Re: [SOGo] Debian Wheezy Repo issue...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 That seems to have resolved it. Stu On 07/15/2016 05:44 AM, Patrice Levesque (pleves...@inverse.ca) wrote: > >>> Looks like there's a redirect? W: Failed to fetch >>> http://inverse.ca/debian/dists/wheezy/wheezy/binary-amd64/Packages >>> 301 Moved Permanently [IP: 2607:5300:60:37b8::2:1 80] >> Yes there is now. You may need to install apt-transport-https >> package. Problem might be with IPv6 though, let me get back to >> you. > > Redirection was just changed to HTTP (instead of HTTPS). Can you > please retry and let us know if you're again able to access our > repository? > > > Thanks, > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXiOLRAAoJEFKVLITDJSGSpB0P/1wm7j/CyN3d79d3GLkXq1L2 CXsj1h+Tm1PajJWP+h0hns+QOy74Juwt2pKefRBIVCJjwXCe8/P1TEGgpui6h9b0 nGf6dQzplx5N7Mnt9e3AV1aQFzIIe+5cYswtsWXuW1CY8zFVIvILPjOq0CfMmbSz PMwCKw5B6rd2UmHEX6B/UFeFY19lwFu83pDl4xCgyrbrF5aAAmtmPRwSeR7Npa6x xs9/hnhNzo5jVjX4vl8zSm3Yl2WOJR469S2f7LdeM4MBX3cVZu/y58wYVZSH7t/P 4WhWb3LiLfrNZxrGnPqabLDe0mh+InXdwEGJ/ZCiDlhDgsUjyvE1pAfoliHk9BA1 scE/np14FBgg+hkSXyyi/Mcz+u5I4qyWwv86X6jFan7grest2+mwj3VytSDEyqsN HAdliuB/El3czWxByQa0l3IfzT428G4DUbCcFdvIQ3ax0oPtpMhwt/vQQN4CSOa/ qoqRQwGzLw95jvmeph2dppkhe7oNR5Zxu+QTCTaeCRGna09mZcEkvCwP6YYErgOT jRsPxHB6nRwS5ms3Lc5mnOqz0JUuxgf0LQYYimmuH7b15VAesjxKlQnoA30mMt3W iiR8Wx+Yb8sZJJEZalyu2MHW6djBv5WaWWD8RZDzMGljEim6p9516qJxJohCodI+ ypq874sedSlQ9owpuErm =M44d -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
[SOGo] Debian Wheezy Repo issue...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Looks like there's a redirect? Ign http://inverse.ca wheezy/wheezy Translation-en_US Ign http://inverse.ca wheezy/wheezy Translation-en Err http://inverse.ca wheezy/wheezy amd64 Packages 301 Moved Permanently [IP: 2607:5300:60:37b8::2:1 80] W: Failed to fetch http://inverse.ca/debian/dists/wheezy/wheezy/binary-amd64/Packages 301 Moved Permanently [IP: 2607:5300:60:37b8::2:1 80] Stu - -- Don't you hear my call, Though you're many years away, Don't you hear me calling you. Write your letters in the sand, For the day I'll take your hand, In the land that our grand-children knew... -- Queen "'39 Lyrics" -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXiAChAAoJEFKVLITDJSGSKR0P/iKErzES3XkhW+nj2ewdKmXz GJIL9wCCCR40cRkn8gWOjl1dWtzcnnXWC1XB/fL0bBcBM100Y+sshnBbfkDC/2Sv TKHkGz7EIgi3ZvwrjA1oVHjgFlfteZSrUqaLg2beKuFtELjq4U1hgw5cOlJXjOZg 1YZOg8cTKcvX+hbtLGLgnANLOAMGGiyGZFSMCYYigZbihoq0JqS1yWeanviDrxqU y2su/uR3s11dJTgdvECKLEY2mIbE8S7V1PzdccYEvIHvUgezufDyL4t1Hx9NY7gK cJXWM8Vnl7LKQIojPO6G8ZsnzTkziD3r8CQPqTl2DblP4B8dgR5Dcp+wMoUAIi6D SJuFVPmJXpILXok+EQJb7upnhaUVpeTH1qg3noVtxeAglVZeMPN8SPoc8oz3v7HS F0o4Is1n5KVkE5ESe5hcB6uWhXl/JKRY7CRqayziowVDKMH1j7VzOEcjjJhPUB7T xPhkD9mI+oHwx+XCXpRNSjbcUV5/R0NzNUyOZ9h0uEzTf7i2dGxmu1TFSMpij3rh bCUrbOL9sHP9FAQeussAaclRZAXOUEXl2m1kaAMnI6Dw6Lv6isXQTea0yMPhyCeJ JhnT75QiaZYki4baGz/qNxCcOpxIJ9/hjVV1L/SFZ6LZyCAmMFIjXj6aUeuZt4Sg m07qxLYIkhIuJf+Xgr74 =I2Zd -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
[SOGo] Temp Files Being Deleted but still Holding Disk Space.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi all.. It seems that SOGo is not closing the temp files it creates under /tmp before it deletes them. I see temp growing in size with no files in the directory, and a bunch of temp files listed under lsof -u sogo as (deleted) but still open. I'm assuming that something is happening out of order here, but I'm not a programmer so at best this is a guess... Debian Wheezy 64 bit SOGo 2.2.3-1 libsope 4.9.r1664.20140403 Any thoughts would be appreciated! Stu Stuart Sheldon ACT USA - -- Hey nineteen Thats retha franklin, She dont remember The queen of soul, Its hard times befallen The sole survivors, She thinks Im crazy, But Im just growing old -- Steely Dan - "Hey 19 - Lyrics" -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJTdNYZAAoJEFKVLITDJSGStk0P/Aq3aFGTXTCDry7VuF8k2PE+ 3BzBCNoBx58ojZb0UADxW64zGNVGMb/irClDq6yr1x+kiosqMxi8ngwn9nduBx5L vK4M0eRZMXIiF9K1z3rXi1XjJ5V7R0OQuN2h1hT3v5hczQ4bhv+pjfkhngOY+yRw ghp5gTii65WtCoH7uU6fuMrvcY3F6YGRyYUx10zf6FwX+ZIhjLb+PFHnpMkKK7l9 P48Mwd4gxm6muhKxKJKKc1YybVBemoXQRdiAfoYUcSVfGTsTzl0QJrtv4CMPVkZc TOoSOkKwKw06fztOKdzSEDEKU+uO0r8iQZV5U9X4EKSKVhKQYjMTLoepXyeJoYpt CmNmIyWhuupW8TKf1y4eNuCzKV98GOjMi3AR22nbxtB6QsFceSOSSMqnCI5mFZZg i2DHvPGsnbK6j9cMxJ2ZsulyJ3QUbOScBr5o31ZS2IhI8CXLkKsyf2ZKb2OshOnI ixxIiYw9De5DFWe1aYULnzXPe1P85viKG/9o1sCHIdAlsmXntUcv2ct9mcevHpoH joAVZfIfybTwnyRyHGJBQqOrFG8jL+sEVr36GCbRGOY8zl0MpT5GoxRGgKB5UFsG 1aNaCUuuHwxtRbrFVnmtB7aiPghLwZb7MWYfVZKIMdCQTRSU/ydxVXWYYJyVdZgL PFtBjN26yZ69yojo4DHp =kiCj -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] ANN: SOGo v1.3.8
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Thanks Francis, Stu On 07/18/2011 05:38 AM, Francis Lachapelle wrote: > Hi Stuart > > On 2011-07-17, at 12:43 PM, Stuart Sheldon wrote: > >> I have not attempted (nor currently plan) to implement the two new >> global domain settings. >> >> Should I adjust our configuration to accommodate any future >> conflicts, such as modifying our domain array keys to not match >> their respective SOGoMailDomain keys, in order to avoid future >> upgrade issues? > > Only if your authentication sources use a mail attribute as the > UIDFieldName. Otherwise, there's no need to change your domain keys. > > Furthermore, I've already committed a change that will avoid any side > effect of the new multi-domains settings when SOGoLoginDomains is not > defined. So this constraint will go away in the next release (and is > already gone in the nightly builds). > > For everyone's information: The main advantage of defining > SOGoLoginDomains is that values of UIDFieldName don't have to be > unique among all domains anymore but only within the same domain > since users will now be identified as UIDFieldName@domainKey. This > identifier will show up in the URL and in the data tables. > > > Francis > > -- flachape...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.755.3640 :: > http://www.inverse.ca Inverse :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://sogo.nu) > and PacketFence (http://packetfence.org) > - -- Every year is getting shorter, never seem to find the time Plans that either come to naught or half a page of scribbled lines Hanging on in quiet desperation is the english way The time is gone, the song is over, thought Id something more to say -- Pink Floyd - "Time Lyrics" -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJOJEddAAoJEFKVLITDJSGSM70QAI3T5fmCKVQQ0pZ3Ix2C1AuJ VykguCn2F83ziGkSbGamVCAcij/jAVbd94m784b2AjdEZKVYFj24PpkMDtRGS5Di QSzEAKVlmdF92M8JkFVvW0eQCkOybs9TWM3iowtwFW3rgiRbZuQjQ4n2VhdlXNwd 1+rF+drtap3EEn5DrLwtCdqWPNvJW+EiDYGgdRcTbIizd7REi6zWgg7JLhdJuz+c L8nNnZWsCTeA8MXd0pkDNCxFBnSHoXHT4+erVw/E4hOMwbVvGG36laE+GWfQZQPX 06cZDBA7AC8alHipnQYfoMBic8MqfWLkYbutCyuQ+/KIq8Llve+dPj9c7dVOYYdw vNHQGMMHd/IQkPMRz5Vv/DACL3R6Hmzcm1HBGCQbL0/8Sd/gluV5lMNk0d0cDr2N ntE/xA7NuUH34cKabskCsWmEGOhGEEuY+cozi54Z6Ml5/5YVFwKlILYXy4I+AzJb 72ee0TSWm6orEGye+rTv/So4RlYiZg+3+L+5HEqrYqPe25lav63RlWPqwKTobTlp AwlkPKB7LQ4J6PaPZXoW3zW753Pv9Z5JsVNFx/wyLyTfWidyvyvI7NZn1AQh hvQw+I/NnPoHiWNb7Vth5+2LNZI5iwMM3D6WhCM11gCQfJzcb7RfIG2fcDw4VXh0 1xqAFNbSPIWF6sGfesc8 =TZtb -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] ANN: SOGo v1.3.8
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I ran the update last night, and have not seen any problems with logins or calendar ACLs. I am running with about 20 unique domain configurations. All domain array keys match their respective SOGoMailDomain keys, and they are the valid domain name for that domain. I have not attempted (nor currently plan) to implement the two new global domain settings. Should I adjust our configuration to accommodate any future conflicts, such as modifying our domain array keys to not match their respective SOGoMailDomain keys, in order to avoid future upgrade issues? Thanks in advance, Stu Stuart Sheldon ACT USA On 07/17/2011 08:14 AM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote: > * Dennis Petschull : >> can you also confirm, that calendar and addressbook sharing is not >> working anymore now? > > I can't confirm that part of the problem. I was able to subscribe > already existing calendars and addressbooks. > > p@rick > >> Am 16.07.2011 21:46, schrieb Patrick Ben Koetter: >>> * Francis Lachapelle : >>>> On 2011-07-15, at 10:59 AM, Ladislav Pašek wrote: >>>> >>>>> my multi-domain config stop working after update. I have to >>>>> switch to single domain config that is working. There some >>>>> changes in multi-domain config syntax? >>>>> <.GNUstepDefaults.txt> >>>> >>>> Does the mail domains of your users addresses match the domains >>>> used in your configuration file of SOGo? If they do match, >>>> change them. For example, instead of using "prodex.sk", use >>>> "prodex-sk". As long as you don't use the new SOGoLoginDomains >>>> setting, the domains keys defined in your .GNUstepDefaults are >>>> never shown. >>> >>> Confirmed. Once I changed the domains name to differ from >>> SOGoMailDomain I could login again. >>> >>> Is this change intentional and I missed to read the relevant >>> documentation or is it a bug? >>> >>> p@rick >>> >>> >> -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJOIxFHAAoJEFKVLITDJSGSRpYP+QFo0M1THWft+GD8smRYOOUM UTsrK2qdO5r0S+Hd1+IGw0YlsH3It2WSgOp52Nn11WxUROiiBKmDZzZwxWYuf/Y1 x4UWtb6uZrRQifchuCaDwLFUXc72z2PrDJd24xTwdvXJVVJTGVNTiJgUMLyJ33ad aV7hfXXu7OPCxe38nX1fqsJlPWGBIpNfCZhbqnislTT8hiWpGXNMBGi/ziR+nlG0 5WZRD+7w7BU1QeJTXTKdFN1xvFAGpJ3L2uUKndoSJ9ediW/i2L3gmpEzh29a73zf A7mVdUtV5z6eeYpkigmUtls49yzy6rsDfraqRAQ5rEb9AtGgnubo04atuff4zY/W 62QsLMudLe9N+vpyzvM1JaPcxD5jgIqmXmVgrCd/jL9TPU2qf0D1iBHnLbFZq2hi qzotzoCuNlri6VQoXH3KCzLxLLuM0FBGocnIuxP2o4SGi0bXeIPuBjPnfb7M6tK7 m97yQSiW0ZCCAInyxCxa0t7UYv3Qx9YxWtywnMkHsZtI3sH0n660wUFIFTwZGZ0p N2mmbkRDuyZAlQHCWO0xCPAifKnD03cFQOOOkITQnux0g5Q5TqYp+cRNtflEjnKt vr7itdVapMrQOmzhP+TBpmZIK8yTl6EHrAWR4nLBCjRZ+HUlo6Iu8FLp86hz/nqc p53oh94q/CGS2FVZIJgi =Ekba -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] 3 domains with ldap
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Your problem is the 'id' keys. They must be unique across all domains. The 2nd and 3rd domains have the same 'id' value. Stu On 04/29/2011 03:21 AM, Jean-Michel OLTRA wrote: > > Bonjour, > > > Le vendredi 29 avril 2011, André Schild a écrit... > > >> No, there is no limit. >> Can you please post your full config file (with removed passwords) > > Here is the full config: > > > > "http://www.gnustep.org/plist-0_9.xml";> > > > NSGlobalDomain > > > sogod > > OCSSessionsFolderURL > > mysql://sogo:XX@localhost:3306/sogo/sogo_sessions_folder > OCSFolderInfoURL > > mysql://sogo:XX@localhost:3306/sogo/sogo_folder_info > SOGoACLsSendEMailNotifications > YES > SOGoProfileURL > > mysql://sogo:XX@localhost:3306/sogo/sogo_user_profile > SOGoSMTPServer > 127.0.0.1 > SOGoAppointmentSendEMailNotifications > YES > SOGoFoldersSendEMailNotifications > YES > SOGoIMAPServer > 127.0.0.1 > SOGoLanguage > French > SOGoMailingMechanism > smtp > SOGoTimeZone > Europe/Paris > > SOGoDraftsFolderName > Drafts > SOGoTrashFolderName > Trash > SOGoSentFolderName > Sent > > domains > > freezbiz.org > > SOGoMailDomain > freezbiz.org > SOGoSuperUsernames > > cstoll > gege > > SOGoLanguage > French > SOGoUserSources > > > CNFieldName > cn > IDFieldName > mail > IMAPHostFieldName > mailHost > UIDFieldName > mail > baseDN > > domainName=freezbiz.org,o=domains,dc=freezbiz,dc=org > bindDN > cn=Manager,dc=freezbiz,dc=org > bindFields > mail > bindPassword > XX > canAuthenticate > YES > displayName > Adresses Partages > hostname > 127.0.0.1 > id > public > isAddressBook > YES > port > 389 > > > > > gestelia-languedoc.fr > > SOGoMailDomain > gestelia-languedoc.fr > SOGoSuperUsernames > > jay > > SOGoLanguage > French > SOGoUserSources > > >CNFieldName >cn >IDFieldName >mail >IMAPHostFieldName >mailHost >UIDFieldName >mail >baseDN > > domainName=gestelia-languedoc.fr,o=domains,dc=freezbiz,dc=org >bindDN >cn=Manager,dc=freezbiz,dc=org >bindFields >mail >bindPassword >XX >canAuthenticate >YES >displayName >Carnet adresses Partagé >hostname >127.0.0.1 >id >contact >isAddressBook >YES >port >389 > > > > > cloud-business-services.eu > > SOGoMailDomain > cloud-business-services.eu >
Re: [SOGo] Memcached and Debian Squeeze
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I had the same problem. the fix was to change the following in the /etc/memcached.conf file: - - -l 127.0.0.1 + -l localhost It has to do with IPv6 I believe. Hope this helps! Stu On 02/10/2011 04:57 AM, Federico Alberto Sayd wrote: > Hello: > > Recently I upgraded my SOGo server from Debian Lenny to Squeeze. > > After the upgrade, SOGo did not connect to memcached anymore. My system > runs memcached from Debian's init scripts. However if I run memcached as > daemon from command line as the user sogo, it works. > > memcached -d -u sogo > > > There is somebody with the same problem? > > Thanks > > Federico -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNU/SGAAoJEFKVLITDJSGSfYMP+gIiU594ahqbVcGzcFap4+K+ gm1n0n2vTyJsv/O302Zwygp85WU7f69UjAzZLweqFXkL0caoeD5p00UwIhlqQLX6 r6ujpw5ex5YaNU1ZzxyX9XPsXlK8puITU9lIR9I8TgML2TOZ9wtokTxnjojLnh+q nNhlda8C7WdW2bSvLoaX8Dvpvae0PzzxAkUjhm5xnp5S6AYiV3/A5Nd0p1IOMecG ugn9MvT3EgrCZZoNMA8mYUrCYS4Djqboz+G6zOhrF2InT5EdsGw/x4Yi+O/EMrQe 93+9QxP03c4APcW84RI1RJPKR2i3rQbnv2myNzL2FLimvEetZ2RywRzlBPokc7QD V9ADw18234op9FnXOmJMj7dmT1VlKhkJOXLP60xWqnK6Z751obTtiWS3xAcU51sB oQa4XaYZB6e+QYl3yhXCBoVilUxKNYYus/9BUJ6MYi2jFYemH03hDoTjshSvz8X0 DnlLrsvQl/p/WUJ6uvnQAuJETVwR4d06f79zSl/DkCxP9oS0reI6zeYV2LNVZsDk Cn26yzmOThMBHdQUNDAu/u1abC4BCESpr4BWouin+4BQ60xw+XsdU1MstGYep+Hs 1peuzwm+5GXpmje4OMYyEfApNGwn6YFatlqZCy1H5D3P2l7IIYRPAA1X/RZz70gh E+nczkgzFXeWMlx6A68y =ctfB -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Strange issue after upgrade to 1.3.5a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Fasil,
I'm actually running mysql... So I don't think that applies, but thanks
for the tip.
I'm going to try to do some additional testing to see if I can duplicate
the problem. I think that it was actually a corrupt entry in my android
that kept messing up the SOGo calendar.
Will post back if I find anything and file a bug if it's actually SOGo
that is causing the issue.
Stu
On 01/30/2011 09:39 AM, fasil wrote:
> On 01/30/2011 08:34 PM, Stuart Sheldon wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Looks like this was actually a problem with the calendar itself. I had a
>> couple recurring appointments that were configured on my Android that
>> were causing the problem. I don't really understand why though, but for
>> now it's fixed.
>>
>> Stu
>>
>>
>> On 01/29/2011 10:29 AM, Stuart Sheldon wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Just upgraded to 1.3.5a and when I went into to web client, discovered I
>>> could not access my calendar. Strangely, others can access theirs. And I
>>> can access the calendar via the Thunderbird Plugin, as well as via
>>> CalDAV. It's just the web based access that seems affected.
>>>
>>> I upgraded to the Daily just to see if it fixed it, but it didn't seem
>>> to make a difference.
>>>
>>> We are currently running Squeeze 64 bit, and are pointed to your Debian
>>> Squeeze repository.
>>>
>>> Here is a snapshot out of the log:
>>>
>>> Jan 29 10:22:23 sogod [2524]: [WARN]<0x0xeb4160[SOGoWebDAVAclManager]>
>>> entry '{DAV:}write' already exists in DAV permissions table
>>> Jan 29 10:22:23 sogod [2524]: [WARN]<0x0xeb4160[SOGoWebDAVAclManager]>
>>> entry '{DAV:}write-properties' already exists in DAV permissions table
>>> Jan 29 10:22:23 sogod [2524]: [WARN]<0x0xeb4160[SOGoWebDAVAclManager]>
>>> entry '{DAV:}write-content' already exists in DAV permissions table
>>> 2011-01-29 10:22:23.324 sogod[2524] NGCalendarDateRange.m:38 Assertion
>>> failed in NGCalendarDateRange(instance), method
>>> initWithStartDate:endDate:. endDate MUST NOT be nil!
>>> EXCEPTION:
>>> NAME:NSInternalInconsistencyException REASON:NGCalendarDateRange.m:38
>>> Assertion failed in NGCalendarDateRange(instance), method
>>> initWithStartDate:endDate:. endDate MUST NOT be nil! INFO:(nil)
>>> Jan 29 10:22:23 sogod [2284]:<0x0xa45800[WOWatchDogChild]> child 2524
>>> exited
>>> Jan 29 10:22:23 sogod [2284]:<0x0xa45800[WOWatchDogChild]> (terminated
>>> due to signal 6)
>>> Jan 29 10:22:23 sogod [2284]:<0x0xa45800[WOWatchDogChild]> avoiding to
>>> respawn child before 2011-01-29 10:22:28 -0800
>>> Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2284]:<0x0xa0f600[WOWatchDog]> child spawned
>>> with pid 2528
>>> Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2284]:<0x0xa0f600[WOWatchDog]> child spawned
>>> with pid 2529
>>> Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2528]:<0x0xc33ad0[SOGoProductLoader]> SOGo
>>> products loaded from '/usr/lib/GNUstep/SOGo':
>>> Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2528]:<0x0xc33ad0[SOGoProductLoader]>
>>> Appointments.SOGo, Contacts.SOGo, MailerUI.SOGo, CommonUI.SOGo,
>>> MailPartViewers.SOGo, ContactsUI.SOGo, Mailer.SOGo,
>>> AdministrationUI.SOGo, SchedulerUI.SOGo, MainUI.SOGo, PreferencesUI.SOGo
>>> Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2529]:<0x0xc33f90[SOGoProductLoader]> SOGo
>>> products loaded from '/usr/lib/GNUstep/SOGo':
>>> Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2529]:<0x0xc33f90[SOGoProductLoader]>
>>> Appointments.SOGo, Contacts.SOGo, MailerUI.SOGo, CommonUI.SOGo,
>>> MailPartViewers.SOGo, ContactsUI.SOGo, Mailer.SOGo,
>>> AdministrationUI.SOGo, SchedulerUI.SOGo, MainUI.SOGo, PreferencesUI.SOGo
>>> Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2528]: |SOGo| version 1.3.5 (build
>>> @vizzini.inverse.ca 201101271844) -- starting
>>> Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2528]: |SOGo| vmem size check enabled: shutting
>>> down app when vmem> 384 MB
>>> Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2529]: |SOGo| version 1.3.5 (build
>>> @vizzini.inverse.ca 201101271844) -- starting
>>> Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2529]: |SOGo| vmem size check enabled: shutting
>>> down app when vmem> 384 MB
>>>
>>> Any help would be great!
>>>
>>> Stuart Sheldon
>>> ACT USA
> Hi,
> did you try the below step from sogo installation guide?
> ---
> You should then adjust the access rights to the database. To do so,
&
Re: [SOGo] Strange issue after upgrade to 1.3.5a
Hi all,
Looks like this was actually a problem with the calendar itself. I had a
couple recurring appointments that were configured on my Android that
were causing the problem. I don't really understand why though, but for
now it's fixed.
Stu
On 01/29/2011 10:29 AM, Stuart Sheldon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just upgraded to 1.3.5a and when I went into to web client, discovered I
> could not access my calendar. Strangely, others can access theirs. And I
> can access the calendar via the Thunderbird Plugin, as well as via
> CalDAV. It's just the web based access that seems affected.
>
> I upgraded to the Daily just to see if it fixed it, but it didn't seem
> to make a difference.
>
> We are currently running Squeeze 64 bit, and are pointed to your Debian
> Squeeze repository.
>
> Here is a snapshot out of the log:
>
> Jan 29 10:22:23 sogod [2524]: [WARN] <0x0xeb4160[SOGoWebDAVAclManager]>
> entry '{DAV:}write' already exists in DAV permissions table
> Jan 29 10:22:23 sogod [2524]: [WARN] <0x0xeb4160[SOGoWebDAVAclManager]>
> entry '{DAV:}write-properties' already exists in DAV permissions table
> Jan 29 10:22:23 sogod [2524]: [WARN] <0x0xeb4160[SOGoWebDAVAclManager]>
> entry '{DAV:}write-content' already exists in DAV permissions table
> 2011-01-29 10:22:23.324 sogod[2524] NGCalendarDateRange.m:38 Assertion
> failed in NGCalendarDateRange(instance), method
> initWithStartDate:endDate:. endDate MUST NOT be nil!
> EXCEPTION:
> NAME:NSInternalInconsistencyException REASON:NGCalendarDateRange.m:38
> Assertion failed in NGCalendarDateRange(instance), method
> initWithStartDate:endDate:. endDate MUST NOT be nil! INFO:(nil)
> Jan 29 10:22:23 sogod [2284]: <0x0xa45800[WOWatchDogChild]> child 2524
> exited
> Jan 29 10:22:23 sogod [2284]: <0x0xa45800[WOWatchDogChild]> (terminated
> due to signal 6)
> Jan 29 10:22:23 sogod [2284]: <0x0xa45800[WOWatchDogChild]> avoiding to
> respawn child before 2011-01-29 10:22:28 -0800
> Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2284]: <0x0xa0f600[WOWatchDog]> child spawned
> with pid 2528
> Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2284]: <0x0xa0f600[WOWatchDog]> child spawned
> with pid 2529
> Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2528]: <0x0xc33ad0[SOGoProductLoader]> SOGo
> products loaded from '/usr/lib/GNUstep/SOGo':
> Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2528]: <0x0xc33ad0[SOGoProductLoader]>
> Appointments.SOGo, Contacts.SOGo, MailerUI.SOGo, CommonUI.SOGo,
> MailPartViewers.SOGo, ContactsUI.SOGo, Mailer.SOGo,
> AdministrationUI.SOGo, SchedulerUI.SOGo, MainUI.SOGo, PreferencesUI.SOGo
> Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2529]: <0x0xc33f90[SOGoProductLoader]> SOGo
> products loaded from '/usr/lib/GNUstep/SOGo':
> Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2529]: <0x0xc33f90[SOGoProductLoader]>
> Appointments.SOGo, Contacts.SOGo, MailerUI.SOGo, CommonUI.SOGo,
> MailPartViewers.SOGo, ContactsUI.SOGo, Mailer.SOGo,
> AdministrationUI.SOGo, SchedulerUI.SOGo, MainUI.SOGo, PreferencesUI.SOGo
> Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2528]: |SOGo| version 1.3.5 (build
> @vizzini.inverse.ca 201101271844) -- starting
> Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2528]: |SOGo| vmem size check enabled: shutting
> down app when vmem > 384 MB
> Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2529]: |SOGo| version 1.3.5 (build
> @vizzini.inverse.ca 201101271844) -- starting
> Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2529]: |SOGo| vmem size check enabled: shutting
> down app when vmem > 384 MB
>
> Any help would be great!
>
> Stuart Sheldon
> ACT USA
--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
[SOGo] Strange issue after upgrade to 1.3.5a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
Just upgraded to 1.3.5a and when I went into to web client, discovered I
could not access my calendar. Strangely, others can access theirs. And I
can access the calendar via the Thunderbird Plugin, as well as via
CalDAV. It's just the web based access that seems affected.
I upgraded to the Daily just to see if it fixed it, but it didn't seem
to make a difference.
We are currently running Squeeze 64 bit, and are pointed to your Debian
Squeeze repository.
Here is a snapshot out of the log:
Jan 29 10:22:23 sogod [2524]: [WARN] <0x0xeb4160[SOGoWebDAVAclManager]>
entry '{DAV:}write' already exists in DAV permissions table
Jan 29 10:22:23 sogod [2524]: [WARN] <0x0xeb4160[SOGoWebDAVAclManager]>
entry '{DAV:}write-properties' already exists in DAV permissions table
Jan 29 10:22:23 sogod [2524]: [WARN] <0x0xeb4160[SOGoWebDAVAclManager]>
entry '{DAV:}write-content' already exists in DAV permissions table
2011-01-29 10:22:23.324 sogod[2524] NGCalendarDateRange.m:38 Assertion
failed in NGCalendarDateRange(instance), method
initWithStartDate:endDate:. endDate MUST NOT be nil!
EXCEPTION:
NAME:NSInternalInconsistencyException REASON:NGCalendarDateRange.m:38
Assertion failed in NGCalendarDateRange(instance), method
initWithStartDate:endDate:. endDate MUST NOT be nil! INFO:(nil)
Jan 29 10:22:23 sogod [2284]: <0x0xa45800[WOWatchDogChild]> child 2524
exited
Jan 29 10:22:23 sogod [2284]: <0x0xa45800[WOWatchDogChild]> (terminated
due to signal 6)
Jan 29 10:22:23 sogod [2284]: <0x0xa45800[WOWatchDogChild]> avoiding to
respawn child before 2011-01-29 10:22:28 -0800
Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2284]: <0x0xa0f600[WOWatchDog]> child spawned
with pid 2528
Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2284]: <0x0xa0f600[WOWatchDog]> child spawned
with pid 2529
Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2528]: <0x0xc33ad0[SOGoProductLoader]> SOGo
products loaded from '/usr/lib/GNUstep/SOGo':
Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2528]: <0x0xc33ad0[SOGoProductLoader]>
Appointments.SOGo, Contacts.SOGo, MailerUI.SOGo, CommonUI.SOGo,
MailPartViewers.SOGo, ContactsUI.SOGo, Mailer.SOGo,
AdministrationUI.SOGo, SchedulerUI.SOGo, MainUI.SOGo, PreferencesUI.SOGo
Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2529]: <0x0xc33f90[SOGoProductLoader]> SOGo
products loaded from '/usr/lib/GNUstep/SOGo':
Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2529]: <0x0xc33f90[SOGoProductLoader]>
Appointments.SOGo, Contacts.SOGo, MailerUI.SOGo, CommonUI.SOGo,
MailPartViewers.SOGo, ContactsUI.SOGo, Mailer.SOGo,
AdministrationUI.SOGo, SchedulerUI.SOGo, MainUI.SOGo, PreferencesUI.SOGo
Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2528]: |SOGo| version 1.3.5 (build
@vizzini.inverse.ca 201101271844) -- starting
Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2528]: |SOGo| vmem size check enabled: shutting
down app when vmem > 384 MB
Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2529]: |SOGo| version 1.3.5 (build
@vizzini.inverse.ca 201101271844) -- starting
Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2529]: |SOGo| vmem size check enabled: shutting
down app when vmem > 384 MB
Any help would be great!
Stuart Sheldon
ACT USA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=NSYu
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Funambol : Calendar synchro on Android 2.2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I'm using Calendar Sync 0.9.4.6 Beta for bi-directional sync using Cal Dav on 2.2 with an G2 Stu On 01/26/2011 06:33 AM, Stéphane PERON wrote: > Hi, > > I have just installed funambol v9 and created sogo-card and card in > FunambolSOGoConnector ( I have deleted the card entry in the > FunambolFoundationConnector ) > > The card synchronisation works very well ... with an android 2.2 > Operating System. > > I have done the same thing for calendar that is supposed to be supported > from this funambol version ... > > However, on my android 2.2, I can't see the calendar icon ... like seen > on this page : http://www.funambol.com/solutions/android.php > > So my question : > Does anyone has succeeded in using calendar synchronisation with SOGO on > android ?? > > Cheers > > Stéphane > - -- Poets tell how Pancho fell, and Lefty's living in a cheap hotel The desert's quiet and Cleveland's cold, And so the story ends we're told Pancho needs your prayers it's true, but save a few for Lefty too He only did what he had to do, and now he's growing old. -- Willie Nelson and Merle Haggart "Pancho and Lefty" -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNQEO+AAoJEFKVLITDJSGShwcP/2eYFM9+wmgk95ki9FOjvxca cpcG2cZR1Ez8wzRjdW6ODRqGev6u6CMQtR2mEAmXbfbxrRvZdO75RsIsBhiAzpaI V/aIeP1JzUpQamXUT2t+pa45uuClRGZ6l4aw++P5kkESWYIFjFdvEHKc4CjnsbT6 GhF/Mrlu2rmkNtnZrCmjynRgaSWTKeWA6jhH8QGc5xAW9XPVccy7PLLo0jvzBabJ fL7gSKMYTBlid/gG1tTHAF6NiEOpT5BawuK0JxDkUy9zlSqBInwBHm9qSfF/6uzp XkWXWbyL2kM3oKFPp5EKQ8bmO38LIx+tHOkr8ANNRqizURglA2ZtKQ9Hwf4F2s2J CHnp14J4zuiuDWjnqwIIyQ+tgtRD2QDK7VxLjosBwBvZNFopfFmTYJOaKH51O8wa HPqQdhjTWtHwYDOyPqE4RlixBSgm1muGSAmi/X1N0SjNYrvd/lYybQtxjY09AXe/ 29ejquCNxGCWr7n2gPakMD47eVH22jGhAPp8YJP8THVW4/piuj8/U6tkB7aJRSEy vJyBt/QNHGiHN3W/mcDM7xhLCxD1yUxhxHaRkdMX30rYv2gQ1SaBGfj7ESi/JRUa HcHa37eII7RpCx3dfQDhXxLLFqn5C9VnknTopqsfui3xNnUE7VN9M+a/qjqW6JIi GnrybRbIdUD3U3bf2d0Q =HcFZ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] One user unable to see any mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Is it possible that the user has so many emails that the server is hitting a byte limit of some sort? On 01/06/2011 12:54 PM, Chris Hobbs wrote: > Still need some ideas on this one... thanks! > > Chris > > On 1/5/11 2:00 PM, Chris Hobbs wrote: >> I have an odd one. I have one user (out of thousands) that is unable >> to see any of his mail any longer in the SOGo web interface. He can >> log in successfully, view his calendar and his address book, but the >> folder pane is empty, and the "Get Mail" and "Write" buttons do nothing. >> >> Steps taken to trouble shoot: >> >> 1) Tried on a different computer with multiple browsers (Firefox, >> Chrome, Safari). >> 2) Deleted sogo user with sogo-tool. Logged back in which created sogo >> account successfully >> 3) Created account in Thunderbird to confirm IMAP was functioning >> correctly - it is. >> >> I can see SOGo logging into the IMAP server in the dovecot logs, so >> that isn't the problem. No other users are complaining of the issue, >> and I've not installed any updates in at least 10 weeks. User claimed >> it began just before our winter break which started 12/17. >> >> Any ideas on what to look at next? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Chris >> -- >> Chris Hobbs >> Director, Technology >> New Haven Unified School District >> -- This message has been checked by ESVA and is believed to be clean. > > > -- > Chris Hobbs > Director, Technology > New Haven Unified School District > -- This message has been checked by ESVA and is believed to be clean. - -- Though it's cold and lonely in the deep dark night I can see paradise by the dashboard light -- Meatloaf - "Paradise by the Dashboard Light - Lyrics" -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNJiyCAAoJEFKVLITDJSGSl7gQAK71rgrj2DehlYtC8Lptx4PQ IkYg++6kOrVF/mvJ1VbXWAkDIKmUkvcSAxf1h+DsOs1ZzEWnTw/3/TkGsIe4Fdyz 2LirYuDE0Bcz7bY1zH67yJ/xagScDfA2SSDB8GnObn8CHoPIEp2IP31WFaoSJHf2 iCRYyR5YwCsieR/O0nSgH8p11YEWDJYU7Na1AfqZZmPtjMXtvC5QnXJyV4S+VEb3 FJtZoC7R2HFRijyctAx0h6WGqYZc6oNiYM8WDJzYZi4XrylYJUaz9U/zxhYT3ZFh CyCmpOu8kkMtIV+KAUdi9SbO/+bvfk5Oe0aKwV0z88V/bsAl/4OnQRTDeE/6PYAr fkICnm/84wVoUlM6mW4XsmPc33UGtlIoVsemcTdvJRcYkAYMyfzgCbKivc+JPETz MVHoZLlGkvefZRQzuAwv9rNaNcx8ljxQ4JRkYIEI6y9AwECVeMGZDTYguKZERFid OiRl1JjFMBs9DGr2MGX8rJHBZhjaGg68zVzn4qc1idYvvKpHxnwi069DUZar/yfk ceEqMh96VpL/OR41GzekMZFBr0GOuZynhKzCTthiz71wZBKkBt7M3qd9twhCJ8UT Jce4vqBtLwX9+na6jpNEdX26EwKivYq91YnBoAHd2mbxqujBni9GwBq8pwactGRy Iksb44xfsBOZ93KC5gtv =c3MZ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Question Regarding Attendees
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Thanks Ludovic, Added to bug tracking. Stu On 01/06/2011 11:23 AM, Ludovic Marcotte wrote: > On 11-01-06 1:25 PM, Stuart Sheldon wrote: >> Ok, Here is a summary of what we are seeing... Should I file a bug >> report? > [snip] > > Yes, please. > > Regards, > - -- And all I can do is keep on telling you, I want you, I need you, But there aint no way Im ever gonna love you, Now dont be sad cause two out of three aint bad... -- Meatloaf - "Two out of Three aint bad - Lyrics" -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNJhu/AAoJEFKVLITDJSGS41kQAISgFxXQ7oGET2RFPaQuqDrB r0KC7dFFelVdhorR31TtGZtqMT5OTji0QgU05N6Hsw3lO21eRD5tV4GHSZfzUpHR qtKunP0lZkEx9YEA9t61RrVZkglacfbCTBzrvI9Nj37x7DoGDKSuyNB8hX4xAlZJ mUrEK5Xn1H8NlnuMBC/WprIyuQGPaCS3EN2Gj2cY4QWRhPwLivrtnBew7xO+6wmB 03UuGcNiuRvgAJ/i45Wjmq6l7oIlJDPnnMxWJydy0Hpe9cyLEEdCarx8sw555IE+ n0vRY+d6gXVc+tudS6hBiGLL2po9dDLagmiizUXp9DJlGHpzC78Dbj9PikJkdw7S 1dxQ9xQDGvEoIDa2IvOkccgavJBiZv974JAgiLpZRPJ8yhxHoev8QAFkQcDfcImc 7WgGDreGCkA9THcusf/1N0MKUG8rWffkYCmvk2+cD3btaxO0bo/3kA6d09uhRWIR 9TGQfMSpX/ebDRIzbbUZO7e2PUngnH/+Uvo9CaD1mi5SL9ZAD+MtrN5jLgNwjisl 31lz/ydYjYIZh5FzhN3Rrlfxizm8MMq21GHY2Ll8j5+qjov3+0F11yEEg84+irDK JCAdSC6GqkDHGEOj9Hh7GNRPCeBBy4/enHodLBX7AA0LQtUddBafFiGvaSjlmmSx 5JYuxKAO8K8AV8OzBxep =LCFl -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Question Regarding Attendees
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Ok, Here is a summary of what we are seeing... Should I file a bug report? When viewing a calendar event created by the current user in Thunderbird, or through the web interface, after clicking on the 'Attendees' link via the Inverse Lightning plugin, the small round graphics that indicate attendee status are missing. When clicking on a calendar event that the current user has not created but has been invited to, the small round graphics that indicate attendee status are visible and correct. 1) This problem exists in both Debian and Ubuntu, 64 and 32 bit. 2) This problem does not exist under Windows. All installs were tested using the Mozilla Thunderbird build from the Mozilla website, as well as the Ubuntu version of Thunderbird. All installs were done from scratch including a default OS install. Problem is easily duplicated: Install Debian Squeeze with default installation settings, then install Thunderbird from the Mozilla site, then install Lightning and connector from the SOGo site, then install the modified version of integrator to attach to your server. Thunderbird is currently installed in '/usr/local/thunderbird'. Error log shows no errors or warnings. Please advise any additional tests you would like us to run... Again, should we file a bug report? Thanks again in advance, Stuart Sheldon ACT USA On 01/05/2011 02:52 PM, Stuart Sheldon wrote: > Any Additional Ideas On this??? > > Stu > > > On 01/04/2011 11:01 AM, Stuart Sheldon wrote: >> The Debian Systems are all running Thunderbird from the Mozilla website, >> and Lightning from Sogo. > >> Here is the 'about' info: > >> Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) >> Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2.104i Thunderbird/3.1.7 > >> Stuart Sheldon >> ACT USA > > >> On 01/04/2011 10:29 AM, Ludovic Marcotte wrote: >>> On 11-01-04 1:19 PM, Stuart Sheldon wrote: >>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>>> Hash: SHA256 >>>> >>>> Some More Info... >>>> >>>> This issue appears to only effect Linux Debian and Ubuntu. I have tested >>>> and verified that the status indicator icons appear properly in the >>>> Windows version. >>>> >>>> My testing is limited to 64bit Debian, and 32bit Ubuntu, as all our >>>> office systems run Squeeze 64bit, and my laptop runs 32bit Ubuntu. >>>> >>>> Sorry for not bringing this fact out sooner. Please advise on any >>>> additional steps you would like us to do to test this further. >>>> >>> Are you using the Thunderbird from the official's Thunderbird website? >>> Lightning from sogo.nu? If not (to both questions), that's your problem. > > > - -- Does anyone know where the love of God goes when the waves turn the minutes to hours. The searchers all say that they'd have made White Fish Bay if they'd put fifteen more miles behind her. -- Gordon Lightfoot "The Wreck of The Edmund Fitzgerald Lyrics" -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNJgkeAAoJEFKVLITDJSGSlvQQALrRaI1ZGE6MvoYtNTebap9z weUvkgCqhW7Bd79mbTyFb0E/IAQyVzsgyo9kKHJrWlU7OACZ0qgaXceziShr5kGM 5Cqm/oN0agdkIz52vzPh15SFJLl9M7c0a8C5lSDYk+JyYvsELsXPttGi6mHHqrL1 VQzoVYKhffbp7ImwRsdprRc1HT48LRKw7ZmpFp4cQJHMDNC8Jno+/S97MbP0P4Qh pCgvAVi/oJluZaIg3r8/K8sI5g7YQVfSh9YjEFgXrmwZJKMV1P0uziIsN1h2+QsO 0rJIdjrigFkYOkN0VZrZ0Z86vVfDGWegw5gnHZIrhJvkxyeNLQ2SU10XntKGWQxe AJ3aOY3/TaqwPMEWQMB1OJxIexqs1G3+HwZP4NAKa/twG7ELM3Gp4+uatYqxFdUu x/CzzjkjOIch/RyGPbdcACDPe6JQBMcmxzy5LZZlkdZE0AAWsVkaa8VbLAsDbcPp +RRmVKDvYinNHwpssrIZuIOsUx0mKl5EbkOC0DCgdIjSsmfDcKWsgditjZT/xAxa YP41iRY+Vbzt6WRSzFn0i5OWiBMEtwTh0K8Tyq50krGdPbaz/8t4N7Gt0cXA7WVT EGbePUxqkvN0o+CL/jLG+caft92Wa+pn0efdmWkYM81LdkofAm+M99UCk9zdrC6d npjQsw22Lkz0rlgsTuuS =l8km -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Will the developers be at SCALE?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 You will be missed... Stu On 01/06/2011 08:26 AM, Ludovic Marcotte wrote: > On 11-01-06 11:13 AM, Stuart Sheldon wrote: >> I have on good authority that the SOGo project has been offered a booth >> at SCALE this year. > Indeed. >> Are you folks going to be able to make it? It would >> be great to meet some of you in person! > We won't be there this year - maybe next year. > > Regards, > - -- Harmlessly passing your time in the grassland away; Only dimly aware of a certain unease in the air. You better watch out, There may be dogs about I've looked over Jordan, and I have seen Things are not what they seem. -- Pink Floyd - "Sheep Lyrics" -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNJe5RAAoJEFKVLITDJSGS8HgP/0X/dQRQbeRmG+yWxh1v+D2p cWPscGt1T0kdjJIcead0cePJQ3lwtozrCesvMS8fc/jsZTmtKN0Ifz9eTewJ30MT 8g2HpwsJtLmtzC/Z3PscFICMxsabk6M46RjNCBcA0A0yoOdtD5qq76IH3sa3brzH kcTBDUEZvgEG5VDtRZFiHn/hFuhEXb/q1X2VnxnPfueYqIkfnULWWWSyqcL5w13U fLHeDVIyvcvcbNIrqMBwF+nr7iepiyufNSeIOgVkGFJGfKcYL0sl4epRbgqkLdCI IgVELFQ2+NpqvDAjhRybzFAghAXoYHJ+76g3qlveEYT393AnYBgNvxG8Do3bsha4 xbf75mr0AQZ+tMRfVO/lLuhXFn2hQ6VOjTfr0ASAxDbTLgL5TW2YNJ/jzRTv849u 3gFSTrCaFVT6bDdJHLhsYzybKuBlo6tL+kDkjpd3t9ovQzHV1aoGdny3KadqcRYd jS6gcNjpOvGGq8T3H/lO78iu31yxeLvQuLpp9PsYTk1xrqzEA4y90k8LLxkH8QfD 0otbefoca69Zf1ae/CKJYiOgsTRKDVmHXVr5pmr+qIPRnuhEJRWCqmctdc+fb+Ft y5mcotKkgp+2jTrn/F7kVSdOsHt5GzV0hV/EoseT0/nGHQaTsAg8u33tyXRXPbj/ sSMW4pb5cwoPUXW87dL4 =bN9i -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
[SOGo] Will the developers be at SCALE?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Project Leaders, I have on good authority that the SOGo project has been offered a booth at SCALE this year. Are you folks going to be able to make it? It would be great to meet some of you in person! Stuart Sheldon - -- Well I've always had a deep respect, And I mean that most sincerely. The band is just fantastic, that is really what I think. Oh by the way, which one's Pink? -- Pink Floyd - "Have a Cigar Lyrics" -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNJeoQAAoJEFKVLITDJSGSbwAQAKvBh1DgEVqnhRXQ45AzhHJ3 Bhn+cAzWL+I3JRWhxX489br3UHD0tLd1mECC7T4+6xnwhgLSn7razatP2dJlKjas GYT/fd0h6nQlOjhbCAK3Z1bytMyFT2ObSYhgxWvCCAavV8lIcwq8jXNkMl3UoavG th2BuzkiGpLsPZmBIpGGDK4x0Oh30Jq3DUoa2l3S82SAGheqZckYZhHifszCnvmM hBy2/P0guuUh0dgaH9ud+63VWw7dSw3p66HKwztfm05AeIg1Q5kD/SVtegta2i61 8JGnggEvljHxEmsutlTtDdadaUrgYivItTOxx90dhm8hdziE0UosbPJ0jZFKsTI2 S2QL9q2EaWY8UTCoCmcv6UhgFyfFJYairxdoh8SOgtp4ygHcWDLrrMrTRIZaHEgB my9YRRclP652kD9BEkvnwTsNcOb/wWm0+S2lceJtJ6MDPcJ3tbIt+98F2LgeZKmx M62NhJkQ2NUvmqVdL9Ze5FCYrG9lYAoO3SCFNe24xM6aGs+7Jl5CMIpnalTZYULE DeqIaETeYaUHmRbL6Yau1Hy+pTzMyv481Bjqtc9DgK2/zVOdDAe1T+UTKZJ6AQ7Z B8Verf9atqQbWHzioEeZES5N24vSJnIvLdmt7KsFqvtqQ4q5YNnFaFa0tFaGpTk3 TbD9nKToqVk3gFrTEEWc =LrIV -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Lightning is crappy...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi all, On 01/05/2011 11:25 PM, tarjei wrote: > On 01/05/2011 07:17 PM, vikt...@gmail.com wrote: >> Hi, > >> On 11/18/2010 05:12 PM, Wolfgang Sourdeau wrote: >>> >>> Well... It could seem like a lame response, but all our free work is >>> provided without warranty. We cannot afford that (and nobody can)... And I personally want to thank everyone involved in the project for their work. >>> >>> I still think we do a pretty good job at fixing issues. Sometimes they >>> are just not easy to narrow down because of contextual problems. But >>> bugs that we fix rarely get reopened. And as someone who's business model is based around open source software, this is the holy grail... >> Does anyone have a work around for this? I would really like to be >> running 3.1. I currently have Thunderbird 3.1.7 working with the three Inverse plugins under the following environments: Debian Squeeze 64 bit OS and 32 bit TBird and Plugins. Debian Squeeze 32 bit OS and 32 bit TBird and Plugins. Ubuntu 10.04 32 bit OS and 32 bit TBird and Plugins. Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit OS and 64 bit Tbird and Plugins. Windows XP Pro 32 bit OS 32 bit TBird and Plugins. Windows 7 Ultimate 32 bit OS 32 bit TBird and Plugins. Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit OS 32 bit TBird and Plugins. I have not noticed any performance issues with these systems. I do however disable some features that became default in the '3' series. These features are: 1) Turn off message synchronizing. 2) Uncheck Enable Global Search and Indexer. I found that with either / both these settings turned on, my Thunderbird performance went down the tubes... - From a calendar perspective, the Inverse plugins work as promised, with the exception of the 'Invitee Status Icon' not displaying in any of the Linux configurations. Which brings me to my next point... I've been doing this for a enough years, on both sides of the table (support and end user) to know that the reason I'm not getting an answer to my issue is because I have not made the issue clear enough for the developers to reproduce the issue. I know that once they can see the issue on a test system, they can begin to correct it. If you want a better product, you probably want more in your bug reports then just 'Lightning is crappy'. This is not only unproductive, but a bit insulting. Open source developers want to create a great product! Any programmer can take the 'easy' road of 9 to 5 commercial programming... But it takes a group that loves to code to put together an open source project like SOGo. Yes, there are issues, and yes, there will always be bugs... And your bug or issue may not be at the top of the list for the developers... But at the end of the day, I'd rather work with open source people then faceless software companies and day of the week! > > Have you tried to attach GDB to the process and get a backtrace? > > One thing I'm missing for SOGo is a document explaining the different > ways we can extract debug and logging information out of the system. The > interaction between Thunderbird/Lightning and SOGo is complex and it > would be usefull to have some pointers on what logs to create, how to > run TB in some debug mode etc. This would be cool... I'm betting my problem is missing graphics or the old 'case sensitivity' issue with Unix flavored OSs, but alas, there is nothing on the command line, or in any of the error logs that would indicate a problem... Just my two cents... Stuart Sheldon ACT USA - -- Every year is getting shorter, never seem to find the time Plans that either come to naught or half a page of scribbled lines Hanging on in quiet desperation is the english way The time is gone, the song is over, thought Id something more to say -- Pink Floyd - "Time Lyrics" -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNJegpAAoJEFKVLITDJSGSPcUP/Rd3D/4iFsBo3lb0BfHntjFk WQQKSJQNGQ8NN8sq540hXD1UJv6XQThPHnZo1Xh21FtfrnGhKNwzM7GEIfaZuy8I fYRGPMbA7iF4KnFRHqIBqI7FxLOwZ7ZVpWpOr52FSrez6p66JXTZ7IucnkiyMqje n2NBQtirzEl6TcbWmka0unO0Bf8C6UdsNVdwpAg7YsL8VW0hbhOqVtMUeGyUNYsN puJdBNZlG4UWoZsVGJnW2pEprhsG2IJJUQvXSa53v9uPL0PQU2P6e9dNvl5wFq1D 6jelwIFQFFl0qia3n68fTzie2oQzXMsCDoSgTbdRYVx1eIpclv+PgMXhZEIqg8Aw gT53gU498VRZxsBSmYErSVALBWIo2xw3yWeQPPHlNiy1S6eFmyPxyaWZadM3TVN8 dxwcR7TB7Ov5g0oGfuuDjd5HJ+CruRw4F+enyXt/qT13g+lA9QZHsPo7yiD6zscE JGpnyaNsQCCI8Jk/E09ghJswEmY6AauiRFG7zTZojuksIoYGGYTPrdRaltcbgu2s RhJ06QEqFmP2Oyt2d+tfH2D3BjQ81tD0+9B/JBiqI+Z5+GDZ9PoN2h/k6yESZuW7 WrwKecVh58/+WKnVkk20KFuTRrI5ZhastEZXl51sQ0w9YE62IZ0EWI/aMBgLKG6W m2sVb2HtKXBPa732QF3x =XY5z -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Question Regarding Attendees
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Any Additional Ideas On this??? Stu On 01/04/2011 11:01 AM, Stuart Sheldon wrote: > The Debian Systems are all running Thunderbird from the Mozilla website, > and Lightning from Sogo. > > Here is the 'about' info: > > Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) > Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2.104i Thunderbird/3.1.7 > > Stuart Sheldon > ACT USA > > > On 01/04/2011 10:29 AM, Ludovic Marcotte wrote: >> On 11-01-04 1:19 PM, Stuart Sheldon wrote: >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>> Hash: SHA256 >>> >>> Some More Info... >>> >>> This issue appears to only effect Linux Debian and Ubuntu. I have tested >>> and verified that the status indicator icons appear properly in the >>> Windows version. >>> >>> My testing is limited to 64bit Debian, and 32bit Ubuntu, as all our >>> office systems run Squeeze 64bit, and my laptop runs 32bit Ubuntu. >>> >>> Sorry for not bringing this fact out sooner. Please advise on any >>> additional steps you would like us to do to test this further. >>> >> Are you using the Thunderbird from the official's Thunderbird website? >> Lightning from sogo.nu? If not (to both questions), that's your problem. > > - -- Open up the window Let some air into this room I think I'm almost chokin' From the smell of stale perfume And that cigarette you're smoking 'Bout scared me half to death Open up the window, sucker Let me catch my breath -- Three Dog Night - "Mama Told Me Not to Come - Lyrics" -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNJPZKAAoJEFKVLITDJSGS5kUP/36f5DvQD96bEmYTRh6S7oh0 PJ8lKpeQIJjvf3BaUj3PLTQ7fIWNf7MfOI+eLS5VuAsYiDl82p1jC8LcTqxQe4Ss k0bnNrfT1rcIw4daIQtkmSvHRHA6mOcMSz5T3+QODZcoaKa/ABw1Z7dPXtfOAhJu Q0Rg3JEboYnBr5surjBF03fkbYCS0wAV9mpsyVw2Ob2kJ2iLUYrNt8trslOM4Tdb uBqwStcee1MVuUmPeL8gi/Q0nMDFfSHXoZunnKMJ0wdKF5hlRtWUIe8UsweoHqK7 cyWxgJFxJOTvOgfkE4DyfMXyEJFPI2Eqm6HTJH6M+a+ow+1ZzkGYLusW5HFw9pDl /goBpo7YI1A/8tZuu99JocrvPFq/UchWmLyGCGLT0PNhu8B6PhxLdKWpDowgIO7/ +ywmCUruCM0x9pRhl4lWz/FCAoTWtpvf1kEVeVk6xEP2ZG2xCS6qaGiQdfXNzrmQ KVA4NLwHVl2xs5gP7N4/qzThMQXY7vOkwEK14lkp9JcXFCYm8dS+r9DaKuvk5cqo ibOM9+LRqsBxLcvjxah6HnHjwtgKjTvHhETvRj9JEiUifm5IzNK1fe1BvbGpFzLZ 8/cD4TzyG3+AzskDjFh26TqJYKF4ItcHoqGYKurzcY8nMXz+AntD/SlfIGjWq1RE 3cUqBZ/pkS8BL2hujswY =OKMF -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Question Regarding Attendees
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 The Debian Systems are all running Thunderbird from the Mozilla website, and Lightning from Sogo. Here is the 'about' info: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2.104i Thunderbird/3.1.7 Stuart Sheldon ACT USA On 01/04/2011 10:29 AM, Ludovic Marcotte wrote: > On 11-01-04 1:19 PM, Stuart Sheldon wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >> Some More Info... >> >> This issue appears to only effect Linux Debian and Ubuntu. I have tested >> and verified that the status indicator icons appear properly in the >> Windows version. >> >> My testing is limited to 64bit Debian, and 32bit Ubuntu, as all our >> office systems run Squeeze 64bit, and my laptop runs 32bit Ubuntu. >> >> Sorry for not bringing this fact out sooner. Please advise on any >> additional steps you would like us to do to test this further. >> > Are you using the Thunderbird from the official's Thunderbird website? > Lightning from sogo.nu? If not (to both questions), that's your problem. > - -- Open up the window Let some air into this room I think I'm almost chokin' From the smell of stale perfume And that cigarette you're smoking 'Bout scared me half to death Open up the window, sucker Let me catch my breath -- Three Dog Night - "Mama Told Me Not to Come - Lyrics" -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNI250AAoJEFKVLITDJSGSH74QALxH0NCGKB8a07UnODU4D/vT 0j/uMH31wYpXxT4vs5HG4gB/IDBA6QBtGV6EyDRrIQagkPdJ6NL5xaUfgKH2yguZ DKbBdiCLMgg54oLLhphVwEkfPM6l7s5P60DVxEeP+iryJytTjJyMNY75xiSfjTPI 9pQ+QXgBNMGLL3dyob2/DT4VqOsBMlkE/dq6b4LBQTm7fsxLx3Sm1wuLaRaCYbo3 TJGg3HaVevZm/8oMuLZDQRjenhEFEAq8cT6cB7zPjDkntbn8rl3nSPxV+6pQvkGT mEa3RaX+X21ej8rmvLBQ5mbwONyw8NudMaZhZ1di0AjnzeoP/LJgRcxtMJ58CpxU h6P/uKIgXa32cvMNnm5OQDlFX+QWRqMafL1oJwlCSOXY5MoaUjNiJICNO/dpAU7W rISfl4OgUwEEnhMF1fivOsHOttZnCPioZGyOaSyl5c6VnsSyQ8PLUjsZoA0L+vUM Bxd2NBPCM+n9sPDqGfPoXQALKspz08h5qRd7r+tI6i3XoCpdttBrHWsDJWmFu157 h2TAPBjJrOWf6nfz2E0LYOj9RqgDVoKv/8v6yQyXPX855Hg3JsIdynKe1pZEJFmH O6Cjm3bwl05qBg36tlBW87m/8m6JeufTe8bokdqO9S2nl3t5+mYTHoEbYkVXX9Ee MhRamUEP80TwSmd6KQ6/ =r3kM -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Question Regarding Attendees
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Some More Info... This issue appears to only effect Linux Debian and Ubuntu. I have tested and verified that the status indicator icons appear properly in the Windows version. My testing is limited to 64bit Debian, and 32bit Ubuntu, as all our office systems run Squeeze 64bit, and my laptop runs 32bit Ubuntu. Sorry for not bringing this fact out sooner. Please advise on any additional steps you would like us to do to test this further. Thanks in advance, Stuart Sheldon ACT USA On 12/21/2010 09:14 AM, Stuart Sheldon wrote: > Hi Ludovic, > > Yes, if I create a calendar item on the web, invite a single attendee on > the web, then have the attendee accept the item on the web. The web > interface shows a green checkbox next to his his name on the pulldown, > but the Thunderbird plugin does not. > > One other thing I've noticed, when a attendee selects "accept" from an > email, either on the web or through the Tbird plugin, it only shows them > as 'might attend' in the item. The attendee must go into the calendar > item and choose accept in order to confirm the appointment. > > These conditions exist on several client installs on different OSs. > > Thoughts? > > Stu > > > On 12/15/2010 01:23 PM, Ludovic Marcotte wrote: >> On 10-12-15 11:42 AM, Stuart Sheldon wrote: >>> Now, I starting to think that this is by design and not a bug or problem >>> with the software. Is this the case? >> It's definitively a problem. I've seen that in the past but the ics was >> actually corrupted. > >> It is happening even with a new event (created from the Web interface of >> SOGo) where only one attandee is involved? > >> Regards, > > - -- Hey nineteen Thats retha franklin, She dont remember The queen of soul, Its hard times befallen The sole survivors, She thinks Im crazy, But Im just growing old -- Steely Dan - "Hey 19 - Lyrics" -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNI2TKAAoJEFKVLITDJSGSvOoP/Rd03r1zpvhaGOF/39lDKE5J 1sJXaP0btS3JORl5Oliva7eW0R2d3nibPnxxGkFOPy7Ii97c9FyC7IEVkwShDRzi Oucm/LSvEh9JLVGfgUleb1tI8Tj5VqtlcOeuL45VscyYN0L65RLXB2rUffoUWMuT yT8SEinPqjj+l4xOFQFX4bwpxx2RCsxj7+p2w8PBwchmqxLqT5rCXt/UeouXsS38 yEzEpeZJQfIfFW5uq/lI+pmBwDf3wWR8mmkd6Me2kfu97/vbLWK+ujohZ9VlcKLB R8tKXzGSz6SNd8z+cOUmhjev223O4NWU/YByvESf1+Osh5Fpr9DROaRNBMFyJw2c UglYTRFrc6Ae7FJMaBsfNhh4pmYg1w3x0oTNT0M30hefb2XX/FupBkdrmgE3U+sX cmRvrDIx1ok+hP/HoEbIHO4JW0lYhgl+UopLlmVt7NkRzWn28vhJXfE0XzWnVk37 /RHGQkKPtTs5vJFPxsAkc5z2QQcjX9+5DwpEOftIegMnHvRJ0Ep6aJ0nKMsFa05M MgLJNyRSS0F23Q+ybSz+yhfVd/1IJOzmwq6sz+y9WWCY1vKzJWDYFNfjY687rSFo Vv15QJ0amILvA241nY0OXs8hOKIq4ODDbBJN3HLQlVE16r87hpLLQL5+2WPLWC+D oOvYqbRJPjD0WkjsKuOi =iPMZ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Question Regarding Attendees
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Ludovic, Yes, if I create a calendar item on the web, invite a single attendee on the web, then have the attendee accept the item on the web. The web interface shows a green checkbox next to his his name on the pulldown, but the Thunderbird plugin does not. One other thing I've noticed, when a attendee selects "accept" from an email, either on the web or through the Tbird plugin, it only shows them as 'might attend' in the item. The attendee must go into the calendar item and choose accept in order to confirm the appointment. These conditions exist on several client installs on different OSs. Thoughts? Stu On 12/15/2010 01:23 PM, Ludovic Marcotte wrote: > On 10-12-15 11:42 AM, Stuart Sheldon wrote: >> Now, I starting to think that this is by design and not a bug or problem >> with the software. Is this the case? > It's definitively a problem. I've seen that in the past but the ics was > actually corrupted. > > It is happening even with a new event (created from the Web interface of > SOGo) where only one attandee is involved? > > Regards, > - -- Hey nineteen Thats retha franklin, She dont remember The queen of soul, Its hard times befallen The sole survivors, She thinks Im crazy, But Im just growing old -- Steely Dan - "Hey 19 - Lyrics" -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNEOB7AAoJEFKVLITDJSGS8vQQALFFMdggpeH1Y0n4DQK3yC83 kCwcaMD2kOFXcnfCoC8vneKGxSbiFKyp7N44YoeWQMbelvsM6q10vqa7vNKYjHbs QTVRHrr8O5n9B6ZJl6sbJPrtXSfl+NFYK7mnMTftXnDhhWS47cNIrlmD/sVOkf8s 8/k0sVWCwXs8x0OgBdLo34SPOePV8EAqOx+ieczYxLKOjrsFnIm2IfsyMkwhiq4P 5x/pt5CZ0EQ8KgPlKO3NMBZaiD9oDjoWquZjqV0lSB9otJGhR8GPgO2a9ZUpswuR oB53zg2SoGdmz0iEI6UVUVvEbDrbmnAUHc0PJoeho1OSqFG7OeBF/3dqlkCklIqf kC1eKuxOLbPf4ckIt/dTNYJiWhbuqFUY5JU9ZyHCUFHh8lv9fPeqOJEMMQN2MWDd eHWUrFOu4Sv2MbjZBa9Wh+38+ONpFBwfU72lP7qO+s2klzYLVkJAXnwnaOGNl9mr tfFnVCgIKH9g5W13y4ZI5rJWnKy5ssfwoFE+A6hnLEpCOjj2CNQJ7U/Ungva4mrt KvOWrcylxx7oDVxJ6iWQuWLQ3G2L2mC2EdLutF8edmKvvwArzWdOMgd7yshifztI eKBFvwCKZUEVsKM1HTwmkSMEp0fzme0kjxCTQMySFRilkt57A9jgeA13Q7TPuWRC VDm8z3kd6VdldHMyTxJR =ZCle -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Question Regarding Attendees
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Sorry for the delay getting back to this... No, there are no errors in the error console... I'm wondering if the is a 'lack of functionality knowledge' problem on my part. I might have the wrong expectation of how this should work. To clarify, In the web interface, when you double click on an appointment, in the Edit Event box at the bottom of the first section, there is a list of the attendees that you can click. When clicked, it returns a small menu that lists some links. At the bottom, are all the attendees with an icon in front of them showing their status. In Lightning, doing the same thing, under that same pop up list, there is no status icon next to the attendees. Now, I starting to think that this is by design and not a bug or problem with the software. Is this the case? Stu On 12/14/2010 06:48 AM, Ludovico Marconi wrote: > On 10-12-14 9:27 AM, Stuart Sheldon wrote: >> Hi Ludovic, >> >> Here it is... All we did was add our servers FQDN... > Looks good. >> Everything else works great... I'm wondering if the icons are missing >> from the package? Or maybe a .js setting is missing? Those would be >> issues that would show up on a fresh install but not an upgrade... > Do you have any errors in the Thunderbird console when that happens? > > Best regards, > - -- Open up the window Let some air into this room I think I'm almost chokin' From the smell of stale perfume And that cigarette you're smoking 'Bout scared me half to death Open up the window, sucker Let me catch my breath -- Three Dog Night - "Mama Told Me Not to Come - Lyrics" -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNCO/YAAoJEFKVLITDJSGSyesP+wX/wLCQXr2S7pSmVzXxAQIq crwCaP4RaoUwZf4QF3MtGrT+OhOZkyTXno6i+Yr3hYL8h347XmHwHEOGrx9piVg/ gYSuZ5vZxFHZje5yQHYV5+2YZuRL/tvaH53QvJk7UPRWrUKzcIRRoAU0yLAKFLqm TEz1gXvMruglu6ZQ5wvPtJ7yoXlSE9adZYRS5U6YwaneaxGzi5JhR07Vzn8LBsHS KexZ+WIcWP4lIZqCjuRFs4p278KbdH3yT3NWu1sk7t/t0cdt8EXSrbSP5Gimkr2L fnA4RYRKOeDViyiN/Xb8Ld0NZYcYyQOYDOqVctLcQyNQANvHCb0DF9QVfj1nRxdC prOZcxPraeK2X9MZQKOJeLKk66fl7OzEfbr5KeR9VXjKcxUIV6Yz1HAubFxeNN5m HNNxQ4gWwUNjqOMpH0FhoJqTxM8iD3CtriX47D5lNk5CABAsA0gQsHwbHuXiHtgT eCtm6aux4gy+WvNK9RQS2zYhlJRLpqKIliPpey/mFM7wnVn3j9miOFO2R8nuva22 rjU4/Pi7whuSju2Y2opJEyc/FVrMBQTCMZM/GD9lnGnDYKlgjpwNP/yOoZeW4SKK PXR7g4t/11eXxBBeBzMayDfNtmCr5x8Rmob6u7ZW35pfmV1hC1PZhsbVYjdgVfXA r7HdHTEATcPpkq6Ix5nU =xE+B -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Question Regarding Attendees
Hi Ludovic, Here it is... All we did was add our servers FQDN... Everything else works great... I'm wondering if the icons are missing from the package? Or maybe a .js setting is missing? Those would be issues that would show up on a fresh install but not an upgrade... Stu http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"; xmlns:isi="http://inverse.ca/sogo-integrator/"; xmlns:em="http://www.mozilla.org/2004/em-rdf#"; xmlns:NC="http://home.netscape.com/NC-rdf#";> http://inverse.ca/sogo-integrator/extensions"; isi:updateURL="https://bob.actusa.net/plugins/updates.php?plugin=%ITEM_ID%&version=%ITEM_VERSION%&platform=%PLATFORM%";> On 12/14/2010 06:14 AM, Ludovic Marcotte wrote: > On 10-12-14 9:12 AM, Stuart Sheldon wrote: >> Not sure where to turn on caldav scheduling... Here is what is installed: >> >> Thunderbird 3.1.6 >> Lightning 1.0b2.104i >> Inverse connector 3.104 >> Inverse Integrator 3.104 >> >> From web interface I see the Green check mark or yellow ball next to >> attendee links in pull down. >> >> These are missing with lightning plug in. > Have you customized SOGo Integrator? Show your SOGo Integrator's > extensions.rdf. > > Regards, > -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Question Regarding Attendees
Not sure where to turn on caldav scheduling... Here is what is installed: Thunderbird 3.1.6 Lightning 1.0b2.104i Inverse connector 3.104 Inverse Integrator 3.104 >From web interface I see the Green check mark or yellow ball next to attendee links in pull down. These are missing with lightning plug in. The is true on multiple fresh installs. I'm stumped... Stu On 12/14/2010 04:35 AM, Mark Adams wrote: > It works OK for me. Are you using the sogo-integrator and > sogo-connector? caldav scheduling should also be set to true in your > plugin config I believe. > > Regards, > Mark > > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:29:26PM -0800, Stuart Sheldon wrote: >> Hey Mark, >> >> I can see the status of the attendees in the web based version when I >> select the attendee's link, but in Lightning, the 'status icon' is >> missing next to the attendee's names. >> >> Is this a bug? >> >> Stu >> >> >> On 12/13/2010 03:57 PM, Mark Adams wrote: >>> you can click on the invite attendees link again to see who has accepted. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Mark >>> >>> On 13 Dec 2010, at 18:47, Stuart Sheldon wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Is there any way to look and see who has not responded to a meeting >>> invitation other then selecting 'Compose email to undecided attendees'? >>> >>> Stu >>> >> -- >> users@sogo.nu >> https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists >> -- >> users@sogo.nu >> https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Question Regarding Attendees
Hey Mark, I can see the status of the attendees in the web based version when I select the attendee's link, but in Lightning, the 'status icon' is missing next to the attendee's names. Is this a bug? Stu On 12/13/2010 03:57 PM, Mark Adams wrote: > you can click on the invite attendees link again to see who has accepted. > > Regards, > Mark > > On 13 Dec 2010, at 18:47, Stuart Sheldon wrote: > > Hi all, > > Is there any way to look and see who has not responded to a meeting > invitation other then selecting 'Compose email to undecided attendees'? > > Stu > -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
[SOGo] Question Regarding Attendees
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi all, Is there any way to look and see who has not responded to a meeting invitation other then selecting 'Compose email to undecided attendees'? Stu - -- Open up the window Let some air into this room I think I'm almost chokin' From the smell of stale perfume And that cigarette you're smoking 'Bout scared me half to death Open up the window, sucker Let me catch my breath -- Three Dog Night - "Mama Told Me Not to Come - Lyrics" -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNBmpQAAoJEFKVLITDJSGSK8UQAM5bPAh06Uj58pskExN2nX0i +SxcRA6JfiN4+8F0Hha9l0PRJTo1wnwJIdAJqEdaJ/7Pg4Gf1XAiLMZaFbdQ3am4 cQ7wyUIb9tUhWxn3nmJ0zXQ4bCpxJAIlpmwWZPFcf4YKOkebUF3Vop8P72kmyUnJ GH+9ly7JQj/cSui3Dg2oyHbaNj4o4q1O1XcHSQZvV+N6f8MDhlXWV/pqVtd7t4qe SZ80lMM0gfGE6eV6CRGNaSoPmxzwl6GhnTMqL6jeEryO5EpNJ77PZ/veNm7C1gd7 ilyWc+ZrqIvNfJyrVAO/R/9DnKueIK3l4iPTaDrRU354e+9khD8kXmzCbgEOi6hu cO0WOyjvi5FHwi/yc0kciECXU5nmMqjQX0i3P9yYuiIBazyuSmtNckkOT/FT7gnu PjPPAaXYg7tSa/0ucLTbAAOKgQeg9hrThny6Mu87LwAhPbwWmYi+bGLN9/VMkzwF HI6ETdcohpuuiuPKRcKVUzkR6oCqDNspFL1loDyOiamfz7drmMghDowbhA4R1esQ XvTnTjWy03sMJijdRPodoufxOzBloSTPhxzVYw/Rt6AOBSw39vutBG2J+9I3+suV 84aE6XUL/zAsRa3mmwyy5MF0hUKPrjLRpTTTDBNrSBmxbmsTraJEZKNp/crD0OGB SgKkjQbePdIS3lJOPLYx =sg10 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Apache with rewrite rule and updates.php
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Since it looks like you are rewriting the whole site, why not just use
Redirect?
Redirect / https://192.168.0.200/
Now, anything going to port 80 will be redirected. It will also deal
with anything after the / as well.
Just a thought...
Stu
On 12/11/2010 12:48 PM, J. Echter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i have set apache with a rewrite rule to force ssl
> (/etc/apachae2/sites-available/default):
>
>
> ServerAdmin webmas...@localhost
>
> RewriteEngine on
> RewriteCond %{SERVER_PORT} ^80$
> RewriteRule ^/(.*)$ https://192.168.0.200/%{N}$1 [R]
> RewriteLog "/var/log/apache2/rewrite.log"
> RewriteLogLevel 2
>
>
> but now my updates.php doesnt work properly, say no updates are made.
>
> is there any thing i have to take care of making apache2 ssl only?
>
> greetings
>
> juergen
- --
And so it was, that later, as the miller told his tale,
that her face at first just ghostly, turned a whiter shade of pale...
-- Procol Harum - "Whiter Shade of Pale Lyrics"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)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=rXx8
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
