LXC template

[Chinu]

Hello all,

Please can someone advice how to create an LXC template image  in tar 
format to spawn containers in KVM for Cloudstack version 4.2 or 4.3
Regards,
Chinu 

Re: System VMs not running

[Amogh Vasekar]

Hi,

More info on the version and management server logs would probably help
you get some response on the list :-)

Amogh

On 4/1/14 12:15 PM, "José Egas López"  wrote:

>I checked my System VMs, there are two (Console Proxy and Secondary
>Storage), both are stopped and both don't start when I try to initialize
>them, it just says "Failed to start".
>Which may be the problem?*
>Thanks
>
>***
>-- 
>
>*
>José
>
>*
>
>
>
>FARMAENLACE ha procesado su mensaje y esta limpio
>No imprima este mail a menos que sea necesario
>

Re: When i update 4.2.1 to 4.3.0,console don't work

[Amogh Vasekar]

Hi,

Can you please let us know the errors you observed for chains? If its
broken, gotta be fixed :-)

Thanks,
Amogh

On 4/1/14 7:38 PM, "Mark van der Meulen"  wrote:

>I believe I saw an email saying that realhostip.com has been retired?
>Regardless, it's been terribly unreliable anyways and you should move
>away from it.
>
>Good luck though, I haven't managed to get the SSL Certificate change to
>work due to CS inability to handle certificate chains - despite many
>attempts with every trick found on google and this list. It's a very much
>incomplete part of CS.
>
>Mark
>
>> On 2 Apr 2014, at 1:04 pm, "ma y"  wrote:
>> 
>> When i open vm console, i got this info from management server log
>>,like "
>> https://192-168-28-2.*.realhostip.com/...",and it don't work.
>> I think the problem is my computer can't resolve this domain name
>> "192-168-28-2.*.realhostip.com".
>> In CS 4.2.1 , that domain name like "192-168-28-2.realhostip.com" , and
>>it
>> works well.
>> So, is this a bug for CS 4.3.0 ?  How to fix this?
>> Thks!

RE: No outbound traffic with F5 as loadbalancer network offering

[Sanjeev Neelarapu]

Hi Amin,

Have you checked whether the configured egress rules are programmed properly on 
VR ? 

-Sanjeev

-Original Message-
From: Amin Pashapour [mailto:jol...@yahoo.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2014 1:24 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: No outbound traffic with F5 as loadbalancer network offering

I am still stuck with this issue.

Looks like the virtualrouter is not allowing any outbound traffic, but I have 
set the egress to allow all TCP ports from 1-64000.
I have restarted my virtualrouter several times and still nothing outbound.
Any hints? Any buttons to push?

Appreciate it in advance
Amin



 From: Amin Pashapour 
To: "users@cloudstack.apache.org"  
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 10:21 AM
Subject: Can't go out of a vm with F5 as loadbalancer network offering
 

Hi All,

On CloudStack 4.2.1, I have set up a network that uses an offering with F5 as 
loadbalancer. All other features use VirtualRouter.  Everything is working fine 
going southbound to the two VM's I am loadbalancing.

But when I am on either one of these VM's, I can't get to anything external.  I 
can get to the virtual router/gateway or other internal VM's. I can resolve 
www.google.com but I can't telnet to google.com on port 80

I have set egress on my network to ALL protocols from 0.0.0.0/0.  I have also 
disabled iptables and still nothing going out.

I can go outside when I use the default network offering.


Any hint on what could be the cause is greatly appreciated. Or any hint on how 
to troubleshoot!

Thanks.
Amin

Re: When i update 4.2.1 to 4.3.0,console don't work

[Mark van der Meulen]

I believe I saw an email saying that realhostip.com has been retired? 
Regardless, it's been terribly unreliable anyways and you should move away from 
it.

Good luck though, I haven't managed to get the SSL Certificate change to work 
due to CS inability to handle certificate chains - despite many attempts with 
every trick found on google and this list. It's a very much incomplete part of 
CS.

Mark

> On 2 Apr 2014, at 1:04 pm, "ma y"  wrote:
> 
> When i open vm console, i got this info from management server log ,like "
> https://192-168-28-2.*.realhostip.com/...",and it don't work.
> I think the problem is my computer can't resolve this domain name
> "192-168-28-2.*.realhostip.com".
> In CS 4.2.1 , that domain name like "192-168-28-2.realhostip.com" , and it
> works well.
> So, is this a bug for CS 4.3.0 ?  How to fix this?
> Thks!

VPN for VPC feature in 4.3

[Praveen Buravilli]

Hi,

I have noticed an issue in working with VPN for VPC which is a new feature 
introduced in CloudStack 4.3("1.1.6 Remote Access VPN for VPC" section of 
CloudStack 4.3 release notes).
Regular remote VPN for guest networks fine without any problem whereas, VPN for 
VPN isn't working.

When I checked  the VPC router, there is no IP address assigned to its public 
Nic.
Has anyone noticed this behaviour? Does this seem like a bug? Any known 
workaround available?

VPC router interface details:
===
root@r-38-VM:/etc/network# ifconfig -a
eth0  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 0e:00:a9:fe:00:7d
  inet addr:169.254.0.125  Bcast:169.254.255.255  Mask:255.255.0.0
  inet6 addr: fe80::c00:a9ff:fefe:7d/64 Scope:Link
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:1478 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:722 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
  RX bytes:126628 (123.6 KiB)  TX bytes:124068 (121.1 KiB)

eth1  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 06:59:68:00:00:1a
  BROADCAST MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
  RX bytes:0 (0.0 B)  TX bytes:0 (0.0 B)

loLink encap:Local Loopback
  inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
  inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
  UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
  RX packets:2 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:2 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
  RX bytes:214 (214.0 B)  TX bytes:214 (214.0 B)

Thanks,
Praveen Kumar

Re: When i update 4.2.1 to 4.3.0,console don't work

[ma y]

Thk u !
It works.
However , is this a bug for 4.3.0 ?


2014-04-02 10:02 GMT+08:00 Amogh Vasekar :

> Hi,
>
> Please change global config "console proxy.url.domain" to realhostip.com
>
> Thanks,
> Amogh
>
> On 4/1/14 6:59 PM, "ma y"  wrote:
>
> >When i open vm console, i got this info from management server log ,like "
> >https://192-168-28-2.*.realhostip.com/...",and it don't work.
> >I think the problem is my computer can't resolve this domain name
> >"192-168-28-2.*.realhostip.com".
> >In CS 4.2.1 , that domain name like "192-168-28-2.realhostip.com" , and
> it
> >works well.
> >So, is this a bug for CS 4.3.0 ?  How to fix this?
> >Thks!
>
>

Re: When i update 4.2.1 to 4.3.0,console don't work

[Amogh Vasekar]

Hi,

Please change global config "console proxy.url.domain" to realhostip.com

Thanks,
Amogh

On 4/1/14 6:59 PM, "ma y"  wrote:

>When i open vm console, i got this info from management server log ,like "
>https://192-168-28-2.*.realhostip.com/...",and it don't work.
>I think the problem is my computer can't resolve this domain name
>"192-168-28-2.*.realhostip.com".
>In CS 4.2.1 , that domain name like "192-168-28-2.realhostip.com" , and it
>works well.
>So, is this a bug for CS 4.3.0 ?  How to fix this?
>Thks!

When i update 4.2.1 to 4.3.0,console don't work

[ma y]

When i open vm console, i got this info from management server log ,like "
https://192-168-28-2.*.realhostip.com/...",and it don't work.
I think the problem is my computer can't resolve this domain name
"192-168-28-2.*.realhostip.com".
In CS 4.2.1 , that domain name like "192-168-28-2.realhostip.com" , and it
works well.
So, is this a bug for CS 4.3.0 ?  How to fix this?
Thks!

Re: Snapshot exceptions on 4.2.1 with NFS and S3

[Nux!]

On 27.03.2014 02:55, Thomas O'Dowd wrote:

I remember this used to work on Cloudstack 4.2 when I was testing it
with devcloud but with CloudPlatform 4.2.1 and KVM I can't get 
snapshots

to work.


Might be this
http://www.nux.ro/archive/2014/01/Taking_KVM_volume_snapshots_with_Cloudstack_4_2_on_CentOS_6_5.html

And update your OS. :)

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

Re: Snapshot exceptions on 4.2.1 with NFS and S3

[Thomas O'Dowd]

Thanks for the feedback Andrei,

In my case the problem seems unrelated to S3 as when I configure NFS as
my secondary storage I get the same problem. My problem seems to be that
the system tries to write the snapshot to directory path
like /mnt/e5c41.../snapshots/2/3/ but as for some reason it finds
that /mnt/e5c41.../snapshots/2/3/ doesn't exist as the /mnt/e5c41... is
not actually mounting secondary storage at that time. If I mount it
manually, the path is there but the system is not doing it automatically
for me.

Tom.

