Re: [UC] Suspicious Looking Character

[Craigsolve]

In a message dated 4/16/2005 8:37:22 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, 
Benseraglio2 writes:

  
  
because screwing is deemed a plain old work product by the courts; 
sorry Rosso.
 
Ciao,
 
Craig
  Shut up, Craig.

Unlike your screwing around, while constitutionally protected free speech, 
is still screwing around. See how much you have in common with the interpretive 
dancers? The only question is, who is prettier?
 
Let's do a poll! Which do we all like more, LV Girls waggin or Rosso 
raggin?

Re: [UC] Suspicious Looking Character

[Benseraglio2]

In a message dated 4/16/2005 7:47:33 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


In a message dated 4/15/2005 2:58:04 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
somebody out for a stroll who is taking in the sights and somebodywho appears to be up to no good.  As I previously stated, I think that it isprudent to error on the side of caution.

And if one of my "leash aggressive" dogs rousted his ass, you would take his case re physical/emotional injury, since you don't handle civil rights violations?
 
This is a time when men like former police commissioner Frank Rizzo and his policies are missed. When his men told a loiterer to move on, you moved on or got your head busted. The only color issue was how red was your blood. Thank God for the ACLU, protecting vagrants', stalkers', drug dealers' and street walkers' civil rights.
 
The ACLU's latest crusade to protect great American's civil rights, is now playing out in Nevada. They are representing exotic dancers against a new State tax. The ACLU claims that case law protects the dancers from being taxed for dancing, which is a recognized form of artistic _expression_. The tax on hookers is OK because screwing is deemed a plain old work product by the courts; sorry Rosso.
 
Ciao,
 
Craig
Shut up, Craig.
 
 

Ross Benderhttp://rossbender.org/mqrtoc.html

Re: [UC] Suspicious Looking Character

[Craigsolve]

In a message dated 4/15/2005 2:58:04 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
somebody 
  out for a stroll who is taking in the sights and somebodywho appears to be 
  up to no good.  As I previously stated, I think that it isprudent to 
  error on the side of caution.

And if one of my "leash aggressive" dogs rousted his ass, you would take 
his case re physical/emotional injury, since you don't handle civil rights 
violations?
 
This is a time when men like former police commissioner Frank Rizzo and his 
policies are missed. When his men told a loiterer to move on, you moved on or 
got your head busted. The only color issue was how red was your blood. Thank God 
for the ACLU, protecting vagrants', stalkers', drug dealers' and street walkers' 
civil rights.
 
The ACLU's latest crusade to protect great American's civil rights, is now 
playing out in Nevada. They are representing exotic dancers against a new State 
tax. The ACLU claims that case law protects the dancers from being taxed for 
dancing, which is a recognized form of artistic _expression_. The tax on hookers 
is OK because screwing is deemed a plain old work product by the courts; 
sorry Rosso.
 
Ciao,
 
Craig

Re: [UC] Suspicious Looking Character

[Craigsolve]

In a message dated 4/15/2005 12:53:15 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
who 
  "have a clearly apparent reason to be there"

Welcome to the urban bad lands; where drinkin & drugin, pillagin & 
plunderin make for an exciting pass time.
 
You should be thrilled to know that his honor Mayor John Street has 
proclaim all Philadelphia's environs cleaner and safer than they were before his 
coronation and administration.
 
There should be space for you somewhere between Nicolary's blood  
wringing hands, Andy Boy's guns, and Cassidy taking another one in the 
back.
 
And remember, Cass makes a good living profiting from other people's 
mistakes.
 
Ciao,
 
Craig

Re: [UC] Suspicious Looking Character

[Craigsolve]

In a message dated 4/15/2005 10:49:48 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Turning it into a cosmic statement about "a man's honor" is quite a 
  stretch.
   
              
                  
                  
                  
              Al 
Airone

 
"Joking 
  about guns is highly offensive".  
They are a popular American tool. When Bender wrote about his new jumbo CRT 
monitor, which is RFing his brain, were you also offended?
 
