Re: [VOTE] Accept contribution of Lucene CAS Indexer into the sandbox
Hi Jörn, thank you for your hints. I'm currently working hard on a new release of Lucas. I know that some tests need refactoring and the exception handling isn't perfect. I'll do my best do get this done in the new release, which should be available next week. Rico Hello everyone, I also vote +1 but the code has to be improved before I would vote +1 for a release. Especially the exception handling should make use of javas managed exceptions and in one place a I saw some code which was copied over and over again. Jörn On Mar 4, 2009, at 11:32 AM, Thilo Goetz wrote: Please vote to accept the contribution of the Lucene CAS indexer into the sandbox. See Jira issue UIMA-1299 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1299) for the tar ball. [ ] +1 Accept Lucene CAS indexer into UIMA sandbox [ ] -1 Do not accept contribution of Lucene CAS indexer You're all encouraged to vote, even if you're not a UIMA committer. If you vote to reject the contribution, please remember to give a reason. --Thilo -- -- Rico Landefeld Jena University Language and Information Engineering (JULIE) Lab +49-3641-9 44324 http://www.julielab.de
Re: [VOTE] Accept contribution of Lucene CAS Indexer into the sandbox
Rico Landefeld wrote: Hi Jörn, thank you for your hints. I'm currently working hard on a new release of Lucas. I know that some tests need refactoring and the exception handling isn't perfect. I'll do my best do get this done in the new release, which should be available next week. I'd hold off on that. We're voting on the version that's now in Jira, and if the vote goes through (which seems certain at this point), that is the version that will go in the repository. All improvements after that will have to come in via the regular processes, and it'll be a major PITA for you to do that merge. I'll close the vote later today, it's been open long enough. We'll still need to go through some other administrativa though before we can commit the code. --Thilo Rico Hello everyone, I also vote +1 but the code has to be improved before I would vote +1 for a release. Especially the exception handling should make use of javas managed exceptions and in one place a I saw some code which was copied over and over again. Jörn On Mar 4, 2009, at 11:32 AM, Thilo Goetz wrote: Please vote to accept the contribution of the Lucene CAS indexer into the sandbox. See Jira issue UIMA-1299 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1299) for the tar ball. [ ] +1 Accept Lucene CAS indexer into UIMA sandbox [ ] -1 Do not accept contribution of Lucene CAS indexer You're all encouraged to vote, even if you're not a UIMA committer. If you vote to reject the contribution, please remember to give a reason. --Thilo
Re: [VOTE] Accept contribution of Lucene CAS Indexer into the sandbox
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 6:32 AM, Thilo Goetz twgo...@gmx.de wrote: Please vote to accept the contribution of the Lucene CAS indexer into the sandbox. See Jira issue UIMA-1299 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1299) for the tar ball. [ ] +1 Accept Lucene CAS indexer into UIMA sandbox [ ] -1 Do not accept contribution of Lucene CAS indexer You're all encouraged to vote, even if you're not a UIMA committer. If you vote to reject the contribution, please remember to give a reason. +1 -Adam
[RESULT][VOTE] Accept contribution of Lucene CAS Indexer into the sandbox
This vote has been open for a week, and is now closed. There were 8 +1s, and no 0s or -1s. The vote passes. The following people voted +1: Adam Lally Eddie Epstein Jochen Leidner Joern Kottman Marshall Schor Michael Baessler Thilo Goetz Tong Fin All except Jochen are UIMA committers. Thanks all for voting. Rico and Joachim, we now need a software grant from you (and any other contributor to the code): http://www.apache.org/licenses/#grants Please print the form and fill it in. Acceptable methods of sending the grant to the ASF include: * snail-mail to the ASF office and/or ASF officer * FAXing to the ASF office and/or an ASF officer * Emailing the scanned document to secret...@apache.org and legal-arch...@apache.org. If you have any questions about this process, do not hesitate to ask. --Thilo Thilo Goetz wrote: Please vote to accept the contribution of the Lucene CAS indexer into the sandbox. See Jira issue UIMA-1299 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1299) for the tar ball. [ ] +1 Accept Lucene CAS indexer into UIMA sandbox [ ] -1 Do not accept contribution of Lucene CAS indexer You're all encouraged to vote, even if you're not a UIMA committer. If you vote to reject the contribution, please remember to give a reason. --Thilo
Re: [VOTE] Accept contribution of Lucene CAS Indexer into the sandbox
+1 I finally had a chance to talk to Marshall about this work. Sounds very good. Thanks for the contribution! Eddie On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 6:35 AM, Thilo Goetz twgo...@gmx.de wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 +1 Thilo Goetz wrote: Please vote to accept the contribution of the Lucene CAS indexer into the sandbox. See Jira issue UIMA-1299 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1299) for the tar ball. [ ] +1 Accept Lucene CAS indexer into UIMA sandbox [ ] -1 Do not accept contribution of Lucene CAS indexer You're all encouraged to vote, even if you're not a UIMA committer. If you vote to reject the contribution, please remember to give a reason. --Thilo -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJrlltVCINLMh0FVwRAiexAJ99hy8po5nFl6vfH2TvqLzN5CY27ACgjftr QWRRdxkJW5PgM06Kis3h9VY= =eNc0 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [VOTE] Accept contribution of Lucene CAS Indexer into the sandbox
Hello everyone, I also vote +1 but the code has to be improved before I would vote +1 for a release. Especially the exception handling should make use of javas managed exceptions and in one place a I saw some code which was copied over and over again. Jörn On Mar 4, 2009, at 11:32 AM, Thilo Goetz wrote: Please vote to accept the contribution of the Lucene CAS indexer into the sandbox. See Jira issue UIMA-1299 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1299) for the tar ball. [ ] +1 Accept Lucene CAS indexer into UIMA sandbox [ ] -1 Do not accept contribution of Lucene CAS indexer You're all encouraged to vote, even if you're not a UIMA committer. If you vote to reject the contribution, please remember to give a reason. --Thilo
Re: [VOTE] Accept contribution of Lucene CAS Indexer into the sandbox
+1 -- Tong On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Marshall Schor m...@schor.com wrote: +1 Contribution looks quite impressive! -Marshall Rico Landefeld wrote: Hi, I've attached the corrected POM without parent POM to the issue. This should solve the problem. best regards, Rico Landefeld Hi - I tried to use maven to build this, but it seems to have a parent POM which is not found. Any suggestions for how to get the build to go? The error reported was: [ERROR] FATAL ERROR [INFO] [INFO] Error building POM (may not be this project's POM). Project ID: de.julielab:jules-lucene-indexer:jar:0.5-SNAPSHOT Reason: Cannot find parent: de.julielab:jules for project: de.julielab:jules-lucene-indexer:jar:0.5-SNAPSHOT for project de.julielab:jules-lucene-indexer:jar:0.5-SNAPSHOT ... Caused by: org.apache.maven.project.ProjectBuildingException: POM 'de.julielab:jules' not found in repository: Unable to download the artifact from any repository de.julielab:jules:pom:1.3 from the specified remote repositories: central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2) Thanks. -Marshall Thilo Goetz wrote: Please vote to accept the contribution of the Lucene CAS indexer into the sandbox. See Jira issue UIMA-1299 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1299) for the tar ball. [ ] +1 Accept Lucene CAS indexer into UIMA sandbox [ ] -1 Do not accept contribution of Lucene CAS indexer You're all encouraged to vote, even if you're not a UIMA committer. If you vote to reject the contribution, please remember to give a reason. --Thilo -- Tong
Re: [VOTE] Accept contribution of Lucene CAS Indexer into the sandbox
+1 Contribution looks quite impressive! -Marshall Rico Landefeld wrote: Hi, I've attached the corrected POM without parent POM to the issue. This should solve the problem. best regards, Rico Landefeld Hi - I tried to use maven to build this, but it seems to have a parent POM which is not found. Any suggestions for how to get the build to go? The error reported was: [ERROR] FATAL ERROR [INFO] [INFO] Error building POM (may not be this project's POM). Project ID: de.julielab:jules-lucene-indexer:jar:0.5-SNAPSHOT Reason: Cannot find parent: de.julielab:jules for project: de.julielab:jules-lucene-indexer:jar:0.5-SNAPSHOT for project de.julielab:jules-lucene-indexer:jar:0.5-SNAPSHOT ... Caused by: org.apache.maven.project.ProjectBuildingException: POM 'de.julielab:jules' not found in repository: Unable to download the artifact from any repository de.julielab:jules:pom:1.3 from the specified remote repositories: central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2) Thanks. -Marshall Thilo Goetz wrote: Please vote to accept the contribution of the Lucene CAS indexer into the sandbox. See Jira issue UIMA-1299 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1299) for the tar ball. [ ] +1 Accept Lucene CAS indexer into UIMA sandbox [ ] -1 Do not accept contribution of Lucene CAS indexer You're all encouraged to vote, even if you're not a UIMA committer. If you vote to reject the contribution, please remember to give a reason. --Thilo
Re: [VOTE] Accept contribution of Lucene CAS Indexer into the sandbox
Hi, I've attached the corrected POM without parent POM to the issue. This should solve the problem. best regards, Rico Landefeld Hi - I tried to use maven to build this, but it seems to have a parent POM which is not found. Any suggestions for how to get the build to go? The error reported was: [ERROR] FATAL ERROR [INFO] [INFO] Error building POM (may not be this project's POM). Project ID: de.julielab:jules-lucene-indexer:jar:0.5-SNAPSHOT Reason: Cannot find parent: de.julielab:jules for project: de.julielab:jules-lucene-indexer:jar:0.5-SNAPSHOT for project de.julielab:jules-lucene-indexer:jar:0.5-SNAPSHOT ... Caused by: org.apache.maven.project.ProjectBuildingException: POM 'de.julielab:jules' not found in repository: Unable to download the artifact from any repository de.julielab:jules:pom:1.3 from the specified remote repositories: central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2) Thanks. -Marshall Thilo Goetz wrote: Please vote to accept the contribution of the Lucene CAS indexer into the sandbox. See Jira issue UIMA-1299 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1299) for the tar ball. [ ] +1 Accept Lucene CAS indexer into UIMA sandbox [ ] -1 Do not accept contribution of Lucene CAS indexer You're all encouraged to vote, even if you're not a UIMA committer. If you vote to reject the contribution, please remember to give a reason. --Thilo
Re: [VOTE] Accept contribution of Lucene CAS Indexer into the sandbox
Hi - I tried to use maven to build this, but it seems to have a parent POM which is not found. Any suggestions for how to get the build to go? The error reported was: [ERROR] FATAL ERROR [INFO] [INFO] Error building POM (may not be this project's POM). Project ID: de.julielab:jules-lucene-indexer:jar:0.5-SNAPSHOT Reason: Cannot find parent: de.julielab:jules for project: de.julielab:jules-lucene-indexer:jar:0.5-SNAPSHOT for project de.julielab:jules-lucene-indexer:jar:0.5-SNAPSHOT ... Caused by: org.apache.maven.project.ProjectBuildingException: POM 'de.julielab:jules' not found in repository: Unable to download the artifact from any repository de.julielab:jules:pom:1.3 from the specified remote repositories: central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2) Thanks. -Marshall Thilo Goetz wrote: Please vote to accept the contribution of the Lucene CAS indexer into the sandbox. See Jira issue UIMA-1299 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1299) for the tar ball. [ ] +1 Accept Lucene CAS indexer into UIMA sandbox [ ] -1 Do not accept contribution of Lucene CAS indexer You're all encouraged to vote, even if you're not a UIMA committer. If you vote to reject the contribution, please remember to give a reason. --Thilo
[VOTE] Accept contribution of Lucene CAS Indexer into the sandbox
Please vote to accept the contribution of the Lucene CAS indexer into the sandbox. See Jira issue UIMA-1299 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1299) for the tar ball. [ ] +1 Accept Lucene CAS indexer into UIMA sandbox [ ] -1 Do not accept contribution of Lucene CAS indexer You're all encouraged to vote, even if you're not a UIMA committer. If you vote to reject the contribution, please remember to give a reason. --Thilo
Re: [VOTE] Accept contribution of Lucene CAS Indexer into the sandbox
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 +1 Thilo Goetz wrote: Please vote to accept the contribution of the Lucene CAS indexer into the sandbox. See Jira issue UIMA-1299 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1299) for the tar ball. [ ] +1 Accept Lucene CAS indexer into UIMA sandbox [ ] -1 Do not accept contribution of Lucene CAS indexer You're all encouraged to vote, even if you're not a UIMA committer. If you vote to reject the contribution, please remember to give a reason. --Thilo -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJrlltVCINLMh0FVwRAiexAJ99hy8po5nFl6vfH2TvqLzN5CY27ACgjftr QWRRdxkJW5PgM06Kis3h9VY= =eNc0 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
RE: [VOTE] Accept contribution of Lucene CAS Indexer into the sandbox
Accept Lucene CAS Indexer into the sandbox [+1] +1 Accept Lucene CAS indexer into UIMA sandbox [ ] -1 Do not accept contribution of Lucene CAS indexer Jochen -- Dr. Jochen Leidner Research Scientist Thomson Reuters Corporation Research Development 610 Opperman Drive St. Paul, MN 55123 USA http://www.ThomsonReuters.com
Re: [VOTE] Accept contribution of Lucene CAS Indexer into the sandbox
Thilo Goetz wrote: Please vote to accept the contribution of the Lucene CAS indexer into the sandbox. See Jira issue UIMA-1299 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1299) for the tar ball. [ ] +1 Accept Lucene CAS indexer into UIMA sandbox [ ] -1 Do not accept contribution of Lucene CAS indexer You're all encouraged to vote, even if you're not a UIMA committer. If you vote to reject the contribution, please remember to give a reason. --Thilo +1 I assume that Rico Landefeld and Joachim Wermter will also drive this in the future when the code is in the Sandbox. -- Michael
