[EMAIL PROTECTED] Slow start of Apache 2.0.55 on AIX 5.3

[Lekha Menon]

Hi,

I have installed Apache 2.0.55 on AIX 5.3 machine.
For installation, i have used  the command "configure --prefix=".

Apache was installed properly without any errors.

However on startup, i.e. execution of "apachectl start", it starts apache v
slowly. Same for "apachectl stop". I have not modified the httpd.conf file,
it is same as the one created during installation.

On the same machine, when i later installed Apache 1.3.29, this version is
fast unlike Apache 2.0.55

Can anyone pls point out what the reason could be.

Thanks in adv,
Lekha


http://www.patni.com
World-Wide Partnerships. World-Class Solutions.
_

This e-mail message may contain proprietary, confidential or legally
privileged information for the sole use of the person or entity to
whom this message was originally addressed. Any review, e-transmission
dissemination or other use of or taking of any action in reliance upon
this information by persons or entities other than the intended
recipient is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error
kindly delete  this e-mail from your records. If it appears that this
mail has been forwarded to you without proper authority, please notify
us immediately at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and delete this mail. 
_

-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Slow start of Apache 2.0.55 on AIX 5.3

[Mahesh S Kudva]

check the logs. They are always handy.


Regards & Thanks

Mahesh S Kudva


-Original Message-
From: "Lekha Menon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 14:17:22 +0530
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Slow start of Apache 2.0.55 on AIX 5.3

> Hi,
> 
> I have installed Apache 2.0.55 on AIX 5.3 machine.
> For installation, i have used  the command "configure --prefix= Apache Installation>".
> 
> Apache was installed properly without any errors.
> 
> However on startup, i.e. execution of "apachectl start", it starts
> apache v
> slowly. Same for "apachectl stop". I have not modified the httpd.conf
> file,
> it is same as the one created during installation.
> 
> On the same machine, when i later installed Apache 1.3.29, this version
> is
> fast unlike Apache 2.0.55
> 
> Can anyone pls point out what the reason could be.
> 
> Thanks in adv,
> Lekha
> 
> 
> http://www.patni.com
> World-Wide Partnerships. World-Class Solutions.
> _
> 
> This e-mail message may contain proprietary, confidential or legally
> privileged information for the sole use of the person or entity to
> whom this message was originally addressed. Any review, e-transmission
> dissemination or other use of or taking of any action in reliance upon
> this information by persons or entities other than the intended
> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error
> kindly delete  this e-mail from your records. If it appears that this
> mail has been forwarded to you without proper authority, please notify
> us immediately at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and delete this mail. 
> _
> 
> 



---
Robosoft Technologies - Partners in Product Development



-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Slow start of Apache 2.0.55 on AIX 5.3

[Lekha Menon]

I have checked the logs, but they do not show any error msg in it.
The error_log contains msg -
[Wed Jan 18 13:21:25 2006] [notice] Apache configured -- resuming normal
operati
ons
[Wed Jan 18 13:24:50 2006] [notice] caught SIGTERM, shutting down

This is normal operation comments.



- Original Message -
From: "Mahesh S Kudva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 3:08 PM
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Slow start of Apache 2.0.55 on AIX 5.3


> check the logs. They are always handy.
>
>
> Regards & Thanks
> 
> Mahesh S Kudva
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: "Lekha Menon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 
> Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 14:17:22 +0530
> Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Slow start of Apache 2.0.55 on AIX 5.3
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have installed Apache 2.0.55 on AIX 5.3 machine.
> > For installation, i have used  the command "configure --prefix= > Apache Installation>".
> >
> > Apache was installed properly without any errors.
> >
> > However on startup, i.e. execution of "apachectl start", it starts
> > apache v
> > slowly. Same for "apachectl stop". I have not modified the httpd.conf
> > file,
> > it is same as the one created during installation.
> >
> > On the same machine, when i later installed Apache 1.3.29, this version
> > is
> > fast unlike Apache 2.0.55
> >
> > Can anyone pls point out what the reason could be.
> >
> > Thanks in adv,
> > Lekha
> >
> >
> > http://www.patni.com
> > World-Wide Partnerships. World-Class Solutions.
> > _
> >
> > This e-mail message may contain proprietary, confidential or legally
> > privileged information for the sole use of the person or entity to
> > whom this message was originally addressed. Any review, e-transmission
> > dissemination or other use of or taking of any action in reliance upon
> > this information by persons or entities other than the intended
> > recipient is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error
> > kindly delete  this e-mail from your records. If it appears that this
> > mail has been forwarded to you without proper authority, please notify
> > us immediately at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and delete this mail.
> > _
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ---
> Robosoft Technologies - Partners in Product Development
>


http://www.patni.com
World-Wide Partnerships. World-Class Solutions.
_

This e-mail message may contain proprietary, confidential or legally
privileged information for the sole use of the person or entity to
whom this message was originally addressed. Any review, e-transmission
dissemination or other use of or taking of any action in reliance upon
this information by persons or entities other than the intended
recipient is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error
kindly delete  this e-mail from your records. If it appears that this
mail has been forwarded to you without proper authority, please notify
us immediately at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and delete this mail. 
_

-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

AW: [EMAIL PROTECTED] stickysession at mod_proxy_balancer

[Oliver.Schaudt]

Hi dom,
 
1. Do you see some lines like "proxy: BALANCER: Found value 12721798.A_ for 
stickysession sessionkey" in the "error_log" ?
2.Do you have set your session-identifier nameinside your servers behind Apache 
to "sessionkey" and the route alias jvmroute to your "A_" and "B_" ? If not 
than it won't work.

Bye

Oliver 



Von: dom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Di 17.01.2006 16:23
An: users@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: [EMAIL PROTECTED] stickysession at mod_proxy_balancer



hi,

i'm using apache 2.2 because of the balancing module, but i can't figure out why
the 'stickyness' doesn't work.


-snip-
 LogLevel debug
 ProxyPass / balancer://prod/ stickysession=sessionkey nofailover=On
  
   BalancerMember http://192.168.1.1:8001   route=A_
   BalancerMember http://192.168.1.2:8001   route=B_
  
-snip-

the sessionkey-coockie is set to something like 12721798.A_

after a few clicks (depends from 2 to 15) i get connectet to the second Member,
but don't see why! any ideas?

when i have a look at the logfile, i never see some information about the
coockie or so.. :-(

thanks in advance
dom


-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



<>-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

AW: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Slow start of Apache 2.0.55 on AIX 5.3

[Oliver.Schaudt]

Hi Lekha,
 
turn on "LogLevel Debug" than apache should point you in the "error_log" to 
something more.
 
Freundliche Gruesse / Best Regards / Avec mes meilleures salutations

Oliver Schaudt
SeniorConsultant
Tel:: +49-178-8855-712
Fax: +49-178-998855-712
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  

Unilog Avinci
Klenzestr. 57b
D-80469 München

http://www.unilog-avinci.de 

  
 



Von: Lekha Menon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mi 18.01.2006 10:51
An: users@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Slow start of Apache 2.0.55 on AIX 5.3



I have checked the logs, but they do not show any error msg in it.
The error_log contains msg -
[Wed Jan 18 13:21:25 2006] [notice] Apache configured -- resuming normal
operati
ons
[Wed Jan 18 13:24:50 2006] [notice] caught SIGTERM, shutting down

This is normal operation comments.



- Original Message -
From: "Mahesh S Kudva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 3:08 PM
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Slow start of Apache 2.0.55 on AIX 5.3


> check the logs. They are always handy.
>
>
> Regards & Thanks
> 
> Mahesh S Kudva
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: "Lekha Menon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 
> Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 14:17:22 +0530
> Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Slow start of Apache 2.0.55 on AIX 5.3
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have installed Apache 2.0.55 on AIX 5.3 machine.
> > For installation, i have used  the command "configure --prefix= > Apache Installation>".
> >
> > Apache was installed properly without any errors.
> >
> > However on startup, i.e. execution of "apachectl start", it starts
> > apache v
> > slowly. Same for "apachectl stop". I have not modified the httpd.conf
> > file,
> > it is same as the one created during installation.
> >
> > On the same machine, when i later installed Apache 1.3.29, this version
> > is
> > fast unlike Apache 2.0.55
> >
> > Can anyone pls point out what the reason could be.
> >
> > Thanks in adv,
> > Lekha
> >
> >
> > http://www.patni.com  
> > World-Wide Partnerships. World-Class Solutions.
> > _
> >
> > This e-mail message may contain proprietary, confidential or legally
> > privileged information for the sole use of the person or entity to
> > whom this message was originally addressed. Any review, e-transmission
> > dissemination or other use of or taking of any action in reliance upon
> > this information by persons or entities other than the intended
> > recipient is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error
> > kindly delete  this e-mail from your records. If it appears that this
> > mail has been forwarded to you without proper authority, please notify
> > us immediately at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and delete this mail.
> > _
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ---
> Robosoft Technologies - Partners in Product Development
>


http://www.patni.com  
World-Wide Partnerships. World-Class Solutions.
_

This e-mail message may contain proprietary, confidential or legally
privileged information for the sole use of the person or entity to
whom this message was originally addressed. Any review, e-transmission
dissemination or other use of or taking of any action in reliance upon
this information by persons or entities other than the intended
recipient is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error
kindly delete  this e-mail from your records. If it appears that this
mail has been forwarded to you without proper authority, please notify
us immediately at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and delete this mail.
_



<>-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache logs into PostgreSQL in realtime

[Danijel Tasov]

Michelle Konzack wrote:
> What I need is a program/script which can put the log
> directly into the PostgreSQL for Real-Time analysis.

I'm using perls Text::ParseWords for doing this:

If you have the classic combined LogFormat:

LogFormat "%h %l %u %t \"%r\" %>s %b \"%{Referer}i\" \"%{User-Agent}i\"" 
combined

You can do:

use Text::ParseWords;
use DBI;
# Database connect here

while(<>) {
  my ($remote_host, $logname, $authuser, $time, $request,
  $status, $size, $referer, $user_agent) = quotewords(/\s+/, 0, $_)
  $dbh->do("INSERT ..."); 
}

$time can be easily converted by using HTTP::Date.

bye,
DaTa

-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] apache installation history file

[Sri]

Hi guys,     If i install apache with different options at the time of compiling like ./configure --enable-module=most --enable-shared=max after installation if i fog got which modules or options i have used at the time of compiling where i need to check this info.If i want to check whic modules are enable how do i check     thanks
	
		Yahoo! Photos 
Got holiday prints? See all the ways to get quality prints in your hands ASAP.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] stickysession at mod_proxy_balancer

[dom]

Hi Oliver,

1. no, i don't.. thats the strange thing.. just see in the accesslog:
[debug] mod_proxy_balancer.c(41): proxy: BALANCER: canonicalising URL
//produrl/site
[debug] mod_proxy_balancer.c(803): proxy: Entering byrequests for BALANCER
(balancer://prod)
[debug] mod_proxy_balancer.c(396): proxy: BALANCER (balancer://prod) worker
(http://192.168.1.1:8001) rewritten to http://192.168.1.1:8001/site
[debug] mod_proxy.c(736): Running scheme balancer handler (attempt 0)

2. don't really understand your question. my 'backendservers' produce a cookie
with teh attribute 'sessionkey' and use this for the own 
sessiondeclaration, so
i thought to use that one. i (the webserver) just added ".A_" at the 
end of the

sessionkey for identify the 'route' to apache, but i guess thats not the only
thing i need to do? i can produce every cookie-attribute you like, thats not
the problem.. whats jvmroute? i'm not using tomcat, we use a self written
webserver..

i thought it should be easy: a have allready a sessionkey, so thats nice. then
the backendwebserver now which server he is, so he set another attribute, and
add this to the sessionkey (sessionkey.route) and this route is 
definied on the

BalanceMember.. but i guess i missunderstand the topc.. :-(

bye
dom

Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:


Hi dom,

1. Do you see some lines like "proxy: BALANCER: Found value 
12721798.A_ for stickysession sessionkey" in the "error_log" ?
2.Do you have set your session-identifier nameinside your servers 
behind Apache to "sessionkey" and the route alias jvmroute to your 
"A_" and "B_" ? If not than it won't work.


Bye

Oliver



Von: dom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Di 17.01.2006 16:23
An: users@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: [EMAIL PROTECTED] stickysession at mod_proxy_balancer



hi,

i'm using apache 2.2 because of the balancing module, but i can't 
figure out why

the 'stickyness' doesn't work.


-snip-
LogLevel debug
ProxyPass / balancer://prod/ stickysession=sessionkey nofailover=On
 
  BalancerMember http://192.168.1.1:8001   route=A_
  BalancerMember http://192.168.1.2:8001   route=B_
 
-snip-

the sessionkey-coockie is set to something like 12721798.A_

after a few clicks (depends from 2 to 15) i get connectet to the 
second Member,

but don't see why! any ideas?

when i have a look at the logfile, i never see some information about the
coockie or so.. :-(

thanks in advance
dom




-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache installation history file

[Anil Dighade]

Hi
Sri
You
can check this by executing 
$./apachectl -l
You
can check run time dependency by executing 
$ldd
httpd
 

Regards,
Anil
D.
+91-20-56018100
Extn:7091
"I can accept failure but I can't
accept not trying." - Michael Jordan
 
 

  -Original Message-From: Sri
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 4:48
  PMTo: users@httpd.apache.orgSubject: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  apache installation history file
  Hi guys,
   
  If i install apache with different options at the time of compiling like
  ./configure --enable-module=most --enable-shared=max after installation if i
  fog got which modules or options i have used at the time of compiling where i
  need to check this info.If i want to check whic modules are enable how do i
  check
   
  thanks
  
  
  Yahoo! PhotosGot holiday prints? See
  all the ways to get quality prints in your hands
ASAP.

*
Disclaimer:

The contents of this E-mail (including the contents of the enclosure(s) or attachment(s) if any) are privileged and confidential material of MBT and should not be disclosed to, used by or copied in any manner by anyone other than the intended addressee(s).   In case you are not the desired addressee, you should delete this message and/or re-direct it to the sender.  The views expressed in this E-mail message (including the enclosure(s) or attachment(s) if any) are those of the individual sender, except where the sender expressly, and with authority, states them to be the views of MBT.

This e-mail message including attachment/(s), if any, is believed to be free of any virus.  However, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and MBT is not responsible for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use

*

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Slow start of Apache 2.0.55 on AIX 5.3

[Lekha Menon]

I tried reinstalling apache again.

Installation procedure takes a long time on AIX as compared to its
installation on other OS like Solaris / Linux.
During installation, it waits long time during steps -
"checking for Berkeley DB 4.3 in the standard places...
checking db43/db.h usability... no
checking db43/db.h presence... no
checking for db43/db.h... no"
The same is repeated for db4/db.h.

The above checks are being performed repeatedly.

What could be the reason?

- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 3:44 PM
Subject: AW: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Slow start of Apache 2.0.55 on AIX 5.3


Hi Lekha,

turn on "LogLevel Debug" than apache should point you in the "error_log" to
something more.

Freundliche Gruesse / Best Regards / Avec mes meilleures salutations

Oliver Schaudt
SeniorConsultant
Tel:: +49-178-8855-712
Fax: +49-178-998855-712
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Unilog Avinci
Klenzestr. 57b
D-80469 München

http://www.unilog-avinci.de





Von: Lekha Menon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mi 18.01.2006 10:51
An: users@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Slow start of Apache 2.0.55 on AIX 5.3



I have checked the logs, but they do not show any error msg in it.
The error_log contains msg -
[Wed Jan 18 13:21:25 2006] [notice] Apache configured -- resuming normal
operati
ons
[Wed Jan 18 13:24:50 2006] [notice] caught SIGTERM, shutting down

This is normal operation comments.



- Original Message -
From: "Mahesh S Kudva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 3:08 PM
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Slow start of Apache 2.0.55 on AIX 5.3


> check the logs. They are always handy.
>
>
> Regards & Thanks
> 
> Mahesh S Kudva
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: "Lekha Menon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 
> Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 14:17:22 +0530
> Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Slow start of Apache 2.0.55 on AIX 5.3
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have installed Apache 2.0.55 on AIX 5.3 machine.
> > For installation, i have used  the command "configure --prefix= > Apache Installation>".
> >
> > Apache was installed properly without any errors.
> >
> > However on startup, i.e. execution of "apachectl start", it starts
> > apache v
> > slowly. Same for "apachectl stop". I have not modified the httpd.conf
> > file,
> > it is same as the one created during installation.
> >
> > On the same machine, when i later installed Apache 1.3.29, this version
> > is
> > fast unlike Apache 2.0.55
> >
> > Can anyone pls point out what the reason could be.
> >
> > Thanks in adv,
> > Lekha
> >
> >
> > http://www.patni.com 
> > World-Wide Partnerships. World-Class Solutions.
> > _
> >
> > This e-mail message may contain proprietary, confidential or legally
> > privileged information for the sole use of the person or entity to
> > whom this message was originally addressed. Any review, e-transmission
> > dissemination or other use of or taking of any action in reliance upon
> > this information by persons or entities other than the intended
> > recipient is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error
> > kindly delete  this e-mail from your records. If it appears that this
> > mail has been forwarded to you without proper authority, please notify
> > us immediately at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and delete this mail.
> > _
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ---
> Robosoft Technologies - Partners in Product Development
>


http://www.patni.com 
World-Wide Partnerships. World-Class Solutions.
_

This e-mail message may contain proprietary, confidential or legally
privileged information for the sole use of the person or entity to
whom this message was originally addressed. Any review, e-transmission
dissemination or other use of or taking of any action in reliance upon
this information by persons or entities other than the intended
recipient is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error
kindly delete  this e-mail from your records. If it appears that this
mail has been forwarded to you without proper authority, please notify
us immediately at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and delete this mail.
_










> -
> The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
> See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>"  

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache installation problem -socket address usage

[Ian Western]

Hi everyone,  can anyone out there help me. I'm trying to install Apache but whenever I try to run it, I get a window with the text below:     "(OS 10048) Only one usage of each socket address  is normally permitted. :make_sock    could not bind to address 0.0.0.0.80  -no listening sockets available, shutting down. Unable to open logs."     I've managed to iron out a few problems before I got to this stage but this has got me stumped. Can anybody help?     Many thanks,  Ian Western      
		To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre.

AW: [EMAIL PROTECTED] stickysession at mod_proxy_balancer

[Oliver.Schaudt]

Hi dom, 
 
so than it seems that the definitions which you had in your apache 
configuration don't match your session cookie
 
Can you use "tamper data"  
https://addons.mozilla.org/extensions/moreinfo.php?id=966&application=firefox 
 
or iehttpheaders to see whar you have in your headers sent by the server when 
he sends you the cookie [the line sith "set-cookie"] . Upon this set-cookie 
your Browser should send back every time a headerline beginning with "cookie".
If this is the case than the cookie should look like
12345678.A_ oder 12345678.B_ . Otherwise you have to change your configuration
 
If you don't want to run in a timeout or if you have a firewall inbetween the 
apache and the backend web server than you can add "keepalive=on" behind the 
route.
 
bye
 
Oliver 



Von: dom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mi 18.01.2006 12:27
An: users@httpd.apache.org
Cc: Schaudt, Oliver
Betreff: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] stickysession at mod_proxy_balancer



Hi Oliver,

1. no, i don't.. thats the strange thing.. just see in the accesslog:
[debug] mod_proxy_balancer.c(41): proxy: BALANCER: canonicalising URL
//produrl/site
[debug] mod_proxy_balancer.c(803): proxy: Entering byrequests for BALANCER
(balancer://prod)
[debug] mod_proxy_balancer.c(396): proxy: BALANCER (balancer://prod) worker
(http://192.168.1.1:8001  ) rewritten to 
http://192.168.1.1:8001/site
[debug] mod_proxy.c(736): Running scheme balancer handler (attempt 0)

2. don't really understand your question. my 'backendservers' produce a cookie
with teh attribute 'sessionkey' and use this for the own
sessiondeclaration, so
i thought to use that one. i (the webserver) just added ".A_" at the
end of the
sessionkey for identify the 'route' to apache, but i guess thats not the only
thing i need to do? i can produce every cookie-attribute you like, thats not
the problem.. whats jvmroute? i'm not using tomcat, we use a self written
webserver..

i thought it should be easy: a have allready a sessionkey, so thats nice. then
the backendwebserver now which server he is, so he set another attribute, and
add this to the sessionkey (sessionkey.route) and this route is
definied on the
BalanceMember.. but i guess i missunderstand the topc.. :-(

bye
dom

Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> Hi dom,
>
> 1. Do you see some lines like "proxy: BALANCER: Found value
> 12721798.A_ for stickysession sessionkey" in the "error_log" ?
> 2.Do you have set your session-identifier nameinside your servers
> behind Apache to "sessionkey" and the route alias jvmroute to your
> "A_" and "B_" ? If not than it won't work.
>
> Bye
>
> Oliver
>
> 
>
> Von: dom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Di 17.01.2006 16:23
> An: users@httpd.apache.org
> Betreff: [EMAIL PROTECTED] stickysession at mod_proxy_balancer
>
>
>
> hi,
>
> i'm using apache 2.2 because of the balancing module, but i can't
> figure out why
> the 'stickyness' doesn't work.
>
>
> -snip-
> LogLevel debug
> ProxyPass / balancer://prod/ stickysession=sessionkey nofailover=On
>  
>   BalancerMember http://192.168.1.1:8001   
>   route=A_
>   BalancerMember http://192.168.1.2:8001   
>   route=B_
>  
> -snip-
>
> the sessionkey-coockie is set to something like 12721798.A_
>
> after a few clicks (depends from 2 to 15) i get connectet to the
> second Member,
> but don't see why! any ideas?
>
> when i have a look at the logfile, i never see some information about the
> coockie or so.. :-(
>
> thanks in advance
> dom



-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



<>-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsorted timestamping in Apache2 log files

[mdemuro]

Hi,
I have problems with throughput calculation from log files in apache2.
Using "classic" awk scripts the output is messy due to the fact that
the lines in the log are not sorted with respect to time.
 In fact each line of the logs has the timestamp of when the request
has been made; this means that different response times urls have
different orders depending on the response time itself.

 - Is this a known bug? (with correspondig fix...)
 - Is there any configuration workaround? (I cannot fix the source
code and recompile it)

Thanks in advance for any kind of big heart suggestion/help/hint
marcello

_
TISCALI ADSL Web&Mail
Solo con Tiscali Adsl navighi e telefoni senza canone Telecom a partire da
14,95 Euro/mese. Attivala subito!
Per te 500 MB inclusi per navigare, inviare e ricevere messaggi e-mail, foto
ed mp3.
http://abbonati.tiscali.it/adsl/sa/2wam_tc/




-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache installation history file

[Joshua Slive]

On 1/18/06, Sri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> If i install apache with different options at the time of compiling like
> ./configure --enable-module=most --enable-shared=max after installation if i
> fog got which modules or options i have used at the time of compiling where
> i need to check this info.If i want to check whic modules are enable how do
> i check

For recent versions, the exact command line will be in
build/config.nice under the apache installation prefix.

Joshua.

-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsorted timestamping in Apache2 log files

[Joshua Slive]

On 1/18/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I have problems with throughput calculation from log files in apache2.
> Using "classic" awk scripts the output is messy due to the fact that
> the lines in the log are not sorted with respect to time.
>  In fact each line of the logs has the timestamp of when the request
> has been made; this means that different response times urls have
> different orders depending on the response time itself.
>
>  - Is this a known bug? (with correspondig fix...)
>  - Is there any configuration workaround? (I cannot fix the source
> code and recompile it)

Apache logs are not sorted by time.  That is just a fact, not a bug. 
The time is calculated when the request is received but the log line
is written after the response is sent.  You can easily sort them
yourself after-the-fact if you need time-sorted logs.  Otherwise,
there is no "solution" that doesn't involve recompiling.

Joshua.

-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2 mod_authnz_ldap problem

[Damian Marinaccio]

This is the error I get when trying to use the same .htaccess file that
worked with apache 2.0.xx
 
[Wed Jan 11 13:28:47 2006] [debug] mod_authnz_ldap.c(849): [2938]
auth_ldap url parse: Host: 127.0.0.1:389
[Wed Jan 11 13:28:47 2006] [debug] mod_authnz_ldap.c(851): [2938]
auth_ldap url parse: Port: 389
[Wed Jan 11 13:28:47 2006] [debug] mod_authnz_ldap.c(853): [2938]
auth_ldap url parse: DN: ou=People,dc=rit,dc=edu
[Wed Jan 11 13:28:47 2006] [debug] mod_authnz_ldap.c(855): [2938]
auth_ldap url parse: attrib: uid
[Wed Jan 11 13:28:47 2006] [debug] mod_authnz_ldap.c(857): [2938]
auth_ldap url parse: scope: base
[Wed Jan 11 13:28:47 2006] [debug] mod_authnz_ldap.c(862): [2938]
auth_ldap url parse: filter: (null)
[Wed Jan 11 13:28:47 2006] [debug] mod_authnz_ldap.c(942): LDAP:
auth_ldap not using SSL connections
[Wed Jan 11 13:28:47 2006] [error] Internal error: pcfg_openfile()
called with NULL filename
[Wed Jan 11 13:28:47 2006] [error] [client 129.21.179.216] (9)Bad file
number: Could not open password file: (null
)
[Wed Jan 11 13:48:48 2006] [debug] mod_authnz_ldap.c(840): [2939]
auth_ldap url parse: `ldap://127.0.0.1:389/ou=Pe
ople,dc=rit,dc=edu?uid'
[Wed Jan 11 13:48:48 2006] [debug] mod_authnz_ldap.c(849): [2939]
auth_ldap url parse: Host: 127.0.0.1:389
[Wed Jan 11 13:48:48 2006] [debug] mod_authnz_ldap.c(851): [2939]
auth_ldap url parse: Port: 389
[Wed Jan 11 13:48:48 2006] [debug] mod_authnz_ldap.c(853): [2939]
auth_ldap url parse: DN: ou=People,dc=rit,dc=edu
[Wed Jan 11 13:48:48 2006] [debug] mod_authnz_ldap.c(855): [2939]
auth_ldap url parse: attrib: uid
[Wed Jan 11 13:48:48 2006] [debug] mod_authnz_ldap.c(857): [2939]
auth_ldap url parse: scope: base
[Wed Jan 11 13:48:48 2006] [debug] mod_authnz_ldap.c(862): [2939]
auth_ldap url parse: filter: (null)
[Wed Jan 11 13:48:48 2006] [debug] mod_authnz_ldap.c(942): LDAP:
auth_ldap not using SSL connections
[Wed Jan 11 13:48:48 2006] [error] Internal error: pcfg_openfile()
called with NULL filename
[Wed Jan 11 13:48:48 2006] [error] [client 129.21.179.216] (9)Bad file
number: Could not open password file: (null
)
 
 
I have seen other postings about this error but not responses...
 
 
 
 
My mail server wont let me see the digest response, could somebody
please reply directly to me, and to the list.
 
Thanks in advance!

 
 
 
Damian Marinaccio
RIT Libraries
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
585-475-7741
 

-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsorted timestamping in Apache2 log files

[Joshua Slive]

On 1/18/06, Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/18/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I have problems with throughput calculation from log files in apache2.
> > Using "classic" awk scripts the output is messy due to the fact that
> > the lines in the log are not sorted with respect to time.
> >  In fact each line of the logs has the timestamp of when the request
> > has been made; this means that different response times urls have
> > different orders depending on the response time itself.
> >
> >  - Is this a known bug? (with correspondig fix...)
> >  - Is there any configuration workaround? (I cannot fix the source
> > code and recompile it)
>
> Apache logs are not sorted by time.  That is just a fact, not a bug.
> The time is calculated when the request is received but the log line
> is written after the response is sent.  You can easily sort them
> yourself after-the-fact if you need time-sorted logs.  Otherwise,
> there is no "solution" that doesn't involve recompiling.

Actually, another alternative would be to use a piped-logger, and have
this program write out the current time, overwriting anything written
by apache.

Joshua.

-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SSL Logs and AWStats

[Mark McCulligh]

I was wondering what is the different between TransferLog and 
CustomLog.  The only difference I can see is that with the TransferLog 
you cannot give it a log format or give it any other parameters.  If 
this is true why use the TransferLog when the CustomLog does the same 
thing and has move features.


Thanks,
Mark.

Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV wrote:

Your non-SSL virtual host logs to access_log using the "combined" log format which AWStats parses correctly. 


Your SSL virtual host logs to access_log using the "common" format (by default).

Since the "combined" format is parsed correctly, I suggest that you replace the 
TransferLog directive in the SSL VH by the same CustomLog directive used in the non-SSL 
virtual host. If you are logging to the same file, you may just as well use the same 
format...

-ascs


-Original Message-
From: Mark McCulligh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 5:59 PM

To: Apache User group
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SSL Logs and AWStats

Hi Group,

I have been looking at how to get AWStats to read SSL logs. And only 
finding other people looking for the same thing, but no real answers.


Below is how I have my VirtualHost setup.  Built using the examples in 
the docs


   <...>
  ErrorLog  /usr/local/httpd/logs/site1/error_log
  CustomLog   /usr/local/httpd/logs/site1/access_log conbined
  LogLevel  emerg


   <...>
  ErrorLog  /usr/local/httpd/logs/site1/error_log
  TransferLog   /usr/local/httpd/logs/site1/access_log
  CustomLog  /usr/local/httpd/logs/site1/ssl_request_log \
  "%t %h %{SSL_PROTOCOL}x %{SLS_CIPHER}x \"%r\" %b"


AWStats is reading the access_log file and of course when it read the 
records from SSL they come up as corrupted records. How do you get 
AWStats to read the SSL logs?


Thanks,
Mark.

-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 




--
___
Mark McCulligh, Web Consultant
VisualTech Components www.VisualTech.ca
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(519)318-7905


-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SSL Logs and AWStats

[Joshua Slive]

On 1/18/06, Mark McCulligh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was wondering what is the different between TransferLog and
> CustomLog.  The only difference I can see is that with the TransferLog
> you cannot give it a log format or give it any other parameters.  If
> this is true why use the TransferLog when the CustomLog does the same
> thing and has move features.

TransferLog only exists for historical reasons.  There is no reason to use it.

Joshua.

-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SSL Logs and AWStats

[Mark McCulligh]

Joshua Slive wrote:


On 1/18/06, Mark McCulligh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 


I was wondering what is the different between TransferLog and
CustomLog.  The only difference I can see is that with the TransferLog
you cannot give it a log format or give it any other parameters.  If
this is true why use the TransferLog when the CustomLog does the same
thing and has move features.
   



TransferLog only exists for historical reasons.  There is no reason to use it.

Joshua.

-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Thanks, I was wondering if that was the reason. 

If TransferLog is for historical reasons would it be better to have your 
SSL VirtualHost Log setup like this:



   <...>
  ErrorLog   /usr/local/httpd/logs/site1/error_log
  CustomLog  /usr/local/httpd/logs/site1/access_log combined
  CustomLog  /usr/local/httpd/logs/site1/ssl_request_log \
  "%t %h %{SSL_PROTOCOL}x %{SSL_CIPHER}x \"%r\" %b"


Trying to figure out the best way to log SSL websites. Starting with the 
examples in the Apache docs.


Thanks,
Mark


-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsorted timestamping in Apache2 log files

[mdemuro]

Hi Joshua,
I'm a little bit concerned about using piped logging for an high volume web
site... but this seems to be a practicable solution. Further investigation
required ...

Thanks again
marcello

2006/1/18, Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

On 1/18/06, Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/18/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I have problems with throughput calculation from log files in apache2.
> > Using "classic" awk scripts the output is messy due to the fact that
> > the lines in the log are not sorted with respect to time.
> >  In fact each line of the logs has the timestamp of when the request
> > has been made; this means that different response times urls have
> > different orders depending on the response time itself.
> >
> >  - Is this a known bug? (with correspondig fix...)
> >  - Is there any configuration workaround? (I cannot fix the source
> > code and recompile it)
>
> Apache logs are not sorted by time.  That is just a fact, not a bug.
> The time is calculated when the request is received but the log line
> is written after the response is sent.  You can easily sort them
> yourself after-the-fact if you need time-sorted logs.  Otherwise,
> there is no "solution" that doesn't involve recompiling.

Actually, another alternative would be to use a piped-logger, and have
this program write out the current time, overwriting anything written
by apache.

Joshua.

-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




_
TISCALI ADSL Web&Mail
Solo con Tiscali Adsl navighi e telefoni senza canone Telecom a partire da
14,95 Euro/mese. Attivala subito!
Per te 500 MB inclusi per navigare, inviare e ricevere messaggi e-mail, foto
ed mp3.
http://abbonati.tiscali.it/adsl/sa/2wam_tc/




-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SSL Logs and AWStats

[Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV]

That's exactly what I was suggesting.

-ascs
 

-Original Message-
From: Mark McCulligh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 4:08 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SSL Logs and AWStats

Joshua Slive wrote:

>On 1/18/06, Mark McCulligh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  
>
>>I was wondering what is the different between TransferLog and 
>>CustomLog.  The only difference I can see is that with the TransferLog 
>>you cannot give it a log format or give it any other parameters.  If 
>>this is true why use the TransferLog when the CustomLog does the same 
>>thing and has move features.
>>
>>
>
>TransferLog only exists for historical reasons.  There is no reason to use it.
>
>Joshua.
>
>-
>The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
>See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>  
>
Thanks, I was wondering if that was the reason. 

If TransferLog is for historical reasons would it be better to have your SSL 
VirtualHost Log setup like this:


<...>
   ErrorLog   /usr/local/httpd/logs/site1/error_log
   CustomLog  /usr/local/httpd/logs/site1/access_log combined
   CustomLog  /usr/local/httpd/logs/site1/ssl_request_log \
   "%t %h %{SSL_PROTOCOL}x %{SSL_CIPHER}x \"%r\" %b"


Trying to figure out the best way to log SSL websites. Starting with the 
examples in the Apache docs.

Thanks,
Mark

-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsorted timestamping in Apache2 log files

[mdemuro]

Hi,
thanks a for your help... but... I still have doubt on the "cleaness" of
this behaviur... (see below).

2006/1/18, Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 1/18/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I have problems with throughput calculation from log files in apache2.
> > Using "classic" awk scripts the output is messy due to the fact that
> > the lines in the log are not sorted with respect to time.
> >  In fact each line of the logs has the timestamp of when the request
> > has been made; this means that different response times urls have
> > different orders depending on the response time itself.
> >
> >  - Is this a known bug? (with correspondig fix...)
> >  - Is there any configuration workaround? (I cannot fix the source
> > code and recompile it)
>
> Apache logs are not sorted by time.  That is just a fact, not a bug.
Every bug is also a fact ( ;-) ). In my opinion writing not ordered lines
is not so nice, instead of logging arrival rate, apache2 tracks the completion
rates but with the arrival timestamp instead of the completion timestamp;
this is not so clean...
> The time is calculated when the request is received but the log line
> is written after the response is sent.
> You can easily sort them
> yourself after-the-fact if you need time-sorted logs.
Sorting in reasonable time is not so easy for a "real" http log file (unless
you have a cray supercomputing system... ;-) )
> Otherwise,
> there is no "solution" that doesn't involve recompiling.
>
> Joshua.
>
> -
> The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
> See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>"   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


_
TISCALI ADSL Web&Mail
Solo con Tiscali Adsl navighi e telefoni senza canone Telecom a partire da
14,95 Euro/mese. Attivala subito!
Per te 500 MB inclusi per navigare, inviare e ricevere messaggi e-mail, foto
ed mp3.
http://abbonati.tiscali.it/adsl/sa/2wam_tc/




-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SSL Logs and AWStats

[Mark McCulligh]

Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV wrote:


That's exactly what I was suggesting.

-ascs


-Original Message-
From: Mark McCulligh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 4:08 PM

To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SSL Logs and AWStats

Joshua Slive wrote:

 


On 1/18/06, Mark McCulligh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


   

I was wondering what is the different between TransferLog and 
CustomLog.  The only difference I can see is that with the TransferLog 
you cannot give it a log format or give it any other parameters.  If 
this is true why use the TransferLog when the CustomLog does the same 
thing and has move features.
  

 


TransferLog only exists for historical reasons.  There is no reason to use it.

Joshua.

-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



   

Thanks, I was wondering if that was the reason. 


If TransferLog is for historical reasons would it be better to have your SSL 
VirtualHost Log setup like this:


   <...>
  ErrorLog   /usr/local/httpd/logs/site1/error_log
  CustomLog  /usr/local/httpd/logs/site1/access_log combined
  CustomLog  /usr/local/httpd/logs/site1/ssl_request_log \
  "%t %h %{SSL_PROTOCOL}x %{SSL_CIPHER}x \"%r\" %b"


Trying to figure out the best way to log SSL websites. Starting with the 
examples in the Apache docs.

Thanks,
Mark

-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Thanks, I just wanted to understand the difference between TransferLog 
and CustomLog before I made the change.


Mark.

-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Apache installation problem -socket address usage

[Joost de Heer]

Ian Western wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>   can anyone out there help me. I'm trying to install Apache but whenever
> I try to run it, I get a window with the text below:
>
>   "(OS 10048) Only one usage of each socket address  address/port> is normally permitted. :make_sockcould not bind to
> address 0.0.0.0.80
>   -no listening sockets available, shutting down. Unable to open logs."

Another application is already using port 80, and only one application can
bind to a port.

Joost


-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re4: [EMAIL PROTECTED] stickysession at mod_proxy_balancer

[dom]

dear oliver,

hmm.. that was i guessd as well at the beginning, so i added the cookie
[%{sessionkey}C] into the apache-log-file, and it looks exactely like it have
to [12345678.A_]! :-(

strange is that when i access the balancing module (the summary where all the
members are shown, etc..) on stickysession is no entry, the route is shown..
when i manually add sessionkey to 'stickysession' it's shown but same
funtionality..

i'm going stupid soon.. ;-)

thanks
dom


Hi dom,

so than it seems that the definitions which you had in your apache 
configuration don't match your session cookie


Can you use "tamper data"  
https://addons.mozilla.org/extensions/moreinfo.php?id=966&application=firefox 

or iehttpheaders to see whar you have in your headers sent by the 
server when he sends you the cookie [the line sith "set-cookie"] . 
Upon this set-cookie your Browser should send back every time a 
headerline beginning with "cookie".

If this is the case than the cookie should look like
12345678.A_ oder 12345678.B_ . Otherwise you have to change your 
configuration


If you don't want to run in a timeout or if you have a firewall 
inbetween the apache and the backend web server than you can add 
"keepalive=on" behind the route.


bye

Oliver



Von: dom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mi 18.01.2006 12:27
An: users@httpd.apache.org
Cc: Schaudt, Oliver
Betreff: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] stickysession at mod_proxy_balancer



Hi Oliver,

1. no, i don't.. thats the strange thing.. just see in the accesslog:
[debug] mod_proxy_balancer.c(41): proxy: BALANCER: canonicalising URL
//produrl/site
[debug] mod_proxy_balancer.c(803): proxy: Entering byrequests for BALANCER
(balancer://prod)
[debug] mod_proxy_balancer.c(396): proxy: BALANCER (balancer://prod) worker
(http://192.168.1.1:8001  ) rewritten to 
http://192.168.1.1:8001/site

[debug] mod_proxy.c(736): Running scheme balancer handler (attempt 0)

2. don't really understand your question. my 'backendservers' produce 
a cookie

with teh attribute 'sessionkey' and use this for the own
sessiondeclaration, so
i thought to use that one. i (the webserver) just added ".A_" at the
end of the
sessionkey for identify the 'route' to apache, but i guess thats not the only
thing i need to do? i can produce every cookie-attribute you like, thats not
the problem.. whats jvmroute? i'm not using tomcat, we use a self written
webserver..

i thought it should be easy: a have allready a sessionkey, so thats 
nice. then

the backendwebserver now which server he is, so he set another attribute, and
add this to the sessionkey (sessionkey.route) and this route is
definied on the
BalanceMember.. but i guess i missunderstand the topc.. :-(

bye
dom

Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:


Hi dom,

1. Do you see some lines like "proxy: BALANCER: Found value
12721798.A_ for stickysession sessionkey" in the "error_log" ?
2.Do you have set your session-identifier nameinside your servers
behind Apache to "sessionkey" and the route alias jvmroute to your
"A_" and "B_" ? If not than it won't work.

Bye

Oliver



Von: dom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Di 17.01.2006 16:23
An: users@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: [EMAIL PROTECTED] stickysession at mod_proxy_balancer



hi,

i'm using apache 2.2 because of the balancing module, but i can't
figure out why
the 'stickyness' doesn't work.


-snip-
LogLevel debug
ProxyPass / balancer://prod/ stickysession=sessionkey nofailover=On
 
  BalancerMember http://192.168.1.1:8001   
  route=A_
  BalancerMember http://192.168.1.2:8001   
  route=B_

 
-snip-

the sessionkey-coockie is set to something like 12721798.A_

after a few clicks (depends from 2 to 15) i get connectet to the
second Member,
but don't see why! any ideas?

when i have a look at the logfile, i never see some information about the
coockie or so.. :-(

thanks in advance
dom




-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]









-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache installation problem -socket address usage

[httpd2]

Please tell us what OS you are using? - we need to know 
this if you want help.

As allready mentioned, only one application can attach 
itself to one port address.

It appears you may allready have a web server listening on 
port 80 unless you are not starting apache as root.


Keith


In theory, theory and practice are the same;
In practice they are not. 

On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Ian Western wrote:

> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> From: Ian Western <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache installation problem -socket address usage
> 
> Hi everyone,
>   can anyone out there help me. I'm trying to install 
>   Apache but whenever I try to run it, I get a window with 
>   the text below:
>"(OS 10048) Only one usage of each socket address 
>is normally permitted. 
>   :make_sock could not bind to address 0.0.0.0.80 -no 
>   listening sockets available, shutting down. Unable to 
>   open logs."
>I've managed to iron out a few problems before I got to 
>   this stage but this has got me stumped. Can anybody 
>   help?
>
>   Many thanks,
>   Ian Western

-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Strange Log Entries... No Client Address?

[David P. Donahue]

I just started getting hits like this:

. - - [18/Jan/2006:11:59:26 -0500] "GET /index.html" 200 1367 "-" "-"

Some of the other entries at least give a user agent, which just looks 
like IE.  I guess it could be a bot, or it could even be someone trying 
to mask their address with intent to be naughty.  Not sure what to make 
of it, since it's also periodically looking for strange things, such as 
files named "location.href=" or some such.  But, being my personal 
website, I have no problem just blocking it outright.


So, my question is, is there an easy to way have Apache ignore requests 
from hostless clients?  Maybe a mod_rewrite to just give them an error 
page?  Any advice would be much appreciated, thank you.



Regards,
David P. Donahue
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] verify GET and POST data.

[M. Onur ERGiN]

In my server(2.0.40), I don't think GET and POST data is properly returned. How can I verify this?Regards, Onur.
	
		Yahoo! Photos 
Got holiday prints? See all the ways to get quality prints in your hands ASAP.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: Bad Chunked Behavior (Solved)

[Fenlason, Josh]

Title: Message



I 
discovered my problem was caused by changes in mod_jk's behavior.  If I 
added JkOptions +FlushPackets to my mod_jk configuration, everything works 
great.
,
Josh.

  
  -Original Message-From: Fenlason, Josh 
  Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 3:22 PMTo: Apache Users 
  (users@httpd.apache.org)Subject: Bad Chunked 
  Behavior
  I have apache and 
  tomcat configured with mod_jk and a jsp page that streams html content.  
  Everything worked fine in 2.0.52 with mod_jk 1.2.8, but then I moved to 
  2.0.54/55 and mod_jk 1.2.15.  In 2.0.54/55 the page is served up 
  correctly, accept instead of gradually passing data to the browser, it sends 
  it all as one chunk.  In 2.0.52, the content is gradually updated.  
  Has any one else seen anything like this?  Any suggestions would be 
  greatly appreciated.  Thanks in advance.
  ,
  Josh.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] htpasswd

[William A. Rowe, Jr.]

David's suggestion won't solve your problem...

your browser will (deliberately) share credentials or cookies between
server1.com and server2.com.  As long as the domain names are out of
sync, your browser will compartmentalize the information specific to
each server.

Perhaps you want to reverse proxy server2 behind server1.com, making
everything within http://server1.com/server2/... fetch its contents
from server?

If you were truly load-balancing, then all requests at http://server1.com
would be round-robin'ed between the two machines, and the -browser- would
think it was always looking at the same server, so the credentials, that
is either the cookies or auth passwords, would be common between those boxes.

David Wolever wrote:

I don't think Apache likes to do that very much... I'm sure it would
be possible to hack your way around it, but the basic authentication
scheme is just that... basic.
It may be quicker and easier to whip something up in PHP (or Perl, or
Python or what have you).  I know sessions are really easy in PHP, you
could probably do this sort of authentication in a couple of lines
(feel free to e-mail me if you'd like those couple lines).
David
On 1/17/06, farhan ahmed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



Hi folks,

I have been running 2 apache servers on different machines.And both apache
servers are doing

basic authentication. I created same users and passwords on both boxes. On
the webpage it

must ask for user name and passowrd once for either apache1 or apache2, but
it asks user name

and password for both servers. Is there anyway on client side if you give
user name and password

once it must not ask for other server.

Example

Server1: username = abc

 password = abc

Server2: username = abc

 password = abc

my index.html

http://server1";>Server1, when i click on it it asks for user
name and password i

give and page opens

http://server2";>Server2 When I click on that browser must
store user name and

password in cache and it should not ask for user name and password but it
asks for user name

and password

Please help me

Thanks





--

Regards,

Farhan Ahmed

NMS Engineer

Soul Australia

Level 14, 201 Kent Streen

Sydney  NSW 2000

Phone(Office): 61 2 8220 6022

Fax(Office): 61 2 9252 6864

Mobile: 61 432 156906

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

URL: www.soulaustralia.com.au

 - The
official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See
for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "
from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional
commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using environment variable in httpd.conf

[Khai Doan]

I am a mod_perl programmer, and I also manage my company web server.  We are growing and constantly adding new features to our products.  I find myself making change to the httpd.conf very frequent.  Sometimes, I change httpd.conf on the development server, and later forget to apply the change to httpd.conf on staging server, and production servers.  I wish to have the httpd.conf in my company cvs repository and get pushed out along with the rest of the application code.  Unfortunately quite a few things in httpd.conf stand in the way, such as hardcoded paths, and port numbers.  (We are in an environment where all developers have to develop on one development server, and each developer is assigned a port number, and run a separate apache process listening on that port.)  I also want other developers to be able to check in changes to the httpd.conf file.  
 
If I set up environment variables to hold these hardcoded paths, and port numbers, can I use these environment variables in httpd.conf?  
 
If I am to write a module in C to handle this, where can I start?  What book do you recommend?
 
Khai


-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See  for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Multiple uses in the same HTTPS virtualhost

[Dave Turvene]

Joshua Slive  slive.ca> writes:

> 
> On 1/17/06, Dave Turvene  comcast.net> wrote:
> 
> > Q1: How efficient is the RewriteCond?  In another case I 
had three RewriteCond
> > directives on a RewriteRule with no apparent impact but the 
server was not being
> > heavily hit.
> 
> The RewriteCond effect will be negligible in comparison to the
> resource usage involved in proxying.  It is simply one regex, 
compared
> to generating a whole new request to a different server.  If you
are
> concerned about resource usage, the first thing to look at is 
if the
> proxy is really necessary, and if it could be cached at the proxy
> server.

Thanks, that makes sense.  I'm running a Content Management System 
(CMS) behind Apache and need Apache for SSL, ACL, and other TLAs

> 
> > Q2: Name-based hosting is the obvious choice, but HTTPS doesn't
> > allow it.  Is there a better way to do this, i.e. different 
handling for incoming
> > HTTPS requests to the same server?
> 
> It depends on what exactly you mean by "different handling".  
There is
> no general answer to that question.

Yeah, I should have been a little less vague.  Here's the 
"different handling" part: 1) Apache to serve some pages for 
a subversion interface and 2) Apache to proxy some requests 
to the CMS server - both over the same SSL Virtual Host.

My guess is from what you're saying, that the RewriteCond is 
probably a clean way to do this. At least it's not obfuscated.

> 
> Joshua.




-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Multiple uses in the same HTTPS virtualhost

[Joshua Slive]

On 1/18/06, Dave Turvene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah, I should have been a little less vague.  Here's the
> "different handling" part: 1) Apache to serve some pages for
> a subversion interface and 2) Apache to proxy some requests
> to the CMS server - both over the same SSL Virtual Host.
>
> My guess is from what you're saying, that the RewriteCond is
> probably a clean way to do this. At least it's not obfuscated.

Yes, it's fine.  You could probably alternatively use
ProxyPass /svn !
ProxyPass / http://othersite/
which avoids mod_rewrite.

Joshua.

-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ldaps authentication

[Sturgis, Grant]

Greetings List,

I have seen this question posted several times, but have not seen a
resolution.  If it is in the archives, I apologize for not seeing it
there.

I have ldap authentication working using mod_auth_ldap, but I want to
enable ldaps to avoid transmitting passwords in clear text.  This is the
configuration so far:


   AuthType basic
   AuthName "ldap test"
   AuthLDAPUrl
ldap://dc1.domain.com/dc=domain,dc=com?sAMAccountName?sub?(objectClass=u
ser)
   AuthLDAPBindDN cn=nobody,ou=Users-IT,dc=domain,dc=com
   AuthLDAPBindPassword password
   AuthLDAPGroupAttribute member
   require group cn=ldap_test_group,ou=Users-IT,dc=domain,dc=com


however, to enable ldaps, I add these lines (outside the , of
course):

LDAPTrustedCA /etc/httpd/conf/cacerts/dc1.cer
LDAPTrustedCAType BASE64_FILE

and then change ldap to ldaps in the AuthLDAPUrl line

and it stops working.

I have used this cert successfully in pam_ldap and ldapsearch.  

Any suggestions for what I could be doing wrong?  

The details:

RHEL ES 4
httpd-2.0.52-22.ent

Thanks for any suggestions,

Grant
-




Pardon this rubbish:


This electronic message transmission is a PRIVATE communication which contains
information which may be confidential or privileged. The information is 
intended 
to be for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution 
or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please notify the
sender  of the delivery error by replying to this message, or notify us by
telephone (877-633-2436, ext. 0), and then delete it from your system.


-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] verify GET and POST data.

[Joshua Slive]

On 1/18/06, M. Onur ERGiN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In my server(2.0.40), I don't think GET and POST data is properly returned.
> How can I verify this?

Do a GET or POST and look at the results?

Sorry, but your question is incomprehensible.  Please provide more
details and examples.

Joshua.

-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] verify GET and POST data.

[M. Onur ERGiN]

yeah, sorry. My problem is, mailman (mail list) admin pages do not save any information and returns back to admin screen each time I submit a form or click on a link. I have discussed this issue in mailman list for quite a lot time, and it seems working very good. And it seems, the problem is related to the web server. Now I suspect the information in GET or POST may be wrong.  Also, I need to somehow verify the cookie information retrieved.An interesting issue is; my apache stopped running a few weeks ago. I took a lot of time to find out the problem. It was a httpd.conf line: "MIMEMagicFile path/to/it ". When I changed this line to "MimeMagicFile path/to/it" , it again started to work. As far as I know, httpd.conf is case  insensitive. What can be the reason causing this? (Note, I was playing with language,lang,locale settings a few days ago but now sure if this effects..)Any idea is very appreciated.
 Regards,Onur.Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 1/18/06, M. Onur ERGiN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> In my server(2.0.40), I don't think GET and POST data is properly returned.> How can I verify this?Do a GET or POST and look at the results?Sorry, but your question is incomprehensible.  Please provide moredetails and examples.Joshua.-The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.See  for more info.To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
		Yahoo! Photos 
Ring in the New Year with Photo Calendars. Add photos, events, holidays, whatever.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] verify GET and POST data.

[Joshua Slive]

On 1/18/06, M. Onur ERGiN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yeah, sorry.
> My problem is, mailman (mail list) admin pages do not save any information
> and returns back to admin screen each time I submit a form or click on a
> link. I have discussed this issue in mailman list for quite a lot time, and
> it seems working very good. And it seems, the problem is related to the web
> server.
> Now I suspect the information in GET or POST may be wrong.
>
> Also, I need to somehow verify the cookie information retrieved.
>
> An interesting issue is; my apache stopped running a few weeks ago. I took a
> lot of time to find out the problem. It was a httpd.conf line:
> "MIMEMagicFile path/to/it ". When I changed this line to "MimeMagicFile
> path/to/it" , it again started to work. As far as I know, httpd.conf is case
>  insensitive. What can be the reason causing this? (Note, I was playing with
> language,lang,locale settings a few days ago but now sure if this effects..)

I can almost guarantee that changing the case of the MimeMagicFile
directive did not have any effect.  There was probably something else
that changed.

As to your other problem, you need to get much more detailed
information.  If you have no other way of looking at the data, you can
try mod_dumpio.  But you are using a very old version of apache that
doesn't include this module.

Joshua.

-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] AddHandler/AddType in

[spamvanger]

Hello all,

I'm migrating from the old days to 2.2 and I have a problem getting my old 
.html-files parsed by PHP 5.1 using the usual settings in  in 
httpd-vhosts.conf.

As I have understood from the documentation the AddType/AddHandler directive is 
valid in the  context and should override settings from the 
mime-file. Unfortunately neither of them seem to work.

If I change the AddType to include .html files in the general config file all 
gets parsed exquisitely.

There's nothing in the error_log, and all configtests run smoothly.

If anybody has a clue or is able to reproduce this problem please let me know!

Here's the dummy example adapted to my settings:


ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DocumentRoot /www/docs/dummy-host.example.com
ServerName dummy-host.example.com
ServerAlias www.dummy-host.example.com
ErrorLog logs/dummy-host.example.com-error_log
AddType application/x-httpd-php .php .html .php3


TIA

Marko.

-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] verify GET and POST data.

[M. Onur ERGiN]

A minute ago, from some logs, I found some case problems.I am seeing HTTP_KEEP_ALÝVE instead of HTTP_KEEP_ALIVE . I think the problem with MIMEModeMagic is the same. Does it give any clue?I might have mistakenly set some system fonts to Turkish. But now I can not fix it. any idea?Best.Onur.Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 1/18/06, M. Onur ERGiN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> yeah, sorry.> My problem is, mailman (mail list) admin pages do not save any information> and returns back to admin screen each time I submit a form or click on a> link. I have discussed this issue in mailman list for quite a lot time, and> it seems working very good. And it seems, the problem is related to the web> server.> Now I suspect the information in GET or POST 
 may be
 wrong.>> Also, I need to somehow verify the cookie information retrieved.>> An interesting issue is; my apache stopped running a few weeks ago. I took a> lot of time to find out the problem. It was a httpd.conf line:> "MIMEMagicFile path/to/it ". When I changed this line to "MimeMagicFile> path/to/it" , it again started to work. As far as I know, httpd.conf is case>  insensitive. What can be the reason causing this? (Note, I was playing with> language,lang,locale settings a few days ago but now sure if this effects..)I can almost guarantee that changing the case of the MimeMagicFiledirective did not have any effect.  There was probably something elsethat changed.As to your other problem, you need to get much more detailedinformation.  If you have no other way of looking at the data, you cantry mod_dumpio.  But you are using a very old version of apache thatdoesn't include this
 module.Joshua.-The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.See  for more info.To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
		Yahoo! Photos – Showcase holiday pictures in hardcover 
Photo Books. You design it and we’ll bind it!

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] localization problem

[M. Onur ERGiN]

Dear all,In mailman logs I've a problem with I letter. Please see below message:It only occurs to 'I' in HTTP_KEEP_ALIVE, HTTP_COOKIE, HTTP_CONNECTIONand HTTP_ACCEPT_ENCODING and not to I in other Apache set variablessuch as SCRIPT_FILENAME, SERVER_ADMIN, SERVER_SIGNATURE, etc.How would apache decide/set those HTTP_* variables? Or what should I check specifically?RegardsOnur.
		Yahoo! Photos – Showcase holiday pictures in hardcover 
Photo Books. You design it and we’ll bind it!

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AddHandler/AddType in

[Joshua Slive]

On 1/18/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> As I have understood from the documentation the AddType/AddHandler directive 
> is valid in the  context and should override settings from the 
> mime-file. Unfortunately neither of them seem to work.

No, directives in  only override directives placed in the
*same context* outside .  So a  inside
a  will override the same container outside a
, but directives placed in  will always
override directives placed in the bare  outside any other
section.

Joshua.

-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] verify GET and POST data.

[Joshua Slive]

On 1/18/06, M. Onur ERGiN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A minute ago, from some logs, I found some case problems.
> I am seeing HTTP_KEEP_ALÝVE instead of HTTP_KEEP_ALIVE . I think the
> problem with MIMEModeMagic is the same. Does it give any clue?
> I might have mistakenly set some system fonts to Turkish. But now I can not
> fix it. any idea?

A seriously screwed up system?

What is your locale set to?  On some systems, basic functions like
strcasecmp don't work properly if the locale is not set to "C". 
Sounds like what you are seeing.

Joshua.

-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] localization problem

[M. Onur ERGiN]

Forgot to add this:Those HTTP_KEEP_ALIVE, HTTP_COOKIE, HTTP_CONNECTION and HTTP_ACCEPT_ENCODING are logged as HTTP_KEEP_ALÝVE, HTTP_COOKÝE, HTTP_CONNECTÝON, HTTP_ACCEPT_ENCODÝNG.Regards, Onur."M. Onur ERGiN" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dear all,In mailman logs I've a problem with I letter. Please see below message:It only occurs to 'I' in HTTP_KEEP_ALIVE, HTTP_COOKIE, HTTP_CONNECTIONand HTTP_ACCEPT_ENCODING and not to I in other Apache set variablessuch as SCRIPT_FILENAME, SERVER_ADMIN, SERVER_SIGNATURE, etc.How would apache decide/set those HTTP_* variables? Or what should I check specifically?RegardsOnur.   Yahoo! Photos � Showcase holiday pictures in hardcover  Photo Books. You design it and we�ll bind it!
		Yahoo! Photos 
Ring in the New Year with Photo Calendars. Add photos, events, holidays, whatever.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] verify GET and POST data.

[M. Onur ERGiN]

At the moment, my locale is:LANG=en_US.UTF-8LC_CTYPE="en_US.UTF-8"LC_NUMERIC=CLC_TIME=CLC_COLLATE="en_US.UTF-8"LC_MONETARY="en_US.UTF-8"LC_MESSAGES=CLC_PAPER="en_US.UTF-8"LC_NAME="en_US.UTF-8"LC_ADDRESS="en_US.UTF-8"LC_TELEPHONE="en_US.UTF-8"LC_MEASUREMENT="en_US.UTF-8"LC_IDENTIFICATION="en_US.UTF-8"LC_ALL=Regards,Onur.Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 1/18/06, M. Onur ERGiN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> A minute ago, from some logs, I found some case problems.> I am seeing HTTP_KEEP_ALÝVE instead of HTTP_KEEP_ALIVE . I think the> problem with MIMEModeMagic is the same. Does it give any clue?> I might have mistakenly set some system fonts to Turkish. But now I can not> fix it. any idea?A serious
 ly
 screwed up system?What is your locale set to?  On some systems, basic functions likestrcasecmp don't work properly if the locale is not set to "C". Sounds like what you are seeing.Joshua.-The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.See  for more info.To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
		Yahoo! Photos 
Ring in the New Year with Photo Calendars. Add photos, events, holidays, whatever.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache email address

[Gerry Danen]

I found that postfix is the culprit. Guess I'll be visiting their forums next.

Thanks all.

Gerry

On 1/17/06, Adam Ossenford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Gerry Danen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 
> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 3:35 PM
> Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache email address
>
>
> When I use a php form to send email, an address called
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] is used. Where would that be set?

--
Gerry
http://portal.danen.org/

-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] verify GET and POST data.

[Joshua Slive]

On 1/18/06, M. Onur ERGiN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At the moment, my locale is:

> LC_CTYPE="en_US.UTF-8"

At least this one probably needs to be set to "C".

Joshua.

-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using environment variable in httpd.conf

[Tom Hoefakker]

As far as I know, it's an undocumented "feature".  But, in my 
experience, it does actually work quite well.  While I vaguely recall a 
note on the development list questioning whether or not this should be 
removed, I would love to see this become a full-fledged documented 
feature as it is very useful in situations such as yours.


In your httpd.conf file you can use environment variables like this:
${varname}

In our environment, we use environment variables for quite a few things:
ServerRoot
Port
DocumentRoot
module paths - both bundled and custom modules
User & group  (different users in development vs. production)
path to piped log program
log file path
etc...

Hope this helps.
Tom



Khai Doan wrote:
I am a mod_perl programmer, and I also manage my company web server.  We 
are growing and constantly adding new features to our products.  I find 
myself making change to the httpd.conf very frequent.  Sometimes, I 
change httpd.conf on the development server, and later forget to apply 
the change to httpd.conf on staging server, and production servers.  I 
wish to have the httpd.conf in my company cvs repository and get pushed 
out along with the rest of the application code.  Unfortunately quite a 
few things in httpd.conf stand in the way, such as hardcoded paths, and 
port numbers.  (We are in an environment where all developers have to 
develop on one development server, and each developer is assigned a port 
number, and run a separate apache process listening on that port.)  I 
also want other developers to be able to check in changes to the 
httpd.conf file. 
 
If I set up environment variables to hold these hardcoded paths, and 
port numbers, can I use these environment variables in httpd.conf? 
 
If I am to write a module in C to handle this, where can I start?  What 
book do you recommend?
 
Khai
- 
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server 
Project. See for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, 
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] php_admin_flag question

[Graham Frank]

Hello.

I am trying to restrict a open_basedir to the document root of the domain.
So I have the following in httpd.conf.


  php_admin_value open_basedir /


That isn't working.  I've tried it using  as well.  I'm still
able to fopen("/etc/passwd");  How could I make it so that a person in say
/home/username/domain.com can only include from /home/username/domain.com
and not /etc/passwd (for example)?  I would turn on safe_mode, but files are
uid:gid the client's FTP account while apache doesn't suexec to their
username and runs httpd:httpd.

Thanks!

---
Graham Frank
Neoservers LLC (http://www.neoservers.com/)
Founder and Owner


-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0.53 large file problem

[Mahesh S Kudva]

Hi

I have got apache 2.0.53 on Mac. I have a strange problem when using file 
more than 64Kb. None of the images or files get downloaded or displayed. 
The httpd conf is the same as default except that it has Virtual Hosts 
configured.

I have check this issue with Apache 1.3 and have no problem. I cannot 
downgrade apache.

How do I go about with the problem??

Regards & Thanks

Mahesh S Kudva



---
Robosoft Technologies - Partners in Product Development



-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]