[Bug 1533258] Re: Selecting grub entries (efi) at boot time leads to "error: symbol 'grub_efi_find_last_device_path' not found"

2016-03-05 Thread David Wynn
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1366546 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1366546

I have a similar problem, but am having trouble deciphering what is the
"safe" resolution here.  Can someone help diagnose my issue?

sudo efibootmgr -v
BootCurrent: 0005
Timeout: 2 seconds
BootOrder: 0005,0002,
Boot  ubuntuVenHw(99e275e7-75a0-4b37-a2e6-c5385e6c00cb)
Boot0002  Windows Boot Manager  
VenHw(99e275e7-75a0-4b37-a2e6-c5385e6c00cb)WINDOWS.x...B.C.D.O.B.J.E.C.T.=.{.9.d.e.a.8.6.2.c.-.5.c.d.d.-.4.e.7.0.-.a.c.c.1.-.f.3.2.b.3.4.4.d.4.7.9.5.}...2....
Boot0005* UEFI: ST1000DM003-1CH162  
PciRoot(0x0)/Pci(0x1f,0x2)/Sata(0,65535,0)/HD(3,GPT,ba842f15-01fe-4f37-8bb6-bf83225d2adf,0xc8800,0x96000)AMBO

f25a2b1d6702324caa2c55e4790d684f  /boot/efi/EFI/ubuntu/grubx64.efi

4db5a7a214176316347cefbbcb40b29f  /boot/efi/EFI/Boot/bootx64.efi

cd /boot/efi/EFI/Microsoft/Boot
sudo md5sum *.efi
9cdfbae08da935c0b9c77f01bb2807c6  bootmgfw.efi
c79876d32448cd0ec360d7660ea310d9  bootmgr.efi
7f64065fea99fee26019d4c8bc896c53  memtest.efi

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1533258

Title:
  Selecting grub entries (efi) at boot time leads to "error: symbol
  'grub_efi_find_last_device_path' not found"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1533258/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1207978] Re: mission-control-5 crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slice_alloc()

2013-08-03 Thread David Wynn
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1167128 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1167128

** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1154674
   mission-control-5 crashed with SIGSEGV in magazine_chain_pop_head()

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1167128
   mission-control-5 crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slice_alloc()

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1207978

Title:
  mission-control-5 crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slice_alloc()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/telepathy-mission-control-5/+bug/1207978/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 325263] Re: KQ package very out of date.

2011-12-01 Thread David Wynn
** Changed in: kq (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/325263

Title:
  KQ package very out of date.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kq/+bug/325263/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 325263] Re: KQ package very out of date.

2011-12-01 Thread David Wynn
** Changed in: kq (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress = New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/325263

Title:
  KQ package very out of date.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kq/+bug/325263/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 897653] [NEW] Upgrade allegro

2011-11-29 Thread David Wynn
Public bug reported:

Please upgrade allegro to the latest upstream versions.

Latest 4.2 series version: 4.2.3.1

Latest series 4 version: 4.4.2

Latest stable version: 5.0.5

So, Ubuntu and Debian are even out of date as far as 4.2 is concerned.
At the very least, we should have allegro4.4 and allegro5.0.  Allegro4.4
should be backwards compatible with previous version, while the 5 series
is specifically not backwards compatible.

I would think providing in the current development release would be
fine.  Add to backports, if deemed necessary for stable releases.

** Affects: allegro4.2 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/897653

Title:
  Upgrade allegro

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/allegro4.2/+bug/897653/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 897653] Re: Upgrade allegro

2011-11-29 Thread David Wynn
See http://alleg.sourceforge.net/download.html

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/897653

Title:
  Upgrade allegro

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/allegro4.2/+bug/897653/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 281839] Re: [needs packaging] osmose

2011-11-29 Thread David Wynn
I was reviewing this a bit closer.  I see that the majority of the code
is GPL-3.  However, the code used for accessing .zip files does not have
a clearly stated license.  Is that officially a deal-breaker for seeing
this put into Ubuntu?  or is there some way to resolve the license for
the .zip code?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/281839

Title:
  [needs packaging] osmose

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/281839/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 768724] Re: Package is outdated

2011-11-14 Thread David Wynn
Please note, latest upstream release is now 0.9.2 as of end of September
2011

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/768724

Title:
  Package is outdated

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/denemo/+bug/768724/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 339501] Re: lsb-desktop package depends on transitional package

2011-07-18 Thread David Wynn
Still a problem, even in Oneiric

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/339501

Title:
  lsb-desktop package depends on transitional package

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lsb/+bug/339501/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 325263] Re: KQ package very out of date.

2011-07-18 Thread David Wynn
Fixed in lucid, then suddenly missing in later releases.  Odd

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/325263

Title:
  KQ package very out of date.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kq/+bug/325263/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 812094] [NEW] lubuntu-desktop depends on network-manager-gnome

2011-07-17 Thread David Wynn
Public bug reported:

lubuntu-desktop depends on network-manager-gnome.  For other desktops,
like ubuntu-desktop, xubuntu-desktop, and mythbuntu-desktop, this is a
recommends, not a depends.  That way, those who find other network
managers (i.e., wicd) more usable may switch, without removing the
desktop meta package.

Using Oneiric
lubuntu-desktop, 0.25

** Affects: lubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: oneiric

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/812094

Title:
  lubuntu-desktop depends on network-manager-gnome

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lubuntu-meta/+bug/812094/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 691100] Re: Replay gain in soundkonverter broken

2011-01-04 Thread David Wynn
OK, I didn't realize that.  The version of soundkonverter that had been
included in Ubuntu in Lucid and previous releases actually changed the
volume of the sound throughout the file in a way that Audacity even
recognized.  I'll see what I can do to test around and verify whether
the tags work on some of the players that I use.

I will point out that I tried a converted file using Exaile.  I
listened to both the original .wav and the .mp3, and found no hearable
difference (and, yes, the original wav was recorded quite soft).  But
that's just one player -- hardly representative.  Still, it is an
indication that, if the tags are correctly in place, the tags are not
universally recognized.  I was personally happier when the replay gain
function worked for everyone, as it did in the days of Lucid.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/691100

Title:
  Replay gain in soundkonverter broken

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 691100] Re: Replay gain in soundkonverter broken

2010-12-18 Thread David Wynn
This version claims itself as version 1.0.0 beta 1.  Also notes -- using
KDE development platform 4.5.1.  Looking in synaptic, I have the
0.9.90-1 package installed.

When I pull both the original .wav and the resultant .mp3 into Audacity,
these look like nearly identical files.  These sermon files tend to get
recorded pretty quietly by my church, and the resulting mp3 is not
louder than the wav file.  I would expect a noticeable volume
difference, if the replay gain worked (as it did in the older version of
soundkonverter).

I included both logs in the zip file.  The main log is the default
main log file.  The file log is the one specific to converting my file
to .mp3.

Thanks for your help.

** Attachment added: soundkonverter_logs.zip
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/soundkonverter/+bug/691100/+attachment/1769841/+files/soundkonverter_logs.zip

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/691100

Title:
  Replay gain in soundkonverter broken

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 691100] [NEW] Replay gain in soundkonverter broken

2010-12-16 Thread David Wynn
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: soundkonverter

With the Maverick Meerkat version of soundkonverter (0.9), the replay
gain function no longer works.  Can't get it to work either with mp3gain
or with the internal functionality.  The created mp3's sound just as
quiet as the original file.  Replay gain with 0.3 version in Lucid is
still working.  I have not tested Natty.

