Re: Messages Not detected as Spam

2006-04-26 Thread Paul Wetter

Paul Wetter wrote:

Ok, I added what you said.  I think things may be back on the up and in
operation.  Some spam however is still not detected, which brings me to
my next question.

I have one other question about razor checks.  They do not appear to be
working.  If I do a manual check (with the amavis user) it logs the
message as a spam message in the razor-agent.log file.  Yet running the
same thing through spamassassin does not show any razor checks picking
it up and also it does not log anything in the razor-agent.log file
either way.

In local.cf I have the following 3 lines related to razor:

loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Razor2


DO NOT put ANY loadplugin statements in your local.cf, or any other .cf
file for
that matter, unless you intentionally want to suppress any rules that go
with
the plugin. loadplugin statements belong in .pre files. In this case, edit
v310.pre and uncomment the existing line for this.

This is VERY important, as .pre files get parsed before the default rules,
but
.cf files are parsed after them. If the plugin is not present when the
default
rules are parsed, the razor rules will be omitted.


You rock man!  Everything is working great now!  I must have gotten my wires
crossed when reading the docs.  I really appreciate the wonderful resources 
of these mailing lists.


Have a good one,
Paul




Re: Messages Not detected as Spam

2006-04-26 Thread Paul Wetter

Probably would also like this output, i think:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# spamassassin -D --lint 2>&1 | grep -i razor
[4398] dbg: diag: module installed: Razor2::Client::Agent, version 2.75
[4398] dbg: config: read file /usr/share/spamassassin/25_razor2.cf
[4398] dbg: plugin: fixed relative path: 
/usr/share/spamassassin/updates_spamassassin_org/25_razor2.cf
[4398] dbg: config: using 
"/usr/share/spamassassin/updates_spamassassin_org/25_razor2.cf" for included 
file
[4398] dbg: config: read file 
/usr/share/spamassassin/updates_spamassassin_org/25_razor2.cf

[4398] dbg: plugin: loading Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Razor2 from @INC
[4398] dbg: razor2: razor2 is available, version 2.75
[4398] dbg: plugin: registered 
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Razor2=HASH(0x912f2c0)



Ok, I added what you said.  I think things may be back on the up and in 
operation.  Some spam however is still not detected, which brings me to my 
next question.


I have one other question about razor checks.  They do not appear to be 
working.  If I do a manual check (with the amavis user) it logs the 
message as a spam message in the razor-agent.log file.  Yet running the 
same thing through spamassassin does not show any razor checks picking it 
up and also it does not log anything in the razor-agent.log file either 
way.


In local.cf I have the following 3 lines related to razor:

loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Razor2
use_razor2 1
razor_config /pathtoconfig/.razor/razor-agent.conf

Am I missing something?  Is this correct?
From what I see my SpamAssassin install is not doing the razor checks.

Thanks in advance.
-Paul

- Original Message - 
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: "Paul Wetter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 


Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 2:14 PM
Subject: Re: Messages Not detected as Spam



Paul Wetter wrote:





To answer your questions:
1.  I ran spamassassin -t as root.
amavis runs as a different user.
I do have bayes_path in the local.cf file.  The line should read as
follows correct?
bayes_path /firstpartofpath/.spamassassin/bayes


Yes. If /firstpartofpath/ doesn't start with ~/ then you'll also need to 
add
bayes_file_mode 0777. Otherwise the bayes DB will change ownership when 
you run

sa-learn and may not be R/W to the amavis process.




2.  I have $sa_local_tests_only = 0and I get other spam reports that
show several RCVD_IN_ checks that hit.
Also when I do sa-learn with the spam I use the path from above to learn
the spam.












Re: Messages Not detected as Spam

2006-04-26 Thread Paul Wetter
Ok, I added what you said.  I think things may be back on the up and in 
operation.  Some spam however is still not detected, which brings me to my 
next question.


I have one other question about razor checks.  They do not appear to be 
working.  If I do a manual check (with the amavis user) it logs the message 
as a spam message in the razor-agent.log file.  Yet running the same thing 
through spamassassin does not show any razor checks picking it up and also 
it does not log anything in the razor-agent.log file either way.


In local.cf I have the following 3 lines related to razor:

loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Razor2
use_razor2 1
razor_config /pathtoconfig/.razor/razor-agent.conf

Am I missing something?  Is this correct?

From what I see my SpamAssassin install is not doing the razor checks.


Thanks in advance.
-Paul

- Original Message - 
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: "Paul Wetter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 


Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 2:14 PM
Subject: Re: Messages Not detected as Spam



Paul Wetter wrote:





To answer your questions:
1.  I ran spamassassin -t as root.
amavis runs as a different user.
I do have bayes_path in the local.cf file.  The line should read as
follows correct?
bayes_path /firstpartofpath/.spamassassin/bayes


Yes. If /firstpartofpath/ doesn't start with ~/ then you'll also need to 
add
bayes_file_mode 0777. Otherwise the bayes DB will change ownership when 
you run

sa-learn and may not be R/W to the amavis process.




2.  I have $sa_local_tests_only = 0and I get other spam reports that
show several RCVD_IN_ checks that hit.
Also when I do sa-learn with the spam I use the path from above to learn
the spam.







Re: Messages Not detected as Spam

2006-04-25 Thread Paul Wetter
> Paul Wetter wrote:
>> Here is what I get when I reproduce the email:
>> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.002 tagged_above=-1 required=1.5
>> tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
>>
>>
>> spamassassin -t gives me this:
>>
>> Content analysis details:   (9.1 points, 2.5 required)
>>
>> pts rule name  description
>>  --
>> --
>> 0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO   Received: contains a forged HELO
>> 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY  Informational: message has unparseable relay
>> lines
>> 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE   BODY: HTML included in message
>> 3.5 BAYES_99   BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
>>[score: 1.]
>> 1.6 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net
>>   [Blocked - see
>> <http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?81.121.100.79>]
>> 3.9 RCVD_IN_XBLRBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL
>>[81.121.100.79 listed in
>> sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org]
>>
>>
>> They are very different!
>> Where do we go from here?
>>
>
> Question 1: what user are you running spamassassin -t as?
> Is it the same user that amavis runs as?
> Do you have a bayes_path statement in your local.cf?
>
> If the answer to the last two is "no" then you're using two different
> bayes DBs.
> SA determines what bayes database to use based on the home directory of
> the
> environment that executes it. It does not attempt to parse the "To:"
> header or
> anything like that.
>
> Question 2: do you have sa_local_tests_only = 1 in your amavisd.conf? If
> so, all
> the RCVD_IN_* tests are disabled.
>
>
>
To answer your questions:
1.  I ran spamassassin -t as root.
amavis runs as a different user.
I do have bayes_path in the local.cf file.  The line should read as
follows correct?
bayes_path /firstpartofpath/.spamassassin/bayes

2.  I have $sa_local_tests_only = 0and I get other spam reports that
show several RCVD_IN_ checks that hit.
Also when I do sa-learn with the spam I use the path from above to learn
the spam.

Thanks again.



Re: Messages Not detected as Spam

2006-04-24 Thread Paul Wetter

Here is what I get when I reproduce the email:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.002 tagged_above=-1 required=1.5
tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]


spamassassin -t gives me this:

Content analysis details:   (9.1 points, 2.5 required)

pts rule name  description
 -- --
0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO   Received: contains a forged HELO
0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY  Informational: message has unparseable relay 
lines

0.0 HTML_MESSAGE   BODY: HTML included in message
3.5 BAYES_99   BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
   [score: 1.]
1.6 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net
  [Blocked - see 
<http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?81.121.100.79>]

3.9 RCVD_IN_XBLRBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL
   [81.121.100.79 listed in sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org]


They are very different!
Where do we go from here?

Thanks again!!
-Paul


- Original Message - 
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: "Paul Wetter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: 
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 10:46 PM
Subject: Re: Messages Not detected as Spam



Paul Wetter wrote:

For the last week now I have been receiving several very similar
messages that are spam and not being detected as spam.  I have done an
sa-learn on every one of them but they still come in not even being
tagged.  Is there something wrong with my bayes detection?  Is there
any way to log what spamassassin is doing to see if it finds anything?

I call spamassassin's spam checks through amavisd-new which controls a
couple virtual domains.


First step, try running one of them manually through spamassassin -t..
what rule hits do you get? (post the X-Spam-Status SA generates).

Next step, modify amavis to always add an X-Spam-Status header (ie: set
tagged_above to -1000.). Compare the results, or post here along with
the above..










Re: Messages Not detected as Spam

2006-04-24 Thread Paul Wetter



I forgot to note that I have flagged 50+ of 
these similar emails.  It seems to me that something is not working 
correctly.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Paul 
  Wetter 
  To: users@spamassassin.apache.org 
  
  Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 10:30 
  PM
  Subject: Messages Not detected as 
  Spam
  
  
  For the last week now I have been receiving 
  several very similar messages that are spam and not being detected as 
  spam.  I have done an sa-learn on every one of them but they still come 
  in not even being tagged.  Is there something wrong with my bayes 
  detection?  Is there any way to log what spamassassin is doing to see if 
  it finds anything?
   
  I call spamassassin's spam checks through 
  amavisd-new which controls a couple virtual domains.
   
  Thanks in advance,
  Paul


Messages Not detected as Spam

2006-04-24 Thread Paul Wetter




For the last week now I have been receiving 
several very similar messages that are spam and not being detected as 
spam.  I have done an sa-learn on every one of them but they still come in 
not even being tagged.  Is there something wrong with my bayes 
detection?  Is there any way to log what spamassassin is doing to see if it 
finds anything?
 
I call spamassassin's spam checks through 
amavisd-new which controls a couple virtual domains.
 
Thanks in advance,
Paul