Non-recycling Saturdays must be a downer. 
 
Ciao,
 
Craig

Re: [UC] Suspicious Looking Character

[Herons]

>> I think what you are trying to say is: "Never share anything 
with me that I may be forced to reveal before a grand jury." <<
 
I think what I was trying to say was, "Joking about guns is highly 
offensive".  The rest was just an attempt to give some advice. Turning it 
into a cosmic statement about "a man's honor" is quite a stretch.
 
                
                
                
                
        Al Airone

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; univcity@list.purple.com 
  Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 8:03 
AM
  Subject: Re: [UC] Suspicious Looking 
  Character
  
  
  In a message dated 4/15/2005 6:44:24 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:
  I find 
it highly offensive even to joke about using a gun to intimidate .. keep 
this in mind: you never know how long ..
  
  I think what you are trying to say is: "Never share anything with me that 
  I may be forced to reveal before a grand jury."
   
  So, you are suggesting the age of servers, changes a man's sense of 
  honor?
   
  Dzoccu nun ti 
  appreni, nun dir né mali né beni.
  You should not talk good or bad about things that doesn't concern 
  you. 
   
  Life is still good in the wild wild west.
   
  Ciao,
   
  Craig

RE: [UC] Suspicious Looking Character

[Jonathan Cass]

"You should make sure a stranger is really engaged in "sinister activities"
before assuming
those are his intentions."

And how do you propose to do this  -- "Sir, I have noticed that you have
been lurking on the street for 20 minutes and eyeballing porch furniture.
Could you please advise as to your intentions and whether they are sinister
in nature."

I have been living in Philadelphia for 20 years and I know the difference
between somebody out for a stroll who is taking in the sights and somebody
who appears to be up to no good.  As I previously stated, I think that it is
prudent to error on the side of caution.

What's next-- an impassioned defense of the scammers who have been going
door to door?

Jonathan A. Cass
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gerardo Razumney
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 12:49 PM
To: Jonathan Cass
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; univcity@list.purple.com
Subject: Re: [UC] Suspicious Looking Character


That is exactly the kind of activity I love to engage in when I visit
a new city.  I think the idea that the only acceptable presence is
that of people who "live on our block" or who "have a clearly apparent
reason to be there" is in direct conflict with the concept of living
in a city.  If one needs to be  isolated from strangers one should
live in the country, far away from any interesting place, preferably
at the end of a road that goes nowhere.  You should make sure a
stranger is really engaged in "sinister activities" before assuming
those are his intentions.

Gerardo Razumney


Jonathan Cass wrote:

> Not sure -- I don't do any criminal work.
>
> I would not characterize my concern as arising from  "racial
> profiling."  My concern arose from the fact that (1) he is not someone
> who lives on our block, and (2) he was loitering from no good apparent
> reason.   I realize that our block is lovely place to walk one's dog,
> but his intentions appeared to be more sinister.
>
>
> Jonathan A. Cass
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 8:08 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; univcity@list.purple.com
> Subject: Re: [UC] Suspicious Looking Character
>
> In a message dated 4/14/2005 11:02:27 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Andy, Sam, perhaps you would be interested in taking some
> vigilante action while exercising your Second Amendment "rights"?
>
> Jonathan A. Cass
>
> Counselor, at what point do become a co-conspirator in planning an
> assault? Not that anyone on the list gives a damn about racial
> profiling.
>
> Ciao,
>
> Craig


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.

Re: [UC] Suspicious Looking Character

[Gerardo Razumney]

That is exactly the kind of activity I love to engage in when I visit 
a new city.  I think the idea that the only acceptable presence is 
that of people who "live on our block" or who "have a clearly apparent 
reason to be there" is in direct conflict with the concept of living 
in a city.  If one needs to be  isolated from strangers one should 
live in the country, far away from any interesting place, preferably 
at the end of a road that goes nowhere.  You should make sure a 
stranger is really engaged in "sinister activities" before assuming 
those are his intentions.

Gerardo Razumney
Jonathan Cass wrote:
Not sure -- I don't do any criminal work.
 
I would not characterize my concern as arising from  "racial 
profiling."  My concern arose from the fact that (1) he is not someone 
who lives on our block, and (2) he was loitering from no good apparent 
reason.   I realize that our block is lovely place to walk one's dog, 
but his intentions appeared to be more sinister.
 

Jonathan A. Cass
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 8:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; univcity@list.purple.com
Subject: Re: [UC] Suspicious Looking Character
In a message dated 4/14/2005 11:02:27 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andy, Sam, perhaps you would be interested in taking some
vigilante action while exercising your Second Amendment "rights"?
Jonathan A. Cass
Counselor, at what point do become a co-conspirator in planning an
assault? Not that anyone on the list gives a damn about racial
profiling.
 
Ciao,
 
Craig

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.

RE: [UC] Suspicious Looking Character

[Leila Graham-Willis]

If it's the person I think you are talking about I have seen him off and on 
in the neighborhood with the dog. Never thought of him as suspicious but did 
get the impression he's a little off.

Leila
Original Message Follows
From: "Jonathan Cass" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Jonathan Cass" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'HBW'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 
Subject: RE: [UC] Suspicious Looking Character
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 09:16:56 -0400
As a dog owner, I am familiar with the dog-walking process and this
individual's actions were not consistent with a "pee" walk.
Hey, maybe you are correct and I am being overly suspicious. Nonetheless, in
our 'hood, I think it is better to error on the side of caution.
Jonathan A. Cass
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of HBW
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 7:42 AM
To: univcity@list.purple.com
Subject: RE: [UC] Suspicious Looking Character
Hmm,
Walking dog around the block lingering until it pees?
Very suspicious.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jonathan Cass
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 11:02 PM
To: univcity@list.purple.com
Subject: [UC] Suspicious Looking Character
This evening there was a older African American man (40s or 50s, heavy set,
about 5'6" or 5"7") on our street (4600 block of Larchwood) walking with a
rotweiller dog, off the leash.  This was the second time he was seen
lingering on the street and appears to be up to no good (i.e., possibly
casing houses).  I would suggest that everyone keep a look out for him.
Andy, Sam, perhaps you would be interested in taking some vigilante action
while exercising your Second Amendment "rights"?
Jonathan A. Cass



Sent via the WebMail system at mail.sbvlaw.com


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.

RE: [UC] Suspicious Looking Character

[Samuel Nicolary]

I completely understand - not everyone can be a connoisseur of such 
things.  My patent offense is assuaged by your illiteracy of our 
affliction.  If only my mommie had breast feed me I might not have such 
a proneness to force.

--
Sam Nicolary

On Fri, 15 Apr 2005, Jonathan Cass wrote:

> Sam:
> 
> Please accept my apologies for, apparently, unfairly linking you with Andy.
> All you violent-prone thug-types look the same to me.
> 
> Jonathan A. Cass
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Samuel Nicolary
> Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 7:55 AM
> To: Herons
> Cc: univcity@list.purple.com
> Subject: Re: [UC] Suspicious Looking Character
> 
> 
> Only "highly" offensive? I would have thought that this would be more on
> the "patent" level of offense. And for what record?
> 
> Sometimes I can barely draw meaning from what people write anymore because
> I get so distracted by all the cliche sentence fragments with which people
> chose to communicate.
> 
> If there is a record - can we append this to it?
> 
> If I am going to assault someone I would never use a weapon. Jonathan gets
> me confused with lazy gun-toting mongrels like Andy Diller.  I prefer a
> more savage and primal form of violence if it comes to that sort of
> encounter.  I am _patently_ offended that Jonathan would imply otherwise.
> 
> Harrumph,
> 
> Sam Nicolary
> 
> On Fri, 15 Apr 2005, Herons wrote:
> 
> > Re: "...perhaps you would be interested in taking some vigilante action
> while
> > exercising your Second Amendment "rights"?"
> >
> > For the record:
> >
> > I find it highly offensive even to joke about using a gun to intimidate -
> or
> > shoot - someone simply because he's a stranger, even a "suspicious" one.
> To do
> > so in a public forum makes it worse.
> >
> > If that isn't enough of a deterrent from making casual and callous
> statements,
> > keep this in mind: you never know how long that e-mail will live. Or how
> many
> > copies have been made of it, how many archives it may appear in years from
> > now, or how far in the future it may come back to embarrass or harm.
> >
> >
> >
> Al
> > Airone
> >
> >
> >
> > - Original Message - From: "Jonathan Cass" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: 
> > Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 11:01 PM
> > Subject: [UC] Suspicious Looking Character
> >
> >
> > > This evening there was a older African American man (40s or 50s, heavy
> set,
> > > about 5'6" or 5"7") on our street (4600 block of Larchwood) walking with
> a
> > > rotweiller dog, off the leash.  This was the second time he was seen
> > > lingering on the street and appears to be up to no good (i.e., possibly
> > > casing houses).  I would suggest that everyone keep a look out for him.
> > >
> > > Andy, Sam, perhaps you would be interested in taking some vigilante
> action
> > > while exercising your Second Amendment "rights"?
> > >
> > > Jonathan A. Cass
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 
> > > Sent via the WebMail system at mail.sbvlaw.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 
> > > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
> > > list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
> > > <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
> >
> > 
> > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
> > list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
> > <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
> >
> 
> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
> list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
> <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
> 
> 
> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
> list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
> <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
> 

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.

RE: [UC] Suspicious Looking Character

[Jonathan Cass]

As a dog owner, I am familiar with the dog-walking process and this
individual's actions were not consistent with a "pee" walk.

Hey, maybe you are correct and I am being overly suspicious. Nonetheless, in
our 'hood, I think it is better to error on the side of caution.

Jonathan A. Cass

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of HBW
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 7:42 AM
To: univcity@list.purple.com
Subject: RE: [UC] Suspicious Looking Character


Hmm,

Walking dog around the block lingering until it pees?

Very suspicious.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jonathan Cass
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 11:02 PM
To: univcity@list.purple.com
Subject: [UC] Suspicious Looking Character


This evening there was a older African American man (40s or 50s, heavy set,
about 5'6" or 5"7") on our street (4600 block of Larchwood) walking with a
rotweiller dog, off the leash.  This was the second time he was seen
lingering on the street and appears to be up to no good (i.e., possibly
casing houses).  I would suggest that everyone keep a look out for him.

Andy, Sam, perhaps you would be interested in taking some vigilante action
while exercising your Second Amendment "rights"?

Jonathan A. Cass






Sent via the WebMail system at mail.sbvlaw.com





You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.



You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.

RE: [UC] Suspicious Looking Character

[Jonathan Cass]

Sam:

Please accept my apologies for, apparently, unfairly linking you with Andy.
All you violent-prone thug-types look the same to me.

Jonathan A. Cass
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Samuel Nicolary
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 7:55 AM
To: Herons
Cc: univcity@list.purple.com
Subject: Re: [UC] Suspicious Looking Character


Only "highly" offensive? I would have thought that this would be more on
the "patent" level of offense. And for what record?

Sometimes I can barely draw meaning from what people write anymore because
I get so distracted by all the cliche sentence fragments with which people
chose to communicate.

If there is a record - can we append this to it?

If I am going to assault someone I would never use a weapon. Jonathan gets
me confused with lazy gun-toting mongrels like Andy Diller.  I prefer a
more savage and primal form of violence if it comes to that sort of
encounter.  I am _patently_ offended that Jonathan would imply otherwise.

