Re: [SOGo] Debian Wheezy Repo issue...

2016-07-15 Thread Stuart Sheldon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

That seems to have resolved it.

Stu


On 07/15/2016 05:44 AM, Patrice Levesque (pleves...@inverse.ca) wrote:
> 
>>> Looks like there's a redirect? W: Failed to fetch 
>>> http://inverse.ca/debian/dists/wheezy/wheezy/binary-amd64/Packages
>>> 301 Moved Permanently [IP: 2607:5300:60:37b8::2:1 80]
>> Yes there is now. You may need to install apt-transport-https
>> package. Problem might be with IPv6 though, let me get back to
>> you.
> 
> Redirection was just changed to HTTP (instead of HTTPS).  Can you
> please retry and let us know if you're again able to access our
> repository?
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 
> 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2

iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXiOLRAAoJEFKVLITDJSGSpB0P/1wm7j/CyN3d79d3GLkXq1L2
CXsj1h+Tm1PajJWP+h0hns+QOy74Juwt2pKefRBIVCJjwXCe8/P1TEGgpui6h9b0
nGf6dQzplx5N7Mnt9e3AV1aQFzIIe+5cYswtsWXuW1CY8zFVIvILPjOq0CfMmbSz
PMwCKw5B6rd2UmHEX6B/UFeFY19lwFu83pDl4xCgyrbrF5aAAmtmPRwSeR7Npa6x
xs9/hnhNzo5jVjX4vl8zSm3Yl2WOJR469S2f7LdeM4MBX3cVZu/y58wYVZSH7t/P
4WhWb3LiLfrNZxrGnPqabLDe0mh+InXdwEGJ/ZCiDlhDgsUjyvE1pAfoliHk9BA1
scE/np14FBgg+hkSXyyi/Mcz+u5I4qyWwv86X6jFan7grest2+mwj3VytSDEyqsN
HAdliuB/El3czWxByQa0l3IfzT428G4DUbCcFdvIQ3ax0oPtpMhwt/vQQN4CSOa/
qoqRQwGzLw95jvmeph2dppkhe7oNR5Zxu+QTCTaeCRGna09mZcEkvCwP6YYErgOT
jRsPxHB6nRwS5ms3Lc5mnOqz0JUuxgf0LQYYimmuH7b15VAesjxKlQnoA30mMt3W
iiR8Wx+Yb8sZJJEZalyu2MHW6djBv5WaWWD8RZDzMGljEim6p9516qJxJohCodI+
ypq874sedSlQ9owpuErm
=M44d
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists


[SOGo] Debian Wheezy Repo issue...

2016-07-14 Thread Stuart Sheldon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Looks like there's a redirect?

Ign http://inverse.ca wheezy/wheezy Translation-en_US
Ign http://inverse.ca wheezy/wheezy Translation-en
Err http://inverse.ca wheezy/wheezy amd64 Packages
  301  Moved Permanently [IP: 2607:5300:60:37b8::2:1 80]
W: Failed to fetch
http://inverse.ca/debian/dists/wheezy/wheezy/binary-amd64/Packages  301
 Moved Permanently [IP: 2607:5300:60:37b8::2:1 80]

Stu

- -- 
Don't you hear my call, Though you're many years away, Don't you
hear me calling you. Write your letters in the sand, For the day
I'll take your hand, In the land that our grand-children knew...
  -- Queen "'39 Lyrics"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=I2Zd
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists


[SOGo] Temp Files Being Deleted but still Holding Disk Space.

2014-05-15 Thread Stuart Sheldon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Hi all..

It seems that SOGo is not closing the temp files it creates under /tmp
before it deletes them. I see temp growing in size with no files in the
directory, and a bunch of temp files listed under lsof -u sogo as
(deleted) but still open. I'm assuming that something is happening out
of order here, but I'm not a programmer so at best this is a guess...

Debian Wheezy 64 bit
SOGo 2.2.3-1
libsope 4.9.r1664.20140403

Any thoughts would be appreciated!

Stu

Stuart Sheldon
ACT USA
- -- 
Hey nineteen Thats retha franklin, She dont remember The queen of soul,
Its hard times befallen The sole survivors, She thinks Im crazy,
But Im just growing old
   -- Steely Dan - Hey 19 - Lyrics
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=kiCj
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists


Re: [SOGo] ANN: SOGo v1.3.8

2011-07-18 Thread Stuart Sheldon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Thanks Francis,

Stu


On 07/18/2011 05:38 AM, Francis Lachapelle wrote:
 Hi Stuart
 
 On 2011-07-17, at 12:43 PM, Stuart Sheldon wrote:
 
 I have not attempted (nor currently plan) to implement the two new 
 global domain settings.
 
 Should I adjust our configuration to accommodate any future
 conflicts, such as modifying our domain array keys to not match
 their respective SOGoMailDomain keys, in order to avoid future
 upgrade issues?
 
 Only if your authentication sources use a mail attribute as the
 UIDFieldName. Otherwise, there's no need to change your domain keys.
 
 Furthermore, I've already committed a change that will avoid any side
 effect of the new multi-domains settings when SOGoLoginDomains is not
 defined. So this constraint will go away in the next release (and is
 already gone in the nightly builds).
 
 For everyone's information: The main advantage of defining
 SOGoLoginDomains is that values of UIDFieldName don't have to be
 unique among all domains anymore but only within the same domain
 since users will now be identified as UIDFieldName@domainKey. This
 identifier will show up in the URL and in the data tables.
 
 
 Francis
 
 -- flachape...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.755.3640 ::
 http://www.inverse.ca Inverse :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://sogo.nu)
 and PacketFence (http://packetfence.org)
 

- -- 
Every year is getting shorter, never seem to find the time
Plans that either come to naught or half a page of scribbled lines
Hanging on in quiet desperation is the english way
The time is gone, the song is over, thought Id something more to say
   -- Pink Floyd - Time Lyrics
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJOJEddAAoJEFKVLITDJSGSM70QAI3T5fmCKVQQ0pZ3Ix2C1AuJ
VykguCn2F83ziGkSbGamVCAcij/jAVbd94m784b2AjdEZKVYFj24PpkMDtRGS5Di
QSzEAKVlmdF92M8JkFVvW0eQCkOybs9TWM3iowtwFW3rgiRbZuQjQ4n2VhdlXNwd
1+rF+drtap3EEn5DrLwtCdqWPNvJW+EiDYGgdRcTbIizd7REi6zWgg7JLhdJuz+c
L8nNnZWsCTeA8MXd0pkDNCxFBnSHoXHT4+erVw/E4hOMwbVvGG36laE+GWfQZQPX
06cZDBA7AC8alHipnQYfoMBic8MqfWLkYbutCyuQ+/KIq8Llve+dPj9c7dVOYYdw
vNHQGMMHd/IQkPMRz5Vv/DACL3R6Hmzcm1HBGCQbL0/8Sd/gluV5lMNk0d0cDr2N
ntE/xA7NuUH34cKabskCsWmEGOhGEEuY+cozi54Z6Ml5/5YVFwKlILYXy4I+AzJb
72ee0TSWm6orEGye+rTv/So4RlYiZg+3+L+5HEqrYqPe25lav63RlWPqwKTobTlp
AwlkPKB7LQ4J6PaPZXoW3zW753Pv9Z5JsVNFx/wyLyTfWidyvyvI7NZn1AQh
hvQw+I/NnPoHiWNb7Vth5+2LNZI5iwMM3D6WhCM11gCQfJzcb7RfIG2fcDw4VXh0
1xqAFNbSPIWF6sGfesc8
=TZtb
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists


Re: [SOGo] ANN: SOGo v1.3.8

2011-07-17 Thread Stuart Sheldon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

I ran the update last night, and have not seen any problems with logins
or calendar ACLs.

I am running with about 20 unique domain configurations.

All domain array keys match their respective SOGoMailDomain keys, and
they are the valid domain name for that domain.

I have not attempted (nor currently plan) to implement the two new
global domain settings.

Should I adjust our configuration to accommodate any future conflicts,
such as modifying our domain array keys to not match their respective
SOGoMailDomain keys, in order to avoid future upgrade issues?

Thanks in advance,

Stu

Stuart Sheldon
ACT USA


On 07/17/2011 08:14 AM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
 * Dennis Petschull users@sogo.nu:
 can you also confirm, that calendar and addressbook sharing is not 
 working anymore now?
 
 I can't confirm that part of the problem. I was able to subscribe
 already existing calendars and addressbooks.
 
 p@rick
 
 Am 16.07.2011 21:46, schrieb Patrick Ben Koetter:
 * Francis Lachapelle users@sogo.nu:
 On 2011-07-15, at 10:59 AM, Ladislav Pašek wrote:
 
 my multi-domain config stop working after update. I have to
 switch to single domain config that is working. There some
 changes in multi-domain config syntax? 
 .GNUstepDefaults.txt
 
 Does the mail domains of your users addresses match the domains
 used in your configuration file of SOGo? If they do match,
 change them. For example, instead of using prodex.sk, use
 prodex-sk. As long as you don't use the new SOGoLoginDomains
 setting, the domains keys defined in your .GNUstepDefaults are
 never shown.
 
 Confirmed. Once I changed the domains name to differ from
 SOGoMailDomain I could login again.
 
 Is this change intentional and I missed to read the relevant
 documentation or is it a bug?
 
 p@rick
 
 
 -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJOIxFHAAoJEFKVLITDJSGSRpYP+QFo0M1THWft+GD8smRYOOUM
UTsrK2qdO5r0S+Hd1+IGw0YlsH3It2WSgOp52Nn11WxUROiiBKmDZzZwxWYuf/Y1
x4UWtb6uZrRQifchuCaDwLFUXc72z2PrDJd24xTwdvXJVVJTGVNTiJgUMLyJ33ad
aV7hfXXu7OPCxe38nX1fqsJlPWGBIpNfCZhbqnislTT8hiWpGXNMBGi/ziR+nlG0
5WZRD+7w7BU1QeJTXTKdFN1xvFAGpJ3L2uUKndoSJ9ediW/i2L3gmpEzh29a73zf
A7mVdUtV5z6eeYpkigmUtls49yzy6rsDfraqRAQ5rEb9AtGgnubo04atuff4zY/W
62QsLMudLe9N+vpyzvM1JaPcxD5jgIqmXmVgrCd/jL9TPU2qf0D1iBHnLbFZq2hi
qzotzoCuNlri6VQoXH3KCzLxLLuM0FBGocnIuxP2o4SGi0bXeIPuBjPnfb7M6tK7
m97yQSiW0ZCCAInyxCxa0t7UYv3Qx9YxWtywnMkHsZtI3sH0n660wUFIFTwZGZ0p
N2mmbkRDuyZAlQHCWO0xCPAifKnD03cFQOOOkITQnux0g5Q5TqYp+cRNtflEjnKt
vr7itdVapMrQOmzhP+TBpmZIK8yTl6EHrAWR4nLBCjRZ+HUlo6Iu8FLp86hz/nqc
p53oh94q/CGS2FVZIJgi
=Ekba
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists


Re: [SOGo] 3 domains with ldap

2011-04-29 Thread Stuart Sheldon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Your problem is the 'id' keys. They must be unique across all domains.
The 2nd and 3rd domains have the same 'id' value.

Stu


On 04/29/2011 03:21 AM, Jean-Michel OLTRA wrote:
 
 Bonjour,
 
 
 Le vendredi 29 avril 2011, André Schild a écrit...
 
 
 No, there is no limit.
 Can you please post your full config file (with removed passwords)
 
 Here is the full config:
 
 
 ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
 !DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC -//GNUstep//DTD plist 0.9//EN 
 http://www.gnustep.org/plist-0_9.xml;
 plist version=0.9
 dict
 keyNSGlobalDomain/key
 dict
 /dict
 keysogod/key
 dict
 keyOCSSessionsFolderURL/key
 
 stringmysql://sogo:XX@localhost:3306/sogo/sogo_sessions_folder/string
 keyOCSFolderInfoURL/key
 
 stringmysql://sogo:XX@localhost:3306/sogo/sogo_folder_info/string
 keySOGoACLsSendEMailNotifications/key
 stringYES/string
 keySOGoProfileURL/key
 
 stringmysql://sogo:XX@localhost:3306/sogo/sogo_user_profile/string
 keySOGoSMTPServer/key
 string127.0.0.1/string
 keySOGoAppointmentSendEMailNotifications/key
 stringYES/string
 keySOGoFoldersSendEMailNotifications/key
 stringYES/string
 keySOGoIMAPServer/key
 string127.0.0.1/string
 keySOGoLanguage/key
 stringFrench/string
 keySOGoMailingMechanism/key
 stringsmtp/string
 keySOGoTimeZone/key
 stringEurope/Paris/string
 
 keySOGoDraftsFolderName/key
 stringDrafts/string
 keySOGoTrashFolderName/key
 stringTrash/string
 keySOGoSentFolderName/key
 stringSent/string
 
 keydomains/key
 dict
 keyfreezbiz.org/key
 dict
 keySOGoMailDomain/key
 stringfreezbiz.org/string
 keySOGoSuperUsernames/key
 array
 stringcstoll/string
 stringgege/string
 /array
 keySOGoLanguage/key
 stringFrench/string
 keySOGoUserSources/key
 array
 dict
 keyCNFieldName/key
 stringcn/string
 keyIDFieldName/key
 stringmail/string
 keyIMAPHostFieldName/key
 stringmailHost/string
 keyUIDFieldName/key
 stringmail/string
 keybaseDN/key
 
 stringdomainName=freezbiz.org,o=domains,dc=freezbiz,dc=org/string
 keybindDN/key
 stringcn=Manager,dc=freezbiz,dc=org/string
 keybindFields/key
 stringmail/string
 keybindPassword/key
 stringXX/string
 keycanAuthenticate/key
 stringYES/string
 keydisplayName/key
 stringAdresses Partages/string
 keyhostname/key
 string127.0.0.1/string
 keyid/key
 stringpublic/string
 keyisAddressBook/key
 stringYES/string
 keyport/key
 string389/string
 /dict
 /array
 /dict
 
 keygestelia-languedoc.fr/key
 dict
 keySOGoMailDomain/key
 stringgestelia-languedoc.fr/string
 keySOGoSuperUsernames/key
 array
 stringjay/string
 /array
 keySOGoLanguage/key
 stringFrench/string
 keySOGoUserSources/key
 array
 dict
keyCNFieldName/key
stringcn/string
keyIDFieldName/key
stringmail/string
keyIMAPHostFieldName/key
stringmailHost/string
keyUIDFieldName/key
stringmail/string
keybaseDN/key

 stringdomainName=gestelia-languedoc.fr,o=domains,dc=freezbiz,dc=org/string

Re: [SOGo] Memcached and Debian Squeeze

2011-02-10 Thread Stuart Sheldon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

I had the same problem. the fix was to change the following in the
/etc/memcached.conf file:

- - -l 127.0.0.1
+ -l localhost

It has to do with IPv6 I believe.

Hope this helps!

Stu


On 02/10/2011 04:57 AM, Federico Alberto Sayd wrote:
 Hello:
 
 Recently I upgraded my SOGo server from Debian Lenny to Squeeze.
 
 After the upgrade, SOGo did not connect to memcached anymore. My system
 runs memcached from Debian's init scripts. However if I run memcached as
 daemon from command line as the user sogo, it works.
 
 memcached -d -u sogo
 
 
 There is somebody with the same problem?
 
 Thanks
 
 Federico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
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=ctfB
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists


Re: [SOGo] Strange issue after upgrade to 1.3.5a

2011-01-30 Thread Stuart Sheldon
Hi all,

Looks like this was actually a problem with the calendar itself. I had a
couple recurring appointments that were configured on my Android that
were causing the problem. I don't really understand why though, but for
now it's fixed.

Stu


On 01/29/2011 10:29 AM, Stuart Sheldon wrote:
 Hi,
 
 Just upgraded to 1.3.5a and when I went into to web client, discovered I
 could not access my calendar. Strangely, others can access theirs. And I
 can access the calendar via the Thunderbird Plugin, as well as via
 CalDAV. It's just the web based access that seems affected.
 
 I upgraded to the Daily just to see if it fixed it, but it didn't seem
 to make a difference.
 
 We are currently running Squeeze 64 bit, and are pointed to your Debian
 Squeeze repository.
 
 Here is a snapshot out of the log:
 
 Jan 29 10:22:23 sogod [2524]: [WARN] 0x0xeb4160[SOGoWebDAVAclManager]
 entry '{DAV:}write' already exists in DAV permissions table
 Jan 29 10:22:23 sogod [2524]: [WARN] 0x0xeb4160[SOGoWebDAVAclManager]
 entry '{DAV:}write-properties' already exists in DAV permissions table
 Jan 29 10:22:23 sogod [2524]: [WARN] 0x0xeb4160[SOGoWebDAVAclManager]
 entry '{DAV:}write-content' already exists in DAV permissions table
 2011-01-29 10:22:23.324 sogod[2524] NGCalendarDateRange.m:38  Assertion
 failed in NGCalendarDateRange(instance), method
 initWithStartDate:endDate:.  endDate MUST NOT be nil!
 EXCEPTION: NSException: 0x1044d50
 NAME:NSInternalInconsistencyException REASON:NGCalendarDateRange.m:38
 Assertion failed in NGCalendarDateRange(instance), method
 initWithStartDate:endDate:.  endDate MUST NOT be nil! INFO:(nil)
 Jan 29 10:22:23 sogod [2284]: 0x0xa45800[WOWatchDogChild] child 2524
 exited
 Jan 29 10:22:23 sogod [2284]: 0x0xa45800[WOWatchDogChild]  (terminated
 due to signal 6)
 Jan 29 10:22:23 sogod [2284]: 0x0xa45800[WOWatchDogChild] avoiding to
 respawn child before 2011-01-29 10:22:28 -0800
 Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2284]: 0x0xa0f600[WOWatchDog] child spawned
 with pid 2528
 Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2284]: 0x0xa0f600[WOWatchDog] child spawned
 with pid 2529
 Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2528]: 0x0xc33ad0[SOGoProductLoader] SOGo
 products loaded from '/usr/lib/GNUstep/SOGo':
 Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2528]: 0x0xc33ad0[SOGoProductLoader]
 Appointments.SOGo, Contacts.SOGo, MailerUI.SOGo, CommonUI.SOGo,
 MailPartViewers.SOGo, ContactsUI.SOGo, Mailer.SOGo,
 AdministrationUI.SOGo, SchedulerUI.SOGo, MainUI.SOGo, PreferencesUI.SOGo
 Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2529]: 0x0xc33f90[SOGoProductLoader] SOGo
 products loaded from '/usr/lib/GNUstep/SOGo':
 Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2529]: 0x0xc33f90[SOGoProductLoader]
 Appointments.SOGo, Contacts.SOGo, MailerUI.SOGo, CommonUI.SOGo,
 MailPartViewers.SOGo, ContactsUI.SOGo, Mailer.SOGo,
 AdministrationUI.SOGo, SchedulerUI.SOGo, MainUI.SOGo, PreferencesUI.SOGo
 Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2528]: |SOGo| version 1.3.5 (build
 @vizzini.inverse.ca 201101271844) -- starting
 Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2528]: |SOGo| vmem size check enabled: shutting
 down app when vmem  384 MB
 Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2529]: |SOGo| version 1.3.5 (build
 @vizzini.inverse.ca 201101271844) -- starting
 Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2529]: |SOGo| vmem size check enabled: shutting
 down app when vmem  384 MB
 
 Any help would be great!
 
 Stuart Sheldon
 ACT USA
-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists


Re: [SOGo] Strange issue after upgrade to 1.3.5a

2011-01-30 Thread Stuart Sheldon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Hi Fasil,

I'm actually running mysql... So I don't think that applies, but thanks
for the tip.

I'm going to try to do some additional testing to see if I can duplicate
the problem. I think that it was actually a corrupt entry in my android
that kept messing up the SOGo calendar.

Will post back if I find anything and file a bug if it's actually SOGo
that is causing the issue.

Stu


On 01/30/2011 09:39 AM, fasil wrote:
 On 01/30/2011 08:34 PM, Stuart Sheldon wrote:
 Hi all,

 Looks like this was actually a problem with the calendar itself. I had a
 couple recurring appointments that were configured on my Android that
 were causing the problem. I don't really understand why though, but for
 now it's fixed.

 Stu


 On 01/29/2011 10:29 AM, Stuart Sheldon wrote:
 Hi,

 Just upgraded to 1.3.5a and when I went into to web client, discovered I
 could not access my calendar. Strangely, others can access theirs. And I
 can access the calendar via the Thunderbird Plugin, as well as via
 CalDAV. It's just the web based access that seems affected.

 I upgraded to the Daily just to see if it fixed it, but it didn't seem
 to make a difference.

 We are currently running Squeeze 64 bit, and are pointed to your Debian
 Squeeze repository.

 Here is a snapshot out of the log:

 Jan 29 10:22:23 sogod [2524]: [WARN]0x0xeb4160[SOGoWebDAVAclManager]
 entry '{DAV:}write' already exists in DAV permissions table
 Jan 29 10:22:23 sogod [2524]: [WARN]0x0xeb4160[SOGoWebDAVAclManager]
 entry '{DAV:}write-properties' already exists in DAV permissions table
 Jan 29 10:22:23 sogod [2524]: [WARN]0x0xeb4160[SOGoWebDAVAclManager]
 entry '{DAV:}write-content' already exists in DAV permissions table
 2011-01-29 10:22:23.324 sogod[2524] NGCalendarDateRange.m:38  Assertion
 failed in NGCalendarDateRange(instance), method
 initWithStartDate:endDate:.  endDate MUST NOT be nil!
 EXCEPTION:NSException: 0x1044d50
 NAME:NSInternalInconsistencyException REASON:NGCalendarDateRange.m:38
 Assertion failed in NGCalendarDateRange(instance), method
 initWithStartDate:endDate:.  endDate MUST NOT be nil! INFO:(nil)
 Jan 29 10:22:23 sogod [2284]:0x0xa45800[WOWatchDogChild]  child 2524
 exited
 Jan 29 10:22:23 sogod [2284]:0x0xa45800[WOWatchDogChild]   (terminated
 due to signal 6)
 Jan 29 10:22:23 sogod [2284]:0x0xa45800[WOWatchDogChild]  avoiding to
 respawn child before 2011-01-29 10:22:28 -0800
 Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2284]:0x0xa0f600[WOWatchDog]  child spawned
 with pid 2528
 Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2284]:0x0xa0f600[WOWatchDog]  child spawned
 with pid 2529
 Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2528]:0x0xc33ad0[SOGoProductLoader]  SOGo
 products loaded from '/usr/lib/GNUstep/SOGo':
 Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2528]:0x0xc33ad0[SOGoProductLoader]
 Appointments.SOGo, Contacts.SOGo, MailerUI.SOGo, CommonUI.SOGo,
 MailPartViewers.SOGo, ContactsUI.SOGo, Mailer.SOGo,
 AdministrationUI.SOGo, SchedulerUI.SOGo, MainUI.SOGo, PreferencesUI.SOGo
 Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2529]:0x0xc33f90[SOGoProductLoader]  SOGo
 products loaded from '/usr/lib/GNUstep/SOGo':
 Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2529]:0x0xc33f90[SOGoProductLoader]
 Appointments.SOGo, Contacts.SOGo, MailerUI.SOGo, CommonUI.SOGo,
 MailPartViewers.SOGo, ContactsUI.SOGo, Mailer.SOGo,
 AdministrationUI.SOGo, SchedulerUI.SOGo, MainUI.SOGo, PreferencesUI.SOGo
 Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2528]: |SOGo| version 1.3.5 (build
 @vizzini.inverse.ca 201101271844) -- starting
 Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2528]: |SOGo| vmem size check enabled: shutting
 down app when vmem  384 MB
 Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2529]: |SOGo| version 1.3.5 (build
 @vizzini.inverse.ca 201101271844) -- starting
 Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2529]: |SOGo| vmem size check enabled: shutting
 down app when vmem  384 MB

 Any help would be great!

 Stuart Sheldon
 ACT USA
 Hi,
 did you try the below step from sogo installation guide?
 ---
 You should then adjust the access rights to the database. To do so,
 modify the configuration file
 /var/lib/pgsql/data/pg_hba.conf in order to add the following line at
 the very beginning
 of the file:
 host sogo sogo 127.0.0.1/32 md5
 
 Regards,
 Fasil


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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[SOGo] Strange issue after upgrade to 1.3.5a

2011-01-29 Thread Stuart Sheldon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Hi,

Just upgraded to 1.3.5a and when I went into to web client, discovered I
could not access my calendar. Strangely, others can access theirs. And I
can access the calendar via the Thunderbird Plugin, as well as via
CalDAV. It's just the web based access that seems affected.

I upgraded to the Daily just to see if it fixed it, but it didn't seem
to make a difference.

We are currently running Squeeze 64 bit, and are pointed to your Debian
Squeeze repository.

Here is a snapshot out of the log:

Jan 29 10:22:23 sogod [2524]: [WARN] 0x0xeb4160[SOGoWebDAVAclManager]
entry '{DAV:}write' already exists in DAV permissions table
Jan 29 10:22:23 sogod [2524]: [WARN] 0x0xeb4160[SOGoWebDAVAclManager]
entry '{DAV:}write-properties' already exists in DAV permissions table
Jan 29 10:22:23 sogod [2524]: [WARN] 0x0xeb4160[SOGoWebDAVAclManager]
entry '{DAV:}write-content' already exists in DAV permissions table
2011-01-29 10:22:23.324 sogod[2524] NGCalendarDateRange.m:38  Assertion
failed in NGCalendarDateRange(instance), method
initWithStartDate:endDate:.  endDate MUST NOT be nil!
EXCEPTION: NSException: 0x1044d50
NAME:NSInternalInconsistencyException REASON:NGCalendarDateRange.m:38
Assertion failed in NGCalendarDateRange(instance), method
initWithStartDate:endDate:.  endDate MUST NOT be nil! INFO:(nil)
Jan 29 10:22:23 sogod [2284]: 0x0xa45800[WOWatchDogChild] child 2524
exited
Jan 29 10:22:23 sogod [2284]: 0x0xa45800[WOWatchDogChild]  (terminated
due to signal 6)
Jan 29 10:22:23 sogod [2284]: 0x0xa45800[WOWatchDogChild] avoiding to
respawn child before 2011-01-29 10:22:28 -0800
Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2284]: 0x0xa0f600[WOWatchDog] child spawned
with pid 2528
Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2284]: 0x0xa0f600[WOWatchDog] child spawned
with pid 2529
Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2528]: 0x0xc33ad0[SOGoProductLoader] SOGo
products loaded from '/usr/lib/GNUstep/SOGo':
Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2528]: 0x0xc33ad0[SOGoProductLoader]
Appointments.SOGo, Contacts.SOGo, MailerUI.SOGo, CommonUI.SOGo,
MailPartViewers.SOGo, ContactsUI.SOGo, Mailer.SOGo,
AdministrationUI.SOGo, SchedulerUI.SOGo, MainUI.SOGo, PreferencesUI.SOGo
Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2529]: 0x0xc33f90[SOGoProductLoader] SOGo
products loaded from '/usr/lib/GNUstep/SOGo':
Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2529]: 0x0xc33f90[SOGoProductLoader]
Appointments.SOGo, Contacts.SOGo, MailerUI.SOGo, CommonUI.SOGo,
MailPartViewers.SOGo, ContactsUI.SOGo, Mailer.SOGo,
AdministrationUI.SOGo, SchedulerUI.SOGo, MainUI.SOGo, PreferencesUI.SOGo
Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2528]: |SOGo| version 1.3.5 (build
@vizzini.inverse.ca 201101271844) -- starting
Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2528]: |SOGo| vmem size check enabled: shutting
down app when vmem  384 MB
Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2529]: |SOGo| version 1.3.5 (build
@vizzini.inverse.ca 201101271844) -- starting
Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2529]: |SOGo| vmem size check enabled: shutting
down app when vmem  384 MB

Any help would be great!

Stuart Sheldon
ACT USA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=NSYu
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists


Re: [SOGo] Funambol : Calendar synchro on Android 2.2

2011-01-26 Thread Stuart Sheldon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

I'm using Calendar Sync 0.9.4.6 Beta for bi-directional sync using Cal
Dav on 2.2 with an G2

Stu


On 01/26/2011 06:33 AM, Stéphane PERON wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I have just installed funambol v9  and created sogo-card and card in
 FunambolSOGoConnector ( I have deleted the card entry in the
 FunambolFoundationConnector )
 
 The card synchronisation works very well ... with an android 2.2
 Operating System.
 
 I have done the same thing for calendar that is supposed to be supported
 from this funambol version ...
 
 However, on my android 2.2, I can't see the calendar icon ... like seen
 on this page : http://www.funambol.com/solutions/android.php
 
 So my question :
 Does anyone has succeeded in using calendar synchronisation with SOGO on
 android ??
 
 Cheers
 
 Stéphane
 

- -- 
Poets tell how Pancho fell, and Lefty's living in a cheap hotel
The desert's quiet and Cleveland's cold, And so the story ends we're told
Pancho needs your prayers it's true, but save a few for Lefty too
He only did what he had to do, and now he's growing old.
 -- Willie Nelson and Merle Haggart Pancho and Lefty
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
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=HcFZ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists


Re: [SOGo] Will the developers be at SCALE?

2011-01-06 Thread Stuart Sheldon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

You will be missed... g

Stu

On 01/06/2011 08:26 AM, Ludovic Marcotte wrote:
 On 11-01-06 11:13 AM, Stuart Sheldon wrote:
 I have on good authority that the SOGo project has been offered a booth
 at SCALE this year.
 Indeed.
 Are you folks going to be able to make it? It would
 be great to meet some of you in person!
 We won't be there this year - maybe next year.
 
 Regards,
 

- -- 
Harmlessly passing your time in the grassland away;
Only dimly aware of a certain unease in the air. You better watch out,
There may be dogs about I've looked over Jordan, and I have seen
Things are not what they seem.
   -- Pink Floyd - Sheep Lyrics
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
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=bN9i
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists


Re: [SOGo] Question Regarding Attendees

2011-01-06 Thread Stuart Sheldon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Ok, Here is a summary of what we are seeing... Should I file a bug report?

When viewing a calendar event created by the current user in
Thunderbird, or through the web interface, after clicking on the
'Attendees' link via the Inverse Lightning plugin, the small round
graphics that indicate attendee status are missing.

When clicking on a calendar event that the current user has not created
but has been invited to, the small round graphics that indicate attendee
status are visible and correct.

1) This problem exists in both Debian and Ubuntu, 64 and 32 bit.

2) This problem does not exist under Windows.

All installs were tested using the Mozilla Thunderbird build from the
Mozilla website, as well as the Ubuntu version of Thunderbird.

All installs were done from scratch including a default OS install.

Problem is easily duplicated:

Install Debian Squeeze with default installation settings, then install
Thunderbird from the Mozilla site, then install Lightning and connector
from the SOGo site, then install the modified version of integrator to
attach to your server.

Thunderbird is currently installed in '/usr/local/thunderbird'.

Error log shows no errors or warnings.

Please advise any additional tests you would like us to run...

Again, should we file a bug report?

Thanks again in advance,

Stuart Sheldon
ACT USA


On 01/05/2011 02:52 PM, Stuart Sheldon wrote:
 Any Additional Ideas On this???
 
 Stu
 
 
 On 01/04/2011 11:01 AM, Stuart Sheldon wrote:
 The Debian Systems are all running Thunderbird from the Mozilla website,
 and Lightning from Sogo.
 
 Here is the 'about' info:
 
 Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.2.13)
 Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2.104i Thunderbird/3.1.7
 
 Stuart Sheldon
 ACT USA
 
 
 On 01/04/2011 10:29 AM, Ludovic Marcotte wrote:
 On 11-01-04 1:19 PM, Stuart Sheldon wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA256

 Some More Info...

 This issue appears to only effect Linux Debian and Ubuntu. I have tested
 and verified that the status indicator icons appear properly in the
 Windows version.

 My testing is limited to 64bit Debian, and 32bit Ubuntu, as all our
 office systems run Squeeze 64bit, and my laptop runs 32bit Ubuntu.

 Sorry for not bringing this fact out sooner. Please advise on any
 additional steps you would like us to do to test this further.

 Are you using the Thunderbird from the official's Thunderbird website?
 Lightning from sogo.nu? If not (to both questions), that's your problem.
 
 
 

- -- 
Does anyone know where the love of God goes when the waves turn the
minutes to hours. The searchers all say that they'd have made
White Fish Bay if they'd put fifteen more miles behind her.
   -- Gordon Lightfoot The Wreck of The Edmund Fitzgerald Lyrics
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
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=l8km
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists


Re: [SOGo] Question Regarding Attendees

2011-01-06 Thread Stuart Sheldon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Thanks Ludovic,

Added to bug tracking.

Stu


On 01/06/2011 11:23 AM, Ludovic Marcotte wrote:
 On 11-01-06 1:25 PM, Stuart Sheldon wrote:
 Ok, Here is a summary of what we are seeing... Should I file a bug
 report?
 [snip]
 
 Yes, please.
 
 Regards,
 

- -- 
And all I can do is keep on telling you, I want you, I need you,
But there aint no way Im ever gonna love you, Now dont be sad
cause two out of three aint bad...
   -- Meatloaf - Two out of Three aint bad - Lyrics
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
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=LCFl
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists


Re: [SOGo] One user unable to see any mail

2011-01-06 Thread Stuart Sheldon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Is it possible that the user has so many emails that the server is
hitting a byte limit of some sort?


On 01/06/2011 12:54 PM, Chris Hobbs wrote:
 Still need some ideas on this one... thanks!
 
 Chris
 
 On 1/5/11 2:00 PM, Chris Hobbs wrote:
 I have an odd one. I have one user (out of thousands) that is unable
 to see any of his mail any longer in the SOGo web interface. He can
 log in successfully, view his calendar and his address book, but the
 folder pane is empty, and the Get Mail and Write buttons do nothing.

 Steps taken to trouble shoot:

 1) Tried on a different computer with multiple browsers (Firefox,
 Chrome, Safari).
 2) Deleted sogo user with sogo-tool. Logged back in which created sogo
 account successfully
 3) Created account in Thunderbird to confirm IMAP was functioning
 correctly - it is.

 I can see SOGo logging into the IMAP server in the dovecot logs, so
 that isn't the problem. No other users are complaining of the issue,
 and I've not installed any updates in at least 10 weeks. User claimed
 it began just before our winter break which started 12/17.

 Any ideas on what to look at next?

 Thanks,

 Chris
 -- 
 Chris Hobbs
 Director, Technology
 New Haven Unified School District
 -- This message has been checked by ESVA and is believed to be clean. 
 
 
 -- 
 Chris Hobbs
 Director, Technology
 New Haven Unified School District
 -- This message has been checked by ESVA and is believed to be clean.

- -- 
Though it's cold and lonely in the deep dark night
I can see paradise by the dashboard light
   -- Meatloaf - Paradise by the Dashboard Light - Lyrics
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
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=c3MZ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists


Re: [SOGo] Question Regarding Attendees

2011-01-04 Thread Stuart Sheldon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Some More Info...

This issue appears to only effect Linux Debian and Ubuntu. I have tested
and verified that the status indicator icons appear properly in the
Windows version.

My testing is limited to 64bit Debian, and 32bit Ubuntu, as all our
office systems run Squeeze 64bit, and my laptop runs 32bit Ubuntu.

Sorry for not bringing this fact out sooner. Please advise on any
additional steps you would like us to do to test this further.

Thanks in advance,

Stuart Sheldon
ACT USA


On 12/21/2010 09:14 AM, Stuart Sheldon wrote:
 Hi Ludovic,
 
 Yes, if I create a calendar item on the web, invite a single attendee on
 the web, then have the attendee accept the item on the web. The web
 interface shows a green checkbox next to his his name on the pulldown,
 but the Thunderbird plugin does not.
 
 One other thing I've noticed, when a attendee selects accept from an
 email, either on the web or through the Tbird plugin, it only shows them
 as 'might attend' in the item. The attendee must go into the calendar
 item and choose accept in order to confirm the appointment.
 
 These conditions exist on several client installs on different OSs.
 
 Thoughts?
 
 Stu
 
 
 On 12/15/2010 01:23 PM, Ludovic Marcotte wrote:
 On 10-12-15 11:42 AM, Stuart Sheldon wrote:
 Now, I starting to think that this is by design and not a bug or problem
 with the software. Is this the case?
 It's definitively a problem. I've seen that in the past but the ics was
 actually corrupted.
 
 It is happening even with a new event (created from the Web interface of
 SOGo) where only one attandee is involved?
 
 Regards,
 
 

- -- 
Hey nineteen Thats retha franklin, She dont remember The queen of soul,
Its hard times befallen The sole survivors, She thinks Im crazy,
But Im just growing old
   -- Steely Dan - Hey 19 - Lyrics
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
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=iPMZ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists


Re: [SOGo] Question Regarding Attendees

2010-12-21 Thread Stuart Sheldon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Hi Ludovic,

Yes, if I create a calendar item on the web, invite a single attendee on
the web, then have the attendee accept the item on the web. The web
interface shows a green checkbox next to his his name on the pulldown,
but the Thunderbird plugin does not.

One other thing I've noticed, when a attendee selects accept from an
email, either on the web or through the Tbird plugin, it only shows them
as 'might attend' in the item. The attendee must go into the calendar
item and choose accept in order to confirm the appointment.

These conditions exist on several client installs on different OSs.

Thoughts?

Stu


On 12/15/2010 01:23 PM, Ludovic Marcotte wrote:
 On 10-12-15 11:42 AM, Stuart Sheldon wrote:
 Now, I starting to think that this is by design and not a bug or problem
 with the software. Is this the case?
 It's definitively a problem. I've seen that in the past but the ics was
 actually corrupted.
 
 It is happening even with a new event (created from the Web interface of
 SOGo) where only one attandee is involved?
 
 Regards,
 

- -- 
Hey nineteen Thats retha franklin, She dont remember The queen of soul,
Its hard times befallen The sole survivors, She thinks Im crazy,
But Im just growing old
   -- Steely Dan - Hey 19 - Lyrics
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNEOB7AAoJEFKVLITDJSGS8vQQALFFMdggpeH1Y0n4DQK3yC83
kCwcaMD2kOFXcnfCoC8vneKGxSbiFKyp7N44YoeWQMbelvsM6q10vqa7vNKYjHbs
QTVRHrr8O5n9B6ZJl6sbJPrtXSfl+NFYK7mnMTftXnDhhWS47cNIrlmD/sVOkf8s
8/k0sVWCwXs8x0OgBdLo34SPOePV8EAqOx+ieczYxLKOjrsFnIm2IfsyMkwhiq4P
5x/pt5CZ0EQ8KgPlKO3NMBZaiD9oDjoWquZjqV0lSB9otJGhR8GPgO2a9ZUpswuR
oB53zg2SoGdmz0iEI6UVUVvEbDrbmnAUHc0PJoeho1OSqFG7OeBF/3dqlkCklIqf
kC1eKuxOLbPf4ckIt/dTNYJiWhbuqFUY5JU9ZyHCUFHh8lv9fPeqOJEMMQN2MWDd
eHWUrFOu4Sv2MbjZBa9Wh+38+ONpFBwfU72lP7qO+s2klzYLVkJAXnwnaOGNl9mr
tfFnVCgIKH9g5W13y4ZI5rJWnKy5ssfwoFE+A6hnLEpCOjj2CNQJ7U/Ungva4mrt
KvOWrcylxx7oDVxJ6iWQuWLQ3G2L2mC2EdLutF8edmKvvwArzWdOMgd7yshifztI
eKBFvwCKZUEVsKM1HTwmkSMEp0fzme0kjxCTQMySFRilkt57A9jgeA13Q7TPuWRC
VDm8z3kd6VdldHMyTxJR
=ZCle
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists


Re: [SOGo] Question Regarding Attendees

2010-12-15 Thread Stuart Sheldon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Sorry for the delay getting back to this...

No, there are no errors in the error console... I'm wondering if the is
a 'lack of functionality knowledge' problem on my part. I might have the
wrong expectation of how this should work.

To clarify,

In the web interface, when you double click on an appointment, in the
Edit Event box at the bottom of the first section, there is a list of
the attendees that you can click. When clicked, it returns a small menu
that lists some links. At the bottom, are all the attendees with an icon
in front of them showing their status.

In Lightning, doing the same thing, under that same pop up list, there
is no status icon next to the attendees.

Now, I starting to think that this is by design and not a bug or problem
with the software. Is this the case?

Stu



On 12/14/2010 06:48 AM, Ludovico Marconi wrote:
 On 10-12-14 9:27 AM, Stuart Sheldon wrote:
 Hi Ludovic,

 Here it is... All we did was add our servers FQDN...
 Looks good.
 Everything else works great... I'm wondering if the icons are missing
 from the package? Or maybe a .js setting is missing? Those would be
 issues that would show up on a fresh install but not an upgrade...
 Do you have any errors in the Thunderbird console when that happens?
 
 Best regards,
 

- -- 
Open up the window Let some air into this room I think I'm almost
chokin' From the smell of stale perfume And that cigarette you're
smoking 'Bout scared me half to death Open up the window, sucker
Let me catch my breath
  -- Three Dog Night - Mama Told Me Not to Come - Lyrics
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
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=xE+B
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists


Re: [SOGo] Question Regarding Attendees

2010-12-14 Thread Stuart Sheldon
Not sure where to turn on caldav scheduling... Here is what is installed:

Thunderbird 3.1.6
Lightning 1.0b2.104i
Inverse connector 3.104
Inverse Integrator 3.104

From web interface I see the Green check mark or yellow ball next to
attendee links in pull down.

These are missing with lightning plug in.

The is true on multiple fresh installs.

I'm stumped...

Stu


On 12/14/2010 04:35 AM, Mark Adams wrote:
 It works OK for me. Are you using the sogo-integrator and
 sogo-connector? caldav scheduling should also be set to true in your
 plugin config I believe.
 
 Regards,
 Mark
 
 On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:29:26PM -0800, Stuart Sheldon wrote:
 Hey Mark,

 I can see the status of the attendees in the web based version when I
 select the attendee's link, but in Lightning, the 'status icon' is
 missing next to the attendee's names.

 Is this a bug?

 Stu


 On 12/13/2010 03:57 PM, Mark Adams wrote:
 you can click on the invite attendees link again to see who has accepted.

 Regards,
 Mark

 On 13 Dec 2010, at 18:47, Stuart Sheldon s...@actusa.net wrote:

 Hi all,

 Is there any way to look and see who has not responded to a meeting
 invitation other then selecting 'Compose email to undecided attendees'?

 Stu

 -- 
 users@sogo.nu
 https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
 -- 
 users@sogo.nu
 https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists


Re: [SOGo] Question Regarding Attendees

2010-12-14 Thread Stuart Sheldon
Hi Ludovic,

Here it is... All we did was add our servers FQDN...

Everything else works great... I'm wondering if the icons are missing
from the package? Or maybe a .js setting is missing? Those would be
issues that would show up on a fresh install but not an upgrade...

Stu

?xml version=1.0?
!DOCTYPE RDF
RDF xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#;
  xmlns:isi=http://inverse.ca/sogo-integrator/;
  xmlns:em=http://www.mozilla.org/2004/em-rdf#;
  xmlns:NC=http://home.netscape.com/NC-rdf#;
  Seq about=http://inverse.ca/sogo-integrator/extensions;

isi:updateURL=https://bob.actusa.net/plugins/updates.php?plugin=%ITEM_ID%amp;version=%ITEM_VERSION%amp;platform=%PLATFORM%;
li
  Description
em:id=sogo-integra...@inverse.ca
em:name=SOGo Integrator/
/li
li
  Description
em:id=sogo-connec...@inverse.ca
em:name=SOGo Connector/
/li
  /Seq
/RDF


On 12/14/2010 06:14 AM, Ludovic Marcotte wrote:
 On 10-12-14 9:12 AM, Stuart Sheldon wrote:
 Not sure where to turn on caldav scheduling... Here is what is installed:

 Thunderbird 3.1.6
 Lightning 1.0b2.104i
 Inverse connector 3.104
 Inverse Integrator 3.104

  From web interface I see the Green check mark or yellow ball next to
 attendee links in pull down.

 These are missing with lightning plug in.
 Have you customized SOGo Integrator? Show your SOGo Integrator's
 extensions.rdf.
 
 Regards,
 
-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists


[SOGo] Question Regarding Attendees

2010-12-13 Thread Stuart Sheldon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Hi all,

Is there any way to look and see who has not responded to a meeting
invitation other then selecting 'Compose email to undecided attendees'?

Stu

- -- 
Open up the window Let some air into this room I think I'm almost
chokin' From the smell of stale perfume And that cigarette you're
smoking 'Bout scared me half to death Open up the window, sucker
Let me catch my breath
  -- Three Dog Night - Mama Told Me Not to Come - Lyrics
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
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=sg10
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists


Re: [SOGo] Question Regarding Attendees

2010-12-13 Thread Stuart Sheldon
Hey Mark,

I can see the status of the attendees in the web based version when I
select the attendee's link, but in Lightning, the 'status icon' is
missing next to the attendee's names.

Is this a bug?

Stu


On 12/13/2010 03:57 PM, Mark Adams wrote:
 you can click on the invite attendees link again to see who has accepted.
 
 Regards,
 Mark
 
 On 13 Dec 2010, at 18:47, Stuart Sheldon s...@actusa.net wrote:
 
 Hi all,
 
 Is there any way to look and see who has not responded to a meeting
 invitation other then selecting 'Compose email to undecided attendees'?
 
 Stu
 
-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists


Re: [SOGo] Apache with rewrite rule and updates.php

2010-12-11 Thread Stuart Sheldon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Since it looks like you are rewriting the whole site, why not just use
Redirect?

Redirect / https://192.168.0.200/

Now, anything going to port 80 will be redirected. It will also deal
with anything after the / as well.

Just a thought...

Stu

On 12/11/2010 12:48 PM, J. Echter wrote:
 Hi,
 
 i have set apache with a rewrite rule to force ssl
 (/etc/apachae2/sites-available/default):
 
 VirtualHost *:80
 ServerAdmin webmas...@localhost
 
 RewriteEngine on
 RewriteCond %{SERVER_PORT} ^80$
 RewriteRule ^/(.*)$ https://192.168.0.200/%{N}$1 [R]
 RewriteLog /var/log/apache2/rewrite.log
 RewriteLogLevel 2
 
 
 but now my updates.php doesnt work properly, say no updates are made.
 
 is there any thing i have to take care of making apache2 ssl only?
 
 greetings
 
 juergen

- -- 
And so it was, that later, as the miller told his tale,
that her face at first just ghostly, turned a whiter shade of pale...
-- Procol Harum - Whiter Shade of Pale Lyrics
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
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=rXx8
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists