Re: R: [Fwd: [Ayatana] Empathy is not in line with the much discussed guidelines]

2009-07-16 Thread Vincenzo Ciancia
Il 16/07/2009 16:59, Matthew Paul Thomas ha scritto:
> Agreed. Showing IMs in the messaging menu is necessary, but not sufficient.

Just let me say again that the new chat window should be minimised and 
flashing, otherwise it may reveal public information in a bad moment.

-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


Re: R: [Fwd: [Ayatana] Empathy is not in line with the much discussed guidelines]

2009-07-16 Thread Matthew Paul Thomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Jo-Erlend Schinstad wrote on 14/07/09 15:35:
>...
> To begin with, I was very happy with the indicator applet. But now
> I've tested it with a few more users, and most doesn't notice it.

That doesn't surprise me at all. (After all, part of the reason we got
rid of the software updates icon was that it was not very noticable; and
IMs are much more time-critical than software updates are.)

> Actually, I feel that a new IM conversation should popup a chat window
> directly, as long as you're set as Available in FUSA.
>...

Agreed. Showing IMs in the messaging menu is necessary, but not sufficient.

Cheers
- --
Matthew Paul Thomas
http://mpt.net.nz/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkpfQFkACgkQ6PUxNfU6ecqB3ACfbAs1UecpUF/aVrknWWb4Nku5
YY4AnRe70x5YV04Yn0n1ufvquNv89c/T
=0AFj
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


Re: R: [Fwd: [Ayatana] Empathy is not in line with the much discussed guidelines]

2009-07-14 Thread Jo-Erlend Schinstad
2009/7/3 Mark Shuttleworth :

>
> It is easy and fast to detect the messaging indicator (by design, so that
> apps can check and behave accordingly). I agree that upstream will want to
> think carefully about how to behave when the indicator isn't there, and we
> should support them in that, but focus our design conversation on the
> standard experience in Ubuntu which is the one with the messaging indicator.
>
> Mark

To begin with, I was very happy with the indicator applet. But now I've tested
it with a few more users, and most doesn't notice it. Actually, I feel
that a new
IM conversation should popup a chat window directly, as long as you're set
as Available in FUSA.

Or, if possible, it would be nice if users on a spesific group or groups would
popup automatically, while all others would not. All messages should be
indicated in the applet though. In an office environment, for instance, IM is
great for asking questions while you're on the phone with a customer. I'd like
something a bit more instant than something resembling a mail notification
icon.

That is; all messages should be indicated in the applet. Messages from users
in the Boss-group, should popup immediately regardless of my status. Messages
from users in the Colleagues-group should popup immediately as long as I'm
set as Available, but for everyone else it should not popup.

That would be nice! I think we do need some configuration options for this
though. Peoples preferences may vary wildly.

In any case, the icon for Indicator applet should be more visible when there
is something to notice, but please don't use animations. There are too many
of those as it is.

Thanks,

Jo-Erlend

-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


Re: R: [Fwd: [Ayatana] Empathy is not in line with the much discussed guidelines]

2009-07-14 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Vincenzo Ciancia wrote:
> 1) New messages cause empathy th flash the notification area. _This is
> forbidden_, I do not know if it's written black-on-white somewhere but
> we all know that we shouldn't flash the notification area, should the
> world be falling. Update notifier can not do that. Why should empathy do
> that? This must be fixed.
>   
Agreed - new messages should optionally use notifications, and then put
the green dot on the messaging indicator, not use the
window-calling-for-attention mechanism.

> 2) It does _not open a popup_ on new messages.
I think opening a window should be optional - we have the messaging
indicator for accessing the window if you want it.

> There is also a problem: empathy does not handle IRC authentication
> correctly. Pidgin has a plugin for that but why not just making
> authentication work? Basically, it should hide from the sight of the
> user the positive response from the server instead of annoying the user
> with a message.
>   
Server messages should also not show up in notifications.

Mark
-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


Re: R: [Fwd: [Ayatana] Empathy is not in line with the much discussed guidelines]

2009-07-14 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Vincenzo Ciancia wrote:
> Yes, should be optional also IMHO. But also from comments elsewhere it
> seems the development is concentrated on the existence of the indicator
> applet. 
>
> A sane default behaviour should be chosen also when the applet is not
> there. In particular if "not flashing" is the default perhaps a
> minimised, alerted pop-up for new messages should be the default too,
> when indicator applet is not there (if this can be detected at all),
> otherwise it will be difficult to notice new messages. YMMV of course.
>   

It is easy and fast to detect the messaging indicator (by design, so
that apps can check and behave accordingly). I agree that upstream will
want to think carefully about how to behave when the indicator isn't
there, and we should support them in that, but focus our design
conversation on the standard experience in Ubuntu which is the one with
the messaging indicator.

Mark
-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


Re: R: [Fwd: [Ayatana] Empathy is not in line with the much discussed guidelines]

2009-07-01 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Vincenzo Ciancia wrote:
> On mar, 2009-06-30 at 12:45 -0500, Evan R. Murphy wrote:
>>
>> XChat flashes the notification area, though it can be disabled. Should
>> this be addressed as well, or is it a nonissue because XChat isn't a
>> candidate for default install?
> 
> Of course I am not the one who can answer this, but contextually, are
> there written guidelines including the "no flashing allowed" thing? If
> so, that can be added to an eventual bug report to xchat.

Yes, there are. Quoting from the GNOME HIG:

"""
* Icons should not usually appear animated. They may change to indicate a
change of state, but should not do so when that change is occurs regularly
rapidly. A battery status indicator would usually change slowly, therefore an
icon is appropriate. By contrast, a load meter would always be changing,
therefore it should use a flat image.
* Any icon may blink to indicate an error in deference to showing an alert.
For example, a printing-in-progress icon may blink when there is a paper jam,
but not when the printer is on fire - that should show an alert.
* Do not rely on blinking or animation as a means of alerting the user to
any particular event.
"""

http://library.gnome.org/devel/hig-book/stable/desktop-notification-area.html.en

Cheers,
Emilio



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


Re: R: [Fwd: [Ayatana] Empathy is not in line with the much discussed guidelines]

2009-07-01 Thread Vincenzo Ciancia
On mer, 2009-07-01 at 03:22 +0100, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
> 
> > 1) New messages cause empathy th flash the notification area. _This is
> > forbidden_, I do not know if it's written black-on-white somewhere but
> > we all know that we shouldn't flash the notification area, should the
> > world be falling. Update notifier can not do that. Why should empathy do
> > that? This must be fixed.
> >   
> Agreed - new messages should optionally use notifications, and then
> put the green dot on the messaging indicator, not use the
> window-calling-for-attention mechanism.
> 
> > 2) It does _not open a popup_ on new messages.
> I think opening a window should be optional - we have the messaging
> indicator for accessing the window if you want it.
> 
> 

Yes, should be optional also IMHO. But also from comments elsewhere it
seems the development is concentrated on the existence of the indicator
applet. 

A sane default behaviour should be chosen also when the applet is not
there. In particular if "not flashing" is the default perhaps a
minimised, alerted pop-up for new messages should be the default too,
when indicator applet is not there (if this can be detected at all),
otherwise it will be difficult to notice new messages. YMMV of course. 

Vincenzo



-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


Re: R: [Fwd: [Ayatana] Empathy is not in line with the much discussed guidelines]

2009-06-30 Thread Vincenzo Ciancia
On mar, 2009-06-30 at 21:19 +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> On mar., 2009-06-30 at 20:11 +0200, Vincenzo Ciancia wrote:
> > can be added to an eventual bug report to xchat.
> 
> Speaking about bug reports did you open some about your issues, could
> you give the numbers there?
> 
> Sebastien Bacher
> 
> 

The two important ones are already opened, I still have to report the
one about IRC authentication.

The one about blinking is here

https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/empathy/+bug/287692

however it's a duplicate of

https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/null/+bug/340180

which is clearly a different bug, however I don't know why it was marked
as a duplicate so should it be unmarked as such? I see from the "fix
released" status of the latter bug that empathy is supported by the
indicator applet but it should work well even without it.

The one about pop-ups is here

https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/empathy/+bug/206547

bye

Vincenzo


-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


Re: R: [Fwd: [Ayatana] Empathy is not in line with the much discussed guidelines]

2009-06-30 Thread Sebastien Bacher
On mar., 2009-06-30 at 20:11 +0200, Vincenzo Ciancia wrote:
> can be added to an eventual bug report to xchat.

Speaking about bug reports did you open some about your issues, could
you give the numbers there?

Sebastien Bacher


-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


Re: R: [Fwd: [Ayatana] Empathy is not in line with the much discussed guidelines]

2009-06-30 Thread Vincenzo Ciancia
On mar, 2009-06-30 at 12:45 -0500, Evan R. Murphy wrote:
> 
> 
> XChat flashes the notification area, though it can be disabled. Should
> this be addressed as well, or is it a nonissue because XChat isn't a
> candidate for default install?
> 
> 

Of course I am not the one who can answer this, but contextually, are
there written guidelines including the "no flashing allowed" thing? If
so, that can be added to an eventual bug report to xchat.

Vincenzo



-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


Re: R: [Fwd: [Ayatana] Empathy is not in line with the much discussed guidelines]

2009-06-30 Thread Evan R. Murphy
2009/6/30 Vincenzo Ciancia :
> [...]
> 1) New messages cause empathy th flash the notification area. _This is
> forbidden_, I do not know if it's written black-on-white somewhere but
> we all know that we shouldn't flash the notification area, should the
> world be falling. Update notifier can not do that. Why should empathy do
> that? This must be fixed.
> [...]

XChat flashes the notification area, though it can be disabled. Should
this be addressed as well, or is it a nonissue because XChat isn't a
candidate for default install?

Regards,
Evan R. Murphy

-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


Re: R: [Fwd: [Ayatana] Empathy is not in line with the much discussed guidelines]

2009-06-30 Thread Vincenzo Ciancia
On gio, 2009-06-25 at 01:03 +0100, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
> 
> Oops - sorry! Vincenzo (Ciancia) would you like to follow up to the
> ubuntu-desktop list?
> 
> Vincenzo Ciaglia wrote: 
> > Hi mark. Here is vincenzo CIAGLIA, not Ciancia. 
> > 
> > Have a nice day,
> > vincenzo
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Da: Mark Shuttleworth 
> > Inviato: martedì 23 giugno 2009 18.14
> > A: ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com; Vincenzo Ciaglia
> > 
> > Oggetto: [Fwd: [Ayatana] Empathy is not in line with the much
> > discussed guidelines]
> > 
> > 
> > FYI, comments on the Ayatana list about Empathy. Vincenzo, these are
> > good feedback, best put in the hands of the desktop team who are
> > integrating Empathy.
> > 
> > Mark
> 

With the due delay and the due "sorry for that", thank you for
considering the comments I made, and here is a summary: basically, apart
from many crashers and missing features, of which I think the most
important would be OTR, which is widely diffused also for windows and
osx chat programs, there are two important problems in empathy,
regarding usability and consistency with the rest of the desktop:

1) New messages cause empathy th flash the notification area. _This is
forbidden_, I do not know if it's written black-on-white somewhere but
we all know that we shouldn't flash the notification area, should the
world be falling. Update notifier can not do that. Why should empathy do
that? This must be fixed.

2) It does _not open a popup_ on new messages. When the infamous
update-notifier popup was decided, it was argued that pidgin already did
that. I am a pop-up hater and the IM client is the only exception. In
fact, for IM a pop-up may be desired. This is because if I start the IM
client chances are I *want* to be disturbed and if a contact calls me I
*want* to interact immediately. So ehm, I know it should not come from
me but can we have the popup back? I would prefer it to be minimised by
default so that stupid jokes from friends will not pop-up in front of my
boss.

Of course the two current behaviours should be left as an opt-in for
those who love it.

There is also a problem: empathy does not handle IRC authentication
correctly. Pidgin has a plugin for that but why not just making
authentication work? Basically, it should hide from the sight of the
user the positive response from the server instead of annoying the user
with a message.

Thank you for reading

Vincenzo


-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop