Re: [users@httpd] Application Developer, ICO watchdog

2021-05-18 Thread back button 
The last word.
I am an application developer with a diverse set of skills.
You are admin juniors.
Learn some manners when you address people like me.


> Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2021 at 4:17 AM
> From: "back button" 
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Cc: woh...@apache.org
> Subject: Re: [users@httpd]  Application Developer, ICO watchdog
>
> You ass's don't even know the meaning of  "man pages".
> How could you help me. You cant help yourself.
> Pardon the pun.
> 
> I could see the frustration and the  skill level when I read in the docs. 
> Just because you setup a virtual host doesn't mean it will be seen by "magic".
> 
> Just about every place I worked at as software engineer or Application 
> developer  I was head of the game because I showed curiosity and interest   
> yearned for knowledge and skill. The only thing that counts. 
> 
> 
> You have settled in your junior roles.
> That is the reality of it. I  have seen your kind.
> Lazy assholes expect people like me to do the work.
> 
> 
> > they are genuine real questions of interest here.
> Of course  I am not junior like you admin staff, 
> so any issues I raise will be of genuine interest to you. 
>  But information in IT is valuable and no freebies from me.
> 
> 
> You people bore me with your crap.
> 
> Sue you ?
> There are watchdogs  for people like you  who think you can setup a media 
> platform and are exempt from realities of law. 
> 
> As for your adjudicator she failed.
> I even simplified it for her , she still failed.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2021 at 9:39 PM
> > From: " Good Guy " 
> > To: users@httpd.apache.org
> > Subject: [users@httpd] Re: Application Developer, ICO watchdog
> >
> > On 18/05/2021 20:11, Andrea Croci wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > BTW, watch your language, or her father will sue you!
> > >
> > Or even be called pedo!   Best thing is to ignore all his posts even if 
> > they are genuine real questions of interest here.
> > 
> > I gave him/her the benefit of doubt in the past but now I have changed 
> > my mind.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > 
> > -- 
> > 
> > With over 1.3 billion devices now running Windows 10, customer 
> > satisfaction is higher than any previous version of windows.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
> > 
> >
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
> 
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org

Re: [users@httpd] Application Developer, ICO watchdog

2021-05-18 Thread back button 
You ass's don't even know the meaning of  "man pages".
How could you help me. You cant help yourself.
Pardon the pun.

I could see the frustration and the  skill level when I read in the docs. Just 
because you setup a virtual host doesn't mean it will be seen by "magic".

Just about every place I worked at as software engineer or Application 
developer  I was head of the game because I showed curiosity and interest   
yearned for knowledge and skill. The only thing that counts. 


You have settled in your junior roles.
That is the reality of it. I  have seen your kind.
Lazy assholes expect people like me to do the work.


> they are genuine real questions of interest here.
Of course  I am not junior like you admin staff, 
so any issues I raise will be of genuine interest to you. 
 But information in IT is valuable and no freebies from me.


You people bore me with your crap.

Sue you ?
There are watchdogs  for people like you  who think you can setup a media 
platform and are exempt from realities of law. 

As for your adjudicator she failed.
I even simplified it for her , she still failed.





> Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2021 at 9:39 PM
> From: " Good Guy " 
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: [users@httpd] Re: Application Developer, ICO watchdog
>
> On 18/05/2021 20:11, Andrea Croci wrote:
> >
> >
> > BTW, watch your language, or her father will sue you!
> >
> Or even be called pedo!   Best thing is to ignore all his posts even if 
> they are genuine real questions of interest here.
> 
> I gave him/her the benefit of doubt in the past but now I have changed 
> my mind.
> 
> 
> 
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> 
> -- 
> 
> With over 1.3 billion devices now running Windows 10, customer 
> satisfaction is higher than any previous version of windows.
> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
> 
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org

Re: [users@httpd] Re: Consolidate multiple s

2021-05-18 Thread vadud3 
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 4:59 PM Christophe JAILLET <
christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr> wrote:

> Le 18/05/2021 à 22:26, vad...@gmail.com a écrit :
> > That format got even worse feedback and I would too :-). Lets try this
> one.
> >
>
> Have you looked at mod_macro?
>
> CJ
>

Hey CJ,

I will give that a try. Looks interesting. I will use it for Location. Does
it work for ProxyPass as well?

Thanks for the suggestion,
Asif



-- 
Asif Iqbal
PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?

[users@httpd] Re: Consolidate multiple s

2021-05-18 Thread Christophe JAILLET 

Le 18/05/2021 à 22:26, vad...@gmail.com a écrit :

That format got even worse feedback and I would too :-). Lets try this one.



Have you looked at mod_macro?

CJ

ProxyPass /confluencenode1 http://nodecnf001:8092/confluencenode1 

ProxyPassReverse /confluencenode1 http://nodecnf001:8092/confluencenode1 

ProxyPass /confluencenode2 http://nodecnf002:8092/confluencenode2 

ProxyPassReverse /confluencenode2 http://nodecnf002:8092/confluencenode2 

ProxyPass /confluencenode3 http://nodecnf003:8092/confluencenode3 

ProxyPassReverse /confluencenode3 http://nodecnf003:8092/confluencenode3 



     # Paths to bypass SSO
     #
     #    Satisfy Any
     #
     m#^/(confluencenode1/rest/|confluencenode1/s/).*#">

         Satisfy Any
     
     Order allow,deny
     Allow from all
     AuthType Shibboleth
     Header set X-Forwarded-Proto "https"
     ShibUseHeaders On
     ShibRequestSetting requireSession true
     
       Require shib-attr AuthType "standard, x509, securePlus2, 
securePlus3, piv"

       Require shib-attr AppAuth true
     


     # Paths to bypass SSO
     #
     #    Satisfy Any
     #
     m#^/(confluencenode2/rest/|confluencenode2/s/).*#">

         Satisfy Any
     
     Order allow,deny
     Allow from all
     AuthType Shibboleth
     Header set X-Forwarded-Proto "https"
     ShibUseHeaders On
     ShibRequestSetting requireSession true
     
       Require shib-attr AuthType "standard, x509, securePlus2, 
securePlus3, piv"

       Require shib-attr AppAuth true
     


     # Paths to bypass SSO
     #
     #    Satisfy Any
     #
     m#^/(confluencenode3/rest/|confluencenode3/s/).*#">

         Satisfy Any
     
     Order allow,deny
     Allow from all
     AuthType Shibboleth
     Header set X-Forwarded-Proto "https"
     ShibUseHeaders On
     ShibRequestSetting requireSession true
     
       Require shib-attr AuthType "standard, x509, securePlus2, 
securePlus3, piv"

       Require shib-attr AppAuth true
     



On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 3:33 PM > wrote:


Sorry the output was not clean. Trying a different format

 1. ProxyPass /confluencenode1
http://nodecnf001:8092/confluencenode1

 2. ProxyPassReverse /confluencenode1
http://nodecnf001:8092/confluencenode1

 3. ProxyPass /confluencenode2
http://nodecnf002:8092/confluencenode2

 4. ProxyPassReverse /confluencenode2
http://nodecnf002:8092/confluencenode2

 5. ProxyPass /confluencenode3
http://nodecnf003:8092/confluencenode3

 6. ProxyPassReverse /confluencenode3
http://nodecnf003:8092/confluencenode3

 7.
 8. 
 9. # Paths to bypass SSO
10. #
11. # Satisfy Any
12. #
13. 
14. Satisfy Any
15. 
16. Order allow,deny
17. Allow from all
18. AuthType Shibboleth
19. Header set X-Forwarded-Proto "https"
20. ShibUseHeaders On
21. ShibRequestSetting requireSession true
22. 
23. Require shib-attr AuthType "standard, x509, securePlus2,
securePlus3, piv"
24. Require shib-attr AppAuth true
25. 
26. 
27. 
28. # Paths to bypass SSO
29. #
30. # Satisfy Any
31. #
32. 
33. Satisfy Any
34. 
35. Order allow,deny
36. Allow from all
37. AuthType Shibboleth
38. Header set X-Forwarded-Proto "https"
39. ShibUseHeaders On
40. ShibRequestSetting requireSession true
41. 
42. Require shib-attr AuthType "standard, x509, securePlus2,
securePlus3, piv"
43. Require shib-attr AppAuth true
44. 
45. 
46. 
47. # Paths to bypass SSO
48. #
49. # Satisfy Any
50. #
51. 
52. Satisfy Any
53. 
54. Order allow,deny
55. Allow from all
56. AuthType Shibboleth
57. Header set X-Forwarded-Proto "https"
58. ShibUseHeaders On
59. ShibRequestSetting requireSession true
60. 
61. Require shib-attr AuthType "standard, x509, securePlus2,
securePlus3, piv"
62. Require shib-attr AppAuth true
63. 
64. 
65.

So I like to see if I can get only one Location stanza with only one
REQUEST_URI and maybe one ProxyPass and one ProxyPassReverse for all
three nodes

On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 2:29 PM mailto:vad...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Hi All,

I have this config and it works fine. Looking for a way to
consolidate it. I tried few things and no success yet.

ProxyPass /confluencenode1

[users@httpd] Re: Consolidate multiple s

2021-05-18 Thread vadud3 
That format got even worse feedback and I would too :-). Lets try this one.

ProxyPass /confluencenode1 http://nodecnf001:8092/confluencenode1
ProxyPassReverse /confluencenode1 http://nodecnf001:8092/confluencenode1
ProxyPass /confluencenode2 http://nodecnf002:8092/confluencenode2
ProxyPassReverse /confluencenode2 http://nodecnf002:8092/confluencenode2
ProxyPass /confluencenode3 http://nodecnf003:8092/confluencenode3
ProxyPassReverse /confluencenode3 http://nodecnf003:8092/confluencenode3

# Paths to bypass SSO
#
#Satisfy Any
#

Satisfy Any

Order allow,deny
Allow from all
AuthType Shibboleth
Header set X-Forwarded-Proto "https"
ShibUseHeaders On
ShibRequestSetting requireSession true

  Require shib-attr AuthType "standard, x509, securePlus2, securePlus3,
piv"
  Require shib-attr AppAuth true



# Paths to bypass SSO
#
#Satisfy Any
#

Satisfy Any

Order allow,deny
Allow from all
AuthType Shibboleth
Header set X-Forwarded-Proto "https"
ShibUseHeaders On
ShibRequestSetting requireSession true

  Require shib-attr AuthType "standard, x509, securePlus2, securePlus3,
piv"
  Require shib-attr AppAuth true



# Paths to bypass SSO
#
#Satisfy Any
#

Satisfy Any

Order allow,deny
Allow from all
AuthType Shibboleth
Header set X-Forwarded-Proto "https"
ShibUseHeaders On
ShibRequestSetting requireSession true

  Require shib-attr AuthType "standard, x509, securePlus2, securePlus3,
piv"
  Require shib-attr AppAuth true




On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 3:33 PM  wrote:

> Sorry the output was not clean. Trying a different format
>
>1. ProxyPass /confluencenode1 http://nodecnf001:8092/confluencenode1
>2. ProxyPassReverse /confluencenode1
>http://nodecnf001:8092/confluencenode1
>3. ProxyPass /confluencenode2 http://nodecnf002:8092/confluencenode2
>4. ProxyPassReverse /confluencenode2
>http://nodecnf002:8092/confluencenode2
>5. ProxyPass /confluencenode3 http://nodecnf003:8092/confluencenode3
>6. ProxyPassReverse /confluencenode3
>http://nodecnf003:8092/confluencenode3
>7.
>8. 
>9. # Paths to bypass SSO
>10. #
>11. # Satisfy Any
>12. #
>13. m#^/(confluencenode1/rest/|confluencenode1/s/).*#">
>14. Satisfy Any
>15. 
>16. Order allow,deny
>17. Allow from all
>18. AuthType Shibboleth
>19. Header set X-Forwarded-Proto "https"
>20. ShibUseHeaders On
>21. ShibRequestSetting requireSession true
>22. 
>23. Require shib-attr AuthType "standard, x509, securePlus2,
>securePlus3, piv"
>24. Require shib-attr AppAuth true
>25. 
>26. 
>27. 
>28. # Paths to bypass SSO
>29. #
>30. # Satisfy Any
>31. #
>32. m#^/(confluencenode2/rest/|confluencenode2/s/).*#">
>33. Satisfy Any
>34. 
>35. Order allow,deny
>36. Allow from all
>37. AuthType Shibboleth
>38. Header set X-Forwarded-Proto "https"
>39. ShibUseHeaders On
>40. ShibRequestSetting requireSession true
>41. 
>42. Require shib-attr AuthType "standard, x509, securePlus2,
>securePlus3, piv"
>43. Require shib-attr AppAuth true
>44. 
>45. 
>46. 
>47. # Paths to bypass SSO
>48. #
>49. # Satisfy Any
>50. #
>51. m#^/(confluencenode3/rest/|confluencenode3/s/).*#">
>52. Satisfy Any
>53. 
>54. Order allow,deny
>55. Allow from all
>56. AuthType Shibboleth
>57. Header set X-Forwarded-Proto "https"
>58. ShibUseHeaders On
>59. ShibRequestSetting requireSession true
>60. 
>61. Require shib-attr AuthType "standard, x509, securePlus2,
>securePlus3, piv"
>62. Require shib-attr AppAuth true
>63. 
>64. 
>65.
>
> So I like to see if I can get only one Location stanza with only one
> REQUEST_URI and maybe one ProxyPass and one ProxyPassReverse for all three
> nodes
>
> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 2:29 PM  wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I have this config and it works fine. Looking for a way to consolidate
>> it. I tried few things and no success yet.
>>
>> ProxyPass /confluencenode1 http://nodecnf001:8092/confluencenode1
>> ProxyPassReverse /confluencenode1 http://nodecnf001:8092/confluencenode1
>> ProxyPass /confluencenode2 http://nodecnf002:8092/confluencenode2
>> ProxyPassReverse /confluencenode2 http://nodecnf002:8092/confluencenode2
>> ProxyPass /confluencenode3 http://nodecnf003:8092/confluencenode3
>> ProxyPassReverse /confluencenode3 http://nodecnf003:8092/confluencenode3
>> 
>> # Paths to bypass SSO
>> #
>> # Satisfy Any
>> #
>> 
>> Satisfy Any
>> 
>> Order allow,deny
>> Allow from all
>> AuthType Shibboleth
>> Header set X-Forwarded-Proto "https"
>> ShibUseHeaders On
>> ShibRequestSetting requireSession true
>> 
>> Require shib-attr AuthType "standard, x509, securePlus2, securePlus3, piv"
>> Require

[users@httpd] Re: Application Developer, ICO watchdog

2021-05-18 Thread  Good Guy  

On 18/05/2021 20:11, Andrea Croci wrote:



BTW, watch your language, or her father will sue you!

Or even be called pedo!   Best thing is to ignore all his posts even if 
they are genuine real questions of interest here.


I gave him/her the benefit of doubt in the past but now I have changed 
my mind.














--

With over 1.3 billion devices now running Windows 10, customer 
satisfaction is higher than any previous version of windows.




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org

[users@httpd] Re: Application Developer, ICO watchdog

2021-05-18 Thread  Good Guy  

On 18/05/2021 19:42, Nick Folino wrote:






Nick,

Can we just ignore the guy.  He seems to have personality disorder 
problems and he is after recognition of some kind here. I suggest we 
should all ignore his posts and the problem will go away.


I gave him a newsgroup link where he can spend time posting his crap but 
clearly he was not interested in that.  He wants to be where there are 
people responding to him.  If you ignore him he'll go away and find some 
other hobbies!












--

With over 1.3 billion devices now running Windows 10, customer 
satisfaction is higher than any previous version of windows.




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org

[users@httpd] Re: Consolidate multiple s

2021-05-18 Thread vadud3 
Sorry the output was not clean. Trying a different format

   1. ProxyPass /confluencenode1 http://nodecnf001:8092/confluencenode1
   2. ProxyPassReverse /confluencenode1
   http://nodecnf001:8092/confluencenode1
   3. ProxyPass /confluencenode2 http://nodecnf002:8092/confluencenode2
   4. ProxyPassReverse /confluencenode2
   http://nodecnf002:8092/confluencenode2
   5. ProxyPass /confluencenode3 http://nodecnf003:8092/confluencenode3
   6. ProxyPassReverse /confluencenode3
   http://nodecnf003:8092/confluencenode3
   7.
   8. 
   9. # Paths to bypass SSO
   10. #
   11. # Satisfy Any
   12. #
   13. 
   14. Satisfy Any
   15. 
   16. Order allow,deny
   17. Allow from all
   18. AuthType Shibboleth
   19. Header set X-Forwarded-Proto "https"
   20. ShibUseHeaders On
   21. ShibRequestSetting requireSession true
   22. 
   23. Require shib-attr AuthType "standard, x509, securePlus2,
   securePlus3, piv"
   24. Require shib-attr AppAuth true
   25. 
   26. 
   27. 
   28. # Paths to bypass SSO
   29. #
   30. # Satisfy Any
   31. #
   32. 
   33. Satisfy Any
   34. 
   35. Order allow,deny
   36. Allow from all
   37. AuthType Shibboleth
   38. Header set X-Forwarded-Proto "https"
   39. ShibUseHeaders On
   40. ShibRequestSetting requireSession true
   41. 
   42. Require shib-attr AuthType "standard, x509, securePlus2,
   securePlus3, piv"
   43. Require shib-attr AppAuth true
   44. 
   45. 
   46. 
   47. # Paths to bypass SSO
   48. #
   49. # Satisfy Any
   50. #
   51. 
   52. Satisfy Any
   53. 
   54. Order allow,deny
   55. Allow from all
   56. AuthType Shibboleth
   57. Header set X-Forwarded-Proto "https"
   58. ShibUseHeaders On
   59. ShibRequestSetting requireSession true
   60. 
   61. Require shib-attr AuthType "standard, x509, securePlus2,
   securePlus3, piv"
   62. Require shib-attr AppAuth true
   63. 
   64. 
   65.

So I like to see if I can get only one Location stanza with only one
REQUEST_URI and maybe one ProxyPass and one ProxyPassReverse for all three
nodes

On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 2:29 PM  wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I have this config and it works fine. Looking for a way to consolidate it.
> I tried few things and no success yet.
>
> ProxyPass /confluencenode1 http://nodecnf001:8092/confluencenode1
> ProxyPassReverse /confluencenode1 http://nodecnf001:8092/confluencenode1
> ProxyPass /confluencenode2 http://nodecnf002:8092/confluencenode2
> ProxyPassReverse /confluencenode2 http://nodecnf002:8092/confluencenode2
> ProxyPass /confluencenode3 http://nodecnf003:8092/confluencenode3
> ProxyPassReverse /confluencenode3 http://nodecnf003:8092/confluencenode3
> 
> # Paths to bypass SSO
> #
> # Satisfy Any
> #
> 
> Satisfy Any
> 
> Order allow,deny
> Allow from all
> AuthType Shibboleth
> Header set X-Forwarded-Proto "https"
> ShibUseHeaders On
> ShibRequestSetting requireSession true
> 
> Require shib-attr AuthType "standard, x509, securePlus2, securePlus3, piv"
> Require shib-attr AppAuth true
> 
> 
> 
> # Paths to bypass SSO
> #
> # Satisfy Any
> #
> 
> Satisfy Any
> 
> Order allow,deny
> Allow from all
> AuthType Shibboleth
> Header set X-Forwarded-Proto "https"
> ShibUseHeaders On
> ShibRequestSetting requireSession true
> 
> Require shib-attr AuthType "standard, x509, securePlus2, securePlus3, piv"
> Require shib-attr AppAuth true
> 
> 
> 
> # Paths to bypass SSO
> #
> # Satisfy Any
> #
> 
> Satisfy Any
> 
> Order allow,deny
> Allow from all
> AuthType Shibboleth
> Header set X-Forwarded-Proto "https"
> ShibUseHeaders On
> ShibRequestSetting requireSession true
> 
> Require shib-attr AuthType "standard, x509, securePlus2, securePlus3, piv"
> Require shib-attr AppAuth true
> 
> 
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> Asif Iqbal
> PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
>
>

-- 
Asif Iqbal
PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?

Re: [users@httpd] Application Developer, ICO watchdog

2021-05-18 Thread Andrea Croci 

That's very true, but I still had a good laugh reading that idiocy. I'll
give her an A grade for that.

BTW, watch your language, or her father will sue you!

On 18.05.21 20:42, Nick Folino wrote:

You're an idiot.

Nick age 50

On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 2:28 PM  wrote:


I have completed my school project.
I showed it to my Daddy.

I showed him how easy it is to setup a website if you have Ubuntu
and even better with Ubuntu-mate.
ALT + CTL + T
type  couple of commands and everything is done for you including
security.

He said if I show the effort I put in to the teacher in the
accompanying project documentation ,
the teacher will marked me down for choosing a project makes which
required little effort. It was too easy! for your age group.

I asked what should do I then Daddy ?
He said  tell the teacher  you followed the documentation provided
here by the https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/
 to do your assignment.

When the teacher makes an assessment of the work required to setup
a website  using the Apache documents  you will get an A grade for
sure !


He also said do keep in mind  these web servers is admin work like
DBAs and operating system admins.

When you grown up make sure you aim for something substantial like
Application Developer.
That is real professional work.
This admin work we call secretarial work. It is not even
technician level.


My Daddy, who is a barrister  said he will see about the " socket
puppy "  remarks
and he will take up the matter with the ICO   watchdog for breach
of privacy.
This apache foundation had their warning.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-54568784


https://www.forbes.com/sites/carlypage/2020/10/16/ico-hits-british-airways-with-record-breaking-fine-for-2018-data-breach/?sh=a954e0f481ac




Best Regards
Emily age 14

Re: [users@httpd] Application Developer, ICO watchdog

2021-05-18 Thread Nick Folino 
You're an idiot.

Nick age 50

On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 2:28 PM  wrote:

>
> I have completed my school project.
> I showed it to my Daddy.
>
> I showed him how easy it is to setup a website if you have Ubuntu and even
> better with Ubuntu-mate.
> ALT + CTL + T
> type  couple of commands and everything is done for you including security.
>
> He said if I show the effort I put in to the teacher in the accompanying
> project documentation ,
> the teacher will marked me down for choosing a project makes which
> required little effort. It was too easy! for your age group.
>
> I asked what should do I then Daddy ?
> He said  tell the teacher  you followed the documentation provided here by
> the https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/ to do your assignment.
>
> When the teacher makes an assessment of the work required to setup a
> website  using the Apache documents  you will get an A grade for sure !
>
>
> He also said do keep in mind  these web servers is admin work like DBAs
> and operating system admins.
>
> When you grown up make sure you aim for something substantial like Application
> Developer.
> That is real professional work.
> This admin work we call secretarial work. It is not even technician level.
>
>
> My Daddy, who is a barrister  said he will see about the " socket puppy "
> remarks
> and he will take up the matter with the ICO   watchdog for breach of
> privacy.
> This apache foundation had their warning.
>
> https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-54568784
>
> https://www.forbes.com/sites/carlypage/2020/10/16/ico-hits-british-airways-with-record-breaking-fine-for-2018-data-breach/?sh=a954e0f481ac
>
>
> Best Regards
> Emily age 14
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

[users@httpd] Consolidate multiple s

2021-05-18 Thread vadud3 
Hi All,

I have this config and it works fine. Looking for a way to consolidate it.
I tried few things and no success yet.

ProxyPass /confluencenode1 http://nodecnf001:8092/confluencenode1
ProxyPassReverse /confluencenode1 http://nodecnf001:8092/confluencenode1
ProxyPass /confluencenode2 http://nodecnf002:8092/confluencenode2
ProxyPassReverse /confluencenode2 http://nodecnf002:8092/confluencenode2
ProxyPass /confluencenode3 http://nodecnf003:8092/confluencenode3
ProxyPassReverse /confluencenode3 http://nodecnf003:8092/confluencenode3

# Paths to bypass SSO
#
# Satisfy Any
#

Satisfy Any

Order allow,deny
Allow from all
AuthType Shibboleth
Header set X-Forwarded-Proto "https"
ShibUseHeaders On
ShibRequestSetting requireSession true

Require shib-attr AuthType "standard, x509, securePlus2, securePlus3, piv"
Require shib-attr AppAuth true



# Paths to bypass SSO
#
# Satisfy Any
#

Satisfy Any

Order allow,deny
Allow from all
AuthType Shibboleth
Header set X-Forwarded-Proto "https"
ShibUseHeaders On
ShibRequestSetting requireSession true

Require shib-attr AuthType "standard, x509, securePlus2, securePlus3, piv"
Require shib-attr AppAuth true



# Paths to bypass SSO
#
# Satisfy Any
#

Satisfy Any

Order allow,deny
Allow from all
AuthType Shibboleth
Header set X-Forwarded-Proto "https"
ShibUseHeaders On
ShibRequestSetting requireSession true

Require shib-attr AuthType "standard, x509, securePlus2, securePlus3, piv"
Require shib-attr AppAuth true



Thanks

-- 
Asif Iqbal
PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?

[users@httpd] Application Developer, ICO watchdog

2021-05-18 Thread emily . bundit 

I have completed my school project.I showed it to my Daddy.
I showed him how easy it is to setup a website if you have Ubuntu and even 
better with Ubuntu-mate.ALT + CTL + T
type  couple of commands and everything is done for you including security. 
He said if I show the effort I put in to the teacher in the accompanying 
project documentation ,
the teacher will marked me down for choosing a project makes which required 
little effort. It was too easy! for your age group.

I asked what should do I then Daddy ?He said  tell the teacher  you followed 
the documentation provided here by the https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/ to do 
your assignment.
When the teacher makes an assessment of the work required to setup a website  
using the Apache documents  you will get an A grade for sure !

He also said do keep in mind  these web servers is admin work like DBAs and 
operating system admins.
When you grown up make sure you aim for something substantial like Application 
Developer.That is real professional work.
 This admin work we call secretarial work. It is not even technician level.


My Daddy, who is a barrister  said he will see about the " socket puppy "  
remarks and he will take up the matter with the ICO   watchdog for breach of 
privacy.This apache foundation had their warning.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-54568784
https://www.forbes.com/sites/carlypage/2020/10/16/ico-hits-british-airways-with-record-breaking-fine-for-2018-data-breach/?sh=a954e0f481ac


Best Regards
Emily age 14

[users@httpd] DKIM misconfiguration of this mailing list

2021-05-18 Thread Yves Goergen 

Hello,

I'm having trouble receiving messages from this mailing list because 
many of them have a broken DKIM signature. I guess that's because the 
mailing list is not configured properly to survive in today's e-mail 
world. If a message with a DKIM signature is sent to this list (like 
mine), they're forwarded to all subscribers without correcting that 
signature but at the same time modifying subject, body or sender.


Maybe somebody would like to take a look at that to ensure that messages 
from this list can still be delivered.


This is an article I found about the topic, it might be helpful in 
fixing the problems.


https://begriffs.com/posts/2018-09-18-dmarc-mailing-list.html

I'm writing to the list directly because list owners never seem to 
respond to such issues. Several other mailing lists I'm subscribed to 
have the same issue.


If you'd like me to read your reply, please CC me as well to make sure 
your message arrives here.


-Yves

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org

Re: [users@httpd] which bit ?

2021-05-18 Thread Eric Covener 
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 8:27 AM Antony Stone
 wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 18 May 2021 at 14:07:03, back button wrote:
>
> > That it is a long standing problem that apache httpd and ubuntu httpd are
> > two different products  therefore case for widespread  confusion ?
>
> I've only been on this mailing list for 2 years, but I'm pretty sure this is
> the first time I've seen such a long-running discussion about the difference,
> instead of someone quite innocently asking here about Ubuntu httpd, being told
> "sorry, that's not the same as Apache httpd" and then going off to talk to the
> Ubuntu people about it instead.

I agree, or even simpler they just accept that software in a
distributions package sometimes has marginally different layout/tools.

> > Obviously ubuntu feel the apache docs and setup do not meet their
> > standard so they have made their point by redesigning  their  own product.
> > In my opinion Apache should ask themselves what they are doing wrong that
> > others are redesigning the product making the point Apache do not meet
> > their standard.
>
> Let's assume that the Apache Software Foundation believes the product is good,
> and sufficiently well-documented.
>
> It's then a question for the Ubuntu community as to why they decided to change
> things.

For posterity, I think it's worth more directly refuting the
misinformation that httpd in ubuntu is "redesigned" in any meaningful
way.

The changes are trivial to accommodate fitting into the distros own
package manager, filesystem layout, lifecycle, and other conventions.
It's no redesign, re-implementation, or anything like that.

This is usually only a minor speedbump, but combine with the traits of
https://slash7.com/2006/12/22/vampires/ and you get this kind of
carelord drama where someone needs to justify their behavior by any
means necessary.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org

Re: [users@httpd] which bit ?

2021-05-18 Thread Antony Stone 
On Tuesday 18 May 2021 at 14:35:56, back button wrote:

> I do not need any help setting up and installing any software.

So, what is your purpose on this mailing list?

> The internet was not invented by Americans

I suggest you try reading the second paragraph of 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet

Antony.

-- 
"The future is already here.   It's just not evenly distributed yet."

 - William Gibson

   Please reply to the list;
 please *don't* CC me.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org

Re: [users@httpd] which bit ?

2021-05-18 Thread back button 
I do not need any help setting up and installing any software.  I was simply 
gauging your response to the points highlighted. You wanted me to look bad for 
your short comings.

Aaahhh isn't it predictable to shoot the messenger.

Check out  https://www.backbutton.org to see that point in action.

I have made my points with evidence. You are making your point through bias and 
influence.


Bias and influence is a plague known as Trumpism.
"Cancel culture ... blah  blah "

The internet was not invented by Americans nor is it for Americans. It belongs  
to all.

> Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2021 at 2:19 PM
> From: "Eric Covener" 
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [users@httpd] which bit ?
>
> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 8:07 AM back button  wrote:
> >
> > My second point which I made and later confirmed by Eric Convener and also 
> > by an email
> > who has an apache  email address and not reflected in your response.Read 
> > the  the archives for that. You failed to recognise that. Please 
> > acknowledge your failure .
>
> This misunderstanding is again chalked up to your own ignorance on the
> matter. Since you have demonstrated no good faith nor capacity to
> learn on this list, I encourage nobody to waste more time trying to
> explain it to you.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org

Re: [users@httpd] which bit ?

2021-05-18 Thread Antony Stone 
On Tuesday 18 May 2021 at 14:07:03, back button wrote:

> That it is a long standing problem that apache httpd and ubuntu httpd are
> two different products  therefore case for widespread  confusion ?

I've only been on this mailing list for 2 years, but I'm pretty sure this is 
the first time I've seen such a long-running discussion about the difference, 
instead of someone quite innocently asking here about Ubuntu httpd, being told 
"sorry, that's not the same as Apache httpd" and then going off to talk to the 
Ubuntu people about it instead.

> Obviously ubuntu feel the apache docs and setup do not meet their
> standard so they have made their point by redesigning  their  own product.
> In my opinion Apache should ask themselves what they are doing wrong that
> others are redesigning the product making the point Apache do not meet
> their standard.

Let's assume that the Apache Software Foundation believes the product is good, 
and sufficiently well-documented.

It's then a question for the Ubuntu community as to why they decided to change 
things.

So, both for the technical support you are seeking, and an answer to the 
philosophical question about why Ubuntu changed the project without 
sufficiently 
changing the name, please go and ask Ubuntu people who know.


Antony.

-- 
Normal people think "If it ain't broke, don't fix it".
Engineers think "If it ain't broke, it doesn't have enough features yet".

   Please reply to the list;
 please *don't* CC me.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org

Re: [users@httpd] which bit ?

2021-05-18 Thread Eric Covener 
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 8:07 AM back button  wrote:
>
> My second point which I made and later confirmed by Eric Convener and also by 
> an email
> who has an apache  email address and not reflected in your response.Read the  
> the archives for that. You failed to recognise that. Please acknowledge your 
> failure .

This misunderstanding is again chalked up to your own ignorance on the
matter. Since you have demonstrated no good faith nor capacity to
learn on this list, I encourage nobody to waste more time trying to
explain it to you.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org

Re: [users@httpd] which bit ?

2021-05-18 Thread back button 
My second point which I made and later confirmed by Eric Convener and also by 
an email  
who has an apache  email address and not reflected in your response.Read the  
the archives for that. You failed to recognise that. Please acknowledge your 
failure .



That it is a long standing problem that apache httpd and ubuntu httpd are two 
different products  therefore case for widespread  confusion ?

Obviously ubuntu feel the apache docs and setup do not meet their 
standard so they have made their point by redesigning  their  own product. In 
my opinion Apache should ask themselves what they are doing wrong that others 
are redesigning the product making the point Apache do not meet their standard.


Please show how this is a matter of needing personal help for me  or it is a 
personal matter for me . I have shown it is a issue showing disregard for the 
general public .

Moreover if I was using MS windows  I would have downloaded the binary and be 
oblivious to the ubuntu httpd and the apache design  conflict. 

I highlighted the problem and I was victimised for it again.


Apache httpd  earns trillions of dollar for internet cable companies. Even 
without warranty it is used. 
This is an abuse of charity status.





> Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2021 at 8:15 AM
> From: "Joan Touzet" 
> To: "back Button" , users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [users@httpd] which bit ?
>
> All:
> 
> I have read back a few weeks in the archives for posts from this
> individual, "Back button." I do not see any contravention of the code of
> conduct on the lists by Nick Folino, or other project members.
> 
> In fact, what I see is Nick asking "Back button" to tone it down, and
> then because of repeated disregard for the list moderators, they were
> removed from the mailing list for abuse by Eric Covener.
> 
> Regular list members, apologies for this intrusion on your time - feel
> free to mute this thread in your MUA.
> 
> "Back Button," you went on ban-evaded by signing up to the mailing list
> with a new address. It even appears that you set up a sock puppet
> account to act as your daughter to complain to the mailing list.
> 
> So, "Back button," the code of conduct contravention here is your own
> actions. You are not being concise. You are assuming bad intentions. You
> were asked to stop posting, and you did not. And, finally, you are
> picking arguments because you are not personally being catered to.
> 
> As an open source developer of nearly 30 years, I can tell you this:
> what you're doing is *not* how you go about asking for help, not from
> other users, and especially not from the maintainers of a project.
> 
> The Apache License v2.0 (under which httpd is distributed) states you
> get permission to do whatever you want with the code, subject to a
> license and copyright notice, and notification of state changes, with
> limitations around liability, trademark use, and - most importantly -
> **zero warranty**.
> 
> No one on this list is obligated to help you with your problem. These
> are people giving freely of their time to try and resolve your problems.
> Please be respectful of their limitations, and understand that your
> actions to date do not inspire those here to give more of their time to
> help you out.
> 
> In fact, quoting from the Apache License v2.0: You get the code "on an
> 'AS IS' BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either
> express or implied." It then goes on to say that "**YOU** [emphasis
> mine] are solely responsible for determining the appropriateness of
> using... the Work and assume any risks associated"
> 
> Finally, at the risk of upsetting you, I want to cite a reference. In a
> famous GitHub post from 2014[1], Steve Klabnik summed it up perfectly:
> "You are the reason people burn out on open source. Don't be such an
> ass." It is entirely possible for you to seek the help you need
> regarding httpd, but everything you have shown to date suggests you are
> the problem here, not the members of the users@httpd.apache.org mailing
> list.
> 
> Best regards,
> Joan Touzet
> 
> [1]: https://github.com/wpeterson/emoji/issues/23
> 
> On 18/05/2021 00:53, back Button wrote:
> > Fact: 
> > All Java EE compliant application servers have the same directory
> > structure , so all Java EE applications are portable and familiar to
> > developers, including tomcat which is not fully Java EE compliant.
> > 
> > Apache HTTPD versions contradict this.
> > There isn't even a recognition anywhere that this  should be an
> > expectation. You are not going to get it anyway.
> > 
> > You did not answer any questions regarding this nor shed any light on it.
> > 
> > You goal is just to try to bother me.
> > 
> > FAO: Joan Touzet Apache  code of conduct. 
> > 
> > Ms. Touzet please have a look at this email account's history in the
> > archives . You will find all his messages are either derogatory towards
> > me or about. 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > back.but...@aol.com
> > 
> > 
> > On Monday, 17

Re: [users@httpd] which bit ?

2021-05-18 Thread Joan Touzet 
All:

I have read back a few weeks in the archives for posts from this
individual, "Back button." I do not see any contravention of the code of
conduct on the lists by Nick Folino, or other project members.

In fact, what I see is Nick asking "Back button" to tone it down, and
then because of repeated disregard for the list moderators, they were
removed from the mailing list for abuse by Eric Covener.

Regular list members, apologies for this intrusion on your time - feel
free to mute this thread in your MUA.

"Back Button," you went on ban-evaded by signing up to the mailing list
with a new address. It even appears that you set up a sock puppet
account to act as your daughter to complain to the mailing list.

So, "Back button," the code of conduct contravention here is your own
actions. You are not being concise. You are assuming bad intentions. You
were asked to stop posting, and you did not. And, finally, you are
picking arguments because you are not personally being catered to.

As an open source developer of nearly 30 years, I can tell you this:
what you're doing is *not* how you go about asking for help, not from
other users, and especially not from the maintainers of a project.

The Apache License v2.0 (under which httpd is distributed) states you
get permission to do whatever you want with the code, subject to a
license and copyright notice, and notification of state changes, with
limitations around liability, trademark use, and - most importantly -
**zero warranty**.

No one on this list is obligated to help you with your problem. These
are people giving freely of their time to try and resolve your problems.
Please be respectful of their limitations, and understand that your
actions to date do not inspire those here to give more of their time to
help you out.

In fact, quoting from the Apache License v2.0: You get the code "on an
'AS IS' BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either
express or implied." It then goes on to say that "**YOU** [emphasis
mine] are solely responsible for determining the appropriateness of
using... the Work and assume any risks associated"

Finally, at the risk of upsetting you, I want to cite a reference. In a
famous GitHub post from 2014[1], Steve Klabnik summed it up perfectly:
"You are the reason people burn out on open source. Don't be such an
ass." It is entirely possible for you to seek the help you need
regarding httpd, but everything you have shown to date suggests you are
the problem here, not the members of the users@httpd.apache.org mailing
list.

Best regards,
Joan Touzet

[1]: https://github.com/wpeterson/emoji/issues/23

On 18/05/2021 00:53, back Button wrote:
> Fact: 
> All Java EE compliant application servers have the same directory
> structure , so all Java EE applications are portable and familiar to
> developers, including tomcat which is not fully Java EE compliant.
> 
> Apache HTTPD versions contradict this.
> There isn't even a recognition anywhere that this  should be an
> expectation. You are not going to get it anyway.
> 
> You did not answer any questions regarding this nor shed any light on it.
> 
> You goal is just to try to bother me.
> 
> FAO: Joan Touzet Apache  code of conduct. 
> 
> Ms. Touzet please have a look at this email account's history in the
> archives . You will find all his messages are either derogatory towards
> me or about. 
> 
> 
> 
> back.but...@aol.com
> 
> 
> On Monday, 17 May 2021, 23:53:23 BST, Nick Folino  wrote:
> 
> 
> Bit 5 has always been my favorite bit.  He just hangs out there between
> 6 and 4.  Nobody bothers him.
> Plus you can't get past 15 without him.  He's a really good guy.
> For what you called a horrible product you sure seem to want to figure
> it out.
> Keep reading.
> 
> On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 2:21 PM back button  > wrote:
> 
>  
> Hi,
>  
> In my application  https://www.backbutton.org/
> 
>  
> I placed the front end proxy server on the all new  64 Bit Rasperry
> Pi 4.
> It is a wopping 64 bit  processor with 8GM Ram  running the on 
> linux  lsb_release Ubuntu 20.04 LTS.
>  
> I used the ubuntu 64 bit OS rather than Raspberry Pi OS because 
> Raspberry Pi OS was pulling down a different version
> of Ubuntu server Apache HTTPD , did not not include all the Ubuntu
> utilities.
>  
> I understand that when I startup the HTTPD using systemctl start
> apache2, it rises directly into RAM
> occupying the massive 8 GM of volatile memory. Then it starts
> listening for urls in the I/O buffer.
> I understand the HTTPD socket server with its text parser mod(s)
> performs quite fast when running in RAM.
>  
> I have tried out two different bits used talk to HTTPD  with the
> back  end business logic application server(s) .
>  
> The first bit  I used is the  mod_jk.
>  
> This is the bit which talks to each other
>