subject:"Re\: SCXML project"

Re: SCXML project

2016-02-01 Thread Ate Douma


Hi Martin,

I've disabled JDK 8 javadoc doclint which should 'fix' your below problem.

BTW: can you please use properly wrapped/formatted plain text for your email?
Like your previous message, content below is pretty much unreadable ...

Ate

On 2016-01-28 14:32, Martin Gainty wrote:

Hi Atecurrently testing what happens when log4j.properties or log4j.xml is 
missing (cured by inserting a working log4j.properties into scxml classpath)
I am currently experiencing this failure:
Javadoc failure with:

Caused by: org.apache.maven.plugin.MojoExecutionException: Error generating 
maven-javadoc-plugin:2.10.3:javadoc:Exit code: 1 - 
\scxml\src\main\java\org\apache\commons\scxml2\SCInstanceObjectInputStream.java:80: error: 
unexpected end tag:  * 
Here is the code:
  /** * Set custom class resolver callback, or null when no longer needed. *  * Typically 
usage: *  * private void readObject(ObjectInputStream in) throws 
IOException,ClassNotFoundException { * ClassResolver currentClassResolver = null; * try { * 
if (in instanceof SCInstanceObjectInputStream) { * currentClassResolver = 
((SCInstanceObjectInputStream)in).setClassResolver(customClassResolver); * } * ... // read 
Object(s) * } * finally { * if (in instanceof SCInstanceObjectInputStream) { *  
   ((SCInstanceObjectInputStream)in).setClassResolver(currentClassResolver); * } * } * 
} *  *  * @see 
org.apache.commons.scxml2.env.groovy.GroovyContext#readObject(ObjectInputStream) * @param classResolver custom 
class resolver */public ClassResolver setClassResolver(ClassResolver classResolver) {

   ClassResolver old = this.classResolver;this.classResolver = 
classResolver;return old;}

fubars javadoc and fails the build..for now i can comment out the  and  
inside comments to bypass

Suggestions are welcomethanksMartin
__




Subject: Re: SCXML project
To: user@commons.apache.org
From: a...@douma.nu
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 22:10:50 +0100

On 2016-01-26 22:36, Martin Gainty wrote:


mvn package doesnt package (testcase fails) currently
   
  
  java.lang.NullPointerException: null at

org.apache.commons.logging.impl.SLF4JLog.isDebugEnabled(SLF4JLog.java:49) at

org.apache.commons.scxml2.env.SimpleContext.setLocal(SimpleContext.java:178) at

org.apache.commons.scxml2.SCXMLExecutionContext.initializeIOProcessors(SCXMLExecutionContext.java:358)
 at

org.apache.commons.scxml2.SCXMLExecutionContext.attachInstance(SCXMLExecutionContext.java:397)
 at

org.apache.commons.scxml2.SCXMLExecutor.attachInstance(SCXMLExecutor.java:398) 
at

org.apache.commons.scxml2.SCXMLTestHelper.testInstanceSerializability(SCXMLTestHelper.java:258)
 at

org.apache.commons.scxml2.SCXMLExecutorTest.testSCXMLExecutorTransitions02Sample(SCXMLExecutorTest.java:139)

correct this small bug lurking in 
org.apache.commons.scxml2.env.SimpleContext.java

   /**
   * Assigns a new value to an existing variable or creates a new one.
   * The method allows to shaddow a variable of the same name up the
   * Context chain.
   *
   * @param name The variable name
   * @param value The variable value
   * @see org.apache.commons.scxml2.Context#setLocal(String, Object)
   * as someone forgot to initialize log toss a System.out.println
   */
   public void setLocal(final String name, final Object value) {
   getVars().put(name, value);
   try {
   if (log.isDebugEnabled()) {
   log.debug(name + " = " + String.valueOf(value));
   }
   }
   catch(NullPointerException npe) {
   System.out.println("SimpleContext::setLocal log.isDebugEnabled() where log="+log+" 
name="+name+" throws NPE");
   }
   }

*Obrigado Guilherme*
Martín


AFAICT the above NPE only can occur when configuring an invalid/wrong logging
class (like in the pom.xml for the maven-surefire-plugin) and/or through
explicitly set the the Log instance to null in SimpleContext.java.

