0.4 radios, XW or XM.  I had
> some being monitored on beta 6, so those are still monitored, but show in
> devices not found column of discovery.  TCP scan only showed prism radios
> too.
>
> I downgraded to 5.6.15 and it was discovered.  I had to downgrade AP and
> CPE for it to discover the devices on AC. Now to search for the missing
> radios!!
>
>
> Troy
>
>
>
>
>
> Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
>
>  Original message 
> From: CBB - Jay Fuller 
> Date: 8/31/17 1:25 PM (GMT-05:00)
> To: Ubiquiti Users Group 
> Subject: [Ubnt_users] aircontrol won't find 6.0.4 devices
>
>
> Been reading all about it in the ubnt forums - but anyone have any
> suggestions around this?
>
> Thought I'd post it here too -
>
> Haven't run aircontrol since about 18 months ago.  About nine months ago I
> attempted to upgrade to the then current beta but it basically corrupted my
> database and would not even start the server service.  Last night late I
> started over again from scratch.  Ran into the 6.0.4 problem as one of my
> network segments (from a recent purchase) we have manually changed the ip
> addresses and put them all on 6.0.4
>
>
> A different segment is still running 5.6.3.  I was planning to move them
> all to 6.0.4 and also make a mass change of the username / password.
>
>
>
> Left discovering overnight, found all the devices on 5.6.3 on that
> particular network segment but did not find any 6.0.4
>
>
>
> Today once googling and discovering this issue I downgraded an AP from
> 6.0.4 to 5.6.3 and discovery found it immediately.
>
>
>
> I don't want to do this to 300 devices.
>
>
>
> Aircontrol v.2.0.2.2874.170719.18353 is running on a public IP within our
> network.
>
>
>
> I tried to new feature tcp scan but no luck (probably because the server
> is in public ip space).
>
>
> I thought about temporarily changing the IP but then radios would be
> reporting to the wrong IP.
>
>
>
> I can manually add the device but have not found a way to do that in bulk.
>
>
>
> I don't know if it is easier for me to upgrade to something higher than
> 6.0.4 on all of my devices and use discovery or to manually add 300+
> devices.  I am hoping for another option.
>
>
>
> Bueller?  Bueller?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Ubiquiti out of step password rules

[James Craig via Ubnt_users]

Great, now I need to change my password

Mary.had.a.little.lamb.l2ittle.lamb.little.lamb1

On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Mike Hammett 
wrote:

> If you think 64 characters is too long, you're thinking about passwords
> incorrectly.
>
> Mary.had.a.little.lamb.l2ittle.lamb.little.lamb
>
> That's not 64 or more characters, but that's the type of password you
> should be using if not able to to use random characters via a password
> manager. Whatever phrase floats your boat separated by special characters
> and a number inserted (not substituted) into one or more words.
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> --
> *From: *"Matt Hoppes" 
> *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" 
> *Sent: *Tuesday, August 8, 2017 11:43:17 AM
>
> *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Ubiquiti out of step password rules
>
> Who in their right mind will type in a 64 character password?
>
> On Aug 8, 2017, at 12:41 PM, Mike Hammett 
> wrote:
>
> Okay, so two years.
>
> BTW: The max of 63 is too low as well. Given that it's a hash, the size of
> the input should be irrelevant as only the hash is being stored anyway. I
> believe Unimus has tested with 500 character passwords, though it's not
> necessarily a limit.
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> --
> *From: *"James Craig via Ubnt_users" 
> *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" 
> *Sent: *Tuesday, August 8, 2017 11:38:06 AM
> *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Ubiquiti out of step password rules
>
> Hey Guys,
>
> We increased the max password length in 5.6.1 when the password hashing
> algorithm was changed.  Current max length should be 63 characters.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Josh Luthman  > wrote:
>
>> It was up to 8 back in 3.5 days with the original Nano station
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>> On Aug 8, 2017 12:31 PM, "Mike Hammett" 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> No, hasn't been for maybe a year? That's still at least six years too
>>> long.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -
>>> Mike Hammett
>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
>>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
>>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
>>> --
>>> *From: *"Josh Luthman" 
>>> *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" 
>>> *Sent: *Tuesday, August 8, 2017 11:27:49 AM
>>> *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Ubiquiti out of step password ru

Re: [Ubnt_users] Ubiquiti out of step password rules

[James Craig via Ubnt_users]

Hey Guys,

We increased the max password length in 5.6.1 when the password hashing
algorithm was changed.  Current max length should be 63 characters.



On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Josh Luthman 
wrote:

> It was up to 8 back in 3.5 days with the original Nano station
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Aug 8, 2017 12:31 PM, "Mike Hammett"  wrote:
>
>> No, hasn't been for maybe a year? That's still at least six years too
>> long.
>>
>>
>>
>> -
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Midwest Internet Exchange 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> The Brothers WISP 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> *From: *"Josh Luthman" 
>> *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" 
>> *Sent: *Tuesday, August 8, 2017 11:27:49 AM
>> *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Ubiquiti out of step password rules
>>
>> It's still only 8???
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>> On Aug 8, 2017 12:03 PM, "Mike Hammett" 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I wouldn't roll it back if I were them.
>>>
>>> Though I also would have lifted the eight character max long ago.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -
>>> Mike Hammett
>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Midwest Internet Exchange 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The Brothers WISP 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> *From: *"Mimbres Communications" 
>>> *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" 
>>> *Sent: *Tuesday, August 8, 2017 10:01:00 AM
>>> *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Ubiquiti out of step password rules
>>>
>>> They got a huge amount of pushback on that and will be making changes
>>> https://community.ubnt.com/t5/airMAX-AC/8-3-admin-
>>> password-requirements/m-p/1991884#M23145
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 8:32 AM, Roy  wrote:
>>>
 I recently updated software on one of my units and found the Ubiquiti
 changed the password rules.  They now require Upper/lower case letters,
 numbers, and the wonderful special characters.

 The NIST has finally admitted their mistake in recommending those
 password rules

 "The Man Who Wrote Those Password Rules Has a New Tip: N3v$r M1^d!"

 https://www.wsj.com/article_email/the-man-who-wrote-those-pa
 ssword-rules-has-a-new-tip-n3v-r-m1-d-1502124118-lMyQjAxMTA3
 ODA5ODIwMDg3Wj/
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042 
>>> <(575)%20342-0042>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Aaaand another Gen2 ether port blows itself

[James Craig via Ubnt_users]

Hi Mike,

I'd like to get a bit more info on this one and get this unit back so we
can have a look at it.


Thanks,
James



On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 11:31 PM,  wrote:

> This time, on a Nanobeam 5ac Gen 2.
>
> If you log into the radio, it shows as up but at the other end of the
> cable, no link. No entry for any attached devices on lan0 in the radio's
> ARP table either...
>
> Brand new radio, was in field for 4 hours and then it barfs on itself.
>
> WTF???
>
> -Mike
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] UNII frequencies in Rocket 5AC-PTP

[James Craig via Ubnt_users]

Hi Eduardo,

After activating the updated UNII rules, channels near the edge of each
band will have reduced max TX output to comply with increased OOBE
restrictions.  You should have the option on to deactivate the updated UNII
rules via the same code.

If you have any trouble, please feel free to send me an email off list

Thanks,
James





On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 10:48 AM, Eduardo  wrote:

> Hi James,
>
> This is very bad news.
>
> Can I just downgrade the radios to v.7.1 and get the previous frequencies?
>
> Eduardo
>
>
> *From:* James Craig via Ubnt_users 
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 26, 2017 10:00 AM
> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group 
> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] UNII frequencies in Rocket 5AC-PTP
>
> Hi Eduardo,
>
> The Rocket5AC-PTP and -PTMP models have hardware filters that limit
> operation to the upper bands. The Rocket5AC-PRISM/Rocket5AC-PRISM Gen2
> and Rocket5AC-Lite all have full band support.
>
> Hope that helps.
>
> Thanks,
> James
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 9:31 AM, Eduardo  wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> We have a link with Rockets 5AC-PTP with v.7.2 and just activated the
>> UNII frequencies, but we found that no all the UNII’s are allowed only
>> UNII-2C and UNII-3. The issue is that the max output power after the
>> activation is too low for the link to work well.
>>
>> I show that  5AC-Gen2 has all the UNII’s working with airSO8; maybe
>> upgrading the Rockets 5AC to v.8.1 can get all the UNII’s?
>>
>> Wonder whether these radios never got the FCC authorization to use all
>> the UNII’s frequencies.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Eduardo
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>
> --
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] UNII frequencies in Rocket 5AC-PTP

[James Craig via Ubnt_users]

Hi Eduardo,

The Rocket5AC-PTP and -PTMP models have hardware filters that limit
operation to the upper bands. The Rocket5AC-PRISM/Rocket5AC-PRISM Gen2 and
Rocket5AC-Lite all have full band support.

Hope that helps.

