对cloudstack的几点疑问
刚刚入门，对cloudstack环境不是很熟悉，现有如下疑问，希望各位大神不吝赐教，感激不尽 1.新建虚机的虚机组有什么作用，在ui上未发现发出其他调用虚机组的命令 2.基础架构上有个更新ssl是什么作用，具体什么时候需要更新ssl 3.很多地方可以添加标签如实例详单最下方的标签选项需要填写密钥和值。这个标签有什么作用密钥该怎么填写
q
q
Re: q
Hello Sent from Yahoo! Mail on Android
Reply: Re: q
say hello to your sister！ -- 来自易信 在2013年11月1日 21:32:36, Luis lt;lmartinez...@yahoo.comgt;写道： Hello Sent from Yahoo! Mail on Android
Adv network traffic assignment help
Hi All, I have KVM host on Centos 6.4 running CS 4.2 with 3 network bridges. cloudbr0 - Management, Storage cloudbr1 - Public cloudbr2 - Guest In the Advanced networking wizard how do I assign each traffic type to its corresponding bridge ? Do I have to name the labels with the bridge name? Thanks, Jacob
Re: Unable to deploy VM on new cluster/host (with xenserver)
Just so you know, zone wide primary storage is not currently supported by XenServer, that's why you had to add a dedicated primary storage for your XenServer Cluster. Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3603 0542tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540tel:+442036030540 | M: +447968161581tel:+447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.commailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS On 1 Nov 2013, at 00:34, Nux! n...@li.nux.romailto:n...@li.nux.ro wrote: On 01.11.2013 00:22, Eric Tykwinski wrote: It looks like you didn't assign the primary storage to Xen. 013-10-31 23:57:36,080 DEBUG [storage.allocator.ClusterScopeStoragePoolAllocator] (Job-Executor-3:job-28 = [ b52e0a27-9f1c-4e15-aef6-0e758333b2e3 ]) No storage pools available for shared volume allocation, returning But I already had a zone-wide primary storage that I was using with the existing KVM. I though it would inherit that automatically.. Anyway, adding a new primary storage for the Xenserver cluster fixed my problem. Thanks a lot! Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.rohttp://www.nux.ro This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: Adv network traffic assignment help
On Nov 1, 2013, at 8:59 AM, Jake G. dj_dark_jungl...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi All, I have KVM host on Centos 6.4 running CS 4.2 with 3 network bridges. cloudbr0 - Management, Storage cloudbr1 - Public cloudbr2 - Guest In the Advanced networking wizard how do I assign each traffic type to its corresponding bridge ? In the zone creation, you see icons for each traffic type, click on the icon and enter the name of the corresponding bridge. Do I have to name the labels with the bridge name? Thanks, Jacob
RE: Adv network traffic assignment help
Jake, Take a look at slides 20 21 http://www.slideshare.net/ShapeBlue/introduction-to-cloud-stack-networking Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: 01 November 2013 08:44 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; Jake G. Subject: Re: Adv network traffic assignment help On Nov 1, 2013, at 8:59 AM, Jake G. dj_dark_jungl...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi All, I have KVM host on Centos 6.4 running CS 4.2 with 3 network bridges. cloudbr0 - Management, Storage cloudbr1 - Public cloudbr2 - Guest In the Advanced networking wizard how do I assign each traffic type to its corresponding bridge ? In the zone creation, you see icons for each traffic type, click on the icon and enter the name of the corresponding bridge. Do I have to name the labels with the bridge name? Thanks, Jacob This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: Unable to deploy VM on new cluster/host (with xenserver)
On 01.11.2013 08:33, Geoff Higginbottom wrote: Just so you know, zone wide primary storage is not currently supported by XenServer, that's why you had to add a dedicated primary storage for your XenServer Cluster. Oh, ok, thanks for that! I was getting confused with this zone-wide primary storage that is not zone-wide. :) -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro
Re: [poll] linux template disk size
Hi Lucian, Op 31 oktober 2013 om 22:35 schreef Nux! n...@li.nux.ro: Hello, Given the fact root disks can't be resized it has become quite important for me to come up with a proper way of partitioning cloudstack linux VMs. I'd like to find out what size are people usually using for their templates or what size have they found appropiate/practical? Any thoughts on partitioning scheme? The templates we make available to our clients are 20GB. This seems to be enough for them, if they need more space the can add a datadisk. For systems like Ubuntu and CentOS it seems less that 10GB can become tricky on the long term. We use LVM for the partitioning so you could extend you root device over the datadisk. But it's not something that we do quite often, normally we just add a data drive (which can be resized) and mount it as homedir (cause this has the most data in most cases) for example. Hope this answers your question! Regards, Lennert Thanks, Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro
RE: [poll] linux template disk size
I agree with Lennert, 20GB for Linux is a good size for the Template. For windows, I would recommend using something in the region of 80GB as it can get bloated with updates etc. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Lennert den Teuling [mailto:lenn...@pcextreme.nl] Sent: 01 November 2013 11:58 To: users Subject: Re: [poll] linux template disk size Hi Lucian, Op 31 oktober 2013 om 22:35 schreef Nux! n...@li.nux.ro: Hello, Given the fact root disks can't be resized it has become quite important for me to come up with a proper way of partitioning cloudstack linux VMs. I'd like to find out what size are people usually using for their templates or what size have they found appropiate/practical? Any thoughts on partitioning scheme? The templates we make available to our clients are 20GB. This seems to be enough for them, if they need more space the can add a datadisk. For systems like Ubuntu and CentOS it seems less that 10GB can become tricky on the long term. We use LVM for the partitioning so you could extend you root device over the datadisk. But it's not something that we do quite often, normally we just add a data drive (which can be resized) and mount it as homedir (cause this has the most data in most cases) for example. Hope this answers your question! Regards, Lennert Thanks, Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Which vhd-util
Hello All , We have a problem about provisioning system VM¹s and focused vhd-util Problem is we have to copy vhd-util under management node. I found one from http://download.cloud.com.s3.amazonaws.com/tools/vhd-util And also under Xen Server /usr/bin there is another vhd_util there Bot size very different , which one i have to use , or which one are you using ? -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 5908 Jun 14 15:58 vhd-util -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 318977 Sep 19 2012 vhd-util_amazon Second all vhd-utils on Management and Xen server should be same ? Or i do not have to care about Xen Server. Regards VM
Secondary storage where to mounted
Hello All , We are facing very interesting issue and its push to understand secondary storage connectivity between Xen servers and cloudstack management server. We configured secondary storage and got no any error on UI. We are wondering where this url should be mounted ? Means if we execute mount on management server should we see it as a mounted on management server ? Regards VM
RE: [poll] linux template disk size
On 01.11.2013 12:01, Geoff Higginbottom wrote: I agree with Lennert, 20GB for Linux is a good size for the Template. For windows, I would recommend using something in the region of 80GB as it can get bloated with updates etc. -Original Message- From: Lennert den Teuling [mailto:lenn...@pcextreme.nl] Sent: 01 November 2013 11:58 To: users Subject: Re: [poll] linux template disk size The templates we make available to our clients are 20GB. This seems to be enough for them, if they need more space the can add a datadisk. For systems like Ubuntu and CentOS it seems less that 10GB can become tricky on the long term. We use LVM for the partitioning so you could extend you root device over the datadisk. But it's not something that we do quite often, normally we just add a data drive (which can be resized) and mount it as homedir (cause this has the most data in most cases) for example. Thanks guys. This helps. I was also looking at 20 GB + LVM as a very generic layout. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro
RE: Secondary storage where to mounted
Vahric, Your question is not very clear, and I think you included an image, but this list strips images. Please re phrase your question and if your image will help, you need to include a link to your image, but not the actual image. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540tel:+442036030540 | M: +447968161581tel:+447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.commailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com From: Vahric Muhtaryan [mailto:vah...@doruk.net.tr] Sent: 01 November 2013 12:53 To: CloudStack SupportMailingList Subject: Secondary storage where to mounted Hello All , We are facing very interesting issue and its push to understand secondary storage connectivity between Xen servers and cloudstack management server. We configured secondary storage and got no any error on UI. [cid:90FD05BF-0362-4B82-A8D2-08020F7527C6] We are wondering where this url should be mounted ? Means if we execute mount on management server should we see it as a mounted on management server ? Regards VM This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
RE: Which vhd-util
Vahric, For XenServer installs, run the following on the Management Server, this will download the correct VHD Util file cd /usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/vm/hypervisor/xenserver/ wget http://download.cloud.com.s3.amazonaws.com/tools/vhd-util chmod 755 /usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/vm/hypervisor/xenserver/vhd-util Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Vahric Muhtaryan [mailto:vah...@doruk.net.tr] Sent: 01 November 2013 12:50 To: CloudStack SupportMailingList Subject: Which vhd-util Hello All , We have a problem about provisioning system VM¹s and focused vhd-util Problem is we have to copy vhd-util under management node. I found one from http://download.cloud.com.s3.amazonaws.com/tools/vhd-util And also under Xen Server /usr/bin there is another vhd_util there Bot size very different , which one i have to use , or which one are you using ? -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 5908 Jun 14 15:58 vhd-util -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 318977 Sep 19 2012 vhd-util_amazon Second all vhd-utils on Management and Xen server should be same ? Or i do not have to care about Xen Server. Regards VM This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
System VMs couldn't up
Hello,
We newly installed and configured zone and faced system vm issue.
They can¹t run and they are in loop now :D
Two interesting message
One : 2013-11-01 14:04:50,029 INFO
[cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
Primary secondary storage is not even started, wait until next turn
We can not understand why and who will up the Primary Secondary storage ?
Other issue is , we can not understand host:2 unreachable , all connection
are ok , cloudstack see green up and running
2013-11-01 14:42:09,495 WARN
[storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
Exception while trying to start secondary storage vm
com.cloud.exception.AgentUnavailableException: Resource [Host:2] is
unreachable: Host 2: Unable to start instance due to null
at
com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStart(VirtualMachineManagerImp
l.java:988)
at
com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:
578)
at
com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:
571)
at
com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.startSecStorageVm(Se
condaryStorageManagerImpl.java:267)
at
com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.allocCapacity(Second
aryStorageManagerImpl.java:696)
at
com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.expandPool(Secondary
StorageManagerImpl.java:1300)
at
com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(PremiumSeco
ndaryStorageManagerImpl.java:123)
at
com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(PremiumSeco
ndaryStorageManagerImpl.java:50)
at com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.loadScan(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:104)
at com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.access$100(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:33)
at com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.reallyRun(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:81)
at com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.run(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:72)
at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471)
at
java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRunAndReset(FutureTask.java:351)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:178)
at
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$
201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:165)
at
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(Sch
eduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:267)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:11
46)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:6
15)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679)
Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
at
org.apache.cloudstack.storage.volume.VolumeServiceImpl.createBaseImageAsync(
VolumeServiceImpl.java:422)
at
org.apache.cloudstack.storage.volume.VolumeServiceImpl.createVolumeFromTempl
ateAsync(VolumeServiceImpl.java:569)
at
com.cloud.storage.VolumeManagerImpl.recreateVolume(VolumeManagerImpl.java:25
36)
at com.cloud.storage.VolumeManagerImpl.prepare(VolumeManagerImpl.java:2592)
at
com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStart(VirtualMachineManagerImp
l.java:889)
... 20 more
2013-11-01 14:42:09,496 INFO
[storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null) Unable
to start secondary storage vm for standby capacity, secStorageVm vm Id :
244, will recycle it and start a new one
But another interesting message is below , under /var/run/ there is no
cloud_mount folder under and also no guid there ?!
2013-11-01 14:42:06,169 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
(DirectAgent-321:null) Seq 1-1414201462: Processing: { Ans: , MgmtId:
345049864043, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 110,
[{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCmdAnswer:{result:false,det
ails:Catch Exception com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException for
template + due to com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: can't
mount 10.110.200.204:/vahric/secondary//template/tmpl/1/1 to
/var/run/cloud_mount/fe70ecb9-4615-4a94-b5e9-f66b229d2d36,wait:0}}] }
Could you help me pls ?
Regards
VM
Re: Secondary storage where to mounted
Sir , My question is after set secondary storage on zone config , should i have to see mount point already mounted on management node or on Xen Servers or both ? Regards VM On 01/11/13 14:59, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: Vahric, Your question is not very clear, and I think you included an image, but this list strips images. Please re phrase your question and if your image will help, you need to include a link to your image, but not the actual image. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540tel:+442036030540 | M: +447968161581tel:+447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.commailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com From: Vahric Muhtaryan [mailto:vah...@doruk.net.tr] Sent: 01 November 2013 12:53 To: CloudStack SupportMailingList Subject: Secondary storage where to mounted Hello All , We are facing very interesting issue and its push to understand secondary storage connectivity between Xen servers and cloudstack management server. We configured secondary storage and got no any error on UI. [cid:90FD05BF-0362-4B82-A8D2-08020F7527C6] We are wondering where this url should be mounted ? Means if we execute mount on management server should we see it as a mounted on management server ? Regards VM This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
RE: System VMs couldn't up
Suggest you take a look at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSVM,+templates,+Secondary+storage+troubleshooting
This should help you troubleshoot SSVM isssues.
Regards
Geoff Higginbottom
D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
-Original Message-
From: Vahric Muhtaryan [mailto:vah...@doruk.net.tr]
Sent: 01 November 2013 13:21
To: CloudStack SupportMailingList
Subject: System VMs couldn't up
Hello,
We newly installed and configured zone and faced system vm issue.
They can¹t run and they are in loop now :D
Two interesting message
One : 2013-11-01 14:04:50,029 INFO
[cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
Primary secondary storage is not even started, wait until next turn
We can not understand why and who will up the Primary Secondary storage ?
Other issue is , we can not understand host:2 unreachable , all connection are
ok , cloudstack see green up and running
2013-11-01 14:42:09,495 WARN
[storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null) Exception
while trying to start secondary storage vm
com.cloud.exception.AgentUnavailableException: Resource [Host:2] is
unreachable: Host 2: Unable to start instance due to null
at
com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStart(VirtualMachineManagerImp
l.java:988)
at
com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:
578)
at
com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:
571)
at
com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.startSecStorageVm(Se
condaryStorageManagerImpl.java:267)
at
com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.allocCapacity(Second
aryStorageManagerImpl.java:696)
at
com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.expandPool(Secondary
StorageManagerImpl.java:1300)
at
com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(PremiumSeco
ndaryStorageManagerImpl.java:123)
at
com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(PremiumSeco
ndaryStorageManagerImpl.java:50)
at com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.loadScan(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:104)
at com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.access$100(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:33)
at com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.reallyRun(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:81)
at com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.run(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:72)
at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471)
at
java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRunAndReset(FutureTask.java:351)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:178)
at
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$
201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:165)
at
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(Sch
eduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:267)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:11
46)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:6
15)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679)
Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
at
org.apache.cloudstack.storage.volume.VolumeServiceImpl.createBaseImageAsync(
VolumeServiceImpl.java:422)
at
org.apache.cloudstack.storage.volume.VolumeServiceImpl.createVolumeFromTempl
ateAsync(VolumeServiceImpl.java:569)
at
com.cloud.storage.VolumeManagerImpl.recreateVolume(VolumeManagerImpl.java:25
36)
at com.cloud.storage.VolumeManagerImpl.prepare(VolumeManagerImpl.java:2592)
at
com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStart(VirtualMachineManagerImp
l.java:889)
... 20 more
2013-11-01 14:42:09,496 INFO
[storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null) Unable to
start secondary storage vm for standby capacity, secStorageVm vm Id :
244, will recycle it and start a new one
But another interesting message is below , under /var/run/ there is no
cloud_mount folder under and also no guid there ?!
2013-11-01 14:42:06,169 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
(DirectAgent-321:null) Seq 1-1414201462: Processing: { Ans: , MgmtId:
345049864043, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 110,
[{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCmdAnswer:{result:false,det
ails:Catch Exception com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException for
template + due to com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: can't mount
10.110.200.204:/vahric/secondary//template/tmpl/1/1 to
/var/run/cloud_mount/fe70ecb9-4615-4a94-b5e9-f66b229d2d36,wait:0}}] }
Could you help me pls ?
Regards
VM
This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you
RE: Secondary storage where to mounted
Secondary Storage is mounted manually on the Management Server only when you deploy the System VM Template, either during initial deployment, or suring upgrades. The Host will auto mount secondary storage when it needs to copy a template to Primary Storage, it will then auto un-mount secondary storage. You will not see this in XenCenter, but can monitor it from the file system. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Vahric Muhtaryan [mailto:vah...@doruk.net.tr] Sent: 01 November 2013 13:27 To: CloudStack SupportMailingList Subject: Re: Secondary storage where to mounted Sir , My question is after set secondary storage on zone config , should i have to see mount point already mounted on management node or on Xen Servers or both ? Regards VM On 01/11/13 14:59, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: Vahric, Your question is not very clear, and I think you included an image, but this list strips images. Please re phrase your question and if your image will help, you need to include a link to your image, but not the actual image. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540tel:+442036030540 | M: +447968161581tel:+447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.commailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.co m From: Vahric Muhtaryan [mailto:vah...@doruk.net.tr] Sent: 01 November 2013 12:53 To: CloudStack SupportMailingList Subject: Secondary storage where to mounted Hello All , We are facing very interesting issue and its push to understand secondary storage connectivity between Xen servers and cloudstack management server. We configured secondary storage and got no any error on UI. [cid:90FD05BF-0362-4B82-A8D2-08020F7527C6] We are wondering where this url should be mounted ? Means if we execute mount on management server should we see it as a mounted on management server ? Regards VM This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: Secondary storage where to mounted
Thanks VM On 01/11/13 15:30, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: Secondary Storage is mounted manually on the Management Server only when you deploy the System VM Template, either during initial deployment, or suring upgrades. The Host will auto mount secondary storage when it needs to copy a template to Primary Storage, it will then auto un-mount secondary storage. You will not see this in XenCenter, but can monitor it from the file system. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Vahric Muhtaryan [mailto:vah...@doruk.net.tr] Sent: 01 November 2013 13:27 To: CloudStack SupportMailingList Subject: Re: Secondary storage where to mounted Sir , My question is after set secondary storage on zone config , should i have to see mount point already mounted on management node or on Xen Servers or both ? Regards VM On 01/11/13 14:59, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: Vahric, Your question is not very clear, and I think you included an image, but this list strips images. Please re phrase your question and if your image will help, you need to include a link to your image, but not the actual image. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540tel:+442036030540 | M: +447968161581tel:+447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.commailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.co m From: Vahric Muhtaryan [mailto:vah...@doruk.net.tr] Sent: 01 November 2013 12:53 To: CloudStack SupportMailingList Subject: Secondary storage where to mounted Hello All , We are facing very interesting issue and its push to understand secondary storage connectivity between Xen servers and cloudstack management server. We configured secondary storage and got no any error on UI. [cid:90FD05BF-0362-4B82-A8D2-08020F7527C6] We are wondering where this url should be mounted ? Means if we execute mount on management server should we see it as a mounted on management server ? Regards VM This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: Which vhd-util
2013.11.01. 13:50 keltezéssel, Vahric Muhtaryan írta: Second all vhd-utils on Management and Xen server should be same ? Or i do not have to care about Xen Server. Actually I tried to run vhd-utils on ubuntu, with no success, but I think, this is not needed. Do this on all xenserver node: wget http://download.cloud.com.s3.amazonaws.com/tools/vhd-util chmod +x vhd-util cp vhd-util /opt/xensource/bin/ And then you will be fine. Regards, Fazy
Re: Which vhd-util
thanks On 01/11/13 15:06, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: Vahric, For XenServer installs, run the following on the Management Server, this will download the correct VHD Util file cd /usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/vm/hypervisor/xenserver/ wget http://download.cloud.com.s3.amazonaws.com/tools/vhd-util chmod 755 /usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/vm/hypervisor/xenserver/vhd-util Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Vahric Muhtaryan [mailto:vah...@doruk.net.tr] Sent: 01 November 2013 12:50 To: CloudStack SupportMailingList Subject: Which vhd-util Hello All , We have a problem about provisioning system VM¹s and focused vhd-util Problem is we have to copy vhd-util under management node. I found one from http://download.cloud.com.s3.amazonaws.com/tools/vhd-util And also under Xen Server /usr/bin there is another vhd_util there Bot size very different , which one i have to use , or which one are you using ? -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 5908 Jun 14 15:58 vhd-util -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 318977 Sep 19 2012 vhd-util_amazon Second all vhd-utils on Management and Xen server should be same ? Or i do not have to care about Xen Server. Regards VM This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: System VMs couldn't up
Dear Geoff,
SSVM is not installed , your link provided show something after SSVM
deployed, isn’t it ?
Regards
VM
On 01/11/13 15:28, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
wrote:
Suggest you take a look at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSVM,+templates,+Se
condary+storage+troubleshooting
This should help you troubleshoot SSVM isssues.
Regards
Geoff Higginbottom
D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
-Original Message-
From: Vahric Muhtaryan [mailto:vah...@doruk.net.tr]
Sent: 01 November 2013 13:21
To: CloudStack SupportMailingList
Subject: System VMs couldn't up
Hello,
We newly installed and configured zone and faced system vm issue.
They can¹t run and they are in loop now :D
Two interesting message
One : 2013-11-01 14:04:50,029 INFO
[cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
Primary secondary storage is not even started, wait until next turn
We can not understand why and who will up the Primary Secondary storage ?
Other issue is , we can not understand host:2 unreachable , all
connection are ok , cloudstack see green up and running
2013-11-01 14:42:09,495 WARN
[storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
Exception while trying to start secondary storage vm
com.cloud.exception.AgentUnavailableException: Resource [Host:2] is
unreachable: Host 2: Unable to start instance due to null
at
com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStart(VirtualMachineManagerI
mp
l.java:988)
at
com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.jav
a:
578)
at
com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.jav
a:
571)
at
com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.startSecStorageVm(
Se
condaryStorageManagerImpl.java:267)
at
com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.allocCapacity(Seco
nd
aryStorageManagerImpl.java:696)
at
com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.expandPool(Seconda
ry
StorageManagerImpl.java:1300)
at
com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(PremiumSe
co
ndaryStorageManagerImpl.java:123)
at
com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(PremiumSe
co
ndaryStorageManagerImpl.java:50)
at com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.loadScan(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:104)
at
com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.access$100(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:33)
at
com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.reallyRun(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:81)
at com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.run(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:72)
at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471)
at
java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRunAndReset(FutureTask.java:351)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:178)
at
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.acces
s$
201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:165)
at
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(S
ch
eduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:267)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:
11
46)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java
:6
15)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679)
Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
at
org.apache.cloudstack.storage.volume.VolumeServiceImpl.createBaseImageAsyn
c(
VolumeServiceImpl.java:422)
at
org.apache.cloudstack.storage.volume.VolumeServiceImpl.createVolumeFromTem
pl
ateAsync(VolumeServiceImpl.java:569)
at
com.cloud.storage.VolumeManagerImpl.recreateVolume(VolumeManagerImpl.java:
25
36)
at
com.cloud.storage.VolumeManagerImpl.prepare(VolumeManagerImpl.java:2592)
at
com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStart(VirtualMachineManagerI
mp
l.java:889)
... 20 more
2013-11-01 14:42:09,496 INFO
[storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
Unable to start secondary storage vm for standby capacity, secStorageVm
vm Id :
244, will recycle it and start a new one
But another interesting message is below , under /var/run/ there is no
cloud_mount folder under and also no guid there ?!
2013-11-01 14:42:06,169 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
(DirectAgent-321:null) Seq 1-1414201462: Processing: { Ans: , MgmtId:
345049864043, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 110,
[{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCmdAnswer:{result:false,d
et
ails:Catch Exception com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException
for template + due to com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException:
can't mount 10.110.200.204:/vahric/secondary//template/tmpl/1/1 to
/var/run/cloud_mount/fe70ecb9-4615-4a94-b5e9-f66b229d2d36,wait:0}}] }
Could you help me pls ?
Regards
VM
This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views
or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of Shape Blue
Re: Which vhd-util
Dear Fazy , Really confused after your words and last answer Vhd-util really need to be on management node ? Or it should be on Xen Servers ? Or On both side ? Regards VM On 01/11/13 16:00, Erdősi Péter f...@niif.hu wrote: 2013.11.01. 13:50 keltezéssel, Vahric Muhtaryan írta: Second all vhd-utils on Management and Xen server should be same ? Or i do not have to care about Xen Server. Actually I tried to run vhd-utils on ubuntu, with no success, but I think, this is not needed. Do this on all xenserver node: wget http://download.cloud.com.s3.amazonaws.com/tools/vhd-util chmod +x vhd-util cp vhd-util /opt/xensource/bin/ And then you will be fine. Regards, Fazy
Re: Which vhd-util
Its crazy all my problems has gone !? VHD UTIL and wrong place? After put it under /opt/xensource/bin/ , provisioning issue of system vm is gone Docs or something wrong ? On 01/11/13 16:34, Vahric Muhtaryan vah...@doruk.net.tr wrote: Dear Fazy , Really confused after your words and last answer Vhd-util really need to be on management node ? Or it should be on Xen Servers ? Or On both side ? Regards VM On 01/11/13 16:00, Erdősi Péter f...@niif.hu wrote: 2013.11.01. 13:50 keltezéssel, Vahric Muhtaryan írta: Second all vhd-utils on Management and Xen server should be same ? Or i do not have to care about Xen Server. Actually I tried to run vhd-utils on ubuntu, with no success, but I think, this is not needed. Do this on all xenserver node: wget http://download.cloud.com.s3.amazonaws.com/tools/vhd-util chmod +x vhd-util cp vhd-util /opt/xensource/bin/ And then you will be fine. Regards, Fazy
Re: Which vhd-util
On 01.11.2013 14:34, Vahric Muhtaryan wrote: Dear Fazy , Really confused after your words and last answer Vhd-util really need to be on management node ? Or it should be on Xen Servers ? Or On both side ? Hello, I have vhd-util on the management server in /usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/vm/hypervisor/xenserver/vhd-util as well as on the Xenservers in /opt/xensource/bin/vhd-util HTH Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro
Re: Which vhd-util
It is supposed to be on the management server only because the scripts that add a host are supposed to copy them to the xen hosts. It does not run on the ms. There appears to be a bug that the script is not pushing it to the hosts. Hence the suggestion below to copy it to xensource/bin. Leave the other one in sbin there. That is part of the XenServer distribution but is missing some of the options that cloudstack uses. On Nov 1, 2013, at 7:34 AM, Vahric Muhtaryan vah...@doruk.net.tr wrote: Dear Fazy , Really confused after your words and last answer Vhd-util really need to be on management node ? Or it should be on Xen Servers ? Or On both side ? Regards VM On 01/11/13 16:00, Erdősi Péter f...@niif.hu wrote: 2013.11.01. 13:50 keltezéssel, Vahric Muhtaryan írta: Second all vhd-utils on Management and Xen server should be same ? Or i do not have to care about Xen Server. Actually I tried to run vhd-utils on ubuntu, with no success, but I think, this is not needed. Do this on all xenserver node: wget http://download.cloud.com.s3.amazonaws.com/tools/vhd-util chmod +x vhd-util cp vhd-util /opt/xensource/bin/ And then you will be fine. Regards, Fazy
Re: Which vhd-util
Okay, thanks to all tHANKS Fazy again :D Need to blog it for next cloudstack players :D VM On 01/11/13 16:43, Carlos Reátegui create...@gmail.com wrote: It is supposed to be on the management server only because the scripts that add a host are supposed to copy them to the xen hosts. It does not run on the ms. There appears to be a bug that the script is not pushing it to the hosts. Hence the suggestion below to copy it to xensource/bin. Leave the other one in sbin there. That is part of the XenServer distribution but is missing some of the options that cloudstack uses. On Nov 1, 2013, at 7:34 AM, Vahric Muhtaryan vah...@doruk.net.tr wrote: Dear Fazy , Really confused after your words and last answer Vhd-util really need to be on management node ? Or it should be on Xen Servers ? Or On both side ? Regards VM On 01/11/13 16:00, Erdősi Péter f...@niif.hu wrote: 2013.11.01. 13:50 keltezéssel, Vahric Muhtaryan írta: Second all vhd-utils on Management and Xen server should be same ? Or i do not have to care about Xen Server. Actually I tried to run vhd-utils on ubuntu, with no success, but I think, this is not needed. Do this on all xenserver node: wget http://download.cloud.com.s3.amazonaws.com/tools/vhd-util chmod +x vhd-util cp vhd-util /opt/xensource/bin/ And then you will be fine. Regards, Fazy
Re: Which vhd-util
Dear, I'm glad to hear that. Yes, the doc has this problem... Actually I think, You don't need to copy to the management. This binary not running on ubuntu, if you try to run that, but it's print the help, if you run on Xen :) BTW, Welcome in the Cloud! ;) Regards, Fazy 2013.11.01. 16:03 keltezéssel, Vahric Muhtaryan írta: Okay, thanks to all tHANKS Fazy again :D Need to blog it for next cloudstack players :D VM On 01/11/13 16:43, Carlos Reátegui create...@gmail.com wrote: It is supposed to be on the management server only because the scripts that add a host are supposed to copy them to the xen hosts. It does not run on the ms. There appears to be a bug that the script is not pushing it to the hosts. Hence the suggestion below to copy it to xensource/bin. Leave the other one in sbin there. That is part of the XenServer distribution but is missing some of the options that cloudstack uses. On Nov 1, 2013, at 7:34 AM, Vahric Muhtaryan vah...@doruk.net.tr wrote: Dear Fazy , Really confused after your words and last answer Vhd-util really need to be on management node ? Or it should be on Xen Servers ? Or On both side ? Regards VM On 01/11/13 16:00, Erdősi Péter f...@niif.hu wrote: 2013.11.01. 13:50 keltezéssel, Vahric Muhtaryan írta: Second all vhd-utils on Management and Xen server should be same ? Or i do not have to care about Xen Server. Actually I tried to run vhd-utils on ubuntu, with no success, but I think, this is not needed. Do this on all xenserver node: wget http://download.cloud.com.s3.amazonaws.com/tools/vhd-util chmod +x vhd-util cp vhd-util /opt/xensource/bin/ And then you will be fine. Regards, Fazy
CS4.2 KVM hypervisor
Hello, I have two instances in Expunging state for the last 24 hrs, the disk attach to the instances are in migrating state any idea how to get rid of this instances and disk? Thanks,
Re: Which vhd-util
:D On 01/11/13 17:16, Erdősi Péter f...@niif.hu wrote: Dear, I'm glad to hear that. Yes, the doc has this problem... Actually I think, You don't need to copy to the management. This binary not running on ubuntu, if you try to run that, but it's print the help, if you run on Xen :) BTW, Welcome in the Cloud! ;) Regards, Fazy 2013.11.01. 16:03 keltezéssel, Vahric Muhtaryan írta: Okay, thanks to all tHANKS Fazy again :D Need to blog it for next cloudstack players :D VM On 01/11/13 16:43, Carlos Reátegui create...@gmail.com wrote: It is supposed to be on the management server only because the scripts that add a host are supposed to copy them to the xen hosts. It does not run on the ms. There appears to be a bug that the script is not pushing it to the hosts. Hence the suggestion below to copy it to xensource/bin. Leave the other one in sbin there. That is part of the XenServer distribution but is missing some of the options that cloudstack uses. On Nov 1, 2013, at 7:34 AM, Vahric Muhtaryan vah...@doruk.net.tr wrote: Dear Fazy , Really confused after your words and last answer Vhd-util really need to be on management node ? Or it should be on Xen Servers ? Or On both side ? Regards VM On 01/11/13 16:00, Erdősi Péter f...@niif.hu wrote: 2013.11.01. 13:50 keltezéssel, Vahric Muhtaryan írta: Second all vhd-utils on Management and Xen server should be same ? Or i do not have to care about Xen Server. Actually I tried to run vhd-utils on ubuntu, with no success, but I think, this is not needed. Do this on all xenserver node: wget http://download.cloud.com.s3.amazonaws.com/tools/vhd-util chmod +x vhd-util cp vhd-util /opt/xensource/bin/ And then you will be fine. Regards, Fazy
RE: System VMs couldn't up
Vahric,
Have you configured the optional 'Storage' network within your Zone. If you
have, have you mapped a 'storage' IP to each of the Hosts and Management
Servers. (note this is different to the Primary Storage IP range)
Regards
Geoff Higginbottom
D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
-Original Message-
From: Vahric Muhtaryan [mailto:vah...@doruk.net.tr]
Sent: 01 November 2013 14:09
To: CloudStack SupportMailingList
Subject: Re: System VMs couldn't up
Dear Geoff,
SSVM is not installed , your link provided show something after SSVM deployed,
isn't it ?
Regards
VM
On 01/11/13 15:28, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
wrote:
Suggest you take a look at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSVM,+templates,
+Se
condary+storage+troubleshooting
This should help you troubleshoot SSVM isssues.
Regards
Geoff Higginbottom
D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
-Original Message-
From: Vahric Muhtaryan [mailto:vah...@doruk.net.tr]
Sent: 01 November 2013 13:21
To: CloudStack SupportMailingList
Subject: System VMs couldn't up
Hello,
We newly installed and configured zone and faced system vm issue.
They can¹t run and they are in loop now :D
Two interesting message
One : 2013-11-01 14:04:50,029 INFO
[cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl]
(secstorage-1:null) Primary secondary storage is not even started, wait
until next turn
We can not understand why and who will up the Primary Secondary storage ?
Other issue is , we can not understand host:2 unreachable , all
connection are ok , cloudstack see green up and running
2013-11-01 14:42:09,495 WARN
[storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
Exception while trying to start secondary storage vm
com.cloud.exception.AgentUnavailableException: Resource [Host:2] is
unreachable: Host 2: Unable to start instance due to null
at
com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStart(VirtualMachineManag
erI
mp
l.java:988)
at
com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.
jav
a:
578)
at
com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.
jav
a:
571)
at
com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.startSecStorage
Vm(
Se
condaryStorageManagerImpl.java:267)
at
com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.allocCapacity(S
eco
nd
aryStorageManagerImpl.java:696)
at
com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.expandPool(Seco
nda
ry
StorageManagerImpl.java:1300)
at
com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(Premiu
mSe
co
ndaryStorageManagerImpl.java:123)
at
com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(Premiu
mSe
co
ndaryStorageManagerImpl.java:50)
at
com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.loadScan(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:104)
at
com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.access$100(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:33
)
at
com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.reallyRun(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:8
1)
at com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.run(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:72)
at
java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471)
at
java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRunAndReset(FutureTask.java:3
51)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:178)
at
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.ac
ces
s$
201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:165)
at
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.ru
n(S
ch
eduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:267)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:
11
46)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.j
ava
:6
15)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679)
Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
at
org.apache.cloudstack.storage.volume.VolumeServiceImpl.createBaseImageA
syn
c(
VolumeServiceImpl.java:422)
at
org.apache.cloudstack.storage.volume.VolumeServiceImpl.createVolumeFrom
Tem
pl
ateAsync(VolumeServiceImpl.java:569)
at
com.cloud.storage.VolumeManagerImpl.recreateVolume(VolumeManagerImpl.java:
25
36)
at
com.cloud.storage.VolumeManagerImpl.prepare(VolumeManagerImpl.java:2592
)
at
com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStart(VirtualMachineManag
erI
mp
l.java:889)
... 20 more
2013-11-01 14:42:09,496 INFO
[storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
Unable to start secondary storage vm for standby capacity, secStorageVm
vm Id :
244, will recycle it and start a new one
But another interesting message is below , under /var/run/ there is no
cloud_mount folder under and also no guid there ?!
2013-11-01 14:42:06,169 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
(DirectAgent-321:null) Seq 1-1414201462: Processing: { Ans: , MgmtId:
345049864043, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 110,
[{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCmdAnswer:{result:false
,d
et
ails:Catch
Re: CS4.2 KVM hypervisor
yes I believe that was the process! is there a way to clean it up? unfortunately it was my mistake to try to migrate the disk to another primary storage in progress when i deleted, . Thanks, On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Marty Sweet msweet@gmail.com wrote: Did you try and migrate the disk to another Primary Storage before attempting to delete it? On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 3:38 PM, motty cruz motty.c...@gmail.com wrote: yes, I meant to mentioned that I had change those settings in Global Settings already, expunge.delay =150 expunge.interval = 160 Thanks, On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 8:29 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: On 01.11.2013 15:22, motty cruz wrote: Hello, I have two instances in Expunging state for the last 24 hrs, the disk attach to the instances are in migrating state any idea how to get rid of this instances and disk? Thanks, Go in Global Settings and look for expunge; the default values are quite generous, I usually bring them down to 400 or so. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro
Re: CS4.2 KVM hypervisor
Are you familiar with the database? If so, I would find the volume in question and change the state to 'Ready'. A query like this should find your trouble volume: SELECThttp://discovery/phpMyAdmin-4.0.5-english/url.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdev.mysql.com%2Fdoc%2Frefman%2F5.5%2Fen%2Fselect.htmltoken=4dda9484429c1750de6a012dab1ecf11 * FROM `volumes` WHERE `state` LIKEhttp://discovery/phpMyAdmin-4.0.5-english/url.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdev.mysql.com%2Fdoc%2Frefman%2F5.5%2Fen%2Fstring-comparison-functions.html%23operator_liketoken=4dda9484429c1750de6a012dab1ecf11 'Migrating'; Using that/those record, update the State to 'Ready'. It may be worth waiting a couple of hours before those steps just in case anyone else has a better solution. Marty On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 4:47 PM, motty cruz motty.c...@gmail.com wrote: yes I believe that was the process! is there a way to clean it up? unfortunately it was my mistake to try to migrate the disk to another primary storage in progress when i deleted, . Thanks, On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Marty Sweet msweet@gmail.com wrote: Did you try and migrate the disk to another Primary Storage before attempting to delete it? On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 3:38 PM, motty cruz motty.c...@gmail.com wrote: yes, I meant to mentioned that I had change those settings in Global Settings already, expunge.delay =150 expunge.interval = 160 Thanks, On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 8:29 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: On 01.11.2013 15:22, motty cruz wrote: Hello, I have two instances in Expunging state for the last 24 hrs, the disk attach to the instances are in migrating state any idea how to get rid of this instances and disk? Thanks, Go in Global Settings and look for expunge; the default values are quite generous, I usually bring them down to 400 or so. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro
Re: CS4.2 KVM hypervisor
Thank you! I will take those steps as last resort. Thanks again, On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Marty Sweet msweet@gmail.com wrote: Are you familiar with the database? If so, I would find the volume in question and change the state to 'Ready'. A query like this should find your trouble volume: SELECT http://discovery/phpMyAdmin-4.0.5-english/url.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdev.mysql.com%2Fdoc%2Frefman%2F5.5%2Fen%2Fselect.htmltoken=4dda9484429c1750de6a012dab1ecf11 * FROM `volumes` WHERE `state` LIKE http://discovery/phpMyAdmin-4.0.5-english/url.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdev.mysql.com%2Fdoc%2Frefman%2F5.5%2Fen%2Fstring-comparison-functions.html%23operator_liketoken=4dda9484429c1750de6a012dab1ecf11 'Migrating'; Using that/those record, update the State to 'Ready'. It may be worth waiting a couple of hours before those steps just in case anyone else has a better solution. Marty On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 4:47 PM, motty cruz motty.c...@gmail.com wrote: yes I believe that was the process! is there a way to clean it up? unfortunately it was my mistake to try to migrate the disk to another primary storage in progress when i deleted, . Thanks, On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Marty Sweet msweet@gmail.com wrote: Did you try and migrate the disk to another Primary Storage before attempting to delete it? On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 3:38 PM, motty cruz motty.c...@gmail.com wrote: yes, I meant to mentioned that I had change those settings in Global Settings already, expunge.delay =150 expunge.interval = 160 Thanks, On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 8:29 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: On 01.11.2013 15:22, motty cruz wrote: Hello, I have two instances in Expunging state for the last 24 hrs, the disk attach to the instances are in migrating state any idea how to get rid of this instances and disk? Thanks, Go in Global Settings and look for expunge; the default values are quite generous, I usually bring them down to 400 or so. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro
Using XenServer-6.2.0 and CloudStack-4.2.0
Hi there, Does anybody use XenServer-6.2.0 from xenserver.org? Does it work with CloudStack-4.2.0? Did you have any troubles with that? Thank you! -- V.Melnik
Re: Using XenServer-6.2.0 and CloudStack-4.2.0
We are using Citrix Xen Server (Sorry newly deployment not very long usage of system) with 4.2 and we can create the zone , pod , cluster , hosts and system vms and at the end download the iso Its running :D But for next steps next week we will work ok, we can share the experiences :D Regards Vahric Muhtaryan And Mehmet Mart On 01/11/13 19:12, Vladimir Melnik v.mel...@uplink.ua wrote: Hi there, Does anybody use XenServer-6.2.0 from xenserver.org? Does it work with CloudStack-4.2.0? Did you have any troubles with that? Thank you! -- V.Melnik
After First Time Cloudstack
Overview is we are all vmware admins were nurseling :D :P Now we are fighting :D Hehheheheheh Happy good weekends to all See you next week :D Vahric Muhtaryan
On the fly CS update from 4.1.1 to 4.2
Hi all, On the university laboratory that I work we have a cloud environment using Cloudstack as the management tool. So far, we have 2 Cloudstack servers and a load balancing apache server, both CS are on 4.1.1 version. Now we are starting to plan the update to the 4.2 version, mostly because of some important fixes that have been updated. The upgrade has to be done with the cloud running, so, we are going to update each CS server at time, in some point on the update process we are going to end up with one CS on 4.2 version and other on 4.1.1, could it create some problems? I noticed that the systems VMs templates were updated, so what does the CS 4.2 would do when it gets up and running and finds a system VM that was created by the CS 4.1.1? Are the CS updates meant to be done with the whole management structure down or they have support to get this job done with everything up and running? Thanks. Gabriel.
Re: On the fly CS update from 4.1.1 to 4.2
Gabriel, You need to follow the update instructions carefully. Yes, it means stopping all your management servers, but all guest VMs continue to run. The upgrade should be relatively quick, but it does involve updating the system VM template and restarting system VMs so they get updated. Remember to backup before upgrading, and ideally test the upgrade process on a test rig if you have never upgraded before. Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3603 0542tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540tel:+442036030540 | M: +447968161581tel:+447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.commailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS On 1 Nov 2013, at 18:27, Gabriel Br?scher gabrasc...@gmail.commailto:gabrasc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, On the university laboratory that I work we have a cloud environment using Cloudstack as the management tool. So far, we have 2 Cloudstack servers and a load balancing apache server, both CS are on 4.1.1 version. Now we are starting to plan the update to the 4.2 version, mostly because of some important fixes that have been updated. The upgrade has to be done with the cloud running, so, we are going to update each CS server at time, in some point on the update process we are going to end up with one CS on 4.2 version and other on 4.1.1, could it create some problems? I noticed that the systems VMs templates were updated, so what does the CS 4.2 would do when it gets up and running and finds a system VM that was created by the CS 4.1.1? Are the CS updates meant to be done with the whole management structure down or they have support to get this job done with everything up and running? Thanks. Gabriel. This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: On the fly CS update from 4.1.1 to 4.2
Thank you! Em 01-11-2013 16:32, Geoff Higginbottom escreveu: Gabriel, You need to follow the update instructions carefully. Yes, it means stopping all your management servers, but all guest VMs continue to run. The upgrade should be relatively quick, but it does involve updating the system VM template and restarting system VMs so they get updated. Remember to backup before upgrading, and ideally test the upgrade process on a test rig if you have never upgraded before. Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3603 0542tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540tel:+442036030540 | M: +447968161581tel:+447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.commailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS On 1 Nov 2013, at 18:27, Gabriel Br?scher gabrasc...@gmail.commailto:gabrasc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, On the university laboratory that I work we have a cloud environment using Cloudstack as the management tool. So far, we have 2 Cloudstack servers and a load balancing apache server, both CS are on 4.1.1 version. Now we are starting to plan the update to the 4.2 version, mostly because of some important fixes that have been updated. The upgrade has to be done with the cloud running, so, we are going to update each CS server at time, in some point on the update process we are going to end up with one CS on 4.2 version and other on 4.1.1, could it create some problems? I noticed that the systems VMs templates were updated, so what does the CS 4.2 would do when it gets up and running and finds a system VM that was created by the CS 4.1.1? Are the CS updates meant to be done with the whole management structure down or they have support to get this job done with everything up and running? Thanks. Gabriel. This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
On the fly CS update from 4.1.1 to 4.2
Hi all, On the university laboratory that I work we have a cloud environment using Cloudstack as the management tool. So far, we have 2 Cloudstack servers and a load balancing apache server, both CS are on 4.1.1 version. Now we are starting to plan the update to the 4.2 version, mostly because of some important fixes that have been updated. The upgrade has to be done with the cloud running, so, we are going to update each CS server at time, in some point on the update process we are going to end up with one CS on 4.2 version and other on 4.1.1, could it create some problems? I noticed that the systems VMs templates were updated, so what does the CS 4.2 would do when it gets up and running and finds a system VM that was created by the CS 4.1.1? Are the CS updates meant to be done with the whole management structure down or they have support to get this job done with everything up and running? Thanks. Gabriel.
Re: Can't destroy system VMs
Hi Dan,
The host value is correct and I am able to connect on ports 22,80 and 8080
from the Xen hosts to that IP (same subnet). Port 8787 is not listening on
my MS.
What can I look for in the DB?
thanks
Carlos
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 2:47 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.comwrote:
H Carlox,
It still seems to me you have a communication problem albeit not at
the network level. ( I agree this doesn't seem likely) But even so the
ms can't reach the xen hosts. The next thing to look at would be
configuration. I presume you did check the ip addresses for the hosts.
check the value 'host' in the global vars and try to telnet it on port
22 80 8080 8787 or what else from the xen hosts . I am sure the
problem is hidden somewhere in the mysql database.
regards,
Daan
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 6:23 AM, Carlos Reategui car...@reategui.com
wrote:
Hi Dan,
Finally getting around to trying this. I am not able to start any vm
(mine
or system).
I am in the process of trying Ahmad's suggestion of removing one of the
hosts, reinstalling it and then adding it back in to see if that helps.
However I am not able to put it in maintenance mode. I am getting the
following when I try:
2013-10-31 15:19:59,120 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet]
(catalina-exec-5:null)
===START=== 172.30.40.135 -- GET command=prepareHostForMa
intenanceid=c2f3c416-f4ba-4f73-b414-6fd6efc734e3response=jsonsessionkey=Yjye5qmcLtUBW0%2FP4XCAcx2ZTAI%3D_=1383258001952
2013-10-31 15:19:59,181 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(catalina-exec-5:null) submit async job-167, details: AsyncJobVO {id:16
7, userId: 2, accountId: 2, sessionKey: null, instanceType: Host,
instanceId: 1, cmd: org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.host.Prep
areForMaintenanceCmd, cmdOriginator: null, cmdInfo:
{id:c2f3c416-f4ba-4f73-b414-6fd6efc734e3,response:json,sessionkey:Yjye5q
mcLtUBW0/P4XCAcx2ZTAI\u003d,ctxUserId:2,_:1383258001952,ctxAccountId:2,ctxStartEventId:699},
cmdVersion: 0, callbackTy
pe: 0, callbackAddress: null, status: 0, processStatus: 0, resultCode: 0,
result: null, initMsid: 233845174730253, completeMsid: null,
lastUpdated: null, lastPolled: null, created: null}
2013-10-31 15:19:59,185 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-1:job-167) Executing org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.ad
min.host.PrepareForMaintenanceCmd for job-167
2013-10-31 15:19:59,188 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet]
(catalina-exec-5:null)
===END=== 172.30.40.135 -- GET command=prepareHostForMain
tenanceid=c2f3c416-f4ba-4f73-b414-6fd6efc734e3response=jsonsessionkey=Yjye5qmcLtUBW0%2FP4XCAcx2ZTAI%3D_=1383258001952
2013-10-31 15:19:59,207 DEBUG [cloud.cluster.ClusterManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-1:job-167) Propagating agent change request event:AdminA
skMaintenace to agent:1
2013-10-31 15:19:59,208 DEBUG [cloud.cluster.ClusterManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-1:job-167) 233845174730253 - 233845174730255.1 [{Propa
gateResourceEventCommand:{hostId:1,event:AdminAskMaintenace,contextMap:{},wait:0}}]
2013-10-31 15:19:59,213 INFO [cloud.cluster.ClusterServiceServletImpl]
(Cluster-Worker-1:null) Setup cluster service servlet. service
url: http://172.30.45.2:9090/clusterservice, request timeout: 300
seconds
2013-10-31 15:19:59,214 DEBUG [cloud.cluster.ClusterManagerImpl]
(Cluster-Worker-1:null) Cluster PDU 233845174730253 - 233845174730255
. agent: 1, pdu seq: 1, pdu ack seq: 0, json:
[{PropagateResourceEventCommand:{hostId:1,event:AdminAskMaintenace,contextMap:{
},wait:0}}]
2013-10-31 15:19:59,343 DEBUG [cloud.cluster.ClusterManagerImpl]
(Cluster-Worker-7:null) Dispatch -1, json: [{PropagateResourceEventC
ommand:{hostId:1,event:AdminAskMaintenace,contextMap:{},wait:0}}]
2013-10-31 15:19:59,347 DEBUG [cloud.cluster.ClusterManagerImpl]
(Cluster-Worker-7:null) Intercepting command to propagate event AdminA
skMaintenace for host 1
2013-10-31 15:19:59,351 DEBUG [cloud.cluster.ClusterServiceServletImpl]
(Cluster-Worker-1:null) POST http://172.30.45.2:9090/clusterser
vice response :true, responding time: 80 ms
2013-10-31 15:19:59,351 DEBUG [cloud.cluster.ClusterManagerImpl]
(Cluster-Worker-1:null) Cluster PDU 233845174730253 - 233845174730255
completed. time: 137ms. agent: 1, pdu seq: 1, pdu ack seq: 0, json:
[{PropagateResourceEventCommand:{hostId:1,event:AdminAskMai
ntenace,contextMap:{},wait:0}}]
2013-10-31 15:19:59,356 DEBUG [agent.manager.ClusteredAgentAttache]
(Cluster-Worker-7:null) Seq 1-102760483: Forwarding Seq 1-102760483
: { Cmd , MgmtId: 233845174730253, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 100111,
[{MaintainCommand:{wait:0}}] } to 233845174730255
2013-10-31 15:19:59,360 DEBUG [agent.manager.ClusteredAgentAttache]
(AgentManager-Handler-1:null) Seq 1-102760483: Forwarding Seq 1-102
760483: { Cmd , MgmtId: 233845174730253, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 100111,
[{MaintainCommand:{wait:0}}] } to 233845174730255
2013-10-31 15:19:59,365 DEBUG
Re: On the fly CS update from 4.1.1 to 4.2
After the upgrade, does the CS run something special like scripts on the database? 2013/11/1 Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com Gabriel, You need to follow the update instructions carefully. Yes, it means stopping all your management servers, but all guest VMs continue to run. The upgrade should be relatively quick, but it does involve updating the system VM template and restarting system VMs so they get updated. Remember to backup before upgrading, and ideally test the upgrade process on a test rig if you have never upgraded before. Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3603 0542tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540tel: +442036030540 | M: +447968161581tel:+447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.commailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS On 1 Nov 2013, at 18:27, Gabriel Br?scher gabrasc...@gmail.commailto: gabrasc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, On the university laboratory that I work we have a cloud environment using Cloudstack as the management tool. So far, we have 2 Cloudstack servers and a load balancing apache server, both CS are on 4.1.1 version. Now we are starting to plan the update to the 4.2 version, mostly because of some important fixes that have been updated. The upgrade has to be done with the cloud running, so, we are going to update each CS server at time, in some point on the update process we are going to end up with one CS on 4.2 version and other on 4.1.1, could it create some problems? I noticed that the systems VMs templates were updated, so what does the CS 4.2 would do when it gets up and running and finds a system VM that was created by the CS 4.1.1? Are the CS updates meant to be done with the whole management structure down or they have support to get this job done with everything up and running? Thanks. Gabriel. This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. -- Rafael Weingartner
Re: On the fly CS update from 4.1.1 to 4.2
Read this message too before upgrade: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cloudstack-users/201310.mbox/%3c525e52f1.2000...@apache.org%3E Milamber Le 01/11/2013 18:32, Geoff Higginbottom a ecrit : Gabriel, You need to follow the update instructions carefully. Yes, it means stopping all your management servers, but all guest VMs continue to run. The upgrade should be relatively quick, but it does involve updating the system VM template and restarting system VMs so they get updated. Remember to backup before upgrading, and ideally test the upgrade process on a test rig if you have never upgraded before. Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3603 0542tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540tel:+442036030540 | M: +447968161581tel:+447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.commailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS On 1 Nov 2013, at 18:27, Gabriel Br?scher gabrasc...@gmail.commailto:gabrasc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, On the university laboratory that I work we have a cloud environment using Cloudstack as the management tool. So far, we have 2 Cloudstack servers and a load balancing apache server, both CS are on 4.1.1 version. Now we are starting to plan the update to the 4.2 version, mostly because of some important fixes that have been updated. The upgrade has to be done with the cloud running, so, we are going to update each CS server at time, in some point on the update process we are going to end up with one CS on 4.2 version and other on 4.1.1, could it create some problems? I noticed that the systems VMs templates were updated, so what does the CS 4.2 would do when it gets up and running and finds a system VM that was created by the CS 4.1.1? Are the CS updates meant to be done with the whole management structure down or they have support to get this job done with everything up and running? Thanks. Gabriel. This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: On the fly CS update from 4.1.1 to 4.2
Le 01/11/2013 18:53, Rafael Weingartner a ecrit : After the upgrade, does the CS run something special like scripts on the database? After the upgrade the packages (rpm/deb), you need start the management service which will execute the SQL upgrade of database automatically. Milamber 2013/11/1 Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com Gabriel, You need to follow the update instructions carefully. Yes, it means stopping all your management servers, but all guest VMs continue to run. The upgrade should be relatively quick, but it does involve updating the system VM template and restarting system VMs so they get updated. Remember to backup before upgrading, and ideally test the upgrade process on a test rig if you have never upgraded before. Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3603 0542tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540tel: +442036030540 | M: +447968161581tel:+447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.commailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS On 1 Nov 2013, at 18:27, Gabriel Br?scher gabrasc...@gmail.commailto: gabrasc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, On the university laboratory that I work we have a cloud environment using Cloudstack as the management tool. So far, we have 2 Cloudstack servers and a load balancing apache server, both CS are on 4.1.1 version. Now we are starting to plan the update to the 4.2 version, mostly because of some important fixes that have been updated. The upgrade has to be done with the cloud running, so, we are going to update each CS server at time, in some point on the update process we are going to end up with one CS on 4.2 version and other on 4.1.1, could it create some problems? I noticed that the systems VMs templates were updated, so what does the CS 4.2 would do when it gets up and running and finds a system VM that was created by the CS 4.1.1? Are the CS updates meant to be done with the whole management structure down or they have support to get this job done with everything up and running? Thanks. Gabriel. This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: On the fly CS update from 4.1.1 to 4.2
Ok, now I got it. thanks. 2013/11/1 Milamber milam...@apache.org Le 01/11/2013 18:53, Rafael Weingartner a ecrit : After the upgrade, does the CS run something special like scripts on the database? After the upgrade the packages (rpm/deb), you need start the management service which will execute the SQL upgrade of database automatically. Milamber 2013/11/1 Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbottom@shapeblue.**comgeoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com Gabriel, You need to follow the update instructions carefully. Yes, it means stopping all your management servers, but all guest VMs continue to run. The upgrade should be relatively quick, but it does involve updating the system VM template and restarting system VMs so they get updated. Remember to backup before upgrading, and ideally test the upgrade process on a test rig if you have never upgraded before. Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3603 0542tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540tel: +442036030540 | M: +447968161581tel:+447968161581 geoff.higginbottom@shapeblue.**com geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com mailto:geoff.higginbottom@**shapeblue.comgeoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS On 1 Nov 2013, at 18:27, Gabriel Br?scher gabrasc...@gmail.com mailto: gabrasc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, On the university laboratory that I work we have a cloud environment using Cloudstack as the management tool. So far, we have 2 Cloudstack servers and a load balancing apache server, both CS are on 4.1.1 version. Now we are starting to plan the update to the 4.2 version, mostly because of some important fixes that have been updated. The upgrade has to be done with the cloud running, so, we are going to update each CS server at time, in some point on the update process we are going to end up with one CS on 4.2 version and other on 4.1.1, could it create some problems? I noticed that the systems VMs templates were updated, so what does the CS 4.2 would do when it gets up and running and finds a system VM that was created by the CS 4.1.1? Are the CS updates meant to be done with the whole management structure down or they have support to get this job done with everything up and running? Thanks. Gabriel. This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. -- Rafael Weingartner
4.1.0 to 4.1.1 Update with XenServer
When updating CS 4.1.0 to 4.1.1 does anything get pushed out/updated on the XenServer hosts?
Re: After First Time Cloudstack
Don't count or you get sleepy On 11/01/2013 10:36 AM, sebgoa wrote: On Nov 1, 2013, at 6:30 PM, Vahric Muhtaryan vah...@doruk.net.tr wrote: Overview is we are all vmware admins were nurseling :D :P Now we are fighting :D Hehheheheheh Happy good weekends to all See you next week :D Vahric Muhtaryan Enjoy the week end, don't dream about clouds :) -- Bjoern Teipel System Operation Manager UNIX Internet Brands 909 N. Sepulveda Blvd., 11th Floor El Segundo, CA 90245 P: (310) 280- 5287 bjoern.tei...@internetbrands.com