When using a clean checkout/clone of the current SCXML git repository (master)
this definitely is not the case, and mvn package works just fine.

So possibly you have local modifications, either to the pom.xml logging
configuration or otherwise causing this exception?

Regards, Ate




Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 23:42:01 -0200
Subject: Re: SCXML project
From: guilhermecgss...@gmail.com
To: user@commons.apache.org

Ok Folks,


I will evaluate SCXML.

BTW, I found these paper and it sounds interesting:

http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs-wm/46457.pdf

It looks like it exports Stateflow to SCXML


MG>will Stateflow support Harel FSM?
MG>Please confirmMG>Obrigado!


On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Martin Gainty <mgai...

RE: SCXML project

2016-02-01 Thread Martin Gainty







> Subject: Re: SCXML project
> To: user@commons.apache.org
> From: a...@douma.nu
> Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 23:34:39 +0100
> 
> Hi Martin,
> 
> I've disabled JDK 8 javadoc doclint which should 'fix' your below problem.
> 
> BTW: can you please use properly wrapped/formatted plain text for your email?
> Like your previous message, content below is pretty much unreadable ...

MG>this is a freebie emailer I picked up in 96 whose primary format is HtmL and 
not plain text
MG>for paying work I use mgaint...@gmail.com (I also have mail username on my 
own site which supports plain text)
MG>Thanks Ate
> 
> Ate
> 
> On 2016-01-28 14:32, Martin Gainty wrote:
>> Hi Atecurrently testing what happens when log4j.properties or log4j.xml is 
>> missing (cured by inserting a working log4j.properties into scxml classpath)
>> I am currently experiencing this failure:
>> Javadoc failure with:
>>
>> Caused by: org.apache.maven.plugin.MojoExecutionException: Error generating 
>> maven-javadoc-plugin:2.10.3:javadoc:Exit code: 1 - 
>> \scxml\src\main\java\org\apache\commons\scxml2\SCInstanceObjectInputStream.java:80:
>>  error: unexpected end tag:  * 
>> Here is the code:
>> /** * Set custom class resolver callback, or null when no longer needed. *  
>> * Typically usage: *  * private void readObject(ObjectInputStream in) throws 
>> IOException,ClassNotFoundException { * ClassResolver currentClassResolver = 
>> null; * try { * if (in instanceof SCInstanceObjectInputStream) { * 
>> currentClassResolver = 
>> ((SCInstanceObjectInputStream)in).setClassResolver(customClassResolver); * } 
>> * ... // read Object(s) * } * finally { * if (in instanceof 
>> SCInstanceObjectInputStream) { * 
>> ((SCInstanceObjectInputStream)in).setClassResolver(currentClassResolver); * 
>> } * } * } *  * 
 * @see 
org.apache.commons.scxml2.env.groovy.GroovyContext#readObject(ObjectInputStream)
 * @param classResolver custom class resolver */ public ClassResolver 
setClassResolver(ClassResolver classResolver) {
> ClassResolver old = this.classResolver; this.classResolver = classResolver; 
> return old; }
>> fubars javadoc and fails the build..for now i can comment out the  and 
 inside comments to bypass
>>
>> Suggestions are welcomethanksMartin
>> __
>>
>>
>>
>>> Subject: Re: SCXML project
>>> To: user@commons.apache.org
>>> From: a...@douma.nu
>>> Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 22:10:50 +0100
>>>
>>> On 2016-01-26 22:36, Martin Gainty wrote:
>>>>
>>>> mvn package doesnt package (testcase fails) currently
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> java.lang.NullPointerException: null at
>>>> org.apache.commons.logging.impl.SLF4JLog.isDebugEnabled(SLF4JLog.java:49) 
>>>> at
>>>> org.apache.commons.scxml2.env.SimpleContext.setLocal(SimpleContext.java:178)
>>>>  at
>>>> org.apache.commons.scxml2.SCXMLExecutionContext.initializeIOProcessors(SCXMLExecutionContext.java:358)
>>>>  at
>>>> org.apache.commons.scxml2.SCXMLExecutionContext.attachInstance(SCXMLExecutionContext.java:397)
>>>>  at
>>>> org.apache.commons.scxml2.SCXMLExecutor.attachInstance(SCXMLExecutor.java:398)
>>>>  at
>>>> org.apache.commons.scxml2.SCXMLTestHelper.testInstanceSerializability(SCXMLTestHelper.java:258)
>>>>  at
>>>> org.apache.commons.scxml2.SCXMLExecutorTest.testSCXMLExecutorTransitions02Sample(SCXMLExecutorTest.java:139)
>>>>
>>>> correct this small bug lurking in 
>>>> org.apache.commons.scxml2.env.SimpleContext.java
>>>>
>>>> /**
>>>> * Assigns a new value to an existing variable or creates a new one.
>>>> * The method allows to shaddow a variable of the same name up the
>>>> * Context chain.
>>>> *
>>>> * @param name The variable name
>>>> * @param value The variable value
>>>> * @see org.apache.commons.scxml2.Context#setLocal(String, Object)
>>>> * as someone forgot to initialize log toss a System.out.println
>>>> */
>>>> public void setLocal(final String name, final Object value) {
>>>> getVars().put(name, value);
>>>> try {
>>>> if (log.isDebugEnabled()) {
>>>> log.debug(name + " = " + String.valueOf(value));
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>> catch(NullPointerException npe) {
>>>> System.out.println("SimpleContext::setLocal log.isDebugEnabled() where 
>>>> log="+log+" name="+name