Thanks,
James



On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 9:31 AM, Eduardo  wrote:

> Hi guys,
>
> We have a link with Rockets 5AC-PTP with v.7.2 and just activated the UNII
> frequencies, but we found that no all the UNII’s are allowed only UNII-2C
> and UNII-3. The issue is that the max output power after the activation is
> too low for the link to work well.
>
> I show that  5AC-Gen2 has all the UNII’s working with airSO8; maybe
> upgrading the Rockets 5AC to v.8.1 can get all the UNII’s?
>
> Wonder whether these radios never got the FCC authorization to use all the
> UNII’s frequencies.
>
> Thanks,
> Eduardo
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] UBNT Rocket M5 AC Gen2 dead LAN port?

[James Craig via Ubnt_users]

Hi Rick,

I sent you a follow-up email.

Thanks,
James





On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 1:43 PM, Rick Boucher 
wrote:

> HI James,
>
> Sorry its been a couple of weeks.
>
> Was powered via a standard UBNT POE.
>
> Rick.
>
>
> -
>
>
> Rick Boucher
> Webmaster / Systems Admin
> Orcas Online / San Juan Web
> (360) 376-6411
> http://www.orcasonline.com
> http://www.sanjuanweb.com
> The information source for the San Juan Islands
>
>
>
> Plans for the next day - "Work, work from early to late. In fact
> I have so much to do that I shall spend the first three hours in prayer."
> - Martin Luther
>
>
> > On Jul 12, 2017, at 9:13 PM, James Craig via Ubnt_users <
> ubnt_users@wispa.org> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the report Rick, I'll follow-up with you offline.  Can I ask
> how this unit was being powered?
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 11:44 PM, Rick Boucher 
> wrote:
> > We had a similar Gen2 5ghz.  The WIFI failed to connect. Upon inspection
> the ethernet port came up but before the PC /switch arrived at a state
> where data could pass the light blinked and started all over.
> >
> > Never got into the radio to reconfigure.  It was 80ft up a tree. Had to
> retrieve.
> >
> > Tried to TFTP a new firmware.  The radio accepted the new firmware but
> that did not fix the problem.  We are RMAing it.
> >
> > Rick
> >
> > -
> >
> >
> > Rick Boucher
> > Webmaster / Systems Admin
> > Orcas Online / San Juan Web
> > (360) 376-6411
> > http://www.orcasonline.com
> > http://www.sanjuanweb.com
> > The information source for the San Juan Islands
> >
> >
> >
> > Plans for the next day - "Work, work from early to late. In fact
> > I have so much to do that I shall spend the first three hours in prayer."
> > - Martin Luther
> >
> >
> > > On Jul 11, 2017, at 4:22 PM, James Craig via Ubnt_users <
> ubnt_users@wispa.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hey Tyson,
> > >
> > > Could you submit these units for RMA and send me a quick note (
> ja...@ubnt.com) once you have done so?
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 6:56 PM,  wrote:
> > > I had 2 go out in a storm last Friday.  Was actually a weird scenario
> because both poe units blinked indicating a short i think.  Either way
> swapped out the prisms and working again.  I as well had them up less than
> a month and none of the other AC or Motorola equipment on tower affected
> though.  Just the gen 2 Prisms.
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
> > > Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] UBNT Rocket M5 AC Gen2 dead LAN port?
> > > From: "James Craig via Ubnt_users" 
> > > Date: 7/11/17 5:19 pm
> > > To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" 
> > > Cc: "Principal WISPA Member List" 
> > >
> > > Hi Mike,
> > >
> > > I'd like to get this one back, sending you an email.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 12:25 AM, Mike Lyon 
> wrote:
> > > Anyone seen a LAN port die on a Rocket M5 AC Gen2 radio? deployed one
> about a month ago and then suddenly, the LAN port died on it. LAN light on
> radio lights up but I don't get any link to an device I plug it into. I
> tried resetting it, still no love. PoE still works and all lights light up
> on it.
> > >
> > > It only lasted a month :(
> > >
> > > -Mike
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Mike Lyon
> > > mike.l...@gmail.com
> > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/mlyon
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ___
> > > Ubnt_users mailing list
> > > Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> > > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> > > ___ Ubnt_users mailing
> list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/
> mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> > >
> > > ___
> > > Ubnt_users mailing list
> > > Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> > > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> >
> > ___
> > Ubnt_users mailing list
> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> >
> > ___
> > Ubnt_users mailing list
> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] R5AC Prism PtMP and nanobeams

[James Craig via Ubnt_users]

Hey Scott,

Nothing rings a bell here, but I'd like to take a look.  I'll follow-up via
email.



On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Scott Lambert 
wrote:

> Is anyone aware of known issues with R5AC Prisms, first gen, talking to
> nanobeams in a PtMP setup? We replaced 11 R5Ms with R5AC Prisms.
>
> 8.3 and 6.0.4
>
> Some of the nanobeam users are now complaining of poor upload speeds.
> --
> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] UBNT Rocket M5 AC Gen2 dead LAN port?

[James Craig via Ubnt_users]

Thanks for the report Rick, I'll follow-up with you offline.  Can I ask how
this unit was being powered?



On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 11:44 PM, Rick Boucher 
wrote:

> We had a similar Gen2 5ghz.  The WIFI failed to connect. Upon inspection
> the ethernet port came up but before the PC /switch arrived at a state
> where data could pass the light blinked and started all over.
>
> Never got into the radio to reconfigure.  It was 80ft up a tree. Had to
> retrieve.
>
> Tried to TFTP a new firmware.  The radio accepted the new firmware but
> that did not fix the problem.  We are RMAing it.
>
> Rick
>
> -
>
>
> Rick Boucher
> Webmaster / Systems Admin
> Orcas Online / San Juan Web
> (360) 376-6411
> http://www.orcasonline.com
> http://www.sanjuanweb.com
> The information source for the San Juan Islands
>
>
>
> Plans for the next day - "Work, work from early to late. In fact
> I have so much to do that I shall spend the first three hours in prayer."
> - Martin Luther
>
>
> > On Jul 11, 2017, at 4:22 PM, James Craig via Ubnt_users <
> ubnt_users@wispa.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hey Tyson,
> >
> > Could you submit these units for RMA and send me a quick note (
> ja...@ubnt.com) once you have done so?
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 6:56 PM,  wrote:
> > I had 2 go out in a storm last Friday.  Was actually a weird scenario
> because both poe units blinked indicating a short i think.  Either way
> swapped out the prisms and working again.  I as well had them up less than
> a month and none of the other AC or Motorola equipment on tower affected
> though.  Just the gen 2 Prisms.
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] UBNT Rocket M5 AC Gen2 dead LAN port?
> > From: "James Craig via Ubnt_users" 
> > Date: 7/11/17 5:19 pm
> > To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" 
> > Cc: "Principal WISPA Member List" 
> >
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> > I'd like to get this one back, sending you an email.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 12:25 AM, Mike Lyon  wrote:
> > Anyone seen a LAN port die on a Rocket M5 AC Gen2 radio? deployed one
> about a month ago and then suddenly, the LAN port died on it. LAN light on
> radio lights up but I don't get any link to an device I plug it into. I
> tried resetting it, still no love. PoE still works and all lights light up
> on it.
> >
> > It only lasted a month :(
> >
> > -Mike
> >
> >
> > --
> > Mike Lyon
> > mike.l...@gmail.com
> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/mlyon
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Ubnt_users mailing list
> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> > ___ Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> >
> > ___
> > Ubnt_users mailing list
> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] UBNT Rocket M5 AC Gen2 dead LAN port?

[James Craig via Ubnt_users]

Hey Tyson,

Could you submit these units for RMA and send me a quick note (
ja...@ubnt.com) once you have done so?

On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 6:56 PM,  wrote:

> I had 2 go out in a storm last Friday.  Was actually a weird scenario
> because both poe units blinked indicating a short i think.  Either way
> swapped out the prisms and working again.  I as well had them up less than
> a month and none of the other AC or Motorola equipment on tower affected
> though.  Just the gen 2 Prisms.
>
>
> - Original Message -
> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] UBNT Rocket M5 AC Gen2 dead LAN port?
> From: "James Craig via Ubnt_users" 
> Date: 7/11/17 5:19 pm
> To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" 
> Cc: "Principal WISPA Member List" 
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> I'd like to get this one back, sending you an email.
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 12:25 AM, Mike Lyon  wrote:
>
>> Anyone seen a LAN port die on a Rocket M5 AC Gen2 radio? deployed one
>> about a month ago and then suddenly, the LAN port died on it. LAN light on
>> radio lights up but I don't get any link to an device I plug it into. I
>> tried resetting it, still no love. PoE still works and all lights light up
>> on it.
>>
>> It only lasted a month :(
>>
>> -Mike
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mike Lyon
>> mike.l...@gmail.com
>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/mlyon
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
> ___ Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] UBNT Rocket M5 AC Gen2 dead LAN port?