On Tue, 2014-04-01 at 22:41 +0100, Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote:
> From what I remember, there was an issue with S3 and snapshots. 
> 
> I might be mixing version numbers, but it could be related to the size of the 
> image. In the past, there was no support for multi-part upload I was not able 
> to snapshot anything larger than 5gb. Not sure if this is the same problem 
> that you are experiencing.
> 
> I would suggest trying 4.3 and letting us know how it works for you.
> 
> I am planning to upgrade to 4.3 and test snapshotting with nfs / s3 / ceph. 
> Will update on the progress.
> 
> Andrei
> 
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: "Thomas O'Dowd" 
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, 1 April, 2014 6:44:28 AM
> Subject: Re: Snapshot exceptions on 4.2.1 with NFS and S3
> 
> Anyone any hints on this? I've installed it a few times and always have
> the same issue. Wondering if it's some configuration problem or a known
> bug.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Tom.
> 
> On Thu, 2014-03-27 at 11:55 +0900, Thomas O'Dowd wrote:
> > I remember this used to work on Cloudstack 4.2 when I was testing it
> > with devcloud but with CloudPlatform 4.2.1 and KVM I can't get snapshots
> > to work.
> > 
> > I've setup a single node using KVM and management server, db and agent.
> > 
> > I can start an instance using a template stored on NFS secondary
> > storage. If I stop the instance and goto storage, I can see it's disk
> > and then I can select "take snapshot". This always seems to fail for me
> > and I'm not sure why.
> > 
> > The error seems to be:
> > Failed to create snapshot
> > com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Failed to
> > backup 4d3ea6fa-6902-4037-be67-166e34575ee9 for
> > disk 
> > /mnt/8a2181f7-86a0-3d7d-a5be-10caa89b3d27/f0615600-d806-486e-bbea-d408de0225e4
> >  to /mnt/e5c41d36-90d2-3d5e-bdbf-8a0140dd330e/snapshots/2/3
> > 
> > /mnt/8a218... is mounted fine if I look at df.
> > /mnt/e5c41... is not mounted.
> > 
> > If I browse to /mnt, the e5c41... directory (used for mounting) exists.
> > If I manually mount it, I can see the
> > directory /mnt/e5c41.../snapshots/2/3 so it exists. If I leave it
> > mounted and try to take a snapshot again, it fails again with the same
> > error and again when I check the /mnt/e5c41... directory is not mounted.
> > 
> > As I mentioned above, the NFS server I'm using is actually the same
> > node. I'm using KVM but I don't think that is causing the issue? I'm
> > using CentOS 6.4.
> > 
> > If I setup S3 as secondary storage and use NFS as the staging server, I
> > get the same error. Any hints on what I am doing wrong is greatly
> > appreciated. 
> > 
> > Here is more of the exception log:
> > 2014-03-24 16:12:33,450 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] 
> > (catalina-exec-10:null) ===START===  10.181.164.198 -- GET  
> > command=createSnapshot&volumeid=96f59602-8a84-4731-91a5-218d4f45ee70&response=json&sessionkey=TnWYMJmMIZRly5DfGPNX%2BpZeT%2BI%3D&_=1395645153401
> > 2014-03-24 16:12:33,819 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl] 
> > (catalina-exec-10:null) submit async job-10 = [ 
> > 4f6ffdef-f66d-405c-81cc-8a09cb39f5da ], details: AsyncJobVO {id:10, userId: 
> > 2, accountId: 2, sessionKey: null, instanceType: Snapshot, instanceId: 1, 
> > cmd: org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.snapshot.CreateSnapshotCmd, 
> > cmdOriginator: null, cmdInfo: 
> > {"id":"1","response":"json","sessionkey":"TnWYMJmMIZRly5DfGPNX+pZeT+I\u003d","cmdEventType":"SNAPSHOT.CREATE","ctxUserId":"2","httpmethod":"GET","_":"1395645153401","volumeid":"96f59602-8a84-4731-91a5-218d4f45ee70","ctxAccountId":"2","ctxStartEventId":"45"},
> >  cmdVersion: 0, callbackType: 0, callbackAddress: null, status: 0, 
> > processStatus: 0, resultCode: 0, result: null, initMsid: 143618408992, 
> > completeMsid: null, lastUpdated: null, lastPolled: null, created: null}
> > 2014-03-24 16:12:33,820 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl] 
> > (Job-Executor-10:job-10 = [ 4f6ffdef-f66d-405c-81cc-8a09cb39f5da ]) 
> > Executing org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.snapshot.CreateSnapshotCmd 
> > for job-10 = [ 4f6ffdef-f66d-405c-81cc-8a09cb39f5da ]
> > 2014-03-24 16:12:33,821 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] 
> > (catalina-exec-10:null) ===END===  10.181.164.198 -- GET  
> > command=createSnapshot&volumeid=96f59602-8a84-4731-91a5-218d4f45ee70&response=json&sessionkey=TnWYMJmMIZRly5DfGPNX%2BpZeT%2BI%3D&_=1395645153401
> > 20

setting guest's macaddress for primary nic

[Brian Galura]

I see that I can add and remove guest NICs using the API. Is it possible to 
explicitly set a macaddress for the primary NIC? Maybe also an IP?

Re: Snapshot exceptions on 4.2.1 with NFS and S3

[Andrei Mikhailovsky]

>From what I remember, there was an issue with S3 and snapshots. 

I might be mixing version numbers, but it could be related to the size of the 
image. In the past, there was no support for multi-part upload I was not able 
to snapshot anything larger than 5gb. Not sure if this is the same problem that 
you are experiencing.

I would suggest trying 4.3 and letting us know how it works for you.

I am planning to upgrade to 4.3 and test snapshotting with nfs / s3 / ceph. 
Will update on the progress.

Andrei


- Original Message -
From: "Thomas O'Dowd" 
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, 1 April, 2014 6:44:28 AM
Subject: Re: Snapshot exceptions on 4.2.1 with NFS and S3

Anyone any hints on this? I've installed it a few times and always have
the same issue. Wondering if it's some configuration problem or a known
bug.

Thanks,

Tom.

On Thu, 2014-03-27 at 11:55 +0900, Thomas O'Dowd wrote:
> I remember this used to work on Cloudstack 4.2 when I was testing it
> with devcloud but with CloudPlatform 4.2.1 and KVM I can't get snapshots
> to work.
> 
> I've setup a single node using KVM and management server, db and agent.
> 
> I can start an instance using a template stored on NFS secondary
> storage. If I stop the instance and goto storage, I can see it's disk
> and then I can select "take snapshot". This always seems to fail for me
> and I'm not sure why.
> 
> The error seems to be:
> Failed to create snapshot
> com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Failed to
> backup 4d3ea6fa-6902-4037-be67-166e34575ee9 for
> disk 
> /mnt/8a2181f7-86a0-3d7d-a5be-10caa89b3d27/f0615600-d806-486e-bbea-d408de0225e4
>  to /mnt/e5c41d36-90d2-3d5e-bdbf-8a0140dd330e/snapshots/2/3
> 
> /mnt/8a218... is mounted fine if I look at df.
> /mnt/e5c41... is not mounted.
> 
> If I browse to /mnt, the e5c41... directory (used for mounting) exists.
> If I manually mount it, I can see the
> directory /mnt/e5c41.../snapshots/2/3 so it exists. If I leave it
> mounted and try to take a snapshot again, it fails again with the same
> error and again when I check the /mnt/e5c41... directory is not mounted.
> 
> As I mentioned above, the NFS server I'm using is actually the same
> node. I'm using KVM but I don't think that is causing the issue? I'm
> using CentOS 6.4.
> 
> If I setup S3 as secondary storage and use NFS as the staging server, I
> get the same error. Any hints on what I am doing wrong is greatly
> appreciated. 
> 
> Here is more of the exception log:
> 2014-03-24 16:12:33,450 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] 
> (catalina-exec-10:null) ===START===  10.181.164.198 -- GET  
> command=createSnapshot&volumeid=96f59602-8a84-4731-91a5-218d4f45ee70&response=json&sessionkey=TnWYMJmMIZRly5DfGPNX%2BpZeT%2BI%3D&_=1395645153401
> 2014-03-24 16:12:33,819 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl] 
> (catalina-exec-10:null) submit async job-10 = [ 
> 4f6ffdef-f66d-405c-81cc-8a09cb39f5da ], details: AsyncJobVO {id:10, userId: 
> 2, accountId: 2, sessionKey: null, instanceType: Snapshot, instanceId: 1, 
> cmd: org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.snapshot.CreateSnapshotCmd, 
> cmdOriginator: null, cmdInfo: 
> {"id":"1","response":"json","sessionkey":"TnWYMJmMIZRly5DfGPNX+pZeT+I\u003d","cmdEventType":"SNAPSHOT.CREATE","ctxUserId":"2","httpmethod":"GET","_":"1395645153401","volumeid":"96f59602-8a84-4731-91a5-218d4f45ee70","ctxAccountId":"2","ctxStartEventId":"45"},
>  cmdVersion: 0, callbackType: 0, callbackAddress: null, status: 0, 
> processStatus: 0, resultCode: 0, result: null, initMsid: 143618408992, 
> completeMsid: null, lastUpdated: null, lastPolled: null, created: null}
> 2014-03-24 16:12:33,820 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl] 
> (Job-Executor-10:job-10 = [ 4f6ffdef-f66d-405c-81cc-8a09cb39f5da ]) Executing 
> org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.snapshot.CreateSnapshotCmd for job-10 
> = [ 4f6ffdef-f66d-405c-81cc-8a09cb39f5da ]
> 2014-03-24 16:12:33,821 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] 
> (catalina-exec-10:null) ===END===  10.181.164.198 -- GET  
> command=createSnapshot&volumeid=96f59602-8a84-4731-91a5-218d4f45ee70&response=json&sessionkey=TnWYMJmMIZRly5DfGPNX%2BpZeT%2BI%3D&_=1395645153401
> 2014-03-24 16:12:33,847 INFO  [user.snapshot.CreateSnapshotCmd] 
> (Job-Executor-10:job-10 = [ 4f6ffdef-f66d-405c-81cc-8a09cb39f5da ]) VOLSS: 
> createSnapshotCmd starts:1395645153847
> 2014-03-24 16:12:34,179 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] 
> (Job-Executor-10:job-10 = [ 4f6ffdef-f66d-405c-81cc-8a09cb39f5da ]) Seq 
> 1-249561236: Sending  { Cmd , MgmtId: 143618408992, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 
> 100011, 
> [{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CreateObjectCommand":{"data":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.SnapshotObjectTO":{"volume":{"uuid":"96f59602-8a84-4731-91a5-218d4f45ee70","volumeType":"ROOT","dataStore":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO":{"uuid":"8a2181f7-86a0-3d7d-a5be-10caa89b3d27","id":1,"poolType":"NetworkFilesystem

Re: iso template of type 'Other (32 bit)' does not get downloaded

[chris snow]

I created another 'Other (32 bit)' ISO definition, this second one has
downloaded ok.

I can't track down why the first one has not been downloaded.

On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 7:59 PM, chris snow  wrote:
> I'm trying to create an instance for on a XEN vm.  The ISO details are
> as follows
>
>Name: Ubuntu 12.04 (32 bit)
>Description: Ubuntu 12.04 (32 bit)
>URL: http://releases.ubuntu.com/12.04/ubuntu-12.04.4-server-i386.iso
>Zone: All Zones
>Bootable: Selected
>
> This ISO gets downloaded OK (but results in VM_HVM_REQUIRED error when
> creating an instance):
>
>OS Type: Ubuntu 12.04 (32 bit)
>
> So I have tried setting the OS type to 'Other (32 bit)' as described here [1].
> However, this ISO doesn't get download:
>
>OS Type: Other (32 bit)
>
> Question 1: Why does the second ISO not get downloaded?
> Question: 2 Why does Cloudstack UI not tell me there is an issue with
> the download?  Why is it silent about this error?
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Chris
>
> ---
> [1] http://shankerbalan.net/blog/cloudstack-ubuntu-10-04-xenserver-template/



-- 
Check out my professional profile and connect with me on LinkedIn.
http://lnkd.in/cw5k69

No outbound traffic with F5 as loadbalancer network offering

[Amin Pashapour]

I am still stuck with this issue.

Looks like the virtualrouter is not allowing any outbound traffic, but I have 
set the egress to allow all TCP ports from 1-64000.
I have restarted my virtualrouter several times and still nothing outbound.
Any hints? Any buttons to push?

Appreciate it in advance
Amin



 From: Amin Pashapour 
To: "users@cloudstack.apache.org"  
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 10:21 AM
Subject: Can't go out of a vm with F5 as loadbalancer network offering
 

Hi All,

On CloudStack 4.2.1, I have set up a network that uses an offering with F5 as 
loadbalancer. All other features use VirtualRouter.  Everything is working fine 
going southbound to the two VM's I am loadbalancing.

But when I am on either one of these VM's, I can't get to anything external.  I 
can get to the virtual router/gateway or other internal VM's. I can resolve 
www.google.com but I can't telnet to google.com on port 80

I have set egress on my network to ALL protocols from 0.0.0.0/0.  I have also 
disabled iptables and still nothing going out.

I can go outside when I use the default network offering.


Any hint on what could be the cause is greatly appreciated. Or any hint on how 
to troubleshoot!

Thanks.
Amin

System VMs not running

[José Egas López]

I checked my System VMs, there are two (Console Proxy and Secondary 
Storage), both are stopped and both don't start when I try to initialize 
them, it just says "Failed to start".

Which may be the problem?*
Thanks

***
--

*
José

*



FARMAENLACE ha procesado su mensaje y esta limpio
No imprima este mail a menos que sea necesario

iso template of type 'Other (32 bit)' does not get downloaded

[chris snow]

I'm trying to create an instance for on a XEN vm.  The ISO details are
as follows

   Name: Ubuntu 12.04 (32 bit)
   Description: Ubuntu 12.04 (32 bit)
   URL: http://releases.ubuntu.com/12.04/ubuntu-12.04.4-server-i386.iso
   Zone: All Zones
   Bootable: Selected

This ISO gets downloaded OK (but results in VM_HVM_REQUIRED error when
creating an instance):

   OS Type: Ubuntu 12.04 (32 bit)

So I have tried setting the OS type to 'Other (32 bit)' as described here [1].
However, this ISO doesn't get download:

   OS Type: Other (32 bit)

Question 1: Why does the second ISO not get downloaded?
Question: 2 Why does Cloudstack UI not tell me there is an issue with
the download?  Why is it silent about this error?

Many thanks,

Chris

---
[1] http://shankerbalan.net/blog/cloudstack-ubuntu-10-04-xenserver-template/

Re: Unable to provision instance

[Fred Newtz]

Can I just increase the size of the storage pool by editing the XML file on
the host?



On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 8:20 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion  wrote:

> I'm not experienced with KVM, and I'm also not sure if the Primary Storage
> is under LVM. But if it is, you could resize the primary storage using LVM?
> If you resize the Primary storage you should not have anything to do in
> CloudStack, it will update is available resources automatically, altough,
> you might need to have the hypervisor config updated.
>
>
>
>
> Pierre-Luc Dion
> Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect
> 514-447-3456, 1101
> - - -
>
> *CloudOps*420 rue Guy
> Montréal QC  H3J 1S6
> www.cloudops.com
> @CloudOps_
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Fred Newtz  wrote:
>
> > Saksham,
> >
> > The volume is 100gb.  I need the volume to be that size.  The local
> storage
> > pool is definitely only 50gb.  How can I expand or create a second
> primary
> > storage pool for this new instance to use?
> >
> >
> > Pierre-Luc,
> >
> > I did create a new service offering and that is the one I am using.
> > Storage Type local is what the Details of the service offering state.
> >
> >
> > Any suggestions on how to specify the max size of the local Primary
> Storage
> > pool?  Is there a configuration setting that dictates the size of the
> pool
> > on creation?  I have dug through all of the Global Settings and do not
> see
> > anything and I don't see any non-global settings that are available for
> the
> > storage pool itself.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Fred
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hello Fred,
> > >
> > > Have you define new service offerings that use local storage. Defaults
> > are
> > > configured to use shared storage.
> > >
> > > Le mardi 1 avril 2014, Fred Newtz  a écrit :
> > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > I have finally gotten past the networking hurdle and when I am
> > attempting
> > > > to provision my first VM instance I am getting the following error
> > > > messages:
> > > >
> > > > 2014-04-01 11:11:17,681 DEBUG
> > > [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
> > > > (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ])
> > > > Checking suitable pools for volume (Id, Type): (3,ROOT)
> > > > 2014-04-01 11:11:17,681 DEBUG
> > > [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
> > > > (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ])
> We
> > > need
> > > > to allocate new storagepool for this volume
> > > > 2014-04-01 11:11:17,682 DEBUG
> > > [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
> > > > (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ])
> > > Calling
> > > > StoragePoolAllocators to find suitable pools
> > > > 2014-04-01 11:11:17,682 DEBUG
> > > [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator]
> > > > (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ])
> > > > LocalStoragePoolAllocator trying to find storage pool to fit the vm
> > > > 2014-04-01 11:11:17,684 DEBUG
> > > > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator]
> > (Job-Executor-13:job-13
> > > =
> > > > [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ]) Checking if storage pool is
> > > > suitable, name: null ,poolId: 1
> > > > 2014-04-01 11:11:17,686 DEBUG [cloud.storage.StorageManagerImpl]
> > > > (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ])
> > > > Checking pool 1 for storage, totalSize: 52844687360, usedBytes:
> > > 2048802816,
> > > > usedPct: 0.03877027035930221, disable threshold: 0.85
> > > > 2014-04-01 11:11:17,690 DEBUG [cloud.storage.StorageManagerImpl]
> > > > (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ])
> > > > Checking pool: 1 for volume allocation [Vol[3|vm=3|ROOT]], maxSize :
> > > > 52844687360, totalAllocatedSize : 0, askingSize : 107374182400,
> > allocated
> > > > disable threshold: 0.85
> > > > 2014-04-01 11:11:17,690 DEBUG [cloud.storage.StorageManagerImpl]
> > > > (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ])
> > > > Insufficient un-allocated capacity on: 1 for volume allocation:
> > > > [Vol[3|vm=3|ROOT]] since its allocated percentage: 2.0318822527706972
> > has
> > > > crossed the allocated
> pool.storage.allocated.capacity.disablethreshold:
> > > > 0.85, skipping this pool
> > > > 2014-04-01 11:11:17,691 DEBUG
> > > [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator]
> > > > (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ])
> > > > LocalStoragePoolAllocator returning 0 suitable storage pools
> > > > 2014-04-01 11:11:17,691 DEBUG
> > > > [storage.allocator.ClusterScopeStoragePoolAllocator]
> > > > (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ])
> > > > ClusterScopeStoragePoolAllocator looking for storage pool
> > > > 2014-04-01 11:11:17,691 DEBUG
> > > > [storage.allocator.ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator]
> > (Job-Executor-13:job-13
> > > =
> > > > [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ])
> ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator
> > to
> > 

Re: packer for building cloudstack templates

[Peter Jönsson]

Hi!

