Re: [Ubnt_users] Recommendation for Rainfade / Bonding

[Roy]

It depends on your network:  bridged or routed.

If its bridged then you have to rely on STP.  A number of STP examples 
available for Mikrotik

On 10/23/2014 10:32 AM, Rick Boucher wrote:
> I’ve finally setup my 1st AirFiber24 connection with the knowledge that Rain 
> Fade is going to work against me.
>
> 1) How can I determine my rain fade. Everyone talks about it but I can not 
> find a definition.
>
> 2) I have Mikrotik Routers on either end with a the former link, a set of 
> PowerBridges, still in place.
>
> Recommendations on the type of bonding others use. I want to bond the two 
> links together for failover. No much help yet on the Mikrotik Forum.
>
> Rick
>
> -
>
>
> Rick Boucher
> Webmaster / Systems Admin
> Orcas Online / San Juan Web
> (360) 376-6411
> http://www.orcasonline.com
> http://www.sanjuanweb.com
> The information source for the San Juan Islands
>
>
>
> Plans for the next day - "Work, work from early to late. In fact
> I have so much to do that I shall spend the first three hours in prayer."
> - Martin Luther
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl

[Roy]

  
  

  
  +1
  
  On 12/3/2014 3:38 PM, Justin Wilson wrote:


  Part of it for me is the perception of UBNT as a company.  We
aren’t like Apple consumers.  For the most part, most of us are
not buying these products to jack with them at Starbucks and
drink Coffee.  We are out on towers, in all kinds of weather,
deploying these.   No matter the driving factor, the majority of
these networks are here to make money.  I, for one, have bet my
house and my future on UBNT products in the past.  It was no
different than betting on another vendor, but I chose UBNT for
several reasons.  Price was a factor but not the only one.
  
  
  Robert and Staff, please don’t misunderstand the passion for
these folks being fanboys.   Sure, the inner geek in everyone
wants the shiny new gadget.  But at the end of the day we all
want to go home and be able to set our thermostat at 71 instead
of 50.  :-) This is about providing a service and being in
business.  Tools like AirControl means we can do that extra
install instead of having the programmer spend their time
figuring out how to pull data from the radio or dump into some
3rd party app.  We all know monitoring and proactive solutions
are essential in this business.  I want to know if my business
customers are getting what they pay for.  If I have SLA
customers I want to prove to them we are living up to
expectations.  Having that data might mean keeping them or not.
A complete product family means we have a lower TCO.
  
  
  Now, back to perception.  If I am putting my house on the
line would I continue to do so for a company that hasn’t
finished a key product like AC in how many years? Version 1
never was completed.  V2 is now dead.  What about the Mfi cloud?
I want to be able to trust a company with my livelihood. Sure, a
software product isn’t the same as a working AP, but it should
be a key component.  In today’s ISP world information is King.
 If I have information I know when to upgrade, what customers to
proactively fix, and how the overall health of the network is.
This is what makes me different than Comcast.  I should be able
to know everything about what I have.
  
  
  If you want to make it cloud based, how about an appliance we
can install locally? Just an idea, in a sea of thousands.   But
more importantly, help us focus on automating our businesses and
being kick butt at it. Give us the tools we actually need.  That
way we can buy more units from you.  Simple.
  
  
  Justin 
  

  


--
  Justin Wilson  
  http://www.mtin.net
  Managed Services – xISP Solutions – Data Centers
  http://www.thebrotherswisp.com 
  Podcast
  about xISP topics
  http://www.midwest-ix.com
  Peering – Transit
– Internet Exchange 
  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  ___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users



  

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Airfiber power draw on Netonix switch

[Roy]

Only ports 1-4 have the 24VH setting on that model

On 7/25/2016 5:23 AM, Jerry Head wrote:
> WS-12-250AC
>
> On 7/24/2016 8:57 PM, Matt Hoppes wrote:
>> Are you running it at:
>> 24V
>> 24VH
>> 48V
>> Or
>> 48VH?
>>
>> Which netonix model?  Which port number?
>>
>>

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Ants in radios!

[Roy]

On 7/30/2016 11:21 AM, Cole Smith wrote:
> We released spiders to catch the ants. Then snakes to deal with the 
> spiders. Now we are looking for an anti snake solution. Any suggestions?
>

Reminds me of

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/There_Was_an_Old_Lady_Who_Swallowed_a_Fly
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] POE POWERED SWITCHES

[Roy]

  
  

  
  Phoenix!   Probably 113 degrees at 4AM,  You need the POE air
  conditioner :-)  Probably 131 degrees at 4AM
  
  On 9/17/2016 2:54 PM, Rory Conaway wrote:


  
  
  
  
What
about temperature?  113 degrees in is in the shade here in
Phoenix and according to the specs, it drops to 100W at 131
which is pretty much normal for us, even in boxes with fans.
 The DC one goes higher though, but haven’t checked the
price.  The Netonix stuff is lasting pretty well for us.
 
Rory

 
From:
ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
[mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
On Behalf Of Michael McKinsey
Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2016 5:33 AM
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] POE POWERED SWITCHES
 

  Ubnt EP-R6 seems to be working very well,
gigabit ports are nice and can move a lot of data.  A bit
more expensive than the mikrotik box at closer to $110, but
I prefer them so far.  Can also put POE out on all ports,
which comes in handy.
  
 
  

  
  
  
  
  ___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users



  

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

[Ubnt_users] Backup radio

[Roy]

We are putting a plan together for an AirFiber 24 link to our main tower 
and will use the existing AirFiber 5X as a backup link.

The question is the use of STP as a mechanism to switch between the main 
and backup links.  The switches at each end are Netonix. Is STP on the 
Netonix usable for this or do I need to find an alternative?


___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Backup radio

[Roy]

The distance is 3.5 miles.  The location is Santa Clara Valley south of 
San Jose, CA.

I like the idea of powering the link from the Netonix although there are 
Mikrotik CRS125-24Gs located at both ends

On 9/23/2016 5:27 PM, Tommy Adams wrote:
> We are using a MikroTik ccr1009 on each end and bonding two interfaces.
> Using active backup for the mode, arp for link monitoring and layer 2 for
> transmit has policy.  Fails over instantly; might lose one ping.
>
> How far is your link going to be?  What part of the country?
>
> Tommy
>
>
> ---
> Tommy Adams
> Network Administrator
> Digitex.com
>
> 817.558.6230 Voice
> 817.558.1204 Fax
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Roy
> Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 2:06 PM
> To: Ubiquiti Users Group 
> Subject: [Ubnt_users] Backup radio
>
> We are putting a plan together for an AirFiber 24 link to our main tower and
> will use the existing AirFiber 5X as a backup link.
>
> The question is the use of STP as a mechanism to switch between the main and
> backup links.  The switches at each end are Netonix. Is STP on the Netonix
> usable for this or do I need to find an alternative?
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> .
>

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] WAN Port Goes to Sleep on PowerBeam M5

[Roy]

Here is a possible scenario:

The AP decided to change channels for DFS reasons and picked a new 
frequency that the STA is not licensed for.  This can occur if the UNII 
rules are set differently on the two radios.



On 11/2/2016 7:23 AM, Shawn C. Peppers wrote:
> Could be DFS related.  What Freq are you running?
>
>

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] AirOS v6, 2.4Ghz XM

[Roy]

  
  
Version 6.0 is not beta
  
  On 2/1/2017 10:24 AM, Nick Bright wrote:


  
  On 1/30/2017 2:46 PM, CBB - Jay
Fuller wrote:
  
  



 
There are a few additional firmware
releases floating around on the ubnt forums - something a
little newer than the official release but not really
released as beta.  Seems to be working pretty good for those
testing.  We are waiting on a few months of no problem
reports before upgrading anything.
 
Here is the link :
 
https://community.ubnt.com/t5/airMAX-M-Beta/6-0-vs-5-6-9/td-p/1778179/page/2
 
you have to be in the beta forum to be
able to read it
 
  
  Thanks Jay, but I'm not too keen on trying a Ubiquiti beta. I'll
  stay on 5.6.9 for now!
  -- 



  

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

[Ubnt_users] Rocket recommendation?

[Roy]

We will be putting up a new tower to split the current customer base.  
My thinking right now is two 90 degree sectors.  The other 180 degrees 
is hillside so no need to radiate in that direction

The clients are all Nanobridge/Powerbeams non-AC radios but we want to 
add AC into the mix.  The environment is 5Ghz with lots of other radios 
out there.

Looking at the bewildering array of Rocket radios, I am looking for some 
recommendations on what equipment to use.
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] PTP with PoweBeam AC ISO

[Roy]

  
  

  
  Litebeam AC
  
  60Ghz Ignitenet
  
          http://www.ignitenet.com/products/metrolinq/
  
  On 2/23/2017 5:21 PM, Daniel Peoples wrote:


  AF24 and be done, 740mbps full duplex.
  
  

  
Daniel
Peoples
  Resonance
  Broadband
  
  Resonancebroadband.com
  918-429-3620


  


On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 5:46 PM, Mark
  Steckel 
  wrote:
  I have a
2130 ft link using a pair of PBE-5AC-300-ISOs and 30
MHz-wide channel in U-NII 1 working great. Consistently
provides 200 Mbps or a bit more.

Based on a few posts on the Ubnt forums, I tried and ended
up with better results configuring the radios as PTMP
instead of PTP.

Cheers
Mark

  
  - On Feb 23, 2017, at 6:29 PM, Eduardo eme...@webjogger.com
  wrote:
  
  > Hi guys,
  > We need a link with at least 120M to join two
  buildings that are 2,200 ft. from
  > each other. Thinking in use the PowerBeam AC ISO that
  suppose to do 450Mbps.
  > I know that the new regulations on the 5GHz have some
  restrictions on the power
  > of the radios that affect the throughput of the link.
  Trying to understand
  > those limitations, but really I could get it totally
  and wondering if someone
  > has a real life experience that can say which of the
  U-NII (1, 2A, or 2C)
  > frequency will work in this scenario and which
  channel width thinking on 20,30
  > or 40MHz. This is a place with a big interference in
  the 5725-5850 MHz
  > spectrum.
  > Any suggestion is much appreciate.
  > Thanks,
  > Eduardo Mejia
> [ http://www.webjogger.net/ | www.Webjogger.net ]
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
  


  
  
  
  
  ___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users



  

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.0 Firmware not showing Device Names of clients on APs

[Roy]

  
  
XW 6.0 seems to be fine.  Clients are
  on XM 6.0.  
  
  Uptime is 8 days so stability seems to be OK.  Reason for 8 days
  was the massive power outage caused tby the storm in Northern CA.
  
  On 2/25/2017 5:17 PM, Rory Conaway wrote:


  
  
  
  
Anyone else having this issue?
 
Rory Conaway
• Triad Wireless • CEO
4226 S. 37th
  Street • Phoenix • AZ 85040
602-426-0542
r...@triadwireless.net
www.triadwireless.net
 
“Baseball
- we do not stop playing because we grow old, we grow old
because we stop playing”
 
 

  


  

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Airfiber sale?

[Roy]

  
  

  
  Amazon has different prices for different classes of customer: 
  Prime, Business, General Public
  
  You need to register as a business customer.  Registration is free
  
  On 4/20/2017 10:22 AM, Too4Short--- via Ubnt_users wrote:


  
  
$239 here. What's business price? 
 
  


  

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Air fiber 24 real world experiences feedback please

[Roy]

  
  

  
  I recently got two 80Mhz wide channels in California  for a Mimosa
  link without any problems 
  
  If you use the Mimosa web site to plan a link, it will show you
  all the 11Ghz coordinated links in your area
  
  
  
  On 6/6/2017 10:01 AM, Tom Fadgen wrote:


  
  He is in California. There are no open channels for 11G with
both Pols available. We should be using the licensed channels
efficiently.
  
  
  Tom Fadgen
  coastinet.com 
   
  


  

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Multiple APs with same SSID

[Roy]

I agree.  The problem that will occur is that one of the two APs will 
fail/reboot/whatever and then everyone will associate with the remaining 
AP.  You then have to redistribute the customers,

On 6/26/2017 7:13 AM, ty...@wigi.us wrote:
> Ive left it like that with multiple ssids for a few weeks before even, 
> but in the end it always pays to bite the bullet and switch the 
> appropriate people over to the newly named sector.  Copy and pasting 
> ssids while at same time rebooting the other ap is sometimes the only 
> way to get it right if they have a poor signal yet connected to the 
> wrong ap.
>

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket 2AC Prism Firmware compatibility

[Roy]

Maybe UBNT could come out with 6.05.  That version number was skipped.   
   6.05 could just be a signed version of 6.04.  You could then 
downgrade 6.06 to 6.05 and then to any unsigned versions



On 7/18/2017 9:37 AM, Mitch wrote:
>
> We have 5   R2AC Prism's up and running
>
> we have to use 6.0.4 for any cpe to connect
>
> We will not use 6.0.6 due to truck roll to TFTP
>
> down grade
>
> Mitch
>
>

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

[Ubnt_users] Ubiquiti out of step password rules

[Roy]

I recently updated software on one of my units and found the Ubiquiti 
changed the password rules.  They now require Upper/lower case letters, 
numbers, and the wonderful special characters.

The NIST has finally admitted their mistake in recommending those 
password rules

"The Man Who Wrote Those Password Rules Has a New Tip: N3v$r M1^d!"

https://www.wsj.com/article_email/the-man-who-wrote-those-password-rules-has-a-new-tip-n3v-r-m1-d-1502124118-lMyQjAxMTA3ODA5ODIwMDg3Wj/
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Air fiber X Child connection

[Roy]

  
  
Dropbear is the SSH server.
  
  192.168.11.1  is connecting on port 22 to the radio and then
  disconnecting without trying to authenticate.
  
  Its a usual sign of network monitoring.
  
  
  
  On 8/15/2017 3:41 PM, Eric Williams SDWISP wrote:


  
  
  
  
  
Need some help here My AP is 192.168.11.9
  and the SU is 11.10 and log is showing Child connection to 11.1 ?
 
Help as I do not understand the log ?
 
Thanks.
 
My link is perfect !
 
 
 

  

  

  

  

  System
  Log

  
  

  Aug 15 14:29:02
  sd_wisp: Messages cleared.
  Aug 15 14:29:31
  dropbear[1886]: Child connection from
  :::192.168.11.1:38284
  Aug 15 14:29:31
  dropbear[1886]: exit before auth: Exited
  normally
  Aug 15 14:30:01
  dropbear[1938]: Child connection from
  :::192.168.11.1:38487
  Aug 15 14:30:01
  dropbear[1938]: exit before auth: Exited
  normally
  Aug 15 14:30:31
  dropbear[2024]: Child connection from
  :::192.168.11.1:38690
  Aug 15 14:30:31
  dropbear[2024]: exit before auth: Exited
  normally
  Aug 15 14:31:01
  dropbear[2037]: Child connection from
  :::192.168.11.1:38893
  Aug 15 14:31:01
  dropbear[2037]: exit before auth: Exited
  normally
  Aug 15 14:31:31
  dropbear[2050]: Child connection from
  :::192.168.11.1:39095
  Aug 15 14:31:31
  dropbear[2050]: exit before auth: Exited
  normally
  Aug 15 14:32:01
  dropbear[2063]: Child connection from
  :::192.168.11.1:39299
  Aug 15 14:32:01
  dropbear[2063]: exit before auth: Exited
  normally
  Aug 15 14:32:31
  dropbear[2077]: Child connection from
  :::192.168.11.1:39502
  Aug 15 14:32:31
  dropbear[2077]: exit before auth: Exited
  normally
  Aug 15 14:33:01
  dropbear[2090]: Child connection from
  :::192.168.11.1:39704
  Aug 15 14:33:01
  dropbear[2090]: exit before auth: Exited
  normally
  Aug 15 14:33:31
  dropbear[2103]: Child connection from
  :::192.168.11.1:39908
  Aug 15 14:33:31
  dropbear[2103]: exit before auth: Exited
  normally
  Aug 15 14:34:01
  dropbear[2117]: Child connection from
  :::192.168.11.1:40110
  Aug 15 14:34:01
  dropbear[2117]: exit before auth: Exited
  normally

  

  

  

  

 
 


 
 

  


  

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Firmware request

[Roy]

  
  
XM.v6.0.30097.161219.1716.bin enroute
  
  On 8/16/2017 8:59 PM, Daniel Peoples wrote:


  Hey guys, I'm looking for 6.0 for XM. Can anyone
send me a copy?

  

  Daniel Peoples
Resonance
Broadband

Resonancebroadband.com
918-429-3620
  
  

  

  
  
  
  
  ___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users



  

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Purchase Agreement

[Roy]

  
  

  
  
  Any sort of purchase agreement depends on what you are buying: 
  Corporation, LLC, or an individual business?
  
  The format would be radically different
  
  On 8/21/2017 7:14 AM, Kevin Melson wrote:


  
  
  
  
Does someone have a purchase agreement I
  can use to buy out another WISP?
Ill adjust to fit our needs.
 
 
 
Thanks,
 
Kevin Melson
Eagle One Wireless\PC Station
2007 Hwy 72 E
Corinth, MS 38834
662-287-1722
e...@e1w.com
www.e1w.com
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  ___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users



  

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Purchase Agreement

[Roy]

Any leases especially for tower space could be a problem for an asset 
purchase.  Things like that may not be transferable.





On 8/21/2017 12:12 PM, G. Nicholas wrote:
> As I general rule I would do an asset purchase.  If you buy the Corporation or
> LLC then you are inheriting any outstanding liabilities, tax liens or 
> judgments,
> lawsuits, etc.
>
> We have bought out 2 other WISPs so far as Asset purchases.
>
> Garth Nicholas
> CFO
> New Wave Net Corp
>
> ----- Original Message -
> From: Roy
> Sent: 8/21/2017 1:32:53 PM
> To: ubnt_users@wispa.org
> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Purchase Agreement
>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Unifi mesh

[Roy]

  
  

  
  The mesh units talk to each other on 5Ghz via 802.11ac.   Assuming
  one unit attaches to your fiber and the other two are remote, you
  will be sending the remotes over a single 5 Ghz channel. 
  
  If you assume that each AP gets 1/3 the load, you will have a
  single 5Ghz channel trying to support 66 clients at 5Mbps each.  
  
  What would be worse is allowing the clients to connect via 5Ghz
  and really screw up the channel.
  
  
  
  On 8/28/2017 6:40 PM, Steve Barnes wrote:


  I am installing my first Unifi Mesh units for an outdoor event.

I have a single fiber feeding one end. I am planning to use the wireless uplink to connect 3 AP's. Am I going to be in trouble if everyone gets a 5Meg connection and I have up to 100 clients?

Steve Barnes
Wireless Ops Manager
NLBC.com


  
  
  
  ___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users



  

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

[Ubnt_users] 6.07 upgrade problem

[Roy]

Hi,

I have an XM 6.0.1 station connected to an XM 6.0.1 AP

I upgraded the station to 6.07 and now they won't talk to each other.  
No errors in either log

Any ideas?

I guess I will try going back to the signed copy of 6.04
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.07 upgrade problem

[Roy]

  
  

  
  The AP radio is set for 5.700 Ghz with 40Mhz width.
  
  The Station is a Nanobridge and the AP is a Nanostation.  Link
  distance is probably 100 yards across some parking lots.   Power
  is -8dbm
  
  The station radio does see the AP as expected.   One other station
  running XM 6.0.1 is connected to the AP.
  
  I haven't tried a power cycle but I have rebooted several times
  
  
  
  On 10/10/2017 11:00 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:


  What frequency?  That's my only guess.

  

  


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

  
  
  On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Roy
<r.engehau...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi,
  
  I have an XM 6.0.1 station connected to an XM 6.0.1 AP
  
  I upgraded the station to 6.07 and now they won't talk to
  each other. 
  No errors in either log
  
  Any ideas?
  
  I guess I will try going back to the signed copy of 6.04
  ___
  Ubnt_users mailing list
  Ubnt_users@wispa.org
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

  
  

  
  
  
  
  ___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users



  

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.07 upgrade problem

[Roy]

The AP is definitely sending because it shows up in the site survey and 
another station is connected to it.   Is there a way to check if the XM 
6.0.7 Station is transmitting?

On 10/10/2017 11:18 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
> I'd check to see if your AP is actually transmitting.
>
> Also check if 5700 is in the scan list.
>
> Being DFS and Ubnt things get really confusing as to what's supported.
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Oct 10, 2017 11:15 AM, "Roy"  <mailto:r.engehau...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
> The AP radio is set for 5.700 Ghz with 40Mhz width.
>
> The Station is a Nanobridge and the AP is a Nanostation.  Link
> distance is probably 100 yards across some parking lots.   Power
> is -8dbm
>
> The station radio does see the AP as expected.   One other station
> running XM 6.0.1 is connected to the AP.
>
> I haven't tried a power cycle but I have rebooted several times
>
>
>
> On 10/10/2017 11:00 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>> What frequency?  That's my only guess.
>>
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340 
>> Direct: 937-552-2343 
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> 
>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+%0D+Suite+1337+%0D+Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g>
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Roy > <mailto:r.engehau...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have an XM 6.0.1 station connected to an XM 6.0.1 AP
>>
>> I upgraded the station to 6.07 and now they won't talk to
>> each other.
>> No errors in either log
>>
>> Any ideas?
>>
>> I guess I will try going back to the signed copy of 6.04
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org <mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org>
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>> <http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org <mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org>
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>> <http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users>
>

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.07 upgrade problem

[Roy]

  
  

  
  There isn't any UNII button but since it worked on 5.7 Ghz before,
  it should work now.   When I reboot the radio, it scans for the AP
  and stops scanning on 5.7Ghz.  The AP shows up on the Site Survey
  so it has no problem with that channel. 
  
  The security key is unchanged.  If it was a key problem, wouldn't
  the log have entries showing authentication problems.  All the log
  on the station shows
  
   wireless: ath0 Set Mode:Managed
   wireless: ath0 Set Mode:Managed
   wireless: ath0 Set Frequency:5.7 GHz (Channel 140)
   wireless: ath0 Set Mode:Managed
   wireless: ath0 Set Frequency:5.7 GHz (Channel 140)
  
  
  On 10/10/2017 11:57 AM, Chris Soiles wrote:


  
  Make sure it’s UNII activates
  
  
  Check the WPA security key


  Sent
  from iPhone 6S Plus

   
  
Chris
Soiles
  
Owner
  
Rio
Cities
csoi...@riocities.net
505-966-6389
  


  On Oct 10, 2017, at 12:55 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
  wrote:
  


  
Oh if another station works you know it's a
  station problem.  It wouldn't tx until it's associated.
  
  Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373


      On Oct 10, 2017 11:48 AM, "Roy"
<r.engehau...@gmail.com>
wrote:

  
  The AP is definitely sending because it shows up in
  the site survey and another station is connected to
  it.   Is there a way to check if the XM 6.0.7 Station
  is transmitting?
  
  On 10/10/2017 11:18 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
  
I'd check to see if your AP is actually
transmitting.

Also check if 5700 is in the scan list.

Being DFS and Ubnt things get really confusing as to
what's supported.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
        
On Oct 10, 2017 11:15 AM, "Roy" <r.engehau...@gmail.com
r.engehau...@gmail.com>>
wrote:



    The AP radio is set for 5.700 Ghz with 40Mhz
width.

    The Station is a Nanobridge and the AP is a
Nanostation.  Link
    distance is probably 100 yards across some
parking lots.   Power
    is -8dbm

    The station radio does see the AP as expected.  
One other station
    running XM 6.0.1 is connected to the AP.

    I haven't tried a power cycle but I have
rebooted several times



    On 10/10/2017 11:00 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:

      What frequency?  That's my only guess.
  
  
      Josh Luthman
      Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:%28937%29%20552-2340>
      Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:%28937%29%20552-2343>
      1100 Wayne St
      <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+%0D+Suite+1337+%0D+Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g>
      Suite 1337
          Troy, OH 45373
  
      On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Roy <r.engehau...@gmail.com
      r.engehau...@gmail.com>>
  wrote:
  
          Hi,
  
          I have an XM 6.0.1 station connected to an
  XM 6.0.1 AP
  
          I upgraded the station to 6.07 and now
   

Re: [Ubnt_users] XM 6.0.4 (unsigned) vs XM 6.04

[Roy]

The newer versions of software (6.0.6 or higher) will not load software 
that is unsigned.  So if you go to 6.0.6 and then want to go back to 
6.0.4, you need the signed version.  Once you go to 6.0.4, you can then 
load unsigned versions go back further.

This "feature" is touted as protecting your radios.  The side effect is 
preventing you from loading software such as open source.  Supposedly, 
you can TFTP in any software you want (signed or unsigned).





On 10/10/2017 1:23 PM, Eduardo wrote:
> Hi Guys,
> We’re trying to upgrade some of our radios that have the issue of 
> randomly reboots using XM 5.6.15 to XM 6.0.4.
> UBNT download site has these two versions and I checked the release 
> notes but there is not explanation about the difference.
> Does anyone know what’s the difference between these two versions?
> Is there any reason to use one or the other?
> Eduardo Mejia
> Webjogger Internet Service
> www.webjogger.net 
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.07 upgrade problem

[Roy]

I think I found the problem,

We rebooted the other radios and then the 6.0.7 version associated.   
The 6.0.1 station associated a few seconds later. So it may be something 
related to which version connects first.



On 10/10/2017 1:23 PM, Troy Gibson, Byhalia.net,LLC wrote:
> Change the channel on the AP and see if the missing radio connects.
>
> Channel may not be checked in scan list or on that firmware for XM.
>
>
>
> Troy Gibson
>
> Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
>

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

[Ubnt_users] Nanostation replacement

[Roy]

Hi

The Nanostation M5 has the feature of two ethernet ports and POE passthru.

Are there any replacements?

Roy
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Nanostation replacement

[Roy]

  
  

  Would have liked it in a radio but the Nanoswitch will do.  
  Unfortunately, I need one in the next few weeks so am stuck with a
  Nanobridge solution for now
  
  On 10/24/2017 10:30 AM, Mimbres Communications wrote:


  Not yet, but they're working on it.


The NanoSwitch ($39 PoE powered, has three ports with PoE
  out) should be in the channel soon.
  
  
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Roy <r.engehau...@gmail.com>
  wrote:
  Hi

The Nanostation M5 has the feature of two ethernet ports and
POE passthru.

Are there any replacements?

    Roy
___

  





-- 

  


  

  


  

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Power Station 5

[Roy]

  
  
I suggest the Litebeam AC.  Either the
  LBE‑5AC‑Gen2 or LBE-5AC-23 
  
  On 10/30/2017 7:46 AM, Mimbres Communications wrote:


  I assume you have clear line of sight there, in
which case there are several potential 5 GHz options.  If the
spectrum is crowded there, I'd start with a pair of IsoStaion
5AC's -- if not, I'd probably use either NanoBeam 5AC-16's or
NS-5AC Locos (once those show up in the channel).
  
On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 11:19 PM, Roger
  Clifton 
  wrote:
  

  
Would
like to connect to home office which is about ½ mile
from me
 
 
From:
ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
[mailto:ubnt_users-bounces@wispa.org]
On Behalf Of Mimbres Communications
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2017 2:57 PM
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Power Station 5

  
 

  Quite a few.  What's the link
distance and use case?


   
  
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at
  12:52 PM, Roger Clifton 
  wrote:

  
Greeting
  
 
Does
anyone have a solution to upgrade the
Power Station 5 .
 
Roger
Clifton
 
  


  

  

  

  

  


  

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

[Ubnt_users] Radios won't operate on the same channel

[Roy]

I have a Nanobridge running 6.1.3 trying to connect to a Nanostation 
also running 6.1.3

The Nanostation is the AP and set for 5630 Mhz.  The Nanobridge won't 
connect since it doesn't seem to allow operation on that channel?

A check of allowed channels has the Nanobridge missing 5585 to 5655 Mhz

Any ideas on how to fix this?

Roy
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Radios won't operate on the same channel

[Roy]

  
  

  
  I have several codes but there is no "Activate" button.  At the
  suggestion of another member of the mailing list, I regressed the
  Nanobridge to 5.6.9 and then the "Activate" button appeared.  I
  did than and then reinstalled 6.1.3.  Luckily I had a copy of
  5.6.9 in my library
  
  To save anyone the digging to find out how to regress, I think
  these are the steps I used.  
  
  1) install 6.0.6
  2) Install 6.0.6 beta
  3) reboot
  4) install 5.6.9
  
  Roy
  
  
  
  On 11/28/2017 9:55 PM, Mimbres Communications wrote:


  Do you have an unlock code for the NBM5?
  
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 9:50 PM, Roy <r.engehau...@gmail.com>
  wrote:
  
I have a Nanobridge running 6.1.3 trying to connect to a
Nanostation
also running 6.1.3

The Nanostation is the AP and set for 5630 Mhz.  The
Nanobridge won't
connect since it doesn't seem to allow operation on that
channel?

A check of allowed channels has the Nanobridge missing 5585
to 5655 Mhz

Any ideas on how to fix this?

Roy
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
  





-- 

  
Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
  

  
  
  
  
  ___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users



  

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Radios won't operate on the same channel

[Roy]

  
  
Quick note, the key to be used via SSH
  does not have the "-" in it.  so - becomes 
  
  --
  
  Now my results:
  
  I got a new radio out of storage  (oldie with 5.5.6) and installed
  6.0.4 and it didn't permit 5585 to 5655 Mhz.  The other DFS
  channels seem to be there
  
  I tested with the dfs-unlock command via SSH using a bad key.  The
  result was
  FCC DFS frequencies are enabled.
FCC DFS NEW GRANT is disabled.
  
  I then did an dfs-unlock and got 
  FCC DFS frequencies are enabled.
  FCC DFS NEW GRANT is disabled.
Enabling FCC DFS frequencies...
Saving ... [%100]
  
  The 5585 to 5655 gap was still not allowed
  
  I regressed the box to 5.6.9 and hit the "Activate" button.  After
  completing the activation, I ran the test again and got
  FCC DFS frequencies are enabled.
FCC DFS NEW GRANT is enabled.

  Now the 5585 to 5655 Mhz. range is in the list.  Went forward to
  6.0.4 and my test now shows both are still enabled.
  
  Bottom line:  V6 doesn't have an activate button because it
  doesn't seem to do anything.  V6 gave the same frequencies before
  and after dfs-unlock via SSH.  To get "FCC DFS NEW GRANT" you need
  to install 5.6.9 and activate there.
  
  Roy
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  On 11/29/2017 3:40 PM, Sam Tetherow wrote:


  
  ssh into the radio and
  ubntbox dfs-unlock -u "YOUR COMPANY NAME" YOUR_ACTIVATION_CODE
  
  On 11/29/2017 01:07 PM, Roy wrote:
  
  


  
  I have several codes but there is no "Activate" button.  At
  the suggestion of another member of the mailing list, I
  regressed the Nanobridge to 5.6.9 and then the "Activate"
  button appeared.  I did than and then reinstalled 6.1.3. 
  Luckily I had a copy of 5.6.9 in my library
  
  To save anyone the digging to find out how to regress, I think
  these are the steps I used.  
  
  1) install 6.0.6
  2) Install 6.0.6 beta
  3) reboot
  4) install 5.6.9
  
  Roy
  
  
  
  On 11/28/2017 9:55 PM, Mimbres Communications wrote:


  Do you have an unlock code for the NBM5?
  
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 9:50 PM,
  Roy <r.engehau...@gmail.com>
  wrote:
  
I have a Nanobridge running 6.1.3 trying to connect to a
Nanostation
also running 6.1.3

The Nanostation is the AP and set for 5630 Mhz.  The
Nanobridge won't
connect since it doesn't seem to allow operation on that
channel?

A check of allowed channels has the Nanobridge missing
5585 to 5655 Mhz
    
Any ideas on how to fix this?

Roy
  




-- 

  
Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042
  

  
  

  


  

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] 8.5.0 problem

[Roy]

Actually they can.  It depends on what OS you used when you activated 
DFS.  I have a number of M5s running in that range


On 1/25/2018 8:58 AM, Rory Conaway wrote:
> The M radios don't support 5585-5655GHz.  AC radios do.
>
> Rory
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On 
> Behalf Of Forbes Mercy
> Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2018 9:29 PM
> To: Ubiquiti Users Group
> Subject: [Ubnt_users] 8.5.0 problem
>
> Did I miss a memo, I upgraded a Prism 5AC Gen2 to firmware 8.50 and the
> 6 radios with 6.14XM Loco and Nanobridges dropped offline and no longer 
> worked on any UNII frequency.  I had to move the radio down to a clogged 
> non-UNII spectrum channel?
>
> Forbes Mercy
> Washington Broadband, Inc.
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] cameras 1000ft through a forest

[Roy]

How about Arlo GO

http://arlo.com/en-us/products/arlo-go/default.aspx?cid=us-arlo-pro-srch

Battery Powered and uses LTE



On 1/25/2018 1:37 PM, nos...@avantwireless.com wrote:
> Cheapest, quickest, I would think to try would be 3
>
>
> https://www.amazon.com/Mikrotik-RouterBOARD-lite-ports-router/dp/B00ZPTW8T2/ref=sr_1_10?ie=UTF8&qid=1516912362&sr=8-10&keywords=mikrotik+poe+switch
>
> With the camera hung on the end..Space the POE switches to retime
> the ethernet.   Start with 30 Volts.   Sounds like you have power at the
> other end to power the cameras?
>
> Power the last switch from the other end
>
> Bunch of assumptions there..1000 feet of direct bury laid on the
> ground without anything in the way and how many cameras?
>
>
> On 1/25/18 12:22 PM, Jan-OOLLC wrote:
>> I have no details/requirements other than cheap, quick.  These bastards
>> are dumping almost every night.  There are cedars, Myrtles, etc... in
>> the way.  Should I think about running power 1000ft?  Is there a cheap
>> way to get enough power to the cameras via POE?
>>
>> Jan V
>>
>> I have to get cameras up and have a forest in the way.  Range is a
>>
>>> little over 1000ft from house, need to live monitor the road and catch
>>> dumpers.  What radios, how to keep them powered and what cameras should
>>> I think about for first attempt?
>>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

[Ubnt_users] Ubiquiti Networks stock sinks after disclosure of SEC subpoenas

[Roy]

In case you missed it

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/ubiquiti-networks-stock-sinks-after-disclosure-of-sec-subpoenas-2018-02-20
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Ubiquiti LBE-5AC

[Roy]

  
  

  
  I just checked a LBE-5AC-23 and it has the "revised U-NII
  question.  Its activated and I think all those channels are
  selectable.  Software is  version 8.5.12
  
      Roy
  
  On 7/28/2019 8:56 PM, RickG wrote:


  
  I dont get that option on these.
  
  
On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 1:17
  PM Mimbres Communications <mim...@sw-ei.com>
  wrote:


  
Any chance you forgot to activate the revised U-NII
  rules?

  
  

  
  
  
On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at
  10:28 AM RickG <rgunder...@gmail.com>
  wrote:


  
Anyone here know what's the deal with the LBE-5AC
  units? I've got several that will not select the UNII
  bands. I've tried upgrading the firmware. -RickG

  
  ___
  Ubnt_users mailing list
  Ubnt_users@wispa.org
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

  
  
  
  -- 
  

  Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042

  
  ___
  Ubnt_users mailing list
  Ubnt_users@wispa.org
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

  
  
  
  
  -- 
  

  -RickG

  
  
  
  ___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users



  

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Ubiquiti LBE-5AC

[Roy]

  
  

  
  We use LiteBeam AC Gen 2 and LBE-5AC-23 successfully out to 3
  miles. YMMV.  For .5 miles and less, we are starting to use
  Mikrotik 60Ghz
  
  Roy
  
  
  
  On 7/29/2019 5:44 AM, Phil Curnutt wrote:


  
  The original model needs the unlock code for the
UNII, the newer, Gen2, comes activated.  They work fine for
short shots 3/4 of mile or less: anything longer move to the
PowerBeams.  The LBE's work much better then the NBE's that have
a funky antenna pattern.


Phil
  
  
  
On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 10:16
      PM Roy <r.engehau...@gmail.com> wrote:


  

  
  I just checked a LBE-5AC-23 and it has the "revised U-NII
  question.  Its activated and I think all those channels
  are selectable.  Software is  version 8.5.12
      
  Roy
  
  On 7/28/2019 8:56 PM, RickG wrote:


  I dont get that option on these.
  
  
On Sun, Jul 28, 2019
  at 1:17 PM Mimbres Communications <mim...@sw-ei.com>
  wrote:


  
Any chance you forgot to activate the revised
  U-NII rules?

  
  

  
  
  
On Sun, Jul 28,
  2019 at 10:28 AM RickG <rgunder...@gmail.com>
  wrote:


  
Anyone here know what's the deal with the
  LBE-5AC units? I've got several that will not
  select the UNII bands. I've tried upgrading
  the firmware. -RickG

  
  ___
  Ubnt_users mailing list
  Ubnt_users@wispa.org
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

  
  
  
  -- 
  

  Kurt Albershardt  |  Mimbres Communications, LLC  |  575-342-0042

  
  ___
  Ubnt_users mailing list
  Ubnt_users@wispa.org
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

  
  
  
  
  -- 
  

  -RickG

  
  

  

  


  

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Ubiquiti LBE-5AC

[Roy]

So far so good.  Its limited to four users right now but those links are 
working great.  Love the AP with the 180 degree antenna coverage and 
beam steering.

Its definitely LOS but we have one link running between two building 
across a parking lot with the radios looking through windows.  Longest 
link is about 1200 feet.

On 7/29/2019 2:37 PM, Robert Dillon wrote:
> Interesting.  You have been happy with the Mikrotik 60Ghz then?
>
>
>
>
>  Original message ----
> From: Roy 
> Date: 7/29/19 10:07 AM (GMT-05:00)
> To: Ubiquiti Users Group 
> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Ubiquiti LBE-5AC
>
>
>
> We use LiteBeam AC Gen 2 and LBE-5AC-23 successfully out to 3 miles. 
> YMMV.  For .5 miles and less, we are starting to use Mikrotik 60Ghz
>
> Roy
>
>
>

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Ubiquiti LBE-5AC

[Roy]

There are similar problems with the AirMax M.  I had to downgrade to 
5.6.9 then unlock the radio and go back to 6.x.x.

On 8/3/2019 8:04 PM, RickG wrote:
> UPDATE: Downgrading to the firmware to 8.5.7 allowed me to input my 
> code and get the additional frequencies.
>
>

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Ubiquiti SNMP for AirOS8?

[Roy]

MRTG, Nagios, and some monitoring scripts I wrote are all working fine.

Roy

On 12/3/2019 8:46 AM, Dan - LTI Support via Ubnt_users wrote:
>
> Ok, so /CLEARLY/ Ubiquiti doesn’t want us using their ‘community’ 
> website since it’s absolutely useless, so I’ll pose my question here.
>
> Is SNMP even remotely supported at this point in airos8? I have 
> downloaded the MIB bundle for 8.6.2 and loaded UBNT-AirMAX-MIB with 
> this metadata:
>
>     REVISION "20171003Z"
>
>     DESCRIPTION "ubntAirMAX revision"
>
>     ::= { ubntMIB 4 }
>
> This MIB imports from bundled UBNT-MIB with this metadata:
>
>     REVISION "20140227Z"
>
>     DESCRIPTION "Split revision"
>
>     ::= { ubnt 1 }
>
>     -- 
> 
>
>     -- Ubiquiti Networks Root
>
>     -- 
> 
>
>     ubnt OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { enterprises 41112 }
>
> …and tried to get/walk but cannot get any vendor-specific information.
>
> $ snmpwalk -v 1 -c public 10.195.5.10 1.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0
>
> iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0 = Timeticks: (24323800) 2 days, 19:33:58.00
>
> $ snmpwalk -v 1 -c public 10.195.5.1
>
> 0 1.3.6.1.4.1.41112
>
> End of MIB
>
> $
>
> Even querying known-good OIDs from previous versions returns nothing:
>
> $ snmpget -v 1 -c public 10.195.5.10 1.3.6.1.4.1.41112.1.4.5.1.14.1
>
> Error in packet
>
> Reason: (noSuchName) There is no such variable name in this MIB.
>
> Failed object: iso.3.6.1.4.1.41112.1.4.5.1.14.1
>
> $
>
> Does anyone have any SNMP working on current AirOS8?
>
> --dan
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users