求助，CentOS6.3 安装cloudStack4.0 无法登陆http://ip:8080/client
各位： 我在CentOS6.3上安装完cloud-client、mysql、NFS后，无法访问UI，查看了下本地8080端口，根本没有服务监听： tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:33060.0.0.0:* LISTEN 1958/mysqld tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:111 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 1123/rpcbind tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:22 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 1223/sshd tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:662 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 1150/rpc.statd tcp0 0 :::111 :::* LISTEN 1123/rpcbind tcp0 0 :::22 :::* LISTEN 1223/sshd tcp0 0 :::662 :::* LISTEN 1150/rpc.statd 我判断是服务没有起来，但是执行service cloud-management start多次都不行，重启也不行，按照官方文档安装两次了，系统也换了CentOS6.3和6.4，都一样的结果。 比较了下service cloud-management status的正常结果: * CloudStack-specific Tomcat servlet engine is running with pid 5324 我的却是： The pid file locates at /var/run/cloud-management.pid and lock file at /var/lock/subsys/cloud-management. 不知道有谁遇到过，求助。
CloudStack Exception
各位好 我第一次搭建CloudStack，通过在线安装的方式安装的，虚拟化采用的是KVM，基于RHEL6.2版本安装的，libvirt的版本为0.94，但是在创建zone的时候导入二级存储时候发现二级存储始终为0KB，后台报出的问题如下，同各位请教一下，有什么好办法解决这个问题，谢谢大家。 INFO [cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:) Primary secondary storage is not even started, wait until next turn INFO [cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:) No running secondary storage vms found in datacenter id=7, starting one INFO [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:) No stopped secondary storage vm is available, need to allocate a new secondary storage vm WARN [network.element.VpcVirtualRouterElement] (secstorage-1:) Network Ntwk[234|Guest|7] is not associated with any VPC WARN [network.element.VpcVirtualRouterElement] (secstorage-1:) Network Ntwk[232|Control|3] is not associated with any VPC WARN [network.element.VpcVirtualRouterElement] (secstorage-1:) Network Ntwk[231|Management|2] is not associated with any VPC INFO [cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl] (consoleproxy-1:) Found a stopped console proxy, bring it up to running pool. proxy vm id : 252 WARN [network.element.VpcVirtualRouterElement] (secstorage-1:) Network Ntwk[233|Storage|4] is not associated with any VPC WARN [network.element.VpcVirtualRouterElement] (consoleproxy-1:) Network Ntwk[234|Guest|7] is not associated with any VPC WARN [network.element.VpcVirtualRouterElement] (consoleproxy-1:) Network Ntwk[232|Control|3] is not associated with any VPC WARN [network.element.VpcVirtualRouterElement] (consoleproxy-1:) Network Ntwk[231|Management|2] is not associated with any VPC INFO [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:) Unable to start VM on Host[-15-Routing] due to internal error unknown timer name 'kvmclock' INFO [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (consoleproxy-1:) Unable to start VM on Host[-15-Routing] due to internal error unknown timer name 'kvmclock' WARN [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:) Exception while trying to start secondary storage vm com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create a deployment for VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-1168-VM]Scope=interface com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=7 at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:728) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:471) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:464) at com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.startSecStorageVm(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:264) at com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.allocCapacity(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:689) at com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.expandPool(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:1300) at com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:121) at com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:52) at com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.loadScan(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:104) at com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.access$100(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:33) at com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.reallyRun(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:81) at com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.run(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:72) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRunAndReset(FutureTask.java:351) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:178) at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:165) at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:267) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679) INFO [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:) Unable to start secondary storage vm for standby capacity, secStorageVm vm Id : 1168, will recycle it and start a new one INFO [cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:) Primary secondary storage is not even started, wait until next turn WARN [cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl] (consoleproxy-1:) Exception while trying to start console proxy com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create a deployment for VM[ConsoleProxy|v-252-VM]Scope=interface com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=7 at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:728) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:471) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:464) at com.cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.startProxy(ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.java:632)
Re: 求助，CentOS6.3 安装cloudStack4.0 无法登陆http://ip:8080/client
非常感谢！改了catalina.out的属主后，Cloud-management正常启动。 但是又遇到了你bolg所说的第二个问题，admin/password登陆时，提示用户密码无效，我的系统的CentOS6.4 minimal，没有找到登陆异常的有关logo。 有改mysql中的/etc/my.conf配置文件，但我不确定我的CentOS minimal系统是否会与CloudStack相关包冲突。 2013/7/23 lanv_11 lanv...@163.com 请参考这篇文章 http://blog.chinaunix.net/uid-26230811-id-3777972.html lanv_11 发件人： sunko2014 发送时间： 2013-07-23 17:44 收件人： users-cn 主题： 求助，CentOS6.3 安装cloudStack4.0 无法登陆http://ip:8080/client 各位： 我在CentOS6.3上安装完cloud-client、mysql、NFS后，无法访问UI，查看了下本地8080端口，根本没有服务监听： tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:33060.0.0.0:* LISTEN 1958/mysqld tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:111 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 1123/rpcbind tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:22 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 1223/sshd tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:662 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 1150/rpc.statd tcp0 0 :::111 :::* LISTEN 1123/rpcbind tcp0 0 :::22 :::* LISTEN 1223/sshd tcp0 0 :::662 :::* LISTEN 1150/rpc.statd 我判断是服务没有起来，但是执行service cloud-management start多次都不行，重启也不行，按照官方文档安装两次了，系统也换了CentOS6.3和6.4，都一样的结果。 比较了下service cloud-management status的正常结果: * CloudStack-specific Tomcat servlet engine is running with pid 5324 我的却是： The pid file locates at /var/run/cloud-management.pid and lock file at /var/lock/subsys/cloud-management. 不知道有谁遇到过，求助。
Re: CloudStack Exception
看起来log的第一句话比较重要。 Primary secondary storage is not even started, wait until next turn 可能存储有问题，所以VM不能启动，具体的还要再往前翻log。 2013-07-24 刘宇超 Richard Liu 发件人： liu_dh 发送时间： 2013-07-24 09:37:08 收件人： users-cn 抄送： 主题： CloudStack Exception 各位好 我第一次搭建CloudStack，通过在线安装的方式安装的，虚拟化采用的是KVM，基于RHEL6.2版本安装的，libvirt的版本为0.94，但是在创建zone的时候导入二级存储时候发现二级存储始终为0KB，后台报出的问题如下，同各位请教一下，有什么好办法解决这个问题，谢谢大家。 INFO [cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:) Primary secondary storage is not even started, wait until next turn INFO [cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:) No running secondary storage vms found in datacenter id=7, starting one INFO [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:) No stopped secondary storage vm is available, need to allocate a new secondary storage vm WARN [network.element.VpcVirtualRouterElement] (secstorage-1:) Network Ntwk[234|Guest|7] is not associated with any VPC WARN [network.element.VpcVirtualRouterElement] (secstorage-1:) Network Ntwk[232|Control|3] is not associated with any VPC WARN [network.element.VpcVirtualRouterElement] (secstorage-1:) Network Ntwk[231|Management|2] is not associated with any VPC INFO [cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl] (consoleproxy-1:) Found a stopped console proxy, bring it up to running pool. proxy vm id : 252 WARN [network.element.VpcVirtualRouterElement] (secstorage-1:) Network Ntwk[233|Storage|4] is not associated with any VPC WARN [network.element.VpcVirtualRouterElement] (consoleproxy-1:) Network Ntwk[234|Guest|7] is not associated with any VPC WARN [network.element.VpcVirtualRouterElement] (consoleproxy-1:) Network Ntwk[232|Control|3] is not associated with any VPC WARN [network.element.VpcVirtualRouterElement] (consoleproxy-1:) Network Ntwk[231|Management|2] is not associated with any VPC INFO [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:) Unable to start VM on Host[-15-Routing] due to internal error unknown timer name 'kvmclock' INFO [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (consoleproxy-1:) Unable to start VM on Host[-15-Routing] due to internal error unknown timer name 'kvmclock' WARN [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:) Exception while trying to start secondary storage vm com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create a deployment for VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-1168-VM]Scope=interface com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=7 at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:728) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:471) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:464) at com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.startSecStorageVm(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:264) at com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.allocCapacity(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:689) at com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.expandPool(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:1300) at com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:121) at com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:52) at com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.loadScan(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:104) at com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.access$100(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:33) at com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.reallyRun(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:81) at com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.run(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:72) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRunAndReset(FutureTask.java:351) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:178) at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:165) at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:267) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679) INFO [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:) Unable to start secondary storage vm for standby capacity, secStorageVm vm Id : 1168, will recycle it and start a new one INFO [cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:) Primary secondary storage is not even started, wait until next turn WARN [cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl] (consoleproxy-1:) Exception while trying to start console proxy com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create a deployment for VM[ConsoleProxy|v-252-VM]Scope=interface com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=7 at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:728) at
Re: cloudstack虚拟机访问控制问题求教
用Squid或者其它的软件搭建一个7层代理，然后虚拟机的所有7层流量走代理，在7层代理那作过滤。 在 2013年7月24日上午10:26，0220323 0220...@163.com写道： Hi!大家好~~ 我有个问题想向各位大侠请教下。。。我的cloudstack-management安装在192.168.3.140上，集群上只有一台主机192.168.3.150，我现在想禁止150上所有的的虚拟机访问某个网站，比如优酷网，怎么实现啊?? 2013-07-24 0220323 -- 杨雨 Email: alex890...@gmail.com GitHub: https://github.com/AlexYangYu Weibo: http://www.weibo.com/alexyangyu
Console proxy functionalities
AOA every one i am new to cloudstack and i didnt understand the functionality of console proxy. Is console proxy is just a console view or something else. -- Regards, *Kashif Ali* Undergraduate Student | 7th Semester BESE-1A | NUST-SEECS | Islamabad 10besek...@seecs.edu.pk
Creating ISO files under Templates in CS 4.1 UI
Hi, I was trying to download a 650MB Ubuntu iso from management server after following this link - https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/upload-your-own-templates-in-cloudstack.html Its quite long time since the Status message does not reflect Download Complete Also, where is this iso file getting downloaded ? It also looks that secondary storage is not mounted. Is this the issue for it ? Here is the output of mount command ; [root@RLD1RNDS08 ~]# mount /dev/sda2 on / type ext4 (rw) proc on /proc type proc (rw) sysfs on /sys type sysfs (rw) devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,gid=5,mode=620) tmpfs on /dev/shm type tmpfs (rw,rootcontext=system_u:object_r:tmpfs_t:s0) /dev/sda1 on /boot type ext4 (rw) /dev/sda5 on /devops type ext4 (rw) /dev/sda3 on /home type ext4 (rw) none on /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc type binfmt_misc (rw) sunrpc on /var/lib/nfs/rpc_pipefs type rpc_pipefs (rw) nfsd on /proc/fs/nfsd type nfsd (rw) *192.168.105.145:/export/primary on /mnt/3efd6ecb-0ed0-3f01-80e4-7357f15f8fb7 type nfs (rw,noac,vers=4,addr=192.168.105.145,clientaddr=192.168.105.145)* Secondary storage is under /export/secondary, but it is not mounted. In Management server UI shows Secondary storage as enabled. Does this internally mounts secondary storage or I have to mount it manually ? Please suggest. Thank you, -- Ashutosh Narayan http://ashutoshn.wordpress.com/
RE: Console proxy functionalities
Refer to http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.1.0/html-single/Admin_Guide/index.html#console-proxy -Original Message- From: Kashif Ali [mailto:temujin...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 11:33 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Console proxy functionalities AOA every one i am new to cloudstack and i didnt understand the functionality of console proxy. Is console proxy is just a console view or something else. -- Regards, *Kashif Ali* Undergraduate Student | 7th Semester BESE-1A | NUST-SEECS | Islamabad 10besek...@seecs.edu.pk
Re: Creating ISO files under Templates in CS 4.1 UI
ISO is getting downloaded to Primary storage then move over to secondary, as I understand, if your secondary storage is on different host, then the speed of the wire and disk / raid performance comes in to question On Jul 23, 2013 2:15 AM, Ashutosh Narayan aashutoshnara...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I was trying to download a 650MB Ubuntu iso from management server after following this link - https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/upload-your-own-templates-in-cloudstack.html Its quite long time since the Status message does not reflect Download Complete Also, where is this iso file getting downloaded ? It also looks that secondary storage is not mounted. Is this the issue for it ? Here is the output of mount command ; [root@RLD1RNDS08 ~]# mount /dev/sda2 on / type ext4 (rw) proc on /proc type proc (rw) sysfs on /sys type sysfs (rw) devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,gid=5,mode=620) tmpfs on /dev/shm type tmpfs (rw,rootcontext=system_u:object_r:tmpfs_t:s0) /dev/sda1 on /boot type ext4 (rw) /dev/sda5 on /devops type ext4 (rw) /dev/sda3 on /home type ext4 (rw) none on /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc type binfmt_misc (rw) sunrpc on /var/lib/nfs/rpc_pipefs type rpc_pipefs (rw) nfsd on /proc/fs/nfsd type nfsd (rw) *192.168.105.145:/export/primary on /mnt/3efd6ecb-0ed0-3f01-80e4-7357f15f8fb7 type nfs (rw,noac,vers=4,addr=192.168.105.145,clientaddr=192.168.105.145)* Secondary storage is under /export/secondary, but it is not mounted. In Management server UI shows Secondary storage as enabled. Does this internally mounts secondary storage or I have to mount it manually ? Please suggest. Thank you, -- Ashutosh Narayan http://ashutoshn.wordpress.com/
RE: Console proxy functionalities
I don't want to be rude but he could have googled it or used the index properly On Jul 23, 2013 2:18 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com wrote: Refer to http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.1.0/html-single/Admin_Guide/index.html#console-proxy -Original Message- From: Kashif Ali [mailto:temujin...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 11:33 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Console proxy functionalities AOA every one i am new to cloudstack and i didnt understand the functionality of console proxy. Is console proxy is just a console view or something else. -- Regards, *Kashif Ali* Undergraduate Student | 7th Semester BESE-1A | NUST-SEECS | Islamabad 10besek...@seecs.edu.pk
Re: Creating ISO files under Templates in CS 4.1 UI
HI Dean, The secondary storage is on the same host. But it doesn't seem to be mounted. Do I need to mount it ? On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Dean Kamali dean.kam...@gmail.com wrote: ISO is getting downloaded to Primary storage then move over to secondary, as I understand, if your secondary storage is on different host, then the speed of the wire and disk / raid performance comes in to question On Jul 23, 2013 2:15 AM, Ashutosh Narayan aashutoshnara...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I was trying to download a 650MB Ubuntu iso from management server after following this link - https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/upload-your-own-templates-in-cloudstack.html Its quite long time since the Status message does not reflect Download Complete Also, where is this iso file getting downloaded ? It also looks that secondary storage is not mounted. Is this the issue for it ? Here is the output of mount command ; [root@RLD1RNDS08 ~]# mount /dev/sda2 on / type ext4 (rw) proc on /proc type proc (rw) sysfs on /sys type sysfs (rw) devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,gid=5,mode=620) tmpfs on /dev/shm type tmpfs (rw,rootcontext=system_u:object_r:tmpfs_t:s0) /dev/sda1 on /boot type ext4 (rw) /dev/sda5 on /devops type ext4 (rw) /dev/sda3 on /home type ext4 (rw) none on /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc type binfmt_misc (rw) sunrpc on /var/lib/nfs/rpc_pipefs type rpc_pipefs (rw) nfsd on /proc/fs/nfsd type nfsd (rw) *192.168.105.145:/export/primary on /mnt/3efd6ecb-0ed0-3f01-80e4-7357f15f8fb7 type nfs (rw,noac,vers=4,addr=192.168.105.145,clientaddr=192.168.105.145)* Secondary storage is under /export/secondary, but it is not mounted. In Management server UI shows Secondary storage as enabled. Does this internally mounts secondary storage or I have to mount it manually ? Please suggest. Thank you, -- Ashutosh Narayan http://ashutoshn.wordpress.com/ -- Ashutosh Narayan http://ashutoshn.wordpress.com/
time out during storage migration
hello i'm trying to migrate some vm's between primary storage source is an nfs storage and moving to a clvm storage the template's are about 50gb in size however during the migration i receive a time out error: 2013-07-23 09:20:09,553 WARN [utils.script.Script] (Script-4:null) Interrupting script. 2013-07-23 09:20:09,555 WARN [utils.script.Script] (agentRequest-Handler-3:null) Timed out: /bin/bash -c qemu-img convert -f qcow2 -O qcow2 /mnt/730146b0-d350-35e8-8a1f-bb27d2fab890/a6de5f10-6d80-4fdc-8c43-68cafc22c5c8 /mnt/122195ae-3c01-3e9d-8749-90dc191b3164/6968ff9b-a32b-4bcc-b059-3994898c10a1.qcow2 . Output is: any idea from where this time out come's and how to resolve it. This happens about an hour into the conversion I also noticed that during the conversion everything else is blocking
RE: cold migrated VMs won't start
Thanks Ahmad, We were wondering about that, although we couldn't find anything that explicitly states that you can't migrate across pods in a basic zone. Our view was that there's no technical reason why the VM can't be started by the hypervisor - it would have to get a new ip (as dhcp in the vr would be incapable of giving it its orginal one) - but that would be our problem to deal with, and if our app was fqdn based - it wouldn't matter anyway. Regards, Paul Angus S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: CloudyAngus paul.an...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemne...@gmail.com] Sent: 23 July 2013 05:31 To: Cloudstack users mailing list Subject: Re: cold migrated VMs won't start Hey Paul, we'd probably need more logs... but my gut tells me its failing because the pod you migrated to isnt part of the same subnet the vm originally came from, thus cant allocate a 'suitable ip'. On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 4:15 AM, Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.comwrote: Hi Guys has anyone seen this behaviour? After cold migrating a VM from one Pod to another we can't start the VM any more basic networking: (Xenserver 6.1 + ACS4.1) VM state transmitted from :Starting to Stopped with event: OperationFailedvm's original host id: null new host id: null host id before state transition: 3 Regards, Paul Angus *Senior Consultant / Cloud Architect* S: +44 20 3603 0540 +442036030540 | M: +4 +44796816158147711418784 | T: CloudyAngus paul.an...@shapeblue.com geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue https://twitter.com/ ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses 10/11 July, Bangalore, Indiahttp://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-bootcamp-training-course/ 21/22 August, Londonhttp://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-bootcamp-training-course/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Cloudstack can't deploy new vm
Hi, We have a problem with our CloudStack. We can't deploying new instance. When we try to deploy new vm we have a short error message on the CloudStack interface : Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|i-3-2764-VM] . We have the same error when we deploy new instance from iso or template. In the event page on CS, we have : VM.CREATE Error while starting Vm. Vm Id: 2764pierre.ben...@inria.fr 22 Jul 2013 13:15:47 VM.CREATE Starting job for starting Vm. Vm Id: 2764 pierre.ben...@inria.fr 22 Jul 2013 13:15:47 VM.CREATE Scheduled async job for starting Vm. Vm Id: 2764 pierre.ben...@inria.fr 22 Jul 2013 13:15:46 VM.CREATE Successfully created entity for deploying Vm. Vm Id: 2764 pierre.ben...@inria.fr 22 Jul 2013 13:15:46 Isn't really verbose ... All the other instance are continuous to running correctly, we can stop/start it. There is no significant error in the log files of CloudStack server and on each we sufficient resources to deploy many instances. The SSVM and primary storage are available. Our CloudStack environment : * CloudStack v3 * 1 pod of 4 clusters KVM, each cluster has 4 KVM hypervisor Please Suggest. Thank you. Pierre Bénard System engineer Inria Rennes - Bretagne Atlantique Campus universitaire de Beaulieu 35042 Rennes Cedex Tél. +33 2 99 84 71 00 Fax +33 2 99 84 71 71 www.inria.fr Suivez‐nous sur : Twitter twitter.com/inria YouTube youtube.com/inriachannel
Re: Cloudstack can't deploy new vm
Just a thought! can you create new user account and launch a vm? it could be an issue with the account. if it works, you could use cloudmonkey later to assign all vms from the affected user account to the new account. On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 4:20 AM, Pierre Benard pierre.ben...@inria.frwrote: Hi, We have a problem with our CloudStack. We can't deploying new instance. When we try to deploy new vm we have a short error message on the CloudStack interface : Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|i-3-2764-VM] . We have the same error when we deploy new instance from iso or template. In the event page on CS, we have : VM.CREATE Error while starting Vm. Vm Id: 2764 pierre.ben...@inria.fr 22 Jul 2013 13:15:47 VM.CREATE Starting job for starting Vm. Vm Id: 2764 pierre.ben...@inria.fr 22 Jul 2013 13:15:47 VM.CREATE Scheduled async job for starting Vm. Vm Id: 2764 pierre.ben...@inria.fr 22 Jul 2013 13:15:46 VM.CREATE Successfully created entity for deploying Vm. Vm Id: 2764 pierre.ben...@inria.fr 22 Jul 2013 13:15:46 Isn't really verbose ... All the other instance are continuous to running correctly, we can stop/start it. There is no significant error in the log files of CloudStack server and on each we sufficient resources to deploy many instances. The SSVM and primary storage are available. Our CloudStack environment : * CloudStack v3 * 1 pod of 4 clusters KVM, each cluster has 4 KVM hypervisor Please Suggest. Thank you. Pierre Bénard System engineer Inria Rennes - Bretagne Atlantique Campus universitaire de Beaulieu 35042 Rennes Cedex Tél. +33 2 99 84 71 00 Fax +33 2 99 84 71 71 www.inria.fr Suivez‐nous sur : Twitter twitter.com/inria YouTube youtube.com/inriachannel
Re: Cloudstack can't deploy new vm
We also face this kind of problem many times but in our case its because of router or storage instance are disconnected or down under vmware, i will suggest you to check their connectivity once not only from cloudstack but also from backend. On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Pierre Benard pierre.ben...@inria.frwrote: Hi, We have a problem with our CloudStack. We can't deploying new instance. When we try to deploy new vm we have a short error message on the CloudStack interface : Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|i-3-2764-VM] . We have the same error when we deploy new instance from iso or template. In the event page on CS, we have : VM.CREATE Error while starting Vm. Vm Id: 2764 pierre.ben...@inria.fr 22 Jul 2013 13:15:47 VM.CREATE Starting job for starting Vm. Vm Id: 2764 pierre.ben...@inria.fr 22 Jul 2013 13:15:47 VM.CREATE Scheduled async job for starting Vm. Vm Id: 2764 pierre.ben...@inria.fr 22 Jul 2013 13:15:46 VM.CREATE Successfully created entity for deploying Vm. Vm Id: 2764 pierre.ben...@inria.fr 22 Jul 2013 13:15:46 Isn't really verbose ... All the other instance are continuous to running correctly, we can stop/start it. There is no significant error in the log files of CloudStack server and on each we sufficient resources to deploy many instances. The SSVM and primary storage are available. Our CloudStack environment : * CloudStack v3 * 1 pod of 4 clusters KVM, each cluster has 4 KVM hypervisor Please Suggest. Thank you. Pierre Bénard System engineer Inria Rennes - Bretagne Atlantique Campus universitaire de Beaulieu 35042 Rennes Cedex Tél. +33 2 99 84 71 00 Fax +33 2 99 84 71 71 www.inria.fr Suivez‐nous sur : Twitter twitter.com/inria YouTube youtube.com/inriachannel
Re: Visualizing the Planners
Hi, Provide visualization based on Host,cluster,pod,zone etc.. that will very helpfull for future planning the cloud capacity. Regards, Prakash.M def. cool, that and multiple accounts across MORE hosts :D Thinking separate colors for each user. On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 5:01 PM, David Comerford davest...@gmail.comwrote: That was pretty cool. Be interesting to see the behaviour with randomised RAM size instances. Best regards, David Comerford Tel: +353 87 1238295 Email: davest...@gmail.com Website: http://dave.ie GPG key: http://gpg.dave.ie On 22 July 2013 20:07, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote: Hi all, I've been playing with a method of simulating provisioning activity on a CloudStack cloud, and visualizing the resulting capacity usage on the hosts. I blogged about the first (very early) work here: http://www.chipchilders.com/blog/2013/7/22/visualizing-the-cloudstack-planners-in-action.html Feel free to let me know if you have any ideas / suggestions.
Re: Cloudstack can't deploy new vm
Hi, Thank you for your suggestion. I've done the test, I've created new user and I've tried to create new vm with him. We have exactly the same error. Regards, Pierre - Mail original - De: Dean Kamali dean.kam...@gmail.com À: users@cloudstack.apache.org Envoyé: Mardi 23 Juillet 2013 10:22:56 Objet: Re: Cloudstack can't deploy new vm Just a thought! can you create new user account and launch a vm? it could be an issue with the account. if it works, you could use cloudmonkey later to assign all vms from the affected user account to the new account. On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 4:20 AM, Pierre Benard pierre.ben...@inria.frwrote: Hi, We have a problem with our CloudStack. We can't deploying new instance. When we try to deploy new vm we have a short error message on the CloudStack interface : Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|i-3-2764-VM] . We have the same error when we deploy new instance from iso or template. In the event page on CS, we have : VM.CREATE Error while starting Vm. Vm Id: 2764 pierre.ben...@inria.fr 22 Jul 2013 13:15:47 VM.CREATE Starting job for starting Vm. Vm Id: 2764 pierre.ben...@inria.fr 22 Jul 2013 13:15:47 VM.CREATE Scheduled async job for starting Vm. Vm Id: 2764 pierre.ben...@inria.fr 22 Jul 2013 13:15:46 VM.CREATE Successfully created entity for deploying Vm. Vm Id: 2764 pierre.ben...@inria.fr 22 Jul 2013 13:15:46 Isn't really verbose ... All the other instance are continuous to running correctly, we can stop/start it. There is no significant error in the log files of CloudStack server and on each we sufficient resources to deploy many instances. The SSVM and primary storage are available. Our CloudStack environment : * CloudStack v3 * 1 pod of 4 clusters KVM, each cluster has 4 KVM hypervisor Please Suggest. Thank you. Pierre Bénard System engineer Inria Rennes - Bretagne Atlantique Campus universitaire de Beaulieu 35042 Rennes Cedex Tél. +33 2 99 84 71 00 Fax +33 2 99 84 71 71 www.inria.fr Suivez‐nous sur : Twitter twitter.com/inria YouTube youtube.com/inriachannel
management server OS
can cloudstack managment server support ubuntu 12.10 -- Regards, *Kashif Ali* Undergraduate Student | 7th Semester BESE-1A | NUST-SEECS | Islamabad 10besek...@seecs.edu.pk
Re: Console proxy functionalities
i read the document .all i understand is its use physical console of VM and have a public IP but i am confused about its functionality compared with web-based UI. On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Dean Kamali dean.kam...@gmail.com wrote: I don't want to be rude but he could have googled it or used the index properly On Jul 23, 2013 2:18 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com wrote: Refer to http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.1.0/html-single/Admin_Guide/index.html#console-proxy -Original Message- From: Kashif Ali [mailto:temujin...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 11:33 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Console proxy functionalities AOA every one i am new to cloudstack and i didnt understand the functionality of console proxy. Is console proxy is just a console view or something else. -- Regards, *Kashif Ali* Undergraduate Student | 7th Semester BESE-1A | NUST-SEECS | Islamabad 10besek...@seecs.edu.pk -- -- Regards, *Kashif Ali* Undergraduate Student | 7th Semester BESE-1A | NUST-SEECS | Islamabad 10besek...@seecs.edu.pk
Alerts
Hi Can I able to customize the Alerts? Like I should get the alert when storage reaches the 85% of threshold value or Cpu utilization exceeds the 85% of threshold or No of snapshots per user exceeds. Thanks regards Chitra.M CAUTION - Disclaimer * This e-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended solely for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by e-mail and delete the original message. Further, you are not to copy, disclose, or distribute this e-mail or its contents to any other person and any such actions are unlawful. This e-mail may contain viruses. Infosys has taken every reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, but is not liable for any damage you may sustain as a result of any virus in this e-mail. You should carry out your own virus checks before opening the e-mail or attachment. Infosys reserves the right to monitor and review the content of all messages sent to or from this e-mail address. Messages sent to or from this e-mail address may be stored on the Infosys e-mail system. ***INFOSYS End of Disclaimer INFOSYS***
Re: Unable to migrate VM to another host
Dear Prasanna and all, I have tried to remove the host from CloudStack, uninstall and reinstall cloudstack-agent and added the host back into CloudStack. The cloud user-id is still not yet created. I then tried to add the cloud user manually, using exactly the same credentials as the cloud user on the other host. From the host, I tried to do a virsh connect qemu+ssh to the other host using the cloud user (instead of root), and getting this error: cloud@hv-kvm-01:~$ virsh --connect qemu+ssh://cloud@10.237.3.22/system list cloud@10.237.3.22's password: error: failed to connect to the hypervisor error: no valid connection error: End of file while reading data: : Input/output error If you notice, the error is the same exact error message I see on the management-server.log when I tried to do a live migration of VM. So I tried to follow this lead and implement this instruction to allow the cloud user to have access to the hypervisor on the other host: http://wiki.libvirt.org/page/SSHSetup usermod -G libvirtd -a cloud Enabled these on /etc/libvirt/libvirtd.conf: unix_sock_group = libvirtd unix_sock_rw_perms = 0770 I also copied the SSH keys of the cloud user to the other host, so that it will not prompt for password. And I am now able to do a virsh connect using the cloud user: cloud@hv-kvm-01:~$ virsh --connect qemu+ssh://cloud@10.237.3.22/system list IdName State 2 i-2-275-VM running 3 i-2-276-VM running 4 i-2-293-VM running But I am still not able to perform live migration of VM. May I know how CloudStack connects to the hypervisors when it performs live migration, after finding a suitable target host? Does it request the source host to perform a qemu+ssh connect to the target host? Appreciate if anyone who is familiar with CloudStack VM live migration can shed some lights on this. Looking forward to your reply, thank you. Cheers. On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Indra Pramana in...@sg.or.id wrote: Hi Prasanna, Good day to you, and thank you for your e-mail. On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.orgwrote: On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 08:25:11PM +0800, Indra Pramana wrote: Dear Prasanna and all, In addition, earlier I have tried to force-connect the hypervisor host when it was on disconnected mode. However, the cloud user id is still not being created. Looking forward to your reply, thank you. please share the /var/log/cloudstack/agent/setupAgent.log via a pastebin. There's no setupAgent.log file under /var/log/cloudstack/agent directory. There's setup.log file, though. However, the file was last updated on 18 July 2013. The content is inside this pastebin: http://pastebin.com/NQQdhkPM Looking forward to your reply, thank you. Cheers.
Re: Unable to migrate VM to another host
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 06:19:06PM +0800, Indra Pramana wrote: Dear Prasanna and all, I have tried to remove the host from CloudStack, uninstall and reinstall cloudstack-agent and added the host back into CloudStack. The cloud user-id is still not yet created. I then tried to add the cloud user manually, using exactly the same credentials as the cloud user on the other host. From the host, I tried to do a virsh connect qemu+ssh to the other host using the cloud user (instead of root), and getting this error: cloud@hv-kvm-01:~$ virsh --connect qemu+ssh://cloud@10.237.3.22/system list cloud@10.237.3.22's password: error: failed to connect to the hypervisor error: no valid connection error: End of file while reading data: : Input/output error If you notice, the error is the same exact error message I see on the management-server.log when I tried to do a live migration of VM. So I tried to follow this lead and implement this instruction to allow the cloud user to have access to the hypervisor on the other host: http://wiki.libvirt.org/page/SSHSetup usermod -G libvirtd -a cloud Enabled these on /etc/libvirt/libvirtd.conf: unix_sock_group = libvirtd unix_sock_rw_perms = 0770 I also copied the SSH keys of the cloud user to the other host, so that it will not prompt for password. And I am now able to do a virsh connect using the cloud user: cloud@hv-kvm-01:~$ virsh --connect qemu+ssh://cloud@10.237.3.22/system list IdName State 2 i-2-275-VM running 3 i-2-276-VM running 4 i-2-293-VM running But I am still not able to perform live migration of VM. May I know how CloudStack connects to the hypervisors when it performs live migration, after finding a suitable target host? Does it request the source host to perform a qemu+ssh connect to the target host? I'm not sure about the specifics here. Perhaps someone else will chime in - But from looking at the resource for KVM in cloudstack it appears the libvirt XML contains a qemu+tcp:// connection on migrate. Can you tell us if the KVM hosts share the same management subnet? Are they in the same cluster as CloudStack denotes a cluster? Is there a way to trap the XMLs sent to the KVM resource in the libvirt logs? I'd try to enable that if so. -- Prasanna., Powered by BigRock.com
RE: Alerts
Yes, you can customize the alerts by setting the global configuration values. In global config window, search for notificationthreshold; you'll get all the gc (.notificationthreshold) that you can set as per your requirement to get alerts. --Sanjay -Original Message- From: Chitra Manjunath [mailto:chitra_manjun...@infosys.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 3:42 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Alerts Hi Can I able to customize the Alerts? Like I should get the alert when storage reaches the 85% of threshold value or Cpu utilization exceeds the 85% of threshold or No of snapshots per user exceeds. Thanks regards Chitra.M CAUTION - Disclaimer * This e-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended solely for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by e-mail and delete the original message. Further, you are not to copy, disclose, or distribute this e-mail or its contents to any other person and any such actions are unlawful. This e-mail may contain viruses. Infosys has taken every reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, but is not liable for any damage you may sustain as a result of any virus in this e- mail. You should carry out your own virus checks before opening the e-mail or attachment. Infosys reserves the right to monitor and review the content of all messages sent to or from this e-mail address. Messages sent to or from this e-mail address may be stored on the Infosys e-mail system. ***INFOSYS End of Disclaimer INFOSYS***
MuleSoft
Hi Guys, Anyone tried integrating Cloudstack with MuleSoft? Cheers Len IMPORTANT NOTICE. This electronic message contains information from Control Circle Ltd, which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended for use only by the individual(s) or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please notify me by telephone or email (to the number or email address above) immediately. Activity and use of the ControlCircle e-mail system is monitored to secure its effective operation and for other lawful business purposes. Communications using this system will also be monitored and may be recorded to secure effective operation and for other lawful business purposes
Re: Unable to migrate VM to another host
There is no cloud user on the host/agent side. Agent runs as root. Or is this an experiment to try to run the agent as another user? On Jul 23, 2013 4:44 AM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 06:19:06PM +0800, Indra Pramana wrote: Dear Prasanna and all, I have tried to remove the host from CloudStack, uninstall and reinstall cloudstack-agent and added the host back into CloudStack. The cloud user-id is still not yet created. I then tried to add the cloud user manually, using exactly the same credentials as the cloud user on the other host. From the host, I tried to do a virsh connect qemu+ssh to the other host using the cloud user (instead of root), and getting this error: cloud@hv-kvm-01:~$ virsh --connect qemu+ssh://cloud@10.237.3.22/systemlist cloud@10.237.3.22's password: error: failed to connect to the hypervisor error: no valid connection error: End of file while reading data: : Input/output error If you notice, the error is the same exact error message I see on the management-server.log when I tried to do a live migration of VM. So I tried to follow this lead and implement this instruction to allow the cloud user to have access to the hypervisor on the other host: http://wiki.libvirt.org/page/SSHSetup usermod -G libvirtd -a cloud Enabled these on /etc/libvirt/libvirtd.conf: unix_sock_group = libvirtd unix_sock_rw_perms = 0770 I also copied the SSH keys of the cloud user to the other host, so that it will not prompt for password. And I am now able to do a virsh connect using the cloud user: cloud@hv-kvm-01:~$ virsh --connect qemu+ssh://cloud@10.237.3.22/systemlist IdName State 2 i-2-275-VM running 3 i-2-276-VM running 4 i-2-293-VM running But I am still not able to perform live migration of VM. May I know how CloudStack connects to the hypervisors when it performs live migration, after finding a suitable target host? Does it request the source host to perform a qemu+ssh connect to the target host? I'm not sure about the specifics here. Perhaps someone else will chime in - But from looking at the resource for KVM in cloudstack it appears the libvirt XML contains a qemu+tcp:// connection on migrate. Can you tell us if the KVM hosts share the same management subnet? Are they in the same cluster as CloudStack denotes a cluster? Is there a way to trap the XMLs sent to the KVM resource in the libvirt logs? I'd try to enable that if so. -- Prasanna., Powered by BigRock.com
Re: How to backup cloudstack data?
We won't be able to tell you that. You will have to determine what is most important to your organization to backup. For simplicity, definitely backup the DB. If you wanted to backup anything, I'd probably suggest the secondary storage, as it contains the templates, isos, and snapshots; of which you'll likely be able to recover from (rebuild instances) more easily. On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:00 PM, WXR 1485739...@qq.com wrote: I use a storage device as my cloudstack primary and secondary storage.I can do redundant storage configuration on the device. But I must do a backup of the most important data on the storage device to another server.If the storage device is ruined for some reasons,I can restore the vms by using the backup data on the server. Each vm has its root and data volume files and the nearest 2 weeks snapshot files on the storage. If there is 50T data on the storage device(including volumes and snapshots),I can just copy 2T-10T of them to the backup server.Now the problem is which files should I copy and how to restore them. -- Original -- From: Ahmad Emneinaaemne...@gmail.com; Date: Tue, Jul 23, 2013 10:29 AM To: Cloudstack users mailing listusers@cloudstack.apache.org; Subject: Re: How to backup cloudstack data? I agree with Kirk here, configuration management for the virtual infra and the important bits of data should be made redundant at the storage level. Cloudstack has a snapshotting function but if your secondary storage server tanks, you'll be in a world of hurt. If you use cloudstack snapshotting, ensure your secondary storage is replicated or has plenty of redundant disks. On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Kirk Jantzer kirk.jant...@gmail.com wrote: I said this in another thread and figured I'd mention it here since it seems applicable. It is my belief that the cloud is the IaaS and that the applications that run on the cloud should be built for failure of the IaaS: they (instances/applications) should be rapidly deployable. So, it shouldn't matter what cloud product (openstack/cloudstack/vmware/aws/etc...) you provide to your customers, they should be able to redeploy their application where ever they go or are given for IaaS. With that said, if you really wanted to backup the VMs, you probably want to look at something that backed up thorough the storage device, or the hypervisor, and then backup the management and mysql db. On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:57 PM, WXR 1485739...@qq.com wrote: Virtual machines. I want to know how to do data backup and restore the vms when the cloudstack storage has been ruined totally. -- Original -- From: Nitin Mehtanitin.me...@citrix.com; Date: Mon, Jul 22, 2013 03:10 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgusers@cloudstack.apache.org; Subject: Re: How to backup cloudstack data? What is it that you want to back up ? Virtual machines, snapshots - anything else ? On 22/07/13 7:09 AM, WXR 1485739...@qq.com wrote: I want to do a full backup of cloudstack data and restore them to a new cloudstack,but I don't know which files should I copy and how to restore them. . -- Regards, Kirk Jantzer c: (678) 561-5475 http://about.met/kirkjantzer -- Regards, Kirk Jantzer c: (678) 561-5475 http://about.met/kirkjantzer
Re: Generating OS Templates
Hi Prasanna, Didn't understand where you puppet provisioning is absent, on packer? On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 2:23 AM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote: Agreed this is something I'd like to see in our test pipeline too and integrated into our internal clouds. Managing multiple templates can be messy. Once I finish off some 4.2 related stuff I'll look at implementing a CloudStack provider for packer in Go. Right now puppet provisioning is absent as well making it a bit difficult to configure the templates with a puppetmaster. So perhaps by the time we get to this, there will be support in packer -- Prasanna., On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 09:53:10PM +, Brian Galura wrote: We have an automated process for deploying code onto existing hosts, it would be cool to have it just build an image instead. -Original Message- From: celso.fernan...@gmail.com [mailto:celso.fernan...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Celso Fernandes Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 2:21 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Generating OS Templates What is this kind of continuous integration? To generate OS templates? ;) Celso Fernandes www.zertico.com +55 35 4105-0922 Av. BPS, 1303 - PCE - PCTI - Sala 10 On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Brian Galura brian.gal...@citrix.com wrote: Yes I opened that issue with packer. Would love to see that support and use it with a continuous integration automation pipeline. On Jul 18, 2013, at 9:11, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote: Celso, There's an issue on the packer [1] github that you may be interested in if you plan on building support for CS. I've been playing around with packer for the last few weeks and find it quite stable for a version 0.1 tool and since it's by the Vagrant author himself I think it'll get good traction in the future. [1] https://github.com/mitchellh/packer/issues/76 -- Prasanna., On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:40:02AM -0300, Celso Fernandes wrote: Christian, I've been using veewee to generate vagrant boxes in a while, for me is much better to develop something based on this and automate to import on Cloudstack instead of develop something from scratch. Prasanna, Thank you for the point.. Packer seems a really cool to do this task, I'm gonna try to make a plugin for XenServer, once it worked I try something specific to CloudStack, thank you for point me into this direction. Thank you all for replies, Celso Fernandes www.zertico.com +55 35 4105-0922 Av. BPS, 1303 - PCE - PCTI - Sala 10 On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote: There are no providers for CloudStack yet in these projects (vagrant/packer). Only for AWS, vmware fusion, vbox and possibly openstack. So you'll have to convert to vhd manually and then import as template and then muck around with the networking a little bit to get it right. On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:11:04AM -0300, Celso Fernandes wrote: Hi Sanjay, thank you for your reply, I thought were some more automated process like Veewee does for Vagrant boxes. Is there any way to convert Vagrant boxes to XenServer ones? So would be much more simpler to automate the process. I'm gonna search for some info and test, then publish any result I got. Thank you, Celso Fernandes www.zertico.com +55 35 4105-0922 Av. BPS, 1303 - PCE - PCTI - Sala 10 On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 2:09 AM, Sanjay Tripathi sanjay.tripa...@citrix.com wrote: If you have VMs running with the mentioned OS types, first stop those VMs then go to Storage tab in the CS UI and select the ROOT disk of the VM for which you want to create the template. There you'll get the option to create template from that ROOT volume. And VM should have xenserver tools installed to reflect it in the template. --Sanjay -Original Message- From: celso.fernan...@gmail.com [mailto:celso.fernan...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Celso Fernandes Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 6:21 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Generating OS Templates I know its an novice question, but I haven't found in the documentation the best way to get this. I'd like to generate template for CentOS 6.4 / Debian 7.1 / Ubuntu 12.04 with xenserver tools installed and password enabled. What is the best way to generate this templates? Any documentation or tutorial some could point would help very much. Thank you, Celso Fernandes www.zertico.com +55 35 4105-0922 Av. BPS, 1303 - PCE - PCTI - Sala 10 -- Prasanna., Powered by BigRock.com Powered by BigRock.com Powered by BigRock.com
Re: Cloudstack can't deploy new vm
Hi, Thank you for your answer. Our virtual router vm was used @50% of CPU and the network traffic it was amazing. We had some system scripts who send DNS request storm on virtual router. Now, we have corrected this and now the usage of cpu is under 1% and network traffic is normal. But, this operation don't be resolving our problems of new instance deployment :-( Somebody has an other idea ? Thanks in advance. Pierre - Mail original - De: ramnivas indani ramind...@h2osoftwares.com À: users@cloudstack.apache.org Envoyé: Mardi 23 Juillet 2013 10:27:11 Objet: Re: Cloudstack can't deploy new vm We also face this kind of problem many times but in our case its because of router or storage instance are disconnected or down under vmware, i will suggest you to check their connectivity once not only from cloudstack but also from backend. On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Pierre Benard pierre.ben...@inria.frwrote: Hi, We have a problem with our CloudStack. We can't deploying new instance. When we try to deploy new vm we have a short error message on the CloudStack interface : Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|i-3-2764-VM] . We have the same error when we deploy new instance from iso or template. In the event page on CS, we have : VM.CREATE Error while starting Vm. Vm Id: 2764 pierre.ben...@inria.fr 22 Jul 2013 13:15:47 VM.CREATE Starting job for starting Vm. Vm Id: 2764 pierre.ben...@inria.fr 22 Jul 2013 13:15:47 VM.CREATE Scheduled async job for starting Vm. Vm Id: 2764 pierre.ben...@inria.fr 22 Jul 2013 13:15:46 VM.CREATE Successfully created entity for deploying Vm. Vm Id: 2764 pierre.ben...@inria.fr 22 Jul 2013 13:15:46 Isn't really verbose ... All the other instance are continuous to running correctly, we can stop/start it. There is no significant error in the log files of CloudStack server and on each we sufficient resources to deploy many instances. The SSVM and primary storage are available. Our CloudStack environment : * CloudStack v3 * 1 pod of 4 clusters KVM, each cluster has 4 KVM hypervisor Please Suggest. Thank you. Pierre Bénard System engineer Inria Rennes - Bretagne Atlantique Campus universitaire de Beaulieu 35042 Rennes Cedex Tél. +33 2 99 84 71 00 Fax +33 2 99 84 71 71 www.inria.fr Suivez‐nous sur : Twitter twitter.com/inria YouTube youtube.com/inriachannel
Re: Cloudstack can't deploy new vm
Please paste the contents of /var/log/cloudstack/management/management-server.log to PasteBin so that we can analyze that. On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Pierre Benard pierre.ben...@inria.frwrote: Hi, Thank you for your answer. Our virtual router vm was used @50% of CPU and the network traffic it was amazing. We had some system scripts who send DNS request storm on virtual router. Now, we have corrected this and now the usage of cpu is under 1% and network traffic is normal. But, this operation don't be resolving our problems of new instance deployment :-( Somebody has an other idea ? Thanks in advance. Pierre - Mail original - De: ramnivas indani ramind...@h2osoftwares.com À: users@cloudstack.apache.org Envoyé: Mardi 23 Juillet 2013 10:27:11 Objet: Re: Cloudstack can't deploy new vm We also face this kind of problem many times but in our case its because of router or storage instance are disconnected or down under vmware, i will suggest you to check their connectivity once not only from cloudstack but also from backend. On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Pierre Benard pierre.ben...@inria.frwrote: Hi, We have a problem with our CloudStack. We can't deploying new instance. When we try to deploy new vm we have a short error message on the CloudStack interface : Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|i-3-2764-VM] . We have the same error when we deploy new instance from iso or template. In the event page on CS, we have : VM.CREATE Error while starting Vm. Vm Id: 2764 pierre.ben...@inria.fr 22 Jul 2013 13:15:47 VM.CREATE Starting job for starting Vm. Vm Id: 2764 pierre.ben...@inria.fr 22 Jul 2013 13:15:47 VM.CREATE Scheduled async job for starting Vm. Vm Id: 2764 pierre.ben...@inria.fr 22 Jul 2013 13:15:46 VM.CREATE Successfully created entity for deploying Vm. Vm Id: 2764 pierre.ben...@inria.fr 22 Jul 2013 13:15:46 Isn't really verbose ... All the other instance are continuous to running correctly, we can stop/start it. There is no significant error in the log files of CloudStack server and on each we sufficient resources to deploy many instances. The SSVM and primary storage are available. Our CloudStack environment : * CloudStack v3 * 1 pod of 4 clusters KVM, each cluster has 4 KVM hypervisor Please Suggest. Thank you. Pierre Bénard System engineer Inria Rennes - Bretagne Atlantique Campus universitaire de Beaulieu 35042 Rennes Cedex Tél. +33 2 99 84 71 00 Fax +33 2 99 84 71 71 www.inria.fr Suivez‐nous sur : Twitter twitter.com/inria YouTube youtube.com/inriachannel -- Regards, Kirk Jantzer c: (678) 561-5475 http://about.met/kirkjantzer
Re: Cloudstack can't deploy new vm
Hi, The log is really short for today (we've made some creating tests today): 2013-07-23 14:55:58,608 ERROR [cloud.server.ManagementServerImpl] (catalina-exec-10:null) Incorrect format of the template id 460 2013-07-23 14:55:59,858 ERROR [cloud.server.ManagementServerImpl] (catalina-exec-6:null) Incorrect format of the template id 439 The precedent log is dated on 21th, and it is short too : 2013-07-21 15:17:08,664 ERROR [cloud.api.ApiDispatcher] (Job-Executor-32:job-10294) Exception while executing StopVMCmd: com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: We cannot stop VM[User|i-451-2756-VM] when it is in state Starting at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStop(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:1005) at com.cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl.stopVirtualMachine(UserVmManagerImpl.java:2776) at com.cloud.event.ActionEventCallback.intercept(ActionEventCallback.java:32) at com.cloud.api.commands.StopVMCmd.execute(StopVMCmd.java:114) at com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:132) at com.cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl$1.run(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:427) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679) Regards, Pierre - Mail original - De: Kirk Jantzer kirk.jant...@gmail.com À: Cloudstack users mailing list users@cloudstack.apache.org Envoyé: Mardi 23 Juillet 2013 17:21:37 Objet: Re: Cloudstack can't deploy new vm Sorry, saw you're on v3. the correct location is: /var/log/cloud/management/management-server.log On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Kirk Jantzer kirk.jant...@gmail.comwrote: Please paste the contents of /var/log/cloudstack/management/management-server.log to PasteBin so that we can analyze that. On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Pierre Benard pierre.ben...@inria.frwrote: Hi, Thank you for your answer. Our virtual router vm was used @50% of CPU and the network traffic it was amazing. We had some system scripts who send DNS request storm on virtual router. Now, we have corrected this and now the usage of cpu is under 1% and network traffic is normal. But, this operation don't be resolving our problems of new instance deployment :-( Somebody has an other idea ? Thanks in advance. Pierre - Mail original - De: ramnivas indani ramind...@h2osoftwares.com À: users@cloudstack.apache.org Envoyé: Mardi 23 Juillet 2013 10:27:11 Objet: Re: Cloudstack can't deploy new vm We also face this kind of problem many times but in our case its because of router or storage instance are disconnected or down under vmware, i will suggest you to check their connectivity once not only from cloudstack but also from backend. On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Pierre Benard pierre.ben...@inria.frwrote: Hi, We have a problem with our CloudStack. We can't deploying new instance. When we try to deploy new vm we have a short error message on the CloudStack interface : Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|i-3-2764-VM] . We have the same error when we deploy new instance from iso or template. In the event page on CS, we have : VM.CREATE Error while starting Vm. Vm Id: 2764 pierre.ben...@inria.fr 22 Jul 2013 13:15:47 VM.CREATE Starting job for starting Vm. Vm Id: 2764 pierre.ben...@inria.fr 22 Jul 2013 13:15:47 VM.CREATE Scheduled async job for starting Vm. Vm Id: 2764 pierre.ben...@inria.fr 22 Jul 2013 13:15:46 VM.CREATE Successfully created entity for deploying Vm. Vm Id: 2764 pierre.ben...@inria.fr 22 Jul 2013 13:15:46 Isn't really verbose ... All the other instance are continuous to running correctly, we can stop/start it. There is no significant error in the log files of CloudStack server and on each we sufficient resources to deploy many instances. The SSVM and primary storage are available. Our CloudStack environment : * CloudStack v3 * 1 pod of 4 clusters KVM, each cluster has 4 KVM hypervisor Please Suggest. Thank you. Pierre Bénard System engineer Inria Rennes - Bretagne Atlantique Campus universitaire de Beaulieu 35042 Rennes Cedex Tél. +33 2 99 84 71 00 Fax +33 2 99 84 71 71 www.inria.fr Suivez‐nous sur : Twitter twitter.com/inria YouTube youtube.com/inriachannel
Re: Cloudstack can't deploy new vm
That's all that's in your log? On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Pierre Benard pierre.ben...@inria.frwrote: Hi, The log is really short for today (we've made some creating tests today): 2013-07-23 14:55:58,608 ERROR [cloud.server.ManagementServerImpl] (catalina-exec-10:null) Incorrect format of the template id 460 2013-07-23 14:55:59,858 ERROR [cloud.server.ManagementServerImpl] (catalina-exec-6:null) Incorrect format of the template id 439 The precedent log is dated on 21th, and it is short too : 2013-07-21 15:17:08,664 ERROR [cloud.api.ApiDispatcher] (Job-Executor-32:job-10294) Exception while executing StopVMCmd: com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: We cannot stop VM[User|i-451-2756-VM] when it is in state Starting at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStop(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:1005) at com.cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl.stopVirtualMachine(UserVmManagerImpl.java:2776) at com.cloud.event.ActionEventCallback.intercept(ActionEventCallback.java:32) at com.cloud.api.commands.StopVMCmd.execute(StopVMCmd.java:114) at com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:132) at com.cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl$1.run(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:427) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679) Regards, Pierre - Mail original - De: Kirk Jantzer kirk.jant...@gmail.com À: Cloudstack users mailing list users@cloudstack.apache.org Envoyé: Mardi 23 Juillet 2013 17:21:37 Objet: Re: Cloudstack can't deploy new vm Sorry, saw you're on v3. the correct location is: /var/log/cloud/management/management-server.log On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Kirk Jantzer kirk.jant...@gmail.comwrote: Please paste the contents of /var/log/cloudstack/management/management-server.log to PasteBin so that we can analyze that. On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Pierre Benard pierre.ben...@inria.frwrote: Hi, Thank you for your answer. Our virtual router vm was used @50% of CPU and the network traffic it was amazing. We had some system scripts who send DNS request storm on virtual router. Now, we have corrected this and now the usage of cpu is under 1% and network traffic is normal. But, this operation don't be resolving our problems of new instance deployment :-( Somebody has an other idea ? Thanks in advance. Pierre - Mail original - De: ramnivas indani ramind...@h2osoftwares.com À: users@cloudstack.apache.org Envoyé: Mardi 23 Juillet 2013 10:27:11 Objet: Re: Cloudstack can't deploy new vm We also face this kind of problem many times but in our case its because of router or storage instance are disconnected or down under vmware, i will suggest you to check their connectivity once not only from cloudstack but also from backend. On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Pierre Benard pierre.ben...@inria.frwrote: Hi, We have a problem with our CloudStack. We can't deploying new instance. When we try to deploy new vm we have a short error message on the CloudStack interface : Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|i-3-2764-VM] . We have the same error when we deploy new instance from iso or template. In the event page on CS, we have : VM.CREATE Error while starting Vm. Vm Id: 2764 pierre.ben...@inria.fr 22 Jul 2013 13:15:47 VM.CREATE Starting job for starting Vm. Vm Id: 2764 pierre.ben...@inria.fr 22 Jul 2013 13:15:47 VM.CREATE Scheduled async job for starting Vm. Vm Id: 2764 pierre.ben...@inria.fr 22 Jul 2013 13:15:46 VM.CREATE Successfully created entity for deploying Vm. Vm Id: 2764 pierre.ben...@inria.fr 22 Jul 2013 13:15:46 Isn't really verbose ... All the other instance are continuous to running correctly, we can stop/start it. There is no significant error in the log files of CloudStack server and on each we sufficient resources to deploy many instances. The SSVM and primary storage are available. Our CloudStack environment : * CloudStack v3 * 1 pod of 4 clusters KVM, each cluster has 4 KVM hypervisor Please Suggest. Thank you. Pierre Bénard System engineer Inria Rennes - Bretagne
Re: Unable to migrate VM to another host
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 08:18:31AM -0600, Marcus Sorensen wrote: There is no cloud user on the host/agent side. Agent runs as root. Or is this an experiment to try to run the agent as another user? That was entirely my mistake. I just went about thinking the agents ran as cloud (ssvm, cpvm, kvm agent). Looking at my deployment it seems that /etc/sudoers has an entry for cloud but the service runs as root. My apologies for misleading on that. On Jul 23, 2013 4:44 AM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 06:19:06PM +0800, Indra Pramana wrote: Dear Prasanna and all, I have tried to remove the host from CloudStack, uninstall and reinstall cloudstack-agent and added the host back into CloudStack. The cloud user-id is still not yet created. I then tried to add the cloud user manually, using exactly the same credentials as the cloud user on the other host. From the host, I tried to do a virsh connect qemu+ssh to the other host using the cloud user (instead of root), and getting this error: cloud@hv-kvm-01:~$ virsh --connect qemu+ssh://cloud@10.237.3.22/systemlist cloud@10.237.3.22's password: error: failed to connect to the hypervisor error: no valid connection error: End of file while reading data: : Input/output error However - the issue still remains that migration between two KVM hosts seems to be failing. The log indicates the error shown above which was tried by hand here. Deployment contains KVM hosts with Ceph+RBD as primary storage. -- Prasanna., Powered by BigRock.com
storage overprovisioning
Hi Guys, Was wondering if someone could explain to me the difference between the following Global Settings: pool.storage.allocated.capacity.disablethreshold pool.storage.capacity.disablethreshold Many thanks! Len IMPORTANT NOTICE. This electronic message contains information from Control Circle Ltd, which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended for use only by the individual(s) or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please notify me by telephone or email (to the number or email address above) immediately. Activity and use of the ControlCircle e-mail system is monitored to secure its effective operation and for other lawful business purposes. Communications using this system will also be monitored and may be recorded to secure effective operation and for other lawful business purposes
VPC Issue with CS 4.1/KVM/Openvswitch
Hello,
I've been testing Cloudstack 4.1 with KVM/Openvswitch networking. When trying
to add a VPC, the VR's public interface default route was not assigned
correctly, nor the source nat. Cloudstack reports the VPC is created
successfully, however the VR is left in an incomplete state. Looking through
the agent logs I found:
2013-07-19 16:39:20,961 DEBUG [cloud.agent.Agent] (agentRequest-Handler-2:null)
Processing command: com.cloud.agent.api.PlugNicCommand
2013-07-19 16:39:20,970 DEBUG [kvm.resource.OvsVifDriver]
(agentRequest-Handler-2:null) plugging nic=[Nic:Public-192.168.1.68-vlan://32]
2013-07-19 16:39:20,970 DEBUG [kvm.resource.OvsVifDriver]
(agentRequest-Handler-2:null) creating a vlan dev and bridge for public traffic
per traffic label vswitch0
2013-07-19 16:39:21,116 DEBUG [cloud.agent.Agent] (agentRequest-Handler-2:null)
Processing command: com.cloud.agent.api.routing.IpAssocVpcCommand
2013-07-19 16:39:21,126 DEBUG [resource.virtualnetwork.VirtualRoutingResource]
(agentRequest-Handler-2:null) Executing:
/usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/network/domr/router_proxy.sh
vpc_ipassoc.sh 169.254.2.23 -A -l 192.168.1.68 -c ethnull -g 192.168.1.1 -m
24 -n 192.168.1.0
2013-07-19 16:39:29,107 DEBUG [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
(UgentTask-5:null) Executing:
/usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/vm/network/security_group.py
get_rule_logs_for_vms
2013-07-19 16:39:29,233 DEBUG [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
(UgentTask-5:null) Execution is successful.
2013-07-19 16:39:29,235 DEBUG [cloud.agent.Agent] (UgentTask-5:null) Sending
ping: Seq 7-103: { Cmd , MgmtId: -1, via: 7, Ver: v1, Flags: 11,
[{PingRoutingWithNwGroupsCommand:{newGroupStates:{},newStates:{},_gatewayAccessible:true,_vnetAccessible:true,hostType:Routing,hostId:7,wait:0}}]
}
2013-07-19 16:39:29,243 DEBUG [cloud.agent.Agent] (Agent-Handler-5:null)
Received response: Seq 7-103: { Ans: , MgmtId: 112938636298, via: 7, Ver: v1,
Flags: 100010,
[{PingAnswer:{_command:{hostType:Routing,hostId:7,wait:0},result:true,wait:0}}]
}
2013-07-19 16:39:38,707 DEBUG [resource.virtualnetwork.VirtualRoutingResource]
(agentRequest-Handler-2:null) Execution is successful.
2013-07-19 16:39:38,708 DEBUG [resource.virtualnetwork.VirtualRoutingResource]
(agentRequest-Handler-2:null) Device ethnull does not exist.
Cannot find device ethnull
Error: argument Table_ethnull is wrong: table value is invalid
Error: argument Table_ethnull is wrong: table value is invalid
RTNETLINK answers: No such process
2013-07-19 16:39:38,709 DEBUG [cloud.agent.Agent] (agentRequest-Handler-2:null)
Processing command: com.cloud.agent.api.routing.SetSourceNatCommand
2013-07-19 16:39:38,719 DEBUG [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
(agentRequest-Handler-2:null) failing to get physical interface from
bridgecloud0, did not find an eth*, bond*, or vlan* in
/sys/devices/virtual/net/cloud0/brif
2013-07-19 16:39:38,719 DEBUG [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
(agentRequest-Handler-2:null) failed to get vlan id from bridge cloud0attached
to physical interface
2013-07-19 16:39:38,719 DEBUG [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
(agentRequest-Handler-2:null) failing to get physical interface from
bridgevswitch0, did not find an eth*, bond*, or vlan* in
/sys/devices/virtual/net/vswitch0/brif
2013-07-19 16:39:38,719 DEBUG [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
(agentRequest-Handler-2:null) failed to get vlan id from bridge
vswitch0attached to physical interface
2013-07-19 16:39:38,719 DEBUG [resource.virtualnetwork.VirtualRoutingResource]
(agentRequest-Handler-2:null) Executing:
/usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/network/domr/router_proxy.sh vpc_snat.sh
169.254.2.23 -A -l 192.168.1.68 -c eth2
2013-07-19 16:39:38,947 DEBUG [resource.virtualnetwork.VirtualRoutingResource]
(agentRequest-Handler-2:null) Execution is successful.
2013-07-19 16:39:38,948 DEBUG [resource.virtualnetwork.VirtualRoutingResource]
(agentRequest-Handler-2:null) iptables: Bad rule (does a matching rule exist in
that chain?).
iptables: No chain/target/match by that name.
Cloudstack is configured with advanced networking. Tags for physical networks
- vswitch0 for public guest traffic
- vif9 for storage traffic
- vif8 for management traffic
Openvswitch configuration:
# ovs-vsctl show
Bridge vswitch1
Port vswitch1
Interface vswitch1
type: internal
Port eth1
Interface eth1
Port vif9
tag: 9
Interface vif9
type: internal
Bridge vswitch0
Port vnet1
tag: 32
Interface vnet1
Port vswitch0
Interface vswitch0
type: internal
Port vif8
tag: 8
Interface vif8
type: internal
Port eth0
Interface eth0
Bridge cloud0
Port vnet0
Interface vnet0
Port cloud0
Interface cloud0
RE: CloudStack performance issue
Indra, How big are the templates you are attempting to deploy? I could see the 1 Gbps connection being a little bit of a bottleneck, but it sounds like there may be something else going on. I know we would have issues on our setup which is on 1 Gbps connections at the moment if we tried to do multiple snapshots at once, but we could normally get away with deploying a couple VMs at once within a few minutes. As for the question about how they are being copied, I am not 100% confident on this, but I believe it is copied via the SSVM, so it would be going secondary storage -- hypervisor host -- primary storage. Hopefully someone will correct me if I am wrong on that. -David Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 12:33:17 +0800 Subject: Re: CloudStack performance issue From: in...@sg.or.id To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Hi David, Good day to you, and thank you for your e-mail. My secondary storage is connected to the switch using 1 Gbps connection, while my primary storage is connected via a 10 Gbps connection. Unfortunately I don't have 10G NIC cards on my secondary storage. Do you think upgrading my secondary storage's NIC to 10 Gbps will help? May I know how the template and ISOs are being copied, is it through the hypervisor host (e.g. secondary storage -- hypervisor host -- primary storage) or directly (i.e. secondary storage -- primary storage)? My primary storage is not on the same subnet/VLAN as secondary storage, since it's connected to different NIC cards on the hypervisor hosts. If it's a direct connection between secondary storage to primary storage without going to the hypervisor, I might be considering changing my network topology to make the primary and secondary storage to be on the same subnet/VLAN. Looking forward to your reply, thank you. Cheers. On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:19 AM, David Ortiz dpor...@outlook.com wrote: Meant that question for Indra. Sorry. From: dpor...@outlook.com To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: CloudStack performance issue Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 11:34:10 -0400 Prasanna, What kind of network do you use for your setup? Creating a new VM requires copying the template or ISO over from secondary storage to primary, so that could be a bottleneck when trying to create multiple VMs at once. -Dave Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 16:20:08 +0530 From: t...@apache.org To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: CloudStack performance issue On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 03:18:12PM +0800, Indra Pramana wrote: Where can I start troubleshooting, which logs I need to go through to find out the bottleneck? The management-server.log file doesn't show much anything about the delay. It seems that there is some locking mechanism and certain processes will need other processes to complete before they can start. This is worrying since in a production environment, many customers might want to try creating VMs at the same time simultaneously. The logs of use would be managment-server.log which defaults to DEBUG mode. The logs on the agent (inside KVM host) are default in INFO mode. You can turn them up to DEBUG by altering the log4j config. Apart from that you can also look at libvirt logs. Folks have been tuning the deployment of the VMs on KVM host in another thread on dev@ and in the bug https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3163 let us know if the symptoms are the same and you can bring this up on dev@ with more details. Any thoughts or feedback on this matter is appreciated. Looking forward to your reply, thank you. Cheers. -- Prasanna., Powered by BigRock.com
Re: Console Proxy not starting
I destroyed proxy vm few days ago, and in about 30 seconds or so I saw the
new one getting created and started in about 1 -2 min.
environment: cs 4.1 xenserver 6.0.2
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Caleb Call calebc...@me.com wrote:
That's odd because of all my zones, this is the only one I haven't moved a
hypervisor in or out of since being built.
I destroyed the Console Proxy VM, how long should it take before CS spins
a new one up?
Thanks
On Jul 22, 2013, at 10:26 PM, Ahmad Emneina aemne...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Caleb, looks like the host the console proxy used to live on is gone.
see:
The last host of this VM cannot be found
2013-07-18 14:02:40,142 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
(Job-Executor-43:job-5916) Cannot choose the last host to deploy this VM
what I would do is nuke (destroy) the console proxy vm, and allow
cloudstack to spin up a new one.
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:56 AM, Caleb Call calebc...@me.com wrote:
Primary storage is not in maintenance mode and is available. I have a
couple dozen VMs running from this same primary storage and the SSVM and
router VM are both running from this same storage. Only the console
proxy
seems to be having a problem.
$ ./cloudAPI.pl -c listStoragePools -p
clusterid=f200c92f-5937-43c7-8bf5-6593f7311400
https://cloud.overstock.com/client/api?apiKey=xclusterid=f200c92f-5937-43c7-8bf5-6593f7311400command=listStoragePoolsresponse=jsonsignature=x{
liststoragepoolsresponse : {
storagepool : [
{
clusterid : f200c92f-5937-43c7-8bf5-6593f7311400,
zonename : Offshore,
state : Up,
disksizeallocated : 359196000256,
podid : 20eff451-3edd-4366-8ab2-60f2390e5134,
podname : Offshore,
id : OFFSHORE_FC_LUN01,
clustername : Offshore,
zoneid : 8e1c49fc-a5b3-44bb-9d54-932b0047eed0,
name : OFFSHORE_FC_LUN01,
disksizeused : 360047443968,
path : /OFFSHORE_FC_LUN01,
disksizetotal : 1099499044864,
tags : ,
created : 2013-06-08T15:45:05-0600,
type : PreSetup,
ipaddress : localhost
}
],
count : 1
}
}
On Jul 20, 2013, at 5:06 PM, David Comerford davest...@gmail.com
wrote:
For some reason I was thinking the system VMs lived on the secondary
storage, but I'm probably wrong on that.
The templates for the system VM's live on secondary storage, then they
are
deployed to primary storage.
Allocator seems happy enough to use host id 51 but theres no primary
storage available in cluster id 9.
Is it in maintenance mode or anything?
'list storagepools' in cloudmonkey might shed some light.
Best regards,
David Comerford
Tel: +353 87 1238295
Email: davest...@gmail.com
Website: http://dave.ie
GPG key: http://gpg.dave.ie http://pgp.dave.ie
On 18 July 2013 21:27, Bradley Hieber mercsni...@gmail.com wrote:
pastebin please
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Caleb Call calebc...@me.com wrote:
When trying to start the console proxy in one of my zones fails. I'm
getting an error that says no suitable storagePools for in this
cluster.
Which storage pool would this be? For some reason I was thinking the
system VMs lived on the secondary storage, but I'm probably wrong on
that.
Either way, I have ~700GB of free space on my primary storage and
~500GB
free in my secondary storage, what else is this looking for to be
able
to
start this console proxy? I've included the logs around this event.
2013-07-18 14:02:40,031 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet]
(catalina-exec-13:null) ===START=== 10.4.108.254 -- GET
command=startSystemVmid=d10d7f57
-8b1b-45b2-9875-8c18995ac37bresponse=jsonsessionkey=uMQLwJmB8uyPSQeSiSBXo04naus%3D_=1374177759969
2013-07-18 14:02:40,033 DEBUG [ehcache.store.MemoryStore]
(catalina-exec-13:null) UserDaoCache: UserDaoMemoryStore hit for 10
2013-07-18 14:02:40,112 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(catalina-exec-13:null) submit async job-5916, details: AsyncJobVO
{id:5916, use
rId: 10, accountId: 7, sessionKey: null, instanceType: SystemVm,
instanceId: 1024, cmd: com.cloud.api.commands.StartSystemVMCmd,
cmdOriginator:
null, cmdInfo:
{response:json,id:d10d7f57-8b1b-45b2-9875-8c18995ac37b,sessionkey:uMQLwJmB8uyPSQeSiSBXo04naus\u003d,ctxUserId:10,
_:1374177759969,ctxAccountId:7,ctxStartEventId:18978},
cmdVersion: 0, callbackType: 0, callbackAddress: null, status: 0,
processStat
us: 0, resultCode: 0, result: null, initMsid: 145320940120008,
completeMsid: null, lastUpdated: null, lastPolled: null, created:
null}
2013-07-18 14:02:40,113 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-43:job-5916) Executing
com.cloud.api.commands.StartSystemVMCmd for
job-5916
Re: Console Proxy not starting
Yeah, should be a couple of minutes at most.
If you don't have it yet it's time to examine the logs.
Best regards,
David Comerford
Tel: +353 87 1238295
Email: davest...@gmail.com
Website: http://dave.ie
GPG key: http://gpg.dave.ie
On 23 July 2013 19:35, Dean Kamali dean.kam...@gmail.com wrote:
I destroyed proxy vm few days ago, and in about 30 seconds or so I saw the
new one getting created and started in about 1 -2 min.
environment: cs 4.1 xenserver 6.0.2
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Caleb Call calebc...@me.com wrote:
That's odd because of all my zones, this is the only one I haven't moved
a
hypervisor in or out of since being built.
I destroyed the Console Proxy VM, how long should it take before CS spins
a new one up?
Thanks
On Jul 22, 2013, at 10:26 PM, Ahmad Emneina aemne...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Caleb, looks like the host the console proxy used to live on is
gone.
see:
The last host of this VM cannot be found
2013-07-18 14:02:40,142 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
(Job-Executor-43:job-5916) Cannot choose the last host to deploy this
VM
what I would do is nuke (destroy) the console proxy vm, and allow
cloudstack to spin up a new one.
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:56 AM, Caleb Call calebc...@me.com wrote:
Primary storage is not in maintenance mode and is available. I have a
couple dozen VMs running from this same primary storage and the SSVM
and
router VM are both running from this same storage. Only the console
proxy
seems to be having a problem.
$ ./cloudAPI.pl -c listStoragePools -p
clusterid=f200c92f-5937-43c7-8bf5-6593f7311400
https://cloud.overstock.com/client/api?apiKey=xclusterid=f200c92f-5937-43c7-8bf5-6593f7311400command=listStoragePoolsresponse=jsonsignature=x{
liststoragepoolsresponse : {
storagepool : [
{
clusterid : f200c92f-5937-43c7-8bf5-6593f7311400,
zonename : Offshore,
state : Up,
disksizeallocated : 359196000256,
podid : 20eff451-3edd-4366-8ab2-60f2390e5134,
podname : Offshore,
id : OFFSHORE_FC_LUN01,
clustername : Offshore,
zoneid : 8e1c49fc-a5b3-44bb-9d54-932b0047eed0,
name : OFFSHORE_FC_LUN01,
disksizeused : 360047443968,
path : /OFFSHORE_FC_LUN01,
disksizetotal : 1099499044864,
tags : ,
created : 2013-06-08T15:45:05-0600,
type : PreSetup,
ipaddress : localhost
}
],
count : 1
}
}
On Jul 20, 2013, at 5:06 PM, David Comerford davest...@gmail.com
wrote:
For some reason I was thinking the system VMs lived on the secondary
storage, but I'm probably wrong on that.
The templates for the system VM's live on secondary storage, then
they
are
deployed to primary storage.
Allocator seems happy enough to use host id 51 but theres no primary
storage available in cluster id 9.
Is it in maintenance mode or anything?
'list storagepools' in cloudmonkey might shed some light.
Best regards,
David Comerford
Tel: +353 87 1238295
Email: davest...@gmail.com
Website: http://dave.ie
GPG key: http://gpg.dave.ie http://pgp.dave.ie
On 18 July 2013 21:27, Bradley Hieber mercsni...@gmail.com wrote:
pastebin please
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Caleb Call calebc...@me.com
wrote:
When trying to start the console proxy in one of my zones fails.
I'm
getting an error that says no suitable storagePools for in this
cluster.
Which storage pool would this be? For some reason I was thinking
the
system VMs lived on the secondary storage, but I'm probably wrong
on
that.
Either way, I have ~700GB of free space on my primary storage and
~500GB
free in my secondary storage, what else is this looking for to be
able
to
start this console proxy? I've included the logs around this
event.
2013-07-18 14:02:40,031 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet]
(catalina-exec-13:null) ===START=== 10.4.108.254 -- GET
command=startSystemVmid=d10d7f57
-8b1b-45b2-9875-8c18995ac37bresponse=jsonsessionkey=uMQLwJmB8uyPSQeSiSBXo04naus%3D_=1374177759969
2013-07-18 14:02:40,033 DEBUG [ehcache.store.MemoryStore]
(catalina-exec-13:null) UserDaoCache: UserDaoMemoryStore hit for 10
2013-07-18 14:02:40,112 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(catalina-exec-13:null) submit async job-5916, details: AsyncJobVO
{id:5916, use
rId: 10, accountId: 7, sessionKey: null, instanceType: SystemVm,
instanceId: 1024, cmd: com.cloud.api.commands.StartSystemVMCmd,
cmdOriginator:
null, cmdInfo:
Re: cold migrated VMs won't start
I agree, I have to work around that kind of issue once in a while. Most of the time I just destroy the instance and recreate it, specifying host, and let puppet do the rest of the work. The best way forward is to probably file a feature enhancement request and bring it up on the dev list. On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 1:03 AM, Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.comwrote: Thanks Ahmad, We were wondering about that, although we couldn't find anything that explicitly states that you can't migrate across pods in a basic zone. Our view was that there's no technical reason why the VM can't be started by the hypervisor - it would have to get a new ip (as dhcp in the vr would be incapable of giving it its orginal one) - but that would be our problem to deal with, and if our app was fqdn based - it wouldn't matter anyway. Regards, Paul Angus S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: CloudyAngus paul.an...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemne...@gmail.com] Sent: 23 July 2013 05:31 To: Cloudstack users mailing list Subject: Re: cold migrated VMs won't start Hey Paul, we'd probably need more logs... but my gut tells me its failing because the pod you migrated to isnt part of the same subnet the vm originally came from, thus cant allocate a 'suitable ip'. On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 4:15 AM, Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Guys has anyone seen this behaviour? After cold migrating a VM from one Pod to another we can't start the VM any more basic networking: (Xenserver 6.1 + ACS4.1) VM state transmitted from :Starting to Stopped with event: OperationFailedvm's original host id: null new host id: null host id before state transition: 3 Regards, Paul Angus *Senior Consultant / Cloud Architect* S: +44 20 3603 0540 +442036030540 | M: +4 +44796816158147711418784 | T: CloudyAngus paul.an...@shapeblue.com geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue https://twitter.com/ ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses 10/11 July, Bangalore, Indiahttp://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-bootcamp-training-course/ 21/22 August, Londonhttp://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-bootcamp-training-course/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: Console proxy functionalities
the console proxy vm is what provides the console view, of the vm, to the webui. On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:03 AM, Kashif Ali temujin...@gmail.com wrote: i read the document .all i understand is its use physical console of VM and have a public IP but i am confused about its functionality compared with web-based UI. On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Dean Kamali dean.kam...@gmail.com wrote: I don't want to be rude but he could have googled it or used the index properly On Jul 23, 2013 2:18 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com wrote: Refer to http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.1.0/html-single/Admin_Guide/index.html#console-proxy -Original Message- From: Kashif Ali [mailto:temujin...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 11:33 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Console proxy functionalities AOA every one i am new to cloudstack and i didnt understand the functionality of console proxy. Is console proxy is just a console view or something else. -- Regards, *Kashif Ali* Undergraduate Student | 7th Semester BESE-1A | NUST-SEECS | Islamabad 10besek...@seecs.edu.pk -- -- Regards, *Kashif Ali* Undergraduate Student | 7th Semester BESE-1A | NUST-SEECS | Islamabad 10besek...@seecs.edu.pk
Re: management server OS
according to the steps here: [1], yes [1] http://beingasysadmin.wordpress.com/2013/04/07/setting-up-apache-cloudstack/ On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:00 AM, Kashif Ali temujin...@gmail.com wrote: can cloudstack managment server support ubuntu 12.10 -- Regards, *Kashif Ali* Undergraduate Student | 7th Semester BESE-1A | NUST-SEECS | Islamabad 10besek...@seecs.edu.pk
Re: Console proxy functionalities
You know when you click the View Console button on an instance and a popup opens with a view of the instances console? Well what your seeing there comes from the instance's console via the console proxy. So it *proxies* the *console* of the instance for the end users who are on strange and distant networks. Best regards, David Comerford Tel: +353 87 1238295 Email: davest...@gmail.com Website: http://dave.ie GPG key: http://gpg.dave.ie On 23 July 2013 11:03, Kashif Ali temujin...@gmail.com wrote: i read the document .all i understand is its use physical console of VM and have a public IP but i am confused about its functionality compared with web-based UI. On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Dean Kamali dean.kam...@gmail.com wrote: I don't want to be rude but he could have googled it or used the index properly On Jul 23, 2013 2:18 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com wrote: Refer to http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.1.0/html-single/Admin_Guide/index.html#console-proxy -Original Message- From: Kashif Ali [mailto:temujin...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 11:33 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Console proxy functionalities AOA every one i am new to cloudstack and i didnt understand the functionality of console proxy. Is console proxy is just a console view or something else. -- Regards, *Kashif Ali* Undergraduate Student | 7th Semester BESE-1A | NUST-SEECS | Islamabad 10besek...@seecs.edu.pk -- -- Regards, *Kashif Ali* Undergraduate Student | 7th Semester BESE-1A | NUST-SEECS | Islamabad 10besek...@seecs.edu.pk
Re: cloud-usage heap
Have it fixed now. Increased -Xmx in /etc/cloud/management/tomcat6.conf and restarted services. Best regards, David Comerford Tel: +353 87 1238295 Email: davest...@gmail.com Website: http://dave.ie GPG key: http://gpg.dave.ie On 23 July 2013 03:23, Dave Dunaway dave.duna...@gmail.com wrote: Dynamically, only because it's not otherwise specified in the options when starting up the JVM. You can edit the script it calls (check the /etc/init.d/cloud-usage script for the actual name) and add in some -Xmx 1024mb or something and see how that works. Could also be a ulimit rather than an actual memory allocation issue. Check that the user running the service can allocate enough resources to the jvm (virtual, open files, etc) so it can create enough threads. The error you posted seems like it dies off pretty quickly but that it can at least start the JVM up, so checking ulimits shed some light. hth. On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 7:56 PM, David Comerford davest...@gmail.com wrote: If I understand you correctly your saying it's dynamically determined when it starts? If that's the case, why is this instance failing to start with ~13GB of memory free (including buffers/cache) Best regards, David Comerford Tel: +353 87 1238295 Email: davest...@gmail.com Website: http://dave.ie GPG key: http://gpg.dave.ie On 22 July 2013 21:27, Dave Dunaway dave.duna...@gmail.com wrote: The mgmt server will get started as a webapp out of Tomcat, so you can check the /etc/cloud/management/tomcat6.conf in which you see it is set to use -Xmx1024m . The usage server is not part of tomcat and does not specify an -Xmx so it used the runtime determine value based on config and resources. hth. On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 2:44 PM, David Comerford davest...@gmail.com wrote: Don't see anything like there in server.xml. There is some useful JAVA_OPTS in /etc/cloud/tomcat6.conf but I don't know if that's specific to cloud-management or shared with cloud-usage. Any thoughts? Best regards, David Comerford Tel: +353 87 1238295 Email: davest...@gmail.com Website: http://dave.ie GPG key: http://gpg.dave.ie On 22 July 2013 15:38, Dean Kamali dean.kam...@gmail.com wrote: it should be somewhere in server.xml On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 9:20 AM, David Comerford davest...@gmail.com wrote: Hi list, Anyone know where the Java heap size is defined for cloud-usage server? And is it a shared heap with cloud-management? I've got an upset usage server that wants more memory. 11:18:39,444 INFO UsageManagerImpl:232 - Starting Usage Manager 2013-07-22 11:18:39,444 INFO [cloud.usage.UsageManagerImpl] (main:null) Starting Usage Manager Exception in thread main java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: unable to create new native thread at java.lang.Thread.start0(Native Method) at java.lang.Thread.start(Thread.java:657) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.addWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:943) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.prestartCoreThread(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1536) more exception trimmed Best regards, David Comerford Tel: +353 87 1238295 Email: davest...@gmail.com Website: http://dave.ie GPG key: http://gpg.dave.ie
Re: How to backup cloudstack data?
I can copy all templates,isos files,and the nearest 1 day snapshots. If I have these files and the db backupfile,how can I rebuild the vms? I must create a temp template from the root volume snapshot and create a new vm with the temp template,and then create a data volume from the data volume snapshot and attach it on the vm.Then delete the temp template. It will take a long time to rebuild a vm,Is there any easy way do rebuild all the vms? -- Original -- From: Kirk Jantzerkirk.jant...@gmail.com; Date: Tue, Jul 23, 2013 10:20 PM To: Cloudstack users mailing listusers@cloudstack.apache.org; Subject: Re: How to backup cloudstack data? We won't be able to tell you that. You will have to determine what is most important to your organization to backup. For simplicity, definitely backup the DB. If you wanted to backup anything, I'd probably suggest the secondary storage, as it contains the templates, isos, and snapshots; of which you'll likely be able to recover from (rebuild instances) more easily. On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:00 PM, WXR 1485739...@qq.com wrote: I use a storage device as my cloudstack primary and secondary storage.I can do redundant storage configuration on the device. But I must do a backup of the most important data on the storage device to another server.If the storage device is ruined for some reasons,I can restore the vms by using the backup data on the server. Each vm has its root and data volume files and the nearest 2 weeks snapshot files on the storage. If there is 50T data on the storage device(including volumes and snapshots),I can just copy 2T-10T of them to the backup server.Now the problem is which files should I copy and how to restore them. -- Original -- From: Ahmad Emneinaaemne...@gmail.com; Date: Tue, Jul 23, 2013 10:29 AM To: Cloudstack users mailing listusers@cloudstack.apache.org; Subject: Re: How to backup cloudstack data? I agree with Kirk here, configuration management for the virtual infra and the important bits of data should be made redundant at the storage level. Cloudstack has a snapshotting function but if your secondary storage server tanks, you'll be in a world of hurt. If you use cloudstack snapshotting, ensure your secondary storage is replicated or has plenty of redundant disks. On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Kirk Jantzer kirk.jant...@gmail.com wrote: I said this in another thread and figured I'd mention it here since it seems applicable. It is my belief that the cloud is the IaaS and that the applications that run on the cloud should be built for failure of the IaaS: they (instances/applications) should be rapidly deployable. So, it shouldn't matter what cloud product (openstack/cloudstack/vmware/aws/etc...) you provide to your customers, they should be able to redeploy their application where ever they go or are given for IaaS. With that said, if you really wanted to backup the VMs, you probably want to look at something that backed up thorough the storage device, or the hypervisor, and then backup the management and mysql db. On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:57 PM, WXR 1485739...@qq.com wrote: Virtual machines. I want to know how to do data backup and restore the vms when the cloudstack storage has been ruined totally. -- Original -- From: Nitin Mehtanitin.me...@citrix.com; Date: Mon, Jul 22, 2013 03:10 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgusers@cloudstack.apache.org; Subject: Re: How to backup cloudstack data? What is it that you want to back up ? Virtual machines, snapshots - anything else ? On 22/07/13 7:09 AM, WXR 1485739...@qq.com wrote: I want to do a full backup of cloudstack data and restore them to a new cloudstack,but I don't know which files should I copy and how to restore them. . -- Regards, Kirk Jantzer c: (678) 561-5475 http://about.met/kirkjantzer -- Regards, Kirk Jantzer c: (678) 561-5475 http://about.met/kirkjantzer
Re: Unable to migrate VM to another host
Dear David, Prasanna and all,
Good day to you, and thank you for your e-mail.
Thanks for the information and confirmation that the cloudstack-agent runs
as root and that CloudStack uses qemu+tcp (instead of qemu+ssh) on live
migration. Have also confirmed that auth_tcp is configured as none on
libvirtd on both hosts.
/etc/libvirt/libvirtd.conf:
auth_tcp=none
I have tried simulating a live migration directly on the hypervisor host
itself, and I can confirm that I can do the live migration manually (not
through CloudStack).
On the first host (hv-kvm-01):
root@hv-kvm-01:~# virsh list --all
IdName State
2 s-299-VM running
3 v-261-VM running
4 i-2-273-VM running
5 i-2-281-VM running
* 6 i-2-278-VM running*
7 i-33-287-VMrunning
root@hv-kvm-01:~# virsh migrate --live i-2-278-VM qemu+tcp://
root@10.237.3.22/system
After the migration:
root@hv-kvm-01:~# virsh list --all
IdName State
2 s-299-VM running
3 v-261-VM running
4 i-2-273-VM running
5 i-2-281-VM running
7 i-33-287-VMrunning
On the second (target) host (hv-kvm-02):
root@hv-kvm-02:~# virsh list --all
IdName State
2 r-271-VM running
3 i-2-275-VM running
4 i-2-276-VM running
5 i-34-289-VMrunning
6 i-2-293-VM running
* 8 i-2-278-VM running*
I can also do a live migration back from hv-kvm-02 to hv-kvm-01.
However, live migration through CloudStack GUI is still failing with the
same error message.
===
2013-07-24 11:47:36,944 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
(Job-Executor-1:job-658) Seq 32-1333264394: Sending { Cmd , MgmtId:
161342671900, via: 32, Ver: v1, Flags: 1001
11,
[{MigrateCommand:{vmName:i-2-281-VM,destIp:10.237.3.22,hostGuid:00dd5dba-7419-3689-bc51-1671035c0d8f-LibvirtComputingResource,isWindows:false,wait
:0}}] }
2013-07-24 11:47:37,712 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
(AgentManager-Handler-3:null) Seq 32-1333264394: Processing: { Ans: ,
MgmtId: 161342671900, via: 32, Ver: v1, F
lags: 110, [{MigrateAnswer:{result:false,details:End of file while
reading data: Input/output error,wait:0}}] }
2013-07-24 11:47:37,713 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentAttache]
(AgentManager-Handler-3:null) Seq 32-1333264394: No more commands found
2013-07-24 11:47:37,713 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
(Job-Executor-1:job-658) Seq 32-1333264394: Received: { Ans: , MgmtId:
161342671900, via: 32, Ver: v1, Flags: 1
10, { MigrateAnswer } }
2013-07-24 11:47:37,713 ERROR [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-1:job-658) Unable to migrate due to End of file while reading
data: Input/output error
2013-07-24 11:47:37,713 INFO [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-1:job-658) Migration was unsuccessful. Cleaning up:
VM[User|CentOS59-64bit]
===
Therefore, it seems that the problem is on the CloudStack's end rather than
libvirt's and/or QEMU/KVM's end. I am really at loss on how to resolve this
problem now.
Any help is greatly appreciated. Live migration is very important and I
can't move forward without this important feature.
Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
Cheers.
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:27 AM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 08:18:31AM -0600, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
There is no cloud user on the host/agent side. Agent runs as root. Or is
this an experiment to try to run the agent as another user?
That was entirely my mistake. I just went about thinking the agents
ran as cloud (ssvm, cpvm, kvm agent). Looking at my deployment it
seems that /etc/sudoers has an entry for cloud but the service runs as
root. My apologies for misleading on that.
On Jul 23, 2013 4:44 AM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 06:19:06PM +0800, Indra Pramana wrote:
Dear Prasanna and all,
I have tried to remove the host from CloudStack, uninstall and
reinstall
cloudstack-agent and added the host back into CloudStack. The cloud
user-id is still not yet created. I then tried to add the cloud
user
manually, using exactly the same credentials as the cloud user on
the
other host.
From the host, I tried to do a virsh connect qemu+ssh to the other
host
using the cloud user (instead of root), and getting this error:
cloud@hv-kvm-01:~$ virsh --connect qemu+ssh://
cloud@10.237.3.22/systemlist
cloud@10.237.3.22's password:
error: failed to connect to the
Re: Generating OS Templates
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:03:31PM -0300, Celso Fernandes wrote: Hi Prasanna, Didn't understand where you puppet provisioning is absent, on packer? yes - you can use a shell script though to do a puppet apply. i fall back on vagrant instead since vagrant already can provision using puppet. $ packer build template.json $ vagrant add template.box template $ vagrant up/vagrant provision (rinse/repeat) -- Prasanna., Powered by BigRock.com
Hosts in CloudStack's avoid set
Dear all, Good day to you. From time to time, CloudStack will put a hypervisor host on avoid set and not willing to deploy VM on that host. === 2013-07-24 13:12:34,639 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] (Job-Executor-2:job-672 FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host name: hv-kvm-02, hostId: 28 is in avoid set, skipping this and trying other available hosts 2013-07-24 13:12:34,639 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] (Job-Executor-2:job-672 FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host name: hv-kvm-01, hostId: 32 is in avoid set, skipping this and trying other available hosts === 1. What are the possible reasons on why CloudStack would put a hypervisor host on avoid set? 2. How to manually force CloudStack to remove the hypervisor host from its avoid set? Looking forward to your reply, thank you. Cheers.
Re: CloudStack performance issue
Hi David, Good day to you, and thank you for your e-mail. Most of my templates are on 100 GB root disk, which I understand is too big. I plan to recreate the templates on a 10 GB disk, which should be sufficient based on an advice from another member of this mailing list on another thread. Do you think that might be the cause? I hope that deployment time will be much faster after I recreated the templates. Thank you. On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 1:22 AM, David Ortiz dpor...@outlook.com wrote: Indra, How big are the templates you are attempting to deploy? I could see the 1 Gbps connection being a little bit of a bottleneck, but it sounds like there may be something else going on. I know we would have issues on our setup which is on 1 Gbps connections at the moment if we tried to do multiple snapshots at once, but we could normally get away with deploying a couple VMs at once within a few minutes. As for the question about how they are being copied, I am not 100% confident on this, but I believe it is copied via the SSVM, so it would be going secondary storage -- hypervisor host -- primary storage. Hopefully someone will correct me if I am wrong on that. -David Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 12:33:17 +0800 Subject: Re: CloudStack performance issue From: in...@sg.or.id To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Hi David, Good day to you, and thank you for your e-mail. My secondary storage is connected to the switch using 1 Gbps connection, while my primary storage is connected via a 10 Gbps connection. Unfortunately I don't have 10G NIC cards on my secondary storage. Do you think upgrading my secondary storage's NIC to 10 Gbps will help? May I know how the template and ISOs are being copied, is it through the hypervisor host (e.g. secondary storage -- hypervisor host -- primary storage) or directly (i.e. secondary storage -- primary storage)? My primary storage is not on the same subnet/VLAN as secondary storage, since it's connected to different NIC cards on the hypervisor hosts. If it's a direct connection between secondary storage to primary storage without going to the hypervisor, I might be considering changing my network topology to make the primary and secondary storage to be on the same subnet/VLAN. Looking forward to your reply, thank you. Cheers. On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:19 AM, David Ortiz dpor...@outlook.com wrote: Meant that question for Indra. Sorry. From: dpor...@outlook.com To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: CloudStack performance issue Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 11:34:10 -0400 Prasanna, What kind of network do you use for your setup? Creating a new VM requires copying the template or ISO over from secondary storage to primary, so that could be a bottleneck when trying to create multiple VMs at once. -Dave Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 16:20:08 +0530 From: t...@apache.org To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: CloudStack performance issue On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 03:18:12PM +0800, Indra Pramana wrote: Where can I start troubleshooting, which logs I need to go through to find out the bottleneck? The management-server.log file doesn't show much anything about the delay. It seems that there is some locking mechanism and certain processes will need other processes to complete before they can start. This is worrying since in a production environment, many customers might want to try creating VMs at the same time simultaneously. The logs of use would be managment-server.log which defaults to DEBUG mode. The logs on the agent (inside KVM host) are default in INFO mode. You can turn them up to DEBUG by altering the log4j config. Apart from that you can also look at libvirt logs. Folks have been tuning the deployment of the VMs on KVM host in another thread on dev@ and in the bug https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3163 let us know if the symptoms are the same and you can bring this up on dev@ with more details. Any thoughts or feedback on this matter is appreciated. Looking forward to your reply, thank you. Cheers. -- Prasanna., Powered by BigRock.com
Re: How to backup cloudstack data?
management : /etc/cloud/* /var/lib/cloud/management DB: mysql master slave node: xenserver or kvm (one cluster not less than three host ) storage: if you used local storage , the node all date need backup if you nas : backup primary and secondary storage path ,when you restore ,need same as before ,or update mysql table secondary storage can backup every primary only vm storage ,you can take every vm snapshots ,its will backup to secondary storage 2013/7/24 WXR 1485739...@qq.com I can copy all templates,isos files,and the nearest 1 day snapshots. If I have these files and the db backupfile,how can I rebuild the vms? I must create a temp template from the root volume snapshot and create a new vm with the temp template,and then create a data volume from the data volume snapshot and attach it on the vm.Then delete the temp template. It will take a long time to rebuild a vm,Is there any easy way do rebuild all the vms? -- Original -- From: Kirk Jantzerkirk.jant...@gmail.com; Date: Tue, Jul 23, 2013 10:20 PM To: Cloudstack users mailing listusers@cloudstack.apache.org; Subject: Re: How to backup cloudstack data? We won't be able to tell you that. You will have to determine what is most important to your organization to backup. For simplicity, definitely backup the DB. If you wanted to backup anything, I'd probably suggest the secondary storage, as it contains the templates, isos, and snapshots; of which you'll likely be able to recover from (rebuild instances) more easily. On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:00 PM, WXR 1485739...@qq.com wrote: I use a storage device as my cloudstack primary and secondary storage.I can do redundant storage configuration on the device. But I must do a backup of the most important data on the storage device to another server.If the storage device is ruined for some reasons,I can restore the vms by using the backup data on the server. Each vm has its root and data volume files and the nearest 2 weeks snapshot files on the storage. If there is 50T data on the storage device(including volumes and snapshots),I can just copy 2T-10T of them to the backup server.Now the problem is which files should I copy and how to restore them. -- Original -- From: Ahmad Emneinaaemne...@gmail.com; Date: Tue, Jul 23, 2013 10:29 AM To: Cloudstack users mailing listusers@cloudstack.apache.org; Subject: Re: How to backup cloudstack data? I agree with Kirk here, configuration management for the virtual infra and the important bits of data should be made redundant at the storage level. Cloudstack has a snapshotting function but if your secondary storage server tanks, you'll be in a world of hurt. If you use cloudstack snapshotting, ensure your secondary storage is replicated or has plenty of redundant disks. On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Kirk Jantzer kirk.jant...@gmail.com wrote: I said this in another thread and figured I'd mention it here since it seems applicable. It is my belief that the cloud is the IaaS and that the applications that run on the cloud should be built for failure of the IaaS: they (instances/applications) should be rapidly deployable. So, it shouldn't matter what cloud product (openstack/cloudstack/vmware/aws/etc...) you provide to your customers, they should be able to redeploy their application where ever they go or are given for IaaS. With that said, if you really wanted to backup the VMs, you probably want to look at something that backed up thorough the storage device, or the hypervisor, and then backup the management and mysql db. On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:57 PM, WXR 1485739...@qq.com wrote: Virtual machines. I want to know how to do data backup and restore the vms when the cloudstack storage has been ruined totally. -- Original -- From: Nitin Mehtanitin.me...@citrix.com; Date: Mon, Jul 22, 2013 03:10 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgusers@cloudstack.apache.org; Subject: Re: How to backup cloudstack data? What is it that you want to back up ? Virtual machines, snapshots - anything else ? On 22/07/13 7:09 AM, WXR 1485739...@qq.com wrote: I want to do a full backup of cloudstack data and restore them to a new cloudstack,but I don't know which files should I copy and how to restore them. . -- Regards, Kirk Jantzer c: (678) 561-5475 http://about.met/kirkjantzer -- Regards, Kirk Jantzer c: (678) 561-5475 http://about.met/kirkjantzer
