Re: [OT] Installing Linux fonts

2010-06-17 Thread Richmond

On 06/17/2010 11:23 PM, Peter Alcibiades wrote:

It might be something to do with subjunctives - English does have them,
though they are hard to recognize.

"I want that you give me that apple". that seems to be OK if a little old
fashioned and stilted.  "I want that he obey his teacher"  (not, that he
obeys).  Its a bit like je veux que tu ailles a la poste.

Better to avoid the problem by using the infinitive. "I want you to give"
"I want him to obey".  Not he, of course, him.

Richmond as an EFL guru will know the proper answer to this
   


As "an EFL guru" I would start by saying that I think that is a misuse 
and abuse

of the word 'guru' . . .  :)

Also, there is a difference between Native English and EFL; the latter 
tending increasingly
to focus on Communicative Competence rather than Prescriptive 
Grammatical niceties.


I never, ever worry about "whom" as it is already half gone,

and as a native speaker I continually catch myself saying "If I was you" 
instead

of "If I were you". From the point of view of a prescriptivist I am wrong;
but, Hey, why don't we all revert to Anglo-Saxon (which is bad Northern 
Germano-Danish)?

Walk down a street in, say, Swindon, and I wonder how many people use
the "if I were you" structure - probably none.

I have never heard anybody say "I want that you give me that apple"; it 
sounds
like somebody trying to fake 18th century English (and botching it) or 
something

from some odd dialect. I would always favour "I want you to give".

"I wist that Thou givest me that apple" micht dae fae some sonsy loon 
fae oot a time-machine,

but isnae mensefu the noo.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] Installing Linux fonts

2010-06-17 Thread Peter Alcibiades

It might be something to do with subjunctives - English does have them,
though they are hard to recognize.

"I want that you give me that apple". that seems to be OK if a little old
fashioned and stilted.  "I want that he obey his teacher"  (not, that he
obeys).  Its a bit like je veux que tu ailles a la poste.  

Better to avoid the problem by using the infinitive. "I want you to give"  
"I want him to obey".  Not he, of course, him.

Richmond as an EFL guru will know the proper answer to this
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/OT-Installing-Linux-fonts-tp2219888p2259430.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] Installing Linux fonts

2010-06-17 Thread Peter Alcibiades

Wolfgang, if this were the only problem, then every reboot would take care of
all the font problems, until you installed more fonts.

That is not my experience.  It varies from distro to distro, but my
experience is that after very many reboots, you still have a situation where
Rev fails to see some installed fonts, and sees other fonts that are not
installed, and that it is the only app with these problems in relation to
these fonts.

The cause of this, if it persists after reboot, cannot surely be the cache?

OT:  "If you don't want that the user have to use..."  Should be, if you
don't want the user TO HAVE TO USE.  You can't 'want that' someone does
something.  Dunno why, but it sounds wrong.  I know, its awful.  I often
have had the feeling in Europe and speaking a foreign language that it was
like trying to play a piano with gloves on.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/OT-Installing-Linux-fonts-tp2219888p2259422.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] Installing Linux fonts

2010-06-17 Thread Richmond

Sorry, chaps:

http://andregarzia.on-rev.com/richmond/STUFF/Skritty.png.zip

Ouch! Again!
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] Installing Linux fonts

2010-06-17 Thread Richmond

Picture of this morning's fiasco:

http://andregarzia.on-rev.com/richmond/STUFF/Skritty.png

Ouch!
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] Installing Linux fonts

2010-06-17 Thread Richmond

On 06/17/2010 04:23 PM, Peter Alcibiades wrote:

We need Rev to tell us straightforwardly:  Do they admit that basic
functionality in the Linux version is broken?  If so, do they intend to fix
it?
   


I suspect actions WILL speak louder than words.


Out of deference to Jacque, Richard and Richmond, I will now bite my tongue,
except to note this is not about whether Rev and I are suited.  This is
about whether the Linux version, as being sold, works.  If it were the
Windows or the OSX version, would this be sold?

   


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] Installing Linux fonts

2010-06-17 Thread Peter Alcibiades

We need Rev to tell us straightforwardly:  Do they admit that basic
functionality in the Linux version is broken?  If so, do they intend to fix
it?