RE: SCXML project

2016-01-28 Thread Martin Gainty

Hi Atecurrently testing what happens when log4j.properties or log4j.xml is 
missing (cured by inserting a working log4j.properties into scxml classpath)
I am currently experiencing this failure:
Javadoc failure with:

Caused by: org.apache.maven.plugin.MojoExecutionException: Error generating 
maven-javadoc-plugin:2.10.3:javadoc:Exit code: 1 - 
\scxml\src\main\java\org\apache\commons\scxml2\SCInstanceObjectInputStream.java:80:
 error: unexpected end tag:  * 
Here is the code:
 /** * Set custom class resolver callback, or null when no longer needed.   
  *  * Typically usage: *  * private void 
readObject(ObjectInputStream in) throws IOException,ClassNotFoundException {
 * ClassResolver currentClassResolver = null; * try { * 
if (in instanceof SCInstanceObjectInputStream) { * 
currentClassResolver = 
((SCInstanceObjectInputStream)in).setClassResolver(customClassResolver); *  
   } * ... // read Object(s) * } * finally {
 * if (in instanceof SCInstanceObjectInputStream) { * 
((SCInstanceObjectInputStream)in).setClassResolver(currentClassResolver); * 
} * } * } *  *  * @see 
org.apache.commons.scxml2.env.groovy.GroovyContext#readObject(ObjectInputStream)
 * @param classResolver custom class resolver */public 
ClassResolver setClassResolver(ClassResolver classResolver) {
ClassResolver old = this.classResolver;this.classResolver = 
classResolver;return old;}
fubars javadoc and fails the build..for now i can comment out the  and  
inside comments to bypass

Suggestions are welcomethanksMartin 
__ 




> Subject: Re: SCXML project
> To: user@commons.apache.org
> From: a...@douma.nu
> Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 22:10:50 +0100
> 
> On 2016-01-26 22:36, Martin Gainty wrote:
> >
> > mvn package doesnt package (testcase fails) currently
> >> classname="org.apache.commons.scxml2.SCXMLExecutorTest" time="0.03">
> >  
> >  java.lang.NullPointerException: null at
> >
> > org.apache.commons.logging.impl.SLF4JLog.isDebugEnabled(SLF4JLog.java:49) at
> >
> > org.apache.commons.scxml2.env.SimpleContext.setLocal(SimpleContext.java:178)
> >  at
> >
> > org.apache.commons.scxml2.SCXMLExecutionContext.initializeIOProcessors(SCXMLExecutionContext.java:358)
> >  at
> >
> > org.apache.commons.scxml2.SCXMLExecutionContext.attachInstance(SCXMLExecutionContext.java:397)
> >  at
> >
> > org.apache.commons.scxml2.SCXMLExecutor.attachInstance(SCXMLExecutor.java:398)
> >  at
> >
> > org.apache.commons.scxml2.SCXMLTestHelper.testInstanceSerializability(SCXMLTestHelper.java:258)
> >  at
> >
> > org.apache.commons.scxml2.SCXMLExecutorTest.testSCXMLExecutorTransitions02Sample(SCXMLExecutorTest.java:139)
> >
> > correct this small bug lurking in 
> > org.apache.commons.scxml2.env.SimpleContext.java
> >
> >   /**
> >   * Assigns a new value to an existing variable or creates a new one.
> >   * The method allows to shaddow a variable of the same name up the
> >   * Context chain.
> >   *
> >   * @param name The variable name
> >   * @param value The variable value
> >   * @see org.apache.commons.scxml2.Context#setLocal(String, Object)
> >   * as someone forgot to initialize log toss a System.out.println
> >   */
> >   public void setLocal(final String name, final Object value) {
> >   getVars().put(name, value);
> >   try {
> >   if (log.isDebugEnabled()) {
> >   log.debug(name + " = " + String.valueOf(value));
> >   }
> >   }
> >   catch(NullPointerException npe) {
> >   System.out.println("SimpleContext::setLocal log.isDebugEnabled() 
> > where log="+log+" name="+name+" throws NPE");
> >   }
> >   }
> >
> > *Obrigado Guilherme*
> > Martín
> 
> AFAICT the above NPE only can occur when configuring an invalid/wrong logging 
> class (like in the pom.xml for the maven-surefire-plugin) and/or through 
> explicitly set the the Log instance to null in SimpleContext.java.
> 
> When using a clean checkout/clone of the current SCXML git repository 
> (master) 
> this definitely is not the case, and mvn package works just fine.
> 
> So possibly you have local modifications, either to the pom.xml logging 
> configuration or otherwise causing this exception?
> 
> Rega

Re: SCXML project

2016-01-27 Thread Ate Douma


On 2016-01-26 22:36, Martin Gainty wrote:


mvn package doesnt package (testcase fails) currently
  
 
 java.lang.NullPointerException: null at
   
org.apache.commons.logging.impl.SLF4JLog.isDebugEnabled(SLF4JLog.java:49) at
   
org.apache.commons.scxml2.env.SimpleContext.setLocal(SimpleContext.java:178) at
   
org.apache.commons.scxml2.SCXMLExecutionContext.initializeIOProcessors(SCXMLExecutionContext.java:358)
 at
   
org.apache.commons.scxml2.SCXMLExecutionContext.attachInstance(SCXMLExecutionContext.java:397)
 at
   
org.apache.commons.scxml2.SCXMLExecutor.attachInstance(SCXMLExecutor.java:398) 
at
   
org.apache.commons.scxml2.SCXMLTestHelper.testInstanceSerializability(SCXMLTestHelper.java:258)
 at
   
org.apache.commons.scxml2.SCXMLExecutorTest.testSCXMLExecutorTransitions02Sample(SCXMLExecutorTest.java:139)

correct this small bug lurking in 
org.apache.commons.scxml2.env.SimpleContext.java

  /**
  * Assigns a new value to an existing variable or creates a new one.
  * The method allows to shaddow a variable of the same name up the
  * Context chain.
  *
  * @param name The variable name
  * @param value The variable value
  * @see org.apache.commons.scxml2.Context#setLocal(String, Object)
  * as someone forgot to initialize log toss a System.out.println
  */
  public void setLocal(final String name, final Object value) {
  getVars().put(name, value);
  try {
  if (log.isDebugEnabled()) {
  log.debug(name + " = " + String.valueOf(value));
  }
  }
  catch(NullPointerException npe) {
  System.out.println("SimpleContext::setLocal log.isDebugEnabled() where log="+log+" 
name="+name+" throws NPE");
  }
  }

*Obrigado Guilherme*
Martín


AFAICT the above NPE only can occur when configuring an invalid/wrong logging 
class (like in the pom.xml for the maven-surefire-plugin) and/or through 
explicitly set the the Log instance to null in SimpleContext.java.


When using a clean checkout/clone of the current SCXML git repository (master) 
this definitely is not the case, and mvn package works just fine.


So possibly you have local modifications, either to the pom.xml logging 
configuration or otherwise causing this exception?


Regards, Ate




Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 23:42:01 -0200
Subject: Re: SCXML project
From: guilhermecgss...@gmail.com
To: user@commons.apache.org

Ok Folks,


I will evaluate SCXML.

BTW, I found these paper and it sounds interesting:

http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs-wm/46457.pdf

It looks like it exports Stateflow to SCXML


MG>will Stateflow support Harel FSM?
MG>Please confirmMG>Obrigado!


On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Martin Gainty <mgai...@hotmail.com> wrote:


+1
Thanks Gary!
Martin Gainty
__





Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 14:07:08 -0800
Subject: Re: SCXML project
From: garydgreg...@gmail.com
To: user@commons.apache.org

Guilherme,

I have not seen much activity. We are all volunteers here, if you want

the

project to move forward, feel free to talk on this list, create Jiras,

and

provide patches.

Gary
On Jan 22, 2016 8:58 AM, "Guilherme Silveira" <

guilhermecgss...@gmail.com>

wrote:


Hi Folks

I am new to FSM and new to SCXML.On the other hand, I am expert in
Simulink, expert in Java and expert in model based systems engineering.

I am currently evaluating SCXML and I would like a*honest, non biased
opinion *on the status of SCXML project.

What I would like to assert if this project has a future, the number of
developers, if the SCXML specification will ever reach a stable
statusand so on

So far, I have noticed few integrations with proprietary softwares
Simulink Stateflow does not export to SCXML, neither does IBM Rhapsody.

How difficult would it be to create custom tool for these

integrations? And

most important, is it REALLY possible to implement in Java all the
functionalities of Simulink Stateflow, without any drawback, with a
friendly user experience and a steep learning curve?

ps: I am not from telecom industry












-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org

RE: SCXML project

2016-01-26 Thread Martin Gainty




mvn package doesnt package (testcase fails) currently  java.lang.NullPointerException: null at 
org.apache.commons.logging.impl.SLF4JLog.isDebugEnabled(SLF4JLog.java:49)at 
org.apache.commons.scxml2.env.SimpleContext.setLocal(SimpleContext.java:178) at 
org.apache.commons.scxml2.SCXMLExecutionContext.initializeIOProcessors(SCXMLExecutionContext.java:358)
   at 
org.apache.commons.scxml2.SCXMLExecutionContext.attachInstance(SCXMLExecutionContext.java:397)
   at 
org.apache.commons.scxml2.SCXMLExecutor.attachInstance(SCXMLExecutor.java:398)  
 at 
org.apache.commons.scxml2.SCXMLTestHelper.testInstanceSerializability(SCXMLTestHelper.java:258)
  at 
org.apache.commons.scxml2.SCXMLExecutorTest.testSCXMLExecutorTransitions02Sample(SCXMLExecutorTest.java:139)

correct this small bug lurking in 
org.apache.commons.scxml2.env.SimpleContext.java
   /** * Assigns a new value to an existing variable or creates a new one.  
   * The method allows to shaddow a variable of the same name up the * 
Context chain. * * @param name The variable name * @param value The 
variable value * @see org.apache.commons.scxml2.Context#setLocal(String, 
Object) * as someone forgot to initialize log toss a System.out.println 
*/public void setLocal(final String name, final Object value){
getVars().put(name, value);try{   if 
(log.isDebugEnabled())   {   
log.debug(name + " = " + String.valueOf(value));}   
}   catch(NullPointerException npe) {   
System.out.println("SimpleContext::setLocal log.isDebugEnabled() where 
log="+log+" name="+name+" throws NPE");  }}
*Obrigado Guilherme*
Martín

> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 23:42:01 -0200
> Subject: Re: SCXML project
> From: guilhermecgss...@gmail.com
> To: user@commons.apache.org
> 
> Ok Folks,
> 
> 
> I will evaluate SCXML.
> 
> BTW, I found these paper and it sounds interesting:
> 
> http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs-wm/46457.pdf
> 
> It looks like it exports Stateflow to SCXML

MG>will Stateflow support Harel FSM?
MG>Please confirmMG>Obrigado!
> 
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Martin Gainty <mgai...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > +1
> > Thanks Gary!
> > Martin Gainty
> > __
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 14:07:08 -0800
> > > Subject: Re: SCXML project
> > > From: garydgreg...@gmail.com
> > > To: user@commons.apache.org
> > >
> > > Guilherme,
> > >
> > > I have not seen much activity. We are all volunteers here, if you want
> > the
> > > project to move forward, feel free to talk on this list, create Jiras,
> > and
> > > provide patches.
> > >
> > > Gary
> > > On Jan 22, 2016 8:58 AM, "Guilherme Silveira" <
> > guilhermecgss...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Folks
> > > >
> > > > I am new to FSM and new to SCXML.On the other hand, I am expert in
> > > > Simulink, expert in Java and expert in model based systems engineering.
> > > >
> > > > I am currently evaluating SCXML and I would like a*honest, non biased
> > > > opinion *on the status of SCXML project.
> > > >
> > > > What I would like to assert if this project has a future, the number of
> > > > developers, if the SCXML specification will ever reach a stable
> > > > statusand so on
> > > >
> > > > So far, I have noticed few integrations with proprietary softwares
> > > > Simulink Stateflow does not export to SCXML, neither does IBM Rhapsody.
> > > >
> > > > How difficult would it be to create custom tool for these
> > integrations? And
> > > > most important, is it REALLY possible to implement in Java all the
> > > > functionalities of Simulink Stateflow, without any drawback, with a
> > > > friendly user experience and a steep learning curve?
> > > >
> > > > ps: I am not from telecom industry
> > > >
> >
> >

Re: SCXML project

2016-01-25 Thread Guilherme Silveira

Ok Folks,


I will evaluate SCXML.

BTW, I found these paper and it sounds interesting:

http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs-wm/46457.pdf

It looks like it exports Stateflow to SCXML

On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Martin Gainty <mgai...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> +1
> Thanks Gary!
> Martin Gainty
> __
>
>
>
>
> > Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 14:07:08 -0800
> > Subject: Re: SCXML project
> > From: garydgreg...@gmail.com
> > To: user@commons.apache.org
> >
> > Guilherme,
> >
> > I have not seen much activity. We are all volunteers here, if you want
> the
> > project to move forward, feel free to talk on this list, create Jiras,
> and
> > provide patches.
> >
> > Gary
> > On Jan 22, 2016 8:58 AM, "Guilherme Silveira" <
> guilhermecgss...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Folks
> > >
> > > I am new to FSM and new to SCXML.On the other hand, I am expert in
> > > Simulink, expert in Java and expert in model based systems engineering.
> > >
> > > I am currently evaluating SCXML and I would like a*honest, non biased
> > > opinion *on the status of SCXML project.
> > >
> > > What I would like to assert if this project has a future, the number of
> > > developers, if the SCXML specification will ever reach a stable
> > > statusand so on
> > >
> > > So far, I have noticed few integrations with proprietary softwares
> > > Simulink Stateflow does not export to SCXML, neither does IBM Rhapsody.
> > >
> > > How difficult would it be to create custom tool for these
> integrations? And
> > > most important, is it REALLY possible to implement in Java all the
> > > functionalities of Simulink Stateflow, without any drawback, with a
> > > friendly user experience and a steep learning curve?
> > >
> > > ps: I am not from telecom industry
> > >
>
>

RE: SCXML project

2016-01-24 Thread Martin Gainty

+1
Thanks Gary!
Martin Gainty 
__ 




> Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 14:07:08 -0800
> Subject: Re: SCXML project
> From: garydgreg...@gmail.com
> To: user@commons.apache.org
> 
> Guilherme,
> 
> I have not seen much activity. We are all volunteers here, if you want the
> project to move forward, feel free to talk on this list, create Jiras, and
> provide patches.
> 
> Gary
> On Jan 22, 2016 8:58 AM, "Guilherme Silveira" <guilhermecgss...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Folks
> >
> > I am new to FSM and new to SCXML.On the other hand, I am expert in
> > Simulink, expert in Java and expert in model based systems engineering.
> >
> > I am currently evaluating SCXML and I would like a*honest, non biased
> > opinion *on the status of SCXML project.
> >
> > What I would like to assert if this project has a future, the number of
> > developers, if the SCXML specification will ever reach a stable
> > statusand so on
> >
> > So far, I have noticed few integrations with proprietary softwares
> > Simulink Stateflow does not export to SCXML, neither does IBM Rhapsody.
> >
> > How difficult would it be to create custom tool for these integrations? And
> > most important, is it REALLY possible to implement in Java all the
> > functionalities of Simulink Stateflow, without any drawback, with a
> > friendly user experience and a steep learning curve?
> >
> > ps: I am not from telecom industry
> >

Re: SCXML project

2016-01-23 Thread Gary Gregory

Guilherme,

I have not seen much activity. We are all volunteers here, if you want the
project to move forward, feel free to talk on this list, create Jiras, and
provide patches.

Gary
On Jan 22, 2016 8:58 AM, "Guilherme Silveira" 
wrote:

> Hi Folks
>
> I am new to FSM and new to SCXML.On the other hand, I am expert in
> Simulink, expert in Java and expert in model based systems engineering.
>
> I am currently evaluating SCXML and I would like a*honest, non biased
> opinion *on the status of SCXML project.
>
> What I would like to assert if this project has a future, the number of
> developers, if the SCXML specification will ever reach a stable
> statusand so on
>
> So far, I have noticed few integrations with proprietary softwares
> Simulink Stateflow does not export to SCXML, neither does IBM Rhapsody.
>
> How difficult would it be to create custom tool for these integrations? And
> most important, is it REALLY possible to implement in Java all the
> functionalities of Simulink Stateflow, without any drawback, with a
> friendly user experience and a steep learning curve?
>
> ps: I am not from telecom industry
>

[SCXML] Re: SCXML project

2016-01-22 Thread Jacob Beard

Hi Guilherme,

I have used SCXML for use cases outside of telecom, including to control 
hardware in industrial systems. Semantically, SCXML has most of the features of 
Statecharts, the language upon which Stateflow is based, and it works well for 
this use case.

Unlike Stateflow, SCXML does not have a dedicated graphical IDE. The 
development I have done has primarily involved editing SCXML by hand, and 
applying automated visualization using D3. I have heard of other SCXML 
developers doing the same. I believe MagicDraw 

 supports SCXML, but I have not tried it. 

There are also semantic difference between SCXML and Stateflow. For example, 
transition priority: Stateflow uses a graphical syntax, based on a clockwise 

 ordering, while SCXML relies on document order of the transition nodes in the 
XML document.

It would be interesting to combine an SCXML engine with open source software 
for modeling system dynamics, such as Modelica   
Xcos , or Minsky 
, to create an open stack of 
simulation software.

Please feel free to reach me with any questions. Thank you,

Jacob Beard

> On Jan 22, 2016, at 11:58 AM, Guilherme Silveira  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Folks
> 
> I am new to FSM and new to SCXML.On the other hand, I am expert in
> Simulink, expert in Java and expert in model based systems engineering.
> 
> I am currently evaluating SCXML and I would like a*honest, non biased
> opinion *on the status of SCXML project.
> 
> What I would like to assert if this project has a future, the number of
> developers, if the SCXML specification will ever reach a stable
> statusand so on
> 
> So far, I have noticed few integrations with proprietary softwares
> Simulink Stateflow does not export to SCXML, neither does IBM Rhapsody.
> 
> How difficult would it be to create custom tool for these integrations? And
> most important, is it REALLY possible to implement in Java all the
> functionalities of Simulink Stateflow, without any drawback, with a
> friendly user experience and a steep learning curve?
> 
> ps: I am not from telecom industry

Re: SCXML project

RE: SCXML project

RE: SCXML project

Re: SCXML project

RE: SCXML project

Re: SCXML project

RE: SCXML project

Re: SCXML project

[SCXML] Re: SCXML project

9 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information