Re: [PLEASE TEST] Apache Maven 3.0-RC1

2010-09-21 Thread Benjamin Bentmann

lukewpatterson wrote:


component-set
   components
 component
   roleorg.apache.maven.lifecycle.mapping.LifecycleMapping/role
   role-hintjar/role-hint

Before, it seems the custom goals were merged with the standard jar
packaging goals.


If you can provide a complete example project to show this merging I 
would be really surprised. AFAICT from my own testing, it's simply 
impossible for a plugin to contribute a custom lifecycle mapping that 
clashes with a built-in mapping in Maven 2.x. I.e. your mapping should 
get ignored and Maven continues to use the default jar mapping.



Now, it seems like they replace the standard goals.


Which is the expected behavior, the mapping is supposed to be a full 
self-contained description, not an overlay.



Benjamin

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: [PLEASE TEST] Apache Maven 3.0-RC1

2010-09-21 Thread lukewpatterson


Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
 
 lukewpatterson wrote:
 Before, it seems the custom goals were merged with the standard jar
 packaging goals.
 
 If you can provide a complete example project to show this merging I 
 would be really surprised. 
 
 lukewpatterson wrote:
 Now, it seems like they replace the standard goals.
 
 Which is the expected behavior, the mapping is supposed to be a full 
 self-contained description, not an overlay.
 

Thanks Benjamin, everything is working ok.

This was an example of a sleeper-corner-case mixed with a healthy does of
ignorance.

The custom jar packaging type was indeed never active with Maven 2.x, I
have no idea why it existed in that plugin's metadata and I have no idea why
it was enabled in the consumer via extension.

The overlay behavior was simply other plugins running which were
explicitly bound to phases.  I forgot that the other phases exist regardless
of whether or not they are listed in the custom lifecycle mappings.

Thanks for your help.

Other than that, everything works great, and seems to be about 33% faster
overall.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/PLEASE-TEST-Apache-Maven-3-0-RC1-tp2841339p2848218.html
Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: [PLEASE TEST] Apache Maven 3.0-RC1

2010-09-20 Thread lukewpatterson

Seeing different behavior around extensions enabled on jar custom
packaging type.

Using a testing plugin which contains jar as a custom packaging type. 
From the plugin's components.xml:

component-set
  components
component
  roleorg.apache.maven.lifecycle.mapping.LifecycleMapping/role
  role-hintjar/role-hint
 
implementationorg.apache.maven.lifecycle.mapping.DefaultLifecycleMapping/implementation
  configuration
phases
  testsome.groupId:some-plugin:run-tests/test
/phases

Did something change/become-fixed around this scenario?

Before, it seems the custom goals were merged with the standard jar
packaging goals.  Now, it seems like they replace the standard goals.  I
haven't had time to investigate enough to determine if that description is
fully accurate, but that's what it seems like so far.

I noticed the behavior when the testing plugin said it didn't have any
tests to run.  Finally I figured out that the compile goals were never run,
which meant the the .class files were never written, which meant the testing
plugin didn't have any .class files to run.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/PLEASE-TEST-Apache-Maven-3-0-RC1-tp2841339p2847303.html
Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: [PLEASE TEST] Apache Maven 3.0-RC1

2010-09-17 Thread Martin Vaněk

 Hi guys,
so far so good, but I've found something little odd.
I have reporting plugins preconfigured in pluginManagement section of 
parent pom and I've noticed that this configuration is used only when 
building parent and is not inherited into child projects and has to be 
configured explicitly again. Version of plugin is inherited. Is it 
intentional?


Martin


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: [PLEASE TEST] Apache Maven 3.0-RC1

2010-09-17 Thread Tim
Still not seeing the promised speed up when on a mac (and actually
always a bit slower).
But definitely seeing the improved times on a linux box (Linux
2.6.32-24-server #41-Ubuntu x86_64 GNU/Linux )

So it seems that if you are on a mac then be aware that upgrading to
mvn 3 could at best give you the same build times as mvn 2 and at
worst be a tad slower out of the box.

If you run with -T options it seems to deliver on performance.

The typical build times with mvn 2 are:
Linux: Total time: 57 seconds (always  1m)
Mac: Total time: 1 minute 11 seconds (usually around this time +-5 seconds)

Initial build times using Apache Maven 3.0-RC1 (r997478; 2010-09-15
14:57:55-0500)
Linux: Total time: 1:53.554s
Mac: Total time: 1:56.945s

Subsequent build times:
Linux: Total time: 48.646s
Mac: Total time: 1:20.053s

I'm only added the last run of 3 from each since the runs were all pretty close.
This was tested on 2 different macs but only 1 linux box (which is a
hefty box so the times are a bit unfair towards the linux box).

Running with -T 1c brings the mac builds under a minute (2 cores on the macs).
Mac: Total time: 58.675s (Wall Clock)
And an astounding 1/2 time builds on the linux box (8 cores)
Linux: Total time: 32.193s (Wall Clock)


On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Benjamin Bentmann
benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu wrote:
 Hi,

 in preparation for the release of Apache Maven 3.0, the Maven team is
 seeking your help to discover regressions since Maven 2.x. Everybody
 interested in taking a preview of the upcoming release for a test drive can
 get source and binary bundles from this URL:

 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-030/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/3.0-RC1/

 Before reporting any issues found during testing, please be sure to have a
 close look at the compatibility notes for Maven 3.x:

 https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Maven+3.x+Compatibility+Notes

 If you encounter unexpected build issues, please fill a report in JIRA that
 provides sufficient information to reproduce and analyze the issue:

 http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG

 The fixes contained in this release candidate since the 3.0-beta-3 release
 can also be seen in JIRA:

 http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?atl_token=PRIR5ueW-iversion=13142styleName=TextprojectId=10500Create=Create

 Thanks,


 -The Maven team

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: [PLEASE TEST] Apache Maven 3.0-RC1

2010-09-17 Thread Martin Vaněk

 So now I've found most likely bug in site plugins configuration

In parent pom.xml
build.pluginManagement.plugins.plugin[maven-site-plugin].reportPlugins
plugin
groupIdorg.apache.maven.plugins/groupId
artifactIdmaven-changes-plugin/artifactId
reports
reportchanges-report/report
/reports
configuration
xmlPath${basedir}/src/changes.xml/xmlPath
/configuration
/plugin

plugin
groupIdde.smartics.maven.plugin/groupId
artifactIdmaven-buildmetadata-plugin/artifactId
reports
reportbuildmetadata-report/report
/reports
/plugin

If in child pom.xml
build.pluginManagement.plugins.plugin[maven-site-plugin].reportPlugins
plugin
groupIdde.smartics.maven.plugin/groupId
artifactIdmaven-buildmetadata-plugin/artifactId
!--
reports
reportbuildmetadata-report/report
/reports
--
/plugin

same maven-buildmetadata-plugin is without 
reportbuildmetadata-report/report mvn site will fail


[ERROR] Failed to execute goal 
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-site-plugin:3.0-beta-2:site 
(default-site) on project komix-common: failed to
get Reports: Could not find goal changes-report in plugin 
de.smartics.maven.plugin:maven-buildmetadata-plugin:1.1.0 among 
available goals bu

ildmetadata-report, provide-buildmetadata, build-point - [Help 1]

So it tries to generate report from another plugin...

It fails in combinations:
parent in build.pluginManagement  child in build.pluginManagement
parent in build.pluginManagement  child in build.plugins
parent in build.plugins  child in build.plugins

So it only works when:
parent in build.plugins  child in build.pluginManagement because child 
build.pluginManagement is completely ignored (and it is inherited) for 
site plugin



 Hi guys,
so far so good, but I've found something little odd.
I have reporting plugins preconfigured in pluginManagement section of 
parent pom and I've noticed that this configuration is used only when 
building parent and is not inherited into child projects and has to be 
configured explicitly again. Version of plugin is inherited. Is it 
intentional?


Martin


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: [PLEASE TEST] Apache Maven 3.0-RC1

2010-09-17 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hi,
Here it's more a site plugin issue (looks related to
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSITE-504 but needs to be more
investigated)
Can you record an issue with a simple project to reproduce ?

Thanks,

2010/9/17 Martin Vaněk antha...@post.cz:
  So now I've found most likely bug in site plugins configuration

 In parent pom.xml
 build.pluginManagement.plugins.plugin[maven-site-plugin].reportPlugins
 plugin
 groupIdorg.apache.maven.plugins/groupId
 artifactIdmaven-changes-plugin/artifactId
 reports
 reportchanges-report/report
 /reports
 configuration
 xmlPath${basedir}/src/changes.xml/xmlPath
 /configuration
 /plugin

 plugin
 groupIdde.smartics.maven.plugin/groupId
 artifactIdmaven-buildmetadata-plugin/artifactId
 reports
 reportbuildmetadata-report/report
 /reports
 /plugin

 If in child pom.xml
 build.pluginManagement.plugins.plugin[maven-site-plugin].reportPlugins
 plugin
 groupIdde.smartics.maven.plugin/groupId
 artifactIdmaven-buildmetadata-plugin/artifactId
 !--
 reports
 reportbuildmetadata-report/report
 /reports
                                --
 /plugin

 same maven-buildmetadata-plugin is without
 reportbuildmetadata-report/report mvn site will fail

 [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
 org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-site-plugin:3.0-beta-2:site (default-site) on
 project komix-common: failed to
 get Reports: Could not find goal changes-report in plugin
 de.smartics.maven.plugin:maven-buildmetadata-plugin:1.1.0 among available
 goals bu
 ildmetadata-report, provide-buildmetadata, build-point - [Help 1]

 So it tries to generate report from another plugin...

 It fails in combinations:
 parent in build.pluginManagement  child in build.pluginManagement
 parent in build.pluginManagement  child in build.plugins
 parent in build.plugins  child in build.plugins

 So it only works when:
 parent in build.plugins  child in build.pluginManagement because child
 build.pluginManagement is completely ignored (and it is inherited) for site
 plugin

  Hi guys,
 so far so good, but I've found something little odd.
 I have reporting plugins preconfigured in pluginManagement section of
 parent pom and I've noticed that this configuration is used only when
 building parent and is not inherited into child projects and has to be
 configured explicitly again. Version of plugin is inherited. Is it
 intentional?

 Martin


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org




 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org





-- 
Olivier
http://twitter.com/olamy
http://www.linkedin.com/in/olamy

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: [PLEASE TEST] Apache Maven 3.0-RC1

2010-09-16 Thread Paul Merlin

+1 (non-binding)

Tested corporate and oss projects.
Did not test the release process.

/Paul


Quoting Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu:
 Hi,
 
 in preparation for the release of Apache Maven 3.0, the Maven team is
 seeking your help to discover regressions since Maven 2.x. Everybody
 interested in taking a preview of the upcoming release for a test drive
 can get source and binary bundles from this URL:
 
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-030/org/apache/mav
 en/apache-maven/3.0-RC1/
 
 Before reporting any issues found during testing, please be sure to have
 a close look at the compatibility notes for Maven 3.x:
 
 https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Maven+3.x+Compatibility+N
 otes
 
 If you encounter unexpected build issues, please fill a report in JIRA
 that provides sufficient information to reproduce and analyze the issue:
 
 http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG
 
 The fixes contained in this release candidate since the 3.0-beta-3
 release can also be seen in JIRA:
 
 http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?atl_token=PRIR5ueW-iversi
 on=13142styleName=TextprojectId=10500Create=Create
 
 Thanks,
 
 
 -The Maven team
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: [PLEASE TEST] Apache Maven 3.0-RC1

2010-09-16 Thread Baptiste MATHUS
+1, no problem.

Tested multimodules build, on windows and AIX (ibm jvm), with and without //
build activated.

Congratulations for the work!

2010/9/16 Paul Merlin eska...@n0pe.org


 +1 (non-binding)

 Tested corporate and oss projects.
 Did not test the release process.

 /Paul


 Quoting Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu:
  Hi,
 
  in preparation for the release of Apache Maven 3.0, the Maven team is
  seeking your help to discover regressions since Maven 2.x. Everybody
  interested in taking a preview of the upcoming release for a test drive
  can get source and binary bundles from this URL:
 
 
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-030/org/apache/mav
  en/apache-maven/3.0-RC1/
 
  Before reporting any issues found during testing, please be sure to have
  a close look at the compatibility notes for Maven 3.x:
 
 
 https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Maven+3.x+Compatibility+N
  otes
 
  If you encounter unexpected build issues, please fill a report in JIRA
  that provides sufficient information to reproduce and analyze the issue:
 
  http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG
 
  The fixes contained in this release candidate since the 3.0-beta-3
  release can also be seen in JIRA:
 
 
 http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?atl_token=PRIR5ueW-iversi
  on=13142styleName=TextprojectId=10500Create=Create
 
  Thanks,
 
 
  -The Maven team
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org




-- 
Baptiste Batmat MATHUS - http://batmat.net
Sauvez un arbre,
Mangez un castor !


Re: [PLEASE TEST] Apache Maven 3.0-RC1

2010-09-16 Thread kristian
I have a plugin where I use the maven3 api.

maven-beta-2, maven-beta-1, maven-alpha-6/7,  worked

maven-beta-3 gives
Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
at 
org.sonatype.aether.impl.internal.DefaultArtifactResolver.resolveArtifacts(DefaultArtifactResolver.java:185)
at 
org.sonatype.aether.impl.internal.DefaultArtifactResolver.resolveArtifact(DefaultArtifactResolver.java:175)
at 
org.apache.maven.project.DefaultProjectBuilder.build(DefaultProjectBuilder.java:237)
at 
org.apache.maven.project.DefaultProjectBuilder.build(DefaultProjectBuilder.java:219)


maven-RC1 gives
Caused by: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
org.apache.maven.project.ProjectBuildingRequest.setForceUpdate(Z)Lorg/apache/maven/project/ProjectBuildingRequest;

maybe I should not have used that ProjectBuilder, maybe that is not
part of the public API, maybe I am the only one writing plugin with
maven3 API - then never mind I fix it on my side.

regards Kristian

On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Baptiste MATHUS m...@batmat.net wrote:
 +1, no problem.

 Tested multimodules build, on windows and AIX (ibm jvm), with and without //
 build activated.

 Congratulations for the work!

 2010/9/16 Paul Merlin eska...@n0pe.org


 +1 (non-binding)

 Tested corporate and oss projects.
 Did not test the release process.

 /Paul


 Quoting Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu:
  Hi,
 
  in preparation for the release of Apache Maven 3.0, the Maven team is
  seeking your help to discover regressions since Maven 2.x. Everybody
  interested in taking a preview of the upcoming release for a test drive
  can get source and binary bundles from this URL:
 
 
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-030/org/apache/mav
  en/apache-maven/3.0-RC1/
 
  Before reporting any issues found during testing, please be sure to have
  a close look at the compatibility notes for Maven 3.x:
 
 
 https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Maven+3.x+Compatibility+N
  otes
 
  If you encounter unexpected build issues, please fill a report in JIRA
  that provides sufficient information to reproduce and analyze the issue:
 
  http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG
 
  The fixes contained in this release candidate since the 3.0-beta-3
  release can also be seen in JIRA:
 
 
 http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?atl_token=PRIR5ueW-iversi
  on=13142styleName=TextprojectId=10500Create=Create
 
  Thanks,
 
 
  -The Maven team
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org




 --
 Baptiste Batmat MATHUS - http://batmat.net
 Sauvez un arbre,
 Mangez un castor !


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: [PLEASE TEST] Apache Maven 3.0-RC1

2010-09-16 Thread Benjamin Bentmann

kristian wrote:


I have a plugin where I use the maven3 api.

maven-RC1 gives
Caused by: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
org.apache.maven.project.ProjectBuildingRequest.setForceUpdate(Z)Lorg/apache/maven/project/ProjectBuildingRequest;

maybe I should not have used that ProjectBuilder, maybe that is not
part of the public API


Usage of the ProjectBuilder in general is fine, but the request object 
needed to change. So yes, please update your plugin to adopt the API in 
the RC.



Benjamin

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: [PLEASE TEST] Apache Maven 3.0-RC1

2010-09-16 Thread Joao Maciel
I've tested a multimodule build, on ubuntu 10.04.
The build ran fine, except the warnings complaining about the missing
versions of the plugins inside build/plugins:

[WARNING] 'build.plugins.plugin.version' for
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin is missing.
[WARNING] 'build.plugins.plugin.version' for
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-war-plugin is missing.
[WARNING] 'build.plugins.plugin.version' for
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-resources-plugin is missing.

and about my parameterized artifact version:
[WARNING] 'version' contains an expression but should be a constant.

Well, those warnings are a little bit annoying, although the build ran
successfully.
But, at the end, I''ll keep on using the 2.2.1 version, cause I'm not
going through
all my poms setting plugins versions and I need to keep my projects version
parameterized.

On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 6:43 AM, Baptiste MATHUS m...@batmat.net wrote:

 +1, no problem.

 Tested multimodules build, on windows and AIX (ibm jvm), with and without
 //
 build activated.

 Congratulations for the work!

 2010/9/16 Paul Merlin eska...@n0pe.org

 
  +1 (non-binding)
 
  Tested corporate and oss projects.
  Did not test the release process.
 
  /Paul
 
 
  Quoting Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu:
   Hi,
  
   in preparation for the release of Apache Maven 3.0, the Maven team is
   seeking your help to discover regressions since Maven 2.x. Everybody
   interested in taking a preview of the upcoming release for a test drive
   can get source and binary bundles from this URL:
  
  
 
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-030/org/apache/mav
   en/apache-maven/3.0-RC1/
  
   Before reporting any issues found during testing, please be sure to
 have
   a close look at the compatibility notes for Maven 3.x:
  
  
 
 https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Maven+3.x+Compatibility+N
   otes
  
   If you encounter unexpected build issues, please fill a report in JIRA
   that provides sufficient information to reproduce and analyze the
 issue:
  
   http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG
  
   The fixes contained in this release candidate since the 3.0-beta-3
   release can also be seen in JIRA:
  
  
 
 http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?atl_token=PRIR5ueW-iversi
   on=13142styleName=TextprojectId=10500Create=Create
  
   Thanks,
  
  
   -The Maven team
  
   -
   To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
   For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
 
 
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
 
 


 --
 Baptiste Batmat MATHUS - http://batmat.net
 Sauvez un arbre,
 Mangez un castor !



Re: [PLEASE TEST] Apache Maven 3.0-RC1

2010-09-16 Thread Arnaud Héritier
Benjamin I just found this problem : http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4813
It is failing for all alpha/beta I tested thus it isn't a problem in RC itself.
It occurs with an old version of the jdocbook plugin we are always using in 
GateIn and few others projects.

Arnaud Héritier
Software Factory Manager
http://www.exoplatform.com

Phone : +33 (0)6 89 74 64 24
Skype : aheritier
Twitter : @aheritier 
Blog : http://aheritier.net

On Sep 15, 2010, at 10:34 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:

 Hi,
 
 in preparation for the release of Apache Maven 3.0, the Maven team is seeking 
 your help to discover regressions since Maven 2.x. Everybody interested in 
 taking a preview of the upcoming release for a test drive can get source and 
 binary bundles from this URL:
 
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-030/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/3.0-RC1/
 
 Before reporting any issues found during testing, please be sure to have a 
 close look at the compatibility notes for Maven 3.x:
 
 https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Maven+3.x+Compatibility+Notes
 
 If you encounter unexpected build issues, please fill a report in JIRA that 
 provides sufficient information to reproduce and analyze the issue:
 
 http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG
 
 The fixes contained in this release candidate since the 3.0-beta-3 release 
 can also be seen in JIRA:
 
 http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?atl_token=PRIR5ueW-iversion=13142styleName=TextprojectId=10500Create=Create
 
 Thanks,
 
 
 -The Maven team
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org



[PLEASE TEST] Apache Maven 3.0-RC1

2010-09-15 Thread Benjamin Bentmann

Hi,

in preparation for the release of Apache Maven 3.0, the Maven team is 
seeking your help to discover regressions since Maven 2.x. Everybody 
interested in taking a preview of the upcoming release for a test drive 
can get source and binary bundles from this URL:


https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-030/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/3.0-RC1/

Before reporting any issues found during testing, please be sure to have 
a close look at the compatibility notes for Maven 3.x:


https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Maven+3.x+Compatibility+Notes

If you encounter unexpected build issues, please fill a report in JIRA 
that provides sufficient information to reproduce and analyze the issue:


http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG

The fixes contained in this release candidate since the 3.0-beta-3 
release can also be seen in JIRA:


http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?atl_token=PRIR5ueW-iversion=13142styleName=TextprojectId=10500Create=Create

Thanks,


-The Maven team

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org