Domain admin role. CS4.2
Hi, According to description of Domain admin role in Cloudstack Computing (book): “The domain administrator cannot access the physical resources of the cloud but has access to all the subdomains and accounts in that domain, the domain administrator can create/delete any user in that domain or change properties such as passwords. The domains do not own any resources; they are just containers that contain objects that can own resources.” But in reality – domain admin in CS does not have right to add new users to the domain and change their passwords. As I have mentioned it doesn’t have any special rights at all. Just ordinary user. Can someone explain this? Thanks, Vadim Kimlaychuk integratsiooni arhitekt tel. 640 2297 mob. 5233474
RE: Domain admin role. CS4.2
Rafael, You are right. That's what I was looking for. As I see it should be implemented at the next release 4.3. Nice ! Thank you Vadim. -Original Message- From: Rafael Weingartner [mailto:rafaelweingart...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 12:58 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Domain admin role. CS4.2 Hi, I guess the explanation you are looking for it is here: http://markmail.org/message/ucxsapyannat2z6b https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4830 2013/12/16 Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee Hi, According to description of Domain admin role in Cloudstack Computing (book): “The domain administrator cannot access the physical resources of the cloud but has access to all the subdomains and accounts in that domain, the domain administrator can create/delete any user in that domain or change properties such as passwords. The domains do not own any resources; they are just containers that contain objects that can own resources.” But in reality – domain admin in CS does not have right to add new users to the domain and change their passwords. As I have mentioned it doesn’t have any special rights at all. Just ordinary user. Can someone explain this? Thanks, Vadim Kimlaychuk integratsiooni arhitekt tel. 640 2297 mob. 5233474 -- Rafael Weingärtner
Re: Domain admin role. CS4.2
Just 4.3? I thought it was going to be shipped on 4.2.1 too. The 4.2.1 is going to be released any time soon. 2013/12/16 Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee Rafael, You are right. That's what I was looking for. As I see it should be implemented at the next release 4.3. Nice ! Thank you Vadim. -Original Message- From: Rafael Weingartner [mailto:rafaelweingart...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 12:58 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Domain admin role. CS4.2 Hi, I guess the explanation you are looking for it is here: http://markmail.org/message/ucxsapyannat2z6b https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4830 2013/12/16 Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee Hi, According to description of Domain admin role in Cloudstack Computing (book): “The domain administrator cannot access the physical resources of the cloud but has access to all the subdomains and accounts in that domain, the domain administrator can create/delete any user in that domain or change properties such as passwords. The domains do not own any resources; they are just containers that contain objects that can own resources.” But in reality – domain admin in CS does not have right to add new users to the domain and change their passwords. As I have mentioned it doesn’t have any special rights at all. Just ordinary user. Can someone explain this? Thanks, Vadim Kimlaychuk integratsiooni arhitekt tel. 640 2297 mob. 5233474 -- Rafael Weingärtner -- Rafael Weingärtner
RE: Domain admin role. CS4.2
Both versions are mentioned at Fix versions. It seems bug is already fixed, so may be 4.2.1 is a target. Anyway will update. Will see :) Vadim. -Original Message- From: Rafael Weingartner [mailto:rafaelweingart...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 1:51 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Domain admin role. CS4.2 Just 4.3? I thought it was going to be shipped on 4.2.1 too. The 4.2.1 is going to be released any time soon. 2013/12/16 Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee Rafael, You are right. That's what I was looking for. As I see it should be implemented at the next release 4.3. Nice ! Thank you Vadim. -Original Message- From: Rafael Weingartner [mailto:rafaelweingart...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 12:58 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Domain admin role. CS4.2 Hi, I guess the explanation you are looking for it is here: http://markmail.org/message/ucxsapyannat2z6b https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4830 2013/12/16 Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee Hi, According to description of Domain admin role in Cloudstack Computing (book): “The domain administrator cannot access the physical resources of the cloud but has access to all the subdomains and accounts in that domain, the domain administrator can create/delete any user in that domain or change properties such as passwords. The domains do not own any resources; they are just containers that contain objects that can own resources.” But in reality – domain admin in CS does not have right to add new users to the domain and change their passwords. As I have mentioned it doesn’t have any special rights at all. Just ordinary user. Can someone explain this? Thanks, Vadim Kimlaychuk integratsiooni arhitekt tel. 640 2297 mob. 5233474 -- Rafael Weingärtner -- Rafael Weingärtner
Re: Domain admin role. CS4.2
You can also refer to a more recent discussion here: http://markmail.org/thread/iptmbd4recxuec5q Indeed, this bug was finally fixed for 4.2.1 and 4.3.0. --- Yu-Heng (Ryan) Lei, Associate Researcher Chunghwa Telecom Laboratories / Cloud Computing Laboratory ryan...@cht.com.tw or ryanlei750...@gmail.com On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Rafael Weingartner rafaelweingart...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I guess the explanation you are looking for it is here: http://markmail.org/message/ucxsapyannat2z6b https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4830 2013/12/16 Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee Hi, According to description of Domain admin role in Cloudstack Computing (book): “The domain administrator cannot access the physical resources of the cloud but has access to all the subdomains and accounts in that domain, the domain administrator can create/delete any user in that domain or change properties such as passwords. The domains do not own any resources; they are just containers that contain objects that can own resources.” But in reality – domain admin in CS does not have right to add new users to the domain and change their passwords. As I have mentioned it doesn’t have any special rights at all. Just ordinary user. Can someone explain this? Thanks, Vadim Kimlaychuk integratsiooni arhitekt tel. 640 2297 mob. 5233474 -- Rafael Weingärtner
How to add new IPs on CS 4.2 (Basic Networking)?
Hi All, I have a question. If I would use up my existing public IPs(for example: xxx.xxx.1.0/24), how to add new subnet(xxx.xxx.2.0/24) to my new pod? Thank you. Steven
Re: Merging/Removing Secondary Storage NFS
I have just restarted the management server, and the templates copy process has begin to the new NFS server... Will update. On 16 December 2013 16:14, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote: HI Geoff, I have just added new NFS secondary storage to CS. Can you please tell, when shall I expect all existing ISOs and templates to be copied over (start being copied...) - so far, I can observe NO network traffic. Is this maybe configurable like purge thread, or similar ? I have also issues the script for checking the SSVM ( /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh) and have no problems so far. More important, I can confirm that I do NOT have checksum inside the template.properties on public templates, only on system templates... And I can confirm that I do not have public templates being replicated on all NFS storages...that is strange. ISOs do get replicated, but public templates does not... Is this a bug or what...? I can not observer any errors in management log... Thanks, Andrija On 13 December 2013 20:10, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you very much, I will check... that... funny thing, I search for files created in last i.e. 1 hour, and there is only one file created on 1 NFS, no files created on other NFSs. Thanks Sent from Google Nexus 4 On Dec 13, 2013 6:06 PM, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: The templates get unique names, however they are in the same folder structure. e.g. My S1 has \\IPADDRESS\lonsec\template\tmpl\1\5 And my S2 has \\IPADDDRESS\lonsec2\template\tmpl\1\5 Note that the '1' is the account ID of the user who created the template, in this case 'system' as this is a system vm template, the '5' is simply the 5th template created on this system The two template.properties files contain the following S1 template.properties file # #Mon May 20 14:11:06 UTC 2013 filename=d015ebd8-5395-31a5-9648-a179062885d8.vhd vhd=true id=5 vhd.filename=d015ebd8-5395-31a5-9648-a179062885d8.vhd public=true uniquename=centos56-x86_64-xen vhd.virtualsize=21474836480 virtualsize=21474836480 checksum=905cec879afd9c9d22ecc8036131a180 hvm=false description=CentOS 5.6(64-bit) no GUI (XenServer) vhd.size=1758786048 size=1758786048 S1 template.properties file # #Wed Nov 21 23:14:59 UTC 2012 filename=8b106378-7d6d-31b3-aab7-bfc85ef97884.vhd vhd=true id=5 vhd.filename=8b106378-7d6d-31b3-aab7-bfc85ef97884.vhd public=true uniquename=centos56-x86_64-xen vhd.virtualsize=21474836480 virtualsize=21474836480 checksum=905cec879afd9c9d22ecc8036131a180 hvm=false description=CentOS 5.6(64-bit) no GUI (XenServer) vhd.size=1758786048 size=1758786048 dsa Note that the line checksum=905cec879afd9c9d22ecc8036131a180 is common to both, you will also find this value in the db in table cloud.vm_template This is the link to the template on disk, and the one referenced in the DB You can also see from the dates within the two properties files, that this template was originally deployed back in may, but when I added the 2nd Secondary Storage Node in November, the template was automatically copied across. Hopefully all this info helps you. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com] Sent: 13 December 2013 16:47 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Merging/Removing Secondary Storage NFS Hi Jeff, thanks for that detailed explanation, I'm on the KVM by the way... For the *volume* snaphost, I can see that real snapshot exist localy (I say real snaphost, not clone), but also the clone is created on 1 of those NFS servers... Can you somehow instruct me to check if new template I have just created, is actualy copied on all 3 NFS hosts (all3 NFS are online, and working fine) ? Template is only 4GB of real size on the host, and it should be very quickly copied to where it shoyld be. (my IO and netowrk traffic are pretty low in general). Should the templates files be created on all 3 NFS storages, with the same file name? Or can I see this somehow from the database...I'm trying to decode it by myself, but can't figure this out... Thanks again, Andrija On 13 December 2013 17:35, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: Andrija, The design is that any Public Template, or ISO gets copied to every secondary storage in the zone. The copying is undertaken by the SSVM and will obviously take some time if you have just added a 2nd Public ISO or Template, so your copy process may not have finished. For 4.2 'Snapshots' are now even more confusing than ever. We now have: 1. VM Snapshots (ESXi XenServer Only) these are true Hypervisor Snapshots, enabling quick roll back to the Snapshot, including Memory State. 2. Volume Snapshots (better thought of as Volume
Re: Merging/Removing Secondary Storage NFS
Well, only ISOs have been copied to the new NFS storage... no other templates... Is this expected behaviour or should I consider this a bug ? Any clue on troubleshooting this ? On 16 December 2013 17:05, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote: I have just restarted the management server, and the templates copy process has begin to the new NFS server... Will update. On 16 December 2013 16:14, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote: HI Geoff, I have just added new NFS secondary storage to CS. Can you please tell, when shall I expect all existing ISOs and templates to be copied over (start being copied...) - so far, I can observe NO network traffic. Is this maybe configurable like purge thread, or similar ? I have also issues the script for checking the SSVM ( /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh) and have no problems so far. More important, I can confirm that I do NOT have checksum inside the template.properties on public templates, only on system templates... And I can confirm that I do not have public templates being replicated on all NFS storages...that is strange. ISOs do get replicated, but public templates does not... Is this a bug or what...? I can not observer any errors in management log... Thanks, Andrija On 13 December 2013 20:10, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you very much, I will check... that... funny thing, I search for files created in last i.e. 1 hour, and there is only one file created on 1 NFS, no files created on other NFSs. Thanks Sent from Google Nexus 4 On Dec 13, 2013 6:06 PM, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: The templates get unique names, however they are in the same folder structure. e.g. My S1 has \\IPADDRESS\lonsec\template\tmpl\1\5 And my S2 has \\IPADDDRESS\lonsec2\template\tmpl\1\5 Note that the '1' is the account ID of the user who created the template, in this case 'system' as this is a system vm template, the '5' is simply the 5th template created on this system The two template.properties files contain the following S1 template.properties file # #Mon May 20 14:11:06 UTC 2013 filename=d015ebd8-5395-31a5-9648-a179062885d8.vhd vhd=true id=5 vhd.filename=d015ebd8-5395-31a5-9648-a179062885d8.vhd public=true uniquename=centos56-x86_64-xen vhd.virtualsize=21474836480 virtualsize=21474836480 checksum=905cec879afd9c9d22ecc8036131a180 hvm=false description=CentOS 5.6(64-bit) no GUI (XenServer) vhd.size=1758786048 size=1758786048 S1 template.properties file # #Wed Nov 21 23:14:59 UTC 2012 filename=8b106378-7d6d-31b3-aab7-bfc85ef97884.vhd vhd=true id=5 vhd.filename=8b106378-7d6d-31b3-aab7-bfc85ef97884.vhd public=true uniquename=centos56-x86_64-xen vhd.virtualsize=21474836480 virtualsize=21474836480 checksum=905cec879afd9c9d22ecc8036131a180 hvm=false description=CentOS 5.6(64-bit) no GUI (XenServer) vhd.size=1758786048 size=1758786048 dsa Note that the line checksum=905cec879afd9c9d22ecc8036131a180 is common to both, you will also find this value in the db in table cloud.vm_template This is the link to the template on disk, and the one referenced in the DB You can also see from the dates within the two properties files, that this template was originally deployed back in may, but when I added the 2nd Secondary Storage Node in November, the template was automatically copied across. Hopefully all this info helps you. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com] Sent: 13 December 2013 16:47 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Merging/Removing Secondary Storage NFS Hi Jeff, thanks for that detailed explanation, I'm on the KVM by the way... For the *volume* snaphost, I can see that real snapshot exist localy (I say real snaphost, not clone), but also the clone is created on 1 of those NFS servers... Can you somehow instruct me to check if new template I have just created, is actualy copied on all 3 NFS hosts (all3 NFS are online, and working fine) ? Template is only 4GB of real size on the host, and it should be very quickly copied to where it shoyld be. (my IO and netowrk traffic are pretty low in general). Should the templates files be created on all 3 NFS storages, with the same file name? Or can I see this somehow from the database...I'm trying to decode it by myself, but can't figure this out... Thanks again, Andrija On 13 December 2013 17:35, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: Andrija, The design is that any Public Template, or ISO gets copied to every secondary storage in the zone. The copying is undertaken by the SSVM and will obviously take some time if you have just added a 2nd Public ISO or Template, so your copy process may not have finished. For 4.2 'Snapshots'
Re: How to add new IPs on CS 4.2 (Basic Networking)?
Have you tried expanding your pod with http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.2/root_admin/updatePod.html On 12/16/13 7:22 AM, Steven Liang stevenli...@yesup.com wrote: Hi All, I have a question. If I would use up my existing public IPs(for example: xxx.xxx.1.0/24), how to add new subnet(xxx.xxx.2.0/24) to my new pod? Thank you. Steven
Re: How to add new IPs on CS 4.2 (Basic Networking)?
Hi Chiradeep, Thank you for updating. I haven't tried. Can I use cloudmonkey? I've installed cloudmonkey, just used for list. Steven On 12/16/2013 03:11 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: Have you tried expanding your pod with http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.2/root_admin/updatePod.html On 12/16/13 7:22 AM, Steven Liang stevenli...@yesup.com wrote: Hi All, I have a question. If I would use up my existing public IPs(for example: xxx.xxx.1.0/24), how to add new subnet(xxx.xxx.2.0/24) to my new pod? Thank you. Steven
public templates does NOT get replicated to new NFS SS
Hi, I have an issue with new NFS storage (and the old ones also): When I create new public template, it is supposed to be copied over to all Secondary Storages (I have already 3 NFSs, and added a new NFS). After I added the new NFS, only the ISO files got replicated. Also inside the template.properties file next to the any public templates, I can NOT see the checksum line (which does exist for the ISOs and system VM templates) This is CS 4.2.0. (update from 4.0), all from official RPMs, on CentOS. Any clue on this... ? -- Andrija Panić
template_host_ref moved to template_store_ref
Hi, I just noticed that I do not have any new lines in template_host_ref after upgrading from 4.0 to 4.2. Inside the template_store_ref (I use NFS for all SS), I can see all entries from the begining of CS, along with the latest entries with new template details... Is template_host_ref being replaced with template_store_ref (at least for NFS) ? I see lot of documentaion reference template_host_ref, but I'm missing any new lines after upgrade to CS 4.2... -- Andrija Panić -- http://admintweets.com --
Re: How to add new IPs on CS 4.2 (Basic Networking)?
Hi, You can add additional public ip addresses with the new vlan or existing vlan on UI below. [image: Inline image 1] On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 5:27 AM, Steven Liang stevenli...@yesup.com wrote: Hi Chiradeep, Thank you for updating. I haven't tried. Can I use cloudmonkey? I've installed cloudmonkey, just used for list. Steven On 12/16/2013 03:11 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: Have you tried expanding your pod with http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.2/root_admin/updatePod.html On 12/16/13 7:22 AM, Steven Liang stevenli...@yesup.com wrote: Hi All, I have a question. If I would use up my existing public IPs(for example: xxx.xxx.1.0/24), how to add new subnet(xxx.xxx.2.0/24) to my new pod? Thank you. Steven
Re: Merging/Removing Secondary Storage NFS
This is definitely not expected. But, in the thread below I see you writing that the restarting MS initiated template copy. Is that not the case ? On 16/12/13 11:58 AM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote: Well, only ISOs have been copied to the new NFS storage... no other templates... Is this expected behaviour or should I consider this a bug ? Any clue on troubleshooting this ? On 16 December 2013 17:05, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote: I have just restarted the management server, and the templates copy process has begin to the new NFS server... Will update. On 16 December 2013 16:14, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote: HI Geoff, I have just added new NFS secondary storage to CS. Can you please tell, when shall I expect all existing ISOs and templates to be copied over (start being copied...) - so far, I can observe NO network traffic. Is this maybe configurable like purge thread, or similar ? I have also issues the script for checking the SSVM ( /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh) and have no problems so far. More important, I can confirm that I do NOT have checksum inside the template.properties on public templates, only on system templates... And I can confirm that I do not have public templates being replicated on all NFS storages...that is strange. ISOs do get replicated, but public templates does not... Is this a bug or what...? I can not observer any errors in management log... Thanks, Andrija On 13 December 2013 20:10, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you very much, I will check... that... funny thing, I search for files created in last i.e. 1 hour, and there is only one file created on 1 NFS, no files created on other NFSs. Thanks Sent from Google Nexus 4 On Dec 13, 2013 6:06 PM, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: The templates get unique names, however they are in the same folder structure. e.g. My S1 has \\IPADDRESS\lonsec\template\tmpl\1\5 And my S2 has \\IPADDDRESS\lonsec2\template\tmpl\1\5 Note that the '1' is the account ID of the user who created the template, in this case 'system' as this is a system vm template, the '5' is simply the 5th template created on this system The two template.properties files contain the following S1 template.properties file # #Mon May 20 14:11:06 UTC 2013 filename=d015ebd8-5395-31a5-9648-a179062885d8.vhd vhd=true id=5 vhd.filename=d015ebd8-5395-31a5-9648-a179062885d8.vhd public=true uniquename=centos56-x86_64-xen vhd.virtualsize=21474836480 virtualsize=21474836480 checksum=905cec879afd9c9d22ecc8036131a180 hvm=false description=CentOS 5.6(64-bit) no GUI (XenServer) vhd.size=1758786048 size=1758786048 S1 template.properties file # #Wed Nov 21 23:14:59 UTC 2012 filename=8b106378-7d6d-31b3-aab7-bfc85ef97884.vhd vhd=true id=5 vhd.filename=8b106378-7d6d-31b3-aab7-bfc85ef97884.vhd public=true uniquename=centos56-x86_64-xen vhd.virtualsize=21474836480 virtualsize=21474836480 checksum=905cec879afd9c9d22ecc8036131a180 hvm=false description=CentOS 5.6(64-bit) no GUI (XenServer) vhd.size=1758786048 size=1758786048 dsa Note that the line checksum=905cec879afd9c9d22ecc8036131a180 is common to both, you will also find this value in the db in table cloud.vm_template This is the link to the template on disk, and the one referenced in the DB You can also see from the dates within the two properties files, that this template was originally deployed back in may, but when I added the 2nd Secondary Storage Node in November, the template was automatically copied across. Hopefully all this info helps you. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com] Sent: 13 December 2013 16:47 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Merging/Removing Secondary Storage NFS Hi Jeff, thanks for that detailed explanation, I'm on the KVM by the way... For the *volume* snaphost, I can see that real snapshot exist localy (I say real snaphost, not clone), but also the clone is created on 1 of those NFS servers... Can you somehow instruct me to check if new template I have just created, is actualy copied on all 3 NFS hosts (all3 NFS are online, and working fine) ? Template is only 4GB of real size on the host, and it should be very quickly copied to where it shoyld be. (my IO and netowrk traffic are pretty low in general). Should the templates files be created on all 3 NFS storages, with the same file name? Or can I see this somehow from the database...I'm trying to decode it by myself, but can't figure this out... Thanks again, Andrija On 13 December 2013 17:35, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: Andrija, The design is that any Public Template, or ISO gets copied to every secondary
Re: template_host_ref moved to template_store_ref
Andrija - You are right and all the entries will be created in template_store_ref post 4.2. The table is similar to the template_host_ref and serves the same purpose. I am guessing that the authors have introduced this table since the secondary store is no more persisted in the host table and also the fact that similar tables were introduced for snapshots/volumes, they wanted to have consistent naming convention. Thanks, -Nitin On 16/12/13 12:54 PM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I just noticed that I do not have any new lines in template_host_ref after upgrading from 4.0 to 4.2. Inside the template_store_ref (I use NFS for all SS), I can see all entries from the begining of CS, along with the latest entries with new template details... Is template_host_ref being replaced with template_store_ref (at least for NFS) ? I see lot of documentaion reference template_host_ref, but I'm missing any new lines after upgrade to CS 4.2... -- Andrija Panić -- http://admintweets.com --
Re: How to add new IPs on CS 4.2 (Basic Networking)?
Hi Giljae, I can not read your picture, can you send me again? BTW, I didn't set any vlans, you mean I must set vlan? Thank you. Steven On 12/16/2013 04:24 PM, giljae o wrote: Hi, You can add additional public ip addresses with the new vlan or existing vlan on UI below. Inline image 1 On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 5:27 AM, Steven Liang stevenli...@yesup.com mailto:stevenli...@yesup.com wrote: Hi Chiradeep, Thank you for updating. I haven't tried. Can I use cloudmonkey? I've installed cloudmonkey, just used for list. Steven On 12/16/2013 03:11 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: Have you tried expanding your pod with http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.2/root_admin/updatePod.html On 12/16/13 7:22 AM, Steven Liang stevenli...@yesup.com mailto:stevenli...@yesup.com wrote: Hi All, I have a question. If I would use up my existing public IPs(for example: xxx.xxx.1.0/24), how to add new subnet(xxx.xxx.2.0/24) to my new pod? Thank you. Steven
Re: Merging/Removing Secondary Storage NFS
Yes that is true, but it was ISOs copy (they are also located under /templates/ folder, so I though it was really templates that were being copied, but instead it was ISOs...) I need to migrate all 3 NFSs to new one, and it seems like I'm going to change database, which is not really my prefered way... On 16 December 2013 22:27, Nitin Mehta nitin.me...@citrix.com wrote: This is definitely not expected. But, in the thread below I see you writing that the restarting MS initiated template copy. Is that not the case ? On 16/12/13 11:58 AM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote: Well, only ISOs have been copied to the new NFS storage... no other templates... Is this expected behaviour or should I consider this a bug ? Any clue on troubleshooting this ? On 16 December 2013 17:05, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote: I have just restarted the management server, and the templates copy process has begin to the new NFS server... Will update. On 16 December 2013 16:14, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote: HI Geoff, I have just added new NFS secondary storage to CS. Can you please tell, when shall I expect all existing ISOs and templates to be copied over (start being copied...) - so far, I can observe NO network traffic. Is this maybe configurable like purge thread, or similar ? I have also issues the script for checking the SSVM ( /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh) and have no problems so far. More important, I can confirm that I do NOT have checksum inside the template.properties on public templates, only on system templates... And I can confirm that I do not have public templates being replicated on all NFS storages...that is strange. ISOs do get replicated, but public templates does not... Is this a bug or what...? I can not observer any errors in management log... Thanks, Andrija On 13 December 2013 20:10, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you very much, I will check... that... funny thing, I search for files created in last i.e. 1 hour, and there is only one file created on 1 NFS, no files created on other NFSs. Thanks Sent from Google Nexus 4 On Dec 13, 2013 6:06 PM, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: The templates get unique names, however they are in the same folder structure. e.g. My S1 has \\IPADDRESS\lonsec\template\tmpl\1\5 And my S2 has \\IPADDDRESS\lonsec2\template\tmpl\1\5 Note that the '1' is the account ID of the user who created the template, in this case 'system' as this is a system vm template, the '5' is simply the 5th template created on this system The two template.properties files contain the following S1 template.properties file # #Mon May 20 14:11:06 UTC 2013 filename=d015ebd8-5395-31a5-9648-a179062885d8.vhd vhd=true id=5 vhd.filename=d015ebd8-5395-31a5-9648-a179062885d8.vhd public=true uniquename=centos56-x86_64-xen vhd.virtualsize=21474836480 virtualsize=21474836480 checksum=905cec879afd9c9d22ecc8036131a180 hvm=false description=CentOS 5.6(64-bit) no GUI (XenServer) vhd.size=1758786048 size=1758786048 S1 template.properties file # #Wed Nov 21 23:14:59 UTC 2012 filename=8b106378-7d6d-31b3-aab7-bfc85ef97884.vhd vhd=true id=5 vhd.filename=8b106378-7d6d-31b3-aab7-bfc85ef97884.vhd public=true uniquename=centos56-x86_64-xen vhd.virtualsize=21474836480 virtualsize=21474836480 checksum=905cec879afd9c9d22ecc8036131a180 hvm=false description=CentOS 5.6(64-bit) no GUI (XenServer) vhd.size=1758786048 size=1758786048 dsa Note that the line checksum=905cec879afd9c9d22ecc8036131a180 is common to both, you will also find this value in the db in table cloud.vm_template This is the link to the template on disk, and the one referenced in the DB You can also see from the dates within the two properties files, that this template was originally deployed back in may, but when I added the 2nd Secondary Storage Node in November, the template was automatically copied across. Hopefully all this info helps you. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com] Sent: 13 December 2013 16:47 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Merging/Removing Secondary Storage NFS Hi Jeff, thanks for that detailed explanation, I'm on the KVM by the way... For the *volume* snaphost, I can see that real snapshot exist localy (I say real snaphost, not clone), but also the clone is created on 1 of those NFS servers... Can you somehow instruct me to check if new template I have just created, is actualy copied on all 3 NFS hosts (all3 NFS are online, and working fine) ? Template is only 4GB of real size on the host,
Re: template_host_ref moved to template_store_ref
Thanks for clarifying Nitin, good to know that... So I have my tables now to be hacked, in order to move templates from one to another SS... Thanks again. On 16 December 2013 22:25, Nitin Mehta nitin.me...@citrix.com wrote: Andrija - You are right and all the entries will be created in template_store_ref post 4.2. The table is similar to the template_host_ref and serves the same purpose. I am guessing that the authors have introduced this table since the secondary store is no more persisted in the host table and also the fact that similar tables were introduced for snapshots/volumes, they wanted to have consistent naming convention. Thanks, -Nitin On 16/12/13 12:54 PM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I just noticed that I do not have any new lines in template_host_ref after upgrading from 4.0 to 4.2. Inside the template_store_ref (I use NFS for all SS), I can see all entries from the begining of CS, along with the latest entries with new template details... Is template_host_ref being replaced with template_store_ref (at least for NFS) ? I see lot of documentaion reference template_host_ref, but I'm missing any new lines after upgrade to CS 4.2... -- Andrija Panić -- http://admintweets.com -- -- Andrija Panić -- http://admintweets.com --
Re: How to add new IPs on CS 4.2 (Basic Networking)?
Hi, Sorry about confusing. The way I wrote is for advanced network not basic zone. I believe that you should stick to Mr. Chiradeep's guide. James. On 12/17/13, 6:29 AM, Steven Liang wrote: Hi Giljae, I can not read your picture, can you send me again? BTW, I didn't set any vlans, you mean I must set vlan? Thank you. Steven On 12/16/2013 04:24 PM, giljae o wrote: Hi, You can add additional public ip addresses with the new vlan or existing vlan on UI below. Inline image 1 On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 5:27 AM, Steven Liangstevenli...@yesup.com mailto:stevenli...@yesup.com wrote: Hi Chiradeep, Thank you for updating. I haven't tried. Can I use cloudmonkey? I've installed cloudmonkey, just used for list. Steven On 12/16/2013 03:11 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: Have you tried expanding your pod with http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.2/root_admin/updatePod.html On 12/16/13 7:22 AM, Steven Liangstevenli...@yesup.com mailto:stevenli...@yesup.com wrote: Hi All, I have a question. If I would use up my existing public IPs(for example: xxx.xxx.1.0/24), how to add new subnet(xxx.xxx.2.0/24) to my new pod? Thank you. Steven
Re: How to add new IPs on CS 4.2 (Basic Networking)?
Hi James, Thank you anyway. But I don't understand what Mr. Chiradeep said. I listed my pods using cloudmonkey, the two pods have the same netmask and gateway(management ips). What should I update? Please help me. Thank you. Steven On 12/16/2013 04:35 PM, ogiljae wrote: Hi, Sorry about confusing. The way I wrote is for advanced network not basic zone. I believe that you should stick to Mr. Chiradeep's guide. James. On 12/17/13, 6:29 AM, Steven Liang wrote: Hi Giljae, I can not read your picture, can you send me again? BTW, I didn't set any vlans, you mean I must set vlan? Thank you. Steven On 12/16/2013 04:24 PM, giljae o wrote: Hi, You can add additional public ip addresses with the new vlan or existing vlan on UI below. Inline image 1 On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 5:27 AM, Steven Liangstevenli...@yesup.com mailto:stevenli...@yesup.com wrote: Hi Chiradeep, Thank you for updating. I haven't tried. Can I use cloudmonkey? I've installed cloudmonkey, just used for list. Steven On 12/16/2013 03:11 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: Have you tried expanding your pod with http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.2/root_admin/updatePod.html On 12/16/13 7:22 AM, Steven Liangstevenli...@yesup.com mailto:stevenli...@yesup.com wrote: Hi All, I have a question. If I would use up my existing public IPs(for example: xxx.xxx.1.0/24), how to add new subnet(xxx.xxx.2.0/24) to my new pod? Thank you. Steven
Re: How to add new IPs on CS 4.2 (Basic Networking)?
Hi. I think what Mr.Chiradeep said is for gmt ip not for public ip address. How about using add publicipaddess on cloudmonkey or using UI manu : infrastructure - zone - network - guest network . James. Sent from Samsung Galaxy NoteSteven Liang stevenli...@yesup.com wrote:Hi James, Thank you anyway. But I don't understand what Mr. Chiradeep said. I listed my pods using cloudmonkey, the two pods have the same netmask and gateway(management ips). What should I update? Please help me. Thank you. Steven On 12/16/2013 04:35 PM, ogiljae wrote: Hi, Sorry about confusing. The way I wrote is for advanced network not basic zone. I believe that you should stick to Mr. Chiradeep's guide. James. On 12/17/13, 6:29 AM, Steven Liang wrote: Hi Giljae, I can not read your picture, can you send me again? BTW, I didn't set any vlans, you mean I must set vlan? Thank you. Steven On 12/16/2013 04:24 PM, giljae o wrote: Hi, You can add additional public ip addresses with the new vlan or existing vlan on UI below. Inline image 1 On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 5:27 AM, Steven Liangstevenli...@yesup.com mailto:stevenli...@yesup.com wrote: Hi Chiradeep, Thank you for updating. I haven't tried. Can I use cloudmonkey? I've installed cloudmonkey, just used for list. Steven On 12/16/2013 03:11 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: Have you tried expanding your pod with http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.2/root_admin/updatePod.html On 12/16/13 7:22 AM, Steven Liangstevenli...@yesup.com mailto:stevenli...@yesup.com wrote: Hi All, I have a question. If I would use up my existing public IPs(for example: xxx.xxx.1.0/24), how to add new subnet(xxx.xxx.2.0/24) to my new pod? Thank you. Steven
Re: How to add new IPs on CS 4.2 (Basic Networking)?
Steven, I assume you want to add ip addresses that are available to VMs. I am also assuming that the IP for VMs is drawn from the pod ip range. In that case, you can use the 'update pod' api with cloudmonkey. On 12/16/13 1:44 PM, Steven Liang stevenli...@yesup.com wrote: Hi James, Thank you anyway. But I don't understand what Mr. Chiradeep said. I listed my pods using cloudmonkey, the two pods have the same netmask and gateway(management ips). What should I update? Please help me. Thank you. Steven On 12/16/2013 04:35 PM, ogiljae wrote: Hi, Sorry about confusing. The way I wrote is for advanced network not basic zone. I believe that you should stick to Mr. Chiradeep's guide. James. On 12/17/13, 6:29 AM, Steven Liang wrote: Hi Giljae, I can not read your picture, can you send me again? BTW, I didn't set any vlans, you mean I must set vlan? Thank you. Steven On 12/16/2013 04:24 PM, giljae o wrote: Hi, You can add additional public ip addresses with the new vlan or existing vlan on UI below. Inline image 1 On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 5:27 AM, Steven Liangstevenli...@yesup.com mailto:stevenli...@yesup.com wrote: Hi Chiradeep, Thank you for updating. I haven't tried. Can I use cloudmonkey? I've installed cloudmonkey, just used for list. Steven On 12/16/2013 03:11 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: Have you tried expanding your pod with http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.2/root_admin/updatePod. html On 12/16/13 7:22 AM, Steven Liangstevenli...@yesup.com mailto:stevenli...@yesup.com wrote: Hi All, I have a question. If I would use up my existing public IPs(for example: xxx.xxx.1.0/24), how to add new subnet(xxx.xxx.2.0/24) to my new pod? Thank you. Steven
