关于cloudstack 4.2.x API rebootVirtualMachine的问题
我在调用这个api对虚拟机进行重启操作的时候，会得到一个jobid，但是当我去查 询这个jobid的时候，得到的jobstatus总是0， 程序在进行判断的时候会认为这个 机器一直处于正在重启的状态。 我也尝试过使用cloudstack自带的那个的后台管理网站来进行重启操作，发现情况 也是如此，在进行重启操作后，他们自带的那个网站也是卡在 了查询重启的jobid 的那段ajax代码上了。 因为我也是刚开始接触cloudstack，所以想问一下各位前辈，这是否是cloudstack 的一个bug呢？我在这里先谢谢了。
回复: 关于cloudstack 4.2.x API rebootVirtualMachine的问题
您好： 查一下cloudstage 的日志，或者再去看一下支持虚拟化功能的日志，如KVM，xenserver 看报什么错误。 cloudstackfqa2013 发件人： sbin 发送时间： 2014-12-09 10:59 收件人： users-cn 主题： 关于cloudstack 4.2.x API rebootVirtualMachine的问题 我在调用这个api对虚拟机进行重启操作的时候，会得到一个jobid，但是当我去查 询这个jobid的时候，得到的jobstatus总是0， 程序在进行判断的时候会认为这个 机器一直处于正在重启的状态。 我也尝试过使用cloudstack自带的那个的后台管理网站来进行重启操作，发现情况 也是如此，在进行重启操作后，他们自带的那个网站也是卡在 了查询重启的jobid 的那段ajax代码上了。 因为我也是刚开始接触cloudstack，所以想问一下各位前辈，这是否是cloudstack 的一个bug呢？我在这里先谢谢了。
RE: 回复: 关于cloudstack 4.2.x API rebootVirtualMachine的问题
呃……好吧，发现是我自己逗逼了，这个重启虚拟机的操作比我想象中的时间要长得多，而且虚拟机的状态还一直是处于running状态，我起初还一直以为这个动作在一瞬间完成了，看来这个不是什么bug，只要耐心等等就行了 Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 13:53:34 +0800 From: cloudstackfqa2...@163.com To: users-cn@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: 回复: 关于cloudstack 4.2.x API rebootVirtualMachine的问题 您好： 查一下cloudstage 的日志，或者再去看一下支持虚拟化功能的日志，如KVM，xenserver 看报什么错误。 cloudstackfqa2013 发件人： sbin 发送时间： 2014-12-09 10:59 收件人： users-cn 主题： 关于cloudstack 4.2.x API rebootVirtualMachine的问题 我在调用这个api对虚拟机进行重启操作的时候，会得到一个jobid，但是当我去查 询这个jobid的时候，得到的jobstatus总是0， 程序在进行判断的时候会认为这个 机器一直处于正在重启的状态。 我也尝试过使用cloudstack自带的那个的后台管理网站来进行重启操作，发现情况 也是如此，在进行重启操作后，他们自带的那个网站也是卡在 了查询重启的jobid 的那段ajax代码上了。 因为我也是刚开始接触cloudstack，所以想问一下各位前辈，这是否是cloudstack 的一个bug呢？我在这里先谢谢了。
Re: Load Balancing in cloudstack
Hi Vadim, What you are saying is Internal LB, it is there only in the VPC. Thanks, Jayapal On 08-Dec-2014, at 12:52 PM, Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee wrote: As far as I know -- network offer with LB is only available for VPC and you must expicitly select it for specific subnet. For shared network it is not available. Vadim. -Original Message- From: Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 12:34 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Load Balancing in cloudstack On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 11:28 PM, Tilak Raj Singh tila...@gmail.com wrote: Hello all, I followed the quick install guide of installing cloudstack and setup a private cloud within my college..Now I created a VM in it and it was assigned an IP address of 172.31.101.250. I created another VM which has an ip address 172.31.101.248...now when I click NIC tabs of both the machines it shows the Network Name as defaultGuestNetwork...I wish to add load balancing to these two machine to share the load of a webservice I would be creating on these. But the problem is when I click on View IP Address inside defaultguestNetwork it shows no IP addressesWhat wrong am I doing here..Can somebody please guide me??? Are you using Basic networking? -- Erik
Re: [DISCUSS] Any issues to be fixed for 4.3.1?
Hi Rohit, Here are a few issues (without resolution). Maybe you can help get a fix in time for 4.3.2 release: Snapshosts errors after upgrade 4.1.1 to 4.3.1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8013 Failed to create a volume from snapshot: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8014 Virtual Router only with DHCP should not have DNS service https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4675 Excessive use of LVM snapshots on XenServer, that leads to snapshot failure and unnecessary disk usage. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6060 Possibly this one too: Failed to create snapshot due to an internal error creating snapshot for volume 372 - Failure from sparse_dd: Fatal error: exception Invalid_argument(index out of bounds”): https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8044?filter=-2 Some others, you have already back-ported. For that we thank you. Thank you, Regards, F. On 20 Nov 2014, at 10:15, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi, We’ve some bugfixes backported to 4.3 branch since 4.3.1 was released and I think we should at least support this branch with a 4.3.2 release in next couple of weeks until a stable 4.5.0 is released in next couple of months. I’m going through JIRA and list of issues and will help backport fixes to the 4.3 branch. So, please share if you’ve found any blocker/critical/major issue that you found in 4.3.0 or 4.3.1 and want to be fixed. Thanks. Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/
RE: Strange instance boot issue
Hi Allesandro, This is just a hunch, but could it be that Windows only uses its 1st CPU to handle the boot process. If this is the case when you allocate 4vCPU @ 500Mhz it only has 500Mhz of CPU power to process the very intensive boot process, vs having 2000Mhz when you allocate a single vCPU @ 200MHz. I believe it's always better to provide a faster single vCPU than multiple Slower vCPUs as there are overheads on the Guest OS and Hypervisor when dealing with multiple vCPUs. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Alessandro Caviglione [mailto:c.alessan...@gmail.com] Sent: 08 December 2014 02:20 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Strange instance boot issue Ok... maybe I found the issue!! Again... I'm learning CS in these month so you've to be patient with me! :) But this thing is strange... I configure some Compute offering setting CPU speed to 500 MHz and changing vCPU number for each offer, all the offerings are with CPU CAP enabled. Now, if I deploy a W2008R2 instance from a template or an ISO (yes W2012 is working fine! :-/) with 4vCPU (4*500 MHz = 2 GHz) I get the issue... sloow boot time (about 15 mins). If I deploy the same instance with 1 vCPU with 2000 MHz, the instance boot in 7 sec!! Why??? On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 1:49 AM, Alessandro Caviglione c.alessan...@gmail.com wrote: Hi guys, I'm sorry if I submit this problem, I honestly do not think it is a fault of CloudStack, but I do not know where to look anymore ... For several days (up to a week ago I did not have this problem) I have trouble creating templates and run instances. My infrastructure is composed of CS4.4.1 and 4 XenServer 6.2 hosts. I want to point out that the problem is not due to poor storage performance. When I create an instance from an ISO, the installation time is greatly increased. When restarting the instances, for example windows VMs, they remain in the boot about 30 minutes. The strange thing is that when instances are started, the performances are excellent! What's even more strange is that trying to install a new VM directly from XenServer, installation is fast and the boot issue when restart the VMs does not appear and also boot is very fast (about 20/30 sec.) In short, the problem seems to be only when the VMs are managed by CloudStack. I found this article and correct the BIOS of my server, even though I had never encountered this problem until a week ago. ( http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX127395) Someone can give me some guidance? Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
System VMs not starting
Hi All,
I have a simple lab setup:
1 x CSMS v4.4.1 and 1 X Xen v6.2.
ccsm01 (10.10.0.16)
cXen01 (10.10.0.14-mgmt, 10.10.1.14 storage).
Xenserver network:
nic0: management (vlan 10 access port)
nic1: vlan interfaces vlans 2 (public), 11(storage), 12(guest)
I followed the guide for Xen server system VM templates and they are
populated on the primary storage NFS (10.10.1.2:/csprimary).
Attached is an output of:
grep -i -E 'exception|unable|fail|invalid|leak|warn|error'
/var/log/cloudstack/management/management-server.log
This entry makes me think that my network setup is incorrect:
*2014-12-08 09:41:00,204 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase]
(DirectAgent-113:ctx-1b7ca6b6) Catch Exception: class
com.xensource.xenapi.Types$PifIsVlan due to You tried to create a VLAN on
top of another VLAN - use the underlying physical PIF/bond instead*
Any help would be much appreciated.
Cheers,
Wikus
2014-12-08 09:39:30,357 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-4:ctx-bb7dc62d job-4/job-2674 ctx-1c1671d3) VM state
transitted from :Starting to Stopped with event: OperationFailedvm's original
host id: null new host id: null host id before state transition: 1
2014-12-08 09:39:30,373 ERROR [c.c.v.VmWorkJobHandlerProxy]
(Work-Job-Executor-4:ctx-bb7dc62d job-4/job-2674 ctx-1c1671d3) Invocation
exception, caused by: com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException:
Unable to create a deployment for VM[ConsoleProxy|v-2-VM]Scope=interface
com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=1
2014-12-08 09:39:30,374 INFO [c.c.v.VmWorkJobHandlerProxy]
(Work-Job-Executor-4:ctx-bb7dc62d job-4/job-2674 ctx-1c1671d3) Rethrow
exception com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to
create a deployment for VM[ConsoleProxy|v-2-VM]Scope=interface
com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=1
2014-12-08 09:39:30,374 ERROR [c.c.v.VmWorkJobDispatcher]
(Work-Job-Executor-4:ctx-bb7dc62d job-4/job-2674) Unable to complete AsyncJobVO
{id:2674, userId: 1, accountId: 1, instanceType: null, instanceId: null, cmd:
com.cloud.vm.VmWorkStart, cmdInfo:
rO0ABXNyABhjb20uY2xvdWQudm0uVm1Xb3JrU3RhcnR9cMGsvxz73gIAC0oABGRjSWRMAAZhdm9pZHN0ADBMY29tL2Nsb3VkL2RlcGxveS9EZXBsb3ltZW50UGxhbm5lciRFeGNsdWRlTGlzdDtMAAljbHVzdGVySWR0ABBMamF2YS9sYW5nL0xvbmc7TAAGaG9zdElkcQB-AAJMAAtqb3VybmFsTmFtZXQAEkxqYXZhL2xhbmcvU3RyaW5nO0wAEXBoeXNpY2FsTmV0d29ya0lkcQB-AAJMAAdwbGFubmVycQB-AANMAAVwb2RJZHEAfgACTAAGcG9vbElkcQB-AAJMAAlyYXdQYXJhbXN0AA9MamF2YS91dGlsL01hcDtMAA1yZXNlcnZhdGlvbklkcQB-AAN4cgATY29tLmNsb3VkLnZtLlZtV29ya5-ZtlbwJWdrAgAESgAJYWNjb3VudElkSgAGdXNlcklkSgAEdm1JZEwAC2hhbmRsZXJOYW1lcQB-AAN4cAABAAEAAnQAGVZpcnR1YWxNYWNoaW5lTWFuYWdlckltcGwAAHBwcHBwcHBwcHA,
cmdVersion: 0, status: IN_PROGRESS, processStatus: 0, resultCode: 0, result:
null, initMsid: 345052769882, completeMsid: null, lastUpdated: null,
lastPolled: null, created: Mon Dec 08 09:39:28 GMT 2014}, job origin:4
com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create a
deployment for VM[ConsoleProxy|v-2-VM]Scope=interface com.cloud.dc.DataCenter;
id=1
2014-12-08 09:39:30,375 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-4:ctx-bb7dc62d job-4/job-2674) Complete async job-2674,
jobStatus: FAILED, resultCode: 0, result:
Re: System VMs not starting
The error is due to bad storage network on your Xenserver, give it another check. -abhi M +919701199011 | abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.commailto:abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com On 08-Dec-2014, at 3:18 pm, Wikus van der Walt (RedArmour) wvanderw...@redarmour.co.ukmailto:wvanderw...@redarmour.co.uk wrote: Hi All, I have a simple lab setup: 1 x CSMS v4.4.1 and 1 X Xen v6.2. ccsm01 (10.10.0.16) cXen01 (10.10.0.14-mgmt, 10.10.1.14 storage). Xenserver network: nic0: management (vlan 10 access port) nic1: vlan interfaces vlans 2 (public), 11(storage), 12(guest) I followed the guide for Xen server system VM templates and they are populated on the primary storage NFS (10.10.1.2:/csprimary). Attached is an output of: grep -i -E 'exception|unable|fail|invalid|leak|warn|error' /var/log/cloudstack/management/management-server.log This entry makes me think that my network setup is incorrect: 2014-12-08 09:41:00,204 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-113:ctx-1b7ca6b6) Catch Exception: class com.xensource.xenapi.Types$PifIsVlan due to You tried to create a VLAN on top of another VLAN - use the underlying physical PIF/bond instead Any help would be much appreciated. Cheers, Wikus ccsms01log.txt Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge - rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: System VMs not starting
Thanks Abhi, Can you please be more specific about what is bad about it? My primary storage NFS is on a separate segment from my Xen management network. In order to reach the storage NFS I create an external network on the Xenserver and assign an IP on that segment (vlan11). Is this not supported? On 8 December 2014 at 10:10, Abhinandan Prateek abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com wrote: The error is due to bad storage network on your Xenserver, give it another check. -abhi M +919701199011 | abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.commailto: abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com On 08-Dec-2014, at 3:18 pm, Wikus van der Walt (RedArmour) wvanderw...@redarmour.co.ukmailto:wvanderw...@redarmour.co.uk wrote: Hi All, I have a simple lab setup: 1 x CSMS v4.4.1 and 1 X Xen v6.2. ccsm01 (10.10.0.16) cXen01 (10.10.0.14-mgmt, 10.10.1.14 storage). Xenserver network: nic0: management (vlan 10 access port) nic1: vlan interfaces vlans 2 (public), 11(storage), 12(guest) I followed the guide for Xen server system VM templates and they are populated on the primary storage NFS (10.10.1.2:/csprimary). Attached is an output of: grep -i -E 'exception|unable|fail|invalid|leak|warn|error' /var/log/cloudstack/management/management-server.log This entry makes me think that my network setup is incorrect: 2014-12-08 09:41:00,204 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-113:ctx-1b7ca6b6) Catch Exception: class com.xensource.xenapi.Types$PifIsVlan due to You tried to create a VLAN on top of another VLAN - use the underlying physical PIF/bond instead Any help would be much appreciated. Cheers, Wikus ccsms01log.txt Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Build http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge - rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineering http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Support http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: System VMs not starting
Please use: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSVM,+templates,+Secondary+storage+troubleshooting to troubleshoot SSVM connectivity... On 8 December 2014 at 11:20, Wikus van der Walt (RedArmour) wvanderw...@redarmour.co.uk wrote: Thanks Abhi, Can you please be more specific about what is bad about it? My primary storage NFS is on a separate segment from my Xen management network. In order to reach the storage NFS I create an external network on the Xenserver and assign an IP on that segment (vlan11). Is this not supported? On 8 December 2014 at 10:10, Abhinandan Prateek abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com wrote: The error is due to bad storage network on your Xenserver, give it another check. -abhi M +919701199011 | abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.commailto: abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com On 08-Dec-2014, at 3:18 pm, Wikus van der Walt (RedArmour) wvanderw...@redarmour.co.ukmailto:wvanderw...@redarmour.co.uk wrote: Hi All, I have a simple lab setup: 1 x CSMS v4.4.1 and 1 X Xen v6.2. ccsm01 (10.10.0.16) cXen01 (10.10.0.14-mgmt, 10.10.1.14 storage). Xenserver network: nic0: management (vlan 10 access port) nic1: vlan interfaces vlans 2 (public), 11(storage), 12(guest) I followed the guide for Xen server system VM templates and they are populated on the primary storage NFS (10.10.1.2:/csprimary). Attached is an output of: grep -i -E 'exception|unable|fail|invalid|leak|warn|error' /var/log/cloudstack/management/management-server.log This entry makes me think that my network setup is incorrect: 2014-12-08 09:41:00,204 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-113:ctx-1b7ca6b6) Catch Exception: class com.xensource.xenapi.Types$PifIsVlan due to You tried to create a VLAN on top of another VLAN - use the underlying physical PIF/bond instead Any help would be much appreciated. Cheers, Wikus ccsms01log.txt Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Build http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge - rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineering http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Support http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. -- Andrija Panić
Re: System VMs not starting
Another issue is that the system vm templates should be seeded on secondary not on primary. Looks like you have created the network on Xenserver for each traffic type. Cloudstack is again trying to setup the networks. google the error you will find some leads to debug it. Abhinandan Prateek M +919701199011 abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com On 08-Dec-2014, at 3:50 pm, Wikus van der Walt (RedArmour) wvanderw...@redarmour.co.uk wrote: Thanks Abhi, Can you please be more specific about what is bad about it? My primary storage NFS is on a separate segment from my Xen management network. In order to reach the storage NFS I create an external network on the Xenserver and assign an IP on that segment (vlan11). Is this not supported? On 8 December 2014 at 10:10, Abhinandan Prateek abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com wrote: The error is due to bad storage network on your Xenserver, give it another check. -abhi M +919701199011 | abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.commailto: abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com On 08-Dec-2014, at 3:18 pm, Wikus van der Walt (RedArmour) wvanderw...@redarmour.co.ukmailto:wvanderw...@redarmour.co.uk wrote: Hi All, I have a simple lab setup: 1 x CSMS v4.4.1 and 1 X Xen v6.2. ccsm01 (10.10.0.16) cXen01 (10.10.0.14-mgmt, 10.10.1.14 storage). Xenserver network: nic0: management (vlan 10 access port) nic1: vlan interfaces vlans 2 (public), 11(storage), 12(guest) I followed the guide for Xen server system VM templates and they are populated on the primary storage NFS (10.10.1.2:/csprimary). Attached is an output of: grep -i -E 'exception|unable|fail|invalid|leak|warn|error' /var/log/cloudstack/management/management-server.log This entry makes me think that my network setup is incorrect: 2014-12-08 09:41:00,204 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-113:ctx-1b7ca6b6) Catch Exception: class com.xensource.xenapi.Types$PifIsVlan due to You tried to create a VLAN on top of another VLAN - use the underlying physical PIF/bond instead Any help would be much appreciated. Cheers, Wikus ccsms01log.txt Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Build http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge - rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineering http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Support http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue
KVM - VM snapshot (round 2)
Hi guys, still wondering is there any interest into imlementing the VM snapshoot for KVM ? We desperately need it, so will try to contribute anyway we can (not me obviosuly, not a developer, but my colegues will). Can you give some guidance on this subject - I'm aware of the design documents here https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/VM+Snapshots but any more input would be very much appriciated. I understand, that VMware/Xen natively support this, and that it might have bigger user-base for Xen VS KVM - but this is one of the major KVM missing features... Any input greatly appreciated... -- Andrija Panić
Load Balancing Cloudstack Management Servers
Good day, When trying to load balance two Cloudstack Management servers which ports should be exposed so that the management function will still work port 8080/443 port 8250 port 8096 Second question , just a confirmation if using two CS management server , a separate NFS server should be used. Thanks Glenn Wagner
RE: KVM - VM snapshot (round 2)
CS does not support memory snapshots for XenServer. Disk snapshots are working. Not sure about VmWare, but I guess it should be the same. I thought the reachest feature-set is developed for KVM. But if it does not support memory snapshots - I wonder wich hypervisor does it ? This option at user interface exists, but I didn't see it worked. Vadim. -Original Message- From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 12:51 PM To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: KVM - VM snapshot (round 2) Hi guys, still wondering is there any interest into imlementing the VM snapshoot for KVM ? We desperately need it, so will try to contribute anyway we can (not me obviosuly, not a developer, but my colegues will). Can you give some guidance on this subject - I'm aware of the design documents here https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/VM+Snapshots but any more input would be very much appriciated. I understand, that VMware/Xen natively support this, and that it might have bigger user-base for Xen VS KVM - but this is one of the major KVM missing features... Any input greatly appreciated... -- Andrija Panić
Re: Load Balancing Cloudstack Management Servers
shapeblue slides on ports: http://image.slidesharecdn.com/cloudstacknetworking-shapebluetechnicaldeepdive-130705132746-phpapp01/95/cloud-stack-networking-shapeblue-technical-deep-dive-60-638.jpg?cb=1373048954 8250/9090 = loadbalnced internaly only for client access 8080/8096/443 - loadbalanced externaly for public access - but remove the 8080 really... NFS location - is your preference - preferably NOT on the mgmt nodes, but can be anywhere really. On 8 December 2014 at 11:52, Glenn Wagner gl...@blackeye.co.za wrote: Good day, When trying to load balance two Cloudstack Management servers which ports should be exposed so that the management function will still work port 8080/443 port 8250 port 8096 Second question , just a confirmation if using two CS management server , a separate NFS server should be used. Thanks Glenn Wagner -- Andrija Panić
RE: Load Balancing Cloudstack Management Servers
Hi Glenn Assuming you are going to use the same Load Balancers for inbound access to the GUI by your customers, and you are going to put the SSL Cert on the LBs, then you need to load balance 443 which maps to 8080 on the Management Servers. If the same LBs are also handling the traffic from the System VMs (they normally do) then you need to load balance 8250. If you need to have the 'un-authenticated api port' enabled for say use with Cloud Portal Business Manager and you want to pass this traffic through your load balancers, then ensure it is only accessible from a private internal network, and NEVER expose to the public internet etc. Regarding NFS, yes, if using multiple Management Servers, they should just be Management Servers and not providing any other services etc Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Glenn Wagner [mailto:gl...@blackeye.co.za] Sent: 08 December 2014 10:53 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Load Balancing Cloudstack Management Servers Good day, When trying to load balance two Cloudstack Management servers which ports should be exposed so that the management function will still work port 8080/443 port 8250 port 8096 Second question , just a confirmation if using two CS management server , a separate NFS server should be used. Thanks Glenn Wagner Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: KVM - VM snapshot (round 2)
With KVM - I understand that there are 2 steps in general. 1) libvirts save - which saves memory of running VM to a file 2) qemu-img to snapshot disks... AS for the KVM VM snapshoting - my understanding is that the code is not implemented at all, right ? On 8 December 2014 at 12:11, Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee wrote: CS does not support memory snapshots for XenServer. Disk snapshots are working. Not sure about VmWare, but I guess it should be the same. I thought the reachest feature-set is developed for KVM. But if it does not support memory snapshots - I wonder wich hypervisor does it ? This option at user interface exists, but I didn't see it worked. Vadim. -Original Message- From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 12:51 PM To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: KVM - VM snapshot (round 2) Hi guys, still wondering is there any interest into imlementing the VM snapshoot for KVM ? We desperately need it, so will try to contribute anyway we can (not me obviosuly, not a developer, but my colegues will). Can you give some guidance on this subject - I'm aware of the design documents here https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/VM+Snapshots but any more input would be very much appriciated. I understand, that VMware/Xen natively support this, and that it might have bigger user-base for Xen VS KVM - but this is one of the major KVM missing features... Any input greatly appreciated... -- Andrija Panić -- Andrija Panić
[proposal] Purge Volumes instead of deleting them
Anybody interested ? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7926 Best -- Andrija Panić
XenServer 6.2: Other 64 bit template
Hello all, I have previously set up XenServer cluster under CS and registered FreeBSD under „Other 64 bit“ template. It worked fine in PV mode. Now I have stand-alone XenServer and can’t launch the same set up for FreeBSD manually. Can someone who is using XenServer under CS create VM from default „Other 64 bit“ template and print out „xe vm-param-list uuid=$VM-UUID“ ?? I would be very thankful for this output. It seems default templates are different. Regards, Vadim Kimlaychuk
Re: 4.3.1 API issue with importing LDAP users
Created. CLOUDSTACK-8046. I¹d also like to point out that you may want to add ³LDAP² to the Components menu in JiraŠ -I On 12/6/14, 6:32 AM, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote: Hi. Haven't looked at the code but it sounds like a casing issue. AD is case aware but not case sensitive. I'm unsure of the top of my head what POSIX LDAP is. Probably best if we change to suit ADs case awareness. i.e. copy across as same casing and allow login from any case variation. Can you open a jira ticket? Thanks, Ian On 6 Dec 2014 01:48, ilya musayev ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Ian, This is probably better suited for Dev list, Ian Duffy has done alot of work on LDAP and CloudStack, he is cc'd to this thread. Perhaps he can shed some light. Regards ilya On 12/5/14, 4:40 PM, Ian Forde wrote: I¹ve got a bash script performing an API call (in my case, via cloudmonkey) as follows: cloudmonkey api listLdapUsers listtype=new display=default filter=username,domain (note that we¹re using Active Directory) There¹s at least one user in AD defined with a capital letter in front. Example: ³Bjones rather than bjones. Now given that we have a user in CS named bjones, Bjones shouldn¹t show up in the output from the above command, but it does. Is this supposed to happen or is the listLdapUsers supposed to perform a case-insensitive match against currently-defined Cloudstack user accounts? Thanks, -Ian
[CVE-2014-7807] Apache CloudStack unauthenticated LDAP binds
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 CVE-2014-7807: Apache CloudStack unauthenticated LDAP binds CVSS: 7.5, AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P Vendors: The Apache Software Foundation Citrix, Inc. Versions Afffected: Apache CloudStack 4.3, 4.4 Description: Apache CloudStack may be configured to authenticate LDAP users. When so configured, it performs a simple LDAP bind with the name and password provided by a user. Simple LDAP binds are defined with three mechanisms (RFC 4513): 1) username and password; 2) unauthenticated if only a username is specified; and 3) anonymous if neither username or password is specified. Currently, Apache CloudStack does not check if the password was provided which could allow an attacker to bind as an unauthenticated user. Mitigation: Users of Apache CloudStack 4.4 and derivatives should update to the latest version (4.4.2) An updated release for Apache CloudStack 4.3.2 is in testing. Until that is released, we recommend following the mitigation below: By default, many LDAP servers are not configured to allow unauthenticated binds. If the LDAP server in use allow this behaviour, a potential interim solution would be to consider disabling unauthenticated binds. Credit: This issue was identified by the Citrix Security Team. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUhgUCAAoJEOom9N0pCN7SOQMQAKyBuhg25u3FcVOU5XMdGGpT 2kSVFoLFR74ObI8bdr3HP+2LdLf/Go9QBBrWlZ034FUj6OV0Ct5o8TNB6AHbv0qF Ar4N05JoGtPaDCe9sWV/+ykOJH8snQjnYwVFrLZlLw8Y/JUQ+I1yJBksw8a2/hT2 vmYgYiAQyrEMMk4bhBBlEyaJFMhuMtKtgUqLDW8wmlhkt2acZMt/0BKxDwAO8o7m 6ypepPCmkPHUpD50tfcCI+K4ib/C5EOn40n4orM97/JHZLsCyhz5nk36eQMOQQz2 fJlaA04fQSV4Cv7c+S0LPh5e4e6TPSrOW3O4/V2dkjK/GgP8kUoo7ivyjIw6d2oJ Z5vqqgxrmgwDjH58YfVu3tyVuDlOFTZfCLkhdoXMxHfMLYYKeXkffRli9XabxrE+ AkVoXaQAumf8IzTLVSQztV18jC79kvEeCV0pFYOjb/X/gShemruqmCWVDulj1ax6 tzoP+Bm2mQRyrRClY37R+q3cQ2z6eNAC/vAoYzhYBN1o63MYneLYDADhyE6YIGz0 LTbDDGFn0WVdFDrqworHdYDIMW7HQFMNtsQuueeP7LBldsgyTmjmBMp+S3Tq27UT RaVgp3n9ZUPdzj/i1vvJBrATKUNmv1GDoy+C1GPNx423nEOe7dFkMJARlcbf5Pml 03DX+ot4Xan0P5HXPT+r =QqOf -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: Load Balancing in cloudstack
Yeah i guess i am using basic networking...i didnt create any routers or network groups...i just installed cloudstack and entered private and guest ip addresses on the first run...then i created a vm and this defaultguestnetwork was automati ally created On 08-Dec-2014 1:52 PM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com wrote: Hi Vadim, What you are saying is Internal LB, it is there only in the VPC. Thanks, Jayapal On 08-Dec-2014, at 12:52 PM, Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee wrote: As far as I know -- network offer with LB is only available for VPC and you must expicitly select it for specific subnet. For shared network it is not available. Vadim. -Original Message- From: Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 12:34 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Load Balancing in cloudstack On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 11:28 PM, Tilak Raj Singh tila...@gmail.com wrote: Hello all, I followed the quick install guide of installing cloudstack and setup a private cloud within my college..Now I created a VM in it and it was assigned an IP address of 172.31.101.250. I created another VM which has an ip address 172.31.101.248...now when I click NIC tabs of both the machines it shows the Network Name as defaultGuestNetwork...I wish to add load balancing to these two machine to share the load of a webservice I would be creating on these. But the problem is when I click on View IP Address inside defaultguestNetwork it shows no IP addressesWhat wrong am I doing here..Can somebody please guide me??? Are you using Basic networking? -- Erik
Port forwarding (web) - doesnt show real client IP
Hi, when doing port forwarding on VPC VR - port 80 - when some client access web site - only the main Public IP of the VPC is logged in apache access logs as remote IP. Why is this behaviour - and can this be changed ? My understanding is that this is kind of bug (unless needed for some other reasons) - port forwading is DNAT in essence, so only the destination IP/port should be changed, not proxied all the way, as it seems to be the case here... I read on other guys mailing list - same behavior for loadbalancer... Any suggestion ? Thanks, -- Andrija Panić
Re: Port forwarding (web) - doesnt show real client IP
And just to spice things a little bit, ALL remote connections appears to come from main Public IP of the VPC VR. So we can not block some stuff on firewall onVM (while doing port forwading) because all connections appear to come from main Public IP of the VPC VR. This is terrible design/bug - can we change this ? I'm on the ACS 4.3 currently... cheers On 8 December 2014 at 23:42, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, when doing port forwarding on VPC VR - port 80 - when some client access web site - only the main Public IP of the VPC is logged in apache access logs as remote IP. Why is this behaviour - and can this be changed ? My understanding is that this is kind of bug (unless needed for some other reasons) - port forwading is DNAT in essence, so only the destination IP/port should be changed, not proxied all the way, as it seems to be the case here... I read on other guys mailing list - same behavior for loadbalancer... Any suggestion ? Thanks, -- Andrija Panić -- Andrija Panić
Re: Port forwarding (web) - doesnt show real client IP
It sounds like some iptables rules got broken at some point for the static NAT, and since there's still a catch-all SNAT for outbound it gets caught by that and still keeps working, but is broken in a subtle way that goes unnoticed. On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote: And just to spice things a little bit, ALL remote connections appears to come from main Public IP of the VPC VR. So we can not block some stuff on firewall onVM (while doing port forwading) because all connections appear to come from main Public IP of the VPC VR. This is terrible design/bug - can we change this ? I'm on the ACS 4.3 currently... cheers On 8 December 2014 at 23:42, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, when doing port forwarding on VPC VR - port 80 - when some client access web site - only the main Public IP of the VPC is logged in apache access logs as remote IP. Why is this behaviour - and can this be changed ? My understanding is that this is kind of bug (unless needed for some other reasons) - port forwading is DNAT in essence, so only the destination IP/port should be changed, not proxied all the way, as it seems to be the case here... I read on other guys mailing list - same behavior for loadbalancer... Any suggestion ? Thanks, -- Andrija Panić -- Andrija Panić
Re: Desktop as a service
On Dec 5, 2014, at 11:08 PM, Tilak Raj Singh tila...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Everybody, I am new to cloudstack so I dont know if I am going off the topic here. I wished to know how to setup Virtual Desktop Interface (VDI) using cloudstack. I browsed the net and found that openstack has the capabilities to setup this feature. Does cloudstack can be used to deploy such a service? If yes some links for the same would be highly appreciated. Also if cloudstack does not have that capability then is there some alternative to this? Hi and welcome! CloudStack can be used with Citrix XenDesktop and XenApp to provide VDI services for users. It’s covered in the XenDesktop install/setup docs (just replace CloudPlatform with CloudStack) Another thing I wanted to know is how to instantiate virtual machines automatically if the load is increased. Have read about load balancing and I guess its regarding this only. If you mean for VDI, XenDesktop can manage this once connected to CloudStack. If you mean outside of that setup, the phrase you’re looking for is “autoscaling.” Currently it works with either NetScaler load balancers or XenServer virtualization. The architecture I wish to setup is to provide VDI to several users on demand via browsers, where the compute is done on the virtual machines. Now when suppose 10 users are simultaneously using this Virtual Desktop the load on the VM increases so cloudstanck spawns another VM to share the load of these 10 users to 5 each on these two VMs created. I hope my doubt is clear. Yep - XenDesktop will do that for ya. :) John
unable to test Network Throttling.
Hi all, i have created one compute offering(2 CPU , 4 GB) and given the Network Rate as 1024 Mb/s, a VM is deployed from that compute offering and in global settings i didn't changed any Network Throttling Rate(default 200 Mb/s) and i'm unable to test the network bandwidth rate. please suggest me how to test the bandwidth rate of the VM. Regards, Rajasekhar.
答复: unable to test Network Throttling.
Hi, There is a priority: the network rate of compute offering the network rate of global configuration. If you deploy on kvm host, you can use virsh command to dumpxml of the VM and focus on interface ... /interface. Best Regards, Star Guo -邮件原件- 发件人: raja sekhar [mailto:rajsekhar@gmail.com] 发送时间: 2014年12月9日 14:28 收件人: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org 主题: unable to test Network Throttling. Hi all, i have created one compute offering(2 CPU , 4 GB) and given the Network Rate as 1024 Mb/s, a VM is deployed from that compute offering and in global settings i didn't changed any Network Throttling Rate(default 200 Mb/s) and i'm unable to test the network bandwidth rate. please suggest me how to test the bandwidth rate of the VM. Regards, Rajasekhar.
Re: 答复: unable to test Network Throttling.
Hi Star, Thanks for your reply. I'm using XenServer 6.2 and cloudstack 4.3.1. how can i check the band width rate of the VM, is there any command for xenserver host? waiting for your reply. Regards, Rajasekhar. On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Star Guo st...@ceph.me wrote: Hi, There is a priority: the network rate of compute offering the network rate of global configuration. If you deploy on kvm host, you can use virsh command to dumpxml of the VM and focus on interface ... /interface. Best Regards, Star Guo -邮件原件- 发件人: raja sekhar [mailto:rajsekhar@gmail.com] 发送时间: 2014年12月9日 14:28 收件人: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org 主题: unable to test Network Throttling. Hi all, i have created one compute offering(2 CPU , 4 GB) and given the Network Rate as 1024 Mb/s, a VM is deployed from that compute offering and in global settings i didn't changed any Network Throttling Rate(default 200 Mb/s) and i'm unable to test the network bandwidth rate. please suggest me how to test the bandwidth rate of the VM. Regards, Rajasekhar.