Out of deference to Jacque, Richard and Richmond, I will now bite my tongue,
except to note this is not about whether Rev and I are suited.  This is
about whether the Linux version, as being sold, works.  If it were the
Windows or the OSX version, would this be sold?

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/OT-Installing-Linux-fonts-tp2219888p2258769.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] Installing Linux fonts

2010-06-17 Thread Richmond

I set up a stack containing a field "FFF"
and a button with the following script:

on mouseUp
   set the textFont of fld "FFF" to "Sanskrit 2003"
   set the useUnicode to true
   put uniencode("abx") into BLOB
   set the unicodeText of fld "FFF" to numToChar(57417) & BLOB
end mouseUp

[bad point] which I had to type manually here because I was unable
   to Copy-Paste from the script-editor on Linux into any
   other program (tried gEdit and this one - ThunderBird).

What I got was " abx"; so the numToChar(57417) yielded the desired 
unicode glyph,

but :

1. at a tiny size

2.  superScripted

adding this line to the end of my script

set the textSize of fld "FFF" to 120

only served to set "abx" to a size of 120, while the complex glyph from 
address 57417

remained the same.

---

I have a "funny feeling" that the inability to scale text will extend to 
all characters from

outwith the extended ASCII table.

Obviously this is not satisfactory.



doing this:

set the unicodeText of fld "FFF" to BLOB & numToChar(57417) & BLOB

made the numToChar(57417) even smaller and put it even higher up the 
textField.




doing this:

set the unicodeText of fld "FFF" to numToChar(57417)

produced a similar phenomenon.

-

Feeling grumpy.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] Installing Linux fonts

2010-06-16 Thread Richmond

On 06/13/2010 01:09 AM, G. Wolfgang Gaich wrote:

Hello Richmond,

I tested to use all installed fonts on Ubuntu 10.04 with rev. No problem.

With

set the textfont of fld "/field/" to "/fontname/"

I can use all available fonts.

Only the function fontnames() does not return all the fonts.

But you can get a list of fontnames with

put shell("fc-list") into tTempFontsList
set the itemdel to ":"
repeat for each line tL in tTempFontsList
   set the itemdel to ":"
   put item 1 of tL into tL2
   set the itemdel to ","
   put item 1 of tL2 & cr after tFontsList
end repeat
delete char -1 of tFontsList


If you want to install a user font then copy it into 
/home//.fonts/truetype/

and in console type:

>  sudo fc-cache

Now you can use that font with rev.



HOWEVER: I moved the source stack of my 'Devawriter' over to my Ubuntu 
10.04 machine
and blow me down if the font (non-standard Unicode) doesn't show up in 
the text field.


Obviously time to drink a large cup of coffee and have a think . . .  :)
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] Installing Linux fonts

2010-06-16 Thread G. Wolfgang Gaich

Richmond,
thanks for the tip.
Learned something new!

Wolfgang

Am 16.06.2010 17:47, schrieb Richmond:


This is where your grammar gets problematic . . .  :)

'you can supply information' . . . "information" is a MASS noun like 
'water', 'air' and 'money'.




___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] Installing Linux fonts

2010-06-16 Thread Richmond

On 06/16/2010 06:33 PM, G. Wolfgang Gaich wrote:

Hello Richmond,

I am pleased to have helped you (is that good english?)


That is a perfect example of the Present Perfect, and you can feel very 
pleased about that.




If you don't want that the user have to use fc-cache, you can give an 
information, 


This is where your grammar gets problematic . . .  :)

'you can supply information' . . . "information" is a MASS noun like 
'water', 'air' and 'money'.


that it is necessary to restart the graphical user interface (gnome or 
kde or...) after the installation of your program. A fc-cache is done 
automatically when the gui is restarted.


Ahah! That really is fantastic news.



Regards
Wolfgang



Am 16.06.2010 17:06, schrieb Richmond:

On 06/13/2010 01:09 AM, G. Wolfgang Gaich wrote:

Hello Richmond,

I tested to use all installed fonts on Ubuntu 10.04 with rev. No 
problem.


With

set the textfont of fld "/field/" to "/fontname/"

I can use all available fonts.

