Re: RulesDuJour error updating bigevil.cf
On Monday, April 4, 2005, 8:25:38 AM, Matt Kettler wrote: Chris Santerre wrote: I shall remove Bigevil info from the site tomorrow. Actually, if you wouldn't mind, Take the info down and replace it with a notice that the ruleset is dead and point them to using SURBL instead. A good suggestion! :-) Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.surbl.org/
Re: RulesDuJour error updating bigevil.cf
On Sunday, April 3, 2005, 10:34:12 AM, Pete Geenhuizen wrote: 2. Any idea how do I go about changing RDJ and bigevil.cf over to use ws.surbl.org? Yes, please use ws.surbl.org instead: http://www.surbl.org/quickstart.html Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.surbl.org/
Re: RulesDuJour error updating bigevil.cf
At 02:13 PM 4/3/2005, Jim Knuth wrote: Hi Jim, Thanks for the reply, guess I missed that. I do have 2 questions though. Sorry, I don`t know. What say Matt Kettler? ;) Hmmm, someone mentioned my name and has summoned me to this thread... hmmm.. 1. Any idea why the rulesemporium rules page isn't very clear and still has info on how to use it with RDJ? I'm not involved in RDJ or bigevil, and I'm only very slightly involved in SARE, so I can't comment here. I know it's been a long time since Chris updated bigevil, and he's been telling people to not use it for months. I think he figured anyone still using bigevil wasn't paying attention to their servers at all. Apparently a few are :) 2. Any idea how do I go about changing RDJ and bigevil.cf over to use ws.surbl.org? If you're using SA 3.x, you're probably already using it if your Net::DNS is new enough. If you're using 2.64, you can add the Mail::SpamAsssassin::SpamCopURI patch. http://sourceforge.net/projects/spamcopuri/ If you're using 2.63 or older, upgrade, you're vulnerable to a DoS attack in the mime parser.
RE: RulesDuJour error updating bigevil.cf
-Original Message- From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 9:40 AM To: Jim Knuth; Pete Geenhuizen Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: RulesDuJour error updating bigevil.cf At 02:13 PM 4/3/2005, Jim Knuth wrote: Hi Jim, Thanks for the reply, guess I missed that. I do have 2 questions though. Sorry, I don`t know. What say Matt Kettler? ;) Hmmm, someone mentioned my name and has summoned me to this thread... hmmm.. Krakatowa! :D 1. Any idea why the rulesemporium rules page isn't very clear and still has info on how to use it with RDJ? I'm not involved in RDJ or bigevil, and I'm only very slightly involved in SARE, so I can't comment here. Slightly? You seem to forget how good your KungFu is ;) I know it's been a long time since Chris updated bigevil, and he's been telling people to not use it for months. I think he figured anyone still using bigevil wasn't paying attention to their servers at all. Apparently a few are :) Ah...but not paying attention to my threats..er..demands...norequest! Yeah thats it...requests! :) I shall remove Bigevil info from the site tomorrow. --Chris (R'Islander trapped in Manhattan.)
Re: RulesDuJour error updating bigevil.cf
Chris Santerre wrote: I'm not involved in RDJ or bigevil, and I'm only very slightly involved in SARE, so I can't comment here. Slightly? You seem to forget how good your KungFu is ;) No, I remember how good my KungFu is.. I just know I rarely have time to use it for the benefit of SARE. Hence my only very slightly involved. Certainly I'm only partially aware of what SARE's latest activities are... Ah...but not paying attention to my threats..er..demands...norequest! Yeah thats it...requests! :) I shall remove Bigevil info from the site tomorrow. Actually, if you wouldn't mind, Take the info down and replace it with a notice that the ruleset is dead and point them to using SURBL instead. If you just remove the info, people will still ask where it went. This way, those who go to rulesemporium to find out what the problem is will be told what's up :)
Re: RulesDuJour error updating bigevil.cf
Hallo und guten Tag Pete, danke für die Email vom 03.04.2005 um 18:52 Pete Geenhuizen schrieb - wrote: I've been getting the following error for a couple of days. The following rules had errors: Big Evil not found (404) at http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/bigevil.cf Big Evil was not retrieved because of: 00:16:15 ERROR 404: Not Found. from http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/bigevil.cf. bigevel is cancelled. Read the archives. -- Viele Grüße, Kind regards, Jim Knuth [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ #277289867 Skype: callto://jimknuth -- Zufalls-Zitat -- Unsere Träume können wir erst dann verwirklichen, wenn wir uns entschließen, einmal daraus zu erwachen. (Josephine Baker) -- Der Text hat nichts mit dem Empfänger der Mail zu tun -- Virus free. Checked by NOD32 Version 1.1044 Update 02.04.2005
Re: RulesDuJour error updating bigevil.cf
Hi Jim, Thanks for the reply, guess I missed that. I do have 2 questions though. 1. Any idea why the rulesemporium rules page isn't very clear and still has info on how to use it with RDJ? 2. Any idea how do I go about changing RDJ and bigevil.cf over to use ws.surbl.org? Pete -- Unencumbered by the thought process --1992-2000 Click and Clack presidential campaign slogan Jim Knuth said: Hallo und guten Tag Pete, danke für die Email vom 03.04.2005 um 18:52 Pete Geenhuizen schrieb - wrote: I've been getting the following error for a couple of days. The following rules had errors: Big Evil not found (404) at http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/bigevil.cf Big Evil was not retrieved because of: 00:16:15 ERROR 404: Not Found. from http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/bigevil.cf. bigevel is cancelled. Read the archives. -- Viele Grüße, Kind regards, Jim Knuth [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ #277289867 Skype: callto://jimknuth -- Zufalls-Zitat -- Unsere Träume können wir erst dann verwirklichen, wenn wir uns entschließen, einmal daraus zu erwachen. (Josephine Baker) -- Der Text hat nichts mit dem Empfänger der Mail zu tun -- Virus free. Checked by NOD32 Version 1.1044 Update 02.04.2005
Re: RulesDuJour error updating bigevil.cf
Hallo und guten Abend Pete, danke für die Email vom 03.04.2005 um 19:34 Pete Geenhuizen schrieb - wrote: Hi Jim, Thanks for the reply, guess I missed that. I do have 2 questions though. Sorry, I don`t know. What say Matt Kettler? ;) -- Viele Grüße, Kind regards, Jim Knuth [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ #277289867 Skype: callto://jimknuth -- Zufalls-Zitat -- Parasiten machen etwa 0.01% unseres Körpergewichtes aus. -- Der Text hat nichts mit dem Empfänger der Mail zu tun -- Virus free. Checked by NOD32 Version 1.1044 Update 02.04.2005
Re: RulesDuJour error updating bigevil.cf
Pete Geenhuizen wrote: Hi Jim, Thanks for the reply, guess I missed that. I do have 2 questions though. 1. Any idea why the rulesemporium rules page isn't very clear and still has info on how to use it with RDJ? 2. Any idea how do I go about changing RDJ and bigevil.cf over to use ws.surbl.org? Pete Version of SpamAssassin? 3.0.x includes it, but I'm guessing you aren't using the 3.0.x series. -- Thanks, JamesDR smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