I patched my library to support ignoring the certificate chain. If you do a

$ make get-ups
$ make

in the packer-directory you should get the latest version. Then you need to set 
the following value in the *.json-file:

insecure_skip_verify = true

Note: I haven’t tested this yet, but it _should_ work. 

If you like we can move the discussion off the list as well :)

// peter

On 1 Apr 2014 at 00:35:51, Erik Weber (terbol...@gmail.com) wrote:

Interesting!  

Initial testing gives me a SSL verification error. I have no idea on how to  
manipulate the Go CA store, any chance for an option to make it ignore  
validation?  

Can post the exact error tomorrow.  

--  
Erik Weber  


On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 9:41 PM, Peter Jönsson wrote: 
 

> Hi all!  
>  
> Sorry for resurrecting this ancient thread. My pull request for packer has  
> been lingering a quite some time now. It would be great if the Cloudstack  
> community could help out with testing a bit more. This however requires  
> that you install go and build a customer packer-version off the  
> pull-request from github. Note that this requires golang 1.2, git, hg and  
> bzr installed. You should be able to do that using your OS packager  
> (yum,apt-get, brew, etc). When you have those tools installed the following  
> commands you get you going:  
>  
> export GOPATH=$HOME/go  
> export PATH=$GOPATH/bin:$PATH  
> mkdir -p $GOPATH  
> go get github.com/mitchellh/packer # build download, build and install the  
> master version of packer into $GOPATH/bin  
> cd $GOPATH/src/github.com/mitchellh/packer/  
> git fetch origin refs/pull/922/head && git checkout FETCH_HEAD # will  
> download the HEAD of the latest version of pull request and check it out  
> make # will compile packer with cloudstack support and install into  
> $GOPATH/bin  
>  
> When building templates it's a good idea to set the PACKER_LOG variable (to  
> anything expect an empty string) to see the actual printouts. This will  
> help in debugging any eventual problems/bugs. I'll send some examples of  
> configuration json-files tomorrow.  
>  
> Thanks :)  
>  
> // peter  
>  
>  
>  
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 11:54 PM, Brian Galura  >wrote:  
>  
> > It's great to see progress in adding support to Packer I will test it as  
> > soon as it's available.  
> >  
> > But what do people do today? Is there a way to convert an ovf to vhd for  
> > example? I would be surprised if everyone creates templates by hand.  
> >  
> >  
> > Sent from Citrix WorxMail for iPhone  
> >  
> >  
> >   
> >  
> > From: Peter Jönsson   
> > Date: 2014-01-25 09:43:55 +  
> > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org ,  
> > peter.joens...@gmail.com ,  
> > users@cloudstack.apache.org   
> > Subject: Re: packer for building cloudstack templates  
> >  
> > Hi!  
> >  
> > As my library for talking to cloudstack (gopherstack) wasn't ideal I have  
> > been waiting for a new variant. It was release yesterday:  
> > https://github.com/svanharmelen/gocs .  
> >  
> > I will take a look at this library and perhaps, if it is good, port over  
> > my updates to packer to talk to this library. Then hopefully I can clean  
> up  
> > my changes and send a pull request to upstream packer.  
> >  
> > In general the approach we take for templates is to built them from  
> > scratch. That means PXE booting the instance, downloading kernel/initrd  
> > from a net boot server, then finally starting the OS-installation through  
> > kickstart. With packer this can be 100% automated via a special iPXE-ISO  
> > which will chain load off the user data attached to the VM instance.  
> >  
> > - Build custom iPXE with simple embedded boot script:  
> >  
> > #!pxe  
> > dhcp  
> > chain http://${dhcp-server}/latest/userdata  
> >  
> > - Boot up VM with user data attached with enough information to continue  
> > the boot, e.g.  
> >  
> > "#!ipxe\nkernel http://netboot/centos/6.3/x86_64/vmlinuz ks=  
> > http://netboot/ks.cfg\ninitrd  
> > http://netboot/centos/6.3/x86_64/initrd.img\nboot";  
> >  
> > - After kickstart is completed we reboot the instance and continue  
> setting  
> > it up using packer provisioning scripts.  
> >  
> > Things become slightly easier when only performing incremental template  
> > updates. But then someone need to create the initial template of course.  
> >  
> > // Peter  
> >  
> >  
> > On Saturday 25 January 2014 at 09:38, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:  
> >  
> > > On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 03:43:07AM +, Brian Galura wrote:  
> > > > At my company we use packer to build ec2 images and really like it.  
> > > > I would like to use it for cloudstack also.  
> > > >  
> > > > I found this: https://github.com/vogxn/packer-builtin  
> > > >  
> > > > Which appears to be a centos6 image builder for cloudstack but it  
> > > > lacks instructions to convert the resultant image into something I  
> > > > can import to cloudstack.  
> > > >  
> > > > Has anyone s

Re: CloudStack 4.1 Advance networking KVM

[motty cruz]

Thanks! after installing vconfig Cloudstack was able to create vlans.

Thanks Kirk,


On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Kirk Kosinski wrote:

> Hi, it looks like the "vconfig" command is not installed.  Run "yum
> install vconfig" and try again.
>
> Best regards,
> Kirk
>
> On 03/31/2014 12:08 PM, motty cruz wrote:
> > Hello, I'm unable to create "Instances" on Cloudstack CentOS KVM.
> >
> > /var/log/cloudstack/
> > 2014-03-31 10:43:02,534 WARN  [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
> > (agentRequest-Handler-3:null) Exception
> > com.cloud.exception.InternalErrorException: Failed to create vnet 602:
> > /usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/vm
> > /network/vnet/modifyvlan.sh: line 34: vconfig: command not
> > found/usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/vm/networ
> > k/vnet/modifyvlan.sh: line 38: vconfig: command not foundFailed to create
> > vlan 602 on pif: eth1
> >
> > [root@kvmt agent]# cat /etc/cloudstack/agent/agent.properties
> > #Storage
> > #Mon Mar 31 10:33:44 PDT 2014
> > guest.network.device=cloudbr1
> > workers=5
> > private.network.device=cloudbr0
> > port=8250
> > resource=com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource
> > pod=2
> > zone=2
> > guid=14529930-6d76-3b00-afa3-a5001bfd7a9d
> > public.network.device=cloudbr1
> > cluster=2
> > local.storage.uuid=486c81b4-d362-4bdd-ad71-4b402a5605ec
> > domr.scripts.dir=scripts/network/domr/kvm
> > LibvirtComputingResource.id=7
> > host=10.107.0.5
> > [root@kvmt agent]#
> >
> > [root@kvmt network-scripts]# cat ifcfg-eth1
> > DEVICE=eth1
> > TYPE=Ethernet
> > ONBOOT=yes
> > BRIDGE=cloudbr1
> >
> > [root@kvmt network-scripts]# cat ifcfg-cloudbr1
> > DEVICE=cloudbr1
> > ONBOOT=yes
> > TYPE=Bridge
> >
> >
> > any idea? looks like it fail to create a VLAN, but I don't understand
> why?
> >
>

Re: Some problem while creating the system vm's

[Giri Prasad]

Hi, 

Tried setting up the 


cloudstack-setup-databases cloud:xxx@localhost --deploy-as=root:y  
-i 192.xxx.xxx.xx


cloudstack-setup-management


Even before any provisioning was done, the management server log reports as:

2014-04-01 19:20:14,964 DEBUG 
[network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] 
(RouterStatusMonitor-1:null) Found 0 routers to update status.

2014-04-01 19:20:14,967 DEBUG 
[network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] 
(RouterStatusMonitor-1:null) Found 0 networks to update RvR status.

2014-04-01 19:20:30,027 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector] 
(StatsCollector-2:null) VmStatsCollector is running...
2014-04-01 19:20:30,027 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector] 
(StatsCollector-1:null) HostStatsCollector is running...
2014-04-01 19:20:30,037 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector] 
(StatsCollector-3:null) StorageCollector is running...
2014-04-01 19:20:43,905 DEBUG [cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl] 
(consoleproxy-1:null) Skip capacity scan due to there is no Primary Storage 
UPintenance mode
2014-04-01 19:20:44,964 DEBUG 
[network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] 
(RouterStatusMonitor-1:null) Found 0 routers to update status.
2014-04-01 19:20:44,966 DEBUG 
[network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] 
(RouterStatusMonitor-1:null) Found 0 networks to update RvR status.
2014-04-01 19:20:50,034 DEBUG [host.dao.HostDaoImpl] (ClusteredAgentManager 
Timer:null) Resetting hosts suitable for reconnect
2014-04-01 19:20:50,037 DEBUG [host.dao.HostDaoImpl] (ClusteredAgentManager 
Timer:null) Completed resetting hosts suitable for reconnect
2014-04-01 19:20:50,037 DEBUG [host.dao.HostDaoImpl] (ClusteredAgentManager 
Timer:null) Acquiring hosts for clusters already owned by this management server
2014-04-01 19:20:50,038 DEBUG [host.dao.HostDaoImpl] (ClusteredAgentManager 
Timer:null) Completed acquiring hosts for clusters already owned by this 
management server
2014-04-01 19:20:50,038 DEBUG [host.dao.HostDaoImpl] (ClusteredAgentManager 
Timer:null) Acquiring hosts for clusters not owned by any management server
2014-04-01 19:20:50,039 DEBUG [host.dao.HostDaoImpl] (ClusteredAgentManager 
Timer:null) Completed acquiring hosts for clusters not owned by any management 
server
2014-04-01 19:21:13,905 DEBUG [cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl] 
(consoleproxy-1:null) Skip capacity scan due to there is no Primary Storage 
UPintenance mode
2014-04-01 19:21:14,963 DEBUG 
[network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] 
(RouterStatusMonitor-1:null) Found 0 routers to update status.
2014-04-01 19:21:14,966 DEBUG 
[network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] 
(RouterStatusMonitor-1:null) Found 0 networks to update RvR status.
2014-04-01 19:21:30,031 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector] 
(StatsCollector-2:null) VmStatsCollector is running...
2014-04-01 19:21:30,031 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector] 
(StatsCollector-1:null) HostStatsCollector is running...
2014-04-01 19:21:30,042 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector] 
(StatsCollector-3:null) StorageCollector is running...

/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 
DEVICE=eth0
HWADDR=xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx
TYPE=Ethernet 
NM_CONTROLLED=no
ONBOOT=yes
BOOTPRO=none
BRIDGE=cloudbr0


# cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-cloudbr0 
DEVICE=cloudbr0
HWADDR=xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx
NM_CONTROLLED=no
ONBOOT=yes
BOOTPRO=none
IPADDR=192.xxx.xxx.
NETMASK=255.255.255.0
GATEWAY=192.xxx.xxx.
DNS1=192.xxx.xxx.
TYPE=Bridge
DELAY=0


Mainly the infinite messages are centered around:
2014-04-01 19:20:14,964 DEBUG 
[network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] 
(RouterStatusMonitor-1:null) Found 0 routers to update status.

2014-04-01
 19:20:14,967 DEBUG [network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] 
(RouterStatusMonitor-1:null) Found 0 networks to update RvR status.

Any clues?

Thanks & Regards,
Giri




 From: Sugandh S 
To: "users@cloudstack.apache.org" ; 
"d...@cloudstack.apache.org" ; Giri Prasad 
 
Sent: Tuesday, 1 April 2014 2:47 PM
Subject: Re: Some problem while creating the system vm's
 

Can you check if your router vm is running or not?



On Tuesday, 1 April 2014 1:48 PM, Giri Prasad  wrote:

Hello Everybody,

 I am using centos 6.5, i3 cpu-core, and cloudstack 4.2.1

 I have installed the cloudstack, and provisioned the cloud. After all the 
steps are over, when I press , the management server log is reporting 
errors as follows:

2014-04-01 13:31:15,245 DEBUG 
[network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] 
(RouterStatusMonitor-1:null) Found 0 routers to update status. 
2014-04-01 13:31:15,248 DEBUG 
[network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] 
(RouterStatusMonitor-1:null) Found 0 networks to update RvR status. 
2014-04-01 13:31:15,753 DEBUG [storage.snapshot.SnapshotSchedulerImpl] 
(SnapshotPollTask:null) Snapshot scheduler.poll is being called at 2014-04-01 
08:01:15 GMT
2014-04-01 13:31:15,755 DEBUG [storage.snapshot.SnapshotSchedulerImpl]

Re: [EVENTS] CloudStack Hyderabad April meetup -3rd April

[Srikanteswararao Talluri]

Sure Rohit. We’ll try to announce the events much in advance so that interested 
people can plan accordingly.

Thanks,
~Talluri

From: Rohit Yadav mailto:bhais...@apache.org>>
Date: Saturday, 29 March 2014 2:57 pm
To: "d...@cloudstack.apache.org" 
mailto:d...@cloudstack.apache.org>>, 
Srikanteswararao Talluri 
mailto:srikanteswararao.tall...@citrix.com>>
Cc: "users@cloudstack.apache.org" 
mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org>>, 
"market...@cloudstack.apache.org" 
mailto:market...@cloudstack.apache.org>>
Subject: Re: [EVENTS] CloudStack Hyderabad April meetup -3rd April

Hi Talluri! Thanks for sharing.

Folks can you please plan/share meetup events at least one month in advance, in 
future? I've sort of missed two meetups in India in the past due to timing 
mismatches which I would have loved to join.

Regards.


On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Srikanteswararao Talluri 
mailto:srikanteswararao.tall...@citrix.com>>
 wrote:
Gentle reminder.

Please join us for CloudStack Hyderabad April meetup on Thursday, 3rd April 
2014 at IIIT Hyderabad.

RSVP @ http://www.meetup.com/CloudStack-Hyderabad-Group/events/172106682/

Thanks,
~Talluri

Re: Unable to provision instance

[Pierre-Luc Dion]

I'm not experienced with KVM, and I'm also not sure if the Primary Storage
is under LVM. But if it is, you could resize the primary storage using LVM?
If you resize the Primary storage you should not have anything to do in
CloudStack, it will update is available resources automatically, altough,
you might need to have the hypervisor config updated.




Pierre-Luc Dion
Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect
514-447-3456, 1101
- - -

*CloudOps*420 rue Guy
Montréal QC  H3J 1S6
www.cloudops.com
@CloudOps_


On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Fred Newtz  wrote:

> Saksham,
>
> The volume is 100gb.  I need the volume to be that size.  The local storage
> pool is definitely only 50gb.  How can I expand or create a second primary
> storage pool for this new instance to use?
>
>
> Pierre-Luc,
>
> I did create a new service offering and that is the one I am using.
> Storage Type local is what the Details of the service offering state.
>
>
> Any suggestions on how to specify the max size of the local Primary Storage
> pool?  Is there a configuration setting that dictates the size of the pool
> on creation?  I have dug through all of the Global Settings and do not see
> anything and I don't see any non-global settings that are available for the
> storage pool itself.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Fred
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion 
> wrote:
>
> > Hello Fred,
> >
> > Have you define new service offerings that use local storage. Defaults
> are
> > configured to use shared storage.
> >
> > Le mardi 1 avril 2014, Fred Newtz  a écrit :
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I have finally gotten past the networking hurdle and when I am
> attempting
> > > to provision my first VM instance I am getting the following error
> > > messages:
> > >
> > > 2014-04-01 11:11:17,681 DEBUG
> > [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
> > > (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ])
> > > Checking suitable pools for volume (Id, Type): (3,ROOT)
> > > 2014-04-01 11:11:17,681 DEBUG
> > [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
> > > (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ]) We
> > need
> > > to allocate new storagepool for this volume
> > > 2014-04-01 11:11:17,682 DEBUG
> > [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
> > > (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ])
> > Calling
> > > StoragePoolAllocators to find suitable pools
> > > 2014-04-01 11:11:17,682 DEBUG
> > [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator]
> > > (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ])
> > > LocalStoragePoolAllocator trying to find storage pool to fit the vm
> > > 2014-04-01 11:11:17,684 DEBUG
> > > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator]
> (Job-Executor-13:job-13
> > =
> > > [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ]) Checking if storage pool is
> > > suitable, name: null ,poolId: 1
> > > 2014-04-01 11:11:17,686 DEBUG [cloud.storage.StorageManagerImpl]
> > > (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ])
> > > Checking pool 1 for storage, totalSize: 52844687360, usedBytes:
> > 2048802816,
> > > usedPct: 0.03877027035930221, disable threshold: 0.85
> > > 2014-04-01 11:11:17,690 DEBUG [cloud.storage.StorageManagerImpl]
> > > (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ])
> > > Checking pool: 1 for volume allocation [Vol[3|vm=3|ROOT]], maxSize :
> > > 52844687360, totalAllocatedSize : 0, askingSize : 107374182400,
> allocated
> > > disable threshold: 0.85
> > > 2014-04-01 11:11:17,690 DEBUG [cloud.storage.StorageManagerImpl]
> > > (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ])
> > > Insufficient un-allocated capacity on: 1 for volume allocation:
> > > [Vol[3|vm=3|ROOT]] since its allocated percentage: 2.0318822527706972
> has
> > > crossed the allocated pool.storage.allocated.capacity.disablethreshold:
> > > 0.85, skipping this pool
> > > 2014-04-01 11:11:17,691 DEBUG
> > [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator]
> > > (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ])
> > > LocalStoragePoolAllocator returning 0 suitable storage pools
> > > 2014-04-01 11:11:17,691 DEBUG
> > > [storage.allocator.ClusterScopeStoragePoolAllocator]
> > > (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ])
> > > ClusterScopeStoragePoolAllocator looking for storage pool
> > > 2014-04-01 11:11:17,691 DEBUG
> > > [storage.allocator.ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator]
> (Job-Executor-13:job-13
> > =
> > > [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ]) ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator
> to
> > > find storage pool
> > > 2014-04-01 11:11:17,691 DEBUG
> > [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
> > > (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ]) No
> > > suitable pools found for volume: Vol[3|vm=3|ROOT] under cluster: 1
> > > 2014-04-01 11:11:17,691 DEBUG
> > [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
> > > (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f2

Re: Unable to provision instance

[Fred Newtz]

Saksham,

The volume is 100gb.  I need the volume to be that size.  The local storage
pool is definitely only 50gb.  How can I expand or create a second primary
storage pool for this new instance to use?


Pierre-Luc,

I did create a new service offering and that is the one I am using.
Storage Type local is what the Details of the service offering state.


Any suggestions on how to specify the max size of the local Primary Storage
pool?  Is there a configuration setting that dictates the size of the pool
on creation?  I have dug through all of the Global Settings and do not see
anything and I don't see any non-global settings that are available for the
storage pool itself.

Thanks,

Fred


On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion  wrote:

> Hello Fred,
>
> Have you define new service offerings that use local storage. Defaults are
> configured to use shared storage.
>
> Le mardi 1 avril 2014, Fred Newtz  a écrit :
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have finally gotten past the networking hurdle and when I am attempting
> > to provision my first VM instance I am getting the following error
> > messages:
> >
> > 2014-04-01 11:11:17,681 DEBUG
> [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
> > (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ])
> > Checking suitable pools for volume (Id, Type): (3,ROOT)
> > 2014-04-01 11:11:17,681 DEBUG
> [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
> > (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ]) We
> need
> > to allocate new storagepool for this volume
> > 2014-04-01 11:11:17,682 DEBUG
> [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
> > (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ])
> Calling
> > StoragePoolAllocators to find suitable pools
> > 2014-04-01 11:11:17,682 DEBUG
> [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator]
> > (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ])
> > LocalStoragePoolAllocator trying to find storage pool to fit the vm
> > 2014-04-01 11:11:17,684 DEBUG
> > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (Job-Executor-13:job-13
> =
> > [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ]) Checking if storage pool is
> > suitable, name: null ,poolId: 1
> > 2014-04-01 11:11:17,686 DEBUG [cloud.storage.StorageManagerImpl]
> > (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ])
> > Checking pool 1 for storage, totalSize: 52844687360, usedBytes:
> 2048802816,
> > usedPct: 0.03877027035930221, disable threshold: 0.85
> > 2014-04-01 11:11:17,690 DEBUG [cloud.storage.StorageManagerImpl]
> > (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ])
> > Checking pool: 1 for volume allocation [Vol[3|vm=3|ROOT]], maxSize :
> > 52844687360, totalAllocatedSize : 0, askingSize : 107374182400, allocated
> > disable threshold: 0.85
> > 2014-04-01 11:11:17,690 DEBUG [cloud.storage.StorageManagerImpl]
> > (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ])
> > Insufficient un-allocated capacity on: 1 for volume allocation:
> > [Vol[3|vm=3|ROOT]] since its allocated percentage: 2.0318822527706972 has
> > crossed the allocated pool.storage.allocated.capacity.disablethreshold:
> > 0.85, skipping this pool
> > 2014-04-01 11:11:17,691 DEBUG
> [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator]
> > (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ])
> > LocalStoragePoolAllocator returning 0 suitable storage pools
> > 2014-04-01 11:11:17,691 DEBUG
> > [storage.allocator.ClusterScopeStoragePoolAllocator]
> > (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ])
> > ClusterScopeStoragePoolAllocator looking for storage pool
> > 2014-04-01 11:11:17,691 DEBUG
> > [storage.allocator.ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator] (Job-Executor-13:job-13
> =
> > [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ]) ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator to
> > find storage pool
> > 2014-04-01 11:11:17,691 DEBUG
> [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
> > (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ]) No
> > suitable pools found for volume: Vol[3|vm=3|ROOT] under cluster: 1
> > 2014-04-01 11:11:17,691 DEBUG
> [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
> > (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ]) No
> > suitable pools found
> > 2014-04-01 11:11:17,691 DEBUG
> [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
> > (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ]) No
> > suitable storagePools found under this Cluster: 1
> > 2014-04-01 11:11:17,694 DEBUG
> [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
> > (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ]) Could
> > not find suitable Deployment Destination for this VM under any clusters,
> > returning.
> > 2014-04-01 11:11:17,694 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> > (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ])
> > Searching all possible resources under this Zone: 1
> > 2014-04-01 11:11:17,695 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> > (Job-Execut

Re: Unable to provision instance

[Pierre-Luc Dion]

Hello Fred,

Have you define new service offerings that use local storage. Defaults are
configured to use shared storage.

Le mardi 1 avril 2014, Fred Newtz  a écrit :

> Hello,
>
> I have finally gotten past the networking hurdle and when I am attempting
> to provision my first VM instance I am getting the following error
> messages:
>
> 2014-04-01 11:11:17,681 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
> (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ])
> Checking suitable pools for volume (Id, Type): (3,ROOT)
> 2014-04-01 11:11:17,681 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
> (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ]) We need
> to allocate new storagepool for this volume
> 2014-04-01 11:11:17,682 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
> (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ]) Calling
> StoragePoolAllocators to find suitable pools
> 2014-04-01 11:11:17,682 DEBUG [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator]
> (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ])
> LocalStoragePoolAllocator trying to find storage pool to fit the vm
> 2014-04-01 11:11:17,684 DEBUG
> [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (Job-Executor-13:job-13 =
> [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ]) Checking if storage pool is
> suitable, name: null ,poolId: 1
> 2014-04-01 11:11:17,686 DEBUG [cloud.storage.StorageManagerImpl]
> (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ])
> Checking pool 1 for storage, totalSize: 52844687360, usedBytes: 2048802816,
> usedPct: 0.03877027035930221, disable threshold: 0.85
> 2014-04-01 11:11:17,690 DEBUG [cloud.storage.StorageManagerImpl]
> (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ])
> Checking pool: 1 for volume allocation [Vol[3|vm=3|ROOT]], maxSize :
> 52844687360, totalAllocatedSize : 0, askingSize : 107374182400, allocated
> disable threshold: 0.85
> 2014-04-01 11:11:17,690 DEBUG [cloud.storage.StorageManagerImpl]
> (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ])
> Insufficient un-allocated capacity on: 1 for volume allocation:
> [Vol[3|vm=3|ROOT]] since its allocated percentage: 2.0318822527706972 has
> crossed the allocated pool.storage.allocated.capacity.disablethreshold:
> 0.85, skipping this pool
> 2014-04-01 11:11:17,691 DEBUG [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator]
> (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ])
> LocalStoragePoolAllocator returning 0 suitable storage pools
> 2014-04-01 11:11:17,691 DEBUG
> [storage.allocator.ClusterScopeStoragePoolAllocator]
> (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ])
> ClusterScopeStoragePoolAllocator looking for storage pool
> 2014-04-01 11:11:17,691 DEBUG
> [storage.allocator.ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator] (Job-Executor-13:job-13 =
> [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ]) ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator to
> find storage pool
> 2014-04-01 11:11:17,691 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
> (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ]) No
> suitable pools found for volume: Vol[3|vm=3|ROOT] under cluster: 1
> 2014-04-01 11:11:17,691 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
> (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ]) No
> suitable pools found
> 2014-04-01 11:11:17,691 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
> (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ]) No
> suitable storagePools found under this Cluster: 1
> 2014-04-01 11:11:17,694 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
> (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ]) Could
> not find suitable Deployment Destination for this VM under any clusters,
> returning.
> 2014-04-01 11:11:17,694 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ])
> Searching all possible resources under this Zone: 1
> 2014-04-01 11:11:17,695 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ]) Listing
> clusters in order of aggregate capacity, that have (atleast one host with)
> enough CPU and RAM capacity under this Zone: 1
> 2014-04-01 11:11:17,696 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ])
> Removing from the clusterId list these clusters from avoid set: [1]
> 2014-04-01 11:11:17,698 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ]) No
> clusters found after removing disabled clusters and clusters in avoid list,
> returning.
> 2014-04-01 11:11:17,700 DEBUG [cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl]
> (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ])
> Destroying vm VM[User|QBSVR] as it failed to create on Host with Id:null
> 2014-04-01 11:11:17,802 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ d

RE: Unable to provision instance

[Saksham Srivastava]

Seeing the logs :

Checking pool: 1 for volume allocation [Vol[3|vm=3|ROOT]], maxSize : 
52844687360,
 totalAllocatedSize : 0, 
askingSize : 107374182400, allocated disable threshold: 0.85
2014-04-01 11:11:17,690 DEBUG [cloud.storage.StorageManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ]) 
Insufficient un-allocated capacity on: 1 for volume allocation:
[Vol[3|vm=3|ROOT]] since its allocated percentage: 2.0318822527706972 has 
crossed the allocated pool.storage.allocated.capacity.disablethreshold:
0.85, skipping this pool

The max size of storage Pool is 52844687360 bytes (49 GB)
The asking size of the new volume is 107374182400 (100 GB)

Can you check the size of the volumes you are trying to deploy.

Thanks,
Saksham

-Original Message-
From: Fred Newtz [mailto:fbne...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 1, 2014 5:43 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Unable to provision instance

Hello,

I have finally gotten past the networking hurdle and when I am attempting to 
provision my first VM instance I am getting the following error messages:

2014-04-01 11:11:17,681 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ]) Checking 
suitable pools for volume (Id, Type): (3,ROOT)
2014-04-01 11:11:17,681 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ]) We need to 
allocate new storagepool for this volume
2014-04-01 11:11:17,682 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ]) Calling 
StoragePoolAllocators to find suitable pools
2014-04-01 11:11:17,682 DEBUG [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator]
(Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ]) 
LocalStoragePoolAllocator trying to find storage pool to fit the vm
2014-04-01 11:11:17,684 DEBUG
[storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ 
da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ]) Checking if storage pool is suitable, 
name: null ,poolId: 1
2014-04-01 11:11:17,686 DEBUG [cloud.storage.StorageManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ]) Checking 
pool 1 for storage, totalSize: 52844687360, usedBytes: 2048802816,
usedPct: 0.03877027035930221, disable threshold: 0.85
2014-04-01 11:11:17,690 DEBUG [cloud.storage.StorageManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ]) Checking 
pool: 1 for volume allocation [Vol[3|vm=3|ROOT]], maxSize :
52844687360, totalAllocatedSize : 0, askingSize : 107374182400, allocated 
disable threshold: 0.85
2014-04-01 11:11:17,690 DEBUG [cloud.storage.StorageManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ]) 
Insufficient un-allocated capacity on: 1 for volume allocation:
[Vol[3|vm=3|ROOT]] since its allocated percentage: 2.0318822527706972 has 
crossed the allocated pool.storage.allocated.capacity.disablethreshold:
0.85, skipping this pool
2014-04-01 11:11:17,691 DEBUG [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator]
(Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ]) 
LocalStoragePoolAllocator returning 0 suitable storage pools
2014-04-01 11:11:17,691 DEBUG
[storage.allocator.ClusterScopeStoragePoolAllocator]
(Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ]) 
ClusterScopeStoragePoolAllocator looking for storage pool
2014-04-01 11:11:17,691 DEBUG
[storage.allocator.ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator] (Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ 
da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ]) ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator to find 
storage pool
2014-04-01 11:11:17,691 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ]) No suitable 
pools found for volume: Vol[3|vm=3|ROOT] under cluster: 1
2014-04-01 11:11:17,691 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ]) No suitable 
pools found
2014-04-01 11:11:17,691 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ]) No suitable 
storagePools found under this Cluster: 1
2014-04-01 11:11:17,694 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ]) Could not 
find suitable Deployment Destination for this VM under any clusters, returning.
2014-04-01 11:11:17,694 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
(Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ]) Searching 
all possible resources under this Zone: 1
2014-04-01 11:11:17,695 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
(Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ]) Listing 
clusters in order of aggregate capacity, that have (atleast one host with) 
enough CPU and RAM capacity under this Zone: 1
2014-04-01 11:11:17,696 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
(Job-Executor-1

Unable to provision instance

[Fred Newtz]

Hello,

I have finally gotten past the networking hurdle and when I am attempting
to provision my first VM instance I am getting the following error messages:

2014-04-01 11:11:17,681 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ])
Checking suitable pools for volume (Id, Type): (3,ROOT)
2014-04-01 11:11:17,681 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ]) We need
to allocate new storagepool for this volume
2014-04-01 11:11:17,682 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ]) Calling
StoragePoolAllocators to find suitable pools
2014-04-01 11:11:17,682 DEBUG [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator]
(Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ])
LocalStoragePoolAllocator trying to find storage pool to fit the vm
2014-04-01 11:11:17,684 DEBUG
[storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (Job-Executor-13:job-13 =
[ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ]) Checking if storage pool is
suitable, name: null ,poolId: 1
2014-04-01 11:11:17,686 DEBUG [cloud.storage.StorageManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ])
Checking pool 1 for storage, totalSize: 52844687360, usedBytes: 2048802816,
usedPct: 0.03877027035930221, disable threshold: 0.85
2014-04-01 11:11:17,690 DEBUG [cloud.storage.StorageManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ])
Checking pool: 1 for volume allocation [Vol[3|vm=3|ROOT]], maxSize :
52844687360, totalAllocatedSize : 0, askingSize : 107374182400, allocated
disable threshold: 0.85
2014-04-01 11:11:17,690 DEBUG [cloud.storage.StorageManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ])
Insufficient un-allocated capacity on: 1 for volume allocation:
[Vol[3|vm=3|ROOT]] since its allocated percentage: 2.0318822527706972 has
crossed the allocated pool.storage.allocated.capacity.disablethreshold:
0.85, skipping this pool
2014-04-01 11:11:17,691 DEBUG [storage.allocator.LocalStoragePoolAllocator]
(Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ])
LocalStoragePoolAllocator returning 0 suitable storage pools
2014-04-01 11:11:17,691 DEBUG
[storage.allocator.ClusterScopeStoragePoolAllocator]
(Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ])
ClusterScopeStoragePoolAllocator looking for storage pool
2014-04-01 11:11:17,691 DEBUG
[storage.allocator.ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator] (Job-Executor-13:job-13 =
[ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ]) ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator to
find storage pool
2014-04-01 11:11:17,691 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ]) No
suitable pools found for volume: Vol[3|vm=3|ROOT] under cluster: 1
2014-04-01 11:11:17,691 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ]) No
suitable pools found
2014-04-01 11:11:17,691 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ]) No
suitable storagePools found under this Cluster: 1
2014-04-01 11:11:17,694 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ]) Could
not find suitable Deployment Destination for this VM under any clusters,
returning.
2014-04-01 11:11:17,694 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
(Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ])
Searching all possible resources under this Zone: 1
2014-04-01 11:11:17,695 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
(Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ]) Listing
clusters in order of aggregate capacity, that have (atleast one host with)
enough CPU and RAM capacity under this Zone: 1
2014-04-01 11:11:17,696 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
(Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ])
Removing from the clusterId list these clusters from avoid set: [1]
2014-04-01 11:11:17,698 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
(Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ]) No
clusters found after removing disabled clusters and clusters in avoid list,
returning.
2014-04-01 11:11:17,700 DEBUG [cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ])
Destroying vm VM[User|QBSVR] as it failed to create on Host with Id:null
2014-04-01 11:11:17,802 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ]) VM
state transitted from :Stopped to Error with event:
OperationFailedToErrorvm's original host id: null new host id: null host id
before state transition: null
2014-04-01 11:11:17,902 WARN  [apache.cloudstack.alerts]
(Job-Executor-13:job-13 = [ da851970-f72b-417f-8f28-9d225d37f0d0 ])
al

Re: Some problem while creating the system vm's

[Sugandh S]

Can you check if your router vm is running or not?


On Tuesday, 1 April 2014 1:48 PM, Giri Prasad  wrote:
 
Hello Everybody,

 I am using centos 6.5, i3 cpu-core, and cloudstack 4.2.1

 I have installed the cloudstack, and provisioned the cloud. After all the 
steps are over, when I press , the management server log is reporting 
errors as follows:

2014-04-01 13:31:15,245 DEBUG 
[network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] 
(RouterStatusMonitor-1:null) Found 0 routers to update status. 
2014-04-01 13:31:15,248 DEBUG 
[network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] 
(RouterStatusMonitor-1:null) Found 0 networks to update RvR status. 
2014-04-01 13:31:15,753 DEBUG [storage.snapshot.SnapshotSchedulerImpl] 
(SnapshotPollTask:null) Snapshot scheduler.poll is being called at 2014-04-01 
08:01:15 GMT
2014-04-01 13:31:15,755 DEBUG [storage.snapshot.SnapshotSchedulerImpl] 
(SnapshotPollTask:null) Got 0 snapshots to be executed at 2014-04-01 08:01:15 
GMT
2014-04-01 13:31:19,551 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl] 
(AgentManager-Handler-13:null) Ping from 1
2014-04-01 13:31:32,198 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector] 
(StatsCollector-1:null) VmStatsCollector is running...
2014-04-01 13:31:32,773 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector] 
(StatsCollector-3:null) StorageCollector is running...
2014-04-01 13:31:32,780 INFO  [storage.endpoint.DefaultEndPointSelector] 
(StatsCollector-3:null) No running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to 
LocalHostEndPoint
2014-04-01 13:31:32,859 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (StatsCollector-3:null) 
Seq 1-596705342: Received:  { Ans: , MgmtId: 77750177916752, via: 1, Ver: v1, 
Flags: 10, { GetStorageStatsAnswer } }
2014-04-01 13:31:45,245 DEBUG 
[network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] 
(RouterStatusMonitor-1:null) Found 0 routers to update status. 
2014-04-01 13:31:45,247 DEBUG 
[network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] 
(RouterStatusMonitor-1:null) Found 0 networks to update RvR status. 
2014-04-01 13:31:45,339 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector] 
(StatsCollector-2:null) HostStatsCollector is running...
2014-04-01 13:31:45,749 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] 
(HostReservationReleaseChecker:null) Checking if any host reservation can be 
released ... 
2014-04-01 13:31:45,762 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] 
(HostReservationReleaseChecker:null) Cannot release reservation, Found 2 VMs 
Running on host 1
2014-04-01 13:31:45,762 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] 
(HostReservationReleaseChecker:null) Done running HostReservationReleaseChecker 
... 
2014-04-01 13:31:45,772 DEBUG [cloud.alert.AlertManagerImpl] 
(CapacityChecker:null) Running Capacity Checker ... 
2014-04-01 13:31:45,772 DEBUG [cloud.alert.AlertManagerImpl] 
(CapacityChecker:null) recalculating system capacity
2014-04-01 13:31:45,772 DEBUG [cloud.alert.AlertManagerImpl] 
(CapacityChecker:null) Executing cpu/ram capacity update
2014-04-01 13:31:45,788 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] 
(CapacityChecker:null) Found 2 VMs on host 1
2014-04-01 13:31:45,803 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] 
(CapacityChecker:null) Found 0 VM, not running on host 1
2014-04-01 13:31:45,808 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] 
(CapacityChecker:null) No need to calibrate cpu capacity, host:1 usedCpu: 1000 
reservedCpu: 0
2014-04-01 13:31:45,808 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] 
(CapacityChecker:null) No need to calibrate memory capacity, host:1 usedMem: 
1342177280 reservedMem: 0
2014-04-01 13:31:45,857 DEBUG [cloud.alert.AlertManagerImpl] 
(CapacityChecker:null) Done executing cpu/ram capacity update
2014-04-01 13:31:45,857 DEBUG [cloud.alert.AlertManagerImpl] 
(CapacityChecker:null) Executing storage capacity update
2014-04-01 13:31:45,875 DEBUG [cloud.storage.StorageManagerImpl] 
(CapacityChecker:null) Successfully set Capacity - 51639720 for capacity 
type - 3 , DataCenterId - 1, HostOrPoolId - 1, PodId 1
2014-04-01 13:31:45,875 DEBUG [cloud.alert.AlertManagerImpl] 
(CapacityChecker:null) Done executing storage capacity update
2014-04-01 13:31:45,875 DEBUG [cloud.alert.AlertManagerImpl] 
(CapacityChecker:null) Executing capacity updates for public ip and Vlans
2014-04-01 13:31:45,888 DEBUG [cloud.alert.AlertManagerImpl] 
(CapacityChecker:null) Done capacity updates for public ip and Vlans
2014-04-01 13:31:45,888 DEBUG [cloud.alert.AlertManagerImpl] 
(CapacityChecker:null) Executing capacity updates for private ip
2014-04-01 13:31:45,899 DEBUG [cloud.alert.AlertManagerImpl] 
(CapacityChecker:null) Done executing capacity updates for private ip
2014-04-01 13:31:45,900 DEBUG [cloud.alert.AlertManagerImpl] 
(CapacityChecker:null) Done recalculating system capacity
2014-04-01 13:31:45,955 DEBUG [cloud.alert.AlertManagerImpl] 
(CapacityChecker:null) Done running Capacity Checker ... 
2014-04-01 13:31:45,956 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (StatsCollector-2:null) 
Seq 1-596705343: Received:  { Ans: , MgmtId: 77750177916752, v

Some problem while creating the system vm's

[Giri Prasad]

Hello Everybody,

 I am using centos 6.5, i3 cpu-core, and cloudstack 4.2.1

 I have installed the cloudstack, and provisioned the cloud. After all the 
steps are over, when I press , the management server log is reporting 
errors as follows:

2014-04-01 13:31:15,245 DEBUG 
[network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] 
(RouterStatusMonitor-1:null) Found 0 routers to update status. 
2014-04-01 13:31:15,248 DEBUG 
[network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] 
(RouterStatusMonitor-1:null) Found 0 networks to update RvR status. 
2014-04-01 13:31:15,753 DEBUG [storage.snapshot.SnapshotSchedulerImpl] 
(SnapshotPollTask:null) Snapshot scheduler.poll is being called at 2014-04-01 
08:01:15 GMT
2014-04-01 13:31:15,755 DEBUG [storage.snapshot.SnapshotSchedulerImpl] 
(SnapshotPollTask:null) Got 0 snapshots to be executed at 2014-04-01 08:01:15 
GMT
2014-04-01 13:31:19,551 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl] 
(AgentManager-Handler-13:null) Ping from 1
2014-04-01 13:31:32,198 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector] 
(StatsCollector-1:null) VmStatsCollector is running...
2014-04-01 13:31:32,773 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector] 
(StatsCollector-3:null) StorageCollector is running...
2014-04-01 13:31:32,780 INFO  [storage.endpoint.DefaultEndPointSelector] 
(StatsCollector-3:null) No running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to 
LocalHostEndPoint
2014-04-01 13:31:32,859 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (StatsCollector-3:null) 
Seq 1-596705342: Received:  { Ans: , MgmtId: 77750177916752, via: 1, Ver: v1, 
Flags: 10, { GetStorageStatsAnswer } }
2014-04-01 13:31:45,245 DEBUG 
[network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] 
(RouterStatusMonitor-1:null) Found 0 routers to update status. 
2014-04-01 13:31:45,247 DEBUG 
[network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] 
(RouterStatusMonitor-1:null) Found 0 networks to update RvR status. 
2014-04-01 13:31:45,339 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector] 
(StatsCollector-2:null) HostStatsCollector is running...
2014-04-01 13:31:45,749 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] 
(HostReservationReleaseChecker:null) Checking if any host reservation can be 
released ... 
2014-04-01 13:31:45,762 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] 
(HostReservationReleaseChecker:null) Cannot release reservation, Found 2 VMs 
Running on host 1
2014-04-01 13:31:45,762 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] 
(HostReservationReleaseChecker:null) Done running HostReservationReleaseChecker 
... 
2014-04-01 13:31:45,772 DEBUG [cloud.alert.AlertManagerImpl] 
(CapacityChecker:null) Running Capacity Checker ... 
2014-04-01 13:31:45,772 DEBUG [cloud.alert.AlertManagerImpl] 
(CapacityChecker:null) recalculating system capacity
2014-04-01 13:31:45,772 DEBUG [cloud.alert.AlertManagerImpl] 
(CapacityChecker:null) Executing cpu/ram capacity update
2014-04-01 13:31:45,788 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] 
(CapacityChecker:null) Found 2 VMs on host 1
2014-04-01 13:31:45,803 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] 
(CapacityChecker:null) Found 0 VM, not running on host 1
2014-04-01 13:31:45,808 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] 
(CapacityChecker:null) No need to calibrate cpu capacity, host:1 usedCpu: 1000 
reservedCpu: 0
2014-04-01 13:31:45,808 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] 
(CapacityChecker:null) No need to calibrate memory capacity, host:1 usedMem: 
1342177280 reservedMem: 0
2014-04-01 13:31:45,857 DEBUG [cloud.alert.AlertManagerImpl] 
(CapacityChecker:null) Done executing cpu/ram capacity update
2014-04-01 13:31:45,857 DEBUG [cloud.alert.AlertManagerImpl] 
(CapacityChecker:null) Executing storage capacity update
2014-04-01 13:31:45,875 DEBUG [cloud.storage.StorageManagerImpl] 
(CapacityChecker:null) Successfully set Capacity - 51639720 for capacity 
type - 3 , DataCenterId - 1, HostOrPoolId - 1, PodId 1
2014-04-01 13:31:45,875 DEBUG [cloud.alert.AlertManagerImpl] 
(CapacityChecker:null) Done executing storage capacity update
2014-04-01 13:31:45,875 DEBUG [cloud.alert.AlertManagerImpl] 
(CapacityChecker:null) Executing capacity updates for public ip and Vlans
2014-04-01 13:31:45,888 DEBUG [cloud.alert.AlertManagerImpl] 
(CapacityChecker:null) Done capacity updates for public ip and Vlans
2014-04-01 13:31:45,888 DEBUG [cloud.alert.AlertManagerImpl] 
(CapacityChecker:null) Executing capacity updates for private ip
2014-04-01 13:31:45,899 DEBUG [cloud.alert.AlertManagerImpl] 
(CapacityChecker:null) Done executing capacity updates for private ip
2014-04-01 13:31:45,900 DEBUG [cloud.alert.AlertManagerImpl] 
(CapacityChecker:null) Done recalculating system capacity
2014-04-01 13:31:45,955 DEBUG [cloud.alert.AlertManagerImpl] 
(CapacityChecker:null) Done running Capacity Checker ... 
2014-04-01 13:31:45,956 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (StatsCollector-2:null) 
Seq 1-596705343: Received:  { Ans: , MgmtId: 77750177916752, via: 1, Ver: v1, 
Flags: 10, { GetHostStatsAnswer } }
2014-04-01 13:31:50,599 DEBUG [host.dao.HostDaoImpl] (Cl