[James Craig via Ubnt_users]

Hi Mike,

I'd like to get this one back, sending you an email.




On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 12:25 AM, Mike Lyon  wrote:

> Anyone seen a LAN port die on a Rocket M5 AC Gen2 radio? deployed one
> about a month ago and then suddenly, the LAN port died on it. LAN light on
> radio lights up but I don't get any link to an device I plug it into. I
> tried resetting it, still no love. PoE still works and all lights light up
> on it.
>
> It only lasted a month :(
>
> -Mike
>
>
> --
> Mike Lyon
> mike.l...@gmail.com
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/mlyon
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.0.6 isn't an upgrade, it's a legal brick

[James Craig via Ubnt_users]

Shawn: Just checked and I haven't seen any similar bug reports.   Can you
forward me the AP and STA .sup (ja...@ubnt.com) and I'll take a look?

What are you using for routers?

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 9:46 PM, Shawn C. Peppers <
videodirectwispal...@gmail.com> wrote:

> It seems as though it may be breaking ospfis anyone else experiencing
> this?  I sent this the other day
>
> Im not sure of its bug but i did just have a odd issue where i have a AP
> running mixed mode 8.3 and when i updated a XM station to 6.06 the ospf was
> stuck in exchange state.  I had to change the ospf from point to point to
> broadcast which fixed the issue.
>
> I can not actually say for certain this is an issue with the ubnt station
> or AP.
>
> Shawn C. Peppers
> Video Direct
> 866-680-8433 <(866)%20680-8433> Toll Free
> http://www.video-direct.tv
>
> On Jul 10, 2017, at 8:34 PM, James Craig via Ubnt_users <
> ubnt_users@wispa.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> We implemented FW signing to improve device security as a result of THIS
> <https://community.ubnt.com/t5/airMAX-General-Discussion/6-0-3-High-CPU-usage/td-p/1895878>
> report (and a few others).   This malware would masquerade as 6.0.3, but in
> reality, it was based on the 5.5.2 SDK.  Regulatory requirements are
> another factor, but device security is the major driving factor here.
>
>
> Forbes:  I haven't seen any other reports of radios bricking, sending you
> a note for more info
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Robert  wrote:
>
>> When you can't compete technically, you compete legally...   Shortly
>> thereafter you wonder why your foot has a hole in it...
>>
>> On 07/10/2017 12:45 PM, Forbes Mercy wrote:
>> > It seems that this upgrade isn't an upgrade at all.  It's driven by
>> > lawyers requiring that you do an electronic signature that you agree to
>> > not use Cambium Elevate software on this device. Pretty odd since it's
>> > my radio, well past warranty so I can do what I want to it.  Is this the
>> > direction UBNT is going, turn your radio into a brick if you don't
>> > modify your use agreement with them?  Well Robert DID come from Apple so
>> > I guess I shouldn't be surprised about sabotaging product to force you
>> > into newer gear, guess 6.04 is the last update I'll do for my radios,
>> > sad. #patheticdirection
>> >
>> > Forbes Mercy
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ___
>> > Ubnt_users mailing list
>> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>> >
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.0.6 isn't an upgrade, it's a legal brick

[James Craig via Ubnt_users]

Hi Guys,

We implemented FW signing to improve device security as a result of THIS

report (and a few others).   This malware would masquerade as 6.0.3, but in
reality, it was based on the 5.5.2 SDK.  Regulatory requirements are
another factor, but device security is the major driving factor here.


Forbes:  I haven't seen any other reports of radios bricking, sending you a
note for more info





On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Robert  wrote:

> When you can't compete technically, you compete legally...   Shortly
> thereafter you wonder why your foot has a hole in it...
>
> On 07/10/2017 12:45 PM, Forbes Mercy wrote:
> > It seems that this upgrade isn't an upgrade at all.  It's driven by
> > lawyers requiring that you do an electronic signature that you agree to
> > not use Cambium Elevate software on this device. Pretty odd since it's
> > my radio, well past warranty so I can do what I want to it.  Is this the
> > direction UBNT is going, turn your radio into a brick if you don't
> > modify your use agreement with them?  Well Robert DID come from Apple so
> > I guess I shouldn't be surprised about sabotaging product to force you
> > into newer gear, guess 6.04 is the last update I'll do for my radios,
> > sad. #patheticdirection
> >
> > Forbes Mercy
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Ubnt_users mailing list
> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> >
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] UBNT support

[James Craig via Ubnt_users]

Hi Brett,

Sorry about the poor experience Brett.  I'm looking into this report.
Expect an update on this shortly.

Thanks,
James



On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Brett A Mansfield <
li...@silverlakeinternet.com> wrote:

> Anyone know how many support tickets each support rep works at UBNT? I
> have one open for an ES-48-Lite that is clearly a known hardware issue and
> the support guy takes forever to respond. And the only time he has
> responded it was to tell me to reset the switch. I don't know anyone that
> would have opened a ticket without having already tried that.
>
> At this point I think I'll just return the switch and buy a Cisco.
>
> Thank you,
> Brett A Mansfield
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.03 firmware still has some bugs

[James Craig via Ubnt_users]

Thanks for the additional reports guys.  I have forwarded to the devs for
review.

If experiencing any trouble/reduced performance when upgrading to 6.0.3,
please grab the AP and STA support file(before reboot/downgrade) and let me
know.

ja...@ubnt.com



On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 12:22 PM,  wrote:

> Luckily, no :) But, the APs are still on 5.6.8
>
> On Apr 5, 2017, at 09:13, Clay Stewart  wrote:
>
> And you are having no issue on 6.0? We have clients drop off one here one
> there on APs?
>
> On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 11:40 AM,  wrote:
>
>> We've been seeing throughput drop to shit on clients that are on 6.0.3.
>> So we've rolled back those clients to 6.0
>>
>> -Mike
>>
>> On Apr 5, 2017, at 08:24, Clay Stewart  wrote:
>>
>> Rory, be aware we had issues on 6.0 with total client dropouts,
>> especially 900s, but also with others.
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 12:54 AM, Rory Conaway 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Started updating APs and backhauls to 6.03.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Started getting calls, users dropping, NetFlix buffering, etc…  Found
>>> out throughput on backhauls went way down.  Checked the first backhaul
>>> which was Powerbeam M5 and PowerBeam 400, xm and xw firmware, it went from
>>> 130Mbps to 54Mbps on the backhaul even though signal levels were the same,
>>> -54/-55dBm.  Even worse, throughput went to 1Mbps or less.  We change it
>>> back to 6.0 and wham, everything goes back to normal.  Not sure what’s
>>> going on be we are going back to 6.0 on all APs and backhauls.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Rory Conaway **• Triad Wireless •** CEO*
>>>
>>> *4226 S. 37th Street • Phoenix • AZ 85040*
>>>
>>> *602-426-0542 <(602)%20426-0542>*
>>>
>>> *r...@triadwireless.net *
>>>
>>> *www.triadwireless.net *
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> “An optimist will tell you the glass is half-full; the pessimist,
>>> half-empty; and the engineer will tell you the glass is twice the size it
>>> needs to be”
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.03 firmware still has some bugs

[James Craig via Ubnt_users]

Hi Mitch,

You can find the -cs and non -cs (custom script) CPU400 versions HERE

.

On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Mitch  wrote:

> yup, Have that one
>
> Looking to get back to 5.6.9 (400) on APs down from 6.0.3
>
>
>
> On 03/31/2017 11:13 AM, Mimbres Communications wrote:
>
> 5.6.15 is out, and includes the recent airOS vulnerability fix.  There's a
> CPU400 version as well..  Never saw an announcement.
> https://www.ubnt.com/download/airmax-m
>
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Mitch  wrote:
>
>> Anyone have the 5.6.9 (400) the verizon fix firmware?
>>
>> Mitch
>>
>> On 03/31/2017 09:13 AM, Chris Soiles wrote:
>>
>> I haven't upgraded any of my APs higher then 5.6.9, it seems when I do my
>> clients start calling about buffering or slowness
>>
>> All my clients are 6.0.2, haven't done .3 yet
>>
>> I wish we could figure out what's up with the AP slowness
>>
>> Sent from iPhone 6S Plus
>>
>> Chris Soiles
>> Owner
>> Rio Cities
>> csoi...@riocities.net
>> 505-966-6389
>>
>> On Mar 30, 2017, at 10:55 PM, Rory Conaway 
>> wrote:
>>
>> Started updating APs and backhauls to 6.03.
>>
>>
>>
>> Started getting calls, users dropping, NetFlix buffering, etc…  Found out
>> throughput on backhauls went way down.  Checked the first backhaul which
>> was Powerbeam M5 and PowerBeam 400, xm and xw firmware, it went from
>> 130Mbps to 54Mbps on the backhaul even though signal levels were the same,
>> -54/-55dBm.  Even worse, throughput went to 1Mbps or less.  We change it
>> back to 6.0 and wham, everything goes back to normal.  Not sure what’s
>> going on be we are going back to 6.0 on all APs and backhauls.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Rory Conaway **• Triad Wireless •** CEO*
>>
>> *4226 S. 37th Street • Phoenix • AZ 85040*
>>
>> *602-426-0542 <%28602%29%20426-0542>*
>>
>> *r...@triadwireless.net *
>>
>> *www.triadwireless.net *
>>
>>
>>
>> “An optimist will tell you the glass is half-full; the pessimist,
>> half-empty; and the engineer will tell you the glass is twice the size it
>> needs to be”
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing 
>> listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>> --
>> Mitch Koep
>>
>> A Better Wireless218-851-8689 <%28218%29%20851-8689> cell
>>
>> ___ Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
> --
>
> Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042 
> <(575)%20342-0042>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing 
> listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
> --
> Mitch Koep
>
> A Better Wireless218-851-8689 <(218)%20851-8689> cell
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] ISSUE AirRouter

[James Craig via Ubnt_users]

I'll look into this Rory and let you know.