** Affects: soundkonverter (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/691100

Title:
  Replay gain in soundkonverter broken

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 616394] Re: dlopen: /usr/lib/xorg/extra-modules/nvidia_drv.so: undefined symbol: miEmptyData

2010-10-12 Thread David Wynn
This has actually happened frequently in the past -- that the legacy
nvidia drivers get abandoned for a time.  Previously, the problem had
always eventually gotten fixed.  However, this is something that we
should warn people about.  At least in my experience, using the
nvidia-96 drivers in Maverick will not allow you any graphic
capabilities.  You will be dropped to a command line, but will not be
given a chance to switch to lower graphic capabilities, as in previous
versions of Ubuntu.  (In Lucid and some previous releases, when nvidia
was not working, it would ask to use low-graphics mode.  This does not
happen in Maverick, even though I have nv and nouveau installed)

-- 
dlopen: /usr/lib/xorg/extra-modules/nvidia_drv.so: undefined symbol: miEmptyData
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/616394
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 637030] Re: package nvidia-96 96.43.17-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: nvidia-96 kernel module failed to build

2010-09-14 Thread David Wynn
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 636016 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/636016

Please open only one bug.  You just opened an identical bug two days
ago.

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 636016
   package nvidia-96 96.43.17-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: nvidia-96 
kernel module failed to build
 * You can subscribe to bug 636016 by following this link: 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-96/+bug/636016/+subscribe

-- 
package nvidia-96 96.43.17-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: nvidia-96 kernel 
module failed to build
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/637030
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 637030] Re: package nvidia-96 96.43.17-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: nvidia-96 kernel module failed to build

2010-09-14 Thread David Wynn
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 636016 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/636016

(Sorry, that should have read per issue.  It's OK to open more than one
bug, as long as they are addressing different issues)

-- 
package nvidia-96 96.43.17-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: nvidia-96 kernel 
module failed to build
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/637030
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 634665] Re: package nvidia-96 96.43.18-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: nvidia-96 kernel module failed to build

2010-09-10 Thread David Wynn
From .proc.driver.nvidia.cards.0.txt, I see you're using a GeForce
6150SE nForce 430.  Looks like you're using the x86_64 kernel.  You'll
want to keep the current series (185), but you should be able to purge
any of the following packages that are installed on your system.  Use
your favorite package manager to strip these out:

nvidia-96
nvidia-96-kernel-source
nvidia-96-dev
nvidia-173
nvidia-173-kernel-source
nvidia-173-dev
nvidia-180-kernel-source
nvidia-180-libvdpau
nvidia-180-libvdpau-dev
nvidia-glx-96
nvidia-glx-96-dev
nvidia-glx-173
nvidia-glx-173-dev
nvidia-glx-180
nvidia-glx-180-dev

The nvidia-96 series (including nvidia-glx-96) is for older cards /
computers.  But from what I see on the nvidia website, your card should
be supported by the latest drivers.

-- 
package nvidia-96 96.43.18-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: nvidia-96 kernel 
module failed to build
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634665
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 339501] Re: lsb-desktop package depends on transitional package

2010-04-20 Thread David Wynn
Continues to be a problem in lucid.  The libqt4-gui package split into 5
different packages as of Intrepid.  So, with the advent of Lucid, this
has now been a bug for 2 full years.  The libqt4-gui package does not
describe itself as a metapackage, but as a transitional, dummy package.
That is, nothing should depend on it, once users have migrated to the
new release.

Please review lsb-dekstop's use of the libraries in libqt4-gui.  Please
choose the libraries that are actually necessary to fulfill the needs of
lsb-desktop, and remove libqt4-gui from the requirements for this
package.

-- 
lsb-desktop package depends on transitional package
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/339501
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 281839] Re: [needs packaging] osmose

2009-12-22 Thread David Wynn
Please update the packages.  Latest version is now 0.9.1

-- 
[needs packaging] osmose
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/281839
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 325263] Re: KQ package very out of date.

2009-12-20 Thread David Wynn
Looks like new code was uploaded to the KQ site in mid-December 2009.
Please update the packages.

-- 
KQ package very out of date.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/325263
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 475503] Re: D-BUS activation fails to start console-kit-daemon with error: Success

2009-12-17 Thread David Wynn
First, just want to clear the air.  I'm using a Linux Mint system, not a
straight Ubuntu system.  But Mint is Ubuntu-based.  I also followed the
upgrade path, instead of installing fresh.  Mine was a more indirect
upgrade.  I believe my path was something like Mint Xubuntu Gloria -
Ubuntu Karmic - Mint Ubuntu Helena.  (Wireless networking was not Just
Working under straight Ubuntu -- no problems in Mint)

$ lsb_release -rd
Description:Linux Mint 8 Helena - Main Edition
Release:8

$ apt-cache policy gnome-system-tools
gnome-system-tools:
  Installed: 2.28.1-0ubuntu2
  Candidate: 2.28.1-0ubuntu2
  Version table:
 *** 2.28.1-0ubuntu2 0
500 http://ubuntu.osuosl.org karmic/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

I was also getting this message from my computer:

$ gksu users-admin

(users-admin:11756): Liboobs-WARNING **: There was an unknown error
communicating with the backends: Failed to execute program /lib/dbus-1.0
/dbus-daemon-launch-helper: Success

I've tried the above:
$ sudo killall /usr/sbin/console-kit-daemon
$ sudo /usr/sbin/console-kit-daemon
$ sudo killall /usr/lib/policykit-1/polkitd
/usr/lib/policykit-1/polkitd: no process found
$ sudo /usr/lib/policykit-1/polkitd
Registering null backend at priority -10
Using authority class PolkitBackendLocalAuthority

At this point, the first terminal session did not give me a c/l back, so
I went to a second terminal session:

$ gksu users-admin
(users-admin:12665): Liboobs-WARNING **: There was an unknown error 
communicating with the backends: Failed to execute program 
/lib/dbus-1.0/dbus-daemon-launch-helper: Success

Back on the first terminal, I now see:

$ sudo /usr/lib/policykit-1/polkitd
Registering null backend at priority -10
Using authority class PolkitBackendLocalAuthority

(process:12651): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: value -1 of type `gint' is invalid 
or out of range for property `pid' of type `gint'
** (process:12651): DEBUG: system-bus-name::1.1893 is inquiring whether 
unix-process:12665:322721 is authorized for 
org.freedesktop.systemtoolsbackends.set
** (process:12651): DEBUG:  user of caller is unix-user:root
** (process:12651): DEBUG:  user of subject is unix-user:root
** (process:12651): DEBUG: checking whether unix-process:12665:322721 is 
authorized for org.freedesktop.systemtoolsbackends.set

** (process:12651): WARNING **: skipping unknown tag _description at
line 11

** (process:12651): WARNING **: skipping unknown tag _message at line
12

** (process:12651): WARNING **: skipping unknown tag _description at
line 12

** (process:12651): WARNING **: skipping unknown tag _message at line
13

** (process:12651): WARNING **: skipping unknown tag _description at
line 21

** (process:12651): WARNING **: skipping unknown tag _message at line
22

** (process:12651): WARNING **: skipping unknown tag _description at
line 30

** (process:12651): WARNING **: skipping unknown tag _message at line
31

** (process:12651): WARNING **: skipping unknown tag _description at
line 39

** (process:12651): WARNING **: skipping unknown tag _message at line 40
** (process:12651): DEBUG:

-- 
D-BUS activation fails to start console-kit-daemon with error: Success
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475503
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 494838] [NEW] xmess packages very dated

2009-12-09 Thread David Wynn
Public bug reported:

This is the same issue as Debian bug #555484.  Posting here in hopes of higher 
visibility.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555484

xmess seems to be the version created back in 2006.  Active development
continues.  Version 0.130 was available at the start of Ubuntu 9.10
development.  Current version is 0.135.

xmame suffers from similar issues.  0.106 was the mame version released
in 2006.  MAME is now up to 0.135.  sdlmame at least hails from 2009
with version 0.132.

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: i386
Date: Wed Dec  9 20:57:35 2009
Dependencies:
 
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Package: xmess-common 0.106-3.1ubuntu2
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-16.52-generic
SourcePackage: xmame
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-16-generic i686
XsessionErrors: (polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1:2166): GLib-CRITICAL **: 
g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed

** Affects: xmame (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386

-- 
xmess packages very dated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/494838
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 417675] Re: Need display size quirk for Intel 945 GM

2009-12-07 Thread David Wynn
Probably copied the information out of the documentation somewhere.
Thank you for fixing the bug title.

-- 
Need display size quirk for Intel 945 GM
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/417675
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 439755] Re: epiphany-webkit crashed with SIGSEGV in strcmp()

2009-10-19 Thread David Wynn
I installed the latest version of Epiphany-browser (2.28.0-4ubuntu1).
After installation, I was able to load Epiphany and view a number of web
pages without seeing a crash.  Closing bug.

** Package changed: epiphany-webkit (Ubuntu) = epiphany-browser
(Ubuntu)

** Changed in: epiphany-browser (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = Fix Released

-- 
epiphany-webkit crashed with SIGSEGV in strcmp()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/439755
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 417675] Re: Need display size quirk for Intel 950 GMA

2009-10-05 Thread David Wynn
??? Doesn't support the hardware???

OK -- I thought that the goal with Linux was to be able to be installed
on pretty much all computers.  Why wouldn't we support a computer that's
only 3 - 4 years old?

Yes, the manufacturer is misreporting the screen size.  But, since this
is so common for certain Intel processors, instead of turning a blind
eye, we should be finding solutions that work for people that want to
try Linux.  This computer is still relatively recent, and worthy of
support -- even with the latest release of the *buntu's.

I'm sold on Linux.  And I'll keep using Linux.  And for the time being,
I'm satisified with the *buntu variants.  But I could see that such a
response could quickly turn a newbie cold on the whole Linux experience.

I was able to poke around and find the workaround for my system.  But,
there shouldn't need to be a workaround.  *buntu needs to just work,
out of the box.

-- 
Need display size quirk for Intel 950 GMA
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/417675
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 439755] Re: epiphany-webkit crashed with SIGSEGV in strcmp()

2009-10-02 Thread David Wynn
** Visibility changed to: Public

** Visibility changed to: Private

-- 
epiphany-webkit crashed with SIGSEGV in strcmp()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/439755
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 439755] Re: epiphany-webkit crashed with SIGSEGV in strcmp()

2009-10-02 Thread David Wynn
** Attachment removed: CoreDump.gz
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32765105/CoreDump.gz

** Visibility changed to: Public

-- 
epiphany-webkit crashed with SIGSEGV in strcmp()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/439755
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 439276] [NEW] Multiple finds impossible in Leafpad.

2009-09-30 Thread David Wynn
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: leafpad

Karmic Koala.  Leafpad version 0.8.13.

Following these steps, my copy of Leafpad fails every time to perform as
expected.

1) Load a document.
2) Go to Search - Find or hit Ctrl+F.  Notice when this first pops up, the 
Find button is greyed out and unusual.  That's OK at this point.  I haven't 
told it what to find.
3) Start typing something to search for in the Find What box.  With the first 
keypress, the Find button becomes active and is usable.
4) Actually perform the find.  I finish typing what I want to find, and hit 
return or click the Find button.  It does find what I asked it to find.  I can 
even do find next (Ctrl+G) and find prev (Shift+Ctrl+G) without a problem.

Everything up to this point seems to works as expected.  But, somehow it
sets up something inthe background that makes the next bit not work.

5) Go to Search - Find or hit Ctrl-F.  Note again that the Find button is 
greyed out, but there is already text in the Find What box.  That's already 
peculiar.  Why can't I search for the same thing I just searched for?  Turns 
out -- if I cancel, I can still successfully use find next and find prev, but 
these only search for the first search text I specified.
6) Start typing something to search for in the Find What box.  This time, it 
doesn't matter what I type in the box.  Nothing makes the find button active 
again.

So, the only way I can search for two different things in my document is
to open the document, search once, close leafpad, restart it, open my
document and search for the other term.

The Replace functionality as broken in the exact same way.

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: i386
Date: Wed Sep 30 05:22:01 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Package: leafpad 0.8.13-1
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-11.36-generic
SourcePackage: leafpad
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-11-generic i686

** Affects: leafpad (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386 karmic

-- 
Multiple finds impossible in Leafpad.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/439276
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 439276] Re: Multiple finds impossible in Leafpad.

2009-09-30 Thread David Wynn

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32743598/Dependencies.txt

-- 
Multiple finds impossible in Leafpad.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/439276
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 439275] [NEW] Multiple finds impossible in Leafpad.

2009-09-30 Thread David Wynn
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: leafpad

Karmic Koala.  Leafpad version 0.8.13.

Following these steps, my copy of Leafpad fails every time to perform as
expected.

1) Load a document.
2) Go to Search - Find or hit Ctrl+F.  Notice when this first pops up, the 
Find button is greyed out and unusual.  That's OK at this point.  I haven't 
told it what to find.
3) Start typing something to search for in the Find What box.  With the first 
keypress, the Find button becomes active and is usable.
4) Actually perform the find.  I finish typing what I want to find, and hit 
return or click the Find button.  It does find what I asked it to find.  I can 
even do find next (Ctrl+G) and find prev (Shift+Ctrl+G) without a problem.

Everything up to this point seems to works as expected.  But, somehow it
sets up something inthe background that makes the next bit not work.

5) Go to Search - Find or hit Ctrl-F.  Note again that the Find button is 
greyed out, but there is already text in the Find What box.  That's already 
peculiar.  Why can't I search for the same thing I just searched for?  Turns 
out -- if I cancel, I can still successfully use find next and find prev, but 
these only search for the first search text I specified.
6) Start typing something to search for in the Find What box.  This time, it 
doesn't matter what I type in the box.  Nothing makes the find button active 
again.

So, the only way I can search for two different things in my document is
to open the document, search once, close leafpad, restart it, open my
document and search for the other term.

The Replace functionality as broken in the exact same way.

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: i386
Date: Wed Sep 30 05:22:01 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Package: leafpad 0.8.13-1
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-11.36-generic
SourcePackage: leafpad
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-11-generic i686

** Affects: leafpad (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386 karmic

-- 
Multiple finds impossible in Leafpad.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/439275
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 439275] Re: Multiple finds impossible in Leafpad.

2009-09-30 Thread David Wynn

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32743596/Dependencies.txt

-- 
Multiple finds impossible in Leafpad.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/439275
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 439289] [NEW] Lubuntu-desktop has unnecessary requirements

2009-09-30 Thread David Wynn
Public bug reported:

lubuntu-desktop has built itself as supposedly a light-weight
alternative to other *buntu-desktop packages.  From what I read, the
intent is for support with minimal resources, including (but not
exclusively) supporting older systems.

Lubuntu-desktop depends on bluetooth and gnome-bluetooth.  This is a
requirement that none of the other -desktop packages have.  Others
*recommend* bluez-cups and bluez-utils.  But they do not depend on them.
Bluetooth wireless should be no more than a recommends on lubuntu also.

Pulse-audio is not fully integrated into all of Linux, and has enough
issues of its own.  It would be best if the lightweight buntu allowed
for pulse to be stripped out.  Again, recommend, not depend.  Same could
be said for gstreamer.  ALSA does very fine on its own.  Make sure an
ALSA system is fully in place, and let the user decide whether to put
anything on top of it.  We're going for lightweight here.

The heavyweight browser (firefox) is demanded by lubuntu-desktop.
Better here to do something like what the lxde package did.  Suggest one
browser (could be Firefox), but only depend on www-browser.  (Actually,
lxde only recommended www-browser, but I could see moving this up to
depend for a -desktop package.)

lubuntu-desktop depends on language-pack-en.  That's just culturally
wrong.  Why insist that everyone speak English?  None of the other
*buntu-desktops demand one particular language -- although each depends
on a language-selector.

lubuntu-desktop depends on xorg, as it should.  It also depends on xorg-
xserver-input-all and the evtouch package, which it should not.  The
xorg package and its dependencies already depend properly on input and
outputs.

lubuntu-desktop depends on abiword and gnumeric.  These may be the best
as far as lightness, but not the best as far as interoperability with
other systems (MS Office).  I would suggest recommending an office
package, but whether the user wants goffice, koffice, or oo.o should be
left to them.

** Affects: lubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Lubuntu-desktop has unnecessary requirements
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/439289
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 439276] Re: Multiple finds impossible in Leafpad.

2009-09-30 Thread David Wynn
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 439275 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/439275

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 439275
   Multiple finds impossible in Leafpad.

-- 
Multiple finds impossible in Leafpad.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/439276
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 432199] [NEW] phonon metapackage depends on unnecessary package

2009-09-17 Thread David Wynn
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: phonon

Karmic metapackage phonon depends on a package that has been replaced.
Instead of libphonon4, phonon should depend on the new name:
libqt4-phonon.

** Affects: phonon (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: karmic

** Tags added: karmic

-- 
phonon metapackage depends on unnecessary package
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432199
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 418083] Re: package gdm (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1

2009-09-12 Thread David Wynn
I had removed completely the /var/lib/gdm library (or file?) via these
commands:

cd /var/lib
sudo rm -rf gdm

then I tried to install gdm (2.27.90-0ubuntu3) again.  I got the
following errors:

The home directory '/var/lib/gdm' already exists.  Not copying from 
'/etc/skel'. 
adduser: Warning: The home directory '/var/lib/gam' does not belong to the user 
you are currently creating.
  * changes will take effect when all current X sessions have ended.
invoke-rc.d: initscript gdm, action reload failed.

-- 
package gdm (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed 
post-removal script returned error exit status 1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418083
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 418083] Re: package gdm (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1

2009-09-10 Thread David Wynn
** Tags added: karmic

-- 
package gdm (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed 
post-removal script returned error exit status 1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418083
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 214413] Re: after upgrading from 7.10 to 8.04 cdrom won't mount

2009-09-10 Thread David Wynn
** Tags added: hardy

-- 
after upgrading from 7.10 to 8.04 cdrom won't mount
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/214413
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 325263] Re: KQ package very out of date.

2009-09-10 Thread David Wynn
** Tags added: intrepid jaunty karmic

-- 
KQ package very out of date.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/325263
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 324864] Re: nvidia-glx-96 driver for mx 440 causes problems with desmume

2009-09-10 Thread David Wynn
** Tags added: intrepid

-- 
nvidia-glx-96 driver for mx 440 causes problems with desmume
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/324864
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 339501] Re: lsb-desktop package depends on transitional package

2009-09-10 Thread David Wynn
** Tags added: intrepid jaunty karmic

-- 
lsb-desktop package depends on transitional package
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/339501
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 417630] Re: xfce4-goodies depends on transitional package

2009-09-10 Thread David Wynn
** Tags added: jaunty karmic

-- 
xfce4-goodies depends on transitional package
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/417630
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 155703] Re: Restricted Manager installs wrong nvidia driver

2009-09-09 Thread David Wynn
No updates to this bug since 2007.  Bug indicates its specific to the
7.10 release of restricted-manager.  Ubuntu 7.10 support ended on
4/18/09.  If this continues to be an issue on later versions of Ubuntu /
restricted-manager, please open a bug specific to the updated software.
Assuming this has been fixed by later releases.

** Changed in: restricted-manager (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Fix Released

-- 
Restricted Manager installs wrong nvidia driver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/155703
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 417675] Re: Need display size quirk for Intel 950 GMA

2009-09-09 Thread David Wynn
** Tags added: karmic
** Tags removed: kubuntu

-- 
Need display size quirk for Intel 950 GMA
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/417675
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 20943] Re: module insertion hangs in apic/irq setup

2009-09-09 Thread David Wynn
** Tags added: dapper intrepid

-- 
module insertion hangs in apic/irq setup
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/20943
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 27969] Re: grub 0.97 doesn't work on several machines

2009-09-09 Thread David Wynn
** Tags added: dapper

-- 
grub 0.97 doesn't work on several machines
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27969
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 27969] Re: grub 0.97 doesn't work on several machines

2009-09-09 Thread David Wynn
If this is still a lingering issue, the grub team should review the
original debian bug. It looks like some patch code has been added into
the upstream bug report.  If I read the accompanying explanation
correctly, this affects both grub and grub2.  For now, this has been
indicated as peculiar to code that was active round about the time of
dapper.

If anyone can confirm that this bug is still active in recent versions
of ubuntu / grub, please update this bug with recent information
regarding the version of ubuntu that you're testing.  For the
courageous, if you want to try the bug patch listed in the Debian bug,
please report back on your test results.

-- 
grub 0.97 doesn't work on several machines
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27969
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 418083] Re: package gdm (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1

2009-09-08 Thread David Wynn
Also, unable to purge gdm because of same error:
~$ sudo dpkg -P gdm
(Reading database ... 226268 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing gdm ...
Purging configuration files for gdm ...
dpkg: error processing gdm (--purge):
 subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
 gdm

This is after just upgrading to 2.27.90-0ubuntu2 (karmic)

-- 
package gdm (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed 
post-removal script returned error exit status 1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418083
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 418083] Re: package gdm (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1

2009-09-08 Thread David Wynn
(Sorry -- forgot to add:)
Note that synaptic registers gdm as removed, but in residual config status.

-- 
package gdm (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed 
post-removal script returned error exit status 1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418083
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 415718] Re: [Karmic] [regression] nvidia module 96 fails to load

2009-09-05 Thread David Wynn
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 391768 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/391768

Response #9 on bug 391768 gives a ppa that provides properly updated
nvidia 96 drivers.  Worked on my athlon classic, at least.  Give that a
try.  Granted, it appears that the powers that be are taking
considerable time to work the fix into the main repositories, but at
least a workable solution has been provided.

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 391768
   nvidia-96-kernel-source fails to build on Karmic

-- 
[Karmic] [regression] nvidia module 96 fails to load
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/415718
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 31218] Re: ubuntu-desktop package could depend on libstdc++5 (lots of thirdy party software requires this library)

2009-08-25 Thread David Wynn
I know this is an old bug -- but its also still open.

Wouldn't this kind of thing fall under LSB compliance?  Ubuntu 8.04 and
9.04 are tested as LSB 4.0 compliant.  Ubuntu 6.06 is LSB 3.1 compliant.
(See https://www.linuxfoundation.org/lsb-cert/productdir.php?by_lsb)  I
don't see Baltix listed.

Its my understanding, that distribution compliance indicates that we
have the libraries available for any LSB-compliant application to just
work with the system.  Now, for a specific computer to see such
functionality, they may need to install the LSB meta-packages, so it
would be a good thing to have the [u|ku|xu|edu]buntu-desktop meta-
packages at least suggest (if not recommend / require) the main lsb
meta-packages.  If the user chooses not to install such functionality,
that's their option.

If an application found on the web is not keeping lsb-compliant
libraries, then it would be the responsibility of the community and
community individuals to encourage the application to become lsb-
compliant so that the software just works in Linux -- almost any Linux
box.  Note that each generation of lsb ensures backwards compatability
(for a reasonable time period) with previous generations.  That allows
lsb-compliant applications time to evolve to newer libraries, as
technologies continue to advance.

As for Baltix, if they have not already, I would encourage them to seek
lsb certification so that they also have the necessary functionality to
support lsb-compliant applications.  Then bugs like this should be able
to be closed.

-- 
ubuntu-desktop package could depend on libstdc++5 (lots of thirdy party 
software requires this library)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/31218
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 417630] [NEW] xfce4-goodies depends on transitional package

2009-08-23 Thread David Wynn
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: xfce4-goodies

karmic (9.10) uses xfce4-goodies 4.4.2.2ubuntu1

xfce4-goodies in karmic depends on xfce4-screenshooter-plugin which has
been renamed to xfce4-screenshooter.  Please update this meta-package in
karmic so that it depends on the real package name.

** Affects: xfce4-goodies (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
xfce4-goodies depends on transitional package
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/417630
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 417675] [NEW] Need display size quirk for Intel 950 GMA

2009-08-23 Thread David Wynn
Public bug reported:

Issues created by upgrade to Karmic on Compaq C307NR laptop.

$ lspci -vvnn | grep -A1 VGA compat
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS, 
943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:27a2] (rev 03)
Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device [103c:30a5]

$ xrandr
Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1280 x 800, maximum 4096 x 4096
VGA1 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
LVDS1 connected 1280x800+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 289mm x 
21mm
   1280x800   60.1*+
   1024x768   60.0  
   800x60060.3  
   640x48059.9  
TV1 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)

As you can see, this is the typical misreported Intel screen size.
According to the manufacturer, the screen dimensions are 33.1 x 20.7 cm.
So, I have updated my xorg.conf with

Section Device
Identifier  Configured Video Device
Option  Monitor-LVDS1 Configured Monitor   -- Line 
Added
EndSection

Section Monitor
Identifier  Configured Monitor
DisplaySize 331 207 
-- Line Added
EndSection

And this successfully fixes the problems.

System fully upgraded from Linux Mint XFCE CE Gloria / Jaunty to Helena
/ Karmic.  Was working fine without additional xorg.conf tweaks in
Gloria / Jaunty, but upgrade to Helena / Karmic messed up the fonts.

Prior to fixing issue:
gdm was usable, but could not see what I was doing, as surrounding text was too 
large -- had to blindly type both userid and passwd.
 Once past the login screen, fonts normalized for splash screen leading to 
xfce.
kdm screen was navigatable, but all fonts, including typed userid and passwd, 
were enormous.
 Once past the login screen, fonts normalized for splash screen leading to 
xfce.
wdm looked fine, but splash screen leading to xfce still used enormous fonts.

Once inside XFCE, gtk applications seemed to go back to normal font
sizes.  All KDE applications were unusable due to enormous fonts, until
I changed XFCE to use custom dpi of 98 (as calculated by Xorg, after
forced DisplaySize added).  Even after XFCE tweak, some instances of
enormous fonts persisted in KDE applications until final xorg.conf tweak
added.

(Order of corrections -- added DisplaySize tweak in xorg.conf, forced
custom dpi in XFCE, added Monitor LVDS1 option to xorg.conf)

** Affects: xorg-server (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Need display size quirk for Intel 950 GMA
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/417675
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 417675] Re: Need display size quirk for Intel 950 GMA

2009-08-23 Thread David Wynn

** Attachment added: dmi.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30690908/dmi.txt

-- 
Need display size quirk for Intel 950 GMA
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/417675
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 414140] Re: [karmic] impossible to switch from kdm to gdm

2009-08-20 Thread David Wynn
I am simply confirming this issue.  (gdm version 2.27.4-0ubuntu11) Both
on install, and when running dpkg-reconfigure gdm, gdm returns the
issue provided by the OP.

When I try to purge gdm from the system, I get 
subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1

While installed, if I try to run gdmsetup, it shows the frontend, but
any attempt to unlock the frontend so I can change settings, results
in nothing.  The window just sits there as if I'd never pressed
anything.

Running gdmsetup through a terminal window results in the following
initial messages:

** (gdmsetup:7290): WARNING **: Error calling
GetValue('daemon/TimedLoginEnable'): The name org.gnome.DisplayManager
was not provided by any .service files

** (gdmsetup:7290): WARNING **: Error calling 
GetValue('daemon/TimedLoginDelay'): The name org.gnome.DisplayManager was not 
provided by any .service files
** (gdmsetup:7290): DEBUG: init delay=30
** (gdmsetup:7290): DEBUG: GdmUserManager: skipping shell /bin/false
** (gdmsetup:7290): DEBUG: Failed to identify the current session: Unable to 
lookup session information for process '7290'

** (gdmsetup:7290): WARNING **: Unable to find users: no seat-id found
** (gdmsetup:7290): DEBUG: GdmUserManager: explicitly skipping user: nobody
** (gdmsetup:7290): DEBUG: GdmUserManager: user icon changed
** (gdmsetup:7290): DEBUG: adding monitor for '/home/dawynn/.face'
** (gdmsetup:7290): DEBUG: GdmUserManager: user icon changed
** (gdmsetup:7290): DEBUG: adding monitor for '/home/mommy/.face'
** (gdmsetup:7290): DEBUG: GdmUserManager: user icon changed
** (gdmsetup:7290): DEBUG: adding monitor for '/home/alex/.face'
** (gdmsetup:7290): DEBUG: GdmUserManager: user icon changed
** (gdmsetup:7290): DEBUG: adding monitor for '/home/derek/.face'
** (gdmsetup:7290): DEBUG: Getting list of sessions for user 1004
** (gdmsetup:7290): DEBUG: Found 0 sessions for user derek
** (gdmsetup:7290): DEBUG: Getting list of sessions for user 1002
** (gdmsetup:7290): DEBUG: Found 0 sessions for user alex
** (gdmsetup:7290): DEBUG: Getting list of sessions for user 1003
** (gdmsetup:7290): DEBUG: Found 0 sessions for user mommy
** (gdmsetup:7290): DEBUG: Getting list of sessions for user 1000
** (gdmsetup:7290): DEBUG: Found 1 sessions for user dawynn
** (gdmsetup:7290): DEBUG: GdmUserManager: not adding session on other seat: 
/org/freedesktop/ConsoleKit/Session1

When I try the unlock button, I get the following additional messages:

** (gdmsetup:7290): WARNING **: Failed to unlock: The name
org.gnome.DisplayManager was not provided by any .service files

I tried installing the jaunty version of gdm (2.20.10-0ubuntu2) but x11-common 
would not allow it.
I searched the debian package lists, and could find no versions of gdm (not 
even in sid) that were even as recent as the jaunty version.


** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
[karmic] impossible to switch from kdm to gdm
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414140
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 339501] Re: lsb-desktop package depends on transitional package

2009-06-02 Thread David Wynn
Still a problem in Karmic.  lsb-desktop still depends on lib4qt-gui, and
lib4qt-gui still describes itself as a dummy transitional package.
Dummy transitional packages should be removable -- nothing should depend
on them.  Either lsb-desktop should be directed to the child packages
which libqt4-gui depends on, or libqt4-gui should have its description
changed so it no longer describes itself as a dummy transitional
package.

-- 
lsb-desktop package depends on transitional package
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/339501
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 347075] Re: letters of the menu bar are hidden

2009-03-25 Thread David Wynn
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 294076 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/294076

Bug 294076.  Issue already reported.  Several times.

Basically, unless you make a couple simple changes to xorg.conf, if you
try to run compiz with nvidia drivers (especially the 96 series), OO.o
loses its menu text.

Marking as another of many duplicates for 294076.

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 294076
   KDE3 apps, OO.o and Wine loose screen text when run with desktop effects

-- 
letters of the menu bar are hidden
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/347075
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to k3b in ubuntu (via bug 294076).

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


[Bug 346532] Re: This bug is related to the display compiz / openoffice.org

2009-03-25 Thread David Wynn
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 294076 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/294076

Duplicate of bug 294076.  Have you tried changing the render accel
settings in you xorg.conf?  This simple change (documented in 294076)
seems to be working for several other users.

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 294076
   KDE3 apps, OO.o and Wine loose screen text when run with desktop effects

-- 
This bug is related to the display compiz / openoffice.org
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346532
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to k3b in ubuntu (via bug 294076).

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


[Bug 336433] Re: Openoffice file menus do not display with visual effects turned on.

2009-03-20 Thread David Wynn
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 294076 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/294076

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 294076
   KDE3 apps, OO.o and Wine loose screen text when run with desktop effects

-- 
Openoffice file menus do not display with visual effects turned on.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336433
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to k3b in ubuntu (via bug 294076).

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


[Bug 343149] Re: no letters on every tab

2009-03-20 Thread David Wynn
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 294076 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/294076

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 294076
   KDE3 apps, OO.o and Wine loose screen text when run with desktop effects

-- 
no letters on every tab
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/343149
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to k3b in ubuntu (via bug 294076).

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


[Bug 339502] [NEW] python-pyvorbis depends on transitional package

2009-03-08 Thread David Wynn
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: python-pyvorbis

Intrepid: python-pyvorbis depends on package python-pyogg.  This is now
a transitional package depending on the new name: python-ogg.  python-
pyvorbis needs to be updated to depend on python-ogg instead of python-
pyogg.

** Affects: pyvorbis (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
python-pyvorbis depends on transitional package
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/339502
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 339501] [NEW] lsb-desktop package depends on transitional package

2009-03-08 Thread David Wynn
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: lsb-desktop

meta-package lsb-desktop currently depends on libqt4-gui which is a
dummy transitional package.  Need to change lsb-desktop to depend on the
various libraries that libqt4-gui depends on, and stop depending on
libqt4-gui.

** Affects: lsb (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
lsb-desktop package depends on transitional package
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/339501
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 339501] Re: lsb-desktop package depends on transitional package

2009-03-08 Thread David Wynn
Forgot to mention -- I noticed this in Intrepid.  Not sure if it affects
other releases at this time.

-- 
lsb-desktop package depends on transitional package
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/339501
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 339504] [NEW] gdm depends on transitional package

2009-03-08 Thread David Wynn
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: gdm

Intrepid: Package gdm depends on transitional package xbase-clients.
xbase-clients has now been broken into several smaller packages.  Please
either change gdm to depend on the appropriate smaller packages of
xbase-clients, or change xbase-clients to describe itself as a meta-
package instead of a transitional package.

** Affects: gdm (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
gdm depends on transitional package
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/339504
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 336675] Re: Names in the menu of Openoffice Doesn't appear

2009-03-03 Thread David Wynn
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 294076 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/294076

I marked this as a duplicate.  Looks like you've got the standard
problem seen when trying to use compiz and OO.o with the nVidia driver.

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 294076
   KDE3 apps, OO.o and Wine loose screen text when run with desktop effects

-- 
Names in the menu of Openoffice Doesn't appear
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336675
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 324864] Re: nvidia-glx-96 driver for mx 440 causes problems with desmume

2009-02-25 Thread David Wynn
Please provide a copy of your /etc/X11/xorg.conf and
/var/log/Xorg.0.log.  Bug still kept in incomplete status, pending the
delivery of these files.

-- 
nvidia-glx-96 driver for mx 440 causes problems with desmume
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/324864
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 329952] Re: Openoffice 3.0.1 display problems when desktop effects are enabled

2009-02-16 Thread David Wynn
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 294076 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/294076

I marked this as another example of bug 294076.  Please review the
changes others have found effective in solving this problem.
Specifically, check what Daveh has suggested in bug 294076.

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 294076
   KDE3 apps, OO.o and Wine loose screen text when run with desktop effects

-- 
Openoffice 3.0.1 display problems when desktop effects are enabled
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/329952
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to k3b in ubuntu (via bug 294076).

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


[Bug 294076] Re: KDE3 apps, OO.o and Wine loose screen text when run with desktop effects

2009-02-16 Thread David Wynn
Wow!  34 duplicates.  Who has authority to add a note on the 8.10
release notes for this?  Need to have a blurb indicating that using
nVidia + compiz causes invisible menus in OO.o, unless changes are made
to xorg.conf to turn RenderAccel off.  (May want to note if this is
general to nVidia or specific to the 96 series)

-- 
KDE3 apps, OO.o and Wine loose screen text when run with desktop effects
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/294076
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to k3b in ubuntu.

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


[Bug 75882] Re: apt-get autoremove removes required packages

2009-02-11 Thread David Wynn
No, it's not.  Look at your output from Show.  Priority: shows as
Optional.  Gnome-core is not a Priority: Required package.  Its a
meta-package that can be used to bring in one group's (Gnome developers?
Debian?) idea of a base set of Gnome packages, but it is not essential.
The Ubuntu folks have developed their own idea of what should be
included as part of a Gnome system, and these would be the Depends
portion of ubuntu-desktop.  If you have ubuntu-minimal, ubuntu-standard,
and ubuntu-desktop installed, you have everything you need for a
functional Gnome desktop, without installing gnome-core.

I'm going to assume this was fixed since the Feisty era then, and
reclose this bug.

** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Fix Released

-- 
apt-get autoremove removes required packages
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/75882
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 108954] Re: Feisty install fails

2009-02-11 Thread David Wynn
Bug claims to be a Feisty-specific issue, and Feisty is no longer
supported.  As bug has had no activity since Gutsy was released, I am
closing this as an Invalid bug.

** Changed in: debian-installer (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
Feisty install fails
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/108954
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 314137] Re: Rendering Issues in Text of Menus and Tool Tips

2009-02-10 Thread David Wynn
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 294076 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/294076

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 294076
   KDE3 apps, OO.o and Wine loose screen text when run with desktop effects

-- 
Rendering Issues in Text of Menus and Tool Tips
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314137
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to k3b in ubuntu (via bug 294076).

