QuickShipEntireOrder
Hello Folks, On quick shipping entire order, I found that order is packed and a shipment is created. But in the facility manager shipment status is shown as packed not shipped. Does quick ship entire order feature automate the shipment process till packaging and then it needs to be shipped manually. Though in my opinion it should ship the order as well. Please provide your suggestion and correct me if I am wrong. Thanks & Regards, -- Vivek Mishra
Re: New to OFBiz. How to modify the eCommerce app?
Thanks everyone. Your suggestions are helpful. I think I'm going the route of making a copy of the eCommerce app for now. I might look more at BigFish also. Thanks for the help. Robert Wynkoop On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Varun Bhansaly wrote: > Hi Robert, > > It depends on how much changes you are making. Instead of copying entire > eCommerce component over to hot-deploy, you can as well 'extend' the > eCommerce component, make and maintain your changes separately (See > > https://cwiki.apache.org/OFBIZ/faq-tips-tricks-cookbook-howto.html#FAQ-Tips-Tricks-Cookbook-HowTo-HowtoExtendanexistingcomponentincustomizedapplication > ? > ). > > On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Paul Foxworthy > wrote: > > > Hi Robert, > > > > I agree with the others that your UI is your UI and it's fine to copy it > > and > > make the changes you need for your own situation. > > > > It's harder with OFBiz services. You might make a change that with a bit > of > > refinement may one day become a submission. But for now you decide to > keep > > to yourself, perhaps to test it. You might have customizations that you > > know > > would not be relevant to the OFBiz community in general. You might base > > your > > work on a release of OFBiz, and cherry-pick fixes that are going into > > trunk. > > One day you might move to a later release, and the cherry-picked changes > > won't be needed any more. > > > > In short, you might branch with some prospect of merging at some stage in > > the future. > > > > In these situations, you want a clear separation between core OFBiz and > > your > > own changes, so you can move to a different core in future and integrate > > your changes. I suspect you understand all of that perfectly well, thus > > your > > caution about changing OFBiz code. > > > > We use Mercurial patch queues (MQ) to handle this. We start with core > > OFBiz, > > and we make our own changes in hot-deploy when we need and want to. > > Anything > > that is our own mod of core OFBiz is done as a patch in a patch queue. We > > have several "guards" so we can apply different sequences of patches. We > > have guards for submitted patches, for pending submissions, and others > for > > customizations that are for a specific customer. > > > > MQ is working well for us and if you want to manage these issues I > suggest > > you give it a try. See http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/MqExtension for > > more. > > > > Cheers > > > > Paul Foxworthy > > > > > > Ruth Hoffman-2 wrote > > > Hi Robert: > > > > > > Having worked on many OFBiz based ecommerce applications (both large > and > > > small), I agree with Paul. Copy over and use the OOTB webapp as a guide > > > to move forward with your own customizations. > > > > > > Best of luck. > > > Ruth Hoffman > > > > > > On 5/22/13 4:08 PM, Paul Piper wrote: > > >> Hi Robert, > > >> > > >> that really depends on what you are set out to do. In general, I > > >> recommend > > >> to copy the eCommerce app over to hot-deploy and get the module to run > > >> from > > >> there. Then check it into your local repository to keep it consistent. > > >> With > > >> SVN you can use svn:external for instance to include your own module > > >> while > > >> keeping the rest of ofbiz consistent with the svn trunk. Then you can > do > > >> your own changes and commit to your local repository at any time. > > >> > > >> Does that help or were you looking for something else? > > >> > > >> Regards, > > >> Paul > > >> > > >> P.S.: I don't think that Nick understood your question - BigFish > > >> certainly > > >> isn't the answer > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> View this message in context: > > >> > > > http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/New-to-OFBiz-How-to-modify-the-eCommerce-app-tp4641469p4641473.html > > >> Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > -- > > Coherent Software Australia Pty Ltd > > http://www.coherentsoftware.com.au/ > > > > Bonsai ERP, the all-inclusive ERP system > > http://www.bonsaierp.com.au/ > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > > > http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/New-to-OFBiz-How-to-modify-the-eCommerce-app-tp4641469p4641484.html > > Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > > -- > Regards, > Varun Bhansaly >
Re: requirement for a shipment group?