Harrumph,

Sam Nicolary

On Fri, 15 Apr 2005, Herons wrote:

> Re: "...perhaps you would be interested in taking some vigilante action
while
> exercising your Second Amendment "rights"?"
>
> For the record:
>
> I find it highly offensive even to joke about using a gun to intimidate -
or
> shoot - someone simply because he's a stranger, even a "suspicious" one.
To do
> so in a public forum makes it worse.
>
> If that isn't enough of a deterrent from making casual and callous
statements,
> keep this in mind: you never know how long that e-mail will live. Or how
many
> copies have been made of it, how many archives it may appear in years from
> now, or how far in the future it may come back to embarrass or harm.
>
>
>
Al
> Airone
>
>
>
> - Original Message - From: "Jonathan Cass" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 
> Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 11:01 PM
> Subject: [UC] Suspicious Looking Character
>
>
> > This evening there was a older African American man (40s or 50s, heavy
set,
> > about 5'6" or 5"7") on our street (4600 block of Larchwood) walking with
a
> > rotweiller dog, off the leash.  This was the second time he was seen
> > lingering on the street and appears to be up to no good (i.e., possibly
> > casing houses).  I would suggest that everyone keep a look out for him.
> >
> > Andy, Sam, perhaps you would be interested in taking some vigilante
action
> > while exercising your Second Amendment "rights"?
> >
> > Jonathan A. Cass
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 
> > Sent via the WebMail system at mail.sbvlaw.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 
> > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
> > list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
> > <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
>
> 
> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
> list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
> <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
>

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.

RE: [UC] Suspicious Looking Character

[Jonathan Cass]

Not sure -- I don't do any criminal 
work.
 
I would not characterize my concern as 
arising from  "racial profiling."  My concern arose from the fact that 
(1) he is not someone who lives on our block, and (2) he was loitering from no 
good apparent reason.   I realize that our block is lovely place to 
walk one's dog, but his intentions appeared to be more sinister.
 
Jonathan A. Cass -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 8:08 
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; univcity@list.purple.comSubject: 
Re: [UC] Suspicious Looking Character

  
  In a message dated 4/14/2005 11:02:27 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  Andy, Sam, perhaps you 
would be interested in taking some vigilante action while exercising your 
Second Amendment "rights"?Jonathan A. 
  Cass
  
  Counselor, at what point do become a co-conspirator in planning an 
  assault? Not that anyone on the list gives a damn about racial 
profiling.
   
  Ciao,
   
  Craig

Re: [UC] Suspicious Looking Character

[Craigsolve]

In a message dated 4/14/2005 11:02:27 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andy, 
  Sam, perhaps you would be interested in taking some vigilante action while 
  exercising your Second Amendment "rights"?Jonathan A. 
Cass

Counselor, at what point do become a co-conspirator in planning an assault? 
Not that anyone on the list gives a damn about racial profiling.
 
Ciao,
 
Craig

Re: [UC] Suspicious Looking Character

[Craigsolve]

In a message dated 4/15/2005 6:44:24 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I find 
  it highly offensive even to joke about using a gun to intimidate .. keep 
  this in mind: you never know how long ..

I think what you are trying to say is: "Never share anything with me that I 
may be forced to reveal before a grand jury."
 
So, you are suggesting the age of servers, changes a man's sense of 
honor?
 
Dzoccu nun ti appreni, 
nun dir né mali né beni.
You should not talk good or bad about things that doesn't concern 
you. 
 
Life is still good in the wild wild west.
 
Ciao,
 
Craig

Re: [UC] Suspicious Looking Character

[Samuel Nicolary]

Only "highly" offensive? I would have thought that this would be more on 
the "patent" level of offense. And for what record?

Sometimes I can barely draw meaning from what people write anymore because 
I get so distracted by all the cliche sentence fragments with which people 
chose to communicate.

If there is a record - can we append this to it?

If I am going to assault someone I would never use a weapon. Jonathan gets 
me confused with lazy gun-toting mongrels like Andy Diller.  I prefer a 
more savage and primal form of violence if it comes to that sort of 
encounter.  I am _patently_ offended that Jonathan would imply otherwise.

Harrumph,

Sam Nicolary

On Fri, 15 Apr 2005, Herons wrote:

> Re: "...perhaps you would be interested in taking some vigilante action while
> exercising your Second Amendment "rights"?"
> 
> For the record:
> 
> I find it highly offensive even to joke about using a gun to intimidate - or
> shoot - someone simply because he's a stranger, even a "suspicious" one. To do
> so in a public forum makes it worse.
> 
> If that isn't enough of a deterrent from making casual and callous statements,
> keep this in mind: you never know how long that e-mail will live. Or how many
> copies have been made of it, how many archives it may appear in years from
> now, or how far in the future it may come back to embarrass or harm.
> 
> 
>   
>  Al
> Airone
> 
> 
> 
> - Original Message - From: "Jonathan Cass" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 
> Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 11:01 PM
> Subject: [UC] Suspicious Looking Character
> 
> 
> > This evening there was a older African American man (40s or 50s, heavy set,
> > about 5'6" or 5"7") on our street (4600 block of Larchwood) walking with a
> > rotweiller dog, off the leash.  This was the second time he was seen
> > lingering on the street and appears to be up to no good (i.e., possibly
> > casing houses).  I would suggest that everyone keep a look out for him.
> > 
> > Andy, Sam, perhaps you would be interested in taking some vigilante action
> > while exercising your Second Amendment "rights"?
> > 
> > Jonathan A. Cass
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Sent via the WebMail system at mail.sbvlaw.com
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
> > list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
> > <http://www.purple.com/list.html>. 
> 
> 
> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
> list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
> <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
> 

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.

RE: [UC] Suspicious Looking Character

[HBW]

Hmm,

Walking dog around the block lingering until it pees?

Very suspicious.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jonathan Cass
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 11:02 PM
To: univcity@list.purple.com
Subject: [UC] Suspicious Looking Character


This evening there was a older African American man (40s or 50s, heavy set,
about 5'6" or 5"7") on our street (4600 block of Larchwood) walking with a
rotweiller dog, off the leash.  This was the second time he was seen
lingering on the street and appears to be up to no good (i.e., possibly
casing houses).  I would suggest that everyone keep a look out for him.

Andy, Sam, perhaps you would be interested in taking some vigilante action
while exercising your Second Amendment "rights"?

Jonathan A. Cass






Sent via the WebMail system at mail.sbvlaw.com





You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.



You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.

Re: [UC] Suspicious Looking Character

[Herons]

Re: "...perhaps you would be interested in taking some vigilante action 
while exercising your Second Amendment "rights"?"

For the record:
I find it highly offensive even to joke about using a gun to intimidate - or 
shoot - someone simply because he's a stranger, even a "suspicious" one. To 
do so in a public forum makes it worse.

If that isn't enough of a deterrent from making casual and callous 
statements, keep this in mind: you never know how long that e-mail will 
live. Or how many copies have been made of it, how many archives it may 
appear in years from now, or how far in the future it may come back to 
embarrass or harm.


   Al Airone


- Original Message - 
From: "Jonathan Cass" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 11:01 PM
Subject: [UC] Suspicious Looking Character


This evening there was a older African American man (40s or 50s, heavy 
set, about 5'6" or 5"7") on our street (4600 block of Larchwood) walking 
with a rotweiller dog, off the leash.  This was the second time he was 
seen lingering on the street and appears to be up to no good (i.e., 
possibly casing houses).  I would suggest that everyone keep a look out 
for him.

Andy, Sam, perhaps you would be interested in taking some vigilante action 
while exercising your Second Amendment "rights"?

Jonathan A. Cass



Sent via the WebMail system at mail.sbvlaw.com


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>. 

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.

[UC] Suspicious Looking Character

[Jonathan Cass]

This evening there was a older African American man (40s or 50s, heavy set, 
about 5'6" or 5"7") on our street (4600 block of Larchwood) walking with a 
rotweiller dog, off the leash.  This was the second time he was seen lingering 
on the street and appears to be up to no good (i.e., possibly casing houses).  
I would suggest that everyone keep a look out for him.  

Andy, Sam, perhaps you would be interested in taking some vigilante action 
while exercising your Second Amendment "rights"?

Jonathan A. Cass
 





Sent via the WebMail system at mail.sbvlaw.com


 
   

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
.