Apache 2
Hallo, ich habe auf meinem Mac den Apache 2- Webserver installiert, nur leider ein bisschen verkorgst Habe mich beim prefix vertan. Gib es ne Möglichkeit die Dateien nun wieder zu entfehrnen außer von hand?? mfg Christoph -- Apache HTTP Server Mailing List users-de unsubscribe-Anfragen an [EMAIL PROTECTED] sonstige Anfragen an [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
Apache 2
Hallo, ich habe auf meinem Mac den Apache 2- Webserver installiert, nur leider ein bisschen verkorgst Habe mich beim prefix vertan. Gib es ne Möglichkeit die Dateien nun wieder zu entfehrnen außer von hand?? mfg Christoph -- Apache HTTP Server Mailing List users-de unsubscribe-Anfragen an [EMAIL PROTECTED] sonstige Anfragen an [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
Re: Apache 2
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 07:58:33PM +0800, Christoph Seitz wrote: Hallo, ich habe auf meinem Mac den Apache 2- Webserver installiert, nur leider ein bisschen verkorgst Habe mich beim prefix vertan. Gib es ne Möglichkeit die Dateien nun wieder zu entfehrnen außer von hand?? mfg Christoph installiert = configure, make, maki install ? Evtl. kannst du den Apache per make uninstall (o.ä.) entfernen, kommt auf dein Makefile an. Ansonsten sollte(TM) ja nicht so viel passieren wenn du ihn per Hand entfernst und dann einfach nochmal neu installierst. Paul -- : Bitte einen Realname benutzen, unter dem Zitat antworten : und einfache Text-Mails senden (kein HTML). : Danke. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Apache 2
Hallo, ja ich habe configure make und make install gemacht. Make unistall gibt es leider nicht(auch keine ähnlichen). Ich war nur auf der Suche, ob es eine andere Lösung gibt. Ich bin aber leider noch nicht fündig geworden so habe ich es einfach per Hand gemacht. Aber trotzdem danke. Christoph Am 30.05.2007 um 21:40 schrieb Paul Puschmann: On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 07:58:33PM +0800, Christoph Seitz wrote: Hallo, ich habe auf meinem Mac den Apache 2- Webserver installiert, nur leider ein bisschen verkorgst Habe mich beim prefix vertan. Gib es ne Möglichkeit die Dateien nun wieder zu entfehrnen außer von hand?? mfg Christoph installiert = configure, make, maki install ? Evtl. kannst du den Apache per make uninstall (o.ä.) entfernen, kommt auf dein Makefile an. Ansonsten sollte(TM) ja nicht so viel passieren wenn du ihn per Hand entfernst und dann einfach nochmal neu installierst. Paul -- : Bitte einen Realname benutzen, unter dem Zitat antworten : und einfache Text-Mails senden (kein HTML). : Danke. -- Apache HTTP Server Mailing List users-de unsubscribe-Anfragen an [EMAIL PROTECTED] sonstige Anfragen an [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is Win32 Apache ready for prime time?
I'm running it with both PHP5 and mod_perl, without any problems, and I am using the binary (no recompile here, no M$ visual studio) A success story! Perhaps you can share with me your setup process: 1. Are you installing from WAMP, or via direct binary download from Apache? 2. Are you using the MSI install from ActiveState + modperl 2 via the theoryx5 ppd for Apache 2.2? 3. Any other steps you took (special httpd.conf?) will be helpful To paint the picture correctly: I have no issues running modperl + Apache2.2 + Windows XP running 99% of the time. It's that 1% that panics the clients. Thanks. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Access problem with https port
Hi, I have installed Apache 2.0.58 on RHEL 5.0.(Red Hat Linux Enterprise edition 5.0) Also i have configured it with SSL. I am able to access the webserver page with HTTP port but am not able to access with HTTPS port. I have checked the logs, i am getting this message Apache/2.0.58 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.0.58 OpenSSL/0.9.8c configured -- resuming normal operations, also the process are starting properly. On RHEL 5.0 , Apache 2.2.3 is a included software, by default. Also i have tried installing Apache 2.2.3 on RHEL 5, but in that case even http port is not working. Is that becoz Apache 2.2.3 is already installed on this machine , there could be any conflict? Any suggestion towards this,will be highly appreciated. Kindly reply. Thanks, Renu - TV dinner still cooling? Check out Tonight's Picks on Yahoo! TV.
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is Win32 Apache ready for prime time?
Foo JH wrote: I'm running it with both PHP5 and mod_perl, without any problems, and I am using the binary (no recompile here, no M$ visual studio) A success story! Perhaps you can share with me your setup process: 1. Are you installing from WAMP, or via direct binary download from Apache? 2. Are you using the MSI install from ActiveState + modperl 2 via the theoryx5 ppd for Apache 2.2? 3. Any other steps you took (special httpd.conf?) will be helpful To paint the picture correctly: I have no issues running modperl + Apache2.2 + Windows XP running 99% of the time. It's that 1% that panics the clients. Thanks. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Direct DL from apache, then using PHP5 (I was lazy and instead of compiling the module myself, I downloaded from Apache Lounge). I didn't use ActiveState, etc. as I already had Perl on my box from working with it for school, so I got mod_perl and installed it, nothing really complex was needed, beyond sorting out a real nightmare of which php.ini is the real php.ini (after the PHP5 install I had three of them in use, one in c:\php\php5, one in c:\windows, one in c:\windows\system32) I had some trouble with the MySQLi php module, for some reason it wouldn't ever work right, but when I used the plain MySQL one, I had no trouble. MySQL was installed from the latest community build available at that time (about a year ago) and was an uneventful install. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] KRB5 context is not updated when starting a new Apache session (using mod_auth_kerb)
Hi. I am using a Linux-From-Scratch based Linux, with OpenLdap-2.3.27, Heimdal-0.7.2, Apache-httpd-2.2.4, mod_auth_kerb-5.3 and php-5.2.1. I'm trying to use OpenLDAP (over Heimdal GSSAPI with KRB5) from mod_php under Apache (using php's ldap_sasl_bind with GSSAPI as mechanism - it calls lsap_sasl_interactive_bind_s). Apache is configured to re-use processes for handling multiple sessions (mpm_workers_module with MaxRequestsPerChild of 0). The first time my code runs inside any given httpd process it works OK. After that it always fails with credentials error, which points to non-existing credentials file from the previous time. After some digging I discovered that the problem is due to KRB5CCNAME evironment variable changes. When a process is re-used by Apache, it first invokes mob_auth_kerb which authenticates and sets KRB5CCNAME environment variable. The problem is that GSSAPI already has an existing KRB5 context (from the previous time) which already has default_cc_name. KRB5 does not re-read the environment variable and stays with incorrect credentials file name. It looks as if GSSAPI is not designed to be invoked from process handling multiple sessions, because it does not have either of: 1) A way to re-initialize the default credentials file if the environment changes 2) A ways to destory underlying KRB5 context after the work is completed by the previous session. I have an ugly hackish solution that solves my problem: In Heimdal's KRB5 cache.cc: krb5_cc_default_name() I've changed if (context-default_cc_name == NULL) krb5_cc_set_default_name(context, NULL); To: if ((context-default_cc_name == NULL) || strcmp(context-default_cc_name, getenv(KRB5CCNAME))) krb5_cc_set_default_name(context, NULL); Which always checks the environment variables whenever default name is required. Another solution would be to modify mod_auth_kerb, to update GSSAPI KRB5 context when KRB5CCNAME is changed. This also looks extremely ugly to me. I didn't try to do that, but it should solve the problem. Yet another solution is to configure Apache to kill each process after handling 1 request. This is extremely undesirable, and will cause other problems for me. What would be the proper solution for this? Thanks, Gil Ran. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] How to store loginformation in user specified directory?
Hi, We are facing a tight problem regarding a user requirement to store logfile in user specified directory.We are getting segmentation fault when we are starting apache when we try to use a log file in user defined directory(other than logs/). We used fopen(),fprintf() to write the user specified file.This always gave segmentation fault.The one option we had regarding using ErrorLog is failing since httpd.conf recognises path w.r.t ServerRoot. Did any one has done this before? Is this possible ? If so please suggest a way out. Thanks regards, Ramakrishna The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. www.wipro.com
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is Win32 Apache ready for prime time?
I'm running Apache 2.2.4 with PHP 5 to enable my blog, and it's been very stable since I installed it in April. The only beef I have is its tendency to keep slowly sucking RAM as the days roll by, so I've been resorting to restarting it on occasion to keep the usage low. I don't know if it's a memory leak or just normal behavior for my situation and config, and I confess I haven't investigated it in any depth yet. None of what you described, in any case. Mark Foo JH wrote: Hey Sam, Just to check: are you running Apache 2.2 only from the binary, w/o any PHP/ modperl addons? Ummm, actually Win32 Apache 2.2 is *VERY* stable, my current server is running on an XP home box (so shoot me) and has been up over six months! I have never seen anything such as that exit status, perhaps you should try to chase that down? - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is Win32 Apache ready for prime time?
--- Mark A. Craig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm running Apache 2.2.4 with PHP 5 to enable my blog, and it's been very stable since I installed it in April. The only beef I have is its tendency to keep slowly sucking RAM as the days roll by, so I've been resorting to restarting it on occasion to keep the usage low. I don't know if it's a memory leak or just normal behavior for my situation and config, and I confess I haven't investigated it in any depth yet. AFAIK, this isn't that uncommon, with windows itself. You may need to adjust the memory management settings for windows to resolve this. I know a number of people who have the memory hog effect slowing their windows systems down even without having a server on the system, so even if apache didn't have very good memory management it could still be windows. The other issue is the php scripts, they might be using keep-alive connections, which the sql server backend could then be sucking resources causing the slow response times. With enough resources eaten up, no oftware will be completely stable, so whatever is actually eating the resources is the cause of your odd errors. Jaqui Ask a question on any topic and get answers from real people. Go to Yahoo! Answers and share what you know at http://ca.answers.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is Win32 Apache ready for prime time?
Regarding Apache 2.2 on Windows, does anyone know how can I set it for waiting more when trying to start or stop it? If I do net stop apache2.2 It tries to stop for a long time, then it gives the error that it can't be stopped. But it continues to try stopping, and in the meantime I cannot start it again. Then, sometimes I try to start it with net start apache2.2 It tries to start, but it gives an error telling that it cannot start. However, it continues to try starting, and finally it really starts. I am using a Catalyst application with mod_perl. Thank you. Octavian - Original Message - From: Jess Holle To: users@httpd.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 8:38 AM Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is Win32 Apache ready for prime time? William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: morgan gangwere wrote: i will agree that the win32 version of apache is *godly* stable - im running somwthing like 2.2.3 win32 - a nice stable version. Note that 2.2.4 fixed a *number* of bugs (and introduced one into Win2000, the flaw of resolving all clients as 0.0.0.0 - disable win32 acceptex to work around that one). 2.2.5 will be substantially improved over 2.2.4, as well. That's nice to hear. When will 2.2.5 see the light of day, though? -- Jess Holle
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 + Logging partial requests
Quoting Joshua Slive ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): See: http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/Logs/Response_Size Nice. Thanks. % apache2 -l | grep logio mod_logio.c Will work on that then, thanks alot! Regards, Sander. -- | Those who get too big for their britches will be exposed in the end. | 1024D/08CEC94D - 34B3 3314 B146 E13C 70C8 9BDB D463 7E41 08CE C94D - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] My Question
An apache module running on one machine, wants to communicate with another module running under apache on remote machine.The communication should be authenticated by using certificates on both sides. Does mod_ssl plays any role to authenticate the module certificates, without requiring any concerning API implementation from the user? if yes ,How ?. Remember I have provided certificates to each modules on both sides to authenticate. Kindly , Provide the details , How can I Authenticate two remote modules running on different servers , if mod_ssl is not going to help me. ? Best Regards Ravi
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WAMP stack
Thank you for responding. There does not appear to be any such file on apache.org. Did you mean apacheconf, which appears to be a separate website selling a gui for apache? Forgive me if I am being too literal, but I don't know what is slang and what is specifcally required. If you tell me where to look I will gladly go there. Thx. morgan gangwere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Nat Colley wrote: I got a wamp stack from a developer, and I have not been able to make vhosts work. While recognizing it is entirely possible I did something wrong, I notice that in this configuration he has changed the files the web is served content from htdocs to something else, and further aliased that to yet another directory where the applications are. So mydomain1 and mydomain2 both go to the same page, and mydomain1/app2 comes up even though app2 is supposed to be the content for mydomain2. I asked about this and he is being unusually slow about responding. So here is my question: Can this webserver configuration, by itself, keep vhosts from working? Thx. read the docs on apache.org under the apache.conf helpers - you should be able to find what you need (did you already do this? if so, pardon my ignorance) - -- Just a Thought Morgan Gangwere For those who want my PGP key: http://pengunassasin.kicks-ass.org/pgpKey.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGXOmmCF9T/dUsmAgRAlazAJ971Fnreu5TzuvLxWaLi8TMhQfPLgCggmEN jGb2RktRI3iTm/uhlMNaFDI= =LuoQ -END PGP SIGNATURE- - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Need Mail bonding? Go to the Yahoo! Mail QA for great tips from Yahoo! Answers users.
RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] My Question
-Original Message- From: Ravi Prakash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 2:07 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] My Question An apache module running on one machine, wants to communicate with another module running under apache on remote machine.The communication should be authenticated by using certificates on both sides. Does mod_ssl plays any role to authenticate the module certificates, without requiring any concerning API implementation from the user? if yes ,How ?. Remember I have provided certificates to each modules on both sides to authenticate. By an amazing coincidence, another poster asked this very question just a few days ago! You can find the answer here: http://marc.info/?l=apache-httpd-usersm=118008898312318w=2 Rgds, Owen Boyle Disclaimer: Any disclaimer attached to this message may be ignored. Kindly , Provide the details , How can I Authenticate two remote modules running on different servers , if mod_ssl is not going to help me. ? Best Regards Ravi This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender urgently and then immediately delete the message and any copies of it from your system. Please also immediately destroy any hardcopies of the message. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. The sender's company reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through their networks. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state them to be the views of the sender's company. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TRACE and Apache 2.x
I was having similar problem with the Apache 2.2.3-4 version and finally
figured out that the TRACE option must be inside the virtual host
configuration file (and not apache2.conf). Hope it helps.
Bhagwati
Foster, Stephen (ASPIRE) wrote:
We never got this to work properly.We ended up moving to 2.0.55 and using the
traceenable feature:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/core.html#traceenable
-Original Message-
From: Jeroen Vriezen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 May 2007 09:57
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TRACE and Apache 2.x
Hello,
Currently we are using Apache 2.0.46. On the 1.3.x version we always used the
following mod_rewrite rule to disable the TRACE option:
RewriteEngine on
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_METHOD} ^TRACE
RewriteRule .* - [F]
When using these rules on Apache 2.0.46, TRACE is still possible. Beside the fact
that the whole TRACK TRACE
security issue is not that interesting, I still wonder how TRACE can be
disabled in Apache 2.0.46. I've also tried the TraceEnable option but that
options seems to be supported in 2.0.55 and later only.
Hope someone can point me in the right direction.
Kind Regards,
Jeroen.
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] question
Hi, I want certificate based authentication among remotely located apache modules just like client/server authentication. Does mod_ssl provides any mechanism to do it? If no, how can I authenticate a module to a remote module ? Thanks Ravi
RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] question
Ravi, Are you looking at the answers that are being posted ? Are they getting thrown to your junk mail by accident? I think this is the third time in a very short time I see this question. Luis From: Ravi Prakash [mailto:] Sent: quarta-feira, 30 de Maio de 2007 14:20 To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] question Hi, I want certificate based authentication among remotely located apache modules just like client/server authentication. Does mod_ssl provides any mechanism to do it? If no, how can I authenticate a module to a remote module ? Thanks Ravi
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to store loginformation in user specified directory?
On 5/30/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, We are facing a tight problem regarding a user requirement to store logfile in user specified directory.We are getting segmentation fault when we are starting apache when we try to use a log file in user defined directory(other than logs/). We used fopen(),fprintf() to write the user specified file.This always gave segmentation fault.The one option we had regarding using ErrorLog is failing since httpd.conf recognises path w.r.t ServerRoot. Did any one has done this before? Is this possible ? If so please suggest a way out. That doesn't really make any sense to me. Apache will happily write the access and error logs wherever you tell it, if the permissions are correct and there is sufficient space. Have you tried starting apache under strace to see what syscall is failing? Have you tried debugging the core dump? I also don't understand what you mean when you say you used fopen(),fprintf(). Why do you need to use these? It is apache that controls the log files directly. Finally, you should heed the warning in the docs that logs shouldn't be written anywhere that root does not exclusively control. Otherwise, whatever user controls the log directory can almost certainly gain root. Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WAMP stack
On 5/29/07, Nat Colley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I got a wamp stack from a developer, and I have not been able to make vhosts work. While recognizing it is entirely possible I did something wrong, I notice that in this configuration he has changed the files the web is served content from htdocs to something else, and further aliased that to yet another directory where the applications are. So mydomain1 and mydomain2 both go to the same page, and mydomain1/app2 comes up even though app2 is supposed to be the content for mydomain2. I asked about this and he is being unusually slow about responding. So here is my question: Can this webserver configuration, by itself, keep vhosts from working? Thx. I find this question relatively hard to decipher. Virtual hosts will work if they are configured correctly. But you haven't given us any idea about how your vhosts are configured. Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] question
On 5/30/07, Ravi Prakash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I want certificate based authentication among remotely located apache modules just like client/server authentication. Does mod_ssl provides any mechanism to do it? If no, how can I authenticate a module to a remote module ? Apache has no such thing as remote module(s). Please be more specific about what you are trying to do. (One guess is that you are using a reverse proxy to send requests from one apache instance to another. In that case, yes, you should be able to use certificate auth between the two servers. See the SSLProxy* directives. But I've never done this myself so I don't know the details.) Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WAMP stack
--- Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/29/07, Nat Colley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I got a wamp stack from a developer, and I have not been able to make vhosts work. While recognizing it is entirely possible I did something wrong, I notice that in this configuration he has changed the files the web is served content from htdocs to something else, and further aliased that to yet another directory where the applications are. So mydomain1 and mydomain2 both go to the same page, and mydomain1/app2 comes up even though app2 is supposed to be the content for mydomain2. I asked about this and he is being unusually slow about responding. So here is my question: Can this webserver configuration, by itself, keep vhosts from working? Thx. I find this question relatively hard to decipher. Virtual hosts will work if they are configured correctly. But you haven't given us any idea about how your vhosts are configured. Joshua. Yes and no Joshua, a friend of mine has 3 domains that his hosting service has all mapped to the same virtual host, which seems to be the main issue of the op. I probably caught the question because of my friends issue. :) Until Nat, can get us the vhost configuration we can't really answer what is wrong, since there are many ways that the config could wind up pointing to the wrong vhost. Jaqui Get news delivered with the All new Yahoo! Mail. Enjoy RSS feeds right on your Mail page. Start today at http://mrd.mail.yahoo.com/try_beta?.intl=ca - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] question
Hi, Details: 1. I have to use two apache web servers on two machines having some modules in each of them. 2. Any of the apache module should be able to communicate with the apache module of another machine. 3. I want ,when modules interact to each other on two machines , they could use certificate based authentication to identify each other. That is the work I want to do. Certainly U people will help me. Thanks Ravi -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua Slive Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 7:36 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] question On 5/30/07, Ravi Prakash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I want certificate based authentication among remotely located apache modules just like client/server authentication. Does mod_ssl provides any mechanism to do it? If no, how can I authenticate a module to a remote module ? Apache has no such thing as remote module(s). Please be more specific about what you are trying to do. (One guess is that you are using a reverse proxy to send requests from one apache instance to another. In that case, yes, you should be able to use certificate auth between the two servers. See the SSLProxy* directives. But I've never done this myself so I don't know the details.) Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] question
On 5/30/07, Ravi Prakash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Details: 1. I have to use two apache web servers on two machines having some modules in each of them. 2. Any of the apache module should be able to communicate with the apache module of another machine. 3. I want ,when modules interact to each other on two machines , they could use certificate based authentication to identify each other. I'm starting to get irritated here. Either provide us with the details or go hire a consultant. How do you expect the modules to communicate? What kind of modules are we talking about? Did I or did I not guess right that you are talking about using a reverse proxy and HTTP for the communicating between the servers? If I did guess right, have you read the SSL docs and configured the SSLProxy* directives as written there? Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems with an extra Rewrite Rule before a RewriteCond
Hi.
I'm trying to create an additional Rewrite Rule appart from those
created by default by my application (in this case, Wordpress). The
extra line (within '.htaccess') is:
---
RewriteRule ^faq index.php?page_id=119 [R,L]
---
However, I want users see 'http://myblog.com/faq' and not
'http://myblog.com/index.php?page_id=379'. This line works with other
Apache configurations, but not with mine. Any suggestion?
.htaccess
-
RewriteEngine On
RewriteBase /
DirectoryIndex index.php
# MY OWN REWRITE RULES
RewriteRule ^faq index.php?page_id=119 [R,L]
# Rewrite www.domain.com to domain.com
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www\.(.*)
RewriteRule ^(.*) http://%1/$1 [R,L]
#uploaded files
RewriteRule ^(.*/)?files/$ index.php [L]
RewriteRule ^(.*/)?files/(.*) wp-content/blogs.php?file=$2 [L]
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} -f [OR]
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} -d
RewriteRule . - [L]
RewriteRule ^([_0-9a-zA-Z-]+/)?(wp-.*) $2 [L]
RewriteRule ^([_0-9a-zA-Z-]+/)?(.*\.php)$ $2 [L]
RewriteRule . index.php [L]
--
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems with an extra Rewrite Rule before a RewriteCond
On 30/05/07, thomas Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi. I'm trying to create an additional Rewrite Rule appart from those created by default by my application (in this case, Wordpress). The extra line (within '.htaccess') is: --- RewriteRule ^faq index.php?page_id=119 [R,L] --- However, I want users see 'http://myblog.com/faq' and not 'http://myblog.com/index.php?page_id=379'. This line works with other Apache configurations, but not with mine. Any suggestion? How exactly isn't is working? Do you see a loop? What does the error log tell you? Are you able to edit the main server config file to enable rewrite logging? -- noodl - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems with an extra Rewrite Rule before a RewriteCond
How exactly isn't is working? Instead of 'http://myblog.com/faq' URL I see 'http://myblog.com/index.php?page_id=379'. The information is OK, but I think it's an ugly URL. Do you see a loop? Nope What does the error log tell you? There's no error Are you able to edit the main server config file to enable rewrite logging? Yep, but I've got the same problem. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems with an extra Rewrite Rule before a RewriteCond
On 5/30/07, thomas Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How exactly isn't is working? Instead of 'http://myblog.com/faq' URL I see 'http://myblog.com/index.php?page_id=379'. The information is OK, but I think it's an ugly URL. Start by replacing the [R] flag with [PT] and then see what you get. Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems with an extra Rewrite Rule before a RewriteCond
The R flag means redirect. You want P for proxy if you want the URL to not change, but this brings with it a host of other issues. Russ Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile. -Original Message- From: Vincent Bray [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 17:02:25 To:users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems with an extra Rewrite Rule before a RewriteCond On 30/05/07, thomas Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi. I'm trying to create an additional Rewrite Rule appart from those created by default by my application (in this case, Wordpress). The extra line (within '.htaccess') is: --- RewriteRule ^faq index.php?page_id=119 [R,L] --- However, I want users see 'http://myblog.com/faq' and not 'http://myblog.com/index.php?page_id=379'. This line works with other Apache configurations, but not with mine. Any suggestion? How exactly isn't is working? Do you see a loop? What does the error log tell you? Are you able to edit the main server config file to enable rewrite logging? -- noodl - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems with an extra Rewrite Rule before a RewriteCond
On 30/05/07, Russ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The R flag means redirect. You want P for proxy if you want the URL to not
change, but this brings with it a host of other issues.
Russ, you're correct regarding [R] but incorrect pertaining to [P] in
this case. He's rewriting to a local script so there's no need for
proxying. And as he requested, the client won't see the change.
However, I suspect he'll see a loop as this is in .htaccess and
further down the ruleset '.' is rewritten to index.php again.
Thomas, if you get a loop, add this line before your custom rule:
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !index.php
--
noodl
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems with an extra Rewrite Rule before a RewriteCond
I'm a bit confused. R means redirect, meaning the server sends the 301 or 302
header to the browser. In either case, the browse will redirect to the new URL
and that's what will show in the address bar. How evactly do you make things
redirect without proxying and without a change in the address bar?
Russ
Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile.
-Original Message-
From: Vincent Bray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 17:33:47
To:users@httpd.apache.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems with an extra Rewrite Rule before a
RewriteCond
On 30/05/07, Russ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The R flag means redirect. You want P for proxy if you want the URL to not
change, but this brings with it a host of other issues.
Russ, you're correct regarding [R] but incorrect pertaining to [P] in
this case. He's rewriting to a local script so there's no need for
proxying. And as he requested, the client won't see the change.
However, I suspect he'll see a loop as this is in .htaccess and
further down the ruleset '.' is rewritten to index.php again.
Thomas, if you get a loop, add this line before your custom rule:
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !index.php
--
noodl
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems with an extra Rewrite Rule before a RewriteCond
On 30/05/07, Russ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm a bit confused. R means redirect, meaning the server sends the 301 or 302 header to the browser. In either case, the browse will redirect to the new URL and that's what will show in the address bar. How evactly do you make things redirect without proxying and without a change in the address bar? Do as Joshua pointed out. First try without any flags at all, and in case that doesn't work try with [PT]. I expect you won't need any flags. -- noodl - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] RewriteMap questions
I have been asked to create rewrite rules for sites that use an old
page naming scheme to a new one. The first attempt was to create
a .htaccess file that had a rewrite rule for every page, something
like:
RewriteRule ^new_page_name.php$ /sitepages/pid123.php [L,QSA,NC]
Works ok for small sites, but some of them have thousands of pages
which translates to thousands of RewriteRules which of course bogs
down the apache server.
I was going to look at creating a rewritemap using a .db hash file -
my main concern is that we have some existing URL's that map to
actual files on the system. My thought was to do something like this:
RewriteMap existing prg:/path/to/file/map.pl
RewriteMap redirects dbm:/path/to/file/map.db
RewriteRule ^/(.*) ${existing:$1} [L,QSA]
RewriteRule ^/(.*) ${redirects:$1} [L,QSA]
My thought being that the first map is a program that tests if the
URL matches an actual file/dir in the doc root, returning NULL if it
doesn't. If it matches then processing would stop and the first
RewriteRule would work. But if it doesn't match, does the second
RewriteRule even get executed? If not, do I then have to resort to a
single map that is a perl program that first checks if the URL maps
to a page and if not manually reads the map file?
Also, curious if anyone has a PhP example of a map program, I'm a
little more proficient in that - or even python...
Thanks,
Josh
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RewriteMap questions
On 5/30/07, Josh Trutwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been asked to create rewrite rules for sites that use an old
page naming scheme to a new one. The first attempt was to create
a .htaccess file that had a rewrite rule for every page, something
like:
RewriteRule ^new_page_name.php$ /sitepages/pid123.php [L,QSA,NC]
Works ok for small sites, but some of them have thousands of pages
which translates to thousands of RewriteRules which of course bogs
down the apache server.
I was going to look at creating a rewritemap using a .db hash file -
my main concern is that we have some existing URL's that map to
actual files on the system. My thought was to do something like this:
RewriteMap existing prg:/path/to/file/map.pl
RewriteMap redirects dbm:/path/to/file/map.db
RewriteRule ^/(.*) ${existing:$1} [L,QSA]
RewriteRule ^/(.*) ${redirects:$1} [L,QSA]
My thought being that the first map is a program that tests if the
URL matches an actual file/dir in the doc root, returning NULL if it
doesn't. If it matches then processing would stop and the first
RewriteRule would work. But if it doesn't match, does the second
RewriteRule even get executed? If not, do I then have to resort to a
single map that is a perl program that first checks if the URL maps
to a page and if not manually reads the map file?
Also, curious if anyone has a PhP example of a map program, I'm a
little more proficient in that - or even python...
Don't use a map program if you can avoid it. The dbm maps are safer and faster.
What you want is easy enough to get, using something like
RewriteCond ${existing:$1|NOT-FOUND} =NOT-FOUND
RewriteRule ^/(.*) ${redirects:$1} [L,QSA]
You could also, if you want, simply use a RewriteCond to test if the
file being requested exists on the filesystem. See the -d and -f
tests.
Joshua.
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Undefined symbol ap_run_http_method
All, I'm trying to configure my Apache webserver with a Web Authentication system. When I try to start up my server, I'm getting the following error: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/apache2/bin$ ./apachectl start httpd: Syntax error on line 39 of /usr/local/apache2/conf/httpd.conf: Cannot load /export/opt/SiteMinder/webagent5QMR7/lib/libmod_sm20.so into server: ld.so.1: httpd: fatal: relocation error: file /export/ opt/ SiteMinder/webagent5QMR7/lib/libmod_sm20.so: symbol ap_run_http_method: referenced symbol not found I initially thought it might an LD_LIBRARY_PATH issue but an ldd on / export/opt/SiteMinder/webagent5QMR7/lib/libmod_sm20.so told me that everything is well defined. When I ran nm on this file and grepped for the missing symbol, it showed up: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/apache2/bin$ /usr/xpg4/bin/nm /export/ opt/SiteMinder/webagent5QMR7/lib/libmod_sm20.so | grep http [5799] | 0| 0|FUNC |GLOB |0|UNDEF | ap_run_http_method Hence there is an undefined symbol in this file. How do I fix this? Thanks in advance, Sashi - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RewriteMap questions
On Wed, 30 May 2007 15:06:27 -0400
Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/30/07, Josh Trutwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been asked to create rewrite rules for sites that use an
old page naming scheme to a new one. The first attempt was to
create a .htaccess file that had a rewrite rule for every page,
something like:
RewriteRule ^new_page_name.php$ /sitepages/pid123.php [L,QSA,NC]
Works ok for small sites, but some of them have thousands of pages
which translates to thousands of RewriteRules which of course bogs
down the apache server.
I was going to look at creating a rewritemap using a .db hash
file - my main concern is that we have some existing URL's that
map to actual files on the system. My thought was to do
something like this:
RewriteMap existing prg:/path/to/file/map.pl
RewriteMap redirects dbm:/path/to/file/map.db
RewriteRule ^/(.*) ${existing:$1} [L,QSA]
RewriteRule ^/(.*) ${redirects:$1} [L,QSA]
My thought being that the first map is a program that tests if the
URL matches an actual file/dir in the doc root, returning NULL if
it doesn't. If it matches then processing would stop and the
first RewriteRule would work. But if it doesn't match, does the
second RewriteRule even get executed? If not, do I then have to
resort to a single map that is a perl program that first checks
if the URL maps to a page and if not manually reads the map file?
Also, curious if anyone has a PhP example of a map program, I'm a
little more proficient in that - or even python...
Don't use a map program if you can avoid it. The dbm maps are safer
and faster.
What you want is easy enough to get, using something like
RewriteCond ${existing:$1|NOT-FOUND} =NOT-FOUND
RewriteRule ^/(.*) ${redirects:$1} [L,QSA]
You could also, if you want, simply use a RewriteCond to test if the
file being requested exists on the filesystem. See the -d and -f
tests.
Thanks - great suggestions - now my next issue. This is all done in
VirtualHosts, I noticed RewriteMap cannot be declared in a .htaccess
so I put it in the VirtualHost like so:
VirtualHost *:80
VirtualDocumentRoot /httpd/%0/html
RewriteMap rewriter dbm:/httpd/%0/html/rewrite_map.db
/VirtualHost
The RewriteMap doesn't seem to replace the %0 with the directory name
- so I have a directory /httpd/josh.test.com/html which has
rewrite_map.db.pag and rewrite_map.db.dir. I created a .htaccess in
josh.test.com/html:
RewriteRule ^(.*) ${rewriter:$1} [R]
When attempting to access the site though I get a No such file or
directory error on /httpd/%0/html/rewrite_map.db.pag
Can I declare the RewriteMap once as above to map to each
VirtualHost's directory?
Thanks! Feels like this is getting a lot closer.
Josh
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RewriteMap questions
On 5/30/07, Josh Trutwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks - great suggestions - now my next issue. This is all done in
VirtualHosts, I noticed RewriteMap cannot be declared in a .htaccess
so I put it in the VirtualHost like so:
VirtualHost *:80
VirtualDocumentRoot /httpd/%0/html
RewriteMap rewriter dbm:/httpd/%0/html/rewrite_map.db
/VirtualHost
The RewriteMap doesn't seem to replace the %0 with the directory name
- so I have a directory /httpd/josh.test.com/html which has
rewrite_map.db.pag and rewrite_map.db.dir. I created a .htaccess in
josh.test.com/html:
RewriteRule ^(.*) ${rewriter:$1} [R]
When attempting to access the site though I get a No such file or
directory error on /httpd/%0/html/rewrite_map.db.pag
Can I declare the RewriteMap once as above to map to each
VirtualHost's directory?
No. The %0 notation is specific to mod_vhost_alias. It can't be used
in any other directive. (In particular, RewriteMaps are initialized at
server startup, so it doesn't work to make their location a
per-request variable.)
You can either manually define a separate rewritemap for each
hostname, or you can use a single rewritemap for all the hosts and use
the hostname as part of the lookup key.
Joshua.
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Strange mod_cache expires header interaction
On Fri, 25 May 2007, Joshua Slive wrote: I would try two things: 1. mod_disk_cache, which is better tested and maintained than mod_mem_cache, and will often be just as performant given a good virtual file system layer. Using disk cache for storage instead of memory cache seems to work. Would it be worth filing a bug report with mod_mem_cache? 2. Remove the gzip encoding. There are some fixes recently introduced in trunk for problems with vary-processing in the cache. These may (or may not) be causing the problem you see. They will probably make it into the next 2.2 release. The gzip filter made no diffrence in this case. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] unknown in .htaccess files
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 @all im setting up a webcam to do some remote admin, but I dont want people to just see what im doing. I have a simple system with this hierarchy: / + webcam/ - .htaccess - .htpasswd + pics/ - current.jpg - etc - index.htm [rest of site] how secure is this? if /webcam/ is a link to C:\wamp\www\webcam\ then should i put my .htpasswd in say c:\wamp\.htpasswd-webcam instead? also, how do i make a different page for say the user admin come up? help is appreciated (and don't criticize me on .htaccess - i like it. and i dont have anything better readily availible - -- Just a Thought Morgan Gangwere For those who want my PGP key: http://pengunassasin.kicks-ass.org/pgpKey.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGXfrCCF9T/dUsmAgRAvkIAJ4jlaIbYBzHt1EZCBegbCxkIhVyGACeKs3h fM7skA0evc3vJ/L8c+OZQYc= =hhC/ -END PGP SIGNATURE- - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is Win32 Apache ready for prime time?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Jess Holle wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: morgan gangwere wrote: i will agree that the win32 version of apache is *godly* stable - im running something like 2.2.3 win32 - a nice stable version. Note that 2.2.4 fixed a *number* of bugs (and introduced one into Win2000, the flaw of resolving all clients as 0.0.0.0 - disable win32 acceptex to work around that one). 2.2.5 will be substantially improved over 2.2.4, as well. That's nice to hear. When will 2.2.5 see the light of day, though? Given interesting news that hit the light of day, early next week, most likely. Depends on how long it takes someone to hack the pid table for the parent processes out of the scoreboard and into the parent process's local hash. [snip] heres my side: Foo JH Said: Hello morgan, Ya Know, i have an apache WAMP5 box runnin on xp home too! and other than net downtime and power outages, its been up ~3mo! i will agree that the win32 version of apache is *godly* stable - im running somwthing like 2.2.3 win32 - a nice stable version. Yes I am enjoying Apache on Win32 too. But my question to be specific is: 1. Apache will automatically recover when it faults (in my case), so you may not notice the problem. Can you check your error log if you are experiencing the same error message as well? in my case, XAMPP (the ApacheFriends dist.) fails completely because of the FTP daemon, but otherwise is fine. Apache Win32 when installed as a windows service works well, and I have only seen it fail in _very_ limited situations (ie 300 requests for admin.htt - an IIS page) but it came back and was running nice and fine with about 1 minute of downtime (how long it took for the machine to restart the service!) I got one error that came close to it - it was related to memory in my case, apache doing a malloc to big for my 32 megs of memory avail to it (caused by mod_php - uploading a 45 mb file!) could it have been the perl script running pushing a file over the system? 2. Since you are on WAMP (P = PHP?) Are you running PHP scripts intensively? Wamp is a port of the LAMP server idea to Windows - i'm running the latest (only really works with apache 2.2.3 because of a special mod_wampadmin addon) in my case, the WAMP part is really this: Apache 2.2.3 with some extras to handle talking to the control daemon using a special device (a named pipe really) PHP 2 MySQL 5 Windows XP Home build #2600 PEAR (for PHP/Perl/Apache comms apparently - im not sure) as long as theres no security problems with the stale version, im fine with it. Hope that helps - -- Just a Thought Morgan Gangwere For those who want my PGP key: http://pengunassasin.kicks-ass.org/pgpKey.html *** Wisdom for the day *** * Dont rawquote - it gives * * spammers free bait! * ** -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGXf7zCF9T/dUsmAgRAtDaAKCWz6mfMKA1vQGPkB4od1rOveztLgCg2NLZ QriiKf6QPmIbgl4TUj7VAtk= =4uL2 -END PGP SIGNATURE- - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Strange mod_cache expires header interaction
On 5/30/07, Christopher Shumway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 25 May 2007, Joshua Slive wrote: I would try two things: 1. mod_disk_cache, which is better tested and maintained than mod_mem_cache, and will often be just as performant given a good virtual file system layer. Using disk cache for storage instead of memory cache seems to work. Would it be worth filing a bug report with mod_mem_cache? Sure. Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_cache not caching /
I'm doing some testing with mod_cache, using disk cache. What I've noticed is that if I hit example.com/index.*, it will cache it and serve it from the cache as well. However, if I just go to http://www.example.com, it isn't cached. This happens with any index page served without giving the name of the index file in the URL. This is with Apache 2.2.4. Has anyone run into this issue before? What should I check for? Thanks, Matt Lehner - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to store loginformation in user specified directory?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Joshua Slive wrote: On 5/30/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, We are facing a tight problem regarding a user requirement to store logfile in user specified directory.We are getting segmentation fault when we are starting apache when we try to use a log file in user defined directory(other than logs/). We used fopen(),fprintf() to write the user specified file.This always gave segmentation fault.The one option we had regarding using ErrorLog is failing since httpd.conf recognises path w.r.t ServerRoot. Did any one has done this before? [did anyone has done this before == has anyone done this before-p] Is this possible ? If so please suggest a way out. That doesn't really make any sense to me. Apache will happily write the access and error logs wherever you tell it, if the permissions are correct and there is sufficient space. Have you tried starting apache under strace to see what syscall is failing? Have you tried debugging the core dump? I also don't understand what you mean when you say you used fopen(),fprintf(). Why do you need to use these? It is apache that controls the log files directly. Finally, you should heed the warning in the docs that logs shouldn't be written anywhere that root does not exclusively control. Otherwise, whatever user controls the log directory can almost certainly gain root. Joshua. agreed. what i _think_ (pullin things outta the air) is that theres something running thats reading in the apache log files as they're being written - something garunteed to segfault. a _proper_ way to do this would be read (or type) /path/to/logfile /path/to/new/log this will read in the logfile and concatenate it to the proper place. the only thing needed is have the permissions to the directory. However, i may be wrong... correct me if i am - -- Just a Thought Morgan Gangwere For those who want my PGP key: http://pengunassasin.kicks-ass.org/pgpKey.html *** Wisdom for the day *** * Dont rawquote - it gives * * spammers free bait! * ** -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGXgI5CF9T/dUsmAgRAlfUAJ0eIomVZCdyHEY9uBL+QOZ/huLQPACfXUc8 G2mN9YqGRtXkFbaRG0WhvQM= =dbI+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_cache not caching /
On 5/30/07, Matt Lehner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm doing some testing with mod_cache, using disk cache. What I've noticed is that if I hit example.com/index.*, it will cache it and serve it from the cache as well. However, if I just go to http://www.example.com, it isn't cached. This happens with any index page served without giving the name of the index file in the URL. This is with Apache 2.2.4. Has anyone run into this issue before? What should I check for? Show us the HTTP response headers and the ErrorLog output at LogLevel debug for the case where it caches and the case where it doesn't. Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_cache not caching /
Here's the log for no index in the URL: [Tue May 15 15:53:41 2007] [debug] mod_cache.c(129): Adding CACHE_SAVE filter for / [Tue May 15 15:53:41 2007] [debug] mod_cache.c(136): Adding CACHE_REMOVE_URL filter for / That will just keep repeating, nothing ever shows up as being served. And with: [Tue May 15 17:39:44 2007] [debug] mod_cache.c(129): Adding CACHE_SAVE filter for /index.html [Tue May 15 17:39:44 2007] [debug] mod_cache.c(136): Adding CACHE_REMOVE_URL filter for /index.html [Tue May 15 17:39:51 2007] [debug] mod_cache.c(277): cache: serving /index.html [Tue May 15 17:40:02 2007] [debug] mod_disk_cache.c(477): disk_cache: Recalled cached URL info header http://example.com:80/index.html Here's the VirtualHost entry I was testing with: VirtualHost 10.10.10.10 ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED] DocumentRoot /usr/www ServerName example.com CacheRoot /usr/nobody/cache CacheEnable disk / CacheDirLevels 3 CacheDirLength 2 CacheDefaultExpire 3600 CacheIgnoreCacheControl On CacheIgnoreHeaders Set-Cookie CacheMaxExpire 86400 CacheMinFileSize 1 CacheMaxFileSize 1024000 /VirtualHost Let me know if I need to provide any other info. Matt On Wed, 30 May 2007, Joshua Slive wrote: Show us the HTTP response headers and the ErrorLog output at LogLevel debug for the case where it caches and the case where it doesn't. Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Undefined symbol ap_run_http_method
Sashi, On May 30, 2007, at 12:54 PM, Malladi, Sasikanth wrote: httpd: Syntax error on line 39 of /usr/local/apache2/conf/httpd.conf: Cannot load /export/opt/SiteMinder/webagent5QMR7/lib/libmod_sm20.so into server: ld.so.1: httpd: fatal: relocation error: file /export/ opt/ SiteMinder/webagent5QMR7/lib/libmod_sm20.so: symbol ap_run_http_method: referenced symbol not found This hook was renamed to ap_hook_http_scheme in 2.2. It looks like you're running an Apache 2.2 server using an Apache 2.0 module, and it calls ap_http_method() which is a #define for that hook to run. Even if there was no symbol conflict, the 2.2 server would refuse to load the 2.0 module at a later point in the server startup cycle. How do I fix this? Ask Netegrity for an Apache 2.2 compatible module, or downgrade (unfortunately) to Apache 2.0. S. -- Sander Temme [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_cache not caching /
Sorry, here's the http headers: HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 23:28:01 GMT Server: Apache/2.2.4 Last-Modified: Wed, 16 May 2007 20:21:33 GMT ETag: 134003-2702-189fcd40 Accept-Ranges: bytes Content-Length: 9986 Cache-Control: max-age=300 Expires: Wed, 30 May 2007 23:33:01 GMT Content-Type: text/html Thanks for any assistance. Matt. On Wed, 30 May 2007, Matt Lehner wrote: Here's the log for no index in the URL: [Tue May 15 15:53:41 2007] [debug] mod_cache.c(129): Adding CACHE_SAVE filter for / [Tue May 15 15:53:41 2007] [debug] mod_cache.c(136): Adding CACHE_REMOVE_URL filter for / That will just keep repeating, nothing ever shows up as being served. And with: [Tue May 15 17:39:44 2007] [debug] mod_cache.c(129): Adding CACHE_SAVE filter for /index.html [Tue May 15 17:39:44 2007] [debug] mod_cache.c(136): Adding CACHE_REMOVE_URL filter for /index.html [Tue May 15 17:39:51 2007] [debug] mod_cache.c(277): cache: serving /index.html [Tue May 15 17:40:02 2007] [debug] mod_disk_cache.c(477): disk_cache: Recalled cached URL info header http://example.com:80/index.html Here's the VirtualHost entry I was testing with: VirtualHost 10.10.10.10 ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED] DocumentRoot /usr/www ServerName example.com CacheRoot /usr/nobody/cache CacheEnable disk / CacheDirLevels 3 CacheDirLength 2 CacheDefaultExpire 3600 CacheIgnoreCacheControl On CacheIgnoreHeaders Set-Cookie CacheMaxExpire 86400 CacheMinFileSize 1 CacheMaxFileSize 1024000 /VirtualHost Let me know if I need to provide any other info. Matt On Wed, 30 May 2007, Joshua Slive wrote: Show us the HTTP response headers and the ErrorLog output at LogLevel debug for the case where it caches and the case where it doesn't. Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_cache not caching /
On 5/30/07, Matt Lehner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry, here's the http headers: HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 23:28:01 GMT Server: Apache/2.2.4 Last-Modified: Wed, 16 May 2007 20:21:33 GMT ETag: 134003-2702-189fcd40 Accept-Ranges: bytes Content-Length: 9986 Cache-Control: max-age=300 Expires: Wed, 30 May 2007 23:33:01 GMT Content-Type: text/html That's the case where it is using the cache or not? I certainly don't see anything there that could cause the cache to have problems. Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_cache not caching /
That isn't being cached. I just hit / a few times, here's all I get: [Wed May 30 19:38:34 2007] [debug] mod_cache.c(129): Adding CACHE_SAVE filter for / [Wed May 30 19:38:34 2007] [debug] mod_cache.c(136): Adding CACHE_REMOVE_URL filter for / [Wed May 30 19:38:38 2007] [debug] mod_cache.c(129): Adding CACHE_SAVE filter for / [Wed May 30 19:38:38 2007] [debug] mod_cache.c(136): Adding CACHE_REMOVE_URL filter for / [Wed May 30 19:38:39 2007] [debug] mod_cache.c(129): Adding CACHE_SAVE filter for / [Wed May 30 19:38:39 2007] [debug] mod_cache.c(136): Adding CACHE_REMOVE_URL filter for / [Wed May 30 19:38:40 2007] [debug] mod_cache.c(129): Adding CACHE_SAVE filter for / [Wed May 30 19:38:40 2007] [debug] mod_cache.c(136): Adding CACHE_REMOVE_URL filter for / That's it, no server from cache entries. Matt. On Wed, 30 May 2007, Joshua Slive wrote: On 5/30/07, Matt Lehner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry, here's the http headers: HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 23:28:01 GMT Server: Apache/2.2.4 Last-Modified: Wed, 16 May 2007 20:21:33 GMT ETag: 134003-2702-189fcd40 Accept-Ranges: bytes Content-Length: 9986 Cache-Control: max-age=300 Expires: Wed, 30 May 2007 23:33:01 GMT Content-Type: text/html That's the case where it is using the cache or not? I certainly don't see anything there that could cause the cache to have problems. Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_cache not caching /
On 5/30/07, Matt Lehner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That isn't being cached. Are you doing anything fancy like mod_rewrite? I don't see any explanation. There are some cache fixes going into the next version of 2.2, but I'm not sure whether any of them would help you. Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_cache not caching /
Nope, nothing special at all. It's even the same way if I do something like example.com/blah/. After searching Google, I think I'm the first person to have this issue. Matt On Wed, 30 May 2007, Joshua Slive wrote: On 5/30/07, Matt Lehner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That isn't being cached. Are you doing anything fancy like mod_rewrite? I don't see any explanation. There are some cache fixes going into the next version of 2.2, but I'm not sure whether any of them would help you. Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy_balance never recovers from a worker error with stickysession
Hello, I am running Apache 2.2.3 on RedHat EL 5. I am trying to use Apache to load balance between two local instances of tomcat in order to utilize the vast quantities of RAM on our production server. My httpd setup looks like this: Proxy balancer://tomcat BalancerMember ajp://localhost:8009 min=10 max=100 route=tomcat1 loadfactor=1 retry=120 BalancerMember ajp://localhost:8010 min=10 max=100 route=tomcat2 loadfactor=1 retry=120 /Proxy Location /balancer-manager SetHandler balancer-manager Order deny,allow Deny from all Allow from .trimblecorp.net /Location ProxyPass /dscgi/ds.py/ balancer://tomcat/docushare/dsweb/ stickysession=JSESSIONID nofailover=On ProxyPass /docushare balancer://tomcat/docushare stickysession=JSESSIONID nofailover=On ProxyPass /docushare/ balancer://tomcat/docushare/ stickysession=JSESSIONID nofailover=On The problem is that if one of the workers gets into error status, any client with a JSESSIONID referencing that route is never able to receive a reply, Apache *always* responds with a 503 - Temporarily unavailable, *until* another request is successful. I expected with retry=120 that after 120 seconds the client would be able to use the errored out worker, but this is *not* the case. Test case: 1. Start tomcats 2. Access /docushare, this succeeds and returns a JSESSIONID cookie referencing the member e.g. JSESSIONID=BC90C156669FDF0194657FF27EC3AF99.tomcat2 3. Stop tomcats to simulate a backend failure 4. Access /docushare again in the same browser session, this fails with a 503 error (as expected). Balance-manager shows tomcat1 is OK, and tomcat2 is Err Error_log shows: All workers are in error state for route (tomcat2) 5. Start tomcats again 6. Wait for 120+ seconds to allow retry=120 to take effect 7. Access /docushare *using the session with the tomcat2 cookie*, expect success, get 503 error. I can repeat this step ad nauseam without ever getting a successful response. Error_log shows: All workers are in error state for route (tomcat2) 8. To resolve the issue, delete the JSESSIONID cookie from the client or open up a new browser and access /docushare. Either of these seem to solve the problem for the cookied browser session. 9. Access /docushare, this succeeds, balance-manager shows both tomcat1 and tomcat2 are now OK even though the cookie returned to this request is for *tomcat1*. So I would expect that the balance would retry the errored path successfully retry seconds after the failure. Is this a bug or do I have some misunderstanding and/or misconfiguration? Regards -- Dale Ogilvie Senior Software Engineer Trimble Navigation NZ Ltd P O Box 8729 Riccarton Christchurch Ph: +64 3 9635344 Fax: +64 3 9635317 - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RewriteMap questions
On Wed, 30 May 2007 16:20:23 -0400 Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No. The %0 notation is specific to mod_vhost_alias. It can't be used in any other directive. (In particular, RewriteMaps are initialized at server startup, so it doesn't work to make their location a per-request variable.) You can either manually define a separate rewritemap for each hostname, or you can use a single rewritemap for all the hosts and use the hostname as part of the lookup key. Crud - or I guess I could go back to the external program method and have it parse the URL. None of these solutions is ideal, but I think that's the best option in front of me. Out of curiosity - how would you use the hostname in the lookup key? Thanks, Josh - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RewriteMap questions
On 5/30/07, Josh Trutwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 16:20:23 -0400
Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No. The %0 notation is specific to mod_vhost_alias. It can't be used
in any other directive. (In particular, RewriteMaps are initialized
at server startup, so it doesn't work to make their location a
per-request variable.)
You can either manually define a separate rewritemap for each
hostname, or you can use a single rewritemap for all the hosts and
use the hostname as part of the lookup key.
Crud - or I guess I could go back to the external program method and
have it parse the URL. None of these solutions is ideal, but I think
that's the best option in front of me.
Out of curiosity - how would you use the hostname in the lookup key?
Adjust your db file to use host/path instead of just path as the key, and then:
RewriteCond ${existing:%{HTTP_HOST}$1|NOT-FOUND} =NOT-FOUND
RewriteRule ^/(.*) ${redirects:%{HTTP_HOST}$1} [L,QSA]
Joshua.
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] auth LDAP issue, help
Hi, I am trying to get ldap auth working, what am i doing wrong? this is my config Directory d:/websites/ldaptest AuthType basic AuthBasicProvider ldap AuthName LdapTest AuthLDAPURL ldap://ldap.com/o=somewhere?cn?sub AuthLDAPBindDN cn=admin,o=somewhere AuthLDAPBindPassword pw AllowOverride None Order allow,deny Allow from 172.30 Allow from 10.1 require valid-user /Directory when i hit the url, i am asked to login, when i do, it asks me again. it fails after 3 times and here is what is in the apache log [Wed May 30 22:25:19 2007] [warn] [client 10.1.1.4] [2692] auth_ldap authenticate: user authentication failed; URI / [ldap_search_ext_s() for user failed][Filter Error] here is what the ldap server (Novell Netware 6.5sp6) see's: New cleartext connection 0x560b9c40 from 172.30.0.20:1998, monitor = 0x131, index = 2 DoBind on connection 0x560b9c40 Bind name:cn=admin,o=somewhere, version:3, authentication:simple Sending operation result 0:: to connection 0x560b9c40 Operation 0x1:0x60 on connection 0x560b9c40 completed in 0 seconds DoSearch on connection 0x560b9c40 Search request: base: o=somewhere scope:2 dereference:3 sizelimit:-1 timelimit:0 attrsonly:0 filter: ((objectclass=*)(cn=tonyg)) attribute: cn Sending search result entry cn=TonyG,o=somewhere to connection 0x560b9c40 Sending operation result 0:: to connection 0x560b9c40 Operation 0x2:0x63 on connection 0x560b9c40 completed in 0 seconds DoBind on connection 0x560b9c40 Bind name:cn=TonyG,o=somewhere, version:3, authentication:simple Sending operation result 0:: to connection 0x560b9c40 Operation 0x3:0x60 on connection 0x560b9c40 completed in 0 seconds *** Tony Guadagno Guadagno Consulting [EMAIL PROTECTED] 585.703.6700 *** BEGIN:VCARD VERSION:2.1 X-GWTYPE:USER FN:Tony Guadagno EMAIL;WORK;PREF;NGW:[EMAIL PROTECTED] N:Guadagno;Tony END:VCARD - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy_balance never recovers from a worker error with stickysession
A couple of questions: 1. Did you set up session replication between your Tomcat instances? If not your client will have to relogin in case of failure of the Tomcat instance that generated session id. 2. Did I get you right that in your test you stop both instances of Tomcat? If yes I don't think that after restart Tomcat will be able to restore previous session unless you set up some kind of session persistence. Serge Dubrouski. On 5/30/07, Dale Ogilvie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I am running Apache 2.2.3 on RedHat EL 5. I am trying to use Apache to load balance between two local instances of tomcat in order to utilize the vast quantities of RAM on our production server. My httpd setup looks like this: Proxy balancer://tomcat BalancerMember ajp://localhost:8009 min=10 max=100 route=tomcat1 loadfactor=1 retry=120 BalancerMember ajp://localhost:8010 min=10 max=100 route=tomcat2 loadfactor=1 retry=120 /Proxy Location /balancer-manager SetHandler balancer-manager Order deny,allow Deny from all Allow from .trimblecorp.net /Location ProxyPass /dscgi/ds.py/ balancer://tomcat/docushare/dsweb/ stickysession=JSESSIONID nofailover=On ProxyPass /docushare balancer://tomcat/docushare stickysession=JSESSIONID nofailover=On ProxyPass /docushare/ balancer://tomcat/docushare/ stickysession=JSESSIONID nofailover=On The problem is that if one of the workers gets into error status, any client with a JSESSIONID referencing that route is never able to receive a reply, Apache *always* responds with a 503 - Temporarily unavailable, *until* another request is successful. I expected with retry=120 that after 120 seconds the client would be able to use the errored out worker, but this is *not* the case. Test case: 1. Start tomcats 2. Access /docushare, this succeeds and returns a JSESSIONID cookie referencing the member e.g. JSESSIONID=BC90C156669FDF0194657FF27EC3AF99.tomcat2 3. Stop tomcats to simulate a backend failure 4. Access /docushare again in the same browser session, this fails with a 503 error (as expected). Balance-manager shows tomcat1 is OK, and tomcat2 is Err Error_log shows: All workers are in error state for route (tomcat2) 5. Start tomcats again 6. Wait for 120+ seconds to allow retry=120 to take effect 7. Access /docushare *using the session with the tomcat2 cookie*, expect success, get 503 error. I can repeat this step ad nauseam without ever getting a successful response. Error_log shows: All workers are in error state for route (tomcat2) 8. To resolve the issue, delete the JSESSIONID cookie from the client or open up a new browser and access /docushare. Either of these seem to solve the problem for the cookied browser session. 9. Access /docushare, this succeeds, balance-manager shows both tomcat1 and tomcat2 are now OK even though the cookie returned to this request is for *tomcat1*. So I would expect that the balance would retry the errored path successfully retry seconds after the failure. Is this a bug or do I have some misunderstanding and/or misconfiguration? Regards -- Dale Ogilvie Senior Software Engineer Trimble Navigation NZ Ltd P O Box 8729 Riccarton Christchurch Ph: +64 3 9635344 Fax: +64 3 9635317 - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is Win32 Apache ready for prime time?
--- morgan gangwere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Morgan, ~snip~ I have seen this with the mySQL connectivity in PHP - but its usually caused by NOT closing the connection to the MySQL server after you're done. This is what I was referring to in my persistent connections comment, but it can happen no matter what database engine is being used. Remember, be a gentleman and close all your MySQL connections when you're done! Exactly, the scripts are actually the cause of most web exploits and server performance issues, not configuration issues as a lot of people posting to this list seem to think. All this is actually better discussed off list, or on a list focussed on the scripting / db best practices rather than here. :) Jaqui Jeff Henager: If the average user can put a CD in and boot the system and follow the prompts, he can install and use Linux. If he can't do that simple task, he doesn't need to be around technology. Website: http://jaqui-greenlees.net Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk email the boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail at http://mrd.mail.yahoo.com/try_beta?.intl=ca - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