Thank you for everybody responded! once in a while it can happen you prepare to extend the functionality of the system and find out it is already there. Regards, Hans On 05/23/2013 03:52 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: On May 22, 2013, at 2:17 PM, Hans Bakker wrote: Then we have to check with the invoice generation if it can list shipment items related from different orders. Hi Hans, you should find that the invoice services already handle this (once the data is in place). Jacopo
Re: Pack Backordered quantity
Could be possible that newly created inventory was reserved for another order, did you check detail screen for newly received item? What's the OFBiz version you're using? On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 6:59 PM, jyoti wrote: > When inventory is received for a product, then at that time it should be > checked if there is any reservation against that product. So, reservation > should be moved to the newly created inventory. Is it a bug in ofbiz? > > Thanks, > Jyoti > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Pack-Backordered-quantity-tp4641447p4641511.html > Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- Regards, Varun Bhansaly
Re: New to OFBiz. How to modify the eCommerce app?
Hi Robert, It depends on how much changes you are making. Instead of copying entire eCommerce component over to hot-deploy, you can as well 'extend' the eCommerce component, make and maintain your changes separately (See https://cwiki.apache.org/OFBIZ/faq-tips-tricks-cookbook-howto.html#FAQ-Tips-Tricks-Cookbook-HowTo-HowtoExtendanexistingcomponentincustomizedapplication? ). On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Paul Foxworthy wrote: > Hi Robert, > > I agree with the others that your UI is your UI and it's fine to copy it > and > make the changes you need for your own situation. > > It's harder with OFBiz services. You might make a change that with a bit of > refinement may one day become a submission. But for now you decide to keep > to yourself, perhaps to test it. You might have customizations that you > know > would not be relevant to the OFBiz community in general. You might base > your > work on a release of OFBiz, and cherry-pick fixes that are going into > trunk. > One day you might move to a later release, and the cherry-picked changes > won't be needed any more. > > In short, you might branch with some prospect of merging at some stage in > the future. > > In these situations, you want a clear separation between core OFBiz and > your > own changes, so you can move to a different core in future and integrate > your changes. I suspect you understand all of that perfectly well, thus > your > caution about changing OFBiz code. > > We use Mercurial patch queues (MQ) to handle this. We start with core > OFBiz, > and we make our own changes in hot-deploy when we need and want to. > Anything > that is our own mod of core OFBiz is done as a patch in a patch queue. We > have several "guards" so we can apply different sequences of patches. We > have guards for submitted patches, for pending submissions, and others for > customizations that are for a specific customer. > > MQ is working well for us and if you want to manage these issues I suggest > you give it a try. See http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/MqExtension for > more. > > Cheers > > Paul Foxworthy > > > Ruth Hoffman-2 wrote > > Hi Robert: > > > > Having worked on many OFBiz based ecommerce applications (both large and > > small), I agree with Paul. Copy over and use the OOTB webapp as a guide > > to move forward with your own customizations. > > > > Best of luck. > > Ruth Hoffman > > > > On 5/22/13 4:08 PM, Paul Piper wrote: > >> Hi Robert, > >> > >> that really depends on what you are set out to do. In general, I > >> recommend > >> to copy the eCommerce app over to hot-deploy and get the module to run > >> from > >> there. Then check it into your local repository to keep it consistent. > >> With > >> SVN you can use svn:external for instance to include your own module > >> while > >> keeping the rest of ofbiz consistent with the svn trunk. Then you can do > >> your own changes and commit to your local repository at any time. > >> > >> Does that help or were you looking for something else? > >> > >> Regards, > >> Paul > >> > >> P.S.: I don't think that Nick understood your question - BigFish > >> certainly > >> isn't the answer > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> View this message in context: > >> > http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/New-to-OFBiz-How-to-modify-the-eCommerce-app-tp4641469p4641473.html > >> Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >> > > > > > > - > -- > Coherent Software Australia Pty Ltd > http://www.coherentsoftware.com.au/ > > Bonsai ERP, the all-inclusive ERP system > http://www.bonsaierp.com.au/ > > -- > View this message in context: > http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/New-to-OFBiz-How-to-modify-the-eCommerce-app-tp4641469p4641484.html > Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- Regards, Varun Bhansaly
Re: requirement for a shipment group?
On May 22, 2013, at 2:17 PM, Hans Bakker wrote: > Then we have to check with the invoice generation if it can list shipment > items related from different orders. Hi Hans, you should find that the invoice services already handle this (once the data is in place). Jacopo
Re: New to OFBiz. How to modify the eCommerce app?
If a level of customization is absolutely required then of course that's the way to go. I did understand the question, if wasn't that complex. The original objective was "I'm interested in developing some personal eCom sites based on OFBiz". The beauty of OFBiz is the comprehensive data model and service layer, all great stuff. The problem is that it is not out-of-the-box-ready for building systems. BigFish solves that (for eComm) and allows the building and configuration of eCommerce sites in very short order. Robert: either way, welcome to OFBiz! Nick On 5/22/2013 5:46 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote: Hi Robert: Having worked on many OFBiz based ecommerce applications (both large and small), I agree with Paul. Copy over and use the OOTB webapp as a guide to move forward with your own customizations. Best of luck. Ruth Hoffman On 5/22/13 4:08 PM, Paul Piper wrote: Hi Robert, that really depends on what you are set out to do. In general, I recommend to copy the eCommerce app over to hot-deploy and get the module to run from there. Then check it into your local repository to keep it consistent. With SVN you can use svn:external for instance to include your own module while keeping the rest of ofbiz consistent with the svn trunk. Then you can do your own changes and commit to your local repository at any time. Does that help or were you looking for something else? Regards, Paul P.S.: I don't think that Nick understood your question - BigFish certainly isn't the answer -- View this message in context: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/New-to-OFBiz-How-to-modify-the-eCommerce-app-tp4641469p4641473.html Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Pack Backordered quantity
When inventory is received for a product, then at that time it should be checked if there is any reservation against that product. So, reservation should be moved to the newly created inventory. Is it a bug in ofbiz? Thanks, Jyoti -- View this message in context: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Pack-Backordered-quantity-tp4641447p4641511.html Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
RE: OFBiz / BigFish eCommerce Updates
All, Bigfish version 1.11 has been 'patched' and is now compatible with Ofbiz 12. Download the latest software http://bigfish.solveda.com/bfDownload.html Regards Len -Original Message- From: Christophe Noel [mailto:christo...@edi7.lu] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 11:13 AM To: user@ofbiz.apache.org Subject: Re: OFBiz / BigFish eCommerce Updates Dear Len, Yes, I'm having something similar as Tri Vssic. I started with a clean install : OOTB OFbiz 12.04.01, Bigfish 1.11 zip and Fashion demo just downloaded, empty database. 1/ When I click on Apparel > Active, I can't see the PLP and have the following groovy errors : Error running script at location [component://osafe/webapp/osafe/WEB-INF/actions/cart/showCartItems.groovy]: javax.script.ScriptException: org.codehaus.groovy.control.MultipleCompilationErrorsException: startup failed: Script194.groovy: 258: unable to resolve class GenericValue @ line 258, column 5. for (GenericValue productFeatureType : productFeatureTypesList) ^ etc. If I click a second time on Apparel > Active, then I get the PLP. 2/ If I then try to go into a PDP, I either have another groovy error preventing the PDP from displaying : 2013-05-21 17:10:52,454 (http-bio-0.0.0.0-8080-exec-32) [ GroovyEventHandler.java:113:WARN ] exception report -- Error running event : Exception: org.ofbiz.base.util.GeneralException Message: Error loading Groovy script at []: (Script not found at location []) cause - Exception: org.ofbiz.base.util.GeneralException Message: Script not found at location [] stack trace --- org.ofbiz.base.util.GeneralException: Script not found at location [] org.ofbiz.base.util.GroovyUtil.getScriptClassFromLocation(GroovyUtil.java:12 3) org.ofbiz.webapp.event.GroovyEventHandler.invoke(GroovyEventHandler.java:103 ) org.ofbiz.webapp.control.RequestHandler.runEvent(RequestHandler.java:660) org.ofbiz.webapp.control.RequestHandler.doRequest(RequestHandler.java:406) ... Or, the same error appears into the PDP in a red box : Error loading Groovy script at []: (Script not found at location []) Hope that helps. Thanks a lot for the hard work on this great product. Christophe -- View this message in context: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/OFBiz-BigFish-eCommerce-Updates-tp4515765p 4641434.html Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Improving OFBiz security
Hi Paul, Thanks. On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Paul Foxworthy wrote: > Hi Ted, > > You could use standard SSL support for client certificate authentication. > You can configure the web server to require a client certificate. Here's how > to to it in Apache: > http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/ssl/ssl_howto.html#allclients > Yes, I am aware of this, as well as how to do it using Apache's httpd server. But I was under the impression that OFBiz used a customized version of Apache Tomcat, and I do not know how to handle SSL in Tomcat in general nor how to configure it to use or better require use of client side certificates. I do not even know where OFBiz puts its container when it is installed (in my case on Suse Linux). > You need to find a secure way to send a client certificate to your users, > and they need to import the client certificate into the browser. This would > be external to OFBiz. The entire web application, not just form submission, > would be encrypted, tamper-proof and authenticated, and that would be > transparent to the OFBiz application. > I am aware of this too. I have a handle on that, involving contact between a registration authority and the users, and issuance of single use credentials to the users, for access (over HTTPS) to a specific website (written in Perl), The RA would establish, also, a set of challenge and response questions and answers with the users, so that the identity of the user can be verified by the combinatin of single use credentials and challenege/response questions. This part of the process, along with documentation the shows the RA's processes indeed verify the users' identities, is entirely external to OFBiz, which is why I didn't mention it before in this context. > Web browsers and operating systems already have certificate stores, and you > could just use them without needing to do anything special. Certificate > deployment would be an annoyance, but a one-off annoyance. > Yes, I was planning on using this. > If you want to do it internal to the application with Javascript, you are in > effect rewriting the SSL infrastructure in your own Javascript code. Your > code doesn't have a secure key store and is subject to risks of code > injection and so on. See the rant on this subject at > > http://www.matasano.com/articles/javascript-cryptography/ > OOPS, we have a misunderstanding here. The objective is NOT to rewrite the SSL infrastructure, although it will be used extensively. Rather, the objective is to provide support for non-repudiation, hence relating the client side certificate provided by the client machine to the identity of the user. Further, as an example, consider the nature of ecommerce: this is essentially a sales contract, and while one dimension of the security need for the integrity of such a contract involves assuring the identities of the parties to the contract, the contract itself needs to be handled in a way in which the details of it can readily be verified and assured against subsequent modification without the express consent of both parties. Thus, in ecommerce, at the checkout page, we need all the data in the shopping cart to be included on the checkout page, and we want that, along with the amount of the transaction, timestamp, &c., to be put into a single document and signed and encrypted. The resulting binary data would be stored with the transaction data, and made easily retrievable/viewable by both both parties to the sales contract and the banks used by the merchant and customer (in case the custmer takes a dispute to the issuing bank and demands a chargeback - such a document would be priceless for the bans to determine whether or not there was a valid sales contract between a merchant and client and is presently generally unavailable in card not present transactions). While ecommerce is an obvious application for what I have in mind, I can see other parts of OFBiz which may involve some sort of contract between parties and which may benefit from having this sort of capability (relations between different departments within a company? accountability of staff to their supervisor? others, to be requested by parties using ofbiz?). The thing is that if the application server asks for a client side certificate, the client's browser will offer one from the browser's or OS' store (I am not sure if, when the store contains more than one client side certificate if the browser asks the user which one to send, but I'll examine this complication in due course). But then, I would expect that one can get at the client's ID from that certificate using code written in Java just as one can using Perl (I dont recall the details, or whether I'd need to use openssl installed on the server and invoked from Perl, but I recall seeing it can be done without too too much pain), so that what the certificate says about the client's identity can be stored with the signed and encrypted document (which, of course, the client's public key
OfBiz Marketing Manager
Hi All, I am new to ofBiz, I have a simple doubt. My Question is "Does the ofBiz support all the features of a CRM (Customer Relationship Management) like Sales force automation, Marketing, Appointments etc OR we need to extend these featues" Hope your reply!! Thanks & Regards Vikas Bhadran -- View this message in context: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/OfBiz-Marketing-Manager-tp4641505.html Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: InvoiceItemType both as seed and demo data?
Jacques, Nicolas, Did some investigation and I see I was mistaken, although they are in both files, the fields are different: defined in seed data, and the assignment to GLAccounts in the demo data so the system is fine as it is.. Regards, Hans On 05/22/2013 10:07 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: I agree with Nicolas, ` Without thinking much at it, just throwing a general rule: why removing types from seed? They can still be usefull. I'd rather remove from demo since demo is a higher level than seed and can always relies on it Jacques From: "Nicolas Malin" I prefer keep on seed and use element on customer site data to remove unneeded type. But remove on demo :) Nicolas Le 22/05/2013 16:47, Hans Bakker a écrit : Invoiceitemtype's and PaymentMethodType's are defined in : AccountingTypeData.xml and in DemoGlSetupData.xml as seed AND demo data. Looks like it should be deleted as seed? however InvoiceItemTypeMap is seed only and need invoiceItemType? any opinions? Regards, Hans -- Nicolas MALIN Consultant Tél : 06.17.66.40.06 Site projet : http://www.neogia.org/ --- Société LibrenBerry Tél : 02.48.02.56.12 Site : http://www.librenberry.net/
Re: operating a single OFBiz with multiple companies.
The current data model provides for this, but it will require setting up the data correctly and adding a bit of code. At 1Tech, we implement Organization Contexts. An Organization Context is a combination of data and code that allows a user to "log into" an internal organization and all data is filtered accordingly (the user sees only the data for that internal organization). The basic idea is to relate various documents, parties, etc to the internal organization, then check for that relationship while searching/displaying data. -Adrian On 5/23/2013 8:33 AM, Hans Bakker wrote: We are currently implementing OFBiz in a large organization (300M$ reveneu) )which intends to use all major components of OFBiz including accounting. This means that every company in the holding will do his own accounting and operation concerning orders, invoices and payments, so orders are sent between ofbiz internal organizations as well as shipments, invoices and payments. So, in other words, a purchase order for the originating organization is send to another internal organization which needs to be converted to a sales order for the receiving organization. The same for shipments, invoices and payments. These documents can also be sent via web services between completely separated OFBiz installations. Anybody having experiences with this and want to share? Regards, Hans
Re: requirement for a shipment group?
Thanks for the suggestion, will keep this in mind! Regards, Hans On 05/22/2013 09:06 PM, Nicolas Malin wrote: Why not adding a drop-down on each orderItemShipGroup area on order view screen that list all shipment open for this customer with a button, "load this shipGroup on this shipment" The result, link all oderItems present on this shipgroup to the shipmentItems (with itemissuance of course). For the rest, invoice already works with one shipment. Nicolas Le 22/05/2013 14:17, Hans Bakker a écrit : Looks like we have to add the possibility to the shipment screens to be able to add other orders or, to be able on the order screen to add an order to an existing (not yet shipped) shipment (with the same destination) Then we have to check with the invoice generation if it can list shipment items related from different orders. any other suggestions welcome Regards, Hans On 05/22/2013 10:11 AM, Hans Bakker wrote: Some investigation: the ordershipment entity allows for partial and combined order shipments so no need to change the data model.now checking for the ERP application. Regards, Hans On 05/22/2013 09:46 AM, Hans Bakker wrote: Business requirement: a manufacturer has a pre-sheduled shipping time (every week or so) when orders can be delivered to a single customer. Up to the last moment orders can be added to the group shipment. The customer requests a single invoice for the items from the orders in this shipment. How to implement this is OFBiz? anybody suggestions? I am thinking creating a shipment group relating to single shipments and this shipment group is related to a single invoice which also lists the orderid the invoiceitem is on. Any help appreciated because i would like to add this to the OFBiz core system. Regards, Hans
Re: requirement for a shipment group?
THanks, Paul, we still learn every single day! Thanks! Regards, Hans On 05/23/2013 01:20 AM, Paul Foxworthy wrote: Hi Hans, The workflow might not be ideal for your situation, but I think this screen is close to what you're looking for: https://demo-stable.ofbiz.apache.org/facility/control/AddItemsFromOrder?shipmentId=9998 It can be used to add items from multiple orders to a shipment. Cheers Paul Foxworthy Malin Nicolas wrote Why not adding a drop-down on each orderItemShipGroup area on order view screen that list all shipment open for this customer with a button, "load this shipGroup on this shipment" The result, link all oderItems present on this shipgroup to the shipmentItems (with itemissuance of course). For the rest, invoice already works with one shipment. Nicolas Le 22/05/2013 14:17, Hans Bakker a écrit : Looks like we have to add the possibility to the shipment screens to be able to add other orders or, to be able on the order screen to add an order to an existing (not yet shipped) shipment (with the same destination) Then we have to check with the invoice generation if it can list shipment items related from different orders. any other suggestions welcome Regards, Hans On 05/22/2013 10:11 AM, Hans Bakker wrote: Some investigation: the ordershipment entity allows for partial and combined order shipments so no need to change the data model.now checking for the ERP application. Regards, Hans On 05/22/2013 09:46 AM, Hans Bakker wrote: Business requirement: a manufacturer has a pre-sheduled shipping time (every week or so) when orders can be delivered to a single customer. Up to the last moment orders can be added to the group shipment. The customer requests a single invoice for the items from the orders in this shipment. How to implement this is OFBiz? anybody suggestions? I am thinking creating a shipment group relating to single shipments and this shipment group is related to a single invoice which also lists the orderid the invoiceitem is on. Any help appreciated because i would like to add this to the OFBiz core system. Regards, Hans -- Nicolas MALIN Consultant Tél : 06.17.66.40.06 Site projet : http://www.neogia.org/ --- Société LibrenBerry Tél : 02.48.02.56.12 Site : http://www.librenberry.net/ - -- Coherent Software Australia Pty Ltd http://www.coherentsoftware.com.au/ Bonsai ERP, the all-inclusive ERP system http://www.bonsaierp.com.au/ -- View this message in context: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/requirement-for-a-shipment-group-tp4641445p4641483.html Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
operating a single OFBiz with multiple companies.
We are currently implementing OFBiz in a large organization (300M$ reveneu) )which intends to use all major components of OFBiz including accounting. This means that every company in the holding will do his own accounting and operation concerning orders, invoices and payments, so orders are sent between ofbiz internal organizations as well as shipments, invoices and payments. So, in other words, a purchase order for the originating organization is send to another internal organization which needs to be converted to a sales order for the receiving organization. The same for shipments, invoices and payments. These documents can also be sent via web services between completely separated OFBiz installations. Anybody having experiences with this and want to share? Regards, Hans
FIND Orders: Issue while searching with inventory id
Dear Ofbiz Community members, I am seeing some unusual behavior in Ofbiz app. (11.04.02), related to FIND ORDERS functionality. 1) Go to order manager app 2) Go to FIND orders 3) Input some valid value of invenotry ID for which the order exists 4) Click on FIND button 5) The orders with inventory id on order, should have been shown regardless of status but : 1) Only "Completed" status orders are shown for that particular inventory id. Other orders with different statuses could not be found. While analyzing ofbiz code, we could see that the system is designed to behave like this. It is by mistake or any specific reason for this behavior. Though if we search by soft identifier / serial no. on inventory, we could see the orders regardless of status but in certain cases we might not have serial no. as well as soft identifier. In such scenarios, i could not see the orders with specific inventory. Please share your views on this. Shall we go ahead and change this search behavior in ofbiz ? regards Varun Kothari =-=-= Notice: The information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, review, distribution, printing or copying of the information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and immediately and permanently delete the message and any attachments. Thank you