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


[Bug 311230] Re: After installing Intrepid Ibex, the openoffice program doesn't display the tools menus; File, Edit, View...?

2009-02-10 Thread David Wynn
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 294076 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/294076

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 294076
   KDE3 apps, OO.o and Wine loose screen text when run with desktop effects

-- 
After installing Intrepid Ibex, the openoffice program doesn't display the 
tools menus;File, Edit, View...?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/311230
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to k3b in ubuntu (via bug 294076).

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


[Bug 310815] Re: open office blank buttons

2009-02-10 Thread David Wynn
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 294076 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/294076

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 294076
   KDE3 apps, OO.o and Wine loose screen text when run with desktop effects

-- 
open office blank buttons
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/310815
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 326411] Re: text in all menu lost !

2009-02-10 Thread David Wynn
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 294076 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/294076

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 294076
   KDE3 apps, OO.o and Wine loose screen text when run with desktop effects

-- 
text in all menu lost !
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326411
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 300243] Re: titlebars disappear when using compiz GeForce4 MX 440 AGP 8x

2009-02-10 Thread David Wynn
Not sure why this happens, but something gets messed up in the xorg.conf
by using the automated tools.  Here's a few parts of the original
xorg.conf posted on this page:

Section Monitor
Identifier Configured Monitor
EndSection

Section Monitor
Identifier Monitor0
VendorName Unknown
ModelName  Sony CPD-G420
HorizSync   30.0 - 110.0
VertRefresh 48.0 - 170.0
EndSection

Does the user have two monitors?  Doubtful.  So there shouldn't be two
monitor entries.  I would suggest removing the first Monitor entry.

Section Device
Identifier Configured Video Device
Driver nvidia
Option NoLogo True
EndSection

Section Device
Identifier Device0
Driver nvidia
VendorName NVIDIA Corporation
BoardName  GeForce4 MX 440 with AGP8X
EndSection

Two devices?  Probably not.  I would strip out the first one, but you
may want to consider keeping the Option and putting it in the second
Device.  (Would prevent the computer from showing the nVidia logo when
X starts.  Your choice.)

Section Screen
Identifier Default Screen
Device Configured Video Device
MonitorConfigured Monitor
DefaultDepth24
Option AddARGBGLXVisuals True
Option DisableGLXRootClipping True
EndSection

Section Screen
Identifier Screen0
Device Device0
MonitorMonitor0
DefaultDepth24
Option TwinView 0
Option TwinViewXineramaInfoOrder CRT-0
Option metamodes 1600x1200_75 +0+0
SubSection Display
Depth   24
EndSubSection
EndSection

Here things get trickier.  Notice how Screen0 is mentioned in the
ServerLayout section of xorg.conf, so you need to keep those two
identifiers coordinated.  You'll also need to make sure that the
Device and Monitor setting listed here match what you have for
identifiers above.

I believe that you can get away with deleting the TwinView settings, as
you appear to be using the defaults.  But I would suggest taking the two
options from the first Screen entry, moving them into your second
Screen entry, and removing the first Screen specification.

I don't know what makes the duplicate entries, but I've found on my own
computer that simplifying xorg.conf makes it obey quite a bit better.

Finally, you indicated that you tried to update how compiz handles
rendering.  See bug 294076.  Looks like others are going the opposite
way and changing how nVidia handles rendering by changing xorg.conf.
Try adding:

Option RenderAccel 0

to your Device settings, and see if that helps your rendering
problems.

-- 
titlebars disappear when using compiz GeForce4 MX 440 AGP 8x
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/300243
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 327016] Re: Open Office drop down menus (title and subsequent menu options) are just underscores (_)

2009-02-10 Thread David Wynn
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 294076 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/294076

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 294076
   KDE3 apps, OO.o and Wine loose screen text when run with desktop effects

-- 
Open Office drop down menus (title and subsequent menu options) are just 
underscores (_)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/327016
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 294076] Re: KDE3 apps, OO.o and Wine loose screen text when run with desktop effects

2009-02-09 Thread David Wynn
96.43.10 fixes this issue?  Great!  When will that be put into Intrepid?

-- 
KDE3 apps, OO.o and Wine loose screen text when run with desktop effects
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/294076
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to k3b in ubuntu.

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


[Bug 325172] Re: OpenOffice when upgrades processed has no menu script

2009-02-09 Thread David Wynn
I changed the package reference, because you are not using the 96 series
drivers.  Stuart, please review bug 294076.  This bug is more for the 96
series of drivers, but the fixes here are worth trying on your system.
Especially review what daveh has contributed to the bug as a possible
fix.

** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-173 (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: nvidia-graphics-drivers-96 = nvidia-graphics-drivers-173

-- 
OpenOffice when upgrades processed has no menu script
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/325172
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 327056] Re: nvidia-96-kernel-source and driver results in compiz issues with Quadro 4 XGL980

2009-02-09 Thread David Wynn
I know that Intrepid still hsa 96.43.09, but bug 294076 identifies some
fixes users are using to work around the issues in Intrepid.  It's worth
reviewing whether these same fixes will cure your problem.  Especially
see daveh's fix regarding OO.o menus.

-- 
nvidia-96-kernel-source and driver results in compiz issues with Quadro 4 XGL980
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/327056
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 27969] Re: grub 0.97 doesn't work on several machines

2009-02-09 Thread David Wynn
grub 0.97-2 must have been a dapper or edgy version.  (Perhaps an update
to dapper?)  Based on packages.ubuntu.com, dapper uses 0.97-1, while
gutsy uses 0.97-29, and of course later releases use later versions of
grub.  (Edgy and feisty are no longer supported)

I'm just trying to get a handle on the scope of this issue.  Is this
issue peculiar to Dapper (which is still supported on the desktop
through June 2009 and on server through June 2011)?  Or does this affect
later versions of grub, and thus later releases also?

-- 
grub 0.97 doesn't work on several machines
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27969
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 326411] Re: text in all menu lost !

2009-02-08 Thread David Wynn
As has been reported before, this tends to happen when certain packages
try to work together.

1) Open-Office
2) nVidia (esp. 96.43.09)
3) Compiz

See bug 297836. If this is what you have, please marke this as a
duplicate of 297836, and review what others are already doing in that
bug.

-- 
text in all menu lost !
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326411
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 323164] Re: OpenOffice 2.4 PL in Ubuntu 8.10, white fonts in menu.

2009-02-08 Thread David Wynn
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 294076 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/294076

Marked this as duplicate of bug 294076.  Please go there and see the
solutions that are being posted.  daveh seems to have proposed a
solution that is working for several people.

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 294076
   KDE3 apps, OO.o and Wine loose screen text when run with desktop effects

-- 
OpenOffice 2.4 PL in Ubuntu 8.10, white fonts in menu. 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/323164
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 324864] Re: nvidia-glx-96 driver for mx 440 causes problems with desmume

2009-02-05 Thread David Wynn
Is this a problem with the package you're downloading, or a problem with
how you have your video card set up?

Make sure you have the mesa-utils package installed, and run
glxgears from a terminal.  This will bring up a pop-up window that
should show a set of interlocked gears turning.  In the meantime, every
10 seconds or so, the terminal window will print out a message about the
number of frames per second that you're seeing in the pop-up window.
While this is not intended as a benchmarking tool, it is an extremely
efficient test of whether opengl is working for you.  Make sure that
glxgears stays running for half a minute or more before you close it.

If your pop-up window only shows black (no gears), if your fps show less
than 1000, or if glxgears after printing only a couple fps messages
before crashing, then something needs to be addressed with your card
setup, and this is an appropriate place to deal with that issue.

If glxgears runs fine, and you're still having problems with this one
package, I would suggest that its more likely there's a problem in the
package that needs to be addressed with the author of the package.  In
that case, I would follow the bug tracking tools for the package.

-- 
nvidia-glx-96 driver for mx 440 causes problems with desmume
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/324864
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 324864] Re: nvidia-glx-96 driver for mx 440 causes problems with desmume

2009-02-05 Thread David Wynn
If you determine that OpenGL is not set up correctly on your system,
please attach a copy of your /etc/X11/xorg.conf and /var/log/Xorg.0.log
for review.

** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-96 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
nvidia-glx-96 driver for mx 440 causes problems with desmume
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/324864
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 245149] Re: package nvidia-glx-dev None [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/nvidia-glx-dev.list] failed to install/upgrade: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 2

2009-02-05 Thread David Wynn
Please make sure that you have the intrepid-security and intrepid-
updates repositories enabled.  The first 96* series driver that worked
with the Intrepid Xorg was 96.43.09, which is available in the update
repositories.  The information above indicates you're still using
96.43.05.

-- 
package nvidia-glx-dev None [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/nvidia-glx-dev.list] 
failed to install/upgrade: subprocess pre-installation script returned error 
exit status 2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/245149
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 291964] Re: xubuntu 8.10 and dell c810 nv geforce 2go not working with any driver recommend staying with 8.04

2009-02-05 Thread David Wynn
Please make sure that you have the intrepid-security and intrepid-
updates repositories enabled.  The first 96* series driver that worked
with the Intrepid Xorg was 96.43.09, which is available in the update
repositories.  The information above indicates you're still using
96.43.05.

The message you're reporting also indicates you're still using the
default version of jockey which had the 96 and older series of drivers
blacklisted.  Again, the solution is to add in the updates repositories
and make sure you're fully updated.

Yes, when Intrepid went live, legacy drivers were not working, but this
has been fixed and 8.10 is fully usable with the drivers in the main
updates repositories.

-- 
xubuntu 8.10 and dell c810 nv geforce 2go not working with any driver recommend 
staying with 8.04
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291964
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 325185] Re: Nvidia GeForce 400 Crashed On Uninstallation

2009-02-05 Thread David Wynn
Please reference bug 300476.  That bug talks about font problems in some
applications run through wine, and it gives an easy fix that can be
applied to the registry.  Please let us know whether this registry fix
might correct your notepad issue.

BTW, if you're only using wine for notepad, I would think that you may
want to reconsider your choice of tools.  There are a multitude of text
editors available in Linux that can do exactly the same thing as
notepad.  gedit, kedit, kate, vi, jed, emacs, mousepad, etc.  The list
is seemingly endless.

Yes, there are recognized font issues with wine, as noted in 300476, but
if notepad is your only use for wine, you would be better served by
removing wine, then by removing the only driver for your video card that
provides OpenGL functionality.

-- 
Nvidia GeForce 400 Crashed On Uninstallation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/325185
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 311230] Re: After installing Intrepid Ibex, the openoffice program doesn't display the tools menus; File, Edit, View...?

2009-02-05 Thread David Wynn
Could be a dupe of 220443.  But that's for upgrading to Hardy.  See bug
297836 for specifics in dealing with an upgrade to Intrepid that
involves OO.o, compiz, and nVidia 96.43.09.  Mark as a dupe of 297836 if
this is your issue.

-- 
After installing Intrepid Ibex, the openoffice program doesn't display the 
tools menus;File, Edit, View...?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/311230
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 310815] Re: open office blank buttons

2009-02-05 Thread David Wynn
Happens a lot whenever the following three try to work together:

1) Open-Office
2) nVidia (esp. 96.43.09)
3) Compiz

See bug 297836.  If this is what you have, we may have a dup.

-- 
open office blank buttons
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/310815
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 309199] Re: text on menus of openoffice writer 2.4 does not show

2009-02-05 Thread David Wynn
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 297836 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297836

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 297836
   8.10 - compiz normal + nvidia binary video loses openoffice menu text

-- 
text on menus of openoffice writer 2.4 does not show
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/309199
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 314137] Re: Rendering Issues in Text of Menus and Tool Tips

2009-02-05 Thread David Wynn
Can happen when compiz, OO.o and nVidia drivers enabled.  See bug 297836
for others with the same issues.  Please provide more information
regarding your driver, and your computer if this is still an issue.

If this is your issue, please mark this bug as a dupe of 297836.

-- 
Rendering Issues in Text of Menus and Tool Tips
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314137
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 313362] Re: Titles not appearing on installed apps

2009-02-05 Thread David Wynn
User indicates that it was a matter of using the wrong nVidia driver.
I've marked this as Fix Released.

** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-96 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = Fix Released

-- 
Titles not appearing on installed apps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/313362
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 308830] Re: Toolbar text is invisible

2009-02-05 Thread David Wynn
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 297836 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297836

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 297836
   8.10 - compiz normal + nvidia binary video loses openoffice menu text

-- 
Toolbar text is invisible
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308830
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 315739] Re: I use OO.o in Italian. I can't see command in menu.

2009-02-05 Thread David Wynn
Using compiz?  Which nVidia driver?  See bug 297836.  If this is a
duplicate of that bug, please mark as such.

-- 
I use OO.o in Italian. I can't see command in menu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315739
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 315045] Re: No letters in top menuś

2009-02-05 Thread David Wynn
Using nVidia? compiz?  Bug 297836 shows others reporting the same issue
when the three try to work together.  If this is your issue, please mark
this bug as a duplicate of 297836.  Thanks!

-- 
No letters in top menuś
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315045
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 318868] Re: can not display the written openoffice and amsn nn opens but you can see written in the toolbar

2009-02-05 Thread David Wynn
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 297836 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297836

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 297836
   8.10 - compiz normal + nvidia binary video loses openoffice menu text

-- 
can not display the written openoffice and amsn nn opens but you can see 
written in the toolbar
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318868
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 317629] Re: Open office 2.4 there is no text in the menue - olnly with desktop effekts

2009-02-05 Thread David Wynn
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 297836 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297836

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 297836
   8.10 - compiz normal + nvidia binary video loses openoffice menu text

-- 
Open office 2.4 there is no text in the menue - olnly with desktop effekts 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317629
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 325172] Re: OpenOffice when upgrades processed has no menu script

2009-02-05 Thread David Wynn
Please indicate whether you are using compiz, and include copies of
/etc/X11/xorg.conf and /var/log/Xorg.0.log.  It's possible that this bug
is a duplicate of bug 297836.

** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-96 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
OpenOffice when upgrades processed has no menu script
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/325172
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 323164] Re: OpenOffice 2.4 PL in Ubuntu 8.10, white fonts in menu.

2009-02-05 Thread David Wynn
Please indicate whether you are using compiz, and include copies of
/etc/X11/xorg.conf and /var/log/Xorg.0.log.  It's possible this is
another duplicate of bug 297836.

** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-96 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
OpenOffice 2.4 PL in Ubuntu 8.10, white fonts in menu. 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/323164
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 322980] Re: OpenOffice Draw doesn't show button labels

2009-02-05 Thread David Wynn
Using nVidia?  Compiz?  See bug 297836.  If this is your issue, please
mark this bug as a duplicate of 297836.

** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-96 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
OpenOffice Draw doesn't show button labels
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322980
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


  1   2   >