Re: Apache 2.0.59/Solaris8-sparc / Probleme beim Buid von mod_auth_ldap. Make bricht ab.
On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 10:56:53AM +0100, Vogel, Thomas (BOT) wrote: Beim kompilieren des Apachen bricht der make mit folgender Meldung ab: mod_auth_ldap.c:47:2: #error mod_auth_ldap requires APR-util to have LDAP support built in Falls die Meldung auf die richtige Ursache hinweist interpretiere ich das so das ich das APR zunächst mit bestimmten Optionen rekompilieren muß bevor ich dann das eigetnliche das mod_auth_ldap.so bauen kann. Ist das so richtig? Habt ihr schonmal ähnliche Probleme gehabt? Tipps? ./configure --prefix /svc/home/t.vogel/local/a_ldap --enable-auth-ldap Ist zwar Linux und nicht Solaris, sollte aber für Dein Problem keinen Unterschied bedeutetn. Ich habe: ./configure --enable-threads=posix --prefix=/usr/local/httpd-2.0.59 \ --enable-dav --enable-dav-fs --enable-so --with-berkeley-db \ --enable-ldap=shared --enable-auth-ldap=shared --enable-mods-shared=all \ --with-ldap --with-ldap-include=/usr/local/openldap-2.3.27/include \ --with-ldap-lib=/usr/local/openldap-2.3.27/lib --enable-ssl \ --with-ssl=/usr/local/openssl-0.9.8d Weicheier können natürlich den Indianer von sunfreeware nehmen ;-) Rainer -- Apache HTTP Server Mailing List users-de unsubscribe-Anfragen an [EMAIL PROTECTED] sonstige Anfragen an [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CGI app held open
Nathan Kellogg wrote: We are debugging a CGI app ( mod_isapi ) running on a WINxp machine. Just so you are clear, ISAPI is not CGI - CGI describes a way to launch a program (or script, via a program) passing environment variables to describe the request, and listening to the stdout of the program/script for what to write back at the client. Pretty simplistic interface. ISAPI doesn't work that way; it's an API that pushes a request to the .dll (on unix, an .so) entry point, and provides a number of more sophisticated mechanisms to respond to the client. The app executes fine but Apache retains the file handle on the app making it impossible to overwrite the old cgi app with the new one without restarting apache. Apache loads the .dll and keeps a reference count of concurrent requests. For many reasons, it is not unloaded between requests. Is there a way to change this behavior without compromising performance? You are asking is it possible to reload the .dll on each and every request, and then unload it when each request completes... ...and you ask if this can be done without comprimising performance? Think it through :) - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] issues of 1.3.37 on Solaris 2.6
Hi, After compiled Apache-1.3.37 on a Solaris 2.6 host,it's fine to run httpd -l. However, after installed it on another solaris 2.6 host, run httpd -l prompted error httpd: Unable to exec Shared Core Executable Program `/opt/httpd/apache/1.3.37/lib/libhttpd.ep'. Can some tell me why? Many Thanks, Q.Xie Sponsored Link Mortgage rates near 39yr lows. $420k for $1,399/mo. Calculate new payment! www.LowerMyBills.com/lre - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Auth problem
Directory c:/nwl/cgi/ Options ExecCGI AuthType Basic AuthName Authorization Required AuthUserFile c:/nwl/passwords Require user test SSLRequireSSL /Directory For one thing, there seems to be a conflict between c:/nwl and c:/nws. For another thing, you don't have the Order allow,deny Allow from all in the c:/nw? directory. Joshua. The nw? was an error I made when i changed the path info for the post here. I dont have the 'Order allow,deny .. ' because auth is required for the cgi directory... - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] CGI app held open
We are debugging a CGI app ( mod_isapi ) running on a WINxp machine. The app executes fine but Apache retains the file handle on the app making it impossible to overwrite the old cgi app with the new one without restarting apache. Is there a way to change this behavior without compromising performance? - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WebDAV setup on Windows XP
This is a well known feature of Windows XP Home and later editions. Workaround: use a port number after the domain, or use a trailing /. or a /# on any URL to use WebDAV properly in the setup wizard. * e.g.: http://www.atarex.com:80 * e.g.: http://www.atarex.com/. * e.g.: https://www.atarex.com/# Explanation: the :port number on the domain name, the trailing slash dot /., or slash pound /# at the end of the URL prevents the bug which interprets the resource as a SMB network drive. Additional editorial and background here: http://www.atarex.com/services/support/webdav-msft.shtml --Mark Mark Lavi, Enterprise Web Management Team @ SGI mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] || phone:+1-650-933-7707 -Original Message- From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 1:42 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WebDAV setup on Windows XP You seem to be confusing auth_sspi (ntlm) auth with basic auth. Or it's an issue with your client - do you have another non-Microsoft dav client to try? And see conf/extras/httpd-dav.conf for an example. Steve Pfister wrote: Sorry if this is a FAQ... I'm trying to set up an Apache server (2.2.3, I think) on XP and I'd like to setup WebDAV on it. Is there any documentation on this? I can't seem to authenticate... I've got an htpasswd generated authentication file, but it keeps wanting the username in the form machinename\username. I'm not sure how to go beyond this point. Thank you! - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Help Wanted for Setup
Do it yourself: download and a few clicks. http://www.apachefriends.org/en/index.html --Mark Mark Lavi, Enterprise Web Management Team @ SGI mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] || phone:+1-650-933-7707 -Original Message- From: Nathan Kellogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 11:15 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Help Wanted for Setup I am looking for PAID help in the setup of Apache 2.2 on a WINXP box. We will be running openSSL, AUTH and later FastCGI, MYSQL and PHP. This server will host multiple sites and multiple SSL certs. Would prefer to hire someone who will be available later on, after the setup is done, from time to time. Also preferred is someone 3 +/- from PST. Please reply directly to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with qualifications and hourly pay expected. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 Memory Usage
Hey Chris, On Nov 20, 2006, at 7:57 PM, Chris wrote: Hi I use apache 1.3 as well as 2.2.3 so this is off topic since this is for 2.2.3 but I have just noticed my processes use in excess of 100meg per child, I run eaccelerator which I know accounts for some of this 32meg so this would leave around 80 meg per process without eacellerator, I always thought this was normal and would explain why on a box with 2 gig of ram I cant get anywhere near the amount of child processes others reach without using swap. This happens because you are serving run-on sentences. You might try breaking up your message into multiple, shorter sentences, so Apache doesn't have to keep your entire message in memory all at once. I can't speak to eaccelerator because I don't know it or use it. It is possible that Apache allocates that much pool memory to serve requests and, after the request, the pool or its parent have grown by that much and will not shrink until they are destroyed. This can be an outright bug, or a memory leak, or a combination of both. I don't really use 1.3 anymore, but I don't think the core would do this so perhaps you might look at third-party modules. Are you perhaps serving very large files? Also, please keep in mind that Apache allocates shared memory for the scoreboard, and depending on your implementation of top the text pages of the code and libraries it loads might also show up as shared memory. This memory is really only allocated once. What can you do about this? Try to find out which requests or modules cause this behaviour, and from there try to find out what actually happens. S. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.temme.net/sander/ Open Source Software Consultant PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Google mini and RPS
Has anyone set up a Google Mini behind an Apache server using reverse proxying? I'm struggling with how to use reverse proxy and rewrite commands to accomplish the following: When a request comes in for http://www.mydomin.com/search?site=my_collectionclient=my_collectionoutput=xml_.. The Apache server would issue the following GET: http://google-mini.mydomain.com/search?site=my_collectionclient=my_collectionoutput=xml_ I think I could do it with a simple proxypass and proxyreversepass command if the Google mini supported adding an additional subdirectory (e.g. http://google-mini-mydomain/search/search?...), but according to their tech support it doesn't. Can someone point me in the right direction on this. Just a disclaimer, the rewrite directive is very cryptic to me ;) Thanks in advance for any aid you can provide. Steven Niedermeyer Bellingham, WA - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WebDAV setup on Windows XP
Webdav in Windows products is broken beyond any hope. Even in Windows XP Pro it doesn't work with certain combinations of updates and patches. Also, MS Office products understand webdav. Even they don't work in all installations as expected. Many a times they start talking FPSE. Checkout http://greenbytes.com/ http://greenbytes.com/tech/webdav/webdav-redirector-list.html http://greenbytes.com/tech/webdav/webfolder-client-list.html http://greenbytes.com/tech/webdav/webdavfaq.html Also look at Microsoft KB articles. Search on MSDN for webdav web folders etc. Overall, its quite hopeless. For your specific problems there are hacks available on the net. specifically a module that sits before auth and (de)mangles the username. -- Vinay On 11/22/06, Mark Lavi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is a well known feature of Windows XP Home and later editions. Workaround: use a port number after the domain, or use a trailing /. or a /# on any URL to use WebDAV properly in the setup wizard. * e.g.: http://www.atarex.com:80 * e.g.: http://www.atarex.com/. * e.g.: https://www.atarex.com/# Explanation: the :port number on the domain name, the trailing slash dot /., or slash pound /# at the end of the URL prevents the bug which interprets the resource as a SMB network drive. Additional editorial and background here: http://www.atarex.com/services/support/webdav-msft.shtml --Mark Mark Lavi, Enterprise Web Management Team @ SGI mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] || phone:+1-650-933-7707 -Original Message- From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 1:42 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WebDAV setup on Windows XP You seem to be confusing auth_sspi (ntlm) auth with basic auth. Or it's an issue with your client - do you have another non-Microsoft dav client to try? And see conf/extras/httpd-dav.conf for an example. Steve Pfister wrote: Sorry if this is a FAQ... I'm trying to set up an Apache server (2.2.3, I think) on XP and I'd like to setup WebDAV on it. Is there any documentation on this? I can't seem to authenticate... I've got an htpasswd generated authentication file, but it keeps wanting the username in the form machinename\username. I'm not sure how to go beyond this point. Thank you! - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Vinay Y S http://vinay-ys.blogspot.com
RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] difference between UNIX and WIN source package
I suspect the difference is the unix distribution includes support for such important systems as sgi and beos From: Syntax [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 1:50 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] difference between UNIX and WIN source package On mailto:users@httpd.apache.org the download page , we can see below: * Unix Source: httpd-2.2.3.tar.gz http://apache.stu.edu.tw/httpd/httpd-2.2.3.tar.gz [PGP http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/httpd-2.2.3.tar.gz.asc ] [MD5 http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/httpd-2.2.3.tar.gz.md5 ] * Unix Source: httpd-2.2.3.tar.bz2 http://apache.stu.edu.tw/httpd/httpd-2.2.3.tar.bz2 [PGP http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/httpd-2.2.3.tar.bz2.asc ] [MD5 http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/httpd-2.2.3.tar.bz2.md5 ] * Win32 Source: httpd-2.2.3-win32-src.zip http://apache.stu.edu.tw/httpd/httpd-2.2.3-win32-src.zip [PGP http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/httpd-2.2.3-win32-src.zip.asc ] [MD5 http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/httpd-2.2.3-win32-src.zip.md5 ] * Win32 Binary (MSI Installer): apache_2.2.3-win32-x86-no_ssl.msi http://apache.stu.edu.tw/httpd/binaries/win32/apache_2.2.3-win32-x86-no _ssl.msi [PGP http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/binaries/win32/apache_2.2.3-win32-x86- no_ssl.msi.asc ] [MD5 http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/binaries/win32/apache_2.2.3-win32-x86- no_ssl.msi.md5 ] My question is : Is there any one know about what is the difference between UNIX source and WIN source in detail ? (Of course, we all know UNIX source is for unix-like platform and WIN is for WIndows.) I want to know why it has to be distributed into those two platform package, what's different, detail, in program code or something ... Any one can answer ? or any where the documents about it is ? Thanks for your help.
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] difference between UNIX and WIN source package
It was thus said that the Great Syntax once stated: My question is : Is there any one know about what is the difference between UNIX source and WIN source in detail ? One major difference will be the character(s) used to mark the end of each line of text in the source code. Unix and Windows use different characters to designate this (and there are reasons, mostly historical, on why this is the way it is). Another difference may be the makefiles (files that describe the order of compilation) or how the makefiles are generated on the two platforms. -spc (other than that, I suspect the sources are similar) - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Auth problem
On 11/21/06, Nathan Kellogg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, that resolved the problem, thanks. BUT, we have another directory where: Directory c:/nwls/htdocs/kna/ AuthType Basic AuthName Authorization Required AuthUserFile c:/nwls/passwords Require user test SSLRequireSSL /Directory In this example, AUTH works fine. Why is this different than the above issue? Because that is under c:/nwls/htdocs and you have a Directory section that opens access there. Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 1.3 and 2.2.3
Hi guys, We are going to migrate apache from 1.3 to 2.2.3. Please let me know the major difference between 1.3 and 2.2.3 Regards, Arun __ Yahoo! India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new http://in.answers.yahoo.com/ - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 1.3 and 2.2.3
On 11/20/06, arun kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi guys, We are going to migrate apache from 1.3 to 2.2.3. Please let me know the major difference between 1.3 and 2.2.3 http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/upgrading.html http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/upgrading.html Feel free to ask if you have more-specific questions. Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WebDAV setup on Windows XP
I've got it working now (sort of). It seems to function, but so far it's unusably slow. Are there any better alternatives for the Windows platform? _ From: Vinay Y S [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 2:20 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WebDAV setup on Windows XP Webdav in Windows products is broken beyond any hope. Even in Windows XP Pro it doesn't work with certain combinations of updates and patches. Also, MS Office products understand webdav. Even they don't work in all installations as expected. Many a times they start talking FPSE. Checkout http://greenbytes.com/ http://greenbytes.com/tech/webdav/webdav-redirector-list.html http://greenbytes.com/tech/webdav/webfolder-client-list.html http://greenbytes.com/tech/webdav/webdavfaq.html Also look at Microsoft KB articles. Search on MSDN for webdav web folders etc. Overall, its quite hopeless. For your specific problems there are hacks available on the net. specifically a module that sits before auth and (de)mangles the username. -- Vinay On 11/22/06, Mark Lavi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is a well known feature of Windows XP Home and later editions. Workaround: use a port number after the domain, or use a trailing /. or a /# on any URL to use WebDAV properly in the setup wizard. * e.g.: http://www.atarex.com:80 * e.g.: http://www.atarex.com/. * e.g.: https://www.atarex.com/# https://www.atarex.com/ Explanation: the :port number on the domain name, the trailing slash dot /., or slash pound /# at the end of the URL prevents the bug which interprets the resource as a SMB network drive. Additional editorial and background here: http://www.atarex.com/services/support/webdav-msft.shtml --Mark Mark Lavi, Enterprise Web Management Team @ SGI mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] || phone:+1-650-933-7707 -Original Message- From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 1:42 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WebDAV setup on Windows XP You seem to be confusing auth_sspi (ntlm) auth with basic auth. Or it's an issue with your client - do you have another non-Microsoft dav client to try? And see conf/extras/httpd-dav.conf for an example. Steve Pfister wrote: Sorry if this is a FAQ... I'm trying to set up an Apache server (2.2.3, I think) on XP and I'd like to setup WebDAV on it. Is there any documentation on this? I can't seem to authenticate... I've got an htpasswd generated authentication file, but it keeps wanting the username in the form machinename\username. I'm not sure how to go beyond this point. Thank you! - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL: http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Vinay Y S http://vinay-ys.blogspot.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auth problem
I am having an auth problem: from error_log : client denied by server configuration: C:/nws/cgi/cfind.dll This has got to be very simple but I don't see it! Thanks in advance. Directory c:/nwls/htdocs/kna/ AuthType Basic AuthName Authorization Required AuthUserFile c:/nwl/passwords Require user test SSLRequireSSL /Directory ScriptAlias /kna/cgi/ c:/nwl/cgi/ Directory c:/nwl/cgi/ Options ExecCGI AuthType Basic AuthName Authorization Required AuthUserFile c:/nwl/passwords Require user test SSLRequireSSL /Directory Directory c:/nwl/htdocs/ Options FollowSymLinks AllowOverride None Order allow,deny Allow from all /Directory
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Auth problem
On 11/21/06, Nathan Kellogg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am having an auth problem: from error_log : client denied by server configuration: C:/nws/cgi/cfind.dll This has got to be very simple but I don't see it! Directory c:/nwl/cgi/ Options ExecCGI AuthType Basic AuthName Authorization Required AuthUserFile c:/nwl/passwords Require user test SSLRequireSSL /Directory For one thing, there seems to be a conflict between c:/nwl and c:/nws. For another thing, you don't have the Order allow,deny Allow from all in the c:/nw? directory. Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Strang successful request
I just noticed this request in the access log on one of my servers: x.x.x.x - - [21/Nov/2006:18:08:07 +0100] GET http://cn.yahoo.com/ HTTP/1.1 200 22 - Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.01; Windows NT) 149 268 22 bytes is the size of /index.html on that server, and I'm suprised by that 200 status and try the same GET: 127.0.0.1 - - [21/Nov/2006:18:52:10 +0100] GET http://cn.yahoo.com/HTTP/1.1; 400 226 - - 37 392 More like the response I would expect, I have not loaded mod_proxy. But when I add the Host header to the request (no virtualhost or servername configured): 127.0.0.1 - - [21/Nov/2006:19:28:05 +0100] GET http://cn.yahoo.com/HTTP/1.1; 200 22 - - 61 268 The 22 bytes recieved is /index.html. Anyone have an explanation for this? I'm running the httpd-2.2.2-1.2 apache package in FC5. -Terje
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Strang successful request
On 11/21/06, Terje Sannum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just noticed this request in the access log on one of my servers: x.x.x.x - - [21/Nov/2006:18:08:07 +0100] GET http://cn.yahoo.com/ HTTP/1.1 200 22 - Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.01; Windows NT) 149 268 22 bytes is the size of /index.html on that server, and I'm suprised by that 200 status and try the same GET: 127.0.0.1 - - [21/Nov/2006:18:52:10 +0100] GET http://cn.yahoo.com/ HTTP/1.1 400 226 - - 37 392 More like the response I would expect, I have not loaded mod_proxy. But when I add the Host header to the request (no virtualhost or servername configured): 127.0.0.1 - - [21/Nov/2006:19:28:05 +0100] GET http://cn.yahoo.com/ HTTP/1.1 200 22 - - 61 268 The 22 bytes recieved is /index.html. Anyone have an explanation for this? I'm running the httpd-2.2.2-1.2 apache package in FC5. Yep: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/1.3/misc/FAQ.html#proxyscan Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reverse Proxy woes
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 4:39 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reverse Proxy woes Hi All, Apache 2.2 -reverse proxy -- IIS6/win2k3 Having a bit of an issue with keeping this connection alive. It's a simple set-up: ProxyRequests Off #ProxyTimeout ProxyPreserveHost off Proxy * Order Deny,Allow Allow from all /Proxy ProxyPass /portal ajp://machine2:7001/portal ProxyPassReverse /portal ajp://machine2:7001/portal ProxyPass /imageserver http://image:7002/imageserver ttl=128 retry=300 ProxyPassReverse /imageserver http://image:7002/imageserver The ajp connection works just fine, the connection to image connects and grabs images, but after awhile, images stop being served. The backend image server is running IIS6 in standard mode on a windows 2003 OS. Apache Httpd.log excerpt: [Fri Nov 17 14:34:10 2006] [info] Initial (No.1) HTTPS request received for child 498 (server portal.test.com:443) [Fri Nov 17 14:34:10 2006] [debug] mod_proxy_http.c(54): proxy: HTTP: canonicalising URL //image:7002/imageserver/plumtree/common/private/js/jsutil/LATEST/PTDateForm ats.js [Fri Nov 17 14:34:10 2006] [debug] proxy_util.c(1378): [client 192.168.17.130] proxy: http: found worker http://image:7002/imageserver for http://image:7002/imageserver/plumtree/common/private/js/jsutil/LATEST/PTDat eFormats.js, referer: https://portal.test.com/portal/server.pt? [Fri Nov 17 14:34:10 2006] [debug] mod_proxy.c(756): Running scheme http handler (attempt 0) [Fri Nov 17 14:34:10 2006] [debug] mod_proxy_http.c(1662): proxy: HTTP: serving URL http://image:7002/imageserver/plumtree/common/private/js/jsutil/LATEST/PTDat eFormats.js [Fri Nov 17 14:34:10 2006] [debug] proxy_util.c(1798): proxy: HTTP: has acquired connection for (image) [Fri Nov 17 14:34:10 2006] [debug] proxy_util.c(1858): proxy: connecting http://image:7002/imageserver/plumtree/common/private/js/jsutil/LATEST/PTDat eFormats.js to image:7002 [Fri Nov 17 14:34:10 2006] [debug] proxy_util.c(1951): proxy: connected /imageserver/plumtree/common/private/js/jsutil/LATEST/PTDateFormats.js to image:7002 [Fri Nov 17 14:34:10 2006] [debug] proxy_util.c(2141): proxy: HTTP: connection complete to 192.168.17.131:7002 (image) [Fri Nov 17 14:34:10 2006] [debug] mod_proxy_http.c(1541): proxy: header only [Fri Nov 17 14:34:10 2006] [debug] proxy_util.c(1816): proxy: HTTP: has released connection for (image) [Fri Nov 17 14:34:10 2006] [info] [client 192.168.17.130] Connection closed to child 498 with unclean shutdown (server portal.mda.mil:443) [Fri Nov 17 14:34:10 2006] [debug] mod_proxy_http.c(1541): proxy: header only [Fri Nov 17 14:34:10 2006] [debug] proxy_util.c(1816): proxy: HTTP: has released connection for (image) [Fri Nov 17 14:34:10 2006] [info] [client 192.168.17.130] Connection closed to child 496 with unclean shutdown (server portal.mda.mil:443) R. Rosado - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] re-write rules
Hi there,
someone posted me a potential fix for this issue in this thread, however having
had mailbox problems it has disappeared, could someone check their mailbox and
see if they have the rest of the thread.
many thanks
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Foster, Stephen (ASPIRE)
Sent: 18 October 2006 14:45
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] re-write rules
hi there,
yes i meant HTTPS ..sorry...
Requests that do work:
a: http://your.domain.com - re-directs to https://your.domain.com/home
b: http://your.domain.com/heartbeat/heartbeat.htm - returns file to browser
with 200 code
c: http://your.domain.com/server-status - returns server-status to browser
with 200 code
d: http://www.your.domain.com/whatever - redirects to http because it doesn't
match the right incoming domainname and then to https://your.domain.com/whatever
e: https://your.domain.com - gives 404
f: https://your.domain.com/ - gives 404
does that help?
Cheers
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Boyle Owen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 October 2006 14:29
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] re-write rules
-Original Message-
From: Foster, Stephen (ASPIRE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 3:18 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] re-write rules
hi there,
i am having a slight issue with re-write rules, i have it
setup so that any requests that are not HTTP get re-sent to
do you mean HTTPS ?
HTTPS. However if i connect using https://your.domain.com or
https://your.domain.com/ i get a page not found,
But do you have a DirectoryIndex defined for the HTTPS VH?
so i need to
be able to catch that its https but that there is no request
and to send it to https://your.domain.com/home.
my current rules are:
These are the rules for the HTTP VH, correct?
# =
# Rewrite to HTTPS Settings
# =
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !=/heartbeat/heartbeat.htm
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !=/server-status
RewriteCond %{SERVER_PORT} !=443
RewriteRule ^/$ https://your.domain.com/home [R=301,L]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^your\.domain\.com [NC]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !=
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !=/heartbeat/heartbeat.htm
RewriteRule ^/(.*) http://your.domain.com:%{SERVER_PORT}/$1 [R=301,L]
The first rules handles the fact that i have to serve
heartbeat.htm and server-status as port 80 requests but
anything else thats not HTTPS goes to HTTPS.
The second rule matches the incoming domain request to
re-write to the correct domain, but allows heartbeat.htm to
send a 200 status code rather than a 301.
I read this three times but couldn't understand what your problem is.
Please specify:
- example input/output URLs that work
- example input/output URLs that don't work and why not.
eg
request A
get B - as expected
request C
get D - expected/want E
Rgds,
Owen Boyle
Disclaimer: Any disclaimer attached to this message may be ignored.
Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated
cheers
Steve
Steve Foster | Capgemini | Telford
Shared Technology Services
T. +44 (0) 1952 296664 | www.capgemini.com
Internal: 46664
Join the Collaborative Business Experience
===
Our e-mail domain has now changed from iraspire.com to
hmrcaspire.com. Please update your address books.
===
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP
Server Project.
See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential,
proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege
is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error,
please notify the sender urgently and then immediately delete the message and
any copies of it from your system. Please also immediately destroy any
hardcopies of the message. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose,
distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. The sender's company reserves the right to monitor all e-mail
communications through their networks. Any views expressed in this message are
those of the individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and
the sender is authorised to state them to be the views of the sender's company.
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ServerLimit
Hi guys I am running 4 x dual 2.8GHz blades with 4Gb RAM load balanced. These are running apache 2.2.3, openssl 0.98c and PHP 5.1.6. They are configured with MPM prefork. I have read some conflicting information on how to up the max_clients directive. My setup is as default, the Max_Clients is set to 256. I would like to raise my max_client limit as we regularly would exceed these and I have read that I would need to raise the server limit in prefork.c. Here is the part of the prefork.c I think I have to tweak :). #ifndef DEFAULT_SERVER_LIMIT #define DEFAULT_SERVER_LIMIT 256 #endif /* Admin can't tune ServerLimit beyond MAX_SERVER_LIMIT. We want * some sort of compile-time limit to help catch typos. */ #ifndef MAX_SERVER_LIMIT #define MAX_SERVER_LIMIT 20 #endif Could someone explain the process to me a little better if possible or point me in the direction of some docs, I am really struggling to find some decent documentation on this. Thanks in Advance Em - This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient do not copy, use, or rely on them. We do not accept any legal responsibility for the contents of this communication due to the generally insecure nature of email. The views and opinions expressed within this email are those of the author and are not necessarily those of 'Piccadilly Ticketline' or any subsidiary. If you received this email in error, please notify us immediately. PiccadillyTicketline has taken every reasonable precaution to ensure that any attachment to this e-mail has been swept for viruses. However, Ticketline cannot accept liability for any damage sustained as a result of software viruses and would advise that you carry out your own virus checks before opening any email or attachment. - - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] re-write rules
-Original Message-
From: Foster, Stephen (ASPIRE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 12:58 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] re-write rules
Hi there,
someone posted me a potential fix for this issue in this
thread, however having had mailbox problems it has
disappeared, could someone check their mailbox and see if
they have the rest of the thread.
Your thread is here:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-httpd-usersm=116117751501364w=2
Rgds,
Owen Boyle
Disclaimer: Any disclaimer attached to this message may be ignored.
many thanks
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Foster, Stephen (ASPIRE)
Sent: 18 October 2006 14:45
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] re-write rules
hi there,
yes i meant HTTPS ..sorry...
Requests that do work:
a: http://your.domain.com - re-directs to
https://your.domain.com/home
b: http://your.domain.com/heartbeat/heartbeat.htm - returns
file to browser with 200 code
c: http://your.domain.com/server-status - returns
server-status to browser with 200 code
d: http://www.your.domain.com/whatever - redirects to http
because it doesn't match the right incoming domainname and
then to https://your.domain.com/whatever
e: https://your.domain.com - gives 404
f: https://your.domain.com/ - gives 404
does that help?
Cheers
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Boyle Owen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 October 2006 14:29
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] re-write rules
-Original Message-
From: Foster, Stephen (ASPIRE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 3:18 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] re-write rules
hi there,
i am having a slight issue with re-write rules, i have it
setup so that any requests that are not HTTP get re-sent to
do you mean HTTPS ?
HTTPS. However if i connect using https://your.domain.com or
https://your.domain.com/ i get a page not found,
But do you have a DirectoryIndex defined for the HTTPS VH?
so i need to
be able to catch that its https but that there is no request
and to send it to https://your.domain.com/home.
my current rules are:
These are the rules for the HTTP VH, correct?
# =
# Rewrite to HTTPS Settings
# =
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !=/heartbeat/heartbeat.htm
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !=/server-status
RewriteCond %{SERVER_PORT} !=443
RewriteRule ^/$ https://your.domain.com/home [R=301,L]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^your\.domain\.com [NC]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !=
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !=/heartbeat/heartbeat.htm
RewriteRule ^/(.*)
http://your.domain.com:%{SERVER_PORT}/$1 [R=301,L]
The first rules handles the fact that i have to serve
heartbeat.htm and server-status as port 80 requests but
anything else thats not HTTPS goes to HTTPS.
The second rule matches the incoming domain request to
re-write to the correct domain, but allows heartbeat.htm to
send a 200 status code rather than a 301.
I read this three times but couldn't understand what your problem is.
Please specify:
- example input/output URLs that work
- example input/output URLs that don't work and why not.
eg
request A
get B - as expected
request C
get D - expected/want E
Rgds,
Owen Boyle
Disclaimer: Any disclaimer attached to this message may be ignored.
Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated
cheers
Steve
Steve Foster | Capgemini | Telford
Shared Technology Services
T. +44 (0) 1952 296664 | www.capgemini.com
Internal: 46664
Join the Collaborative Business Experience
===
Our e-mail domain has now changed from iraspire.com to
hmrcaspire.com. Please update your address books.
===
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP
Server Project.
See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This message is for the named person's use only. It may
contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged
information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or
lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in
error, please notify the sender urgently and then immediately
delete the message and any copies of it from your system.
Please also immediately destroy any hardcopies of the
message. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose,
RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 Memory Usage
Well it does seem like mod_perl is a a RAM users... I commented it out and instead of 120mb RAM it is using 60mb RAM... Any suggestions on what I can do to make mod_perl not use so much ram... I have it running cause I am testing out a CMS system called WebGUI... Maybe I should just get used to that amount of ram being used... Thanks, Billy Strader WebPool WebPool Pager: 865-417-5622 Work: 865-425-5178 Pager: 865-417-5012 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua Slive Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 10:50 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 Memory Usage On 11/20/06, Strader, William A. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not sure if this is the right place to be asking but I thought I would try. OK I am running Fedora Core 6 with Apache 2.2.3 (installed via yum). The server has 1.5gb RAM on a Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.66GHz (2666 MHz). What I am running into is I am getting like 12 or more httpd processes running. Each processing using approximately 120mb RAM. I am running the system with prefork.c and here is the configu statement I have for it: IfModule prefork.c StartServers 2 MinSpareServers3 MaxSpareServers 10 ServerLimit 256 MaxClients 256 MaxRequestsPerChild 4000 /IfModule I also have this line in my config: MaxMemFree 30720 Now can anyone know me why I have so many httpd processes running at a given time and why is each process using such a large amount of RAM. The number of sites I am running on the server is 7 domains and 4 sub domains so a total of 11 sites. Any advice you can give me in helping me possible reduce the amount of ram the system is using would greatly be appricated. 12 httpd processes does not seem at all unusual, given that you allow up to 10 spare (inactive) processes, plus the parent (control) process and perhaps a piped-logger or something like that. What is unusual here is memory requirements of 120MB per process. This is at least 10 times what you would expect in a standard install. It implies that you are running some modules (mod_perl or similar) that are gobbling up tons of RAM. You should isolate which module is doing that and see if you can fix it. Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 Memory Usage
On 20/11/06, Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/20/06, Strader, William A. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well it does seem like mod_perl is a a RAM users... I commented it out and instead of 120mb RAM it is using 60mb RAM... Any suggestions on what I can do to make mod_perl not use so much ram... I have it running cause I am testing out a CMS system called WebGUI... Maybe I should just get used to that amount of ram being used... Even 60mb of RAM is on the absurd side, except for very specific cases. You should keep removing modules until you get down to something in the low double digits. As far as mod_perl goes, I'm not an expert. Obviously there is too much stuff getting loaded at startup. You should ask over on the mod_perl list, or in a support forum for WebGUI. Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi I use apache 1.3 as well as 2.2.3 so this is off topic since this is for 2.2.3 but I have just noticed my processes use in excess of 100meg per child, I run eaccelerator which I know accounts for some of this 32meg so this would leave around 80 meg per process without eacellerator, I always thought this was normal and would explain why on a box with 2 gig of ram I cant get anywhere near the amount of child processes others reach without using swap. Chris - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tuning the MaxKeepAliveRequests and KeepAliveTimeout http.conf parameters
Arthur Kreitman wrote: I noticed a random but all to frequent (perhaps 1 or 2 or 3 for every few hundred http requests) error from ap_core_output_filter (about line 903 in core_filters.c). The error is an os 10054 “An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host”. At the same time, the client side would believe the server performed a premature socket close. Regardless of the value of KeepAliveTimeout, if I set MaxKeepAliveRequests to 1 (ie no keep alive) the error occurs for almost 80% or 90% of the http requests If I don’t set MaxKeepAliveRequests, which then uses the default value, by setting KeepAliveTimeout between 60 and 90 seconds, the error disappears. DING DING DING - thank you for providing the essentials for a reproducible test case!!! It sounds like we are not handling keep alive disconnection in the best manner possible, leading to confusion by the ISAPI application. My understanding of KeepAliveTimeout is that it plays with the socket linger option. What are the side effects of setting KeepAliveTimeout to a high value? What are the side effects of setting MaxKeepAliveRequests to a high value? 1. fewer workers available to handle high load 2. more exposure to denial of service (every daemon has an implicit denial of service that it can handle only X parallel requests over N amount of time - keeping N low helps mitigate this). Contra wise, the benefit is that the next request from the same client is handled more quickly, if you assume that 'next page' requests will happen within the keepalivetimeout period. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tuning the MaxKeepAliveRequests and KeepAliveTimeout http.conf parameters
And what about bad side effects from increasing the linger time? -Original Message- From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 12:50 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tuning the MaxKeepAliveRequests and KeepAliveTimeout http.conf parameters Arthur Kreitman wrote: I noticed a random but all to frequent (perhaps 1 or 2 or 3 for every few hundred http requests) error from ap_core_output_filter (about line 903 in core_filters.c). The error is an os 10054 An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host. At the same time, the client side would believe the server performed a premature socket close. Regardless of the value of KeepAliveTimeout, if I set MaxKeepAliveRequests to 1 (ie no keep alive) the error occurs for almost 80% or 90% of the http requests If I don't set MaxKeepAliveRequests, which then uses the default value, by setting KeepAliveTimeout between 60 and 90 seconds, the error disappears. DING DING DING - thank you for providing the essentials for a reproducible test case!!! It sounds like we are not handling keep alive disconnection in the best manner possible, leading to confusion by the ISAPI application. My understanding of KeepAliveTimeout is that it plays with the socket linger option. What are the side effects of setting KeepAliveTimeout to a high value? What are the side effects of setting MaxKeepAliveRequests to a high value? 1. fewer workers available to handle high load 2. more exposure to denial of service (every daemon has an implicit denial of service that it can handle only X parallel requests over N amount of time - keeping N low helps mitigate this). Contra wise, the benefit is that the next request from the same client is handled more quickly, if you assume that 'next page' requests will happen within the keepalivetimeout period. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] WebDAV setup on Windows XP
Sorry if this is a FAQ. I'm trying to set up an Apache server (2.2.3, I think) on XP and I'd like to setup WebDAV on it. Is there any documentation on this? I can't seem to authenticate. I've got an htpasswd generated authentication file, but it keeps wanting the username in the form machinename\username. I'm not sure how to go beyond this point. Thank you!
RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] issues of 1.3.37 on Solaris 2.6
-Original Message- From: Qingshan Xie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 7:57 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] issues of 1.3.37 on Solaris 2.6 Hi, After compiled Apache-1.3.37 on a Solaris 2.6 host,it's fine to run httpd -l. However, after installed it on another solaris 2.6 host, run httpd -l prompted error httpd: Unable to exec Shared Core Executable Program `/opt/httpd/apache/1.3.37/lib/libhttpd.ep'. Can some tell me why? What do you mean by installed on another host? If you mean you simply *copied* the binary from host1 to host2, then that probably won't work (both hosts would need to have exactly the same libraries installed and in the same locations). Better to repeat the compilation on host2... Rgds, Owen Boyle Disclaimer: Any disclaimer attached to this message may be ignored. Many Thanks, Q.Xie __ __ Sponsored Link Mortgage rates near 39yr lows. $420k for $1,399/mo. Calculate new payment! www.LowerMyBills.com/lre - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender urgently and then immediately delete the message and any copies of it from your system. Please also immediately destroy any hardcopies of the message. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. The sender's company reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through their networks. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state them to be the views of the sender's company. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
