Re: New L2 nework types are not shared
Jean-Francois, The issue raised is a valid bug in the new feature but not a blocker so it was not included in RC2, the shared bugfix PR will be targeted for 4.11.1.0 release. - Rohit <https://cloudstack.apache.org> From: Jean-Francois Nadeau <the.jfnad...@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2018 1:44:36 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: New L2 nework types are not shared Perfect. Thanks Boris. Can the fix for shared L2 networks also be merged in 4.11 RC2 ? On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 4:02 AM, Boris Stoyanov < boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > Thanks Jean-Francois, > We’ve just confirmed CLOUDSTACK-10239 is a regression and will be included > in 4.11 RC2. Thanks for bringing this up. > > Boris > > > boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > @shapeblue > > > > > On 24 Jan 2018, at 9:57, Boris Stoyanov <boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com> > wrote: > > > > Hi Jean-Francois, I don’t know if you’re following dev@ list, there’s > an open thread for voting on release candidates. If you reply to that > thread with your findings it’ll be more visible to devs and release > management. > > > > Bobby. > > > > > > boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com > > www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> > > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > > @shapeblue > > > > > > > >> On 23 Jan 2018, at 16:23, Jean-Francois Nadeau <the.jfnad...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> Thank you both Boris and Nux! > >> > >> I'll keep an eye 4.11.1. If I may get your attention on another issue > >> that blocks me from further testing on 4.11, I filled CLOUDSTACK-10239 > :-) > >> > >> best regards, > >> > >> Jean-Francois > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 8:55 AM, Boris Stoyanov < > >> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > >> > >>> Thanks for bringing this up Jean-Francois, > >>> One of our devs has addressed this and with the following PR it’s now > >>> fixed. It turned out a constraint was violated when deploying a VM in a > >>> project. This will likely get merged in 4.11.1.0 > >>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2420 > >>> > >>> Please let keep us posted if you find any further issues. > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Boris. > >>> > >>> On 19 Jan 2018, at 17:57, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro<mailto:n...@li.nux.ro>> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> Might be worth sending this to dev@ as well, especially now that we > are > >>> doing testing for 4.11. > >>> > >>> HTH > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > >>> > >>> Nux! > >>> www.nux.ro<http://www.nux.ro> > >>> > >>> > >>> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com > >>> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> > >>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > >>> @shapeblue > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue - Original Message - > >>> From: "Jean-Francois Nadeau" <the.jfnad...@gmail.com> > >>> To: "users" <users@cloudstack.apache.org> > >>> Sent: Wednesday, 17 January, 2018 21:09:19 > >>> Subject: New L2 nework types are not shared > >>> > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> I'm testing 4.11-rc1 and the new L2 network type feature as shown at > >>> http://www.shapeblue.com/layer-2-networks-in-cloudstack/ > >>> > >>> I want to use this as a replacement to a shared network offering with > no > >>> DHCP which works to support an external DHCP server but still required > to > >>> fill some CIDR information. > >>> > >>> I thought the intent was that L2 network type was to replace the > previous > >>> approach when required to integrate an existing network. > >>> > >>> If I attempt to provision a VM in a project as the root admin using > the L2 > >>> network I get denied... apparently because they are not shared and I > can't > >>> make them public. > >>> > >>> ('HTTP 531 response from CloudStack', , {u'errorcode': > 531, > >>> u'uuidList': [], u'cserrorcode': 4365, u'errortext': u'Unable to use > >>> network with id= 7712102b-bbdf-4c54-bdbf-9fddfa16de46, permission > >>> denied'}) > >>> > >>> Provisioning in the root project works just fine but really I > want to > >>> use L2 networks in user projects even if only the admin can do so. > >>> > >>> Thoughts ? > >>> > >>> > > > >
Re: New L2 nework types are not shared
I think that’s the only outstanding item before we cut rc2. Regards, Boris Stoyanov boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue > On 25 Jan 2018, at 14:44, Jean-Francois Nadeau <the.jfnad...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Perfect. Thanks Boris. > > Can the fix for shared L2 networks also be merged in 4.11 RC2 ? > > On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 4:02 AM, Boris Stoyanov < > boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > >> Thanks Jean-Francois, >> We’ve just confirmed CLOUDSTACK-10239 is a regression and will be included >> in 4.11 RC2. Thanks for bringing this up. >> >> Boris >> >> >> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com >> www.shapeblue.com >> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK >> @shapeblue >> >> >> >>> On 24 Jan 2018, at 9:57, Boris Stoyanov <boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Jean-Francois, I don’t know if you’re following dev@ list, there’s >> an open thread for voting on release candidates. If you reply to that >> thread with your findings it’ll be more visible to devs and release >> management. >>> >>> Bobby. >>> >>> >>> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com >>> www.shapeblue.com >>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK >>> @shapeblue >>> >>> >>> >>>> On 23 Jan 2018, at 16:23, Jean-Francois Nadeau <the.jfnad...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>>> >>>> Thank you both Boris and Nux! >>>> >>>> I'll keep an eye 4.11.1. If I may get your attention on another issue >>>> that blocks me from further testing on 4.11, I filled CLOUDSTACK-10239 >> :-) >>>> >>>> best regards, >>>> >>>> Jean-Francois >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 8:55 AM, Boris Stoyanov < >>>> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thanks for bringing this up Jean-Francois, >>>>> One of our devs has addressed this and with the following PR it’s now >>>>> fixed. It turned out a constraint was violated when deploying a VM in a >>>>> project. This will likely get merged in 4.11.1.0 >>>>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2420 >>>>> >>>>> Please let keep us posted if you find any further issues. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Boris. >>>>> >>>>> On 19 Jan 2018, at 17:57, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro<mailto:n...@li.nux.ro>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Might be worth sending this to dev@ as well, especially now that we >> are >>>>> doing testing for 4.11. >>>>> >>>>> HTH >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! >>>>> >>>>> Nux! >>>>> www.nux.ro<http://www.nux.ro> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com >>>>> www.shapeblue.com >>>>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK >>>>> @shapeblue >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> - Original Message - >>>>> From: "Jean-Francois Nadeau" <the.jfnad...@gmail.com> >>>>> To: "users" <users@cloudstack.apache.org> >>>>> Sent: Wednesday, 17 January, 2018 21:09:19 >>>>> Subject: New L2 nework types are not shared >>>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> I'm testing 4.11-rc1 and the new L2 network type feature as shown at >>>>> http://www.shapeblue.com/layer-2-networks-in-cloudstack/ >>>>> >>>>> I want to use this as a replacement to a shared network offering with >> no >>>>> DHCP which works to support an external DHCP server but still required >> to >>>>> fill some CIDR information. >>>>> >>>>> I thought the intent was that L2 network type was to replace the >> previous >>>>> approach when required to integrate an existing network. >>>>> >>>>> If I attempt to provision a VM in a project as the root admin using >> the L2 >>>>> network I get denied... apparently because they are not shared and I >> can't >>>>> make them public. >>>>> >>>>> ('HTTP 531 response from CloudStack', , {u'errorcode': >> 531, >>>>> u'uuidList': [], u'cserrorcode': 4365, u'errortext': u'Unable to use >>>>> network with id= 7712102b-bbdf-4c54-bdbf-9fddfa16de46, permission >>>>> denied'}) >>>>> >>>>> Provisioning in the root project works just fine but really I >> want to >>>>> use L2 networks in user projects even if only the admin can do so. >>>>> >>>>> Thoughts ? >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> >>
Re: New L2 nework types are not shared
Perfect. Thanks Boris. Can the fix for shared L2 networks also be merged in 4.11 RC2 ? On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 4:02 AM, Boris Stoyanov < boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > Thanks Jean-Francois, > We’ve just confirmed CLOUDSTACK-10239 is a regression and will be included > in 4.11 RC2. Thanks for bringing this up. > > Boris > > > boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > @shapeblue > > > > > On 24 Jan 2018, at 9:57, Boris Stoyanov <boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com> > wrote: > > > > Hi Jean-Francois, I don’t know if you’re following dev@ list, there’s > an open thread for voting on release candidates. If you reply to that > thread with your findings it’ll be more visible to devs and release > management. > > > > Bobby. > > > > > > boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com > > www.shapeblue.com > > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > > @shapeblue > > > > > > > >> On 23 Jan 2018, at 16:23, Jean-Francois Nadeau <the.jfnad...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> Thank you both Boris and Nux! > >> > >> I'll keep an eye 4.11.1. If I may get your attention on another issue > >> that blocks me from further testing on 4.11, I filled CLOUDSTACK-10239 > :-) > >> > >> best regards, > >> > >> Jean-Francois > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 8:55 AM, Boris Stoyanov < > >> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > >> > >>> Thanks for bringing this up Jean-Francois, > >>> One of our devs has addressed this and with the following PR it’s now > >>> fixed. It turned out a constraint was violated when deploying a VM in a > >>> project. This will likely get merged in 4.11.1.0 > >>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2420 > >>> > >>> Please let keep us posted if you find any further issues. > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Boris. > >>> > >>> On 19 Jan 2018, at 17:57, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro<mailto:n...@li.nux.ro>> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> Might be worth sending this to dev@ as well, especially now that we > are > >>> doing testing for 4.11. > >>> > >>> HTH > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > >>> > >>> Nux! > >>> www.nux.ro<http://www.nux.ro> > >>> > >>> > >>> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com > >>> www.shapeblue.com > >>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > >>> @shapeblue > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> - Original Message - > >>> From: "Jean-Francois Nadeau" <the.jfnad...@gmail.com> > >>> To: "users" <users@cloudstack.apache.org> > >>> Sent: Wednesday, 17 January, 2018 21:09:19 > >>> Subject: New L2 nework types are not shared > >>> > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> I'm testing 4.11-rc1 and the new L2 network type feature as shown at > >>> http://www.shapeblue.com/layer-2-networks-in-cloudstack/ > >>> > >>> I want to use this as a replacement to a shared network offering with > no > >>> DHCP which works to support an external DHCP server but still required > to > >>> fill some CIDR information. > >>> > >>> I thought the intent was that L2 network type was to replace the > previous > >>> approach when required to integrate an existing network. > >>> > >>> If I attempt to provision a VM in a project as the root admin using > the L2 > >>> network I get denied... apparently because they are not shared and I > can't > >>> make them public. > >>> > >>> ('HTTP 531 response from CloudStack', , {u'errorcode': > 531, > >>> u'uuidList': [], u'cserrorcode': 4365, u'errortext': u'Unable to use > >>> network with id= 7712102b-bbdf-4c54-bdbf-9fddfa16de46, permission > >>> denied'}) > >>> > >>> Provisioning in the root project works just fine but really I > want to > >>> use L2 networks in user projects even if only the admin can do so. > >>> > >>> Thoughts ? > >>> > >>> > > > >
Re: New L2 nework types are not shared
Thanks Jean-Francois, We’ve just confirmed CLOUDSTACK-10239 is a regression and will be included in 4.11 RC2. Thanks for bringing this up. Boris boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue > On 24 Jan 2018, at 9:57, Boris Stoyanov <boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > > Hi Jean-Francois, I don’t know if you’re following dev@ list, there’s an open > thread for voting on release candidates. If you reply to that thread with > your findings it’ll be more visible to devs and release management. > > Bobby. > > > boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > @shapeblue > > > >> On 23 Jan 2018, at 16:23, Jean-Francois Nadeau <the.jfnad...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Thank you both Boris and Nux! >> >> I'll keep an eye 4.11.1. If I may get your attention on another issue >> that blocks me from further testing on 4.11, I filled CLOUDSTACK-10239 :-) >> >> best regards, >> >> Jean-Francois >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 8:55 AM, Boris Stoyanov < >> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com> wrote: >> >>> Thanks for bringing this up Jean-Francois, >>> One of our devs has addressed this and with the following PR it’s now >>> fixed. It turned out a constraint was violated when deploying a VM in a >>> project. This will likely get merged in 4.11.1.0 >>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2420 >>> >>> Please let keep us posted if you find any further issues. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Boris. >>> >>> On 19 Jan 2018, at 17:57, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro<mailto:n...@li.nux.ro>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Might be worth sending this to dev@ as well, especially now that we are >>> doing testing for 4.11. >>> >>> HTH >>> >>> -- >>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! >>> >>> Nux! >>> www.nux.ro<http://www.nux.ro> >>> >>> >>> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com >>> www.shapeblue.com >>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK >>> @shapeblue >>> >>> >>> >>> - Original Message - >>> From: "Jean-Francois Nadeau" <the.jfnad...@gmail.com> >>> To: "users" <users@cloudstack.apache.org> >>> Sent: Wednesday, 17 January, 2018 21:09:19 >>> Subject: New L2 nework types are not shared >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I'm testing 4.11-rc1 and the new L2 network type feature as shown at >>> http://www.shapeblue.com/layer-2-networks-in-cloudstack/ >>> >>> I want to use this as a replacement to a shared network offering with no >>> DHCP which works to support an external DHCP server but still required to >>> fill some CIDR information. >>> >>> I thought the intent was that L2 network type was to replace the previous >>> approach when required to integrate an existing network. >>> >>> If I attempt to provision a VM in a project as the root admin using the L2 >>> network I get denied... apparently because they are not shared and I can't >>> make them public. >>> >>> ('HTTP 531 response from CloudStack', , {u'errorcode': 531, >>> u'uuidList': [], u'cserrorcode': 4365, u'errortext': u'Unable to use >>> network with id= 7712102b-bbdf-4c54-bdbf-9fddfa16de46, permission >>> denied'}) >>> >>> Provisioning in the root project works just fine but really I want to >>> use L2 networks in user projects even if only the admin can do so. >>> >>> Thoughts ? >>> >>> >
Re: New L2 nework types are not shared
Hi Jean-Francois, I don’t know if you’re following dev@ list, there’s an open thread for voting on release candidates. If you reply to that thread with your findings it’ll be more visible to devs and release management. Bobby. boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue > On 23 Jan 2018, at 16:23, Jean-Francois Nadeau <the.jfnad...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thank you both Boris and Nux! > > I'll keep an eye 4.11.1. If I may get your attention on another issue > that blocks me from further testing on 4.11, I filled CLOUDSTACK-10239 :-) > > best regards, > > Jean-Francois > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 8:55 AM, Boris Stoyanov < > boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > >> Thanks for bringing this up Jean-Francois, >> One of our devs has addressed this and with the following PR it’s now >> fixed. It turned out a constraint was violated when deploying a VM in a >> project. This will likely get merged in 4.11.1.0 >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2420 >> >> Please let keep us posted if you find any further issues. >> >> Regards, >> Boris. >> >> On 19 Jan 2018, at 17:57, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro<mailto:n...@li.nux.ro>> >> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Might be worth sending this to dev@ as well, especially now that we are >> doing testing for 4.11. >> >> HTH >> >> -- >> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! >> >> Nux! >> www.nux.ro<http://www.nux.ro> >> >> >> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com >> www.shapeblue.com >> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK >> @shapeblue >> >> >> >> - Original Message - >> From: "Jean-Francois Nadeau" <the.jfnad...@gmail.com> >> To: "users" <users@cloudstack.apache.org> >> Sent: Wednesday, 17 January, 2018 21:09:19 >> Subject: New L2 nework types are not shared >> >> Hi all, >> >> I'm testing 4.11-rc1 and the new L2 network type feature as shown at >> http://www.shapeblue.com/layer-2-networks-in-cloudstack/ >> >> I want to use this as a replacement to a shared network offering with no >> DHCP which works to support an external DHCP server but still required to >> fill some CIDR information. >> >> I thought the intent was that L2 network type was to replace the previous >> approach when required to integrate an existing network. >> >> If I attempt to provision a VM in a project as the root admin using the L2 >> network I get denied... apparently because they are not shared and I can't >> make them public. >> >> ('HTTP 531 response from CloudStack', , {u'errorcode': 531, >> u'uuidList': [], u'cserrorcode': 4365, u'errortext': u'Unable to use >> network with id= 7712102b-bbdf-4c54-bdbf-9fddfa16de46, permission >> denied'}) >> >> Provisioning in the root project works just fine but really I want to >> use L2 networks in user projects even if only the admin can do so. >> >> Thoughts ? >> >>
Re: New L2 nework types are not shared
Thank you both Boris and Nux! I'll keep an eye 4.11.1. If I may get your attention on another issue that blocks me from further testing on 4.11, I filled CLOUDSTACK-10239 :-) best regards, Jean-Francois On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 8:55 AM, Boris Stoyanov < boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > Thanks for bringing this up Jean-Francois, > One of our devs has addressed this and with the following PR it’s now > fixed. It turned out a constraint was violated when deploying a VM in a > project. This will likely get merged in 4.11.1.0 > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2420 > > Please let keep us posted if you find any further issues. > > Regards, > Boris. > > On 19 Jan 2018, at 17:57, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro<mailto:n...@li.nux.ro>> > wrote: > > Hi, > > Might be worth sending this to dev@ as well, especially now that we are > doing testing for 4.11. > > HTH > > -- > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > > Nux! > www.nux.ro<http://www.nux.ro> > > > boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > @shapeblue > > > > - Original Message - > From: "Jean-Francois Nadeau" <the.jfnad...@gmail.com> > To: "users" <users@cloudstack.apache.org> > Sent: Wednesday, 17 January, 2018 21:09:19 > Subject: New L2 nework types are not shared > > Hi all, > > I'm testing 4.11-rc1 and the new L2 network type feature as shown at > http://www.shapeblue.com/layer-2-networks-in-cloudstack/ > > I want to use this as a replacement to a shared network offering with no > DHCP which works to support an external DHCP server but still required to > fill some CIDR information. > > I thought the intent was that L2 network type was to replace the previous > approach when required to integrate an existing network. > > If I attempt to provision a VM in a project as the root admin using the L2 > network I get denied... apparently because they are not shared and I can't > make them public. > > ('HTTP 531 response from CloudStack', , {u'errorcode': 531, > u'uuidList': [], u'cserrorcode': 4365, u'errortext': u'Unable to use > network with id= 7712102b-bbdf-4c54-bdbf-9fddfa16de46, permission > denied'}) > > Provisioning in the root project works just fine but really I want to > use L2 networks in user projects even if only the admin can do so. > > Thoughts ? > >
Re: New L2 nework types are not shared
Thanks for bringing this up Jean-Francois, One of our devs has addressed this and with the following PR it’s now fixed. It turned out a constraint was violated when deploying a VM in a project. This will likely get merged in 4.11.1.0 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2420 Please let keep us posted if you find any further issues. Regards, Boris. On 19 Jan 2018, at 17:57, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro<mailto:n...@li.nux.ro>> wrote: Hi, Might be worth sending this to dev@ as well, especially now that we are doing testing for 4.11. HTH -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro<http://www.nux.ro> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue - Original Message - From: "Jean-Francois Nadeau" <the.jfnad...@gmail.com> To: "users" <users@cloudstack.apache.org> Sent: Wednesday, 17 January, 2018 21:09:19 Subject: New L2 nework types are not shared Hi all, I'm testing 4.11-rc1 and the new L2 network type feature as shown at http://www.shapeblue.com/layer-2-networks-in-cloudstack/ I want to use this as a replacement to a shared network offering with no DHCP which works to support an external DHCP server but still required to fill some CIDR information. I thought the intent was that L2 network type was to replace the previous approach when required to integrate an existing network. If I attempt to provision a VM in a project as the root admin using the L2 network I get denied... apparently because they are not shared and I can't make them public. ('HTTP 531 response from CloudStack', , {u'errorcode': 531, u'uuidList': [], u'cserrorcode': 4365, u'errortext': u'Unable to use network with id= 7712102b-bbdf-4c54-bdbf-9fddfa16de46, permission denied'}) Provisioning in the root project works just fine but really I want to use L2 networks in user projects even if only the admin can do so. Thoughts ?
Re: New L2 nework types are not shared
Hi, Might be worth sending this to dev@ as well, especially now that we are doing testing for 4.11. HTH -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Jean-Francois Nadeau" <the.jfnad...@gmail.com> > To: "users" <users@cloudstack.apache.org> > Sent: Wednesday, 17 January, 2018 21:09:19 > Subject: New L2 nework types are not shared > Hi all, > > I'm testing 4.11-rc1 and the new L2 network type feature as shown at > http://www.shapeblue.com/layer-2-networks-in-cloudstack/ > > I want to use this as a replacement to a shared network offering with no > DHCP which works to support an external DHCP server but still required to > fill some CIDR information. > > I thought the intent was that L2 network type was to replace the previous > approach when required to integrate an existing network. > > If I attempt to provision a VM in a project as the root admin using the L2 > network I get denied... apparently because they are not shared and I can't > make them public. > > ('HTTP 531 response from CloudStack', , {u'errorcode': 531, > u'uuidList': [], u'cserrorcode': 4365, u'errortext': u'Unable to use > network with id= 7712102b-bbdf-4c54-bdbf-9fddfa16de46, permission denied'}) > > Provisioning in the root project works just fine but really I want to > use L2 networks in user projects even if only the admin can do so. > > Thoughts ?
New L2 nework types are not shared
Hi all, I'm testing 4.11-rc1 and the new L2 network type feature as shown at http://www.shapeblue.com/layer-2-networks-in-cloudstack/ I want to use this as a replacement to a shared network offering with no DHCP which works to support an external DHCP server but still required to fill some CIDR information. I thought the intent was that L2 network type was to replace the previous approach when required to integrate an existing network. If I attempt to provision a VM in a project as the root admin using the L2 network I get denied... apparently because they are not shared and I can't make them public. ('HTTP 531 response from CloudStack', , {u'errorcode': 531, u'uuidList': [], u'cserrorcode': 4365, u'errortext': u'Unable to use network with id= 7712102b-bbdf-4c54-bdbf-9fddfa16de46, permission denied'}) Provisioning in the root project works just fine but really I want to use L2 networks in user projects even if only the admin can do so. Thoughts ?