Re: Messages Not detected as Spam
Paul Wetter wrote: Ok, I added what you said. I think things may be back on the up and in operation. Some spam however is still not detected, which brings me to my next question. I have one other question about razor checks. They do not appear to be working. If I do a manual check (with the amavis user) it logs the message as a spam message in the razor-agent.log file. Yet running the same thing through spamassassin does not show any razor checks picking it up and also it does not log anything in the razor-agent.log file either way. In local.cf I have the following 3 lines related to razor: loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Razor2 DO NOT put ANY loadplugin statements in your local.cf, or any other .cf file for that matter, unless you intentionally want to suppress any rules that go with the plugin. loadplugin statements belong in .pre files. In this case, edit v310.pre and uncomment the existing line for this. This is VERY important, as .pre files get parsed before the default rules, but .cf files are parsed after them. If the plugin is not present when the default rules are parsed, the razor rules will be omitted. You rock man! Everything is working great now! I must have gotten my wires crossed when reading the docs. I really appreciate the wonderful resources of these mailing lists. Have a good one, Paul
Re: Messages Not detected as Spam
Probably would also like this output, i think: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# spamassassin -D --lint 2>&1 | grep -i razor [4398] dbg: diag: module installed: Razor2::Client::Agent, version 2.75 [4398] dbg: config: read file /usr/share/spamassassin/25_razor2.cf [4398] dbg: plugin: fixed relative path: /usr/share/spamassassin/updates_spamassassin_org/25_razor2.cf [4398] dbg: config: using "/usr/share/spamassassin/updates_spamassassin_org/25_razor2.cf" for included file [4398] dbg: config: read file /usr/share/spamassassin/updates_spamassassin_org/25_razor2.cf [4398] dbg: plugin: loading Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Razor2 from @INC [4398] dbg: razor2: razor2 is available, version 2.75 [4398] dbg: plugin: registered Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Razor2=HASH(0x912f2c0) Ok, I added what you said. I think things may be back on the up and in operation. Some spam however is still not detected, which brings me to my next question. I have one other question about razor checks. They do not appear to be working. If I do a manual check (with the amavis user) it logs the message as a spam message in the razor-agent.log file. Yet running the same thing through spamassassin does not show any razor checks picking it up and also it does not log anything in the razor-agent.log file either way. In local.cf I have the following 3 lines related to razor: loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Razor2 use_razor2 1 razor_config /pathtoconfig/.razor/razor-agent.conf Am I missing something? Is this correct? From what I see my SpamAssassin install is not doing the razor checks. Thanks in advance. -Paul - Original Message - From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Paul Wetter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 2:14 PM Subject: Re: Messages Not detected as Spam Paul Wetter wrote: To answer your questions: 1. I ran spamassassin -t as root. amavis runs as a different user. I do have bayes_path in the local.cf file. The line should read as follows correct? bayes_path /firstpartofpath/.spamassassin/bayes Yes. If /firstpartofpath/ doesn't start with ~/ then you'll also need to add bayes_file_mode 0777. Otherwise the bayes DB will change ownership when you run sa-learn and may not be R/W to the amavis process. 2. I have $sa_local_tests_only = 0and I get other spam reports that show several RCVD_IN_ checks that hit. Also when I do sa-learn with the spam I use the path from above to learn the spam.
Re: Messages Not detected as Spam
Ok, I added what you said. I think things may be back on the up and in operation. Some spam however is still not detected, which brings me to my next question. I have one other question about razor checks. They do not appear to be working. If I do a manual check (with the amavis user) it logs the message as a spam message in the razor-agent.log file. Yet running the same thing through spamassassin does not show any razor checks picking it up and also it does not log anything in the razor-agent.log file either way. In local.cf I have the following 3 lines related to razor: loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Razor2 use_razor2 1 razor_config /pathtoconfig/.razor/razor-agent.conf Am I missing something? Is this correct? From what I see my SpamAssassin install is not doing the razor checks. Thanks in advance. -Paul - Original Message - From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Paul Wetter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 2:14 PM Subject: Re: Messages Not detected as Spam Paul Wetter wrote: To answer your questions: 1. I ran spamassassin -t as root. amavis runs as a different user. I do have bayes_path in the local.cf file. The line should read as follows correct? bayes_path /firstpartofpath/.spamassassin/bayes Yes. If /firstpartofpath/ doesn't start with ~/ then you'll also need to add bayes_file_mode 0777. Otherwise the bayes DB will change ownership when you run sa-learn and may not be R/W to the amavis process. 2. I have $sa_local_tests_only = 0and I get other spam reports that show several RCVD_IN_ checks that hit. Also when I do sa-learn with the spam I use the path from above to learn the spam.
