[Bug 2024019] Re: Add GCC atomic support (-moutline-atomics) for arm64 on Focal
Thanks Andreas. I retriggered gbrowse armhf again due to testbed error. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2024019 Title: Add GCC atomic support (-moutline-atomics) for arm64 on Focal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haproxy/+bug/2024019/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064930] Re: dnsmasq cannot execute at systemctl
Nick, were there any other issues here? Sorry for letting this expire. It looks like there's 2 improvements that could be made, but don't seem high priority if nothing functional is really breaking - 1) check that the port is available in the maintainer script 2) if port is not open, create a descriptive error/warning ** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu) Status: Expired => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064930 Title: dnsmasq cannot execute at systemctl To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/2064930/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2072700] Re: [Bionic/Focal] Unbound prerm script stops the service on upgrades
I kicked off a build for both bionic/focal at [0]. [0] - https://launchpad.net/~mitchdz/+archive/ubuntu/lp2072700-unbound- downtime -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072700 Title: [Bionic/Focal] Unbound prerm script stops the service on upgrades To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unbound/+bug/2072700/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2072700] Re: [Bionic/Focal] Unbound prerm script stops the service on upgrades
Thanks Salvatore. This change makes sense to me. I propose the following: 1) Creating a test package 2) Ensuring no other issues occur due to the change 3) If good - we can stage the changes in this package and tag it as block-proposed, what this will do is not immediately apply the change, but when another update comes along (either for security, or for a regular bug fix) this change will be included in that, as to eliminate the need for an extra update just for this. This will not fix the issue on the next upgrade as mentioned before - but the upgrades after that will have the updated behavior. To have this new behavior immediately you will have to unfortunately modify the prerm script currently installed - but of course do so at your own risk :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072700 Title: [Bionic/Focal] Unbound prerm script stops the service on upgrades To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unbound/+bug/2072700/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2072700] Re: [Bionic/Focal] Unbound prerm script stops the service on upgrades
Actually this will be more involved than simply updating the prerm maintainer script - simply because when you upgrade a package, the currently installed prerm script will be executed, so changing this in a new package upgrade will not fix the underlying issue, but will for the next upgrades. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072700 Title: [Bionic/Focal] Unbound prerm script stops the service on upgrades To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unbound/+bug/2072700/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2072700] Re: [Bionic/Focal] Unbound prerm script stops the service on upgrades
Thank you for making this bug report and making Ubuntu better Salvatore! Does unbound remain inactive after the upgrade, or does the postinst maintainer script start it up again for you successfully? If automatically restarted, how long is this downtime you are experiencing when doing the upgrades? I don't imagine it should be terribly long, but I could see that being an issue on certain devices. Either way, the patch seems simple enough. It will not apply directly to the package, but we can simply remove #DEBHELPER# macro from d/unbound.prerm and replace it with the fixed version. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072700 Title: [Bionic/Focal] Unbound prerm script stops the service on upgrades To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unbound/+bug/2072700/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068729] Re: pam_radius_auth: Failed to open RADIUS IPv6 socket: Address family not supported by protocol
Thanks for mentioning that, I definitely missed that in the setup. However even with setting those parameters it is still not reproducible (same steps as #12, except update the grub cmdline and use a VM instead of container) root@n-vm:~# cat /proc/cmdline BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-6.8.0-35-generic root=UUID=7df54820-4e88-4805-aed8-832ab23eb0ea ro ipv6.disable=1 console=tty1 console=ttyS0 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068729 Title: pam_radius_auth: Failed to open RADIUS IPv6 socket: Address family not supported by protocol To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libpam-radius-auth/+bug/2068729/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069324] Re: vsftpd hangs with SIGCHLD when pam_exec.so is used
Thank you for your time in attempting to install the package Markus. I agree with Paride in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vsftpd/+bug/2069324/comments/8, we should go ahead and implement this fix on our side. I'll attempt a quick repro tomorrow, but I'm pretty booked so if it takes substantial time then I'll defer the reproduction and validation for someone else. If repro is easy, I'll go ahead and stage the change back to Focal. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069324 Title: vsftpd hangs with SIGCHLD when pam_exec.so is used To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vsftpd/+bug/2069324/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1756785] Re: lxcfs startup failures because fuse directory not empty
** Summary changed: - lxcfs startup failues because fuse directory not empty + lxcfs startup failures because fuse directory not empty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1756785 Title: lxcfs startup failures because fuse directory not empty To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxcfs/+bug/1756785/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2071949] Re: Missing frame pointers on Noble
Thanks Danilo, it seems the fix from debian is pretty straightforward. Would you like to do the SRU for this package? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071949 Title: Missing frame pointers on Noble To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipvsadm/+bug/2071949/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1756785] Re: lxcfs startup failues because fuse directory not empty
Thanks Felipe. This bug will remain in an incomplete state then, and will expire in 53 days. Please give us an update if you have any new information, or leads on this issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1756785 Title: lxcfs startup failures because fuse directory not empty To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxcfs/+bug/1756785/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1957079] Re: [SRU] Update WALinuxAgent to 2.5.0
Is this perhaps a duplicate of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/walinuxagent/+bug/2068021? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1957079 Title: [SRU] Update WALinuxAgent to 2.5.0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/walinuxagent/+bug/1957079/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1957079] Re: [SRU] Update WALinuxAgent to 2.5.0
Or rather, 2068021 is a duplicate of this one. Either way, I think this bug should be made a duplicate of the aforementioned bug report unless otherwise stated. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1957079 Title: [SRU] Update WALinuxAgent to 2.5.0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/walinuxagent/+bug/1957079/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068729] Re: pam_radius_auth: Failed to open RADIUS IPv6 socket: Address family not supported by protocol
Real, Is there more steps you took to configure the system? I'm not able to reproduce the issue. Here's the steps I took to attempt a reproduction. $ lxc launch ubuntu:noble n $ lxc shell n # apt update -y && apt upgrade -y # echo "auth sufficient pam_radius_auth.so" >> /etc/pam.d/sudo # echo "user ALL=(ALL:ALL) ALL" > /etc/sudoers.d/support # sudo true -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068729 Title: pam_radius_auth: Failed to open RADIUS IPv6 socket: Address family not supported by protocol To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libpam-radius-auth/+bug/2068729/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1887558] Re: multipathd bcache disks do not get picked up by multipath-tools during boot
I'm working on the oracular multipath-tools merge right now, and there are some udev changes there. Once that gets in -proposed I'll test this issue again in Oracular and try to fix it there first. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887558 Title: multipathd bcache disks do not get picked up by multipath-tools during boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bcache-tools/+bug/1887558/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068645] Re: Oracular migration issues
Attached an MP, still a work in progress, but passed all autopkgtest locally. Will kick off the autopkgtest against the PPA once it is published. I also plan to do some more testing with testflinger tomorrow, especially around the removal of kpartx-boot. ** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+git/multipath-tools/+merge/468385 ** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+git/multipath-tools/+merge/468386 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068645 Title: Oracular migration issues To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2068645/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066286] Re: Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using Multipath
Any luck narrowing down the issue more Andres? Thanks for the remedy steps Ninoy. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066286 Title: Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using Multipath To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2066286/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1887558] Re: multipathd bcache disks do not get picked up by multipath-tools during boot
Thanks for the confirmation axino. I would like to read up on the bcache-tools udev rules and see if there's anything historically blocking moving them later in the boot cycle, but if all checks out I'd be glad to make a PPA and do as much testing as I reasonably can. This will take a bit of research, so maybe by the time everything is researched and tested, a system will be available to test the fix in a more production-like environment. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887558 Title: multipathd bcache disks do not get picked up by multipath-tools during boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bcache-tools/+bug/1887558/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2070537] Re: New upstream 1.5.19
@hjd, thanks for adding a tag, are you planning on working on this merge? I was going to take it, but feel free if you are interested :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2070537 Title: New upstream 1.5.19 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ec2-ami-tools/+bug/2070537/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060248] Re: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal
While waiting for the new autopkgtest to publish and run, I am going to attempt to kick off the upstream CI/CD tests for 3.9.22. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060248 Title: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/2060248/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060248] Re: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal
Okay quick response - this time the dep8 test passed in the LP runners[0]. 3 dep8 test failures in a row seems fishy though, so I'd like to run the test a few more times to see if it is really flaky, or if the runners were just sad on the previous runs. Will run 2 more tests now. [0] - https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-mitchdz- rabbitmq-server-mre-2204-v2/jammy/ppc64el/r/rabbitmq- server/20240626_202946_36422@/log.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060248 Title: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/2060248/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060248] Re: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal
Okay, manually ran the rpc test on a ppc64el system and it passed fine. Ran on bobonevm4 $ dpkg -s rabbitmq-server | grep Version: Version: 3.9.22-0ubuntu0.1~jammy1 $ python3 rpc_server.py & [1] 5069 $ client_result=$(python3 rpc_client.py) [.] fib(30) $ echo $client_result [x] Requesting fib(30) [.] Got 832040 This is just from manually copy+paste the contents of the test. Maybe the autopkgtest runner was flaky? I just re-ran another test from the PPA so will wait to hear back from that. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060248 Title: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/2060248/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060248] Re: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal
Finally got my hands on a ppc64el system. Running the rpc test manually now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060248 Title: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/2060248/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069324] Re: vsftpd hangs with SIGCHLD when pam_exec.so is used
Just kicked off a build at [0]. [0] - https://launchpad.net/~mitchdz/+archive/ubuntu/lp2069324-vsftpd- sigchld -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069324 Title: vsftpd hangs with SIGCHLD when pam_exec.so is used To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vsftpd/+bug/2069324/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069324] Re: vsftpd hangs with SIGCHLD when pam_exec.so is used
Thanks Markus, I'll make a PPA for that right now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069324 Title: vsftpd hangs with SIGCHLD when pam_exec.so is used To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vsftpd/+bug/2069324/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1887558] Re: multipathd bcache disks do not get picked up by multipath-tools during boot
I wonder if we can just move the udev rules for bcache to be higher than multipath-tools, so mpath runs first? I can test this on a smalle-scale, but I worry there could be negative ramifications to simply moving udev rules around. @Jerzy, would there be a system available to test the changes once they are made to increase confidence in no other regressions to occur? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887558 Title: multipathd bcache disks do not get picked up by multipath-tools during boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bcache-tools/+bug/1887558/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068645] Re: Oracular migration issues
Debian has a new version - 0.9.8-1 so I will also update to the new version. ** Tags added: needs-merge -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068645 Title: Oracular migration issues To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2068645/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2070537] [NEW] New upstream 1.5.19
Public bug reported: The latest version is version 1.5.19 released 2023-09-20. The download is available at [0]. [0] - https://s3.amazonaws.com/ec2-downloads/ ** Affects: ec2-ami-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2070537 Title: New upstream 1.5.19 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ec2-ami-tools/+bug/2070537/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2024019] Re: Add GCC atomic support (-moutline-atomics) for arm64 on Focal
Attached is the detailed test results. No significant performance regression is seen in ARMv8.0, and a significant improvement in STREX events are seen in ARMv8.1, which makes me happy to verify the proposed package. Test result summary: Package tested: nginx 1.18.0-0ubuntu1.5 [ARMv8.0] STREX EVENTS * 178 -> 181 CPU Usage * 99.21 -> 99.64 [ARMv8.1] STREX EVENTS * 151 -> 0 CPU Usage * 100 -> 19.47 ** Attachment added: "nginx-focal-strex-validation.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postgresql-12/+bug/2024019/+attachment/5792398/+files/nginx-focal-strex-validation.txt ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2024019 Title: Add GCC atomic support (-moutline-atomics) for arm64 on Focal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haproxy/+bug/2024019/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066286] Re: Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using Multipath
Thanks Andres, that is very helpful information. Let me know if there's anything I can do to help out. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066286 Title: Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using Multipath To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2066286/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068645] Re: Oracular migration issues
Right now I'm working on getting access to testflinger systems to confirm that it is indeed okay to remove kpartx-boot binary package splitting. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068645 Title: Oracular migration issues To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2068645/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066999] Re: enable hibernation on ARM
The following packages have been tested on amd64 to ensure no
regressions:
* 1.0.0-0ubuntu16.24.04.1
* 1.0.0-0ubuntu16.23.10.1
* 1.0.0-0ubuntu11.22.04.5
* 1.0.0-0ubuntu9.6
The process is the same for each release, but shown below is the example
for noble.
1) Launch instance
Example of how to start it via awscli:
$ aws ec2 run-instances --region eu-north-1 --image-id ami-0b15dce563b217be3
--count 1 --instance-type t3.micro --key-name mitchell --security-group-ids
sg-0e03e00997fa53926 --tag-specifications
'ResourceType=instance,Tags=[{Key=Name,Value=mitchdz-hibernate-test-noble}]'
--metadata-options HttpTokens=required --block-device-mappings
'[{"DeviceName":"/dev/sda1","Ebs":{"Encrypted":true,"DeleteOnTermination":true,"VolumeSize":24,"VolumeType":"gp3"}}]'
--hibernation-options Configured=true
2) ssh into the ec2 instance
3) Update package
# cat
[Bug 2066999] Re: enable hibernation on ARM
** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066999 Title: enable hibernation on ARM To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ec2-hibinit-agent/+bug/2066999/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060248] Re: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal
FWIW, I did see the same thing when I did my original merge, where ppc54el timed out for rpc[0] and then when I re-ran it, it passed[1]. [0] - https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-mitchdz-rabbitmq-server-mre-2204/jammy/ppc64el/r/rabbitmq-server/20240516_012945_a4e10@/log.gz [1] - https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-mitchdz-rabbitmq-server-mre-2204/jammy/ppc64el/r/rabbitmq-server/20240516_131808_2bf20@/log.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060248 Title: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/2060248/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060248] Re: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal
I prepared a v3.9.22 in Jammy and have ran the autopkgtest, I am seeing a failure[0] with the new rpc test in ppc64el. I re-ran it twice so far with the same timeout, and waiting for a third run to see the results. The logs unfortunately do not have a lot of useful information, so I'm hoping it's just a flaky situation, although a new test being flaky is not ideal. [0] - https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-mitchdz- rabbitmq-server-mre-2204-v2/jammy/ppc64el/r/rabbitmq- server/20240619_044237_d738a@/log.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060248 Title: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/2060248/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069080] Re: package mysql-server-8.0 8.0.37-0ubuntu0.24.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed mysql-server-8.0 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1
No need to worry Cesar - thank you for your contributions, we really appreciate it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069080 Title: package mysql-server-8.0 8.0.37-0ubuntu0.24.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed mysql-server-8.0 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-8.0/+bug/2069080/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069324] Re: vsftpd hangs with SIGCHLD when pam_exec.so is used
Markus, if we prepare a package with the patch, would you be willing to help out testing the patch? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069324 Title: vsftpd hangs with SIGCHLD when pam_exec.so is used To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vsftpd/+bug/2069324/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1887558] Re: multipathd bcache disks do not get picked up by multipath-tools during boot
Removing server-todo. I still plan to look at this, but it is a lower priority item for me, please let me know if this is a bigger issue that needs addressing, but to me it looks like there is a workaround in place so it is not critical to fix ASAP. I also worry the fix for this will be messing with bcache (and/or multipath-tools) handling, and me not being an expert in bcache, I would want some time to thoroughly test whatever change is made to ensure no regressions or unexpected fallout. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887558 Title: multipathd bcache disks do not get picked up by multipath-tools during boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bcache-tools/+bug/1887558/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2046489] Re: exim4-daemon-heavy: please compile with DMARC support
I'm still planning to do this, but haven't finished the paperwork just yet, mainly want to investigate the security side of things. Apologies on the delays. ** Tags removed: server-todo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046489 Title: exim4-daemon-heavy: please compile with DMARC support To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2046489/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2024019] Re: Add GCC atomic support (-moutline-atomics) for arm64 on Focal
Thanks Chris. I'm setting up a Graviton system (ARMv8.0) in a different AWS region, since my old region doesn't support it. Results coming soon. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2024019 Title: Add GCC atomic support (-moutline-atomics) for arm64 on Focal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haproxy/+bug/2024019/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2024019] Re: Add GCC atomic support (-moutline-atomics) for arm64 on Focal
I did 3 runs pre/post patch and recorded the data in the attached file. Post-patch means using my PPA from [0]. I had to set up these systems in a different AWS region. I chose eu- west-1 simply because it supports the AWS a1.metal instance type which is the first graviton instance. I set these systems up as described in[1], otherwise the test performed was identical to[2]. Overall I think the degradation in performance is nominal in this setup. Notes I took on the results: * I saw a 0.72% increase in CPU usage * The strex events seem relatively the same, the first run post-patch seemed a little high, but that could just be due to inconsistencies due to an e2e test like this, the 2 runs after seem to equalize. To summarize the results in the txt file: request/s pre-patch: (160287+152196+154558)/3 = 155680 post-patch: (154558+162545+161283)/3 = 159462 strex events: pre-patch: (894+867+883)/3 = 881 post-patch: (913+879+872)/3 = 888 CPU usage (only did one run, explained how this is gathered in txt document) pre-patch: 98.77% post-patch: 99.49% [0] - https://launchpad.net/~mitchdz/+archive/ubuntu/lp2024019-moutline-atomic [1] - https://github.com/mitchdz/aws-nginx-testbed/blob/main/ARMv8.0-test.bash [2] - https://github.com/mitchdz/aws-nginx-testbed ** Attachment added: "graviton_test_results.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nginx/+bug/2024019/+attachment/5791004/+files/graviton_test_results.txt ** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Incomplete => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2024019 Title: Add GCC atomic support (-moutline-atomics) for arm64 on Focal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haproxy/+bug/2024019/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066286] Re: Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using Multipath
Andres, Apologies for the delay. It looks like the default solution is simply using perf, which I can help setup, but the problem is that perf logs a ton of info. The perf logs will balloon in size substantially. How often does this issue occur for you? If it does not happen frequently then I'd not suggest perf and try something else. I was looking into callgrind[0] which looks pretty good, but personally have not used it so I can't vouch for it fully. [0] - https://valgrind.org/docs/manual/cl-manual.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066286 Title: Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using Multipath To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2066286/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060248] Re: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal
As per the previous comment - I will do some research in v3.9.22 for Jammy, ensuring that no bugs are introduced there that is fixed in a more recent version, and proceed to do the MRE for that version instead. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060248 Title: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/2060248/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069324] Re: vsftpd hangs with SIGCHLD when pam_exec.so is used
Markus, would you mind making a bug report upstream to see if this could be included? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069324 Title: vsftpd hangs with SIGCHLD when pam_exec.so is used To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vsftpd/+bug/2069324/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066999] Re: enable hibernation on ARM
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-done ** Tags added: verification-done-noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066999 Title: enable hibernation on ARM To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ec2-hibinit-agent/+bug/2066999/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060248] Re: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal
I'm investigating the jammy MRE - specifically on the addition of
ERL_MAX_PORTS. I'm not a fan of the ideas I have so far. The concern is
that a user may have increased the cap, and on upgrade would silently
cap, which could cause failures.
This of course will be documented in the d/changelog, but I don't think
a "you didn't look at d/changelog" is a valid excuse to let that
behavior happen, it should be expected that if you modify something as
simple as the open file handle limit, that should be respected on
upgrade.
The current ideas/why I don't like them:
1. parse the systemd unit configuration - add a new line to add the environment
variable to the systemd unit on upgrade
- Just not a fan of parsing like this, in-case the user has made other
modifications such as various comments that could mangle the parsing.
2. Remove the addition of this environment variable
- This diverges from upstream, could cause confusion when looking at
upstream docs. This could not be an issue, but I think in this case it should
be considered an issue because having a too high value could cause unexpected
DoS and be difficult to debug.
3. modify the upstream code to, at runtime, match ERL_MAX_PORTS from the
systemd unit, and leave it uncapped in LimitNOFILE is not present
- Same issue as #2, diverges from upstream. Also, this assumes that the
user knowingly disabled the limit in systemd and is not using another mechanism
to cap the open file handle limit. This has the potential of not playing nice
with whatever mechanism the user decides to use.
Due to this, I am thinking to have the Jammy MRE upgrade to version
v3.9.22 instead, as the bug fixes between v3.9.{23..27} are of course
nice to have, but I think are fine to skip out on.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060248
Title:
MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/2060248/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066286] Re: Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using Multipath
Andres, Thanks for being willing to help out! Let me see if there is some easy way to profile multipath-tools, I'll get back to you on that. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066286 Title: Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using Multipath To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2066286/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066286] Re: Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using Multipath
Andres, Thanks a lot for chiming in. It's always good data to see multiple people hitting this issue to help narrow things down. > but if I have to narrow it down, I'd say it happens when umounting/mounting a > disk. And performing a sudo multipath -F cleans up this connections (at least most of the time) I have a question about this - does the CPU usage stay high until you run -F? Or will it over time diminish? Also, would either of you (Andres, Ninoy) be willing and able to run a profiler to help narrow down exactly what function is using all the CPU time? If we find what function it is, I can narrow down my git archaeology efforts. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066286 Title: Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using Multipath To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2066286/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069305] Re: scp fails to copy files from sysfs
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069305 Title: scp fails to copy files from sysfs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/2069305/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069324] Re: vsftpd hangs with SIGCHLD when pam_exec.so is used
Markus, if I were to create a PPA with this patch applied, would you be willing to help test that out? ** Changed in: vsftpd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069324 Title: vsftpd hangs with SIGCHLD when pam_exec.so is used To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vsftpd/+bug/2069324/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069305] Re: scp fails to copy files from sysfs
To be complete, I also tried openssh-server_9.3p1-1ubuntu3.3 and see this issue on noble. Which leaves something changed between openssh-client 8.9 and 9.3 to cause this behavior. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069305 Title: scp fails to copy files from sysfs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/2069305/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069305] Re: scp fails to copy files from sysfs
Just for fun, I also tried the latest openssh-client that we have in Jammy and see it works too - # wget https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+files/openssh-client_8.9p1-3ubuntu0.7_amd64.deb # dpkg -i ./openssh-client_8.9p1-3ubuntu0.7_amd64.deb # scp root@localhost:/sys/firmware/efi/efivars/BootOrder-8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d-00e098032b8c . root@localhost's password: BootOrder-8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d-00e098032b8c 100% 2027.4KB/s 00:00 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069305 Title: scp fails to copy files from sysfs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/2069305/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069305] Re: scp fails to copy files from sysfs
Thank you for taking the time to make this bug Alfonso! I can reproduce this in a noble-vm very easily. $ lxc launch ubuntu:noble n-vm --vm $ lxc shell n-vm # rm /etc/ssh/sshd_config.d/60-cloudimg-settings.conf # sed -i 's/#PermitRootLogin prohibit-password/PermitRootLogin yes/' /etc/ssh/sshd_config # echo "root:pass" | chpasswd # systemctl restart ssh # scp root@localhost:/sys/firmware/efi/efivars/BootOrder-8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d-00e098032b8c . However it's not just every file in /sys/, there are some files you can still scp. For example: # scp root@localhost:/sys/firmware/efi/runtime . You can also cp the efi variable file and then scp it fine. # cp /sys/firmware/efi/efivars/BootOrder-8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d-00e098032b8c ./ # scp root@localhost:/root/BootOrder-8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d-00e098032b8c ./ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069305 Title: scp fails to copy files from sysfs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/2069305/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069324] Re: vsftpd hangs with SIGCHLD when pam_exec.so is used
Thank you for taking the time to make this bug report Markus! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069324 Title: vsftpd hangs with SIGCHLD when pam_exec.so is used To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vsftpd/+bug/2069324/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069324] Re: vsftpd hangs with SIGCHLD when pam_exec.so is used
What version of Ubuntu are you seeing this bug on? Unfortunately upstream/debian has been pretty dormant for a while, in-fact we are ahead of debian right now, so it may make sense to apply this patch. Unfortunately it looks like even upstream does not have this patch applied. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069324 Title: vsftpd hangs with SIGCHLD when pam_exec.so is used To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vsftpd/+bug/2069324/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069080] Re: package mysql-server-8.0 8.0.37-0ubuntu0.24.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed mysql-server-8.0 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1
Thanks Cesar, I'll change this to incomplete in-case other people are encountering similar issues. Please comment on this bug again if it becomes an issue, although with that said I don't know how often you would be reinstalling mysql for fun. ** Changed in: mysql-8.0 (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069080 Title: package mysql-server-8.0 8.0.37-0ubuntu0.24.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed mysql-server-8.0 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-8.0/+bug/2069080/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2065848] Re: An ocf:heartbeat:nfsserver resource's stop operation succeeded despite the /var/lib/nfs filesystem failing to unmount.
The init scripts should probably be removed in favor of the systemd scripts. Jacob, just to confirm, the fix requires 2 things that we know of so far: 1. removing the init script 2. applying the upstream patch to error check unbind_tree[0] Or is it JUST removing the init script that alleviates the issues you are seeing? [0] - https://github.com/ClusterLabs/resource-agents/pull/1611 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065848 Title: An ocf:heartbeat:nfsserver resource's stop operation succeeded despite the /var/lib/nfs filesystem failing to unmount. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/resource-agents/+bug/2065848/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2054301] Re: [worker/event] Some child processes aren't killed on reload (graceful), being stuck in state "Sending Reply", leaving old logfiles open, disk fills up, server stops responding after
Thanks for the discussion thermoman and ekomc. thermoman, are your machines identically set up? Is it just a single machine that is experiencing this issue, or a few out of your fleet? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054301 Title: [worker/event] Some child processes aren't killed on reload (graceful), being stuck in state "Sending Reply", leaving old logfiles open, disk fills up, server stops responding after some days, DoS To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/2054301/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060248] Re: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal
I'll see if I can find evidence that it was used by many people, but it doesn't seem like there was a lot of blowing up in the pull request after it was merged. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060248 Title: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/2060248/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060248] Re: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal
https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-management/pull/748 In the comment chain: > As this wasn't a documented feature, I didn't think that it could be > considered a breaking change. Let's discuss privately re PCF. I am not aware > of anyone other than us using this feature. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060248 Title: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/2060248/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060248] Re: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal
Regarding comment #10 I was planning on documenting the need to set the environment variable, but didn't consider having systemd export the variable, which I really like that idea. I'll test and include that change in my MP soon. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060248 Title: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/2060248/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060248] Re: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal
Andreas, got it. I'll update the section about the file handle limit change as well. Want me to just update the MP I already have up? Or should I make a new MP? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060248 Title: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/2060248/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068645] Re: Oracular migration issues
I'm considering removing the kpartx-boot split. This will take a bit of testing to be thorough to account for no regressions. If multipath-tools failing in -proposed is blocking your package please contact me and I can expedite the testing to get this package through without that change. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068645 Title: Oracular migration issues To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2068645/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060248] Re: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal
One more thing I'd like to have a discussion on - if rabbitmq-server's database has open queues, they will be lost on upgrade. This is already the current behavior, and I assume this is fine, but I'd like to at the very least bring it up. For example, if you open up an lxc shell, and run the new hello-world test that is in the MP for both Jammy/Focal, you can see: root@j:~# rabbitmqctl list_queues Timeout: 60.0 seconds ... Listing queues for vhost / ... namemessages hello 1 root@j:~# sudo apt install --reinstall rabbitmq-server Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading state information... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 reinstalled, 0 to remove and 27 not upgraded. Need to get 15.2 MB of archives. After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used. Get:1 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-updates/main amd64 rabbitmq-server all 3.9.13-1ubuntu0.22.04.2 [15.2 MB] Fetched 15.2 MB in 1s (11.7 MB/s) (Reading database ... 36794 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to unpack .../rabbitmq-server_3.9.13-1ubuntu0.22.04.2_all.deb ... Unpacking rabbitmq-server (3.9.13-1ubuntu0.22.04.2) over (3.9.13-1ubuntu0.22.04.2) ... Setting up rabbitmq-server (3.9.13-1ubuntu0.22.04.2) ... Processing triggers for man-db (2.10.2-1) ... Scanning processes... No services need to be restarted. No containers need to be restarted. No user sessions are running outdated binaries. No VM guests are running outdated hypervisor (qemu) binaries on this host. root@j:~# rabbitmqctl list_queues Timeout: 60.0 seconds ... Listing queues for vhost / ... root@j:~# -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060248 Title: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/2060248/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060248] Re: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal
Thanks for the question Andreas, Looking into this, I noticed the defaults are already 65536! root@j:~# dpkg -s rabbitmq-server | grep Version Version: 3.9.13-1ubuntu0.22.04.2 root@j:~# cat /proc/$(pgrep -f rabbitmq)/limits | grep "Max open files" Max open files6553665536files I thought wow, what a coincidence, maybe too much of a coincidence. It turns out that this default is _already_ available in the current Jammy version 3.9.13. Debian has set the cap via systemd service since 9 years ago[0]! ubuntu@ip-172-31-36-170:~$ sudo systemctl show rabbitmq-server.service --property=LimitNOFILE LimitNOFILE=65536 [0] - https://salsa.debian.org/openstack-team/third-party/rabbitmq- server/-/commit/6ced1e42f48d114edf9140ce6e04b1d6581515cd -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060248 Title: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/2060248/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060248] Re: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal
I added that changelog entry due to v3.9.23 making that change[0]. Before pushing, I would like to remove that changelog entry as to not cause any confusion, but will wait for the rest of the review in-case some more changes are needed. [0] - https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/releases/tag/v3.9.23 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060248 Title: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/2060248/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068645] Re: Oracular migration issues
Also fixing kpartx-boot, new initramfs test, systemd socket/service handling. All WIP. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068645 Title: Oracular migration issues To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2068645/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2046994] Re: Spotlight search function broken with macOS Ventura and later client
One additional note - The fix for this is available in Focal in the -proposed pocket. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046994 Title: Spotlight search function broken with macOS Ventura and later client To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/samba/+bug/2046994/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2046994] Re: Spotlight search function broken with macOS Ventura and later client
Closing this for Focal, since I do not have the hardware to test this. If you need this feature for Focal and have the hardware to test, please re-open this bug. ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Won't Fix ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: Won't Fix => Fix Committed ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Fix Committed => Won't Fix ** Tags removed: server-todo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046994 Title: Spotlight search function broken with macOS Ventura and later client To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/samba/+bug/2046994/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1941785] Re: ec2-hibinit-agent: Add support for IMDSv2
** Changed in: cloud-images Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1941785 Title: ec2-hibinit-agent: Add support for IMDSv2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-images/+bug/1941785/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068750] Re: [SRU] webkit2gtk does not ask for smartcard PIN
Closing this ticket as not needed anymore. Feel free to open again if this functionality is needed. ** Changed in: webkit2gtk (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: webkit2gtk (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068750 Title: [SRU] webkit2gtk does not ask for smartcard PIN To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/webkit2gtk/+bug/2068750/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060248] Re: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal
My test PPA passed the CI/CD - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/charm-rabbitmq-server/+/915836 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060248 Title: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/2060248/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068750] Re: [SRU] webkit2gtk does not ask for smartcard PIN
** Summary changed: - webkit2gtk does not ask for smartcard PIN + [SRU] webkit2gtk does not ask for smartcard PIN ** Changed in: webkit2gtk (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: webkit2gtk (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: webkit2gtk (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068750 Title: [SRU] webkit2gtk does not ask for smartcard PIN To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/webkit2gtk/+bug/2068750/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068750] Re: webkit2gtk does not ask for smartcard PIN
** Also affects: webkit2gtk (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068750 Title: webkit2gtk does not ask for smartcard PIN To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/webkit2gtk/+bug/2068750/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068750] [NEW] webkit2gtk does not ask for smartcard PIN
Public bug reported: [ Impact ] webkit2gtk does not ask for the PIN on a PIN protected smartcard. There is an upstream fix at https://github.com/WebKit/WebKit/pull/26074 [ Test Plan ] The test plan is manual due to the nature of the bug needing hardware that is difficult to simulate. An E2E test of using the smartcard with a PIN on it will be performed. [ Where problems could occur ] * Adds an extra check every time a smartcard is used. Although likely nominal, it does add computation time. * This is both a bug fix, but also a functional addition. Software using this library could be unknowingly relying on the behavior of no PIN requested, and therefore break once this functionality is added. ** Affects: webkit2gtk (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068750 Title: webkit2gtk does not ask for smartcard PIN To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/webkit2gtk/+bug/2068750/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2065848] Re: An ocf:heartbeat:nfsserver resource's stop operation succeeded despite the /var/lib/nfs filesystem failing to unmount.
Thanks for the update Jacob. I will leave this bug alone and wait to hear back. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065848 Title: An ocf:heartbeat:nfsserver resource's stop operation succeeded despite the /var/lib/nfs filesystem failing to unmount. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/resource-agents/+bug/2065848/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068641] Re: Ubuntu 24.04 apache2: misleading comment in default /etc/apache2/apache2.conf
Hello Oliver, Thank you for making this bug report! This documentation is pulled directly from Debian which you can find at [0]. I think it'd be best to have a discussion about this with Debian. Would you be okay making this bug report with Debian as well? [0] - https://salsa.debian.org/apache- team/apache2/-/blob/master/debian/config- dir/apache2.conf.in?ref_type=heads#L153 ** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068641 Title: Ubuntu 24.04 apache2: misleading comment in default /etc/apache2/apache2.conf To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/2068641/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068547] Re: package rabbitmq-server 3.12.1-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: o subprocesso instalado, do pacote rabbitmq-server, o script post-installation retornou erro do status de saída 1
Hello, thank you for making this bug report! Can you please give the status of `systemctl status rabbitmq- server.service`? ** Changed in: rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068547 Title: package rabbitmq-server 3.12.1-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: o subprocesso instalado, do pacote rabbitmq-server, o script post- installation retornou erro do status de saída 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/2068547/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066286] Re: Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using Multipath
No, Version 0.9.4 is not planned to be backported to Jammy. Big updates like these do not happen often to stable releases. To get this fixed, the specific bug will be narrowed down and just the fix itself will need to be backported. I'd be glad to do some investigation on what other commits may look like the fix if you are able to test them out. Alternatively, do you have steps to reproduce this issue? I can investigate it more in my testbed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066286 Title: Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using Multipath To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2066286/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work
I agree. I think we may have a case to do libspf2 inclusion, I'll be happy to start investigating that package and situation a bit deeper next week. For now, the default SPF code in mantic/noble is broken out of the box and I'm not sure which solution (calling bash, removing the quote macro) I like better. They both work, but I have reservations on the security implications that I don't believe I have the bandwidth right now to properly address. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372 Title: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067608] Re: clamav-freshclam 1.0.5 and logwatch 7.7-1 fails to report
Actually I think what may be happening here is that clamav- freshclam.service updates the database routinely, so when logwatch attempts to update it, there is nothing to update, so the failure message is actually expected. heynnema, how does your /var/log/clamav/freshclam.log look like now? ** Changed in: clamav (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067608 Title: clamav-freshclam 1.0.5 and logwatch 7.7-1 fails to report To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clamav/+bug/2067608/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067608] Re: clamav-freshclam 1.0.5 and logwatch 7.7-1 fails to report
reproduction: $ lxc launch ubuntu:noble n $ lxc shell n # apt update -y && apt install -y logwatch clamav # logwatch --service clam-update -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067608 Title: clamav-freshclam 1.0.5 and logwatch 7.7-1 fails to report To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clamav/+bug/2067608/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067608] Re: clamav-freshclam 1.0.5 and logwatch 7.7-1 fails to report
[0] in my previous comment and still see the failure. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067608 Title: clamav-freshclam 1.0.5 and logwatch 7.7-1 fails to report To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clamav/+bug/2067608/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067608] Re: clamav-freshclam 1.0.5 and logwatch 7.7-1 fails to report
Thank you for making this bug report! I wonder if this can be fixed by the solution in this blog[0], but the blog is pretty old so I'd be surprised such an old solution fixes it. [0] - https://adriano.ws/fixing-updates-detected-log-freshclam-daemon- error/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067608 Title: clamav-freshclam 1.0.5 and logwatch 7.7-1 fails to report To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clamav/+bug/2067608/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068645] Re: Oracular migration issues
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+git/multipath-tools/+merge/467051 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068645 Title: Oracular migration issues To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2068645/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064380] Re: Merge multipath-tools from Debian unstable for oracular
Since multipath-tools was merged and is now in -proposed, I am closing this bug and creating a new one to track the migration failures. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2068645 ** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064380 Title: Merge multipath-tools from Debian unstable for oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2064380/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068645] [NEW] Oracular migration issues
Public bug reported: This bug tracks multipath-tools migration failures. ** Affects: multipath-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: High Assignee: Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) Status: In Progress ** Tags: update-excuse ** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) ** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Tags added: update-excuse -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068645 Title: Oracular migration issues To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2068645/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064380] Re: Merge multipath-tools from Debian unstable for oracular
Setting to in-Progress to track the migration. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064380 Title: Merge multipath-tools from Debian unstable for oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2064380/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064380] Re: Merge multipath-tools from Debian unstable for oracular
0.9.7-7 is now in -proposed thanks to Steve Langasek. I see the merge doesn't have a few of the changes I needed when I was in the process of the noble merge[0][1]. Had a quick chat with Steve Langasek on IRC and mentioned I'll keep an eye on the migration and handle any fixes/changes that are needed. ** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064380 Title: Merge multipath-tools from Debian unstable for oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2064380/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2062058] Re: Add a UFW firewall config to support QUIC
Hello, nginx versions 1.26.0-1ubuntu2 is now available for oracular. This contains the code from [0] and therefore should be available. I am closing this bug now. [0] - https://salsa.debian.org/nginx-team/nginx/-/merge_requests/73 ** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062058 Title: Add a UFW firewall config to support QUIC To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nginx/+bug/2062058/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066999] Re: enable hibernation on ARM
This is the shell script I made to test for amd64 regressions, and the results. mitchdz-hibernate-test-6mantic results: Version: 1.0.0-0ubuntu16.23.10.1~mantic1 22:50:50 up 0 min, 0 user, load average: 1.18, 0.40, 0.14 mitchdz-hibernate-test-6focal results: Version: 1.0.0-0ubuntu9.6~focal1 23:36:28 up 46 min, 1 user, load average: 0.31, 0.08, 0.02 mitchdz-hibernate-test-6jammy results: Version: 1.0.0-0ubuntu11.22.04.5~jammy1 23:00:46 up 10 min, 0 users, load average: 0.23, 0.07, 0.02 mitchdz-hibernate-test-6noble results: Version: 1.0.0-0ubuntu16.24.04.1~noble1 23:07:27 up 17 min, 1 user, load average: 0.24, 0.06, 0.02 mitchdz-hibernate-test-6oracular results: Version: 1.0.0-0ubuntu17~oracular1 23:14:17 up 24 min, 1 user, load average: 0.07, 0.02, 0.00 ** Attachment added: "test_arm_regression" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ec2-hibinit-agent/+bug/2066999/+attachment/5786062/+files/test_arm_regression -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066999 Title: enable hibernation on ARM To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ec2-hibinit-agent/+bug/2066999/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067942] Re: autopkgtest failure in oracular
** Changed in: fcgiwrap (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) ** Changed in: fcgiwrap (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: fcgiwrap (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067942 Title: autopkgtest failure in oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fcgiwrap/+bug/2067942/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067942] Re: autopkgtest failure in oracular
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/fcgiwrap/+git/fcgiwrap/+merge/466889 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067942 Title: autopkgtest failure in oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fcgiwrap/+bug/2067942/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work
I'll ask internally again, but the original reasoning why we deviated from debian is explained at https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1952738 It is definitely open to discussion, and these woes with the parser can help justify it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372 Title: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067942] Re: autopkgtest failure in oracular
Running the autopkgtest commands manually in an LXC container: ``` AUTOPKGTEST_TMP="/tmp/autopkgtest.mitch/autopkgtest_tmp" rm -rf "$AUTOPKGTEST_TMP" mkdir -p "$AUTOPKGTEST_TMP" cd "$AUTOPKGTEST_TMP" export GIT_AUTHOR_NAME=root export GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL=root@localhost export GIT_AUTHOR_DATE=@1234567890 + export GIT_COMMITTER_NAME=root export GIT_COMMITTER_EMAIL=root@localhost export GIT_COMMITTER_DATE=@1234567890 + git init test1 git -C test1 commit --allow-empty -m test tee /etc/nginx/sites-available/default
[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work
I ran `sudo exim4 -bd -d+all` on my server and sent myself an email with
the current config in noble to see what the errors look like, and I get
a ton of information, it looks like the parsing worked correctly at
least (argv[6]).
23:35:50.263 410533 direct command:
23:35:50.263 410533 argv[0] = '/usr/bin/spfquery.mail-spf-perl'
23:35:50.263 410533 argv[1] = '--ip'
23:35:50.263 410533 argv[2] = '${quote:$sender_host_address}'
23:35:50.263 410533 argv[3] = '--scope'
23:35:50.263 410533 argv[4] = 'mfrom'
23:35:50.263 410533 argv[5] = '--identity'
23:35:50.263 410533 argv[6] = '${quote:$sender_address}'
23:35:50.263 410533 direct command after expansion:
23:35:50.263 410533 argv[0] = '/usr/bin/spfquery.mail-spf-perl'
23:35:50.263 410533 argv[1] = '--ip'
23:35:50.263 410533 argv[2] = '185.125.188.123'
23:35:50.263 410533 argv[3] = '--scope'
23:35:50.263 410533 argv[4] = 'mfrom'
23:35:50.263 410533 argv[5] = '--identity'
23:35:50.263 410533 argv[6] = '"@canonical.com"'
23:35:50.263 410533 (tainted)
23:35:50.263 410533 daemon-accept forking for expand-run
23:35:50.265 410533 daemon-accept forked for expand-run: 410540
The unfortunate thing is no real information is shown in expand-run
which is what I really care about.
It'd be nice to see what was ran in that forked process
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372
Title:
Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work
One extra thing I tried, is to use the condition check logic Jammy is
using by default (which I tested a jammy system does have working SPF),
except I added preexpand like [0] mentions to use the "old" parsing
method. This didn't work, but just putting my attempt here for future
reference:
condition = ${run,preexpand {/usr/bin/spfquery.mail-spf-perl --ip \
${quote:$sender_host_address} --identity \
${if def:sender_address_domain \
{--scope mfrom --identity ${quote:$sender_address}}\
{--scope helo --identity ${quote:$sender_helo_name\
{no}{${if eq {$runrc}{1}{yes}{no
[0] -
https://github.com/Exim/exim/commit/cfe6acff2ddc7eb03b3489770219edf829abd323
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372
Title:
Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work
Thanks for clarifying, I misread what you meant, now I understand.
I was looking through https://github.com/Exim/exim/blob/master/doc/doc-
txt/ChangeLog to see if there were any other changes between version
4.95 and 4.96 and I don't see much else other than JH/24.
Currently I think that [0] and [1] broke something in how we are using
it.
It looks like [1] attempts to fix the run{ } parsing, even going as far
to add
${run{DIR/aux-fixed/0002.runfile ${quote:1}}{$value}{2}}
as a testcase, which is supposed to test using quotes in the run{}
command, but of course isn't doing variable substitution within the
quote and is not as complicated.
Unfortunately right now I'm not sure exactly what to test, I'm going to
dig into the actual source changes in [0] and [1] to see if there is an
implementation detail that isn't caught in the docs.
[0] -
https://github.com/Exim/exim/commit/cfe6acff2ddc7eb03b3489770219edf829abd323
[1] -
https://github.com/Exim/exim/commit/44b6e099b76f403a55e77650821f8a69e9d2682e
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372
Title:
Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067942] Re: autopkgtest failure in oracular
** Description changed: fcgiwrap has been failing autopkgtest in proposed - https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/fcgiwrap/oracular/amd64 Most likely related to the git upgrade. Can be reproduced in an LXC container easily: $ lxc launch ubuntu-daily:oracular o $ lxc shell o # wget https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+sourcefiles/fcgiwrap/1.1.0-14build1/fcgiwrap_1.1.0-14build1.dsc # wget https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+files/fcgiwrap_1.1.0-14build1_amd64.deb # wget https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+sourcefiles/fcgiwrap/1.1.0-14build1/fcgiwrap_1.1.0.orig.tar.xz # wget https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+sourcefiles/fcgiwrap/1.1.0-14build1/fcgiwrap_1.1.0-14build1.debian.tar.xz # cat
[Bug 2067942] [NEW] autopkgtest failure in oracular
Public bug reported: fcgiwrap has been failing autopkgtest in proposed - https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/fcgiwrap/oracular/amd64 Most likely related to the git upgrade. Can be reproduced in an LXC container easily: $ lxc launch ubuntu-daily:oracular o $ lxc shell o # wget https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+sourcefiles/fcgiwrap/1.1.0-14build1/fcgiwrap_1.1.0-14build1.dsc # wget https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+files/fcgiwrap_1.1.0-14build1_amd64.deb # wget https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+sourcefiles/fcgiwrap/1.1.0-14build1/fcgiwrap_1.1.0.orig.tar.xz # wget https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+sourcefiles/fcgiwrap/1.1.0-14build1/fcgiwrap_1.1.0-14build1.debian.tar.xz # cat