Only the function fontnames() does not return all the fonts.

But you can get a list of fontnames with

put shell("fc-list") into tTempFontsList
set the itemdel to ":"
repeat for each line tL in tTempFontsList
   set the itemdel to ":"
   put item 1 of tL into tL2
   set the itemdel to ","
   put item 1 of tL2 & cr after tFontsList
end repeat
delete char -1 of tFontsList


If you want to install a user font then copy it into 
/home//.fonts/truetype/

and in console type:

>  sudo fc-cache

Now you can use that font with rev.

Thanks Wolfgang! I just tried your recipe and it really solves all my 
problems

(and I hope that Peter will feel that this is a suitable 'stop gap').

My only grumble is that I have to expect end-users to be proficient with
the terminal for sudo fc-cache. Unfortunately, as every end user has 
adifferent

password there is no way to build this into a stack.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your 
subscription preferences:

http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your 
subscription preferences:

http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] Installing Linux fonts

2010-06-16 Thread G. Wolfgang Gaich

Hello Richmond,

I am pleased to have helped you (is that good english?)

If you don't want that the user have to use fc-cache, you can give an 
information, that it is necessary to restart the graphical user 
interface (gnome or kde or...) after the installation of your program. A 
fc-cache is done automatically when the gui is restarted.


Regards
Wolfgang



Am 16.06.2010 17:06, schrieb Richmond:

On 06/13/2010 01:09 AM, G. Wolfgang Gaich wrote:

Hello Richmond,

I tested to use all installed fonts on Ubuntu 10.04 with rev. No 
problem.


With

set the textfont of fld "/field/" to "/fontname/"

I can use all available fonts.

Only the function fontnames() does not return all the fonts.

But you can get a list of fontnames with

put shell("fc-list") into tTempFontsList
set the itemdel to ":"
repeat for each line tL in tTempFontsList
   set the itemdel to ":"
   put item 1 of tL into tL2
   set the itemdel to ","
   put item 1 of tL2 & cr after tFontsList
end repeat
delete char -1 of tFontsList


If you want to install a user font then copy it into 
/home//.fonts/truetype/

and in console type:

>  sudo fc-cache

Now you can use that font with rev.

Thanks Wolfgang! I just tried your recipe and it really solves all my 
problems

(and I hope that Peter will feel that this is a suitable 'stop gap').

My only grumble is that I have to expect end-users to be proficient with
the terminal for sudo fc-cache. Unfortunately, as every end user has 
adifferent

password there is no way to build this into a stack.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your 
subscription preferences:

http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] Installing Linux fonts

2010-06-16 Thread Richmond

On 06/13/2010 01:09 AM, G. Wolfgang Gaich wrote:

Hello Richmond,

I tested to use all installed fonts on Ubuntu 10.04 with rev. No problem.

With

set the textfont of fld "/field/" to "/fontname/"

I can use all available fonts.

Only the function fontnames() does not return all the fonts.

But you can get a list of fontnames with

put shell("fc-list") into tTempFontsList
set the itemdel to ":"
repeat for each line tL in tTempFontsList
   set the itemdel to ":"
   put item 1 of tL into tL2
   set the itemdel to ","
   put item 1 of tL2 & cr after tFontsList
end repeat
delete char -1 of tFontsList


If you want to install a user font then copy it into 
/home//.fonts/truetype/

and in console type:

>  sudo fc-cache

Now you can use that font with rev.

Thanks Wolfgang! I just tried your recipe and it really solves all my 
problems

(and I hope that Peter will feel that this is a suitable 'stop gap').

My only grumble is that I have to expect end-users to be proficient with
the terminal for sudo fc-cache. Unfortunately, as every end user has 
adifferent

password there is no way to build this into a stack.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] Installing Linux fonts

2010-06-15 Thread Richard Gaskin

Richmond wrote:

On 06/14/2010 10:59 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:

Peter Alcibiades wrote:

Richmond, one sees no signs they are even working on this - and other
problems.  Are expressions of anger and impatience any less
productive than
compliant silence?  This is not an excusable way for a company to
behave!


Yes, anger on a publicly searchable list can be damaging, and as such
is less productive than other methods. Richmond is right: RR is doing
exactly what they need to be doing right now.