On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Rory Conaway  wrote:

> James, any chance you can put the minimum threshold level back in the
> firmware for the Airrouter HP or all the indoor APs so users with -83 to
> -90+ don’t connect?  Even better, just add a minimum level threshold and
> disconnect them?  I’m getting tired of streaming complaints because of poor
> connections.
>
>
>
> Rory
>
>
>
> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
> *On Behalf Of *James Craig via Ubnt_users
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 8, 2017 9:17 AM
>
> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] ISSUE AirRouter
>
>
>
> Clay,
>
>
>
> I don't recall any similar reports, but I would like to get more details.
> Sending you an email.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Clay Stewart 
> wrote:
>
> Also, only on AirRouters with DHCP on WAN, not on static assignment.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Clay Stewart 
> wrote:
>
> Only with AirRouter are we seeing an issue, improvements on all radios.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 8:52 PM, Rory Conaway 
> wrote:
>
> That’s weird guys,  We’ve done hundreds of radios and haven’t seen the
> issue including 900Mhz where we believe there was an improvement.
>
>
>
> Rory
>
>
>
> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
> *On Behalf Of *RickG
> *Sent:* Friday, March 3, 2017 5:36 PM
> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] ISSUE AirRouter
>
>
>
> Ditto but I backed down to 5.6.9. Why go all the way back to 5.5.11?
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Mitch  wrote:
>
> Clay
>
> We have seen the same thing with 6.0 and also XM devices crashing
>
> So far the 6.0 has not worked well with any of our 2.4 or 900
>
> XW we have seen power drops and crashing.
>
> We have backed all air routers down to 5.5.11 and they are working great
> now.
>
> We are working with the DEV firmwares and so far no changes
>
> Also are testing the new GEN2 AC and so far looks great!!
>
> Mitch Koep
>
> 218-851-8689 <(218)%20851-8689> cell
>
>
>
>
>
> On 03/03/2017 04:17 PM, Clay Stewart wrote:
>
> Never use AirGrids, sorry.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Steve Barnes  wrote:
>
> We are seeing Older AirGrids lose ½ their power after going to 6.0 and
> also seeing many more Crash reports with XM radios.
>
>
>
> *Steve Barnes*
>
> Wireless Operations Manager
>
> *New Lisbon Broadband*
>
> *NLBC.COM <http://NLBC.COM>*
>
> *PCSWIN.COM <http://PCSWIN.COM>*
>
> 765-584-2288 ext:1101 <%28765%29%20584-2288>
>
>
>
> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
> *On Behalf Of *Clay Stewart
> *Sent:* Friday, March 03, 2017 3:22 PM
> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group 
> *Subject:* [Ubnt_users] ISSUE AirRouter
>
>
>
> We had a major issue today with 17 installs today where as the AirRouter
> stops working after a minute or so after (or before) upgraded 6.00
> firmware. If we down grade, it works. If we setup below 6.00 it works, then
> upgrade it fails. We do not have this happening on hundreds of wireless
> static IP customers. This is happening on one of our fiber networks which
> is private IP DHCP.
>
>
>
> Clueless here, have any clues that is?
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
>
> Ubnt_users mailing list
>
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
> --
>
> Mitch Koep
>
>
>
> A Better Wireless
>
> 218-851-8689 <(218)%20851-8689> cell
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> -RickG
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] ISSUE AirRouter

[James Craig via Ubnt_users]

Clay,

I don't recall any similar reports, but I would like to get more details.
Sending you an email.



On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Clay Stewart 
wrote:

> Also, only on AirRouters with DHCP on WAN, not on static assignment.
>
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Clay Stewart 
> wrote:
>
>> Only with AirRouter are we seeing an issue, improvements on all radios.
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 8:52 PM, Rory Conaway 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> That’s weird guys,  We’ve done hundreds of radios and haven’t seen the
>>> issue including 900Mhz where we believe there was an improvement.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Rory
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-bounces@wis
>>> pa.org] *On Behalf Of *RickG
>>> *Sent:* Friday, March 3, 2017 5:36 PM
>>> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
>>> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] ISSUE AirRouter
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Ditto but I backed down to 5.6.9. Why go all the way back to 5.5.11?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Mitch  wrote:
>>>
>>> Clay
>>>
>>> We have seen the same thing with 6.0 and also XM devices crashing
>>>
>>> So far the 6.0 has not worked well with any of our 2.4 or 900
>>>
>>> XW we have seen power drops and crashing.
>>>
>>> We have backed all air routers down to 5.5.11 and they are working great
>>> now.
>>>
>>> We are working with the DEV firmwares and so far no changes
>>>
>>> Also are testing the new GEN2 AC and so far looks great!!
>>>
>>> Mitch Koep
>>>
>>> 218-851-8689 <(218)%20851-8689> cell
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 03/03/2017 04:17 PM, Clay Stewart wrote:
>>>
>>> Never use AirGrids, sorry.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Steve Barnes  wrote:
>>>
>>> We are seeing Older AirGrids lose ½ their power after going to 6.0 and
>>> also seeing many more Crash reports with XM radios.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Steve Barnes*
>>>
>>> Wireless Operations Manager
>>>
>>> *New Lisbon Broadband*
>>>
>>> *NLBC.COM *
>>>
>>> *PCSWIN.COM *
>>>
>>> 765-584-2288 ext:1101 <%28765%29%20584-2288>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-bounces@wis
>>> pa.org] *On Behalf Of *Clay Stewart
>>> *Sent:* Friday, March 03, 2017 3:22 PM
>>> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group 
>>> *Subject:* [Ubnt_users] ISSUE AirRouter
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> We had a major issue today with 17 installs today where as the AirRouter
>>> stops working after a minute or so after (or before) upgraded 6.00
>>> firmware. If we down grade, it works. If we setup below 6.00 it works, then
>>> upgrade it fails. We do not have this happening on hundreds of wireless
>>> static IP customers. This is happening on one of our fiber networks which
>>> is private IP DHCP.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Clueless here, have any clues that is?
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>>
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>>
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>>
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Mitch Koep
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> A Better Wireless
>>>
>>> 218-851-8689 <(218)%20851-8689> cell
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> -RickG
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] FW: Ubiquiti Networks, Inc.: Invoice #To Be Generated

[James Craig via Ubnt_users]

Taking a look in this one.

On Feb 24, 2017 10:51 AM, "Ben Moore"  wrote:

> Was this one rejected?
>
> James - can you check on this one and see what issue is?
>
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 9:25 PM, Rory Conaway 
> wrote:
>
>> Here is one we submitted last week for example.
>>
>>
>>
>> Rory
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* UBNT RMA [mailto:r...@ubnt.com]
>> *Sent:* Thursday, February 23, 2017 5:33 PM
>> *To:* Rory Conaway
>> *Subject:* Ubiquiti Networks, Inc.: Invoice #To Be Generated
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2580 Orchard Parkway
>> San Jose CA 95131-1033
>> US
>>
>>
>>
>> *Replacement RMA*
>>
>> Date
>>
>>
>>
>> 02/23/2017
>>
>> Replacement #
>>
>>
>>
>> US1077722
>>
>> Ship Date
>>
>>
>>
>> 02/23/2017
>>
>> Tracking #
>>
>>
>>
>> 1ZA92T380351123711
>>
>> RMA No.
>>
>>
>>
>> Return Authorization #RM41
>>
>> End User Email
>>
>>
>>
>> r...@triadwireless.net
>>
>> Shipping Code (2)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Item*
>>
>> *Quantity*
>>
>> *Description*
>>
>> LocoM5(US)
>>
>> 1
>>
>> NanoLocoM5 MIMO CPE, AirMax US
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Really liking that new return policy

[James Craig via Ubnt_users]

Hi Jan,

Sending you an email to clear this up.

Thanks,
James



On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 7:44 PM, Jan Van Kort 
wrote:

> I gave up with the rma crap.  I have 10 nanobeams that all failed within a
> month of deployment and all I got was send me a picture of whatever screen
> of the day was being desired.  Not a happy camper club member
>
> On 17-02-23 04:36 PM, Ben Moore via Ubnt_users wrote:
>
> Hi Rory -
>
> Sorry, not sure what you are referring to here?  Can you email me what
> issue is?  RMA turnaround should be much faster.
>
> thanks,
> ben
>
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Rory Conaway 
> wrote:
>
>> Have to pull receipts for every device we sold that was defective, then
>> have to wait at least a week or more to hear something back to even ship it
>> out.
>>
>>
>>
>> *Rory Conaway **• Triad Wireless •** CEO*
>>
>> *4226 S. 37th Street • Phoenix • AZ 85040*
>>
>> *602-426-0542 <%28602%29%20426-0542>*
>>
>> *r...@triadwireless.net *
>>
>> *www.triadwireless.net *
>>
>>
>>
>> *“First rule of Racing, whats behind you does not count.” – Gregory White*
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing 
> listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] UBNT Frills over function? (warning

[James Craig via Ubnt_users]

Thanks for the reports.  This should be fixed in 8.0.2-beta2 which will be
available next week.

We also have UMobile available for iOS and Android.  If you haven't tried
it out, please do and let us know what you think here
 or directly to me.

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.ubnt.umobile&hl=en
https://itunes.apple.com/ca/app/umobile-ubnt/id1183022489?mt=8



On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Mike Hammett 
wrote:

> LOL
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
>
> Intelligent Computing Solutions 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
> Midwest Internet Exchange 
> 
> 
> 
>
> The Brothers WISP 
> 
> 
> --
> *From: *"Matt Hoppes" 
> *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" 
> *Sent: *Wednesday, February 22, 2017 7:25:02 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] UBNT Frills over function? (warning 
>
>
> How did you load the firmware and config file on the radio?
>
> Try using a modern browser like safari or Firefox.
>
> On Feb 22, 2017, at 19:33, James Wilson  wrote:
>
> Try to read this in the daylight...
>
> On Feb 22, 2017 7:25 PM, "Stuart Pierce"  wrote:
>
>> I don't have a problem with it even on my cheap andriod phone.
>>
>> On Wed, February 22, 2017 6:37 pm, Josh Luthman wrote:
>> > Even on your phone??
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Josh Luthman
>> > Office: 937-552-2340
>> > Direct: 937-552-2343
>> > 1100 Wayne St
>> > Suite 1337
>> > Troy, OH 45373
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 6:07 PM, Matt Hoppes <
>> > mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >> At first I was amazed. I was petrified. Thinking airos8 wasn't by my
>> >> side. But then I had to get along.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Oh yes. Airos8 and I are really friendly guests. I just love the way it
>> >>  works. It has very few quirks. Oh 5 just die.
>> >>
>> >> Seriously though. I love 8.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Feb 22, 2017, at 17:04, Josh Luthman 
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> If it makes you feel any better, ePMP made their GUI work beautifully
>> >> well with phones in 3.2.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Josh Luthman
>> >> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
>> >> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
>> >> 1100 Wayne St
>> >> Suite 1337
>> >> Troy, OH 45373
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Kees H 
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>> UBNT,
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Sorry if I offend someone here, but why could you not leave the gui
>> >>> as it was.  Today I installed our first PBM5 AC.  First I noticed that
>> >>> AirOS V8
>> >>> is not fully functional in android’s default internet browser.
>> >>>
>> >>> OK We will try Chrome.  After fighting Chrome, which wants the login
>> >>> name to start wit a Cap, I got into the unit and was able to access
>> >>> the wireless tab.  Ran a scan to find our radio and SSID and what do I
>> >>> run into.  Some wizard programmer with a way too big a monitor on his
>> >>> desk, must have decided that it looks really cool to have the
>> >>> information show up, -not the standard black on white-, but white on
>> >>> black.  Have you ever tried to read a screen white on black on a smart
>> >>> phone in the sun?
>> >>>
>> >>> Why do you have to change what is working so well?  AirOS v5X works
>> >>> excellent on an android. Did you guys ever check with people who
>> >>> actually use this for a living?
>> >>>
>> >>> The dashboard of the Airfiber AirOS8 is way too cluttered to be of
>> >>> efficient use.  Why the shading and the funky colors?  I could go on
>> >>> but I think you get my drift.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Funky over function?.  Pulleazeee.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> ___
>> >>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> >>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >> ___
>> >> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> >> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ___
>> >> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> >> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> > ___
>> > Ubnt_users mailing list
>> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
> 
>
> _

Re: [Ubnt_users] [WISPA Members] Rocket AC Link Throughput Issues

[James Craig via Ubnt_users]

@sburei

Sending you an email.  I'd like to get the .sup file from the AP and a STA.

On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 11:02 AM,  wrote:

> Yes, particularly with TX to the AP.  Even a link with -41 signal, CINR of
> 32, and isolated capacity TX 60 and RX 65 is only getting testing at about
> 13-17 TX.
>
>
> *- Original Message -*
> *From:* James Craig via Members [mailto:memb...@wispa.org]
> *To:* memb...@wispa.org
> *Cc:* treinh...@hderit.com, ubnt_users@wispa.org
> *Sent:* Mon, 30 Jan 2017 10:35:35 -0500
> *Subject:* Re: [WISPA Members] Rocket AC Link Throughput Issues
>
> Hi There,
>
> Are you seeing low throughput on all 13 Stations?
>
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 10:26 AM,  wrote:
>
>> Hello All,
>>
>> We are troubleshooting a bandwidth throughput issues for links on a few
>> sectors. One such link is between a Rocket 5AC PtP with AM-5G16-120 sector
>> antenna and a PowerBeam 5AC 500 ISO on a 10mhz channel. The sector has 13
>> clients, the 500 ISO is 5.3 miles away with an CINR of 24 and received
>> signal fluctuating around 63. RX. AP side has a CINR of about 23 with
>> received signal fluctuating around 62.
>>
>> We realize a few things about this link are not ideal. We look to try an
>> AM-5G-Ti or AM-5G19-120 antenna on the sector, and perhaps add RF armor.
>> Also, PTMP and Prism radios were hard to come by when this AP was
>> established, so we’re looking to swap radio with a Rocket Prism. In spite
>> of these factors though, throughput still seems lower than it should be.
>> Isolated capacity shows RX 42 and TX 20-30, but we’re only able to get max
>> of about RX 23 and TX 5. This particular link is being used to feed a small
>> remote sector with only 5 clients.
>>
>> We have similar issues on other sectors, two of which have AC Prism
>> Rockets. Is there anything else we should be looking at besides shielding
>> and different antennae? Our noise levels don’t look too bad, but do others
>> see noise statistics from their AC equipment that don’t seem to reflect
>> actual noise experienced in the environment?
>>
>> Thanks for your thoughts!
>>
>> ___
>> Members mailing list
>> memb...@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/members
>>
>
> ___
> Members mailing list
> memb...@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/members
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] [WISPA Members] Rocket AC Link Throughput Issues

[James Craig via Ubnt_users]

Hi There,

Are you seeing low throughput on all 13 Stations?

On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 10:26 AM,  wrote:

> Hello All,
>
> We are troubleshooting a bandwidth throughput issues for links on a few
> sectors. One such link is between a Rocket 5AC PtP with AM-5G16-120 sector
> antenna and a PowerBeam 5AC 500 ISO on a 10mhz channel. The sector has 13
> clients, the 500 ISO is 5.3 miles away with an CINR of 24 and received
> signal fluctuating around 63. RX. AP side has a CINR of about 23 with
> received signal fluctuating around 62.
>
> We realize a few things about this link are not ideal. We look to try an
> AM-5G-Ti or AM-5G19-120 antenna on the sector, and perhaps add RF armor.
> Also, PTMP and Prism radios were hard to come by when this AP was
> established, so we’re looking to swap radio with a Rocket Prism. In spite
> of these factors though, throughput still seems lower than it should be.
> Isolated capacity shows RX 42 and TX 20-30, but we’re only able to get max
> of about RX 23 and TX 5. This particular link is being used to feed a small
> remote sector with only 5 clients.
>
> We have similar issues on other sectors, two of which have AC Prism
> Rockets. Is there anything else we should be looking at besides shielding
> and different antennae? Our noise levels don’t look too bad, but do others
> see noise statistics from their AC equipment that don’t seem to reflect
> actual noise experienced in the environment?
>
> Thanks for your thoughts!
>
> ___
> Members mailing list
> memb...@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/members
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Random users keep dropping off with 6.0

[James Craig via Ubnt_users]

Are these XM stations Rory?

We are working a bug in 6.0 specific to XM stations and hope to have a
service release available shortly.

On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Chris Soiles 
wrote:

> I upgraded 3 towers to 6.0 and the phone started ringing off the hook
>
> Downgraded to 5.6.9 back to what they were
>
> Randomly stopped passing traffic
> Reboot fixes for a little bit
> Then again
>
> Sent from iPhone 6S Plus
>
> Chris Soiles
> Owner
> Rio Cities
> csoi...@riocities.net
> 505-966-6389
>
> On Jan 15, 2017, at 10:27 AM, Daniel Peoples  wrote:
>
> One of many reasons to fork lift for mimosa.
>
> On Jan 15, 2017 10:58 AM, "Rory Conaway"  wrote:
>
>> Just had to replace 3 Nanostation Locos because 6.0 wouldn’t connect
>> between them for some unknown reason.  Throwing in a Nanobeam-19 didn’t
>> help.  Now I have 30 users that randomly dropped off a Rocket 5M although
>> 10 people are still connected. Frequency doesn’t matter.  On the NSM Locos,
>> going back to 5.5.9 didn’t help.  Trying that now but this sucks.
>>
>>
>>
>> *Rory Conaway **• Triad Wireless •** CEO*
>>
>> *4226 S. 37th Street • Phoenix • AZ 85040*
>>
>> *602-426-0542 <(602)%20426-0542>*
>>
>> *r...@triadwireless.net *
>>
>> *www.triadwireless.net *
>>
>>
>>
>> “Baseball - we do not stop playing because we grow old, we grow old
>> because we stop playing”
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] FW 6.0 on LocoM900

[James Craig via Ubnt_users]

Hey Steve,

Thanks for the report.  Sending you an message offline.

On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Steve Barnes  wrote:

> Yesterday we started doing more testing on 6.0.  We decided to test a Loco
> M900 upgrade here in the office before rolling out to customers.  Glad we
> did.
> Upgraded first radio from 5.6.9 to 6.0.  upgraded directly plugged into
> radio not wirelessly.  Upgrade applied and the radio Bricked.  No matter
> what we would do could not get back into radio.
> Tried factory reset with button on radio, No luck.  Gave up and tried 2nd
> radio.
>
> Same scenario, upgrade proceeded as before.  Was able to get back into
> radio.  Decided to factory reset from GUI to make sure no issues.  Then
> this device Bricked.  Tried more times to get back in and finally got a
> login. Interesting thing was LAN light on radio would not show connection.
> Only sporadic blinking.  Flashed unit back to 5.6.9 and restarted.  Same
> issue.  No Lan light, and unit takes minutes to be able to get a login and
> then is 10 Mbps on the LAN connection and is not stable.  Tried other
> computers and POE same issue.  Have upgraded lots of M5 devices with this
> same system and no issues.
>
> Ideas
>
> Steve Barnes
> Wireless Operations Manager
> New Lisbon Broadband
> NLBC.COM
> PCSWIN.COM
> 765-584-2288 ext:1101
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Firmware Releases

[James Craig via Ubnt_users]

Hi Keith,

Sending you an email for more details.


Also, Were these stations mostly XM based stations that wouldn't connect,
or a mix?



On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 1:33 PM, Keith Yoder  wrote:

> We updated about 1700 radios over the weekend.  Yesterday afternoon we
> sent the APs back to 5.6.9 because our phones wouldn't stop ringing.
> Symptoms where bunches of CPEs not connected.  A reboot of the AP usually
> fixed things but we can't be babysitting a hundred APs all day long.
>
> We had been testing the beta versions from about b15 on and hadn't really
> noticed this problem.  We went from RC2 to the release version. (we skipped
> RC3)
>
> Keith Yoder
>
>
> 2016-12-22 15:27 GMT-03:00 Steve D :
>
>> Updating CPE first?  Mike, you secretly started drinking the Ubuiquiti
>> koolaid?  You of all people are going to let them get away with shoddy QA?
>> It's okay if new cpe are deployed one at a time are at or newer, but when
>> doing a system wide upgrade, no f'n way.  The damn things should be able to
>> be newer or older and just connect and just work regardless.
>>
>> A stone-cold reliable updating process should be number one on their
>> list.  I just updated some scabby old canopy network we acquired a couple
>> weeks ago from versions 6-10 years old and it just worked, no BS.  Did the
>> AP first.  Then brought up a handful of CPE.  Then the whole works.  We
>> don't even have addresses for all these locations so really didn't want to
>> truck roll.  But I trust that update system.
>>
>> A primary/secondary firmware loading system ought to get on their to-do
>> list at the very least.  If people can't trust the damn things to work
>> without truck rolls, then people won't update firmware.  Period.
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Mike Hammett > > wrote:
>>
>>> I think the clients should always be at equal or greater version than
>>> the AP, regardless of the platform.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -
>>> Mike Hammett
>>>
>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>
>>> Midwest Internet Exchange 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>
>>> The Brothers WISP 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> *From: *"Rory Conaway" 
>>> *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" 
>>> *Sent: *Wednesday, December 21, 2016 2:08:38 PM
>>>
>>> *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Firmware Releases
>>>
>>> I just test it with an XM Rocket 5M.  All clients on beta 15.  41 users
>>> online.  After installation, 18 users came up.  Went back to Beta, 41 users
>>> online again.  I'm not sure if I have to make all the clients 6.0 first but
>>> I do know that this is exactly what we saw with RC3 and we had to go to a
>>> lot of houses to unload it when they wouldn't reconnect.  We refer to that
>>> as hell week.
>>>
>>> Rory
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
>>> On Behalf Of Nick Bright
>>> Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2016 10:08 AM
>>> To: ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Firmware Releases
>>>
>>> On 12/20/2016 9:43 AM, Kevin Lamothe wrote:
>>> > My experiences so far:
>>> >
>>> > 8.0 is stable
>>> >
>>> > 6.0 is stable running on 5GHz only. 2.4GHz and 900MHz AP/cpes will
>>> > randomly disconnect or goto sleep. Downgrading it back to 5.6.9 fixed
>>> > it for us.
>>> >
>>> > Ubiquiti is reviewing some support files I sent em.
>>> Remember kids: Just say no to dot-oh. :D
>>>
>>> --
>>> ---
>>> -  Nick Bright-
>>> -  Vice President of Technology   -
>>> -  Valnet -=- We Connect You -=-  -
>>> -  Tel 888-332-1616 x 315 <(888)%20332-1616> / Fax 620-331-0789
>>> <(620)%20331-0789>  -
>>> -  Web http://www.valnet.net/ -
>>> ---
>>> - Are your files safe?-
>>> - Valnet Vault - Secure Cloud Backup  -
>>> - More information & 30 day free trial at -
>>> - http://www.valnet.net/services/valnet-vault -
>>> ---
>>>
>>> This email message and any attachments are intended solely for the use
>>> of the addressees hereof. This message and any attachments may contain
>>> information that is confidential, privileged and exempt from disclosure
>>> under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient of this
>>> message, you are prohibited from reading, disclosing, reproducing,
>>> distributing, disseminating or otherwise using this transmission

Re: [Ubnt_users] Crash reports

[James Craig via Ubnt_users]

Hey Steve,

We've resolved most of these in the airOS6 branch.  I'd like to get a few
.sup files to see if this has already been addressed.  Sending a follow-up
email.

On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Steve Barnes  wrote:

> Since all our customer facing stuff was running 10MHz channels and Airmax
> we had not applied Wireless Security.  We decided to start adding security
> to all clients.  (backhauls already had security)
>
> Since applying WPA2-AES to all our Rocket M5 APs and CPEs (5.6.9 ALL) we
> have been getting lots of Crash reports on the AP side an some one the
> CPE.  Also have had several AP’s just stop passing traffic till they were
> rebooted.  Funky communication with AC2 and all around goofiness of our
> network that we never had without security.
>
> Giving lots of consideration to reversing this decision.  Any thoughts or
> ideas?
>
> P.S.  ePMP is not an answer Josh.  ☺
>
> Steve Barnes
> Wireless Operations Manager
> New Lisbon Broadband
> NLBC.COM
> PCSWIN.COM
> 765-584-2288 ext:1101
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Great CCQ, AMC, AMQ, etc. shit throughput

[James Craig via Ubnt_users]

HI Mike,

I'm looking into this report and will contact you offline.

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 12:47 PM, Mike Hammett 
wrote:

> I have a link that's a couple hundred feet. -57 or so signal with balanced
> chains. CCQ, AMC and AMQ are all above 95%. I only can get double digit
> KILObit throughput one direction. I've rebooted, upgraded to 5.6.9, sent in
> support files, checked CPU usage, etc. Modulations are 130/130 on 20 MHz
> (was at least 240/240, usually 270/300 on 40 MHz). The worst noise in the
> area is probably -87.
>
>
> I have no clue.
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
>
> Intelligent Computing Solutions 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
> Midwest Internet Exchange 
> 
> 
> 
>
> The Brothers WISP 
> 
> 
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Backhaul Radios freeze on Station side

[James Craig via Ubnt_users]

Sending you an email David.  I'd like to arrange remote access to have a
look.

Anyone else seeing similar issues, please feel free to reach out directly
ja...@ubnt.com



On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 12:45 PM, David Hulsebus 
wrote:

> Long read, but wanted get out what we have found. Still don't have a
> workable solution other than replacing links with Mimosa which we are doing
> now to all the P to P links.
>
> Here's a snipit of what a log shows.
>
> Nov  15 13:42:12 wireless: ath0 Received disassoc from
> 80:2a:a8:a8:56:81. Reason: Unspecified reason (1).
> Nov  15 13:42:13 wireless: ath0 New Access Point/Cell
> address:Not-Associated
> Nov  15 13:42:14 wireless: ath0 New Access Point/Cell
> address:80:2A:A8:A8:56:81
>
> All these have Airmax quality and capacity numbers above 90% - SNR's above
> 30 some near 50
>
> Point to Point PBE-M5-400 V 5.6.2 firmware - 20M Channel - DFS 5500 - 2.3
> m link. No DFS issues. The link will stop passing traffic. Logging into the
> AP shows station at 144/6.5 rate. If I kick the station it will
> re-associate and work again - never more than a week sometimes less than a
> day. Looking at the station on the AP side the TX combined signal goes away
> and comes back a couple seconds later. A reboot of the AP looks to fix it
> as well as a kick of the station.
>
> Point to Point NB-13's V5.6.3 firmware - 10M channel - 1.2m link - power
> turned down - quality and capacity well above 95%. No interference issues.
> Ran for a few months with no problems. Started having the same issue as
> above radios. I noticed the latency number would jump to 100-200-500ms.
> Tried updating from 5.6.3 to 5.6.5 eventually to worked up to 5.6.9 - same
> issue persists.
>
> Point to Point NB25 to PBE-M5-400 V5.6.3 on both - 30M channel - 5.6 mile
> - non DFS. This is the first link I started having issues with. Thought it
> was related to XM to XW hardware. Replaced one side with a PBE-400 and the
> issue continued although it took a few weeks to show up. I did change the
> frequency a weeks ago from 5755 to 5760 it seemed to lasted longer without
> dropping but still drops off . I've tried from 5.6.3 through 5.6.9 with no
> success.
>
> Point to Point NB25 to PBE-M5-400 V5.6.2 on both - 20M channel - 2.8 mile
> DFS link. No issues at all until I replaced the NB25 with a NBE-400. Now I
> see 144.444/6.5 on it multiple times per day. The AP was the NB25.
>
> I had an NSM2 feeding 7 clients 10M channel - mixed NS2, M2, M2L, NB13's
> and NB18's - Replaced the AP with a PBE-M2400 to focus the energy down a
> road and started having issues with it a couple weeks later.  Replaced all
> the clients that weren't XW hardware and the issue continues.
>
> PBE-M2-400 AP feeding 2 NB13 and 1 PBE-M2-400 client. All clients have the
> same issue, not always at the same time. I usually kick all three clients
> so as not to deal with the issue multiple times per day. Again, have
> updated firmware from 5.6.2 to 5.6.9 over the last month to no avail.
>
> I've tried all versions of firmware between 5.6.2 and 5.6.9  No beta yet
> but in reading the beta forum I don't expect it would help. Others
> reporting similar problems all the way through rc15 beta.
>
> I see in the Ubiquiti forums folks with similar issues being reported but
> no fix or what seems an acknowledgement of the issue. Any ideas ?
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Troy Gibson, Byhalia.net <
> t...@byhalia.net> wrote:
>
>> Clay that is exactly what is happening.  Issue is weather is incredible
>> for October and November as well as these are long standing connections and
>> not new crimps.
>>
>> Simple reboot remotely through Air Control or directly connected to
>> station side restores connection.
>>
>> I was reviewing beta firmware,  but unsure if it would fix this issue.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Troy
>>
>>
>>
>> Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
>>
>>  Original message 
>> From: Clay Stewart 
>> Date: 11/8/16 12:29 PM (GMT-05:00)
>> To: Ubiquiti Users Group 
>> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Backhaul Radios freeze on Station side
>>
>> If you saying stopped passing traffic on Lan side, but remained powered
>> and connected to AP, I would suspect a bad crimper and cold weather.
>>
>> On Nov 7, 2016 1:04 PM,  wrote:
>>
>>> I have had 3 towers in the past week have the Station side of the
>>> Backhaul
>>> link lock up and not transfer service to the tower until rebooted, but
>>> each stayed connected to the AP side of the Backhaul connection.  In all
>>> 3
>>> cases, I was able to log into both the AP and Station side of the
>>> backhaul
>>> link to reboot the station remotely.  Once rebooted every CPE came back
>>> online.
>>>
>>> These radios have been in operation for months and zero issues.  The
>>> details are below for the setup and firmware.
>>>
>>> The radio's are M series Rocket radios.
>>>
>>> Tower 1:  M5 5.6.4 XW to M5 5.6.4 XW
>>>
>>> Tower 2:  M365 5.6.4 XM to M365 5.6.4 XM
>>>
>>> Tower 3:  PBE M5

Re: [Ubnt_users] AirPrism GPS and Performance

[James Craig via Ubnt_users]

Hi Guys,

We're very close to an airOS 8 Release Candidate.  Once airOS 8 is
finalized, we'll have beta 8.1 w/ GPS Sync support soon after.


On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 7:18 PM, J Portman  wrote:

> Gps sync does not work.
> Performance has been pretty stellar.
> Using mixed+ mode now on about 50 Prism APs and 1200 CPE.
>
> AC CPE can easily achieve 60-90 mbps on 20HMZ channel. Worst I've seen was
> 30+
> mbps on an AP with 47 clients.
> We are seeing a 20 to 40% gain in overall throughput vs a simple Rocket M5.
> As we get to more and more AC clients, that should improve as well.
>
> YMMV,
>
> JP
>
> On Wed, 2 Nov 2016 10:21:06 -0500, Sam Morris wrote
> > Anyone using AirPrism...does the GPS Sync work on them? And other
> > than that, are you liking the AirPrism?
> ___
> > Ubnt_users mailing list
> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
> Joe Portman
> Alamo Broadband Inc.
> www.alamobroadband.com
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] DFS on AC

[James Craig via Ubnt_users]

Hi Alex,

You should have the option to limit the channel list under Wireless ->
Control Frequency List.

We are working on some features to help reduce false hits further and
improve channel selection on a hit.

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 3:11 PM, alex phillips 
wrote:

> To say its a Sham, may be a little harsh.
>
> OS8 does a better job at the issue however essentially if a PrismAC radio
> sees activity on the DFS channel  you are on that is not part of its
> session list, it runs away and goes to another channel.
>
> I think its physically impossible for these class of radio systems to
> actually detect the difference between Radar and just Signal on that band.
>
> I have had these discussions with UBNT, as well as others who use other
> radio products and I think false detect is a common problem on all
> platforms, not just UBNT.
>
> The FAA really threw a fit about this issue and the FCC made this a very
> strict certification requirement and so this is all that can be done.  Even
> AF5 has this issue.
>
> We are going to start running a script that checks the radio ever 10 mins
> and if the freq has changed its going to change it back.  I guess if there
> is a war going on between dfs logic and our logic, this may not work.
>
> I also wonder if the channel list can be limited.  I don't see it in the
> UI.  Perhaps UBNT folks listening can lend a hand here.
>
>
>
> *Alex Phillips*
> CEO and General Manager
> RBNS.net
> HighSpeedLink.net
> *WISPA.org Board of Directors ** (2011-2017)*
> *WISPA President (2015-2017)*
> *540-908-3993 <540-908-3993>*
>
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 2:37 PM, James Craig via Ubnt_users <
> ubnt_users@wispa.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi Guys,
>>
>> airMAX radios should only jump to another channel if a RADAR hit is
>> detected.  I would suggest running a Frequency list when operating in DFS
>> bands.
>>
>> That being said, this is most like related to a bug fixed in airOS8beta16.
>>
>>
>> Ethan / Matthew:  Could you forward the Support Info file from an AP that
>> has recently seen this?
>>
>> ja...@ubnt.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Ethan E. Dee 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On the rockets, you choose a DFS channely and it sticks, that is what
>>> I'm used to.
>>> Can't replicate that on the rocket ac's
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/20/2016 1:35 PM, Jordan de Geus wrote:
>>>
>>> Isn't DFS supposed to channel hop?
>>>
>>> Have you tried blocking the higher noise frequencies to prevent the use
>>> of those specific channels?
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Matthew Brendle <
>>> mattagator.mailingli...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have a 5AC PRISM doing the same thing.  I manually pick a DFS channel
>>>> on
>>>> the wireless tab and the radio will go to a non-DFS channel.  Does not
>>>> matter which DFS channel I pick, it will go to a non-DFS channel to
>>>> operate.
>>>> It will let me manually pick a non-DFS channel and it will stay on it.
>>>> Not
>>>> auto, no freq list...
>>>>
>>>> Matt B.
>>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
>>>> On
>>>> Behalf Of Ethan E. Dee
>>>> Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2016 1:31 PM
>>>> To: Ubiquiti Users Group 
>>>> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] DFS on AC
>>>>
>>>> No, not confusing them.
>>>> Complaining about both.
>>>> DFS channel selection has a mind of it's own. With or without a
>>>> frequency
>>>> list.
>>>> And auto, does not pick the best channel, or anywhere close.
>>>>
>>>> On 10/20/2016 1:27 PM, Matt Hoppes wrote:
>>>> > It sounds like you're confusing DFS and auto channel selection. Which
>>>> is
>>>> your question about?
>>>> >
>>>> >> On Oct 20, 2016, at 13:13, Ethan E. Dee 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> So DFS on the AC lites is basically a sham from what I can tell.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I pick a dfs channel and the rocket picks it's own channel. Usually a
>>>> >> channel with much higher noise/interference.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I use the frequency list and it does me no good.
>>>> >>
>>>>

Re: [Ubnt_users] DFS on AC

[James Craig via Ubnt_users]

Hi Guys,

airMAX radios should only jump to another channel if a RADAR hit is
detected.  I would suggest running a Frequency list when operating in DFS
bands.

That being said, this is most like related to a bug fixed in airOS8beta16.


Ethan / Matthew:  Could you forward the Support Info file from an AP that
has recently seen this?

ja...@ubnt.com





On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Ethan E. Dee  wrote:

> On the rockets, you choose a DFS channely and it sticks, that is what I'm
> used to.
> Can't replicate that on the rocket ac's
>
>
> On 10/20/2016 1:35 PM, Jordan de Geus wrote:
>
> Isn't DFS supposed to channel hop?
>
> Have you tried blocking the higher noise frequencies to prevent the use of
> those specific channels?
>
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Matthew Brendle <
> mattagator.mailingli...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I have a 5AC PRISM doing the same thing.  I manually pick a DFS channel on
>> the wireless tab and the radio will go to a non-DFS channel.  Does not
>> matter which DFS channel I pick, it will go to a non-DFS channel to
>> operate.
>> It will let me manually pick a non-DFS channel and it will stay on it.
>> Not
>> auto, no freq list...
>>
>> Matt B.
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
>> On
>> Behalf Of Ethan E. Dee
>> Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2016 1:31 PM
>> To: Ubiquiti Users Group 
>> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] DFS on AC
>>
>> No, not confusing them.
>> Complaining about both.
>> DFS channel selection has a mind of it's own. With or without a frequency
>> list.
>> And auto, does not pick the best channel, or anywhere close.
>>
>> On 10/20/2016 1:27 PM, Matt Hoppes wrote:
>> > It sounds like you're confusing DFS and auto channel selection. Which is
>> your question about?
>> >
>> >> On Oct 20, 2016, at 13:13, Ethan E. Dee  wrote:
>> >>
>> >> So DFS on the AC lites is basically a sham from what I can tell.
>> >>
>> >> I pick a dfs channel and the rocket picks it's own channel. Usually a
>> >> channel with much higher noise/interference.
>> >>
>> >> I use the frequency list and it does me no good.
>> >>
>> >> In addition, I have lot's of frequencies that are in the -90's for
>> >> noise and 'auto' picks channels in the -75 to -85. I don't understand
>> >> the channel selection for these at all.
>> >>
>> >> Any thoughts?
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Ethan Dee
>> >> Network Admin
>> >> Globalvision
>> >> 864 704 3600 <864%20704%203600>
>> >> e...@globalvision.net
>> >>
>> >> gv-supp...@globalvision.net
>> >> 864 467 1333 <864%20467%201333>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> This message has been scanned by E.F.A. Project and is believed to be
>> clean.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ___
>> >> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> >> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>> > ___
>> > Ubnt_users mailing list
>> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>> --
>> Ethan Dee
>> Network Admin
>> Globalvision
>> 864 704 3600
>> e...@globalvision.net
>>
>> gv-supp...@globalvision.net
>> 864 467 1333
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing 
> listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
> --
> Ethan Dee
> Network Admin
> Globalvision864 704 3600e...@globalvision.net
> Gv-support@globalvision.net864 467 1333
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] EdgeOS conntrack tuning

[James Craig via Ubnt_users]

I should also add the every CLI option is configurable via GUI on the
ConfigTree tab.


Conntrack values can be tweaked in System - > Connntrack.




On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Andrew Duey <
andrew.d...@widerangebroadband.net> wrote:

> Scott,
>To answer your questions, I do not have any junipers or real Cisco
> units in the network.  I've worked with a few smaller Cisco units but
> nothing of even the same caliber.  I only have a handful of the EdgeRouter
> Pro's at each site I support.  For the ISP network we have a pair of
> EdgeRouter Pro's at the core and then have Mikrotik at all the tower
> sites.  We had been using Vyatta for years before Brocade bought them and
> burnt all bridges with me (what a terrible, worthless, corporate greed
> driven company).
>
> --Andrew
>
>
> On Friday, June 10, 2016, Scott Lambert  wrote:
>
>> Thank you for the reply.  I would not keep attempting to make the WebUI
>> work, except the guy paying me to set these up specifically does not
>> want to type more than he has to.   He's not much of a typist.
>>
>> If i could find an equivalent of RouterOS's "/interface monitor-traffic
>> ether1" or cisco's "show interfaces GigabitEthernet 0/3", I would never
>> load EdgeOS's heavy WebUI.
>>
>> I just compared the connection tracking timeouts between EdgeOS and
>> RouterOS.
>>
>> It looks to me like RouterOS is at least three times as aggressive
>> about getting rid of connections which were likely to be malicious
>> traffic.  It also looks to me as though RouterOS autoscales the size of
>> the connection tracking table when it gets "too full"; whatever "too
>> full" means.
>>
>> The minimum size I've seen is 88088 entries, the maximum on my network
>> is somewhere over 472,000 entries on a box which has lots of firewall
>> rules, does NAT, and passes 800Mbps during peak hours for more than 1500
>> users.  That box is using less than 1GB of RAM.  Maybe I'll just set all
>> of the EdgeRouters to use similar settings to that CCR1036.
>>
>> Just out of curiosity, how many EdgeRouters do you have deployed?
>>
>> Do you use anything between the Juniper and the EdgeRouter Pro?
>>
>> I'm at around 100 RouterOS routers in the ISP network.  Several more
>> at client businesses.  In ISP networks, I've only used about 10
>> ImageStreams and a few dozen Ciscos.  No Junipers, yet.
>>
>> The Ciscos are hands down the reliability champs, followed by
>> ImageStream, then RouterOS, then the EdgeRouters, in my experience so
>> far.
>>
>> Like you said, it's hard to justify the big brands when MikroTik and
>> Ubiquiti have such low cost options in the CCR1009s and the EdgeRouter
>> Pros.
>>
>> I better get back to looking up how to setup GRE tunnels across the
>> Internet and run OSPF across them as a backup path for when the network
>> gets partitioned internally on the EdgeRouters.
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 11:05:03PM -0500, Andrew Duey wrote:
>> > Scott,
>> >
>> > We have been running the EdgeRouter Pro's for at least a year now and
>> ran
>> > Vyatta for a couple years before that.  After reading your frustrations
>> > here's a couple observations:
>> >
>> > 1) We do NO NAT in our Edgerouters now, but when we did in Vyatta we had
>> > the same conntrack issues.  We found you could increase the table size
>> > dramatically and that fixed our problems until we could un-NAT
>> everything.
>> > I would recommend not doing NAT on those units at all but if you have to
>> > you can increase the table sizes to help.
>> >
>> > 2) Ours have been crazy stable (given the very low cost of the units).
>> >
>> > 3) The web gui is only useful for viewing real-time network
>> information.  I
>> > do like that you can see real-time traffic counts, see how routing
>> changes
>> > take effect, and see an outage in a heartbeat but the web guy is for
>> > information only.  I would STRONGLY recommend that in an ISP environment
>> > that ALL configuration be done at the command line.  I found it very
>> > friendly and easy to use, and there used to be TONS of peer Vyatta
>> support
>> > out there  (Brocade killed a lot of it, but there's still a lot left in
>> > other places).
>> >
>> > 4) While UBNT's direct support is crap on a good day, I've found that
>> their
>> > forums have 90% of the answers I'm looking for and the rest can be
>> gotten
>> > with my googlefu and searching for Vyatta examples.
>> >
>> > While the $400 EdgeRouter Pro is no Juniper MX160 I've found that they
>> are
>> > amazing little boxes given their price point.  We make a point to always
>> > keep at least one spare on hand and run them in pairs anyway but so far
>> > haven't needed to worry about them too much (knock on wood).
>> >
>> > Best of luck with them
>> > --Andrew Duey
>> >
>> > On Thursday, June 9, 2016, Scott Lambert 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Warning, this message has not been well editted.  I don't have time to
>> > > go back and get it to try to get the tone to match what is intended.
>> I
>> > > have limitted time