Re: Messages Not detected as Spam
> Paul Wetter wrote: >> Here is what I get when I reproduce the email: >> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.002 tagged_above=-1 required=1.5 >> tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] >> >> >> spamassassin -t gives me this: >> >> Content analysis details: (9.1 points, 2.5 required) >> >> pts rule name description >> -- >> -- >> 0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO Received: contains a forged HELO >> 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay >> lines >> 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message >> 3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100% >>[score: 1.] >> 1.6 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net >> [Blocked - see >> <http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?81.121.100.79>] >> 3.9 RCVD_IN_XBLRBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL >>[81.121.100.79 listed in >> sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org] >> >> >> They are very different! >> Where do we go from here? >> > > Question 1: what user are you running spamassassin -t as? > Is it the same user that amavis runs as? > Do you have a bayes_path statement in your local.cf? > > If the answer to the last two is "no" then you're using two different > bayes DBs. > SA determines what bayes database to use based on the home directory of > the > environment that executes it. It does not attempt to parse the "To:" > header or > anything like that. > > Question 2: do you have sa_local_tests_only = 1 in your amavisd.conf? If > so, all > the RCVD_IN_* tests are disabled. > > > To answer your questions: 1. I ran spamassassin -t as root. amavis runs as a different user. I do have bayes_path in the local.cf file. The line should read as follows correct? bayes_path /firstpartofpath/.spamassassin/bayes 2. I have $sa_local_tests_only = 0and I get other spam reports that show several RCVD_IN_ checks that hit. Also when I do sa-learn with the spam I use the path from above to learn the spam. Thanks again.
Re: Messages Not detected as Spam
Here is what I get when I reproduce the email: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.002 tagged_above=-1 required=1.5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] spamassassin -t gives me this: Content analysis details: (9.1 points, 2.5 required) pts rule name description -- -- 0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO Received: contains a forged HELO 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100% [score: 1.] 1.6 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net [Blocked - see <http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?81.121.100.79>] 3.9 RCVD_IN_XBLRBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL [81.121.100.79 listed in sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org] They are very different! Where do we go from here? Thanks again!! -Paul - Original Message - From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Paul Wetter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 10:46 PM Subject: Re: Messages Not detected as Spam Paul Wetter wrote: For the last week now I have been receiving several very similar messages that are spam and not being detected as spam. I have done an sa-learn on every one of them but they still come in not even being tagged. Is there something wrong with my bayes detection? Is there any way to log what spamassassin is doing to see if it finds anything? I call spamassassin's spam checks through amavisd-new which controls a couple virtual domains. First step, try running one of them manually through spamassassin -t.. what rule hits do you get? (post the X-Spam-Status SA generates). Next step, modify amavis to always add an X-Spam-Status header (ie: set tagged_above to -1000.). Compare the results, or post here along with the above..
Re: Messages Not detected as Spam
I forgot to note that I have flagged 50+ of these similar emails. It seems to me that something is not working correctly. - Original Message - From: Paul Wetter To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 10:30 PM Subject: Messages Not detected as Spam For the last week now I have been receiving several very similar messages that are spam and not being detected as spam. I have done an sa-learn on every one of them but they still come in not even being tagged. Is there something wrong with my bayes detection? Is there any way to log what spamassassin is doing to see if it finds anything? I call spamassassin's spam checks through amavisd-new which controls a couple virtual domains. Thanks in advance, Paul
Messages Not detected as Spam
For the last week now I have been receiving several very similar messages that are spam and not being detected as spam. I have done an sa-learn on every one of them but they still come in not even being tagged. Is there something wrong with my bayes detection? Is there any way to log what spamassassin is doing to see if it finds anything? I call spamassassin's spam checks through amavisd-new which controls a couple virtual domains. Thanks in advance, Paul