If you would like a more productive outlet, pony up for Enterprise.
One of the perks for that level of subscription is that you can join
the Improve list where you'll be able to participate in the process
that helps form the future of the product. The NDA info you'll receive
will also alleviate the silence you feel RR keeps.

I don't know of any other commercial software companies that announce
their intentions to the general public before a release is final.
Apple even fires people who mention what product they're working on next.



"pony up for Enterprise"

I am surprised to hear that very English phrase from 'tother side of the
pond . . .  :)

I wonder if it might not be an idea for RunRev to have sort of
membership thing, where folk
who cannot or won't 'pony up' for Enterprise can pay an annual fee to
take part in the Improve
list?


Yes:  they can pay a fee to join the improve-rev list, and they get 
Enterprise bundled for free. :)


I agree with Jacque in her focus on productive outcomes:

If you don't like Rev then please recognize that the choice of using it 
is entirely your own.  This is a big world chock full o' development 
tools.  Shouldn't be hard to do as the rest of the world does:  find one 
you like and use it.


If instead you actually like using Rev but find some aspects annoying 
and want to see them improved, consider how that may best be 
accomplished and then pursue that path.


I've found it useful to try to choose my words online as I would if the 
reader were across the dinner table from me.  I wouldn't yell at my 
dinner guests, or call them names.


If there's something I need from someone, I do what I can to help them 
find what they need to accomplish it.


Being angry consumes energy that could be employed to solve problems.

--
 Richard Gaskin
 Fourth World
 Rev training and consulting: http://www.fourthworld.com
 Webzine for Rev developers: http://www.revjournal.com
 revJournal blog: http://revjournal.com/blog.irv
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] Installing Linux fonts

2010-06-15 Thread Richmond

On 06/14/2010 10:59 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:

Peter Alcibiades wrote:

Richmond, one sees no signs they are even working on this - and other
problems.  Are expressions of anger and impatience any less 
productive than
compliant silence?  This is not an excusable way for a company to 
behave!


Yes, anger on a publicly searchable list can be damaging, and as such 
is less productive than other methods. Richmond is right: RR is doing 
exactly what they need to be doing right now.


If you would like a more productive outlet, pony up for Enterprise. 
One of the perks for that level of subscription is that you can join 
the Improve list where you'll be able to participate in the process 
that helps form the future of the product. The NDA info you'll receive 
will also alleviate the silence you feel RR keeps.


I don't know of any other commercial software companies that announce 
their intentions to the general public before a release is final. 
Apple even fires people who mention what product they're working on next.




"pony up for Enterprise"

I am surprised to hear that very English phrase from 'tother side of the 
pond . . .  :)


I wonder if it might not be an idea for RunRev to have sort of 
membership thing, where folk
who cannot or won't 'pony up' for Enterprise can pay an annual fee to 
take part in the Improve

list?
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] Installing Linux fonts

2010-06-14 Thread J. Landman Gay

Peter Alcibiades wrote:

Richmond, one sees no signs they are even working on this - and other
problems.  Are expressions of anger and impatience any less productive than
compliant silence?  This is not an excusable way for a company to behave!


Yes, anger on a publicly searchable list can be damaging, and as such is 
less productive than other methods. Richmond is right: RR is doing 
exactly what they need to be doing right now.


If you would like a more productive outlet, pony up for Enterprise. One 
of the perks for that level of subscription is that you can join the 
Improve list where you'll be able to participate in the process that 
helps form the future of the product. The NDA info you'll receive will 
also alleviate the silence you feel RR keeps.


I don't know of any other commercial software companies that announce 
their intentions to the general public before a release is final. Apple 
even fires people who mention what product they're working on next.


--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software   | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] Installing Linux fonts

2010-06-14 Thread Richmond

On 06/14/2010 10:33 PM, David C. wrote:

Thank you Richmond for the care taken with your thoughtful reply.

I've used a *lot* of different development tools and languages over
the years and never found a single one that was exactly to my liking
or to have met all of my felt needs. Whether it be Windows or Linux
(don't use Macs), Rev by far, meets or exceeds the large majority of
my needs, expectations and wishes. When I look at the RunRev glass, it
always seems almost full.

--
   

But, then, I am the chap
who when a 4 x 4 hoots at me because I am an extremely careful driver, I stop 
the car,
turn off the lights, and go and have "an intimate little chat" with the driver 
of the 4 x 4.
Bulgarian drivers NOT being the same as drivers in Britain.
 

--

Are you certain that you aren't from the part of Texas where I grew up?
   


Have you ever been to Arbroath? I suspect that may be where a lot of
the original red-necks came from.


My final "intimate little chat" of that nature resulted in a visit to
a local hospital having bird-shot picked out my person, from a
thankfully misplaced shotgun blast some 25 years ago... somehow I
managed to survive my youth and gained a bit of wisdom about at least
ONE thing.

I certainly hope that Bulgarian drivers are neither easily offended or
in the habit of driving around armed with a loaded shotgun. Just some
food for thought... ;-)
   


NO, they don't carry loaded shotguns; most of the bald-headed,
neckless goons who drive the 4 x 4s (gifties from their Mafia
bosses) probably would find it beyond their intellectual capacity
to work out one end of a shotgun from another.

All one really needs to do is abuse then in Doric Scots, as, first of all,
as I drive a 15 year-old beat-up Citroen "Elation" with the steering
wheel on the wrong side (drove it here from Scotland) they expect
English; secondly, when they reply in Bulgarian, I switch into their
language as a way of proving that there is little difference between
gutter Dundonian and gutter Plovdivian; this really "sets the cat 
amongst the

pigeons" and they generally end up apologising . . .  :)
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] Installing Linux fonts

2010-06-14 Thread David C.
Thank you Richmond for the care taken with your thoughtful reply.

I've used a *lot* of different development tools and languages over
the years and never found a single one that was exactly to my liking
or to have met all of my felt needs. Whether it be Windows or Linux
(don't use Macs), Rev by far, meets or exceeds the large majority of
my needs, expectations and wishes. When I look at the RunRev glass, it
always seems almost full.

--
>But, then, I am the chap
>who when a 4 x 4 hoots at me because I am an extremely careful driver, I stop 
>the car,
>turn off the lights, and go and have "an intimate little chat" with the driver 
>of the 4 x 4.
>Bulgarian drivers NOT being the same as drivers in Britain.
--

Are you certain that you aren't from the part of Texas where I grew up?

My final "intimate little chat" of that nature resulted in a visit to
a local hospital having bird-shot picked out my person, from a
thankfully misplaced shotgun blast some 25 years ago... somehow I
managed to survive my youth and gained a bit of wisdom about at least
ONE thing.

I certainly hope that Bulgarian drivers are neither easily offended or
in the habit of driving around armed with a loaded shotgun. Just some
food for thought... ;-)

Best regards,
David C.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] Installing Linux fonts

2010-06-14 Thread Richmond

On 06/14/2010 02:02 PM, Peter Alcibiades wrote:

Richmond, one sees no signs they are even working on this - and other
problems.  Are expressions of anger and impatience any less productive than
compliant silence?  This is not an excusable way for a company to behave!
   


No; you don't see any signs that they are working on "this"; but one 
opens the window
one fine summer morning and find the field behind the house carpetted 
with mushrooms;
not having realised that the whole field was bursting with growing, 
burgeoning hyphae

until the fruiting-bodies burst forward.

I don't know, however (and nor do you, for that matter) what is going on
with the incipient 4.5 release, and the subsequent 5.0.

Now many other companies (Apple, Microsoft, Adobe to start with) don't
feel a desperate urge to share with the existing clients what is going to be
in the upcoming release of their thing: so it might be a bit 
disingenuous to expect

RunRev to behave any differently.

Had you paid the money to attend the Edinburgh conference you would, 
probably,
have been invited to attend the Non-Disclosure Event at the end where 
those who attended
(myself included) were told quite a lot of things about what to expect 
in 4.5 and so on.


Unfortunately for you; you neither paid the money to attend that event, 
and I, having
signed the NDA, am not prepared to tell you what we were told. Well . . 
. :) to be honest,

owing to various factors, I cannot remember all that much anyway.

Of course if you shell out the money for RunRev Enterprise, as far as I 
can gather, you
will get your hands on the beta builds of 4.5 and so on as they come 
down the pipe.


--

What I do know; is that if you were to write to me, as a developer, the 
way you are
going on about joinery and pipe-bending to RunRev it would make me so 
bloody-minded
I would deliberately NOT sort out the things you were talking about. 
But, then, I am the chap
who when a 4 x 4 hoots at me because I am an extremely careful driver, I 
stop the car,
turn off the lights, and go and have "an intimate little chat" with the 
driver of the 4 x 4.

Bulgarian drivers NOT being the same as drivers in Britain.

--

RunRev are what they are; a group of close-knit individuals who work the 
way they do,
and I, at least, have come to accept them the way they are; not my way, 
obviously not
your way, but nevertheless coming up with something pretty good. Now it 
seems to me that
both Thee and Me have been bashing on about FONTS long enough to give 
the folks in
Edinburgh a nice set of cluster headaches; so I suggest we now give 
things a rest, and
see what appears with 4.5. AT that point, if things are not what either 
of us require we
can either accept it for what it is, or decamp and adopt another RAD for 
our needs.

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] Installing Linux fonts

2010-06-14 Thread Peter Alcibiades

Richmond, one sees no signs they are even working on this - and other
problems.  Are expressions of anger and impatience any less productive than
compliant silence?  This is not an excusable way for a company to behave!
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/OT-Installing-Linux-fonts-tp2219888p2254175.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] Installing Linux fonts

2010-06-13 Thread Richmond

On 06/13/2010 12:18 PM, Peter Alcibiades wrote:

Can you imagine finding these directions on how to use installed fonts on a
Python mailing list?  Its simply ridiculous.  Rev needs to make the fonts
work on Rev like they do on all other applications. Or stop selling the
thing!

There are in excess of 20k packages in the Debian repositories.  None of
them, none, have problems recognizing installed fonts.  If you are a systems
programmer and writing programs that cannot manage fonts properly in the OS
for which you are writing, its time to stop.  Take up carpentry, or
plumbing.
   


Um . . . I have a feeling writing vitriolic stuff like this may have a 
negative

effect (I speak from experience).

Now; Runrev have been trying to be 'all things to all men' and because of
that have fallen short with Linux fonts . . . well Wolfgang's method 
will suffice

until things get sorted out by RunRev.

Oh, by-ther-way, I don't know why carpentry or plumbing should be seen as
somehow inferior to computer programming: having successfully botched
loads of woodwork projects and done some fairly awful plumbing in my time
I will always respect Carpenters and Plumbers. At least with RunRev 
programming
there is no risk of burst pipes; just spent about 3 weekends replacing 
toilets, sink
U-bends and so on in our country cottage as they all bust during the 
freeze last winter

because I had put them in so badly the first time . . .  :)

And the lesson of my story is: if you are as bad a plumber as Richmond; 
take up

RunRev programming instead!
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] Installing Linux fonts

2010-06-13 Thread Richmond

On 06/13/2010 01:09 AM, G. Wolfgang Gaich wrote:

Hello Richmond,

I tested to use all installed fonts on Ubuntu 10.04 with rev. No problem.

With

set the textfont of fld "/field/" to "/fontname/"

I can use all available fonts.

Only the function fontnames() does not return all the fonts.

But you can get a list of fontnames with

put shell("fc-list") into tTempFontsList
set the itemdel to ":"
repeat for each line tL in tTempFontsList
   set the itemdel to ":"
   put item 1 of tL into tL2
   set the itemdel to ","
   put item 1 of tL2 & cr after tFontsList
end repeat
delete char -1 of tFontsList


If you want to install a user font then copy it into 
/home//.fonts/truetype/

and in console type:

>  sudo fc-cache

Now you can use that font with rev.

hth

Wolfgang




Wow! Thanks so much.

Hey; Alcibiades . . . take note of this one . . .  :)
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] Installing Linux fonts

2010-06-13 Thread Peter Alcibiades

Can you imagine finding these directions on how to use installed fonts on a
Python mailing list?  Its simply ridiculous.  Rev needs to make the fonts
work on Rev like they do on all other applications. Or stop selling the
thing!

There are in excess of 20k packages in the Debian repositories.  None of
them, none, have problems recognizing installed fonts.  If you are a systems
programmer and writing programs that cannot manage fonts properly in the OS
for which you are writing, its time to stop.  Take up carpentry, or
plumbing.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/OT-Installing-Linux-fonts-tp2219888p2253303.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] Installing Linux fonts

2010-06-12 Thread G. Wolfgang Gaich

Hello Richmond,

I tested to use all installed fonts on Ubuntu 10.04 with rev. No problem.

With

set the textfont of fld "/field/" to "/fontname/"

I can use all available fonts.

Only the function fontnames() does not return all the fonts.

But you can get a list of fontnames with

put shell("fc-list") into tTempFontsList
set the itemdel to ":"
repeat for each line tL in tTempFontsList
   set the itemdel to ":"
   put item 1 of tL into tL2
   set the itemdel to ","
   put item 1 of tL2 & cr after tFontsList
end repeat
delete char -1 of tFontsList


If you want to install a user font then copy it into 
/home//.fonts/truetype/

and in console type:

>  sudo fc-cache

Now you can use that font with rev.

hth

Wolfgang




Am 17.05.2010 18:09, schrieb Richmond Mathewson:

 [I hope that the thread I am attempting to initiate will, eventually
lead to an understanding of why RunRev does not play 'nicely' with
Linux fonts]

[Ubuntu 10.04  -- Debian deriv.]

1.  open a .ttf font with FontViewer

2. click on 'Install Font' button ;  'Install Failed'

Q1. Is that because I am not root user?

3. attempt to open FontViewer as root:

got "distracted" by Font Manager  /usr/bin

click on 'Manage Fonts' blob at the bottom

navigate to where target font is installed

on selecting font Font Manager opens and "blow me down"
it seems the font has been installed as a system font:

4. Open RunRev: and the target font DOESN'T show up . . . um, mumble, 
mumble, excrement, and so on.


5.  AbiWord (what my sons call "Shabby Word" - never mind, it will 
suffice for now):


 font (Unicode TTF) shows up.

Q2. Could this be because my target font does not have an accompanying 
.conf file 

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your 
subscription preferences:

http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] Installing Linux fonts

2010-05-17 Thread Peter Alcibiades

The link is maybe a bit old - it refers to Fedora 6, which was 2006, and we
are now on Fedora 12.  I think there is a problem with Debian based distros. 
Mandriva, if I recall correctly, worked fine.  Your experience with being
refused install and then the font showing up anyway is very odd.

Still, the question would be, if gedit (say) can find it, why cannot Rev? 
You can understand open office maybe being anomalous, but gedit and geany
(which is not packaged with hardly any distro from default install) to find
it, and Rev not, that's inexplicable.  Someone in Edinburgh must know the
answer to this, but we keep asking how Rev handles and finds fonts, and
answer comes there none.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/OT-Installing-Linux-fonts-tp2219918p2219978.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


[OT] Installing Linux fonts

2010-05-17 Thread Richmond Mathewson

 Here is what is probably the real reason:

http://tldp.org/HOWTO/Font-HOWTO/notgood.html
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


[OT] Installing Linux fonts

2010-05-17 Thread Richmond Mathewson

 [I hope that the thread I am attempting to initiate will, eventually
lead to an understanding of why RunRev does not play 'nicely' with
Linux fonts]

[Ubuntu 10.04  -- Debian deriv.]

1.  open a .ttf font with FontViewer

2. click on 'Install Font' button ;  'Install Failed'

Q1. Is that because I am not root user?

3. attempt to open FontViewer as root:

got "distracted" by Font Manager  /usr/bin

click on 'Manage Fonts' blob at the bottom

navigate to where target font is installed

on selecting font Font Manager opens and "blow me down"
it seems the font has been installed as a system font:

4. Open RunRev: and the target font DOESN'T show up . . . um, mumble, 
mumble, excrement, and so on.


5.  AbiWord (what my sons call "Shabby Word" - never mind, it will 
suffice for now):


 font (Unicode TTF) shows up.

Q2. Could this be because my target font does not have an accompanying 
.conf file 

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution