Re: How to add new IPs on CS 4.2 (Basic Networking)?

[Chiradeep Vittal]

Steven, I assume you want to add ip addresses that are available to VMs.
I am also assuming that the IP for VMs is drawn from the pod ip range. In
that case, you can use the 'update pod' api with cloudmonkey.

On 12/16/13 1:44 PM, "Steven Liang"  wrote:

>Hi James,
>
>Thank you anyway.
>But I don't understand what Mr. Chiradeep said.
>I listed my pods using cloudmonkey, the two pods have the same netmask
>and gateway(management ips).
>What should I update? Please help me.
>Thank you.
>
>Steven
>
>
>
>On 12/16/2013 04:35 PM, ogiljae wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Sorry about confusing.
>> The way I wrote is for advanced network not basic zone.
>> I believe that you should stick to Mr. Chiradeep's guide.
>>
>> James.
>>
>>
>> On 12/17/13, 6:29 AM, Steven Liang wrote:
>>> Hi Giljae,
>>>
>>> I can not read your picture, can you send me again?
>>> BTW, I didn't set any vlans, you mean I must set vlan?
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>> Steven
>>>
>>> On 12/16/2013 04:24 PM, giljae o wrote:
 Hi,

 You can add additional public ip addresses with the new vlan or
 existing vlan on UI below.

 Inline image 1


 On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 5:27 AM, Steven Liang>>> >  wrote:

  Hi Chiradeep,

  Thank you for updating.
  I haven't tried. Can I use cloudmonkey? I've installed
  cloudmonkey, just
  used for "list".

  Steven


  On 12/16/2013 03:11 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
  >  Have you tried expanding your pod with
  >
 
 
http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.2/root_admin/updatePod.
html
  >
  >  On 12/16/13 7:22 AM, "Steven Liang">>>  >  wrote:
  >
  >>  Hi All,
  >>
  >>  I have a question. If I would use up my existing public
 IPs(for
  example:
  >>  xxx.xxx.1.0/24), how to add new subnet(xxx.xxx.2.0/24) to my
  new pod?
  >>  Thank you.
  >>
  >>  Steven



>>>
>>>
>>
>
>

Re: How to add new IPs on CS 4.2 (Basic Networking)?

[Ogiljae]

Hi.

I think what Mr.Chiradeep said is for gmt ip not for public ip address.
How about using " add publicipaddess" on cloudmonkey or using UI manu : 
infrastructure -> zone -> network -> guest network .

James.



Sent from Samsung Galaxy NoteSteven Liang  wrote:Hi 
James,

Thank you anyway.
But I don't understand what Mr. Chiradeep said.
I listed my pods using cloudmonkey, the two pods have the same netmask
and gateway(management ips).
What should I update? Please help me.
Thank you.

Steven



On 12/16/2013 04:35 PM, ogiljae wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry about confusing.
> The way I wrote is for advanced network not basic zone.
> I believe that you should stick to Mr. Chiradeep's guide.
>
> James.
>
>
> On 12/17/13, 6:29 AM, Steven Liang wrote:
>> Hi Giljae,
>>
>> I can not read your picture, can you send me again?
>> BTW, I didn't set any vlans, you mean I must set vlan?
>> Thank you.
>>
>> Steven
>>
>> On 12/16/2013 04:24 PM, giljae o wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> You can add additional public ip addresses with the new vlan or
>>> existing vlan on UI below.
>>>
>>> Inline image 1
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 5:27 AM, Steven Liang>> >  wrote:
>>>
>>>  Hi Chiradeep,
>>>
>>>  Thank you for updating.
>>>  I haven't tried. Can I use cloudmonkey? I've installed
>>>  cloudmonkey, just
>>>  used for "list".
>>>
>>>  Steven
>>>
>>>
>>>  On 12/16/2013 03:11 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
>>>  >  Have you tried expanding your pod with
>>>  >
>>> 
>>> http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.2/root_admin/updatePod.html
>>>  >
>>>  >  On 12/16/13 7:22 AM, "Steven Liang">>  >  wrote:
>>>  >
>>>  >>  Hi All,
>>>  >>
>>>  >>  I have a question. If I would use up my existing public
>>> IPs(for
>>>  example:
>>>  >>  xxx.xxx.1.0/24), how to add new subnet(xxx.xxx.2.0/24) to my
>>>  new pod?
>>>  >>  Thank you.
>>>  >>
>>>  >>  Steven
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>

Re: How to add new IPs on CS 4.2 (Basic Networking)?

[Steven Liang]

Hi James,

Thank you anyway.
But I don't understand what Mr. Chiradeep said.
I listed my pods using cloudmonkey, the two pods have the same netmask
and gateway(management ips).
What should I update? Please help me.
Thank you.

Steven



On 12/16/2013 04:35 PM, ogiljae wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry about confusing.
> The way I wrote is for advanced network not basic zone.
> I believe that you should stick to Mr. Chiradeep's guide.
>
> James.
>
>
> On 12/17/13, 6:29 AM, Steven Liang wrote:
>> Hi Giljae,
>>
>> I can not read your picture, can you send me again?
>> BTW, I didn't set any vlans, you mean I must set vlan?
>> Thank you.
>>
>> Steven
>>
>> On 12/16/2013 04:24 PM, giljae o wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> You can add additional public ip addresses with the new vlan or
>>> existing vlan on UI below.
>>>
>>> Inline image 1
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 5:27 AM, Steven Liang>> >  wrote:
>>>
>>>  Hi Chiradeep,
>>>
>>>  Thank you for updating.
>>>  I haven't tried. Can I use cloudmonkey? I've installed
>>>  cloudmonkey, just
>>>  used for "list".
>>>
>>>  Steven
>>>
>>>
>>>  On 12/16/2013 03:11 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
>>>  >  Have you tried expanding your pod with
>>>  >
>>> 
>>> http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.2/root_admin/updatePod.html
>>>  >
>>>  >  On 12/16/13 7:22 AM, "Steven Liang">>  >  wrote:
>>>  >
>>>  >>  Hi All,
>>>  >>
>>>  >>  I have a question. If I would use up my existing public
>>> IPs(for
>>>  example:
>>>  >>  xxx.xxx.1.0/24), how to add new subnet(xxx.xxx.2.0/24) to my
>>>  new pod?
>>>  >>  Thank you.
>>>  >>
>>>  >>  Steven
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>

Re: How to add new IPs on CS 4.2 (Basic Networking)?

[ogiljae]

Hi,

Sorry about confusing.
The way I wrote is for advanced network not basic zone.
I believe that you should stick to Mr. Chiradeep's guide.

James.


On 12/17/13, 6:29 AM, Steven Liang wrote:

Hi Giljae,

I can not read your picture, can you send me again?
BTW, I didn't set any vlans, you mean I must set vlan?
Thank you.

Steven

On 12/16/2013 04:24 PM, giljae o wrote:

Hi,

You can add additional public ip addresses with the new vlan or
existing vlan on UI below.

Inline image 1


On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 5:27 AM, Steven Liangmailto:stevenli...@yesup.com>>  wrote:

 Hi Chiradeep,

 Thank you for updating.
 I haven't tried. Can I use cloudmonkey? I've installed
 cloudmonkey, just
 used for "list".

 Steven


 On 12/16/2013 03:11 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
 >  Have you tried expanding your pod with
 >
 http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.2/root_admin/updatePod.html
 >
 >  On 12/16/13 7:22 AM, "Steven Liang"mailto:stevenli...@yesup.com>>  wrote:
 >
 >>  Hi All,
 >>
 >>  I have a question. If I would use up my existing public IPs(for
 example:
 >>  xxx.xxx.1.0/24), how to add new subnet(xxx.xxx.2.0/24) to my
 new pod?
 >>  Thank you.
 >>
 >>  Steven

Re: template_host_ref moved to template_store_ref

[Andrija Panic]

Thanks for clarifying Nitin, good to know that...

So I have my tables now to be hacked, in order to move templates from one
to another SS...

Thanks again.


On 16 December 2013 22:25, Nitin Mehta  wrote:

> Andrija - You are right and all the entries will be created in
> template_store_ref post 4.2.
> The table is similar to the template_host_ref and serves the same purpose.
> I am guessing that the authors have introduced this table since the
> secondary store is no more persisted
> in the host table and also the fact that similar tables were introduced
> for snapshots/volumes, they wanted to have consistent naming convention.
>
> Thanks,
> -Nitin
>
> On 16/12/13 12:54 PM, "Andrija Panic"  wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >I just noticed that I do not have any new lines in template_host_ref after
> >upgrading from 4.0 to 4.2.
> >
> >Inside the template_store_ref (I use NFS for all SS), I can see all
> >entries
> >from the begining of CS, along with the latest entries with new template
> >details...
> >
> >Is template_host_ref being replaced with template_store_ref (at least for
> >NFS) ?
> >
> >I see lot of documentaion reference template_host_ref, but I'm missing any
> >new lines after upgrade to CS 4.2...
> >
> >--
> >
> >Andrija Panić
> >--
> >  http://admintweets.com
> >--
>
>


-- 

Andrija Panić
--
  http://admintweets.com
--

Re: Merging/Removing Secondary Storage NFS

[Andrija Panic]

Yes that is true, but it was ISOs copy (they are also located under
/templates/ folder, so I though it was really templates that were being
copied, but instead it was ISOs...)
I need to migrate all 3 NFSs to new one, and it seems like I'm going to
change database, which is not really my prefered way...


On 16 December 2013 22:27, Nitin Mehta  wrote:

> This is definitely not expected. But, in the thread below I see you
> writing that the restarting MS initiated template copy. Is that not the
> case ?
>
> On 16/12/13 11:58 AM, "Andrija Panic"  wrote:
>
> >Well, only ISOs have been copied to the new NFS storage... no other
> >templates...
> >
> >Is this expected behaviour or should I consider this a bug ?
> >
> >Any clue on troubleshooting this ?
> >
> >
> >On 16 December 2013 17:05, Andrija Panic  wrote:
> >
> >> I have just restarted the management server, and the templates copy
> >> process has begin to the new NFS server...
> >>
> >> Will update.
> >>
> >>
> >> On 16 December 2013 16:14, Andrija Panic 
> >>wrote:
> >>
> >>> HI Geoff,
> >>> I have just added new NFS secondary storage to CS.
> >>> Can you please tell, when shall I expect all existing ISOs and
> >>>templates
> >>> to be copied over (start being copied...) - so far, I can observe NO
> >>> network traffic.
> >>> Is this maybe configurable like purge thread, or similar ? I have also
> >>> issues the script for checking the SSVM (
> >>> /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh) and have no problems so far.
> >>>
> >>> More important, I can confirm that I do NOT have checksum inside the
> >>> "template.properties" on public templates, only on system templates...
> >>> And I can confirm that I do not have public templates being replicated
> >>>on
> >>> all NFS storages...that is strange. ISOs do get replicated, but public
> >>> templates does not...
> >>> Is this a bug or what...? I can not observer any errors in management
> >>> log...
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Andrija
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 13 December 2013 20:10, Andrija Panic 
> >>>wrote:
> >>>
>  Thank you very much, I will check... that... funny thing, I search for
>  files created in last i.e. 1 hour, and there is only one file created
> on 1
>  NFS, no files created on other NFSs.
> 
>  Thanks
> 
>  Sent from Google Nexus 4
>  On Dec 13, 2013 6:06 PM, "Geoff Higginbottom" <
>  geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> 
> > The templates get unique names, however they are in the same folder
> > structure.
> >
> > e.g.
> >
> > My S1 has
> > \\IPADDRESS\lonsec\template\tmpl\1\5
> >
> > And my S2 has
> > \\IPADDDRESS\lonsec2\template\tmpl\1\5
> >
> > Note that the '1' is the account ID of the user who created the
> > template, in this case 'system' as this is a system vm template, the
> >'5' is
> > simply the 5th template created on this system
> >
> > The two template.properties files contain the following
> >
> > S1 template.properties file
> > #
> > #Mon May 20 14:11:06 UTC 2013
> > filename=d015ebd8-5395-31a5-9648-a179062885d8.vhd
> > vhd=true
> > id=5
> > vhd.filename=d015ebd8-5395-31a5-9648-a179062885d8.vhd
> > public=true
> > uniquename=centos56-x86_64-xen
> > vhd.virtualsize=21474836480
> > virtualsize=21474836480
> > checksum=905cec879afd9c9d22ecc8036131a180
> > hvm=false
> > description=CentOS 5.6(64-bit) no GUI (XenServer)
> > vhd.size=1758786048
> > size=1758786048
> >
> > S1 template.properties file
> > #
> > #Wed Nov 21 23:14:59 UTC 2012
> > filename=8b106378-7d6d-31b3-aab7-bfc85ef97884.vhd
> > vhd=true
> > id=5
> > vhd.filename=8b106378-7d6d-31b3-aab7-bfc85ef97884.vhd
> > public=true
> > uniquename=centos56-x86_64-xen
> > vhd.virtualsize=21474836480
> > virtualsize=21474836480
> > checksum=905cec879afd9c9d22ecc8036131a180
> > hvm=false
> > description=CentOS 5.6(64-bit) no GUI (XenServer)
> > vhd.size=1758786048
> > size=1758786048
> > dsa
> >
> > Note that the line
> > checksum=905cec879afd9c9d22ecc8036131a180
> > is common to both, you will also find this value in the db in table
> > cloud.vm_template
> > This is the link to the template on disk, and the one referenced in
> >the
> > DB
> >
> > You can also see from the dates within the two properties files, that
> > this template was originally deployed back in may, but when I added
> >the 2nd
> > Secondary Storage Node in November, the template was automatically
> >copied
> > across.
> >
> > Hopefully all this info helps you.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Geoff Higginbottom
> >
> > D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
> >
> > geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.c

Re: How to add new IPs on CS 4.2 (Basic Networking)?

[Steven Liang]

Hi Giljae,

I can not read your picture, can you send me again?
BTW, I didn't set any vlans, you mean I must set vlan?
Thank you.

Steven

On 12/16/2013 04:24 PM, giljae o wrote:
> Hi,
>
> You can add additional public ip addresses with the new vlan or
> existing vlan on UI below.
>
> Inline image 1
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 5:27 AM, Steven Liang  > wrote:
>
> Hi Chiradeep,
>
> Thank you for updating.
> I haven't tried. Can I use cloudmonkey? I've installed
> cloudmonkey, just
> used for "list".
>
> Steven
>
>
> On 12/16/2013 03:11 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
> > Have you tried expanding your pod with
> >
> 
> http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.2/root_admin/updatePod.html
> >
> > On 12/16/13 7:22 AM, "Steven Liang"  > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> I have a question. If I would use up my existing public IPs(for
> example:
> >> xxx.xxx.1.0/24), how to add new subnet(xxx.xxx.2.0/24) to my
> new pod?
> >> Thank you.
> >>
> >> Steven
>
>
>

Re: template_host_ref moved to template_store_ref

[Nitin Mehta]

Andrija - You are right and all the entries will be created in
template_store_ref post 4.2.
The table is similar to the template_host_ref and serves the same purpose.
I am guessing that the authors have introduced this table since the
secondary store is no more persisted
in the host table and also the fact that similar tables were introduced
for snapshots/volumes, they wanted to have consistent naming convention.

Thanks,
-Nitin

On 16/12/13 12:54 PM, "Andrija Panic"  wrote:

>Hi,
>
>I just noticed that I do not have any new lines in template_host_ref after
>upgrading from 4.0 to 4.2.
>
>Inside the template_store_ref (I use NFS for all SS), I can see all
>entries
>from the begining of CS, along with the latest entries with new template
>details...
>
>Is template_host_ref being replaced with template_store_ref (at least for
>NFS) ?
>
>I see lot of documentaion reference template_host_ref, but I'm missing any
>new lines after upgrade to CS 4.2...
>
>-- 
>
>Andrija Panić
>--
>  http://admintweets.com
>--

Re: Merging/Removing Secondary Storage NFS

[Nitin Mehta]

This is definitely not expected. But, in the thread below I see you
writing that the restarting MS initiated template copy. Is that not the
case ?

On 16/12/13 11:58 AM, "Andrija Panic"  wrote:

>Well, only ISOs have been copied to the new NFS storage... no other
>templates...
>
>Is this expected behaviour or should I consider this a bug ?
>
>Any clue on troubleshooting this ?
>
>
>On 16 December 2013 17:05, Andrija Panic  wrote:
>
>> I have just restarted the management server, and the templates copy
>> process has begin to the new NFS server...
>>
>> Will update.
>>
>>
>> On 16 December 2013 16:14, Andrija Panic 
>>wrote:
>>
>>> HI Geoff,
>>> I have just added new NFS secondary storage to CS.
>>> Can you please tell, when shall I expect all existing ISOs and
>>>templates
>>> to be copied over (start being copied...) - so far, I can observe NO
>>> network traffic.
>>> Is this maybe configurable like purge thread, or similar ? I have also
>>> issues the script for checking the SSVM (
>>> /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh) and have no problems so far.
>>>
>>> More important, I can confirm that I do NOT have checksum inside the
>>> "template.properties" on public templates, only on system templates...
>>> And I can confirm that I do not have public templates being replicated
>>>on
>>> all NFS storages...that is strange. ISOs do get replicated, but public
>>> templates does not...
>>> Is this a bug or what...? I can not observer any errors in management
>>> log...
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Andrija
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 13 December 2013 20:10, Andrija Panic 
>>>wrote:
>>>
 Thank you very much, I will check... that... funny thing, I search for
 files created in last i.e. 1 hour, and there is only one file created
on 1
 NFS, no files created on other NFSs.

 Thanks

 Sent from Google Nexus 4
 On Dec 13, 2013 6:06 PM, "Geoff Higginbottom" <
 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> wrote:

> The templates get unique names, however they are in the same folder
> structure.
>
> e.g.
>
> My S1 has
> \\IPADDRESS\lonsec\template\tmpl\1\5
>
> And my S2 has
> \\IPADDDRESS\lonsec2\template\tmpl\1\5
>
> Note that the '1' is the account ID of the user who created the
> template, in this case 'system' as this is a system vm template, the
>'5' is
> simply the 5th template created on this system
>
> The two template.properties files contain the following
>
> S1 template.properties file
> #
> #Mon May 20 14:11:06 UTC 2013
> filename=d015ebd8-5395-31a5-9648-a179062885d8.vhd
> vhd=true
> id=5
> vhd.filename=d015ebd8-5395-31a5-9648-a179062885d8.vhd
> public=true
> uniquename=centos56-x86_64-xen
> vhd.virtualsize=21474836480
> virtualsize=21474836480
> checksum=905cec879afd9c9d22ecc8036131a180
> hvm=false
> description=CentOS 5.6(64-bit) no GUI (XenServer)
> vhd.size=1758786048
> size=1758786048
>
> S1 template.properties file
> #
> #Wed Nov 21 23:14:59 UTC 2012
> filename=8b106378-7d6d-31b3-aab7-bfc85ef97884.vhd
> vhd=true
> id=5
> vhd.filename=8b106378-7d6d-31b3-aab7-bfc85ef97884.vhd
> public=true
> uniquename=centos56-x86_64-xen
> vhd.virtualsize=21474836480
> virtualsize=21474836480
> checksum=905cec879afd9c9d22ecc8036131a180
> hvm=false
> description=CentOS 5.6(64-bit) no GUI (XenServer)
> vhd.size=1758786048
> size=1758786048
> dsa
>
> Note that the line
> checksum=905cec879afd9c9d22ecc8036131a180
> is common to both, you will also find this value in the db in table
> cloud.vm_template
> This is the link to the template on disk, and the one referenced in
>the
> DB
>
> You can also see from the dates within the two properties files, that
> this template was originally deployed back in may, but when I added
>the 2nd
> Secondary Storage Node in November, the template was automatically
>copied
> across.
>
> Hopefully all this info helps you.
>
> Regards
>
> Geoff Higginbottom
>
> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 13 December 2013 16:47
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Merging/Removing Secondary Storage NFS
>
> Hi Jeff, thanks for that detailed explanation, I'm on the KVM by the
> way...
> For the *volume* snaphost, I can see that real snapshot exist localy
>(I
> say real snaphost, not clone), but also the clone is created on 1 of
>those
> NFS servers...
>
> Can you somehow instruct me to check if new template I have just
> created, is actualy copied on all 3 NFS hosts (all3 NFS are online,
>and
> working
> fine) ?
> Template is only 4GB of r

Re: How to add new IPs on CS 4.2 (Basic Networking)?

[giljae o]

Hi,

You can add additional public ip addresses with the new vlan or existing
vlan on UI below.

[image: Inline image 1]


On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 5:27 AM, Steven Liang  wrote:

> Hi Chiradeep,
>
> Thank you for updating.
> I haven't tried. Can I use cloudmonkey? I've installed cloudmonkey, just
> used for "list".
>
> Steven
>
>
> On 12/16/2013 03:11 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
> > Have you tried expanding your pod with
> >
> http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.2/root_admin/updatePod.html
> >
> > On 12/16/13 7:22 AM, "Steven Liang"  wrote:
> >
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> I have a question. If I would use up my existing public IPs(for example:
> >> xxx.xxx.1.0/24), how to add new subnet(xxx.xxx.2.0/24) to my new pod?
> >> Thank you.
> >>
> >> Steven
>
>
>

template_host_ref moved to template_store_ref

[Andrija Panic]

Hi,

I just noticed that I do not have any new lines in template_host_ref after
upgrading from 4.0 to 4.2.

Inside the template_store_ref (I use NFS for all SS), I can see all entries
from the begining of CS, along with the latest entries with new template
details...

Is template_host_ref being replaced with template_store_ref (at least for
NFS) ?

I see lot of documentaion reference template_host_ref, but I'm missing any
new lines after upgrade to CS 4.2...

-- 

Andrija Panić
--
  http://admintweets.com
--

public templates does NOT get replicated to new NFS SS

[Andrija Panic]

Hi,

I have an issue with new NFS storage (and the old ones also):

When I create new public template, it is supposed to be copied over to all
Secondary Storages (I have already 3 NFSs, and added a new NFS).

After I added the new NFS, only the ISO files got replicated.

Also inside the "template.properties" file next to the any public
templates, I can NOT see the checksum line (which does exist for the ISOs
and system VM templates)

This is CS 4.2.0. (update from 4.0), all from official RPMs, on CentOS.

Any clue on this... ?
-- 

Andrija Panić

Re: How to add new IPs on CS 4.2 (Basic Networking)?

[Steven Liang]

Hi Chiradeep,

Thank you for updating.
I haven't tried. Can I use cloudmonkey? I've installed cloudmonkey, just
used for "list".

Steven


On 12/16/2013 03:11 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
> Have you tried expanding your pod with
> http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.2/root_admin/updatePod.html
>
> On 12/16/13 7:22 AM, "Steven Liang"  wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I have a question. If I would use up my existing public IPs(for example:
>> xxx.xxx.1.0/24), how to add new subnet(xxx.xxx.2.0/24) to my new pod?
>> Thank you.
>>
>> Steven

Re: How to add new IPs on CS 4.2 (Basic Networking)?

[Chiradeep Vittal]

Have you tried expanding your pod with
http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.2/root_admin/updatePod.html

On 12/16/13 7:22 AM, "Steven Liang"  wrote:

>Hi All,
>
>I have a question. If I would use up my existing public IPs(for example:
>xxx.xxx.1.0/24), how to add new subnet(xxx.xxx.2.0/24) to my new pod?
>Thank you.
>
>Steven

Re: Merging/Removing Secondary Storage NFS

[Andrija Panic]

Well, only ISOs have been copied to the new NFS storage... no other
templates...

Is this expected behaviour or should I consider this a bug ?

Any clue on troubleshooting this ?


On 16 December 2013 17:05, Andrija Panic  wrote:

> I have just restarted the management server, and the templates copy
> process has begin to the new NFS server...
>
> Will update.
>
>
> On 16 December 2013 16:14, Andrija Panic  wrote:
>
>> HI Geoff,
>> I have just added new NFS secondary storage to CS.
>> Can you please tell, when shall I expect all existing ISOs and templates
>> to be copied over (start being copied...) - so far, I can observe NO
>> network traffic.
>> Is this maybe configurable like purge thread, or similar ? I have also
>> issues the script for checking the SSVM (
>> /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh) and have no problems so far.
>>
>> More important, I can confirm that I do NOT have checksum inside the
>> "template.properties" on public templates, only on system templates...
>> And I can confirm that I do not have public templates being replicated on
>> all NFS storages...that is strange. ISOs do get replicated, but public
>> templates does not...
>> Is this a bug or what...? I can not observer any errors in management
>> log...
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Andrija
>>
>>
>>
>> On 13 December 2013 20:10, Andrija Panic  wrote:
>>
>>> Thank you very much, I will check... that... funny thing, I search for
>>> files created in last i.e. 1 hour, and there is only one file created on 1
>>> NFS, no files created on other NFSs.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Sent from Google Nexus 4
>>> On Dec 13, 2013 6:06 PM, "Geoff Higginbottom" <
>>> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
>>>
 The templates get unique names, however they are in the same folder
 structure.

 e.g.

 My S1 has
 \\IPADDRESS\lonsec\template\tmpl\1\5

 And my S2 has
 \\IPADDDRESS\lonsec2\template\tmpl\1\5

 Note that the '1' is the account ID of the user who created the
 template, in this case 'system' as this is a system vm template, the '5' is
 simply the 5th template created on this system

 The two template.properties files contain the following

 S1 template.properties file
 #
 #Mon May 20 14:11:06 UTC 2013
 filename=d015ebd8-5395-31a5-9648-a179062885d8.vhd
 vhd=true
 id=5
 vhd.filename=d015ebd8-5395-31a5-9648-a179062885d8.vhd
 public=true
 uniquename=centos56-x86_64-xen
 vhd.virtualsize=21474836480
 virtualsize=21474836480
 checksum=905cec879afd9c9d22ecc8036131a180
 hvm=false
 description=CentOS 5.6(64-bit) no GUI (XenServer)
 vhd.size=1758786048
 size=1758786048

 S1 template.properties file
 #
 #Wed Nov 21 23:14:59 UTC 2012
 filename=8b106378-7d6d-31b3-aab7-bfc85ef97884.vhd
 vhd=true
 id=5
 vhd.filename=8b106378-7d6d-31b3-aab7-bfc85ef97884.vhd
 public=true
 uniquename=centos56-x86_64-xen
 vhd.virtualsize=21474836480
 virtualsize=21474836480
 checksum=905cec879afd9c9d22ecc8036131a180
 hvm=false
 description=CentOS 5.6(64-bit) no GUI (XenServer)
 vhd.size=1758786048
 size=1758786048
 dsa

 Note that the line
 checksum=905cec879afd9c9d22ecc8036131a180
 is common to both, you will also find this value in the db in table
 cloud.vm_template
 This is the link to the template on disk, and the one referenced in the
 DB

 You can also see from the dates within the two properties files, that
 this template was originally deployed back in may, but when I added the 2nd
 Secondary Storage Node in November, the template was automatically copied
 across.

 Hopefully all this info helps you.

 Regards

 Geoff Higginbottom

 D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

 -Original Message-
 From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com]
 Sent: 13 December 2013 16:47
 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
 Subject: Re: Merging/Removing Secondary Storage NFS

 Hi Jeff, thanks for that detailed explanation, I'm on the KVM by the
 way...
 For the *volume* snaphost, I can see that real snapshot exist localy (I
 say real snaphost, not clone), but also the clone is created on 1 of those
 NFS servers...

 Can you somehow instruct me to check if new template I have just
 created, is actualy copied on all 3 NFS hosts (all3 NFS are online, and
 working
 fine) ?
 Template is only 4GB of real size on the host, and it should be very
 quickly copied to where it shoyld be. (my IO and netowrk traffic are pretty
 low in general).

 Should the templates files be created on all 3 NFS storages, with the
 same file name? Or can I see this somehow from the database...I'm trying to
 decode it by myself, but can't figure this out...

 Thanks again,
>

Re: Merging/Removing Secondary Storage NFS

[Andrija Panic]

I have just restarted the management server, and the templates copy process
has begin to the new NFS server...

Will update.


On 16 December 2013 16:14, Andrija Panic  wrote:

> HI Geoff,
> I have just added new NFS secondary storage to CS.
> Can you please tell, when shall I expect all existing ISOs and templates
> to be copied over (start being copied...) - so far, I can observe NO
> network traffic.
> Is this maybe configurable like purge thread, or similar ? I have also
> issues the script for checking the SSVM (
> /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh) and have no problems so far.
>
> More important, I can confirm that I do NOT have checksum inside the
> "template.properties" on public templates, only on system templates...
> And I can confirm that I do not have public templates being replicated on
> all NFS storages...that is strange. ISOs do get replicated, but public
> templates does not...
> Is this a bug or what...? I can not observer any errors in management
> log...
>
> Thanks,
> Andrija
>
>
>
> On 13 December 2013 20:10, Andrija Panic  wrote:
>
>> Thank you very much, I will check... that... funny thing, I search for
>> files created in last i.e. 1 hour, and there is only one file created on 1
>> NFS, no files created on other NFSs.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Sent from Google Nexus 4
>> On Dec 13, 2013 6:06 PM, "Geoff Higginbottom" <
>> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The templates get unique names, however they are in the same folder
>>> structure.
>>>
>>> e.g.
>>>
>>> My S1 has
>>> \\IPADDRESS\lonsec\template\tmpl\1\5
>>>
>>> And my S2 has
>>> \\IPADDDRESS\lonsec2\template\tmpl\1\5
>>>
>>> Note that the '1' is the account ID of the user who created the
>>> template, in this case 'system' as this is a system vm template, the '5' is
>>> simply the 5th template created on this system
>>>
>>> The two template.properties files contain the following
>>>
>>> S1 template.properties file
>>> #
>>> #Mon May 20 14:11:06 UTC 2013
>>> filename=d015ebd8-5395-31a5-9648-a179062885d8.vhd
>>> vhd=true
>>> id=5
>>> vhd.filename=d015ebd8-5395-31a5-9648-a179062885d8.vhd
>>> public=true
>>> uniquename=centos56-x86_64-xen
>>> vhd.virtualsize=21474836480
>>> virtualsize=21474836480
>>> checksum=905cec879afd9c9d22ecc8036131a180
>>> hvm=false
>>> description=CentOS 5.6(64-bit) no GUI (XenServer)
>>> vhd.size=1758786048
>>> size=1758786048
>>>
>>> S1 template.properties file
>>> #
>>> #Wed Nov 21 23:14:59 UTC 2012
>>> filename=8b106378-7d6d-31b3-aab7-bfc85ef97884.vhd
>>> vhd=true
>>> id=5
>>> vhd.filename=8b106378-7d6d-31b3-aab7-bfc85ef97884.vhd
>>> public=true
>>> uniquename=centos56-x86_64-xen
>>> vhd.virtualsize=21474836480
>>> virtualsize=21474836480
>>> checksum=905cec879afd9c9d22ecc8036131a180
>>> hvm=false
>>> description=CentOS 5.6(64-bit) no GUI (XenServer)
>>> vhd.size=1758786048
>>> size=1758786048
>>> dsa
>>>
>>> Note that the line
>>> checksum=905cec879afd9c9d22ecc8036131a180
>>> is common to both, you will also find this value in the db in table
>>> cloud.vm_template
>>> This is the link to the template on disk, and the one referenced in the
>>> DB
>>>
>>> You can also see from the dates within the two properties files, that
>>> this template was originally deployed back in may, but when I added the 2nd
>>> Secondary Storage Node in November, the template was automatically copied
>>> across.
>>>
>>> Hopefully all this info helps you.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Geoff Higginbottom
>>>
>>> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>>>
>>> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: 13 December 2013 16:47
>>> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: Merging/Removing Secondary Storage NFS
>>>
>>> Hi Jeff, thanks for that detailed explanation, I'm on the KVM by the
>>> way...
>>> For the *volume* snaphost, I can see that real snapshot exist localy (I
>>> say real snaphost, not clone), but also the clone is created on 1 of those
>>> NFS servers...
>>>
>>> Can you somehow instruct me to check if new template I have just
>>> created, is actualy copied on all 3 NFS hosts (all3 NFS are online, and
>>> working
>>> fine) ?
>>> Template is only 4GB of real size on the host, and it should be very
>>> quickly copied to where it shoyld be. (my IO and netowrk traffic are pretty
>>> low in general).
>>>
>>> Should the templates files be created on all 3 NFS storages, with the
>>> same file name? Or can I see this somehow from the database...I'm trying to
>>> decode it by myself, but can't figure this out...
>>>
>>> Thanks again,
>>> Andrija
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 13 December 2013 17:35, Geoff Higginbottom <
>>> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Andrija,
>>> >
>>> > The design is that any Public Template, or ISO gets copied to every
>>> > secondary storage in the zone.  The copying is undertaken by the SSVM
>>> > and will obviously take some time if you have just added a 2nd Public
>

How to add new IPs on CS 4.2 (Basic Networking)?

[Steven Liang]

Hi All,

I have a question. If I would use up my existing public IPs(for example:
xxx.xxx.1.0/24), how to add new subnet(xxx.xxx.2.0/24) to my new pod?
Thank you.

Steven

Re: Merging/Removing Secondary Storage NFS

[Andrija Panic]

HI Geoff,
I have just added new NFS secondary storage to CS.
Can you please tell, when shall I expect all existing ISOs and templates to
be copied over (start being copied...) - so far, I can observe NO network
traffic.
Is this maybe configurable like purge thread, or similar ? I have also
issues the script for checking the SSVM (
/usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh) and have no problems so far.

More important, I can confirm that I do NOT have checksum inside the
"template.properties" on public templates, only on system templates...
And I can confirm that I do not have public templates being replicated on
all NFS storages...that is strange. ISOs do get replicated, but public
templates does not...
Is this a bug or what...? I can not observer any errors in management log...

Thanks,
Andrija



On 13 December 2013 20:10, Andrija Panic  wrote:

> Thank you very much, I will check... that... funny thing, I search for
> files created in last i.e. 1 hour, and there is only one file created on 1
> NFS, no files created on other NFSs.
>
> Thanks
>
> Sent from Google Nexus 4
> On Dec 13, 2013 6:06 PM, "Geoff Higginbottom" <
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
>
>> The templates get unique names, however they are in the same folder
>> structure.
>>
>> e.g.
>>
>> My S1 has
>> \\IPADDRESS\lonsec\template\tmpl\1\5
>>
>> And my S2 has
>> \\IPADDDRESS\lonsec2\template\tmpl\1\5
>>
>> Note that the '1' is the account ID of the user who created the template,
>> in this case 'system' as this is a system vm template, the '5' is simply
>> the 5th template created on this system
>>
>> The two template.properties files contain the following
>>
>> S1 template.properties file
>> #
>> #Mon May 20 14:11:06 UTC 2013
>> filename=d015ebd8-5395-31a5-9648-a179062885d8.vhd
>> vhd=true
>> id=5
>> vhd.filename=d015ebd8-5395-31a5-9648-a179062885d8.vhd
>> public=true
>> uniquename=centos56-x86_64-xen
>> vhd.virtualsize=21474836480
>> virtualsize=21474836480
>> checksum=905cec879afd9c9d22ecc8036131a180
>> hvm=false
>> description=CentOS 5.6(64-bit) no GUI (XenServer)
>> vhd.size=1758786048
>> size=1758786048
>>
>> S1 template.properties file
>> #
>> #Wed Nov 21 23:14:59 UTC 2012
>> filename=8b106378-7d6d-31b3-aab7-bfc85ef97884.vhd
>> vhd=true
>> id=5
>> vhd.filename=8b106378-7d6d-31b3-aab7-bfc85ef97884.vhd
>> public=true
>> uniquename=centos56-x86_64-xen
>> vhd.virtualsize=21474836480
>> virtualsize=21474836480
>> checksum=905cec879afd9c9d22ecc8036131a180
>> hvm=false
>> description=CentOS 5.6(64-bit) no GUI (XenServer)
>> vhd.size=1758786048
>> size=1758786048
>> dsa
>>
>> Note that the line
>> checksum=905cec879afd9c9d22ecc8036131a180
>> is common to both, you will also find this value in the db in table
>> cloud.vm_template
>> This is the link to the template on disk, and the one referenced in the DB
>>
>> You can also see from the dates within the two properties files, that
>> this template was originally deployed back in may, but when I added the 2nd
>> Secondary Storage Node in November, the template was automatically copied
>> across.
>>
>> Hopefully all this info helps you.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Geoff Higginbottom
>>
>> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>>
>> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 13 December 2013 16:47
>> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Merging/Removing Secondary Storage NFS
>>
>> Hi Jeff, thanks for that detailed explanation, I'm on the KVM by the
>> way...
>> For the *volume* snaphost, I can see that real snapshot exist localy (I
>> say real snaphost, not clone), but also the clone is created on 1 of those
>> NFS servers...
>>
>> Can you somehow instruct me to check if new template I have just created,
>> is actualy copied on all 3 NFS hosts (all3 NFS are online, and working
>> fine) ?
>> Template is only 4GB of real size on the host, and it should be very
>> quickly copied to where it shoyld be. (my IO and netowrk traffic are pretty
>> low in general).
>>
>> Should the templates files be created on all 3 NFS storages, with the
>> same file name? Or can I see this somehow from the database...I'm trying to
>> decode it by myself, but can't figure this out...
>>
>> Thanks again,
>> Andrija
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 13 December 2013 17:35, Geoff Higginbottom <
>> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Andrija,
>> >
>> > The design is that any Public Template, or ISO gets copied to every
>> > secondary storage in the zone.  The copying is undertaken by the SSVM
>> > and will obviously take some time if you have just added a 2nd Public
>> > ISO or Template, so your copy process may not have finished.
>> >
>> > For 4.2 'Snapshots' are now even more confusing than ever.  We now have:
>> >
>> > 1. VM Snapshots (ESXi & XenServer Only) these are true Hypervisor
>> > Snapshots, enabling quick roll back to the Snapshot, including Memory
>> State.
>> > 2. Volume Snapshots (better thoug

Re: Domain admin role. CS4.2

[Ryan Lei]

You can also refer to a more recent discussion here:
http://markmail.org/thread/iptmbd4recxuec5q

Indeed, this bug was finally fixed for 4.2.1 and 4.3.0.

---
Yu-Heng (Ryan) Lei, Associate Researcher
Chunghwa Telecom Laboratories / Cloud Computing Laboratory
ryan...@cht.com.tw or ryanlei750...@gmail.com



On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Rafael Weingartner <
rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi, I guess the explanation you are looking for it is here:
> http://markmail.org/message/ucxsapyannat2z6b
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4830
>
>
> 2013/12/16 Vadim Kimlaychuk 
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > According to description of Domain admin role in Cloudstack Computing
> > (book):
> >
> > “The domain administrator cannot access the physical resources of the
> > cloud but has
> > access to all the subdomains and accounts in that domain, the domain
> > administrator
> > can create/delete any user in that domain or change properties such as
> > passwords.
> > The domains do not own any resources; they are just containers that
> > contain objects
> > that can own resources.”
> >
> > But in reality – domain admin in CS does not have right to
> add
> > new users to the domain and change their passwords. As I have mentioned
> it
> > doesn’t have any special rights at all. Just ordinary user. Can someone
> > explain this?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Vadim Kimlaychuk
> > integratsiooni arhitekt
> > tel. 640 2297
> > mob. 5233474
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Rafael Weingärtner
>

RE: Domain admin role. CS4.2

[Vadim Kimlaychuk]

Both versions are mentioned at "Fix versions".  It seems bug is already fixed, 
so may be 4.2.1 is a target. Anyway will update. Will see :)

Vadim.

-Original Message-
From: Rafael Weingartner [mailto:rafaelweingart...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 1:51 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Domain admin role. CS4.2

Just 4.3? I thought it was going to be shipped on 4.2.1 too.
The 4.2.1 is going to be released any time soon.


2013/12/16 Vadim Kimlaychuk 

> Rafael,
>
> You are right. That's what I was looking for. As I see it 
> should be implemented at the next release 4.3. Nice !
>
> Thank you
>
> Vadim.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rafael Weingartner [mailto:rafaelweingart...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 12:58 PM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Domain admin role. CS4.2
>
> Hi, I guess the explanation you are looking for it is here:
> http://markmail.org/message/ucxsapyannat2z6b
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4830
>
>
> 2013/12/16 Vadim Kimlaychuk 
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > According to description of Domain admin role in Cloudstack 
> > Computing
> > (book):
> >
> > “The domain administrator cannot access the physical resources of 
> > the cloud but has access to all the subdomains and accounts in that 
> > domain, the domain administrator can create/delete any user in that 
> > domain or change properties such as passwords.
> > The domains do not own any resources; they are just containers that 
> > contain objects that can own resources.”
> >
> > But in reality – domain admin in CS does not have right 
> > to add new users to the domain and change their passwords. As I have 
> > mentioned it doesn’t have any special rights at all. Just ordinary 
> > user. Can someone explain this?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Vadim Kimlaychuk
> > integratsiooni arhitekt
> > tel. 640 2297
> > mob. 5233474
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Rafael Weingärtner
>



--
Rafael Weingärtner

Re: Domain admin role. CS4.2

[Rafael Weingartner]

Just 4.3? I thought it was going to be shipped on 4.2.1 too.
The 4.2.1 is going to be released any time soon.


2013/12/16 Vadim Kimlaychuk 

> Rafael,
>
> You are right. That's what I was looking for. As I see it should
> be implemented at the next release 4.3. Nice !
>
> Thank you
>
> Vadim.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rafael Weingartner [mailto:rafaelweingart...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 12:58 PM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Domain admin role. CS4.2
>
> Hi, I guess the explanation you are looking for it is here:
> http://markmail.org/message/ucxsapyannat2z6b
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4830
>
>
> 2013/12/16 Vadim Kimlaychuk 
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > According to description of Domain admin role in Cloudstack Computing
> > (book):
> >
> > “The domain administrator cannot access the physical resources of the
> > cloud but has access to all the subdomains and accounts in that
> > domain, the domain administrator can create/delete any user in that
> > domain or change properties such as passwords.
> > The domains do not own any resources; they are just containers that
> > contain objects that can own resources.”
> >
> > But in reality – domain admin in CS does not have right to
> > add new users to the domain and change their passwords. As I have
> > mentioned it doesn’t have any special rights at all. Just ordinary
> > user. Can someone explain this?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Vadim Kimlaychuk
> > integratsiooni arhitekt
> > tel. 640 2297
> > mob. 5233474
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Rafael Weingärtner
>



-- 
Rafael Weingärtner

RE: Domain admin role. CS4.2

[Vadim Kimlaychuk]

Rafael,

You are right. That's what I was looking for. As I see it should be 
implemented at the next release 4.3. Nice !

Thank you

Vadim.

-Original Message-
From: Rafael Weingartner [mailto:rafaelweingart...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 12:58 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Domain admin role. CS4.2

Hi, I guess the explanation you are looking for it is here:
http://markmail.org/message/ucxsapyannat2z6b
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4830


2013/12/16 Vadim Kimlaychuk 

> Hi,
>
> According to description of Domain admin role in Cloudstack Computing
> (book):
>
> “The domain administrator cannot access the physical resources of the 
> cloud but has access to all the subdomains and accounts in that 
> domain, the domain administrator can create/delete any user in that 
> domain or change properties such as passwords.
> The domains do not own any resources; they are just containers that 
> contain objects that can own resources.”
>
> But in reality – domain admin in CS does not have right to 
> add new users to the domain and change their passwords. As I have 
> mentioned it doesn’t have any special rights at all. Just ordinary 
> user. Can someone explain this?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Vadim Kimlaychuk
> integratsiooni arhitekt
> tel. 640 2297
> mob. 5233474
>
>


--
Rafael Weingärtner

Re: Domain admin role. CS4.2

[Rafael Weingartner]

Hi, I guess the explanation you are looking for it is here:
http://markmail.org/message/ucxsapyannat2z6b
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4830


2013/12/16 Vadim Kimlaychuk 

> Hi,
>
> According to description of Domain admin role in Cloudstack Computing
> (book):
>
> “The domain administrator cannot access the physical resources of the
> cloud but has
> access to all the subdomains and accounts in that domain, the domain
> administrator
> can create/delete any user in that domain or change properties such as
> passwords.
> The domains do not own any resources; they are just containers that
> contain objects
> that can own resources.”
>
> But in reality – domain admin in CS does not have right to add
> new users to the domain and change their passwords. As I have mentioned it
> doesn’t have any special rights at all. Just ordinary user. Can someone
> explain this?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Vadim Kimlaychuk
> integratsiooni arhitekt
> tel. 640 2297
> mob. 5233474
>
>


-- 
Rafael Weingärtner

Domain admin role. CS4.2

[Vadim Kimlaychuk]

Hi,

According to description of Domain admin role in Cloudstack Computing (book):

“The domain administrator cannot access the physical resources of the cloud but 
has
access to all the subdomains and accounts in that domain, the domain 
administrator
can create/delete any user in that domain or change properties such as 
passwords.
The domains do not own any resources; they are just containers that contain 
objects
that can own resources.”

But in reality – domain admin in CS does not have right to add new 
users to the domain and change their passwords. As I have mentioned it doesn’t 
have any special rights at all. Just ordinary user. Can someone explain this?

Thanks,

Vadim Kimlaychuk
integratsiooni arhitekt
tel. 640 2297
mob. 5233474